The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 9/23/2020DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Bill Randall MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, October 15, 2020, 1:30 — 2:30 PLACE: DPW ^_F______ Room c'6 z=+6 Virtual via GoToMeeting CONTACT PERSON: Andy Limbird Current Planning Staff: J Donovan, L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Canfio _ Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW ✓ Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW) Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager __ Knsb Krueger, Principal Engineer, Development S Public Works ✓ Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development S Public Works ✓ Eric Phillips-Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshal 2, Fre S Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development S Public Works __ Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District _✓ Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) _ Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) ✓ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Ublity Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning S Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odo tr2 pla n mg r@odo t. s tate. o r. us ) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities S Operators; Springfield Public Schools __ Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools _✓ Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink __ Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW ✓ Chris Moorhead, DPW City Surveyor ✓ Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportabon (Steve Gallup, cc only) Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director Mane Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kmaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM) Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexabons) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revixd: 06/05/2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 6151616 Meeting Date: Thu"day, October 15, 2020 1:30 — 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -20 -000170 -PRE 811-20-000176-PROJ Bill Randall Assessor's Map: 17-02-31-31 TL 2200 Address: 3402 Main Street Existing Use: vacant Applicant has submitted proposal for cluster subdivision on 1.99 acres. Planner: Andy Limbird The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.si)ringfield-or.govhaeblink8/browse.asl)x .I 7. r. wo +as ' f1II u_ 3505 350] 3W.5 1'35229 3fi85 j 1• 101 35fi] 3fi5] 5fi5T bn 1521 �.. � .uwzr aOn» r rw �I a Iy .1' at e 31q 3p1 � 31O 315 � Ig IZII �. R69 ...261. 5y D 2fF - 2I0 'g TI], o /O 233 O , 2011 A] 226.. 101 195 199 a ?Sti •..� .I 7. r. wo +as ' f1II u_ 3505 350] 3W.5 1'35229 3fi85 j 1• 101 35fi] 3fi5] 5fi5T bn 1521 �.. � .uwzr aOn» !city of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 8PRINOPI� 1 Required Project Information .. Prospective Applicant Name: William A. Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Architecture, PC Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: William A. Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Archicitecture, PC Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Karrie Knecht Phone: Company: KDirt LLC/Ka co United Inc Fax: Address: 3400 Main Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-31 TAX LOT NO 5 : 02200 Property Address: approx 3400 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Size of Property: 1.99 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of if you are Filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Cluster Subdivision with 22 duplexes Existing Use: Vacant land # of Lots/Parcels: Av . Lot Parcel Size: sf Densi : du/acre Prospective Applicant: 1,1 If, Q�/ii Date: 16 Sept2020 Signature �l,Q William A. Randall Print RequiredProject Information -� (� complete section)/®/ Case No.: �I I -4-00600 -iC 'i Date: -1 I [ I m Reviewed by: bi st/l 111 C` Application Fee: ; Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ '� '• PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 380 LINCOLN STREET E Sere,, Organ 97401 541-344-3332 www. arborsouth.rom 16 September 2020 DUPLEX PROJECT I 33rd AND 34th STREETS, SPRINGFIELD, OR DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I QUESTIONS 17-02-31-31-02200 The applicant is wanting to develop a group of duplexes on an LDR parcel near 3400 Main Street.The current parcel is split zoned with Community Commercial at the south and Low Density residential at the norvh.The applicant is in the process of readying a submittal for a partition into two separate tax lots The existing south portion has an existing warehouse development that is to remain.The north portion of the property is currently vacantThe current LDR density allowance is 6 to 14 dwelling units per acre (SDC 3.2-205(A)(1). Following are our questions for the DIM: I. LAYOUT AND DENSITY: In previous conversations with City staff, it was indicated that development of this parcel would require dedication of public right of way to connect 34th and 33rd Streets.We are showing this as a preliminary layout for connectivity.The existing 33rd ROW is 60' and 34th appears to be 44'.Would the rights of ways be the same width as the streets they extend? Is a 60' ROW necessary? If this is correct, then the remaining two parcels would be about 11,411 sq ft and 60,972 sq ft. Based on LDR density, the smaller parcel's maximum allowable unit count would be 4 and the larger parcel would be 20.We-are proposing 4 units for the smaller parcel and 18 for the larger parcel.Are these density assumptions correct? With a cluster subdivision, could we access the 10 units from one driveway as shown on Option I rather than a separate driveway to Units 14 and 15 as shown in Option 2 (we believe the 8 unit maximum only applies to flag lots)? Also, with the I acre minimum, would the smaller parcel be separate or could it also be incorporated into the entire cluster development as a single development site? 2. HB2001 AND SB 1051: How do the HB and SB requirements affect a cluster subdivision, if at all? What would you recommend for lot configurations and layout for the cluster? We are not showing any property lines on the enclosed site plan until we can determine the best layout for a cluster subdivision. 3. DESIGN STANDARDS: The multi -unit design standards apply in all residential districts for a multi -unit development (3 or more attached units).We believe since the proposal is duplexes, the multi -unit design standards at SDC 3.2-240 do not apply. Is this correct? We also assume the Design Standards for Duplexes in 4.7-142 also do not apply because we are not in SLR, MDR or HDR zones. Is this correct? Does a cluster subdivision affect any of these standards?Also, in the Cluster Subdivision requirements for duplexes, at SDC 3.2-230.G.2 requires a door facing the street, but given the size and shape of the property, as well as the desire to create community within the development, the front doors are proposed to be oriented around the driveway/courtyard layout. How would this be addressed in the cluster subdivision process? 4. STORMWATER: We are proposing the stormwater facilities to be located at the north of the smaller parcel and southeast portion of the larger parcel.We will be having this designed by The Favreau Group.Are there any specific issues related to this parcel and the stormwater that you feel we should be aware of? Would common stormwater facilities be allowed if the project is partitioned into several tax lots in a cluster subdivision? S. OTHER: Are there any other issues you may have seen in your review that we did not address?