HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 4/27/2021Pre -Submittal Meeting
Development and Public Works Department
Reem 61
PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE:
Tuesday, May 4, 2021
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
DPW /^....L......nee Room 616
1. Pre -Submittal (Partition Tentative) #811 -21 -000092 -PRE 811-20-000250-PROJ Cindy Koza
Assessor's Map: 18-02-03-11 TL: 8000
Address: 778 S. 67th
Existing Use: residential
Applicant has submitted for 2 -lot partition
Planner: Andy Limbird
Meeting: Tuesday, May 4, 202111:00 — 12:00 via MS Teams
0
�o�.: r —-
..�: .:
_�
��� � W-�
a
(City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
SPRINGFIELD
tive Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal:
(Applicant., check Partition Ftive
Partition Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
- - �.. _
_. __.. _._..._...�
A licante: Cindy Koza, Judv HardinPhone:
Com anyFax:
,❑
❑
Address: 84458 Marcola Rd. Marcola, OR 97454
Applicant's Rep.: Curtis Thomas
Phone: 541-302-9830
Company: Metro Planning, Inc,
Fax:
Address: 846 A Street. Springfield, OR 97477
Property Owner: Same as applicant
Phone:
Com an :
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18 02 03 11
TAX LOT l 5
: 08000
Property Address: 778 S 67th. Springfield, OR 97478
Size of Pro ert : 0.93
Acres ❑X square Feet
❑
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description of if you are offiry in [his Form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Atwo-lot partition.
Existing Use: Vacant
# Of Lots/Parcels: Two
Total acreage of parcels/ Folli
allowable density:
Proposed # TWO
Dwell units
Si natures: Please sign and print your name and date in the app ro nate box on the next
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
a e.
Case No.: Date:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $
Reviewed b :
Postage Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 117114 kl 1 of 10
6knRC,G0j4
FIELD
DEVELOPMENT ANC225 FIFTH STREET
L.sPRINGr1ELD, OR q7477
PHONE541.7'26.3753
FAX 64°_736.1021
wkvv sponglield orgov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATI12 tiT t 4'i SHEET USE POLICY:
hr October 2003, Springfield Public l'No11rs released a ttial "stormwater scoping sheet;' provided to help
engineers and developers mcei slonmctncr requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and I'ro::edures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparentthat users ofthe scopine sheet suhmitted moth more cmnplete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the ovetclI t n iew time spent on the applications. resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
Asa result of the benetiuss of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of sloranaater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applicmlons submitted to the Citv shall provide a copy of acompleted stormwater
scopingsheetwithdteapplicationpncl:et. ALtachcd With tills letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SURMITTFD APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET. S'I'ORM\I ER S"IUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE Wit It 7 HP. SCi;I'I[ ItRnl1IREM F,NTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USIN(r iSTORreM A I I [I SCOPING SHEETS AREAS FOLLOWS:
1.) Obtain scopine sheet I)om application packet city wchsito. of otheI location.
2.) Fill cut project inform sl IoIlk o P Pial fon frons sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scopine shed until it Is received 'From the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, orcntail all pages tu: City w Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept.. Attn: Clayton
McF.achcm,
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (EI!ed out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complow scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that compl} with the minimum required scope with suhinittal ofapplication packet. The
scopingsheet shall he included us er uttachment inside the tion! cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be bound with all applicalion packels (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engznecrin,e curd Crnso'nclion Rasmn ce.s i ,ebpogc located at. httn:7/wwwsprin^field-
or.Rov/DPW/Fico neer tutltT on,of - un-es.hui under the Public ho7proven,enl Permil Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for is withthe Cit, of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern. PE
City of Springfield, Devclopmcnt :: ld b': tat, A✓,'orks
Email: emceachern(rjspringlield-organ
Phone: (541) 736— 1036
Fax: (541) 736 —1021
SPRINGFIELD
to-I'CPF' BEET
DEVELOPMENT�. o.ecot cn�c e.il,UHs7an
1,,C)N : 641725.3753
a 776. 1(121
;,vnv. sprir� `(eld-ecgov
STORM WA T ), R ''AGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
- - -- ----------- --- --
(PleasereturhtoClytonA9.lfnlu" nni.... ... ,p,Ji,ld Uevelopmenl and Public Works; Fns,' 7361021, Phone#736-1036),
cnmlhuncaachernr<r springTeld-or-gnv
Project Name: _ Applicant:
Assessors Parcel 4 Date:
Land Use(s): Phone 4:
Project Size (Acres): Fax4: _
Approx. Impervious Area Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor s map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s). G'uc',iargc location(s)-ctc- AtlachaMitional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Storme•ater Desi ;annge:neet rnctices:
(At a n t nuns oil Cm on the 0nl and hacR / thn <heet shall be s,,b.iusd
for rzn opp/ica/nvt -h tei. a1(hwrgh other requirements w, be neeeesaty)
Drainaae Studv l v))e d-!)SPNI Section 4.03 2 r lNotc- UH may be substituted for Rational Methodl
❑ Small Site Study — (uso Kation..: �.. r c:daduannst
❑ Mid -Level Development :Sind; 'nit I lydnograph Method for ca lculatio[is)
❑ Full Drainage Development it -I . Iii.+: tmil liydragruph V-Iethad for calctdations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone: _ ❑ Hillside Development
❑ Welland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line For starting water sent we , elc, ation:
❑ Design HGL to use Cor sturtine Hca- surface elevation: _
F1Manhole/Junction to take - .
Return io Clayton -� _ or, FAX: (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY I 1 Il;vl. oro sial uaa oaty
"Based upon
the inform rli n yrm PJt a /I,, f and r I d 'Neel, the / llr ruing reprra'ents a minimum nfal is needed for an
application to
he comrpll is snbnrd .ill .Is,, uainIce ;/sm ... ... (his lolshou/dnotb, used;,Geuo1Ihe Spring1eld
Development
Cade (.4)C) ar the ('i,, I .rr• I I m linnua/ C'mnplionce with there requir..e,,Is does nets construne site
u.
approval; Additional sr[ sp I)iu ipfr t p' ht r pm.,l :Fate Opon saopinl; sheet sebaddl, entvre c,np d dfo,. has heal
signed in the
space provided belnru
Interim Design
Standards/Walcr Quala, (llDSPIM Chant_; 3)_
Req'd
N/A
All non -building rooftop (NEIP) intpurvious surfaues shall be pre-treated (e.g, multi-chambered catehbasin w/oil flirtation
media) for stomnwatcr gnalin.: slid ilionolly_ a utinilnum of 50% of fu NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods,
Where required, cL,,till, a: ill, elan,tesign shall be consistent with design standards(EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
iu Chapter 2 of the F I,uuc to, ..oyster ,Management chilled
F7
No new NRR . nervi. , ut I .ass Ihau 11.1100 .squnre feet a simplilied design approach may be followed as specified
by the F,ugene Slot llctaer h lanngcutcnl Manual (Sec2.4_1).
It stel ,wmel neat,,. .r I. at a_c I, submit cal Ir iouslspeo.Gcntions for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope_ and seed n.,._r<i,1,rr,lth(nyofSp..u,I!elid o,Full, ene's bestia water Management Manual.
❑
❑
Water Out lily ca l c idol o cs as i t I. i i and i it Se cl i o n 3.03. l of th e ED S PM
❑A
l l bu i Id i ag mo fl o p loo un m lieqnln...Ahtolother ft u id co it to i it i ng eq u i pm ent located outside of the bu i lding,shall
be 0, ov id cd w i it scnhn du;vu.,ntsinn;e'it nr a ea the r res isl and enclose re.
General Study Re u i rem an is (;? DS P slSett ton LTll _
❑
Drains e'lad prepay( d l ii 1 41 t, Iczsinn ii ICI'iIEu gi neer l l Ceti sed i n th e state of Orego n.
❑
A comp) to dye huge s'. ., cit:< In EDSPM Section 4.031, Including hydl'ological study map.
Cal cu tato ns showing: s, stun _ rill: iIv for a `&y ell ,'storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event.
The time of cons,uit; al,a n ( I : ] lo,I I K detel'n. i sed usi ug a 10 In ln..le days Ime for developed basins.
Review
of Downstream System. uA l Ps I ti,_ bo l l 4.03.4. C)
❑
❑
A dowl t al dl . ,ave usa des III :n EDSPM Section 4 03.4C'. On-site drainage shall be governed by The
Oregon Plun.binu !Sp: i.dp Carie (UPSC').
❑
❑
Elevation t fth. I-i.3)od I i, v lines Ia both eiqend 1. ht, systems where applicable.
❑
❑
Design of Sturm S, ,n,ll (Illy;.'!A1 Section 4.04)_
❑
❑
Flow lines slopes. rim I ,e, pi, l Ito unf saes el ' Iv irdiculed on the plan set
Minimum pipe coe<r sl 1 h 1 � :.Je7 ill utfowd pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
properren In Ill., evi, ah .1h:Iil1. tided when 1,�l the cover shall be s uffirientto supportan 80,000Ill load
without failure of Ihit pipe 'it .11111
Mannin s n,11¢I111 alalic rt,wist with little 4-I of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum vdu<,il__ of Ihrz: (3) leer per second al 0.5 pipe full based on'I able 4-1 as well.
Other/Miscellameons
Existingand pl'oposad i II I-.l)_lod at ouc food mel 'a1_ holude spot elevations and sadandesshowinghowsit,
drains.
Private stet....m a to eea., uu, ;tall be dearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
m
Drywalls shall not rcee r.. sol lace w,o being treated by one or more EYIPs, with the exception of
residential hu llding vel .eel , t 3.fLi.4.A). I\ddltional provisions apply to this as requtied by the DEQ. Referto
theweb,ile ; I_n fol no nformation.
Dec,ldo pon,ds IIJI'r , to IIn r u loll to pre develop nem rstos forthe 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*'7'hi .....L,r... I, .rt v. Will lhmenl,inlidcllre.frontcoror, of the spanalaterseall,
As the
engineer of record. 11,,, yc II ;.br,v: a,Qd ilmas a, complete and i.. c l u ded wi ill th e su bm i tied sto nn water study
and plan set.
_ Date
Po, n. Version 5. file 201 S
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Minor Variance
SPRINGFIw I AA
ELD
r1hol
Applicant Name: Cindy Kozo, Judy Hardin
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address: 84458 Marcola Rd. Marcola, OR 97454
Applicant's Rep.; Curtis Thomas
15 6458
Company: Metro Planning, Inc.
Fax:
Address: 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477
Property Owner: earnc as Applicant
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-0=-11
TAX LOT NOS :
8000
Property Address: s67th
Size of Pro ert : .9s acre Acres V square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: variance on Hillside lot frontage
Existing Use: vacant
Numeric Standard to be Adjusted (See SDC 5.21-125 A. for standards that may be adjusted):
Percentage of Standard to be Adjusted: less than 30a
Si natures: Please sign andprint fur name and date in thea propriate box on the next a e.
FA
Associated Applications: Si ns:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed b :
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee:
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 2/25/11 1 of 4
Signatures
The
Applicant:
Signature
Cindy ioa=
Print
if [he - -
Owner:
Same as applicant.
Signature
s.�o:.rano s_oTert and accwate.
Date: 04/25/2021
pnrv;
Revised 2/25/11 2 of a
Minor Variance Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Minor Variance Application to the Development Services
Department
The application must conform to the Minor Variance Submittal Requirements
Checklist on page 4 of this application packet.
Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine
whether all required items listed in the Minor Variance Submittal Requirements
Checklist have been submitted.
Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal.
2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check
Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of
submittal.
The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of
the application.
An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary
to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the
provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and
statutes have been provided.
Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the
application review process and may result in denial.
3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In
addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject
property.
• There is a 14 -clay public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which
is effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 2/25/11 3 of 4
Minor Variance Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
EX Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Land Division applications, where
applicable.
® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
® Minor Variance Application Form
® Copy of the Deed
® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
® Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing
in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with
the Minor Variance Criteria described in SDC 5.21-125 D.
NOTE: Before the Director can approve a Minor Variance request, information submitted
by the applicant must adequately support the request. All of the Minor Variance Criteria
must be addressed by the applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or
unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. In certain
circumstances, it is advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to
prepare the required findings.
® Three (3) Copies of a Plot Plan including the following:
❑ If submitted concurrently with a Land Division or Site Plan Review application, eighteen
copies of the Land Division Tentative Plan or Site Plan sheet may be submitted in lieu
of the plot plan as long as it meets the following requirements.
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor if the minor variance involves a setback
❑ The scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" — 30', 1" = SO' or 1" — 100', north arrow, and date of
preparation
❑ The nature and extent of the minor variance requested and relevant site features
Revised 2/25/11 4 of 4
Written Statement — Tentative Partition
Background
The applicant is proposing a tentative two -lot partition on property zoned low density residential. The property is
under the Hillside Development Overlay District. The property is 40,712 sq It and the minimum lot size is 10,000 sq ft
for the overlay district. Currently the site is vacant. In order to split the parcel as a two -lot partition, the applicant
must comply with the Table in 3.3-520 below.
Table 3.3-1
Average Slope
Minimum Lot/Parcel Size Per
Dwelling Unit
Minimum Per Lott Parcel
Frontage'"
cess than 15 °b and below 670
feet
See the applicable otiaarcel size and frontage real emerts in
Section 3.2-215.
Less than IMb n wooded--'ots"
10,003 sq. ft.
W ft.
15%-25%
1m 3 sq. $.
90 ft.
2590-359E
29,0Op sq. 8.
150 R.
Over 35:5
45,00_- sq. f..
2�0 %
Parcel 1
The average slope of the development area is 15%-25%. Therefore, the parcel needs 90 ft of frontage as well as a
minimum size of 10,000 sq ft. Both criteria are met.
Parcel 2
The average slope of the development area is 25y, -350/b. Therefore, the parcel needs 150 ft of frontage as well as
the minimum size of 20,000 sq ft. While the minimum parcel size is met, Parcel 2 needs a minor adjustment to
qualify for the parcel frontage. 150 ft. of frontage - 25% adjustment = 112 ft. of frontage.
In this written statement SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan - General, SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal
Requirements and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria are addressed to demonstrate that this application clearly
meets all of the SDC requirements and criteria.
SDC 5.12-115 T�ntatbe Plan=General
Any residential /and division shal/conform to the fol/owing standards.
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards ofthis Code. When lots/parcels are more Man
double the minimum area permitted by the ening district, the Director shall require that these hots/parcels be
arranged
1. To allow to division, and
2. To ah/ow for the extension ofstreets to serve future lots/parrehs.
3. Placement ofstructures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a
determination that the potential maximum density of the larger hot luarcel is not impaired in order to make
this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 512120E
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and falls within the Hillside
Development Overlay District. The applicant is applying for a minor variance in order to be compliant with the Hillside
Development standards.
B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential devehopmentfrom
collectorandatteriaistreets crop overcame specific topographic situations.
Response: The proposed tentative partition will not result in the creation of double frontage parcels; this standard
does not apply.
METRO PLANNING, INC.
Tentative Partition - Cindy Kozo
C Panhandle /obyparceis shall comply with the standards specrBed rn Sections 32-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of
multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction ofnecessary utilities to serve all approvedpanhand/e /obyparceis
shall occurprior to recording the Plat.
Response: Panhandle lots are not proposed as a part of this partition, this this criterion does not apply.
D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-115
Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The proposed tentative
partition utilizes an existing street network.
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative E4 -u Submittal Re tents
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are
being fulfilled. EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public
agency, the Director, during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be
addressed as part of a future development application.
A. General Requirements.
1. The TerTtative Plan, indudlog any required Future Development Plan, shall be preparedbyarh Oregon Licensed
Land Surveyor cn standard sheets of 18-x 24' The servkes ofand Oregon registered Engriheermay also be required
by the City in order to resolve utility issues (espenal/ystornvwater management, street design and transportation
issues), and site constraint and/or water qu ilityissues.
Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Donn Rowe, a licensed Oregon Land Surveyor, as
required.
2. The scale ofthe Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area inwlved and the amount ofdetail and data,
nomrally I'= 50; 1' = 100; or I" - 200.
Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 30'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and
the amount of data needing to be shown.
J. A north arrow and the date the Tentative P/an was prepared
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the plans that are included with this application.
4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared
the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response: The name and address of the surveyor from Donn Rowe has prepared the tentative plan.
S A drawing of the boundariesofthe entire area owned by the partitioner or -sub -divider of which the proposed land
division is a part
Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the
partitioner.
6. Dry boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) andany special service district boundaries orrarlroad right-of-
way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad rights-of-way are adjacent to the subject property.
Z Applicable raring d/stricr5 and the Metro Plan dusignaticui of tis, proposed land division and otprnpert/es within
100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), designated L (low density
residential) in the Metro Plan and falls within the Hillside Development Overlay District.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 12
Tentative Partition - Cindy Kozo
H The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) ofeach lot/parce/and the approximate
dimensions ofeach building site, where applicable, and the top and toe ofcutand fill slopes to scale.
Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are clearly labeled on the tentative partition plan drawing.
9. The location, outline to scale and present use ofal/existing structures to remain on the property afnerpiatt/ng and
their required setbacks firm the proposed new pzpert) lines.
Response: No existing structures are present on the property; thus, this requirement is not applicable.
10. The location andstie ufexisrng and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent
to the site, including butnot enaaed to sanitarysewer mains, stom>wvter managementsystems, water mains, power,
gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indirate the proposed connection points'.
Response: The existing utilities are noted on the tentative plan, including water, wastewater, stormwater and
underground utilities.
11. The locations widths and purpose ofall existing orproposed easements on and abutting the proposed land
division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips.
Response: A proposed slop and tree conservation area is clearly shown on the tentative plan.
12. The locations ofaliareas to be dedicated of reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition orlimitations of
the reservations Cleary indicated
Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use; thus, this requirement is not applicable.
B. A Site Assessment ofthe Entire DeveiopmentArea. The Site Assessmentshall be prepared byan Oregon
Lirensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at Ifoot Intervals and percent of
slope thatpreasely maps and delineates the areas described beiow. Proposed modi,7cations to physical features shall
be clearly indicated The Director may waive portions ofthrs requirement if there rs a finding that the proposed
development will not have an adverse Impact on physica/features or water quality, either on the site oradjacent to
the site. Information required for adjacentproperres maybe generalized to show the connections to physical
features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response: The enclosed tentative partition plan prepared by Donn Rowe, an Oregon licensed land surveyor,
identifies all physical features of the subject property as required.
1. The name, location, dimensions, direction offow and top ofbank ofall watercourses that are shown on the Water
Quality Limited Watercourses (WL QW) Map on file in the Doleuopment Services Department, -
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property; thus, this requirement is not applicable.
2. The 100year floodplain and fioodway boundaries on the site, as s idtfifed in the latest adopted FEMA Hood
Insurance Maps or FEMA approved tetter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Realsion,
Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated
on FIRM Map Number 41039C1166F dated September 27, 1985; thus, this requirement is not applicable.
3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Section 3.3-220 arra delineated on the Wel/head PI'otection Areas Map on
File in the DeveiopmentService Department,
Response: The subject property falls outside of the wellhead protection area.
4. Physeal features including but not /united to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the
(WL QW) Map and thein/paean areas, wetlands, and cock outrroppingg'
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 13
Tentative Partition - Cindy Kozo
Response: The primary physical features on this site are clusters of trees and sloped areas. 10 foot contours per
LIDAR data from Oregon DOGAMI are shown on the plan. The existing slope and tree preservation area is
delineated on the Tentative Partition Plan. There are no watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings
within the boundaries of the subject property. No individual trees are shown given that they exist in large clusters.
Existing trees and a tree -felling permit will be addresses as a condition of approval.
S Sol/ types and water table information as mapped and specified in the .Soil.,, Survey of Lane County, and
The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the subject
property consists of one -hundred percent (75%), with a depth water table of more than 80 inches, Nekia silty clay
loam (75%) with a depth water table of more than 80 inches, and twenty-five percent (25%) Dixonville-Philomath-
Hazelair complex (43C), with a depth to water table of more than 80 inches.
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117.
Response: A slope and tree preservation area exists on the subject site as shown on the Tentative Partition Plan.
There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property; thus this requirement is not
applicable.
C A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at Sfoot intervals and percent of slope
that precisely maps and addresses the information described below In areas where the percent of slope is 10
percent ormom, contours maybe shown at 5foat interva/s. This plan shall show the stormwater management
system for the entire doPolopment31 Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an
Oregon licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where pants are proposed as part of the stormwater management
system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall Include the fol/owing
components:
1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations,
2. Peivioas and impervious arena drainage paBerns,'
3 The size and location ofstoonwater management sys^ems components, including but not limited to: anim lines,
catch basins, dry veils and/or detention ponds stormwater quality measures and natural drainage -ways to be
retained, -
4. Existing andproposed site elevations, grades and contoums, and
S A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculaiiorx; and documentation as required In Section
4.3-110 shal/be submitted supporting the proposed system The plan, calculations and documentation shall be
consistent with Nene Engineenlig Designs Standards and Procedures Arai to a//ow staff to determine If the proposed
stormwater managementsyslam will accomplish its purposes.
Response: Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell located on each
parcel as required by the City of Springfield Stormwater Scoping Sheet. No outfall to the public stormwater system is
proposed with this partition. Further stormwater management plan details may be provided as a condition of
approval.
D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code,
1. The locations, condition, e.g., fidly improved afeth curb, gutterand sidawalk, ACmari orgrovel, wrdMs and names
of all existing streets, alleys, or oMerrightsof al within or adjacent to the proposed /and division;
Response: The subject site has frontage on 67th street with improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the east
side of the street.
2. The locations, widths and names of allproposed streets and other nghtsof-way to include the appiroximate radius
ofcurues andgrades. The relationship of m1pros0sedstreets to any protected streets as shown on the Metra Plan,
including the TransPlan, anyapproved Conceptual Development PLsn and the latest version of the Conceptual Local
StreetMap,
Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject site; thus this requirement is
not applicable.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 14
Tentative Partition - Cindy Koza
A The locations and widths ofall existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian hails and accessways, including the
/ocatlor, size and type ofinini ingr and street trees in any required plantersurp,
Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways.
4. The location ofexisdng and proposed traffic centro/ devices, tier hydrants, ponverpoles, transformers,
neighborhood mai/box units and similar publIc facilities, where app/icable,
Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is approximately 208 feet South of the
Southeast corner of the Subject property on the East right of way of 5 671h Street, and the South of right of way of
Glacier Drive. There is an electric box on the Eastern border of the property.
S The location and dimensYons ofexisfing and proposed dr/veways, vhere appricable.
Response: There are not any existing driveways on the site but will be proposed at the time of development. The
driveway location has not yet been determined by the application.
6. The location ofexist/ng and pnvo,;6cd street llghdng: including the type, heightandarea ofillumination,
Response: All existing streetlights are show on the tentative plan on the east side of 67th. No additional streetlights
are proposed.
7, fie location ufexisting and proposed transit foci/ides;
Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest
transit facility is located on the North side of Main Street west of 68th Street and is served by Lane Transit District
Route 11.
& A copy ofa Right-of-wayApproarh Permit application whera the property has frontage on in Oregon Department
of Transportation (ODOT) facility, and
Response: B Street is a city street and not ODOT facility; thus this requirement is not applicable.
9. A FaB7CImpact5tudyprepar bya Traffic Engineer where necessary, asspecifledin Section 4.2-105A.4.
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-
family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each
of the two parcels proposed generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips
necessary for a traffic impact study to be required.
E A Future Development Plan. Where phasing andlorlots/partes thatare more than til the minimum let/parcel
size are proposed, the Tentative P/an shaliinc/ude a Future Development Plan that:
Response: No phasing plan is being proposed.
F. Additionaiinformadon andlorapelications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittalshall
include the following items, where applicable.
1. A briefnarrative explaining the purpose ofthe proposed land dmsion and the existing use of the property,'
Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the
existing use of the subject property.
2. Ifthe applicant is not the property owner, written pemrimbn from the property owner is required,'
Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 15
Tentative Partition - Cindy Kom
3. A Vanity Map drawn to scale show/ng bus steps, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and
other transportahoyfire access issues within 200 feetof the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or
Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land ebvisioq,-
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet.
4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any appiicabie over9ay district,
Response: See how the development address the standards of the Hillside Overlay Development District below.
5 How Me Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use cliteda, where applicable;
Response: The existing use that will remain on proposed Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 are single-family residential. Single-
family residential is a permitted use in the LDR (Low Density Residential) zone; thus no Discretionary Use Permit is
required.
6. A Tree Felling Permit as spected In Section 5X9 -i00,
Response: No individual trees are shown given that they exist in large clusters. Since more than five trees are
proposed to be removed, a tree felling permit is required per SDC 5.19-110 which may be provided as a condition of
approval.
7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of15pincent crgreater and as specifedin Section 3.3-500, andjor if the
required Site Assessment in Section.5.1-21209 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or
high water table as specified in the soils survey of Lane e�ai, y,
Response: No development is proposed at this time. Drainage plans will be submitted at building permit for
individual lots if development is proposed to be on slopes greater than 15 percent.
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 57100 where a development is proposed outside of the city
limit' but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitarysewer,
Response: The subject property is located within the city limits; thus no annexation application is necessary.
9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a
wetland on the property,
There are no existing wetlands on the subject site; thus this requirement is not applicable.
10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted
concurrently,
Response: No federal or state permits are required with this partition application; thus this requirement is not
applicable.
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time oftnstalladon and method
of financing,
Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application.
ZZ Proposed deed restrictions and drag of Homeowner's Association Agreement, whet appropriate,'
Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed; thus this requirement is not applicable.
13 CYuster5ubdivrsions shallalso address the design standards specified in Section 32230,
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 16
Tentative Partition - Cindy koza
14. Where the Subdivision ofa manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive
certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M However, the Tentative Plan shall address the
applicable standards listed under the park 5ubdivision approval criteria specified in Section 512-125
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park.
5®C 5.13-130
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all
applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director
shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director
may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future
development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions ofthis Code pertaining to lod parcel size and dimensions.
Response: The lot is on an East-West street and falls under those requirements.
The property is under the Hillside Development Overlay District. The property is 40,712 sq ft and the minimum lot
size is 10,000 sq It for the overlay district. Currently the site is vacant. In order to split the parcel as a two -lot
partition, the applicant must comply with the Table in 3.3-520 below.
Table 3.3-1
Average Slope
Minimurn Lot/Parcel Size Per
Dwelling Unit
Minimum Per Lot/Parcel
I Frontage -
Less ti an 15 % and oelo.v 67i
feet
See to app Icah e size and Fonaga ejuri anrents in
sect U1 12-215
lass than 15% on vacced ots"
,OGL sq. ft.
60 ft.
15 2552
! 7,G-'] so. k.
46 ft.
25',0-35%
2.i3O:l sq,f
150 ft,
Over 3546
43,0: i sq. R.
2dg ft.
Parcel 1
The average slope of the development area is 15%-25%. Therefore, the parcel needs 90 ft of frontage as well as a
minimum size of 10,000 sq ft. Both criteria are met.
Parcel 2
The average slope of the development area is 25%-35%. Therefore, the parcel needs 150 ft of frontage as well as
the minimum size of 20,000 sq ft. While the minimum parcel size is met, Parcel 2 needs a minor adjustment to
qualify for the parcel frontage. 150 ft. of frontage - 25% adjustment = 112 ft. of frontage.
SDC 3.2-215 states that setbacks for primary structures for parcels located in a LDR (Low Density Residential) are as
follows: 1) Front/Rear Yard - 10 Feet, 2) Side Yard - 5 Feet. Future development on the parcels of this proposed
partition will meet the setback standards of SCD 3.2-215.
S. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Pian diagram, Pian Distnd map,
and Conceptual De velopment Plan.
Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated
as Low -Density Residential.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 17
Tentative Partition - Cindy Koza
C. Capacity requirements ofpub/Ic and private fac/lities, including but not limited to, water and electricity, sanitary
sewer and stormwater management facilities, and streets and traffic safetycontrols shall not be exceeded, and the
public improvements shal/be avarlab/e to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided forby
this Code and otherapplrcable regulations The Public Works Director cr a utility provrdersha// determine capacity
issues.
Response: The capacity of the public and private facilities is able to handle the increase of two future dwellings; thus
this approval criterion will be satisfied.
D. The proposed /and division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and consmiction standards
contained in this Code and other applicable regulatrons.
Response: All the existing public and private facilities meet the design and construction standards of the SDC. There
are no public improvements proposed with this partition application. In addition, the future private utilities will be
constructed according to all applicable SDC and other regulations. This approval criterion will be satisfied.
F. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable sort orgeo/ogic conditions,, areas with
susceptibility offloodrng, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, waterrourses shown on the WQLWMap and their
associated riparian areas, other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117, rock outcropprngs,open
spaces, and areas of historic and/or archaeological signi icance, as may be specified rn Section 33-900 or ORS
97740-760, 358905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal la w.
Response: This development site is located outside of the 500 -year Floodplain and there are no watercourses,
riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, open spaces, or historically significant features. The only physical
features present are large clusters of trees and steep slopes. Future development of the subject site will occur on
land with slopes less than 250/c. A proposed tree preservation and slope easement will ensure that no development
happens over the steepest parts of the property. No individual trees are shown given that they exist in large clusters.
A tree felling permit is required per SDC 5.19-110 which may be provided as a condition of approval. Based on these
facts, this approval criterion will be satisfied.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian
safety to avoid congestion, provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas,
transit stops, neighborhood activityrenters, and commercial, industrial and public areas minimize driveways on
arterial and m/lector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulatrons and comply with the ODOT
access management standards for State highways.
Response: The proposed parking as well as ingress -egress locations will allow safe vehicular travel that avoids
congestion. This approval criterion will be satisfied.
G Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accompirshedas specified in this
Code.
Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition.
K Adjacent /and can be developed or is provided access that will allow Its development as specified rn this Code.
Response: All adjacent land is that can be developed is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
L Where the Partition ofproperty that rs outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanrzab/e area and no
concurrent annexation application rs submitted, the standards specified below shall a/so apply
Response: Not applicable. The proposed development is within the city limits; therefore, this criterion does not apply.
J Where the Subdivision of manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the fol/owing approval
criteria apply..
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 1 8
Tentative Partition -Cindy Koza
Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
Metro Planning, Inc. April 2021 Page 1 9
.�
j
.
\{)\/§/
\\\/�
\
\)\\J)
]
\\\
®2
()
\
.
�
.
-
.�
j
.
\{)\/§/
\\\/�
\
\)\\J)
]
\\\
®2
()
� 2
j
\{)\/§/
\\\/�
\
\)\\J)
]
\\\
®2
()
-
-e�.��-«w�-
}
\
{
-
!
\\
\(\\