HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 8/14/2020City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Historical Review Application
SPRINGFIELD
W
Application check
Historical Review Type I - Minor Alterations; Sites or Structures:
Historical Review Type II - Major Alterations; Sites or Structures: ❑
Historical Review Type III:
Addition of a Site or Structure to the Historic Landmark Inventory ❑
Removal of a Site or Structure from the Historic Landmark Inventory ❑
Demolition of Historic Land Mark Structures ❑
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Karin Cary Phone: 541-556-7274
Company:
Fax:
Address: 627 D Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Applicant's Rep.: Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
Property Owner: David & Karin Cary Phone: 541-556-7274
Company:
Fax:
Address: 627 D Street, Springfield, OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033524 TAX LOT NO(S): 08600
Property Address: 627 D Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this
application.
Both ends of the front porch railing were bowing creating a "hump."We want to repair the
cause and restore the railing & porch to the original design and appearance using materials in kind or in
matching appearance when not possible. Reusing existing trim elements where possible
Signatures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page.
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ 75.60
Technical Fee: $
1 Postage Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 10.10.13k1 1 of 7
Signatures
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Applicant
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate.
Date:
Signature
Karin H.
If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
Owner:
Signature
Karin H. Cary
Revised 10.10.13ki 2 of 7
Historical Review
The Historic (H) Overlay District is established to encourage the restoration, preservation and
adaptive use of identified Historic Landmark Structures and Sites. The H Overlay District
implements applicable Metro Plan policies, the Washburne Historic Landmark District, Section
2.500 et seq., of the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997 and OAR Chapter 660-023.
The prospective applicant is encouraged to meet with planning staff to become familiarized with
the review process and determine what is required for a complete application.
1. Applicant Submits an Application for Historical Review
The application must conform to the Historical Review Requirements Checklist included in
this application packet.
2. Review
A. Type I applications for Minor Alterations of Historical Landmark Sites and
Structures will be reviewed by City Staff. The types of Minor alterations reviewed
are:
1. Construction, modification or demolition of accessory structures;
2. Additions, partial or total demolitions or substantial alterations to the
building fagade of non-contributing and intrusive structures withinthe
Washburne Historic District;
3. Replacement of damaged exterior features with virtually identical
materials;
4. Additions, partial demolitions or alterations to Historic Landmark Sites
and Structures which fully conform to the standards of Section 3.3-945
and which are not visible from the street;
S. Installation of fewer than four (4) parking spaces;
6. Installation of signs of less than four (4) square feet; or
7. Any similar alteration or use which does not detract from thecharacter
of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure.
B. Type II applications for Major Alterations of Historical Landmark Sites and
Structures will be reviewed by the Historical Commission. The Historical
Commission acts as the Development Review Committee for issues involving
Section 3.3-900 Historical Overlay District. Adjacent property owners and
occupants are notified and may attend a public review meeting and state their
concerns, or send written comments. The types of Major alterations reviewed are:
1. Additions, partial demolitions, or substantial alterations to abuilding
fagade;
2. A change to a more intensive use category as defined in the underlying
district;
3. Installation of four (4) or more parking spaces;
4. Removal or radical trimming of large established trees or vegetation,
except where necessary for immediate public safety as determined by
the City Engineer;
S. Specific Development Standards in the Washburne Historic Landmark
District specified in section 3.3-935B.;
6. New construction of 1,000 sq. feet or more within the Washburne
Historic Landmark District; or
7. Any other alteration or use that the Director determines may detract
from the historic character of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure.
Revised 10.10.13ki 3 of 7
C. Type III Applications for Establishment of Historic Landmark Inventory,
Removal from Historic Landmark Inventory, Demolition of Historic
Landmark Structures and any Discretionary Use listed in the underlying
zoning district as specified in section 5.9-100 will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission following a recommendation by the Historical Commission. Adjacent
property owners and occupants are notified and may attend a public review meeting
and state their concerns, or send written comments.
Major and Minor Alteration Standards (3.3-945)
The following standards apply to major and minor alterations as specified in Section 3.3-
915B. and C., within the H Overlay District.
1. Any proposed use shall minimize exterior alteration of the Historic Landmark Siteor
Structure and its environment; uses that require substantial exterior alteration shall
not be permitted.
2. The distinguishing original qualities of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and
its environment shall not be substantially altered. The removal or alteration of any
historic material or distinctive architectural features is prohibited unless an
immediate hazard to public safety exists.
3. All historic Landmark Sites or Structures are recognized as products of their own
time. Alterations which have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier
appearance are prohibited.
4. Changes that have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the historyand
development of a Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment. Where
changes have acquired significance in their own right, this significance shall be
recognized.
S. Distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship which
characterize a Historic Landmark Site or Structure shall be retained.
6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced. In the
even replacement cannot be avoided, the new material shall match the material
being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and visual qualities. Repair or
replacement of missing architectural features is based on accurate duplicate
features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on
conjectural design, or the availability of different architectural elements from other
buildings or structures.
7. New design for undeveloped Historic Landmark Sites in the Washburne Historic
Landmark District and for alterations and additions to existing Historic Landmark
Sites and Structures are permitted when they complement significant historic,
architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size,scale,
color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.
B. New additions or alterations to Historic Landmark Structures shall not impairthe
essential form and integrity of the structure.
Revised 10.10.13ki 4 0f 7
Demolition Standards (3.3-950)
Demolition of Historic Landmark Sites or Structures is an extreme measure that may be
permitted only after all other reasonable alternatives for preservation have been
thoroughly examined.
A. No demolition permit will be granted for any Historic Landmark Site or Structureunless
the owner has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Historical Commission that 1 of
the following criteria applies:
1. The condition of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure constitutes a serious and
immediate threat to the safety of the public or occupants that cannot beeliminated
without repairs that would exceed 50 percent of the value of the structure itself.
a. A MIA -certified appraisal shall be required to determine the value of theHistoric
Landmark Structure.
b. At least 2 bids from qualified contractors shall be required to determine thecost
of repairs to the Historic Landmark Structure.
2. The property owner has demonstrated that there would be no reasonable, long-
term economic benefit from preservation of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure.
In making this determination, the owner shall demonstrate that all potential uses or
adaptive uses for the Historic Landmark Site or Structure have been thoroughly
examined. For example:
a. The fact that a greater economic return would result from demolition than
preservation is insufficient to meet this criteria.
b. A lack of adequate funds to pursue potential uses or adaptive uses is insufficient
to meet this criteria (i.e., selling the Historic Landmark Site or Structure is an
option that shall be considered).
B. If a Historic Landmark Site or Structure is permitted to be demolished, theproperty
owner shall provide the Historical Commission with:
1. Four sets of measured drawings prepared by a qualified draftsperson showing the
primary floor plans and the primary exterior elevations.
2. A set of photographs that document the exterior and interior details, including
significant architectural elements.
C. The property owner shall also supply the Historical Commission with any artifact or
other architectural element as identified by the Historical Commission. The artifactor
architectural element shall be carefully removed and delivered to the Historical
Commission in good condition to be used in future conservation work.
Revised 10.10.13ki 5 0f 7
Historical Review Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the time of complete application submittal.
❑ Historical Review Application Form
❑ A Brief Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposal.
❑ One (1) Copy of the Deed to show ownership.
In Addition:
❑ Type I - Minor Alterations -Four (4) Copies of the Required Information:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
❑ Photos of the existing structure and/or each damaged exterior feature to be
replaced to sufficiently show existing structure and/or conditions.
❑ Exterior elevation drawings of the new and/or modified structure.
❑ Type of fagade materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures.
❑ Type of construction materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures.
For Installation of fewer than four (4) parking spaces:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirement Checklist attached.
❑ Location of trees and vegetation, indicating what vegetation is to be removed.
❑ Number of parking spaces shown as proposed (to scale).
❑ Type II - Major Alterations - Four (4) Copies of the Required Information:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
❑ Photos of the existing structure and/or each damaged exterior feature to be
replaced to sufficiently show existing structure and/or conditions.
❑ Exterior elevation drawings of the new structure, addition, alteration or area to be
demolished drawn to scale.
❑ Existing type of fagade materials.
❑ Type of fagade materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures.
❑ Type of construction materials to be utilized including manufacturer's specification
brochures.
For Installation of four (4) or more parking spaces:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirement Checklist attached.
❑ Location of trees and vegetation, indicating what vegetation is to be removed.
❑ Number of parking spaces shown as proposed (to scale).
❑ Type III - Twelve (12) Copies of the Required Information:
Revised 10.10.13ki b 0f 7
Addition of Site or Structure to Historic Landmark Inventory:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
❑ Complete City of Springfield Historic Inventory Form.
❑ Current photo of each exterior wall of the structure or if a vacant site, one current
photo of the site.
❑ Written findings which address the criteria for Establishment of Historic Landmark
Inventory (SDC 3.3-920).
Removal of Site or Structure from Historic Landmark Inventory:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
❑ Copy of the City of Springfield Historic Inventory Form.
❑ Copy of the National Register Designation (if applicable).
❑ Current photo of the site or structure.
❑ Written findings determining Historic Designation was erroneously applied according
to the criteria for Establishment of Historic Landmark Inventory (SDC 3.3-920).
Demolition of Historic Landmark Structure:
❑ Plot plan drawn to scale - See Plot Plan Requirements Checklist attached.
❑ Information to meet the criteria of Demolition standards (SDC 3.3-950).
Plot Plan Requirements
A Plot plan must be drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 8 1/2' X 14"
and must contain the following information:
• The scale (appropriate to the area involvied and sufficient to show detail of the plan
related data such as 1' = 30", 1" = 50' OR 1" = 100, north arrow and the date of
preparation;
• The street address and assessor's map and tax lot number;
• The dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the property;
• Proposed and existing buildings; location, size (gross floor area), conceptual floor
plan, setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height;
• Off-street parking areas, vehiclular access points and their dimensions; and
• The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets and
sidewalks within or on the boundary of the proposed property.
The following additional information may be required, please check with
planning:
• The on-site drainage system to an approved storm system;
• The connection to the City sanitary sewer system;
• The location and height of proposed or existing fences, walls, outdoor equipment,
storage, trash receptacles and signs;
• Required landscaped areas and street tree locations to include type of landscaping
or trees and type of irrigation system; or
• Any additional information necessary to address land use compatability or Metro
Plan issues.
Revised 10.10.13ki 7 0f 7
627 D Street, Springfield, OR 97477 August 13, 2020
Porch Repair & Restoration Project
The property is a 1912 Transitional Box design single family home. House & porch are covered by a
hipped-roof with wide overhang. The front roils of the porch have begun to bow as the corners of
the property have settled and detreated. The existing porch boxed columns are not continuous from
foundation to roof support and have become a greater safety concern as the porch elements have
moved further apart. The roiling walls have compressed over time and damaged beyond repair.
Prior to the current owners, poorly done repairs were made to the under-floor deck structure and
railing walls, plywood was used to repair and cover the damaged 1x4 fir decking and outdoor
carpet added to hide these repairs. The proposed repairs will reinforce the support system including
re-pouring the crumbling north foundation wall, repair under floor framing, column post to have
continuous support, new roiling walls and finish materials used to match the original design and
appearance.
A. The following standards apply to major and minor alterations as specified in Section 3.3-9158. and
C., within the H Overlay District.
1. Any proposed use shall minimize exterior alteration of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and
its environment, uses that require substantial exterior alteration shall not be permitted. All though much
of the original porch is to be replaced, the exterior alteration will be minimized by replicating and
matching the original porch elements and detail
2. The distinguishing original qualities of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment
shall not be substantially altered. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive
architectural features is prohibited unless an immediate hazard to public safety exists. The front
foundation wall has badly settled, crocked and begun to move apart, the roiling walls have
compressed and are failing due to non-continuous support post. The porch not only looks bad, it
has become a safety hazard to the occupants. All elements of the house that are removed to make
the necessary repairs will be restored or replaced with like materials to match the original
construction.
3. All Historic Landmark Sites or Structures are recognized as products of their own time. Alterations
which have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance are prohibited. Weare
proposing to use the existing and original porch as the template to make repairs and restoration to
the porch.
4. Changes that have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development
of a Historic Landmark Site or structure and its environment. Where changes have acquired significance in
their own right, this significance shall be recognized. The only visual change to the porch was made by
the previous owners, placing plywood and outdoor carpet over the damaged 1x4 fir decking. This
change is not recognized as significant or historic. The repair and restoration will match the current
and original design.
5. Distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship which characterize a
Historic Landmark Site or Structure shall be retained.All work shall replicate the original architecture.
6. Deteriorated archrtecturalfeatures shall be repaired rather than replaced. In the event replacement
cannot be avoided, the new material shall match the material being replaced in composition, design,
color, texture and visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features is based on
accurate duplicate features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on
conjectural design, or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures.
All work shall be done in compliance with this item; materials will be reused where possible,
replaced in kind or in composition. The porch elements have been documented and removed parts
will be on site to use as a template for replacing.
7. New design for undevebped Historic Landmark Sites in the Washburn Historic Landmark District
and for alterations and additions to existing Historic Landmark Sites and Structures are permitted when
they complement significant historic, architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with
the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. There will be
no new elements introduced in the repair and restoration of the porch.
8. New additions or alterations to Historic Landmark Structures shall not impair the essential form
and integrity of the structure. The proposed repairs to the porch are to insure the integrity of the
structure and finish detailing to renew the essential form.
Karin Cary
Property Owner
541-556-774
I
--•••• _ _ae�r ala
1
}I
ML Em A
��- �W a
Lys'. �-q' _i ��. c�, �•�-- s.Y -r'! �. :� •'y � � _ � -
-- -
�• •e- R . • - ___�... _ .rMRrrR _w IM u »
t
r - -
meow
dam, .����, � � � �� � _c'?'. - `'• ' ` 7 � .•. F .:�'-i...._ _ -fig
}
I id
r
Awl
r. ., .�� Y'•. ,y 't' + _ � -. :.. � i:�-rad .•,R- ��:(��1._ r - "�;. .`. i
•.Y+-
_
PON- 1% is_ - / - Ste,
r _� .. -r*' *_ - iT••''_�► .r may• r -• •`+.¢r'•+'w k-•�._ +' _ _ _ ;- t+�r, _`'""'e►y:..'^_- +Faim-
'T. �...�r•,a+ ..,w. rrr7- t r'ti7[ •I I . - _ - `��•y•' �* . r r -� _r _ - _
# �.Yll��/1'rrS` •»w - +r1iLr�a. i.1- ti ..y.• �!- _N •f'.._. F
f _ • i. i9 y �'* wa.- . h� _.� _ - • _ • - • •✓tL' t • �1 - h • _ 'y 'i�1•S;a r, _ y Y _ rr' a -
i 1. ._3�" i.�.�. _. ...T? _.�
►I
��- �W a
Lys'. �-q' _i ��. c�, �•�-- s.Y -r'! �. :� •'y � � _ � -
-- -
�• •e- R . • - ___�... _ .rMRrrR _w IM u »
t
r - -
meow
dam, .����, � � � �� � _c'?'. - `'• ' ` 7 � .•. F .:�'-i...._ _ -fig
}
I id
r
Awl
r. ., .�� Y'•. ,y 't' + _ � -. :.. � i:�-rad .•,R- ��:(��1._ r - "�;. .`. i
•.Y+-
_
PON- 1% is_ - / - Ste,
r _� .. -r*' *_ - iT••''_�► .r may• r -• •`+.¢r'•+'w k-•�._ +' _ _ _ ;- t+�r, _`'""'e►y:..'^_- +Faim-
'T. �...�r•,a+ ..,w. rrr7- t r'ti7[ •I I . - _ - `��•y•' �* . r r -� _r _ - _
# �.Yll��/1'rrS` •»w - +r1iLr�a. i.1- ti ..y.• �!- _N •f'.._. F
f _ • i. i9 y �'* wa.- . h� _.� _ - • _ • - • •✓tL' t • �1 - h • _ 'y 'i�1•S;a r, _ y Y _ rr' a -
i 1. ._3�" i.�.�. _. ...T? _.�
A
i l=
B
V S T R E E T
----- ----
-------r---(32.00')
(50.00') (32.00')
PROPERTY LINE (82.00') LIST of DRAWINGS
o I 1
34'-0" I
� I a1 Site Plan
a2 Porch Plan
a3 Porch Framing Plan
a4 Partial Roof Plan
I a5 Porch Section
I ^ I
I I
front porch repair a6 Details
and restoration P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T 1 0 N
I I
I I Do to the affects of gravity, this old porch has experienced
0 I I unwanted settling and concerns of safety. The proposed
repair is to correct the structural considerations and restore
the porch to its original design. Finish materials will be
I I replaced in kind or match the original appearance.
of
01 1
Ci
1
IJ I I
zl
J I I
I I
® S I TE P L AN
� I I
w I
0 l I I 116„ - 1,_0.
0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Map No 17 04 24 32
I I Tax Lot No 4600
I I 1
A L L E Y
ti
JOHN
TUTTLE
DESIGN
JOHN TUTTLE
329 5th STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR
9 7 4 7 7
(541) 726 . 5121
john tuttledesignOgm ail.com
Aug. 11, 2020
4
L-
ii
c0
n
o
U
v
m
C
m
)
'L
cd
a
1
0
Ca
O
Cod.
Cd
ID
Cr
�
!
rn
�
r
>
p
P
Dir,
r-
d
inttoo
ED
Aug. 11, 2020
painted cedar blocks to hold up solid
railing between post supports, similar to
existing condition. note that the original
boxed columna were not continuous and
resting on railing cap, contributing to the
porch failure.
1.11 head tri
front to rept
head trim ai
panted to n
,,x( )3i fir
cedar wropp
column to n
boxed corn
fi)s'x6)¢' aqu
painted to n
new cedar 1,
aiding to m�
exposure an
match
F r o n t P o r c h E l e v a t i o n
'ij6, _ V -0"
p
new pour - equal on
both aides of front porch
Side
new 1x4 TM
`existing concrete steps to
remain if possible, and
replace the
decking to r
replaced if needed
pre—sealed 4
F r o n t P o r c h E l e v a t i o n
'ij6, _ V -0"
p
new pour - equal on
both aides of front porch
Side
El
e v a
tion
L
�5•
— 1'-0"
JOHN
TUTTLE
DESIGN
JOHN TUTTLE
329 5th STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR
9 7 4 7 7
(541) 726 . 5121
john tuttledesignOgm ail.com
Aug. 11, 2020
a7
O
L
0
O
U
m
C
V
O
all,
a1C
d0.
U
L
C
«1n
p
'Cr
C
'r -
0
d
(D
IL
(A
Aug. 11, 2020
a7