Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 12/3/2020DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Northwood Christian Church MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, January 7, 2021, 1:30 — 2:30 PLACE: Virtual via GoToMeeting CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird Current Planning Staff: J Donovan, L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Carifio Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW ✓ Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW) Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Principal Engineer, Development S Public Works ✓ Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works ✓ Eric Phillips-Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire S Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development S Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District ✓ Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) ✓ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) ✓ Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning S Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or. us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities S Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools ✓ Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW ✓ Chris Moorhead, DPW City Surveyor ✓ Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation (Steve Gallup, cc only) Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM) Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 6151616 Meeting Date; Thursday, January 7, 2021 1:30 — 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -20 -000232 -PRE 811-20-000237-PROJ Northwood Christian Church Assessor's Map: 17-03-25-11 TL 2300 Address: Marcola Road Existing Use: Vacant Applicant has submitted proposal for new location for church Planner: Andy Limbird The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.soringfield-or.Dovtweblink8lbrowse.asox City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD I& Required Project Information (Applicant: Prospective Applicant Name: complete Phone: this section) 541-746-2790 Company: Northwood Christian Church Fax: Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: WilliamA Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Architecture, PC I Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Phone: 541-746-2790 Company: Northwood Christian Church I Fax: Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-25-11 TAX LOT NOS : 02300 Property Address: Marcola Road and V Street, Springfiled, Oregon Size of Property: 8.15 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Construct a new church facility Existing Use: Vacant Land # of Lots Parcels: 1 Avg. Lot Parcel Size: 354,900 sf Densit : WA du/acre Prospective n Applicant: V Signattureune 'lM lL1 W i I I iam A Randal I Print Case No.: Date: Date: 1 Dec 2020 Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 380 LINCOLN STREET Srg.m. Orvgen 97401 541-344-3332 www.arborsouth.com I December 2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I NORTHWOOD CHRISTIAN CHURCH Marcella Road and Street 1 17-03-25-1 1-02300 Northwood Christian Church is planning to build a new church facility on the parcel noted herein.The property is zoned CC, Community Commercial and churches are permitted outright in this zone (SDC 3.2-310).The church fronts on Marcola Road, an arterial street and the future extension of V Street, a collector street (Must front on a collector or arterial street per SDC 4.7-130). Irving Slough, a local wetland, runs through and at the edge of the parcel at the west and north. Surrounding properties are Community Commercial (at the east and a portion of the west), Single Family Residential (portions of the west and north) and a small portion of Medium Family Residential (at the northeast). QUESTIONS I. SCREENING FROM RESIDENTIAL: Springfield Development Code 4.4-1 10 requires screening (either a 6 ft hedge or 6 ft fence) when abutting residential zones.This would be the northern portion of the west property line and the entire north property line. Since no proposed building are within 100 feet of the adjacent residential properties (indeed, the range of setback is 260 to over 400 feet), is there the ability to eliminate this requirement? The Irving Slough, a local wetland borders most of the area where screening would need to occur and it seems to conflict with what is desired for the wetland areas. 2. STORMWATER:WiII we be required to detain all stormwater onsite or are we able to treat on-site, then distribute post -development flow into the existing storm system? With the local wetlands at the Slough, can our stormwater be directed there? We also have plans for a future bridge across the slough to the future High School building and the overflow parking lot; are there any special requirements for the bridge? 3. MONUMENT SIGN:The church would like to install a monument sign on the property, facing Marcella Road.We assume the provisions of SMC 8.200, specifically 8.248 in the Community Commercial zone would apply, is this correct? We assume we are allowed a maximum 100 sq ft for one face and 200 sq ft for two or more faces at a maximum of 20 ft above grade is allowed, is this correct? It is unclear to us from the Sign Code whether or not internal illumination allowed. Could you clarify? SMC 8.248(4) discusses external illumination requirements, but seems silent on internal illumination. yet in a CC zone, internal illumination seems appropriate. 4. BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS:T here is no maximum building height in the CC zone and we believe we are meeting all of the setback requirements from the parking areas and buildings. Do you see any issues with the parking and building locations that would cause concern? What setbacks will be required from the Slough? Is there a f rm, delineated edge line for the wetland that we could measure that setback from? We do not anticipate there being an issue, but want to be sure. VEHICLEAND BICYCLE PARKING:The church facility is approximately 44,788 sq ft total.About 10,000 sq ft is the main assembly space. Per SDC 4.6-125, we calculate 100 required vehicle parking spaces for the main assembly space and 174 for the remainder of the building, totaling 274 spaces. We are providing 239 spaces (including 40 at the overflow west of the slough), including 7 standard accessible spaces and 2 "wheelchair user only" spaces (per OSSC 1 106.1). Per SDC 4.6-1 10(L), it appears we can reduce the required 274 spaces by up to 20%, resulting in a minimum number of vehicle spaces of 220. Is this a correct assumption? We are also providing 705 seats in the main auditorium. Based on a ratio of I bicycle parking space per 20 seats, we calculate the need for 36 bicycle parking spaces (all short-term), with at least 13 sheltered (50% of those spaces over 10).We also believe we will need to provide 4 oversize spaces (109'.). Are these also a correct assumptions? We would also like to disperse the bicycle parking since there are so many required spaces and locating all of the bicycle parking and ADA spaces at the main entry would, frankly, be cluttered. Is it possible to disperse some of the bicycle parking spaces among various entries to the facility (SDC4.6-150(A)(3)(a): "primary point of entry to the use")?