The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 12/23/2020J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 12/11/2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@springfleld-or.gov RE: Request to ConstructSmall Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Portland Bureau of Transportation: R A S T R U C T U R E � � i 'Vi ➢ R P A R T N E R S On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, without requiring structure replacement. AT&TID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG03_026/ FA 14826600 City of Springfield streetlight Pole #0964 S Cloverleaf loop. Oakdale Ave. 36'-0" 44.047361.-122.03601 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Reauested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities • Pole Attachment & Public Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 12/11/2020. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Tuesday, February 9'", 2021. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Monday, December 21st, 2020. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it Is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision Is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, David Barnes City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SPRINGFIELD W #A/ Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone -.425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular lMreless PCS, LLC E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 16331 SE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone:503-312-3400 Applicant's Rep.: Meredith Hewett Company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mhewett@j5ip.com Address: 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR, 97225 Property Owner: City of Springfield Phone:541-726-3700 Company: E-mail: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032243 TAX LOT NOS :00101 Property Address: 2791 S Cloverleaf Loop Nearest Intersection : Oakdale Ave ROW ® Private Property❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Propose collocation of SWF on oint use pole in City ROW Existing Use: Power/telecommunications Si natures: Please si n and rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures The undersigned acknowledg{�ess that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Date: 12/11/2020 Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: Date: 12/11/2020 'Signature Print I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submit checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best rmation. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the ere are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: Date: Plot Plan Preparer Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts TypesAllowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 EXHIBIT A New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") AT&T ID: EUG03_026/18925-026 City of Springfield Pole n: 0964 In the Public Right -of -Way ("PROW") near 2791 S Cloverleaf Loop Small Wireless Facility Project Narrative New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") is proposing to install a new small wireless facility ("SWF") in the PROW to serve residents and businesses in City of Springfield. Introduction. SWFs are low-power, low -profile wireless communication facilities that improve signal quality and capacity within AT&T's existing wireless network. The proposed SWF will help AT&T provide and improve critical wireless services in this area. AT&T estimates that since introduction of the iPhone in 2007, mobile data usage has increased 580,000% on its network. AT&T forecasts its customers' growing demand for mobile data services to continue. Customer needs require AT&T to design and maintain its network to provide and improve wireless signal quality and to increase data rates sufficient to stream video. Areas that do not meet this minimal standard, or where wireless service is otherwise compromised, represent service issues that must be addressed. Specifically, this proposed SWF will help improve AT&T's wireless services by offloading network traffic carried by existing macro facilities in the area. In addition, faster data rates allow customers to get on and off the network quickly, which produces more efficient use of AT&T's limited spectrum. By placing the SWF in areas where AT&T's existing wireless communication facilities are constrained and where AT&T experiences especially high network traffic, AT&T can address the existing and forecasted demand and support 5G speeds in the nearfuture. Improving signal quality and increasing data speed is critical to providing the mobile experience customers demand and to manage the unprecedented increase in mobile data usage on AT&T's network. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") tracks the rates at which American households are shifting from landlines to wireless telecommunications. According to the CDCs latest Wireless Substitution Report, nearly 80 percent of Americans rely exclusively or primarily on wireless communications in their homes.' In addition, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') esti mates that 70 percent of all 911 calls are made from wireless devices.2 And with AT&T's selection by FirstNet as the wireless service provider to build and manage the nationwide first responder wireless network, each new or modified facility will help strengthen first responder communications. AT&T selected the proposed SWF as the best available means to address its service objectives in this portion of City of Springfield. The overall site location and design will comply with applicable code provisions. 'See Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, July -December 2019, available at httos://www.cdc.aov/nchs/data/nhis/earlvrelease/wireless202009-508.odf. 2 See 911 Wireless Services, available at httas://v .fcc.wv/consumers/guides/911-wireless-services. The proposed SWF will be located in the PROW. The project will involve the placement of a small antenna and associated small wireless equipment on a replacement City of Springfield street light pole. Small Cellular. Thefacilitywill not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Itwill not adversely affect the surrounding properties, and itwill have minimal physical and aesthetic footprint in this area. The City of Springfield can easily make the necessary findings for approval of this SWF. Compliance with Applicable Design Standards. AT&T's proposed SWF complies with applicable design requirements in 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications System (WTS) Facilities as follows: • SWF Definition o AT&T's SWF meets the FCC's definition of small wireless facility. The SWF and pole are less than 50 feet in height. The antenna volume is 2.35 cubic feet, and the volume of the equipment cabinet and surge suppressor is 11.078 (10.7+.378) cubic feet. The radio frequency ("RF") emissions will meet FCC safety standards. See FCC Compliance Study on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure submitted for this proposed SWF (Exhibit E). • Design Standards A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10% taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed within the pole that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K. The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements orfor public safety II. A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L. Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District SITE PHOTO SITE NAME: CRAN_RWOR_E0003_026 PREPARED FOR AT&T POLE#: 0964 SCID I D # : 18925-026D6331 NE REDMOND,WA 9WAY RD, WA 98052 805 TYPE: WOOD LIGHT/SMARTSTACK Vendor: 4 ,x SSITE SITE ADDRESS: 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP AT&T y51NFRASTRUCTUR3 MAIN ST. 25 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477sPROJETIoPob SUITE 200 � COUNTY: LANE COUNTY Vendor: JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Vendor: SITE INFORMATION: SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR_EUG03_026 SKIP ID # : 18925-026D - s _ r" 1 a Costco Who L PROPOSED SITE BUILD OF AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY, ON AN PROPOSED POLE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF WAY LATITUDE: 44-04-24.98"N (44.07361) as 7 �f CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: r s LONGITUDE: -123002'09.64"W (-123.03601) ° ` REMOVAL: AL: SITE ADDRESS: 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP McRmiam+ '{ �? u EXISTING WOOD LIGHT POLE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 COUNTY: LANE COUNTY JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD NortrIngf • �. raj, v Valle River Center 5pringfluld • t d� - �! '1' ' INSTALLATION: DRAWN BY: MDA CHECKED BY: JDM Y � s T w;,y� .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE ZONING CLASSIFICATION: -- CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A s��. } p t a Skinner ^' Butte Park •• (1) PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA .. (1) PROPOSED AT&T DISCONNECT/SURGE SUPPRESSOR OCCUPANCY: N/A •• (3) PROPOSED AT&T CONDUITS ADJACENT PARCEL#: 17032243-00101 rrnurPr i ; A ' .. (2) PROPOSED AT&T COMBINERS OVERLAY ZONE: NONE SPECIAL AREASUBZONE: NONE A.D.A COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR ;} { r Eugene ,,, Fy 'zY .a•r# g r. `� { HUMAN HABITATION Springfield University of Oregon 0 POLE OWNER: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ens rk 77 a, �_ ADDRESS: 225 FIFTH ST. z SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: (541) 726-3753 College HIII �57Ti APPLICANT/CARRIER: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC ('AT&T") ADDRESS: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 CONTACT: KRISTY WEAVER PHONE: (425) 214-2186 Mt Pisgah Arboretum 0 12/10/20 100% CDs IREV DATE DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC PROVIDER: PGE (PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC) PHONE: (800) 542-8818 Licensor: NOR7H �r 89198PE PROJECT TEAM CODE COMPLIANCE DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. q�OREGONp O ENGINEER: SRE ACQUISITION: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENTDIRECTIONS FROM PDX AIRPORT: T-1 TITLE SHEET 0 9 9y 13,2 J� t �FSINNG� 1%0 EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCATION GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. GN-1 GENERAL NOTES 0 12/ J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT: JAMES CHUNG CONTACT: AARON GUDELJ 1. HEAD NORTHWEST ON NE AIRPORT WAY (10 FT) A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 EXPIRES: 12131/21 EMAIL: jchung@JSIP.com EMAIL: AGUDELJQJSIP.com COMMERCIAL BUILDING CODE: 2. TURN LEFT (0.2 MILES) A-1.1 DEMO SITE PLAN 0 PHONE: (949) 247-7767 x 111 PH: (805) 298-3091 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE (01 3. TURN LEFT (0.2 MILES) A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 " AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL CODE: 4. SLIGHT LEFT ONTO NE AIRPORT WAY (1.8 MILES) A-3 I LETTER AND SURVEY - A-4 ELEVATIONS 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT SUFERVISION ANDTHATI AM DULY REGISTERED ENcmEER UNDER THE LAWS oEEHE STATE oEOREcoN OREGON ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CODE (OESC)-2017 5. SLIGHT RIGHT TO MERGE ONTO I-205 S TOWARD I-84 (0.5 MILES) A-5 ELEVATIONS 0 CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS 6. MERGE ONTO I-205 S (2.6 MILES) AT&T Site ID: EMAIL: cp]261@att.com CONTACT: DEVIN TAYLOR 7. TAKE EXIT 12B TO MERGE ONTO I-84 W (5.4 MILES) D-1 DETAILS 0 PH: 971-295-6924 PH: (503) 309-1380 TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS 8. TAKE THE EXIT ON THE LEFT ONTO-5 S TOWARD SALEM (1.5 MILES) D-2 DETAILS 0 UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG IN OREGON, CALL OREGON 9. KEEP RIGHT TO STAY ON I-5 S (105 MILES) D-3 DETAILS RF-1 RF WARNING SIGNS 0 RAN-RWOR-EUG03-026 AT&T RF ENGINEER: ALE MANAGER: UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OO 10. TAKE EXIT 195 FOR OR-569 TOWARD SPRINGFIELD (0.2 MILES) E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC 0 CONTACT: CHRIS OSGOODJS INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS TOLL FREE: 1-800-332-2344 OR Now TOLL 11. KEEP LEFT, FOLLOW SIGNS FOR BELTLINE ROAD (0.1 MILES) GROUNDING DETAILS 0 18925-026D EMAIL: co3884Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG www.digsafelyoregon.com 12. TURN LEFT ONTO OR-569 E (0.3 MILES) G-2 TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 0 EMAIL: jmaiberg@jSip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 OREGON STATUTE Know what s below. REQUIRES MIN OF 13. TURN RIGHT TOWARD GATEWAY ST (384 FT) 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP WORKING DAYS NOTICE 14. CONTINUE ONTO GATEWAY ST (0.6 MILES) SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 ATT PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: CaII before you dig. BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE 15. TURN LEFT ONTO OAKDALE AVE (0.3 MILES) AND THE SITE WILL BE ON YOUR RIGHT. Sheet Title: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMAIL: wiong@jSip.com CONTACT: DAVE BARNES PH: 321-1116 TITLE SHEET (206) EMAIL: DBarnes@jSip.com PH: (208) 939-7631 RIGHT-OF-WAY Sheet Number: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS Tool CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE STAMPED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES, AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED, OR OTHERWISE DISCONNECTED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 7. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 8. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW, OR ICE SHALL BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 9. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 10. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT, OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 12. NOTICE TO PROCEED - NO WORK TO COMMENCE PRIOR TO COMPANY;S WRITTEN NOTICE TO PROCEED AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ERECTION PLANS, RIGGING PLANS, CLIMBING PLANS, AND RESCUE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN AND SHALL MEET ANSI/TIA 1019 (LATEST EDITION), OSHA AND GENERAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL RIGGING PLANS SHALL ADHERE TO ANSI/TIA-1019 (LATEST EDITION) INCLUDING THE REQUIRED INVOLVEMENT OF A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR CLASS IV CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) CARRIER - AT&T OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES, WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORM CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 4. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. "KITTING LIST" SUPPLIED WITH THE BID PACKAGE IDENTIFIES ITEMS THAT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL OF MATERIALS AND KITTING LIST SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY SUCH CHANGE OF INSTALLATION. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWINGS. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE; TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION; TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. ABREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS: ABREVIATION AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (E) EXISTING MIN MINIMUM REF REFERENCE RF RADIO FREQUENCY T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED TYP TYPICAL REQ'D REQUIRED EGR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MOB MASTER GROUND BAR EG EQUIPMENT GROUND BCW BARE COPPER WIRE SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE IRG INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RBS RADIO BASE STATION SYMBOLS: S/G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR 5 N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR g°- SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR o�a 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CIRCUIT BREAKER A� SINGLE POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED CIRCUIT BREAKER 8 CHEMICAL GROUND ROD BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF TEST WELL Q' DISCONNECT SWITCH END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE METER (ADD EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 'RED -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUNDING WIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, NEC AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES 2. CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT BLOCKED AND TRIP HAZARDS ARE ELIMINATED. 3. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC, HILTI EPDXY ANCHORS ARE REQUIRED BY AT&T. 4. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC. 5. CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDER -STYLE CABLE TRAY RUNGS. 6. EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E., HOTS), GROUNDING AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE SHALL BE LABELED WITH COLOR -CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL TAPE (3M BRAND, Y" PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE W/ UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD SHALL CONFORM W/ NEC AND OSHA. 7. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE LABELED W/ THEIR VOLTAGE RATING, PHASE CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR AMPACITY RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E. PANEL BOARD AND CIRCUIT ID'S). 8. PANEL BOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHAL BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH PLASTIC LABELS. 9. ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. 10. POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90-C (WET & DRY) OPERATION LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 11. SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN INSULATION CLASS B OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE MULTI -CONDUCTOR, TYPE TO CABLE (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 50OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION WITH OUTER JACKET LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13. ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CRIMP -STYLE COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRE NUTS BY THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRE NUTS SHALL BE RATE FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75'C (90'C IF AVAILABLE). 14. RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 15. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E. RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE) SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 16. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL NONMETALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40 ) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 17. SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNDERGROUND ON STRAIGHTS AND SCHEDULE 80 PVC FOR ALL ELBOWS/90'S AND ALL APPROVED ABOVE GRADE PVC CONDUIT. 18. LIQUID -TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE FLEX) SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED. 19. CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR COMPRESSION TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED. SET SCREW FITTING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 20. CABINETS, BOXES AND WIRE WAYS SHALL BE LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 21. WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPDXY-COATED (GRAY) AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARDS, SHALL BE CONDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) 22. CONDUITS SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY IN PLACE WITH APPROVED NON PERFORATED STRAPS AND HANGERS. EXPLOSIVE DEVICES FOR ATTACHING HANGERS TO STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, CLOSELY FOLLOW THE LINES OF THE STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE STRUCTURE AND KEEP CONDUITS IN TIGHT ENVELOPES. CHANGES IN DIRECTION TO ROUTE AROUND OBSTACLES SHALL BE MADE WITH CONDUIT OUTLET BODIES.CONDUIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER, PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE WALL AND CEILING LINES. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE FISHED TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS. ENDS OF CONDUITS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY CAPPED FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE TO PREVENT CONCRETE, PLASTER OR DIRT FROM ENTERING. CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGIDLY CLAMPED TO BOXES BY GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON BUSHING ON INSIDE AND GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON LOCKNUT ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. 23. EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPDXY-COATED SHEET STEEL; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50 AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 24. METAL RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPDXY- COATED OR NON -CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A AND NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 25. NONMETALLIC RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 26. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS. 27. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS TO SAFEGUARD LIFE AND PROPERTY. 28. INSTALL PLASTIC LABEL ON THE METER CENTER TO SHOW "####". 29. ALL CONDUITS THAT ARE INSTALLED ARE TO HAVE A METERED MULE TAPE PULL CORD INSTALLED. GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTING PROTECTION AND AC POWER GESS) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AT OR BELOW GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL -OF -POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR LESS 3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY SEQUENCING GROUNDING AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION AS TO PREVENT ANY LOSS OF CONTINUITY IN THE GROUNDING SYSTEM OR DAMAGE TO THE CONDUIT AND PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS. 4. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTING OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH #6 AWG COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS. 5. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT. 6. EACH CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS. 7. CONNECTIONS TO THE GROUND BUS SHALL NOT BE DOUBLED UP OR STACKED BACK TO BACK, CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE GROUND BUS ARE PERMITTED. 8. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONDUCTORS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT/GROUND BARS AND THE GROUND RING SHALL BE #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 9. ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 10. USE OF 90' BENDS IN THE PROTECTION GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AVOIDED WHEN 45' BENDS CAN BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED. 11. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE. 12. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS ABOVE GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) SHALL BE FORMED USING HIGH PRESS CRIMPS. 13. COMPRESSION GROUND CONNECTIONS MAY BE REPLACED BY EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS. 14. ICE BRIDGE BONDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY BONDED OR BOLTED TO THE BRIDGE AND THE TOWER GROUND BAR. 15. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E. CONDUCTIVE GEL OR PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. 16. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH A CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON -ELECTRICAL METAL BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 18. BOND ALL METALLIC OBJECTS WITHIN 6FT OF MAIN GROUND WIRES WITH 1-#2 AWG TIN-PLATED COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 19. GROUND CONDUCTORS USED IN THE FACILITY GROUND AND LIGHTING PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH METALLIC OBJECTS THAT FORM A RING AROUND THE CONDUCTOR, SUCH AS METALLIC CONDUITS, METAL SUPPORT CLIPS OR SLEEVES THROUGH WALLS OR FLOORS, WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE HOUSED IN A CONDUIT, SAID CONDUIT TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL CONDITIONS, NON-METALLIC MATERIAL SUCH AS PVC PLASTIC CONDUIT SHALL BE USED. WHERE USE OF METAL CONDUIT IS UNAVOIDABLE (I.E. NON-METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED BY LOCAL CODE) THE GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH END OF THE METAL CONDUIT. 20. ALL GROUNDS THAT TRANSITION FROM BELOW GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED SOLID IN 3/4" LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT LEG 1 FROM 24" BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF CAD -WELD TERMINATION POINT. THE EXPOSED END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED WITH SILICONE CAULK. (ADD TRANSITIONING GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). DESCRIPTION PHASE./CODE LETTER WIRE COLOR 240/120 10 LEG 1 HIACK LEG 2 RED AC NEUTRAL N WHITE GROUND (ECC) G GREEN VDC POS + 'RED -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION VDC NEG* BLACK-POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION 240V OR 20BV, 30 PHASE A BLACK PHASE B RED (ORG. IF HI LEG) PHASE C BLUE 48OV, 30 PHASE A BROWN PHASE B ORANGE PHASE C YELLOW * SEE NEC 210.5(C)(1) AND (2) PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: G1 SINFRASTRUCTURE /P A R T N E R 3 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: 0 1 12/10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: ---A.ti 010 1 EXPIRES: 12131/21 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GENERAL NOTES Sheet Number: GN -1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BY OTHERS. G L, 17 Q av QaDo��o Dp Q < °d Qodpo o❑ Q O a 4t 0 d° a O a 0 Quo poo o o poo Q� O � 40 a 0 0 0 A II V Ll �(E) BUILDING o D' o o a o o as b o Q cs o� �G d� Q 0 0 0 0 Q O � �0pq o6p�op o6 poo a \ a by O ASv 0 o bo OAKDALE AVE. (E) TREES (TYP) OVERALL SITE PLAN o Ie b j 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 10' PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: 0 12/ 10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: 0/10 I EXPIRES: 121310 1 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 � 0 Dap �� c3oao Qa e� C7 o O p o0 0 0 0 o � OAKDALE AVE. (E) TREES (TYP) OVERALL SITE PLAN o Ie b j 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 10' PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: 0 12/ 10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: 0/10 I EXPIRES: 121310 1 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OETHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. TE: TO DE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN A ED L LEGAL MANNER. '/, o� Qv4 p o \ N�� o� �Q'75�oDp� QaboQ��pp� O <J � Q Doo y, o dp d o p p o pop o �poo�o O �o a OAKDALE AVE. (E) TREES (TYP) � 0 a p Obo 0 0 p� d° Dq Q [jo0 Q o bDoo DEMO SITE PLAN o 1e A Z 4t 00 d O Q 46 o�d� � Qo^Doo � � o ❑ p b f(E) BUILDING O b Q �p0 Q o 0 � od °0460 �o Q , o Qo D oob°o a� 006 q a on d� 4Q o° p a o D�a� �DO�°oma pip °d o �bD��o 0 o pa�0 o Do QQ � D o o° O O 00600 o oe / a v / o 0 o v ' / 2 121 0 O �F/T cre 061/ /// (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE (TO B (TO BE REPLACED) a — � p�J�o dpQ�, op6pQ4 . ¢ O a� j 24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 10 5 0 10' Q PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: I Licensor: ---Ati 1 010 I EXPIRES: 12131/11 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPEREISION ANDTHAT I AM �ULY REGISTERED ENGINEER U NDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: DEMO SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1.1 1 NOTE: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGI1' BETTER. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTR 191 FA H ENLARGED SITE PLAN 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2. 1, 2' I ioRTHI PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: Licensor: __-Ati 1 0/10 1 EXPIRES: 12131/21 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 PREPARED FOR �1 AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 1A SURVEY CERTIFICATION SCID ID#: 18295-026 NAD 83 Vendor: BELTLINERD�ZD---)JOSEpHPL �o a LAT — 44 04'24.98" N A (44.07361) 15 z 23 - wuLaxrtlE RD OAKI)ALE AVE LONG — 123°02'09.64" W 2030 MAIN ST. x ��q © - - ASPNAL T f (-123.03601 SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J H �` m a T1 -7S -R)3 e� ELEV = 438.53' NAVD 88 J5 PROJECT ID: P -0503D4 Vendor: i RFC R w EHLY DR T 23 iT.=29.5' HT. =29.S `-,:. - 'bs a iI ' t 30' TO CL HT. =28.7' rLN o *- H 60' TO ROW O JDIA.=0.5 !j G ✓i 9r Q - - CENTER OF SUBJECT HT.=26.3' aF oaxrAtKevzy£ POLE -SEE DETAIL HT=25.8' Vendor: -- -w qs Z� l3 x - Tb HT. -25.5' �A HT.=25.4'-/ a t HAYDEN BRIDGE WAY p I7D L N - � - _s HARLOW RD .� r' „ WOODLANE DR 4 J 4 — -1 Y 57 V sr w F" V!V IIJJ w W NpRTHRiDIII � T DQ DRAWN BY: MDA z i SCOTT5 GLExrDR o r `g ' ' GONG �g CHECKED BY: JDM s o 0964 W 1— - - ? . .OR9tlW WAV SHELLEY 57 - „ „ �- PARCEL STOP N 1 7032243- 00101 "STREETS" 4sr - m 126. d -�f :; = co GRASS HT. 9.1' GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES LATITUDE: 44°04'24.98" N (44.07361) (NAD 83) 30' TO CL {}" LJMT❑ 25 LONGITUDE: 123°02'09,64" W 123.03601 (- ) (NAD 83) 60' TO ROW cv / PORCH/BUILDING HT.=S.Cr' OVERHANG - GROUND ELE\IATION: 438.53 FEET (NAVE) 88) I J f - HEIGHT: % — -- @ TOP OF POLE: 29.29 FEET (AGQ t _-_y' '' - @ TOP OF LIGHT: 29.46 FEET (ACL) - _ EL 4 =438.53' A �}+ 0 12/10/20 100 CDs DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 21, ZOZO a � Q+ REV DATE DESCRIPTION 2000 0 1000 2000 4000 I POLE DETAIL RE: SCIP ID#, 18925-026 Licensor: 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP 4 a EXISTING f ° s SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 1 INCH = 2000 FEET a 14 BUILDING — NOT TO SCALE — q 89198PE q q a DRIVEWAY �OREGON,a O 9 9Y 13, I CERTIFY THAT THE LATITUDE AND THE LONGITUDE SHOWN ABOVE ARE � � a (CONCRETE) � �Fs,,,�,c��o�20 ACCURATE TO WITHIN +15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THAT THE SITE a REGISTERED ELEVATION IS ACCURATE TO WITHIN +3 FEET VERTICALLY, WHICH MEETS 4 4 PROFESSIONAL EXPIRES: 12131/21 1A STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATION SHEET a { LAND SURVEYOR 91:003, THE HORIZONTAL DATUM (GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES) ARE IN LEGEND: n¢" ow!,-.,tlrewd�nPed,=-US, "I HERR UNERMY DIREDIRECTTHESE SUPEWISION EDTHAREABY ME ORITEREDE SNDER90 AN�iHAiIAM TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD 83 AND ARE ( ) o=58FLaLd Sery es +1 emad-andrew.plettgsRantls.com ENGINEER o rREGsrEREOENcOF RUNOERrHE WwsoErHEsrArE of OREcoN REGISTERED ROFESSIONAL EXPRESSED AS DEGREES ( ), MINUTES ( ), AND SECONDS ( ). TO7LPAND LIGHT—LAMP POST E WATER VAULT Q UTILITY MANHOLE OREGON AT&T Site ID: THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A SECOND. THE VERTICAL DATUM SURVEYDR �� STORM CURB INLET IRRIG CONTROL VALVE SIGN DECEMBER 30, 2D10 (ELEVATION AMSL) IS IN TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL D.N.-A.d,ohn� �5. ANDREW JOHN PLETT DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88)_ ,j.L ema`� aaENands� ROW LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GIS DATA, MID NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY 78538PLS CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-026 Location: Varaarrn. WA 0o Date: 10/22/2020 OREGON Date: 10/22/2020 RENEWS 12f31/20 SHEET 18925-026D ■ Sr=rvicr=s Proj Na: 2020-177-62 DECEMBER30, 2010 ■ Proj NO: 2020-177-62 1 OF 1 JOHN PLETT Prepared: C.M.I. SHEET Prepared: C.M.I. 4858 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD, SUITE A wwwsFlands.com 78538PL5 1 OF 1 4858 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD, SUITE A www.silands.com�7 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP PORTLAND, OR 97225 TnfoCsFlcnds.com Checked: A.J.P. 503-345-0328 RENEWS 12/'51/20 PORTLAND, OR 97225 infoOsilunds.com Scale: 1"=1�' -18925-026 503-345-0328 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: 1A LETTER AND SURVEY Sheet Number: A-3 I A LETTER 2 SURVEY ORT 1 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. i^ AT&T 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. 2030 MAIN ST. T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SUITE 200 ELEV. 36'-0" (A.G.L.) IRVINE, CA 92614 AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION. (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL J5 PROJECT Io: P-050304 �� RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA Y ELEV. 35-0"(AG L.) e4 p_1 Vendor: 0 L I (E) LUMINAIRE (E) LUMINAIRE T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE 16" ELEV. 31'-0" (A.G.L.) I Vendor: T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE 1. ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING POLE ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) I ELEV. 29'-4" (A.G.L.) 4"xRT ACCESS 1� PORT T.O. EXISTING CONDUIT ELEV. 25'-5" (A.G.L.) � I DRAWN BY: MDA )III ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE II CHECKED BY: JDM ��I I (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16' SMARTSTACK POLE �I T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) III I alD EQUIPMENT BAY WITH Iljll I (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS alD (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE IIII 0964) ELEV. 14'-4" (A.G.L.) I I (TO BE REPLACED) alD EQUIPMENT BAY 0 12/10/20 100% CDs FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION IIII OBD Licensor: II,�II I 8919 PE r I� IIII T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 5'-8" (A.G.L.) UTILITY BAY WITH: (P) AT&T DISCONNECT / SURGE SUPPRESSOR SEE DETAIL i D_ 1 OREGON a O &VI3, 12/ 10 ZO EXPIRES: 12131/11 I I (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE `(I'I '�Ulg (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE HEREBY CERrIEY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON 6"x8" ACCESS PORT I 11 AT&T Site ID: I (E) CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT FINISHED GRADE V ELEV. 0'-0" FINISHED GRADE M ELEV. 0'-0" GRAN RWOR EUG03 026 - - - I I I I I I 18925-026D I I I I ' I I 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES I (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL I NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE e WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS D 2 Sheet Title: I I s ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-4 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2' V o 2 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 24"x38" SCALE: 3/8" = - 1'0" 2' 1' 0 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. i^ AT&T 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 16331 NE 72ND WAY 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA IRVINE, CA 92614 ELEV. 36'-0" (A. G.L.) AT&T IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKE READY COORDINATION AND CONSTRUCTION. J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA _ Y ELEV. 35'-0" (A. G.L.) o (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA I I SEE DETAIL �4 D-1 (E) LUMINAIRE T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE I 16„, (E) LUMINAIRE Vendor: ELEV. 31'-0” (A. G. L.) T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING POLE ELEV. 29'-4" (A.G.L.) I DRAWN BY: MDA IJ I III CHECKED BY: JDM ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE f1y��l j 16" III SMART TACK POLE T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) I I EQUIPMENT BAY WITH (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS )� PERF. SCREEN VENTS FOR (1) CONVECTIVE COOLING, 3 PLACES T.O. EQUIPMENT-4BAYSMARTSTACK POLE (E) WOOD LIGHT POLE ELEV. 14'" (A. G.L.) . I — J (0964) I 0 12/10/20 100 CDs I (TO BE REPLACED) EQUIPMENT BAY I FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION I Licensor: III s �r I'1�yl E 89198PE I� T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE �OREGON,a O 9 9y 13,1 J� �F&VINHG� ELEV. 5'-8" (A.G.L.) UTILITY BAY WITH: 10/ZO I (P) AT&T DISCONNECT /SURGE SUPPRESSOR 12/ III I SEE DETAIL 3 D-1 EXPIRES: 12I31Y11 'I HEREBY cERMYDTHAT THESE D BY \I I MERE UNDER UREWI6ON A DTHAT I AM AM 1 E GINEE UNDERISIQVANOTHAT DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER THE Wws oFTHE STATE Ij EGOER of OREGON (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I� (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I I� I AT&T Site IF FINISHED GRADE ,i,�� FINISHED GRADE CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 ELEV. 0'-0" ELEV. 0'-0" 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE 1 (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER ROUTES e MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS D-2 (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FIBER AND ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE PERMITTED AND PERFORMED BY OTHERS) ELEVATIONS Sheet Number: A-5 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 24"x38" SCALE: 3/8" = - 1'0" 2' V o 2 2' 1' 0 PSEUDO OMNI 12 -PORT CANISTER ANTENNA PREPARED FOR MANUFACTURER: GALTRONICS PART NUMBER: GQ2412-06613 DIAMETER: 14.7" HEIGHT: 24.5" WEIGHT W/MOUNT: 30.9 LBS AXT VOLUME: 3.1416 (0.6125 FT)A2 x (2 FT) = 2.35 CUBIC FEET 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 14.7" Vendor: ® ® )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050304 Vendor: ,las N U .. noo uH. cas (e+as' 0 h Ol Vendor: 51N-59255 un: Inas 0 o D U 31,5 o,) U,la� DRAWN BY: MDA a, .0 ® ® CHECKED BY: JDM vLJ L N FRONT VIEW BOTTOM VIEW ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS 4 N.T.S. NOT USED 2 N.T.S. SURGE PROTECTION BOX MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP PART NUMBER: RCCAC-1333-PS-240-A WEIGHT: 8 LBS DIMENSIONS (LxWxH): 9.38" x 5.58" x 10.43" VOLUME: (0.781 FT) x (0.557FT) x (0.869 FT) = 0.378 CUBIC FEET 0 12/10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION 5.58" 9.39' 5.06" 8.59" Licensor: �FS�E ,J Q RR�S 89198PE OREGON ,p O 9 9y 13,2 �F&VINHk 1010 EXPIRES: 12/31121 o = _ C6 o • "I HERESY CER THAT ESE PLAN'S WERE PREPAREDA 9v ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT IAM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE i E OF OREGON ji O AT&T Site IT CRAN RWOR EUG03 026 18925-026D SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW M40 GLANDS CAN BE 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP REPLACED BY 1-1/4"NPT CONDUIT FITTINGS SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: O ❑ o o OO DETAILS O O Sheet Number: 3 AC DISCONNECT W/ SURGE PROTECTION SPECIFICATION BOTTOM VIEW N.T.S. 1 NOT USED N.T.S. D-1 C C ID 10 N.T.S. 8 7 6 PART LIST ITEM QTY /M P/N DESCRIPTION 1 2.12 CLI.YDS 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 CONCRETE, 1 CYD BATCH, 150 PCF 2 11 Each 410250 REBAR, #4 (1/2"), PREBENT 30" DIA 3 91.00 FT 12 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 4 8.08 FT 1 TUBE, SLEEK, 36" 5 4 Each C4004105B ANCHOR BOLT 1" X 51" F1554 GR105 6 2 Each SM00100 ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE, 19 1/2" BC 7 2 Each SWO0378 LIFTING LUG, PIER, 3" X 18 5/8" X 1" 8 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 9 8 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2",90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 10 12 Each COUPLING, G -PVC, 2" 11 12 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 13 1 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4", 90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 14 3 Each COUPLING, G -PVC, 3/4" 5 2 01 CUT LIST ITEM P/N DESCRIPTION LENGTH WIDTH PC 3 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 91.00 in 12 8 410250 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 48.00 in 8 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 36.00 in 1 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 12.00 in 1 NOTES: 1. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS AND VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS ARE TO BE SECURELY TIED BEFORE CONCRETE IS PLACED SO THEY WILL REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE PIER. 2. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS ARE TO BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH. 3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. 4. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-11. 5. REINFORCING STEEL TO HAVE A 3" MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER. 6. ANCHOR BOLTS 1"0 X 4'-3" (F1554 GR105) ON A 19 1/2"0 BOLT CIRCLE (4 REO'D). 7. CONCRETE REQUIRED 2.12 CUBIC YARDS. 8. LAP SPLICES OF ADJACENT CIRCULAR TIES SHALL BE POSITIONED ON ALTERNATE SIDES. 16*1111ACAN10dl►I9410171151111:]6*1 N SECTION AA 7 -5° X 3/4" 'HAMFER 3'-0"[36]" DIA IT nu IN 1 vire vv #4 TIES W/(3) IN TOP 5" AND THEN '/C SPACING VERTICAL SPACED) (12) #6 VERTICAL (EVENLY SPACED) O 9 SECTION B -B 11 (11) 30"0 #4 REBAR TIES O PAODUCU S51AE000I DESCRIPTION : CONCRETE PIER 3'0" X 8'1" (4) 1 "0 X 4'-3" ANCHOR BOLTS ON A 19 1 /2"B.C. N 10 PREPARED FOR f ) AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �5INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050304 Vendor: 0 12/10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: EXPIRES: 12/31121 1 I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED ev ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AV DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: A CRAN RWOR EUG03 026 iIF 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: 6 5 4 3 2 1 DETAILS Sheet Number: D-2 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD METER PEDESTAL N.T.S. {2) 8' ground rods required with mlrlmum b' S acing r-. k } tJIC _.0 MCIAL" }I" mol: IFUUlt breakers 6" +'l III NOTES: Electrical label or pefml� 1. Approved service equipment provided by customer includes oonduit, meter base, ground rad and conductors must be d1SPlayed an the meter base. 2. Customer installed alld mal ntained tranche aril conductors beyond point of delivery (load side of meter) subject to City of Springfield approval. See note 5 3. Refer to ESD 0090 for details regarding S_U_B_ requirements far meter installatiorts. Meter location subject to approval by S_U_E_ 4. Set a '118" x 1R x 1" steel angl: -drive into the ground and attach it to each side of the pedestal -.VAh 114" or Ja rgei bolts. 5. Access door to _U.E. connections must be kept clear by a minimum of £r above the final grade and must have a sealable provksian for S. U. B. t 6. Pedestal constfuction, material, and corrosive -resistant finish shall be approved by necogirl best " J11 I laboratory (i.e_ UL). 7_ €Minimum interior dimensions of pedestal shall be 4" depth and 7-112- w9dkh>_ 8_ Minimum depth of pedestal in the ground shall be 24'°_ 9. Minimum meter height to cen#eref meter shall be 48"_ T1 10. Set the pedestal such thal`the froiAdwr to S.U. B. connections rernains accessible - '11. Do NOT install customer conduit across the front of S_U_E_ access door on the pe1 ton" Sen ESD 0105 See note 4 _------Z3:' To S.U.B. A8" h11r. TD MDblle h0rne SP:RLNGFIELa UTILITY BOARD ENGiNEEMNG STANDARD DISTRI9UT10N PROCEDURES & POLICIES TYPICAL U NDERG RQU IND MOELI LE HOME PEDIll S E F;',; I CE STANDARC NUMS R ESD 0109 age 1 of 2 REVISIONS Date Description 8124183 Created 6115!10 Reformatted, drawing Updated 9111111 40&1 - M SPRMGFIE LD UTI LITYBOARD ENGINEERING STANDARD DISTRIBUT10N PROCEDURES & POLICIES TYPICAL UNDERGROU NID h ORFLE HOME PEDESTAL SERVICE 1P"I�IIVFIJ AIL'WONE MW ST15ND,w1; NUMEER ESD 0109 Page 2 of 2 PREPARED FOR `� � AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050304 Vendor: I Licensor: _-4.ti 1 %0 I EXPIRES: 12131 P11 1 "I HEREBY CERUFY THAT THESE PLAN" WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: DETAILS Sheet Number: D-3 RF WARNING SIGNS \VAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL: ittps://vvvvw.weneedsigns.com/product.php? prod uct id=171904&cat=1135&page= I -LICK ON AT&T 'H: 510-651-0445 401 -DC -16 1"x6' NOTICE DECAL FOR 1 FOOT DISTANCE" VYVYL DECAL WITH ADHESIVE BACKING ORDER COMES IN A PACK PF 25. PLACE THREE NOTICE STICKER EQUALLY SPACED AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE ANTENNA RADOME RF WARNING NOTICE SIGN AT ANTENNA 5" NOTICE ON THIS POLE: RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS NEAR SOME ANTENNAS MAY EXCEED FCC RULES FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE PERSONNEL CLIMBING THIS TOWER SHOULD BE TRAINED FOR WORKING RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIRONMENTS AND USE A PERSONAL RF MONITORING IF WORKING NEAR ACTIVE ANTENNAS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION RULES ON RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS 47 CFR 1.1307(B) 5" (3 DIGITS REE 000 NETWORK OPERATION CONTROL CENTER (NOC) 1-800-264-6620 REENTER I.D. NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH NODE NODE NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATED AT EACH NODE PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: 0 12/10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: NODE ID #12 r V Bi 9�j9Y131� t 6.. FSVINHOZ/1O/11O THIS SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH FCC RULES FOR BOTH OCCUPATION AND EXPIRES: 12131/21 CONTROLLED AND GENERAL PUBLIC OR NOTES: SITE NAME N IS FOR AMPLE IFY AT RECT NAME HALL BEV INDICATE AT EACH SITE STAY BACKDA MINIMUM OF 4 FEET SAME SQDE AS THE NT ENCLOSURE ON THE EoeeuNoeR voiOFORu PLAINS WERE PeePnemev AT&T TGA R D 0021 PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE SITE ISIwANDTHAnAM - _ 1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED, IN DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE FROM ANY ACTIVE ANTENNA 2. WARNING SIGNS TO BE INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS AND FCC. AT&T Site ID: 1 800 638 2822 SIGNS ALLOWED ONLY AS REQUIRED BY TO DEACTIVATE ANTENNA CALL LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO THE N.O. PHONE NUMBER BEFORE ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 OPERATING DISCONNECT U S D. 192355 1 USID NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE 18925-026D • -PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE USID NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT DISCONNECT RF WARNING NOTICE SIGNS AT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 24'x36" SCALE: N -S 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: RF WARNING SIGNS Sheet Number: RF -1 1 PREPARED FOR THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. _ ��— AT&T Nuo Location 16331 NE 72ND WAY �+ I� 5 u �y r}47df? in n71d-O f d) REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: 0-P011 M &H1!U4 Barld T '5 INFRASTRUCTURE n na 2030 MAIN ST. .� �4r�4 rune Optio 1 : SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Xux-- +.� U 1 4iig� �enina vAth- MAX 30A PRO Ecr ID: P-050334 -- Vendor: xxx POWER LINE 4 Port% MId- G 3:111d (2 + 2 Por S H IgI�-Barla (!5GHZ) x - Aha Trate Piraducit sUpportIng LGw-P a nd an dinr 3.5 GHz (1) 6-#10THHN/THWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE SURGE SUPPRESSOR Vendor: M Band J:-7-7 P I CrassBarrel Cxnbi�r � (1) 6-#1OTHHN/THWN/VW-1 eoBIC POLE MOUNTED STREET LAMP TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO STREET LAMP DRAWN BY: MDA CHECKED BY: JDM has AiGmb GfiG %-WIG�4 RRH-1 1U11+2 RRH RRH RRH RRH FRH -1: 4T4Fl Air-Sc;i �a Mi -c ro 9251POG RE H-2: 4T4R Air -Sr a III Yi-c rD BffaMWS RAYCAP DISCONNECT/SURGE _ SUPPRESSOR (1) 2-#12THHN/THWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO RRH 0 12/10/20 100% CDs 4 AMP BREAKER -1 j REV DATE DESCRIPTION METAL OXIDE — / SWITCH Licensor: VARISTOR (TYP.) �r 89198PE p NEUTRAL BUS BAR 9 4)' 3, &VINHG - 6 F ilm r!; Fronthakj] regal rmd EXPIRES: 12131/21 GROUND BUS BAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE �{ OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN RWOR EUG03 026 18925-026D AC Source 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP Dark FI b -I SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 tem Hub Sheet Title: PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC Sheet Number: E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 121 DC POWER SCHEMATIC 24"x36" SALE: NTS 1 THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. NOTES: 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF THE INSTALLATION ON THE POLE SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AND BARREL COMPRESSION GROUNDED. 2. A COPPER GROUND WIRE, #6 AWS MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE BASE OR FEEDLINE ATTACH TO GROUND CONNECTION POINT OF THE ANTENNA TO A GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE POLE AND BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE ANTENNA FEEDLINE CONDUIT. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY CONNECTED CONTRACTOR TO THE GROUND ROD. 3. WHERE A UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR EXISTS, THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY BONDED BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR AT THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR LEVEL BY UTILITY CO. CREWS. 4. A GROUND ROD, 8 FEET MINIMUM IN LENGTH SHALL BE INSTALLED (WHERE NO UTILITY CO. GROUND GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH ROD & INTACT GROUND WIRE EXISTS) AT THE BASE OF THE POLE. THIS INSTALLATION SHALL MEET OR 3. EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINE D16-2 5. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE MOLDING FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH ON THE REFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. POLE, EXCEPT AT THE POINT WHERE IT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR BONDING TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL. 6. THE UTILITY CO. AND COMMUNICATION GROUND RODS SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER USING COPPER #6 AWG WIRE G R O O N D O N G NOTES 24"x36" SCALE: NTS COAXIAL GROUND KITS W. LONG BARREL COMPRESSION DOUBLE LUG WITH SIGH HOLE, ATTACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALLED BY ANTENNA CONTRACTOR 0 0 0,0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O '000000000000000000' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER GROUND BAR COPPER WIRE (TYP.) INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: 1. COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTION WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL GROUND LUGES TO HAVE INSPECTION WINDOWS/SIGHT HOLES G R O O N D O N G BAR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOT USED 24"x36" SCALE: NTS GROUND BAR L #6 AWG TO ANTENNA GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO GROUND ROD J MMITI IOki Mwe] =waIBMW, \:=itolllllal=111111[6l►l n 24"x36" SCALE: NTS NOTES: 1. GROUND WIRE MOLDING SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE BARE GROUND WIRE TO PROTECT LINE WORKERS, THE WIRE, AND THE PUBLIC. EXTEND PLASTIC MOLDING AT LEAST TWO INCHES BELOW GRADE. 2. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE IN ONE CONTINUOUS LENGTH. INSERT GROUND WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GROUND CLAMP AND BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TIGHTENING. CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL ON THE POLE. PLACE GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH SIDE) AND SERVICE NEUTRAL. 3. IDRIVE GROUND ROD IN UNDISTURBED EARTH 4. REFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. 1/2" PLASTIC MOULDING #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) GRADE _. Lk GROUND ROD CLAMP 6" GROUND ROD, 5/8"0 X 8' LONG (NOT REQUIRED IF PGE GROUND ROD IS PRESENT) CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL 5 1 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS WOODEN POLE E E 0 2 IC—CRIMP DETAIL TYPE SS TYPE TA TYPE W TYPE GT 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 16 C A R D W E L D D E T A 0 L S -D '6' ECTOR CRIMP CONNI TYPE PT TYPE VN TYPE VS TYPE GY 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 13 TYPE GL TYPE NC TYPE VB TYPE GR 24"x36" SCALE: NTS PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 Vendor: I Licensor: ---Ati 1 0/10 I EXPIRES: 12131/11 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN—RWOR—EUG03-026 18925-026D 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-1 LEGEND PREPARED FOR ■ MECHANICAL CONNECTION, DBL -BOLT OR EQUAL i^ AT&T • CADWELD CONNECTION OR EQUAL ♦ IN-LINE Cu C -CRIMP, SPLIT -BOLT OR EQUAL 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTES AS A ONE LINE Vendor: DIAGRAM. POWER DESIGN AND ONE LINE DIAGRAM TO BE FINALIZED WITH POWER �SINFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEER. R A R T N E R S 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-050374 (P) OMNI DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PER PLAN, TYP. Vendor: ANTENNA GROUND POLE EXTENSION GROUND Vendor: RRU EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 2' W x 6' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER DRAWN BY: MDA #2 COPPER -TINNED, BARE WIRE. ADD 1/2" WIRE COVER ON THE CHECKED BY: JDM NOTE: BOTTOM 12 FT. DETAIL SHOWS GENERAL SCHEMATIC GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS ONLY. (P) METAL POLE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE EQUIPMENT BONDING JUMPER #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER, TYP. 0 12/10/20 100% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION #2 GREEN STRANDED TO #2 SOLID MASTER GROUND BAR 2' Licensor: W x 12' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. S SERVICE GROUND #2 AWG BARE 89198PFE OR GREEN STRANDED COPPER CONTINUOUS TO GROUND DISCONNECT POLE GROUNDING q� OREGON A O 1' 13, FSVIII NHG� 10/Zo 12/ POLE GROUNDING BAR 2" W x 6' EXPIRES: 12131/21 CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. METER (IF APPLICABLE) (E) FINISHED SURFACE 'I HEREBY9v MERE UNDERMYDIRECT U NDER THE LANG iFAHI AM RU CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WEREEWISIONA AND DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER ENDER THE WwU OF THE STATE OF OREGON o z AT&T Site ID: PILE GROUNDING CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_026 EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION TO NEW GROUND ROD 18925-026D (N) GROUND ROD 5/8" x 8' LONG 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP COPPER CLAD STEEL SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Sheet Title: Sheet Number: G-2 NOT USED TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: N1�; 1 al8ct EUG03_026 / 18925-26D '51NFRASTRUCTURE PHOTO SIMULATION 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PAGE 1 Disclaimer: These photographic simulations have been previdert to aid in visuallung how the proposed vnreless telecummunicetions fadlily shown herein woulrt appear p constructed. While these renderings are not an end science, they haw been pmpmd diligently to accurately reflect dimensions, scale, depth, colonng, twt m, and other important elements in the proposed design insofar as the digital medium allows. Taken together with the engineering drawings and other materials submitted with the application, they are fair and reasonable visual depictions of how the proposed site would appear. AT&T Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction (RFSSRP) Site Name: EUG03_026 M-RFSC Name: Piero Rovani ll 14353479 Site Structure Type: Light Pole U SI D: 208151 PACE#: Site ID: 18925-026 MRWOR034996/MRWOR034920/MRWOR035008 Address: 2791 S. Cloverleaf Loop Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC Springfield, Oregon 97477 c/c JS Infrastructure Partners County: Lane 2030 Main Street, Suite 200 Latitude: 44.07361000 Irvine, CA 92614 Longitude: -123.03601000 EBI Project Number: 6220006158 Report Information: Report Writer: Andrew Simpson Report Date: December 4, 2020 CDs: ATT -1 8925-026 90 CRAN CD REV A 2020-1 1-06 Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. EBI Consulting environmental I engineering I duediligence AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208151 i 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN........................................................................................3 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY..........................................................................................................4 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING................................................................................. 6 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 13 6.0 APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ 14 APPENDIXA: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................. IS APPENDIX EI: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 18 APPENDIX C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION.................................................................... 19 APPENDIX D: LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIXE: RoofMasterT".................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX F: CERTIFICATIONS................................................................................................ 22 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208151 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) modeling for AT&T Site 18925-026 located at 2791 S. Cloverleaf Loop in Springfield, Oregon to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Recommended Mitigation at the Site: Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 6 by 6 inch Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 3 feet below the bottom of the antenna • Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: No Action Required • Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: 7_1R01-1 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 2 Predictive Modeling Results: The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 8.35 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1.67 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the light fixture level. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. At the antenna face level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 163.83 percent of the FCC's general public limit (32.766 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.04 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.008 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 3 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY Site USI D: 208151 4 Note there Is I AT&T omnidirectional antenna at this site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. yO p m 0 M E L JL 9C q m c n V p n p n C ` C 'E R y M s L q L y 9 I: ] c g o C C �'D y O � L v 1] g Eo yE I ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-0 61300DT 1900 Iwo 0 0 156 20 5 4 SM 64.87 106.38 I ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-061300DT 2100 1100 0 0 IBI 20 5 4 5.45 59.16 9].01 1 ATT G TRONICS GQ2412-061300DT 5150 5150 0 0 228 20 a5 2 235 1.45 238 Note there Is I AT&T omnidirectional antenna at this site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Site USI D: 208151 5 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Z -Height Antenna Radiation Z -Height Light Z -Height Ant# NAME X Y Adjacent Centerline Fixture Ground Budding ATT 20.4 35.3 35.0 4.5 4.0 34.0 AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 6 4.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterT. software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site light fixture level and ground -level and nearby rooftops resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupationallcontrolled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers with equipment installed at this site. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled exposures on any accessible light fixture level and ground walking/working surface related to ATT's proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational and/or general public exposure limits at this site. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the light fixture level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 8.35 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1.67 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 8.35 percent of the FCC's general public limit (1.67 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground/street level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground/street level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.04 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.008 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Adjacent Roof Level 30 feet AGL Site USID: 208151 7 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. ry Peimnt MPE LegPntl ❑ o; noD; ■ ioo< sno> ■ mo<mov ■ noo tuo Dmie G,1, 09 IAvg 30 b36 FeG1 LIGHT FIXTURE -295 6anie, Dolor C,dA Arr LIC T, 4� O� 4 qArr OTINNA�r I / i I W71 4 /I en / _ I � I AwAcervr emcowG-ao.o i AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Elevation View Site USID: 208151 8 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). therefor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. J l LIGHT FIXTURE -29 5' (b Pement.11 Legentl ❑ 0%-100% 10N'<-500% 50", 006 ■ 50001.. sNz 09 Vertical GROUND LEVE L-0 _ 10 mol gild me Mld Zone Avg ll Caitiff Color Coda k ATT I I I AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). therefor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Light Fixture Level Site USID: 208151 9 Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 4 ry Peiren,MPE Legend ❑ l50n0; 100;Ni- ❑ 500Y5000% IN s000x. EOa o a99 di "d 0611.32 � Avg 265 b325 Feet) LIGHT FIXTURE-29.5 Carrie, Colo, Code ALL L J a c 1M 17 AN1EJRI E� a C: I / FF 'W" y L q Q I —phi r I I I nodncervT eulmwG-coo i n a I Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Antenna Face Level Site USID: 208151 10 Max MPE: 163.83% General Population MPE at Antenna Face Level AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 4 N Percent MPE Legend ❑ or..Toor. moe-sone ❑ eov-e000s ■ noo.. Publij Limits9 10 Fe 32101ooto'38 IAvg 38 Feet) LIGHT FIXTURE -29 5 Ceine, Colo, Codi ATT ILC J Q ATIANTENNA Q Q 1 W / 1 / _ ( I I I I I AodAceNT euILOINSaoo' Max MPE: 163.83% General Population MPE at Antenna Face Level AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 1435347911 Ground Level 0 feet AGL Site USID: 208151 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N Pe:wnt MPE Legend ❑ ore -Toon 1o0-"■ snv ■ nUOA.. Public Limits Sua9l 10 bmgiidme G. 0 b6Feetl LIGHT FIXrUBE=35 fame: Colo: Code Arr ILC I V _ p ATTANTENNA i / �7w I / I d �I �I i ------------------ I I I I I I I AodAEErvT eulLowG=EO U' 4 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Site USID: 208151 12 AT&T Contribution of More Than 5% of the FCC's General Ex osure RF Limit Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's amennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. 4 N PemenIMPE Legend ❑ U/..5°6 r Pubic Limits Sula9 1 O botg,idsee IA, Oa6Fea, Carrier Color Code ALL LIGHT FIXTURE -235' 7�q !�WEN'41A :Z ,h 4 /I Past as / r/ I_ ______________ __ III I Iad ANT BUILDINGdO 1 Q I 1 Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. Under FCC regulations, AT&T is therefore not responsible for predicted exceedances of another carrier's amennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 5.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Site USID: 208151 13 Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. The following mitigation measures are recommended for this site. Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 6 by 6 inch Stonehouse NOTICE signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 3 feet below the bottom of the antenna AT&T Mobility Sectors: o Sector A: No Action Required AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 6.0 APPENDICES Site USID: 208151 14 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Nottor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Appendix A: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION(FCC) REQUIREMENTS Site USID: 208151 IS The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSIIIEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupationallcontrolled exposure limits (for workers) and general publicluncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupationallcontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general publicluncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Generol publicluncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE limit is 2.33 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 0.47 mW/cm2. For the AT&T equipment operating at 1900 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 5.0 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 1.0 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Site USID: 208151 16 Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm)(mW/cm') Power Density (S) Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f 900/ * 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 f/300 6 1,500-100,000 (8) Limits for General PublidUncontrolled Exposure 5 6 Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm)(mW/cm') Power Density (S) Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 8248 2.19/f 180/f * 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane -wave equivalent power density Figure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissibie Exposure (MPE) Piano -wave Equivalent Power Density Oc.paliona//ConboMad Exposure -- -- General Population/Urrconbolfed Exposure 0.11 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 003 03 q 3 30 300 3,000 36,00'0 },300,000 134 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 17 Personal Wireless Service Approximate Frequency Occupational MPE public MPE Microwave (Point -to -Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm' 0.58 mW/cm' Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm' 0.57 mW/cm' Long Term Evolution (LTE) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm' 0.47 mW/cm' Most Restrictive Frequency Range 30-300 MHz 1.00 mW/cm' 0.20 mW/cm' MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 18 Appendix B: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated May 27, 2015, requires that I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site USID: 208151 Site FA 14353479 19 Appendix C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: • Be posted at a conspicuous point; • Be posted at the appropriate locations; • Be readily visible; and • Make the reader aware of the potential risksro for to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. CRAN I HETNET Small Cell Decals I Signs �Alerting STONEHOUSE w...W.othadW ill.l&.nmm y.+nsel FCC. -2_61111413: .&Ima.r. smm for Nexmral Mulabon. NOTICE slaralaast , luta..r Rem me,nem. DECAL Call AT&T at d&9br&."n, optlon 9 Nen &, M Iwlp a you InWa".. wain hurl. dare n me .uuJTRILINGUAL I.., aq�n.°.CCm4amYaIty, ......,d.n..am.Ar.:.91... STONEHOUSE r NOTICE SIGN „,..,,.a ...... .lm. NOTICE2 Con^atl@a, Ar PPoE]B ]Ul..ut 9. ACAUTION .:°rqmoo,'. A,ua.M:: .m It•1' Ya.4vFlW _IDB bR8T 9b Y4p A CAUTION A STONEHOUSE RF.mrW@m1 dOy Nls.nlmn.may.m.HN.FCC% oF,rpatbnal e[po9um nmlu. CAUTION sural.., t auot upom N°amanm. DECAL Call AT&T at 9WLM2922,opunn 9 M.", Mlp Xyou m.d.Cmss MNln 1 Iwt. A CAUTION Ararop.rawu STONEHOUSE •':m R.q.�,.e.,m..r.,.9 �... CAUTION .....m......l... m. SIGN C.nur �iaT ai BmiNSeR..q 9. 'w- It, PII Cell Ale uat, Signs �Alerting -2_61111413: au W=A .uuJTRILINGUAL r NOTICE NOTICE2 ACAUTION ACAUTION It•1' Ya.4vFlW CAUTION 2— ROOFTOP CAUTION 2A &CAUTION ACAUTION .9a..m CAUTION 2B - CAUTION 2C TOWER -PARAPETS WARNING IB WARNING 2A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Appendix D: LIMITATIONS Site USID: 208151 20 This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC to meet requirements outlined in AT&T's corporate RF safety guidelines. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information provided by the client The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Appendix E: RoofMasterTM Site USID: 208151 21 RoofMasterT. is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed to predict RF power density values for rooftop and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" (OET-65), RoofMasterT. calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMasterTM models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Appendix F: CERTIFICATIONS Site USID: 208151 22 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Nottor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: EUG03_026 Site FA 14353479 Preparer Certification I, Andrew Simpson, state that: Site USID: 208151 23 • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&Ts RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated October 28, 2014) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofMasterT. modeling software. • I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 0111100W- AT&T /TIP W AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. The comparative LTE: RSRP coverage map over the focus zone is provided below as an illustration. All the other coverage maps (MRO, dominance, etc.) are directly viewable in Atoll (with more detail) or can be provided as a snapshot similar to the illustration below upon request. emeMalenw LTE: MR' IdBW I♦ Hest RSRP IRS EPRq Level tlR.l>=ES I♦ Hest RSRP IRS EPRn Level d0ml>= 95 Best RSRP IRS EPRQ Level ltl0-1 = 105 I♦ Hest RSRP IRSEPRQ Level tlO' 115 I♦ Hest RSRP IRS EPuQ Level ltl.m =125 `� IV ©2019 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo, Mobilizing your World and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Sabre Industries - INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 31'-2" Smart Stack (36'-2" Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG03_026-D, OR Site Number: 18925-026D Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22 December 9, 2020 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 7 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2-3 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 4-9 Foundation Calculations........................................................................ 10-15 L fj I 61633PE u OREGON �t12 _" b�. J. 1 , V. 0 E%P1RES: O6/30/20DJ2022 Designed Appurtenance Loading Base Plate Dissensions U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + NEVER, I REEDID,tEE Owl, av W aw.. Hav e y, IA5II. RE Anchor Bolt Dimensions LE, RI 1. Ttp III j RI 16 Ttp FILERE. S1'-2'9nar13ack-RP= PGe 4. 001 0. E,. xJr Tim. H�m DE ou— EE 11 ou— EE : RE I Designed Appurtenance Loading Design Criteria - MM IA-22Nt Base Plate Dissensions U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + NEVER, I REEDID,tEE Owl, av EVIL al-EfEr aw.. Hav e y, IA5II. RE Anchor Bolt Dimensions LE, RI 1. Ttp III j RI 16 Ttp FILERE. S1'-2'9nar13ack-RP= PGe 4. 001 0. E,. xJr DE ou— EE 11 ou— EE Design Criteria - MM IA-22Nt Loed Case Reacd. Base Plate Dissensions U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + NEVER, I REEDID,tEE Owl, av EVIL al-EfEr aw.. Hav e y, IA5II. RE(E—VV1w ORDERED Anchor Bolt Dimensions Et Loed Case Reacd. Neter 1) Antenna Feed tines Run Inside %a 2) All dimensions are above ground laws, unless etbewise specified. 3) Weighosboxnareeefimazea. FinevaghtsmaYva 1. 4) Tower Razing: 12 5) Th V (ower design and, if applicable, the fwndadm designs) sboxn m the following pages) also meet or exceed! the requirenmts of the 2019 pegs Stmctural Specialty Code. Sha YtluLrbs Base Plate Dissensions U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + HmEVIL av EVIL al-EfEr aw.. Hav e y, IA5II. RE(E—VV1w ORDERED Anchor Bolt Dimensions Et j .- IVEV. 211 S1'-2'9nar13ack-RP= PGe 4. 001 0. Neter 1) Antenna Feed tines Run Inside %a 2) All dimensions are above ground laws, unless etbewise specified. 3) Weighosboxnareeefimazea. FinevaghtsmaYva 1. 4) Tower Razing: 12 5) Th V (ower design and, if applicable, the fwndadm designs) sboxn m the following pages) also meet or exceed! the requirenmts of the 2019 pegs Stmctural Specialty Code. Sha YtluLrbs Base Plate Dissensions U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + HmEVIL av EVIL al-EfEr aw.. Hav e y, IA5II. INNO DELIVERED Anchor Bolt Dimensions n1W3 0260, OR lflsl 290 vgpn repnx S1'-2'9nar13ack-RP= PGe ndxann E,. xJr Neter 1) Antenna Feed tines Run Inside %a 2) All dimensions are above ground laws, unless etbewise specified. 3) Weighosboxnareeefimazea. FinevaghtsmaYva 1. 4) Tower Razing: 12 5) Th V (ower design and, if applicable, the fwndadm designs) sboxn m the following pages) also meet or exceed! the requirenmts of the 2019 pegs Stmctural Specialty Code. Sha YtluLrbs U-226}EW CpL 22 =tlpennve + Sabre IOJustrle x. J5 INFRASIRVCNRE PARTNERS Hav e y, IA5II. INNO DELIVERED N x^x. n1W3 0260, OR lflsl 290 repnx S1'-2'9nar13ack-RP= PGe •••'DER,lverzom E,. xJr Page Sabre Industries" I N NOVFTION DELIVERED Grade (8) 2" Conduits 8 (2) 3/4" Conduits Grout --see following page for installation notes No.: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22 Date: 12/09/20 By: KJT Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG03 026-0, OR 18925-026D 31.16' Smart Stack Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 5,000 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. c Dia. � 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 G=� kkk_I Grade 60. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ELEVATION VIEW (1.59 Cu. Yds.) (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- 222-H-2017. 0 iD 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be positioned as closely as possible to the bottom of the anchor bolts. Rebar Schedule for Pier Pier (12) #6 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" of pier, then 12" C/C Information contained herein is the sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive - P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279.0814 Page Sabre Industries'" INNOVATION DELIVE0.ED Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG03 026-D, OR 18925-026D Precast Foundation for a 31.16' Smart Stack Installation Notes: No.: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22 Date: 12/09/20 By: KJT 1). Lifting plate assemblies shall be tightened against concrete surface using heavy hex nuts and F436 hardened flat washers. Nuts to be snug tight. 2). Approximate weight of pier is 6579 pounds. 3). Drilled hole shall be no larger than 42" diameter. 4). Loads at ground surface should be minimized in close proximity to the excavated hole, before it has been grouted. 5). Top of pier shall be held level (plus or minus 1 degree) during installation of grout. 6). A quick -setting grout shall be used for same day installation of the foundation and pole structure. 7). Grout shall be non -shrink, with a 7 -day compressive strength of at least 5000 psi. 8). Air voids within the grouted space should be minimized by tamping with a rod. 9). Minimum grout requirement for a neatly drilled 42" diameter hole is 0.57 cubic yards. 10). This design assumes the drilled hole can remain stable during installation. It may not be appropriate for weak, collapsible soil, or in locations where groundwater will be encountered. Information contained herein is the sole properly of Sahre Industries, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690- Fax 712.279.0814 Page (VSA 222-X) - Monopole spatial Analysis (c)2011 Gu,hast Inc. Tel:(416)]36-]453 Fax:(416)]36-43]2 Emb: Moo.guymast.com P rocessed under license at: sabre Towers and voles on. 9 tlec 2020 at: 11:48:12 31.16' Pipe vole / EOS03_026-D, OR + All pole diameters shown on the following pages are across corners. see profile drawing for widths across flats. POLE GEOME70.Y ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE TACK RESISTANCES SPLICE ...OVERLAP... W/t NAME SIDE OIAM -NESS f+Pn f+Mn TYPE LENGM RATIO ft In I kip ft -kip ft 31.1 ........................................... 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 A 0 42.] 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 0.0 ........................................... POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLTS AT BASE OF SECTION............ CALC NAME ELEV NUMBER TYPE DIm STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE SHEAR PLANE ELEV ft in si ft A 0.000 0 M25 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 POLE SECTIONS SECTION NO.Of LENGTH WrSIOE.OIANETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.IO FLANGE. WELD NAME SIDES BOT TOP RAD ERIAL BOT TOP .. GULF. ID.. ID BOT TOP ft in inIn A 0 31.08 16.00 16.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 + - Diameter of circuscribed circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF TYPE NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .TIICONESS. IRREOULAAITY SHAPE No ELEM. W® FLAN. P. ECTICN. % OF ORIENT AREA & deg in Tn Tn In deg PL 1 1 0.0 16.00 0.38 0.3]5 0.3]5 0.00 0.0 & - with respect to vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES MATERIAL ELASTIC RMIT SIREN. THERMAL TYPE NO. M1COU.S WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi kss /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.000011]0 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A 91 mph Mind with no ice. wind Azimuth: Do LOAD ELEV APPLY..LOAD..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... M:MIENTS..... TYPE .1. . AZI Ig RIZ D. VERTICAL TORSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip c 34.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 c 33.5]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0]]2 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 Page 4 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0144 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0224 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0279 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0140 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0122 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1036 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 c 1].91] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 c 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 c 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 c 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 31.080 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0124 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 LWOING CONDITION M 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: Co LORDS ON PoLE LORD ELEV APPLY -LOAD -AT LOAD ...... FO S...... ...... MOMENTS ..... 1E RADIUS AII AII IIIWIZ D. VERTICAL TpiSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip c 34.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0279 0.0000 0.0000 c 33.5]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0]]2 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0108 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0168 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0209 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0105 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1036 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0918 0.0000 0.0000 c 1].91] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 c 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 c 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0225 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.00]] 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 O.D000 0.0072 0.0000 D.0000 c 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 31.080 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0124 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 (OSA 222-N) - Monopole Spatial Analysis --------------- (c)2017 Guymast inc. Tel:(416)]36-]453 Fax:(416)]36-43]2 wdp: wow.guymast.com P rocessed under license at: sabre Towers and voles on. 9 dec 2020 at: 11:48:12 31.16' Pipe vole / EO003_026-D, OR MOJ . POLE OEFpNWTIOIS CALCVLATEO(w.r.t. wind direction) MAST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ......... 0.0TATIOws (de,)...... ... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... D......... TILT .......... TWST ft ALOE M1055 ALOE AO105s 31.1 0.03A O.00F 0. MA 0.07A O.00F O.00F ............................................67...........66........... 23.3 0.02A O.00F O.00A 0.0]A O.00F O.00F Page 5 15.5 0.01A O.00F 0. OCA O.0" O.00F O.00F ............................................64...........66........... ].8 O.OW O.00F O.00A O.OM O.00F O.00F 0.0 O.00A 0. ODA 0. 00A O.00A 0. OCA 0. OCA ...................................................................... wwo1wuM VOLE FMCES CALCVLATEO(W.r, to Wind direction) MAST TOTAL SXEPA. W. r. t. EINO. OIR MOMENT. W.r.t.wINO.OIa TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG AOIOSs ALONG AO1o5G ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 31.1...................................................................... 0.32 O 0.08 L 0.00 B -0.19 K 0.00 B 0.00 B 1.20 O 0.28 L 0.00 B -1.40 L 0.00 B 0.00 B 23.3...................................................................... 1.20 A 0.28 A 0.00 w -1.40 B 0.00 B 0.00 B 1.93 C 0.37 A 0.00 w -3.91 A 0.00 W 0.00 W 15.5...................................................................... 1.93 A 0.37 M 0.00 F -3.91 A 0.00 w 0.00 I 2.61 A 0.46 M 0.00 F -7.14 K 0.00 F 0.00 F 7.8...................................................................... 2.61 A 0.46 M 0.00 Q -7.14 K 0.00 F 0.00 F 3.26 A 0.54 M 0.00 Q -11.03 A 0.00 F 0.00 u ------------------------------------------------------------------------ base reaction 3.26 A -0.54 m 0.00 Q 11.03 A 0.00 F 0.00 u .------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONPLI CE wiI 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ------------- ELEV AXIAL BENDING SHEAR + TOTAL SATISFIED O/t(W/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft 31.08.................................................................6666. O.00D O.00K O.00L O.00K YEB 42.67A 400.0 O.00D 0.01L O.00L 0.01L Y6 42.67A 400.0 23.31.................................................................6666. O.00A 0.01B 0. OCA 0.01B Y6 42.67A 400.0 O.00A 0.02A 0. OCA 0.02A Y6 42.67A 400.0 15.54.................................................................6666. O.00A 0.02A O. COM 0.02A Y6 42.67A 400.0 O.00A 0.03K O. COM 0.03A Y6 42.67A 400.0 ].]].................................................................6666. O.00A 0.03K O. COM 0.03K Y6 42.67A 400.0 0.02A 0.05A O. COM 0.05A Y6 42.67A 400.0 0.00...................................................................... MAXIMUM LOADS ONTO FODNDATION(W.r.t. Wind direction) DO4N SHEAR.W.r.t.WIND.DIR MOMENT. W. r. t. D. DIR TO15IO! ALONG ACROSS ALONG AC0.ORs kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 3.26 0.54 0.00 -11.03 0.00 0.00 A M Q A F u (VSA 222-H) - moroGole spatial Analysis (c)2017 Gu,awat Inc. Tel:(416)]36-]453 Fax:(416)]36-43]2 wdN: wmw.guymast.com P rocessed under license at: sabre Towers and voles on. 9 dec 2020 at: 11:48:25 31.16' Pipe vole / EDG03_026-D, OR d dd d serVice LoadfAndltion It only 1 condition(s) shown in full Page 6 LOADING CwoxTION A 60 Mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: M I. ELEV APPLY -LAND -AT LOAD ...... F01 S...... ...... MOMENTS ..... TYPE RPDIUS AZI AII IIIM3IZ DOWN VERTICAL TOISNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip G 34.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 c 33.5]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0300 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0084 0.0000 0.0000 c 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0120 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 31.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0186 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0233 0.0000 0.0000 c 29.0]] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0116 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 c 25.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0403 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 c 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1020 0.0000 0.0000 c 1].91] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 c 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 c 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 c 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 c 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 c 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 c 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 c 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 31.080 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0049 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0047 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 MAXIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CSLCULATED(w.r.t. wind direction) -------------------- MAST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... .........ROTATIONS (de,)...... ... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOM! ........ TILT .......... TWST ft AL. ACROSS AL. ACROSS 31.1 0. GIN 0. Ow O. SON 0.03H 0. We O.00c ............................................63...........66........... 23.3 0.0]N O.00e O.00H 0.03H O.00e O.00c 15.5 0. OCH 0. Ow 0. 00C 0.02h 0. We O.00c ................................................................ 6 OX ].8 O.OM O.00e O.00c O.OLN O.00e O.00c 0.0 0. 00A 0. 00A 0. 00A 0. 00A O. GOA O. GOA ...................................................................... NACOMUM POLE FMCES CALCULATED(w.Lt to wind direction) MAST TOTAL SHEAR. W. C t. WIND. SIR MOMENT. W. r. t. No. OIR TORSION ELEV PXIAI ALCNG ACROSS ALONG 40105G ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 31.1...................................................................... 0.27 K 0.03 L 0.00 B -0.07 K 0.00 C 0.00 K 1.00 I 0.11 L 0.00 B -0.55 I 0.00 B 0.00 B 23.3...................................................................... 1.00 A 0.11 D 0.00 I -0.55 H 0.00 B 0.00 C 1.61 A 0.15 D 0.00 I -1.54 H 0.00 B 0.00 I 15.5...................................................................... 1.61 I 0.15 H 0.00 F -1.54 H 0.00 B 0.00 C 2.17 I 0.18 H 0.00 F -2.82 H 0.00 B 0.00 C 7.8...................................................................... 2.17 K 0.18 H 0.00 L -2.82 H 0.00 B 0.00 C 2.71 K 0.22 H 0.00 L -4.39 H 0.00 c 0.00 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.71 K -0.22 H 0.00 L 4.39 H 0.00 c 0.00 c .PLIANCE with 4.8.2 & 4. 5.4 ELEV AXIAL BENDING SHEAR + TOTAL SATISFIED O/t(W/t) MAX Page 7 Page 8 T IMAL ALLMEO ft 31.08...................................................................... O.00K O.00K O.00L O.00K Y6 42.67A 400.0 0.001 0.001 O.00L 0.001 Y6 42.67A 400.0 23.31...................................................................... O.00A O.00H O.000 O.00H Y6 42.67A 400.0 O.00A 0.01 O.000 0.01 Y6 42.67A 400.0 15.54...................................................................... 0.001 0.01 O.00H 0.01 Y6 42.67A 400.0 0.001 0.01 O.00H 0.02H Y6 42.67A 400.0 7.77.................................................................. .. .. O.00K 0.01 O.00H 0.02H Y6 42.67A 400.0 O.00K 0.02H O.00H 0.02H Y6 42.67A 400.0 0.00...................................................................... MAXIMUM LOADS ONTO FCUDATION(W. Lt Wind direction) CONN SHEAA.W.LtWINO.0IR ..T. W. r. t. WIND. OI0. TpiSION ALONG ACROSS ALM'AC0.�S kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.71 0.22 0.00 -4.39 0.00 0.00 H L H C C Page 8 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DE LI VE 1E1) SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 22 Site Name: EUG03_026-D, OR Dale: 12/9/2020 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSUTIA 222-H Pole Data Diameter: 16.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 'e' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Base Plate Results Plate Data Anchor Rod Results Moment, Mu: 11.03 ff-kips Allowable m'Fy: Axial, Pu: 3.26 kips Maximum Put: Shear, Vu: 0.54 kips mt'Rnh Eff. Width: 11.15 in Vu: Anchor Rod Data mv'Rnv: Tension Interaction Ratio: Quantity: 4 (multiple of 4) Maximum Puc: Diameter: 1 in mc'Rnc: Rod Material: F1554 Vu: Strength (Fu): 125 ksi mc'Rnvc: Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Compression Interaction Ratio: BC Diam. (in): 19.5 BC Override: 19.5 Maximum Interaction Ratio: Base Plate Results Plate Data Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 6.18 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.14 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.01 7.60 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.14 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.12 12.0% Pass 4.8 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 10.6% Pass Page 9 Base Plate (Mu/Z): Width (in): 19.5 Width Override: 19.5 Allowable m'Fy: Thickness: 1 in Base Plate Interaction Ratio: Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 11.15 in Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 6.18 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.14 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.01 7.60 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.14 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.12 12.0% Pass 4.8 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 10.6% Pass Page 9 LPile for windows, version 2019-11.001 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled shafts subjected to Lateral Loading using the p -y Method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, inc. All Rights Reserved This cagy of LPile is being used by: Keith Tindall sabre rowers and Poles serial Number of security Device: 227885948 This cagy of LPile is licensed for exclusive use by: sabre communications corporation use of this program by any entity other than sabre communications corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Files used for analysis Path to file locations: \Program Files (x86)\Ensoft\Lpile2019\files\ Name of input data file - 19 -2283 -EPG apt. 22.lp11d Name of output report file - 19 -2283 -EPG apt. 22.lp110 Name of plot output file - 19 -2283 -EPG apt. 22.1pllp Name of runtime message file - 19 -2283 -EPG apt. 22.lpllr Date and Time of Date: December 9, 2020 rime: 12:14:48 Problem Title site EuW3_026-D, oR Tozer 31.16' S. rt stack Prepared for 35 INFRAsImJC URE PARTNERS Iob Nunber 19 -2283 -EPG mt. 22 Engineer KIT Program options and settings computational axions- - conventional Analysis Engineering units used for Data input and computations- - us customary system units (pounds, feet,inches) Analysis control options: - maximum number of iterations all axed 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection 100.0000 in - Number of pile increments 100 Loading Tyr and Numberofcycles of Loading: - stats 1 g sped - use of p -y modification factors for p-Yue v s rot selected - Analysis uses layering r ection (meth dofeeorgiadis) - No distriuted lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 10 - input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - m utation of pile -Mad foundation stiffness matrix not selected - wasp-Ovranalysis Of pile not selected - Buckl ing analysis Of pile not selected output options: - output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Report only s v tables Of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maxima shear ryorce in output report file. - No p-y c ves to be computed and reported for user-specified depths - Print u ingwide report formats Pile structural Properties end Geometry Pumper of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 6.083 ft Depth of ground surface below tap of pile 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. pg curveseng computed usipile diameter depth lues interpolated with dth over the length of the pile. A summary Of values of pile diameter vs. depth follows. Depth Below vile Point vile Head of ameter NO. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.083 36.0000 input structural Properties for vile sections: vile section NO. 1: section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or CLDH pile Length of section 6.083333 ft shaft Diameter 36.000000 i shear capacity of section 0.0000 Its Ground slope and vile Batter Angles -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ground slope Angle 0.000 degrae 0.000 rad ns Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degme 0.000 ratlians soil and Rock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance frau tap of pile to top of layer 0.083333 ft Distance frau tof pile to bottom of layer 1.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer 14.400000 psf undrained cohesion at bottom of layer 14.400000 psf Epsilon -SO at tap of layer 0.100000 Epsilon -SO at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer 1.083333 ft Distance from tope of pile to bottom of layer 20.083333 ft Effective unit ght at top of layer 110.000000 pcf Effective unit might at bottom of layer 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesion at bottom of layer 1000.000000 psf Epsilon -SO at tap of layer 0.010000 Epsilon -SO at bottom of layer 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 14.000 ft below the pile tip) summary Of input soil Properties Page 11 Layer soil Type Layer Effective undrained E50 Layer Name Depth unit ON. cohesion Or Nun. (p -y curve Type) ft pcf psf krm 1 soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 Total Area of Reinforcing steel clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 stiff clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 W/O free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pile - static Loading Type Axial structural capacities: ------------ values of top y vs. pile lengths can be computed only for load types with static loading criteria were used when mMuting p -y curves for all analyses. File -head Loading and vile -head Fixity conditions Nunber of loads specified - 2 Load Load condition condition Axial Thrust Compute TOP y Run Analysis 36.000000 i Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) NO. Type 1 2Force, Nunber of Reinforcing Bars lbs . vile Length ------------ 1 1 v 720.000000 lbs m 176480. in -lbs 4347. No Yes 2 1 v 220.000000 lbs m 52680. in -lbs 29000000. psi 2710. No Yes v shear force applied nor al to pile axis Total Area of Reinforcing steel 5.301438 sq. in. m bending Potent applied to pile head percent Edge -DO -Edge Bar spacing y lateral deflection normal to pile axis 6.626343 maximum Concrete Aggregate size S pile slope relative to O iginal pile batter angle Ratio of Bar spacing to Aggregate size 8.84 R rotational stiffness applied to pile head Pile - 0.0000 in Axial structural capacities: ------------ values of top y vs. pile lengths can be computed only for load types with NOM. Axial structural capacity - 0.85 FC AC + pacified shear loading (Load Types 1, 2, d 3). 4621.528 kips Tensile Load for cracking Of Concrete Thrust force is assume tl to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. -318.086 kips -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- conputations of Norinal mmrent capacity and Nonlinear Bending stiffness ________________________________________________________________________________ Axial thrust force values were determined fron pile -head loading conditions Nunber of vile sections Analyzed 1 Pile section No. 1 - Di Pensions : Dimensions and Properties of Drilled shaft (Bored vile): Length Of section 6.083333 ft Sha Diameter 36.000000 i Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Nunber of Reinforcing Bars 12 bars Yield stress Of Reinforcing ears 60000. psi modulus Of Elasticity Of Reinforcing Bars 29000000. psi cross Area of shaft 1018. Total Area of Reinforcing steel 5.301438 sq. in. Area natio Of steel Reinforcement0.52 percent Edge -DO -Edge Bar spacing 6.626343 maximum Concrete Aggregate size 0.750000 i Ratio of Bar spacing to Aggregate size 8.84 Offset of center of Rebar cage from center of Pile - 0.0000 in Axial structural capacities: ------------ NOM. Axial structural capacity - 0.85 FC AC + FY As - 4621.528 kips Tensile Load for cracking Of Concrete -486.917 kips Nori nal Axial Tensile capacity -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions used in carputations: Bar Bar Dies. Bar Area x Y Number inches sq. in. i rches inches __________ __0_750___ __0_441___ 1 0.750000 0.441786 _14_25____ 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 ].125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 1.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 122.310862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 ].125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -].125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -1.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -122.310862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -].125000 Page 12 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by LPile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to sero 6.626 inches between bars 7 and S. patio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate sice - 8.84 concrete Properties: f concret th oof SOW. psi motlulussofeElasticit concrete 1030509. psi modulus of pupture of concrete -530.330086 psi strain congression strain at Peak stress 0.002109 Tensile strain Fracture of concrete -0.0001150 maximum coarse aggregate sise Ag 0.750000 in Number of axial Thrust Force values Determined from vile -head Loadings - 2 Nunber Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.]10 2 4.347 of mesults for Nominal moment capacity for section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain - 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mem. cap. max. comp. No. kipsin-kip strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.710 4895.709 0.00300000 2 4.347 4918.380 0.00300000 Note that thevalues f moment capacity ' the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). in Act 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate PoPent capacity according to Act 318, section 9.3.2.2 or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followingg table resents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stiffne computed for common resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial mesist. Nominal ult. (Fac) ult. (Fac) Bend. stiff. Load Factor moment ca, AS. Thrust Moment Cap at Nlt Mm No. for momentin-kips kips - n -kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ------------ ---------------------- 1 0.65 4896. 1.761500 3182. 415445]]. 2 0.65 4918. 2.825333 3197. 41]]8251. 1 0.75 4896. 1.897.70 3672. 39884008. 2 0.75 4918. 3.042667 3689. 40135133. 1 0.90 4896. 2.032500 4406. 26327717. 2 0.90 4918. 3.260000 4427. 26469924. Layering correction equivalent Depths of soil & pock Layers ---------- TOPofequivalent Layer Below ToBelowth sameceapor Lmmoyck o integral integral NO. vile Head trod sort Layer is eel ON for Layer for Layer ft ft above pock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0. DO N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer n+1 equals the sun of the FO and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layeri n9 c cti on equivalent depths arecomputed only fors 1 type with both rshallow-depth and deepdepthexpressions for peak lateral load transfer. Theses 1 types are soft and stiff clays, non -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- summery of Pile -head mesponses for conventional Analyses Definitions of Pile -head Loading conditions: Page 13 Load Type 1: Load 1 shear, v, lbs, and Load 2 mom m, m, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 - shear, v, lbs, and Load 2 - slope, s, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 shear, v, lbs, and Load 2 no, stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 moment, m, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 slope, s, radians Load Load Load Axial vile -head vile -head max shear max mom m case Type vile -head Tvvp vile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n vile n vile NO. 1 Load 1 2 Load 2 lbs inches radians lbsin-lbs ------------------- 1 v, lb 720.0000 ------------------------------ m, in -1b 176480. —---------------------------- 4347. 0.1445 -0.00311 -5925. —-------- ]86816. 2 v, lb 220.0000 m, in -1b 52680. 2710. 0.00]80 -4. 20e-05 -1506. 55763. maximum pile -head deflection 0.1444915612 inches maximum pile -head rotation -0.0031056033 radians - -0.1]]938 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 14 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 11.03 Shear (k) 1 0.54 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 3 0.083333 6 250.00 20.51 540 500.00 3 O.B4= (2.34P)/(S, b) 4.78=0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h/A))'M] Page 15 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHEET:I DESCRIPTION: Tl I TITLE SHEET TC1 I VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TC2 I PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR E0003 026 SITE ADDRESS: 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP PROJECT CONTACTS AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: A&E MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: cp1261Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG PH: 971-295-6924 EMAIL: jmalbergQj5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: wl729kQatt.com CONTACT: MIKE SLOTEMAKER PH: (206) 321-1116 EMAIL: mslotemakerQj5ip.com PH: (206) 214-8954 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE, LAYOUTS AND PROCEDURES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), LATEST EDITION, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. 2. PRIOR TO ANY ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE. 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LANE CLOSURES INCLUDING SIGNS, CONES, BARRICADES, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHOUT ACTUAL LANE CLOSURES AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CLOSURES. 4. SELECTION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIANS, AND WORKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) - PART VI "TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL", AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION 5. ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS, DISTANCES, AND TAPER LENGTHS MAY BE EXTENDED TO ADJUST FOR REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CURVATURE OF THE ROADWAY AND FOR ACTUAL TRAFFIC SPEEDS IF IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED LIMITS. 6. TAPERS SHALL BE LOCATED TO MAXIMIZE THE VISIBILITY OF THEIR TOTAL LENGTH 7. CONFLICTING OR NON-OPERATING SIGNAL INDICATIONS ON THE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SHALL BE BAGGED OR COVERED. 8. ALL (E) ROAD SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR PLOWABLE PAVEMENT REFLECTORS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE (N) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED, OR RELOCATED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE RESTORED TO MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. 9. CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED LIMIT IF REDUCED FROM POSTED LIMITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD AND WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 10. TAPER LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: L= WS2/60 (40 MPH AND HIGHER) OR L2 = WS (OVER 40 MPH), WHERE W = OFFSET WIDTH (FT), S = TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH). 11. THE SPACING BETWEEN CONES, TUBULAR MARKERS, VERTICAL PANELS, DRUMS, AND BARRICADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED A DISTANCE IN FEET EQUAL TO 1.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TAPER CHANNELIZATION, AND A DISTANCE IF FEET EQUAL TO 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TANGENT CHANNELIZATION. 12. WHERE DICTATED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND WORKER CROSSING LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING HIGHWAY JURISDICTION AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "FLAGMEN" OR POLICE SUPERVISION, IF REQUIRED. 14. ALL EXCAVATED AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND PLACED ON A MINIMUM 6H:1 V SLOPE WITHIN THE CLEAR ZONE ARE TO BE EITHER BACKFILLED OR PRECAST CONCRETE CURB BARRIER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SET TEMPORARILY IN PLACE TO SHIELD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 15. CONES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR DRUMS AND INSTALLED UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION PROVIDED THEY COMPLY WITH MUTCD. 16. THERE SHALL BE NO WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER VEHICLES IN THE BUFFER SPACE OR THE ROLL AHEAD SPACE. 17. DRIVEWAYS AND/OR SIDE STREETS ENTERING THE ROADWAY AFTER THE FIRST ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE ROAD WORK AHEAD SIGN AS A MINIMUM. 18. WHEN CHANNELIZATION DEVICES HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF LEADING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OUT OF THE INTENDED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SPACE, THE CHANNELIZATION DEVICES SHOULD BE EXTENDED A DISTANCE IN FEET OF 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE TRANSITION AREA. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (TTCP) LOCATION MAP PREPARED FOR: All ♦ • 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 LANS PREPARED BY: r* INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. LNumber:LA Q $4 Springdale Ave h Qol Loop N cloverleaf Loop m d m HiQ. ^ `0a nrookdale Ave Gateway Livingp f� Brookdale Ave b o` v z v o o a A _wa` w Oakdale d A q M qve $ m o i Oakdale Ave Oakdale Ave Oakdale Ave Oakdale AveO mvr sNG_mn McKenzie Meadow Apam WORK ZD� o m Eugene Springfield ' Fire Station 5 ek`em v Chateau Gardens Merl Care NORTH A Spring Valley S T Assisted Living Willamette Dental G m - SpringfieldSpe PREPARED FOR: All ♦ • 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 LANS PREPARED BY: r* INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: TITLE SHEET Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. LNumber:LA J3 SIGN SPACING AND BUFFER LENGTHS (FEET) POSTED SPEED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS "BUFFER" SPACE A B C 20 100 100 100 50 25 75 30 100 35 350 350 350 125 40 150 45 500 500 500 180 50 210 55 250 60 700 700 700 285 65 325 70 365 WORK HOURS: 9AM-5PM M -F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND SPEED 40 ROAD SPEED BARRIER WORK AREA TRAFFIC SIGNAL �" Rono TRAFFIC WDRK CONTROL AHEAD SIGN T TRAFFIC SIGN 30'-0" 0 30'-0" 18' 6' SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NORTH DVJ PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: A151NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IF Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: F TC1 A 100' 100' 100' TEMPORARY "NO PARKING" 30'-0" 0 30'-0" 18' 6' SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NORTH DVJ PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: A151NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IF Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: TC1 A 2 of 3 NOTE: MAINTAIN S PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AT ALL TIMES & PROVIDE FLAGGERS TO ASSIST PEDESTRIANS THROUGH THEW OR KAREA DURING ALL WORK HOURS. WORK HOURS: 9AM-5PM M -F -NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING THIS PLAN & KEEP RECORD OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM TRAFFIC CONTROL LEGEND SPEED 40 ROAD SPEED BARRIER WORK AREA TRAFFIC SIGNAL �" RonD TRAFFIC WORK CONTROL AHEAD SIGN T TRAFFIC SIGN OAKDALE AVE 25 ° 0 0 ° 0 ° ° 0 ° ° 0 ° 0 ° 15 I NORTH ° 30'-0" 0 30'-0" SCALE: Y' = 30'-0" PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN PREPARED FOR: 11 • 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN Address: IN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. 2791 S CLOVERLEAF LOOP SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477. Sheet Number: Rev: TC2 A 3 of 3