Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/8/2020'Pty of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) ISPNINOFI� Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective James Limerick A licant Name: hone: 541-923-6607 Company: Hayden Homes LLC Fax: Address: 2464 SW Glacier Place Suite 110 Redmond OR 97756 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Scott Morris, PE Phone: 541-302-9790 Company: A & 0 Engineering LLC Fax: Address: 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 ��cot{mUrriS QU-C f • Go'•r`� Property Owner: Phone: Company:y SSR Investments, LLC Fax: Address: PO Box 2617 Eugene, OR 97402 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-04-00 TAX LOT NOS :2800 Property Address: 5400 Mount Vernon Road Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 72.87 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: single family residential subdivision with associated infrastructure Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: 108 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: approx 61 8s7 Density: approx 7.4 acre Prospective Applicant: Date: 2020 s gnat re SLvri MO.4-1 a� Ua�.,,I nF Ns��•-•- ��..-+s LLL Print Required this InformationIntake , complete rr ppII_ yy��f/��ririp Case No.: I I —000 S - I a, Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ b� Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: L� -®') I PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ® Development Issues Meeting Application Form ® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. FA Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ® North arrow ® Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ❑ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ® How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review [� Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Woodland Ridge—Future Phases Development Issues Meeting Questions 12/8/2020 1. Tax lot 307 (East side) has an existing panhandle that extends to Mt. Vernon Road and prohibits connection to Holly Street and Pinehurst Street. Will the City of Springfield procure this property to insure these future connections? 2. It is possible that phases 3 & 4 would be in the northern portion of the site within the current City Limits. Would the City allow connection to the wastewater system with the UGB area (outside city limits) in an easement to attach to the trunk line by the railroad tracks? 3. Same question as N2, but related to storm. Would the City allow the detention ponds outside the current City Limits line be constructed to service these phases prior to annexation and be placed in easements? 4. Will the City and Lane County approve a roadway connection to Mount Vernon Road in the approximate location shown on the tentative site plan? 5. Are there any potential issues on the property that we should know about? (i.e. assessments, other issues the City knows about).