Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/28/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SPRINGFIELD W 0, Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone: Company: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 16221 NE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 96052 Applicant's Rep.: 3acey Becton Phone: Company: Mastec Network Solutions E-mail: jacey.becton@mastec.com Address: 22263 68th Ave S, Kent, WA 96032 Property Owner: Century -Link (CTL) Phone: Company: Century -Link (CTL) E-mail: Address: 111 A St. Cheney WA 99004 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NOS : Adj Parcel # 1703253404300 Property Address: 1565 Mohawk BLVD, Springfield, OR97477 (Pole # A0358063) Nearest Intersection : Mohawk Blvd & Olympic St ROW ❑ Private Property❑ Description of SUB Dght pole and Century -link pole to be combined and owned by CrL. Mastec to attach AT&T associated Proposal: equipment to new pole. Existing Use: Utility Pole Si §natures: Please si n and rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: lApplication Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Applicant: ,f,4 u"°' Date: 9/23/2020 Signature Kristy Weaver, AT&T Area Manager Print Owner: If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Print re Date: I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submit checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best rmation. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the ere are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: Date: Plot Plan Preparer Signature Print • Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revisec 5121/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts TypesAllowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 :-IasTec Network Solutions December 11, 2020 City of Springfield Attn: Liz Miller Development and Public Works Department 225 5'^ Street Springfield, OR, 97477 VIA Email to Liz Miller RE: Request to Construct Small Wireless Facilities on Replacement Structures Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Development and Public Works Department, On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T') we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on a replacement structure within the public right-of-way.The facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Proiert Description This request includes one facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities' pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on a replacement structure in the public right-of-way. AT&T ID Omer/Pole Tym Location Proposed Heieht EUG02-00-A Century Link Owned Pole Nearest address: 18934-014 A0358063 1565 Mohawk Blvd, 14824047/208174 Springfield, OR 97477 List of Permits/Aemements Requested AT&T has already entered into a MAA and ROW agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facilities: • Type l Wireless Telecommunications Systems Development application FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm City of Springfield will review AT&T's applications pursuant to the FCC's new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined in 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be constructed on [a) new or replacement structure[s) are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 12/11/2020. • Absent tolling, City of Springfield must take final action by 02/09/2020. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by 12/21/2020. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets it notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot dock does not reset; instead, it is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision is made. Small Wireless Facility Application Filing Page 2 Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Erin Omzzw Erin Osmus Mastec Network Solutions 22263 68'^ Ave S Kent, WA 98032 erin.osmus@mastec.com Enclosed: -Type 1 MDS Minor Small Cell Application -Construction Drawings -Photosim -Narrative -Structural Analysis -Signed Consent/Letter of Authorization -FCC SWF w 60 -day Cover Letter Application Narrative Small Wireless Facility (Type I Review) Project Name: EUG02-014-A/MRWOR034904 NatureofApplication: Applicant New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CAT&T") proposes the installation of a small wireless Facility (" SWF") on a replacement (Century Link owned) wood pole in Mohawk Blvd right-of-way. Project Location: Nearest address is 1565 Mohawk Blvd, Springfield, OR 97477 Current Site Conditions: The location of Century Link's existing wood utility pole is in Right of Way near the right-of-way of 51' Street. PROPERTY/ROW APPLICANT: APPLICANT'S REP: OWNER: New Cingular Wireless PCS, Jacey Becton City of Springfield LLC (AT&T) Mastec Network Solutions 225 5° Street 16221 NE 72nd W ay 22263 68fl, Avenue S. Springfield, OR 97478 Redmond, WA 95052 Kent, WA 95032 SITE: Utility Pole ifQ -�cx. nun euro - t � Scone of Work Century Link has approved a replacement pole to be located entirely within the right-of-way, on the east side of the road. The existing 24' 0" wood pole will be replaced with a pole of 38' 6", an increase of approximately 14 Ys feet The SWF attachments to be installed are one canister antenna, one equipment cabinet, an RRIL one disconnect/surge suppressor, 2 combiners and 3 conduits. The existing pole will remain energized until the replacement pole has been set and facilities transferred Applicable Criteria Applicants for a SWF in the public right of way (ROW) must provide the following information and fors required under Springfield Municipal Code (SMC) 3.212 and Springfield Development Code (SDC) 4.3- 145: 1. Provide a completed Type I Wireless Telecommunications Services Development application, including all information required to show compliance with relevant standards in SDC 4.3-145F and G. SDC 4.3-145F. and G. Relevant Standards to Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right of Way: SDC 4.3-145F. 28—Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right of Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: a. Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: L 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or it. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. Applicant's Response: The replacement pole is 38'6" in height, meeting this standard. AT&T's canister antenna is mounted below the highest point of the pole. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. Applicant's Response: The canister antenna is shown as 2.4 cubic feet in volume on page A-6 of the plan, detail 2. c. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. Applicant's Response: In aggregate, all of the equipment on the structure does not total more than 28 cubic feet d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than 6 cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. Applicant's Response: The antenna proposed is not more than 6 cubic feet in volume. e. Antennas may not project more than 5 feet above or 2 feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to addeve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. Applicant's Response: The canister antenna is the same diameter as the pole and does not project more than 5 feet above or two feet laterally (the distance from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole is 10.65 inches). f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. Applicant's Response: Plan Sheet A-4 shows the Disconnect/Surge Suppressor and the equipment cabinet to be more than 10 feet above grade. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush~ mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this Section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. Applicant's Response: All exposed equipment falls within the exception which includes the antenna, antenna equipment and power disconnect. IF All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. Applicant's Response: The plans show that all cabling and wires are running through conduit L All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. Applicant's Response: AT&T's antenna, equipment cabinet, and conduit will be painted fairfax brown to be compatible with replacement wood utility pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Applicant's Response: Fxistng overhead utilities are tobeutlized. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: L A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. U. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right of way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. Hi. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Applicant's Response: The proposed plans meet criterion (i). The replacement pole is to be relocated approximately 2' from its cuff cut location (in order to move it into the right of way). 1. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. Applicant's Response: The replacement pole is not a decorative light pole. an. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Applicant's Response: The facility is not located within the Historic District SDC 4.1145G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: L A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility. For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; Applicant's Response: A structural report is includedwith this application, which was stamped by Raphael Mohamed, an Oregon licensed Professional Engineer. ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; Applicant's Response: A photo simulation is included with this application. iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and Applicant's Response: A Springfield Utility Board Letter of Authorization and Cons cut is included with this application. iv. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Applicant's Response: AT&T will obtain an electrical pehmit for the proposed installation. CenturyUnk- Letter of Authorization New Cingurlar Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) Attn: Kristy Weaver 16621 NE 72n^ Way Redmond, WA 98052 To Whom it May Concern: LUMEN' 12/01/2020 Lumen/Centurylink is giving AT&T, through the use of an approved vendor, formal authorization to attach their previously approved small cell equipmentto the following Lumen/Centurylink owned poles (see Alden One reference numbers), after Mastec/Potelco has completed all make-ready work. Here is a list of present locations: # le Alden One PACE# Site Identifier SCID ID CCL PoTicket# Node Address MRWOR034904 EU602-014-A 18934-014-A A0358063 1021137 1565 Mohawk Blvd, Springfield, OR, 97477 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Richard J. Harms Sr. Joint Use Manager Wa. Or. Id. Mt.. Wy. Sd. Nd. Ca. 111 A St. Cheney Wa 99004 509-235-3349/702-466-9707 Ricbard.j.harms@1umen.com EXISTING _ rI LETS LETS America, Inc. 112 S a11SNE RD. SIE 1 WALK K MIN MKKE (4W 961-9151 IER PAU. �: MILCRNLI9J b"CasOec Network So;utio65s 223a 6oRS AFllf. W. 161 KI �Om APROPOS IAT&T CANISTER ANTENNA MODEL : GALTRONICS/GD2412-08813 ■ (1) PROPOSED AT&T uRSCALE RRH'S '(1)uPROPOSED AT&T STAND-OFF ANTENNA MOUNT ENIE NG W CONNECTION -PROPOSED AT&T EOUIPMEM ENCLOSURE .MODEL COMMSCOPE/SSC-780238114 '. . 1 I r,PROPOSED AT&T DISCONNECT/ SURGE SUPPRESSOR -(MODEL RAY /RSCAC-1333-PS-240-A ny. RRIER: 5" INFORMATION: VIEW SITE NAME: EUG02-014-A SCIP ID #: 18934-014 * `t ��� SITE TYPE: WOOD LIGHT POLE .: LATITUDE: 44° 03'32.72" N (44.05909) VIEW OF LONGITUD: 122° 59' 59.30" W (-122.99980) POLEFACINC- 1031 DMOND`. SX2 SITE ADDRESS: 1565 MOHAWK BLVD SOUTHWEST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 COUNTY: LANE SHEET 1/1 December 7, 2020 Jacey K. Becton 4300 Stockton or, North Little Rock, AR 72117 Tel(501)351-6416 Jacey.Becton@mastec.com Subject: Node Information: Engineering Firm Designation: Dear Jacey, -M a sTe c Network Solutions Mastec Network Solutions 507 Airport Blvd, Suite 111, Morrisville, NC 27560 Tel (919) 674-5895 M NS. Engineering@mastec.com Wood Pole Structural Analysis Report Carrier: Node ID: Node Type: MasTec Network Solutions Project Number: AT&T EUG02-014 45 ft Class 3 Douglas Fir 24881 -SCAT MasTec Network Solutions is pleased to submit this Structural Analysis to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned structure. This analysis has been performed in compliance with the 1017Nationa/ Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and the 1018 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (055C). Based on our analysis we have determined the structural strength to be sufficient: 1. This analysis assumes the existing guy wire is rated for a strength of at least 19WIlbs. if this is not the case or the rating can not be confirmed, the existing guy wire is to be replaced by an SM 3/16" or better wire. 2. This analysis assumes no groundwater is encountered during pole installation. If groundwater is encountered during installation the EOR must be contacted in order to proceed with installation. We at Mastec Network Solutions appreciate the opportunity of providing continued specialty services. Please do not hesitate to contact our office should you have any questions. EGO PROFS Prepared By: �F'PS ,OZ Reviewed By:N 778iIPE Arienna Wilson -Muller, EIRaphael Mohamed, PE, P. Eng Structural Engineer II i _I E Senior Director of Engineering apnapalyrea ryaap�el monemm 0 OR PE License No. 77528PE ori:lrmnam�maarerem.. 9Ay' fWn'to,'�P�rV Raphael Mohamedou-�wg11M'h o,k °o� qfL MoN 0I Urea ao�oasax, D 11 1 NW:2Q012 m m 112$0srr EXPIRES: 12/3120 If this Rem has been digRallysgned and sealed by Bryan Madaren, PE. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the sgnature must be verified on any electroniccopies. Pole ID:EUG02-014.pplx O-Calc®Pro Analysis Report Monday, December 7,2020]:12W Pole Num: EUG02-014 Pole Length / Class: 45/3 Code: NESC Structure Type: Guyed Tangent Aux Data 1 Unset Species: DOUGLAS FIR NESC Rule: Rule 2508 Status Guy Wires Adequate Aux Data 2 Unset Setting Depth (ft): 6.50 Construction Grade: C Pole Strength Factor: 0.85 Aux Data 3 Unset G/L Circumference (in): 37.31 Loading District: Medium Transverse Wind LF: 1.75 Aux Data 4 Unset G/L Fiber Stress (psi): 8,000 Ice Thickness (in): 0.25 Wire Tension LF: 1.30 Aux Data 5 Unset Allowable Stress (psi): 6,800 Wind Speed (mph): 39.53 Vertical LF: 1.90 Aux Data 6 Unset Fiber Stress Ht. Reduc: No Wind Pressure (psf): 4.00 Latitude: 44.059090 Deg Longitude: -122.999800 Deg Elevation: 0 Feet Pole Moments ft -lb) Load From Worst Wind Load Angle Pole Capacity Utilization (%) Height Wind Angle (deg) (ft) (deg) Maximum 17.2 0.0 354.1 Groundline 17.2 0.0 354.1 Vertical 1.2 20.1 270.0 Pole Moments ft -lb) Load From Worst Wind Load Angle Wind Angle Angle on Pole (deg) (deg) Max Cap Util 15,563 344.0 354.1 Groundline 15,563 344.0 354.1 GL Allowable 93,217 Capacity (%) (deg) Guy System Component Summary Load From Worst Wind Individual Maximum Load Angle on Pole Description Lead Length Lead Angle Height Nominal Wind Angle Max Load Wind Angle (ft) (deg) (ft) Capacity (%) (deg) Capacity (%) (deg) Single - 12' - Soil Class 4 10.0 90.0 2.8 354.1 6.2 270.0 • SM 3/16 (Down) 21.1 40.5 354.1 89.9 270.0 System Capacity Summary: Adequate Adequate User:awlsonmuler MASTEC OCP 5.03 -Includes Load Fador(s) Page 1 of4 'Wast Vend PerGuy Wire a Wnd At 354.1" Pole ID:EUG02-014.pplx O-Calc®Pro Analysis Report Monday, December 7,20207: 12 PM Groundline Load Summary - Reporting Angle Mode: Load - Reporting Angle: 344.0° Owner Heigh[ Hartz. Cade Sagad Shear Applied Bending Applied Pole Bending Vertical Vertical Total Pole Load* Load Moment Moment Capacity Stress Load Stress Stress Capacity Morrnht' Obs) (%) (ft -Ib) (%) (%) (+/-psi) (Ibs) (psi) (psi) (%) Powers 30 5.0 924 5.9 1.0 68 35 0 69 1.0 Comms 140 23.4 3,078 19.8 3.3 228 53 0 228 3.4 GuyBraces -74 -12.3 -1,530 -9.8 -1.6 -113 949 9 -105 -1.5 GenericEquipments 255 42.6 6,432 41.3 6.9 476 627 6 482 7.1 Pole 212 35.4 4,046 26.0 4.3 300 2,247 20 320 4.7 Streetlights 35 5.8 2,606 16.8 2.8 193 180 2 195 2.9 Insulators 0 0.0 7 0.0 0.0 1 19 0 1 0.0 Pole Load 599 100.0 15,563 100.0 16.7 1,152 4,111 37 1,189 17.5 Pole Reserve Capacity 77,654 83.3 5,648 5,611 82.5 Load Summary by Owner - Reporting Angle Mode: Load - Reporting Angle: 344.0" Owner Heigh[ Hartz. Cade Sagad Shear Applied Bending AppliedPole Tension Bending Vertical Vertical Total Pole Load- Load Moment Moment Capacity Stress Load Stress Stress Capacity Morrnht' (Ibs) (%) (ft -Ib) (%) (%) (+/-psi) (Ibs) (psi) (psi) (%) <Undefined> 387 64.6 11,517 74.0 12.4 853 1,864 17 869 12.8 Pole 212 35.4 4,046 26.0 4.3 300 2,247 20 320 4.7 Totals: 599 100.0 15,563 100.0 16.7 1,152 4,111 37 1,189 17.5 Detailed Load Components Power Owner Heigh[ Hartz. Cade Sagad Cade Leai/Span Span lMre Tension Tension OffaM VSrrd Mwreht (ft) Offset Diarrnter Max Weight Length Angle Lr.;h (Ibs) Morrnht' MomerM' MwreM' &GL* I 1+^) (n) Term I ( ft) Ift) Ideal lal Ift46) (ft4b) (ft46) (ft4b) a Secondary TRIPLEX6AWG 30.95 6.60 0.5800 0.48 0.113 50.0 90.0 W.0 250 -2,767 3 466 -2,298 Secondary TRIPLEX6AWG 3095 6.60 0.5800 0.48 0.113 W.0 270.0 W.0 250 2,767 3 466 3,236 Totals: 0 5 932 938 Comm Owner Height Nortz- Cade Saga' Cade LeaNSpan Span W. Teresa.Tension Offset VBrrtl Moment Ift) Oasd Diaretar Matt Weight Length A.* Length (bs) Moment' MomeW MarreM• ra GL* M) (1111) Term Ian) la) (deg) la) Ift4lb) Ift4b) Ift4lb) Ift4b) a Oaedashed eundle 1/V EHS 22.08 7.13 0.2500 0.06 0.121 W.0 270.0 W.0 333 2,629 9 309 2,947 CATV CAW .50 22.03 7.13 0.5700 0.600 W.0 270.0 W.0 22 155 177 Tomis: 2,629 30 465 3,124 Ussamwtlsonmuler MASTEC OCP: 5.03 - Includes Load Factorial Page2cf4 'Wars) Wnd Par Guy W. aVVndAt354.1- Poll ID:EUG02-D14.pplx O-Calc®Pro Analysis Report Monday, December], 2020]: 12 PM GBOerICEQUIpmeOt Owner OwrMr HeigM1[ (ft) Honz. Offset n Oftse[ Angle Rotate Angle tle Uni[ Weigh[ lbs Uni[ Height in Ilnil Depth m Uni[ Diameter Il Unit Length m Offset Moment• ft46 Wntl Moment• H-0 Moment at GL• ft46 Cylinder Get... G02412- 37.50 44.72 0.0 0.0 17.20 24.90 -- 10.00 - it] 447 564 lin) 06613 in(deg) (deg) (deg) lbs in in in in) (ft4b) jft-0 ft46 General Streetlight-12ft.Aon 32.00 Box Standoff Mount 35.50 22.11 0.0 0.0 43.00 16.00 34.54 - 6.00 145 297 442 Box AzScale 646 RRH 35.50 22.64 0.0 0.0 25.00 11.60 1.60 - 10.60 86 326 412 Cylinder Z'Conduit 2].50 11.31 260.0 0.0 8.00 264.00 -- 2.00 - 1 695 697 Cylinder Z'Conduit 2].50 11.31 270.0 0.0 8.00 264.00 -- 2.00 - 4 695 699 Cylinder Z'Conduit 2].50 11.31 280.0 0.0 8.00 264.00 -- 2.00 - 6 695 701 Box Spice Box 21.61' 12.16 0.0 0.0 10.00 12.00 3.00 - 12.00 19 234 252 Cylinder Z'Conduit 19.25 5.80 90.0 0.0 20.00 462.00 -- 2.00 - -5 851 846 Box Commscape 18.00 14.87 0.0 0.0 175.00 44.00 20.00 - 21.00 3% 1,272 1,668 SSC760236114 (Loaded) Box Surge Suppressor 16.50 14.30 270.0 0.0 8.00 10.43 6.68 - 9.38 5 89 94 Cylinder Z'Conduit 8.25 12.45 90.0 0.0 8.00 19800 -- 2.00 - -4 156 152 Totals: ]]0 5,756 6,526 Streetlight Owner Heigh[ Horiz. Offset Rote Unit UnitUnit Unit Unit Unit Offset Wird Moment New Ift) I (ft) Offset Angle Angle Weigh[ Height Depth Diameter Length Moment- Mm oent• .GL• Ift) lin) in in(deg) (deg) (deg) lbs in in in in) (ft4b) jft-0 ft46 General Streetlight-12ft.Aon 32.00 4.05 0.0 0.0 95.00 36.00 20.00 3.00 144.00 1,524 1,121 2,645 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.00 5 0 5 624 Totals: 1,524 1,121 2,645 Insulator Owner ownerHal lad Heigh Horiz. Offset Ro[.e Unit Unit Unit oft. Offs. Wind I anent. (Loads and Reactions) New Ift) I (et Offset Angle Angle Weight Diameter Length Length Mannal GL* let (psi) Ift) lin) in tle (deg) lbs it m ft46 ft46 ft46 J41odc J41odc 31.00 0.00 270.0 270.0 5.00 3.00 0.00 1 0 1 J41odc J41ook 22.08 0.00 0.0 0.0 5.00 3.00 0.00 5 0 5 624 299 -82 -1,553 Totals: ] 0 ] GUyWfeendBfeCe Owner Attach lad Heigh LeadiSpan Wire Percent Lead! Anje Incline Wire Weight Res[Lengh Stretch Marrwnt. (Loads and Reactions) New Ift) I Length Diameter Solid (deg) I Angle (Ibai (ft) Length At Report GL' let (psi) Ift) lin) (%1 (lbs) (deg) (lost t1 ) (in) SM 3/16 Down 21.08 0.00 10.00 0.188 75.00 90.0 64.4 0.0]3 29.21 0.51 Guy Wire and Brace Elastic Rates! Guy Allowable Initial Loaded Mazinwn Appfetl Vertical shear Load Shea Loatl Marrwnt. (Loads and Reactions) Modulus Tell Strength Tension Tension Tension•' Tensterh' Tetsuo• Load In Guy Di At Report GL' (psi) Strength Factor (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lost t1 ) t1 ) t1 ) Angle (ft -0) goal Ibsl 3x W16 Down 2.30e+7 1,900 0.90 1,710 700 1,537 1,397 692 624 299 -82 -1,553 Tats: Ill 299 42 4,553 Usx:adlsanmuler MASTEC OCP 5.03 -Includes Load Factorial Page 3.4 x Wast Wind Par Guy W. ' Wnd Al 354.1" Pole ID:ElGD2-D14.pplx O-Calc®Pro Analysis Report Monday, December 7,20207: 12 PM Mchor/Rod Load Summary owner Rod Length Lead Length Lead Angle Strength of AnchorlRod Allowable Max Load' Load at Pde Max AGL (ft) (deg) Assembly Strength Load (lbs( MCU• Required Ice Density Pole Tip (in) Buckling Buckling Obs) Factor (Ibs) Section Obs) Capacity- (%) 9ngle-12"-Soil Class4 0.00 10.00 900 25,000 1,00 25,000 1,537 892 6.1 Pole Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Minimum Diameter at Diameter at Modulus of Pole Ice Density Pole Tip Buckling Buckling Buckling Constant COlurm Section Section Buckling Tip GL Elasticity Density (pcf) Height Load Load Load Factor Height' Height Diameter Diameter at (in) (in) (psi) (pcn (ft) Capacity at Applied at of Safety (ft) (%Buckling (in) GL Height Height Col. Hgt.) (in) (Ibs) (Ibs) 0.11 20.05 33.00 11.09 8.93 7.32 11.88 1.60e+6 60.00 57.00 38.50 344,801 3425,63 83.33 Usel:awilsonmuler MASTEC OCP 5.03 -Includes Load Factor(s) Page 4 of 4 'Wast Wind Pa Guy W. 'Wind At 354.0 Embedded Pole Site ID: I EUG02-014 TIA Revision:© Moment (kip -ft) 15.563 kip -ft Axial Force (kips)l 1 1kips Shear Force (kips)l 0.599 1kips r Diameter 1.022 Ift Depthl 6.5 Ift Soil Lateral Capacity Bottom Thickness Top (ft) (ft) (ft) Dv=O (ft from TOC) 1.61 Soil Safety Factor 1.35 Max Moment (kip -ft) 16.65 Rating 98.8% Soil Vertical Capacity 30 Skin Friction (kips) 4.51 End Bearing (kips) 4.31 Total Capacity (kips) 8.82 Axial (kips)l 5.07 Rating ME§ 57.5% Soil Parameters Groundwater Depth (R) Ultimate Bearing (ksf) Layer Bottom Thickness Top (ft) (ft) (ft) Cohesion Ysoil (pct) (ksf) Angle of Friction (degrees) SPT Blow Count 110 0 30 1 0 1 110 0 30 2 1 4