Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/22/2021City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review S�PRItNOFl Application.- , Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: Site Plan Review Submittal: DOMa"or Site Plan Modification Required Project Information (Applicant., Applicant Name: John Hammer Submittal: 57 complete this section) Phone: 541-683-1166 Company: Oakway Golf Inc Email: Address: P.O BOX 2266 Eugene, OR 97402 Applicant's Rep.: Scott Morris, PE Phone: 541-302-9790 Company: A& O Engineering LLC Email: scottmorris@ao-engcco Address: 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield,OR 97477 Property Owner: Sameas Applicant Phone: Company: Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30-44 TAX LOT NOS : 300,400 Property Address: no address assigned Size of Property: 2.68 Acres ❑x Square Feet ❑Dwelling Proposed No. of Units per acrem Na Proposed Name of Project: 40th Street Mini Warehouse Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: construct four new multi -tenant buildings and associated infrastructure Existing Use: vacant New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 102,825 sf Si natures: Please sin and rint our name and date in the ao Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: ro Nate box on the next QLc&j complete this section) Si ns: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: Technical Fee: Posta a Fee: TOTAL FEES: I PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre -Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests. and requirements conveyed to my representative. Owner: P t wwt/{ v D Date: 5 7- 2 I/ g 1 Sig�nr'tu e JO fY N P I—/ P2 I" Print Submittal 1 represent the application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, 1 affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not oths,wlsa contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of OAS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: t+, � Date: - % - 202) Sigat re JO it4 1Z C_ Print Revised 1/7114 KL 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. x❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. x❑ Site Plan Review Application Form x❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ❑x Copy of the Deed x❑ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. x❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet x❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: x❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. x❑ All plan sets must be folded to Syz" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor xM Vicinity Map x❑ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department OThe 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision Q The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department EpPhysical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan Q Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor Mx Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. Q Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Q Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections Q Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district Fx1 On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation © Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Q Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 'A mile) Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11 x❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses x❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Location and width of all existing easements Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. ❑x Location and type of existing street lighting x❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities x❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ® Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. ® Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below x❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components ❑x Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development ® Location and width of all proposed easements ❑x Location and type of proposed street lighting ❑x Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan ❑x Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director x❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage ® Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 x❑ Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans x❑ Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached x❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May -be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: ❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. ❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. ❑ Photometric test report for each light source. ❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT`S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: x❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11 ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual Floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 d 11 Site Review Narrative This narrative is for a site review application for a proposed multi -tenant industrial building on Parcels 7 and 8 of J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision, which is located at the southeast corner of 40t' Street and Kathryn Street in Springfield, Oregon. The proposal is to construct four buildings ranging from 6,099 square feet to 11,964 square feet with associated infrastructure. Applicant / Owners Representative A & O Engineering LLC Scott Morris, PE 380 Q Street, Ste 200 Springfield, OR 97477 (541)302-9790 scottmorris@ao-engr.com Owner Oakway Golf Inc. Attn: John Hammer P.O. Box 2266 Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 683-1166 Project Location Address: No Address Assigned Tax Lot: 17-02-30-44 T.L. 300,400 Existing Use of Site The project site is currently vacant of any buildings. There is an existing joint driveway to serve the Aramark Development at the southeast corner of Lot 7 in an existing joint access easement. Proposed Use The applicant is proposing to construct four multi -tenant buildings with associated infrastructure. There is not an identified tenant. There is one proposed loading dock (truck well) to serve the development on the west side of building one. There will be a shared trash enclosure within building three of lot 8 which serves all of lot 8. Lot 7 will have a shared trash enclosure within building one which will serve all of lot 7. The locations of these trash enclosures are shown on the site plans. The site will be accessible through existing entrances on the north side of Lot 8 (Kathryn Street) and the southeast corner of lot 7 as shown on the site plans. The proposed site is within the Mid -Springfield Development Plan. Our proposed use is within the parameters of the Mid -Springfield Development Plan. Land Use The parent zoning of the property is heavy industrial. The land uses of the abutting properties are: North: Heavy Industrial - Existing industrial development East: Heavy Industrial - 40' Street - Lot 10 across street (vacant) South: Heavy Industrial - Heavy Industrial — Aramark - West: Low Density Residential - 36th Street The proposed project meets the land use requirements of the development code given the abutting land use zoning and uses. The setbacks required for the project are 10 feet from the property lines, which have been provided in the proposed project. Site Access There are two existing accesses to the site which were constructed during the PEPI project associated with the J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision. There is a joint driveway shared with Aramark to the south, on Lot 7. This access is proposed to remain, utilizing existing grading and drainage patterns. The second access is a curb cut on Kathryn Street adjacent to Lot 8. Grading The proposed site will be graded to direct stormwater away from the buildings and into nearby catch basins throughout the site. The remainder of the site will be graded to match existing drainage patterns as well as elevations of adjacent properties. Wastewater System The buildings are proposed to be served by a new wastewater pipe system that will plug into existing stubs adjacent to the lots as shown on the utility plan. The lines will be routed to serve each potential lease space individually and be extended to tie into the area drains proposed in the trash enclosure and loading dock. The trash enclosure area will be covered with the concrete base graded to be hydraulically isolated. The existing mainline and stubs from Industrial Avenue were constructed as part of the PER project related to the J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision. Floor drains tied to the wastewater system are proposed to be located just inside the building at each overhead door location. Storm Water Svstem The site is located in the J.P. Hammer Industrial subdivision which includes 3 +/- acres of detention ponds to serve all of the parcels. Lots 7 and 8 discharge stormwater runoff into these detention ponds. The post -construction peak stormwater runoff was found to be 1.73 cfs during a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. The drainage systems for Lot 7 and 8 are outlined below: Paving across both lots is proposed to be graded towards catch basins, forming a collection of basin areas. See the basin map shown on site plans for more information. Within this basin map, basins 7, 11, 13, 14, and 15 will see the stormwater runoff be mechanically treated prior to discharge into the storm main connection on the east side of Lot 7. Stormwater runoff from basins 10 and 12, which are composed of the roofs of the buildings proposed to be built on lot 7, will be routed into the same pipe system as the mechanically treated stormwater runoff before being discharged into the same storm main connection for Lot 7. The basin areas 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 9 will instead be vegetatively by flowing through a drainage system into the proposed stormwater planter on the northeast corner of Lot 8. From there, the stormwater will be treated prior to discharge into the storm main connection on the north side of the northeast corner of Lot 8. Basin areas 4 and 6, which are composed of the roofs of the buildings proposed to be built on Lot 8, will be routed around the stormwater planter to discharge directly into the same storm main connection for Lot 8. Water System The proposed water system is to install individual domestic water meters on the east side of the building, where the existing water line is located in a public utility easement. Both lines will then be routed through approved backflow systems and will be routed to separate portions of the proposed building. There will also be a %" branch line that will be extended to the trash enclosure to provide water for a yard hydrant and to prime the trap for the area drain. There are existing fire hydrants located north and south of the property. There is an existing hydrant on the north side of Olympic Street at the intersection with 40" Street (approximately 197' north of building). There is another hydrant located on the west side of 40� Street which is located approximately 209 feet south of the building. A separate sprinkler system for the building is not proposed. The final design of domestic water lines will be completed during the building permit process. Site Lighting The proposal is to install recessed downward facing TWR1 LED lighting on the exterior of the building, directed down to light the sidewalk and pavement areas adjacent to the structure. Pole lighting locations are shown on sheet C-3.0 with fixture details on sheet C-6.0 Photometric analysis is included with this submittal and shows no light trespass across exterior property lines. Landscape We are not removing more than 5 trees, therefore no tree removal permit is required. The planting plan for the site (including stormwater facilities) are outlined on sheets LA -1 and LA -2 of the plan set. The planting in the stormwater facilities meet the requirements outlined in the Eugene Slormwater Management Manual. The frontage along Kathryn Street and 40' Street has existing street trees that were planted during the public improvement project for the subdivision. Drinking Water Protection The proposed lot is located inside the 2-5 year time of travel zone and 5-10 year travel zone for drinking water protection. The area where vehicles will be driving will be paved. Storm water will be directed to two types of facilities to provide pollution control treatment prior to entering the existing detention pond system. Details are outlined on the plan sheets. Wetland protections notes are listed on Sheet 2.0 The stormwater planters will include 18 inches of soil media to meet the requirements in the drinking water protection area. Site Soils Malabon Urban Land Complex is generally described as hydrologic soil group C. The expected infiltration rate of this soil is approximately 0.5 inches per hour, which will allow the landscape areas to drain. The stormwater planter is lined, so no infiltration is planned for that facility. Franchise Utilities Franchise Utilities (Electric, Phone, Cable, Natural Gas) are located in the Kathryn Street and 40" Street rights of way adjacent to the project. Sheet C4 shows the preferred location for electric, phone, cable, and gas meters to serve the development. Franchise services will be designed by the providing utility companies during the building permit process. Building Elevations Preliminary building elevations for the building are shown on the architectural plan sheets provided by Rodd Hansen Architecture. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Scott Morris via email (scottmorrisoao-engr coml or phone (541-302-9790). City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: 401h Street Mini Warehouse SPRINGFIELD OREGON Project Proposal: Four (4) new multi -tenant buildings on a 2.68 -acre vacant site comprised of two separate tax lots. Case Number: 811 -21 -000161 -PRE Project Address: Not yet municipally addressed but located west of N. 42nd Street, south of Kathryn Avenue, and between 39th and 401h Streets Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): Map 17-02-30-44, Tax Lots 300 & 400 Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (5 -10 -year TOTZ for the SP Wellhead) Applicable Refinement Plan: Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan Designation: HI Metro Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial (HI) Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: July 9, 2021 Application Submittal Deadline: January 10, 2022 Associated Applications: N/A POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Project Planner Land Use Planning Melissa Carino 541.744.4068 Transportation Plannina En inee Transportation Michael Liebler 541.736.1034 Public Works Civil En ineer Utilities Sanitary & Storm Clayton McEachern 541.736.1036 Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Eric Phillips -Meadow 541.682.5741 Building Official Building Chris Car enter 541.736.1029 Applicant John Hammer Oakway Golf Inc. PO Box 2266 Eugene, OR 97402 Scott Morris, PE A & 0 Engineering LLC 380 Q St, Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees BILE PLAN REVIEW:.so.... o) Pb-InenlMal Meetln9 Cib: W1 RequlnJ Morn, au0nitlel W 81% Plan UGB: 6894 Sea Plan Rename CW and IAG I: <10000Sq. X. inpervioussudace 78,140 -MMor appllcatlons. 10000 Sq a. ar9naler impervious solace 60,14 9-66111000ey.R 01b Plan Review Medlfted.-i Cke&�G1@:64,907 916 Plan Review Mwllncatlon - Minor City: 61,612 6190 UGB: 62,282 FIMI Bib Plan Ee,IW,nt C 6069:Wall Final dib Plan Revlwl0evN.l_n_enl Bee 9pec1sl l'and"U M rawnent NIA NIA RequlnJ Morn, au0nitlel W 81% Plan WA NIA Revbe and Blte Plan and. ModMcatlon -MMor appllcatlons. 8267.30 8190 Type 11 6% 6190 6249.36 6190 Type 11 n6.0o WA TypeI 6114.10 WA 6229.26 WA (Typal »>» >rar Typal-Fllel.ftphinanidaMelanonl a0n n ent be le IN al Me paid alb plan lee (emluabe W PM a,) A 0% Tachnola,y FM will applied~ Inp or collecbtl. II 102,825 sq. ft. of impervious surfaces $11,549.95 Site Plan Review ($5146 + $5673 application fee + $540.95 tech fee + $190 postage) $4,485 Final Site Plan Review (tech fee?) o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81/2»x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ 8 1/2" x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ 0 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ®. ❑. Brief Narrative Revised 10/25/07 o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer ❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping �'� ❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces (total) ❑ 2 Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces ® ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses ❑ 3 Location of existing and proposed transit facilities o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning N/A Note(s) F-1 [] Phased Development Plan Revised 10/25/07 o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) WOMEN a N7 o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® 0 ® M o On -Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) �1 ■ MOMEMEN Revised 10/25/07 Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source Planning Notes: 1. Please be sure to include deed and title report dated within 30 days when submitting the Tentative Site Plan Review application. 2. Solar access requirements will also be reviewed at the building permit process. 3. Add a note of the closest LTD bus stops to the development area. This can be added to Existing Conditions and/or Vicinity Map. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: • Density is N/A for this industrial development project. The total warehouse units proposed for the 4 new buildings is 48. • Recommend contacting SUB Water and Electric Divisions to plan for connections if applicant has not already. All utilities must be placed underground. • A Drinking Water Protection (DWP) permit is required for this application and can be submitted concurrently with the Tentative Site Plan. DWP Application: httr): //www.si)ri ngf eld-or. gov/wo-conte nt/uploads/2019/01/DWP-Overlav- District-Development-1-15-09-ddk • While there are no local significant wetlands on the subject site, there are still wetlands. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. Applicant may submit a free wetland determination form (usually processed within 30 days) to Department of State Lands (DSL) to see if a more official wetland delineation is required. • Recommend reviewing the Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan in case anything applies to the proposed development project or development site. Project Planner can provide a copy of the Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan to the applicant. Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 21 -161 -PRE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 0 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer 0 171 Vicinity Map 0, El The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings n/a The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department �; n/a The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision 0 1 The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department ® 0 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings 21 Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Revised 10/25/07 o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 11 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ri Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) F1 re, ►'Ii �4 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainagewaysto be retained (, Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 13 go Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes: 1. site is in the 5-10 TOT zone Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: • site appears to have the required internal drains for the loading doors, and trash enclosures Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/ Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#: 21-000161 Applicant: LULU LLC TRANSPORTATION o Right -of -Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NA Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NA Traffic Impact Study o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Revised 10/25/07 Note(s) (1) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails [� Z Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, Revised 10/25/07 access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable ',I❑j (2) Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. The ROW width, utility poles and street lighting for 39`h Street is not labeled. 2. A stop sign is labeled at 39th and Kathryn. A dead-end sign with a street names assembly and sidewalk closed sign are located at the corner of the intersection. Please adjust the labeling in the area for the dead-end sign and label the sidewalk closed signs on both sides of Kathryn. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Recent changes to the development codes bike parking dimensional standards require more space than what is provided on the submitted bike parking detail. Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: 21 -000167 -PRE FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Notes) ® © On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) 1 Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. Heads up items: Unless these buildings are sprinkleredor an additional fire hydrant is installed near the north entrance, the placement of the buildings exceed the maximum 400 foot hose lay distance for non-sprinklered buildings. The problem isthat the existing fire hydrant to the northeast on 40t^ Street: there is no direct access into the property due to the proposed fence and no curb cut. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Revised 9/24/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE - APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Revised 10/25/07 Applicable ❑ ® Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ ® A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ® ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ® ❑ If more than 5 trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ® ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ® ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ® ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ ® Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ ® An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer Revised 10/25/07 THIS APPLICATION IS: ❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ® INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 - day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -day timeline. o., fa. "I (- ,f JO �- 14s u... -7 /2 f /-2 oz Signature Date Revised 10/25/07 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE541.726.3753 FAX 541.726.1021 www.spangfieldorgov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK (Area below this line flied oat by Applicant) ------ (Please room to Gayton McEachern @ City of Sprineleld Development and Public Works, Fax # 736-1011, Phone # 736-1036), email: cmcenchern(a)springf l eld-ongov Project Name: Industrial Ave Lot 7&8 Applicant: John Hammer Assessors Parcel ht: 17-02-30-44, T.L. 400, T.L. 300 Date: 04/05/2021 Land Use(s): Heavy Industrial Phone #: 541-683-1166 Project Size (Acres): 2.68 Fax #: or an—application to be complete for submittal, although other reuiremenls nroy be necessa Approx. Impervious Area: 2.43 acres Email: dyla eiver@w-engr.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Four buildings within lots 7 and 8 composed of smaller suites each with front doors, bay door access, puking spaces and unloading zones. Overall site includes handicap parking spaces, indoor bathrooms, outdoor trash enclosures, and a single loading dock. Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Existing 12" stormwatcr stab is located on the northem side of the northeast comer of lot 8 (T.L. 400). Existing 12" stormwater stub is located on the eastern side of the southeast comer of lot 7 (TL. 300). For both lots, both roof and treated stormwater rrmoffwill discharge into these stubs. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Between lots 7 & 8, 50% of all non -roof stomrwater maoff will be treated by catch basins designed for mechanical stonawater treatment. The other half will be treated with a 105' rain garden or equivalent. —(Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Applicant) — (-41 a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front mid back oJ'this sheer shall be submared or an—application to be complete for submittal, although other reuiremenls nroy be necessa Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: fo yearTOTwne ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ala ❑ Soil Type: ❑ Hillside Development: Na ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: nia ❑ Other Jurisdictions we Downstream Analysis: N/A Downstream analysis not required BUT there Is an existing detention pond for this ale and the runofffrom Nis alto MUST canons to the damage reportdone for the whole subdivision. 1 am pretty sure A and O did that report (when itwas celled dson and more s) ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736.1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS o, orsaaic own: 't Based upon the information provided on tae front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed far an application to be complete for submand vilh respect to drainage; bar ever, this list should not be used in lies of the Spr ng%ield Development Code 6150) or the Cuts Engineering Design Mamat. Compliance with these requirements does not constm le .rise appionah Additional site specie infornmtion may be required. Note: Upon sc'aphig sheet submittal, ensure completed farm has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A Z ❑ AD non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin Wait filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. dWhere required, vegetative stovnwater design shall be consistent with design slandacds (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manuel. m❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specifical by the Eugene Stormwster Management Manual (Ses,14.1). ❑ If a stia.ter treatment swate is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stonowater Management Manual. 0rn [-IWaterQuality calculations as required in Section 3 03.1 ofthe EDSPM. Z] ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall Z❑ Z Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. study and plan set. Simulate A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. Z I ❑ Calculations shoving system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow, effects of a 25 -year victim event. FA n The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. L] Z A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.46 On-site drainage shall be governed by the study and plan set. Simulate Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). Z I ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable - ❑ Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.14). ❑ Flow Imes, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for remlorced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, in proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. Maiming's'W'values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed m ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one font interval Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. mPrivate starmwater casements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private sto rr water flows from one property to another. Z ❑ Drywells shall not receive mnoff from any surface wfo being treated by one or more DMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3 03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DRQ. Refer to the website: him'//www.deo.state.or.usiwg/ui./uic.hmi for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to Imut runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25-vear storm events. see note above about existing regional pond for the hammer subdivision -you must COnfBfg0o thalA 1AshmdhatAawalam*inside thefrom cover, ofthe srormn-we, study. * IMPORTANT: EN GIA PLEASE READ BELOW D SD S/GA'! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above re iced it s are complete and included with the submitted sto at study and plan set. Simulate Dnte '7 Z I Zo Z Form Version 5: dune 2015 ®i19 9 i ®®a3 g a ! g iR ,BRag6 Ajl y��'l�5a Al 11lIi�gli, 1. 4 lialaa .1®1!! Roagg Ya!!A111 n �� EI `G i€lei �� w Ea 9;3JRM �p- li -.- a Imil! 1 gi®ia Hill ® 1 1lal �a fill' egagge � epa�ll ree�tyv.la(dB II IN kill mB�i�mp r sm— TEDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ei 40thStreet SN=Wl�e oueb an➢ en Imy_ mesr