Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/25/2020iCity of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision SPNINGFIELG wo Application Type (Applicant: check • Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal: Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Steve Williams 541-337-5791 Com an TFax,one: Address: P.O. Box 31, Walterville, OR 97489 Applicant's Rep.: Lloyd L. Tolbert, LS Phone; 541-359-8426 company: Tolbert Associates, LLC Fax: Address: P.O. Box 22603, Eugene, OR 97402 Property Owner: Steve Williams Phone: 541-337-5791 Company: Fax: Address: P.O. Box 31, Waterville, OR 97489 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-28-34 TAX LOT NO 5 : 500 & 600 Property Address: 6315 & 5335 High Banks Road, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 3.3 Acres Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Subdivision: High Banks Estates Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: To create a 22 Lot residential subdivision Existing Use: Tax Lots 500 & 600 = Single Family Residential # of Lots/Parcels- 21 Total acreage of parcels/ 125,716 S fl proposed # allowable densi 4 Dwell units 21 Si natures: Please si n and Drint your name and date in the a ro riate box on the next race- Information Associated Applications: Si ns: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: Technical Fee: Posta a Fee: TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 117114 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided it not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Signature Steve Williams Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. 0 Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. x1 Land Division Tentative Application Form El Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. 7 Copy of the Deed ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. EJ Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to S'/:'x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. 0 Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: El All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑ All plan sets must be folded to 81/2' by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Q Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 ❑� Vicinity Map Q The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of Flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and Floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑� The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑� Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan 0 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor ❑ City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division ❑� Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division Ful Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ❑ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination EEI Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. Q Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways 0 Location of existing and proposed transit facilities 00 Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Q Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised I17/14 kl 5 of 10 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points ❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated ❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan Q Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ❑Q Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns ❑� The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ❑a• Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ❑� Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement ❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 ki 6 of 10 ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer ❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 117114 ki 7 of 10 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 87477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www. spingfrokl-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Areabelow this bnefilledondbyAppbkrvnO -- — (Please return to Clayton A&Eachern @ City ofSprirglield Development cud Public Works, Fas #736-1021, Phare #736-1036), email:cnaeurlern@sprbgllieldor.gov Project Name: High Banks Estates Applicant: GOEBEL ENGINEER Assessors Parcel #: 17-02-28-34 #500 & 600 Date: 6-29-2018 Land Use(s): R-1 Phone #: Project Size (Acres): 3.3 Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: 0.4 Email: 541-687-0542 scott@goebeleng.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): 22 Lot subdivision Drainage Proposal (Public connedion(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Infiltration swale, no overflow or outlet to public infrastructure. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Public drywells and individual private lot infiltration planters. (Area below this line tilled and by the City and Aehvned k the Applicant) (At a mbdmmtu, all boxes checked by the City on the frond and backofdds sheet shall be subndtted or on TLlication to be coniltletefor submittal, although other requirements tuare be necessas. Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study —(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: #27-Chahahs ❑ Other Jurisdictions X N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@sprirgfeb-orgov, FAX (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Bmedupon tie tnformntion provided on tie front ofthis sheet, the follmving represents a Pimiento of rvhrd is neededfor an applicedion to be complete for subndttal with respect to droinoge; however, this list sh ouldnat be usedin lieu ofihe Springfield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Designblmool. ConWharrce with these requirements does not constitute site approval, Adrbtionned site specific tnfornsntion nary be required. Note: Upon striping sheet submitted, ensure completedforne hos been signed in the space provirkd below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered cawhbasin w/oil filtration media) for stomuwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stomuwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stomuwater Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For newNBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach maybe followed as specked by the Eugene Stomuwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1). ❑ If a stomuwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomuwater Management Manual. ❑ ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be Provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stomuwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0 ❑ ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ ❑ Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Maiming's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to Other/MisceOaneous ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stomuwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. ❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: htto:/Avww. deg. state. or.usAva/uic/uic.him for more infomuation. ❑ ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year stoma events. *Thisform shall be inchukd m nn rdtnehmen4 inside the frouteover, ofthe stormnWer shady. * IMPORTANT.' ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAND SICN.� As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above req d items complete a included with the submitted stomm mer study and plan set. Signature Date 27 July 2020 Fomu Version 5: June 2015 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR HIGH BANKS ESTATES ASSESSOR'S MAP 17-02-28-34, TAX LOTS 500 & 600 CRITERIA CONFORMANCE STATEMENT GENERAL CRITERIA August 3, 2020 This criteria conformance statement was written to accompany the Tentative Subdivision Application for High Banks Estates. The subject property contains 3.3 acres and is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential). The applicant is proposing to divide the property into 21 Lots as shown on the attached Tentative Plan. There are existing single-family residences on Lots 1 and 18 which will remain. The remaining Lots are currently vacant. Lots 1, 2, and 18 will take direct access off High Banks Road. Lots 3 through 17 and 19-21 will take access off of the proposed extension of 53rd Place. In this written statement SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements and SDC 5.12- 125 Tentative Plan Criteria are addressed to demonstrate that this application clearly meets all of the SDC requirements and criteria. Wthin this document, the SDC text excerpts are in italics and the applicant's responses are in plain text. SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements A. General Requirements. 1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18"x 24". The services of and Oregon registered Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. The tentative subdivision plan has been prepared by Lloyd L. Tolbert, PLS 2813 of Tolbert Associates, LLC, an Oregon licensed land surveyor. 2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally 1" = 50', 1 ° = 100' or 1" = 200'. The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 30'. which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the amount of data needing to be shown. 3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. A north arrow and date are included on the tentative subdivision plan that is being submitted with this application. 4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Subdivision Tentative Plan. The name and address of the property owner/applicant, surveyor, and engineer are noted on the plan. 5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area awned by the partitioner or subdivider of which the proposed land division is a part. A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show Tax Lots 500 & 600 that owned by the subdivider. 6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. No City boundary, Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, cross or abut the proposed land division. 7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property. The zoning of the subject property is LDR (Low Density Residential) and is noted on the Tentative Subdivision Plan. The total lot area for Lots 1 through 21 is 125,716 square feet (net acreage 2.886 acres) resulting in a density of 7.62 units per net acre. In the Metro Plan the plan designation for the subject property is low density residential. All adjacent properties are also LDR. 8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are clearly labeled on the tentative subdivision plan drawing. 9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property afterplatting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. Existing structures are depicted on the tentative subdivision plan along with their setbacks and proposed future use. 10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. The existing sanitary sewer line, stormwater facilities, and water mains are all shown and labeled on the attached plan. In addition, the plan shows the proposed sanitary sewer connection locations for each parcel. Stormwater is proposed for collection in the proposed streets and directed to the stormwater infiltration swale which is depicted in the attached Storm Study. 11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing orproposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division, the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. All existing and proposed easements are shown on the attached tentative subdivision plan drawing set. See Proposed Subdivision Layout sheet for details. 12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved forpublic use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated. The streets as shown are proposed to be dedicated to the City of Springfield concurrent with final plat recording. B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. The attached Tentative Subdivision Plan drawing includes the General Requirements, Site Assessment items, and Stormwater items. The plan was prepared and signed by Lloyd Tolbert, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor. however, Scott Goebel, PE/PLS, an Oregon licensed civil engineer also reviewed the plan and utilized the topographic information to design the utility and infrastructure layout as shown. 1. The name/ location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQIM Map on file in the Development Services Department, There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property. therefore this requirement is not applicable. 2. The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specked in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision, The subject properties lie outside of the 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as depicted on FEMA FIRM Map number 41039C1 166F. 3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specked in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Service Department, The subject property falls outside the 20 -year time of travel zone for wellhead protection (WEYCO wellhead). 4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the (WLQtM Map and theirrlparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; There are no watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within the boundaries of the subject property. One foot contours per a physical site survey are shown on the plan. Significant trees are depicted on the site plan. 5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specked in the Soils Survey of Lane County, The subject project consist of 100° Chehalis -Urban land complex soil (type 27) as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. No high water tables are known to exist on the subject property. 6. Natural resource protection areas as specked in Section 4.3-117. There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property. therefore this requirement is not applicable. C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or mote, contours may be shown at 5 -foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed Civil Engineerprepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: 1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations, 2. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns, 3. The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to. drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds, stomnvater quality measures, and natural drainageways to be retained, 4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours, and 5. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in Section 4.3-110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the proposed stomnvater management system will accomplish its purposes. The Stormwater Management Plan is shown on Sheet C-1 of 2, Grading Plan and is accompanied by the attached Stormwater Report & Stormwater Management System Scope of Work by Goebel Engineering & Surveying Engineering. One foot contours are depicted hereon. D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code. 1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutterand sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights -0f --way within or adjacent to the proposed land division, The site is adjacent to High Banks Road. Details are shown on the attached tentative subdivision plan drawings. 2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan including the TransPlan any approved Conceptual Development Plan and the latest version of the Conceptual Local Street Map, Lots 1 and 18 are developed with single family residences with vehicular access onto High Banks Road. Lot 2 will take vehicular access onto High Banks Road via a proposed shared access easement with Lot 1 as depicted on the Tentative Plan. Lots 3 through 17 and 19 through 21 will take vehicular access from the proposed extension off 53rd place as depicted on the Tentative Plan. 3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planterstrip; The existing sidewalks on High Banks Road are shown on the attached plan. Sidewalks are designed into the proposed street right-of-ways. 4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, powerpoles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable, Where applicable, these items are shown on the proposed tentative subdivision plan set. 5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways where applicable, Lots 1 and 18 are developed with single family residences an currently take direct vehicular access onto High Banks Road. Per this application: Lots 1 & 2 will take vehicular access onto High Banks Road via a proposed shared access easement. Lot 3, 4 & 5 will take vehicular access onto 53rd Place via a proposed shared access easement. Lots 5 through 17 and 19through 21 will take direct vehicular access onto 53rd Place. Future driveways will be installed at the time of site development to serve the proposed lots. 6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination, The location of existing and proposed street lighting is indicated on C-2 the Site Wastewater and Utility Plan. The existing street lights along High Banks Road are LED Cobra Head luminaires. The proposed lights will be LED Cobra Head luminaires. Photometric analysis and final street light locations will be completed during PEPI permit process. 7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities, There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest transit stop is on 58th Street south of Thurston Road and is served by LTD Route 11. 8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT} facility, High Banks Road is a city street and not an ODOT facility, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 9. A Traffic Impact study prepared by a Traffic Engineer where necessary, as specified in Section 4.2-105A.4. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. There are two current dwellings and ninteen future dwellings on the proposed parcels which generate 9.57 trips per day per dwelling equals 201 trips per day or 20 peak hour trips and so will not cross the threshold of traffic volumes necessary for a traffic impact study to be required. E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: There will be no remainder parcels more than twice the minimum lot size in the LDR zone exclusive of easements, and the project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. F Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: 1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property, This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed subdividing and the existing use of the subject property. 2. If the applicant is not the property owner written permission fmm the property owner is required, The attached application form has been signed by the property owner. J. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and other transportationfiire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division, A vicinity map is shown on the Cover Sheet of the tentative subdivision plan set. 4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district, No oveday districts apply to the subject property. 5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable, Single-family residential is a permitted use in the LDR zone. thus no Discretionary Use Permit is required. 6. A Tree Felling Permit as specked in Section 5.19-100, A tree felling permit is not proposed 7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specked in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in Section 512-1208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water table as specked in the Soils Survey of Lane County, There are no slopes greater than 15% on this site, so a geotechnical report is not necessary or required. 8. An Annexation application as specked in Section 5.7-100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within Citys urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer, The subject property is located within the city limits. therefore no annexation application is necessary. 9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property, There are no existing wetlands on the subject site. therefore this requirement is not applicable. 10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently, No federal or state permits are required with this partition application. therefore this requirement is not applicable. 11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing, The applicant is hoping to construct this subdivision in 2021. Financing of the infrastructure will likely come from private sources. 12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowners Association Agreement where appropriate, No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed at this juncture. therefore this requirement is not applicable. 13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specked in Section 3.2- 230, This application is for a tentative subdivision and not a cluster subdivision. 14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specked in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specked in Section 5.12-125. (6286, 6211) This application is not for the subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. The Subject property is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential). Lots 1-2, 11-12 and 20-21 are oriented to an east -west street and accordingly the lots are at least 4500 square feet in area and have at least 45 feet of frontage. Lots 7-9, 15-16 and 19 are oriented on a north -south street and accordingly the lots are at least 5000 square feet in area and have at least 60 feet of frontage. Lot 14 and 15 are oriented on a north -south street and accordingly the lots are at least 5000 square feet in area with 34.9 and 57.0 feet of frontage, respectively, therefore the applicant is asking for an exception to the standard. Lots 6, 10, 17 and 18 are corner lots and accordingly the lots are at least 6000 square feet in area. Lots 10, 17 and 18 have at least 60 feet of frontage. Lot 6 has 35.20 feet of frontage therefore the applicant is asking for an exception to the standard. Lots 3-5 and 13 are panhandle lots and accordingly the lots are at least 4500 square feet in area in the pan portion and have at least 20 feet of frontage for a single panhandle and 26 feet of frontage for multiple panhandles. The proposed partition will satisfy this approval criterion regarding compliance with the SDC pertaining to parcel size and dimensions. B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The Metro Plan diagram clearly shows that the subject property is located within an area designated for low density residential development. which is consistent with the existing LDR (Low Density Residential) zoning district. This approval criterion is satisfied. C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity, sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities, and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director ora utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Current public infrastructures are in place to serve the proposed development except stormwater management. Therefore, an onsite Stormwater Infiltration System is proposed for all public improvements associated with this subdivision. D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. The future public utilities as shown on the attached tentative subdivision plan set will be constructed according to all applicable SDC and other regulations. Further review will occur through the City's public improvement review process once the subdivision is tentatively approved. This approval criterion will be satisfied. E Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions, areas with susceptibility of flooding, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and theirassociated riparian areas, otherripanan areas and wetland specked in Section 4.3-117,, rock outcroppings; open spaces, and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specked in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97740-760,358.905-955and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specked in this Code or in State or Federal law. The subject properties lie outside of the 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as depicted on FEMA FIRM Map number 41039C 1166F. There are no other significant physical features on this site. F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to. facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion, provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas, minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specked in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the COOT access management standards for State highways. All proposed lots contain adequate space for off street parking. The proposed street is a consistent extension of the existing street design for 531d Place, 28' wide paving in a 40' wide right-of-way. The existing two dwellings located on proposed Lots 1 and 18 will continue to gain access from High Banks Road. Lot 2 will share a joint access with Lot 1. There are no County or State access permits required for the proposed development. G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specked in this Code. There are no adjacent lands owned by the applicant. This approval criterion is satisfied. H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specked in this Code. This application acts to complete infill in the area. Adjacent properties are fully developed. therefore, this code section does not apply. I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specked below shall also apply. 1. The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the OF -10 Overlay District shall be 10 acres. 2. EXCEPTIONS: a. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specked in Section 512-120E. for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this Code. b. In addition to the standards of Subsection 2.a., above, any proposed new parcel that is less than 5 acres shall meet 1 of the following standards: is The property to be partitioned shall be awned or operated by a governmental agency or public utility, or ii. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be partitioned shall be smaller than 5 acres. iii. No more than 3 parcels shall be created from 1 tract of land while the property remains within the OF -10 Overlay District. EXCEPTION: Land within the OF -10 Overlay District may be partitioned more than once as long as no proposed parcel is less than 5 acres in size. The subject property is located within the city limits and is for a subdivision. therefore, this approval criterion is not applicable to this tentative subdivision application. J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply. 1. The park was approved before July 2,2001and is in compliance with the standards in Section 3.2-235 or other land use regulations in effect at the time the site was approved as a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park, or the park is an approved non -conforming use. In the latter case, a park is in compliance if the city has not issued a notice of noncompliance on or before July 2, 2001. 2. The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home spaces previously approved or legally existing in the park. 3. The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed. 4. The use of lots, as shown on the Tentative Plan, shall be limited to the installation of manufactured dwellings; i.e., "stick -built" houses are prohibited. 5. Any other area in the Subdivision other than the proposed lots shall be used as common property, unless park streets have previously been dedicated to the City or there are public utilities in the park. All common property shall be addressed in a Homeowner's Association Agreement. a. Areas that are used for vehicle circulation (streets), driveways that serve more than 2 lots/parcels or common parking areas shall be shown in a Tract or easement on the Tentative Plan. b. All other services and utilities that serve more than 1 lot shall be in a Tract or easement. Where a service or utility serves only 1 lot, but crosses another, that service or utility shall also be in an easement shown on the Tentative Plan. C. Existing buildings in the park used for recreational, meetings or otherpurposes for the park residents shall be in a Tract shown on the Tentative Plan. 6. Any public utilities shall be within a public utility easement. 7. If public utilities or services are required to serve the Subdivision the park owner shall sign and execute a waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district to provide the public utilities or services. The subject application is for a tentative subdivision, but is not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park/mobile home park therefore, this approval criterion is not applicable.