HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/26/2021City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPRINGFIELD
W 0#1
Required Project Information (Applicant:
Prospective Betsy Schultz
Applicant Name:
complete this section)
541.520.7997
Phone:
Company: PNW[Dev]elopment, LLC
Fax:
Address:
Prospective Kristen Taylor
Applicant's Rep.:
541.687.1010 Ex 115
Phone:
Company: TBG Architects + Planners
Fax:
Address: 132 E Broadway, Suite 200
Property Owner: Shannon Hancock
phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address: 760 A Street Unit 1752, Springfield OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-35-33
TAX LOT NOS
: 4900 and 5000
Property Address: Not yet assigned
Size of Property: 0.57 Acres 0 Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal:
Existing Use: Undeveloped
# of Lots Parcels: 2
16,553 &
Av. Lot Parcel Size: 8,276
sf
5&3
Densit : du/acre
Prospective _
Applicant: (z,
/`--
Signature
Betsy Schultz, Owner, PNW [Dev]elopment
Print
Case No.: Date:
Date: 4.26.21
Reviewed by:
Application Fee:
Technical Fee: 0
Posta a Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Process
The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development
opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or
standards change.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
• The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
• Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.
• We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
• The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the
meeting.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting
• The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.
• The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
• Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
• The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report.
Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
X❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the time of complete application submittal.
X❑ Development Issues Meeting Application Form
❑X Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
❑ Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
❑ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
❑ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
❑ North arrow
❑ Date of preparation
❑ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
❑ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
❑ Parking and circulation plan
Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3
ARCHITECTS
April 26, 2021
City of Springfield
Development Services
Planning Division
225 5' Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
RE: S 2nd Street Townhomes (202115/1.3)
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
Project Address: Not assigned at this time
Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Map 17-03-35-33 Tax Lots 4900 and 5000
Applicant:
Daytime Phone:
E-mail Address:
Applicant's Representative:
Daytime Phone:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PNW [Dev]elopement LLC
Attn: Betsy Schultz
541.520.7997
betsy@pnwstrategies.00m
TBG Architects + Planners
Attn: Kristen Taylor
541.687.1010
132 East Broadway, Suite 200
Eugene, Oregon 97401
ktaylor@tbg-arch.com
The applicant is requesting a DIM for a prospective project involving a potential new residential
townhome development with associated required parking and other site infrastructure located on two tax
lots on South F Street (unimproved) between South 2nd and South 3rd Streets (unimproved) in Springfield,
Oregon. The applicant is exploring how many townhomes are allowed on these tax lots based on the
current code and what will be allowed as a result of HB 2001 and 2003 at a minimum.
We request at a minimum, staff members from planning, fire, and public works to attend the meeting.
Please do not hesitate to invite additional staff members to attend the meeting in order to adequately
address the questions.
SITE INFORMATION
Tax Lots: Lane County records identify parcels as Lane County Assessor's Map 17-0335-33, Tax Lots
5000 and 4900 (the "site").
541 .687,1010 1132 EAST BROADWAY, SUITE 2001 EUGENE, OREGON 97401 1 TBG ARCH.CDM
City of Springfield
April 26, 2021
Page 2 of 4
Location/Access: Currently, there is not an improved access connection to the site, which is located on
South F Street (unimproved) between South 2nd (no current access and there is a significant grade
change) and South 3'd Streets (unimproved) in Springfield, Oregon. South 2nd Street is a minor collector
street, and the other streets are classified as local streets.
Acreaoe: The site is about 0.57 acres according to the County Assessment and Taxation records. Tax
Lot 4900 is about 0.38 acres or 16,553 square feet and Tax Lot 5000 is about 0.19 acres or 8,276 square
feet.
Ownership: The site is currently owned by Shannon Hancock, Shannon.
Plan Land Use Desionation: The site is located at the southern edge of the Springfield City limits. The
southern portion of Tax Lot 4900 is located outside of the City limits so Tax Lot 4900 will require an
Annexation application. Tax Lot 5000 was annexed to the City of Springfield in 1909. Both parcels are
designated Low Density Residential (LDR) on the Metro Plan Diagram.
Zoning and Surrounding Land Uses: The site is zoned LDR. LDR zoning and uses surround the site. On
the west side of the site, across South 2nd Street, is property zoned and used for industrial activity.
DIM QUESTIONS (Questions In Bold)
Planning:
• It is our understanding that an Annexation application will be required for Tax Lot 4900. Please
confirm that this interpretation is correct.
o Please also confirm that aside from the Annexation application, there are no other
land use applications required as part of bringing Tax Lot 4900 into the City limits.
o Can Tax Lots 5100 and 4900 be proposed for annexation in the same Annexation
application?
o If the applicant does not purchase Tax Lots 5000, 4900 and 5100, can Tax Lots 5100
and 4900 be proposed for annexation in the same Annexation application even with
two different owners as long as both owners sign the application and any other
required documents?
• Please confirm the two tax lots are zoned LDR and are considered corner lots.
• Current density allowance:
o Tax Lot 5000 is about 0.19 acres or 8,276 square feet (about 63'x 132'). Please confirm
that the current code allows 2 to 3 units based on the LDR density allowance
assuming all other applicable code requirements are met. Therefore, theoretically
as long as other applicable standards can be met, two townhomes (duplex) and a
single detached unit could be developed on this parcel. Please confirm.
City of Springfield
April 26, 2021
Page 3 of 4
o Tax Lot 4900 is about 0.38 acres or 16,553 square feet (about 127' x 130'). Please
confirm that the current code allows 3 to 5 units based on the LDR density
allowance assuming all other applicable code requirements are met. Therefore,
theoretically as long as other applicable standards can be met, 2 sets of 2
townhomes (or 2 duplexes) and a single detached unit could be developed on this
parcel. Please confirm.
o Please confirm that the applicant can choose to maintain the existing lot
configuration and not create individual lots for each dwelling for the above
theoretical options.
o Is it possible to consider the two parcels as one development site in its current
configuration totaling about 0.57 acres, which would allow up to 8 units based on
the LDR density allowance, assuming all other applicable land use and building
permit code requirements are met? Therefore, theoretically as long as other
applicable standards can be met, 4 sets of townhomes (4 duplexes) could be
developed on this parcel.
• If not, please clarify if a property line adjustment (assuming that two parcels
would be maintained but just reconfigured) or partition application would be
required (assuming that the two parcels would be proposed to be one
parcel).
• Please confirm that a Site Plan Review or a Discretionary Use Type III land use
application will not be required to develop these parcels based on the theoretical options
above. The applicant understands that a development proposal such as townhome
duplexes are subject to the design standards of SDC 4.7-142.
o As part of the code updates required to comply with HB 2001/2003, will SDC 4.7-142
be impacted? If yes, can you please explain with the understanding that this update
process will not be complete until mid -year 2022?
• At this point, except for cottage clusters, triplexes, quads, townhouses (more than 2) and other
middle housing types are not allowed in the LDR zone. Please explain how this will likely
change in the updated development code being drafted in compliance with HB 2001/20035
which would go into effect June 2022.
o For instance, could the applicant theoretically develop 8 attached townhomes on
the development site assuming all other applicable code requirements are met?
2. Transportation:
• Due to the fact that there are no adjacent developed right-of-ways adjacent to these
subject parcels (except South 2^d Street with a significant grade change) please explain
the right-of-ways that would be required to be constructed in order to develop these
parcels and who would be responsible for the design and construction of the right-of-
ways.
o Is there an existing Local Improvement District (LID) or similar and if not, would a
LID be established for the right-of-way(s)? Please explain this process, potential
cost, and implications to the applicant.
o Will the City design and construct the right-of-way extension(s)?
City of Springfield
April 26, 2021
Page 4 of 4
o If the applicant is required to submit a PIP to design and construct a right-of-way(s)
to provide access to the subject parcels, please explain the improvements required.
3. Public Works/Fire:
• Please explain off-site or public utility improvements anticipated to be required to
develop these parcels.
o Is there an existing LID and if not, would a LID be established for the public utility
extensions? Please explain this process, potential costs, and implications to the
applicant.
o Will the City design and construct the public utility extensions?
o If the applicant is required to submit a PIP to design and construct the public utility
extensions to serve the subject parcels, please explain the improvements required.
• Are there any known capacity deficiencies in the existing City's main public service lines
for water, stormwater, and sanitary sewer that would serve the site?
o What are the preferred connection points for the extended public utilities?
• Is a new public fire hydrant required to serve these parcels or is there an existing fire
hydrant that can adequately serve the site?
4. In general, are City staff aware of any issues or concerns regarding residential development
on this site?
Thank you for your time and effort in clarifying these questions so that we can proceed smoothly with the
development of this proposed project.
Sincerely,
Kristen Taylor
Senior Director/Planning Director
nl
Enclosures: City of Springfield DIM Application Form - 1 copy
DIM Questions - 5 copies
cc: Betsy Shultz, PNW[Dev]elopment, LLC
Z:\PROJ\NewPqM\S 2nd Street\Corresp\Agency\0I M\202115-0IMdocx
1■ . A-11-ITII c L1 oxs