HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 12/3/2020DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM
APPLICANT: Northwood Christian Church
MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, January 7, 2021, 1:30 — 2:30
PLACE: Virtual via GoToMeeting
CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird
Current Planning Staff: J Donovan, L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Carifio
Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW
✓ Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW
Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW)
Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works
Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager
Kristi Krueger, Principal Engineer, Development S Public Works
✓ Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works
✓ Eric Phillips-Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire S Life Safety Department
Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development S Public Works
Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
✓ Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
✓ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
✓ Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP)
Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District
Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Matt Caswell, Planning S Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division
(odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or. us)
Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board
Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board
Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools
Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities S Operations; Springfield Public Schools
Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools
✓ Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official
Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department
Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director
Luke Pilon, CenturyLink
Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW
✓ Chris Moorhead, DPW City Surveyor
✓ Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services
Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation (Steve Gallup, cc only)
Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director
Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911
Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas
Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable
Water Resource Coordinator, ESD
Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District
Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request)
Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM)
Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations)
Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and
file to Shannon. Thanks!
Revised: 06/08/2020
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
MEETING
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL
225 FIFTH STREET
DPW Conference Room 6151616
Meeting Date; Thursday, January 7, 2021 1:30 — 2:30
1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -20 -000232 -PRE 811-20-000237-PROJ Northwood Christian
Church
Assessor's Map: 17-03-25-11 TL 2300
Address: Marcola Road
Existing Use: Vacant
Applicant has submitted proposal for new location for church
Planner: Andy Limbird
The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for
you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.soringfield-or.Dovtweblink8lbrowse.asox
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPRINGFIELD
I&
Required Project Information (Applicant:
Prospective
Applicant Name:
complete
Phone:
this section)
541-746-2790
Company: Northwood Christian Church
Fax:
Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: WilliamA Randall
Phone:
541-344-3332
Company: Arbor South Architecture, PC
I
Fax:
Address: 380 Lincoln Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401
Property Owner:
Phone:
541-746-2790
Company: Northwood Christian Church
I
Fax:
Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-25-11
TAX LOT NOS :
02300
Property Address: Marcola Road and V Street, Springfiled,
Oregon
Size of Property: 8.15 Acres ® Square
Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Construct a new church facility
Existing Use: Vacant Land
# of Lots Parcels: 1
Avg. Lot Parcel Size: 354,900
sf
Densit
: WA du/acre
Prospective n
Applicant:
V
Signattureune 'lM lL1
W i I I iam A Randal I
Print
Case No.: Date:
Date: 1 Dec 2020
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: 0
Posta
a Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3
380 LINCOLN STREET
Srg.m. Orvgen 97401
541-344-3332
www.arborsouth.com
I December 2020
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I NORTHWOOD CHRISTIAN CHURCH
Marcella Road and Street 1 17-03-25-1 1-02300
Northwood Christian Church is planning to build a new church facility on the parcel noted
herein.The property is zoned CC, Community Commercial and churches are permitted
outright in this zone (SDC 3.2-310).The church fronts on Marcola Road, an arterial street
and the future extension of V Street, a collector street (Must front on a collector or arterial
street per SDC 4.7-130). Irving Slough, a local wetland, runs through and at the edge of the
parcel at the west and north. Surrounding properties are Community Commercial (at the
east and a portion of the west), Single Family Residential (portions of the west and north)
and a small portion of Medium Family Residential (at the northeast).
QUESTIONS
I. SCREENING FROM RESIDENTIAL: Springfield Development Code 4.4-1 10 requires
screening (either a 6 ft hedge or 6 ft fence) when abutting residential zones.This would
be the northern portion of the west property line and the entire north property line.
Since no proposed building are within 100 feet of the adjacent residential properties
(indeed, the range of setback is 260 to over 400 feet), is there the ability to eliminate this
requirement? The Irving Slough, a local wetland borders most of the area where
screening would need to occur and it seems to conflict with what is desired for the
wetland areas.
2. STORMWATER:WiII we be required to detain all stormwater onsite or are we able to
treat on-site, then distribute post -development flow into the existing storm system?
With the local wetlands at the Slough, can our stormwater be directed there? We also
have plans for a future bridge across the slough to the future High School building and
the overflow parking lot; are there any special requirements for the bridge?
3. MONUMENT SIGN:The church would like to install a monument sign on the property,
facing Marcella Road.We assume the provisions of SMC 8.200, specifically 8.248 in the
Community Commercial zone would apply, is this correct? We assume we are allowed a
maximum 100 sq ft for one face and 200 sq ft for two or more faces at a maximum of
20 ft above grade is allowed, is this correct? It is unclear to us from the Sign Code
whether or not internal illumination allowed. Could you clarify? SMC 8.248(4) discusses
external illumination requirements, but seems silent on internal illumination. yet in a CC
zone, internal illumination seems appropriate.
4. BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS:T here is no maximum building height in the CC
zone and we believe we are meeting all of the setback requirements from the parking
areas and buildings. Do you see any issues with the parking and building locations that
would cause concern? What setbacks will be required from the Slough? Is there a f rm,
delineated edge line for the wetland that we could measure that setback from? We do
not anticipate there being an issue, but want to be sure.
VEHICLEAND BICYCLE PARKING:The church facility is approximately 44,788 sq ft
total.About 10,000 sq ft is the main assembly space. Per SDC 4.6-125, we calculate 100
required vehicle parking spaces for the main assembly space and 174 for the remainder
of the building, totaling 274 spaces. We are providing 239 spaces (including 40 at the
overflow west of the slough), including 7 standard accessible spaces and 2 "wheelchair
user only" spaces (per OSSC 1 106.1). Per SDC 4.6-1 10(L), it appears we can reduce the
required 274 spaces by up to 20%, resulting in a minimum number of vehicle spaces of
220. Is this a correct assumption? We are also providing 705 seats in the main
auditorium. Based on a ratio of I bicycle parking space per 20 seats, we calculate the
need for 36 bicycle parking spaces (all short-term), with at least 13 sheltered (50% of
those spaces over 10).We also believe we will need to provide 4 oversize spaces (109'.).
Are these also a correct assumptions? We would also like to disperse the bicycle parking
since there are so many required spaces and locating all of the bicycle parking and ADA
spaces at the main entry would, frankly, be cluttered. Is it possible to disperse some of
the bicycle parking spaces among various entries to the facility (SDC4.6-150(A)(3)(a):
"primary point of entry to the use")?