HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/8/2020'Pty of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
ISPNINOFI�
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Prospective James Limerick
A licant Name: hone: 541-923-6607
Company: Hayden Homes LLC Fax:
Address: 2464 SW Glacier Place Suite 110 Redmond OR 97756
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: Scott Morris, PE
Phone: 541-302-9790
Company: A & 0 Engineering LLC
Fax:
Address: 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 ��cot{mUrriS QU-C f • Go'•r`�
Property Owner:
Phone:
Company:y SSR Investments, LLC Fax:
Address: PO Box 2617 Eugene, OR 97402
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-04-00
TAX LOT NOS :2800
Property Address: 5400 Mount Vernon Road Springfield, OR 97478
Size of Property: 72.87 Acres ® Square Feet ❑
Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: single family residential subdivision with associated infrastructure
Existing Use: Vacant
# of Lots/Parcels: 108
Av . Lot/Parcel Size: approx 61 8s7
Density: approx 7.4 acre
Prospective
Applicant: Date: 2020
s gnat re
SLvri MO.4-1 a� Ua�.,,I nF Ns��•-•- ��..-+s LLL
Print
Required
this
InformationIntake , complete rr ppII_
yy��f/��ririp
Case No.: I I —000 S - I a, Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ b�
Technical Fee: $0
Posta a Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: L� -®') I PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of
Development Issues Meeting Process
The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development
opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or
standards change.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
• The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
• Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.
• We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
• The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the
meeting.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting
• The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.
• The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
• Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
• The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report.
Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the time of complete application submittal.
® Development Issues Meeting Application Form
® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
FA Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
® North arrow
® Date of preparation
Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
❑ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMS Related to Land Divisions
Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
® How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
[� Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
❑ Parking and circulation plan
Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3
Woodland Ridge—Future Phases
Development Issues Meeting Questions
12/8/2020
1. Tax lot 307 (East side) has an existing panhandle that extends to Mt. Vernon Road and prohibits
connection to Holly Street and Pinehurst Street. Will the City of Springfield procure this
property to insure these future connections?
2. It is possible that phases 3 & 4 would be in the northern portion of the site within the current
City Limits. Would the City allow connection to the wastewater system with the UGB area
(outside city limits) in an easement to attach to the trunk line by the railroad tracks?
3. Same question as N2, but related to storm. Would the City allow the detention ponds outside
the current City Limits line be constructed to service these phases prior to annexation and be
placed in easements?
4. Will the City and Lane County approve a roadway connection to Mount Vernon Road in the
approximate location shown on the tentative site plan?
5. Are there any potential issues on the property that we should know about? (i.e. assessments,
other issues the City knows about).