The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 8/31/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ Revised 1/7/14 Id 1 of 11 aw Im Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ iMajor Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal, ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: Q Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant. complete this section) Applicant Name: Nathan Wiedenmann Phone: 503-559-3535 Company: ALLC, LLC Email: nathan@stellalighting.c Address: 88141 Chita Lp, Springfield, OR 97476 Applicant's Rep.: Renee Clough, PLS PE AICP Phone: 541-746-0637 • Branch Engineering,Inc Company: reneec@branchengineering.com Email: Address: 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: Nathan Wiedenmann Phone: 503-559-3535 Company: ALLC LLC Email: nathan@stellalighting.c Address: 88141 Chita Lp, Springfield, OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-34-34 TAX LOT NOS : 700 Property Address: 6165 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97476 Size of Property: 1.0 Acres x❑ Square Feet ❑ No. of Proposed 17 Proposed Name of Project: Arrowhead Meadows Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro osal:Two multifamily dwellings with 7 units each, 3 townhomes and associated parking, utilities and s orage. nc u es a extension o ser Streeto reacha site. ExistingUse: Vacant New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 0.55 ac sf Si natures: Please sign and Drint Mour name and date in the acicirociriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ I PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 Id 1 of 11 aw Im Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory e, m npamon, requeszs4nd requirements conveyed to my representative. Nathan mea, Cony t Web the wrnplttenew Me& 1 at8ml me NfmmaBon k Ubed by me Cay as or me Inromation will me ba provided If not emelsa zs me appl..m,. web me INprmaaon as nt to me Mulremente & lMs 221.178 pertaining to e peW¢d V7/146 2011 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. x❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ❑x Site Plan Review Application Form 0 Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. 0 Copy of the Deed 0 Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. 0 State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. 0 Completed Attached Scoping Sheet 0 Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: x❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. x❑ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑Q Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Vicinity Map x❑ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. © The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department x❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑x The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department 0 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. x❑ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs x❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections x❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces x❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district x❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ❑x Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces x❑ Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within '/3 mile) Revised 1/7/14 Ia 5 of 11 ❑x Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses x❑ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Location and width of all existing easements x❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. x❑ Location and type of existing street lighting x❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities x❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails x❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. ❑x Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below x❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components x❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development ❑x Location and width of all proposed easements x❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting x❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 Ia 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan ❑ Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director ❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage ❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 ❑ Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans ❑x Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan ❑x Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ® Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: ❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. ❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. ❑ Photometric test report for each light source. ❑x An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑x Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 7 of 11 ® Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑x A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 x❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 Ia 8 of 11 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX. 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.spdrygfialdor.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Area below this b'sefdled out by Applicant) __— (Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprtngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: (Area below this line /'died outby the City andReturned m the Aaabeand (At a nurumuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlus sheet shall be subnutted or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol; Adebtioml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stormrmer design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stomrmarmer flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stomrmarmer flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stomrmvater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 ranch ENGINEERING= August S, 2020 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW - ARROWHEAD MEADOWS TAX MAP 17-02-34-34, TAX LOT 700 WRITTEN STATEMENT Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 19-453 This site plan review application is for the property formerly addressed as 6185 Main Street in Springfield, Oregon, Tax Map 17-02-34-34, Tax Lot 700. The site is currently vacant and formerly had a single-family dwelling. The proposed site plan will develop the property to accommodate three townhouses and two multi -family buildings with seven units each, as well as the associated open space areas. The property was rezoned from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential in accordance with the Metro Plan on May 19, 2020. The applicable approval criteria are addressed below. 5.17-100 Site Plan Review 5.17-105 Purpose and Applicability The project qualifies for Site Plan Review under SDC 517-105(B)(1) for the townhomesand (2)(a)forthe multi- familybuildingsAsmentionedabove, the properiyiszoned asMedium DensityResidential The townhouses and multi- familyhousing are new development on a vacant site and do not meet anyof the criteria for exception under SDC 517 105(B)(1)(a) and (b) or SDC 517 105(B)(2)(c)(v)(a) and (b) 5.17-115 Phased Development The site plan phasing is shown in the plan set asrequired bySDC 517-115(A) One or more phases may be constructed at one time and/or the phases constructed in non -numerical order No exceptions listed under SDC 517- 115(B) are applicable. Public facilities will be constructed in conjunction with OF prior to each phase, as per SDC 517-115(C)(1) Neither the City nor adjacent property owners will be required to construct public facilities associated with the development proposal, as per SDC 517-115(C)(2). 5.17-120 Submittal Requirements The Site Plan application has been prepared by Renee Clough, PP PIS, AICP, an Oregon licensed surveyor and civil engineer The general requirements outlined under SDC 517-120(A) for scale, address/tax map/tax lot number, EOG ENE -SPRINGFIELD ALRANV 310 5th Sheet, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.]46.063] 1 w .branchengineering.mm Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 dimensions of the development area, proposed and existing buildings/fences/walls, and area of all properties to be conveyed have aB been met and are represented in the site plan drawing SDC 517120(A)(6), proposed number of employees and future expansions plans, and SDC 517 1200)(8), observance of solar access requirements as specified in the appropriate zoning district, are not applicable for this project It should be noted that the solar access requirements are not applicable due to SDC 32- 2253.1iii (the hillside to the south) and 32-2253.ci (Main Street and Aster Street) SDC 517- 120(B)Bstsrequirementsfor the Site Assessment Th2s application's Site AssessmenthasbeenpreparedbyRenee Clough, PIS, Pl;AICP, mOregon licensed engineer as required The drawing is to scale with existing contours at I -foot intervals Similarly, the name/location/dimension direction of flow/top of bank of all available watercourses, 100 -year floodplain boundaries Time of Travel Zones physical features such as trees and watercourses subtypes, and natural resource protection areas have all been identified on the drawing as pei-SDC 517-120(B)(1) through (6) SDC 5.17-120(C) lists requirements for the Access, Circulation and Parking Plan This information has been addressed on the Site Plan instead of its own document, but all necessarycode sections have been addressed. The locatioq dimensions and number of parking spaces including wheel bumpers and striping, are all detailed on the Site Plan as per SDC 517120(C)(1). No aisles landscaped areas or directional signs are included as part of this project On- site vehicular and pedestrian circulation is represented on the Site Plan in accordance with SDC 517-120(C)(2) The site is currently vacant, though a single-fambyhome used to be on the property As such the existing driveway on Main Street will be closed asindicated on the Existing Conditions Plan The new accessway along Aster Street has been marked and labeled with the proper dimensions as per SDC 517-120(C)(3) Lighting has been illustrated on the Site Plan as per SDC 517-120(C)(4) SDC 517120(C)(5) discusses location, type and number of bicycle spaces Bicycle parking is provided in storage units and garages as applicable for multifamily and townhome housing See Section SDC 4.6-115 Inc further discussion on bicycle parking SDC 517120(C)(6) discusses gross floor area applicable to parking requirements The table at SDC 4.6-125 does not specifygross floor area for multifamily or townhome dwellings, rather, parking is based on the number of available units in each dwelling Under this sectioq multifamily housing requires I space per dwelling unit and single-family dwellings require 2 spaces Inc each dwelling unit when no paved on -street parking is available directly abutting the property Sheet C00 in the Site Plan details that the Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 2 of is Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 minimum amount of parking spaces for this project is 20 (14 spaces for the 14 multifamily units and 6 spaces for the 3 townhouse units) and that the proposed project features 27 spaces SDC 517120(C)(7), location of off- street loading areas is not applicable. No new transit facilities are proposed, though an existing minor stop exists along E Main Street and 62vtl Place, served byLTD Routes 11 and 91. This is noted on the cover sheet of the site plan, fulfilling the requirements of Section SDC 517-120(C)(8) A copy of the Right of WayApproach Permit required under Section SDC 517-120(C)(9) will be submitted for the driveway closure as part of the construction permitting process A Trip Generation Study is not required for this project, as the site has a peak hour traffic estimation of 7 trips during the PM peak and an average daily traffic threshold of 92 daily trips which is far below the 100 or more peak hour threshold and 1, 000 or more trips per day for average daily traffic threshold as indicated in SDC 51-120(C)(10) Similarly, there are no known traffic issues where traffic safety, street capacity, future planned facilities or multimodal concerns would be reasonably affected by the proposed development SDC 517-120(D) lists requirements for the Landscape Plan. The only non- lawngrass planting will comply with storm standards and as such is shown on the Stormwater Plan and Site Plan rather than on a separate landscape plan. Screening is required under SDC 4.4-110(A)(4) and (6) as the project contains trash receptacles and is for a multi family development, further discussion is covered under SIX' 4.4-110(A) Screening standards are met with the walls around the trash enclosure Planting, irrigation systems and materials are listed on the construction plans asrequired in SDC 517120(D) No new street trees are proposed as part of this project SIX' 5.17 120(E) lists requirements for the Improvements Plan. The required information is included on the Site Plan rather than a separate Improvements Plan. Names and locations of existing and proposed public and private streets including right-of-way and paving dimensions are on the plan as per SDC 517-120(E)(1) No new or existing traffic control devices or fire hydrants are within the project area, and lighting has been indicated on the site plan as per SIX' 517120(E)(2) Location, width and construction material for all existing and proposed sidewalks sidewalk ramps and pedestrian accessways/trails are all included on the site plan, as are location and size of existing and proposed utilities, meeting the code specified in SDC 517 120(E)(3) and (4) SIX' 517-120(F) lists requirements for the Grading, Paving and Stormwater Management Plan. Contours and slopeshave been detailed asindicated in the Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 3 415 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 code. The plan has been prepared and signed by a licensed civil engineer, as required in the Code Planting will be per Citystandard and therefore will not require a landscape architect The plan submitted with this application includes the required roof drainage patterns, discharge locations perviouslimper-wous area drainage patterns sizellocation of stormwater management system components existing and proposed elevations/site grades/contours, and a stormwater management plan as detailed in SDC 5.17-120(F)(1) through (5). SIX' 517120(G) lists requirements for a Phased Development Plan. This project will be phased, therefore a Phased Development Plan is required As per the code, phasing for this project will progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwatermanagemennt, waterandelectricity Asnotedm517115 one or more phases may be constructed at one time and/or the phases constructed in non -numerical order. SDC 517-120(H)bstsrequirementsfaranOrtSite Lighting Plan . Atthistime, specific lighting fixtures have not been selected Approximate locations and fixture features are included on the Site Plan SDC 517-120(1) lists additional information required at the time of Site Plan Rewew application submittal These are as follows This narrative fulfils the requirements of SDC 517120(1)(1) Written permission from the property owner is not necessary per SIX' 517120(1)(2) as Nathan Wiedenmarm of ALLC, LLC is both the property owner and the project applicant The vicinitymap included with this submittal contains all of the required information listed in SDC 517-120(1)(3) The zoning of the area is Medium Density Residential and the proposed development of the property meets the zoning designation as required in SDC 517120(H)(4) Multi -family dwellings and attached single-family dwellings are both classified as Permitted Uses with required Site Plan Rewewin SDC 32-210 as per SDC 517-120(1)(5) A Tree Felling Permit will be submitted with the construction plans, meeting the qualifications put forth in SDC 517-120(1)(6) Section 517-120(1)(7) is not applicable as the subject property is located within the City limits Wetland delineation and wetland impact applications are being submitted concurrently, thereby fulfilling Sections SDC 517 120(1)(8) and (9) A geotechnical report has been prepared by an Oregon licensed geotechnical engineer and is submitted along with this application as per 517-120(1)(10). Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 4 415 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 5of is Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 5.17-125 Criteria According to SDC 517125, the Director shall approve or approve with conditions A Type II Site Plan Review application upon determining that approval criteria in SubsectionsA through Ehave been satisfied This application fulfills these approval criteria as follows According to SDC 517-125(A), zoning mustbe consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or the applicable Refinement Plan Diagram, Plan District Map and Conceptual Development Plan. The site is zoned Medium Density Residential, which is consistent with the Metro Plan and is not locatedwitMn any of the Citys Refinement Plan Areas No additional maps or plans apply to the site No utilityproviders have given indication of capacityrestrictiori therebymeeting SDC 517-125(B) The site plan complies withal] public and private design and construction standards in the Code and applicable regulations as per SDC 517-125(C). The site is configured to connect only to an extension of Aster Street to achieve the efficiency and safety goals discussed in SIX' 517125(D) The site's pedestrian route is separated from traffic with a curb and located away from vehicular reversing action to facilitate pedestrlancomfort and safety The site's pedestrian route connects both multi -family buildings to the sidewalks in Aster Street and Main Street Bicyclists will connect to Aster Street via the driveway or to Main Street via shared use of the pedestrian path An LTD bus stop is available within 280 feet of the site near the intersection of E Main Street and 62° Place Most activity centers and commercial areas to the area are to the west approximately 1, 315 feet along Main Street This completes the criteria listed under SDC 517-125(D) All physical features listed under SDC 5.17-125(E) have been indicated on the drawing and geotechnical report A wetland area existsin the center of the site. The remnants of an old drainage channel cross through the site within the wetlands The southern portion of the site is steep and forested 5.17-130 Conditions Section SDC 517-130 lists additional approval conditions which may or may not need to be addressed for Site Plan projects These conditions are addressed below as follows SIX' 5.117 130(A) handles dedication of right-of-way and utility easements The Aster Street right-of-way, including adjacent PVEs, is being extended through the site to connect the segments on either side (improved to the east and unimproved to the west). The existing storm and sanitarymams through the site alreadyhave easements However, easements are proposed for that Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 6 415 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 portion of the stormwater system which will convey, detain and/or treat runoff from Aster Street A 25 -foot fence along the property line bordering Main Street, and 6 -foot fences along the east and west property lines will be constructed as part of this project, therebymeeting the requirements listed under SDC 517430(B). Since the site connects to Aster Street rather than Main Street, none of the safetymeasures listed in SDC 517-130(C) are necessary No modification of the layout of structures caused by the location of streets or required stormwater management systems are proposed, therefore, SDC 5.17-130(D) is not applicable. No noise -attenuating barrier or similar device as specified in Section 4.4-110 is required for this project due to no surrounding incompatible uses or conditions therefore SDC 517130(E) isnot applicable. SDC 5.17-130(F) deals with limiting hours of operation whenever a land use conflict is identified by the Director or a party of record, including but not limited to noise and traffic generation As this is a residential project, the criteria under SDC 5.17-130(F) are not applicable to this project The project will be phased, and a Phased Development Plan is submitted with this application Development will be phased to match the availability of public facilities and services, including but not limited to water and electricity, sanitary sewer and stormwatermanagement facilities, and streets and traffic safety controls in compliance with SDC 517130(G) As noted in 517-115 one or more phases may be constructed at one time and/or the phases constructed in non numerical order. A Land and Drainage Alteration Permit will be submitted concurrent to the construction plans in compliance with SDC 517-130(H) The Site Plan reflects retention and protection of existing physical features and their functions including significant clusters of trees and shrubs watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their riparian areas as per SDC 517-130(IJ The wetland drainage channel on the site will be removed entirely, and the wetlands will be mitigated through the purchase of Wetland Mitigation Credits Impact to the hillside trees will be minimal Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 7415 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 As discussed under SDC 517120(H) the specific lighting fixtures have not yet been selected therefore a Lighting Plan per SDC 517-130(J) cannot be provided at this time The site has frontage on a public street therefore the conditions to waive public street requirements listed in SDC 517-130(K) are not applicable Copies of all required permits Inc State, Federal and local programs will be submitted prior to approval of the Final Site Plan as per SDC 517-130(L) Wetland permitting has been submitted concurrent to this application The required ODOT permitting to close the driveway on the property will be submitted with the construction plans The Stormwater Management Plan is submitted with this application as per SDC 5.17-130(M). 3.2-200 Residential Zoninc Districts 3.2-205 Establishment of Residential Zoning Districts The property is zoned as Medium Density Residential,therefore, only SDC 3.2-205(C) is applicable. SDC 32-205(C)(1) allows a zoning of MDR Inc residential development where primarilymultifamilydwebings are permitted and the densityrange is 14-28 dwelling units pernet acre rounded up to the next whole number. As shown in the drawing, the developmenton the site hasa dematyof 19 unitsperacre fulfilling the above listed requirements 3.2-215 Base Zone Development Standards The following is a discussion of how the site meets the standards listed in Table 32-215 Base Zone Development Standards No new lots are being created as part of this application therefore only the setback standards are applicable. As indicated on the Site Plan the multifamilydwellings and townhomesmeet or exceed all of the 10' minimum setback requirements Inc front, side and rear yards The townhomes feature interior side yards measuring 6' wide, which exceeds the 5'nummum set forth in the table. The site iszoned as Medium -Density Residential and McKenzie Highwayruns East to West Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 8 of is Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 The proposed Site Plan does not affect the area or dimensions of the site itself. The property's area is 44,964 sqft, which exceeds the standard lot area of 4,500 sq. ft Similarly, the property's 68 ft frontage along McKenzie Highway exceeds the SDCs 60 ft minimum for Medium Density Residential areas along North-South streets The site is not a corner lot or panhandle lot, nor isit located within a cul de -sac. The southern half of the site falls within the Hillside Development Overlay District as described in SDC 33-500 This site plan however, does not create anynew lots or alter the existing lot lines in any way Therefore, the area and frontage of the site are considered pre-existing and the standards set forth by the Hillside Development Overlay District section of the table are not applicable. The site is located within the City Limits therefore, the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District section of the table is not applicable to this project 3.2-240 Multi -Unit Design Standards The Site Plan design qualifies as a multi unit development under SDC 32- 240(A) and is being reviewed as a Type 11 Site Plan Review application as per SDC 3 2-240(C) SDC 32-240(D) lists design standards for multi unit developments on - street parking is not available on Main Street but is available along Aster Street As per the code requirements the entrance for the southernmost multi family building directlyfaces the street Additionally, the front of the building is less than 25 feet from the front lot/parcel linea with the main entrance being 20feetfrom the streetright-of-wayand the extenorstaircase being roughly 11.5feet from the right of way. The multi unit buildings do not have continuous horizontal distances exceeding 120; meeting standard SDC 32-240(D)(2)(a) The features and structures detailed in sections SDC 3.2-240(D)(2)(b) through (h) have been included in the design and are shown in the Arclutect Plans SDC 32-240(D)(3) is not applicable as the properties adjacent to the site are not designated as Low Density Residential SDC 32-240(D)(4) discusses storage and trash receptacles for multi unit development Each of the two multi family buildings has dedicated storage unit for each of the dwelling units, offering 312 sqft of enclosed and secure storage. This exceeds the 112 cubic foot minimum listed under SDC 32 - Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 9 of is Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 240(D)(4)(a) Trash receptacles are shielded from view in a 112 sq.ft enclosure situated in the parking area between the two multifamily buildings away from front yard setbacks and following code regulations under SDC 32-240(D)(4)(b) As the adjacent properties are designated Medium Density Residential, the property line conditions under SDC 32- 240(D)(c) are not applicable Fixture specifics have not yet been determined with enough exactitude to allow for SUB to accurately design the required facilities The transformer shown in the northerly Aster Street PUE is an assumption If necessary, it will need to be located within the PUE and unscreened to meet SUB criteria. SDC 32-240(D)(5) discusses open space requirements for Multi unit developments The Arrowhead Meadows developmentprojectprowdes both Common Open Space and Private Open Space as required SDC 32- 240(D)(5)(a) requires a minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area to be designated and permanentlyreserved as open space. About 20,790 square feet of the roughly 43, 560 square feet total area of the site is designated as open space as indicated on the Open Space Plan totaling at about 41% of the total area, which exceeds the required minimum. Of the total open space, 2,835 square feet is Common Open Space (of which 309 square feet is Active Common Open Space and 245 square feet is Sloped Common Open Space) and 3,285 square feet is Private Open Space. Under SDC 32-240(D)(5)(b), Common Open Space must be at least 500 square feet with no horizontal dimension less than 15 feet, and a minimum of 025 square feet of common space is required for each square foot of gross residential floor area. The Common Open Space area meets all of these requirements with the shortest dimension being 16 feet wide, the total area being 2,835 square feet, and the combined Common and Private Open Space areas being 6,120 square feet SDC 32- 240(D)(5)(b)(m) mandates that a maximum of 15% of the required Common Open Space maybe on slopesgreater than 25N therefore only245 square feet of the development's sloped ground is included in the open space tally SDC 32- 240(D)(5)(b)(iv) isnot applicable as there are fewer than 20 unitsin the multi-familydwellings SDC 32-240(D)(5)(c) discusses Private Open Space requirements All Private Open Space is directlyaccessible from the dwelling units from a doorway as per SDC 3.2-240(D)(5)(c)(Q, and none of the Private Open Space areas have dimensions less than 6 feet wide or areas less than 96 square feet as per SDC 32- 240(D)(5)(c)(W). Main Street currentlyfeatures a sidewalk along the project site, therefore, it is not feasible to include a planter strip with this development Similarly, the south side of Aster Street features curbside sidewalks As such, SDC 32- 240(D)(6)(b) is not applicable to those areas Due to the driveway, sight Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 10 of 15 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 distance and utilities, the north side ofAster will feature onlyone street tree rather than the two required bycode spacing SDC 32-240(D)(7) discusses pedestrian circulation for multi -unit developments with more than 20 units each As the total number of units in the multi- familydwellingsdoes not exceed thlsmaximum, thissectiondoes not apply As per SDC 32-240(8)(a), parking lots have been placed to ensure that no parking areas exist between the buildings and the street Lighting has been indicated on the site plan in accordance with SDC 32-240(8)(b) A 6 -ft -wide planter island is located in the centerlot next to the trash collection facility, meeting the requirements of SIX' 32-240(8)(c) A Pacific Dogwood or other tree in the "Parking Strips 4 to 6 Feet Wide" section of the Approved Street Tree List will be planted in the island No parking areas face a living area window, therefore, SIX' 32-420(D)(8)(d) is not applicable Parking lots are connected to all building entrances byinternal sidewalks as indicated on the site plan meeting the requirements listed in SDC 32-240(8)(e) Wheel bumpers have been provided for each parking space as perSDC 32-240(8)(f) The site is not a comer lot, therefore, SDC 32-240(D)(8)(g) is not applicable SDC 32-240(D)(8)(h) is also not applicable as none of the parking, loading or maneuvering areas abut a property line or right-of-way There are no decorative walls associated with this project, therefore, SDC 32-240(8)(1) is not applicable. Parking area landscaping and its effect on stormwater runoff is detailed in the stormwater and landscape plans and has been designed to reduce stormwater runoff as much as practicable as per SDC 32-240(8)(j) Bicycle parking is provided in storage units and garages as applicable, as discussed in SDC 4.6-115(A)(8), meeting the requirements under SDC 3.2- 240(D)(8)(k) Due to the low volume of Aster Street, a shared ddvewayis not anticipated to be necessary for the site As such, SDC 32-240(D)(9)(b) is not applicable The property does not abut an alley, nor are there any alleys nearby which could be reasonably be extended to serve the development Therefore SDC 3.2-240(D)(9)(c) is not applicable. 4.4-100 1andscaning. Screening and Fence Standards 4.4-110 Screening As the project is a multifamily development and contains trash receptacles, the project requires screening as per SDC 4.4-110(A)(4) and (6) A 2.5 foot wooden fence along the Main Street pmpertyline and 6 -foot wooden fences along the east and west propertybne4 as well as a walled area surrounding Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 114 15 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 the trash enclosure will be constructed to provide a uniform sight- obscuring screen as per SDC 4.4-110(B)(3). 4.4-115 Fences The fences mentioned in Section 4.4-110 above meet the standards set forth in Table 4.4-1. The site is zoned as residential,therefore, the 6' fences 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards At this time, specific lighting fixtures have not been selected Approximate locations and fixture features are included on the Site Plan 4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking. Loading and Bicvcle Parking Standards 4.6-110 Vehicle Parking - General As per SDC 4.6-110(A), this site plan provides off-street parking for the proposed new construction There were no existing buildings or parking areas prior to the new constructiog so there is no change in existing use of parking per SDC 4.6-110(A)(2) nor is SDC 4.6-110(B) applicable. No reductions in the number of required parking spaces has been requested, therefore, SDC 4.6-110(C) is not applicable. The current site plan proposes a total of 19 spaces and 2ADA space for the multi -family units (which provide 14 dwelling units m total), and one garage and an additional parking space on the driveway for each of the three townhouses These parking spaces are designed for the purpose of resident and guest use only Therefore, the conditions listed under SDC 4 6-110(D) are met No jointuseparking facilities are proposed as part of this site plan. Therefore, SDC 4.6-110(E and F) is not applicable. No parking spaces are proposed within the right-of-way of the street therefore, SDC 4.6-1 10(G) is not applicable. 4.6-115 Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Design The parking spaces for the multi unit housing comply with the standards laid out under Table 4.6-1. All spaces are aligned at a 90° angle. The spaces facing east are 9' wide and 18' long, which match the standard stall widths and lengths in the table. The two north facing spaces abutting Main Street are 9' wide and 19' long 4.6-120 Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Improvements Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 12 4 15 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 The proposed parking spaces will be paved and will not encroach upon the public right-of-way, asindicatedin SDC4.6-120(A) As shown on the Grading and Paving Plan and Stormwater Plaii all parking lot stormwater is collected on-site and does not surface flow across a propertyline or sidewalk The parking spaces designated for the multi -family buildings all front sidewalks or public rights-of-way, therefore, the conditions under SDC 4.6- 120(C) are applicable. Each parking space in the multi -fambylots features a 6 -foot -long wheel bumper and 6 -inch -tall curb as per the specifications under SDC 4.6-120(C) The parking lot areas proposed Inc this Site Plan allow adequate space to avoid backing into the public right-of-way The closest building to the street, being a multi family unit, has a 40 -ft distance between the street and the first parking space. Tlus adheres to SDC 4.6-120(D). All proposed spaces will be clearlyand permanentlymarked as per SDC 4.6- 120(E) The parking areas will be all-new construction therefore, no existing striping will need to be covered 2 of the 21 total parking spaces Inc the multi family buildings are designed Inc compact cars bringing the total percentage of compact car spaces to 9% This is well below the 30%maximum put forth bySDC 4.6-120(F), thereby meeting this requirement Each of the two multi -family buildings features an ADA parking space located directly adjacent to the ground floor accessible unit The spaces are designed and will be constructed in accordance with Section 1104 of the Structural Specialty Code This meets the requirements set forth in SDC 4.6- 120(G). 4.6-125 Vehicle Parking - Parking Snace Rea uirements As per the table in SDC 4.6-125, the three townhouses offer 2 spaces per dwelling unit (a single -car garage and an additional parking space in each driveway), and the multi family units offer 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (21 spaces, including 2 ADA spaces, for 14 dwelling units), which isgreater than the 1 space per dwelling unitnummum setforthin the table underSDC 4.6- 125 Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 13 4 15 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 The site does not fall into ally of the districts listed under the Special Provisions sectioq therefore, the code therein is not applicable to this project Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 14 of 15 Site Plan Review - Arrowhead Meadows Written Statement August 5, 2020 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking - Facility Improvements Per subsection 8, bike parkLW is in the storage units and garages as applicable. Therefore, all other code sections under SDC 4.6-150 are not applicable. Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 15 4 15 ranch ENGINEERING= August 14, 2020 Melissa Cation Planning and Development City of Springfield 225 5� St Springfield OR 97477 RE SITE PIAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL ARROWHEAD MEADOWS Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 19-453 Dear Melissa, The following discussion is how this submittal material addresses the comments provided in the Pre -Submittal Meeting. FIRE • Buildings 1 and 2 need to be under 30 feet to avoid triggering the aerial apparatus standards. Per a conversation between Quince Sterry, project architect, and Eric Phillips - Meadow, Fire Marshal reviewer, it is only necessary for a portion of the roof along the emergency vehicle access aisle to meet the 30 feet requirement. The drawings have been updated to demonstrate where this occurs, in particular refer to the North and South Elevations. • Aerial apparatus standards will be triggered for Building 3, but Aster Street will provide compliance. Thank you for the heads up and confirmation. • Show the hydrants on the Site Plan. Since the hydrants are beyond the view of the Site Plan, annotation has been added indicating the distance to the nearest hydrant from the property corners. • Hydrants need to be within 600 feet of all parts of a building. The hydrants to the east of the site along both Main Street and Aster Street meet this distance requirement. • A temporary turnaround is needed at the end of Aster Street. The turnaround has been added to the plans. EOG ENE -SPRINGFIELD ALRANV 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.746.0637 1 w .branchengineenng.mm SPR Submittal, Arrowhead Meadows August 14, 2020 TRANSPORTATION • The existing street light on Aster Street just east of the site needs to be shown The street light is now shown on the Existing Conditions and Site Plan sheets. PUBLIC WORKS • Concerns were expressed at the meeting regarding commingling the public and private stormwater. Clayton followed up with authorization due to the site limitations. A copy of this authorization is included in this submittal. • More diversity in swale plantings is needed. An additional species has been added to the swales as requested. PLANNING • Trash enclosure elevations are needed. The drawings have been updated and the elevations are now shown on Sheet Q4 • Additional landscaping details are needed - particularly an irrigation plan and planting schedule. A landscaping plan is included which includes a planting schedule and irrigation plan. • Alighting plan is needed. A lighting plan is included. • A copy of the wetland permitting is needed. The Wetland Delineation Concurrence is included along with a copy of the JPA application and submittal receipt. • The Hillside Overlay applies to the portion of the site south of Aster Street and needs to be addressed in the Written Statement. The Hillside Overlay is discussed in the Written Statement under the 3.2-215 section. • A title report dated within 30 days will be needed for the next submittal. The title report is included. Sincerely, Renee Clough, PLS, PE, AICP Project Manager Branch Engineering Inc. Branch Engineenng, Inc. Page 2 4 2 Renee C From: Chris Morris Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 7:41 PM To: Renee C Subject: FW: Removal -Fill application received Here is the email showing receival Regards, Chris Chris Morris Engineering Technician BRANCH ENGINEERING, INC. office: 541.746.0637 cell (text or call): 541-232-2689 www.b ranch en a i neeri na.com From: PELTON Melissa <Melissa. Pelton@state.or.us> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2020 1:52 PM To: Chris Morris <ChrisM@branchengineering.com>;'nathan@stellalighting.com' <nathan@stellalighting.com>; 'mikeb@stellalighting.com' <mikeb@stellalighting.com> Subject: Removal -Fill application received Chris, Nathan, and Mike, Your uploaded application has been received. You Will receive another email soon With the file number and fees that Will need to be paid. The Department of State Lands is taking precautions to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. We are currently teleworking, With access to email. We will get back to you as soon as we can, but ask for your understanding should our response be delayed. McCissa PeCton Public Records Coordinator Oregon Department of State Lands 775 Summer St NE Ste 100 Salem, OR 97301 503-986-5220 www.oreeon.eov/dsl • DSL Online Payment Portal Renee C From: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-ocgov> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 3:04 PM To: Renee C; Chris Morris Cc: GREENE Kyle Subject: Public street drainage question from Friday's Presubmittal for Arrowhead Meadows I was able to talk with my colleagues about this issue today and I wanted to give you the results of that discussion - The drainage layout you are proposing is approvable but has some additional requirements for maintenance over the usual maintenance agreement required for all private stormwater facilities -meaning it will need to acknowledge that the property owner is responsible for the maintenance of the onsite system even though a portion of the water is from the public street and we will want to make sure the easement language and the maintenance agreement explicitly lays this out. This can be done as part of the regular type I I review procedure. To state clearly -The city would be responsible for the maintenance of the system in Aster St including the catch basins but once it crosses over into the private property that would be the apartment complex s responsibility until the system again crosses into the existing easement for the existing east/west line the bisects the site. The level of maintenance required would be the same as if it was solely a private system and is required in any case or if the below option is chosen and can be made to work. As an alternative the city would also approve a system that was located between the street and the sidewalk for the public water that could be used to meet the detention requirement -this would involve also using the parking lane on the north side of Aster so that the stormwater bumpout was about 12' wide from sidewalk to curb and about 40' long (if I measured right) from the existing stormwater manhole on the east side of the site to the driveway entrance. This would probably require that full area and it might cause problems for the turning radius requirements for fire department access, but if those concerns could be addressed than the public and private water could be kept separate. If you have any questions on this let me know. Clayton McEachern Civil Engineer City of Springfield 541-736-1036 vaWi springfield-or.gov 0000® t This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. "s ram Brown,Gov c May 18, 2020 Bill and Cindy Foster PO BOX 98 Elmira, OR 97437 Department of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100 Salem, OR 973011279 (503) 9565200 FAX (503) 378-4544 www.oregongov/dsl State Land Board Kate Brown Governor ALLC LLC Attn: Nathan Wiedenmann Bevclarno 88141 Chita Loop Secretary of State Springfield, OR 97478 Tobias Read Re: WD # 2019-0612 Approved State Treasurer Wetland Delineation Report for Multi -Family Residential Lane County. T17S R2W Sec. 34CD, TLs 600, 601, 700, and a ROW and a NONTL, Springfield Local Wetlands Inventory, Wetland M-5 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Foster. and Mr. Wiedenmann: The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Branch Engineering, Inc. for the site referenced above. Based upon the information presented in the report and additional information submitted upon request, we concur with the wetland boundaries as mapped in revised Figure 6 of the report. Please replace all copies of the preliminary wetland map with this final Department -approved map. Within the study area, 2 wetlands (Wetland A and B, totaling approximately 0.234 acres) were identified. The wetlands are subject to the permit requirements of the state Removal -Fill Law. Under current regulations, a state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in wetlands or belowthe ordinary high- water line (OHWL) of the waterway (or the 2 -year recurrence interval flood elevation if OHWL cannot be determined). This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal -Fill Law only. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to any subsequent state permit application to speed application review. Federal or local permit requirements may apply as well. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will determine jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, which may require submittal of a complete Wetland Delineation Report. Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination is valid for five years from the date of this letter unless new information necessitates a revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). In addition, laws enacted by the legislature and/or rules adopted by the Department may result in a change in jurisdiction; individuals and applicants are subject to the regulations that are in effect at the time of the removal -fill activity or complete permit application. The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination in writing within six months of the date of this letter. Thank you for having the site evaluated. If you have any questions, please contact the Jurisdiction Coordinator for Lane County, Matt Unitis, at (503) 986-5262. Sincerely, Z*__4 Peter Ryan, PWS Aquatic Resource Specialist Enclosures ec: Christopher Morris, Branch Engineering, Inc. City of Springfield Planning Department (Maps enclosed for updating LWI) Benny Dean, Corps of Engineers Charles Radon, DSL WETLAND DELINEATION I DETERMINATION REPORT COVER FORM Fully completed and signed report cover forms and applicable fees are required before report review timelines are initiated by the Department of State Lands. Make checks payable to the Oregon Department of State Lands. To pay fees by credit card, go online at into-, L,,ps_oreaon_pov/DSL/EPS.nr ymm]ka,=4. Attach this completed and signed forth to the front of an unbound report or include a hard copy with a digital version (single PDF file of the report cover farm and report, minimum 300 dpi resolution) and submit to. Oregon Department of State Lands, 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301.1279. A single PDF of the completed cover from and report may be e-mailed to: Wetland_ Delineationrgdsl.state.or.us. For submittal of PDF files larger Nm an 10 MB, email DSL instructions on how to access the file from your ftp or other file sharing website. Contact and Authorization Information X Applicant ❑X Owner Name, Firm and Address: Business phone # (541) 912-1079 FOSTER BILL & CINDY Mobile phone # (optional) PO BOX 98 E-mail: luckyanddndyfoster®9mail.com ELMIRA, OREGON 97437 ❑ Authorized Legal Agent, Name and Address (if different): Business phone # Mobile phone # (optional) E-mail: I either own the property described below or I have legal authority to allow access to the property. I authorize the Department to access the property for the purpose of confirming the information in the report, after prior notification to the primary contact. Typed/Printed Name: CINDY/BILL FOSTER Signature: ,7/1(l I�7 ,C Date: Special instructions regarding site access: Project and Site Information Project Name: Aster St Lots 22, 77, 600, 601 and 700 Latitude: 44.044480 N Longitude: -122.919335 W Delineation decimal degree - centroid of site or start $ end points of linear project Proposed Use: Tax Map # 17-02-34134 Multi -Family Residential Tax Lot(s) 22, 77, 600, 601, 700 Tax Map 22=NONTL; 77=ROW Tax Project Street Address (or other descriptive location): Township 17S Range 02W Section 34 QQ 34 Southwest of 6165 Main St Use separate sheet for additional tax and location information Waterway: None River Mile: N/A Ci!y: Springleld County: Lane Welland Delineation Information Welland Consultant Name, Firm and Address: Phone # (541) 746-0637 Christopher Monis Mobile phone # (if applicable) Branch Engineering, Inc. E-mail: chdsm@branchengineering.mm 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 The information and conclusions on this form and in the attached report aretrue and correct to the best of my knowledge. Consultant Signature: Date: 11/12/2019 Prima Contact for report review and site access is X Consultant ❑ Applicant/Owner ❑ Authorized Agent WetlandlVJaters Present? ® Yes ❑ No I Study Area size: 1.80 Total Wetland Acreage: 0.2340 Check liwble Boxes Below ❑ R -F permit application submitted ❑X Fee payment submitted $ ❑ Mitigation bank site ❑ Fee ($100) for resubmittal of rejected report ❑ Industrial Land Certification Program Site ❑ Request for Reissuance. See eligibility criteria. (no fee) ❑ Wetland restoration/enhancement project DSL # _ Expiration date (not mitigation) ® Previous delineation/application on parcel [$LWI shows wetlands or waters on parcel If known, previous DSL # 92-1 D23 Welland ID code M-5 For Office use Onry DSL Reviewer: MLT Fee Paid Date: 11 1 17 1 _ DSL WD # 2019-0612 Date Delineation Received: 11 1.13_1 Io Scanned: 0 Electronic: ® DSL App.# WETLAND DELINEATION / DETERMINATION REPORT COVER FORM Fully completed and signed report cover forms and applicable fees are required before report review timelines are initialed by the Department of Slate Lands. Make checks payable to the Oregon Department of Slate Lands. To pay fees by credit card, go online at: hltpcmaooc oregOn aovIDSL1EPS1nmaram?kev=4. Attach this completed and signed fans to the front of an unbound report or induce a hard copy with a digital version (single PDF file of the report cover farm and report, minimum 300 dpi resolution) and submit to: Oregon Department of Slate Lands, 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301 -12 79. A single PDF of the completed cover fmm and report my be e-mailed to: Wake nd_Delinealiorisl.slalemr.us. For submittal of PDF files larger than 10 MB, e-mail DSL Instructions on how to access the file from your to or other file shanna website. © Applicant x Owner Name, Firm and Address: Business phone # (855) 282-3222 ALLC LLC Mobile phone # (optional) 88141 CHITA LOOP E-mail: nathan@slellalighling.com; SPRINGFIELD. OREGON 97478 LJ Authorized Legal Agent, Name and Address (if different): Business phone If Mobile phone If (optional) E+nail: 1 either am the property described below or I have legal autha .ty to slow access la th epep Drize the De artmenl to access the property for the purpose of confirming the information in the report, after prior noti IefTO the o taeb_. Typed/Printed Name: Nathan Wiedenmann Signalu Date: Special instructions regarding site are esS: Project Name: Aster St Lots 22, 77, 600, 601 and 700 Latitude: 44.044480 N Longitude: -122.919335 W Delineation decimal degree -centroid of site orstart& end points of linear project Proposed Use: Tax Map # 17-02-34-34 Multi -Family Residential Tax Lot(s) 22, 77, 600, 601, 700 Tax Map # Tax Lot(ss ___ Project Street Address (or other descriptive location): Township 17S Range 02W Section 34 QQ 34 6185 Main St Use separate sheet for additional tax and location information Waterway: None RiverMile: N/A City'. Springfield County: Lane a Welland Consultant Name, Firm and Address: Phone # (541) 746-0637 Christopher Morris Mobile phone If (if applicable) Branch Engineering, Inc. Email: rhrism@branchengmeering.com 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 The information and conclusions on this form and in the attached report are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Consultant Signature: Date: 11112/2019 Primary Contact for report review and site access is ❑X Consultant ❑ ApplicantiOwner ❑ Authorized Agent Welland/Waters Present? ® Yes ❑ No Stutly Area size: 1.80 Total Weltand Acreage: 0.2340 ❑ R -F permit application submitted ❑X Fee payment submitted $ ❑ Mitigation bank site ❑ Fee ($100) for resubmittal of rejected report ❑ Industrial Land Certification Program Site - ❑ Request for Reissuance. See eligibility criteria. (no fee) F1 Welland restoration/enhancement project DSL#_ Expiration date_ (not mitigation) ❑N Previous delineation/application on parcel ❑ LWI shows wetlands or waters on parcel If known, previous DSL #2002-0231 Wetland ID code _ 1. DSL Reviewer: Fee Paid Date: / _ /_ DSL IND # Date Delineation Received: _/ _/ — Scanned: ❑ Electronic: 0 DSL App.# 1-1 till --iWININ lieINS djAm IN �;■�.� _. IA Zia MOWN [EEL go `PW r�OWLINAO Ir ! ��o A��L�'� --•_.F.w�t'HI��• �' _. .. ■I Off!, 4Alu Writ' ®r� ®�� . r,� yer�IL<enSM+Rd��II LW17 WL!� ',G INP - In[ 2[ t ser tiLo The. rhhnmi..w,.m.p..m e.m.a a.m a��i a.teteem . the Le.. N h, ....®..b..I�.M...�... hre .rake..the—r.. A Thr o,rbm.....r.o�.�tm..,..yhthe....<s®o..®.rly,W Vicinity Map —hT. ,.m�..m....p®mo.a s...ar�.etiam�tae.r... I ..eh..d be �®m.s.....ep. pp,hp—�..,., Th.. m..os rep...i_Phhe be ..n im..mb eb.pp..pn.n m..w. *b.... .a she, ep�..a mo�el,--o.hwmmi•ch�.r.I,emm.ni.e of.nr—..w b..pprtnaGi. 0 305 610 1,220 Feet Lene County. Oregon FORASSESSMENT ONLY LY ONS.E.1/4 S.W.1/4 SEC. 34 T.17S. R.2W. W.M. TAXATION R IONS Lane County 02&2010-LCAT18]-CONC6W &10006 12/1 B/2018-LCATN2-GANG 830]8 P02343302AV TOID14V1]0] LCATBHH-2018-12-191152 V=100' I!c �C u ff u�A 17023434 SEE MAP__m-C'-KENZL��,_K11aaH-\jl/P�Y-_.I ____ SEE MAP 17023442 MCKI 1 A 200 300 400 500 app CANCELLED 1.5AC 188 AC 1.08 AC 1.06AC 2AC 100 ' e s 1100 SEE M P 1101 170234 1 I 0.55A i 1102 LOT'A'y s I 6300 COIOMONAREA a 8100 800 �/ m 1.63AC 0.43AC I n/ LOT 'B' I 1 w ASTER ST 001 I $ z� 'COMMON AR ovAc �w 900 0.31 AC 1 10 3 � 0,08 c area�O.igQS w�Eu�• ii 1000 i 801 m s+54e'L,aT;wu_J ff 0.06 AC sa 0!, o +a iB > 1. ¢•P 1 j xsa•.r.Tw , I x +: 1 tzl5' 4 e wI ASTER TR S �._____-'�,_._��ia ° EET R x F i" x'; `� ''• a 019 600 1005 7� 1006 2 n 3 q a>a 8 rr a `s:, sw�' x'1206 o.a, ac O.nnC O.nnC 1007 1008 1010 1011 bs9 a�" �,'° \•\ 0.17 AC 0.17 AC 0.19 AC S e S 8 90.17 AC _ 3 lass a. F 1009n.mE me s n' a i Al R .q T� Nm -13 1.31 aca� X, \J X <) 0.9a nc i 1300 1400 �0� .TE ,o.aB ac o.aB ac\ a. aaN >\ �`� \ T C 1 z 3 g I a y 1800 y sxs>wstz r J N i 0.34 AC al>l>l!l>�OOOOOOO s°auE H°evrceW»oM \l�Jl tahXNlM-f(tNNBBFV� � re t ♦. B z are8 HB'.a'tTW sz8 1 I g pl "<78a>s A 9o5z9700 ee 580 0 6000 AC 023Ac " 5700 «'saE,su "N z.vtl 5600 : 550 0s 5 400 : 5300 1 0.2AC 0.2AC 02AC 028 AC 024AC 80522s30m0 0 > •aw" 2100 iL -.2m' ' yw--e)s0 Ian-a1l- 8-0sa0-� -- 1ta7•m00 Hasa P ,\i_ ", 000 0.42 AC 047 48 230 C 023AC2 .38A02AC0.3AC 49 10 68AC ' I x% �z: 1001 6 .s ID 0.34Axa�m.>•. xL\«Os-+T awi8 12.98°z --- RNHILOO e0 _smnarwu 'xs.°wRo•m•s,ms+'+°o^--------- s' - $-0ia' eai--ds0a-TMz-zw mmacdre® s_ 84 7oFE- - w 740033AC OT7200 AC 7500 7600 N ssm,E 7900 0 0.37 AC .3928 �jf071B7 sw 4600 I xs'm t 5000 23AC e B• !_ OC 0.46AC t Iaaa0r g i`o.za ac �38n ^� 37 £m as A e 39 620 0.23 AC a 4600 2400 12 I2s�� 6400 i 5 o023AC83 7000 $7w,,,130.27AC 53278 p . t' S6 '\ n ® •. n 024 AC , 4400 a a 0.46 AC 33p~ 0.37 AC K M' 2600 _ j Iy ,f, 0.28 AC @ •F^ i xa 83 AC 500.' irp I 0.23 Ac reaa'�. ,'� 2700 � ,e 3700 xn ne,s,, h 028 AC y 0.23AC p% Y \ \ 6 d & 57 6600 u',..E -\ ^� 16 w �' �° mew'+:"�- � C. n l� a ze .�j1 4 ,N' '�� 4300 Nagar m� 4.. �•� o.za ac � a, \ " X55 vG 38 0 i �' ' a. 29. Se 6700 '` a .\as ,•�+ ..`�P "' 02ac a 3900 � \,\3 ,nf N®.o•, E� Nm•.,^'k o.z32c 3500 ? s y,. o2a ac e. a,,1Pa Ilzz kd 89 3 '\ k 028AC ° �(.n� Wys x 0.23AC °}z �.'d o 28 bk xsw.\- w -41W 17 re `\••- n W 24 •A .`1 x_r,arow_sh- 6800 8500 k \'\ iiP ,s 9 0 s�.. 'b� VpI\T a>. m 0.23AC '�o �. lr A e ,d" t+g. m 3400 "ij"" s E 40000''nt',n.. , 0.23A C 0C1.4l9�/AC23 75 4100 0 0t�ziaEre 2301A 840 8600 0n 3200 74 8300 0.3 AC 0 AP 738200 8700 8800 17023443 if o29Ac H 0.2ac0.8Ac2T 7. ,\a -ss�n e LP,EE MAP 3000 a.. as IZ' '17023433 0.23AC FOREST 3100 'OF ` w RIDGE----------� - . - w m. DRIVE _ \ I 023 AC ' w u rem>r p - �-si'a-' ---------- ...... •\ Nx 11 w .p 20 9500 9400 A 9300 x�°a•.w' xssWvw ^ w.x re se mss' •\ wx a • 011 AC m 0.27 AC 027 AC 9200 s s slaw \ k 114 113 R 112 A 027 AC 8 9100 900012 '\ ♦ 1182 x _e w 111 0.28 AC P O;�C ' 8900 ° 0.98 AC IN 5.39753 A � re ` _`\ 1 l a 1/414 CDR COR SEE MAP Irl/ SEE MAP SEE MAP I 18020321 z,.E u5" 17023434 1802032 -------- I Nm•9. 18020300 W? WEUND BOUNDARY, TAX LOT BOUNDARIES, SAMPLE PLOT POINTS AND ALL OTHER MAPPED FEATURES WERE MAPPED USING SUB -METER RESOURCE GRADE TRIMBLE RIO GNSS AND MOBILE HANDHELD COMPUTER LINKED BY BLUETOOTH TO THE GNSS RECEIVER. 3 \ AN % LOT STUDY AREA TAX 77 LOT BOUNDARY – — — — – WETLAND 601 BOUNDARY 700 ADJACENT LOT 22 BOUDARY FENCE X SP -1 SAMPLE PLOT 517.63 e I•x-�1 ONSITE WETLAND L. n PHOTO NUMBER, CL LOGITKIN AND DIRECTION WEUND BOUNDARY, TAX LOT BOUNDARIES, SAMPLE PLOT POINTS AND ALL OTHER MAPPED FEATURES WERE MAPPED USING SUB -METER RESOURCE GRADE TRIMBLE RIO GNSS AND MOBILE HANDHELD COMPUTER LINKED BY BLUETOOTH TO THE GNSS RECEIVER. 3 \ AN % LOT ACM 77 0.00 600 0.00 601 0.174 700 .0554 22 .00415 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 IN FEET 1 0.017Vy OMIT E•: :5�."': •.� •::.� •: .�'.% wgruw ,l V•;•� wcnwm a {� y conmrvxs aRsrt WT DSL WD # 2019-0612 Approval Issued 5/18/2020 Approval Expires 5/18/2025 WT san 22 a .t': eo'�meal fu'SO0.V EYING :rr"::":°i"moo•: ae. MRIL 16, 2020 q CM CM prymno: 14353 WETLAND AND STUDY AREA MAP Fig. 6 0 0 e 0 0 e n n N CL N Q S O `} xJx F Ell v Q v Z N O a 00 � Z F0 Q�o J zJ 4 2 u m W z m � a � � m ae. MRIL 16, 2020 q CM CM prymno: 14353 WETLAND AND STUDY AREA MAP Fig. 6 Mr. Nathan Wedenmann Mr. Mike Blair ALLC,LLC. 88141 Chita Loop Springfield, Oregon 97478 nathan@stellalighting.com mikeb@stellalighting.com Dear Mr. Wiedenmann and Mr. Blair: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received ALLC's application for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to place fill in 2,552 square feet of wetland for the construction of a residential development. The project is in Wetland A and Wetland B located at the west end of Aster Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon at Latitude/Longitude: 44.044916° N, 122.919136° W. Your application has been assigned Corps No.: NWP-2020-319. Please refer to this number in all correspondence. We have reviewed your application pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (RHA). We have completed an Approved Jurisdictional Determination of the review area at this site as shown on the enclosed drawings (Enclosure 1). This determination applies only to the review area. Other aquatic resources that may occur on this property or on adjacent properties outside the reviewarea are not the subject of this determination. Based on the Approved Jurisdictional Determination, we have determined that a DA permit is not required for your proposed work as described in your application and as shown on the enclosed drawings (Enclosure 2). Under Section 404 of the CWA, a DA permit is generally required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. We have determined Wetland A and Wetland B in the review area are not waters of the U.S.; as a result, the activity would not occur in waters of the U.S. Our determination regarding the presence or absence of waters of the U.S. and/or navigable waters of the U.S. is documented on the enclosed Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form (Interim) (Enclosure 3) provides the basis for jurisdiction. A copy of the AJD Form can also be found on our website at hftp:/twww.nwp.usace.army.mil/MissionstRegulatory/Appeals/. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ., U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PORTLAND DISTRICT EJ,Y P.O. BOX 2946 PORTLAND, OR 97206-2946 August 26, 2020 Regulatory Branch Corps No. NWP-2020-319 Mr. Nathan Wedenmann Mr. Mike Blair ALLC,LLC. 88141 Chita Loop Springfield, Oregon 97478 nathan@stellalighting.com mikeb@stellalighting.com Dear Mr. Wiedenmann and Mr. Blair: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received ALLC's application for a Department of the Army (DA) permit to place fill in 2,552 square feet of wetland for the construction of a residential development. The project is in Wetland A and Wetland B located at the west end of Aster Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon at Latitude/Longitude: 44.044916° N, 122.919136° W. Your application has been assigned Corps No.: NWP-2020-319. Please refer to this number in all correspondence. We have reviewed your application pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (RHA). We have completed an Approved Jurisdictional Determination of the review area at this site as shown on the enclosed drawings (Enclosure 1). This determination applies only to the review area. Other aquatic resources that may occur on this property or on adjacent properties outside the reviewarea are not the subject of this determination. Based on the Approved Jurisdictional Determination, we have determined that a DA permit is not required for your proposed work as described in your application and as shown on the enclosed drawings (Enclosure 2). Under Section 404 of the CWA, a DA permit is generally required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. We have determined Wetland A and Wetland B in the review area are not waters of the U.S.; as a result, the activity would not occur in waters of the U.S. Our determination regarding the presence or absence of waters of the U.S. and/or navigable waters of the U.S. is documented on the enclosed Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form (Interim) (Enclosure 3) provides the basis for jurisdiction. A copy of the AJD Form can also be found on our website at hftp:/twww.nwp.usace.army.mil/MissionstRegulatory/Appeals/. No If you object to the enclosed AJD, you may request an administrative appeal under 33 CFR Part 331 as described in the enclosed Notification of Administrative Appeal Options and Process and Request for Appeal (RFA) form (Enclosure 4). To appeal this AJD, you must submit a completed RFA form to the Corps Northwestern Division (NWD) office at the address listed on the form. In order for the request for appeal to be accepted, the Corps must determine that the form is complete, that the request meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR Part 331.5, and the form must also be received by the NWD office within 60 days from the date on the form. It is not necessary to submit the form to the NWD office if you do not object to the enclosed AJD. The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in this request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional determination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland determination with the local USDA service center, prior to starting work. This AJD is valid for a period of five years from the date of this letter unless new information warrants revisions of the determination. Based upon information provided in your permit application, we have determined a Section 10 or Section 404 DA permit is not required for your proposed work. Although a DA permit is not required, other local, State, or Federal requirements may still apply. Our determination regarding the proposed work is based on the project description and construction methods provided in your permit application. You are cautioned that any change in the location or plans of the work may result in activities that require a DA permit. We would like to hear about your experience working with the Portland District, Regulatory Branch. Please complete a customer service survey form at the following address: https://corpsmapu.usace.army.miI/cm_apex/f?p=136:4. 0 If you have any questions regarding our regulatory authority, please contact Mr. Benny A. Dean Jr. by telephone at (541) 465-6769 or email: Benny. A. Dean@usace.army. mil Sincerely, For: Wiliam D. Abadie Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosures cc: Branch Engineering (Chris Morris, chrism@branchengineering.com) Oregon Department of State Lands (Charles Radon, charles.redon@state.or.us) Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (401 applications@deq.state. or. us) USGS Topography Map: NWP-2020-319, Aster Street Multi -Family Anil 52 61 !75 Piet S 1 :� �7' of 77 g I - ' '=rHa6_fid Legend �a Ow _ Project Site �r„a . x,en v`.h • k ys tli`� - X • is .: Lam.• 3 !••�YFM .. ' •„r-•'NWP 2020 F319,A' en pf 14 J� ti` sPSIC��Brr�J •-� 4M �l� 1.; �. .Fad- 50• : e�/• I v � e, cwvelx 62 f Irr • V ^ o I Ga.elg .r .�.•5p8 , _�• ? n as atmal Geographibdocicty, I-rubed` 0 0.25 0.5 1 Scale: 1:24,Wo IazimEe: 44044916 LangiWde:-122.919136 Daze: 812VMM City: Springfield Cwnry: lane prepared by: US Army Caps of Engineers, Regulatory Miles PISS: Sediion0jownship l].OS, Range 2.OW PrgeCtlw: Staze Plane, Oregw, Swth(NAD83) HUC12: Welta�.ille Canal-MeMe Ww (1]090oo10]OB) NWP-2020-319 Page 1 of 3 Enclosure 1 NWP-2020-319 Page 2 of 3 Enclosure 1 1-1 till riWININ lieINS NFE djAm I' T;I ' RTW �r �b MELI 1 r !aid �� ■ ®�'��i�,�C ti QI 1�_WIT 4fiA ®` q® a FIN RNA ��• L� Ogg yenlLxenSN+Rd N �I NI sNONE INP t� [��jT The hfh—etm rr w�. m.o..m e.m.a form a��i aatebem tti Ler. N nm,r.a.m. b. rI-I.h. m. he —taker rth ,—t.r A ,f the h,, ......... b,,pro pmmorai . m,,C �r ,....`a a,ra mm. rr°a.nr�m ofrbm.p.brt.pm.�tm..,r.yhth,arrasmpr .®rr"I"' Vicinity Map . C—rt p- tla4nMlrn. -r, —., foo.Ve m. �[ 2.1. eh.. a be or1-M wlm[M zppohpree v3.n, m...rt .a i®._Phhe l i,phel,ammparr,rg m'.. phAme. H,rmm,et—aany nee ww be appmnaraa. 0 305 610 1,220 I—Lounty. Feet Oregon NWP-2020-319 Page 2 of 3 Enclosure 1 NWP-2020-319 Page 1 of 4 Enclosure 2 1-1 till "iWININ lieINS djAm I'M "E., Inn dINK T .. ernhll JI�' ItRSlI f in 0 All Hill _yI'IfP'�bfV I , ��--•_.F.w�t'HI��• �� 9 il�.�I,Ir��,�'U �' ■I Off!, � r®� �,� ®�� ;��. �-GE INP In[ 2[ t ser tiLo .b �nfo.mnm i.. N onh,..,.®. be.�nh o,, ..«.ta�..th.-to. A ,tb.m.o...t.o�. � 'C .. r.,..as®, r .®.d. —.A�,.—rtP....o®mo'r-r, �.eti a�m�imta.. 1. ..°n.nr�� rry, Vicinity Map .rinhc .�.ep..ama.Mma..m..,...r...�m. p... h.. ..fi ,,e,--p.op�W7h, hAxt...b..,. .- d, "m FIG 1 impiae.a.'mmp..nmm'.•o��t.no�...., emm.nioe a.er=mon ww b, ppm, 0 305 610 1,220 1,,oCounty. rept Oregon NWP-2020-319 Page 1 of 4 Enclosure 2 FORASSESSMENT ONLY LY ONS.E.1/4 S.W.1/4 SEC. 34 T.17S. R.2W. W.M. TAXATION R IONS Lane County 02&2010-LCAT18]-CONC6W &10006 12/1 B/2018-LCATN2-GANG 830]8 P02343302AV TOID14V1]0] LCATBHH-2018-12-191152 V=100' I!c �C u fff u�A 17023434 SEE MAP--M-C'-r_IGNZLE-KI-a�LJ_1Ll/P!Y-_.I ____ SEE MAP 17023442 MCKI 1 A 200 300 400 500 app CANCELLED 1.5AC 188 AC 1.08 AC 1.06AC 2AC 100 ' e s 1100 SEE M P 1101 170234 1 I 0.55A 1102 LOT'A'y s I 6300 COIOMONAREA a 8100 800 �/ m 1.63AC 0.43AC I n/ LOT *B I 1 w 1 - '/ COMMON AR ASTER ST 601 , g z j �Iq 0.2 AC 900 2 i o j 0.31 AC I IT 10 3 F 0,08 C r oe'w 1 � 6 � i _ � '� ,-�ea�-,rF -,,->,3, � im. o'Q area '� _ ��a , o.igQc4 °f..;f"�• ji All- 1000 801 m » c0. ocn. w s+5¢4e'L,aT;wu_J ff 0.06 AC NW4P. tzl5' 4 A' E' a ��E eeE 'w+t. * 1 •spa q�Y �C'lµ ,A I ASTER�,a s<Ln a---_-__ '_---_��;;<__-_._____-'�,_._ia oaW� a\... STREET R x F i" x'; `� ''• a 019 600 1005 1� ° a>a 1006 2 's 3 4 5 'a 0.4, AC O.nnC o.VAC 1007 1008 1010 1011 bs9 a�" �,'° \•\ 0.17 AC 0.17 AC 0.17 g I 0.19 AC9AC _ On. lass a. p° F 1009 a. 1.31 Ac «'t>•s� I ' rnsl es' X n.9>. ` j s apse mE <\� a9a 1012 e5' f \J 0.94 AC i 1300 1400 �50� .TEe , �) 1 ,0.46 AC 0.38 AC •\ FiAeE R1G > \ �`� �� T x 1 2 3 g 14 4 1600 .� essi wstz r J 1�01 , = 3 0.34 AC " '\ a,»»'>In 0000000 seauE Heev>ceW»oM \l�Jl XN4N8V � re t ♦. B z are8 HB'.e'tTW sz8 1 I g pl "<7 1 5800 sm«'saE,su z.vtl sm«x >m -' us az a es sir sa taem P I a 5900 >s o.27 AC e m 5700 5800 .m - --- - 6000 u _ o23 Ac s 5500 5400 5300 5200 > n' L a - �' y---aa-- -- 0.3AC A 51 = 0.28 AC 0.27 AC 023 AC 2300 • 2100 ro 2000 'gnw --� w 50 A 0.27 AC 028 AC 024 AC 8 p 49 ae s - 1900 1800 1700 52 9 '" w 47 w 48 p 45 - 44 43 0.42 AC i 0.38 AC 8 024 AC 0.23 AC Al 10 N 9 e w 0.258AC I 7 6 61001 1x,,W ennn a "ws 0.34 AQ s� s ,ss-1jpB'mxw Nan.aw >a re. snr>� E m mw e 53 _ -`n_ __a-a3e'ea"> 2- 0,347 �m.>. - o- - "m NP LOT 8 snru'xw $0" crest xr�" �! �1G m na r En_E9aW+gm_ szoo W,e>re, - - 4 R t? n®'•e_ m u '} 12.98 y wto w CC `OC 0.46 AC s. i sy°•9naw t n Nus'm°ww N AS +e+ x„m. \, b$' zgxs i --- a 'A D 54 73oota FERNHILL LOOP - - - - ems ro" w 023 AC p 7400 sa.°'B,.E ®.a ss. m,E mn 7900 4 2200w \�. " �"° n*% R•sm mire' ;xxE , 6% K 0.27 AC m • ,s•B x® tea• y 7200 3 65 7500 7600 7700 7800 o.z7 AC �' ms me, �, 027 AC _ w 0.3 AC 0.37 AC a Ne� 9 $.39275 0.3 AC a y as na 0.27 AC 71 11 `?+,'01,. 57 se 6 �j f bs t \ s,„azaw 4600 I 23A m .46A I5000 X 8 `C. 70 8 +aslB' ® save ?z"'R E \ i' ' °5w 4700 a 0.48 AC _ c 1 0.23 AC 023 AC £ A 39 6300 -ez ryl o >e.ww.F aar'.se y 1�� zz yR Mn'x' 02007- 3 a^te , R� 4600 s� 0238C a 37 6 38 p . 55 re a`, 5" o">°,T \� wr*"'E 2400 ,2 " 'N. i P\ o.23AC ^� _e re 6400 �°Q 83 °j�g 'in. w ,a s 0.23 AC I as i F s> \yl <,/'() 0.27AC I.m. B.`\ $.39275 �n^^ 07000 '49s M a _ 2500 ,3 Nf6 k 'N. 9.m�BET\i 35 t' S6 '\ n ® •. n o24 AC a % ree- aI'' i 'm ,z+a 4400 K 82 ss„¢ �o Nss-tease \�' m ,sr 2800 ,a ;�a. a ;w = 0.46 AC i n '\ 'Ar'` see w.•" 0.37 AC 'Po.>. P' a 028 AC t1a= wss'm e'er g�\vw ex' . a I 33 M' e'I n 15 �•s P��P .A 2600 _ d' Iy 0.25 AC @ •F^ i xa 8500 s, \ ��.,, Nom,.. k r L ��I ,y'sa a �\ o r < irp I 0.za ac reaa'�. ,'� 2700 ,e 3700 3a xn ' •%. ^„er. n+re k 028 AC , ` < O� y 0.23 AC p� ti \ \ 57 6800 `'u',.-E �\ ^� 18 w "�° wap":"�.� s '� zs .�" 4,N' 4300 rJt m� �' w` P 4. o.za ac a, \ "e s �`vG 36 0 �' ' a. 29. Se 8700 '` a\as 02; AC a 3900 %,� \,\3nf N®.o•, E� Nm•.o^'k o.z32c 5 y,. o24 Ac e. a,,1Pa Ilzz k 028AC ° �(.n� wys x 0.23 AC °}z �.'d o 28 w .aso: 17 se°re `a••- n W 24 •A .`1 N_r,arow_sha _ 8800 k \'\ i P ,e 9 si,•� s �+ e>O o.23 AC '�o �. lr A e ,d" t+g. m 3400 "ij we, e E 8500 '}� 40000''°t,e. , se, E "° 0.23 AC 0.49 AC ? 125 AC C 200 i 23 /ni 2300 840 75 8600 29 240AOC tw s 125AC dC„ 2900 "'. \ ww' �- 22 0691 w.+y9s 0.39 g l 0.41 AC b' ^ 30 y ?°' 025 AC \ �" S's iw wp,asv 74 �j 76 °> a4 em x £ 3200 A. s >" d 'm' 8300 0.26 Ac 8200 73 a,,+ AP jl� w e 8700° 8800 Nw 17023443 o.28 Ac f l: o29T/Ac H o.28 AC ,\ � � -ss�n e ,` l� = G ass ) , 4 ,\I i xe 4 m LP,EE MAP a I "ms,. 3000 s« ea p°'�- r m„ +e,.ea ,s sw-asea '17023433 `\ ° "ls ,g 0.23Ac e�h ,rs ,,> a°9�_._._._______-Y: €z?a,s a,a,a�>.E a�-E r;,n,-E .n'nrE ' FOR p� A' " aW ,9 3100' w RIDGE - - - - - -E awa,m. DRIVE =�"- \ I 023 AC ' w u rem>r p--si'a-' ---------- •\ as 11 w 20 9500 9400 A 9300 x�ee•.w' NssWvw ^ m.+r R se tee' •\ wa a • 024 AC m 0.27 AC 027 AC 9200 ss slaw \k 114 113 R 112 027 AC 8 9100 9000 "°s�°«w '\ ♦ 1182 x _e w 111 0.28 AC P 0 5 C s 8900 ° IN 0.95 AC 9 " C IN $.39753 FIG 2 APPROX - s ` _`\ 1 l a 1/4 COR SEE MAP Ir,/ SEE MAP SEE MAP\ I 18020321 sE u5" 18020300 17023434 18020322 Cpl-------- --- I Nm°o• .. \\WP-2020-319 -- i Page 2 of 4 Enclosure 2 LEGEND EXIONG _ CURB —(E)w(E)w— WATER LINE —(E)SD (E)SD— STORMWATER LINE �E)G�E)G— CAS LINE STORMWATER PIPE SANITARY LINE ® WATER METER D4 WATER VALVE ® GAS METER ® WASTEWATER MANHOLE ® STORMWATER MANHOLE B CATCH BASIN CLEAN OUT SS — CONCRETE —w—w— DECIDUOUS TREE INTRANSFORMER PROPOSED FENCE X— STORMWATER PIPE Q ® DRCH INLET m DUAL CHAMBER CATCH BASIN 00 � STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITY W — SS SS — S4NITARY PIPE —w—w— WATER LINE wmi z o WATER METER Iw WATER VALVE — c c— GAS LINE —E—E— ELECTRIC LINE No CURB CONCRETE BUILDING FOOTPRINT DECK FIRE TURNAROUND WETLANDS Lzss--z s1 DLAWN GRASS PROPOSED TREE GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 IN FEET ) branch ENGINEERING= Since 1977 civil • transportation structural• geotechnical SURVEYING 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 p: 541.746.0637 www. Branch Engi neerl ng.com Springfield OR I Albany OR project title: Vl O Q W 00 � W >� Q W Q z z o W �IJ W LLJ cc� No O W > J W Cd Q ~ z z li Qz� w a �- N date: AUGUST 4, 2020 drawn by: CM designer: CM project no: 19-453 SITE PLAN FIG 4 NWP-2020-319 Page 3 of 4 Enclosure 2 LEGEND EXISTING _ CURB —(E)W (E)N WATER LINE —(E)So(E)sp— STORMWATER LINE �E)GE)9— GAS LINE —(E)W(E)WW— SANITARY LINE ® WATER METER Dd WATER VALVE [,3n CAS METER ® WASTEWATER MANHOLE ® STORMWATER MANHOLE A CATCH BASIN 1P CLEAN OUT DCONCRETE Qw DECIDUOUS TREE ® TRANSFORMER BUILDING PAD 518 516 PROPOSED FENCE 3f 3f X50 Q STORMWATER PIPE W eD ® DITCH INLET W DUAL CHAMBER CATCH BASIN > Qw Q ZZ STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITY W �o W LU Cr- _SS SS — SANITARY PIPE _W _W_ WATER LINE W > 0 Cd WATER METER Iw Q WATER VALVE — c ~ c — GAS LINE LU —E—E— �V) ELECTRIC LINE CURB CONCRETE e. p. l . ar P: u3 ��w I• .'I WETLANDS DLAWN GRASS ifyZ, PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL—FILL BUILDING PAD REMOVAL—FILL Alignment — 514 512 r11�L1111�:ZIli1��Ila/l 18.00' PUBLIC STORM SEWER EASEMENT �, • — -------------------- .'n.' _ 'F «' • • • • • • • • • • n' __ F 0 0 =.— 2= —"e ��E=e a �r "r ' — =art ="S .o yq. a—a—a ==—s • • as • r• E .0 0+50.00 0 r 1+50.00 \• 12+ 0.001 • 2+50.00 3+00.00 \• to ,a •'.'. ., ,'.'.'. 14.00' PUBLIC SANITA Y•• 1 • • • ' ' • \ /;•.•.'•'.'.•.'.s '.•••••� • • • • • • • • • • • SEWER EASEMENT \ ♦ • ) o.3700 •\ •••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••1 li �'I I% \� 20 .' 0 BUILDING PAD iia I III III' Q'�, 0 8" FL (E):511.96 .d". FL. (W):512,0.6. `r!`_.r_� a77 8" FL (E):512.71 branch ENGINEERING= Since 1977 civil , transportation structural • geotechnical SURVEYING 310 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 p: 541.746.0637 www.BranchEngineering.com Springfield OR I Albany OR project title: revisions date: AUGUST 4, 2020 drawn by: cm designer: eM project no: 19-453 CROSS-SECTION PLAN sheet. FIG 5 NWP-2020-319 Page 4 of 4 Enclosure 2 0 Q W 00 � W > Qw Q ZZ W �o W LU Cr- N� 0 W > J W Cd Q ~ Z li QZ LU - a �V) revisions date: AUGUST 4, 2020 drawn by: cm designer: eM project no: 19-453 CROSS-SECTION PLAN sheet. FIG 5 NWP-2020-319 Page 4 of 4 Enclosure 2 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . ' REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 8/26/2020 ORM Number: NWP-2020-319 Associated JDs: N/A. Review Area Location': State/Territory: Oregon City: Springfield County/Parish/Borough: Lane Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 44.045013° N Longitude 122.919131° W II. FINDINGS A Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the corresponding sectionsttables and summarize data sources. ❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters orwater features, including wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A. ❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete table in Section 11.13). ❑ There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete appropriate tables in Section II.C). ® There are waters orwater features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete table in Section II.D). B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2 10 Name 1 § 10 Size 1 § 10 Criteria 1 Rationale for § 10 Determination N/A. I N/A. I N/A I N/A. I N/A. C. Clean Water Act Section 404 Territorial Seas and Traditional Navi able Waters a 1 waters :3 a 1 Name a 1 Size a 1 Criteria Rationale fora 1 Determination N/A. I N/A. I N/A. I N/A. I N/A. Tributaries a 2 waters a 2 Name a 2 Size (a)(2) Criteria Rationale fora 2 Determination N/A. N/A. N/A. N/A. N/A. Lakes and onds, and im oundments of Jurisdictional waters a 3 waters): a 3 Name (a)(3) Size a 3 Criteria Rationale fora 3 Determination N/A. N/A. I N/A. I N/A. I N/A. Adacentwetlands a 4 waters: a 4 Name (a)(4) Size (a)(4) Criteria Rationale fora 4 Determination N/A. N/A. N/A. N/A. N/A. ' Map(sufigure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requester ' If the navigable water is not subject to Me ebb and Flow of the tide or includetl on the District's list of Rivers and Hat ors Act Section 19 navigable waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR pad 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 1D navigability determination. ' A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request fix an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river orslream orolher type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand- alone TNW determination shouk be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form, Page 1 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020 updated NWP-2020-319 Page 1 of 3 Enclosure 3 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE D. Excluded Waters or Features Excluded waters b)(1) — (b)(12)):4 Exclusion Name Exclusion Size Exclusions Rationale for Exclusion Determination NWP-2020-319 0.02 acre(s) (b)(1) Non- This wetland is a ditch that provides stormwater Wetland A adjacent wetland. and ephemeral flows and is not identified on any maps as a tributary. The area surrounding the delineated wetland is encompassed with roadways, residential, and commercial development. Culverts convey the ephemeral flows off-site to the west. No (a)(1) -(a)(3) water of the U.S. is within the review area and the wetland is not flooded by an (a)(1) -(a)(3) water in a typical year. The GIS map and the National Hydrography Dataset map of the location does not show any intermittent tributary flowing through the study area location. No defined channel or waters were observed on aerial photographs to reflect the wetland maintains a hydrologic surface water connection with a relatively permanent waterway downstream and outside of the study area. NWP-2020-319 0.22 acre(s) (b)(1)Non- This wetland is a hillslope wetland which Wetland B adjacent wetland. provides flows into the ephemeral ditched Wetland A offsite. The area surrounding the delineated wetland is encompassed with roadways, residential, and commercial development. Culverts convey the ephemeral flows. No(a)(1}(a)(3) water of the U.S. is within the review area and the wetland is not flooded by an (a)(1) -(a)(3) water in a typical year. The GIS map and the National Hydrography Dataset map of the location does not show any intermittent tributary flowing through the study area location. No defined channel or waters were observed on aerial photographs to reflect the wetland maintains a hydrologic surface water connection with a relatively permanent waterway downstream and outside of the study area. III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION A. Selectlenter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate. ® Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Aster Street Properties Wetland Delienation Report performed by Branch Engineering on November 13, 2019. ° Some excluded waters, act as (bx2) and (b)(41), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so. Caps districts may, in case-by-case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the renew area. Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to coiled data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (bx1) exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as definetl by the NVJPR. Page 2 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020 updated NWP-2020-319 Page 2 of 3 Enclosure 3 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE This information is sufficient for purposes of this AJD. Rationale: The delineator completed a wetland delineation which followed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 wetland delineation manual and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region to determine the boundaries of the waters within the review area. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: N/A. ® Photographs: Aerial and Other: Google Earth 2019 and delineation photos 31 October 2019. ❑ Corps site visit(s) conducted on: N/A. ❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): N/A. ❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B. ® USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Coburg -Urban land complex, Nekia silty clay loam, and Courtney gravelly silty clay loam soils were within the review area and observed in the delineation dated 31 October 2019. ® USFWS NWI maps: USFWS Maps, LWI Springfield Maps ® USGS topographic maps: 1:24K Springfield Other data sources used to aid in this determination: Data Source select Name and/or date and other relevant information USGS 8, 10, 12 digit HUC maps HUC #170900040706 USDA Sources N/A. NOAA Sources N/A. USACE Sources N/A. U DAR data/maps Lidar Map of project location provided with wetland delineation 31 October 2019. Other Sources N/A. B. Typical year assessment(s): The antecedent precipitation tool was utilized for the timing of the wetland delineation on 31 October 2019 to determine if the site was reviewed during drier orwetter than normal circumstances. The APT determined the review was performed during normal climatic conditions for the time of year and the region overall was in a mild drought. Therefore, the Corps can conclude circumstances during the delineation of the site were under normal climatic conditions for October 2019. C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A. Page 3 of 3 Foam Verson N My 2020 updated NWP-2020-319 Page 3 of 3 Enclosure 3 NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: ALLC, LLC. File Number: NWP-2020-319 Date: 26 August 2020 Attached is: See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of emission B PERMIT DENIAL C 3= APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found in Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331, or at htu1Aa,ww.usace.=V.mil/Missims/CivirWorks/RcwlatPro r=mdPmnits/FedualRe ulatim.as x A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter ofPermission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approvedjurisdictional determinations associated with the permit • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluateyour objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previouslywritten. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter ofPermission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approvedjurisdictional determinations associated with the permit • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify, the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the fomh to the division engineer. This to= must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. NWP-2020-319 Page 1 of 2 Enclosure 4 SECTION II - REQUEST FORAPPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new infomhation or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may process you may contact: also contact: William D. Abadie, Chief Regulatory Branch Melinda M.Larsen, Regulatory Appeals Review Officer U.S. Amry Corps of Engineers, Portland District Office U.S. Amry Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division PO Box 2946 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 400 Portland, OR 97209-2946 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone: (503)909-4373 Telephone: (503) 909-3999 Email: William. D.Abadie usace. .mil Email: Melinda.M.Lusm(dusace.anny.mil RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature belowgrants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. NWP-2020-319 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure 4