Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application APPLICANT 6/4/2021
City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SPRINGFIELD W #A/ Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone:425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LCC D/b/a AT&T Wireless, LLC E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 19801 SW 72nd Ave, Suite 200, Tualatin, OR 97062 Applicant's Rep.: Martha Miller Phone: 510-325-3362 company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mmiller@j5ip.com Address: 2428 NW Market Street, #258, Seattle, WA 98107 Property Owner: City ofSpringfiedl Phone:541-744-3784 Company: E-mail: Address: 1001 Main St, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032234 TAX LOT NOS :90000 Property Address: 2727 Gateway St Nearest Oakdale Ave Intersection : ROW ® Private Property❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Existing Use: Existing wood JU streetlight .Minatures: Please si n and rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. 7/412 ILCL 7rk&41. Signature Martha Miller Print Date: 5/27/2021 If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. re Print Date: I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submits requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: Date: Plot Plan Preparer Signature Print • Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts TypesAllowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 5/27/2021 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@soringfield-or.gov RE: Request to Construct Small Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear City of Sm: INFRASTRUCTURE P A R T N E R S On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T') we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Proiect Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities' pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, without requiring structure replacement. AT&T ID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Heixht EUG03_019/ City of Springfield owned wooden 2727 GATEWAY ST. 38' FA streetlight,#0949 44.07351.-123.04237 14846978 To be replaced with metal smartstack streetlight J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Requested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities 0 Pole Attachment & Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCC's new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after fling, as follows: • This Application was filed on 5/27/2021. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Monday July 26'^, 2021. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Monday June 7'^, 2021. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Martha Miller mmiller@j5ip.com 2428 NW Market St, #258, Seattle, WA 98107 510-325-3362 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities—Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, Martha Miller Springfield Development Code Compliance Narrative A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10%taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed in a single cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety II. A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District at&t EUG03_019G / 18925-019G PHOTO SIMULATION 2727 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 '51NFRASTRUCTURE PAGE 1 Disclaimer: These photographic simulations have been previdert to aid in visuallung how the proposed vnreless telecummunicetions fadlily, shown herein woulrt appear p constructed. While these renderings are not an end science, they haw been pmpmd diligently to accurately reflect dimensions, scale, depth, coloring, twt m, and other important elements in the proposed design insofar as the digital medium allows. Taken together with the engineering drawings and other materials submitted with the application, they are fair and reasonable visual depictions of how the proposed site would appear. AT&T Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction (RFSSRP) Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 M-RFSC Name: Piero Rovani FA#: 14846978 Site Structure Type: Light Pole USID: 301401 PACE#: MRWOR041142 Site ID: 18925-019 Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC Address: 2727 Gateway St. c/o J5 Infrastructure Partners Springfield, Oregon 97477 2030 Main Street, Suite 200 County: Lane Irvine, CA 92614 Latitude: 44.0735 083 3 Longitude: -123.04237222 EBI Project Number: 6221001877 Report Information: Report Writer: Rebecca Sinisgalli Report Date: May 20, 2021 CDs: ATT 18925-019 90 CRAN CD REV A 2021-05-17 Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. EBI Consulting environmental I engineering I duediligence AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 301401 I 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN........................................................................................3 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY..........................................................................................................4 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING.................................................................................6 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 12 6.0 APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ 13 APPENDIXA: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................. 14 APPENDIX EI: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 17 APPENDIXC: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION.................................................................... 18 APPENDIX D: LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIXE: RoofMa ter T".................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX F: CERTIFICATIONS................................................................................................ 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 301401 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site 18925-019 located at 2727 Gateway St in Springfield, Oregon to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF- EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Recommended Mitigation at the Site: Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: Blue 7" by 7" Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole, 2' below the bottom of the antenna. Signs should denote a stay back distance of 4' from the face of the antenna. Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: Barriers are not recommended because the areas of concern extend into free space over lower walking/working surfaces. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 2 Predictive Modeling Results: The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 3.48 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.70 percent ofthe FCC's occupational limit) at the light fixture level. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. At the antenna face level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 190.49 percent of the FCC's general public limit (38.098 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.04 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.008 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Site USID: 301401 3 4y AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. ................. a•••91ue 7" by T•Srawhwrs —_ w NOTICE Ali m oppress. aides : " ii� of the light pde. 2' below the : Light Future -3R .7.00il botrnm dthe arRnna. Sign :ehi denote a stay back hotroge: d 4' frau the here dthe anenor i .................. ......: I� IT `(Wy1�I C n C.I.,Code 4 10 foot gridme b Ground Level -G' LGN IDENTIFICRTION LEGEND AT&T NOTICE 2 Sp -®- AT&T CAUTION 2-Roohop Son Fxisting Sign — TT AT&T WARNING IB and ASigns AT&T CAUTION 2R -Tower Sign i Proposed Sign `- ..we. ........... 1 _= AT&T NOTICE Smill Cell S,- AT&T CALor 2C-Panpe[ Si r I Installed Sign '- __ AT&T CAUTION SmaII Cell igrs AT&T TGLINGUAL NOTICE Sign AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY Site USID: 301401 4 Note there are I AT&T pseudo -omni antennas per sector Mthis site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 3 N 9 W 3$ W iii L N Q 6 L L E L U m IL I ATT GALTRONla GQ2412-W 13 MDT 1900 Iwo 0 0 169 20 5 4 633 70.80 116.11 I ATT GALTRONla GQ2412-W 13 MDT 2100 2100 0 0 130 20 5 4 6.67 78.35 128.49 Note there are I AT&T pseudo -omni antennas per sector Mthis site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Site USID: 301401 5 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Antenna Radiation Z -Height Light Z -Height Ant # NAMEX Y Centerline Fixture Ground ATT 12.7 7.5 37.0 6.0 36.0 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 6 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterT. software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site light fixture level and ground -level resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst- case MPE levels to the FCC's occupationallcontrolled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers with equipment installed at this site. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled exposures on any accessible light fixture level and ground walking/working surface related to ATT's proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational and/or general public exposure limits at this site. Modeling indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 4 feet of the antenna face. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general population limit within approximately 2 feet below the bottom of the AT&T antenna. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the light fixture level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 3.48 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.70 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 3.48 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.70 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Site USID: 301401 7 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 4 Light Fixture =30' dD JU uu dD qD Percent APE legend ❑ 0 - ❑ In%00100% ❑ 500%-5000% ■ 50004. PULllmmlls rule 09 Vertical © Mld2one Avg Gamer Color Coda Ground level=P �_ AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Light Fixture Level Site USID: 301401 8 Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. i N 1 i n +0 1 � L IIII Fxw,e=11 7—J 0G,—dL-11- P,—k MCC Legend ❑ oz -"M ■ iov-sno> i ■ soos-�nooi e000s. PA, L.m.1, Sule9 10 bolg,itlma [Avq 2] b33 C-1) CII118F Color Code ATT 1 Q Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Antenna Face Level Site USID: 301401 9 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. r i N v i a f +0 L L'o Fi.te—zo TG,—d -o• Percent MPE legend ❑ -Too Tv ■ oos-sooi ■ eooz-e000v ■ moo , PUGIICLI Sula9 101mtgFdsize rAvg 3d W 101-1) Carrier Color Code ATT f 4 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Ground Level 0 feet AGL Site USID: 301401 10 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 4 i N a i ' 0 L,hlF.I.o-3o �1 1 —J errrrrrra Lanai - o' Percent MPE Legend ❑ disno'ooz ■ ioo e -e � ❑ aoo e-a000c ■ s000z. Frreon o9 ula9 bolgi6 srza A, fpvg 0b6FeeC Carrier Color Cotla Ali AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 1484697811 Site USID: 301401 AT&T Contribution of More Than 5% of the FCC's General Ex osure RF Limit Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure 1. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. � i rI i XL I I L Dant erwe=3o T J Levelll 0 Po—I APE legend ❑ N°,.5< 56♦ PuldclLmits Sula9 9 la bol giitlsaa [Avg 0 W6Fee1) Comer Color Code G Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure 1. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 12 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. The following mitigation measures are recommended for this site. Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. AT&T Mobility Sectors: o Sector A Blue 7" by 7" Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole, 2' below the bottom of the antenna. Signs should denote a stay back distance of 4' from the face of the antenna AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 6.0 APPENDICES Site USID: 301401 13 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 14 Appendix A: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION(FCC) REQUIREMENTS The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSIIIEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupationallcontrolled exposure limits (for workers) and general publicluncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupationallcontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general publicluncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General publicluncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE limit is 2.33 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 0.47 mW/cm2. For the AT&T equipment operating at 1900 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 5.0 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 1.0 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Site USID: 301401 IS Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) Alm Power Density (S) (mW/cm) Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 18421f 4.891f (9001f2y 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 f/300 6 1,500-100,000 (B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure mwm 5 6 Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) Alm Power Density (S) (mW/cm') Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 8241f 2.191f IBO/ * 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane -wave equivalent power density Figure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivaient Power Density Gcarpatonaf/Ce Imfi.d Exposure - - - - General PopulaI,e 1Unconbo0ed Exposure 0.11 i i I I 1 1 I I I 1 0.03 a3 1 3 30 300 3,000 30,000 1300,000 1.34 1,600 f 00,000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 16 Personal Wireless Service Approximate Fre uenc Occupational MPE public MPE Microwave (Point -to -Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm' 0.58 mW/cm' Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm' 0.57 mW/cm' Long Term Evolution (LTE) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm' 0.47 mW/cm' Most Restrictive Frequency Range 30-300 MHz 1.00 mW/cm' 0.20 mW/cm' MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I ) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Pennissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 17 Appendix B: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated May 27, 2015, requires that: I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Appendix C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION Site USID: 301401 18 Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: as Be posted at a conspicuous point; as Be posted at the appropriate locations; as Be readily visible; and as Make the reader aware of the potential risksro for to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. CRAN I HETN ET Small Cell Decals I Signs STONEHOUSE RF anarur...a by One an..-n.,—nHHw ICC% .Hpnu,.0Anans l., H1. ItI pnpw.bnn. NOTICE Hwa91eav + ¢euway nam Ne manna' DECAL Call AT&T a 900bNae22. opuon 9 Nen a mr bey H yw ,IeeHa.twideN Inl. LTIT.1.1.aTIT.1.1. a� .let ,a,eeneen,- H. CSC 6.nnY s.'..wn NOTICE n. a.,w",.Ilvin.n STONEHOUSE IfF� ax...�,�. NOTICE SIGN m. w.'.n,m. �.1.a an^ b1IM1.61I..'1., 1. �Wv n`a�nn ea ` .:TaT ens ASID awwl.. A CAUTION A STONEHOUSE IV nw,. neenal I th s an. n.,..A. N. ICC% metWhaseul exposure mm,a. CAUTION Hweunel 1 La away from the antenna. DECAL GIIAi6T 91nan ]Io,MIpH ym s9Hyean I hat. M.E a[maxMln 1 hat. A CAUTION AT&T n..l,..a 111-1 a., nI As _As. As STONEHOUSE "":RY'"""""`"""'""RF CAUTION Keep A .y—In. l.n.. a the SIGN CAUTION 2— ROOFTOP CII A,I ATST It z.zz ena. a CAUTION 2A Ans An n,ml. n11-1 w..mnlen ACAUTION c.II S.I. USio Alerting Signs TRILINGUAL •NOTICE 2 NOTICE ACAUTI0111. awwl.. �w...,..r.... n..l,..a _As. As a CAUTION 2— ROOFTOP CAUTION 2A ACAUTION A ..�.�..,... ,. As CAUTION 2B CAUTION 2C -TOWER -PARAPETS JheW]W AWA easessesA=w^.4A= WARNING IB WARNING 2A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Appendix D: LIMITATIONS Site USID: 301401 19 This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC to meet requirements outlined in AT&T's corporate RF safety guidelines. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Appendix E: RoofMasterTM Site USID: 301401 20 RoofMasterT. is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed to predict RF power density values for rooftop and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofi equency Electromagnetic Fields" (OET-65), RoofMasterT. calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMasterTM models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site FA 14846978 Appendix F: CERTIFICATIONS Site USID: 301401 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019 Site USID: 301401 Site FA 14846978 22 Preparer Certification 1, Rebecca Sinisgalli, state that • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated October 28, 2014) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofMasterT. modeling software. • I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement © 2021 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. I � II W. I SHEET:I DESCRIPTION: T1 I TITLE SHEET TC1 I VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TC2 I PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR E0003 019 SITE ADDRESS: 2727 GATEWAY ST. PROJECT CONTACTS AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: A&E MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: cp1261Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG PH: 971-295-6924 EMAIL: jmalbergQj5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: wl729kQatt.com CONTACT: MARTHA MILLER PH: (206) 321-1116 EMAIL: mmillerQj5ip.com PH: (510) 325-3362 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE, LAYOUTS AND PROCEDURES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), LATEST EDITION, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. 2. PRIOR TO ANY ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE. 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LANE CLOSURES INCLUDING SIGNS, CONES, BARRICADES, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHOUT ACTUAL LANE CLOSURES AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CLOSURES. 4. SELECTION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIANS, AND WORKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) - PART VI "TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL", AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION 5. ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS, DISTANCES, AND TAPER LENGTHS MAY BE EXTENDED TO ADJUST FOR REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CURVATURE OF THE ROADWAY AND FOR ACTUAL TRAFFIC SPEEDS IF IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED LIMITS. 6. TAPERS SHALL BE LOCATED TO MAXIMIZE THE VISIBILITY OF THEIR TOTAL LENGTH 7. CONFLICTING OR NON-OPERATING SIGNAL INDICATIONS ON THE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SHALL BE BAGGED OR COVERED. 8. ALL (E) ROAD SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR PLOWABLE PAVEMENT REFLECTORS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE (N) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED, OR RELOCATED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE RESTORED TO MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. 9. CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED LIMIT IF REDUCED FROM POSTED LIMITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD AND WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 10. TAPER LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: L= WS2/60 (40 MPH AND HIGHER) OR L2 = WS (OVER 40 MPH), WHERE W = OFFSET WIDTH (FT), S = TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH). 11. THE SPACING BETWEEN CONES, TUBULAR MARKERS, VERTICAL PANELS, DRUMS, AND BARRICADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED A DISTANCE IN FEET EQUAL TO 1.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TAPER CHANNELIZATION, AND A DISTANCE IF FEET EQUAL TO 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TANGENT CHANNELIZATION. 12. WHERE DICTATED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND WORKER CROSSING LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING HIGHWAY JURISDICTION AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "FLAGMEN" OR POLICE SUPERVISION, IF REQUIRED. 14. ALL EXCAVATED AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND PLACED ON A MINIMUM 6H:1 V SLOPE WITHIN THE CLEAR ZONE ARE TO BE EITHER BACKFILLED OR PRECAST CONCRETE CURB BARRIER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SET TEMPORARILY IN PLACE TO SHIELD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 15. CONES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR DRUMS AND INSTALLED UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION PROVIDED THEY COMPLY WITH MUTCD. 16. THERE SHALL BE NO WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER VEHICLES IN THE BUFFER SPACE OR THE ROLL AHEAD SPACE. 17. DRIVEWAYS AND/OR SIDE STREETS ENTERING THE ROADWAY AFTER THE FIRST ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE ROAD WORK AHEAD SIGN AS A MINIMUM. 18. WHEN CHANNELIZATION DEVICES HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF LEADING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OUT OF THE INTENDED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SPACE, THE CHANNELIZATION DEVICES SHOULD BE EXTENDED A DISTANCE IN FEET OF 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE TRANSITION AREA. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 LOCATION MAP Kohl's Q `jap i;aparlireot store N Cloverleaf Loop N Ciaverleaf Lao, r Original Roadhouse Grill IM q takeoui Delivxry w rj yQ a d 'o V U Oakdale Ave o � a H u Mattress Firm oandale Ake w x EuOene Gateway Mall o Del yen oakdxie Ave Oakdale Ave PChipotle Mexican Grill v McKenzie A McKenzie Meadow TakeaA•nahvery Ohch Apartments Menchie's Frozen Yogurt ;Ahi capsTakeoui• DeliveryWORK n Sports V$ ,, Panera Bread k ROOM Shoes � �Takroui � Delivery Shoe stare m K s Buffalo Wild Wings i?� "@` Spring Valle 9 p g Y Tat • Del iverp keou/� Assisted Living Y Chalet NORTH The Pointe Aiyara Thai eout Gale �, O Tak• Delivery PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 LANS PREPARED BY: r* INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2727 GATEWAY ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Number: Rev: T1 0 1 of 3 SIGN SPACING AND BUFFER LENGTHS I I I I i FIELD FIT PREPARED FOR: (LENGTHS IN FEET) (OTTCH-v201 1) ---LL WORK - AHEAD SIDEWALK D W ® AIM NORTH 16331 NE 72ND WAY SIDEWALK REDMOND WA 96052 I SPEED OAKDALE AVE 25 PLANS PREPARED BY: 151NFRASTRUCTURE I I 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 WORK HOURS: J5 PROJECT ID: P-052179 Of 9AM-5PM M -F I- I -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT w LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING I THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF m COMMUNICATION WITH THEM TAKEN FROM OTTCH-v2011 DIAGRAM 500 N 5 • O RIGHT LANE • CLOSED a SPEED LIMIT 35 ' ?+ I I Q I Sheet Title: N N rn N V AIK E) VEHICULAR TRAFFIC • CONTROL PLAN TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND ' o' ROAD WORK AHEAD LANE 100• Address: INDICATOR SPEED I IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. LIMIT ROAD SPEED I 40 � 2727 GATEWAY ST. I I SPRINGFIELD, OR 00000 PCMS 97477 MALL ENTRANCE 0 ® BARRIER ry0 RIGHT LANE CLOSED WORK AREA AHEAD I I w 0 TTRAFFIC SIGNAL I a I ON w I ROADWAY TRAFFIC VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN w I w a C WORK O K CONTROL N � Sheet Number: RevD]f3 SIGN 30'-0" 0 30'-0" I I �ROAD RK 18' 6' HEAD T TRAFFIC SIGN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" I I TC 1 POSTED SPEED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS "BUFFER" LENGTH A g C 20 100 100 100 so 25 75 30 100 35 350 350 350 125 40 150 45 500 500 500 700 180 50 210 ss zso 60 700 700 285 bs 325 70 365 NOTE: MAINTAIN S PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AT ALL TIMES & PROVIDE FLAGGERS TO ASSIST PEDESTRIANS THROUGH THEW OR KAREA DURING ALL WORK HOURS. WORK HOURS: 9AM-5PM M -F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND LANE INDICATOR 40 ROAD SPEED ® BARRIER I ME mTRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFFIC WORK CONTROL AHEAD SIGN T TRAFFIC SIGN PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN 30'-0" 0 30'-0" SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SP® 11MIT 35 OAKDALE AVE 25 PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN rAddress IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2727 GATEWAY ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Number: Rev: TC2 0 3 of 3 Sabre Industries - INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 33'-1" Smart Stack (38'-1" Overall Height AGL) Site: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019, OR Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 27 May 28, 2021 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 1 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 3-8 Foundation Calculations........................................................................ 9-14 61633PE OREGON J. lo. nc+ot` 0'i"' ;O6/3D/2022 S � a$ i9 -l Digitally Signed By Keith 'Intlall DN: o=NS, st=Texas, =Alvarado, a -SABRE INDUSTRIES, INC., m=KeAh Tindall, email- iindalSsabreindustri es.wm te: 2021.0.5.28 12:59:28 Designed Appurtenanw Loading III ., Eh— —mr.) en(.a) .E.IN Evs/IEan2m ED DE r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR LL Anchor Bolt Dimensions 071 16M OM ydy pp Fsy. 52E/N2+ IVF P.q.a�. IE IL,,rt 11 ED s$J,3a�S3a Designed Appurtenanw Loading Design Criteria -ANSUTIF.-222 [ Lead Stated an, Int, III ., Eh— —mr.) en(.a) .E.IN Evs/IEan2m ED DE r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR Anchor Bolt Dimensions 071 16M OM 01 warn Fsy. 52E/N2+ IVF P.q.a�. IE IL,,rt 11 ED (1) DPR20I ID III Design Criteria -ANSUTIF.-222 [ Lead Stated an, Int, III ., Eh— —mr.) en(.a) .E.IN Evs/IEan2m VEEW r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR Anchor Bolt Dimensions 071 16M Load Case Re0naone Fe+nbMn <LLLPba Eh— —mr.) en(.a) .E.IN Evs/IEan2m VEEW r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR Anchor Bolt Dimensions 071 16M OM 01 warn Fsy. 52E/N2+ IVF P.q.a�. Notes 1) Antenre Feed Lt. Run Inside Pole 2) All dimensions are atove ground level, unMss othearwisa specified. 3) Weighs, shown are estimates. FinalwalgMs mayvar, d) Tax®r Rating: 16.3% 5) TMs taxer design and, If applicable, tVe foundatbn design(s) shown on tVa following pagals) also meat or eviceed tba regulremants of tba 2019 Oregon stmctural specially Cade. $EyY IMk u�86Me Base Plate Dimensions 1&YlE}EPG CpLY) p owe VEEW r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR Anchor Bolt Dimensions --I'$m&t Sack -RtoRMe E.ipn eV'. warn Fsy. 52E/N2+ IVF P.q.a�. Notes 1) Antenre Feed Lt. Run Inside Pole 2) All dimensions are atove ground level, unMss othearwisa specified. 3) Weighs, shown are estimates. FinalwalgMs mayvar, d) Tax®r Rating: 16.3% 5) TMs taxer design and, If applicable, tVe foundatbn design(s) shown on tVa following pagals) also meat or eviceed tba regulremants of tba 2019 Oregon stmctural specially Cade. $EyY IMk u�86Me 1&YlE}EPG CpLY) p owe Sabre InYJ Vrjl+ rlErj eu Ytl r JS INFRASTRUCNRE PA RTNER$ r ay, IP511MMY INNOVAIIOX DELIVERED Nd CAAN RWGR EUG� U19,GR --I'$m&t Sack -RtoRMe eV'. RE R.R.�sw 52E/N2+ IVF Page Sabre Industries" I N NDVFTION DELIVERED No.: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 27 Date: 05/28/21 By: KJT Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: CRAN RWOR EUG03 019, OR 33.08' Smart Stack of pier, then 12" C/C Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 4,500 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. Grade is. 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. 111111 r- —I =_ 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete �— I —I I cover. I I I 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered — —i I 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- (8) 2" Conduits & I 222-H-2017. (2) 3/4" ConduitsL-----j 4 7 I I m I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be ELEVATION VIEW positioned as closely as possible to the (2.12 Cu. Yds.) bottom of the anchor bolts. (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) Rebar Schedule for Pier (12) #5 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Iniorni contained herein Ethe sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes atrade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690- Fax 712.279.0814 Page (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaK:(416)736-4372 web: wnw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: $ab re Towers and Poles n: 28 may 2021 at: 12:50:48 ----------------------- 33.08' Pipe vole / CRAN_NWOR_EU603_019, OR * All pole diameters shown on the following pages are Across corners. See profile Jrawi ng for widths Across flats. PILE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCE$ SPLICE ...OVERLAP... w/t NAME SIDE DI -NESS **M♦*Mn TYPE LENGTH RATIO ft in in kip ft -kip ft 33.0 ........................................... 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 A 0 42.7 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 0.0 ........................................... PILE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLT$ AT BASE OF SECTION............ GLC NAME ELEV NUMBER TYPE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE $HEAR PLANE ELEV ft in Rai ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 PILE SECTIONS SECTION NO.Of LENGTH OUT$IDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGE.WELD NAME $IDE$ NOT TOP HAD PHIAL NOT TOP ..GROUP.ID.. ID NOT TOP ft in in in A 0 33.00 16.00 16.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 * - Diameter Of circunscribeE circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF TYPE NO OF HNIENT HEIGHT WIDTI .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE NO ELEM. WEB RANGE .PROJECTION. .W OF ORIENT AREA & deg in in in in deg PC 1 1 0.0 16.00 0.38 0.375 0.375 0.00 0.0 & - with respect t0 Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES -------------- MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL TYPE NO. MODULUS WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT Rai pcf Rai ksi /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001170 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full COADING CONDITION A -- 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOAD$ ON MULE LOAD ELEV APPLY..LOAD..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... MOMENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ NOR. DOWN VERTICAL TOHSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0781 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 Page 3 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0327 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0238 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0116 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2458 0.2700 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0164 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0133 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 U 33.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0125 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 U 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 LMUIHG COHUITTOH m __________ 91 mph wind with no ice. wine Azimuth: oe LOAD ELEV APVLr_LOAU..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... MOMENTS ..... TPE ...... RADIUS AZI AZI HORTZ DOS:N VERTICAL TORSRAL ft ft 33.0 kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0279 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0781 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0105 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0246 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0198 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0087 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2458 0.2025 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0918 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0100 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0225 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 33.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0125 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 Fax:(416)736-4372 web:- g.ymast.c. Processed under license at: Sabre Towers Rod axles on: 28 may 2021 at: 12:50:48 33.08' Pipe vole / CRAR_RWDR_EU603_019, OR MAXIMUM PQE DEFOIAWTIOR$ CALCULATED(w.r.t. wintl direction) MAST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... .........ROTATIONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... IXYNN ........ TILT .......... .$T ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 33.0 0.040 0.000 0.000 0. 10C 0.000 0.000 ..................................................................66 24.7 0.030 0.000 0.000 6. 1k 0.000 0.000 16.5 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.08C 0.000 0.000 Page 4 .................................................................. 66 8.2 0.06 0.60 0.000 O.OSC 0.60 0.000 0.0 0.00A 0.6A O.00A 0.6A 0.6A O.00A ........................................ . .. . .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCUTATED(W.r.t. to Mntl direction) MAST VIAL SHEAR.W.r.Lwxx U.UIR MUMERI.W.r.Lwxx U.UIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 33.0...................................................................... 0.39 A 0.08 0 0.00 R -0.20 U 0.00 0 0.00 w 1.01 A 0.18 D 0.00 R -1.27 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 24.7...................................................................... 1.01 C 0.18 0 0.00 0 -1.27 K 0.00 R 0.00 X 2.05 C 0.52 0 0.00 0 -5.07 C 0.00 0 0.00 U 16.5...................................................................... 2.05 I 0.52 K 0.00 0 -5.07 C 0.00 0 0.00 0 2.77 I 0.62 K 0.00 0 -9.81 C 0.00 0 0.00 0 8.2...................................................................... 2.77 I 0.62 0 0.00 0 -9.81 C 0.00 0 0.00 0 3.46 I 0.71 0 0.00 0 -15.30 C 0.00 0 0.00 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 3.46 I -0.71 0 0.00 0 15.30 C 0.00 0 0.00 0 CEMPLIANCE WILD 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL RENDING SHEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISPIEU U/t(W/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft 33.00...................................................................... O.00A O.00u O.00D O.00K rES 42.67A 400.0 O.00A O.Ola O.00D 0.01A vES 42.67A 400.0 24.75...................................................................... 0.000 O.M 0.000 0.01K YES 42.67A 400.0 0.000 0.02C 0.000 0.02C vES 42.67A 400.0 16.50...................................................................... O.00I 0.02C O.00K 0.02C YES 42.67A 400.0 O.00I 0.04C O.00K 0.05C YES 42.67A 400.0 8.25...................................................................... O.00I 0.04C 0.000 0.05C YES 42.67A 46.0 O.OlI 0.06c 0.000 0.07C vES 42.67A 400.0 0.00...................................................................... MAXIMUM LMUS ONTO FOUNUATIOH(W.r.t. Mntl direction) IXMH SHEAR.W.r.t.WIHO.MR MO EHT.W.r.t.WIHO.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 3.46 0.71 0.00 -15.30 0.00 0.00 T 0 0 C 0 0 (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 Eax:(416)736-4372 web:www.guymastcoa Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 28 may 2021 at: 12:50:58 33.08' Pipe POIR / CRAN_RY R_EUG03_019, OR .......................... Service Load Condition .......................... ............................................................................... * Only 1 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A Page 5 60 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: Oa LO4o$ ON BOLE LOAD ELEV APELY..LOAO..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... ElOmENTS..... IE RADIO$ AZI AZI HORTZ DOWN VERTICAL TORSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0300 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.397 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0117 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0273 0.0000 0.0000 C 34.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0220 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0198 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0097 0.0000 0.0000 C 24.167 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0956 0.2250 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1020 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 33.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0049 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0047 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 MA IMOM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED(W.LL Wind direction) .$I ...... DEFLECTIONS (ft) ........ .........ROTATION$ (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOWN ........ TILT .......... PNI$T ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 33.0 0.021 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 O.00L ............................................64...........6........6... 20.7 O.OII 0.000 O.00x O.00x 0.000 O.00L 16.5 0.011 0.000 0.001 0.031 0.000 O.00L ............................................6............6........66.. 8.2 O.00x 0.000 O.00x 0.02x 0.000 O.00L 0.0 0.0M 0.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MA IMUM POLE FORCES CALCUTATED(w.r.t. to wintl direction) MST VIAL $HEAR.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR NTMENT.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 33.0...................................................................... 0.33 C 0.03 L 0.00 F -0.08 D 0.00 L 0.00 L 0.60 C 0.07 L 0.00 F -0.50 L 0.00 F 0.00 F 24.7...................................................................... 0.80 N 0.07 E 0.00 1 -0.50 D 0.00 F 0.00 C 1.71 N 0.21 C 0.00 1 -1.98 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 16.5...................................................................... 1.71 H 0.21 1 0.00 C -1.98 H 0.00 1 0.00 x 2.31 H 0.25 1 0.00 C -3.86 1 0.00 L 0.00 L 8.2...................................................................... 2.31 N 0.25 C 0.00 C -3.86 1 0.00 L 0.00 L 2.88 N 0.28 C 0.00 C -6.05 1 0.00 C 0.00 L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.88 a -0.28 C 0.00 C 6.05 1 0.00 C 0.00 L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ---------------------- ELEV A%IAL BENDING $HEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(w/t) M4% TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft Page 6 33.00 ...................................................................... 0.000 O.00D O.00L O.00D vES 42.67A A00.0 0.000 O.00L O.00L O.00L vES 42.67A A00.0 20.75 ...................................................................... 0.00R O.00D 0.00E O.00D vs 42.67A A00.0 O.00R 0.011 0.000 0.011 v S 42.67A A00.0 16.50 ...................................................................... O.00H 0.01H 0.001 0.01H r 42.67A A00.0 O.00H 0.021 0.001 0.021 r 42.67A A00.0 8.25 ...................................................................... O.00R 0.021 0.000 0.021 v$ 42.67A A00.0 O.00R 0.031 0.000 0.031 vs 42.67A A00.0 0.00 ...................................................................... Ne XIMU1 LOA)S ONTO FOUNDn ON(w.r.t. wind direction) .N SHEA2.W.r.t.WIHU.UI2 NKXEHT.W.r.t.WIHU.UI2 TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.88 0.28 0.00 -6.05 0.00 0.00 e C C I C L Page 7 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DE LI VE 1E1) SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 27 Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_019, OR Date: 5/28/2021 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSVTIA 222-H Pole Data Diameter: 16.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 'e' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Base Plate Results Plate Data Anchor Rod Results Moment, Mu: 15.3 ft -kips Allowable m'Fy: Axial, Pu: 3.46 kips Maximum Put: Shear, Vu: 0.71 kips U*Rnt: Eff. Width: 11.15 in Vu: Anchor Rod Data (Pv'Rnv: Tension Interaction Ratio: Quantity: 4 (multiple of 4) Maximum Puc: Diameter: 1 in q)c'Rnc: Rod Material: F1554 Vu: Strength (Fu): 125 ksi q)c'Rnvc: Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Compression Interaction Ratio: BC Diam. (in): 19.5 BC Override: 19.5 Maximum Interaction Ratio: Base Plate Results Plate Data Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 8.77 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.18 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.02 10.28 Kips 74.22 Kips 0.18 Kips 33.40 Kips 0.14 13.9% Pass 6.5 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 14.3% Pass Page 6 Base Plate (Mu/Z): Width (in): 19.5 Width Override: 19.5 Allowable m'Fy: Thickness: 1 in Base Plate Interaction Ratio: Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 11.15 in Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 8.77 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.18 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.02 10.28 Kips 74.22 Kips 0.18 Kips 33.40 Kips 0.14 13.9% Pass 6.5 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 14.3% Pass Page 6 LPile for windows, version 2019-U.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled Shafts Subjected to Lateral Loading Using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, inc. All Nights Reserved This copy of CPI Ie is being used by: Keith LIndall Sabre Towers and Poles Serial Number of Security Device: 227885948 This copy of LN le is licensed for exclusive use by: Sabre Communications Corporation Use of this program by any entity other than Sabre Communications Corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Piles used for Analysis Path to file locations: \Program Piles (x86)\Ensoft\Cpile2019\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22.lplld Name of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. p2.lp1lo Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22.1pllp Name of runtime message file - 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22.1pllr Date and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: may 28, 2021 rime: 12:55:00 Problem Title Site CRAN_Rw EUG03 019, ON Tourer 33.08' Smart Stack Prepared for J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Job Number 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22 Engineer KJT Program Options and Settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering Units used for Data input and Computations: - US Customary System Units (sounds, feet, inches) Analysis Control Options: - maximum number of iterations allowed = 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence = 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection = 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments = 100 LoadingType and Number of Cycles of Loading: - Static loading specified - use of p -y modification factors for p -y curves not selected - Analysis uses layer,. nn correction (method of Georgiadis) - xo tlI st ri butetl lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 9 input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at thepile tip not selectetl - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - Com utation of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected - Pus -over analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Neport only summary tables of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maximum shear force in output report file. - NO i otureport ycurves oe becomputedand reported for user-specified depths Pile Structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 8.083 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. os•thlethehemle1eimmlutfluel�iaetTwehepol ng oftPi. using summary ofvaa oedi meter dptol lows. Depth Below Pile Point Pile Head Di meter No. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 8.083 36.0000 Input Structural Properties for Pile Sections: Pile Section No. 1: Section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or Cion pile Length of section = 8.083333 ft Shaft Diameter =36.000000 in Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lbs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grountl Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground Slope Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 raans Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 radians Soil and Nock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers top of layer = 1.083333 Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 0.083333 Effective unit weight at top f[ Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 pcf f[ Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer =110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 14.400000 = 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer = 14.400000 pa epsilon -60 at top of layer = 0.100000 ep511on-60 at bottom of layer epsilon -60 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer = 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 1000.000000 P5 undrained cohesion at bottom of layer = 1000.000000 psf epsilon -60 at top of layer = 0.010000 ep511on-60 at bottom of layer = 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 12.000 ft below the pile tip) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of input Soil Properties Page 10 Layer Soil Type Layer effective Undrained ESO Layer Name De th unit wt. Cohesion or Nun. (P -y Curve Type) ft pcf psf kre10. 1 Soft 0.08333 10000 14.4000 0.10000 1 Clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff Clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 v = 280.000000 lbs m = w/o Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity Conditions from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Number of loads specified = 2 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Load Load Condition Condition Axial Thrust Compute Top y Nun Analysis 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in No. Type 1 2 Force, lbs vs. Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v =946.666667 lbs m = 244800. in -lbs 4613. No Yes 2 1 v = 280.000000 lbs m = 72WO. in -lbs 2880. No Yes v = shear force applied normal to pile axis m= bending moment applied to pile head y = lateral deflection normal to pile axis S = rotational sti relative sto plied to pile header angle values of to lengthsp� specified shear loading(LosTypes 1, 2, Rod 3). only for load types with Thrust force is assumed to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. Computations of Nominal moment Capacity and Nonlinear ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Di mansions and Properties of Drilled Shaft (Bored Pile): Len nth of Section 8.083333 ft Shaft Diameter 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Number of Beinforcin9 ears 12 bars Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bars = 60000. psi modulus of elasticity of Reinforcing Bars = 29000000. psi Gross Area of Shaft = 1018. in. Total Area of Beinforcin Steel = 5.301438 sq. in. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement = 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing = 6.626343 in maximum Concrete Aggregate Size =0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate Size =8.84 Offset of Center of Rebar Cage from Center of Pile = 0.0000 in Axial Structural Capacities: ---------------------------- Rom. Axial Structural Capacity = 0.85 Fc Ac 4 FY As = 4191.184 kips Tensile Load for Cracking of Concrete =-463.561 kips Nominal Axial Tensile Capacity = -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions Used in Computations: Bar Bar Man. Bar Area X Y Number inches sq. i . n_- inches inches ---------- ------ --- --- -- 1 0.750000 0.441786 ---------- 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 7.125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 14.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 12.340862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 7.125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -7.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -14.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -12.340862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -7.125000 Page 11 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by Lpile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero = 6.626 inches between bars 7 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate size = 8.84 Concrete properties: -------------------- Compressive Strength Of Concrete= 4500. psi modulus Of elasticity Of Concrete = 3823676. psi modulus Of Rupture of Concrete =-503.115295 psi Compression Strain at peak Stress = 0.002001 Tensile Strain at Fracture of Concrete =-0.0001152 maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.750000 in Number Of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from pile -head Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.880 2 4.613 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Results for Nominal moment Capacity for Section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mom. Cap. max. Co'. No. kipsin-kip Strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.880 4851.777 0.00300000 2 4.613 4875.647 0.00300000 Note that thevalues of moment ca acity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate moment capacity according to ACI 318, Section 9.3.2.2 Or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followinnn table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stiffnesses computed for cormon resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Nesi St. Nominal ult. (Fac) int. (Fac) Rend. Stiff. Load Factor moment Cap Ax. Thrust moment Cap at It mom NO. for momentin-kips kipsin-kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 1 0.65 4852. 1.872000 3154. 41153288. 2 0.65 4876. 2.998667 3169. 41397415. 1 0.75 4852. 2.016000 3639. 39705492. 2 0.75 4876. 3.229333 3657. 39963790. 1 0.90 4852. 2.160000 4367. 26372794. 2 0.90 4876. 3.460000 4388. 26519280. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Layering Correction equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Layers TOP Of equivalent Layyer TOP Depth Same Layer Layer is FO F1 Layer Be OW eAID. Type As Rock or integral integral NO. pile Head Grnd Surf Layer is Be]. for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer ml equals the sum Of the M and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layering correction equivalent depths are computed only for soil ty es with both shallow -depth and deep -depth expressions for peak latera R load transfer. These soil types are soft and stiff clays, on -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. Summary of pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of pile -head Loading Conditions: Page 12 Load Type L Load 1 =$hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Not. Stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians LORD Load Load exi al vile -head Vile -head max $hear Max Moment Case Type vile -head Type Rile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n Rile n vile NO. y Load 1 y Load 2 lbs inches radians lbs - n -lbs ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- —------- 1 v, lb 946.6667 M, in -lb 244800. 4613. 0.03255 -5.46E-04 -6019. 259913. 2 v, lb 280.0000 M, in -lb 72600. 2880. DAMS -2.52E-05 -1442. 76806. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.0325473850 inches maximum pile -head rotation = -0.0005464731 radians = -0.031311 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 13 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 15.30 Shear (k) 1 0.71 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 3 0.083333 6 250.00 21.63 710 500.00 3 1.11=(2.34P)/(S Ib) 5.69=0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h /A Page 14