Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 8/28/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 W ilzo Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Kristy Weaver I Phone: 425-214-2186 Company: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC E-mail: ko3199@att.com Address: 16331 SE 72nd Way, Redmond, WA 98052 Applicant's Rep.: Meredith Hewett Phone: 503-312-3400 Company: J5 Infrastructure Partners E-mail:mhewett@j5ip.com Address: 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR, 97225 Property Owner: City of Springfield Phone: 541-726-3700 Com p an E-mail: Address: 225 Fifth St, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP N0: 17023342 TAX LOT NOS :03100 Property Address: No Address- q SKS �Yt ion U\ aS (Y7 hl Nearest Intersection : Main St & N 54th St ROW V Private Property ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Propose collocation of SWF on oint use pole in City ROW Existing Use: City Streetlight pole Si natures: Please si n and riot our name and date in the a ro riate box on the next a e. Associated Permits Case NoQII 4-000[51-1 h1 '1/ i Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ lm . Z� PROIECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1.f 14 Signatures Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the Information in this application is correct and accurate. Date: ignature Meredith T.M. Hewett If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Signature Date: I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submit requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plat plan. Plan // e ,aration: //��^, /�/ �f" y ,1 1 -/i#- Date: pA/04/2020 Plot hPlan ✓.LPrGepa/rer Signature Meredith T.M. Hewett Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility VN/TS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co -location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following VdTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Fagade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. C. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side -mounted antennas and small top - mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top -mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co -location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co -location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: L An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co -location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co -location of antennas or arrays on existing VVTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements pr Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. SZ Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property State or County Approvals Required - The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. V Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. ❑ Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant's and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider's service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co -location is possible within a 5 -mile radius of the proposed WfS facility. C. Co -Location. An engineer's analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co -location is within the area recommended by the engineer's report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: L The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co -location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer's statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co -located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. L FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: i. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; Iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and iv. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-145 F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1)'unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services" 2) "prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co -Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. 5. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield's zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts Types Allowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light -Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining O rations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space 1 Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility wTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co -location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or C. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 & 14 S. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WT'S facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; C. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 & 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged VJTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not "stand out" from its surrounding environment. 16. Facade -Mounted Antenna. Facade -mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Facade -mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof -Mounted Antenna. Roof -mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator's service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention -getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and C. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. C. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: a. Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: L 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. C. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole -mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush - mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner's joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. L All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: i. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. M. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator's expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WFS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. S. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE 08/04/2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Attn: Liz Miller 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 VIA EMAIL- Imiller@sprinefield-or.gov RE: Request to Construct Small Wireless Facility on Existing Structure Subject to 60 -day Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") Shot Clock Dear Springfield Development& Public Works: On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") we are pleased to submit this request to construct a small wireless facility on an existing structure within the public right-of-way. This facility will enhance the capacity of AT&T's existing wireless network and provide critical service improvements to the surrounding area. Project Description This request includes a facility that meets the definition of "small wireless facilities" pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.6002(1), constructed on an existing structure in the public right-of-way, without requiring structure replacement. AT&T IU I Owner/Pole Type Location Proposed Height EUG02_008/ FA 14810819 City of Springfield Streetlight Pole Pole g 1294 Main St&N54^h Ave. 44.0458221- 43'-10" 122.9342110 J5 INFRASTRUCTURE List of Permits/Agreements Requested AT&T has already entered into a Franchise Agreement with the City of Portland. AT&T requests approval of the following permits and agreements, as well as any other authorizations necessary, for its proposed small wireless facility/facilities o Pole Attachment& Public Right Of Way Use Agreement— City Contract 2093, signed 1/2/19 FCC Shot Clock for Small Wireless Facilities We would also like to confirm the City of Springfield will review AT&Ts application pursuant to the FCCs new timelines, or "Shot Clacks," for small wireless facilities, which are outlined 47 G.F.R. 4 1.6003. All authorizations related to facilities to be collocated on existing structures are required to be completed within 60 days after fling, as follows: • This Application was filed on 08/04/2020. • Absent tolling, the City of Springfield must take final action by Monday, October S`^,2020. If you determine one or more of these applications are incomplete, please notify us by Friday, April 14th, 2020. Under 47 C.F.R. 4 1.6003, the "Shot Clock" for incomplete applications resets if notice of incompleteness is provided to the applicant within ten days of submittal. If an application is deemed incomplete a second time, the shat clock does not reset; instead, it is tolled, and then after resubmittal, it continues to run until a decision is made. Our goal is to work with you to obtain approval of these permits without delay. We will respond promptlyto any requests for information you may have for our application. Please let us know how we can work with you to make the approval process easi9r for you. We look forward to working with you on this important project, which will significantly improve wireless communication services in your community. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below. Sincerely, Meredith Hewett mhewett@j5ip.com 6732 SW Terri Ct, Portland, OR 97225 503-312-3400 Enclosures: Low Visibility. Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunications Facilities— Minimum Development Standards Type 1 Attachments: Construction Drawings, Photo sim, Propagation, RFSSR, pole owner No Make Ready/Permission cc: Wendy Long, Mike Slotemaker Springfield Development Code Compliance Narrative A. The proposed installation is less than 50' and not more than 10% taller than the existing structure B. The proposed antenna will be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume C. The proposed antenna and associated equipment will be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume D. The proposed antenna will be no more than 6 cubic feet in volume E. The proposed installation will not project more than 5' above or 2' laterally from the pole, antenna will not exceed diameter of the pole it is attached to F. The proposed antenna will be mounted a minimum of 10' above grade G. The proposed equipment, separate from the antenna, will be concealed in a single cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards on this Section or otherwise shielded from public view H. All proposed cabling and wire will be concealed or shielded inside conduit I. All proposed antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts will be painted or textured in a non -reflective neutral color that matches or is compatible with the pole J. The proposed installation will include a new underground connections where required when an overhead connection does not already exist K. The proposed installation will comply with: I. Will be placed as close to the same location as possible unless minor adjustments are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety IL A new structure will be proposed only when no other existing structure in the right of way is available or suitable III. Installation will allow safe passage on the sidewalk, will not be located within vision clearance, will not interfere with other utilities, traffic control devised or intersections and will be determined safe L. Installation is not proposed on a decorative pole M. If required by the city design will include concealment measures in the Historic Overlay District go,�� Ea >�� �E� lila-lIf �i g��£.. Dw az Qa O s�s � •':'< Woe �$Q. o eo 55;a�H U b ¢M$$$$ ?�C 9' ... x,�,ii9'9 FEa83 EIkia$ a � U U Z o Z W Z U 3 � � Z j ik9g E:E W Ddi W W UIN H �2PL g_Pa P3 kkwa6 6i E D �6 E PS M' Hul Z QE8 M. E Z Q 'H t 110 U O ,r w g se F o 4 a O E 5a s $ gap x 6W a €fie 5 kSE}q g F .h;= ..E� st_ sad w _ S E p tl B a S F a 6 W1 ilk g 6 H d € ® Y �@ @ R� a is1 d fie$ 0® tl B a S F a 6 W1 ilk g 6 H d € ® lk l F @ R� a is1 d fie$ 0® 9 S i sE iN 1 O l DOME s<� a s 6 i 4 AT p H.€�€a � i 1- �sW.e N fi� € gg @ § p �i:d1111 € - ,ae$"s3 € Yy$�` Lid w \6 -1 IS k - mw ; / � \ ( \6 ) IS k - mw ; � \ ( � I�E �P P � � @ E 4• - 5 °s• a, /!! \�: ~ /�cc $}}{,)!§;« lkb:: J Jim \y �f;:•2E y t - A/!\; \{ /. \ 2 \\ \ ) . r� � \\ - \ \ � ;•( ISE t - A/!\; \{ /. \ 2 \\ \ ) . r� � =11111difl ��\}} lj��(( !!;� /,\(! /,\(! : dr ~ �©( m, \ M / Alo a mi�;i OD S� s i BE s�? s e go E, S� i BE s�? s e go k,. amu• a eya an _ ag6• e�� <aE es:o a� � e g um� ¢eg n^Y�� L, ni h FV. p: sm s aS' ge.e _ vyr MR ma iia k,. amu• a eya an _ ag6• e�� <aE es:o a� � e g um� ¢eg n^Y�� L, a 55e J e � e p: sm s aS' ge.e _ vyr MR e � e ma iia 4 X32'2 �t o� 3t a$ 3 a3 &mo� 90 `z g4 H'i oo� F Raz z" mk 'q o � .Ffosw'=b y E' Rq V eg oa 'o c� Rze'o is Y'"'a Lt 4 a$ 3 a3 &mo� 90 `z g4 H'i oo� F Raz z" mk 'q o � .Ffosw'=b y £oGd`Y`�� V 4 a$ 3 90 `z F Raz z" mk 'q o ee z V 'o c� ,/ « y. -----©-.�� \) \ - j!� § !e z ���� / LL O O O ^< O z 0 0 � 5 0 00 w a N O OI O N = z N a O LU 06 �6 Es LL 00 O 9 Q ¢ 0 co CD � g o w �a CD ° NI a O W 66 4.4 K a I } i O mQ a� . z� v� vQ P � t Q m Q C G a a 3 E0 v a n v v a ?�Y �i o z n v i 3 E 'o °i a s m o N a o ?' � � m E 0 0 o°�' �- a � oa o` s d m `v . n — o a a 2— o w .�, � v � v a m a m 0 O }. RfRRl77 //[/|\\ ' a9t9t2a � RfRRl77 //[/|\\ ' a9t9t2a ' \ � \E o 42 � AT&T On -Site Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report (RFSSR) Site Name: PDX16450-008 M-RFSC Name: Piero Rovani FA#: 14810819 Site Structure Type: Light Pole USID: 251732 Property Owner: Public ROW Site ID: CRAN_RWOR_EUG02_008 Property Owner Contact: NIA Address: 5470 Main Street PACE#. MRWOR032566/MRWOR030293 Springfield, Oregon 97478 Prepared For: AT&T Mobility, LLC County: Lane c/o JS Infrastructure Partners Latitude: 44.04581944 2030 Main Street, Suite 200 Longitude: -122.93420000 Irvine, CA 92614 EBI Project Number: 6220002236 Report Information: Report Writer: Ian Swanson Meter Model/Serial: NBM-SSO/E-0541 Report Date: May 28, 2020 Probe Model/Serial: EAS091/01049 Survey Technician: Joe Vitulli Site Survey Date and Time: May 21, 2020 13:00 PST CDs:-2020-04-08JDM_MDA RL_ ATT_PDX16450-008_90% CRAN CD REV B_2020-02-13 RFDS: 16450-008 P-042819 MRWOR030293 Preliminary RFDS Compliance Statement: AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. EBI Consulting environmental I engineering I due diligence AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX I64SO-008 Site FA: 14810819 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 251732 I 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN........................................................................................3 3.0 ANTENNAINVENTORY..........................................................................................................4 4.0 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS.............................................................................................................6 5.0 ONSITE MEASUREMENTS......................................................................................................9 6.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING............................................................................... 10 7.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 16 8.0 APPENDICES........................................................................................................................ 17 APPENDIXA: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS ................. IS APPENDIX B: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS.................................................. 21 APPENDIXC: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION.................................................................... 22 APPENDIX D: LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIXE: RoofMasterT..................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIx F: CERTIFICATIONS................................................................................................ 25 Preparer Certification................................................................................................................ 27 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site USID: 251732 1 EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Consulting) has been contracted by AT&T Mobility, LLC to conduct radio frequency electromagnetic (RF-EME) monitoring and modeling for AT&T Site CRAN_RWOR_EUG02_008 located at 5470 Main Street in Springfield, Oregon to determine RF-EME exposure levels from proposed AT&T wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix A of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF-EME monitoring and modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF-EME compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF-EME fields. This document addresses the compliance of AT&Ts transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated facilities at the site. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Existing Mitigation at the Site: • No Existing Signs on the Utility Pole. Recommended Mitigation at the Site: Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. • Signage at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: No Action Required. • Barriers at AT&T Mobility Sectors: o A: No Action Required AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Predictive Modeling Results: Site USID: 251732 2 The maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately I,183.28 percent of the FCC's general public limit (236.66 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the light fixture level. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. At the antenna face level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 1451.65 percent of the FCC's general public limit (290.33 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). At ground level, the maximum predictive power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.26 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.052 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Onsite Measured Results: EBI conducted a site visit on May 21, 2020. There are no access restrictions to the light pole as it is located in the public right-of-way. At ground level, the maximum measured power density generated by the antennas combined with predictive modeling is approximately 5.57 percent of the FCC's general public limit (I.I I percent of the FCC's occupational limit). 1.2 Climate Conditions at Time of On -Site Audit Temperature: 55' Sky Conditions: Cloudy Wind Factor: Mild Breeze Precipitation: N/A AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 6450-008 Site FA: 14810819 2.0 SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION PLAN Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on apposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. Existing Sign Proposed Sign I 1 — I Tnstalled Sign I except under 15' Site USID: 251732 3 Carnal Cob, Ude 10 ATT 101oolyid me I p'_._ I ATNT NOTICE I S, I :- I AT&T CAMON 2—Roofi�LV II AT&T WARNING I B aM 2A 5µns l =� IAT&T CAUTION Z— T. Sq, AT&T—ceS ICA Sg. AT&T CAUnON 2C—Hnpn Sy, AT&T CAIRION SWI U1 Signs AT&T TRIUNf:UPL NOTICE San '> r -nal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Ou%) auia imi o On -m) aaa vwy ,n (PEP) maw euualuy puna��aA!wson{!, „� (SunnU 1ndnl iamod (laa�) a�nuaay (eaaa9aQ) 41P7mweag — luloa;�ng _ O -P) lElumoQ Inaluuyaa� ('Hap) ylnwlzV (zfQy) Sauanbaud g S Q q Iap.w nunaynV a V U `z a4elµ nuuayuy z aoleaad0 N IUV N N N p b J G N F O H � U w b0 � N 9 d Site Name: PDXI6450-008 Site FA: 14810819 4.0 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Site USID: 251732 6 The following pages contain site photos from the on-site survey conducted on May 21, 2020. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX I64SO-008 Site FA: 14810819 Site USID: 251732 7 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Sim Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Sim USID: 251732 8 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 5.0 ONSITE MEASUREMENTS EBI performed a ground level RF-EME survey on May 21, 2020. Site USID: 251732 9 Monitoring was performed using a NBM-550 Electromagnetic Radiation Survey Meter, E-0541 with an EA5091-shaped probe with a frequency range of 300kHz-50 GHz. The meter was last calibrated on 4/26/2019. This meter was programmed to measure the total power density for all electromagnetic radiation within the 300kHz-SOGHz frequency range and report the power density as a percent of the FCC's controlled MPE. During this survey, no spatially averaged readings above 1.0620% of the FCC's occupational MPE (5.3100% of the general public MPE) were encountered on any ground surface. This maximum spatially averaged reading was measured at ground level 10 feet away on the west side of the pole, as shown in the monitoring site plan. Please see below for a graphical representation of monitoring locations and readings. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. I I veonggto I I I cons@3s .� I 1 f f I i i _ 2u� nuwrt ... t1105Q�00 i WfJ @'Nv 30350@SR 51150®10P r 4u0 3in0�5' a-'PF�.ry LEGEM IpM1 Fek I ♦ 6�ee, ertsFseq�c.aaON AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA 14810819 10 6.0 WORST-CASE PREDICTIVE MODELING In accordance with AT&Ts RF Exposure policy, EBI performed theoretical modeling using RoofMasterTu software to estimate the worst-case power density at the site light fixture level and ground -level resulting from operation of the antennas. For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by AT&T and compared the resultant worst-case MPE levels to the FCC's occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65. The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information collected during the site survey and information provided by AT&T and information gathered from other sources. There are no other wireless carriers with equipment installed at this site. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately 10 feet of AT&T's Sector A antenna at the light fixture level. Modeling also indicates that the worse -case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's occupational limit within approximately 5 feet of AT&Ts Sector A antenna at the light fixture level. Modeling indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general public limit within approximately I I feet of the antenna face and the occupational limit within approximately 5 feet of the antenna face. Modeling also indicates that the worst-case emitted power density may exceed the FCC's general population limit within approximately 4 feet below the bottom of the AT&T antenna and the occupational limit within approximately 3 feet below the bottom of the AT&T antenna. At the nearest walking/working surfaces to the AT&T antennas on the light fixture level, the maximum power density generated by the AT&T antennas is approximately I,183.28 percent of the FCC's general public limit (236.66 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). The composite exposure level from all carriers on this site is approximately 1, 183.28 percent of the FCC's general public limit (236.66 percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at the nearest walking/working surface to each antenna. It should be noted that percentage of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there are no areas at ground/street level related to the proposed AT&T antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or general public exposure limits at this site. At ground/street level, the maximum power density generated by the antennas is approximately 0.26 percent of the FCC's general public limit (0.052 percent of the FCC's occupational limit). Existing conditions at the site were measured by radiofrequency monitoring. Combining these results with the predictive modeling results for the proposed AT&T antennas resulted in a maximum power density for the existing and proposed AT&T antennas will be approximately 5.57 percent of the FCC's general public limit (I.I I percent of the FCC's occupational limit) at ground level. Microwave dish antennas are designed for point-to-point operations at the elevations of the installed equipment rather than ground -level coverage. Based on AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated October 28, 2014, microwave antennas are considered compliant if they are higher than 20 feet above any accessible walking/working surface. There are no microwaves installed at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 11 Elevation View I i iOPORUMINNPE=00.5 1 1 �. PemLMPE IegeM I ❑ 6Y 1mY ❑ �'51NY 1 RMm Lmh SW 03VeNctl i..- - IDIINPma � GRGUND=0' Mk Zma A,p i � ATT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX I64SO-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 12 Light Fixture Level 40.5 feet AGO N I GROUND •0' I �CfGN. i0P nF W MIMRE =405 MAIN SS. Pmcn1NFE Leal ❑ n 101% 1W% SDD% ❑ = WM% son,♦ RkFcl S-9 101w1mA du IAv¢3).51v13.5F®p �,�me mae • All Note: Graphical representation of MPE is based on spatially -averaged power densities over a height of six feet, with the height of the light fixture being centered within that spatial range. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©1020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Antenna Face Level MAIN Si. Site USID: 251732 13 Nrwrt MPE Leg M ❑ %1. Son 5W% ❑ 500%%5W0% � 50W%+ PiAAclumis W9 ID fwl eli0 B (Aa339A9b45aFetl) Cutlo CLILI Cxe ALT AT&T proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Ground Level 0 feet AGL GROUND=D SELiOPA TOP OF LUMINNRE-465' MAIN ST. Site USID: 251732 14 0 N Pe tMPE LBWnd ❑ I 1a6 Im# 5OGX ❑ 5m#5OGGY. Pus, PI suns As ;9 IO 6 F. fAVP 0 1v6 Fs11 C-'. Cd. code IS ATT AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©3020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 Is AT&T Contribution of More Than 5% of the FCC's General Exposure RF Limit I I a GROUND - O' SELTORA � 1 a Q TOP OF WMINNRE-1465 MAIN SL PW.. MFE LegeM ❑ M.Ga PuX SWa9 i6 ag 1O 01.6 tre e — 1Ag DIo6 F®U [zniuG CMe • ATT Note that the areas shown in purple are where AT&T antennas contribute more than 5% of the FCC's general exposure RF limit. These do not overlap any areas in front of other carrier antennas exceeding the FCC's general exposure RF limit because there are no other carriers as shown in Figure I. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 16 7.0 COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. The following mitigation measures are recommended for this site. Access Point(s): o To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, E61 recommends that access to the light pole or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible. o Install 10.25 by 10.25 inch Stonehouse CAUTION signs on opposite sides of the light pole with the top of the sign being 4 feet below the bottom of the antenna. AT&T Mobility Sectors: c Sector A: No Action Required. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 8.0 APPENDICES Site USID: 251732 17 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 92020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 18 Appendix A: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) REQUIREMENTS The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF-EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP. The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General public/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area- Table reaTable I and Figure I (below), which are included within the FCC's OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are "time -averaged" limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures. The FCC's MPEs are measured in terms of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm2). Known as the power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) and an uncontrolled MPE of I mW/cm2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency range. For the AT&T equipment operating at 700 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE limit is 2.33 mW/Cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 0.47 mWlcma. For the AT&T equipment operating at 1900 MHz, the FCC's occupational MPE is 5.0 mW/cm2 and an uncontrolled MPE limit of 1.0 mW/cm2. These limits are considered protective of these populations. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX I64SO-008 Site FA: 14810819 Site USID: 251732 19 Table I: Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) V/m Magnetic Field Strength (H) A/tn Power Density (S) (mW/cm') Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S minutes 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100). 6 3.0-30 18421f 4.89/f (9001e). 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 f/300 6 1,500-100,000 H 5 6 (B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) /m Magnetic Field Strength (H) Alm Power Density (S) (mW/cm2)minutes Averaging Time [E]', [H]', or S 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100). 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f 180/P * 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane -wave equivalent power density Fiouref" FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane -wave Equivalent Power Density OccupationaViControlled Exposure ---- General Populan olUnconnolf dExposure 100 U \ \ v 5 \ O \ Q, \ 3 a i \ i 0.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 0.03 0.3 1 3 30 300 13,000 30,000 1300,000 1.34 1,500 1W'WD Frequency (MHz) Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized below: AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 20 Personal Wireless Service Approximate Frequency Occupational MPE public MPE Microwave (Point -to -Point) 5,000 - 80,000 MHz 5.00 mw/cm' 1.00 mW/cm2 Broadband Radio (BRS) 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm° Wireless Communication (WCS) 2,300 MHz 5.00 mW/cm' 1.00 mW/cm' Advanced Wireless (AWS) 2,100 MHz 5.00 mW/rm2 1.00 mW/cm2 Personal Communication (PCS) 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW/cm, 1.00 mW/cm2 Cellular Telephone 870 MHz 2.90 mW/cm2 0.58 mW/cm2 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) 855 MHz 2.85 mW/cm2 0.57 mW/cm2 Long Tm Evolutionreq(LTEry ) 700 MHz 2.33 mW/cm° 0.47 mW/cm' Mort Resertrictive FuenRange 30-300 MHz L00 mW/cm' 0.20 mW/cm' MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Personal Communication (PCS) facilities used by AT&T in this area operate within a frequency range of 700-1900 MHz. Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables. Because of the short wavelength of PCS services, the antennas require line -of -site paths for good propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the horizon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky. This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the exception of areas directly in front of the antennas. FCC Compliance Requirement A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 21 Appendix B: AT&T RF EXPOSURE POLICY REQUIREMENTS AT&Ts RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document, dated May 27, 2015, requires that: I. All sites must be analyzed for RF exposure compliance; 2. All sites must have that analysis documented; and 3. All sites must have any necessary signage and barriers installed. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 15450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 22 Appendix C: AT&T SIGNAGE AND MITIGATION Signs are the primary means for control of access to areas where RF exposure levels may potentially exceed the MPE. As presented in the AT&T guidance document, the signs must: • Be posted at a conspicuous point; • Be posted at the appropriate locations; • Be readily visible; and • Make the reader aware of the potential risksrp for to entering the affected area. The table below presents the signs that may be used for AT&T installations. CRAN / HETNET Small Cell Decals / Signs • STONEHOUSE are«m«nm.em,w. W.e.«,y« mmrety em«uekmur«uese,umYOYwriuw NOTICE suyeh..t.�'..rmr.,ereem uw..hm. DECAL CNI ATAT «e W <}Btp1L opYen V M!n }, iw Mp it Yan •eetlae«eswYhM het va.mP .ni eprvn armmu a mn u..e,un w Mw� hW�YI 1Pe'"�e1tli nuy u W M FCC OmxY PcpiYpm �.wne.u.ew. m;.w�whw STONEHOUSE w..xA.e.nt NOTICE SIGN IGp n.«.re�w.u.weu. i 8AY .e! rclb Lu W Ibe�pb ub0. glwminp.�« mfl"Ynambwu«In l4hbAT6TBIm YyO A CAUTION. A STONEHOUSE aF e•erm enema eY «u.nwu,. my exeem vIe Teri a«awmmie.mew.imm: CAUTION Soy.nmu t texrxa rramn.mun,u DECAL CYIAT6TtlPPoNJ&iBR.tpWn 9rMn; MlWyllyeu mWamiWM I Mt A CAUTION A roFMwm,fCOeupA1enp STONEHOUSE CAUTION :..n.F•y F,wewaw.•aw SIGN c.�aAm asoeaw.zt.q. s. .NtW". tlW FmWalbn.p4u CNIBXF VYII AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual' property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDXI 6450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Appendix D: LIMITATIONS Site USID: 251732 23 This report was prepared for the use of AT&T Mobility, LLC to meet requirements outlined in AT&T's corporate RF safety guidelines. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by EBI are based solely on the information ;collected during the site survey and provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. 02020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Appendbc E: RoofMasternA Site USID: 251732 24 RoofMasterTu is a widely -used predictive modeling program that has been developed to predict RF power density values for rooftop and tower telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas that are typically used in the cellular, PCS, paging and other communications services. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OEI) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" (OET-65), RoofMasterTu calculates predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. RoofMasterTM' models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET-65 and an implementation of the OET-65 Cylindrical Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for different types of antennas to produce a plot of spatially -averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2010 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Appendix F: CERTIFICATIONS Site USID: 251732 25 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©1020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX 16450-008 Site USID: 251732 Site FA: 14810819 26 Field Personnel Certification I, foe Vitulli, state that: • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in the proper use of the RF-EME measurement equipment and have successfully completed EBI training in the policies and procedures for site survey protocols. • All information collected during the site survey and contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on the data gathered. 2°-to'e AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©1020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Site Name: PDX16450-008 Site FA: 14810819 Preparer Certification I, Ian Swanson, state that: Site USID: 2S 1732 27 • I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF-EME safety and compliance services to the wireless communications industry. • I have successfully completed RF-EME safety training, and I am aware of the potential hazards from RF-EME and would be classified "occupational" under the FCC regulations. • I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. • I have been trained in on the procedures outlined in AT&T's RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document (dated October 28, 2014) and on RF-EME modeling using RoofMasterru modeling software. • I have reviewed the data collected during the site survey and provided by the client and incorporated it into this Site Compliance Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. - ;I- ... 1-11] AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ©2020 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights reserved. os3c:ivaF2�� 3 I � 0 I I Page 12 2011 Edition CHAPTER 2 — SETTING UP THE WORK ZONE This section provides guidelines and procedures for setting up work zone, special event, or incidence response. The use of additional devices, such as PCMS, arrow boards, and TMAs during set up and taking down of the work zone may be used to enhance worker safety. In developing and implementing the TCP, existing devices shall be maintained at an equivalent or better level than existed prior to project implementation. 2.1 Work Zone Components The work zone, as shown in Figure 2-1 below, consists of four parts and extends from the initial advance warning signs to the last temporary traffic control device or the END ROAD WORK sign (optional). Figure 2.1: Work Zone Components Intl I r ar= l� tt�nieelVa M'a Chapter September 2016 2011 Edition Page 55 Pedestrian Accommodation, Mid -Block Diagram 5-7 The sidewalk should be closed at the nearest intersection on each side of the work area when a safe, ADA -compliant path through the work area is not available. Type --- (Mount onn B(II)L) 20x12 Type °W1° (Mount on B(II)R) or Nx18 Type W of a 24x18 Type w1 September 2016 Chapter 6 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION DELIVERED Structural Design Report 38'-11" Smart Stack (44' Overall Height AGL) Site: EUG02_008, OR Site Number: 16450-008F Prepared for: J5 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS by: Sabre Industries TM Job Number: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18 August 21, 2020 MonopoleProfile.................................................................................. 1 Foundation Design Summary ................ Pole Calculations....... 2 .......... 3-8 Foundation Calculations........................................................................ 9-14 C a Digitally Signed By Keith Tintlall N:c=US, st=Texas, ;61 =Abdnh ,o=SABRE INDUSTRIES, INC., cn=Keith n 1( Z I elt10Nb Dtea 2020082J. 201414336 n�f� E>ai 05/30/2122 Designed Appurtenance Loading Elso credits, —11 camle,nianose .11, has 'noccole"ll son 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 1. clocand" 11 (21 loo levi I'd— 077 c Anchor Bolt Dimensions 30'-11"Smardeas Pipe Pole nro enM I allon, 1111111sleaserl swill I Tan. 18 r, R a == t 5 z a a 2 3 E Designed Appurtenance Loading Elso credits, —11 camle,nianose .11, has 'noccole"ll son 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 1. clocand" 11 (21 loo levi I'd— 077 c Anchor Bolt Dimensions 30'-11"Smardeas Pipe Pole nro enM I allon, 1111111sleaserl swill I Tan. 18 aw— nor Design Criteria-ANSI/TIA-222-H wensisse(mind, in n" vinvall one. 1a camle,nianose .11, Sabrelndustries m• 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 mr on liatelaws to sellect al nI el 0111 wis 077 Load Case Reactions Notes 1) Antenna i Lines Run Inside Pole 2) al aim a alwve ground level, unieas Almosse speclfiea. 3) Weights shown are estimates. Final weights mayvary. 4) This tower design and,'rf applicable, the foundation casign(s) shown on the following page(s)als0 meet or etteed the lsguirements of the 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 5) Tower Rating22% Sabre lixe sties Base Plate Dimensions vinvall one. 1a Sabrelndustries m• 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 mr on liatelaws to sellect al nI el 0111 wis 077 Anchor Bolt Dimensions 30'-11"Smardeas Pipe Pole nro enM I allon, Notes 1) Antenna i Lines Run Inside Pole 2) al aim a alwve ground level, unieas Almosse speclfiea. 3) Weights shown are estimates. Final weights mayvary. 4) This tower design and,'rf applicable, the foundation casign(s) shown on the following page(s)als0 meet or etteed the lsguirements of the 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 5) Tower Rating22% Sabre lixe sties Base Plate Dimensions vinvall one. 1a Sabrelndustries m• 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 mr on liatelaws anavn9oa onlyo ro d"•"- Euc0200i leste coil Anchor Bolt Dimensions 30'-11"Smardeas Pipe Pole nro enM I allon, 1111111sleaserl swill I Tan. IplKa Notes 1) Antenna i Lines Run Inside Pole 2) al aim a alwve ground level, unieas Almosse speclfiea. 3) Weights shown are estimates. Final weights mayvary. 4) This tower design and,'rf applicable, the foundation casign(s) shown on the following page(s)als0 meet or etteed the lsguirements of the 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 5) Tower Rating22% Sabre lixe sties vinvall one. 1a Sabrelndustries m• 35g,reArTROCTOREPkumorm5 slam�Cpeae Lfiaa anavn9oa onlyo ro d"•"- Euc0200i leste coil o•`°"q'°"' 30'-11"Smardeas Pipe Pole nro r NJT al2L2o20 Page 1 Sabre Industries' INNOVATION." vEe Fe Grade (8) 2" Conduits & (2) 3/4" Conduits Customer: JS INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Site: EUG02 008 OR IM&008F 38.91' Smart Stack ELEVATION VIEW (1.72 Cu. Yes.) (1 REQUIRED; NOTTO SCALE) No.: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18 Date: 08/21/20 By: KJT Notes: 1) Concrete shall have a minimum 28 -day compressive strength of 4,500 psi, in accordance with ACI 318-14. 2) Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. 3) All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4) All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4". 5) The foundation design is based on presumptive clay soil as defined in ANSI/TIA- 222-H-2017. 6) The bottom anchor bolt template shall be positioned as closely as possible to the bottom of the anchor bolts. Rebar Schedule for Pier (12) #6 vertical rebar w/ #3 ties, (3) within top 5" Pier of pier, then 12" C/C Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Industries, comptutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or read in whole or part for any purpose wlutenever without the prior written consent of Sabre IndusMes, 7101 Southbridge Drive - P O. Box 656 - Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279.0814 Page 2 (USA 212-X) - MOOOPOld Spatial Analysis (c)2917 Guymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 FF.:(416)736-4322 Web: Www. guymast.com Processed under license at- sabre nsabre Towers and Poles on: 21 CUR 2020 at: 13:47:59 39.91' Pipe Pole / EuG02_009, OR Y A6eePClefdiameters shown Widthe ths f0 lowrfgac59e5 are across corners. pro g across 1 POLE GEOMETRY ELEV SECTION NO. OUTSIDE THICK RESISTANCES SPLICE ...OVERLAP... W/t NAME SIDE DIAM -NESS O*Pn f°Mn TYPE LENGTH RATIO PC m Tn kip ft -kip It 38.8 ........................................ ... 1fi.00 0.3]5 5]9.9 240.4 O 42.7 16.00 0.3]5 5]9.9 240.4 POLE ASSEMBLY SECTION BASE BOLTS AT BASE OF SECTION............ CALC NAME ELEV NUMBER TYPE DIAM STRENGTH THREADS IN BASE SHEAR PLANE ELEV ft in si ft A 0.000 0 A325 0.00 92.0 0 0.000 POLE SECTIONS SECTION NO.nf LENGTH OUTSIDE.DIAMETER BEND MAT- FLANGE.ID FLANGC.WELD NAME SIDES NET TOP RAD ERIAL BOT TOP ..GROU D BOT TOP IT in ro in A 0 38.83 16.00 16.00 0.625 1 0 0 0 0 - - Diameter of Circumscribed Circle MATERIAL TYPES TYPE OF TYPE NO OF ORIENT HEIGHT WIDTH .THICKNESS. IRREGULARITY SHAPE NO ELEM. WEB FLANGE PROTECTION. % OF ORIENT & AREA de9 in In m io deg PL 1 1 0.0 16.00 0.38 0.375 0.375 0.00 0.0 & - With respect to Vertical MATERIAL PROPERTIES MATERIAL ELASTIC UNIT STRENGTH THERMAL TYPE N0. MODULUS WEIGHT Fn FY COEFFICIENT ksi pcf ksi ksT /de, 1 29000.0 490.0 60.0 35.0 0.00001170 Only 2 condition(s) shaven in Toll LOADING CONDITION A 91 mph wind with no ice. wind Azimuth: D• LOAD ELEV APPLY..LOAD..AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ......MOMENTS...... TYPE RADIUS AIE A. NOR= DOWN VERTICAL TORSNAL It IT kip kip ft -kip ft -kip c 42.247 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 C 41.367 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0920 0.2400 0.0000 0.0000 Page 3 C 39.]6] DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0382 0.0000 0.0000 C 39.]6] RADIOS 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0101 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.827 ft 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.827 42.]4] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0280 0.0000 0.0000 C 37.417 C 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2239 0.2160 0.0000 0.0000 c 36.827 0.0000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0172 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.0000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0184 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.0076 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.912 0.0002 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0111 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0252 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 C 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 9.0000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.42] 0.0000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0300 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.917 0.0360 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.0000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 38.830 0.00 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0129 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0752 0.0000 0.0000 LOADING CONDI PION M - - - -- --- 91 mph wind With no ire. wind azimuth: Oe LOANS ON POLE LOAD DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... ELEV APPLV..LOAD. . AT LOAD ......FORCES...... ......MOMENTS..... TYPE ...... a.. ........ RADIOS AEI AZI NORIZ DOWN VERTICAL TORENAL ALONG ACROSS ft It 0.08E 0.00E kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 42.]4] ....0.00E 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0279 0.0000 0.0000 C 41.367 0.00E 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0820 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 39.767 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0286 0.0000 0.0000 C 39.767 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0076 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.827 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.827 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 c 37.417 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2239 0.1620 0.0000 0.0000 C 36.827 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0133 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0138 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0918 0.0000 0.0000 C 17.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.0000 C 14.117 O.Oo 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0102 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0083 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 9.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.427 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0225 0:0000 0.0000 C 5.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0027 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.342 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0022 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D 38.830 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0129 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0109 0.0564 0.0000 0.0000 (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 6oymast Inc. Tel:(416)736-7453 Eax:(416)736-438 web: www guwast.com Processed under license at sabre Towers and Poles on: 21 aug 2020 at: 13:47:59 38.91' Pipe Pole / EUGC2_008, OR MAXIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATED (w. 1. t. wind direction) MAST ...... DEFLECTIONS (ft) ......... .........ROTATIONS (deg)......... ELEV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... a.. ........ TILT .......... 1WI51 ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 38.8 0.08E 0.00E 0.00E 0.18E 0.00E 0.00E 29.1 ...................0.00E ....0.00E .........O. ..E ........O.00e.......... O.00e 19.4 0.03E O.oOE 0.00E 0.14E 0.00E 0.00E ...................................................................... 9.I 0.01E O.oOe 0.00E 0.09E O.00R 0.008 Page 4 0.0 0.00A 0.00A 0.00A 0.00A 0.00A 0.00A ..................................................................... MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCULATED(W.LL t0 Wlnd direction) MAST TOTAL SHEAR.w.CtWIND.DIR Sr EAR I MOMENT.w.r.LWIND.OIR SATISFIED TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip ft kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 38.8 :....... ............................................ 0.00 D u .................. ..................................................................4444. e 0.35 A 0.08 A 0.00 C -0.21 . 0.00 N 0.00 i 1.32 A 0.43 A 0.00 C -3.49 E 0.00 C 0.00 C 29.1 400.0 .E .....-.3... . .......0.00.W..... D.ODA 40.0444W.... . YES 1.32 O 0.43 a 0.00 . . 2.05 D 0.55 U 0.00 E -8.27 E 0.00 E 0.00 E 19.4 ..................................................6...........6.66 6.666 0.02. YES 42.67A 400.0 2.05 D 0.55 I 0.00 B -8.D E 0.00 E 6" 0.00 0 42.67A 3.02 D 0.66 i 0.00 a -14.19 E 0.00 E 0.00 E 9.2 .................................................. ... 0.03E 3.02 D 0.66 a 0.00 R -14.19 E 6:66 L......0.00.E 0.00 E 0.00 E 6:66. 3.81 D 0.]] a 0.00 9 -21.15 E 0.00 R 0.00 D ---------------------------------------------------------------------- bas 400.0 9. ]1 ....................................................................6 reactinn 3.81 D -0.72 u 0.00 R 21.15 E 0.00 a 0.00 a COMPLIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL SENDING Sr EAR I TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(W/t) MAX ACROSS ALONG ACROSS TORSIONAL kip kip kip ft -kip ALLOWED ft 3.81 0.]] 0.00 -21.15 0.00 0.00 D u 38.83 ..................................................................4444. e R O.00A 0.00. 0.00A 0.06F YES 42.67A 400.0 O.00A 0.01E D.ODA a 02F YES 42.67A 400.0 29.12 ...................................................................... 6.00. O.Olf 6.666 0.02. YES 42.67A 400.0 0.001) 0.03E 0.000 0.04E YES 42.67A 400.0 19.42 ...................................................................... 6.00. 0.03E O.00i 0.04E ves 42.6]A 400.0 0.010 0.06E O.00R 0.06E YES 42.67A 400.0 9. ]1 ....................................................................6 0.01D 0.06e 0.000 0.06E ves 42.6]A 400.0 O..DID o. n. 4444. ......0..009.. .....O0..O0O0u. .....0..0.9.E. .....v.e.s. ......4422..66]7A. .......0.0...0. MAXIMUM LOA.S ONTO F.UNDATION(m.r.t. wind direction) DOWN SHEAR.W'.r.LWIRD.DIR MDMENT.W.r.LWIND.02R TORSION ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip fn -kip 3.81 0.]] 0.00 -21.15 0.00 0.00 D u e E e R (USA 222-H) - Monopole Spatial Analysis (c)2017 GUymast Inc. Tel:(416)]36-]453 Fax:(416)]36-43]2 web:wx.. guymast.com Processed under license at: sabre Towers and Poles an: 21 dug 2020 at: 13:48:12 38.91' Pipe Pala / EUG02_008, OR Service Load Condition ---------------- only 1 conditions) shown in full LOADING CONDITION A -_ 60 mph wind with n0 ice. wind Azimuth: Oa Page 5 LOAD & 4.5.4 ELEV APPLY..LOAD..AT LOAD ...... FORCES...... ......MOMENTS..... TYPE SHEAR + TOTAL SATISFIED RADIUS AZI AZI HORIZ DOWN VERTICAL TORSNAL ALLOWED ft ft ft kip kip ft -kip ft -kip C 42.247 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0310 0.0000 0.0000 C 41.362 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0319 0.2000 0.0000 0.0000 C 39.762 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0318 0.0000 0.0000 C 39.262 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0084 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.822 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 38.822 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0233 0.0000 0.0000 C 3].41] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0821 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 C 36.822 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0147 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0153 0.0000 0.0000 C 19.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.1020 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.117 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0113 0.0000 0.0000 C 14.112 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0400 0.0000 0.0000 C 12.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.567 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0093 0.0000 0.0000 C 11.562 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0210 0.0000 0.0000 C 10.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.422 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 C 6.42] 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0250 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.912 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0086 0.0000 0.0000 C 5.347 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0080 0.0000 0.0000 C 4.917 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 38.830 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0051 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 D 0.000 0.00 180.0 0.0 0.0046 0.0626 0.0000 0.0000 MAXIMUM POLE DEFORMATIONS CALCULATEO(w.r.t. wind direction) MAST .......DEFLECTIONS (ft)......... .666.6.... IDTATTONS (de9)......... EL CV ..... HORIZONTAL ...... DOWN ........ TILT .......... - T.4IST ft ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS 38.8 0.031 0.000 0.001 0.071 0.000 0.000 ..................................... .......6..........6.66........... 29.1 OA22 0.000 O.00i O.OZI 0.00< 0.000 19.4 0.01T 0.000 O.00x 0.061 0.000 0.000 ............................6.66..........6..............66.....6.6... 9J O.00i OAOC 0.000 0.03x O.00c 0.000 0.0 O.00A 0.00A O.00A O.00A O.00A O.ODA ........................................ .............................. MAXIMUM POLE FORCES CALCULATEO(W.r.t. to wind di ... ti.r) MAST TOTAL SUEAR.w.f.t.WIND.DIR MOMENT.W.LtWIND.DIR TORSION ELEV AXIAL ALONG ACROSS ALONG ACROSS IT kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 38.8 .................. ......................6.........6.66................ 0.29 K 0.03 A 0.00 F -0.08 F 0.00 F 0.00 F 1.10 D 0.17 A 0.00 F -1.36 C 0.00 C 0.00 C 29.1 .1.10 E ......0.1] .L ......0.00 .0 .....-.1.36F ......6:66.; ...... .00.B...... ... 0.00 K 1.20 E 0.22 L 0.00 C -3.24 i 0.00 C 0.00 C 19.4....................................................66........6.6..... 1.]0 D 0.22 E 0.00 C -3.24 x 0.00 C 0.00 c 2.51 D 0.26 E 0.00 C -5.58 I 0.00 C 0.00 C 9.].............................................................66:0 6666 2.51 D 0.26 E 0.00 L -5.58 2 0.00 C 0.00 C 3.12 D 0.31 E 0.00 L -8.35 I 0.00 c 0.00 C ---------------------- -- -- - - - - - - - -- - ------------------------------- base reaction 3.12 D -0.31 E 0.00 L 8.35 I 0.00 C 0.00 C COMPLIANCE WITH 4.8.2 & 4.5.4 ELEV AXIAL RENDING SHEAR + TOTAL SATISFIED D/t(w/t) MAX TORSIONAL ALLOWED ft 38.83......................................................2.67'........0... "67 O.00K O.ODF O.00A O.00F YES 42 400.0 Page 6 DOWN Sn EAR.w.r.nw1NO.0IR 0.000 0.01, 0. OU 0. 01C YES 42.67A 400.0 29.13 .................................. .... ..... ..... ..... ft -kip ....:. ft -kip ......... .. 0.00 -8.35 0.00E O.O1F 0.00E O.OiF YES 42.62A C 400.0 0.00E 0.012 O.00L 0.031 YES 42.6IA 400.0 19.42 .................................................................... .. 0.000 0.OII 0.00E OAII vEs 42.6)A d00.0 0.000 0.021 O. UOE 0.031 YES 42.6A 400.0 9.>1 ...................................................................... 0.000 0.021 0.00E 0.03i YES 42.fi1P 400.0 0.010 0.032 O.00E 0.041 YES 42.62A 400.0 0.00 ..... ................................... ............................... MAXIMON LOADS Orvm FOUNDAnoN(w.r.t. Mnd direction) DOWN Sn EAR.w.r.nw1NO.0IR MOMENT.w.r.LwINO.Ole TORSION ALONGACROSS ALONG ACROSS kip kip kip ft -kip ft -kip ft -kip 3.12 0.31 0.00 -8.35 0.00 0.00 D E L I C C Page 7 Sabre Industries' INN9VATION OELIVEfl ED Pole Data SO#: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18 Site Name: EUG02_008, OR Date: 8(2112020 Square Base Plate and Anchor Rods per ANSIMA 222-H Diameter: 16.000 in (flat to flat) Thickness: 0.375 in Yield (Fy): 35 ksi # of Sides: 0 •0• IF Round Strength (Fu): 60 ksi Reactions Base Plate Results Plate Data Anchor Rod Results Moment, Mu: 21.15 ft -kips Allowable VFy: Axial, Pu: 3.81 kips Maximum Put: Shear, Vu: 0.77 kips mt'Rnt: Etf. Width: 11.15 in Vu: Anchor Rod Data (DV`Rnv: Tension Interaction Ratio: Quantity: 4 (multiple of 4) Maximum Puc: Diameter: 1 in (DC'Rnc: Rod Material: F1554 Vu: Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Oc'Rnvc: Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Compression Interaction Ratio: BC Diam. (in): 19.5 BC Override: 19.5 Maximum Interaction Ratio: Base Plate Results Plate Data Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 12.30 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.19 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.05 13.97 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.19 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.22 22.0% Pass 8.8 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 19.5% Pass Page 8 Base Plate (MulZ): Width (in): 19.5 Width Override: 19.5 Allowable VFy: Thickness: 1 in Base Plate Interaction Ratio: Yield (Fy) 50 ksi Etf. Width: 11.15 in Center Hole: 16.125 in. diameter (per 4.9.9) 12.30 Kips 56.81 Kips 0.19 Kips 36.82 Kips 0.05 13.97 Kips 63.63 Kips 0.19 Kips 19.09 Kips 0.22 22.0% Pass 8.8 ksi 45 ksi (per AISC) 19.5% Pass Page 8 -Pile for windows, version 2019-11.004 Analysis of individual Piles and Drilled shafts subjected to Lateral loading using the p -y method 0 1985-2019 by E soft, Inc. All Rights Reserved This copy Of Lille is being used by: eith Tindall Sabre forcers add Coles serial Number of security device: 227885948 This deny Of LPile is licensed for exclusive use by: sabre communications corporation Use of this program by any entity other than sabre communications corporation is a violation of the software license agreement. Files used for Analysis Pavh TO file locations: \Program Files (x86)\EnSOft\LPile2019\files\ Name of input data file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18.1plld Card of output report file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18.1p110 Name of plot output file: 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18.1pllp Danda of runtime message file - 19 -2Z83 -EM Opt. 18.1p].].r rate and Time of Analysis -------------------------------------------------- Date: August 21, 2020 Time: 14:35:30 Problem Title Site EUG02_008, OR Tower 38.91' Smart Stack Prepared for 15 INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS Too Number 19 -2283 -EPG Opt. 18 Engineer x1T and settings Computational Options: - Conventional Analysis Engineering units used for data input and computations: - US Customary System Units (pounds, feet, inches) lysis control Anans- maximum lumberofiterations allowed 999 - reflectiontolerance for c ergence 1.0000E-05 i - maximum allowable deflection 100.0000 i - Number of pile increments 100 Loading ryye and Number of cycles of loading: - static loading specified - (Ise of p -u modification factors for p-ycurves not selected - Analysis ses layering or scli On (methodofGeorgiodis) - No distributed lateral loads a entered - Loading by lateral soil movements acting on pile not selected Page 9 - Input of shear resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of moment resistance at the pile tip not selected - input of side resistance moment along pile not selected Computation Of pile -head foundation stiffness matrix not selected . - Pus o -o analysis of pile not selected - Buckling analysis of pile not selected Output Options: - Output files use decimal points to denote decimal sybols. - Report onlmaximuy shear summary orceles in o tpile-headtde lection, maximum bending moment, rri ntyucurvesng de bepcomput computed reported for user-specified depths Pile structural Properties and Geometry Number of pile sections defl ped = 1 'rotal length of pile =6.583 ft Depth of ground surface below top of pile = 0.0833 ft Pile diameters used for p -y curve computations are defined using 2 points. p curves are a computed using pile diameter values interpolated with depth o the length of the pile. Asummary of values of pile diameter vs. depth follows• Depth Below Pile Paint Pile Head Diameter xp. feet inches 1 0.000 36.0000 2 6.583 36.0000 input Structural Properties for Pile sections: Pile section No. 1: section 1 i a round drilled shaft, bored pile, or CIDH pile Length of section 6.583333 ft shaft Diameter =36.000000 i Shear capacity of section = 0.0000 lhs ----------------------------------- Ground Slope and Pile Batter Angles Ground slope angle = 0.000 deg 0.000 raons Pile Batter Angle = 0.000 do red, 0.000 ra ns Sol] and Bock Layering information The sail profile is modelled using 2 layers Layer 1 is soft clay, p -y criteria by mattock, 1920 Distance from tap of pile to top of layer 0.083333 ft It istance from top of pile to bottom of layer = 1.083333 Effective unit weight at top of 1;, ft Effective unit weight at top of layer 110.000000 - 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer 110.000000 pcf undrainedcohesion At top of layer 14.400000 psf psf undrained cohesion at bottom of layer - 14.400000 Epsilon -50 at bottom of layer psf Epsilon -50 at top of layer = 0.100000 Eps11on-50 at bottom of layer 0.100000 Layer 2 is stiff clay without free water istance from top of pile to top of layer - 1.083333 ft Distance from top of pile to bottom Of layer 20.083333 ft Effective unit weight at top of 1;, 110.000000 pcf Effective unit weight at bottom of layer - 110.000000 pcf undrained cohesion at top of layer - 1000.000000 psf undrained cohesiont bottom of layer 1000.000000 psf Epsilon 50 at top of layer 0.010000 Epsilon -50 at bottom of layer 0.010000 (Depth of the lowest soil layer extends 13.500 ft below the pile tip) summary of input sail Properties Page 10 Layer sail Type Layer effective undrained E50 Layer Name Depth unit et, cohesion Force, Mum. (p -y curve Type) it pcfpsf Number of Reinforcing Bars krm 3. soft 0.08333 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 v =shear force applied normal to pile axis clay 1.0833 110.0000 14.4000 0.10000 2 Stiff clay 1.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement W/O Free water 20.0833 110.0000 1000.0000 0.01000 Static Loading Type Static loading criteria were used when computing p -y curves for all analyses. Pile -head Loading and Pile -head Fixity conditions Number of loads specified = 2 Load Load Condition Condition (Bored Pile): AXial Thrust compute Top y Run Analysis Number _ _ _ _ __ 6.583333 ft Shaft iometer N0. Type I, 2 36.000000 Force, lux . Pile Length ------------ 1 1 v - 1027. lbs M = 338400. in -lbs i Number of Reinforcing Bars 5080. A. Yed 2 1 v = 310.000000 lbs M 100200. in -lbs Yield stress of Rein tarcing Bars 0.750000 3170. No Yes v =shear force applied normal to pile axis 4 29000000. psi Grass Area of shaft M = bending moment applied to pile head 1018. So. in. 'ental Area of Rei nforci np Steel -2.125000 y = lateral deflection normal to pile a s Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement 0.441786 0.52 slope relatives o original pilebatter angle Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing - 6.626343 i R = pile held ed 1.pbeecomputed = 0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate size vs. values of top y s. pile lengths can only for load types with offset of center of Rebar cage from center of Pile p cified shear (Loa Types 1, 2a d 3). in Axial structural capacities: ---------------------------- 0.441786 0.00000 in rust force is assume E to be acting axially for all pile batter angles. 4191.184 kips computations of Nominal Moment capacity and nonlinear Bending Stiffness Axial thrust force values were determined from pile -head loading conditions Number of Pile sections Analyzed - 1 Pile Section No. 1: Dimensions and Properties of Drilled shaft (Bored Pile): Bar Area X Length of section Number _ _ _ _ __ 6.583333 ft Shaft iometer - 36.000000 in Concrete Cover Thickness (to edge of long. rebar) = 3.375000 i Number of Reinforcing Bars 0.441786 12 bars Yield stress of Rein tarcing Bars 0.750000 60000. psi modulus of Elasticity oReinforcing oars 4 29000000. psi Grass Area of shaft 1.250000 1018. So. in. 'ental Area of Rei nforci np Steel -2.125000 5.301438'n. Area Ratio of Steel Reinforcement 0.441786 0.52 percent Edge -to -Edge Bar Spacing - 6.626343 i Maximum Concrete Aggregate Size = 0.750000 i Ratio of Bar Spacing to Aggregate size -2.125000 8.84 0.750000 offset of center of Rebar cage from center of Pile 0.0000 in Axial structural capacities: ---------------------------- 0.441786 0.00000 -1.340862 4 .0 Nom. Axial structural capacity = 0.85 no AS + By As 4191.184 kips Tensile Load for cracking of concrete -12.34340862862 -463.561 kips Nominal Axial Tensile capacity 12340862 -318.086 kips Reinforcing Bar Dimensions and Positions used in Computations Page 11 Bar Diem. Bar Area X Y Number _ _ _ _ __ oche, _ _ _ _ _ sg. in. _ _ _ _ _ 1 echos ____ 0000 inches ---------- 1 0.750000 0.441786 1.250000 0.00000 2 0.750000 0.441786 122340862 7.115000 3 0.750000 0.441786 7000 12340862 4 0.750000 0.441786 0.00 0.00000 1.250000 5 0.750000 0.441786 -2.125000 122340862 0.750000 0.441786 -12340862 7000 7 7 0.750000 0.441786 -1.250000 0.00 0.00000 8 0.750000 0.441786 -122340862 -2.125000 9 0.750000 0.441786 -7.125000 10 0.750000 0.441786 0.00000 -1.340862 4 .0 11 0.750000 0.441786 2.125000 -12.34340862862 12 0.750000 0.441786 12340862 -7.125000 Page 11 NOTE: The positions of the above rebars were computed by LPile Minimum spacing between any two bars not equal to zero 6.626 inches between bars 2 and 8. Ratio of bar spacing to maximum aggregate Size = 8.84 concrete Properties: -------------------- of cconcrete 4500. Modulus ofeElasticity ofh psi 3923676. si Modulus of Rupture of concrete -503.115295 psi compression strain at Peak stress 0.002001 Tensile strain at Fracture of concrete -0.6001152 Maximum Coarse Aggregate Size = 0.250000 in Number of Axial Thrust Force values Determined from Pile -bead Loadings = 2 Number Axial Thrust Force kips 1 3.1]0 2 5.080 summary of Results for Nominal Moment capacity for section 1 Moment values i terpolated at maxim compressive strain = 0.003 or maximum developed moment if pile falls at smaller strains. Load Axial Thrust Nominal Mom. Cap. Max. Comp. No. kips n -kip Strain ____ ________________ ------------------ ------------ 1 __ _ _ __ _1 3.120 4855.]]1 0.00300000 2 5.08o 4882.024 0.00300000 Note that the values of moment capacity in the table above are not factored by a strength reduction factor (phi -factor). In ACI 318, the value of the strength reduction factor depends on whether the transverse reinforcing steel bars are tied hoops (0.65) or spirals (0.20). The above values should be multiplied by the appropriate strength reduction factor toco pute ultimate m nt cap... Ey a cording to ACE 318, section 9.3.2.2 or the value required te design standard being followed. The follower?y table presents factored moment capacities and corresponding bending stiffnecomputed for common resistance factor values used for reinforced concrete sections. Axial Resist. Nominal uln. (Fac) it,. (Fac) Bend. Stiff. Load Factor Moment Cap AS. Thrust Memery Cap at Dlt Mom No. for Moment_ n -kips kips n -kips kip-inA2 _ _____ ____________ _____________________ -----------i ------------ 1 - - - - -1 0.65 4856. 2.060500 3156. 41194103. 2 0.65 4882. 3.302000 3123. 41463215. 1 0.75 4856. 2.219000 3642. 39248211. 2 0.75 4882. 3.556000 3662. 40033322. 1 0.90 4856. 2.327500 4320. 26392295. 2 0.90 4882. 3.810000 4394. 26558238. Layering Correction Equivalent Depths of Soil & Rock Tap of Equivalent La e Tap Depth Same Layer Layer i to F1 Layer Below Below Type As Rock OF integral integral xo. Pile Head Grid surf Layer is eel om for Layer for Layer ft ft Above Rock Layer lbs lbs 1 0.08333 0.00 N.A. No 0.00 305.0469 2 1.0833 0.03384 No No 305.0469 N.A. Notes: The FO integral of Layer mra equals the sum of the FO and F1 integrals for Layer n correction c e ction quivalent depths a computed only fors 1 tyye with both shallow -depth and deep -depth Expressions for peak lateral load transfer. Theses 1 types are soft and stiff clays, non -liquefied sands, and cemented c -phi sail. summary of Pile -head Responses for Conventional Analyses Definitions of Pile -head Loading conditions: Page 12 Load Type 1: Load 1 =shear, v, lbs, and Load 2 Moment, M, in-lbs Load type 2J Load 1 = shear, v, ms. and Load 2 Slop , S. radian R, in-lbs/rad. Load Type 3: Load 1 Shear, v, ms, Load Type 4: Load 1 = Top Deflection, y, inches, and Load 2 = moment, M, in-lbs Load type 5: Load 1 = Tap Deflecti0n, y, 'inches, and Load 2 = slope, 5, radians Lead Load Load Axial Pile-head Pile-head Max Shear Max Moment case type Pile-head type Pile-head Loading Deflection Rotation in Pile in Pile No. 1 Load 1 2 Loatl 2 lbs n,h,, radians lbs n-lbs ---- ----- — - — — — -- — — — - -- — — — - — — ----- —---------------------------- --------- 1 v, lb 12]. M, ;n-lb 338400. 5080. 0.2908 -0.01581 -10273. 354152. 2 v, 1b 310.0000 m, in-lb 100200. / 3120. 0.00615 -1.29E-04 -2879. 104636. maximum pile -head deflection = 0.]90]511910 inches maximum pile -head rotation -0.0158067444 radians = -0.905660 deg. The analysis ended normally. Page 13 IBC 1807.3.2.1 Moment (it k) 21.15 Shear (k) 1 0.77 Caisson diameter (ft) Caisson height above ground (ft) Caisson height below ground (it) Lateral soil pressure (Ib/ft) Ground to application of force, h (ft) Applied lateral force, P (Ib) Lateral soil bearing pressure, Sr (Ib/ft) Diameter, to (ft) A Minimum depth of embedment, d (ft) 27.55 770 550.00 3 1.09=(2.34P)I(S rb) 6.30 =0.5A[1+(1+(4.36h/A Page 14