Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 11/3/2020,city of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIrLD Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Ira Lucia (ninthstprop@outlook.com) Phone: 971-226-8784 Company: Ninth St. Properties, LLC I Fax: n/a Address: 17605 NW Autumn Ridge Drive, Aloha, OR 97006 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Jason Goshert Qasong@sswengineers.com) Phone: 541-485-8383 Company: SSW Engineers Inc. Fax: 541-485-8384 Address: 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Laura Romine & Ronald Auxier Phone: Company: n/a I Fax: n/a Address: 5735 Mineral Way, Springfield, OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-24 TAX LOT NOS : 11900 Property Address: 431 35th Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 0.93 Acres / 40,527 Square Feet Acres ❑x Square Feet ❑x Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: 6 lot residential subdivision to accommodate 1 existing dwelling & 5 future dwellings Existing Use: Residential (existing single-family dwelling, detached garage, yard) # of Lots/Parcels: 6 Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: 5991.5 sf Densit : 6+ du/acre Prospective n Applicant: J\Ie,_ Date: 10/2872020 Signature Ira Lucia (Member of Ninth St. properties, LLC) Print Case No.: Date: I Z Reviewed by: L, �fl Application Fee: $ 40 Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: $ 0 L1-) PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist x❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. 0 Development Issues Meeting Application Form 0 Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. x❑ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" X❑ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' X❑ North arrow X1 Date of preparation ❑X Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ❑x Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ❑X Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑X On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions ❑X Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots nla Q How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review Q-Prepesed- and -existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height n1a F-1 Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑X Park ng and circulation plan (access driveway / fire apparatus access road & turnaround) Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 November 3, 2020 Development to Springfield Development &Public Warks 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 ENGINEERS,a OR SHUMUL wiwmmiu wmnn wnmrUNXln RE: Development Issues Meeting 2350 Oakmora Way, Suke 105 p g (UI1M) Eugene, OR 97401 431 35th Street, Springfield , OR (541) 485-8383 Fax (541) 485-8384 www.sswengineers.com Description of Proposal: The prospective applicant plans to apply for tentative approval of a 6 lot subdivision of the property comprised of"fax Lot 11900 of Assessors Map 17-02-31-24, located at 431 35th Street The subdivision is currently planned to accommodate one future single family dwelling each within proposed Lots 1 through 5 and an existing single family dwelling to remain within proposed Lot 6, as depicted on the preliminary plans included with this submittal. The subject property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (LDR), and is designated Low Density Residential per the Metro Plan. Five (5) Questions: 1. Due to the shape and orientation of the subject property relative to the adjacent street, and in order to make the best use of available space and comply with applicable density requirements, two (2) standard lots with frontage on 35th Street and four (4) panhandle lots in the rear (easterly) portion of the property with shared access from 35th Street are proposed. However, there is not quite enough existing street frontage to accommodate the four (4) stacked panhandles totaling the required minimum 26 feet of frontage as well as two (2) standard lots with the typically required minimum 60 feet of frontage each. This is further exacerbated by the need to comply with the required minimum 5 foot interior yard setback on the north side of the existing dwelling to remain within proposed Lot]. We are therefore planning on submitting an application for a Minor Variance concurrent with the Tentative Subdivision application to request approval for proposed Lot 1 to have a reduced street frontage of 54.22 feet as opposed to the typical 60 foot minimurn on north -south streets. This would constitute a 9.63% adjustment to the street frontage standard, well below the allowable 30% threshold pursuant to the Minor Variance Criteria at SDC 5.21-125(A)(2), and proposed Lot I would still comply with the applicable minimum 5,000 square foot lot area requirement for standard lots on north -south streets in the LDR zoning district. Does the City concur with, or have any concerns about this strategy? 2. Will dedication of additional right-of-way for 35th Street be required, and if so how much? 3. City standard drawings / specifications for residential driveway aprons note that driveway apron transition wings shall not extend beyond the projection of a property line. In order to make the best use of the limited space available within the site, we are planning for the both the necessary 20 foot wide shared driveway / fire apparatus access road and vegetated stormwater management facilities to be contained entirely within the 26 foot total width of the stacked panhandles IIowever, this results in the southerly driveway apron transition wing extending beyond the projection of the north properly line of proposed Lot 1 as depicted on the preliminary plans. Will this be acceptable considering that said property line is internal to the proposed subdivision as opposed to being adjacent properly under separate ownership? 1=4110903M 4. Will only the first 18 feet of the proposed shared driveway / fire apparatus access road be required to be paved, what paving materials are acceptable (e.g. concrete vs. asphalt paving), would gravel be an acceptable surface for the remainder of the driveway beyond 18 feet, and if so would said gravel surface be considered pervious or impervious for purposes of stormwater management considerations? 5. What electric, communications and water distribution improvements (including fire hydrants) are anticipated to be necessary to serve the proposed development, including likely routes / locations thereof and necessary easements? NOTE: Distances to the nearest existing fire hydrants are dimensioned on the preliminary plans, and we are tentatively planning for water, electric and telecommunications service lines (W -E -T) to be located within ajoint trench under the proposed shared driveway as conceptually depicted on the preliminary plans. Prepared by: SSW Engineers Inc. Jason Coshert, Project Manager Survey & Land Use Planning Tehnician PAGE 2 OF 2