HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 4/9/2021AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Staff Review; Tuesday, May 4,202Z 9.•00-10.•00am.
1. Minor Variance 811-21-000069-TYP2 811-20-000012-PROJ Bruce Wiechert Custom Homes
Assessor's Map: 17-02-28-34 TL: 500 & 600
Address: 5315 & 5335 High Banks Road
Existing Use: zoned LDR
Applicant submitted request for minor variance for reduced street frontage on 2 lots of a proposed 22 -
lot subdivision
Planner: Melissa Carifio
Meeting: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 9:00 — 10:00 virtual meeting via Microsoft Teams
The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out
from the laserfiche website: htto://www.sr)rinafield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx
�� Sib] 53•]3 5361. ISigg 9M L�
i27
52]9 52B5 52B8
•
5315
�
I
5323
533,5
11
C11
10@ I
5281 10T2
'?� - -.: I
1 -E
—1�
1052 1060
• .,
lIXS
103ti 1031
�,
105210f11W4
1419 �.
`
IOT:
3 1028 -
•;
— _
'�
.
�1 ._
10
•r1d10
1010
1�
:-�'U��'
.`
'�
�� Sib] 53•]3 5361. ISigg 9M L�
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Minor Variance
SPRINGFIELD
W ft/
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Bruce Wechert Phone: 541-686-9458
Company: Bruce Wechert Custom Homes, Inc.
Fax:
Add ress:3073 Skyview Ln., Eugene, OR 97405
Applicant's Rep.: Anthony J. Favreau
Phone:541-683-7048
Company: The Favreau Group, LLC
Fax:
Address: 3750 Norwich Ave., Eugene, OR 97408
Property Owner: Same as applicant
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-28-34
TAX LOT NO(S): 500 & 600
Property Address: 5315 & 5335 High Banks Road
Size of Property: 3.3 Acres 0 Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Adjust two lots belowthe minimum street frontage of 45'
Existing Use: Two homes and vacant field
Numeric Standard to be Adjusted (See SDC 5.21-125 A. for standards that may be adjusted):
SDC 5.21-125(D)
Percentage of Standard to be Adjusted: 27%
Si natures: Please si n and print your name and date in thea ro riate box on the next a e.
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Case No.:
Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee:
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 2/25/11 1 of 4
HIGH BANKS ESTATES VARIANCE NARRATIVE
April 2, 2021
Assessor's Map: 17-02-28-34 Tax Lots 500 & 600
Applicants: Bruce Wiechert Custom Homes, Inc.
3073 Skyview Lane
Eugene, OR 97405
(541) 686-9458
Applicant's
Representative: The Favreau Group
3750 Norwich Ave.
Eugene, OR 97408
541-683-7048
Attn: Tony Favreau
VARIANCE REQUEST
The applicant proposes to divide the subject 3.3-acre property to create 20 lots and to provide all
necessary infrastructure to support the development. Lots 12 and 13 of the proposed subdivision
do not meet the minimum frontage standards and therefore a variance is requested.
Springfield Code 5.21-125
D. The Director shall approve the Minor Variance if the applicant demonstrates compliance
with all of the applicable approval criteria:
1. Locational or dimensional problems have been identified that can be resolved by
a Minor Variance;
Response: By allowing a minor variance to the 45-foot street frontage, the lots will meet
the requirements for the lot area on a east-west street.
2. The request is the minimum necessary to alleviate the identified dimensional or
locational problem;
Response: Only a variance on the 45-foot street frontage requirement is needed for the lots
to meet the requirements. The lots are on a small curve which makes it difficult to efficiently
create normal size lots. The proposed driveway locations for both lots have been reviewed
and approved by the City of Springfield's Public Works Department.
3. Where applicable, the request shall result in the preservation of onsite trees 5-
inch dba and above;
Response: Not applicable.
4. The request shall not impede adequate emergency access to the site;
Response: The request will not impede adequate emergency access to the site.
S. The request shall not unreasonably adversely impact public or private
easements; and
Response: No existing or proposed easements will be adversely impacted.
6. The request shall not unreasonably limit solar access standards for abutting
properties. In order to meet this criterion, the Director may require that the building or
structure be placed as close to the south property line as possible;
Response: The developer will be building the structures on each lot and will be able to
accommodate the solar standards on the individual lots.
7. In addition to the applicable approval criteria specified in Subsections 1. through
6., above, the following approval criteria shall also apply to a request involving parking
reductions on infill lots/parcels in the Commercial and Industrial Districts when there is a
change of use, addition or expansion that requires Site Plan Review Modification. The
Minor Variance for parking reductions shall not apply to MDS applications as specified in
Section 5.15-100:
a. The individual characteristics of the proposed use require more parking
than is generally required for a use of this type,
Response: Not applicable.
b. The Minor Variance for a parking reduction shall run with the use or uses
to which it pertains and not run with the land itself,
Response: Not applicable.
C. The need for additional parking cannot reasonably be met through
provision of on -street parking or shared parking with adjacent or nearby uses
because:
i. The owners of abutting properties cannot agree to execute a
joint access/parking agreement, and/or
Response: Not applicable.
ii. The Public Works Director has determined the proposed shared
parking area is a safety hazard because it is located too far from the
proposed use,
Response: Not applicable.
d. The request shall not result in the parking or loading of vehicles on
public streets in a manner that may interfere with the free Flow of traffic on the
streets,
Response: Not applicable.
e. The property otherwise complies with the provisions of this Code.
Response: Not applicable.