Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/19/2020!city of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 8PRINOPI� 1 Required Project Information .. Prospective Applicant Name: William A. Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Architecture, PC Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: William A. Randall Phone: 541-344-3332 Company: Arbor South Archicitecture, PC Fax: Address: 380 Lincoln Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Karrie Knecht Phone: Company: KDirt LLC/Ka co United Inc Fax: Address: 3400 Main Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-31 TAX LOT NO 5 : 02200 Property Address: approx 3400 Main Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Size of Property: 1.99 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of if you are Filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Cluster Subdivision with 22 duplexes Existing Use: Vacant land # of Lots/Parcels: Av . Lot Parcel Size: sf Densi : du/acre Prospective Applicant: 1,1 If, Q�/ii Date: 16 Sept2020 Signature �l,Q William A. Randall Print RequiredProject Information -� (� complete section)/®/ Case No.: �I I -4-00600 -iC 'i Date: -1 I [ I m Reviewed by: bi st/l 111 C` Application Fee: ; Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ '� '• PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ® Development Issues Meeting Application Form ® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ® Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" ® Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ® North arrow ® Date of preparation ® Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ® Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ® On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ® Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions ® Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ® How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of3 380 LINCOLN STREET E Sere,, Organ 97401 541-344-3332 www. arborsouth.rom 16 September 2020 DUPLEX PROJECT I 33rd AND 34th STREETS, SPRINGFIELD, OR DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I QUESTIONS 17-02-31-31-02200 The applicant is wanting to develop a group of duplexes on an LDR parcel near 3400 Main Street.The current parcel is split zoned with Community Commercial at the south and Low Density residential at the norvh.The applicant is in the process of readying a submittal for a partition into two separate tax lots The existing south portion has an existing warehouse development that is to remain.The north portion of the property is currently vacantThe current LDR density allowance is 6 to 14 dwelling units per acre (SDC 3.2-205(A)(1). Following are our questions for the DIM: I. LAYOUT AND DENSITY: In previous conversations with City staff, it was indicated that development of this parcel would require dedication of public right of way to connect 34th and 33rd Streets.We are showing this as a preliminary layout for connectivity.The existing 33rd ROW is 60' and 34th appears to be 44'.Would the rights of ways be the same width as the streets they extend? Is a 60' ROW necessary? If this is correct, then the remaining two parcels would be about 11,411 sq ft and 60,972 sq ft. Based on LDR density, the smaller parcel's maximum allowable unit count would be 4 and the larger parcel would be 20.We-are proposing 4 units for the smaller parcel and 18 for the larger parcel.Are these density assumptions correct? With a cluster subdivision, could we access the 10 units from one driveway as shown on Option I rather than a separate driveway to Units 14 and 15 as shown in Option 2 (we believe the 8 unit maximum only applies to flag lots)? Also, with the I acre minimum, would the smaller parcel be separate or could it also be incorporated into the entire cluster development as a single development site? 2. HB2001 AND SB 1051: How do the HB and SB requirements affect a cluster subdivision, if at all? What would you recommend for lot configurations and layout for the cluster? We are not showing any property lines on the enclosed site plan until we can determine the best layout for a cluster subdivision. 3. DESIGN STANDARDS: The multi -unit design standards apply in all residential districts for a multi -unit development (3 or more attached units).We believe since the proposal is duplexes, the multi -unit design standards at SDC 3.2-240 do not apply. Is this correct? We also assume the Design Standards for Duplexes in 4.7-142 also do not apply because we are not in SLR, MDR or HDR zones. Is this correct? Does a cluster subdivision affect any of these standards?Also, in the Cluster Subdivision requirements for duplexes, at SDC 3.2-230.G.2 requires a door facing the street, but given the size and shape of the property, as well as the desire to create community within the development, the front doors are proposed to be oriented around the driveway/courtyard layout. How would this be addressed in the cluster subdivision process? 4. STORMWATER: We are proposing the stormwater facilities to be located at the north of the smaller parcel and southeast portion of the larger parcel.We will be having this designed by The Favreau Group.Are there any specific issues related to this parcel and the stormwater that you feel we should be aware of? Would common stormwater facilities be allowed if the project is partitioned into several tax lots in a cluster subdivision? S. OTHER: Are there any other issues you may have seen in your review that we did not address?