Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/29/2020J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 12/14/2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@springfleld-or.gov RE: Request to ConstructSmall Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Portland Bureau of Transportation: R A S T R U C T U R E � � i 'Vi ➢ R P A R T N E R S On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, requiring structure replacement. AT&TID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG03_027/ FA 14826599 City of Springfield streetlight Pole #0581 Shelley St & Don SL 44.06515. - 36'-0" 123.04128 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Reauested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities • Pole Attachment & Public Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 12/14/2020. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Friday, February 12'^, 2021. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Thursday, December 24th, 2020. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it Is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision Is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, David Barnes J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 12/14/2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@springfleld-or.gov RE: Request to ConstructSmall Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Portland Bureau of Transportation: R A S T R U C T U R E � � i 'Vi ➢ R P A R T N E R S On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, requiring structure replacement. AT&TID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG03_001/ FA 14824108 City of Springfield streetlight Pole #2589 69th St & B St. 44.04713. -122.90423 38'-0" J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Reauested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities • Pole Attachment & Public Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 12/14/2020. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Friday, February 12'^, 2021. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Thursday, December 24th, 2020. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it Is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision Is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, David Barnes City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SP1NOF1W Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone -.425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular lMreless PCS, LLC E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 16331 SE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone:503-312-3400 Applicant's Rep.: Meredith Hewett Company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mhewett@j5ip.com Address: 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR, 97225 Property Owner: City of Springfield Phone:541-726-3700 Company: E-mail: Address: 225 Fifth St, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032724 TAX LOT NOS :00600 Property Address: 910 Shelley St Nearest Intersection : Don Street ROW ® Private Property❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Propose collocation of SWF on joint use pole in City ROW Existing Use: City Streetlight pole .Minatures: Please si n and rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the. information in this application is correct and accurate. Date: 12/14/20 Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Print re Date: I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submit requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan u I Preparation: Date: 12/14/20 Plot Plan Preparer Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print • Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts TypesAllowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 EXHIBIT A New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") AT&T ID: EUG03_026/18925-026 City of Springfield Pole a: 0581 In the Public Right -of -Way ("PROW") near 910 Shelly Street Small Wireless Facility Project Narrative New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") is proposing to install a new small wireless facility ("SWF") in the PROW to serve residents and businesses in City of Springfield. Introduction. SWFs are low-power, low -profile wireless communication facilities that improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T's existing wireless network. The proposed SWF will help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in this area. AT&T estimates that since introduction of the iPhone in 2007, mobile data usage has increased 580,000% on its network. AT&T forecasts its customers' growing demand for mobile data services to continue. Customer needs require AT&T to design and maintain its network to provide and improve wireless signal quality and to increase data rates sufficient to stream video. Areas that do not meet this minimal standard, or where wireless service is otherwise compromised, represent service issues that must be addressed. Specifically, this proposed SWF will help improve AT&T's wireless services by offloading network traffic carried by existing macro facilities in the area. In addition, faster data rates allow customers to get on and off the network quickly, which produces more efficient use of AT&T's limited spectrum. By placing the SWF in areas where AT&T's existing wireless communication facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences especially high network traffic, AT&T can address the existing and forecasted demand and support 5G speeds in the nearfuture. Improving signal quality and increasing data speed is critical to providing the mobile experience customers demand and to manage the unprecedented increase in mobile data usage on AT&T's network. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") tracks the rates at which American households are shifting from landlines to wireless telecommunications. According to the CDCs latest Wireless Substitution Report, nearly 80 percent of Americans rely exclusively or primarily on wireless communications in their homes.' In addition, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') esti mates that 70 percent of all 911 calls are made from wireless devices.2 And with AT&T's selection by FirstNet as the wireless service provider to build and manage the nationwide first responder wireless network, each new or modified facility will help strengthen first responder communications. AT&T selected the proposed SWF as the best available means to address its service objectives in this portion of City of Springfield. The overall site location and design will comply with applicable code provisions. 'See Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, July -December 2019, available at httos://www.cdc.aov/nchs/data/nhis/earlvrelease/wireless202009-508.odf. 2 See 911 Wireless Services, available at httas://v .fcc.wv/consumers/guides/911-wireless-services. The proposed SWF will be located in the PROW. The project will involve the placement of a small antenna and associated small wireless equipment on a replacement City of Springfield street light pole. Small Cellular. Thefacilitywill not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Itwill not adversely affect the surrounding properties, and itwill have minimal physical and aesthetic footprint in this area. The City of Springfield can easily make the necessary findings for approval of this SWF. Compliance with Applicable Design Standards. AT&T's proposed SWF complies with applicable design requirements in 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications System (WTS) Facilities as follows: • SWF Definition o AT&T's SWF meets the FCC's definition of small wireless facility. The SWF and pole are less than 50 feet in height. The antenna volume is 2.35 cubic feet, and the volume of the equipment cabinet and surge suppressor is 11.078 (10.7+.378) cubic feet. The radio frequency ("RF") emissions will meet FCC safety standards. See FCC Compliance Study on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure submitted for this proposed SWF (Exhibit E). • Design Standards A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10% taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed within the pole that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K. The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements orfor public safety II. A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L. Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District SITE PHOTO SITE NAME: CRAN_RWOR_E0003_027_C POLE#: 0581 PREPARED FOR = -:'AT&T �: �+ S C I D I D#: 18925-027 16331 NE D, WA 9WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 805 - SITE TYPE: METAL LIGHT POLE Vendor: y SITE ADDRESS: 910 SHELLEY ST 'S INFRASTRUCTURE AT&T 2030 MAIN ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 SUITE 200 IRVINE, PROJCA92614 JS PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: COUNTY: LANE COUNTY JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Vendor: SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: SKIP ID # : LATITUDE: LONGITUDE: SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: JURISDICTION: ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: OCCUPANCY: ADJACENT PARCEL#: OVERLAY ZONE: SPECIAL AREA SUBZONE: A.D.A COMPLIANCE: POLE OWNER: ADDRESS: APPLICANT /CARRIER: ADDRESS: CRAN RWOR_EUG03_027_C 18925-027 44-03-54.53"N (44.06515) ST (-123.04128) 910 SHELLEY ST 910 SHELLEY SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 LANE COUNTY CITY OF SPRINGFIELD LIGHT -MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL N/A N/A 1703272400600 NONE NONE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD 1001 MAIN ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 NEW CINGU41) B (" ) LAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC AT&T" 16331 NE 72ND WAY r9 y s+ (— A I p �, I �I a, P, _ 70M mlawae HEytlu F 1,,, l ,. fir i snow z�Awa =' u" _ i J -' " ° r s. .S oI v �9i05heliey5lreet S 9 Jlil '�. � I f I _ ! " 1IF - + 9 { Ohase+Yll�9e _ PROPOSED SITE BUILD OF AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY, ON AN PROPOSED POLE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WAY CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: REMOVAL: METAL LIGHT POLE INSTALLATION: .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA :: (1) PROPOSED AT&T DISCONNECT/SURGE SUPPRESSOR (3) PROPOSED AT&T CONDUITS .. (2) PROPOSED AT&T COMBINERS DRAWN BY: JSP CHECKED BY: JDM REDMOND, WA 98052 H •R 1 'M CONTACT: PHONE: ELECTRIC PROVIDER: PHONE: KRISTY WEAVER (425) 214-2186 SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD (541) 746-8451 t 1 ' 0 11/ 10096 CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: u u PJB OO R7H 8919 PE PROJECT TEAM CODE COMPLIANCE DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. ENGINEER: SRE ACQUISITION: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: JAMES CHUNG CONTACT: AARON GUDELJ EMAIL: jchung@J51P.com EMAIL: AGUDELJQJ51P.com PHONE: (949) 247-7767 x 111 PH: (805) 298-3091 AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT JS INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: cp]261@att.com CONTACT: DEVIN TAYLOR PH: 971-295-6924 PH: (503) 309-1380 AT&T RF ENGINEER: ARE MANAGER: CONTACT: CHRIS OSGOOD J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSit EMAIL: co3884Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG EMAIL: jmalberg@j5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCATION GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. COMMERCIAL BUILDING CODE: OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE (OSSC)-2014 COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL CODE: OREGON ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CODE (OESC)-2017 DIRECTIONS FROM PDX AIRPORT: 1. HEAD EAST ON NE AIRPORT WAY (1.8 MI) 2. USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN SLIGHTLY RIGHT TO MERGE ONTO 1-205 S TOWARD 1-84/PORTLAND/SALEM (0.5 MI) 3. MERGE ONTO 1-205 S (2.6 MI) 4. TAKE EXIT 21B TO MERGE ONTO 1-84 W/US-30 W TOWARD PORTLAND (5.4 MI) 5. USE THE LEFT 2 LANES TO MERGE ONTO 1-5 S TOWARD SALEM (1.5 MI) 6. KEEP RIGHT TO STAY ON 1-5 S, FOLLOW SIGNS FOR 1-5 S/SALEM (106 MI) 7. TAKE EXIT 194A TO MERGE ONTO OR -126 E (1.2 MI) 8. TAKE THE EXIT TOWARD SPRINGFIELD CITY CENTER (0.4 MI) 9. USE THE LEFT LANE TO TURN LEFT ONTO PIONEER PKWY E (0.1 MI) 10. USE THE 2ND FROM THE LEFT LANE TO TURN LEFT AT THE 1ST CROSS STREET ONTO W O ST (0.2 MI) 11. TURN RIGHT TOWARD LAURA ST (243 FT) 12 CONTINUE ONTO LAURA ST (456 FT) 13. TURN LEFT ONTO SHELLEY ST (0.6 MI) 14. TURN RIGHT ONTO DON ST (148 FT) 15. TURN LEFT ONTO SHELLEY ST (177 FT) T-1 GN -1 A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 D-1 D-2 RF -1 E-1 G-1 G-2 TITLE SHEET GENERAL NOTES DEMO SITE PLAN OVERALL SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1A LETTER AND SURVEY ROW SURVEY ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS DETAILS DETAILS RF WARNING SIGNS PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC GROUNDING DETAILS TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9�OREGON�p 13,E �SVI�G�' /ZO /1/19 EXPIRES: 12131/21 0 YiDIRECT SUEPEWISION APREPARED ME HEREBY D THAT I AM DULY OF REGISTERED ENGINEER Ru��NTHELAWSOFTHESTATE TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG IN OREGON, CALL OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OO TOLL FREE: 1-800-332-2344 OR www.di safel ore on.com ! g y g OREGON STATUTE Know what's below. REQUIRES MIN OF 2 WORKING DAYS NOTICE Cal I before )IOU dig. BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE AT&T Site ID: CRA N_RWOR_EUG03_027_C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 CONTACT: WENDY LONG EMAIL:wlong@j5ip.com PH: (206) 321-1116 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: DAVE BARNES EMAIL: DBarnes@j5ip.com 16. DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT. Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET LEGAL DESCRIPTION PH: (208) 939-7631 RIGHT-OF-WAY Sheet Number: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS T-1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE STAMPED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES, AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED, OR OTHERWISE DISCONNECTED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 7. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 8. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW, OR ICE SHALL BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 9. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 10. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT, OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 12. NOTICE TO PROCEED - NO WORK TO COMMENCE PRIOR TO COMPANY;S WRITTEN NOTICE TO PROCEED AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ERECTION PLANS, RIGGING PLANS, CLIMBING PLANS, AND RESCUE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN AND SHALL MEET ANSI/TIA 1019 (LATEST EDITION), OSHA AND GENERAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL RIGGING PLANS SHALL ADHERE TO ANSI/TIA-1019 (LATEST EDITION) INCLUDING THE REQUIRED INVOLVEMENT OF A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR CLASS IV CONSTRUCTION. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4"0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE %"0 ASTM A307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185, AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SLAB FOUNDATION DESIGN ASSUMING ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PSF. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD. DINO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS. 4.1. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH: 3" MIN. 4.2. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO WEATHER: 4.2.1. #6 AND LARGER- 2" MIN. 4.2.2. #5 AND SMALLER & WWF,- 1)¢" MIN. 4.3. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: 4.3.1. SLAB AND WALLS 3/4' MIN. 4.3.2. BEAMS AND COLUMNS 1)z" MIN. 5. A %4" CHAMFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4 GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) CARRIER - AT&T OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES, WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORM CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 4. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. "KITTING LIST" SUPPLIED WITH THE BID PACKAGE IDENTIFIES ITEMS THAT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL OF MATERIALS AND KITTING LIST SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY SUCH CHANGE OF INSTALLATION. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWINGS. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE; TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION; TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. ABREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS: ABREVIATION AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (E) EXISTING MIN MINIMUM REF REFERENCE RF RADIO FREQUENCY T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED TYP TYPICAL REQ'D REQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MOB MASTER GROUND BAR EG EQUIPMENT GROUND BCW BARE COPPER WIRE SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE IRG INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RBS RADIO BASE STATION SYMBOLS: S/G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR 5 N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR g°- SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR o�a 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CIRCUIT BREAKER o� SINGLE POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED CIRCUIT BREAKER 8 CHEMICAL GROUND ROD BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF TEST WELL Q' DISCONNECT SWITCH END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE METER (ADD EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) VDC NEG MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUNDING WIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, NEC AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES 2. CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT BLOCKED AND TRIP HAZARDS ARE ELIMINATED. 3. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC, HILTI EPDXY ANCHORS ARE REQUIRED BY AT&T. 4. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC. 5. CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDER -STYLE CABLE TRAY RUNGS. 6. EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E., HOTS), GROUNDING AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE SHALL BE LABELED WITH COLOR -CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL TAPE (3M BRAND, Y" PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE W/ UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD SHALL CONFORM W/ NEC AND OSHA. 7. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE LABELED W/ THEIR VOLTAGE RATING, PHASE CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR AMPACITY RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E. PANEL BOARD AND CIRCUIT ID'S). 8. PANEL BOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHAL BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH PLASTIC LABELS. 9. ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. 10. POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90-C (WET & DRY) OPERATION LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 11. SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN INSULATION CLASS B OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE MULTI -CONDUCTOR, TYPE TO CABLE (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 50OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION WITH OUTER JACKET LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13. ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CRIMP -STYLE COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRE NUTS BY THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRE NUTS SHALL BE RATE FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75'C (90'C IF AVAILABLE). 14. RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 15. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E. RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE) SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 16. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL NONMETALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40 ) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 17. SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNDERGROUND ON STRAIGHTS AND SCHEDULE 80 PVC FOR ALL ELBOWS/90'S AND ALL APPROVED ABOVE GRADE PVC CONDUIT. 18. LIQUID -TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE FLEX) SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED. 19. CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR COMPRESSION TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED. SET SCREW FITTING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 20. CABINETS, BOXES AND WIRE WAYS SHALL BE LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 21. WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPDXY-COATED (GRAY) AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARDS, SHALL BE CONDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) 22. CONDUITS SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY IN PLACE WITH APPROVED NON PERFORATED STRAPS AND HANGERS. EXPLOSIVE DEVICES FOR ATTACHING HANGERS TO STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, CLOSELY FOLLOW THE LINES OF THE STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE STRUCTURE AND KEEP CONDUITS IN TIGHT ENVELOPES. CHANGES IN DIRECTION TO ROUTE AROUND OBSTACLES SHALL BE MADE WITH CONDUIT OUTLET BODIES.CONDUIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER, PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE WALL AND CEILING LINES. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE FISHED TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS. ENDS OF CONDUITS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY CAPPED FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE TO PREVENT CONCRETE, PLASTER OR DIRT FROM ENTERING. CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGIDLY CLAMPED TO BOXES BY GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON BUSHING ON INSIDE AND GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON LOCKNUT ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. 23. EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPDXY-COATED SHEET STEEL; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50 AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 24. METAL RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPDXY- COATED OR NON -CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A AND NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 25. NONMETALLIC RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 26. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS. 27. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS TO SAFEGUARD LIFE AND PROPERTY. 28. INSTALL PLASTIC LABEL ON THE METER CENTER TO SHOW "####". 29. ALL CONDUITS THAT ARE INSTALLED ARE TO HAVE A METERED MULE TAPE PULL CORD INSTALLED. GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTING PROTECTION AND AC POWER GESS) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AT OR BELOW GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL -OF -POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR LESS 3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY SEQUENCING GROUNDING AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION AS TO PREVENT ANY LOSS OF CONTINUITY IN THE GROUNDING SYSTEM OR DAMAGE TO THE CONDUIT AND PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS. 4. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTING OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH #6 AWG COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS. 5. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT. 6. EACH CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS. 7. CONNECTIONS TO THE GROUND BUS SHALL NOT BE DOUBLED UP OR STACKED BACK TO BACK, CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE GROUND BUS ARE PERMITTED. 8. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONDUCTORS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT/GROUND BARS AND THE GROUND RING SHALL BE #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 9. ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 10. USE OF 90' BENDS IN THE PROTECTION GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AVOIDED WHEN 45' BENDS CAN BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED. 11. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE. 12. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS ABOVE GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) SHALL BE FORMED USING HIGH PRESS CRIMPS. 13. COMPRESSION GROUND CONNECTIONS MAY BE REPLACED BY EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS. 14. ICE BRIDGE BONDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY BONDED OR BOLTED TO THE BRIDGE AND THE TOWER GROUND BAR. 15. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E. CONDUCTIVE GEL OR PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. 16. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH A CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON -ELECTRICAL METAL BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 18. BOND ALL METALLIC OBJECTS WITHIN 6FT OF MAIN GROUND WIRES WITH 1-#2 AWG TIN-PLATED COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 19. GROUND CONDUCTORS USED IN THE FACILITY GROUND AND LIGHTING PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH METALLIC OBJECTS THAT FORM A RING AROUND THE CONDUCTOR, SUCH AS METALLIC CONDUITS, METAL SUPPORT CLIPS OR SLEEVES THROUGH WALLS OR FLOORS, WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE HOUSED IN A CONDUIT, SAID CONDUIT TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL CONDITIONS, NON-METALLIC MATERIAL SUCH AS PVC PLASTIC CONDUIT SHALL BE USED. WHERE USE OF METAL CONDUIT IS UNAVOIDABLE (I.E. NON-METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED BY LOCAL CODE) THE GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH END OF THE METAL CONDUIT. 20. ALL GROUNDS THAT TRANSITION FROM BELOW GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED SOLID IN 3/4" LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT LEG 1 FROM 24" BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF CAD -WELD TERMINATION POINT. THE EXPOSED END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED WITH SILICONE CAULK. (ADD TRANSITIONING GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). DESCRIPTION PHASE./CODE LETTER WIRE COLOR 240/120 10 LEG 1 BIACK LEG 2 RED WHITE AC NEUTRAL N GROUND (ECC) G GREEN VDC POS + 'RED -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION VDC NEG _ *BLACK -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION 240V OR 20BV, 30 PHASE A BLACK PHASE B RED (ORG. IF HI LEG) PHASE C BLUE 48OV, 30 PHASE A BROWN PHASE B ORANGE PHASE C YELLOW * SEE NEC 210.5(C)(1) AND (2) PREPARED FOR AT&T i J 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: G1 5INFRASTRUCTURE /R A R T N E R 3 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: 011/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Li censor: ��E S 89198P�E OREGON ,p O 9Lj9,13,1% J� FS VIw 11/19/1 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: _027_C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GENERAL NOTES Sheet Number: GN -1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. TE: TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN A CD L LEGAL MANNER. f(E) BUILDING PARCEL#: 1703270000906 DR (TYP) s U I I I I I I I I I --.......... `` I � I a as I ------------------ ------(E)PROPERTYLINE----- e — — — — L — -7 / \ a \ PARCEL# : 1703272400600 a (E) METAL LIGHT POLE (0581) (TO BE REPLACED) — -------------------- I — '(E) LUMINAIRE (E) PROPERTY LINE 1 _ — (TO BE REPLACED) i 1 /0i --- PARCEL#: \ 1703270000904 \ i 10, J I PARCEL#: 1703272401800 o o 0 =1 dl I I � DEMO SITE PLAN (E) PROPERTY LINE G o SHELLEY ST. w ---�-- -- -- (E) PROPERTY LINE PARCEL#: 1703272400700 f(E) BUILDING 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 110' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: 'SINFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJecrID: P-049785 Vendor: 0 111/19/20 100% CDs EV DATE DESCRIPTION Li censor: 89198PFE q� OREGOIN O 9Lj qY 13, % . FSVI11/19/10 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: -027-C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BY OTHERS. "�-(E) BUILDING PARCEL#: 8 1703270000906 -- - -T / I / I j a (E) TREES I ® J1 Tr) I -- (E) PROPERTY LINE ----------------- 7 1 G 2 \: A-5 (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA (P) AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE (P) LUMINAIRE - — — ------------ - - - (E) PROPERTY LINE - I � i 1 I / 439 i � 1 2 \ A-6 A-6 \ — — — — — — — — — — — PARCEL#: \ 1703270000904 I PARCEL#: 1703272401800 �I w a O a I I OVERALL SITE PLAN PARCEL#: 1703'7 400600 - REFER TO ENLARGED SITE PLAN ON SHEET A-2 (E) PROPERTY LINE M il ---1— -- -- (E) PROPERTY LINE PARCEL#: 1703272400700 (E) BUILDING SHELLEY ST. - —_rL 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 10' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: 0 11/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: 89198PFE q, OREGON ,p O 9 4Y13,ti� SFSVIN" 11/19120 EXPIRES: 121310 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: -027-C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 1 � w ---1— -- -- (E) PROPERTY LINE PARCEL#: 1703272400700 (E) BUILDING SHELLEY ST. - —_rL 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 10' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: 0 11/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: 89198PFE q, OREGON ,p O 9 4Y13,ti� SFSVIN" 11/19120 EXPIRES: 121310 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: -027-C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 1 NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. BOUNDARIES DEPICTED HEREIN MAY NOT ALIGN WITH ACTUAL LEGAL BOUNDARIES AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO EXISTING POLE AND ANTENNA MOUNTS ARE FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. CONFIRMATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT. IN NO EVENT WILL J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS BE LIABLE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND ADEQUACY WITHOUT A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS DETERMINED AS SUCH PRIOR TO NEW INSTALLATIONS. PARCEL#: I \� 1703270000906 \ \ w z — J wl / � I \ (E) TREE` \ / (TYF PARCEL# : 1703272400600 I � I 5r;' \ CV I _ I L _ FO (E) PROPERTY LINE \ \ (P) AT&T SABRE 16" I _ \ SMARTSTACK POLE \ \\ o I \ �\ o \ \ I O U(E) SIDEWALK \ \ \ (TYP) \ \ (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA I — — — — \ 439' — — — — _ — — — — — — -- - I — — \ (P) LUMINAIRE (E) CURB \ p o O p (P) AT&T WORK AREA `v \ � U \ a O \ O \ \ J \ U \ SHELLEY ST. - ENLARGED SITE PLAN 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2' 1 0 2 doR1H PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PRoJecrID: P -0497a5 Vendor: Li censor: F 89198PE � OREGON ,I O 9 9Y13,1� �FSVINHG 9/Zo EXPIRES: 12/31/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUREWISION ANDTHAT I AM ,ULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: _027_C ---------- - 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-3 PREPARED FOR -, AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 1A SURVEY CERTIFICATION SCIP ID#: 18925-027 PARCEL I NAD 83 ' I' o °; 17032.700-00908. Vendor: a 44°03'54.53" N Q (1AlSDq�LE AVE z 23 z ` ---MCKENI (44.06515) 5INFRASTRUCTURE R A R T N E R S 21 -� a 22 I - c - PARCEL r " LONG — 123`02 28.62 2030 MAIN ST. AHAWKCh, J V = `- p a. q — q u � 17032724-00600 \ J (-123.04128) SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 HAYDEN BRIDGE WAY �Rc- ' ELEV = 439.12 NAVD 88 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: HARLOW RD " -" z L PARKING __ __ vi'i w WOOOLANE DR r YST AREA (ASPHALT) �•`�``I "�, HT.=32.3' /- d n a 11a v w �w UST _ LL = PARKING Q ti o /–z 0 3 m _ N`oR7HRlo G – c AREA HT.=28.3' _ SCO27 . 5-GEENiDR " `^ z cD Pl I, (ASPHALT) DIA.=0.33' Vendor: C F/AY '� z z r ^ ; waY ! �.xtLF.EYST HT.=27.8' / eY LN — -. ✓ + x� HT.=27.3' = ' _ - .. – 126 1 LANDSCAPE _ IW QUINALT arc `' ST yot+4 _ [!E LO M � I �;, ao. cfi o.. culls L.=1o.0' – ? I �, SPAIN" �_FIIELD --_ w��anul __I o <1 1 W M ST 2 - DRAWN BY: JSP I) 1 ii y J w j s2$. SEQUOIA AVE OyNv, x vt rENNIAI N CENTENNI Q - a ❑T F CHECKED BY: JDM /�I� ., 7 W CEN _a r U — i �ut11t UNDERGROUND .UTILITY — y - _. I A 1 PAINT MARKS (FBF OPTIC) nd w w ` � I to �„�, � � o � r v 05a 1 GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES a CONCRETE d< —439' LATITUDE: 44°03'54.53” N (44.06515) (NAD 83) CURB LONGITUDE: 123°02'28.62" W (-123.04128) (NAD 83) �39,� CENTER OF SUBJECT — GROUND ELEVATION: 439.12 FEET (NAND 88) \ POLE —SEE DETAIL — HEIGHT: \ 30' TO CL — \ 60' TO ROW @ TOP OF POLE: 28.26 FEET (AGL) \ DIA.=0.68 _ @ TOP OF LIGHT: 32.32 FEET (AGL) \ EL.=439.12" 0 11/19/20 100% CDs DATE OF SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 REV DATE DESCRIPTION 2000 0 1000 2000 4000 — POLE DETAIL : SCIP ID#: 18925-027 Licensor: 910 SHELLEY ST �` s SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 1 INCH = 2000 FEET NOT TO SCALE — 89198PE I CERTIFY THAT THE LATITUDE AND THE LONGITUDE SHOWN ABOVE ARE \ SHELLEY ST qI OREGON ,p O 9 9)13. % � / FSVINNc�///19 ao ACCURATE TO WITHIN +15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THAT THE SITEHAL T (ASPREGISTERED ELEVATION IS ACCURATE TO WITHIN +3 FEET VERTICALLY, WHICH MEETS q3� PROFESSIONAL EXPIRES:12I3V21 1A STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATION SHEET \ LAND SURVEYOR 91:003. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM (GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES) ARE IN LEGEND: Dwita"Y signs b4 And'awJ°hn P'eR IHEREBY CEW'FY THAT THESE PIANS WERE PREPAREDE` oRUNOERMrDIRECT sUPERVI�AND THAT I°^ TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD 83 AND ARE ( j REGISTERED ADN ES&FLnd�waoh°PIa"��s' ,GYu� � I o_al anJrase��,aa, email=antlrew.pletl@s0antlawm our ��EREOEN�INEER PI�oER,aEawsOE,aEtI.I oEOP[co' MINUTES UTES EXPRESSED AS DEGREES ( j, ( ) AND SECONDS ( ). TO PROFESSIONAL � LICHT-LAMP POST GAS VALVE TREE — DECIDUOUS �P oe,g,�-o, oP THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A SECOND. THE VERTICAL DATUM LAND SURVEYOR cv OREG`dN��o ❑T TELEPHONE RISER IRRIG CONTROL VALVE TREE - CONIFER DECEMBER 30, 2010 AT&T sitelD: (ELEVATION AMSL) IS IN TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL ANDREW JOHN PLETT aNc"Ana,e JchnI'lete-Sen � �� o ear anaserv¢es r,�l a,ewpl Hyyafl el DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88).on ROW LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GIS DATA, AND NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY 7HJ�3SPLS CRAN_RWOR_E0003_027_C Location Vancouver WA Date: 9/18/2020 a OREGON Date: 9/1.8/2020. RENEWS 12/31/20 SHEET 18925-027 ■ServicesProj No: 2020-177-62 DECEMBER 30, 2010 S&F Land Pri No: 2020.-177-62 1 OF 1 ANDREW JOHN PLETT Prepared: C.M.I. SHEET 4858 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD, SUITE A www.sfiaids.com '8538PL.S Prepared: C.M.I. 4558 SW SCROLLS- FERRY RD, SUITE A www.sflands.com 910 SHELLEY ST PORTLAND, OR 97225 info®sflands.com Checked: A•J.P. 1 OF 1 PORTLAND, OR 97225 in"Oesflands.com Scale: 1"'=10' -18925-027—C SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 503-345-0328 RENEWS 12/31./20 503 345-0328 Sheet Title: 1A LETTER AND SURVEY cl Sheet Number: A-4 I A LETTER oR 2 SURVEY oR; 1 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RFTRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO i =_ AT&T MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA ELEV. 36'-0" (A. G.L.) (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL D-1 'SINFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 _ Y ELEV. 35'-0"(AG L.) o J (1) (P) AT&T NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH p_1 SEE DETAILe Vendor: an L, T' T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 14" SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 31'_O. (A. G. L.) Vendor: 14" (E) LUMINARE PROPOSED LUMINAIRE EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 26'-10" (A.G.L.) ELEV. 26'-10' (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING POLE I (E) LUMINARE ELEV. 25'-1" G. L.) 4"x8"ACCESS I I DRAWN BY: JSP PORT I I CHECKED BY: JDM d ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE d (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 14" d SMARTSTACK POLE T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE I d EQUIPMENT BAY WITH (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS AND (1) NOKIA ELEV. 15'-8" (A. G.L.) AIRSCALE RRH QD d D-1 100% CDs all[) 0 11/19/20 a REV DATE DESCRIPTION T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE d Licensor: ELEV. 10'-8" (A. G.L.) a (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE (TO BE REPLACED) as I EQUIPMENT BAY FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT 9 89198E d v T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE q� OREGON ,p O 9 4),13,1% " SVIN" 11/19/10 UTILITY BAY WITH: EXPIRES: 12/31/21 ELEV. 5-8" (A.G.L.) (P) AT&T DISCONNECT / SURGE SUPPRESSOR a SEE DETAIL QD d (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE a (E) CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I D-1 10'k1TACCESS PORT • I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLANS W ERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEERuNDERTHE WwSOETHESTATE of OREcoN I a M J FINISHED GRADE (E) CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT&T Site IF V ELEV. 0 _O„ ------ = CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL 18925-027 WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) I I I I NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE le 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS D-3 I I Sheet Title: ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-5 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. !i^. "AT&T 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 16331 NE 72ND WAY 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA �5INFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS.II0 ELEV. 36'-0" (A.G.L.) (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA 2030 MAIN ST. SEE DETAIL 2e SUITE 200 D-1 IRVINE, CA 92614 RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA J5 PROJECT ID: P -0497a5 Y ELEV. 35-0" (A.G.L.) (1) (P) AT&T NOKIAAIRSCALE RRH SEE DETAIL(Z) Vendor: o p_1 T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 14" SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 31'-0" (A.G.L.) Vendor: I 1 k„ (E) LUMINARE PROPOSED LUMINAIRE EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 26'-10" (A.G.L.) ELEV. 26'-10" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING POLE I (E) LUMINARE ELEV. 25'-1" (A.G.L.) I DRAWN BY: JSP d I I CHECKED BY: JDM ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE I d I I POO I (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 14" d I SMARTSTACK POLE T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE I I d ELEV. IVIB8' (A.G.L.) EQUIPMENT BAY WITH a (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS AND (1) NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH d I D_1 a I PERF. SCREEN VENTS FOR 0 11/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION CONVECTIVE COOLING, 2 PLACES T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE d ELEV. 10(A.G.L.) EQUIPMENT BAY Licensor: a (E) CONCRETE LIGHT POLE FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT S (TO BE REPLACED) SSPE F 89198PE a I � OREGON oa O 9 9Y13,1� �F&VINHG T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE 1/19/10 d ELEV. 5'-8" (A.G.L.) UTILITY BAY WITH: (P) AT&T DISCONNECT / SURGE SUPPRESSOR EXPIRES: 12/31/21 SEE DETAIL e d I D-1 i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE ME ORUNDER ENGINE UNDER THELSION ANETFTH AM DULY REGISTERORUNDER ENGINEER UREER THE AN THAT STATE 4of 10'X12"ACCESS PORT OREGON d AT&T Site ID: h FINISHED GRADE ELEV. O'-0.. CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) \\\\ { 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE e SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS D-3 Sheet Title: ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-6 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"2® 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" B46 NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH FOR LAA (ARIA): PSEUDO OMNI 12 -PORT CANISTER ANTENNA PREPARED FOR MANUFACTURER: NOKIA MANUFACTURER: GALTRONICS CORE UNIT SIZE PART NUMBER: GQ2412-06613 (DC VERSION): 11.6" x 9.6' x 1.8" (H x W x D) DIAMETER: 14.7" INTERFACE: 2 CPRI PORTS FOR FRONT -HAUL (2x9.8 GB/S) HEIGHT: 24.5" / POWER INPUT: DC: -40.5V TO -57V WEIGHT W/MOUNT: 30.9 LBS AT&T CORE UNIT WEIGHT: 11.0 LBS VOLUME: 3.1416 (0.6125 FT)A2 x (2 FT) = 2.35 CUBIC FEET VOLUME: 0.116 CUBIC FEET 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 14.7" Vendor: C1.6 '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: 0 v N U 115 ]55S 5]pp 1,i v Vendor: 5141- (HH:i (Ol l 1 ISOMETRIC VIEW 6-95'1L 515 0-5915 MHz 9Y O onp 1 1 6 1 X95 8-896 Mlle 520 I05-936➢ MHv O U,1,5 +411 � DRAWN BY: JSP M,I O OO ® CHECKED BY: JDM O � N BOTTOM VIEW FRONT VIEW BOTTOM VIEW RADIO SPECIFICATION ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS 4 2 N.T.S. N.T.S. SURGE PROTECTION BOX MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP PART NUMBER: RCCAC-1333-PS-240-A WEIGHT: 8 LBS DIMENSIONS (LxWxH): 9.38" x 5.58" x 10.43" VOLUME: (0.781 FT) x (0.557FT) x (0.869 FT) = 0.378 CUBIC FEET — 0 11/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION 5.58" 9.38" 5.06" Licensor: 8.59"J. �E S F O 89198PE � OREGON oa O 9 9Y13,2� SFS V INNI 1/19/10 = EXPIRES: 12/31/21 o c _ co � c6 M o HEREBY cER THAT THESE PREPARED 9v E_ EW ISIwNA OR MERE UNDER M DIRECT iFAi AM •I E UNDERITHE LANG ouLv REGISTERED ENGINEER ulvoER THE Wws oEiFE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: O CRAN RWOR EUG03 027 C 18925-027 SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW M40 GLANDS CAN BE 910 SHELLEY ST REPLACED BY 1-1/4" NPT SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 CONDUIT FITTINGS Sheet Title: E] ❑ DETAILS o OO o O O Sheet Number: D-1 3 AC DISCONNECT W/ SURGE PROTECTION SPECIFICATION BOTTOM VIEW 1 NOT USED III N.T.S. N.T.S. R C C V 8 7 6 PART LIST ITEM QTY /M P/N DESCRIPTION 1 2.12 CLI.YDS 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 CONCRETE, 1 CYD BATCH, 150 PCF 2 11 Each 410250 REBAR, #4 (1/2"), PREBENT 30" DIA 3 91.00 FT 12 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 4 8.08 FT 1 TUBE, SLEEK, 36" 5 4 Each C4004105B ANCHOR BOLT 1" X 51" F1554 GR105 6 2 Each SM00100 ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE, 19 1/2" BC 7 2 Each SWO0378 LIFTING LUG, PIER, 3" X 18 5/8" X 1" 8 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 9 8 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2", 90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 10 12 Each COUPLING, G -PVC, 2" 11 12 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 13 1 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4", 90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 14 1 3 1 Each I ICOUPLING, G -PVC, 3/4" 5 2 KI CUT LIST ITEM P/N DESCRIPTION LENGTH WIDTH PC 3 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 91.00 in 12 8 410250 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 48.00 in 8 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 36.00 in 1 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 12.00 in 1 NOTES: 1. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS AND VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS ARE TO BE SECURELY TIED BEFORE CONCRETE IS PLACED SO THEY WILL REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE PIER. 2. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS ARE TO BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH. 3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. 4, CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-11. 5. REINFORCING STEEL TO HAVE A 3" MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER. 6, ANCHOR BOLTS 1"0 X 4'-3" (F1554 GR105) ON A 19 1/2"0 BOLT CIRCLE (4 REQ'D). 7. CONCRETE REQUIRED 2.12 CUBIC YARDS. 8. LAP SPLICES OF ADJACENT CIRCULAR TIES SHALL BE POSITIONED ON ALTERNATE SIDES. x.911ITA I_i1A0RAM 0101IS1�:�151111:b1 SECTION AA -5' X 3/4" ;HAMFER 3'-0"[36]" DIA IT nu 1N 1 v 1TJ vv #4 TIES W/(3) IN TOP 5" AND THEN -1/C SPACING VERTICAL SPACED) (12) #6 VERTICAL (EVENLY SPACED) O 9 1 (11) 30"V) #4 REBAR TIES 0 SECTION BB S51AE000I DESCRIPTION : CONCRETE PIER 3'0" X 8'1" (4) 1"0 X 4'-3" ANCHOR BOLTS ON A 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 SABRE CONCRETE PIER TYPICAL FOUNDATION N.T.S. 0 ,0 I PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: Lil V INH�11/19/Z0 EXPIRES: 12131/21 "I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: A 1 CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C 18925-027 19 1 /2"B.C. 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: 1 DETAILS Sheet Number: D-2 AVAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL: htt ps: //www.weneeds ig ns. com /prod uct. ph p? product id=171904&cat=1135&page= l CLICK ON AT&T PH: 510-651-0445 NO] -DC -16 1'x6' NOTICE DECAL "FOR 1 FOOT DISTANCE" VYVYL DECAL WITH ADHESIVE BACKING 1 ORDER COMES IN A PACK PF 25. RF WARNING SIGNS PLACE THREE NOTICE STICKER EQUALLY SPACED AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE ANTENNA RADOME RF WARNING NOTICE SIGN AT ANTENNA d f S' NOTICE ON THIS POLE: RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS NEAR SOME ANTENNAS MAY EXCEED FCC RULES FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE PERSONNEL CLIMBING THIS TOWER SHOULD BE TRAINED FOR WORKING RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIRONMENTS AND USE A PERSONAL RF MONITORING IF WORKING NEAR ACTIVE ANTENNAS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION RULES ON RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS 47 CFR 1.1307(B) S' (3 DIGITS REE 000 NETWORK OPERATION CONTROL CENTER (NOC) 1-800-264-6620 NODE ID # 12 r 6" f THIS SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH FCC RULES F FOR BOTH OCCUPATION AND CONTROLLED AND GENERAL PUBLIC OR SITE NAME / PURPOSES ONLLY. THE APPROPRIATE SITE IS FOR EXAMPLE UNDERCINTROLLED AT&T TGA R D002 _ NAME SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE STAY BACK A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET FROM ANY ACTIVE ANTENNA 1=800=638=2822 TO DEACTIVATE ANTENNA CALL THE N.O. PHONE NUMBER BEFORE OPERATING DISCONNECT USID• 92 355 USID NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE _ PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE USID NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT DISCONNECT f REENTER I.D. NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH NODE NODE NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATED AT EACH NODE NOTES: 1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED, IN VIEW, ON EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE DISCONNECT. 2. WARNING SIGNS TO BE INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS AND FCC. SIGNS ALLOWED ONLY AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. RF WARNING NOTICE SIGNS AT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 24"x36" SCALE: NTS PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 eo Vendor: SINFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-049785 Vendor: 0 111/19/20 100% CDs REV I DATE DESCRIPTION Li censor: .SFR s 89198PE q� OREGON �V INNG 11/19/10 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PIANS WERE PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: _027_C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: RF WARNING SIGNS Sheet Number: RF -1 1 PREPARED FOR THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. .� i AT&T 1 Y akin Pico Location 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 CofIfigvia J� f2f 0apbymer1 puna �ICo17 fftom 4Q f 7a Vendor: 6 -Part MfdIIHigh Sartd '51NFRASTRUCTURE AnCewra 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 xxx r"y11f1T1c3 O[1linTlS; IRVINE, CA 92614 - SI-nglp Anlenrr2 U.7M" MAX 30A Js PROJECT ID: P -0497a5 Portrs N1ia-Gand Q GHz1+ 4Ports HIgh-Band POWER LINE Vendor: xxx Alt2M iiM P'=U CLS SUPPOr#(r5g L --ow. Ban I andPDr 2-5 G)4z x FA211? 81 (1) 6-#10THHN/THWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE Vendor: Vd GaJFd SURGE SUPPRESSOR — PC5rAW$ Crosti Band Ccfnb•Yner I ISM, (1) 6-#10THHN/THWN/VW-1 - * POLE MOUNTED STREET LAMP TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO STREET LAMP DRAWN BY: JSP fit _ rAh3gie' Qfl �y�. IVIA4c CHECKED BY: JDM Ft� r MRS. - R RH-1 4T -4R kr�ca€p Mfc%ro- B25PC% �al� esu rr - RKH-2. 4T4R NF fir{ ro BOUAINS RRH RRH RRH RRH -RRF-S.2T&C-q kr B .153H A A - AC Flown r .mridwRI& - C PRI C h � in rl-lat vuppoTw4 JDhti2HY �Dr A1r9G 3I$ I (Hill n d a dGdc�d C PMfGr -9ac�l Ra Y RAYCAP DISCONNECT/SURGE 79 SUPPRESSOR (1) 2-#12THHN/THWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO RRH r 0 11/19/20 100% CDs 4 AMP BREAKER REV DATE DESCRIPTION �1<kFll�iJ Ll�rm>an� METAL OXIDE SWITCH Licens^89198PE" 6 FibQM FFOn1h-aU! FOCIU iced VARISTOR (TYP.) � OREGON oa O 13, �.y NEUTRAL BUS BAR �FSV1w 11/1 0 EXPIRES: 12/31/21 GROUND BUS BAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE Puna WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON' AC Source if w AT&T Site ID: Dark f IbUS tiOftm Hub CRAN RWOR EUG03 027 C 18925-027 910 S H E L L E Y ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC Sheet Number: E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 121 DC POWER SCHEMATIC 24"x36" SALE: NTS 1 THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. NOTES: 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF THE INSTALLATION ON THE POLE SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AND BARREL COMPRESSION GROUNDED. 2. A COPPER GROUND WIRE, #6 AWS MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE BASE OR FEEDLINE ATTACH TO GROUND CONNECTION POINT OF THE ANTENNA TO A GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE POLE AND BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE ANTENNA FEEDLINE CONDUIT. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY CONNECTED CONTRACTOR TO THE GROUND ROD. 3. WHERE A UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR EXISTS, THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY BONDED 3. TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR AT THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR LEVEL BY UTILITY CO. CREWS. 4. A GROUND ROD, 8 FEET MINIMUM IN LENGTH SHALL BE INSTALLED (WHERE NO UTILITY CO. GROUND ROD & INTACT GROUND WIRE EXISTS) AT THE BASE OF THE POLE. THIS INSTALLATION SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINE D16-2 5. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE MOLDING FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH ON THE POLE, EXCEPT AT THE POINT WHERE IT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR BONDING TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL. 6. THE UTILITY CO. AND COMMUNICATION GROUND RODS SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER USING COPPER #6 AWG WIRE G R O C N D O N G NOTES 24"x36" SCALE: NTS COAXIAL GROUND KITS W. LONG BARREL COMPRESSION DOUBLE LUG WITH SIGH HOLE, ATTACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALLED BY ANTENNA CONTRACTOR 0 0 0,0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O '000000000000000000' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER GROUND BAR COPPER WIRE (TYP.) INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: 1. COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTION WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL GROUND LUGES TO HAVE INSPECTION WINDOWS/SIGHT HOLES G R O D N D O N G BAR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOT USED 24"x36" SCALE: NTS GROUND BAR L #6 AWG TO ANTENNA GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO GROUND ROD J 1 1 WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION FA 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOTES: 1. GROUND WIRE MOLDING SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE BARE GROUND WIRE TO PROTECT LINE WORKERS, THE WIRE, AND THE PUBLIC. EXTEND PLASTIC MOLDING AT LEAST TWO INCHES BELOW CEADE. 2. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE IN ONI CONIINUOUS LENGTH. INSERT GROUND WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GROUND C AVS AND BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TIGHTENING. CONNECT TO SECONDARY OF SERVICE NEUTRAL ON THE POLE. PLACE GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH SIDE) AND SERVICE NEUTRAL. 3. IDRIVE GROUND ROD IN UNDISTURBED EARTH 4. IREFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. 1/2" PLASTIC MOULDING #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) GRADE _. LN GROUND ROD CLAMP 6" GROUND ROD, 5/8"0 X 8' LONG (NOT REQUIRED IF PGE GROUND ROD IS PRESENT) CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL 5 1 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS WOODEN POLE E E 0 2 IC -CRIME DETAIL TYPE SS TYPE TA TYPE W TYPE GT 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 16 ICARDWELD D E T A D L S -D '6' ECTOR CRIMP CONNI TYPE PT TYPE VN TYPE VS TYPE GY 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 13 TYPE GL TYPE NC TYPE VB TYPE GR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P -0497a5 Vendor: Li censor: ��E S F 89198PE OREGON Na O 9 9Y13,2� SFSV11 11/19/10 EXPIRES: 12131/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SBREWIISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: —027—C 18925-027 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-1 LEGEND PREPARED FOR ■ MECHANICAL CONNECTION, DBL -BOLT OR EQUAL i AT&T • CADWELD CONNECTION OR EQUAL - IN-LINE Cu C -CRIMP, SPLIT -BOLT OR EQUAL 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Js PROJECT ID:P-o497Bs (P) OMNI DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PER PLAN, TYP. Vendor: ANTENNA GROUND POLE EXTENSION GROUND Vendor: RR U EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 2' W x 6' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER DRAWN BY: JSP #2 COPPER -TINNED, BARE WIRE. ADD 1/2" WIRE COVER ON THE CHECKED BY: JDM NOTE: BOTTOM 12 FT. DETAIL SHOWS GENERAL SCHEMATIC GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS ONLY. (P) METAL POLE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE RRU EQUIPMENT BONDING JUMPER #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER, TYP. 0 11/19/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION #2 GREEN STRANDED TO #2 SOLID MASTER GROUND BAR 2' Licensor: W x 12' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. SERVICE GROUND #2 AWG BARE F 89198PE OR GREEN STRANDED COPPER CONTINUOUS TO GROUND DISCONNECT POLE GROUNDING OREGON p O 9�FSV13, 11/19 ZO POLE GROUNDING BAR 2" W x 6' EXPIRES: 12131/21 CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. METER (IF APPLICABLE) (E) FINISHED SURFACE cER THAT THESE PLAINS WERE ARm 9v 'I HEREBY CERTIFY MEOPUNDERMY DIRECTEISIONANDTHI AM ouLv REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS oFTHE STATE OF OREGON o z PILE GROUNDING AT&T Site IF CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION TO NEW GROUND ROD 18925-027 (N) GROUND ROD 5/8" x 8' LONG 910 SHELLEY ST COPPER CLAD STEEL SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: Sheet Number: G-2 NOT USED TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: N,�; 1 at8ct EUG03_027 / 18925-027 51NFRASTRUCTURE PHOTO SIMULATION at 1 � i a N • ' •44°3'54.52"N 123°2'28.62"W 02020 DOODLE MAPS 910 SHELLY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PAGE 1 Disclaimer: These photographic simulations have been previded to aid in visual'¢tng how the proposed vnreless telecummunicetions fadlily shown herein would appear 0 constructed. While these renderings are not an end science, they haw been pmpmd diligently to accurately retied dimensions, scale, depth, coloring, twt m, and other important elements in the proposed design insofar as the digital medium allows. Taken together with the engineering drawings and other materials submitted with the application, they are fair and reasonable visual depictions of how the proposed site would appear. AT&T Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction (RFSSRP) FA#: 14470779 U SI D: 208148 Site ID: 18925-027 Address: 910 Shelley Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 County: Lane Latitude: 40.065 15 000 Longitude: -123.04128000 EBI Project Number: 6220006159 Report Information: M-RFSC Name: Piero Rovani Site Structure Type: Light Pole PACE#: M RWOR034994/M RWOR034923/M RWOR035005 Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC c/o J5 Infrastructure Partners 2030 Main Street, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 Report Writer: Andrew Simpson Report Date: December 4, 2020 CDs: ATT_PDX18925-027_100 CRAN CD REV 0_2020-11-19 (S&S) Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. EBI Consulting environmental I engineering l duedillgence AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208148 I 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN........................................................................................3 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY..........................................................................................................4 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING................................................................................. 6 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 12 6.0 APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ 13 APPENDIXA: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................. 14 APPENDIX EI: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 17 APPENDIX C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION.................................................................... 18 APPENDIX D: LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIXE: RoofMasterT".................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX F: CERTIFICATIONS................................................................................................ 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208148 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site 20589-003 located at 910 Shelley Street in Springfield, Oregon to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Recommended Mitigation at the Site: Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 6 by 6 inch Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 3 feet below the bottom of the antenna • Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: No Action Required • Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: 7_1R01-1 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 2 Predictive Modeling Results: The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 1.52 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.30 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the light fixture level. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. At the antenna face level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 163.86 percent of the FCC's general public limit (32.772 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.04 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.008 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 3 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY Site USID: 208148 4 Note there Is I AT&T omnidirectional antenna M this site. For clarity, the dilferentfregmncies for the antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. yO p m 0 M E L JL 9C q 0 C n u$ p n p n C ` C 'E R y M s L q L y 9 I: ] C o L L y'D y O � L v 1] g Eo a C yE I ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-0 61300DT 1900 Iwo 0 0 156 20 5 4 5.85 64.87 106.38 I ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-061300DT 2100 1100 0 0 IBI 20 5 4 5.45 59.16 9].01 1 ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-061300DT 5150 5150 0 0 228 20 as 2 235 1.45 238 Note there Is I AT&T omnidirectional antenna M this site. For clarity, the dilferentfregmncies for the antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Site USID: 208148 5 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Antenna Radiation Z -Height Light Z -Height Ant# NAMEX Y Centerline Fixture Ground ATT 22.0 2.5 35.0 7.1 34.0 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 6 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterT. software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site light fixture level and ground -level resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupationallcontrolled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers with equipment installed at this site. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled exposures on any accessible light fixture level and ground walking/working surface related to ATT's proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational and/or general public exposure limits at this site. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the light fixture level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 1.52 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.30 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 1.52 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.30 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground/street level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground/street level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.04 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.008 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Elevation View Site USID: 208148 7 Percent APE legend ❑ 0"L -100"L 500 5000 ❑ 500%% -5000% 5000'/.+ PublicGmi6 u,09 VeNoal 101..1 ,idme Aid Zone Avg Geier Color Coda 10 ATT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Light Fixture Level Site USID: 208148 8 \ I ` I i GaouNO LEVEL=o' / I � I \ i _ - ---- -------- -- ATTA�TEN�A a ° ° -- -- LIGHT FlMIIPE=26.83' Pe,mnt MPE LegPntl ❑ Tov v-Fovmv ■ ■ unooz. s-unoore � eoo NblmFor, Sula9 18 foot grid ma (Avg 2383 to29 83 Feet) Came, Colo, Code Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Antenna Face Level Site USID: 208148 9 Max MPE: 163.86% General Population MPE at Antenna Face Level AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. I � I i i Ii��s yes\per / ` \� I Geourvo LEVE[L-0 �I I � I I a V r �— ----- - ---- -------- -- ATTArvTErvrvA � a L' —� -- -- LIGHT FIXTURE -2.93' Per—nt APE Legend ❑ 9%-109% ■ 00% 500%% 5001-50091. ■ 50501... Pi in Limits 5dle9 10 foot grid geo (Avg 32ted, 30 Feet) Gnie,Glo, Code Max MPE: 163.86% General Population MPE at Antenna Face Level AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Ground Level 0 feet AGL Site USID: 208148 10 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. I I saouuo LEVEL-O /I I I \\\ 4 4 I ❑ V --- -------- -- nr. ANrENNA a LIGHr FINruAE-26M P—t MPE Legend ❑o% roux ❑ 50 000- ■ moo.. Pnel mmits swan 10lmtgiidme fpvg 0 b 6Feet] fame, Colo, Csi AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 1447077911 Site USID: 208148 AT&T Contribution of More Than 5% of the FCC's General Ex osure RF Limit Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T amennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in from of other carrier arenas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. � I I I c GROUND LEVEL -O' �I v � ` ' \` \ I I </ I � I I - ---- -------- -- ArrA�rE��A a LIGHT FIxrUFE-26 83 Percent PIPE Legend ❑ ■ 1, Pcblio Limits `ula9 lU feet a128eve Ub6Feet) Carrier color code � Arr Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T amennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in from of other carrier arenas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 12 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. The following mitigation measures are recommended for this site. Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 6 by 6 inch Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 3 feet below the bottom of the antenna AT&T Mobility Sectors: o Sector A: No Action Required AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 6.0 APPENDICES Site USID: 208148 13 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Nottor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Appendix A: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION(FCC) REQUIREMENTS Site USID: 208148 14 The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSIIIEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupationallcontrolled exposure limits (for workers) and general publicluncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupationallcontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general publicluncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Generol publicluncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE limit is 2.33 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 0.47 mW/cm2. For the AT&T equipment operating at 1900 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 5.0 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 1.0 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Site USID: 208148 IS Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (Vim) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm) Power Density (S) (m Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f 900/ * 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 f/300 6 1,500-100,000 (8) Limits for General PublidUncontrolled Exposure 5 6 Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm)(mW/cm') Power Density (S) Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 8248 2.19/f 180/f * 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane -wave equivalent power density Figure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissibie Exposure (MPE) Piano -wave Equivalent Power Density Oc.paliona//ConboMad Exposure -- -- General Population/Urrconbolfed Exposure 0.11 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 003 03 q 3 30 300 3,000 36,00'0 },300,000 134 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 16 Personal Wireless Service Approximate Frequency Occupational MPE public MPE Microwave (Point -to -Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm' 0.58 mW/cm' Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm' 0.57 mW/cm' Long Term Evolution (LTE) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm' 0.47 mW/cm' Most Restrictive Frequency Range 30-300 MHz 1.00 mW/cm' 0.20 mW/cm' MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 17 Appendix B: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated May 27, 2015, requires that I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 18 Appendix C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: • Be posted at a conspicuous point; • Be posted at the appropriate locations; • Be readily visible; and • Make the reader aware of the potential risksro for to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. CRAN I HETNET Small Cell Decals I Signs STONEHOUSE O. C1 R erogy—by,d byNi. antenna baby ennbll0 .yaaburro 1. burlm b•pe.,.]pb,ads n. NOTICE auynbm I Iect—,ftbm N.amemu DECAL Ca ataT.i eroetaxu. wibn c baby T. ror baro n you mM,rsu.bNln bat .rnr op.mm nwm..mmn.w.wA. ;-n, b.om�riM�pHd•Wn wn.xr Po°�`u�escc TRILINGUAL STONEHOUSE n•vylimm.berowm. NOTICE SIGN NOTICE2 ACAUTIOR ACAUTION co uuam.z.o.ae.azz.µ..> adar.m°bbp a�°iy «tpiwwn. a .m.. Ni. b. x0ararouw A CAUTION A STONEHOUSE RF.n.py emi W by MK mlmna mrynawdlM FCC s .. .....nM.n bbnwewna..ao,ms burn:. CAUTION avynbnll I.«.nnr nom m. nm.nm. DECAL Cat! AT&T at 8006. "U, .,"b 9N.n 1,.1Mip MIO. ACAUTION nNEsbn.MWln r tat a� A CAUTIONgs ..&. y.,m.....mlb. .1-1.n. ,inn.n STONEHOUSE (CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION .,...ban —by F. SIGN -PARAPETS JAWARNING c..•., nnr a ban.b.zmx oa..> Aik A CN Bb VYD� Alerting Signs TRILINGUAL NOTICE NOTICE2 ACAUTIOR ACAUTION ' .. .....nM.n ON 2— CAUTION m11w..... ROOFTOP CAUTION 2A °ACAUTION ACAUTION a� ,2B- (CAUTION CAUTION 2C TOWER -PARAPETS JAWARNING AWARNING Aik A WARNING IB WARNING 2A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Appendix D: LIMITATIONS Site USID: 208148 19 This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC to meet requirements outlined in AT&T's corporate RF safety guidelines. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Appendix E: RoofMasterTM Site USID: 208148 20 RoofMasterT. is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed to predict RF power density values for rooftop and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" (OET-65), RoofMasterT. calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMasterTM models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site FA 14470779 Appendix F: CERTIFICATIONS Site USID: 208148 21 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Nottor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_027_C Site USID: 208148 Site FA 14470779 22 Preparer Certification 1, Andrew Simpson, state that: • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&Ts RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated October 28, 2014) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofMasterT. modeling software. • I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 0111100W- AT&T /TIP W AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. The comparative LTE: RSRP coverage map over the focus zone is provided below as an illustration. All the other coverage maps (MRO, dominance, etc.) are directly viewable in Atoll (with more detail) or can be provided as a snapshot similar to the illustration below upon request. LTE: RSRP IdOmI IN Unt nsRP IRSEmq Level dS" >.= 35 IN 5eit RSRP RSEmu Level dS" >.= as co, PSRP IRSEPRq Level dS" >.= 105 Lieut RSRP Is EmE] Level Ida" >.= 115 eeR asRP RSEmE] Lcrel cdm] >.= 1u `� IV ©2019 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo, Mobilizing your World and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Sabre Industries - INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 30' Smart Stack (35' Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG03-027-A, OR Site Number: 18925-027-A Prepared for: J5 Infrastructure Partners by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 October 21, 2020 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 1 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 3-8 Foundation Calculations......... 61633PE u OREGON r ""RES. D6/30/2022 9-14 Designed Appurtenanw Loading ..naim VAI SOONER 11 IN Ulaovizuev Isl vz' Al A a r EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A (1, araza° em IAA, an. n zl I n - AD nm°e al—I AD nm°e a.gn nle'am me �� nl In- 15 VI a YDE 15 111 A-.. fre.41lalaw Wnal al ln- 6 nlassa°mRLEADER a.Are lasal al la' 15 nl aaza. em nAA, mR nl In - 15 alcac,..szv �S3a A. rt 10 ROAD 10 rt Designed Appurtenanw Loading Design CrReria - ARSIITIi LAID SOONER (NN, I ..naim VAI SOONER 11 IN Ulaovizuev Isl vz' Al A 19caaexUu'r As. r EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A (1, araza° em IAA, an. n zl I n - AD nm°e al—I AD nm°e a.gn nle'am me �� nl In- 15 VI 15 111 A-.. fre.41lalaw Wnal al ln- 15 nlassa°mRLEADER a.Are lasal al la' 15 nl aaza. em nAA, mR nl In - 15 alcac,..szv al +n- 10 rt 10 ROAD 10 rt 10 a„e,+esn<>ax al +n- 10 nlaiAIDE,.lazs.ranmwlasal al la' 10 nl ANSI am l.l mR nl ln- 10 n,AMER. mIT.a. Are lunN., al la' ,�, nscAc-amxnma n, +a� Design CrReria - ARSIITIi LAID SOONER (NN, I AT VAI SOONER 11 ..0 1.ueexi NET 1 s AN) RI I r EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A RARROARROLon Anchor Bolt Dimensions al—I DATE Load Case Reactions oEARD a 1 nwpba 1 en.rlaPa 11. a) 1.ueexi NET 1 s AN) aog INNOVATION DELIVERED& ray, lAAII. r EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A RARROARROLon Anchor Bolt Dimensions AS er ..en a.gn 1 ]a. 1r.q..le. Notes 1) Antenna Flied Lines Run Inside Pole 2) All dirrensions are altove grouts level, unbss oenerwise specified. 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Finavelghtlarm ary. d) TMs taxer design aM, If applba5le, the founcatbn dreign(s) shown on tine foll,whg pagels) ale, meet or exceed tine regnmere me of tine 2019 Oregon hft Structural Swy Cade. 5) Tomer Rating: 11% a0 lAMbardeks Base Plate Dimensions 1&Y1NEW-R. oPh.e AN ° °""° - by cW P a aog INNOVATION DELIVERED& ray, lAAII. r EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A aYsmLEELAPI�Pde Anchor Bolt Dimensions er ..en a.gn 1 ]a. 1r.q..le. Notes 1) Antenna Flied Lines Run Inside Pole 2) All dirrensions are altove grouts level, unbss oenerwise specified. 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Finavelghtlarm ary. d) TMs taxer design aM, If applba5le, the founcatbn dreign(s) shown on tine foll,whg pagels) ale, meet or exceed tine regnmere me of tine 2019 Oregon hft Structural Swy Cade. 5) Tomer Rating: 11% a0 lAMbardeks 1&Y1NEW-R. oPh.e AN ° °""° - by cW P a Sa re Industries” o INNOVATION DELIVERED& ray, lAAII. a^.' EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A aYsmLEELAPI�Pde ��•, er 1azlrzozo lur Page Sabre Industries' INN OVATION DELIVERED No.: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Date: 10/2120 By: KJT Customer: J5 Infrastructure Partners Site: EUG03-027-A, OR 18925-027-A 30' Pipe Pole Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 4,500 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. Grade is. 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 p=— =1 Grade 60. SHIM= 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete F— I —I I cover. I I I 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- (8) 2" Conduits & 222-H-2017. (1) 3/4" ConduitL-----j 4 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ___-- 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be ELEVATION VIEW positioned as closely as possible to the (1.59 Cu. YEE.) bottom of the anchor bolts. (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) Rebar Schedule for Pier (12) #6 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Information contained herein E the sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not he reproduced copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279.0814 Page (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02012 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)236-7453 FaK:(416)736-4372 web: Wnw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: $ab re Towers Rod Poles n: 21 oct 2020 at: 19:53:12 ---------------------------------- 30' Pipe Pole / EU603-0271, OR * All pole diameters shown on the following pages are Across corners. See profile Jrawi ng for widths Across flats. POLE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCE$ SPLICE ... O✓ENIAP... w/t NAME SIDE DI -NESS **Pm **Mn WEE LENGTH RATIO ft in in kip ft -kip ft 29.9 ........................................... 14.00 0.375 505.6 182.8 A 0 32.3 14.00 0.375 505.6 182.8 0.0 ........................................... POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLT$ AT BASE OF SECTION............ GLC NAME ELEV NUMBER WEE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE $HEAR PLANE ELEV ft in ksi ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 ROLE SECTIONS SECTION No.Of LENGTH OUT$IDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGE.WELD NAME $IDE$ NOT TOP HAD ENTAL BOT TOP .. GRGUE.ID.. ID NOT TOP ft in in in A 0 29.92 14.00 14.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 * - Diameter of circunscribeE circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF IF NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE No ELEM. WEB RANGE .PROTECTION. .W OF ORIENT AREA & deg in in in in deg PL 1 1 0.0 14.00 0.38 0.375 0.325 0.00 0.0 & - with respect to Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES -------------- MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL WEE NO. MODULUS WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi ksi /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001120 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A -- 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOADS ON MULE LOAD ELEV APELY..LOAD..AT LOAD ...... FORCE$...... ...... MOMENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ NOR. DOWN VERTICAL TOHSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 33.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0225 0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 C 31.412 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0398 0.1200 0.0000 0.0000 Page 3 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0574 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0634 0.1200 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1608 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0286 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0190 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0048 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0024 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0084 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0024 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 U 29.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0107 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0096 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 LOADING CCNOITION m __________ 91 mph wind with no ice. wine Azimuth: 0e LDADs ON roLE LOAD ELEV APVLr_LOAU..AT LOAD ...... EONCES...... ...... MIMIENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ HONIZ IXYNN VERTICAL TONSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 D 29.920 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0107 0.0492 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0096 0.0492 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - monopole spatial Analysis (02017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 Fax:(416)736-4372 web:w guymast.rob Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and tyles on: 21 ort 2020 at: 19:53:12 30' Pipe Pole / EUG03-027-A, OR MA%IMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATEO(w.r.t. wind direction) Page 4 MST .......DEFLECTION$ (ft) ......... .........NOTATION$ (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOwN ........ TILT .......... .$T ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 29.9 0.03A O.00R O.00A O.OSA O.00R O.00R ...................................................................... 22.4 0.02A O.00R O.00A O.OBA O.00R O.00R 15.0 0.01A 0.00a O.00A 0.07A O.00R O.00R 6666.....6...........6........66........ . 66.66. .. .. .. 666.6. .. .. 66.66.. 7.5 O.OM O.00R O.00K O.O4A O.00R O.00R 0.0 0.00A O.00A O.00A 0.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCUUTED(w.r.t. to Rd ntl direction) .$T VIAL $HEAR.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR MTM ENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft-kip ft-kip ft-kip 29.9...................................................................... 0.23 F 0.07 w 0.00 E -0.17 M 0.00 N 0.00 R 1.01 F 0.21w 0.000 -1.33 A 0.000 0.000 22.4...................................................................... 1.01 H 0.21 1 0.00 T -1.33 A 0.00 C 0.00 C 1. SO H 0.29 T 0.00 T -3.20 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 15.0...................................................................... 1.64 K 0.29 K 0.00 T -3.20 B 0.00 R 0.00 R 2.24 K 0.36 K 0.00 T -5.65 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 7.5...................................................................... 2.24 C 0.36 U 0.00 N -5.65 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 2.78 C 0.43 U 0.00 N -8.64 A 0.00 R 0.00 R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.78 C -0.43 U 0.00 N 8.64 A 0.00 R 0.00 R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMITIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL SENDING SHEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(w/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft 29.92.................................................................6666. O.00F O.OQ4 O.00w O.00K YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00F 0.01A O.00W O.OIA YES 37.33A 400.0 22.44...................................................................... O.00H 0.01A O.00T O.OIA YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00H 0.02A O.00T 0.02A YES 37.33c 400.0 14.96...................................................................... O.00K 0.028 O.00K 0.02B YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00K 0.03A O.00K 0.04A YES 37.33A 400.0 7.48...................................................................... 0.000 0.03A 0.000 0.04A YES 37.33A 400.0 0.01C 0.05A 0.000 0.05A YES 37.33A 400.0 0.00...................................................................... NAXIMUM LOAD$ ONTO FOUNDATIOR(w.r.t. Rd ntl direction) DMN SHEAR.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR MMERT.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.78 0.43 0.00 -8.64 0.00 0.00 C U R A R R (USA 222-H) - monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaX:(416)736-4372 web: www. guymast.com processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 21 ocn 2020 at 19:54:16 30' pipe role / EW03-027-A, OR Page 5 ..•..................•• service Load condition .........................•• ............................................................................ * Only 1 condition(s) shown in full LMUING CONUIEON A _________________________________________ 60 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: 04 Lo4o5 ON MILE LMO ELEV APVLY..LOAO..AT LWO ...... FORCE$...... ...... PkNMNTS..... If RADIUS AZI AZ HORIZ IXYNN VERTICAL TORSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 D 29.920 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0050 0.0546 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0048 0.0546 0.0000 0.0000 MMIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED(w.r.t. wind direction) MST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ......... ROTATTONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOwN ........ TILT .......... TWIST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 29.9 0.01,, O.001L O.00F 0.04F O.001L O.00L ............................................63...........66........... 22.4 0.01E O.00L O.00F 0.03E O.00L O.00L 15.0 O.00F O.00L O.00F 0.03F O.00L O.00L ........................................ . 66.66. .. .. .. 666.6... .. 66.66.. Z5 O.00F O.00L O.00F 0.02E O.00L O.00L 0.0 0.00e, O.00A O.00A O.OUA O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... M4XIM. POLE FORCES CALCUTATEO(w.r.t. to wind direction) MOST TOTAL SHEAR.w.r.Lwxx O.OIR MCMENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 29.9...................................................................... 0.19 R 0.03 K 0.00 I -0.07 A 0.00 I 0.00 F 0.84 R 0.09 K 0.00 I -0.55 K 0.00 E 0.00 I 22.4...................................................................... 0.84 H 0.09 L 0.00 L -0.55 C 0.00 C 0.00 x 1.25H 0.13L O.00L -1.36L O.00L O.00L 15.0...................................................................... 1.37 F 0.13 F 0.00 H -1.36 L 0.00 L 0.00 L 1.87F O.16F 0.00H -2."F O.00L O.00L 7.5...................................................................... 1.87K O.16F O.00F -2."F O.00L O.00L Page 6 2.31 K 0.20 F 0.00 F -3.79 F 0.00 L 0.00 L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.31 K -0.20 F 0.00 F 3.79 F 0.00 L 0.00 L CMELIANCE WIIH 4.8.2 & 4.5A ELEv AXIAL BENDING $HEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED 0/t(W/t) EAR TORSIONAL ALLOdED ft 29.92...................................................................... 0.00B O.OUA O.00K 0.006 YES 37.33c 400.0 0.00B O.00K O.00K O.00K YES 37.33c 400.0 22.44...................................................................... O.00H 0.000 O.00L 0.000 YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00H O.M O.00L 0.01L YES 37.33A 400.0 14.96...................................................................... O.00F O.M O.00F 0.01L YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00F 0.01E O.00F 0.02F YES 37.33c 400.0 7.48...................................................................... O.00K O.OIF O.00F 0.02F YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00K 0.02F O.00F 0.03F YES 37.33c 400.0 0.00...................................................................... MAYIMUM LOAD$ ONTO FOUNDATION(W.LL rnnE direction) HIGH $HEAR.W.r.t.WIND.DIR FBBENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.31 0.20 0.00 -3.79 0.00 0.00 K F F F L L Page 7 Sabre Industries INNOVATION DELIVENED Pole Data SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Site Name: EUG03-027-A, OR Date: 10/21/2020 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSUTIA 222-H Diameter: 14.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 '0' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Moment, Mu: 8.64 ft -kips Axial, Pu: 2.78 kips Shear, Vu: 0.43 kips Anchor Rod Data Quantity: 4 Diameter: 1 Rod Material: F1554 Strength (Fu): 125 Yield (Fy): 105 BC Diam. (in): 17.25 Plate Data (multiple of 4) in ksi ksi BC Override: 17.25 Width (in): 17.25 Width Override: 17.25 Thickness: 1 in Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 10.08 in Center Hole: 14.125 in. diameter Anchor Rod Results Maximum Put: 5.49 Kips (Pt'Rnt: 56.81 Kips Vu: 0.11 Kips (Pv'Rnv: 36.82 Kips Tension Interaction Ratio: 0.01 Maximum Puc: 6.71 Kips q)c'Rnc: 63.63 Kips Vu: 0.11 Kips q)c'Rnvc: 19.09 Kips Compression Interaction Ratio: 0.11 Maximum Interaction Ratio: 10.5% Pass Base Plate Results Base Plate (Mu/Z): 4.3 ksi Allovuable m'Fy: 45 ksi Base Plate Interaction Ratio: 9.6% Pass (per 4.9.9) (per AISC) Page 6 Toile for windows, version 2019-11.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled Shafts Subjected to Lateral Loading Using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, mc. All Rights Reserved This copy of CPI Ie is being used by: Keith LIndall Sabre Towers and Poles Serial Number of Security Device: 227885948 This copy of LN le is licensed for exclusive use by: Sabre Communications Corporation Use of this program by any entity other than Sabre Communications Corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Piles used for Analysis Path to file locations: \Program Piles (x86)\Ensoft\Lpile2019\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPO -N4 Opt. 9.lplld Name of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.1p1lo Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.lpllp Name of runtime message file - 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.lpllr Date and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: October 21, 2020 rime: 20:04:31 Problem Jltle Site EUG03-021-A, OR Tourer 30' Pipe Pole Prepared for J5 infrastructure Partners Job Number 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Engineer NJT Program Options and Settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering Units used for Data input and Computations: - US Customary System Units (sounds, feet, inches) Analysis Control Options: - maximum number of iterations allowed = 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence = 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection = 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments = 100 LoadingType and Number of Cycles of Loading: - Static loading specified - use of p -y modification factors for p -y curves not selected - Analysis uses layer,. nn correction (method of Georgiadis) - xo tlI st ri butetl lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 9 input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at thepile tip not selectetl - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - Com utation of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected - Pus -over analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Neport only summary tables of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maximum shear force in output report file. - NO i otureport ycurves oe becomputedand reported for user-specified depths Pile Structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 6.083 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. os•thlethehemle1eimmlutfluel�iaetTweepol ng oftPi. using summary ofvaa oedi meter dpthol lows. Depth Below Pile Point Pile Head Di meter No. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.083 36.0000 Input Structural Properties for Pile Sections: Pile Section No. 1: Section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or Cion pile Length of section = 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter =36.000000 in Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lbs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grountl Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground Slope Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 raans Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 radians Soil and Nock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers top of layer = 1.083333 Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 0.083333 Effective unit weight at top f[ Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 pcf f[ Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer =110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 14.400000 = 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer = 14.400000 pa epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.100000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer epsilon -80 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer = 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 1000.000000 P5 undrained cohesion at bottom of layer = 1000.000000 psf epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.010000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer = 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 14.000 ft below the pile tip) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of input Soil Properties Page 10 Layer Soil Type Layer effective Undrained ESO Layer Name De th unit wt. Cohesion or Nun. (P -y Curve Type) ft pcf psf kre 1 Soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 1 Clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff Clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 v = 200.000000 lbs m = w/o Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity Conditions from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Number of loads specified = 2 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Load Load Condition Condition Axial Thrust Compute Top y Nun Analysis 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in No. Type 1 2 Force, lbs vs. Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v =573.333333 lbs m = 138240. in -lbs 3707. No Yes 2 1 v = 200.000000 lbs m = 45480. in -lbs 2310. No Yes v = shear force applied no real to pile axis m= bending o nt applied to pile head y = lateral deflection normal to pile axis S = rotational sti relative sto plied to pile header angle values of to lengthsp� specified shear loading(LosTypes 1, 2, Rod 3). only for load types with Thrust force is assumed to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. Computations of Nominal moment Capacity and Nonlinear ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Di mansions and Properties of Drilled Shaft (Bored Pile): Len nth of Section 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Number of Beinforcin9 ears 12 bars Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bars = 60000. psi modulus of elasticity of Reinforcing Bars = 29000000. psi Gross Area of Shaft = 1018. in. Total Area of Beinforcin Steel = 5.301438 sq. in. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement = 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing = 6.626343 in maximum Concrete Aggregate Size =0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate Size =8.84 Offset of Center of Rebar Cage from Center of Pile = 0.0000 in Axial Structural Capacities: ---------------------------- Rom. Axial Structural Capacity = 0.85 Fc Ac 4 FY As = 4191.184 kips Tensile Load for Cracking of Concrete =-463.561 kips Nominal Axial Tensile Capacity = -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions Used in Computations: Bar Bar Man. Bar Area X Y Number inches sq. i . n_- inches inches ---------- ------ --- --- -- 1 0.750000 0.441786 ---------- 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 7.125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 14.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 12.340862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 7.125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -7.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -14.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -12.340862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -7.125000 Page 11 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by Lpile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero = 6.626 inches between bars 7 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate size = 8.84 Concrete properties: -------------------- Compressive Strength Of Concrete= 4500. psi modulus Of elasticity Of Concrete = 3823676. psi modulus Of Rupture of Concrete =-503.115295 psi Compression Strain at peak Stress = 0.002001 Tensile Strain at Fracture of Concrete =-0.0001152 maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.750000 in Number Of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from pile -head Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.310 2 3.707 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Results for Nominal moment Capacity for Section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mom. Cap. max. Co'. No. kipsin-kip Strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.310 4843.926 0.00300000 2 3.707 4863.162 0.00300000 Note that thevalues of moment ca acity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate moment capacity according to ACI 318, Section 9.3.2.2 Or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followinn table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stifgnesses computed for carmon resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Resist. Nominal ult. (Fac) ult. (Fac) Rend. Stiff. Load Factor moment Cap Ax. Thrust moment Cap at ult mom NO. for momentin-kips kipsin-kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ---------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ 1 0.65 4844. 1.501500 3149. 41073102. 2 0.65 4863. 2.409333 3161. 41269665. 1 0.75 4844. 1.617000 3633. 39620542. 2 0.75 4863. 2.594667 3647. 39828686. 1 0.90 4844. 1.732500 4360. 26324648. 2 0.90 4863. 2.780000 4377. 26442647. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Layering Correction equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Layers TOP Of equivalent Layer TOP Depth Same Layer Layer is FO F1 Layer BeOWeAID. Type As Rock or integral integral NO. pile Read Grnd Surf Layer is Be]. for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer ml equals the sum Of the RO and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layering correction equivalent depths are computed only for soil ty es with both shallow -depth and deep -depth expressions for peak latera R load transfer. These soil types are soft and stiff clays, on -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. Summary of pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of pile -head Loading Conditions: Page 12 Load Type L Load 1 =$hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Not. Stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians LORD Load Load exi al vile -head Vile -head max $hear Max Moment Case Type vile -head Type Rile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n Rile n vile NO. y Load 1 y Load 2 lbs inches radians lbs - n -lbs ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- —------- 1 v, lb 573.3333 M, in -lb 136240. 3707. 0.05463 -0.00118 -4637. 146403. 2 v, lb 200.0000 M, in -lb 45480. 2310. 0.00143 -3.39e-05 -1273. 48274. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.0546252575 inches maximum pile -head rotation = -0.0011762651 radians = -0.067511 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 13 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 8.64 Shear (k) 1 0.43 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 20.18 430 500.00 3 0.67 = (2.34P)/(S, b) 4.19=0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h/A))'M] Page 14 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN (TTCP) SHEET: DESCRIPTION: T1 TITLE SHEET TC1 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SITE SITE AC NAME: CRAN RWOR E0003 027 DRESS: 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PROJECT CONTACTS AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT EMAIL: cp1261Qatt.com PH: 971-295-6924 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: WENDY LONG EMAIL: wl729kQatt.com PH: (206) 321-1116 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES A&E MANAGER: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG EMAIL: jmalbergQj5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 PROJECT MANAGER: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: MIKE SLOTEMAKER EMAIL: mslotemakerQj5ip.com PH: (206) 214-8954 1. ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE, LAYOUTS AND PROCEDURES 11. THE SPACING BETWEEN CONES, TUBULAR MARKERS, VERTICAL PANELS, SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANUAL 1 of 2 DRUMS, AND BARRICADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED A DISTANCE IN FEET EQUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), LATEST EDITION, TO 1.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TAPER WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. CHANNELIZATION, AND A DISTANCE IF FEET EQUAL TO 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TANGENT CHANNELIZATION. 2. PRIOR TO ANY ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE. 12. WHERE DICTATED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND WORKER CROSSING 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LANE CLOSURES INCLUDING SIGNS, CONES, LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OSHA BARRICADES, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SIGNS SHALL NOT REQUIREMENTS. BE PLACED WITHOUT ACTUAL LANE CLOSURES AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CLOSURES. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING HIGHWAY JURISDICTION AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "FLAGMEN" OR POLICE 4. SELECTION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, SUPERVISION, IF REQUIRED. PEDESTRIANS, AND WORKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) - PART VI "TEMPORARY 14. ALL EXCAVATED AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY SHALL BE TRAFFIC CONTROL", AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNLESS BACKFILLED AND PLACED ON A MINIMUM 6H:1 V SLOPE WITHIN THE CLEAR OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE ZONE ARE TO BE EITHER BACKFILLED OR PRECAST CONCRETE CURB APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. BARRIER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SET TEMPORARILY IN PLACE TO SHIELD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 5. ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS, DISTANCES, AND TAPER LENGTHS MAY BE EXTENDED TO ADJUST FOR REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO HORIZONTAL AND 15. CONES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR DRUMS AND INSTALLED UPON THE VERTICAL CURVATURE OF THE ROADWAY AND FOR ACTUAL TRAFFIC SPEEDS APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION PROVIDED THEY IF IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED LIMITS. COMPLY WITH MUTCD. 6. TAPERS SHALL BE LOCATED TO MAXIMIZE THE VISIBILITY OF THEIR TOTAL LENGTH. 16. THERE SHALL BE NO WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER VEHICLES IN THE BUFFER SPACE OR THE ROLL AHEAD SPACE. 7. CONFLICTING OR NON-OPERATING SIGNAL INDICATIONS ON THE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SHALL BE BAGGED OR COVERED. 17. DRIVEWAYS AND/OR SIDE STREETS ENTERING THE ROADWAY AFTER THE FIRST ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE 8. ALL (E) ROAD SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR PLOWABLE PAVEMENT ROAD WORK AHEAD SIGN AS A MINIMUM. REFLECTORS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE (N) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED, OR RELOCATED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 18. WHEN CHANNELIZATION DEVICES HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF LEADING SHALL BE RESTORED TO MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AFTER VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OUT OF THE INTENDED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SPACE, THE COMPLETION OF WORK. CHANNELIZATION DEVICES SHOULD BE EXTENDED A DISTANCE IN FEET OF 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE 9. CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED LIMIT IF REDUCED FROM POSTED LIMITS SHALL BE TRANSITION AREA. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD AND WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 10. TAPER LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: L= WS2/60 (40 MPH AND HIGHER) OR L2 = WS (OVER 40 MPH), WHERE W = OFFSET WIDTH (FT), S = TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH). LOCATION MAP I 'I Marcy Ave % 0 t v Leehaven Avu Lochayen Ave Lnchaven Ave fir ' Q Lochawen Ave Lw.haven Ave Lochawen Ave �, \ 7; SoDalicious White Wave Scotts clon o, Scans Glen Dr Shipping and Recieving Hughes Fired Turtle Mountain Equipment, Inc a � a McKenzie q sharey sl Platt Electric Supply . I Wsinaring s Eleerrical supply Gore Shelley R PTreel-ine Cross R l Ncrthwest Ninjd r_ Brothers - Cleating Services t Cornforl Flow Heating 5nallay St Pan galin4x41p Pad n Lock 9 &ELFdR Pr[rpeltY � 9 'fir" Restoration 1" Curtis Restaurant Equipment Restaurant supply stat Y4 36 _— F 0 e y ovth aike.Psch��— �� .... w ounalt sl _ _. `NQ"vMah=v awQumalt S+ Fairview Mobile Hame Park RAS _ 3 °> © wi7ainalt St � a '$ y � a = A £ WF.Wievw Dr wFarrvlew pr wFalrvlQw ar .h! r9 a NORTH PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET AI ddress: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: T1 A 1 of 2 TTCP DIMENSION GUIDELINES (WATCH 2019) POSTED SPEED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS "BUFFER" * LENGTH "MERGING" LENGTH "SHIFTING" LENGTH A B C 20 100 100 100 105 80 50 25 155 125 65 30 250 250 250 200 180 90 35 250 245 125 40 305 320 160 45 350 350 350K645780 540 270 50 600 300 55 500 500 500720 660 330 60 360 65 390 * BUFFER SPACE SHOULD BE INSERTED IN HIGH-SPEED URBAN AND RURAL AREAS BUT IS OPTIONAL IN LOW -SPEED URBAN AREAS. WORK HOURS: 9AM-5PM M -F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM ----��W-- —----L/W SHELLEY ST (PRIVATE ROAD) F TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND SPEED 40 ROAD SPEED ® BARRIER WORK AREA TRAFFIC SIGNAL "° RonD TRAFFIC WORK CONTROL AHEAD SIGN T TRAFFIC SIGN NORTH 30'-0" 0 30'-0" 1 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 LANS PREPARED BY: r* INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: TC1 A 2 of 2 Sabre Industries'" INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 30' Smart Stack (35' Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG03-027-A, OR Site Number: 18925-027-A Prepared for: J5 Infrastructure Partners by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 October 21, 2020 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 1 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 3-8 Foundation Calculations......... 9-14 Signed By Keith 'IntlallDN:o-0S, st=Texas, Z12Digitally L-AWeda, a -SABRE INDUSTRIES, INC., w=KeAh Tindall, IyIr-` \ I I )210 emaji= lindalpsabreindustri es.wm2020.10.21 20:14:53 0'"REs06;30/2022 9-14 Designed Appurternanw Loading ..nplm VVI i..mmtl.a) Ulaovizuev Isl vz' d op a WmPMa 111 nl arazae amllaal an. nzl la' ED nmpe ER ED nmpe I w.gpt nle'am meter nl ln- 15 a 15 YRE 15 Illaxve avRemmlalaw Wnal al la' 6 s$�3a���S3a al la' 15 nl araza. em l.l mR nl ln- 15 alcac,..szv al +a' 10 rt 10 EE - 10 rt Designed Appurternanw Loading Design Crileria - MSIITIAI VVI ..nplm VVI i..mmtl.a) Ulaovizuev Isl vz' d op 19caaexUu'r5e5 WmPMa 111 nl arazae amllaal an. nzl la' ED nmpe ER ED nmpe I w.gpt nle'am meter nl ln- 15 15 15 15 Illaxve avRemmlalaw Wnal al la' 15 nl.—R. mR ax alai are lasal al la' 15 nl araza. em l.l mR nl ln- 15 alcac,..szv al +a' 10 rt 10 EE - 10 rt 10 alcac+.",. 10 nl ARRIVE 1azE 1.n mw lasal al la' 10 nl araza, am l.l mR nl ln- 10 (1lAMR. FERH.a. are (nal al la' nl�,Mal n, In- I1lnscac-saaF.nlaw nl In - Design Crileria - MSIITIAI VVI 1 arapba VVI i..mmtl.a) 1.deexi lR 1 = Red d op - WmPMa INNOV DELIVERED r(Yy, IP511MMY ane' EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A RE(ERVEREen LIELEIVED Anchor Bolt Dinnensions ER 8. Load Case Re0ntionm or•ab+ne 1 arapba 1 re—mna i..mmtl.a) 1.deexi lR 1 = Red d op - WmPMa INNOV DELIVERED r(Yy, IP511MMY ane' EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A RE(ERVEREen LIELEIVED Anchor Bolt Dinnensions ER 8. Lot I w.gpt 1 1, 1P•4k�. Notes 1) Antenna F6ad Limos Run Inside Pole 2) All dimenslons are above ground level, unMss Mhervise specified. 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Flrelwelghtsmayvar, d) TMs taxer design and, If applyable, the foundatbn dre ign(s) shown on the followhg pagels) alao meat or exceed the reQWrements of the 2019 Oregon svuctural speclaRy Cade. 5) Toeer Rathg: 11% SBhI1Mtl u�etrMe Base Plate Dimensions 1&Y1NEW-R. thin. It p nwe d op - WmPMa INNOV DELIVERED r(Yy, IP511MMY ane' EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A Anchor Bolt Dinnensions 3Y amBM1 Serb - PIE - Do e rsm .men ar'. w.gpt 1 1, 1P•4k�. Notes 1) Antenna F6ad Limos Run Inside Pole 2) All dimenslons are above ground level, unMss Mhervise specified. 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Flrelwelghtsmayvar, d) TMs taxer design and, If applyable, the foundatbn dre ign(s) shown on the followhg pagels) alao meat or exceed the reQWrements of the 2019 Oregon svuctural speclaRy Cade. 5) Toeer Rathg: 11% SBhI1Mtl u�etrMe 1&Y1NEW-R. thin. It p nwe Sabre lndustrRa.� - WmPMa INNOV DELIVERED r(Yy, IP511MMY ane' EUOT1Uz]A,nR1a92SUz]A r� W m'. 3Y amBM1 Serb - PIE - Do e rsm ar'. 1azlrzozo lur Page Sabre Industries" I N NOVFTION DELIVERED No.: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Date: 10/2120 By: KJT Customer: J5 Infrastructure Partners Site: EUG03-027-A, OR 18925-027-A 30' Pipe Pole Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 4,500 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. Grade is. 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. SHIM= 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete F— I —I I cover. I I I 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- (8) 2" Conduits & 222-H-2017. (1) 3/4" ConduitL-----j 4 7 I I D I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ----- 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be ELEVATION VIEW positioned as closely as possible to the (1.59 Cu. Yds.) bottom of the anchor bolts. (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) Rebar Schedule for Pier (12) #5 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Information contained herein E the sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690- Fax 712.279.0814 Page (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02012 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)236-7453 FaK:(416)736-4372 web: Wnw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: $ab re Towers Rod Poles n: 21 oct 2020 at: 19:53:12 ---------------------------------- 30' Pipe Pole / EU603-0271, OR * All pole diameters shown on the following pages are Across corners. See profile Jrawi ng for widths Across flats. POLE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCE$ SPLICE ... O✓ENIAP... w/t NAME SIDE DI -NESS **Pm **Mn WEE LENGTH RATIO ft in in kip ft -kip ft 29.9 ........................................... 14.00 0.375 505.6 182.8 A 0 32.3 14.00 0.375 505.6 182.8 0.0 ........................................... POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLT$ AT BASE OF SECTION............ GLC NAME ELEV NUMBER WEE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE $HEAR PLANE ELEV ft in ksi ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 ROLE SECTIONS SECTION No.Of LENGTH OUT$IDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGE.WELD NAME $IDE$ NOT TOP HAD ENTAL BOT TOP .. GRGUE.ID.. ID NOT TOP ft in in in A 0 29.92 14.00 14.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 * - Diameter of circunscribeE circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF IF NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE No ELEM. WEB RANGE .PROTECTION. .W OF ORIENT AREA & deg in in in in deg PL 1 1 0.0 14.00 0.38 0.375 0.325 0.00 0.0 & - with respect to Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES -------------- MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL WEE NO. MODULUS WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi ksi /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001120 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A -- 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOADS ON MULE LOAD ELEV APELY..LOAD..AT LOAD ...... FORCE$...... ...... MOMENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ NOR. DOWN VERTICAL TOHSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 33.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0225 0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 C 31.412 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0398 0.1200 0.0000 0.0000 Page 3 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0574 0.0000 0.0000 C 29.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0634 0.1200 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 C 27.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1608 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0072 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0286 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0095 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0190 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0156 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0048 0.0000 0.0000 C 9.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0024 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0084 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0024 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 U 29.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0107 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0096 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 LOADING CCNOITION m __________ 91 mph wind with no ice. wine Azimuth: 0e LDADs ON roLE LOAD ELEV APVLr_LOAU..AT LOAD ...... EONCES...... ...... MIMIENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ HONIZ IXYNN VERTICAL TONSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 D 29.920 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0107 0.0492 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0096 0.0492 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - monopole spatial Analysis (02017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 Fax:(416)736-4372 web:w guymast.rob Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and tyles on: 21 ort 2020 at: 19:53:12 30' Pipe Pole / EUG03-027-A, OR MA%IMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATEO(w.r.t. wind direction) Page 4 MST .......DEFLECTION$ (ft) ......... .........NOTATION$ (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOwN ........ TILT .......... .$T ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 29.9 0.03A O.00R O.00A O.OSA O.00R O.00R ...................................................................... 22.4 0.02A O.00R O.00A O.OBA O.00R O.00R 15.0 0.01A 0.00a O.00A 0.07A O.00R O.00R 6666.....6...........6........66........ . 66.66. .. .. .. 666.6. .. .. 66.66.. 7.5 O.OM O.00R O.00K O.O4A O.00R O.00R 0.0 0.00A O.00A O.00A 0.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCUUTED(w.r.t. to Rd ntl direction) .$T VIAL $HEAR.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR MTM ENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft-kip ft-kip ft-kip 29.9...................................................................... 0.23 F 0.07 w 0.00 E -0.17 M 0.00 N 0.00 R 1.01 F 0.21w 0.000 -1.33 A 0.000 0.000 22.4...................................................................... 1.01 H 0.21 1 0.00 T -1.33 A 0.00 C 0.00 C 1. SO H 0.29 T 0.00 T -3.20 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 15.0...................................................................... 1.64 K 0.29 K 0.00 T -3.20 B 0.00 R 0.00 R 2.24 K 0.36 K 0.00 T -5.65 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 7.5...................................................................... 2.24 C 0.36 U 0.00 N -5.65 A 0.00 R 0.00 R 2.78 C 0.43 U 0.00 N -8.64 A 0.00 R 0.00 R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.78 C -0.43 U 0.00 N 8.64 A 0.00 R 0.00 R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMITIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL SENDING SHEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(w/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft 29.92.................................................................6666. O.00F O.OQ4 O.00w O.00K YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00F 0.01A O.00W O.OIA YES 37.33A 400.0 22.44...................................................................... O.00H 0.01A O.00T O.OIA YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00H 0.02A O.00T 0.02A YES 37.33c 400.0 14.96...................................................................... O.00K 0.028 O.00K 0.02B YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00K 0.03A O.00K 0.04A YES 37.33A 400.0 7.48...................................................................... 0.000 0.03A 0.000 0.04A YES 37.33A 400.0 0.01C 0.05A 0.000 0.05A YES 37.33A 400.0 0.00...................................................................... NAXIMUM LOAD$ ONTO FOUNDATIOR(w.r.t. Rd ntl direction) DMN SHEAR.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR MMERT.w.r.Lwxx D.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.78 0.43 0.00 -8.64 0.00 0.00 C U R A R R (USA 222-H) - monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaX:(416)736-4372 web: www. guymast.com processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 21 ocn 2020 at 19:54:16 30' pipe role / EW03-027-A, OR Page 5 ..•..................•• service Load condition .........................•• ............................................................................ * Only 1 condition(s) shown in full LMUING CONUIEON A _________________________________________ 60 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: 04 Lo4o5 ON MILE LMO ELEV APVLY..LOAO..AT LWO ...... FORCE$...... ...... PkNMNTS..... If RADIUS AZI AZ HORIZ IXYNN VERTICAL TORSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 14.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 9.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 C 4.917 D 29.920 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0050 0.0546 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0048 0.0546 0.0000 0.0000 MMIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED(w.r.t. wind direction) MST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ......... ROTATTONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOwN ........ TILT .......... TWIST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 29.9 0.01,, O.001L O.00F 0.04F O.001L O.00L ............................................63...........66........... 22.4 0.01E O.00L O.00F 0.03E O.00L O.00L 15.0 O.00F O.00L O.00F 0.03F O.00L O.00L ........................................ . 66.66. .. .. .. 666.6... .. 66.66.. Z5 O.00F O.00L O.00F 0.02E O.00L O.00L 0.0 0.00e, O.00A O.00A O.OUA O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... M4XIM. POLE FORCES CALCUTATEO(w.r.t. to wind direction) MOST TOTAL SHEAR.w.r.Lwxx O.OIR MCMENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 29.9...................................................................... 0.19 R 0.03 K 0.00 I -0.07 A 0.00 I 0.00 F 0.84 R 0.09 K 0.00 I -0.55 K 0.00 E 0.00 I 22.4...................................................................... 0.84 H 0.09 L 0.00 L -0.55 C 0.00 C 0.00 x 1.25H 0.13L O.00L -1.36L O.00L O.00L 15.0...................................................................... 1.37 F 0.13 F 0.00 H -1.36 L 0.00 L 0.00 L 1.87F O.16F 0.00H -2."F O.00L O.00L 7.5...................................................................... 1.87K O.16F O.00F -2."F O.00L O.00L Page 6 2.31 K 0.20 F 0.00 F -3.79 F 0.00 L 0.00 L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.31 K -0.20 F 0.00 F 3.79 F 0.00 L 0.00 L CMELIANCE WIIH 4.8.2 & 4.5A ELEv AXIAL BENDING $HEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISFIED 0/t(W/t) EAR TORSIONAL ALLOdED ft 29.92...................................................................... 0.00B O.OUA O.00K 0.006 YES 37.33c 400.0 0.00B O.00K O.00K O.00K YES 37.33c 400.0 22.44...................................................................... O.00H 0.000 O.00L 0.000 YES 37.33A 400.0 O.00H O.M O.00L 0.01L YES 37.33A 400.0 14.96...................................................................... O.00F O.M O.00F 0.01L YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00F 0.01E O.00F 0.02F YES 37.33c 400.0 7.48...................................................................... O.00K O.OIF O.00F 0.02F YES 37.33c 400.0 O.00K 0.02F O.00F 0.03F YES 37.33c 400.0 0.00...................................................................... MAYIMUM LOAD$ ONTO FOUNDATION(W.LL rnnE direction) HIGH $HEAR.W.r.t.WIND.DIR FBBENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.31 0.20 0.00 -3.79 0.00 0.00 K F F F L L Page 7 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DE LI VE 1E1) Pole Data SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Site Name: EUG03-027-A, OR Date: 10/21/2020 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSI/TIA 222-H Diameter: 14.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 'e' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Moment, Mu: 8.64 ff-kips Axial, Pu: 2.78 kips Shear, Vu: 0.43 kips Anchor Rod Data Quantity: 4 Diameter: 1 Rod Material: F1554 Strength (Fu): 125 Yield (Fy): 105 BC Diam. (in): 17.25 Plate Data (multiple of 4) in ksi ksi BC Override: 17.25 Width (in): 17.25 Width Override: 17.25 Thickness: 1 in Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 10.08 in Center Hole: 14.125 in. diameter Anchor Rod Results Maximum Put: 5.49 Kips (Pt'Rnt: 56.81 Kips Vu: 0.11 Kips (Pv'Rnv: 36.82 Kips Tension Interaction Ratio: 0.01 Maximum Puc: 6.71 Kips q)c'Rnc: 63.63 Kips Vu: 0.11 Kips q)c'Rnvc: 19.09 Kips Compression Interaction Ratio: 0.11 Maximum Interaction Ratio: 10.5% Pass Base Plate Results Base Plate (Mu/Z): 4.3 ksi Allowable m'Fy: 45 ksi Base Plate Interaction Ratio: 9.6% Pass (per 4.9.9) (per AISC) Page 6 Toile for windows, version 2019-11.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled Shafts Subjected to Lateral Loading Using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, mc. All Rights Reserved This copy of CPI Ie is being used by: Keith LIndall Sabre Towers and Poles Serial Number of Security Device: 227885948 This copy of LN le is licensed for exclusive use by: Sabre Communications Corporation Use of this program by any entity other than Sabre Communications Corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Piles used for Analysis Path to file locations: \Program Piles (x86)\Ensoft\Lpile2019\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPO -N4 Opt. 9.lplld Name of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.1p1lo Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.lpllp Name of runtime message file - 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9.lpllr Date and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: October 21, 2020 rime: 20:04:31 Problem Jltle Site EUG03-021-A, OR Tourer 30' Pipe Pole Prepared for J5 infrastructure Partners Job Number 19 -2283 -EPG -R4 Opt. 9 Engineer NJT Program Options and Settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering Units used for Data input and Computations: - US Customary System Units (sounds, feet, inches) Analysis Control Options: - maximum number of iterations allowed = 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence = 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection = 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments = 100 LoadingType and Number of Cycles of Loading: - Static loading specified - use of p -y modification factors for p -y curves not selected - Analysis uses layer,. nn correction (method of Georgiadis) - xo tlI st ri butetl lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 9 input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at thepile tip not selectetl - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - Com utation of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected - Pus -over analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Neport only summary tables of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maximum shear force in output report file. - NO i otureport ycurves oe becomputedand reported for user-specified depths Pile Structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 6.083 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. os•thlethehemle1eimmlutfluel�iaetTweepol ng oftPi. using summary ofvaa oedi meter dpthol lows. Depth Below Pile Point Pile Head Di meter No. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.083 36.0000 Input Structural Properties for Pile Sections: Pile Section No. 1: Section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or Cion pile Length of section = 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter =36.000000 in Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lbs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grountl Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground Slope Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 raans Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 radians Soil and Nock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers top of layer = 1.083333 Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 0.083333 Effective unit weight at top f[ Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 pcf f[ Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer =110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 14.400000 = 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer = 14.400000 pa epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.100000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer epsilon -80 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer = 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 1000.000000 P5 undrained cohesion at bottom of layer = 1000.000000 psf epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.010000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer = 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 14.000 ft below the pile tip) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of input Soil Properties Page 10 Layer Soil Type Layer effective Undrained ESO Layer Name De th unit wt. Cohesion or Nun. (P -y Curve Type) ft pcf psf kre 1 Soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 1 Clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff Clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 v = 200.000000 lbs m = w/o Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity Conditions from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Number of loads specified = 2 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Load Load Condition Condition Axial Thrust Compute Top y Nun Analysis 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in No. Type 1 2 Force, lbs vs. Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v =573.333333 lbs m = 138240. in -lbs 3707. No Yes 2 1 v = 200.000000 lbs m = 45480. in -lbs 2310. No Yes v = shear force applied no real to pile axis m= bending o nt applied to pile head y = lateral deflection normal to pile axis S = rotational sti relative sto plied to pile header angle values of to lengthsp� specified shear loading(LosTypes 1, 2, Rod 3). only for load types with Thrust force is assumed to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. Computations of Nominal moment Capacity and Nonlinear ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Di mansions and Properties of Drilled Shaft (Bored Pile): Len nth of Section 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Number of Beinforcin9 ears 12 bars Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bars = 60000. psi modulus of elasticity of Reinforcing Bars = 29000000. psi Gross Area of Shaft = 1018. in. Total Area of Beinforcin Steel = 5.301438 sq. in. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement = 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing = 6.626343 in maximum Concrete Aggregate Size =0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate Size =8.84 Offset of Center of Rebar Cage from Center of Pile = 0.0000 in Axial Structural Capacities: ---------------------------- Rom. Axial Structural Capacity = 0.85 Fc Ac 4 FY As = 4191.184 kips Tensile Load for Cracking of Concrete =-463.561 kips Nominal Axial Tensile Capacity = -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions Used in Computations: Bar Bar Man. Bar Area X Y Number inches sq. i . n_- inches inches ---------- ------ --- --- -- 1 0.750000 0.441786 ---------- 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 7.125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 14.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 12.340862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 7.125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -7.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -14.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -12.340862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -7.125000 Page 11 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by Lpile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero = 6.626 inches between bars 7 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate size = 8.84 Concrete properties: -------------------- Compressive Strength Of Concrete= 4500. psi modulus Of elasticity Of Concrete = 3823676. psi modulus Of Rupture of Concrete =-503.115295 psi Compression Strain at peak Stress = 0.002001 Tensile Strain at Fracture of Concrete =-0.0001152 maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.750000 in Number Of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from pile -head Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.310 2 3.707 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Results for Nominal moment Capacity for Section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mom. Cap. max. Co'. No. kipsin-kip Strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.310 4843.926 0.00300000 2 3.707 4863.162 0.00300000 Note that thevalues of moment ca acity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate moment capacity according to ACI 318, Section 9.3.2.2 Or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followinn table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stifgnesses computed for carmon resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Resist. Nominal ult. (Fac) ult. (Fac) Rend. Stiff. Load Factor moment Cap Ax. Thrust moment Cap at ult mom NO. for momentin-kips kipsin-kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ---------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ 1 0.65 4844. 1.501500 3149. 41073102. 2 0.65 4863. 2.409333 3161. 41269665. 1 0.75 4844. 1.617000 3633. 39620542. 2 0.75 4863. 2.594667 3647. 39828686. 1 0.90 4844. 1.732500 4360. 26324648. 2 0.90 4863. 2.780000 4377. 26442647. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Layering Correction equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Layers TOP Of equivalent Layer TOP Depth Same Layer Layer is FO F1 Layer BeOWeAID. Type As Rock or integral integral NO. pile Read Grnd Surf Layer is Be]. for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer ml equals the sum Of the RO and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layering correction equivalent depths are computed only for soil ty es with both shallow -depth and deep -depth expressions for peak latera R load transfer. These soil types are soft and stiff clays, on -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. Summary of pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of pile -head Loading Conditions: Page 12 Load Type L Load 1 =$hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Not. Stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians LORD Load Load exi al vile -head Vile -head max $hear Max Moment Case Type vile -head Type Rile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n Rile n vile NO. y Load 1 y Load 2 lbs inches radians lbs - n -lbs ---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- —------- 1 v, lb 573.3333 M, in -lb 136240. 3707. 0.05463 -0.00118 -4637. 146403. 2 v, lb 200.0000 M, in -lb 45480. 2310. 0.00143 -3.39e-05 -1273. 48274. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.0546252575 inches maximum pile -head rotation = -0.0011762651 radians = -0.067511 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 13 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 8.64 Shear (k) 1 0.43 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 3 0.083333 6 250.00 20.18 430 500.00 3 0.67 = (2.34P)/(S, b) 4.19=0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h/A))'M] Page 14