HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 6/21/2021City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPRINGFIELD
W 0#/
Required Project Information (Appficant:
Prospective
Applicant Name: Cynthia Schuster
compiete this section)
O: 503-265-1520
Phone: M: 503-265-1520
Company: Lrs Architects
Fax:
Address: 720 NW Davis- Portland -Oregon -97222
Prospective Jean-Pierre Veillet
Applicant's Rep.:
Phone: 971.506.2337
Company: Blue McKenzie Apartments LLC
Fax:
Address:
Property Owner:
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:
TAX LOT NOS
: 2300
Property Address:
Size of Property: .27
Acres ® Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: EARLY PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT IMPACT BUILDING DESIGN FOR MIXED USE 84 UNIT
Existing Use: Parking
# of Lots Parcels: 1
Avg. Lot Parcel Size:
sfDensit
: du/acre
Prospective
Applicant:
Si nature
Cynthia Schuster
Print
Case No.: Date:
Date: 6/16/21
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: 0
Posta a Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Process
The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development
opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or
standards change.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
• The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
• Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.
• We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
• The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the
meeting.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting
• The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.
• The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
• Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
• The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report.
Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
S6 Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the time of complete application submittal.
V Development Issues Meeting Application Form
Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
{a' Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
Vr Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
�] North arrow
�] Date of preparation
Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
�Qf Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
gArea and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
❑ Parking and circulation plan
Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3
ZONING REQUIREMENTS- SITE QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1
BUILDING PROJECTIONS
ALLOWED OVER PUBLIC �1WHAT TEuIS
. THE TIMING
OF THIS DEMO
SIDEWALKOR EASEMENTS Q¢� GARAGE
EXISTING SITE PLAN 9I
b
212002 1 city quntions
ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 l"1
g
FF -.61.80'
K 72
I" LOT 1690
TBD BY COS - ZONING SECTION
3.2-615(3) Where an easement is larger than the required
setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except
a fence, shall be built on or over that easement
_______________________________________ o o_a__
______—____ t __V ____ ____________
.oAHUN W52.37- W 9L45'
on loss nr'Ta lass
�ro
�� �arEwrvuNLlc unllrr FAsruENr PROPOSED REVISED
RESERVFO IN 00.01NANCF N0. 5.08 EASEMENT LINE -COSTO
REL N0. eF535R0
0
TAR WT]2D8
APPROVE
QUESTION 2
MAKING
IMPROVEMENT ALONG EAST AND
R
WEST EDGES -OFF SITE
F -
QUESTION 3
w
• POSSIBLE TO VACATE PART OF
THE CURRENT EASEMENT TO THE
= a
NORTH PROPOSE CENTERING A 7'
z
MIN EASEMENT ON SEWER LINE.
IMPROVEMENTSON
QUESTION 4
• PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS-
• DRIVEWAY CLOSURE HALF ON
PROPERTY- PED
ADJACENT SITE
D.S. POST OFFICE
• STREETTREES
• SIDEWALK LIGHTING
DO WE HAVE TO
EXISTING SITE PLAN 9I
b
212002 1 city quntions
ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 l"1
g
FF -.61.80'
K 72
I" LOT 1690
TBD BY COS - ZONING SECTION
3.2-615(3) Where an easement is larger than the required
setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except
a fence, shall be built on or over that easement
_______________________________________ o o_a__
______—____ t __V ____ ____________
.oAHUN W52.37- W 9L45'
on loss nr'Ta lass
�ro
�� �arEwrvuNLlc unllrr FAsruENr PROPOSED REVISED
RESERVFO IN 00.01NANCF N0. 5.08 EASEMENT LINE -COSTO
REL N0. eF535R0
0
TAR WT]2D8
APPROVE
RO
MAKING
R
TA} tOT 2388
SPRINGFIELDMOTORS
s
OWNER
THE I?bTbfiS. LLC
g
MN• 11,745 SIL Fl. (.210 ACRES)
z
TO BE REMOVED
IMPROVEMENTSON
o�
NEIGHBORING
PROPERTY- PED
D.S. POST OFFICE
CONNECTION?
DO WE HAVE TO
CLOSE OFF DRIVE
WAY-ANYOTHER
--
PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS?
FF=.61.05
RD
' 589°52'37" E .92.45'
OAv' AV w
6
"A" STREET
L
5Q¢��p
(p
.41010 �
COS -ARE
BALCONIES OR
BAYS ALLOWED
OVER PUBLIC
W AY-
{
_ 1
NORTH
APPROVE
RO
MAKING
R
IMPROVEMENTS ON
s
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY
EXISTING PAVING HAS
TO BE REMOVED
o�
D.S. POST OFFICE
5Q¢��p
(p
.41010 �
COS -ARE
BALCONIES OR
BAYS ALLOWED
OVER PUBLIC
W AY-
{
_ 1
NORTH
ZONING REQUIREMENTS- BIKE PARKING TYPE OPTIONS - QUESTION 5
CITY FIGURE - BIKE PARKING
`rs 212002 I city questions
ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021
11 i
APARTMENT BIKE HOOKS
Bike Parking Req.
llwt
3_.
2.__
section 4.6-155
Use; M ultifamily- Short term
_
84
42
I .
.............................
84
42
.
1/6D0 sf
Use: Commercial -Short
0.75
Use: Commercial -Long
0.25
retail
1/ 3000 sf
Use: Commercial -Short
0.75
Use: Commercial -Long
0.25
Total Required
84
CITY FIGURE - BIKE PARKING
`rs 212002 I city questions
ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021
11 i
APARTMENT BIKE HOOKS
Bike Parking Req.
City Ratio
units - Factor
Parks Required
section 4.6-155
Use; M ultifamily- Short term
0.5
84
42
Use; Multifamily - Longterm
0.5
84
42
(lased on Eating and Drinking
1/6D0 sf
Use: Commercial -Short
0.75
Use: Commercial -Long
0.25
retail
1/ 3000 sf
Use: Commercial -Short
0.75
Use: Commercial -Long
0.25
Total Required
84
Can Bike be provided with a hook in
apratment? proposed double stacking rack
Sheltered Long term to be covered
If more than 10 short term 50% must be
coverd.
Oversized bikes Size 4'x8'
Qnty 10% on long term
STAGGERED WALL RACKS -
BIKE STACKING RACK