Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 6/25/2021(City of Springfield Development & Public Warks 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD W Application Type (Applicant: check one) Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: x Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: John Hammer Phone: 541-683-1166 Company: Oakway Golf Inc Email: Address: P.0 BOX 2266 Eugene, OR 97402 Applicant's Rep.: Scott Morris, PE Phone: 541-302-9790 Company: A& O Engineering LLC Email: scottmorris@ao-engr.corr Address: 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: Same as Applicant Phone: Company: Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30-44 TAX LOT NOS : 300,400 Property Address: no address assigned Size of Property: 2.68 Acres El Square Feet ❑ Proposed No. of I pwellina Unift Der screw n/a Proposed Name of Project: 40th Street Mini Warehouse Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: constructfour new multi -tenant buildings and associated infrastructure Existing Use: vacant New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 102,825 sf Si natures: Please sin and 2rInt our name and date in thea Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: A,II A Associated Applications: k1k ro riate box on the next a e. complete this section) Si ns: Pre -Sub Case No.: U1�'Z�- ��E Date: b"LS— � 1 Reviewed b : t -t - L. Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: Posta a Fee: TOTAL FEES: �ti\'JU PROJECT NUMBER: 31111111111 Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. P f+ Date: Signu e 7o/Y 1fvawinI�fz I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Date: Signature Revised 1/7/14 K1 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. ReviSed 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. Q Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. El Site Plan Review Application Form Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. Q Copy of the Deed 0 Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. x❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet Q Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: Q All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. All plan sets must be folded to 81h" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Vicinity Map &I The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department $The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified In the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision Q The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department EPPhysical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections ❑x Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces ro Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district 0 On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Q Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Q Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Q Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11 x❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses x❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Location and width of all existing easements ❑x Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. ❑x Location and type of existing street lighting Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities x❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails x❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. ® Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below x❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components Q Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development ❑x Location and width of all proposed easements x❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting x❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan ❑x Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage ® Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 X1 Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached x❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: ❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. ❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. ❑ Photometric test report for each light source. ❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: x❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11 ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 of 11 vee,.o ami nd ll9� n,ycu..as 1 i—J U N yaa179 Woo „ate ®o o.. MV'1d ihawamanVIa 9115 a All HIM Oil s 3t Hig gB�{gs� aha?$ E it iN,M Al I i i i S 014 1 k i k 8PBp e 38TI( ST i DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE. 541.7263753 FAX, 541.725.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK -- — (Area below this line frged out by Applicant) — -- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City ofS)srurgfeld Development and Public Works; For 4 736-1011, Phone #736-1036), email: cm cwcPrmvt@spring/teld-or.gov Project Name: Industrial Ave Lot 7&8 Applicant: John Hammer Assessors Parcel #: 17-02-30-44, T.L. 400, T.L. 300 Date: 04/05/2021 Land Use(s): Heavy Industrial Phone #: 541-683-1166 Project Size (Acres): 2.68 Fax #: (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the Ciln on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted or an a liwtion to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary. Approx. Impervious Area: 2.43 acres Email: dylanmeiver@w-engr.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Four buildings within lots 7 and 8 composed of smaller suites each with front doors, bay door access, parking spaces and unloading zones. Overall site includes handicap parking spaces, indoor bathrooms, outdoor trash enclosures, and a single loading dock. ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: we ❑ Other Jurisdictions ma Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Existing 12" stonnwater stub is located on the northern side of the northeast comer of lot 8 (T.L. 400). Existing 12" stonnwater stub is located on the eastern side of the southeast coma of lot 7 T.L. 300). For both lots, both roof and treated stormwater runoff will discharge into these stubs. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Between lots 7 & 8, 50% of all non-mof stolmwater runoff will be treated by catch basins designed for mechanical stormwater treatment. The other half will be treated with a 105' rain garden or equivalent. (Area be&. this lira (tiled out by the Ciro andRerurned to OreAnylkant) (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the Ciln on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted or an a liwtion to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary. Drainage Study TVVe (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Ilydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: loyearTOTione ❑ Hillside Development: c/a ❑ Wedand/Riparian: Na ❑ Soil Type: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: we ❑ Other Jurisdictions ma Downstream Analysis: E]Downstu are analysis net required BUT there is an ezisfng detention pond for this site and the runoff from this site MUST mdorm to Ne N/A drainage report done for Me whole subdivision. I am pretty sure A antl O did that report (when it was called alson antl morns) ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, small: cmceachern@springfield-orgel FAX (541) 736.1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS * Basedupon the information p evided on the front of This sheet. the following represents a minimum ofthal is needed for or application to be complete for submina/ with respect to drainage,' however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Sp'ingfreld Dei elopmenn Code (SD(7) or the Citr's Engineenng Design Manual. Cmnplianee with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional sire specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping Shaer sabmltral, ensure completed form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (RDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A Z All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin Wait filtration media) for stommwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 5040 of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. I _I where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (RDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stmmwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stommwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1), If a smmmomer treatment Swale is proposed, submit celadatioua specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope. and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. r� water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. YJ ❑ All building trollop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed ht the state of Oregon. E] A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year norm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. The time of.weennation (Te) shall be determined using a 10 minute star time for ❑ Z A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4 03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations ofthc HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Z ❑ Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ Flow lines, slopes, riot elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 incites for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Marring s "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to Existing and proposed contours, located atone foot interval. Include spot elevations and site guides showing how site drains. Z❑ Private sto irs.ter easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private sto urvater flows from one property to another. Drywells shall not receive mnoff from any surface wia being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential budding roofs (ED' Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer o thewebsite: lino://www.dea.shw ocus/wa/uic/uicJmr for more information. ❑ [Z Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events_ see note above about existing regional pond for the hammer subdivision -you must CorlfDltpleinside diefmnt corer, ofrhe stornewater study. * ],4fPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEGOW'AND SIGA'! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items ate complete and included with the submitted stormwater study mid plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: Jane 2015 Site Review Narrative This narrative is for a site review application for a proposed multi -tenant industrial building on Parcels 7 and 8 of J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision, which is located at the southeast corner of 40� Street and Kathryn Street in Springfield, Oregon. The proposal is to construct four buildings ranging from 6,099 square feet to 11,964 square feet with associated infrastructure. Applicant / Owners Representative A & O Engineering LLC Scott Morris, PE 380 Q Street, Ste 200 Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 302-9790 scottmorris@ao-engr.com Owner Oakway Golf Inc. Attn: John Hammer P.O. Box 2266 Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 683-1166 Project Location Address: No Address Assigned Tax Lot: 17-02-30-44 T.L. 300,400 Existing Use of Site The project site is currently vacant of any buildings. There is an existing joint driveway to serve the Aramark Development at the southeast corner of Lot 7 in an existing joint access easement. Proposed Use The applicant is proposing to construct four multi -tenant buildings with associated infrastructure. There is not an identified tenant. There is one proposed loading dock (truck well) to serve the development on the west side of building one. There will be a shared trash enclosure within building three of lot 8 which serves all of lot 8. Lot 7 will have a shared trash enclosure within building one which will serve all of lot 7. The locations of these trash enclosures are shown on the site plans. The site will be accessible through existing entrances on the north side of Lot 8 (Kathryn Street) and the south east corner of lot 7 as shown on the site plans. Land Use The parent zoning of the property is heavy industrial. The land uses of the abutting properties are: North: Heavy Industrial - Existing industrial development East: Heavy Industrial - 401" Street - Lot 10 across street (vacant) South: Heavy Industrial - Heavy Industrial —Aramark West: Low Density Residential - 36th Street The proposed project meets the land use requirements of the development code given the abutting land use zoning and uses. The setbacks required for the project are 10 feet from the property lines, which have been provided in the proposed project. Site Access There are two existing accesses to the site which were constructed during the PEPI project associated with the J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision. There is a joint driveway shared with Aramark to the south, on Lot 7. This access is proposed to remain, utilizing existing grading and drainage patterns. The second access is a curb cut on Kathryn Street adjacent to Lot B. Grading The proposed site will be graded to direct stormwater away from the buildings and into nearby catch basins throughout the site. The remainder of the site will be graded to match existing drainage patterns as well as elevations of adjacent properties. Wastewater System Lots 7 and 8 are independently served by existing wastewater stubs to each lot. Private piping will be routed to all areas of the buildings where service is required and to the loading dock on lot 7. The trash enclosure areas will be covered with the concrete base graded to be hydraulically isolated. Floor drains tied to the wastewater system are proposed to be located just inside the building at each overhead door location. Storm Water System The site is located in the J.P. Hammer Industrial subdivision which includes 3 +/- acres of detention ponds to serve all of the platted parcels. Lots 7 and 8 discharge stormwater runoff into these detention ponds. The drainage for lots 7 and 8 were looked at collectively to meet the City requirements for detention and treatment of paved surfaces. More than 50% of the paved surfaces are routed to to the stormwater planter located on lot 8 with the remainder being treated by filter inserts in the sediment catch basins. The storm management system has been designed to incorporate detention to meet the allowed post construction peak flow rate as determined during the J.P. Hammer Industrial Subdivision. A complete storm water report is being submitted with this application with calculations and details of the storm management system. Water System Domestic water service to each building will be from (2) separate meters at the location shown on the utility plan. An individual meter will be sized and placed to serve each lot independently. Commercial backflow devices will be placed on each service line. Sizing of water facilities to be completed during the building permit process. There are existing fire hydrants located north and south of the property. There is an existing hydrant on the north side of Olympic Street at the intersection with 4V Street (approximately 197' north of building). There is another hydrant located on the west side of 40� Street which is located approximately 209 feet south of the building. A separate sprinkler system for the building is not proposed. Site Lighting The proposal is to install downward facing wall pack lighting on the exterior of the buildings, directed down to light the sidewalk and pavement areas adjacent to the structure. Pole lighting locations are shown on sheet C-3.0 with fixture details on sheet C-6.0 Photometric analysis is included with this submittal and shows no light trespass across exterior property lines. Landscape The planting plan for the site (including stormwater facilities) are outlined on sheet LA -1.0 of the plan set. The planting in the stormwater facilities meet the requirements outlined in the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. The frontages along Kathryn Street and 401M1 Street have existing street trees that were planted during the public improvement project for the subdivision. Drinking Water Protection The proposed lot is located inside the 2-5 year time of travel zone for drinking water protection. The area where vehicles will be driving will be paved. Storm water will be directed to two types of facilities to provide pollution control treatment prior to entering the existing detention pond system. Details are outlined on the plan sheets. Wetland protections notes are listed on Sheet 2.0 The stormwater planter will include 18 inches of soil media to meet the requirements in the drinking water protection area. Site Soils Malabon Urban Land Complex is generally described as hydrologic soil group C. The expected infiltration rate of this soil is approximately 0.5 inches per hour, which will allow the landscape areas to drain. The stormwater planter is lined, so no infiltration is planned for that facility. Franchise Utilities Franchise Utilities (Electric, Phone, Cable, Natural Gas) are located in the Kathryn Street and 40t1 Street rights of way adjacent to the project. Sheet C-4.0 shows the preferred location for electric, phone, cable, and gas meters to serve the development. Franchise services will be designed by the providing utility companies during the building permit process. Building Elevations Preliminary building elevations for the building are shown on the architectural plan sheets provided by Rodd Hansen Architecture. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Scoff Morris via email (scoffmorriscg ao-engr.coml or phone (541-302-9790).