Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/15/2020City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD AA Prospective Applicant Name: Todd Woodley Phone: 503-931-3894 Com an :Woodley Properties Inc Fax: Address: 42242 Salmon Creek Rd, Baker City, OR 97814 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Mark Ferris Phone: 503-364-4004 Company: Project Delivery Group Fax: Address: 200 Hawthorne Ave SE, Salem, OR 97301 Property Owner: Todd Woodley Phone:503-931-3894 Company: Woodley Properties Inc Fax: Address: 42242 Salmon Creek Rd, Baker City, OR 97814 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17023444 TAX LOT NOS : 01000 Property Address: 250 S 67th St., Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 6.09 Acres 0 Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Multi -Family Development Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: Av . Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: 16.7 du/acre Prospective Applicant:. Signature Print Case No.: Date: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑ Development Issues Meeting Application Form ❑ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ® Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' PO North arrow Euj ` Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area [ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained [✓" Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review Q' Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), ,�,% setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Ly" Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces "f Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Waterstone Apartment Community (Thurston Heights was previous name) Proposed 100 units of Multifamily Apartments 250S.67 1h St, Springfield OR Executive Summary Waterstone is a proposed 100 unit apartment complex located at 250 S. 67" street in Springfield. The project site is approximately 6 acres, of which approximately 1.5 to 2 acres consist of wetland/wetlands buffer, or pending anticipated street dedication. The project consists of a balanced mix of One Bedroom one bathroom units, Two Bedroom two bathroom units, and Three Bedroom two bathroom units, with actual unit count/mix dependent upon issues encountered during design, including findings from our development issues meetings. The housing units are undefined as to any affordable component. The developer is open to discussion on affordable components should incentives be available to make such feasible. In absence of any affordable component, the project must be feasible on its own market rate merits to be able to obtain necessary financial support. A dedication of land for widening of 67th street is anticipated and accounted for in our preliminary design. The project site contains delineated wetlands, with a DSL and COE acceptance in 2018. The proposed design requires fill of some lower quality wetlands, we are preparing for a joint fill permit application that we hope to have submitted by end of August. We are targeting wetlands issues resolution with state and federal regulatory agencies to be completed first quarter 2021, and hope that such timeline can accommodate any supplemental City requirements affecting wetlands fill within city limits. The development team anticipates ground breaking in spring of 2021, with units fully on line by summer 2022. Specific Questions we are seeking answers to 1. Permitting time frames. We are concerned about hidden layers of permits and approvals required. We are aware of site plan approval requirements by the City. We are aware of regulatory agency approvals related to wetlands. And we understand the final building permit process. We are needing to determine what other submittals may be required along the permitting process. We are attempting to develop an outright zoned multifamily project and hoping with existing land use compliance this wouldn't be a year long process to obtain a building permit. 2. Setbacks from neighbors and Wetlands. We are looking for clarification on setback language for both wetlands and adjacent parcels. Definitions related to setbacks from adjacent owners are clear, but we are looking for clarification of uses of adjacent properties as that affects the terms of the setbacks. In addition, setbacks from wetlands are confusing. Can utilities be installed in wetlands setbacks, since the earthwork and restorations are not within defined wetlands? 3. Tree Preservation and replacement. The site contains mature trees, we anticipate efforts to retain as many trees as possible both for prudent development practice as well as an amenity feature for our residents. We will however be removing a fair amount of trees in order to make development of the site feasible. We are looking for clarity on code interpretation of tree preservation requirements. 4. Design Standards. The development code has multifamily dwelling design standards that are mutually exclusive to some degree. Example being: attempting to meet street frontage requirements in our site design, while also meeting minimum density requirements of MDR zoning. We note that there is a code section 3.2-250 "Alternative design discretionary criteria" that it would be helpful to have explained in detail, especially interpretations, and how those can be used to allow our most feasible site layout to be realized. 5. System Development Fees and Charges. Are there any incentive programs to dampen the unusually high SDC charges? SDC charges have been an impediment to development of this property for 10 years. We are attempting to make this project feasible, but for the past 10 years, no market rate multifamily developer has been able to successfully pull off an apartment complex of any size in Springfield. Is the City serious about supporting housing development? Can the City or other assessing agencies consider deferral of some fees until actual occupancy, or even better, have longer term abatements?