Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/22/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SP1NOF1W Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver Phone -.425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular lMreless PCS, LLC E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 16331 SE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone:503-312-3400 Applicant's Rep.: Meredith Hewett Company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mhewett@j5ip.com Address: 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR, 97225 Property Owner: City of Springfield Phone:541-726-3700 Company: E-mail: Address: 225 Fifth St, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17023532 TAX LOT NOS :05306 Property Address: 222 69th St Nearest Intersection : B St ROW ® Private Property❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Propose collocation of SWF on joint use pole in City ROW Existing Use: City Streetlight pole .Minatures: Please si n and rint our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case No.: Date: Reviewed b Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 Signatures Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Date: 9/3/20 Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Print re Date: I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submittal requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: n,�, C /U^—• I / Date: 9/3/20 (Plot Plan Preparer Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Print • Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. ❑ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property ❑ State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: I. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and V. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-14S F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) "unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services' 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. S. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts TypesAllowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out' from its surrounding environment. 16. Fagade-Mounted Antenna. Fagade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Fagade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. I. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: I. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 03/31/2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@springfleld-or.gov RE: Request to ConstructSmall Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC') Shot Clock Dear Portland Bureau of Tryansportation:11 R A S T R U C T U R E P A R T N E R 5 On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, without requiring structure replacement. AT&TID Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG03_001/ FA 14824108 City of Springfield streetlight Pole #2589 69th St & B St. 44.04713. -122.90423 38'-0" J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Aereements Reauested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Springfield. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities • Pole Attachment & Public Right Of Way Use Agreement —City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&T's application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clocks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after filing, as follows: • This Application was filed on 03/31/2020. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Monday, September 10, 2020. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Monday, November 2nd, 2020. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shot clock does not reset; instead, it is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptly to any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easier for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards -Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, Mike Slotemaker Springfield Development Code Compliance Narrative A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10%taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed within the pole that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety II. A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District SITE PHOTO SITE NAME: CRAN_RWOR_E0003_001_D PREPARED FOR a�- POLE#: SUB 2589 AT&T 1 I1 SCID ID#: 18925-001 DREDMOND,A905 REDMD, WA 98052 1{� I SITE TYPE: WOOD STREETLIGHT POLE Vendor: I s 1 SITE ADDRESS: 222 69TH ST. '5 INFRASTRUCTURE AT&T 2030 MAIN ST. 200 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 IRVINE, CA 92614 PSUIROJECT Js PROJecr lo: P-oasayo COUNTY: LANE Vendor: JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION Vendor: SITE INFORMATION: fCieT R (' t'' �' PROPOSED SITE BUILD OF AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR_EUG03_001_Dil`' SKIP ID # : 18925-001 D ee `dr'• FACILITY, ON AN PROPOSED POLE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WAY ° CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: LATITUDE: 44002'49.66'N (44.04713) Ql .' h"r N� X '� �� LONGITUDE: -122054'15.22"W (-122.90423) ;' U, �`�• r, -{ REMOVAL: SITE ADDRESS: 222 69TH ST. - Wallace c a reek R r yF '_ !M .� M, Ruff 'Jr. .. (1) EXISTING WOOD UTILITY POLE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 COUNTY: LANE MemonalPark i, ' QcosslerFmmsNurser9 DRAWN BY: AS JURISDICTION: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ZONING CLASSIFICATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ; xeemesh arsQ `.. d s � � . 4 �' _ Li¢Cly il Lively *'!1'r �'' ' +• _ is INSTALLATION: as (1) PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16' SMARTSTACK POLE CHECKED BY: JMM CONSTRUCTION TYPE: N/A s. ©Thurston Mlddle School i ,.r ' - !' °. �•- - �' ���. a (1) PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA OCCUPANCY: N/A _ , •- q ThurstonmarkM® i i as (1) PROPOSED AT&T DISC ONNECT/SURGESUPPRESSOR mm.o °, Q .. (3) PROPOSED AT&T CONDUITS ADJACENT PARCEL#: 17023532-05306 TMMI.Us Qt enaeewerovestyle ',2 a TaussTou a S r y .. O PROPOSED AT&T AIRSCALE RRH OVERLAY ZONE: NONE y Maherry'sQ '`"° _ 2 .. PROPOSED AT&T COMBINERS ( ) SPECIAL AREA SUBZONE: NONE m sw xa s A.D.A COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR wm • Thurst.n HUMAN HABITATION '., the church of Elementary School0 bob AOg �18mo* PAf4, + n Jesus Ehhst of Latter_ Rld9r,11.9 " POLE OWNER: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD °. All Eleentary. school m ADDRESS: 250 A STREET lm o.. ,cs - K SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 t + PHONE. (541) 746-8451 as, e _ _ _- �' ,SITS- ` r i6 • APPLICANT/CARRIER: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC ('AT&T") _ AS _ = rNaP.nHIIR/� •,,_ • (r� - 0 08/24/20 100% CDs ADDRESS: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Q O NawralArea�/ TE CONTACT: KRISTY WEAVER SPRINGFIELDy°� ^- FI°wersaihymeQ-� - OMEMoalnEcneoENs C 05/19/20 90% CDs PHONE: (425) 214-2186 E " •' B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs ° Ii ELECTRIC PROVIDER: SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD REV DATE DESCRIPTION PHONE: (541) 746-8451 Licensor: u u NORTH 89198PE PROJECT TEAM CODE COMPLIANCE DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. T-1 TITLE SHEET 0 9�OREGONs 13,2 ENGINEER: SRE ACQUISITION: ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT DIRECTIONS FROM PDX AIRPORT: �SVI�G�' yy/ZO EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCATION GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. GN -1 GENERAL NOTES 0 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 EXPIRES: 12131/21 CONTACT: JAMES CHUNG CONTACT: AARON GUDELJ 1. GO SOUTHWEST ON NE AIRPORT WAY 0.54 MI A-1.1 DEMO SITE PLAN 0 EMAIL: jchung@J5IP.com EMAIL: AGUDELJQJ5IP.com COMMERCIAL BUILDING CODE: 2. KEEP RIGHT AT THE FORK ONTO NE AIRPORT WAY 0.12 MI A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 PHONE: (949) 247-7767 x 111 PH: (805) 298-3091 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE (OSSC)-2014 3. KEEP LEFT AT THE FORK ONTO NE AIRPORT WAY 1.64 MI A-3 I LETTER AND SURVEY I HEREBY OEWI FV THAT OH FSE PLANS WERE PREPARED 9V AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL CODE: 4. TAKE THE RAMP ON THE RIGHT AND GO ON I-205 S TOWARD A-4 ELEVATIONS 0 Duty RREEGIsTEERED EENGINEER UNOFR THaWWSOOOFTHE STATE OF OREGON' OREGON ELECTRICAL SPECIALTY CODE (OESC)-2017 PORTLAND / SALEM / I-84 3.07 MI A-5 ELEVATIONS 0 CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS 5. BEAR RIGHT ONTO THE RAMP AT EXIT 21 B AND GO ON I-84 W / US -30 W AT&T Site ID: EMAIL: cp1261Qatt.com CONTACT: DEVIN TAYLORD-1 TOWARD PORTLAND 5.44 MI DETAILS 0 PH: 971-295-6924 PH: (503) 309-1380 TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTSD-2 6. TAKE THE RAMP ON THE LEFT TO I-5 S TOWARD SALEM / OMSI /CITY CENTER 0.31 MI DETAILS 0 UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE 7. KEEP LEFT AT THE FORK ONTO -5 S TOWARD SALEM 1.19 MI -RF1 RF WARNING SIGNS 0 CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 AT&T RF ENGINEER: ARE MANAGER: YOU DIG IN OREGON, CALL OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 8. KEEP RIGHT AT THE FORK ONTO I-5 S TOWARD SALEM 106.34 MI E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC 0 D CONTACT: CHRIS OSGOOD J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSit OO TOLL FREE: 1-800-332-2344 OR 9. TAKE THE RAMP ON THE RIGHT AT EXIT 194A AND GO ON OR -126 E G-1 GROUNDING DETAILS 0 G-2 GROUNDING DETAILS 0 18925-001 D EMAIL: co3884Qatt.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG www.digsafelyoregon.com TOWARD SPRINGFIELD 6.76 MI EMAIL: jmalberg@j5ip.com OREGON STATUTE 10. TURN LEFT ON MAIN ST (MCKENZIE HWY) 1.35 MI PH: (208) 316-1897 Know what's below. REQUIRES MIN OF 2 11. TURN LEFT ON 69TH ST 0.11 MI 222 69TH ST. WORKING DAYS NOTICE CaII before you dig. BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE 1' SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: Sheet Title: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION EMAIL:W729k@att.com CONTACT: MIKE SLOTEMAKER TITLE SHEET PH: (206) 321-1116 EMAIL: mslotemaker@j5ip.com PH: (206) 214-8954 RIGHT-OF-WAY Sheet Number: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS T-1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE STAMPED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES, AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED, OR OTHERWISE DISCONNECTED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER, AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 7. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 8. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW, OR ICE SHALL BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 9. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 10. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT, OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED ON THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 12. NOTICE TO PROCEED - NO WORK TO COMMENCE PRIOR TO COMPANY;S WRITTEN NOTICE TO PROCEED AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND METHODS; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ERECTION PLANS, RIGGING PLANS, CLIMBING PLANS, AND RESCUE PLANS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK CONTAINED HEREIN AND SHALL MEET ANSI/TIA 1019 (LATEST EDITION), OSHA AND GENERAL INDUSTRY STANDARDS. ALL RIGGING PLANS SHALL ADHERE TO ANSI/TIA-1019 (LATEST EDITION) INCLUDING THE REQUIRED INVOLVEMENT OF A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR CLASS IV CONSTRUCTION. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4"0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE %"0 ASTM A307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185, AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SLAB FOUNDATION DESIGN ASSUMING ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PSF. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD. DINO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS. 4.1. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH: 3" MIN. 4.2. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO WEATHER: 4.2.1. #6 AND LARGER- 2" MIN. 4.2.2. #5 AND SMALLER & WWF,- 1)¢" MIN. 4.3. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: 4.3.1. SLAB AND WALLS 3/4' MIN. 4.3.2. BEAMS AND COLUMNS 1)z" MIN. 5. A %4" CHAMFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4 GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS SUBCONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) CARRIER - AT&T OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES, WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORM CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 4. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 6. "KITTING LIST" SUPPLIED WITH THE BID PACKAGE IDENTIFIES ITEMS THAT WILL BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BILL OF MATERIALS AND KITTING LIST SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR AND AT&T PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY SUCH CHANGE OF INSTALLATION. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWINGS. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE; TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION; TRASH AND DEBRIS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. ABREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS: ABREVIATION AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (E) EXISTING MIN MINIMUM REF REFERENCE RF RADIO FREQUENCY T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED TYP TYPICAL REQ'D REQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MOB MASTER GROUND BAR EG EQUIPMENT GROUND BCW BARE COPPER WIRE SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE IRG INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RBS RADIO BASE STATION SYMBOLS: S/G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR 5 N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR g°- SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR o�a 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CIRCUIT BREAKER A� SINGLE POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED CIRCUIT BREAKER 8 CHEMICAL GROUND ROD BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF TEST WELL E=P DISCONNECT SWITCH END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE METER (ADD EXOTHERMIC WELD (CADWELD) GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) VDC NEG MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUNDING WIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, NEC AND ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES/ORDINANCES 2. CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT BLOCKED AND TRIP HAZARDS ARE ELIMINATED. 3. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC, HILTI EPDXY ANCHORS ARE REQUIRED BY AT&T. 4. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC. 5. CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDER -STYLE CABLE TRAY RUNGS. 6. EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E., HOTS), GROUNDING AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE SHALL BE LABELED WITH COLOR -CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL TAPE (3M BRAND, Y" PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE W/ UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD SHALL CONFORM W/ NEC AND OSHA. 7. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE LABELED W/ THEIR VOLTAGE RATING, PHASE CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR AMPACITY RATING AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E. PANEL BOARD AND CIRCUIT ID'S). 8. PANEL BOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHAL BE CLEARLY LABELED WITH PLASTIC LABELS. 9. ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. 10. POWER, CONTROL AND EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90-C (WET & DRY) OPERATION LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 11. SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR LARGER), 60OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN INSULATION CLASS B OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE MULTI -CONDUCTOR, TYPE TO CABLE (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 50OV, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90'C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION WITH OUTER JACKET LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 13. ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE CRIMP -STYLE COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRE NUTS BY THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRE NUTS SHALL BE RATE FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75'C (90'C IF AVAILABLE). 14. RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 15. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E. RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE) SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 16. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL NONMETALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40 ) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED INDOOR LOCATIONS. 17. SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNDERGROUND ON STRAIGHTS AND SCHEDULE 80 PVC FOR ALL ELBOWS/90'S AND ALL APPROVED ABOVE GRADE PVC CONDUIT. 18. LIQUID -TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE FLEX) SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED. 19. CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR COMPRESSION TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED. SET SCREW FITTING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 20. CABINETS, BOXES AND WIRE WAYS SHALL BE LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE AND NEC. 21. WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPDXY-COATED (GRAY) AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARDS, SHALL BE CONDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) 22. CONDUITS SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY IN PLACE WITH APPROVED NON PERFORATED STRAPS AND HANGERS. EXPLOSIVE DEVICES FOR ATTACHING HANGERS TO STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, CLOSELY FOLLOW THE LINES OF THE STRUCTURE, MAINTAIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE STRUCTURE AND KEEP CONDUITS IN TIGHT ENVELOPES. CHANGES IN DIRECTION TO ROUTE AROUND OBSTACLES SHALL BE MADE WITH CONDUIT OUTLET BODIES.CONDUIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER, PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO STRUCTURE WALL AND CEILING LINES. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE FISHED TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS. ENDS OF CONDUITS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY CAPPED FLUSH TO FINISH GRADE TO PREVENT CONCRETE, PLASTER OR DIRT FROM ENTERING. CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGIDLY CLAMPED TO BOXES BY GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON BUSHING ON INSIDE AND GALVANIZED MALLEABLE IRON LOCKNUT ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. 23. EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPDXY-COATED SHEET STEEL; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50 AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 24. METAL RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPDXY- COATED OR NON -CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A AND NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 25. NONMETALLIC RECEPTACLE, SWITCH AND DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS OR WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS. 26. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS. 27. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS TO SAFEGUARD LIFE AND PROPERTY. 28. INSTALL PLASTIC LABEL ON THE METER CENTER TO SHOW "####". 29. ALL CONDUITS THAT ARE INSTALLED ARE TO HAVE A METERED MULE TAPE PULL CORD INSTALLED. GROUNDING NOTES 1. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTING PROTECTION AND AC POWER GESS) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AT OR BELOW GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE FALL -OF -POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT OF 5 OHMS OR LESS 3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROPERLY SEQUENCING GROUNDING AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLATION AS TO PREVENT ANY LOSS OF CONTINUITY IN THE GROUNDING SYSTEM OR DAMAGE TO THE CONDUIT AND PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS. 4. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTING OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH #6 AWG COPPER WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS. 5. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT. 6. EACH CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS. 7. CONNECTIONS TO THE GROUND BUS SHALL NOT BE DOUBLED UP OR STACKED BACK TO BACK, CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE GROUND BUS ARE PERMITTED. 8. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONDUCTORS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT/GROUND BARS AND THE GROUND RING SHALL BE #2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 9. ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 10. USE OF 90' BENDS IN THE PROTECTION GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AVOIDED WHEN 45' BENDS CAN BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED. 11. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE. 12. ALL GROUND CONNECTIONS ABOVE GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) SHALL BE FORMED USING HIGH PRESS CRIMPS. 13. COMPRESSION GROUND CONNECTIONS MAY BE REPLACED BY EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS. 14. ICE BRIDGE BONDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE EXOTHERMICALLY BONDED OR BOLTED TO THE BRIDGE AND THE TOWER GROUND BAR. 15. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E. CONDUCTIVE GEL OR PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED GROUND CONNECTIONS. 16. ALL EXTERIOR GROUND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH A CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL. 17. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON -ELECTRICAL METAL BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC. 18. BOND ALL METALLIC OBJECTS WITHIN 6FT OF MAIN GROUND WIRES WITH 1-#2 AWG TIN-PLATED COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 19. GROUND CONDUCTORS USED IN THE FACILITY GROUND AND LIGHTING PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH METALLIC OBJECTS THAT FORM A RING AROUND THE CONDUCTOR, SUCH AS METALLIC CONDUITS, METAL SUPPORT CLIPS OR SLEEVES THROUGH WALLS OR FLOORS, WHEN IT IS REQUIRED TO BE HOUSED IN A CONDUIT, SAID CONDUIT TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL CONDITIONS, NON-METALLIC MATERIAL SUCH AS PVC PLASTIC CONDUIT SHALL BE USED. WHERE USE OF METAL CONDUIT IS UNAVOIDABLE (I.E. NON-METALLIC MATERIAL PROHIBITED BY LOCAL CODE) THE GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH END OF THE METAL CONDUIT. 20. ALL GROUNDS THAT TRANSITION FROM BELOW GRADE TO ABOVE GRADE MUST BE #2 TINNED SOLID IN 3/4" LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT LEG 1 FROM 24" BELOW GRADE TO WITHIN 3" TO 6" OF CAD -WELD TERMINATION POINT. THE EXPOSED END OF THE LIQUID TIGHT CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED WITH SILICONE CAULK. (ADD TRANSITIONING GROUND STANDARD DETAIL AS WELL). DESCRIPTION PHASE./CODE LETTER WIRE COLOR 240/120 10 LEG 1 BIACK LEG 2 RED WHITE AC NEUTRAL N GROUND (ECC) G GREEN VDC POS + 'RED -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION VDC NEG _ *BLACK -POLARITY MARK AT TERMINATION DATE 240V OR 20BV, 30 PHASE A BLACK PHASE B RED (ORG. IF HI LEG) PHASE C BLUE 48OV, 30 PHASE A BROWN PHASE B ORANGE PHASE C YELLOW * SEE NEC 210.5(C)(1) AND (2) PREPARED FOR AT&Ti 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: G1 SINFRASTRUCTURE /R A R T N E R 3 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Lil I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: GENERAL NOTES Sheet Number: GN -1 100% CDs 05/19/20 90% CDs LARE08/24/20 03/16/20 90% CDs 02/28/20 90% CDs DATE DESCRIPTION Lil I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: GENERAL NOTES Sheet Number: GN -1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. PERMIT NOTE: FIBER ROUTE PERMITTING BY OTHERS. OVERALL SITE PLAN 24"x36" SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 6' 4' 2' 0" 8' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: '5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Lil .I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 0 08/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Lil .I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1 1 INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LEGAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. TE: TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN A ED L LEGAL MANNER. OVERALL SITE PLAN 24"x36" SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 6' 4' 2' 0" 8' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Licensor: CSVINNGrB Zq/ZO EXPIRES: 12131121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: DEMO SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1.1 1 0 08/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: CSVINNGrB Zq/ZO EXPIRES: 12131121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM NLY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: DEMO SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-1.1 1 NOTES: 1. NEW EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH WOOD POLE. 2. EQUIPMENT IS MOUNTED INSIDE METAL POLE 3. AC PANEL/DISCONNECT MOUNTED INSIDE OF METAL POLE 4. NEW ANTENNA & MOUNT ON POLE 5. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL THE ENCLOSURE ON THE STREET SIDE 6. REPLACEMENT POLES ARE INTENDED TO BE PLACED IN THE ROW ONLY. 7. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ROW PRIOR TO PLACEMENT FOR NEW POLE. INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW FOR DEPICTION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL DATA GATHERED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND GENERATED FROM AERIAL IMAGES AND SITE VISITS. BOUNDARIES DEPICTED HEREIN MAY NOT ALIGN WITH ACTUAL LEGAL BOUNDARIES AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SURVEYING OR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES. ENLARGED SITE PLAN (E) WOOD FENCE (E) GRASS PARCEL# : 17023532-04600 (E) UTILITY VAULT --- (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA 1 1 (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16" A-4 A-5 SMARTSTACK POLE I I I I L I (E) GUTTER (E) CURB ? (E) SIDEWALK ---------------- / I (P) AT&T WORK AREA L ill V I (P) LUMINAIRE 7'-5" (F.O.C. TO POLE) 28'-0' (C.L. OF STREET TO POLE) 30'-91 (TO C.L. OF STREET) (E) GATE FENCE I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — PARCEL# : 17023532-05306 I I I J Ia (E) GRASS d I I -- a�NO D a Q' O 04 0 � a (E) TREES (TYP) a I a a o I 24"x36" SCALE: 1 IT= 1'-0' 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 2' 1' 0' PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Licensor: ---4, CSVINHGrB Z410 EXPIRES: 12131/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUREWISION AND THAT I AM �ULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: ENLARGED SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 1 0 108/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: ---4, CSVINHGrB Z410 EXPIRES: 12131/21 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE EDAM WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUREWISION AND THAT I AM �ULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: ENLARGED SITE PLAN Sheet Number: A-2 1 PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 1A SURVEY CERTIFICATION SCIP ID#: 18925-001 I NAD 83 Vendor: cry �s RD a LAT — 44'02'49.66" N T 5INFRASTRUCTURE a I 30' TO CL j (44.04713) R A R T R E R S r I wI THORSTpH 3 7HIIRS7t7N Rd Ra Thurstrin�_ VARIED TO ROW ~� i �' LONG - 122°54'15.22" W 20SUITTE200T Z i w 4 C ` (-122.90423) IRVINE, CA 92614 ELEV - 527.07 NAVD 88 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 F N 34 I 1l Vendor: " 1 NT.=29.2' ' HT. -29,5 r z - � I DIA.=C.6G' HT.=29.11 i I A 126 _ 5 A Sr '.ST -. r a Vendor: f Springfield-; _- E3 Memarik Cem F T HT.=27.2' SITE f f FORESTRIDGFOR - ... y �+ n $.�-�9Cp I O I TAXLOT I 1 1 7023532-04 6 006 I i u ` y - ?� ' 4 i CENTER OF SUBJECT f DRAWN BY: AS CHECKED BY: JMM " z lvrsr �: — �� -� `• _, ��� l POLE -SEE DETAIL Mint Virnon mom: �} C1 VE ON, ( !3,_ r` x-576'— 4M7 I GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES a I LATITUDE: 44°02'49.66" N (44.04713) (NAD 83)wD I �� LONGITUDE: 122°54'15.22" W (-122.90423) (NAD 83) TAXLOT ' a GROUND ELEVATION: 527.07 FEET (NAVA 88) 17023532-05309 v) HEIGHT: I 1 1 DrA--o•' 0 08/24/20 10096 CDs @ TOP OF POLE: 29.24 FEET( � AGL Q I EL.=527.07' TOP OF LIGHT: 29.51 FEET (AGL) ` 1 z 6 c 05/19/20 9096 CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs I A 02/28/20 90% CDs DATE OF SURVEY: FEBRUARY 3, 2020 z I REV DATE DESCRIPTION 2000 0 1000 2000 4000 J I I I POLE DETAIL RE: SCIP ID#: 1.8925-0.D1 Licensor: 6893 B ST = � � SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 1 INCH = 2000 FEET 4 iI - NOT TO SCALE - 89198 1 CERTIFY THAT THE LATITUDE AND THE LONGITUDE SHOWN ABOVE ARE OREGON ,a O 9''Fsvi�`�� ACCURATE TO WITHIN +15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THAT THE SITE f � � REGISTERED s 4# o ELEVATION IS ACCURATE TO WITHIN +3 FEET VERTICALLY, WHICH MEETS j I I PROFESSIONAL EXPIRES: 12131/21 1A STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATION SHEET I + } + LAND SURVEYOR 91:003. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM (GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES) ARE IN REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD 83) AND ARE LEGEND: ///��+���BY I .� " I HEREBYIS CERTIFY THAT TH ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPEWIISION AND THAT I AM ENGINEERIII UNDERP-NSWIRI DULY EEGISiEEE°E"�OEER°"°EErHEuw3o"HESrAiE LAWSPREPARED AT LAND SURVEYOR j+■/yfV %%%fff OF OREGON EXPRESSED AS DEGREES { ), MINUTES ( ), AND SECONDS ( ). TO LIGHT POLE ® STORM CURB INLET THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A SECOND. THE VERTICAL DATUM f (ELEVATION AMSL) IS IN TERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL - UTILITY VAULT TREE DECIDUOUS OREGON SEPTEMBER 10, 2099 AT&T Site ID: LI-, JACK L WHITE it CRAN-RWOR-EUG03-001 DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). ROWLWES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON G!5 DATA, AND NOT A BOUNDARY SUWEY 91987PLS D Date: 2/4/2820 OREGON SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 Date: 2/4/2020 SHEET RENEWS 6/30/22 ■ Proj No: 2019-177-18 JACK L WHITE II ■ Proj No: 2019-177-16 1 OF 1 18925-001 D Prepared: C.M.I. SHEET 91987PI S �SW - C.M.I. Prepared: 4855 SCROLLS FERRY RD, SUITE A rrwwsflands.com PORTLAND, OR 97225 iIT fogs Aonds.com Checked: J.L.W. 1 OF 1 RENEWS 6/30/22 4$56 SW SCROLLS FERRY Rp, SUITE A www.sitands.com PORTLAND, OR 97225 wfD®s4onds.DDm Scale: 1"=10' -18925-001-D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 503-345-0328 503-345-0328 Sheet Title: 1A LETTER AND SURVEY Sheet Number: A-3 I A LETTER CPT 2 SURVEY FRY 1 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. i^ AT&T 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 16331 NE 72ND WAY 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA ELEV. 38'-0" (A. G. L.) 'SINFRASTRUCTURE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. RAD _ -0" CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA Y ELEV. 3T (A. G.L.) (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL D-1 e} P A R T N E R s 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 _ (1) (P) AT&T NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH �5PROJECTID:P-043470 SEE DETAILLO Vendor: T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 33'-0" (A. G. L.) I 1 16' Vendor: PROPOSED LUMINAIRE ELEV. 30'-0" (A.G.L.) -- (E) LUMINAIRE 4"x8" ACCESS PORT I DRAWN BY: AS T.O. EXISTING WOOD POLE (E) LUMINAIRE ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE CHECKED BY: JMM ELEV. 30'-0" (A.G.L.) TO BE REPLACED T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) 1 I T.O. EXISTING LIGHT ARM SUPPORT III (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16' SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 29'-1" (A.G.L.) B.O. EXISTING LIGHT ARM SUPPORT (�I T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE I ELEV. 27'-2" (A. G. L.) ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING RISER II J alp ELEV. 26'-7" (A. G. L.) I I EQUIPMENT BAY WITH 1 (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS AND (1) NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH (E) LIGHT ARM I I SUPPORT I alp j� 0 08/24/20 100% CDs 1 1 T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE C 05/19/20 90% CDs II, ELEV. 14'-4" (A.G.L.) B 03/16/20 9096 CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs alp EQUIPMENT BAY 1 FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION IIII (E) RISER IIII 1 1 alp Licensor: 8919 PIE I I� III T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE l UTILITY BAY WITH: (P) AT&T DISCONNECT / SURGE SUPPRESSOR SEE DETAIL �OREGONp O 9�� )'13 1%�J� FG SV8 Z4#0 ELEV. 5'-8" (A.G.L.) l I D-1 e EXPIRES: 12131/21 11 I HEREBY H cER THAT THESE PLANS W WERE PREPAREDA 9v MEORUNDER MY DIRECT ISI AND THAT IAM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDERTHELAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON I SIDEWALK/GRADE I(E) 6"x8" ACCESS PORT 1 AT&T Site ID: III (E) CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT h FINISHED GRADE M CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 1 (E) WOOD STREETLIGHT POLE ELEV. O'-0" D IIII, TO BE REPLACED 18925-001D (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE 222 69TH ST. �II I I SPRINGFIELD, OR97478 I11 (P) UNDERGROUND FIBER AND POWER, DIRECTION TBD NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE e I III I MAN U FACTU RER SPECI FICATIONS D2 I Sheet Title: FINISHED GRADE ELEV. 0-0" I I ELEVATIONS s y� EXISTING WOOD UTILITY BURIED PER CITY Sheet Number: OF SPRINGFIELD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS A-4 _4 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = V-0" ®, 2' V 0 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" 2' 1' 0 7 PREPARED FOR NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -INSTALL ALL EXISTING STREET SIGNS AS NEEDED ON NEW POLE. 2. INSTALL RF WARNING SIGNS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. !i^ AT&T 3. PROPOSED CONDUITS TO BE ROUTED INSIDE POLE. 4. NEW EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED WITH RF TRANSPARENT, OUTDOOR RATED PAINT TO MATCH REPLACEMENT POLE. 5. FIBER TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 16331 NE 72ND WAY 6. ALL LANDSCAPING AND SPRINKLERS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR REDMOND, WA 98052 BETTER. 7. ANY DISTURBED CONCRETE/BRICKWORK IN EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REPAIRED TO MATCH CURRENT CONDITIONS AND CODE. Vendor: T.O. PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA ELEV. 38'-0" (A.G.L.) ASINFRASTRUCTURE P A R T N E R s STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF NEW POLES ARE BY OTHERS. (1) (P) AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA SEE DETAIL 2 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 RAD CENTER OF PROPOSED AT&T CANISTER ANTENNA D-1 IRVINE, CA 92614 Y ELEV. 37'-0" (A.G.L.) J5 PROJECT ID: P -0434 o (1) (P) AT&T NOKIA AIRSCALE RRH SEE DETAIL Vendor: T.O.S. PROPOSED AT&T SABRE 16" SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 33'-0" (A.G.L.) I 16" Vendor: PROPOSED LUMINAIRE ELEV. 30'-0" (A. G. L.) I i I (E) LUMINAIRE I DRAWN BY: AS T.O. EXISTING WOOD POLE ELEV. 30'-0" (A.G.L.) I I ALL (P) AT&T CABLES TO BE RUN INSIDE POLE CHECKED BY: JMM T.O. EXISTING LUMINAIRE ELEV. 29'-6" (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING LIGHT ARM SUPPORT (1) (P) AT&T SABRE 16" ELEV. 29'-1" (A. G.L.) SMARTSTACK POLE B.O. EXISTING LIGHT ARM SUPPORT ELEV. XISTI (A.G.L.) T.O. EXISTING RISER III T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE ELEV. 20'-0" (A.G.L.) ELEV.26-7" (A.G.L.) (E) LUMINAIRE TO BE REPLACED EQUIPMENT BAY WITH (P) (2) AT&T COMBINERS AND (1) NOKIA (E) LIGHT ARM AIRSCALE RRH SUPPORT D-1 �I I PERF. SCREEN VENTS FOR 0 08/24/20 10096 CDs T.O. EQUIPMENT BAY SMARTSTACK POLE CONVECTIVE COOLING, 3 PLACES C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 9096 CDs VIII' I EQUIPMENT BAY ELEV. 14'4" (A.G.L.) A 02/28/20 90% CDs FOR FUTURE AT&T EQUIPMENT REV DATE DESCRIPTION IIII I Licensor: (E) WOOD STREETLIGHT POLE TO BE REPLACED I 1 IIII' T.O. UTILITY BAY SMARTSTACK POLE UTILITY BAY WITH: (P)AT&T DISCONNECT /SURGE SUPPRESSOR � OREGON,p O 9 9y 13,2 �FSVINHG SZ410 / ELEV. 5-13" (A.G.L.) SEE DETAIL EXPIRES: 12131/21 III I `Ippf�J • - I HEREBY CER1IFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' ll I I (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE I I I AT&T Site ID: I 1II I M FINISHED GRADE CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D ELEV. 0'-0" Ij 18925-001D (E) SIDEWALK/GRADE 222 69TH VIII 1 I JII I I I � (P) UNDERGROUND FIBERAND POWER, DIRECTION TBD II II NEW FOUNDATION PER POLE 1 MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS D-2 SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: FINISHED GRADE ELEV. O'-0" ELEVATIONS EXISTING WOOD UTILITY BURIED PER CITY Sheet Number: OF SPRINGFIELD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS A-5 _5 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"®, 2' V o 2 2 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = — 1'0" 2' 1' 0 PSEUDO OMNI 12-PORT CANISTER ANTENNA PREPARED FOR MANUFACTURER: GALTRONICS PART NUMBER: GQ2412-06613 DIAMETER: HEIGHT: WEIGHT W/MOUNT: VOLUME: 14.7" 24.5' 30.9 LBS 3.1416 (0.6125 FT)A2 x (2 FT) = 2.35 CUBIC FEET —'AT&T ` 1 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 14.7" Vendor: ® o �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: L] O Vendor: 5145 6n Q 1s91-93N" �`0 . c-4s rrI O 0 O s1 698-896 Alpe -45 2 O� U MI 1, as to DRAWN BY: AS O O CHECKED BY: JMM v N FRONT VIEW BOTTOM VIEW NOT USED 4 N.T.S. ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS 2 N.T.S. SURGE PROTECTION BOX MANUFACTURER: RAYCAP PART NUMBER: RCCAC-1333-PS-240-A WEIGHT: 8 LBS 0 08/24/20 10096 CDs DIMENSIONS (LxWxH): 9.38" x 5.58" x 10.43" VOLUME: (0.781 FT) x (0.557FT) x (0.869 FT) = 0.378 CUBIC FEET C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION 5.58" 9.38" 5.06" 8.59" Licensor: E S J. Q 89198PE B9OREGON ,p 9 y 13,2 �FSVINHG 8 Z4M EXPIRES: 12131/21 EMERE o 06 _ v o • = o C M J� IPREPARED 9v HEREBY U cERnFY THAT THESE EWb6 W EREANDTHAT ONOER MYGIREE U PERVISION HELASOFTH AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER ONOER THE WWS OFiHE SiAiE OF OREGON' 7--� D AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR EUG03_001 D 18925-001D SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW M40 GLANDS CAN BE 222 69TH ST. REPLACED BY 1-1/4" NPT CONDUIT FITTINGS SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: E] ❑ Lq o OO o DETAILS O O Sheet Number: 3 AC DISCONNECT W/ SURGE PROTECTION SPECIFICATION N.T.S. BOTTOM VIEW 1 NOT USED N.T.S. D-1 K C E V N.T.S. 8 7 6 PART LIST ITEM QTY /M P/N DESCRIPTION 1 2.12 CLI.YDS 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 CONCRETE, 1 CYD BATCH, 150 PCF 2 11 Each 410250 REBAR, #4 (1/2"), PREBENT 30" DIA 3 91.00 FT 12 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 4 8.08 FT 1 TUBE, SLEEK, 36" 5 4 Each C4004105B ANCHOR BOLT 1" X 51" F1554 GR105 6 2 Each SM00100 ANCHOR BOLT TEMPLATE, 19 1/2" BC 7 2 Each SWO0378 LIFTING LUG, PIER, 3" X 18 5/8" X 1" 8 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 9 8 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2", 90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 10 12 Each COUPLING, G -PVC, 2" 11 12 FT CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 13 1 Each CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4", 90 DEGREE SWEEP BE 14 3 Each COUPLING, G -PVC, 3/4" 5 2 1 CUT LIST ITEM P/N DESCRIPTION LENGTH WIDTH PC 100% 3 112503 REBAR #6 (3/4") GRADE 60 91.00 in CDs 12 8 410250 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 2" 48.00 in 02/28/20 8 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 36.00 in 1 12 410198 CONDUIT, G -PVC, 3/4" 12.00 in 1 NOTES: 1. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS AND VERTICAL REINFORCING BARS ARE TO BE SECURELY TIED BEFORE CONCRETE IS PLACED SO THEY WILL REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE PIER. 2. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS ARE TO BE CHAMFERED 3/4 INCH. 3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. 4. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-11. 5. REINFORCING STEEL TO HAVE A 3" MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER. 6. ANCHOR BOLTS 1"0 X 4'-3" (F1554 GR105) ON A 19 1/2"0 BOLT CIRCLE (4 REQ'D). 7. CONCRETE REQUIRED 2.12 CUBIC YARDS. 8. LAP SPLICES OF ADJACENT CIRCULAR TIES SHALL BE POSITIONED ON ALTERNATE SIDES. syn•e�r�:�►�lin�e�::r�:��i:�n:�� 0 SECTION AA 7 -5° X 3/4" ;HAMFER C( 3'-0"[36]" DIA IT nUIN T VIL VV #4 TIES W/(3) IN TOP 5" AND THEN -1/C SPACING VERTICAL SPACED) (12) #6 VERTICAL (EVENLY SPACED) O 9 1 (11) 30"vj #4 REBAR TIES O SECTION B -B PRoouae S51 AE0001 REV 1 DESCRIPTION: CONCRETE PIER 3'0" X 8'1" (4) 1"0 X 4'-3" ANCHOR BOLTS ON A 19 1/2"B.C. 0 0 PREPARED FOR f AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Licensor: ---4, CS N(' Zq/ZO EXPIRES: IM1121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: A CRAN_RWOR EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: 6 5 4 3 2 1 DETAILS Sheet Number: D-2 0 08/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Licensor: ---4, CS N(' Zq/ZO EXPIRES: IM1121 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' AT&T Site ID: A CRAN_RWOR EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: 6 5 4 3 2 1 DETAILS Sheet Number: D-2 M RF WARNING SIGNS AVAILABLE FROM EXCEL SIGN AND DECAL: htt ps: //www.weneeds ig ns. com /prod uct. ph p? prod uct id=171904&cat=1135&page= l CLICK ON AT&T PH: 510-651-0445 NO] -DC -16 1'x6' NOTICE DECAL "FOR 1 FOOT DISTANCE" VYVYL DECAL WITH ADHESIVE BACKING 1 ORDER COMES IN A PACK PF 25. PLACE THREE NOTICE STICKER EQUALLY SPACED AROUND THE BOTTOM OF THE ANTENNA RADOME RF WARNING NOTICE SIGN AT ANTENNA WIIM M AT&T TGA R D_002 1=800=638=2822 USID: 192355 - IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT DISCONNECT SITE NAME SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE SITE NAME SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE USID NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE USID NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH SITE 5" NOTICE ON THIS POLE: RADIO FREQUENCY FIELDS NEAR SOME ANTENNAS MAY EXCEED FCC RULES FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE PERSONNEL CLIMBING THIS TOWER SHOULD BE TRAINED FOR WORKING RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIRONMENTS AND USE A PERSONAL RF MONITORING IF WORKING NEAR ACTIVE ANTENNAS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION RULES ON RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS 47 CFR 1.1307(6) 5" (3 DIGITS REE 000 NETWORK OPERATION CONTROL CENTER (NOC) 1-800-264-6620 NODE ID #12 THIS SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH FCC RULES FOR BOTH OCCUPATION AND CONTROLLED AND GENERAL PUBLIC OR UNDERCINTROLLED STAY BACK A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET FROM ANY ACTIVE ANTENNA TO DEACTIVATE ANTENNA CALL THE N.O. PHONE NUMBER BEFORE OPERATING DISCONNECT REENTER I.D. NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATE AT EACH NODE NODE NUMBER SHOWN IS FOR EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE NODE I.D. SHALL BE INDICATED AT EACH NODE NOTES: 1. WARNING SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED, IN VIEW, ON EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ON THE SAME SIDE AS THE DISCONNECT. 2. WARNING SIGNS TO BE INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS AND FCC. SIGNS ALLOWED ONLY AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR BY THE POLE OWNER. NO ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE WILL BE POSTED. RF WARNING NOTICE SIGNS AT EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 24"x36" SCALE: NTS PREPARED FOR - AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: Lil • I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: RF WARNING SIGNS Sheet Number: RF -1 1 0 08/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 10% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION Lil • I HEREBY CER1IEY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 D 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: RF WARNING SIGNS Sheet Number: RF -1 1 PREPARED FOR NEW AND OR EXISTING POWER TO POLE AND NEW EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY OTHERS. AT&T Nokia Micro — urban/ ubur n, RAD C. E'r 5'�- '6331 NE REDMOND,72NDWAY R, WA 98052 Vendor: '51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 MAX 30A J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 POWER LINE Vendor: (1) 6-#10THHN/1HWN/VW-1 TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE SURGE SUPPRESSOR Vendor: (1) 6-#10THHN/THWN/VW-1 POLE MOUNTED TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO DRAWN BY: AS STREET LAMP STREET LAMP CgC G6C C93 CHECKED BY: JMM AM PGS AhI PC-; Am pcz AWS PCs RRM-1 RRH4 {.30 925 IL RRH-2 "RRH4x45 B66s RRH RRH RRH RRH i RAYCAP DISCONNECT/SURGE ;PCS C Block SUPPRESSOR 0 08/24/20 10096 CDs AWS -1 A Block 2-#12THHN/THWN/VW-1FF (1) C 05/19/20 90% CDs TYPE TC -ER DC CABLE TO RRH B 03/16/20 9096 CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs 4 AMP BREAKER REV DATE I DESCRIPTION x711 rg METAL OXIDE SWITCH Licensor: VARISTOR (TYP.) ' - ~ 89198E OREGON ,p O 9 9)'13,1% NEUTRAL BUS BAR �FSV11W 8 Z4#0 — EXPIRES: 121310 GROUND BUS BAR 'I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLAINS WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF OREGON' Bac 1Spicer LAC Cabille AT&T Site ID: CRAN_RWOR EUG03_001 D A� �41t-��FS41��tC�1 — 18925-001D ■ 222 69TH ST. Datk Fibers AG same* SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 tolfrom Flub Sheet Title: PLUMBING DIAGRAM & DC POWER SCHEMATIC Sheet Number: E-1 PLUMBING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 121 DC POWER SCHEMATIC 24"x36" SALE: NTS 1 NOTES: 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF THE INSTALLATION ON THE POLE SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER AND BARREL COMPRESSION GROUNDED. 7A COPPER GROUND WIRE, #6 AWS MINIMUM SIZE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE BASE OR FEEDLINE ATTACH TO GROUND CONNECTION POINT OF THE ANTENNA TO A GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE POLE AND BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE ANTENNA FEEDLINE CONDUIT. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY CONNECTED CONTRACTOR TO THE GROUND ROD. 3. WHERE A UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR EXISTS, THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE PERMANTLY BONDED BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE TO THE UTILITY CO. NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR AT THE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR LEVEL BY UTILITY CO. CREWS. 4. A GROUND ROD, 8 FEET MINIMUM IN LENGTH SHALL BE INSTALLED (WHERE NO UTILITY CO. GROUND 0 0 ROD & INTACT GROUND WIRE EXISTS) AT THE BASE OF THE POLE. THIS INSTALLATION SHALL MEET OR 0 EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINE D16-2 5. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE MOLDING FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH ON THE 0 POLE, EXCEPT AT THE POINT WHERE IT MUST BE EXPOSED FOR BONDING TO THE UTILITY CO. 0 NEUTRAL. 6. THE UTILITY CO. AND COMMUNICATION GROUND RODS SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER USING COPPER _ #6 AWG WIRE GROUNDING NOTES 24"x36" SCALE: NTS COAXIAL GROUND KITS W. LONG BARREL COMPRESSION DOUBLE LUG WITH SIGH HOLE, ATTACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALLED BY ANTENNA CONTRACTOR 000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) NOTES: C COPPER GROUND BAR INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1. COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTION WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL GROUND LUGES TO HAVE INSPECTION WINDOWS/SIGHT HOLES GROUNDING BAR NOT USED GROUND BAR L #6 AWG TO ANTENNA GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO GROUND ROD J 1 1 WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION 24"x36" SCALE: N c NOTES: 0 0 0,0000000000000 OVER THE BARE GROUND WIRE TO 08/24/20 PROTECT LINE WORKERS, THE WIRE, AND THE PUBLIC. EXTEND PLASTIC MOLDING C AT LEAST TWO INCHES BELOW GRADE. 90% 2. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE IN ONE CONTINUOUS LENGTH. INSERT GROUND WIRE 03/16/20 FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GROUND CLAMP AND BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O _ 000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) NOTES: C COPPER GROUND BAR INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1. COAT ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTION WITH "NOOX" OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL GROUND LUGES TO HAVE INSPECTION WINDOWS/SIGHT HOLES GROUNDING BAR NOT USED GROUND BAR L #6 AWG TO ANTENNA GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDS TWO HOLE LUG, OR EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BE USED WITH #2 AWG BCW TO GROUND ROD J 1 1 WIRE TO GROUND BAR CONNECTION 24"x36" SCALE: N c NOTES: 1. GROUND WIRE MOLDING SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE BARE GROUND WIRE TO 08/24/20 PROTECT LINE WORKERS, THE WIRE, AND THE PUBLIC. EXTEND PLASTIC MOLDING C AT LEAST TWO INCHES BELOW GRADE. 90% 2. THE GROUND WIRE SHALL BE IN ONE CONTINUOUS LENGTH. INSERT GROUND WIRE 03/16/20 FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GROUND CLAMP AND BOND OVER CLAMP BEFORE A TIGHTENING. CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL ON THE POLE. PLACE 90% GROUND WIRE ON POLE BETWEEN FACE (NOTCH SIDE) AND SERVICE NEUTRAL. 3. IDRIVE GROUND ROD IN UNDISTURBED EARTH 4. REFERENCE OF UTILITY CO. STD. CONNECT TO SECONDARY OR SERVICE NEUTRAL 1/2" PLASTIC MOULDING— #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE (TYP.) E E 0 ni 2 IC -CRIMP DETAIL TYPE SS TYPE TA -D V ECTOR CRIMP CONNI TYPE PT TYPE VN 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 13 TYPE GL TYPE NC PREPARED FOR AT&T 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: )5 INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 Vendor: U, 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 4 GRADE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY N _m I MERE UNDER E DIRECT UNDERITHE LAS THATTI AM L DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UREWI H N ANDOF iT I STATE OF OREGON' WOODEN POLE AT&T Site ID: GROUND CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 ROD CLAMP TYPE W TYPE VS TYPE VB D PER PLAN GROUND ROD, 4 5/8"0 X LONG (NOT REQUIRE IF PGE GROUND ROD IS PRESENT) 51 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS "x36" SCA TYPE GT 6 ICARDWELD DETAILS TYPE GY TYPE GR 24"x36" SCALE: Nle 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-1 7 0 08/24/20 100% CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs B 03/16/20 90% CDs A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION U, 24"x36" SCALE: NTS 4 GRADE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY N _m I MERE UNDER E DIRECT UNDERITHE LAS THATTI AM L DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UREWI H N ANDOF iT I STATE OF OREGON' WOODEN POLE AT&T Site ID: GROUND CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001 ROD CLAMP TYPE W TYPE VS TYPE VB D PER PLAN GROUND ROD, 4 5/8"0 X LONG (NOT REQUIRE IF PGE GROUND ROD IS PRESENT) 51 HARDWARE DETAIL FOR EXTERIOR CONNECTIONS "x36" SCA TYPE GT 6 ICARDWELD DETAILS TYPE GY TYPE GR 24"x36" SCALE: Nle 18925-001D 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-1 7 LEGEND PREPARED FOR ■ MECHANICAL CONNECTION, DBL-BOLT OR EQUAL AT&T • CADWELD CONNECTION OR EQUAL IN-LINE Cu C-CRIMP, SPLIT-BOLT OR EQUAL 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 Vendor: �51NFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 J5 PROJECT ID: P-043470 (P) OMNI DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA PER PLAN, TYP. Vendor: ANTENNA GROUND POLE EXTENSION GROUND Vendor: RR U EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 2' W x 6' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. #6 AWG GREEN STRANDED COPPER DRAWN BY: AS #2 COPPER-TINNED, BARE WIRE. ADD 1/2" WIRE COVER ON THE CHECKED BY: JMM NOTE: BOTTOM 12 FT. DETAIL SHOWS GENERAL SCHEMATIC GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS ONLY. (P) METAL POLE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE RRJ 0 08/24/20 10096 CDs C 05/19/20 90% CDs EQUIPMENT BONDING JUMPER #6 AWG GREEN B 03/16/20 9096 CDs STRANDED COPPER, TYP. A 02/28/20 90% CDs REV DATE DESCRIPTION #2 GREEN STRANDED TO #2 SOLID MASTER GROUND BAR 2' Licensor: W x 12' CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. �E 9 SERVICE GROUND #2 AWG BARE 89198 OR GREEN STRANDED COPPER DISCONNECT CONTINUOUS TO GROUND POLE GROUNDING OREGON p 92jgY 20` FSV13INHG 8 Z410 POLE GROUNDING BAR 2" W x 6' EXPIRES: 12131/21 CU/CU CLAD W/DBL. BOLT CONN. METER (IF APPLICABLE) (E) FINISHED SURFACE -I HEREBY THAT THESE Wb6WERE PREPARED 9v MEORUM DIRECTEisONADTHI An DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OFTHE siAiE OF OREGON o z PILE GROUNDING AT&T Site IT CRAN_RWOR EUG03_001 D EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTION TO NEW GROUND ROD 18925-001 D (N) GROUND ROD 5/8" x 8' LONG 222 69TH ST. COPPER CLAD STEEL SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Sheet Title: GROUNDING DETAILS Sheet Number: G-2 NOT USED TYPICAL GROUNDING DIAGRAM 24"x36" SCALE: N, 1 EXISTING PROPOSED The comparative LTE: RSRP coverage map over the focus zone is provided below as an illustration. All the other coverage maps(RSRQ, dominance, etc.) are directly viewable in Atoll (with more detail) or can be provided as a snapshot similar to the illustration below upon request. ■ :a r � a Met ,a ,BQeR., EmE88 .0. `tl FW.. L UI - uesssaF_TT 11 1P AnV RY EfLQi ,. �1PL0633 P9 9 G03'0ol R4S`E RLI P IIGRA_a01 •c h �, PL PPW� �RL'SE.S 4 k _Y "r"i *i menJ ITB RSRP(EBm1 ■ Bert RSRPIas EPREi u.B damp 5o W 1 'I rest RIBI IRS EPR, Lryd(dem, Wfi' Best RSRP(0.S EIRE] Level dBml>=1R3 > Best RSRP IRS EPRq Levelld1ml> Best RSRP(RI EPRB LeveldBml> 113 Best (0.S EP0.Ei Level (dBm(>-116 n ... i T Best RSRP IRS level a -118 e. .� f➢su Best (RS Rq Lry11mlel (dBm>=�1yy2fi u it - 3 (D 2019 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo, Mobilizing your World and DIRECTV are registered trademarks and service marks of AT&T AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T affiliated companies. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. AT&T On -Site Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report (RFSSR) Site Name: PDX18925-001 M-RFSC Name: Piero Rovani FA#: 14824108 Site Structure Type: Light Pole USID: 208132 Property Owner: Public ROW Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001_D Property Owner Contact: N/A Address: 6893 B Street PACE#: MRWOR035013/MRWOR035055 Springfield, Oregon 97478 Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC County: Lane c/c JS Infrastructure Partners Latitude: 44.04712778 2030 Main Street, Suite 200 Longitude: -122.90422778 Irvine, CA 92614 EBI Project Number: 6220002238 Report Information: Report Writer: Ian Swanson Meter Model/Serial: NBM-550/E-0541 Report Date: July 28, 2020 Probe Model/Serial: EAS091/01049 Survey Technician: Joe Vitulli Site Survey Date and Time: May 21, 2020 12:30 PST CDs: ATT PDX18925-001_90%_ CRAN CD REV C_2020-06-01 RFDS: 18925-001 P-043470 MRWOR035055 Preliminary RFDS (1) Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. EBI Consulting environmental I engineering I duediligence AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208132 I 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN........................................................................................3 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY..........................................................................................................4 4.0 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS............................................................................................................. 6 5.0 ONSITE MEASUREMENTS...................................................................................................... 9 6.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING............................................................................... 10 7.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 16 8.0 APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ 17 APPENDIXA: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................. 18 APPENDIX EI: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 21 APPENDIX C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION.................................................................... 22 APPENDIX D: LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIXE: RoofMasterT".................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX F: CERTIFICATIONS................................................................................................ 25 PreparerCertification................................................................................................................ 27 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 208132 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) monitoring and modeling for AT&T Site CRAN_RWOR_EUG03_001_D located at 6893 B Street in Springfield, Oregon to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME monitoring and modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&T's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Existing Mitigation at the Site: No Existing Signs on the Utility Pole Recommended Mitigation at the Site: • Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. • Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: No Action Required. o B: No Action Required. o C: No Action Required. Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: N/A o B: N/A o C: N/A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 2 Predictive Modeling Results: The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 24.29 percent of the FCC's general public limit (4.86 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the light fixture level. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. At the antenna face level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 120 1.54 percent of the FCC's general public limit (240.308 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.27 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.054 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Onsite Measured Results: EBI conducted a site visit on May 21, 2020. There are no access restrictions to the light pole as it is located in the public right-of-way At ground level, the maximum measured power density generated by the antennas combined with predictive modeling is approximately 1. 13 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.23 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). 1.2 Climate Conditions at Time of On -Site Audit Temperature: 55° Sky Conditions: Cloudy Wind Factor: Mild Breeze Precipitation: NIA AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Site USID: 208132 3 is lo - Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. .......................... 1� Carrier Color Gee ATT 4 10 loAgad one GaoUNo- Mull SIGN IDENTIFICATION LEGEND gg AT&T NOTICE 7 Sign _p AT&TCAUTION2—Raaftiol , Existing Sign - AT&T WARNING Band M Sign all —A AT&T CAUTION gB—Tewer Sig, ............ Proposed Sign m AT&T NOTICE Small Cell Signs gip_ ATATCAUTIONIC—Paralre[Sig, Installed Sign AT&T CAUnON Small Cell Sign riiiiii, AT&T TRIUNGUAL NOTICE Sign AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY Site USID: 208132 4 Note there is I AT&T panel antenna at this site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. o 1 ATT Gns MomM GQ2412-0661300DT1900 1900 0 0 156 20 40 4 5.85 51&94 851.07 1 ATT GAIMomM GQ2412-0661300DT2100 2100 0 0 181 2.0 40 4 5.45 473.28 ]]6.18 Note there is I AT&T panel antenna at this site. For clarity, the different frequencies for each antenna are entered on separate lines AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Site USID: 208132 5 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Antenna Radiation Z -Height Top of Ant # NAMEX y Z -Height Ground Centerline Luminaire 1 ATT 5.8 0.3 37.0 6.0 36.0 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 4.0 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Site USID: 208132 6 The following pages contain site photos from the on-site survey conducted on May 21, 2020. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Site USID: 208132 7 4. 1 Top of Pole Close Up S. I Base of Pole 6. 1 Broadcast Direction North HT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 7. 1 Broadcast Direction East B. I Broadcast Direction South Site USID: 208132 8 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 5.0 ONSITE MEASUREMENTS EBI performed a ground level RF-EME survey on May 21, 2020. Site USID: 208132 9 Monitoring was performed using a NBM-550 Electromagnetic Radiation Survey Meter, E-0541 with an EA5091-shaped probe with a frequency range of 300kHz-50 GHz. The meter was last calibrated on 4/26/2019. This meter was programmed to measure the total power density for all electromagnetic radiation within the 300kHz-50GHz frequency range and report the power density as a percent of the FCC's controlled MPE. During this survey, no spatially averaged readings above 0.1720% of the FCC's occupational MPE (0.8600% of the general public MPE) were encountered on any ground surface. This maximum spatially averaged reading was measured at ground level 20 feet away on the north side of the pole, as shown in the monitoring site plan. Please see below for a graphical representation of monitoring locations and readings. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. i I I _ _ -- 041M@5 �--� OBti5®f0' __ YfM ! 37Z�5 I r i oocugmo� Leceno AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 10 6.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&T's RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterT. software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site light fixture level and ground -level resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupationallcontrolled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information collected during the site survey and information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers with equipment installed at this site. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no modeled exposures on any accessible light fixture level and ground walking/working surface related to ATT's proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational and/or general public exposure limits at this site. Modeling indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 12 feet of the antenna face and the occupational limit within approximately 5 feet of the antenna face. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general population limit within approximately 4 feet below the bottom of the AT&T antenna and the occupational limit within approximately 3 feet below the bottom of the AT&T antenna At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the light fixture level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately 24.29 percent of the FCC's general public limit (4.86 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 24.29 percent of the FCC's general public limit (4.86 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground/street level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground/street level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.27 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.054 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Existing conditions at the site were measured by radiofrequency monitoring. Combining these results with the predictive modeling results for the proposed AT&T antennas resulted in a maximum power density for the existing and proposed AT&T antennas will be approximately 1. 13 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.23 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at ground level. Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 11 Elevation View AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Percent MPE Legend ❑O' ,00, ■ ,Poo: ❑ EPP<-EPPPA ■ Pool Q PublicZtilx swe Psvemeei ceouMP -P• 10..1gnd ' Mid Zone Avg, C-1- Colm Code ATT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 12 Light Fixture Level (30 feet Ai Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N SECTOR A U S —TOP OF LUMINAIRE-30 GROUND =0' a �6 aQ a.,ao tl0 n° c Per,,e1 API Ley -d ❑ o% Too: M 00% 00% ■ 5Ool rol ■ 5➢DO%. Publm M sda9 ul 9 tto'3 Fe Pi1O12 2] 2] 1033 Feet) Carie, Color Code ALL Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 Antenna Face Level Site USID: 208132 13 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N SECTOR TOP OF LUMITAIRE-30— 30 GROUND= 0 GROUND=0 �0 a� a pia oeD.p a , tl0 9 0 o" C Seri APE Legend ❑ of -Toni ,]�' iO0°ry-e00, �Oo■ moO.. PudlmLimi sdM Sula9 Ipvg 34 b 40 FeeU Caniu Colo, Code ALL AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 Ground Level (0 feet AGL) Site USID: 208132 14 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N SECTOR A U S a —TOP OF LUMINAIRE =30 6 vQa Deo tl0 p6A 6 0� M o Pei®nL MOP Tegend ❑ 0Z-106: 100%-500% M 5➢0%-5➢OOZ 50006+ P0FLmile sal 9 Minor giidow Sea 0 W 6 Feel) Carrier Color Code AFT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 Site USID: 208132 IS AT&T Contribution of More Than 5% of the FCC's General Exposure RF Limit Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in from of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. N SECTOR A TOPOFWMINAIRE-30 S girl �0 a pia oeD.p is o^a� tl0 9 0 o" C Pe,eem MPE Legend Public Limsd M, TD mmgdd size IAvg0 GF -i der-, Colo, Code Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in from of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 16 7.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. The following mitigation measures are recommended for this site. Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. • AT&T Mobility Sectors: o Sector A: No Action Required. o Sector B: No Action Required. o Sector C: No Action Required. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 8.0 APPENDICES Site USID: 208132 17 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Appendix A: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION(FCC) REQUIREMENTS Site USID: 208132 18 The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSIIIEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupationallcontrolled exposure limits (for workers) and general publicluncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupationallcontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general publicluncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General publicluncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area Table I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE limit is 2.33 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 0.47 mW/cm2. For the AT&T equipment operating at 1900 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 5.0 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 1.0 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Site USID: 208132 19 Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (Vim) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm) Power Density (S) (mW/cm') Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S (minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 -- -- f/300 6 1,500-100,000 -- -- (8) Limits for General PublidUncontrolled Exposure 5 6 Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (Vim) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (Alm) Power Density (S) (mW/cm') Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S (minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 8248 2.19/f 080/f * 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 -- -- f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane -wave equivalent power density Figure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissibie Exposure (MPE) Piano -wave Equivalent Power Density Oc.paliona//CooboMad Exposure -- -- General Population/Urrconbolfed Exposure 0.11 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 003 03 q 3 30 300 13,000 36,00'0 },300,000 134 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ®2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 20 Personal Wireless Service Approximate OccupationalMPublicPEFrequency MPE Microwave (Point -to -Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cm'm'Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm'm'Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm'cm'Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/cm cmPersonal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm'cm'Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm'cm' Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm' 0.57 mW/cm' Long Term Evolution (LTE) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm' 0.47 mW/cm' Most Restrictive Frequency Range 30-300 MHz 1.00 mW/cm' 0.20 mW/cm' MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: I) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 21 Appendix B: AT&T RF ExPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated May 27, 2015, requires that I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 18925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 22 Appendix C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: • Be posted at a conspicuous point; • Be posted at the appropriate locations; • Be readily visible; and • Make the reader aware of the potential risksrp for to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. CRAN I HETN ET Small Cell Decals I Signs A STONEHOUSE III meryymidvE by Nb arIll m., rscee0N+ Fl apo+ limn+ Im u•M...I pppukpom NOTICE 84y,1k+.11 IMI+.ar enm u•Mb,m� DECAL WAUT+1&IO 8] 2en.aimnp Nms,br Mlpnyou TIME accea wiNM 11+1. nE+op.m .. mn.nu rt. mboam ,.n.o.. [wO eiCC Ga .P.I..n STONEHOUSE TRILINGUAL NOTICE SIGN ,,,,•,,,,n,,,„,,,,,,M NOTICE Conutl ATSI al BPobl9 ACAUTION nelememlmmew�:,� W�mM 14bpAi6i&Y U&p A CAUTION A STONEHOUSE RF eno,Uy omnleJ Oy Inls anbnna may vaee0lne FCC'9 uaMonn+l..pn.nm limn+. CAUTION sunll.a:111.a1,v+r Rnm lManbnM DECAL Cm AUT,1 SOOLM.]922, opWn S N•n 4 mr Mlp X yw ,IME+a..s wllmn 1 r••1. CAUTION 2A ACAUTION A CAUTION A • STONEHOUSE .�. a°„ ,.....,....,,e.. „ CAUTION IOC CAUTION 2 2B - ..... m.1......1 m° SIGN -PARAPETS .rnn, woex. mx]..P1 +. + Il t,11 P—to .Nvemn Cn, S+a U40r•r. Alerting Signs A TRILINGUAL . -- -_`" " NOTICE2• NOTICE ACAUTION ACAUTION W�mM CAUTION ROOFTOP CAUTION 2A ACAUTION ACAUTION IOC CAUTION 2 2B - CAUTION 2C TOWER -PARAPETS WARNING IB WARNING 2A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Appendix D: LIMITATIONS Site USID: 208132 23 This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC to meet requirements outlined in AT&T's corporate RF safety guidelines. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information collected during the site survey and provided by the client The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Notfor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Appendix E: RoofMasterTM Site USID: 208132 24 RoofMasterT. is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed to predict RF power density values for rooftop and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" (OET-65), RoofMasterT. calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMasterTM models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX18925-001 Site FA 14824108 Appendix F: CERTIFICATIONS Site USID: 208132 25 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Nottor use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 18925-001 Site USID: 208132 Site FA 14824108 26 Field Personnel Certification I, Joe Vitulli, state that: • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in the proper use of the RF-EME measurement equipment, and have successfully completed EBI training in the policies and procedures for site survey protocols. • All information collected during the site survey and contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on the data gathered. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 8925-001 Site FA 14824108 Preparer Certification I, Ian Swanson, state that: Site USID: 208132 27 • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated October 28, 2014) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofMasterT. modeling software. • I have reviewed the data collected during the site survey and provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except underwritten agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHEET: DESCRIPTION: T1 TITLE SHEET TC1 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TC2 PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN SITE NAME: CRAN RWOR E0003 001 D SITE ADDRESS: 222 69TH ST. PROJECT CONTACTS AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: A&E MANAGER: CONTACT: CHARLIE PITT J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: cp1261 @ott.com CONTACT: JOSH MALBERG PH: 971-295-6924 EMAIL: jmalbergQj5ip.com PH: (208) 316-1897 AT&T PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT MANAGER: CONTACT: WENDY LONG J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS EMAIL: W729kQatt.com CONTACT: MIKE SLOTEMAKER PH: (206) 321-1116 EMAIL: mslotemakerQj5ip.com PH: (206) 214-8954 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE, LAYOUTS AND PROCEDURES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), LATEST EDITION, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. 2. PRIOR TO ANY ROAD CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE. 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR LANE CLOSURES INCLUDING SIGNS, CONES, BARRICADES, ETC. SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHOUT ACTUAL LANE CLOSURES AND SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED UPON REMOVAL OF THE CLOSURES. 4. SELECTION, PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIANS, AND WORKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) - PART VI "TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL", AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 5. ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS, DISTANCES, AND TAPER LENGTHS MAY BE EXTENDED TO ADJUST FOR REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CURVATURE OF THE ROADWAY AND FOR ACTUAL TRAFFIC SPEEDS IF IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED LIMITS. 6. TAPERS SHALL BE LOCATED TO MAXIMIZE THE VISIBILITY OF THEIR TOTAL LENGTH. 7. CONFLICTING OR NON-OPERATING SIGNAL INDICATIONS ON THE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SHALL BE BAGGED OR COVERED. 8. ALL (E) ROAD SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND/OR PLOWABLE PAVEMENT REFLECTORS WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE (N) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE COVERED, REMOVED, OR RELOCATED. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE RESTORED TO MATCH PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AFTER COMPLETION OF WORK. 9. CONSTRUCTION ZONE SPEED LIMIT IF REDUCED FROM POSTED LIMITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD AND WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 10. TAPER LENGTHS ARE CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS: L= WS2/60 (40 MPH AND HIGHER) OR L2 = WS (OVER 40 MPH), WHERE W = OFFSET WIDTH (FT), S = TRAFFIC SPEED (MPH). 11. THE SPACING BETWEEN CONES, TUBULAR MARKERS, VERTICAL PANELS, DRUMS, AND BARRICADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED A DISTANCE IN FEET EQUAL TO 1.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TAPER CHANNELIZATION, AND A DISTANCE IF FEET EQUAL TO 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH WHEN USED FOR TANGENT CHANNELIZATION. 12. WHERE DICTATED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS FOR MAINTAINING PEDESTRIAN AND WORKER CROSSING LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OSHA REQUIREMENTS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING HIGHWAY JURISDICTION AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL "FLAGMEN" OR POLICE SUPERVISION, IF REQUIRED. 14. ALL EXCAVATED AREAS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND PLACED ON A MINIMUM 6H:1V SLOPE WITHIN THE CLEAR ZONE ARE TO BE EITHER BACKFILLED OR PRECAST CONCRETE CURB BARRIER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SET TEMPORARILY IN PLACE TO SHIELD VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 15. CONES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR DRUMS AND INSTALLED UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION PROVIDED THEY COMPLY WITH MUTCD. 16. THERE SHALL BE NO WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER VEHICLES IN THE BUFFER SPACE OR THE ROLL AHEAD SPACE. 17. DRIVEWAYS AND/OR SIDE STREETS ENTERING THE ROADWAY AFTER THE FIRST ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE ROAD WORK AHEAD SIGN AS A MINIMUM. 18. WHEN CHANNELIZATION DEVICES HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF LEADING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OUT OF THE INTENDED VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SPACE, THE CHANNELIZATION DEVICES SHOULD BE EXTENDED A DISTANCE IN FEET OF 2.0 TIMES THE SPEED LIMIT IN MPH BEYOND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE TRANSITION AREA. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 (TTCP) LOCATION MAP ., NORTH T C St B.St B St =r McKenzie Di# Cn aSt 6St e (ti ' A 'St WORK_ A 0 Dari Mart' ' r ,.r Eugene Springfield Main St Eire Station 16 Everyone's Market 40 9Fr 00 Aster St {/� =r�' A St I'r !3' 40 o PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 r Sheet Title: TITLE BLOCK rAddress: 101&1:1 =11I 111-111010 UTA 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478. Sheet Number: Rev: T1 A 1 of 3 SIGN SPACING AND BUFFER LENGTHS (FEET) POSTED SPACING BETWEEN SIGNS "BUFFER" SPEED A B C SPACE 20 100 100 100 50 25 75 30 100 35 350 350 350 125 40 150 45 500 500 500 180 50 210 55 250 60 700 700 700 285 65 325 70 365 0 SIDEWALK L'Llm"T B ST. 301-0" 0 30'-0" SCALE: 1" - 30'-0" BE PREPARED TO STOP ONEIAN ROAD AHEAD n VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ROAD WORK AHEAD PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN Address: 0101&101 =11I 111-111119CKoIAUTm 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478. Sheet Number: Rev: A TC1tot 3 SPEED B ST. LIMIT J 25 SPEED I LIMIT SPEED A ST. uMrr 25 \ 20'-0" 0 20'-0" z' 4' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SPEED B ST. L'M'T 25 SIDMAI PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN PREPARED FOR: 16331 NE 72ND WAY REDMOND WA 96052 PLANS PREPARED BY: 'S INFRASTRUCTURE 2030 MAIN ST. SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 Sheet Title: PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN Address: 010111111101=111U-11-11101MsagTm 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478. Sheet Number: Rev: A TC2 3 of 3 NUMMEMEN Sheet Title: PEDESTRIAN WORK SAFETY PLAN Address: 010111111101=111U-11-11101MsagTm 222 69TH ST. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478. Sheet Number: Rev: A TC2 3 of 3 2011 Edition Stationary Lane Closure with Flagging PMW a M M SOD no so 210 55 no 10D us us 70 M I I t Page 85 Diagram 320 t Smtanbe 2018 Chapter5 2011 Edition Page 55 Pedestrian Accommodation, Mid -Block Diagram 5-7 The sidewalk should be closed at the nearest intersection on each side of the work area when a safe, ADA -compliant path through the work area is not available. or 24x18 Typa'w1" or axle Typa'W1' September 2018 Chapter Sabre Industries'" INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 33' Smart Stack (38'-2" Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG03_001_D, OR Site Number: 18925-001D Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19 September 1, 2020 MonopoleProfile................................................................................... 1 Foundation Design Summary................................................................. 2 PoleCalculations.................................................................................. 3-8 Foundation Calculations......... ,rte Digitally Signed By Keith Tndall 61633PE DN: c=DS, s1 -Texas, OREGON kAbarada, a -SABRE INDUSTRIES, INC., m=KeAh -& lgV e. nr4oP` Tindall, email- / nQ � �m L 10:25:01 iindal%sabreindustri 1e: 2020.09 .01 0'"REs0030/2022 9-14 Designed Appurtenanw Leading .enplm LIVED aPw llrol [.0 Ulaovizuev Isl RA' ED DE e sa�se —1 =PLLyyas p mi latin", h a, .1-111— ELE aa,a. d wLEE p Y12yN Kn nI ID. RED urn, nl In- nlA,aEaemelRRII<.<Ralvl<smwa.a. 1. 142 nl ArillM.R.VTVIRexreasmw AERIEal+a' 11 RE moPamre.e loal s$�3a���S3a (1)-ttasi al lr� 5. nlascnc.IsssPszaaA al+a' Designed Appurtenanw Leading Design Criteria -AN$IfTW-222� LIVED aPw(w R) .enplm LIVED aPw llrol [.0 Ulaovizuev Isl RA' ED DE 19canuxUe'vaz'I sa�se —1 alcacnmr.slD mi latin", ELE a, .1-111— ELE aa,a. EV' wLEE Y12yN Kn nI ID. RED urn, nl In- nlA,aEaemelRRII<.<Ralvl<smwa.a. 1. 142 nl ArillM.R.VTVIRexreasmw AERIEal+a' 11 RE moPamre.e loal (1)-ttasi al lr� 5. nlascnc.IsssPszaaA al+a' Design Criteria -AN$IfTW-222� LIVED aPw(w R) sl., LIVED aPw llrol [.0 outer l.ml— Otrut G�vv sa�se —1 v„e' mi latin", m^R, Anchor Bolt Dimensions .1-111— ortut Loan Case Reactions D•emne. 1 A,Dawoa aD..lma naelkl o Inn1 s,.,rwa067 E sa�se —1 v„e' LEE Anchor Bolt Dimensions art 5. Slbh-PIo REV.�sw EV' wLEE Y12yN Kn Notes 1) Antenna load Lire, Run Inside Pole 2) All dimerelore are ati ground laval, unMss otherol. sparifiai 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Final vakjhftr yvary. I) Thia WERE design and, If appleadla, the foundation deal sial on the followhg pagels) also meet or exceed the regulramenta of the 2019 Oregon Structural Sperefty Coda. i) Tol Rafin, 13% $B Base Plate Dimensions 1&Y26}EPa ept 18 Et,t at'lu veSabrE wEl 1 E sa�se INNOVATION DELIVERED rtly, IFAS®MMY v„e' EUDI3_C%n, onIstra %n Anchor Bolt Dimensions art 5. Slbh-PIo REV.�sw EV' wLEE Y12yN Kn Notes 1) Antenna load Lire, Run Inside Pole 2) All dimerelore are ati ground laval, unMss otherol. sparifiai 3) Weight, shown are estimates. Final vakjhftr yvary. I) Thia WERE design and, If appleadla, the foundation deal sial on the followhg pagels) also meet or exceed the regulramenta of the 2019 Oregon Structural Sperefty Coda. i) Tol Rafin, 13% $B 1&Y26}EPa ept 18 Et,t at'lu veSabrE InJVj+rlEj R RUCNRE --Ens INNOVATION DELIVERED rtly, IFAS®MMY v„e' EUDI3_C%n, onIstra %n art 5. Slbh-PIo REV.�sw EV' Y12yN Kn Page Sabre Industries" I N NDVFTION DELIVERED No.: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19 Date: 09/0120 By: KJT Customer: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG03 001 D, OR 18925-001D 33' Smart Stack Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 4,500 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. Grade is. 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 p=— =1 Grade 60. SHIM= 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete �— I —I I cover. I I I 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSIMA- (8) 2" Conduits & 222-H-2017. (2) 3/4" ConduitsL-----j 4 7 I I D I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ----- 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be ELEVATION VIEW positioned as closely as possible to the (1.59 Cu. Yds.) bottom of the anchor bolts. (1 REQUIRED; NOT TO SCALE) Rebar Schedule for Pier (12) #5 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Iniorni contained herein Ethe sole properly of Sabre Industries, constitutes atrade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Industries. 7101 Southbridge Drive -P.O. Boz 658 -Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 -Phone 712.258.6690- Fax 712.279.0814 Page (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaK:(416)736-4372 web: Wnw.guymast.c. Processed under license at: Sabre Towers Rod Poles : 1 sep 2020 an: 10:12:38 ----------------------- 33' Pipe Pole / EUG03 00", ON * All pole diameters shown on the following pages are Across corners. See profile Jrawi ng for widths Across flats. PULE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCE$ SPLICE ... O✓ERIAP... w/t NAME SIDE DI -NESS **Pm **Mn WEE LENGTH RATIO ft in in kip ft -kip ft 32.9 ........................................... 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 A 0 42.7 16.00 0.375 579.9 240.4 0.0 ........................................... POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE .............BOLT$ AT BASE OF SECTION............ GLC NAME ELEV NUMBER WEE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE $HEAR PLANE ELEV ft in ksi ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 RULE SECTIONS SECTION NO.Of LENGTH OUT$IDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGE.WELD NAME $IDE$ NOT TOP HAD ENTAL BOT TOP ..GROUE.ID.. ID NOT TOP ft in in in A 0 32.92 16.00 16.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 * - Diameter Of circunscribeE circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF IF NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE NO ELEM. WEB RANGE .PROTECTION. .W OF ORIENT AREA & deg in in in in deg PL 1 1 0.0 16.00 0.38 0.375 0.375 0.00 0.0 & - with respect t0 Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES -------------- MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL WEE NO. MODULUS WEIGHT Fu FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi ksi /tleg 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001170 * Only 2 condition(s) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A -- 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOADS ON MULE LOAD ELEV APELY..LOAD..AT LOAD ...... FORCE$...... ...... MOMENT$..... TYPE RADIUS AZI AZ NOR. DOWN VERTICAL TOHSNAL ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0372 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0809 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 Page 3 C 33.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0232 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0292 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.992 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0125 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.992 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1032 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.562 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.562 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.422 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.422 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 32.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0125 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 LOADING CONDITION M 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: OF LOAD$ ON POLE L0AD DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ELEV APVLY..LOAU..AT LOAD ......PONCES...... ...... MUNEHTS..... TYPE WwH ........ TILT .......... RADIUS AZI AZI HONII DONN VERTICAL TONSNAL ACROSS ft ft O.00F O.00F kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.912 O.00A 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.492 O.00F 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0809 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 33.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0026 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.992 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.992 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1032 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0918 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.562 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.562 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.422 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.422 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0225 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 32.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0125 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 Guynast Inc. Tel:(416)736-2453 Fax:(416)236-4322 web: wwwguymast. can Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on. 1 sep 2020 at: 10:12:38 33' Pipe Pole / EUG03 0010, OR MA%IMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED(w.r.t. wind direction) MAST ....... DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... .........ROTATIONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... WwH ........ TILT .......... PNI$T ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 32.9 0.03F O.00F O.00F 0.08F O.00F O.00F ........................................ 24.2 0.02A O.00F O.00A . ...... .. .. .. O.OBF ...... .. .. O.00F ....... O.00F 16.5 0.01A O.00F O.00A 0.02F 0.0OF O.00F ........................................ 8.2 O.00A O.00F O.00A . ...... .. .. .. O.OM ...... .. .. O.00F ....... O.00F Page 4 0.0 O.OUA O.00A O.00A 0.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MGXIMLM POLE PONCES CALCUTATEO(W.r.t. to Mod direction) .$I VIAL SHEAN.W.r.Lwxx U.UIN MCMENI.W.r.Lwxx U.UIN TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 32.9...................................................................... 0.31 I 0.08 w 0.00 K -0.21 N 0.00 H 0.00 K 1.21 C 0.29 w 0.00 K -1.44 B 0.00 K 0.00 K 24.7...................................................................... 1.21 I 0.29 M 0.00 B -1.44 I 0.00 H 0.00 H 1.97 I 0.38 M 0.00 B 4.21 F 0.00 B 0.00 F 16.5...................................................................... 1.97 K 0.38 M 0.00 u 4.21 F 0.00 0 O.00 F 2.69 K 0.48 M 0.00 U -7.78 F 0.00 U 0.00 F 8.2...................................................................... 2.69 C 0.48 M 0.00 w -7.78 F 0.00 F 0.00 F 3.37 C 0.57 M 0.00 w -12.11 A 0.00 F 0.00 F ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 3.37 C -0.57 M 0.00 w 12.11 A 0.00 F 0.00 F COG PLIANCE WITH 4.8.2 ---------------------- & 4.5.4 MO ENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ELEV AXIAL BENDING $HEAR ♦ TOTAL SATISPIEO O/t(W/t) MGX ft -kip 3.37 0.57 TORSIONAL -12.11 0.00 0.00 C ALLOWED ft A F F 32.92 ...................................................................... O.00I O.00N O.00w O.00H YES 42.67A 400.0 O.000 0.010 O.00w 0.010 YES 42.67A 400.0 24.69 ...................................................................... 0.001 O.011 O.00M 0.01I YES 42.67A 400.0 O.00I 0.02F O.00M 0.02F YES 42.67A 400.0 16.46 ...................................................................... O.00K 0.02F O.00M 0.02F YES 42.67A 400.0 O.00K 0.03F O.00M 0.04F YES 42.67A 400.0 8.23 ...................................................................... O.000 0.03F O.00M 0.04F YES 42.62A 400.0 0.010 0.05A O.00M O.OGA YES 42.67A 400.0 0.00 ...................................................................... MAXIMUM ----------------------------------------- L0AD$ ONTO FOUNDATION(W.r.t. Wind direction) CONN $HEAR.W.r.t.WIND.DIR MO ENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 3.37 0.57 0.00 -12.11 0.00 0.00 C M w A F F (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (02017 GuMast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FaX:(416)736-4372 web: wvm.guymast.c. Processed under license at: Sabre Towers and Poles on: 1 sep 2020 an: 10:12:51 33' Pipe Pole / EuD03 00", ON ."""""" . service Load condition °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° ............................................................................. * Only 1 conditions) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A 60 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: 00 Page 5 LOADS ON POLE LOAD WITH 4.8.2 ELEV APVLr_LOAO..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ...... EaBBENTS..... TYPE RADIO$ AZI AZI HORII IXYNN VERTICAL TORSNAL ft ft O.00L O.00L O.000 kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 36.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 C 35.497 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0315 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 C 33.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0084 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 32.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0198 0.0000 0.0000 C 30.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0247 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 C 25.997 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0403 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1020 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 32.920 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0049 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0047 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 MA IMOM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCLLATED(W.LL wind direction) EAST .......DEFLECTION$ (ft) ......... ......... ROTATDON$ (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOWN ........ TILT .......... TWIST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 32.9 0.01D O.00L O.00D 0.03D O.00L O.00L .........................................................66.......66.. 24J O.O1D O.00L O.00I 0.03D O.00L O.00L 16.5 O.00D O.00L 0.001 0.03D O.00L O.00L .........................................................66.......66.. 8.2 O.00D O.00L O.00I 0.02D O.00L O.00L 0.0 O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A ...................................................................... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCU!ATED(W,t. to Mod direction) MAST LOTAL $HEAR. W.r.t..IND.DIR MUMENT.W.r.t.WIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 32.9..............................................................6666.... 0.26 L 0.03 C 0.00 H -0.08 L 0.00 H 0.00 L 1.01 L 0.11 C 0.00 H -0.56 C 0.00 N 0.00 H 24.7...................................................................... 1.01 I 0.11 D 0.00 L -0.56 A 0.00 H 0.00 H 1.64 I 0.15 D 0.00 L -1.65 D 0.00 L 0.00 L 16.5...................................................................... 1.64 I 0.15 D 0.00 B -1.65 D 0.00 L 0.00 L 2.24 I 0.19 D 0.00 B -3.07 D 0.00 B 0.00 B 8.2...................................................................... 2.24 1 0.19 D 0.00 N -3.07 D 0.00 6 0.00 6 2.811 0.23D O.00N 4.81D O.00L O.00L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- base reaction 2.81 I -0.23 D 0.00 N 4.81 D 0.00 L 0.00 L CEMELIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL BENDING $HEAR 4 TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(W/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOGED ft 32.92.................................................................6666. O.00L O.00L O.000 O.00L YES 42.67A 400.0 Page 6 Page 7 O.00L 0.000 0.000 O.00A YES 42.62A 4OU.O 24.69 ...................................................................... O.00I 0.00A 0.000 O.00A YES 42.67A AW.O 0.001 0.010 0.000 0.Oli YES 42.67A AW.O 16.46 ...................................................................... 0.001 0.010 0.000 0.010 YES 42.6)A 400.6 0.001 0.010 0.000 0.020 YES 42.67A AW.O 8.23 ...................................................................... O.00T 0.010 0.000 0.020 YES 42.67A 400.6 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.020 YES 42.67A AW.O 0.00 ...................................................................... MAYIMUM LQ40$ ONTO FOUNOATION(W.LL WINE Ei Ne Cti ON) DOWN $HEAN.W.N.t.WINO.OIN EkNENT.W.N.t.WINO.OIN TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 2.81 0.23 0.00 -4.81 0.00 0.00 T U O L L Page 7 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DE LI VE 1E1) SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19 Site Name: EUG03_001_D, OR Dale: 9/1/2020 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSIMA 222-H Pole Data Diameter: 16.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 'e' IF Hound Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Base Plate Results Plate Data Anchor Rod Results Moment, Mu: 12.11 ff-kips Allowable m'Fy: Axial, Pu: 3.37 kips Maximum Put: Shear, Vu: 0.57 kips mt'Rnt: Eff. Width: 11.15 in Vu: Anchor Rod Data (Pv'Rnv: Tension Interaction Ratio: Quantity: 4 (multiple of 4) Maximum Puc: Diameter: 1 in q)c'Rnc: Rod Material: F1554 Vu: Strength (Fu): 125 ksi q)c'Rnvc: Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Compression Interaction Ratio: BC Diam. (in): 19.5 BC Override: 19.5 Maximum Interaction Ratio: Base Plate Results Plate Data Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 6.82 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.14 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.01 8.29 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.14 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.13 13.0% Pass 5.2 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 11.6% Pass Page 6 Base Plate (Mu/Z): Width (in): 19.5 Width Override: 19.5 Allowable m'Fy: Thickness: 1 in Base Plate Interaction Ratio: Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Eff. Width: 11.15 in Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 6.82 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.14 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.01 8.29 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.14 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.13 13.0% Pass 5.2 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 11.6% Pass Page 6 Toile for windows, version 2019-11.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled Shafts Subjected to Lateral Loading Using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by Ensoft, mc. All Rights Reserved This copy of CPI Ie is being used by: Keith LIndall Sabre Towers and Poles Serial Number of Security Device: 227885948 This copy of LN le is licensed for exclusive use by: Sabre Communications Corporation Use of this program by any entity other than Sabre Communications Corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Piles used for Analysis Path to file locations: \Program Piles (x86)\Ensoft\Lpile2019\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19.1plld Name of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19APIlo Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19.lpllp Name of runtime message file - 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19.1pllr Date and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: September 1, 2020 rime: 10:19:47 Problem Jltle Site E0003_001 D, OR Tourer 33' Pipe Pole Prepared for J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Job Number 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 19 Engineer NJT Program Options and Settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering Units used for Data input and Computations: - US Customary System Units (sounds, feet, inches) Analysis Control Options: - maximum number of iterations allowed = 999 - Deflectiontolerance for convergence = 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection = 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments = 100 LoadingType and Number of Cycles of Loading: - Static loading specified - use of p -y modification factors for p -y curves not selected - Analysis uses layer,. nn correction (method of Georgiadis) - xo tlI st ri butetl lateral loads are entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 9 input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at thepile tip not selectetl - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected - Com utation of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected - Pus -over analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal symbols. - Neport only summary tables of pile -head deflection, maximum bending moment, and maximum shear force in output report file. - NO i otureport ycurves oe becomputedand reported for user-specified depths Pile Structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defined 1 Total length of pile 6.083 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. os•thlethehemle1eimmlutfluel�iaetTweepol ng oftPi. using summary ofvaa oedi meter dpthol lows. Depth Below Pile Point Pile Head Di meter No. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.083 36.0000 Input Structural Properties for Pile Sections: Pile Section No. 1: Section 1 is a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or Cion pile Length of section = 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter =36.000000 in Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lbs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grountl Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground Slope Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 raans Pile Batter Angle 0.000 degrees 0.000 radians Soil and Nock Layering information The soil profile is modelled using 2 layers top of layer = 1.083333 Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by Matlock, 1970 Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 0.083333 Effective unit weight at top f[ Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 pcf f[ Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer =110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 14.400000 = 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer = 14.400000 pa epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.100000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer epsilon -80 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water Distance from top of pile to top of layer = 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of layer = 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer = 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer = 1000.000000 P5 undrained cohesion at bottom of layer = 1000.000000 psf epsilon -80 at top of layer = 0.010000 ep511on-80 at bottom of layer = 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 14.000 ft below the pile tip) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of input Soil Properties Page 10 Layer Soil Type Layer effective Undrained ESO Layer Name De th unit wt. Cohesion or Nun. (P -y Curve Type) ft pcf psf kre 1 Soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 1 Clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff Clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 v = 230.000000 lbs m = w/o Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity Conditions from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Number of loads specified = 2 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Load Load Condition Condition Axial Thrust Compute Top y Nun Analysis 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in No. Type 1 2 Force, lbs vs. Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v =760.000000 lbs m = 193760. in -lbs 4493. No Yes 2 1 v = 230.000000 lbs m = 57720. in -lbs 2810. No Yes v = shear force applied normal to pile axis m= bending moment applied to pile head y = lateral deflection normal to pile axis S = rotational sti relative sto plied to pile header angle values of to lengthsp� specified shear loading(LosTypes 1, 2, Rod 3). only for load types with Thrust force is assumed to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. Computations of Nominal moment Capacity and Nonlinear ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -bead loading conditions Number of Pile Sections Analyzed = 1 Pile Section NO. 1: ------------------- Di mansions and Properties of Drilled Shaft (Bored Pile): Len nth of Section 6.083333 ft Shaft Diameter 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) 3.375000 in Number of Beinforcin9 ears 12 bars Yield Stress of Reinforcing Bars = 60000. psi modulus of elasticity of Reinforcing Bars = 29000000. psi Gross Area of Shaft = 1018. in. Total Area of Beinforcin Steel = 5.301438 sq. in. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement = 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing = 6.626343 in maximum Concrete Aggregate Size =0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate Size =8.84 Offset of Center of Rebar Cage from Center of Pile = 0.0000 in Axial Structural Capacities: ---------------------------- Rom. Axial Structural Capacity = 0.85 Fc Ac 4 FY As = 4191.184 kips Tensile Load for Cracking of Concrete =-463.561 kips Nominal Axial Tensile Capacity = -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions Used in Computations: Bar Bar Man. Bar Area X Y Number inches sq. i . n_- inches inches ---------- ------ --- --- -- 1 0.750000 0.441786 ---------- 14.250000 ---------- 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 ).125000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 12.340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 14.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 12.340862 6 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 7.125000 7 0.750000 0.441786 -14.250000 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -12.340862 -7.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 -12.340862 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -14.250000 11 0.750000 0.441786 7.125000 -12.340862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12.340862 -7.125000 Page 11 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by Lpile minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero = 6.626 inches between bars 7 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate size = 8.84 Concrete properties: -------------------- Compressive Strength Of Concrete= 4500. psi modulus Of elasticity Of Concrete = 3823676. psi modulus Of Rupture of Concrete =-503.115295 psi Compression Strain at peak Stress = 0.002001 Tensile Strain at Fracture of Concrete =-0.0001152 maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.750000 in Number Of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from pile -head Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 2.8]0 2 4.493 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of Results for Nominal moment Capacity for Section 1 moment values interpolated at maximum compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile fails at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal mom. Cap. max. Co'. No. kipsin-kip Strain -------------------- ------------------ ------------ 1 2.810 4850.813 0.00300000 2 4.493 4873.995 0.00300000 Note that thevalues Of moment ca acity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.70). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor to compute ultimate moment capacity according to ACI 318, Section 9.3.2.2 Or the value required by the design standard being followed. The followinn table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stifgnesses computed for cormon resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Resist. Nominal ult. (Fac) ult. (Fac) Rend. Stiff. Load Factor moment Cap Ax. Thrust moment Cap at ult mom NO. for momentin-kips kipsin-kips kip -i M2 ----------------- ------------ ---------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ 1 0.65 4851. 1.826500 3153. 41143438. 2 0.65 4874. 2.920667 3168. 41380500. 1 0.75 4851. 1.967000 3638. 39695060. 2 0.75 4874. 3.145333 3655. 39945909. 1 0.90 4851. 2.107500 4366. 26366880. 2 0.90 4874. 3.370000 4387. 26509136. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Layering Correction equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Layers TOP Of equivalent Layer TOP Depth Same Layer Layer is FO F1 Layer BeOWeAID. Type As Rock or integral integral NO. pile Read Grnd Surf Layer is Be]. for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer ml equals the sum Of the RO and F1 integrals for Layer n. Layering correction equivalent depths are computed only for soil ty es with both shallow -depth and deep -depth expressions for peak latera R load transfer. These soil types are soft and stiff clays, on -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi soil. Summary of pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of pile -head Loading Conditions: Page 12 Load Type L Load 1 =$hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 2: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Type 3: Load 1 = $hear, v, lbs, and Load 2 = Not. Stiffness, a, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in -lbs Load Type 5: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = Slope, $, radians Load Load Load exi al vile -head pile -head! max $hear Max Moment Case Tvpe vile -head Tvpe Rile -head Loading Deflection Rotation n Rile n vile NO. y Load 1 y Load 2 lbs inches radians lbsn-lbs ---- ------------------------- -- — --------------------------------------------- — i------- 1 v, lb 760.0000 M, in -lb 193760. 4493. 0.2056 -0.00442 -6466. 204699. 2 v, lb 230.0000 M, in -lb 57720. 2610. 0.00217 -5.04e-05 -1662. 60941. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.2057950649 inches maximum pile -head rotation = -0.0044235226 radians = -0.253449 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 13 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (f4k) 12.11 Shear (k) 1 0.57 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (fl) Caisson height below ground (fl) Lateral soil pressure (Iblfe) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, S, (lb/ft) Diameter, b (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 3 0.083333 6 250.00 21.33 570 500.00 3 0.89 = (2.34P)/(S, b) 5.01 =0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h/A))'M] Page 14