HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 5/4/2021Pre -Submittal Meeting
Development and Public Works Department
Reem 61
PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE:
Friday, May 14, 2021
10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
DPW /^....L......nee Room 616
1. Pre -Submittal (Partition Tentative) #811 -21 -000102 -PRE 811-21-000104-PROJ Chad Wilson
Assessor's Map: 17-02-33-42 TL: 300 & 700
Address: 5524 B Street
Existing Use: single family residence
Applicant has submitted for 3 -lot partition
Planner: Drew Larson
Meeting: Friday, May 14, 202110:00 — 11:00 via MS Teams
VICINITY MAP
811 -21 -000102 -PRE Pre -Submittal Meeting
17-02-33-42 TL 300 & 700
5524 B Street
Chad Wilson
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
SPNINGFIE�
1
Application
r❑
Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: x❑ Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal:
Partition Tentative Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal: ❑
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Applicant Name: Chad Wilson Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address: PO Box 5143. Eugene, OR 97405
Applicant's Rep.: Curtis Thomas
Phone'S41-302-9830
Company: Metro Planning, Inc.
Fax'
Address: 846 A St. Springfield, OR. 97477
Property Owner:
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-42
TAX LOT NOS :
00300 & 00700
Property Address: 5524 B Street. Springfield, OR. 97478
Size of Property: 17,843 Acres ❑ S uare Feet X❑
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
D05CrIPtlon of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro oral: A three lot partition.
Existing Use: Single-family home.
3
!! of Lots/Parcels:
Total acreage of parcels/ 3
allowable density;
Proposed # N/A
Dwell unies
Signatures: Please si nand rint our name and date in thea
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.,
Associated Applications:
ro riate box on the next a e.
complete this section)
Signs:
n
Pre -Sub Case No.: tid� 1_), I' I Z/ Date:S Z
Reviewed b • MI���
Case No.: Date:
Reviewed b :
Application Fee:: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $ �)O•��
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD
225 FIFTH STREET
�O&EGON SPRINGFIELD OR 97477
PHONE541.725.3753
FAX' 541,726 1021
www. springfield-or go v
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
below this fine filled out by Applicant) — ------
(Please return to Clation McEachern @ Ciry ofSpringneld Development and Public Works, Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
email.emceachern@springfield-or.gov
Project Name:
Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #:
Date:
Land Use(s):
Phone #:
Project Size (Acres):
Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area:
Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessors map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
----------- (Area below this fine filled out b r theClt d Re[ d m theApplicant) -------------
(At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back oJ'this sheet shall be submitted
or an a licatiion to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may beneeessar .)
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): Mote UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study—(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfield-o ,gov, FAX: (541) 735-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
* Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed far an
application to be complete,for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this lis/ shouldnol be used in lieu orate Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval, Additional site spec fic information may be required Note. Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has been
signed in the space provided below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality-DSPM Cha pter3
Req'd N/A
❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the N13R impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
❑ Where required, vegetative stonnwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2A.1).
❑ ❑ If a stonnwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual.
❑ ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
❑ ❑ Al1. building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
U U Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
❑ F-1 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
❑ F Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of 25 -year storm event.
❑ E The time of concentration (Te) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
U
U
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
❑
F
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑
0
Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
❑
F-1
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load
without failure of the pipe structure.
Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well.
U U Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑ 7 Private Stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEC. Refer to
the website: hftp:/i.w.dea.state.or.us/wa/uio/uichtm for ma to information.
❑ ❑ Detention ponds shall he designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*This farm shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwaler study.
• IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW.IND SICN!
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwaler study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
Written Statement —Tentative Partition
Background
The applicant owns two adjacent parcels: 17-02-33-92-00700 and 17-02-33-42-00300. The applicant is proposing to
partition the two parcels as a three -lot partition. Currently, there is a single-family home on the property. No
development is proposed with this application except for the platting of two lots into three.
Density:
TL 700 is 0.23 acres and TL 300 is 0.18 acres for a total acreage of 0.41 acres. Both Tax Lots are zoned Low Density
Residential which allows for 6 to 14 dwellings per acre. The current density is 4.9 dwelling units per acre and the
tentative partition proposes 7.3 dwelling units per acre.
In this written statement SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan - General, SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal
Requirements and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria are addressed to demonstrate that this application clearly
meets all of the SDC requirements and criteria.
SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General
Any residential /and division shall conform to Me fol/owing standards:
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shal/conform to the minimum standards ofthis Code. When lots/parcels are more than
double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Diredorsha//require that these lots/pares be
arranged:
1. To allow re -division; and
2. To a//ow for Me extension ofstreets to serve future lots/parcels.
3 Placement ofstructures on Me larger lowparcels shall be subject to approva/by the Director upon a
determination that the potential maximum densityofthe largerlot/parce/is not impaired. In order to make
this determination, Me Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 512120E
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential). The proposed parcels conform to
the minimum development standards required by SDC as stated below. This standard has been met.
e Double frontage lots/parreIs shall beavoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development fmm
collector and arteria/streets or to overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: The proposed tentative partition will not result in the creation of double frontage parcels; this standard
does not apply.
C Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with Me standards specified in Sectors 32-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of
multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction ofneressary utilites to serve all approved panhand/e lots/party/s
shall =ur prior to recording the Plat
Response: All of the lots will have a driveway access via a shared driveway. The two panhandle lots will have a
shared access easement of 26' wide, or 13' each. As a condition of approval for this tentative partition, construction
of necessary utilities will occur prior to recording the Plat.
D, elocklengM forlocalsbeets is as specified in 5ecton 4.2-115
Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The proposed tentative
partition utilizes an existing street network.
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are
being fulfilled. EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public
agency, the Director, during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be
addressed as part of a future development application.
Written Statement for Chad Wilwn
A. General Requirements
1. The Tentative Plan, Including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed
Land Surveyor on standard sheets of18"x24" The services ofand Oregon registered Engineer may also be required
by the Co in order to resolve utility issues(especially stormwatermanagement, street design and transportation
issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues
Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, a licensed Oregon Land Surveyor as
required.
2 The scale ofthe Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount ofdetail and data,
normally 1' = 50; 1' = 100; or S' = 200:
Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 20'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and
the amount of data needing to be shown.
7 A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the plans that are included with this application.
4. The name and address ofthe owner, applicant, ddifferent, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared
the Padition Tentative Plan.
Response: The name and address of the surveyor from EGR and Associates, LLC has prepared the tentative plan and
the engineer, Eric Favreau, will prepare the utility plan is noted on the tentative partition plan.
5 A drawing ofthe boundaries ofthe entire area owned by the partiVioner orsub-divider ofwhich the proposed /and
division is a pad
Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the
partitioner.
6. G'ty boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and anyspeclafservire district boundaries or railroad rightrof-
way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad right-of-ways are adjacent to the subject property.
7 Applinable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and ofproperties within
100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), designated L (low density
residential) in the Metro Plan.
8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either In square feet or acres) ofeach ldtlparcel and the approximate
dimensions ofeach building site, where appiinable, and the top and toe of cut and fl// slopes to sca/e.
Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are clearly labeled on the tentative partition plan drawing.
9. The location, outfine to scale and present use ofall existing.snuctums to remain on the property aRerplatting and
theirrequiredsetbacks from the proposed new property lines.
Response: The existing structures to remain are on the property, including their setbacks, are shown on the tentative
partition plan drawing.
10. The location and size ofexisung and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent
to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power,
gas, telephone, and cable TV Indicate the proposed conneiton points.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 1 2
Written Statement for Chad Wilson
The existing sanitary sewer line, stormwater facilities, and water mains are all shown and labeled on the attached
plan. The public sanitary and stone sewer systems as well as water and electricity are located within the B Street right-
of-way. Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell located on each parcel
as required by the City of Springfield Stormwater Scoping Sheet.
11. The /orations widths andpurpose ofall existing orpmposed easements on and abutting the proposed/and
division, the location of any existing or proposed reserve sides.
Response: There are not any existing or proposed easements on or abutting the proposed land division.
12. The /ecdAme; of all areas to be dedicated or reserved forpubiic use, with the purpose, condition or/imitations of
Me reservations clearly indicated
Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use; thus this requirement is not applicable.
S. A Site Assessment of the Entire Deve/opmentArea. The Site Assessmentshall be prepared byan Oregon
Licensed Landscape Architect or Eng/neerand drawn M scale with existing contours at Ifootiniervaisand percentof
slope thatprecisely maps and delineates the areas describedbelow Proposed modiflcadons to physical features shall
beaeadymoiicated The Dmeacrmay waiveportions of this requirementif there is a finding that the proposed
development wi/l nothave an adverse impact on physica/features or water quality, either on the site oradjacent to
the site. Information requlred foradjacentproperties maybe generai/zed to show the connections to physical
features. A Site Assessmentshell contain the following information.
Response: The enclosed tentative partition plan prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor
identifies all physical features of the subject property as required.
1. The name, location, dlmensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water
Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQW) Map on file in the DevelopmentServices, Department,
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property; thus this requirement is not applicable.
2. The 100year floodplain and foodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Amendment or letter of Map Revision,
Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated
on FIRM Map Number 41039CI133F dated June 2, 1999; thus this requirement is not applicable.
3. The Time of Travel Zones, as speafiedIn Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on
file in the Development Service Department,
Response: The subject property falls within the 99 year time of travel zone for wellhead protection.
4, Physical features Including, but not limited to significant clusters of bees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the
(WL QW) Map and their riparian areas, wet/ands, and rock outc-oppings,
Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings
within the boundaries of the subject property.
S Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified /n the Solis Survey of Lane County, and
The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the subject
property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Coburg -Urban land complex (32), with a depth to water table of
more than BO inches.
6 Natural resource protection areas as specified In Section 4.3-117.
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property; thus this requirement is
not applicable.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 1 3
Written Statement for Chad Wilson
CA Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at Ifootinterva/s and percent of slope
thatpreciselymaps and addresses the information described below In areas wherethe percent ofslope is 10
percent or more contours maybe shown at 5foot Intervals. 7771s plan shall show the stormwater management
system for the entre de✓elopmentarea. Unless exemptby the Public Works Director, the Cltyshall require thatan
Oregon licensed O'vil Engmeerprepare the plan. Where plants are pmposedas part ofthe stormwatermanagement
system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required The plan shall include the following
component
1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations,'
2 Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns, -
3 The size and location ofstomiwater managementsystems components, including but not limited to: drain lines,
catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds, stormwater quality measures, and natural dnunage-ways to be
retained,,
4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and mmoursr, and
5 A stomhwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in 5e tnm
4.3-110 shal/be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and documentation shall be
consistent with the engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to a//ow staff to determine if the proposed
stormwater management system wl// accomplish its purposes.
Response: Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell located on each
parcel as required by the City of Springfield Stormwater Scoping Sheet- No outfall to the public stormwater system is
proposed with this partition. Further stormwater management plan details may be provided as a condition of
approval.
D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code
1. The locahons, mndltlon, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutterandsidewalk, AC mat orgraval widths and names
of all existhg steels, alleys, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed land division;
The subject site has frontage on B Street which has eighty-fve (85) feet of paving. B Street does not have a curb,
gutter or sidewalk and is made of gravel.
2. The locations, widths and names ofall proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius
ofcuives andgrades. The relationship of allproposed5treetF to anyprojected steets as shown on the Metro Plan,
including the TmnsPlan, any approved Conceptual Development Plan and the latest version of the Conceptual Local
street Map,
Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject site; thus this requirement is
not applicable.
3 The locations and widths of all existing andpmposedsidewallrs, pedestrian trails and accessways, including the
/oration, size and type ofpiantings and street trees in any required planterStrip,
Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessvays. The applicant can
sign an irrevocable petition to improve the sidewalk.
4. The location ofevstng and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, powerpoles, transformers,
ne/ghborhood mailbox units and s/milarpublic facilities, where applicable,
Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is approximately 90 feet West of the
Southwest corner of the subject property on the North right of way of B Street. There are power poles on the North
side of B street. There are no other public facilities such as traffic control devices, transformers, or neighborhood
mailbox units located adjacent or within the development site.
5 The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable,
The driveway to serve future development will take place in the panhandles of the property. The panhandle driveway
will be shared and will be installed at the time of site development. All panhandle driveway standards will be met per
SDC 3.2-220.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 14
Written Statement for Chad Wilson
6 The location ofexisting and proposed streetlighting: including the type, height and area ofillumination,
As illustrated on the Tentative Partition Plan, there is an existing street on the SW corner of B and 55a Street. No
additional streetlights are proposed.
7 The location ofexisting and proposed transit faa ties, -
Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest
transit facility is located near the intersection of Main Street and 59th Street and served by Lane Transit District (LTD)
Route 11.
8 A copy of Rightrof-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department
of Transportation (ODOT) facility,' and
Response: B Street is a city street and not ODOT facility; thus, this requirement is not applicable.
9. A Trafflc Impact Study prepared by a Tiaffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in Section 42-105A.4.
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-
family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each
of the three parcels proposed generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily
trips necessary for a traffic impact study to be required.
E A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot parcel
size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future DevelopmentP/an that
Response: No phasing plan is being proposed.
F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall
include the following items, where applicable:
1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the e,istrg use of the property,.
Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the
existing use of the subject property.
2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission fmm the property owner is required,.
Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner.
3 A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and
other transportatioyflre access issues within 100 feet of the proposed land division and all exisb'ng Panib'ons or
Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division,
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet.
4. How the Tentative Pian addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district,,
Response: Not applicable.
5 How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable,
The existing use that will remain on proposed Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are single-family residential. Single-family
residential is a permitted use in the LDR (Low Density Residential) zone; thus no Discretionary Use Permit is
required.
6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 519-100,
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 15
Written Statement for Chad Wilson
No individual trees are shown given that they exist in large clusters. Since more than five trees are proposed to be
removed, a tree felling permit is required per SDC 5.19-110 which may be provided as a condition of approval.
7 A Geotechnical Report forslopes of 15percent orgreamrand as specified in Section 33-500, and/ordthe
required Site Assessment in Section 51-21208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or
high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lone County,'
No development is proposed at this time. Drainage plans will be submitted at building permit for individual lots if
development is proposed to be on slopes greater than 15 percent.
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 57100 where a development is proposed outside of the city
limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sower,-
The
ewerThe subject property is located within the city limits; thus no annexation application is necessary.
9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of5tate Lands shall be submitted mncurrently where there is a
wetland on the property,'
There are no existing wetlands on the subject site; thus this requirement is not applicable.
10. Evidence thatany required Federal or -Stahl permit has been appliedfor orapproved shall be submitted
roncumently,
No federal or state permits are required with this partition application; thus this requirement is not applicable.
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time ofinstallation and method
of finanang,•
There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application.
12. Proposed deed restrictions and a deft of Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate,'
No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed; thus this requirement is not applicable.
13 LlusterSubdivisions shall also address the design standards specified m Section 32230,
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision.
14. Where the Subdivision of manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive
certain submittal requirements spec Iliedin Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the
applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval crteria specified in Section 512-125
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park.
5.13-130
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that
all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria,
the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a
public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can
be addressed as part of a future development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions ofthis Cade pertaining to loc parcel size and dimensions.
Response: The lot is on an East-West street and falls under those requirements.
Lot Size:
The minimum Lot Size is 4,500 sq. ft. The smallest lot in the partition is 4,501 sq. ft. and therefore meets this
requirement. The minimum lot size in the pan portion of a panhandle lot is 4,500 sq ft. The smallest panhandle lot
has 4,813 sq. ft. in the pan.
Lot Frontage:
The minimum lot frontage is 45 ft and the applicant's street abutting lot has 59 ft of frontage. The minimum frontage
for multiple panhandles is 26' and the applicant's two (2) panhandle lots have 13' of street frontage each.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 16
Written Statement for Chad Wilson
SDC 3.2-215 states that setbacks for primary structures for parcels located on an east -west street in a LDR (Low Density
Residential) are as follows: 1) Front/Rear Yard - 10 Feet, 2) Side Yard - 5 Feet. Future development on the parcels of
this proposed partition will meet the setback standards of SCD 3.2-215.
B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/orappliicab/e Refinement Plan diagram, Pian Disoictmap,
and Conceptual Development Plan.
Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated
as Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The
proposed development is about 7 units per acre.
C Capacity requirements ofpublicandpri✓ate facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity,, sanitary
sewer and stormwitermanagement £ac Ribes,• and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the
public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by
this Code and otherapplicable regulations The Public Works Director ora utilitypmwdershall detemrine capacity
issues.
Response: A public sanitary mainline and water mainline are located within the a Street right-of-ways. Dwellings on
Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 will be served by a future line/lateral that will connect to the existing line. All future dwellings will
be served by on-site stormwater drywells or other on-site methods on each parcel. The capacity of the public and
private facilities is able to handle the increase of two future dwellings; thus, this approval criterion will be satisfied.
D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public andprwite design and construction standards
containedin this Code and other applicable regulations.
Response: All the existing public and private facilities meet the design and construction standards of the SDC. There
are no public improvements proposed with this partition application. In addition, the future private utilities will be
constructed according to all applicable SDC and other regulations. This approval criterion will be satisfied.
E Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil orgeologic conditions,areas with
susceptibility of flooding, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,' watercourses shown on the WQCW Map and their
associated riparian areas, other nparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117, rock outcroppings,, open
spaces, and areas ofhistoncand/or archaeological significance, as maybe specified in Section 33-900 or ORS
97.740-760, 358905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal la w.
Response: The subject property does not face qualities of steep slopes, susceptibility to Flooding, clusters of trees,
watercourses and riparian areas, open spaces, historical significance, etc. This criterion is not applicable.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian
safety to avoid congestion, protide connectivity within the do velopment ares and to adjacent residential areas,
transit stops, neighborhood activity renters and commercial industrial andpublic areas, minimize driveways on
arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT
access management standards for5tate highways.
Response: The applicant is proposing three lots that all have a shared driveway in order to mitigate the number of
driveways on a Collector street. The proposed parking as well as ingress -egress locations will allow safe vehicular travel
that avoids congestion. This approval criterion will be satisfied.
G Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this
Code.
Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition.
H Adjarent land can be developed oris provided access that whallowits development as specifiedin this Code.
Response: All adjacent land is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 17
written Statement for Chad Wilson
I Where the Partition ofproperty that is outside of the city limits but within Me Oty's urbanizable area and no
concurrent annexation application is submifted. the standards specified below shall also apply
Response: Not applicable. The proposed development is within the city limits; therefore, this criterion does not apply.
J Where the Subdivision of manufactured dwelling park ormobile home park is proposed, the following approval
critena apply..
Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page j 8
H10
2(
/
_
ƒ Rd•
.,.
))
o.t pw•
�
»
;z
•
g / /{
\
mlQM$b
_
&
.. . .......
... „:..:.. m m,m,
LLJ
�z
\�
-
/
ƒ
}
`Ric
�
\�}
�-®—
—®—---
-----27,
«
.
y}
m:
\
W \§{$
\
®,93m
\
k}�
�
�{2
-
•^°
];
w �!
`
..
.
--
\---
,
�
`
\
-
r-
\
n\ZM
!!
a
!
a
6
--=yam=----ƒ----9