Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/12/2021ranch ENGINEERING= May 12, 2021 Andy Limbird Development and Public Works City of Springfield 225 5� St Springfield OR 97477 RE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SHOPPES AT GATEWAY Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 21-035 Dear Andy, Per the comments made at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, this revised application material is provided for the review submittal of the Tentative Subdivision for Shoppes at Gateway. The following is a description of the changes made per the Pre -Submittal Meeting comments: • Check with Amy Chinitz at SUB regarding any effect on DWP Permits. Per email communication with Amy on April 3011, the subdivision will not affect or require new or revised DWP Permits. • The city will need the plat or document(s) associated with the plat to specify (a) the entity responsible for stormwater vegetative treatment, (b) private utilities and providing for hydrant usage rights and emergency vehicle access. The Written Statement has been updated to discuss how the design team proposes to address this. • Coordinate with city staff to determine what existing internal boundary lines need to be included on the Existing Conditions Sheet. Per email communication with yourself on April 30", it was determined that the internal deed boundaries need to be shown. These have been added to the Existing Conditions Sheet. • Before final plat approval the stormwater facilities along I5 need to comply with the 2014 agreement. The Written Statement has been updated to discuss how the design team proposes to address this. • Provide a third sheet that shows just the buildings, lot lines and easements. The requested third sheet has been added to the plan set. EOG ENE -SPRINGFIELD ALBANY 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.746.0637 1 w .branchengineenng.mm Tentative Subdivision Applkation Shoppes at Gateway May 12, 2021 Please reach out if any questions arise during the review process. Sincerely, Renee Clough Ogtllysigned by Renee Clough -0T00' Renee Clough, PIS, PE, AICP Principal Branch Engineering Inc. Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 2 .172 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ PApplication Type (Applicant: check ne artition Tentative Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: I❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: Q Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Bo Cromelin Phone: 310-857-4291 Company: BRFI Gateway LLC Fax: Address: 11611 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 900, Los Angeles, CA 90049 Applicant's Re .: Andrew Strout Phone: 541-746-0637 Company: Branch Engineering Fax: Address: 310 5th Street, Springfield OR, 97477 Property Owner: Bo Cromelin Phone: 310-857-4291 company: BRFI Gateway LLC I Fax: Address: 11611 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 900, Los Angeles, CA 90049 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-22 1 TAX LOT NOS :2109, 22003 22183 22193 2300 Property Address: 3000 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Size of Property: 56.54 Acres 0 Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Subdivision: The Shoppes at Gateway DeSCf IPtIOn Of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro osal: Subdivision based on lease boundaries Existing use: 3000 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 # of Lots/Parcels: 22 reaeoposed =11s densf parcels/ N/A # cmniell unies Si natures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next aaqe. complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre -Submittal The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Signature I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, 1 affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the Information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: s' (Z^21, Signature Print 30 Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. x❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. x❑ Land Division Tentative Application Form ❑x Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ® Copy of the Deed ® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑x Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. n/a ❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. x❑ Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Wa❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: x❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. x❑ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 ❑x Vicinity Map ❑x The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. ❑x The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑x The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑x The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department x❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings ❑x Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor ❑x City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division x❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division ❑x Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ❑x Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination x❑ Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. ❑x Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities ❑x Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways ❑x Location of existing and proposed transit facilities x❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails ❑x Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10 ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points n/a ❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated n/a ❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer n/a❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ❑x Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ❑x Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns ® The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained n/a ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) n/a ❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑x Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement n/a ❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 n/a ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW n/a❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present n/a ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district n/a❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 n/a ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property n/a ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review n/a ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 n/a❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 n/a❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer n/a❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX. 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.spdrygfiald­or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Area below this b'sefdled out by Applicant) __— (Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprtngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: (Area below this line /'died outby the City andReturned m the Aaabeand (At a nurumuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlus sheet shall be subnutted or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 ranch ENGINEERING= May 12, 2021 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHOPPES AT GATEWAY Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 21-035 This application is to subdivide the main mall area of the Shoppes at Gateway. The application encompasses Tax Map 17-03-22, Tax Lots 2109, 220Q 2218, 2219 and 2300. this aligns with the lands conveyed as Parcels I, II and III in the current deed (Reception Number 2017-037745). It should be noted that Tax Lots 2305 (Target and associated parking) and 2307 (Walmart Neighborhood Market, Big 5 and their related parking) are not included in this subdivision. Tax Lot 2305 is the lands conveyed as Parcel IV of the current deed and Tax Lot 2307 is the lands conveyed to separate ownership by the deed recorded as Reel 1620R as Instrument 9011882. The site has been developed as a mall since the early 1990's and underwent a significant renovation in 2013-2015. The renovation included the conversion of enclosed inline mall space to new exterior -facing junior anchor boxes and the addition of new multi -tenant outparcel buildings along Gateway Street. In total, the renovation produced six new exterior junior anchor spaces and four new multi -tenant outparcel buildings and attracted new tenancy, including Ross, Marshalls, Ashley's Furniture, Hobby Lobby, Panera Bread, Chipotle and Firehouse Subs. The previous Site Plan Review approvals (most recently TYP213-00017 and TYP114-00018) control the land use aspects of the site as a whole. It is expected and intended that this will continue after the subdivision process. The application proposes an internal subdivision of the property with no associated site modifications. Therefore, things such as parking, landscaping, lot coverage and building orientation and setbacks are viewed by this subdivision from an overall site perspective rather than an individual lot perspective. This approach of applying the code criteria to the site as a whole, rather than individual lots, is already occurring between the subdivision lands and Tax Lot 2307 through the Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement (COREA or REA) and its amendments. Copies of these documents are included in this submittal.. In addition to ensuring the site functions as a cohesive whole, the REA and its amendments create easement rights for things such as private utilities and emergency vehicle access and maintenance responsibilities for things like vegetative stormwater treatment facilities. The access rights in the REA fulfill the requirements of Footnote 1 to SDC 3.2-315. On the fact of the plat, the REA and its amendments will be cited as CC&Rs applicable to all the lot in the plat. E6G ENE -SPRINGFIELD ALBANY 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.746.0637 1 w .branchengineenng.mm Project D wnpnon May 12, 2021 The main purposes of the subdivision are to increase the marketability and investment potential for the property and increase operation efficiency by conforming the property's lots with the current site plan. The REA and its amendments ensures all lots will still need to function as part of the overall whole rather than discrete entities. The intent is that, even if lots transfer to separate ownership, the site will continue to function as an integrated whole from the perspectives of both site design and the everyday user. All portions of the site are currently fully served with utilities. Therefore, no utility construction is proposed with, or as a result of, this subdivision. Conversations with SUB Water and Electric are currently underway to address an interest expressed by both to replace their current strip easements with a new easement that is more blanket in nature. These conversations will be resolved prior to recording the plat. Conversations with city Public Works staff are also currently underway to ensure the site complies with previous agreements and conditions regarding maintenance of the vegetative stormwater management facilities. Lots 3-8, 10 and 18 have lines that cross through the main mall structure. For lots with walls that don't meet the necessary fire rating for the occupancy on each side of the wall, a deed restriction will be recorded concurrent with the plat requiring these lots to remain in common ownership until such time as evidence is provided to the city that the relevant walls have adequate fire rating. Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 2 42