Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 7/27/2021Pre -Submittal Meeting Development and Public Works Department Reem 61 PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. DPW Conferenee Room 616 Pre -Submittal (Partition Tentative) #811 -21 -000188 -PRE 811-21-000191-PROJ Grand Real Estate Investments Assessor's Map: 17-02-31-24 TL: 3000 Address: 479 33rd Street Existing Use: residential Applicant has submitted plans for 2 -lot partition Meeting: Tuesday, August 3, 202111:00 — 12:00 via MS Teams 1. K 7Pa':'V � s,o K 1 �, ens eu a� e3,. azs en414 ■. ins _ ✓� - am. 10ty of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision SPRINGFIELD w */ Application Type (Applicant. check one) Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ® Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: completeRequired Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Robert and Ricky Grand Phone: ❑ Company: Grand Real Estate Investments Inc. Fax: Address: 1675 Willamette St. Eugene, OR 97401 Applicant's RC .: Phone: 541-302-9830 Company: Metro Planning, Inc. Fax: Address: 846 A St. Springfield, OR. 97477 PropertV Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-24 TAX LOT NOS : 03000 ProperPropertv Address: 479 33rd St. Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Pro ert : 0.30 Acres ® Square Feet Proposed Name of Subdivision: N/A Description of Ir you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your Proposal; A two -lot partition. proposal description to this application. Existing Use: Single-family home. # Of Lots/Parcels: 1 Total acreage of parcels/ 4 allowable densit Proposal *N/A (2 SF Dwell Unita lots` Signatures: Please sin and grint your name and date in t e anomoriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. Associated Applications: box on the next complete this section) Si ns: a e. Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: Technical Fee: Posta a Fee: TOTAL FEES: PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 vaR RSE nanxRR nn coxsunRs samco 846 A STREET SPRINGEIEM, OREGON 97477 1541)302-9830 wNW.MEcRO"NNING.COM Metro Planning, Inc. TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR GRAND REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC. Written Statement Submission No. Document Date: Applicants Request: Property Owner/ Applicant: Civil Engineer: Surveyor: Project Planner. Subject Property. Location: Property Size: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: Number of Parcels Proposed: Size Proposed Parcel 1: Size Proposed Parcel 2: July 2021 1 07/21/2021 Request for approval of Tentative Two Lot Partition Grand Real Estate Investments, Inc. 1675 Willamette Sr. Eugene, OR 97401 Eric Favreau Favreau Engineering, Inc (541)556-4425 EGR & Associates, Inc. c/o Ryan Erickson, PIS 25356 Prairie Road Eugene, OR 97402 Metro Planning, Inc. c/o led Truett, AICP 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 Assessor's Map 17-02-31-34 Tax Lot 03000 479 33`d St. Springfield, OR 97478 0.30 acres (13,150 sq. ft.) R-1 (Low Density Residential) Low Density Residential (per Metro Plan) 04 5,916 sf 7,234 sf (including pole) cage 11 Written Statement- Tentative Partition Background The applicant is proposing a Tentative Partition of Tax Lot 17-02-31-24-03000 into two parcels. Currently, there is a single-family home on Proposed Parcel 1; no additional development is proposed for Parcel 1. Proposed Parcel 2 will be partitioned as a panhandle lot. No development is proposed for Parcel 2. Density: Tax Lot 03000 is 0.30 acres and zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) which allows for 6 to 14 dwellings per acre. The current density is 3.3 dwelling units per acre and the tentative partition proposes 6.6 dwelling units per acre. This Written Statement demonstrates that this application for a two -lot Tentative Partition addresses, and definitively meets, all of the requirements and criteria mandatory as specified by SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan - General, SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements, and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards: A. The lotlparcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this Code. When lots/parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shall require that these lots/parcels be arranged. 1. To allow re -division; and 2. To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels. 3. Placement ofstructures on the largerlots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lotlparcel is not impaired. In order to make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 5.12-120E. Response: The subject property is in an area zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). Proposed Parcel 1 is a standard lot on a North-South street, and conforms to the minimum area requirements as specified in SDC 3.2-215. Proposed Parcel 2 is a Panhandle lot and conforms to the minimum area requirements as specified in SDC 3.2- 215. These requirements are addressed in detail later in this statement. Neither of these parcels are double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, so the remainder of this subsection does not apply. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e l 2 B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations. Response: The proposed Tentative Partition will not result in the creation of double frontage parcels; this standard does not apply. One will be a standard lot and one is a panhandle lot. C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections 3.2-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels shall occur prior to recording the Plat. Response. Parcel 2 is a panhandle lot and will be served by a 20' handle or access easement. It is 7,234 square feet and so exceeds the minimum area required of 4,500 sq ft. Since this is a single panhandle the improvements will be constructed after the plat is recorded. D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-115. Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The proposed tentative partition utilizes an existing street network. SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are being fulfilled. EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of future development application. A. General Requirements. 1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18"x 24". The services of and Oregon registered Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson (EGR & Associates) a licensed Oregon Land Surveyor as required. 2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally 1" = 50', 1" _ 100', or 1 " = 200'. Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 10'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the amount of data needing to be shown. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 13 3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. Response: A north arrow and Tentative Plan preparation date are included on the Tentative Plan drawing included with this application. 4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan. Response: The surveyor and engineer who prepared the Tentative Partition Plan are, respsectively, Ryan Erickson, from EGR and Associates, LLC, and Eric Favreau, from Favreau Engineering. 5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or sub -divider of which the proposed land division is a part. Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the partitioner. 6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right -of --way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad right-of-way is adjacent to the subject property. 7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), designated L (low density residential) in the Metro Plan. 8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are dearly labeled on the tentative partition plan drawing. 9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. Response: The existing structures to remain are on the property, including their setbacks, are shown on the Tentative Partition Plan drawing. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 14 10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Response: The location and size of existing utilities are noted on the tentative plan, including water, wastewater, stormwater and underground utilities. 11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing orproposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. Response: The existing 10' PUE is shown on the proposed land division. The 60.00' Ash Street vacation is also shown on the site plan. 12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated. Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use. This requirement is not applicable. B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. Response: The enclosed Tentative Partition Plan prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor identifies all physical features of the subject property as required. 1. The name, location, dimensions, direction offiowand top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQIM Map on file in the Development Services Department; Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property. thus this requirement is not applicable. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 F a g e S 2. The 100year ffoodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated on FIRM Map Number 41039C1 161F dated June 2, 1999, thus this requirement is not applicable. 3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specked in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Service Department; Response: The subject property falls within the 10 year time of travel zone for wellhead protection. 4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the (WLQM Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within the boundaries of the subject property. 5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and Response: The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Awbrig-Urban Land Complex, with a depth to water table of 0 to 2 inches. 6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117. Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property, thus this requirement is not applicable. C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or more, contours may be shown at 5 foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 r - 6 3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip; Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways. The applicant can sign an irrevocable petition to improve the sidewalk. 4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable; Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is approximately seven (7) feet West of the Northwest corner of the subject property. There are power poles on the NE and NW comer of the property that have a power line between them. There is a water meter directly to the West of the existing home and a mailbox near the SW corner of the property. Additionally, there is a waste water manhole on the NE corner of the site. There are no other public facilities such as traffic control devices, or transformers located adjacent or within the development site. 5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable; Response: The driveway to serve future development will take place in the panhandle of the property. The panhandle driveway will be installed at the time of site development. 6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination; Response: As illustrated on the Tentative Partition Plan, there is an existing street light on the on the NW corner of the property about 20' south of the northern property line. No additional streetlights are proposed. 7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities; Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest transit facility is located near the intersection of Main Street and 33rd and served by Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 11. 8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility, and Response: 33rd Street is a city street and does not have frontage on an ODOT facility. This requirement is not applicable. 9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specked in Section 4.2-105A.4. Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each of the two parcels proposed Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 a E' 18 generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips necessary for a traffic impact study to be required. E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/paroels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: Response: No phasing plan is being proposed. F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: 1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property; Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the existing use of the subject property. 2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner. 3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, Fire hydrants and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division; Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet. 4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district; Response: Not applicable. 5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable; Response: Single-family residential is a permitted use in the LDR (Low Density Residential) zone; thus no Discretionary Use Permit is required. 6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100; Response: No trees will be felled as a part of this application. Not applicable. 7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in Section 5.1-21208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water tab le as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; Response: The site is of slopes less than 5% and composed of Awbrig-Urban land complex. The soil is mainly used for urban and homesite development, yards, and open Metra Planning, Inc. July 2021 19 areas between buildings. However, no development is proposed at this time. The water table is below 80 inches (see infiltration report by Enc Favreau, a licensed engineer). This criterion is met. 8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer; Response: The subject property is located within the city limits, thus no annexation application is necessary. 9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property; Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject site. This requirement is not applicable. 10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently; Response: No federal or state permits are required with this partition application. This requirement is not applicable. 11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing; Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application. 12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate; Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed. This requirement is not applicable. 13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2230; Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision. 14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-125. Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park. 5.13-130 The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e 110 a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: The proposed Parcel 1 meets minimum area (5,000 sq ft) and street frontage (60 ft) development requirements in a Low -Density Residential zone, on a North-South Street. The proposed Parcel 2 meets the minimum area (4,500 sq ft) and frontage (20 ft) development requirements for a panhandle lot. Below describes specifics of each lot. Lot Size: Parcel 1 is 5,916 sf. Parcel 2 is 7,234 sf. These both, respectively, meet the minimum lot/parcel minimum area requirements. Lot Frontage: Parcel 1 has 85 ft of street frontage. Parcel 2 lot has 20 ft of street frontage. These both, respectively, meet the minimum street frontage requirements . B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated as Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed development is about 7 units per acre (current is 3.3 units/acre). C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: A public sanitary mainline and water mainline are located within the 33rd Street rights-of-way. The dwelling on Parcel 2 will be served by a future line/lateral that will connect to the existing line. Stormwater drainage for Parcel 2 will be managed by the proposed infiltration rain garden, sized for the 25 -year event, with an overflow to the existing roadside ditch. Streets and traffic safety controls will not be exceeded. All improvements will be done at the time of site development. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 111 J. Where the Subdivision of manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply. Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this criterion does not apply. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e 113 a2! vlaz$p«!.§ Ra 2; \} \ ® m,a :tQ Q -UH R + � ----j � _- ' _ � - P4 :..>:r/, \ � , � 2! z*` , ! _._ml._ }