Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 2/23/2021J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 1/28/2021 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@springfleld-or.gov RE: Request to ConstructSmall Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Portland Bureau of Transportation: Y\ A 5 T R U C T U R E l� Y r 0 P A R T N C 4 S On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, requiring structure replacement. AT&TID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG03_023/ FA 14826603 City of Springfield streetlight Pole #UNK Near 3000 Gateway St. 44.07686.- 36'-0" 123.04230 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Reauested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities • Pole Attachment & Public Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 1/28/2021. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Monday, March 29'", 2021. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Monday, February 8th, 2021. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision Is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, David Barnes City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SPRINGFIELD W 0/ Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone:425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular Wreless PCS, LLC E-mail:ko3199@att.com Address: 16331 SE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 98052 Applicant's Rep.: Meredith Hewett Phone:503-312-3400 Company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mhewett@j5ip.com Address:6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR, 97225 Property Owner: City of Springfield Phone: 541-726-3700 Com pan E-mail: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032200 TAX LOT NOS :02200 Property Address: Near 3000 Gateway St Nearest Intersection : Oakdale Ave ROW ® Private Property ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Propose collocation of SWF on joint use pole in City ROW Existing Use: Power/telecommunications Si natures: Please si nand rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. � �/'vl. l'ItuI.GC�C- Date: /Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Date: Print I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submit requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: Date: Plot Plan Preparer Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following wTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility wTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the wTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed wTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed wTS facility; iii. The locations of existing wTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed wTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both wTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts Types Allowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 8. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 EXHIBIT A New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") AT&T ID: EUG03_023/18925-023 City of Springfield Pole #: UNK In the Public Right -of -Way ("PROW") near 3000 Gateway St Small Wireless Facility Project Narrative New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") is proposing to install a new small wireless facility ("SWF") in the PROW to serve residents and businesses in City of Springfield. Introduction. SWFs are low-power, low -profile wireless communication facilities that improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T's existing wireless network. The proposed SWF will help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in this area. AT&T estimates that since introduction of the iPhone in 2007, mobile data usage has increased 580,000% on its network. AT&T forecasts its customers' growing demand for mobile data services to continue. Customer needs require AT&T to design and maintain its network to provide and improve wireless signal quality and to increase data rates sufficient to stream video. Areas that do not meet this minimal standard, or where wireless service is otherwise compromised, represent service issues that must be addressed. Specifically, this proposed SWF will help improve AT&T's wireless services by offloading network traffic carried by existing macro facilities in the area. In addition, faster data rates allow customers to get on and off the network quickly, which produces more efficient use of AT&T's limited spectrum. By placing the SWF in areas where AT&T's existing wireless communication facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences especially high network traffic, AT&T can address the existing and forecasted demand and support 5G speeds in the nearfuture. Improving signal quality and increasing data speed is critical to providing the mobile experience customers demand and to manage the unprecedented increase in mobile data usage on AT&T's network. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") tracks the rates at which American households are shifting from landlines to wireless telecommunications. According to the CDCs latest Wireless Substitution Report, nearly 80 percent of Americans rely exclusively or primarily on wireless communications in their homes.' In addition, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') esti mates that 70 percent of all 911 calls are made from wireless devices.2 And with AT&T's selection by FirstNet as the wireless service provider to build and manage the nationwide first responder wireless network, each new or modified facility will help strengthen first responder communications. AT&T selected the proposed SWF as the best available means to address its service objectives in this portion of City of Springfield. The overall site location and design will comply with applicable code provisions. 'See Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, July -December 2019, available at httos://www.cdc.aov/nchs/data/nhis/earlvrelease/wireless202009-508.odf. 2 See 911 Wireless Services, available at httas://v .fcc.wv/consumers/guides/911-wireless-services. The proposed SWF will be located in the PROW. The project will involve the placement of a small antenna and associated small wireless equipment on a replacement City of Springfield street light pole. Small Cellular. Thefacilitywill not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Itwill not adversely affect the surrounding properties, and itwill have minimal physical and aesthetic footprint in this area. The City of Springfield can easily make the necessary findings for approval of this SWF. Compliance with Applicable Design Standards. AT&T's proposed SWF complies with applicable design requirements in 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications System (WTS) Facilities as follows: • SWF Definition o AT&T's SWF meets the FCC's definition of small wireless facility. The SWF and pole are less than 50 feet in height. The antenna volume is 2.35 cubic feet, and the volume of the equipment cabinet and surge suppressor is 11.078 (10.7+.378) cubic feet. The radio frequency ("RF") emissions will meet FCC safety standards. See FCC Compliance Study on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure submitted for this proposed SWF (Exhibit E). • Design Standards A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10% taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed within the pole that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K. The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements orfor public safety II. A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L. Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District SITE PHOTO SITE NAME: CRAN_RWOR_E0003_023 PREPARED FOR =�'AT&T POLE#: 0992 SC I P I D # : 18925-023-E 19801 TUALAW7 897062ND . TUALATIN, OR 97062 SITE TYPE: WOOD LIGHT/SMARTSTACK Vendor: AT&T SITE ADDRESS: 3000 GATEWAY ST URE y51NFRA2030 T. MAAININSST. SUITE 200 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 IRVINE, CA92614 JS PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: COUNTY: LANE COUNTY JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ,F SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Vendor: SITE INFORMATION: r PROPOSED SITE BUILD OF AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE NAME: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 Costco Wholesa4e9 FACILITY, ON AN PROPOSED POLE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WAY SKIP ID # : 18925-023-E LATITUDE: 44°04'36.69"N (44.07686) M t5ne w. e -a .t3. jZ6I �F CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: � LONGITUDE: -123002'32.28"W (-123.04230) SITE ADDRESS: 3000 GATEWAY ST x 3 Mrxni� v� mfi { r REMOVAL: (1) EXISTING WOOD LIGHT POLE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 COUNTY: LANE COUNTY North , Sryringiinl ♦T DRAWN BY: SLM JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 4 Vo1Vey Rrver Ce,irer i .S.TA (LA PIROOPOSED AT&T SABRE 16 POLE CHECKED BY. JDM ZONING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: COMMERICAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A - ;; SI TE Skinner SI i ; + I .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T DISCONNECT/SURGE SUPPRESSOR Bu ue � � v OCCUPANCY: N/A ,. F, � lei ! _ .. (3) PROPOSED AT&T CONDUITS ADJACENT PARCEL#: 1703220002200 OVERLAY ZONE: NONE W A ?+' nv .. (2) PROPOSED AT&T COMBINERS .. (1) PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL SPECIAL AREA SUBZONE: NONE Eugene A.D.A COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR } ��4r r HUMAN HABITATION * ;y Springfiel[! University c �1�! I of r}urynn r POLE OWNER: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ars I' (Tat) ;;qV► " rl -_\ ADDRESS: 225 FIFTH ST. �" . SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477� :�*' ''�'i �• 4, Collego Hill ,H PHONE: (541) 726-3753 M APPLICANT /CARRIER: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC ('AT&T") ADDRESS: 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 # p �: rt CONTACT: KRISTY WEAVER PHONE: (425) 214-2186 Ml Plsgah Arboretu y. 0 01/28/21 100% CDs ELECTRIC PROVIDER: SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD' - "' REV DATE DESCRIPTION PHONE: (541) 746-8451 Licensor: •� S PJBOOR7H F 8919 PE PROJECT TEAM CODE COMPLIANCE DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. OREGON ENGINEER: SRE ACQUISITION: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT DIRECTIONS FROM PDX AIRPORT: T-1 TITLE SHEET 0 GN GENERAL NOTES 0 V, O 9� 9t' 13,2 J� �SMHG V�/ EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCATION GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. -1 Zg/Zy J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 EXPIRES: 12131/21 CONTACT: JAMES CHUNG CONTACT: AARON GUDELJ EMAIL: jchung@J5IP.com EMAIL: AGUDELJQJ5IP.com1. COMMERCIAL BUILDING CODE: HEAD NORTHWEST ON NE AIRPORT WAY (10 FT) A-1.1 DEMO SITE PLAN 0 PHONE: (949) 247-7767 x 111 PH: (805) 298-3091 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE (OSSC)-2014 2. TURN LEFT (0.2 MILES) A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL CODE: 3. TURN LEFT (0.2 MILES) 4. SLIGHT LEFT ONTO NE AIRPORT WAY (1.8 MILES) A-3 I LETTER AND SURVEY - A-4 ELEVATIONS 0 nEOReUNDER CERTIFY THAT SUEPERMISON ANDTHAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGIIOFEORRuND R THE LAWS OFTHESTATE CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT JS INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS OREGON ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CODE (OESC)-2017 5. SLIGHT RIGHT TO MERGE ONTO 1-205 S TOWARD I-84 W (0.5 MILES) A-5 ELEVATIONS 0 EMAIL: cp]261@att.com CONTACT: DEVIN TAYLOR 6. MERGE ONTO 1-205 S (2.6 MILES) D-1 DETAILS 0 AT&T Site ID: PH: 971-295-6924 PH: (503) 309-1380 TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS 7. TAKE EXIT 21 B TO MERGE ONTO I-84 W (5.4 MILES) D-2 DETAILS 0 UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG IN OREGON, CALL OREGON 8. TAKE THE EXIT ON THE LEFT ONTO -5 TOWARD SALEM (1.5 MILES) RF -1 RF WARNING SIGNS 0 CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 AT&T RF ENGINEER: ARE MANAGER: UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 9. KEEP RIGHT TO STAY ON I-5 S (105 MILES) UC -1 UTILITY COORDINATION SITE PLAN 0 CONTACT: CHRIS OSGOOD OO TOLL FREE: 1-800-332-2344 OR 10. TAKE EXIT 195 AND KEEP RIGHT TO MERGE ONTO BELTLINE RD (0.2 MILES) E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC 0 18925-023-E J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: co3884Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG www.di ore on.com ! g y g it 11. HEAD EAST TO GATEWAY RD (0.2 MILES) G-1 GROUNDING DETAILS 0 EMAIL: jmalbergQjSip.com OREGON STATUTE ON 12. TURN RIGHT ON GATEWAY RD AND GO TO SITE (0.4 MILES) G-2 TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 0 PH: (208) 316-1897 Know what's below. REQUIRES MIN OF 2 13. SITE IS ON THE RIGHT BEFORE CARL'S JR. (LIGHT POST) 3000 GATEWAY ST WORKING DAYS NOTICE Call before you dig. BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: Sheet Title: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMAIL:wlong@j5ip.com CONTACT: DAVE BARNES PH: 321-1116 TITLE SHEET (206) EMAIL: DBarnes@j5ip.com PH: (208) 939-7631 RIGHT-OF-WAY Sheet Number: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS T-1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE STAMPED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES, AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED, OR OTHERWISE DISCONNECTED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 7. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 8. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW, OR ICE SHALL BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 9. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 10. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT, OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 12. NOTICE TO PROCEED - NO WORK TO COMMENCE PRIOR TO COMPANY;S WRITTEN NOTICE TO PROCEED AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ERECTION PLANS, RIGGING PLANS, CLIMBING PLANS, AND RESCUE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN AND SHALL MEET ANSI/TIA 1019 (LATEST EDITION), OSHA AND GENERAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL RIGGING PLANS SHALL ADHERE TO ANSI/TIA-1019 (LATEST EDITION) INCLUDING THE REQUIRED INVOLVEMENT OF A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR CLASS IV CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) CARRIER - AT&T OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES, WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORM CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 4. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. "KITTING LIST" SUPPLIED WITH THE BID PACKAGE IDENTIFIES ITEMS THAT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL OF MATERIALS AND KITTING LIST SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY SUCH CHANGE OF INSTALLATION. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWINGS. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE; TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION; TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. ABREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS: ABREVIATION AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (E) EXISTING MIN MINIMUM REF REFERENCE RF RADIO FREQUENCY T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED TYP TYPICAL REQ'D REQUIRED EGR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MOB MASTER GROUND BAR EG EQUIPMENT GROUND BCW BARE COPPER WIRE SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE IRG INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RBS RADIO BASE STATION SYMBOLS: S/G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR 5 N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR g°- SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR o�a 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CIRCUIT BREAKER A� SINGLE POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED CIRCUIT BREAKER 8 CHEMICAL GROUND ROD BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF TEST WELL Q' DISCONNECT SWITCH END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE METER (ADD EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) VDC NEG* MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUNDING WIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, NEC AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES 2. CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT BLOCKED AND TRIP HAZARDS ARE ELIMINATED. 3. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC, HILTI EPDXY ANCHORS ARE REQUIRED BY AT&T. 4. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC. 5. CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDER -STYLE CABLE TRAY RUNGS. 6. EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E., HOTS), GROUNDING AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE SHALL BE LABELED WITH COLOR -CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL TAPE (3M BRAND, Y" PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE W/ UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD SHALL CONFORM W/ NEC AND OSHA. 7. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE LABELED W/ THEIR VOLTAGE RATING, PHASE CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR AMPACITY RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E. PANEL BOARD AND CIRCUIT ID'S). 8. PANEL BOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHAL BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH PLASTIC LABELS. 9. ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. 10. POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90-C (WET & DRY) OPERATION LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 11. SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN INSULATION CLASS B OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE MULTI -CONDUCTOR, TYPE TO CABLE (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 50OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION WITH OUTER JACKET LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13. ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CRIMP -STYLE COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRE NUTS BY THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRE NUTS SHALL BE RATE FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75'C (90'C IF AVAILABLE). 14. RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 15. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E. RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE) SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 16. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL NONMETALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40 ) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 17. SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNDERGROUND ON STRAIGHTS AND SCHEDULE 80 PVC FOR ALL ELBOWS/90'S AND ALL APPROVED ABOVE GRADE PVC CONDUIT. 18. LIQUID -TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE FLEX) SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED. 19. CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR COMPRESSION TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED. SET SCREW FITTING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 20. CABINETS, BOXES AND WIRE WAYS SHALL BE LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 21. WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPDXY-COATED (GRAY) AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARDS, SHALL BE CONDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) 22. CONDUITS SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY IN PLACE WITH APPROVED NON PERFORATED STRAPS AND HANGERS. EXPLOSIVE DEVICES FOR ATTACHING HANGERS TO STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, CLOSELY FOLLOW THE LINES OF THE STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE STRUCTURE AND KEEP CONDUITS IN TIGHT ENVELOPES. CHANGES IN DIRECTION TO ROUTE AROUND OBSTACLES SHALL BE MADE WITH CONDUIT OUTLET BODIES.CONDUIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER, PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE WALL AND CEILING LINES. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE FISHED TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS. ENDS OF CONDUITS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY CAPPED FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE TO PREVENT CONCRETE, PLASTER OR DIRT FROM ENTERING. CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGIDLY CLAMPED TO BOXES BY GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON BUSHING ON INSIDE AND GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON LOCKNUT ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. 23. EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPDXY-COATED SHEET STEEL; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50 AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 24. METAL RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPDXY- COATED OR NON -CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A AND NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 25. NONMETALLIC RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 26. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS. 27. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS TO SAFEGUARD LIFE AND PROPERTY. 28. INSTALL PLASTIC LABEL ON THE METER CENTER TO SHOW "####". 29. ALL CONDUITS THAT ARE INSTALLED ARE TO HAVE A METERED MULE TAPE PULL CORD INSTALLED. GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTING PROTECTION AND AC POWER GESS) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AT OR BELOW GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL -OF -POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR LESS 3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY SEQUENCING GROUNDING AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION AS TO PREVENT ANY LOSS OF CONTINUITY IN THE GROUNDING SYSTEM OR DAMAGE TO THE CONDUIT AND PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS. 4. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTING OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH #6 AWG COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS. 5. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT. 6. EACH CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS. 7. CONNECTIONS TO THE GROUND BUS SHALL NOT BE DOUBLED UP OR STACKED BACK TO BACK, CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE GROUND BUS ARE PERMITTED. 8. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONDUCTORS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT/GROUND BARS AND THE GROUND RING SHALL BE #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 9. ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 10. USE OF 90' BENDS IN THE PROTECTION GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AVOIDED WHEN 45' BENDS CAN BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED. 11. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE. 12. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS ABOVE GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) SHALL BE FORMED USING HIGH PRESS CRIMPS. 13. COMPRESSION GROUND CONNECTIONS MAY BE REPLACED BY EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS. 14. ICE BRIDGE BONDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY BONDED OR BOLTED TO THE BRIDGE AND THE TOWER GROUND BAR. 15. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E. CONDUCTIVE GEL OR PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. 16. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH A CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON -ELECTRICAL METAL BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 18. BOND ALL METALLIC OBJECTS WITHIN 6FT OF MAIN GROUND WIRES WITH 1-#2 AWG TIN-PLATED COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 19. GROUND CONDUCTORS USED IN THE FACILITY GROUND AND LIGHTING PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH METALLIC OBJECTS THAT FORM A RING AROUND THE CONDUCTOR, SUCH AS METALLIC CONDUITS, METAL SUPPORT CLIPS OR SLEEVES THROUGH WALLS OR FLOORS, WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE HOUSED IN A CONDUIT, SAID CONDUIT TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL CONDITIONS, NON-METALLIC MATERIAL SUCH AS PVC PLASTIC CONDUIT SHALL BE USED. WHERE USE OF METAL CONDUIT IS UNAVOIDABLE (I.E. NON-METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED BY LOCAL CODE) THE GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH END OF THE METAL CONDUIT. 20. ALL GROUNDS THAT TRANSITION FROM BELOW GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED SOLID IN 3/4" LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT LEG 1 FROM 24" BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF CAD -WELD TERMINATION POINT. THE EXPOSED END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED WITH SILICONE CAULK. (ADD TRANSITIONING GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). DESCRIPTION PHASE./CODE LETTER WIRE COLOR 240/120 10 LEG 1 HIACK LEG 2 RED WHITE AC NEUTRAL N GROUND (ECC) G GREEN VDC POS + 'RED -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION VDC NEG* BLACK-POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION 240V OR 20BV, 30 PHASE A BLACK PHASE B RED (ORG. IF HI LEG) PHASE C BLUE 48OV, 30 PHASE A BROWN PHASE B ORANGE PHASE C YELLOW * SEE NEC 210.5(C)(1) AND (2) PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: G1 SINFRASTRUCTURE /P A R T N E R 3 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: 0 01/28/21 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: /Z1 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GENERAL NOTES Sheet Number: GN -1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION do PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM p PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM foo AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION D 0� DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY ° 0 SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR a D SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. C7 a o STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BY OTHERS. � � o nU L7 v / O a 4 �^--- ---- -- (TYP) (E) PARKING LOT PARCEL# : 1703220002109 Q U V ❑� a 0 �� °460 0 D ° d 0 0 o °e� OVERALL SITE PLAN (P) AT&TISABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE (0992) (P) METER PEDESTAL 6C ®Ii ral PARCEL# : 1703220002200 ' ' I I I I 53'-0" ;i0 C•I. OF STREET) (E) R.O.W. ToPOLE) AI (To C.L•OFSTREEi)I I I I � III I� REFER TO ENLARGED SITE PLAN ON SHEET A-2 I I I� I I I (E) BELOW GROUND GAS ROUTE I I� I I f(E) BUILDING I I I I I I I V I I� I I I I I I� I G -G - G--------- - GG G—j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EJ oU �7 Q d q �OD o o I Doo a oU II r7 I a o e I � � 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 110' PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: /Z1 EXPIRES: 12131/21 I HEREBY CER1IFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM FLY REGISTERED ENGINEER U NDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN RWOR EUG03 023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. TE: TO DE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN A ED L LEGAL MANNER. DEMO SITE PLAN a PARCEL# : 1703220002200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 j 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE (0992) (TO BE REPLACED) x I I I 1 I A-4 o I j (E) BELOW GROUND GAS ROUTE I I i I j I I I I I I I EJ 0 V G% I I I I I I I I I I I I v <Z�7 o 1-7 �7 a 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 00, 10 5 0 10'I ioRTHI PREPARED FOR ._ AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: /Z1 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUREWISION AND THAT I AM �ULY REGISTERED ENGINEER U NDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: DEMO SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1.1 NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION. I I --- ---------------- PARCEL# : 1703220002200 ENLARGED SITE PLAN L I I I I I 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: 0 01/28/21 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION EXPIRES: 12/31/21 /Z1 .I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: C RA N-RWOR-EUG03-023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 1 PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 - SLIP ID#: 18925-023 1A SURVEY CERTIFICATION f NAD 83 - o Vendor: LAT - 44'04'36.69" N u G _ (44.07686) OEAOMOND FERRY RD 000 ex 15 INFRASTRUCTURE P A R T N E R S PARCEL a } » l LONG — 123'02 32.28 W - aELTLINE RQ r JOSEPMPL a 2030 MAIN ST. 170.32200-0210,9 _ - sE 200 Q (-123.C4230) a � a > CA9 IRVINE, CA 92614 ELEV = 438.58' NAND 88 i r� 23 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: E7 '^ - WtLE�it(fNYIE RO - Z; - '^ F °� M = w � Ir 75 R3 W I 4Tg KT.=33.0' HT.=32.6' AEGENCV PR § J' 23 4 DIA. -0.79' 4 - BAILEY LN I _ Vendor: x HT.=32.3' 2 o a Qi0 OAKDALE AVE D - -- 23 -- McKriy2,r�- 2122H 7.6HI '1 T.-26.2 y w + 3 r IIT HA DEN 8RJOSE WAY bdRC CENTER OF SUB ECT L.=1s.a' '�C r 1,i r FlMIOW RD R z - _ W008LAHt 8R DRAWN BY: SLM POLE —SEE DETAIL jj L4 - VST I ff z I F� L a u Sr CHECKED BY: JDM scorrs GL OR w GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES d LATITUDE: 4404'36.69" N (44.07686) (NAD B3) CL LONGITUDE: 123'02'3228" W (-123,04230) (NAD 83) z + D�- 38 GROUND ELEVATION: 438.58 FEET (NAVD B8) J HEIGHT: < @ TOP OF POLE: 3297 FEET (AGE) J 0 TOP OF LIGHT: 32.83 FEET (AGE) - 01/28/21 100% CDs 0 v 53' TO CL DATE OF SURVEY: NOVEMBER 19, 2C20 DATE DESCRIPTION REV 1 v 93' TO ROW POLE DETAIL 2000 a 100 2�60 40U0 o RE: SCP ID#: 18925-023 Lici J Q 3000 GATEWAY ST v o - NOT TO SCALE - SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 1 INCH = 2000 FEET 98PE �o 44 cY a I CERTIFY THAT THE LATITUDE AND THE LONGITUDE SHOWN ABOVE ARE EGON,r, 3,L n ! ! REGISTERED ACCURATE TO WITHIN +15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THAT THE SITE NH��t/ZB�Z� r f PROFESSIONAL ELEVATION IS ACCURATE TO WITHIN +3 FEET VERTICALLY, WHICH MEETS EXPIRES: 12/310 � 1A STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATICN SHEET 1 ! LAND SURVEYOR LEGEND: nveyM sren.d bran F- 91: OC3. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM (GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES) ARE IN IHEREBY CER,IEY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM °S8F-nd.Z°. - TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD 83) AND ARE REGISTERED DULY REGISTERED ENGOF ORS " THE awSOETHESTATE POWER POLE pq WATER VALVE IRRIG CONTROL VALVE , - '{ ,� EXPRESSED AS DEGREES MINUTES ) ( ) AND SECONDS ( ). TO PROFESSIONAL OREG [:]T TELEPHONE RISER OD STORM MANHOLE DECEMBER 30, 2010 THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A SECOND. THE VERTICAL DATUM LAND SURVEYOR AT&T Site ID: ANDREW JOHN PLETT (ELEVATION AMSL) IS IN TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL nN t�=nye .w ono Pim E -us. ROW LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GIS DATA, AND NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY 78538PL5 DATUM OF 1988 (NAND 88). kn m;u`�wa-P w�a.� CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-023 E�p R. V..'. WA � Date: 11/20/2020 SHEET RENEWS 12/31/20 Date; 11/20/2020 OREGON 18925-023-E Land Services Proj No: 2020-177-62 1 OF 1 f Proj No: 2020-177-62 DECEMBER 30, 2010 Prepared: C.M.I. 4858 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD, SUITE A xwwsflands.c om ^7 G.M.I. ANDREW JOHN PLETT Prepared: SHEET 7B53BPLS 4858 SW SCH6LL5 FERRY RD, SUITE A www.sFlcn ds.ccNn 3000 GATEWAY ST s p ? PORTLAND., OR 97225 'Info0sfland3.GOm Scale; 1 ��=10� 1 0 65-02.3-E PORTLAND, OR 97225 info®sFlandsxc Checked: A.J.P. 1 OF 1 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 503-345-0328 503-345-0328 RENEWS 12/31/20 Sheet Title: 1A LETTER AND SURVEY Sheet Number: A-3 1 A LETTER 21 SURVEY ORT 1 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO ==LAW .'AT&T 1 MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: 'SINFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. 2030 MAIN ST. T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SUITE 200 ELEV.3IS 0" (A.G.L.) IRVINE, CA 92614 AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION. (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL J5 PROJECT ID: P-04277 �� RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA Y ELEV. 35'-0" (A.G.L.) i D-1 e Vendor: C? L rL (1) (P) AT&T NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH SEE DETAIL 1 HO D-1 IF. LTITJU (E) LUMINAIRE (E) LUMINAIRE T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE 16" `r ELEV. 31'-0" (A.G.L.) I Vendor: T.O. EXISTING POLE I ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-4" (A.G.L.) / ELEV. 29'-4" (A.G.L.) I 4"x8"ACCESS I PORT II IIII DRAWN BY: SLM )III ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE CHECKED BY: JDM ��I I (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16' SMARTSTACK POLE �I T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) I'II I o1D EQUIPMENT BAY WITH 1� IIjII I i alD (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE 1 IIII 0992) ELEV. 14'-4" (A.G.L.) I I (TO BE REPLACED) oID EQUIPMENT BAY 0 01/28/21 100% CDs FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION IIII Licensor: IIII I 89198PE I` ^��I I ,III T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 5'-8" (A.G.L.) j I 1 � UTILITY BAY WITH: (P) AT&T DISCONNECT /SURGE SUPPRESSOR SEE DETAIL q� OREGON p O y�qy f3 LO VINHG� 21 �8/ D-1 a EXPIRES: 12131/21 ��I � \ IIII I (P) METER PEDESTAL (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I� Uq (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE THAT THESE EWI6WEREDTHAT I PREPARED BY E REBYOR BEER AM ANDTHATTHE MERE ONOERMy DI GINEE UNDER ou LY REGISTERED ENGINEER EGOER THE Wws oEiHE siAiE of OREGON IIII AT&T Site ID: FINISHED GRADE ELEV. 0'-0" M FINISHED GRADE ELEV. 0.0.. .. . i CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 I I I 18925-023-E I I I I I ' I 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES I I (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS Sheet Title: I s I ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-4 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2' V o 2 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 24"x38" SCALE: 3/8" = - 1'0" 2' 1' 0 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO ==LAW .'AT&T 1 MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 19801 SW 72ND AVE. b. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TUALATIN, OR 97062 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: 'SINFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. 2030 MAIN ST. T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA ELEV. 36'-0" (A. G.L.) SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION. (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL QD J5 PROJECT Io: P-042779 Vendor: RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA D-1 Y ELEV. 35-0"(AG L.) o (1) (P) AT&T NOKIAAIRSCALE RRH SEE DETAIQ I D-1 (E) LUMINAIRE T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 31'-0" (A. G. L.) I 16„ °` (E) LUMINAIRE Vendor: T.O. EXISTING POLE T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-4" (A.G.L.) I DRAWN BY: SLM IJ I III CHECKED BY: JDM ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE I (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16" I SMARTSTACK POLE If T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) I I�\+ I I EQUIPMENT BAY WITH �II I (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS III�I I PERF. SCREEN VENTS FOR CONVECTIVE COOLING, 3 PLACES T.O. EQUIPMENT BAYSMARTSTACK POLE (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE (0992) (TO BE REPLACED) ELEV. 14'-4" (A. G. L.) I EQUIPMENT BAY 0 01/28/21 10096 CDs FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION I Licensor: IIII��I \III 89198PE III(I IIII T.. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELOEV. 5-13" (A.G.L.) I UTILITY BAY WITH: (P)AT&T DISCONNECT/SURGE SUPPRESSOR SEE DETAIL 3 D-1 OREGON 9iq �•. C9 9 Y 13 L a� VINHG ZS/Z1 EXPIRES: 12131M �I 1 Ij \I (P) METER PEDESTAL O I • ' MEOPHEREBY cERMY DIREDIRECT SE SUPEWISIONINS NDTHAREAMv MERE ONOER E GINEE UNDERISQV ANOiFTH AM ou�v REGISTERED ENGINEER THE Wws oErHE srArE of OREGON (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I� I \1U I� AT&T Site ID: (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I FINISHED GRADE ,i,�� FINISHED GRADE CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 ELEV. 0'-0" ELEV. 0'-0" II II 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-5 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2' V o 2 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 24"x38" SCALE: 3/8" = — 1'0" 2' 1' 0 PSEUDO OMNI 12 -PORT CANISTER ANTENNA PREPARED FOR MANUFACTURER: GALTRONICS PART NUMBER: GQ2412-06613 DIAMETER: 14.7" HEIGHT: 24.5" WEIGHT W/MOUNT: 30.9 LBS AT&T VOLUME: 3.1416 (0.6125 FT)A2 x (2 FT) = 2.35 CUBIC FEET 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 14.7" Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE ® ® 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: N U ,las .. noo uH. Vendor: cas (e+as' 0 h Ol O51N 1 0 o aisa —seas5 un: Inas D 0 31,5 o,) 411` U DRAWN BY: SLM a, .0 ® ® CHECKED BY: JDM vLJ L N FRONT VIEW BOTTOM VIEW ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS NOT USED 4 2 N.T.S. N.T.S. SURGE PROTECTION BOX B46 NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH FOR LAA (ARZA): MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP MANUFACTURER: NOKIA PART NUMBER: RCCAC-1333-PS-240-A CORE UNIT SIZE WEIGHT: 8 LBS (DC VERSION): 11.6" x 9.6" x 1.8" (H x W x D) DIMENSIONS (LxWxH): 9.38" x 5.58" x 10.43" INTERFACE: 2 CPRI PORTS FOR FRONT -HAUL (2x9.8 GB/S) VOLUME: (0.781 FT) x (0.557FT) x (0.869 FT) = 0.378 CUBIC FEET POWER INPUT: DC: -40.5V TO -57V CORE UNIT WEIGHT: 11.0 LBS VOLUME: 0.116 CUBIC FEET 0 01/28/21 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION 5.58" 9.39' 5.06" Licensor: 8.59" 0 9.b 8919 PE q�OREGON,p O 9 9Y ��VINHG Zg/Z/ / EXPIRES: 12/31/21 o _ = v C6 O o O "I HERESY cER THAT THESE PLAINS' WERE PREPAREDA 9v ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT IAM • E DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE i JADO OF OREGON 0 0 01 O AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 ISOMETRIC VIEW 18925-023-E SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW 11.6" M40 GLANDS CAN BE 3000 GATEWAY ST REPLACED BY 1-1/4"NPT SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 CONDUIT FITTINGS Q Sheet Title: O ❑ O O O DETAILS o o BOTTOM VIEW O Sheet Number: D-1 3 AC DISCONNECT W/ SURGE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONBOTTOM VIEW ) RADIO SPECIFICATION N.T.S. N.T.S. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD METER PEDESTAL N.T.S. (2) 8' graund rods required with mlrlmum 6' upwing 0 riot -Ile NDrre CIl It breakers W NlIn 5ei� ESD 0105 See note 4 To S.U.B. Elaatrlaal label or pemrl: III be dlsplayed an the meter base, See n04e 5 To nizinllc hcrv- SPRII+IGFIELD LITILbTY BOARD ENGNEEP3W3 STANDARD DISTRI9LITION PROCEDURES & P OL3CIES- TYPICALUNDERGRQUN:O MQBFLE HOME PEDESTALaEFMCE ST.iNOAFM hT-3AEr=R ESD 8165 Page 1 of 2 NOTES: 1- Approved service equipraerpt provided by cLestoraer imiu es.oarrdA rrMeter base, ground rod conductors. 2- Custorner installed and rlim stained tranch and conduckxs beyond point of delivery (load sxde of meter) subject to City of SprirEgheld approval- 3- refer to ESD 0691) for details regarding S -Lt -B- requirements for meter ihsfallai3ons- Meter lom:6tiarti subject to approval by 4- Set a 118" x 1' x I" steel angle -drive irlto the grouftd and attach it to each side of the pedestal v:hh 114" ur larger LKAts. 6- Access door to S_tJ-B- connedcrls must be kepi clear by a rrlirliniurn of 6" above the Prlal grade and mum have a "aWe pravmAm for S.U. B. 6- Pede-cA2J consfruck6n, material, and oarrosi resi!I finish shall be approved by recognized test laboratory (i -e- IJL)_ 7- Minimum interior dliniens orfs of pedestal shat be 4" depths and 7-11T widths. 8- Mira n]Um depths of pedestal in the ground.shwall be 24'- 9- Minimum meter I76ghzl: to center -of meter shall be 48°- 10. Set the pedostal such that the frent dour to -U-B- am ne ns remains accessUe- 11- Do NOT install customer conduct across ttse front of -U-6- access doer on the pedestal. REVISIONS Date Descri lion 8724183 Created 611511.6 Reforrliatted, di -axing updated SPRNGFIEL€} UTELETY BOARD ENGiNEERMISTANDARD DISTRI91LrTJON PROCEDURES & POLICIES TYPICAL UHIDERGROUN'D MOBILE HOME PEDEST.4LSERVICE IMMENIDFINM ST.M0JFJ3 hlhl6cR ESID 0189 Page 2 or 2 PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: 01/28/21 100% CDs DATE DESCRIPTION EXPIRES: 12131/21 /Z1 "I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PWP6 WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: DETAILS Sheet Number: D-2 AVAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL: https://vvvvw.weneedsigns.com/product.php? prod uct id=171904&cat=1135&page= I CLICK ON AT&T PH: 510-651-0445 NO] -DC -16 1'x6' NOTICE DECAL "FOR 1 FOOT DISTANCE" VYVYL DECAL WITH ADHESIVE BACKING 1 ORDER COMES IN A PACK PF 25. RF WARNING SIGNS PLACE THREE NOTICE STICKER EQUALLY SPACED AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE ANTENNA RADOME RF WARNING NOTICE SIGN AT ANTENNA 5' NOTICE ON THIS POLE: RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS NEAR SOME ANTENNAS MAY EXCEED FCC RULES FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE PERSONNEL CLIMBING THIS TOWER SHOULD BE TRAINED FOR WORKING RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIRONMENTS AND USE A PERSONAL RF MONITORING IF WORKING NEAR ACTIVE ANTENNAS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION RULES ON RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS 47 CFR 1.1307(B) 5' (3 DIGITS REE 000 NETWORK OPERATION CONTROL CENTER (NOC) 1-800-264-6620 REENTER I.D. NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH NODE NODE NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATED AT EACH NODE PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: 0 01/28/21 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION NODE ID #12 r OREGON p O 6.. 4) 13, t VINHG ZS/Z1 THIS SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH FCC RULES FOR BOTH OCCUPATION AND EXPIRES: 12/31/21 CONTROLLED AND GENERAL PUBLIC OR NOTES: SITE NAME N IS FOR AMPLE IFY AT RECT NAME HALL BEV INDICATE AT EACH SITE STAY BACKDA MINIMUM OF 4 FEET SAME SQDE AS THE NT ENCLOSURE ON THE EoeeuNoeR voiOFOR GON WERE PeePnemev AT&T TGA R D 0021 PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE SITE ISIwANDTHAnAM - _ 1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED, IN DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE FROM ANY ACTIVE ANTENNA 2. WARNING SIGNS TO BE INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS AND FCC. AT&T Site ID: 1 800 638 2822 SIGNS ALLOWED ONLY AS REQUIRED BY TO DEACTIVATE ANTENNA CALL LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO THE N.O. PHONE NUMBER BEFORE ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 OPERATING DISCONNECT U S D. 192355 1 USID NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE 18925-023-E • -PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE USID NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT DISCONNECT RF WARNING NOTICE SIGNS AT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 24'x36" SCALE: N -S 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: RF WARNING SIGNS Sheet Number: RF -1 1 0 O a p -- v ---- o, 0 0 Qop o �OboQa ^'J�o O Q o b (E) TREES o d (TYP) ",_(E) PARKING LOT PARCEL# : 1703220002109 C3oo 0 Q 1:727d Do Qo�D o M 0 0 c 0 0 PARCEL# : 1703220002200 (P) AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE (0992) (P) METER PEDESTAL — G— UTILITY COORDINATION SITE PLAN z PREPARED FOR 1 � I I I =1 AT&T 1 1 I 1 1 I I I _ — I 19801 SW 72ND AVE. � TUALATIN, OR 97062 a Q� oDp Vendor: ° L7 6 o p o I I I o Q a �odo "15 INFRASTRUCTURE Q D 2030 MAIN ST. I I I I DQ Q o SUITE 200 O o p IRVINE, CA 92614 I d j J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 o Vendor: I 0 p I o� II I I O VU' o I I I ' I Vendor: I � I I I (E) BELOW GROUND GAS ROUTE I I ZE� � �� D p DRAWN BY: SLM O� CHECKED BY: JDM I7zga ��� Q o Dom I Doo I I r v I I I ZF ` D 0 01/28/21 100% CDs i^ REV DATE DESCRIPTION /I- % C v II Licensor: Ii 89198PE I o I ° OREGON,*13, �O I R, <1 VINHC I I I O EXPIRES: 12/31/21 LU I\/ `I HEREBY /� a ✓ cER THAT THESE PLAINS PREPARED 9v MEORUNDER M DIRECTEISIONANDTHAT AM ouLV REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDERHE WwsoFTHESTATE OF OREGON n I IVL I g D AT&T SiteQI ID w ° I �� a��000 Z I� Q Q �o CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 I 0Z/3 ° �0 °J D 0 18925-023-E C- I C o 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 �7 Sheet Title: I RF WARNING ' SIGNS ' a o Sheet Number: I ao� <Z-7 UC_1 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 'l 10 a o 1c' �oPrH PREPARED FOR THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. �� = `AT&T 1 Y akin Pico Locatfon 72ND AVE. TUALUAL ATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: 6 -Part MudIIHigh Sartd �51NFRASTRUCTURE An�eEtir�a 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 xxx r"y11f1T1c3 O[1linn; IRVINE, CA 92614 - SI-nglp Anlenrr2 U.I MAX 30A Js PRoJECr ID: P-042779 xxx .1 P -I Nlia-Gand Q GlA2)+ ZPorts High -Band -H } POWER LINE Vendor: xxx Alt2m arra PIC}17U as suppori(rE� L -ow. Ban I andPDr 2-5 G)4z x FA211? 81 (1) 6-#10THHN/1HWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE Vendor: Vd gaud SURGE SUPPRESSOR — PC5rAVWS Crow ©and Ccm baler (1) 6-#1OTHHN/THWN/VW-1 - * POLE MOUNTED STREET LAMP TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO STREET LAMP DRAWN BY: SLM fit _ rAh3gie' Qfl �y�. IVIA4c CHECKED BY: JDM Ft� r MRS. - R Fel -1 ' 4T"4R AJr: caAf€��� B�5�PG:5 - i H- 4T4R NF5c 1p M -k r4 $OiUAINS RRH RRH RRH RRH -F�Rl��. 2T�Ir�.��� F[rl? Bd4Y:53HzA.h.,�. j�_ - AC Froom r MrldUIrx& - C PRI C h � in nut vuppunc4 JDhti2HY �Dr AIr9G 3I$ I (Hill n d a dGdc�d C PMfGr -9ac� Ra Y RAYCAP DISCONNECT/SURGE SUPPRESSOR (1) 2-# 12 THHN/THWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO RRH r 0 01/28/21 100% CDs 4 AMP BREAKER REV DATE DESCRIPTION �'<kF�l�iJ 11J�2�n� METAL OXIDE T SWITCH Licensor: 6 FibQM FFOn1h-aUl rcgidired VARISTOR (TYP.) 89198PE it OREGON qY f3,,p O 9 NEUTRAL BUS BAR VINNC 1 Zg/Zl GROUND BUS BAR EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE Puna WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON' AC Source if w AT&T Site ID: Dark fIbc-Ts Hifi Hub CRAN RWOR EUG03 023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC Sheet Number: E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 121 DC POWER SCHEMATIC 24"x36" SALE: NTS 1 THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. NOTES: 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF THE INSTALLATION ON THE POLE SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AND BARREL COMPRESSION GROUNDED. 2. A COPPER GROUND WIRE, #6 AWS MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE BASE OR FEEDLINE ATTACH TO GROUND CONNECTION POINT OF THE ANTENNA TO A GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE POLE AND BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE ANTENNA FEEDLINE CONDUIT. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY CONNECTED CONTRACTOR TO THE GROUND ROD. 3. WHERE A UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR EXISTS, THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY BONDED BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR AT THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR LEVEL BY UTILITY CO. CREWS. 4. A GROUND ROD, 8 FEET MINIMUM IN LENGTH SHALL BE INSTALLED (WHERE NO UTILITY CO. GROUND GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH ROD & INTACT GROUND WIRE EXISTS) AT THE BASE OF THE POLE. THIS INSTALLATION SHALL MEET OR 3. EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINE D16-2 5. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE MOLDING FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH ON THE IREFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. POLE, EXCEPT AT THE POINT WHERE IT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR BONDING TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL. 6. THE UTILITY CO. AND COMMUNICATION GROUND RODS SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER USING COPPER #6 AWG WIRE G R O C N D O N G NOTES 24"x36" SCALE: NTS COAXIAL GROUND KITS W. LONG BARREL COMPRESSION DOUBLE LUG WITH SIGH HOLE, ATTACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALLED BY ANTENNA CONTRACTOR 0 0 0,0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O '000000000000000000' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER GROUND BAR COPPER WIRE (TYP.) INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: 1. COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTION WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL GROUND LUGES TO HAVE INSPECTION WINDOWS/SIGHT HOLES G R O D N D O N G BAR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOT USED 24"x36" SCALE: NTS GROUND BAR L #6 AWG TO ANTENNA GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO GROUND ROD J 1 1 WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION FA 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOTES: 1. GROUND WIRE MOLDING SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE BARE GROUND WIRE TO PROTECT LINE WORKERS, THE WIRE, AND THE PUBLIC. EXTEND PLASTIC MOLDING AT LEAST TWO INCHES BELOW GRADE. 2. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE IN ONE CONTINUOUS LENGTH. INSERT GROUND WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GROUND CLAMP AND BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TIGHTENING. CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL ON THE POLE. PLACE GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH SIDE) AND SERVICE NEUTRAL. 3. IDRIVE GROUND ROD IN UNDISTURBED EARTH 4. IREFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. 1/2" PLASTIC MOULDING #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) GRADE _. LN GROUND ROD CLAMP 6" GROUND ROD, 5/8"0 X 8' LONG (NOT REQUIRED IF PGE GROUND ROD IS PRESENT) CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL 5 1 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS WOODEN POLE E E 0 2 IC -CRIME DETAIL TYPE SS TYPE TA TYPE W TYPE GT 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 16 ICARDWELD D E T A D L S -D '6' ECTOR CRIMP CONNI TYPE PT TYPE VN TYPE VS TYPE GY 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 13 TYPE GL TYPE NC TYPE VB TYPE GR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS PREPARED FOR AT&T 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 Vendor: /Z1 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-1 LEGEND PREPARED FOR ■ MECHANICAL CONNECTION, DBL -BOLT OR EQUAL i AT&T • CADWELD CONNECTION OR EQUAL IN-LINE Cu C -CRIMP, SPLIT -BOLT OR EQUAL 19801 SW 72ND AVE. TUALATIN, OR 97062 THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE Vendor: DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER �51NFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. v A R r N E R 3 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 (P) OMNI DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PER PLAN, TYP. Vendor: ANTENNA GROUND POLE EXTENSION GROUND Vendor: RR U EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 2' W x 6' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER DRAWN BY: SLM #2 COPPER -TINNED, BARE WIRE. ADD 1/2" WIRE COVER ON THE CHECKED BY: JDM NOTE: BOTTOM 12 FT. DETAIL SHOWS GENERAL SCHEMATIC GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS ONLY. (P) METAL POLE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE RRU EQUIPMENT BONDING JUMPER #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER, TYP. 0 01/28/21 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION #2 GREEN STRANDED TO #2 SOLID MASTER GROUND BAR 2' Licensor: W x 12' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. SERVICE GROUND #2 AWG BARE 89198PE OR GREEN STRANDED COPPER CONTINUOUS TO GROUND DISCONNECT POLE GROUNDING OREGON,- O 9Ligk 13, VINNG POLE GROUNDING BAR 2" W x 6' EXPIRES: 12/31/21 CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. METER (IF APPLICABLE) (E) FINISHED SURFACE 'I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EW ISION A DTHARm 9v MERE ENDER E DIRECT UNDERI90 ANGiF THI AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER ENDER THE Wws OF THE STATE OF OREGON o z AT&T Site IF PILE GROUNDING CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION TO NEW GROUND ROD 18925-023-E (N) GROUND ROD 5/8" x 8' LONG 3000 GATEWAY ST COPPER CLAD STEEL SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: Sheet Number: G-2 NOT USED TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: N,�; 1 Sabre Industries - INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 31' Smart Stack (36' Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG03_023, OR Site Number: 18925-023-E Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24 January 21, 2021 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 7 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2-3 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 4-9 Foundation Calculations........................................................................ 10-15 61633PE r OREGON ¢FG<Y t2 10�e �. E%WREi. 06!30/2022 I I21I2( Designed Appurtenanw Loading Design Crfleria-ANSII AaaplPa ah—OR a n.nl..h o.l�mpa s.+rleeaDRED AR A I AENERVII EUDI3_U23, OR 1&92502&E r�µm'. Al TaOlm, GIw1d E1,11— A, TaOlm, DIED wean 1 1, OR Rrwt. Is IR,rt 11 AD (1) DPR200NI CRT 11 ART (1) FD�AVARI 5. ("torcen'sARR�A Design Crfleria-ANSII Load Case Reacitone e.alP+e. AaaplPa ah—OR a n.nl..h o.l�mpa s.+rleeaDRED RI I AENERVII EUDI3_U23, OR 1&92502&E r�µm'. 31' smart ate h - PIS Pde Anchor Bolt Dimensions GIw1d E1,11— DATE Load Case Reacitone e.alP+e. AaaplPa ah—OR a n.nl..h o.l�mpa s.+rleeaDRED uog INNOVATION DELIVERED ray, lASflMMY AENERVII EUDI3_U23, OR 1&92502&E r�µm'. 31' smart ate h - PIS Pde Anchor Bolt Dimensions OUR 14M OM DIED wean 1 1, Notes 1) Anten. Feed Lt. Run Inside Pole 2) All dimensions are atone grouts level, unbss oearwise specMed. 3) Weighs, shown are estimates. Flnaveightlarm vary. d) Tozer Ran,:13.8% 5) TMs taxer design aM, If applbaSle, HER founcatbn design(s) shown on HER followhg pagels) also meet or exceed HER regnmere nts of HER 2819 Oregon Structural Speclalry Cade. $ByY IMu86Me Base Plate Dimensions J&NSR-UCN.EL PA RTNER$ uog INNOVATION DELIVERED ray, lASflMMY AENERVII EUDI3_U23, OR 1&92502&E r�µm'. 31' smart ate h - PIS Pde Anchor Bolt Dimensions eY' E.ien wean 1 1, Notes 1) Anten. Feed Lt. Run Inside Pole 2) All dimensions are atone grouts level, unbss oearwise specMed. 3) Weighs, shown are estimates. Flnaveightlarm vary. d) Tozer Ran,:13.8% 5) TMs taxer design aM, If applbaSle, HER founcatbn design(s) shown on HER followhg pagels) also meet or exceed HER regnmere nts of HER 2819 Oregon Structural Speclalry Cade. $ByY IMu86Me J&NSR-UCN.EL PA RTNER$ 5a PE Inuuj+piES" INNOVATION DELIVERED ray, lASflMMY AENERVII EUDI3_U23, OR 1&92502&E r�µm'. 31' smart ate h - PIS Pde 'em eY' 1/212y11 Kn Page Sabre Industries" INNOVATION DELIVERED Grade (8) 2" Conduits 8 (2) 3/4" Conduits Grout --see following page for installation notes No.: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24 Date: 01 /2121 By: KJT Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG03 023, OR 18925-023-E 31' Smart Stack Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 5,000 psi, in 31 accordance with ACI 318-14. c Dia. � 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 G=� kkk_I Grade 60. I I L_____I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ELEVATION VIEW (1.59 Cu. Yds.) (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) 3) All Taber to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- 222-H-2017. 6 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be positioned as closely as possible to the bottom of the anchor bolts. Rebar Schedule for Pier Pier (12) #6 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" of pier, then 12" C/C Information contained herein is the sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not he reproduced copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive - P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279.0814 Page Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DELIVERED Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG03 023, OR 18925-023-E Precast Foundation for a 31' Smart Stack Installation Notes: No.: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24 Date: 01 /2121 By: KJT 1). Lifting plate assemblies shall be tightened against concrete surface using heavy hex nuts and F436 hardened flat washers. Nuts to be snug tight. 2). Approximate weight of pier is 6579 pounds. 3). Drilled hole shall be no larger than 42" diameter. 4). Loads at ground surface should be minimized in close proximity to the excavated hole, before it has been grouted. 5). Top of pier shall be held level (plus or minus 1 degree) during installation of grout. 6). A quick -setting grout shall be used for same day installation of the foundation and pole structure. 7). Grout shall be non -shrink, with a 7 -day compressive strength of at least 5000 psi. 8). Air voids within the grouted space should be minimized by tamping with a rod. 9). Minimum grout requirement for a neatly drilled 42" diameter hole is 0.57 cubic yards. 10). This design assumes the drilled hole can remain stable during installation. It may not be appropriate for weak, collapsible soil, or in locations where groundwater will be encountered. Information contained herein is the sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279.0814 Page (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaK:(416)736-4372 web: Wnw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: Sabre Towers Rod Poles n: 21 jan 2021 at 11:00:21 ----------------------- 31' Pipe Pole / EU603 023, ON * All pole diameters shown On the following pages are across corners. See profile Jrawi ng for widths across flats. PULE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCE$ SPLICE ... O✓ENIAP... w/t NAME SIDE DI -NESS **Pm **Mn WEE LENGTH RATIO ft in in kip ft -kip ft 30.9 ........................................... 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 A 0 42.7 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 0.0 ........................................... POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLT$ AT BASE OF SECTION............ GLC NAME ELEV NUMBER WEE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE $HEAR PLANE ELEV ft in ksi ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 RULE SECTIONS SECTION NO.Of LENGTH OUT$IDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGE.WELD NAME $IDE$ NOT TOP HAD ENTAL BOT TOP ..GROUE.ID.. ID BUT TOP ft in in in A 0 30.92 16.00 16.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 * - Diameter Of circunscribeE circle MATERIAL TYPE$ TYPE OF IF NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE No ELEM. WEB RANGE .PROTECTION. .W OF ORIENT AREA & deg in in in in deg PL 1 1 0.0 16.00 0.31 0.375 0.375 0.00 0.0 & - with respect t0 Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES -------------- MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL WEE NO. MODULUS WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi ksi /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001170 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A -- 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOADS ON MULE LOAD ELEV APELY..LOAD..AT LOAD ...... FORCE$...... ...... MOMENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ NOR. DOWN VERTICAL TOHSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 34.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 C 33.417 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0771 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 Page 4 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0308 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2494 0.2700 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 30.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0124 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 LOADING CONDITION M 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOAD$ ON POLE LOAD DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ELEV APVLY..LOAU..AT LOAD ......PONCES...... ...... MUNEHTS..... TYPE dJwH ........ TILT .......... RADIUS AZI AZI HONII DONN VERTICAL TONSNAL ACROSS ft ft 0.00X O.00A kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 34.917 O.00A 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0279 0.0000 0.0000 C 33.417 0.00X 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0771 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0231 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0198 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2494 0.2025 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0918 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0225 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0077 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 30.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0124 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 GuynaSt Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaX:(416)736-4372 web: www. guymast.cpm Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 21 jan 2021 at: 11:00:21 31' Pipe Pole / EUG03 023, OR MAXIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED(w.r.t. wind direction) MAST ....... DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ......... ROTATIONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... dJwH ........ TILT .......... TWIST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 30.9 0.04A 0.00X O.00A 0.09D 0.00X O.00x ...................................................................... 23.2 0.02A O.00x O.00A 0.090 O.00x O.00x 15.5 0.01A O.00X O.00A 0.0" O.00X 0.00X ...................................................................... 7.7 O.OM O.00x 0.000 0.0 SA O.00x O.00x Page 5 0.0 0.004 O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MAXIM H POLE PONCES CALCUureO(W.r.t. to Mod direction) .$I VIAL SHEA2.W.r.Lwxx O.OIN EBMENI.W.r.Lwxx O.OIN TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 30.9...................................................................... 0.36 H 0.08 C 0.00 x -0.19 P 0.00 a 0.00 x 1.22 H 0.42 E 0.00 x -1.85 C 0.00 x 0.00 N 23.2...................................................................... 1.22 C 0.42 A 0.00 x -1.85 0 0.00 w 0.00 T 1.94 C 0.51 A 0.00 x -5.48 0 0.00 x 0.00 x 15.5...................................................................... 1.94 0 0.51 m 0.00 R -5.48 0 0.00 x 0.00 x 2.62 0 0.60 m 0.00 R -9.80 0 0.00 x 0.00 x 7.7...................................................................... 2.62 0 0.60 m 0.00 0 -9.80 0 0.00 x 0.00 x 3.27 0 0.69 m 0.00 0 -14.79 C 0.00 x 0.6 x ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 3.27 0 -0.69 m 0.00 0 14.79 C 0.00 x 0.00 x COMPLIANCE WITH 4.8.2 ---------------------- & 4.5.4 F%MENT.W.r.t.WIN,.,IR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ELEV AXIAL BENDING SHEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISPIEo O/t(W/t) m4x ft -kip 3.27 0.69 TORSIONAL -14.79 0.00 0.00 D ALLOWED ft C x x 30.92 ...................................................................... O.00H 0.00P 0.000 0.001 YES 42.67A 400.0 O.00H 0.010 0.00E 0.01C YES 42.67A 400.0 23.19 ...................................................................... 0.000 0.01, O.00A 0.010 YES 42.67A 46.0 0.000 0.02, O.00A 0.03, YES 42.67A 400.0 15.46 ...................................................................... 0.00, 0.02, O.00N 0.03, YES 42.67A 46.0 0.00, 0.04, O.00m 0.05, YES 42.67A 400.0 7.73 ...................................................................... 0.00, 0.04, O.00m 0.05, YES 42.67A 46.0 0.01, 0.060 O.00m 0.07C YES 42.67A 400.0 0.00 ...................................................................... MAXIMUM ----------------------------------------- LOAD$ ONTO FOUNDATION(W.r.t. Wind direction) CONN SHEAR.W.r.t.WIN,.,IR F%MENT.W.r.t.WIN,.,IR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 3.27 0.69 0.00 -14.79 0.00 0.00 D m 0 C x x (USA 222-H) - monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaX:(416)736-4372 web: wvrw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 21 jan 2021 at: 11:00:45 31' Pipe Pole / EuD03 023. OR ."""""" . service Load condition ........................•• ............................................................................. * Only 1 conditions) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A 60 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: 00 Page 6 LOADS ON POLE LOAD WITH 4.8.2 ELEV APVLY_LOAO..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... EaMIEHTS..... TYPE RADIO$ AZI AZI HORII IXYNN VERTICAL TORSRAL ft ft O.00D O.00K O.000 kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 34.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 C 33.417 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0300 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0257 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.107 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0220 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0186 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0970 0.2250 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1020 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 30.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0049 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0047 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 MA IMOM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCLLATED(W.LL wind direction) EAST .......DEFLECTION$ (ft) ......... ......... ROTATDONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOWN ........ TILT .......... TWIST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 30.9 0.01. 0.00L 0.00. 0.04. O.00L O.00L ............................................64...........66........... 23.2 0.01. O.00L 0.00. 0.04e O.00L O.00L 15.5 0.00. O.00L 0.00. 0.03. O.00L O.00L ....... ....................................... JJ 0.00. 6.66E 6.66E 0.02e 6.66E 6.66E 0.0 0.00A O.00A O.00A 0.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCU!ATED(W,t. to Mod direction) MAST LOTAL SHE..w.r.LWIRU.UIR MCMENT...r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 30.9...................................................................... 0.30 D 0.03 C 0.00 K -0.07 K 0.00 F 0.00 F 1.02 D 0.16 C 0.00 K -0.72 F 0.00 K 0.00 K 23.2...................................................................... 1.02 C 0.16 R 0.00 L -0.72 D 0.00 K 0.00 K 1.62 D 0.20 . 0.00 L -2.15 . 0.00 L 0.00 L 15.5...................................................................... 1.62 D 0.20 L 0.00 F -2.15 . 0.00 L 0.00 L 2.18 D 0.24 L 0.00 F -3.86 . 0.00 L 0.00 L 7.7 ...................................................................... 2.18 D 0.24 . 0.00 F -3.86 L 0.00 L 0.00 L 2.72 D 0.28 . 0.00 F -5.85 . 0.00 L 0.00 L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.72 D -0.28 a 0.00 F 5.85 a 0.00 L 0.00 L COEELIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL .ENDING $HEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(S/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOGED ft 30.92.................................................................6666. O.00D O.00K O.000 O.00K YES 42.67A 400.0 Page 7 Page 8 O.00D O.00F 0.000 O.00F YES 42.67A AOO.O 23.19 ...................................................................... 0.000 O.00D 0.000 O.00D YES 42.67A A00.0 O.00D 0.M 0.000 0.010 YES 42.67A A00.0 15.46 ...................................................................... O.00D 0.M O.00L 0.010 YES 42.67A A00.0 O.00D 0.020 O.00L 0.020 YES 42.67A A00.0 7.73 ...................................................................... O.00D 0.02L 0.000 0.02L YES 42.67A A00.0 O.00D 0.020 0.000 0.030 YES 42.67A A00.0 0.00 ...................................................................... MAYIMUM LQD$ ONTO FOUNOATION(W.LL WINE Ei Ne Cti ON) DOWN $HEAN.W.N.t.WINO.OIN EkNENT.W.N.t.WINO.OIN TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.72 0.28 0.00 -5.85 0.00 0.00 U e F e L L Page 8 Sabre Industries INNOVATION DELIVENED SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG- R 1 Opt. 24 Site Name: EUG03_023, OR Date: 1/21/2021 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSUTIA 222-H Pole Data Diameter: 16.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 '0' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Base Plate Results Plate Data Anchor Rod Results Moment, Mu: 14.79 fl -kips Allovuable m'Fy: Axial, Pu: 3.27 kips Maximum Put: Shear, Vu: 0.69 kips U*Rnt: Eff. Width: 11.15 in Vu: Anchor Rod Data (Pv'Rnv: Tension Interaction Ratio: Quantity: 4 (multiple of 4) Maximum Puc: Diameter: 1 in q)c'Rnc: Rod Material: F1554 Vu: Strength (Fu): 125 ksi q)c'Rnvc: Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Compression Interaction Ratio: BC Diam. (in): 19.5 BC Override: 19.5 Maximum Interaction Ratio: Base Plate Results Plate Data Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 8.49 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.17 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.02 9.92 Kips 74.22 Kips 0.17 Kips 33.40 Kips 0.13 13.4% Pass 6.2 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 13.8% Pass Page 9 Base Plate (Mu/Z): Width (in): 19.5 Width Override: 19.5 Allovuable m'Fy: Thickness: 1 in Base Plate Interaction Ratio: Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 11.15 in Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 8.49 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.17 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.02 9.92 Kips 74.22 Kips 0.17 Kips 33.40 Kips 0.13 13.4% Pass 6.2 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 13.8% Pass Page 9 Toile for windows, version 2019-11.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled Shafts Subjected to Lateral Loading Using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, mc. All Rights Reserved This copy of CPI Ie is being used by: Keith LIndall Sabre Towers and Poles Serial Number of Security Device: 227885948 This copy of LN le is licensed for exclusive use by: Sabre Communications Corporation Use of this program by any entity other than Sabre Communications Corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Piles used for Analysis Path to file locations: \Program Piles (x86)\Ensoft\LPile20l9\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24.1p1ld Name of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24.1p110 Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24.1p11, Name of runtime message file. 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 2g.Ipllr Date and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: January 21, 2021 rime: 11:10:00 Problem Jltle Site E0003_023, OR Tower 31' Smart Stack Prepared for J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Job Number 19 -2283 -EPG -R1 Opt. 24 Engineer NJT Program Options and Settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering Units used for Data input and Computations: - US Customary System Units (sounds, feet, inches) Analysis Control Options: - maximum number of iterations allowed = 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence = 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection = 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments = 100 LoadingType and Number of Cycles of Loading: - Static loading specified - use of p -y modification factors for p -y curves not selected - Analysis uses layer,. nn correction (method of Georgiadis) - xo tlI st ri butetl lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 10 input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at thepile tip not selectetl - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - Com utation of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected - Pus -over analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Neport only summary tables of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maximum shear force in output report file. - NO i otureport ycurves oe becomputedand reported for user-specified depths Pile Structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 6.083 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. os•thlethehemle1eimmlutfluel�iaetTweepol ng oftPi. using summary ofvaa oedi meter dpthol lows. Depth Below Pile Point Pile Head Di meter No. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.083 36.0000 Input Structural Properties for Pile Sections: Pile Section No. 1: Section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or Cion pile Length of section = 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter =36.000000 in Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lbs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grountl Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground Slope Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 raans Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 radians Soil and Nock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers top of layer = 1.083333 Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 0.083333 Effective unit weight at top f[ Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 pcf f[ Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer =110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 14.400000 = 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer = 14.400000 pa epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.100000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer epsilon -80 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer = 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 1000.000000 P5 undrained cohesion at bottom of layer = 1000.000000 psf epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.010000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer = 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 14.000 ft below the pile tip) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of input Soil Properties Page 11 Layer Soil Type Layer effective Undrained ESO Layer Name De th unit wt. Cohesion or Nun. (P -y Curve Type) ft pcf psf kre 1 Soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 1 Clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff Clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 v = 280.000000 lbs m = w/o Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity Conditions from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Number of loads specified = 2 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Load Load Condition Condition Axial Thrust Compute Top y Nun Analysis 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in No. Type 1 2 Force, lbs vs. Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v =920.000000 lbs m = 236640. in -lbs 4360. No Yes 2 1 v = 280.000000 lbs m = 70200. in -lbs 2720. No Yes v = shear force applied normal to pile axis m= bending moment applied to pile head y = lateral deflection normal to pile axis S = rotational sti relative sto plied to pile header angle values of to lengthsp� specified shear loading(LosTypes 1, 2, Rod 3). only for load types with Thrust force is assumed to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. Computations of Nominal moment Capacity and Nonlinear ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Di mansions and Properties of Drilled Shaft (Bored Pile): Len nth of Section 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Number of Beinforcin9 ears 12 bars Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bars = 60000. psi modulus of elasticity of Reinforcing Bars = 29000000. psi Gross Area of Shaft = 1018. in. Total Area of Beinforcin Steel = 5.301438 sq. in. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement = 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing = 6.626343 in maximum Concrete Aggregate Size =0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate Size =8.84 Offset of Center of Rebar Cage from Center of Pile = 0.0000 in Axial Structural Capacities: ---------------------------- Rom. Axial Structural Capacity = 0.85 Fc Ac + FY As = 4621.528 kips Tensile Load for Cracking of Concrete =-486.917 kips Nominal Axial Tensile Capacity = -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions Used in Computations: Bar Bar Man. Bar Area X Y Number inches sq. i . n_- inches inches ---------- ------ --- --- -- 1 0.750000 0.441786 ---------- 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 7.125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 14.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 12.340862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 7.125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -7.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -14.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -12.340862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -7.125000 rage 12 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by Lpile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero = 6.626 inches between bars 7 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate size = 8.84 Concrete properties: -------------------- Compressive Strength Of Concrete= 5000. psi modulus Of elasticity Of Concrete = 4030509. psi modulus Of Rupture of Concrete =-530.330086 psi Compression Strain at peak Stress = 0.002109 Tensile Strain at Fracture of Concrete =-0.0001150 maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.750000 in Number Of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from pile -head Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.720 2 4.360 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Results for Nominal moment Capacity for Section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mom. Cap. max. Co'. No. kipsin-kip Strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.720 4895.847 0.00300000 2 4.360 4918.565 0.00300000 Note that thevalues Of moment ca acity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate moment capacity according to ACI 318, Section 9.3.2.2 Or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followinn table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stifgnesses computed for cormon resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Nesi St. Nominal ult. (Fac) int. (Fac) Rend. Stiff. LO ad Factor moment Cap Ax. Thrust moment Cap at It mom NO. for momentin-kips kipsin-kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 1 0.65 4896. 1.768000 3182. 41546004. 2 0.65 4919. 2.834000 3197. 41780157. 1 0.75 4896. 1.904000 3672. 39885543. 2 0.75 4919. 3.052000 3689. 40137179. 1 0.90 4896. 2.040000 4406. 26328586. 2 0.90 4919. 3.270000 4427. 26471084. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Layering Correction equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Layers TOP Of equivalent Layer TOP Depth Same Layer Layer is FO F1 Layer BeOWeAID. Type As Rock or integral integral NO. pile Head Grnd Surf Layer is Be]. for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer ml equals the sum Of the M and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layering correction equivalent depths are computed only for soil ty es with both shallow -depth and deep -depth expressions for peak latera R load transfer. These soil types are soft and stiff clays, on -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. Summary of pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of pile -head Loading Conditions: Page 13 Load Type L Load 1 =$hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Not. Stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians LORD Load Load exi al vile -head Vile -head max $hear Max Moment Case Type vile -head Type Rile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n Rile n vile NO. y Load 1 y Load 2 lbs inches radians lbs - n -lbs ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- —------- 1 v, lb 920.0000 M, in -lb 236640. 4360. 0.4634 -0.00994 -7956. 250142. 2 v, lb 260.0000 M, in -lb 70200. 2720. 0.00366 -8.70e-05 -2177. 74147. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.4633534717 inches maximum pile -head rotation = -0.0099446129 radians = -0.569764 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 14 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 14.79 Shear (k) 1 0.69 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 21.52 690 500.00 3 1.08 = (2.34P)/(S, b) 5.59 = 0.5A[ 1 + ( 1 + (4.36h / A Page 15 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) COMPLIANCE STUDY ON ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS EXPOSURE Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE on behalf of MA- Site Name: EUG03_023 Site ID: 18925-023-E City of Springfield Pole 44.07686° N, -123.04230- W near 3000 Gateway St. Springfield, Oregon 97477 FCC COMPLIANCE: AT&T is proposing to enhance its wireless communication service by installing a canister -shaped antenna on top of a proposed new light pole at the location mentioned above. A radio equipment enclosure will be installed on the same pole. The proposed installation will comply with FCC standards and all Applicable Standards for RF Exposure. The conclusion is based on information provided by J5 Infrastructure Partners/AT&T, on site measurement of existing RF field strength and the RF power density calculations performed in this study. Members of the General Public will not be exposed to hazardous levels of RF energy in the surrounding area of thefacility. The operation of thefacilitywill contribute a maximum of 3.6% to existing cumulative Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels on publicly accessible surfaces at ground level or in adjacent buildings. A i.,_., a,, lt_,.-mwww.mroon-anmlung. mm 18925-023-E RFSSRP QUALIFICATION December 21, 2020 Page 12 This report is an engineering statement confirming compliance. I am a Professional Engineer in electrical engineering registered in the State of Washington, Oregon and California. I have been designing electrical systems and writing RF exposure compliance reports for the last 20 years. The information included and calculations performed herein are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Sei Yuen Sylvan Wong, PE Washington PE Reg. No. 37962 PROTOCOL December 21, 2020 This study, andthe calculations performed herein, is based on OET Bulletin 6511 which adopts ANSI C95.1- 1992 and NCRP standards. In particular, equation 10 from section 2 of the guideline is used as a model (in conjunction with known antenna radiation patterns) for calculating the power density at different points of interest. This information will be used to judge the RF exposure level incident upon the general population, and any employee present in the area. It should be noted that ground reflection of RF waves has been taken into account. FCC Maximum Permissible Exposure Levels The FCC's maximum permissible exposure (MPE) is defined as "the rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with an acceptable safety factor level". The FCC defines two exposure environments based on the awareness of persons who are being exposed. RF safety compliance centers on management of these two environments. Cleveland, Robert F, et al. Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OEf Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August 1997. Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1 (778) 805-2166 1 EN 7 u L T i N O USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure December 21, 2020 Page 13 The General Population/Uncontrolled exposure appliesto human exposureto RF fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. Occupational/Controlled Exposure The Occupational/Controlled exposure applies to human exposure to RF fields when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. These exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above General Population/Uncontrolled limits as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate action. The FCC's MPE limits for the General Population/Uncontrolled and Occupational/ Controlled environments aregiven in Table l and Table 2, respectively. Figure l is a graph of both MPEs as functions of frequency. Table 1: MPE Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Environment Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength WN Magnetic Field Strength (A/m) Power Density (mW/cm2) Averaging Time for JE12, IH 12, or S(Minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f/1500 30 1500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f=frequency in MHz *=Plane wave equivalent power density Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 1 ❑ F 7 L, L r n usa www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP 0.1 1.0 December 21, 2020 Page 14 Table 2: MPE Limits for Occupational/Controlled Environment Frequency Electric Magneti Power Averaging Range Field cField Density Time for (MHz) Strength Strength (mW/cm2) JE 12, IH 12, Bad Band (V/m) (A/m) or5 5 (Minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300 —1500 -- -- f/300 6 1500-100,000 -- -- 5.0 6 f =frequency in MHz * = Plane wave equivalent power density iG�NLSfl:tPiNII:Ij$�NIHI:IIt Frequency {MHz) Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 V c. r1 u L r i N e usa www.coreoneconsulting.com ccupationaii( ontrolled Cellu ar PCS Bad Band 5 Factor of 5 c 2 G neral Populations 1.34 3 30 300A 150U0 Uncontrolled iG�NLSfl:tPiNII:Ij$�NIHI:IIt Frequency {MHz) Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 V c. r1 u L r i N e usa www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E December 21, 2020 RFSSRP Page 15 In general, as specified in 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), as amended, when the FCC's guidelines are exceeded in an accessible area due to the emissions from multiple fixed transmitters the following policy applies. Actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters contribution to the RF environment at the non -complying accessible area exceeds 5% of the exposure limit (that applies to their particular transmitter) in terms of power density orthe square of the electric or magnetic field strength. This applies regardless of whether such transmitters would, by themselves, normally be excluded from performing a routine environmental evaluation. Owners of transmitter sites are expected to allow applicants and licensees to take reasonable steps to comply with the FCC's requirements and, where feasible, should encourage collocation of transmitters and common solutions for controlling access to areas where the RF exposure limits might be exceeded. RF Safety Signs AT&T uses two types of RF safety signs: Y Alerting signs Y Information signs Alerting Signs Three types of alerting signs, NOTICE, CAUTION, and WARNING, associated with increasing exposure risk relative to the applicable MPE limits are used. They announce the existence of potential RF exposure hazards within the areas they demarcate. The formats of these signs follow the recommendations of the ANSI and IEEE standards regarding colors, wording, and symbols. MW fRfP1E%Y RnLpS NCM MYE Mol W 0 MY B4CE[a iLC PLL6f FP MBYM WYNYII. RI✓BVYFCi nc 1wa, CMUrtO K rMOFD F V 4 W CPNa: fl RYOLACY EMIRP'IEM 2 ML YY RPSM/.i RFYpffaY i MWM MFM KTF£�NfP'M4 CAUTION Beyond This Point y��Y era cmcr{np a cunM11W arca what R1Cmiasio nm emend the FCC Oceupatu..1 Fipasma limiro nmRF for qmYn(AlW1 fl In' m![yMi<IM f wkin@avi�ramev Beyond This Point you= rolmiig a e,.tmlled . whom RF Fmircions exceed die FCC Controlled Exposure limits FYdYR lY IJ1fY dll IVnLYt vpU a14t Elh guukliYn roWJ nyua m xrmus InIYiY Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 1 ❑ li 7 L _ 1, -__ USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E December 21, 2020 RFSSRP Page 16 NOTICE signs alert persons that they are attempting to access an area in which RF exposure levels may exceed the General Population/Uncontrolled MPE. CAUTION signs alert persons that they are attempting to enter an area in which RF exposure may exceed the Occupational/Controlled MPE. WARNING signs alert persons that they are attempting to enter an area in which the RF exposure may exceed the Occupational/Controlled MPE by a factor of 10 or greater The NOTICE sign should be installed on the post 4 feet below the antenna. The CAUTION and WARNING signs are not applicable to this site. Information Signs INFORMATION signs instruct persons on what to do and who to contact if they are in, or desire to enter, an area where AT&T operates antennas. Several types of INFORMATION signs are used by AT&T, each of which is identified by unique number. Information Sign l AT&TM Hty pperM, WlKomnuncabena a men.. al Mle 1.1.11 n. Remain .t bbl ] W away ham erry or ..... no obey all pusod s19n ConMot IM oMIMrlel of the m4nnnl bbr. work'n, cka.r thin l reel iron Irv..Rona Ganott AT&1 Manley.1 !0043!.]&32 prior to pedormllp airy maimm.nce or re," near AT&T or.. TOLL b AT&T M.W01y Sib II Cpntact 1be m.na0.men1 puke 0 th. Eoorftoolllp.o 1. En e.W prop MuWn. rfn. Oe Ie4cmnunlCxlona op.md. pw AT&TMebily Fav mau nlenernaeisuncia de Iv menaa da ] pMc y ebedecer�mdoc loa aeuoa. Com.niabb con el nopo,ury o I..'r ,nnuno. b Ib amens ante. G babAarIW a ona disoncia de nba nano. d. l pon 1..nt nn Comunipueb con AT&T Momury edd434.2e22 An..W .14. cn.pme antenimiemn. rop non.. urt.a on la. .nuns de AT&T m Eeu e.1. avuci.n be.e nOm.rp F.V., tmnumcel00 eon la micro p0 u BdmlNSllKron dol .dOkk M eco puen o cam Werra a. co ..r" in cand.d.. kr-', COREONE USA Core One Consulting US Ltd. Phone: 1 (778) 805-2166 www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E December 21, 2020 RFSSRP Page 17 Information Sign 2 Antennas that are stand-alone (e.g., lamp posts, stadiums) in areas where there is little potential for exceeding the General Population/Uncontrolled MPE except, perhaps, very close to the antenna. In this case, the INFORMATION Sign 2 would be mounted close to the antenna in order to alert maintenance workers. (Note: In areas where the potential exists for exceeding the GP MPE limits, additional compliance action, including alerting signs, may be needed.). ACTIVE ANTENNAS ARE MOUNTED ❑ ON THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THIS BUILDING ❑ BEHIND THIS PANEL ON THIS STRUCTURE STAY BACK A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM THESE ANTENNAS Contact AT&T Mobility at and follow their instructions prior to performing any maintenance or repairs closer than 3 feet from the antennas. This is AT&T MOBILITY site - MITIGATION MEASURES: Due to the mounting height of the proposed AT&T antenna, it would not be accessible to the general public. No mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. INTERFERENCE: The proposed communication equipment is certified by the FCC under the equipment authorization procedures set forth in Part 2 of the FCC rules. The equipment operates only within the desired frequency band and spurious emissions are within FCC specifications. AT&T is licensed to operate within the allocated frequency blocks. The proposed antenna usage will not interfere with other adjacent or neighboring transmission or reception communications signals. Core One Consulting US Ltd. k,-1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP ON SITE MEASUREMENTS December 21, 2020 Page 18 The site was visited on December 9, 2020 at 3:00pm. The weather at the time of the visit was a partly cloudy afternoon with a temperature of 53'F. All accessible areas of the site were inspected. Measurement collection was performed using Narda Survey Meter and Broadband Probe (300kHz to 50 GHz) and was consistent with FCC and Narda procedures in making slow sweeping motions overthe area that a person could occupy. In using this broadband instrument, the results represent the cumulative contributions of all RF sources at the measurement locations. Narda Radiation meter NBM-550-S / F- 0266 and probe EA -5091 (NBM) (Calibration Date: October 31, 2019) were used to record spatially averaged power density levels as a percentage of the FCC MPE General Population MPE limits. Table 3 below is the collection of measurement readings. Table 3: Measurement Readings are Spatial Average and Maximum as MPE % of the FCC General Population Limits Location # Site Reading Average Maximum % % Distance to Pole (ft) Location # Site Reading Distance to Pole (ft) Average Maximum % % 1 0.0043 0.1731 0' 8 0.0176 0.7044 142' 2 0.0105 0.4214 145' 9 0.0150 0.6012 270' 3 0.0124 0.4963 259' 10 0.0226 0.9039 387' 4 0.0211 0.8448 370' 11 0.0132 0.5293 397' 5 0.0148 0.5910 493' 12 0.0028 0.1111 179' 6 0.0142 0.5676 283' 13 0.0012 0.0483 234' 7 0.0190 0.7593 166' 14 - - - Measurements taken during the site visit attest that the current maximum spatial average power density reading is 0.02% of the MPE limit for general population/uncontrolled exposure in the surrounding area of the proposed facility. There are no locations in the surrounding area near the facility that will have RF exposure levels close to the MPE limit. Table 4: Distance from proposed Pole to adjacent buildings NORTH-WEST NORTH-EAST SOUTH WEST 250' 190' 99' 186' Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 �_ EN 7 Li L T I rl USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP The site map below shows the measurement locations December 21, 2020 Page 19 Core One Consulting US Ltd. k,-1 COREONE Phone: 1 (778) 805-2166 �_ Ci fl Li L i fr USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS The following parameters have been considered in modeling this configuration: December 21, 2020 Page 110 Ant# Antenna Antenna Model Frequency (MHz) Total ERP ANT Centerline AG L (ft) 1 Galtronics OMNI 1900/2100/ 623/623/64 35' G02412-06613 5250 Radios: Nokia AirScale - AHFIB B25, B66, (Max. Tx output: 4x 40W per band) - AZRB B46 (LAA) (Max. Tx output: 1 W) RF FIELD PREDICTION Calculations have been made to predict RF field strength and power density levels around typical RF sources. In order to evaluate the RF exposure level, the power densities at different locations of interest have been examined. Equation 10 from Bulletin 65 is reproduced here as equation 1: 33.4 F2 ERP 5 R (1) Where: 5= Power density (µW/cm2] ERP= Effective radiated power [W] R = Distance [m] F= Relativefieldfactor (relative numeric gain) For accessible areas at ground level, the maximum predicted power density level resulting from the AT&T operations is 3.6% of the FCC General Population limits. The result represents worst-case predication and are based on antennas operating at the maximum power level. Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 ri L, L r iiUSA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E December 21, 2020 RFSSRP P a g e 111 This map shows exposure level at ground level and adjacent buildings �1 J P, '4s1; *locations outside a;um.,uaK M Uw Nmo�awa �i�c: Kva rtu �. Wfut Core One Consulting US Ltd. COREONEPhone: 1 (778) 805-2166 �_ Ci fl Li L i fr USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP December 21, 2020 Page 112 This map shows the exposure level at the center of the antenna at 35' AGL 1 COREONE USA Core One Consulting US Ltd. Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP December 21, 2020 Page 113 Predicted MPE (General Public) depicted at the center of the vertical zone that a person could occupy NOTICE SIGN INSTALLED W BELOW ANTENNA ON BOTH SIDES OF THE POLE RAD CENTER OF ANTENNA±35' AGL RF Sign can be omitted with an approved Sign Waiver Form from the pole owner. 71' OX — 100X 10OX — 500% ® >50OX Core One Consulting US Ltd. k,-1 COREONE Phone: 1(778) 805-2166 �_ Ci rl Li L i rr USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP SITE PICTURES December 21, 2020 1 14 View facing North F -14� — . View facing East Core One Consulting US Ltd. k,-1 COREONE Phone: 1 (778) 805-2166 �_ Ci rl Li L i rr USA www.coreoneconsulting.com 18925-023-E RFSSRP December 21, 2020 View facing West Pa 115 Core One Consulting US Ltd. 1 COREONE Phone: 1 (778) 805-2166 3 ❑ ri 7 L: 1, -__ USA www.coreoneconsulting.com �RONICS GQ2412-06613 Description: • Pseudo Omni Canister Antenna for Outdoor DAS and Small Cells • 2x ports for Low Band 698-896 MHz • U ports for AWS/PCS/WCS Band 1695-2360 MHz • U ports for CBRS Band 3550-3700 MHz • 2x ports for U -NII Band 5150-5925 MHz* ■ Gray ■ Brown ■ Black ■ 3M' Conceal Flim 698-8%,16952360, 3550.3700 and 5150.5925 MHz Pseudo Omni Canister Antenna *Compllain to 789033 D02 General LLNII Test Procedures New Rules W lmul The antenna meets current U -NII -1 requirements for gain and upper side -lobe performance. Guklelines for Compliance Testing of Unlicensed Natbnal Information Infrastructure (LLNIp DeNces-Part 15, Subpart E Electrical Specifications Frequency RarM[MHz) 698-8% 1695-2180 2305-2360 3550-3700 5150-5925 Input Canrwctor Type 2x4.3 -10(F) 4x4.3-1 Op) 4x4.3-1 Op) 2x4.3 -10(F) Isola icn(min.) 2OdB VSNR (max.) /RL (min.) 1.5:1 / 14.0 dB Impedance son Polarization Dual slant 45^(t45°) Horizontal eeamwidth Omni (3600) Vertical Reamwidth 41.7o 190 15.90 18o 23.7o Gain(max.) 7.8 dBi 8.9 dBi 9.1 dBi 8.5 dBi 6dBi Gain(aeg.) 6.1 dBi 7.5 dBi 8.OdBi 7.9dBi 5.4 dBi DowrHilt Do Fixed! Max power/Port 100Watts 100Watts SO Watts 1Watt PIM®2x43dllm .153 dBc x153 dBc N/A N/A MW MHz 5800 MHz Copyright ® 2020- Galtmnics Corporation Ltd. Proprietary Information. All rights reserved. Galtmnics reserves the night to modify or amend any antenna or specification without prior notice. �RONICS 740 MHz 751 MHz 1770 MHz 2155 MHz 2325 MHz 3580 MHz 3650 MHz 5200 MHz 5850 MHz Copyright ® 2020- Galtmnics Corporation Ltd. Proprietary Information. All rights reserved. Galtmnics reserves the right to modify or amend any antenna or spxifloation without prior notice. �RCINICS Mechanical Dimensions 45• //�" asso-nm Mlh `" GALTi ONICS p.4s° 16953360 MHz Q 43° 5° ®� 696896 MHx 1695.Pd60 MHz ]Ss6J]m H,* x WE d'Q Mechanical Specifications Operating Temperature -40° to 158°F (40° to +]0°Q Mtenna Weight 30.9 lbs(14 kg) Mtenna Dimension (Dlameterx Height) 14.5 (369mm) x 24.5° (622 mm) Ratio. Material ASA Rade. Calor Gray, Bmwry Black, 31V- Conceal Film Ingress Rraection Outdoor (1165) Wind Survival Rating 150 mph (241 kmih) Mabrig Conreactar Tarcim: 4.3-10: 3.7 R -Ib (5 Nm) Copyright 0 2020- Galtmnics Corporation Ltd. Proprietary Information. All rights reserved. Galtmnics reserves the right to modify or amend any antenna or specification without prior notice. NOKIA PICO RADIOS AirScale 4T4R ■ AHFB B25 (PCS) — CEQ.21288 ■ AHIB B66 (AWS) — CEQ.21287 r ;*;7-AF Ihx vv _ • HxWxD: 11.6" x 9.6" x 2.2" • Weight: 12.81bs. • RF: NEX10 Plus Female • Power Consumption: 150 Watts Max • Minimum AC Fuse Rating: 7 Amp • One CPRI SFP Included (472949A) with AirScale 2T2R ■ AZRB B46 (LAA) — CEQ.21311 .a • HxWxD: 11.6" x 10.6" x 2.2" • Weight: 12 lbs. • RF: NEX10 Plus Female • Power Consumption: 90 Watts Max • Minimum AC Fuse Rating: 7 Amp • Two CPRI SFP Included (472949A) SAT&T I Densification mmWave 39 GHz ■ AEWD/AEWE — Coming Soon • HxWxD: 14.3" x 11.1" x 6.8" (AEWD) • HxWxD: 12.8" x 9.8" x 6" (AEWE) • Weight: 26.5 lbs. (AEWD) • Weight: 11 lbs. (AEWE) • Power Consumption: 370 Watts Typ. (AEWD) • Power Consumption: 60 Watts Typ. (AEWD) • Minimum AC Fuse Rating: The comparative LTE: MRP coverage map over the focus zone is provided below as an illustration. All the other coverage maps (MRO, dominance, etc.) are directly viewable in Atoll (with more detail) or can be provided as snapshot similar to the illustration below upon request. R (D- jW 'I Wr 1— Irea RP mBM 9 e50R RP IRS EPRE1 Level la eml¢=-BS %e RSRP IRS EP REI Level 146m1>yAS 9e,t RSRP IRS EPRE1 Level146" >p-105 6eII RSRP IRS Ep15 9eIIRRPIREPREe">p-4 `M IV 1 ©2019 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo, Mobilizing your World and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. e at&t CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_023 18925-023-E 3000 GATEWAY ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 '51NFRA5TRUCTURE PAGE 1 Disclaimer'. These photographic simulations have been provided to aid in visualizing how the proposed wireless telecommunication facility shown herein would appearif constructed. While these renderings are not an exact science, they have been prepared diligently to accurately reflect dimensions, scale, depth, coloring, texture, and other important elements in the pmposed design insofar as the digital medium allows. Taken together with the engineering drawings and other materials submitted with the application, they are fair and reasonable visual depictions of how the proposed site would appear. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN (TTCP) SHEET: DESCRIPTION: Tl TITLE SHEET TC1 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TC2 PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR E0003 023 SITE ADDRESS: 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PROJECT CONTACTS AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT EMAIL: cp1261Qatt.com PH: 971-295-6924 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: WENDY LONG EMAIL: wl729kQatt.com PH: (206) 321-1116 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES A&E MANAGER: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG EMAIL: jmalbergQj5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 PROJECT MANAGER: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: MIKE SLOTEMAKER EMAIL: mslotemakerQj5ip.com PH: (206) 214-8954 1. ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE, LAYOUTS AND PROCEDURES 11. THE SPACING BETWEEN CONES, TUBULAR MARKERS, VERTICAL PANELS, SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANUAL 1 of 3 DRUMS, AND BARRICADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED A DISTANCE IN FEET EQUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), LATEST EDITION, TO 1.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TAPER WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. CHANNELIZATION, AND A DISTANCE IF FEET EQUAL TO 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TANGENT CHANNELIZATION. 2. PRIOR TO ANY ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE. 12. WHERE DICTATED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND WORKER CROSSING 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LANE CLOSURES INCLUDING SIGNS, CONES, LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OSHA BARRICADES, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SIGNS SHALL NOT REQUIREMENTS. BE PLACED WITHOUT ACTUAL LANE CLOSURES AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CLOSURES. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING HIGHWAY JURISDICTION AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "FLAGMEN" OR POLICE 4. SELECTION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, SUPERVISION, IF REQUIRED. PEDESTRIANS, AND WORKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) - PART VI "TEMPORARY 14. ALL EXCAVATED AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY SHALL BE TRAFFIC CONTROL", AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNLESS BACKFILLED AND PLACED ON A MINIMUM 6H:1 V SLOPE WITHIN THE CLEAR OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE ZONE ARE TO BE EITHER BACKFILLED OR PRECAST CONCRETE CURB APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. BARRIER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SET TEMPORARILY IN PLACE TO SHIELD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 5. ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS, DISTANCES, AND TAPER LENGTHS MAY BE EXTENDED TO ADJUST FOR REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO HORIZONTAL AND 15. CONES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR DRUMS AND INSTALLED UPON THE VERTICAL CURVATURE OF THE ROADWAY AND FOR ACTUAL TRAFFIC SPEEDS APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION PROVIDED THEY IF IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED LIMITS. COMPLY WITH MUTCD. 6. TAPERS SHALL BE LOCATED TO MAXIMIZE THE VISIBILITY OF THEIR TOTAL LENGTH. 16. THERE SHALL BE NO WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER VEHICLES IN THE BUFFER SPACE OR THE ROLL AHEAD SPACE. 7. CONFLICTING OR NON-OPERATING SIGNAL INDICATIONS ON THE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SHALL BE BAGGED OR COVERED. 17. DRIVEWAYS AND/OR SIDE STREETS ENTERING THE ROADWAY AFTER THE FIRST ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE 8. ALL (E) ROAD SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR PLOWABLE PAVEMENT ROAD WORK AHEAD SIGN AS A MINIMUM. REFLECTORS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE (N) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED, OR RELOCATED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 18. WHEN CHANNELIZATION DEVICES HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF LEADING SHALL BE RESTORED TO MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AFTER VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OUT OF THE INTENDED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SPACE, THE COMPLETION OF WORK. CHANNELIZATION DEVICES SHOULD BE EXTENDED A DISTANCE IN FEET OF 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE 9. CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED LIMIT IF REDUCED FROM POSTED LIMITS SHALL BE TRANSITION AREA. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD AND WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 10. TAPER LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: L= WS2/60 (40 MPH AND HIGHER) OR L2 = WS (OVER 40 MPH), WHERE W = OFFSET WIDTH (FT), S = TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH). LOCATION MAP Michaels Leather and oak"r n x Furnmure Blore .a The Gateway Grill lE3 Gateway village erGr.s A takeout•aeliwry s. 5 n, Apartmee nts s, ' ©':-d'-mni15 Furniture � w � at Gateway i Sizzlpr- Springfield F umrture elate Ternpo,,,m, closed s United Way of ?5> Lane County j!j Master Cronut �'sy j I Joy Church © Dari Mart W Convemenoe Blore MCycle Gear Airbrushwo Momrcyycle shop Til ur waren r_k Ln � 1 I United States ® Northwest College Postal Service © El Springfield Campus m P..xn•y 0. I Maifard Mallard ?l w tewysy Creditp p Pacific Village Ave s Apartments o MI •E Gamebird Partin m % c� Flnaningu Aw ©FOCD for Lane CountyrYouth Farm Lennan Sound Awplebeekse Grill + Bar nitoring, Inc oeliwry meaudtc store 9 R LenoHor ad US Marine Recruiters 9 �s WOXKZ I 2 � I a Cinemark 77 Kohl'a f•► I 1 � eeyarhnent store �` N@Eoverltaflo� Army National & Guard Recruiting - Original Roadlhouse Grill li:'1 d C, Gateway Living 9 acturad - a, z Ashley HomeSlore z ¢ Fruan rue store OaAdale Ave Mattress Firm The Shoppes at Gateway Gateway Mahl9 Oapd`reAVe $ �n Sh.,,ir, rn 'l nelrvery QMcKenzie McKenzie Meadow © f� T-Mobilev Apartments 9 pitch 9 Cati s Cell phan¢ stole Si goads stere Panera Bread 9 Springfield ' i I Nails Uncorked9 � Takeout-oelhery _m" Secure Storage NORTH 9 9 eco PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET AI ddress: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: T1 A 1 of 3 TTCP DIMENSION GUIDELINES (WATCH 2019) PREPARED FOR: I I NORTH AT&T I I 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 3 ROAD PLANS PREPARED BY: WO I I 15 INFRASTRUCTURE AHEAD UNNAMED ENTRY ROAD R A R T„ E R a 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 w IRVINE, CA 92614 Lu1 J5 PROJECT ID: P-042779 WORK HOURS: `�� LANE 9AM-5PM M-F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT CLOSED LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING `W THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM o I I N I I I I I I SPEED LIMIT I I 35 V) O I I j�4f o 0 0 v I Y O � 3 o w 0 O N o LANE I Sheet Title: CLOSED O O 0 I I o Io VEHICULAR TRAFFIC o CONTROL PLAN O I I 0§0 0 4fl I O 0 o I Address: o , TRAFFIC CONTROL o IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. LEGEND a o I I 3000 GATEWAY ST I I SPRINGFIELD, OR SPM TD 97477. 40 ROAD SPEED � BARRIER � I I w I WORK AREA I I I d 0 0 m TRAFFIC SIGNAL ROAD TRAFFIC WORK CONTROL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AHEAD Sheet Number: Rev: w SIGN ��' ROAD 30'-0" 0 30'-0" LS> HEA Tt 1 //P"l\7 AHEAD 1g' g' T TRAFFIC SIGN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 2 of 3 mmmmmo POSTED SPEED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS "BUFFER" * LENGTH "MERGING" LENGTH "SHIFTING" LENGTH A g C 100 100 100 �� 105 180 �0 30 250 250 250 200 180 90 35 250 245 125 40 305 320 160 45 350 350 350 360 540 270 50 425 600 300 55 500 500 500 495 660 330 60 570 720 360 65 645 780 390 * BUFFER SPACE SHOULD BE INSERTED IN HIGH-SPEED URBAN AND RURAL AREAS BUT IS OPTIONAL IN LOW -SPEED URBAN AREAS. ��■vim, NOTE: MAINTAIN 5' PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AT ALL TIMES & PROVIDF FI AC' GFRS Tn ASSIST PEDESTRIANS THROUGH THEW OR KAREA DURING ALL WORK HOURS: 9AM-5PM M -F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND SPEED 40 ROAD SPEED BARRIER WORK AREA TRAFFIC SIGNAL "° RonD TRAFFIC WORK CONTROL AHEAD SIGN T TRAFFIC SIGN 0 30'-0" 18' 6' SCALE: Y' = 30'-0" PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN NORTH PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 3000 GATEWAY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: TC2 A 3 of 3