Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/3/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD I& Required Project Information (Applicant: Prospective Applicant Name: complete Phone: this section) 541-746-2790 Company: Northwood Christian Church Fax: Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: WilliamA Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Architecture, PC I Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Phone: 541-746-2790 Company: Northwood Christian Church I Fax: Address: 2425 Harvest Lane, Springfield, Oregon 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-25-11 TAX LOT NOS : 02300 Property Address: Marcola Road and V Street, Springfiled, Oregon Size of Property: 8.15 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Construct a new church facility Existing Use: Vacant Land # of Lots Parcels: 1 Avg. Lot Parcel Size: 354,900 sf Densit : WA du/acre Prospective n Applicant: V Signattureune 'lM lL1 W i I I iam A Randal I Print Case No.: Date: Date: 1 Dec 2020 Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ® Development Issues Meeting Application Form ® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ® Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" ❑X Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ® North arrow ® Date of preparation ® Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ® Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ® On-site diainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review ❑x Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ® Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ® Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 380 LINCOLN STREET Srg.m. Orvgen 97401 541-344-3332 www.arborsouth.com I December 2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I NORTHWOOD CHRISTIAN CHURCH Marcella Road and Street 1 17-03-25-1 1-02300 Northwood Christian Church is planning to build a new church facility on the parcel noted herein.The property is zoned CC, Community Commercial and churches are permitted outright in this zone (SDC 3.2-310).The church fronts on Marcola Road, an arterial street and the future extension of V Street, a collector street (Must front on a collector or arterial street per SDC 4.7-130). Irving Slough, a local wetland, runs through and at the edge of the parcel at the west and north. Surrounding properties are Community Commercial (at the east and a portion of the west), Single Family Residential (portions of the west and north) and a small portion of Medium Family Residential (at the northeast). QUESTIONS I. SCREENING FROM RESIDENTIAL: Springfield Development Code 4.4-1 10 requires screening (either a 6 ft hedge or 6 ft fence) when abutting residential zones.This would be the northern portion of the west property line and the entire north property line. Since no proposed building are within 100 feet of the adjacent residential properties (indeed, the range of setback is 260 to over 400 feet), is there the ability to eliminate this requirement? The Irving Slough, a local wetland borders most of the area where screening would need to occur and it seems to conflict with what is desired for the wetland areas. 2. STORMWATER:WiII we be required to detain all stormwater onsite or are we able to treat on-site, then distribute post -development flow into the existing storm system? With the local wetlands at the Slough, can our stormwater be directed there? We also have plans for a future bridge across the slough to the future High School building and the overflow parking lot; are there any special requirements for the bridge? 3. MONUMENT SIGN:The church would like to install a monument sign on the property, facing Marcella Road.We assume the provisions of SMC 8.200, specifically 8.248 in the Community Commercial zone would apply, is this correct? We assume we are allowed a maximum 100 sq ft for one face and 200 sq ft for two or more faces at a maximum of 20 ft above grade is allowed, is this correct? It is unclear to us from the Sign Code whether or not internal illumination allowed. Could you clarify? SMC 8.248(4) discusses external illumination requirements, but seems silent on internal illumination. yet in a CC zone, internal illumination seems appropriate. 4. BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS:T here is no maximum building height in the CC zone and we believe we are meeting all of the setback requirements from the parking areas and buildings. Do you see any issues with the parking and building locations that would cause concern? What setbacks will be required from the Slough? Is there a f rm, delineated edge line for the wetland that we could measure that setback from? We do not anticipate there being an issue, but want to be sure. VEHICLEAND BICYCLE PARKING:The church facility is approximately 44,788 sq ft total.About 10,000 sq ft is the main assembly space. Per SDC 4.6-125, we calculate 100 required vehicle parking spaces for the main assembly space and 174 for the remainder of the building, totaling 274 spaces. We are providing 239 spaces (including 40 at the overflow west of the slough), including 7 standard accessible spaces and 2 "wheelchair user only" spaces (per OSSC 1 106.1). Per SDC 4.6-1 10(L), it appears we can reduce the required 274 spaces by up to 20%, resulting in a minimum number of vehicle spaces of 220. Is this a correct assumption? We are also providing 705 seats in the main auditorium. Based on a ratio of I bicycle parking space per 20 seats, we calculate the need for 36 bicycle parking spaces (all short-term), with at least 13 sheltered (50% of those spaces over 10).We also believe we will need to provide 4 oversize spaces (109'.). Are these also a correct assumptions? We would also like to disperse the bicycle parking since there are so many required spaces and locating all of the bicycle parking and ADA spaces at the main entry would, frankly, be cluttered. Is it possible to disperse some of the bicycle parking spaces among various entries to the facility (SDC4.6-150(A)(3)(a): "primary point of entry to the use")?