The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 6/21/2021DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Blue McKenzie MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, July 8, 2021, 1:30 — 2:30 PLACE: Virtual via Microsoft Teams CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird Current Planning Staff: J Donovan, L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Cari6o Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW ✓ Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW) Clayton McEachem, Civil Engineer, Development 8 Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Rincipal Engineer, Development 8 Public Works ✓ Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development @. Public Works ✓ Eric Phillips -Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fre 8 Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development 8 Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District ✓ Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) ✓ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas JeRreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning 8 Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planngr@odot.smte.or. us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities 8 Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools ✓ Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, Centuryl-ink Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW Chris Moorhead, DPW City Surveyor Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation (Steve Gallup, oc only) Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District ✓ Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) ✓ Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM) Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 86/88/2828 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL 225 FIFTH STREET Meeting Date; Thursday, July 8, 2021 1;30-2;30 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -21 -000154 -PRE 811-21-000153-PROJ Blue McKenzie Assessor's Map: 17-03-35-42 TL 2300 Address: 702 A Street Existing Use: parking Applicant has submitted proposal for mixed use development. Planner: Andy Limbird The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx it I tl r w P=x ;7, 7' SITE VICINITY MAP 811 -21 -000154 -PRE Development Issues meeting 17-03-35-42 TL 2300 702 A Street Blue McKenzie ZONING REQUIREMENTS- SITE QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 BUILDING PROJECTIONS ALLOWED OVER PUBLIC �1WHAT TEuIS . THE TIMING OF THIS DEMO SIDEWALKOR EASEMENTS Q¢� GARAGE EXISTING SITE PLAN 9I b 212002 1 city quntions ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 l"1 g FF -.61.80' K 72 I" LOT 1690 TBD BY COS - ZONING SECTION 3.2-615(3) Where an easement is larger than the required setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except a fence, shall be built on or over that easement _______________________________________ o o_a__ ______—____ t __V ____ ____________ .oAHUN W52.37- W 9L45' on loss nr'Ta lass �ro �� arEwrvuNLlc unllrr FAsruENr PROPOSED REVISED RESERVFO IN 00.01NANCF N0. 5.08 EASEMENT LINE -COSTO REL N0. eF535R0 0 TAR WT]2D8 APPROVE QUESTION 2 MAKING IMPROVEMENT ALONG EAST AND R WEST EDGES -OFF SITE F - QUESTION 3 w • POSSIBLE TO VACATE PART OF THE CURRENT EASEMENT TO THE = a NORTH PROPOSE CENTERING A 7' z MIN EASEMENT ON SEWER LINE. IMPROVEMENTSON QUESTION 4 • PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS- • DRIVEWAY CLOSURE HALF ON PROPERTY- PED ADJACENT SITE D.S. POST OFFICE • STREETTREES • SIDEWALK LIGHTING DO WE HAVE TO EXISTING SITE PLAN 9I b 212002 1 city quntions ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 l"1 g FF -.61.80' K 72 I" LOT 1690 TBD BY COS - ZONING SECTION 3.2-615(3) Where an easement is larger than the required setback standard, no building or above grade structure, except a fence, shall be built on or over that easement _______________________________________ o o_a__ ______—____ t __V ____ ____________ .oAHUN W52.37- W 9L45' on loss nr'Ta lass �ro �� arEwrvuNLlc unllrr FAsruENr PROPOSED REVISED RESERVFO IN 00.01NANCF N0. 5.08 EASEMENT LINE -COSTO REL N0. eF535R0 0 TAR WT]2D8 APPROVE RO MAKING R TA} tOT 2388 SPRINGFIELDMOTORS s OWNER THE I?bTbfiS. LLC g MN• 11,745 SIL Fl. (.210 ACRES) z TO BE REMOVED IMPROVEMENTSON o� NEIGHBORING PROPERTY- PED D.S. POST OFFICE CONNECTION? DO WE HAVE TO CLOSE OFF DRIVE WAY-ANYOTHER -- PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS? FF=.61.05 RD ' 589°52'37" E .92.45' OAv' AV w 6 "A" STREET L 5Q¢��p (p .41010 � COS -ARE BALCONIES OR BAYS ALLOWED OVER PUBLIC W AY- { _ 1 NORTH APPROVE RO MAKING R IMPROVEMENTS ON s NEIGHBORING PROPERTY EXISTING PAVING HAS TO BE REMOVED o� D.S. POST OFFICE 5Q¢��p (p .41010 � COS -ARE BALCONIES OR BAYS ALLOWED OVER PUBLIC W AY- { _ 1 NORTH ZONING REQUIREMENTS- BIKE PARKING TYPE OPTIONS - QUESTION 5 CITY FIGURE - BIKE PARKING `rs 212002 I city questions ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 11 i APARTMENT BIKE HOOKS Bike Parking Req. llwt 3_. 2.__ section 4.6-155 Use; M ultifamily- Short term _ 84 42 I . ............................. 84 42 . 1/6D0 sf Use: Commercial -Short 0.75 Use: Commercial -Long 0.25 retail 1/ 3000 sf Use: Commercial -Short 0.75 Use: Commercial -Long 0.25 Total Required 84 CITY FIGURE - BIKE PARKING `rs 212002 I city questions ARCHITECTS 6/16/2021 11 i APARTMENT BIKE HOOKS Bike Parking Req. City Ratio units - Factor Parks Required section 4.6-155 Use; M ultifamily- Short term 0.5 84 42 Use; Multifamily - Longterm 0.5 84 42 (lased on Eating and Drinking 1/6D0 sf Use: Commercial -Short 0.75 Use: Commercial -Long 0.25 retail 1/ 3000 sf Use: Commercial -Short 0.75 Use: Commercial -Long 0.25 Total Required 84 Can Bike be provided with a hook in apratment? proposed double stacking rack Sheltered Long term to be covered If more than 10 short term 50% must be coverd. Oversized bikes Size 4'x8' Qnty 10% on long term STAGGERED WALL RACKS - BIKE STACKING RACK City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ Required Project Information (Appficant: Prospective Applicant Name: Cynthia Schuster compiete this section) O: 503-265-1520 Phone: M: 503-265-1520 Company: Lrs Architects Fax: Address: 720 NW Davis- Portland -Oregon -97222 Prospective Jean-Pierre Veillet Applicant's Rep.: Phone: 971.506.2337 Company: Blue McKenzie Apartments LLC Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NOS : 2300 Property Address: Size of Property: .27 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: EARLY PLANNING QUESTIONS THAT IMPACT BUILDING DESIGN FOR MIXED USE 84 UNIT Existing Use: Parking # of Lots Parcels: 1 Avg. Lot Parcel Size: sfDensit : du/acre Prospective Applicant: Si nature Cynthia Schuster Print Case No.: Date: Date: 6/16/21 Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist S6 Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. V Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. {a' Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Vr Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' �] North arrow �] Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number �Qf Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained gArea and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3