The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 6/12/2020AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET 695 Staff Revlew: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 9:00 —10:00 a.m. 1. Site Plan Review 811-20-000110-TYP2 811-20-000089-PROJ ZAP LLC Assessor's Map: 17-02-31-00 TL: 3900 Address: 30" Street Existing Use: vacant Applicant submitted plans to construct two industrial buildings on vacant parcel. Planner: Drew Larson Meeting: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 9:00 — 10:00 virtual meeting via GoToMeeting The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out from the laserfiche website: htto://www.si)ringfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.asi)x WW1 P"7 SITE VICINITY MAP 811-20-000110-TYP2 Site Plan Review 17-02-31-00 TL 3900 30" Street ZAP, LLC ARCHITECTS ♦PLANNERS June 9, 2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Current Development Division 225 5" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 RE: New Way Electric 30" Industrial Development (202006/1.3) Site Plan Review Application — Submittal Project Address: 30" Street— Not Yet Assigned Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Map 17-02-31-00, Tax Lot 3900 Property Owner: Applicant: Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail: Applicant's Representative: Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail: Hyland Business Park, LLC Contact: Shaun Hyland ZAP, LLC Contact: Justin Paslay PO Box 21503 Eugene, Oregon 97402 541.686.2365 justin@newwayelectdc.com TBG Architects + Planners Contact: Kristen Taylor, CSBA 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541.687.1010 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com On behalf of the applicant, ZAP, LLC, enclosed is a Site Plan Review application for the proposed industrial development at 30" Street. In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements under SDC 5.17-00, the following electronic documents are provided for review by the City Staff: Site Plan Review Application Form Site Plan (8%" x 11") Attachments Written Statement Attachment Tax Assessor's Map Attachment B Legal Description Attachment C Deed for Tax Lot 3900 Attachment D Title Report Attachment E Jeff Parker Subdivision Recorded Plat 541.687.1010 1132 EAST BROADWAY. SU I TE 200 1 EUGENE. OREGON 97401 1 TBG -ARCH. COM City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Attachment F Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, Plan Diagram Attachment G Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan Diagram Attachment H FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map, Map Number 41039C1161 F Attachment I Stormwater Report Attachment J Lighting Specifications Attachment K Email from Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator, Springfield Utility Board (SUB) Plan Set T1 Title Sheet Topographic Survey C1.1 Civil Notes C2.1 Demolition Plan C3.1 Utility Plan C4.1 Grading Plan EC1.0 Erosion Control Plan A1.1 Site Plan A2.1 First Floor Plan A2.2 Second Floor Plan A3.1 Exterior Elevations LA -1 Landscape Plan E000 Site Lighting Photometric Plan If you have any questions, please call me at your convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, Kristen Taylor, CSBA Senior Director/Planning Manager KGT/ZG/nl cc: Jason and Brandon Paslay, ZAP, LLC Anna Backus, KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc. David Dougherty, Dougherty Landscape Architects Z:WROJr2 MW Ne Way 19 tlnc MM Sr Spnngfie1MCorrespV,gencASire Ran RevieM MM SPR Cove W.do 1■. n x c xi T[ IT S I P L L N N sxs City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINaF1E� W 0#1 Application Type (Applicant: check one) Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ® Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma'Or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Justin Paslay Phone: 541.686.2365 ZAP, LLC justin(g Company, Email: newwa electric.com Address: PO Box 21503, Eugene, Oregon 97402 Applicant's Rep.: Kristen Taylor Phone: 541 687.1010 Company: TBG Architects + Planners Email: ktaylor@tbg-arch.com Address' 132 East Broadway, Suite 200, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Property Owner: Shaun Hyland Phone: 541.726.8081 Company: 30th Street Business Park, LLC Emall: Shaun@jhconst.com Address: PO Box 7867, Eugene, Oregon 97475 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-00 TAX LOT NOS : 3900 Property Address: Not yet assigned Size of Property: 1.0 Acres x❑ Square Feet ❑Dwellings Proposed No. of Units ner ancrou Proposed Name Of Project: 30th Street Industrial Development Description of Site Plan RevAm approval atwo induabal buildings Ann Me assonazed Ate inkaA inure,parking and landscaping. Wilding 1 is a hv"M about 12,9g5zqume-fxt building Win a Angle tenant. 2 is a singkesM a bout 15,100,quwe-fo building Win multiple tenants Pio Osal: minnu sof second o ce, manufactunn and wetlrauAs induamal s aces. Tenants W Building2bave nIX been identified. Thea tenants wilnot a anti anti Wer ecce an canstrurdm a un rings. Existing Use: Undeveloped New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 33,916 sf Si natures: Please sin and rint our name and date in the aQQronrdate Required Project Information (City Zntake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next QQAjJ complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: 06/09/2020 Reviewed b 811-20-000110-TYP2 Application Fee: Technical Fee: 330.24 posts a Fee: 190 6604.88 TOTAL FEES: 7125'12 PROJECT NUMBER: $11-20-000089-PROJ Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 m 0 w @@wRpp p$p € I �°g a[: p °pi i RR € 3 d g az R R R °® paa=pa I d a. s e ae E E �d5 ; ¢� a _�; d3 : d d I� ;�a°� iid dpippp6ippil �§ ° � Z4 Hill iR � E$dd d d i d $ i s d$41 II $eis o das'Ad R. € ' a , i'$ $ a R �d i iE H Rd � p p AA�� I1 i I � 9p p plllpi � p d%a:, €€" � 11 0 I Fgdg gggg € F6 as l� l �d3�� F d 11tR16E1 s Hill �8s s d s ° s � gg gg$ g pp pp n p a ;" S E 9 di pllAsg aap 3 $'$4gp i° • e i is ispd p ! s ° iR d d p d t p R _s ap°�� °lip d$�{j��° ddp pd��,@iq'€pppgilg,�l pg 0111 a NEW WAY ELECTRIC30TH INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTZAP, LLC -SITE PLAN REVIEWN 3M STR Er .� SPRINGFIEIAOREGON ARCHITECTS ♦PLANNERS June 9, 2020 City of Springfield Development & Public Works Department Current Development Division 225 5" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 RE: New Way Electric 30" Industrial Development (202006/1.3) Site Plan Review Application — Submittal Project Address: 30" Street— Not Yet Assigned Assessor's Map & Tax Lot: Map 17-02-31-00, Tax Lot 3900 Property Owner: Applicant: Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail: Applicant's Representative: Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail: WRITTEN STATEMENT SUMMARY Hyland Business Park, LLC Contact: Shaun Hyland ZAP, LLC Contact: Justin Paslay PO Box 21503 Eugene, Oregon 97402 541.686.2365 justin@newwayelectdc.com TBG Architects + Planners Contact: Kristen Taylor, CSBA 132 East Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, Oregon 97401 541.687.1010 ktaylor@tbg-arch.com In accordance with the Site Plan Review submittal requirements, this written statement describes the proposed development and demonstrates thatthe proposal complieswith the criteria under SDC 5.17-100. The proposal is subject to the Type II application review process per SDC 5.17-110(B). A. Summary of Request The present request is for Site Plan Review approval of an industrial building with the associated site infrastructure, parking, and landscaping. The building is two stories and approximately 12,000 square feet with a single industrial tenant (permitted: industrial warehousing, secondary: business office and outdoor storage). 541.687TCHD 1132 EAST BROADWAY. SU I TE 2001 EUGENE. OREGON 97401 1 TED -ARCH. CUR City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 2 of 11 Additional details regarding this proposal are provided on the Site Plan Review drawings, the remainder of this written statement, and other materials attached herein. B. Project Objectives The 30" Industrial Development represents an effort to raise the standard of typical industrial development in Springfield. 1. Enhance the quality of local industrial development. 2. Provide attractive, functional and safe spaces for small industrial businesses and their employees. 3. Ensure compatibility between the proposed industrial and existing residential development to the east. SITE INFORMATION Location: The project is located on 30' Street, Springfield, Oregon, north of Main Street. Refer to the attached Site Plan. Tax Lots: Lane County records identify the site as Lane County Assessor's Map 17-02-31-00, Tax Lot 3900. Refer to the attached Tax Assessor's Map. Legal Description: Refer to the attached Legal Description. Acreage: The project site totals 1.0 acre according to Lane County Assessment and Taxation records. The subject site includes one parcel, identified as Tax Lot 3900, which fronts 30' Street. Address: Not yet identified — 30' Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477. Ownership: The site is owned by Hyland Business Park, LLC. Refer to the attached Deed and Title Report. Plan Land Use Designation: The lot is within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and City limits. The area of the subject lotwas annexed to the City of Springfield in 1948. The parcel is designated Light Medium Industrial in the Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The Mid - Springfield Refinement Plan also designates the lot Light Medium Industrial. Zoning: The lot is zoned Light Medium Industrial (LMI). The Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Overlay District applies to the subject parcel. Property to the west, north and south are also zoned LMI. Property to the east across 30' Street is zoned Medium Density Residential. Street Classification: 30' Street is classified as a major collector on the City's Functional Classification map. IM. oar' TEETE.o,e„FERE City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 3 of 11 Environmental: The subject lot has soil type Coburg -Urban land complex. Per the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the site is located in area X, determined to be outside of the 500 -year flood area. Refer to the attached Flood Insurance Rate Map. The site is located in the Maia Wellhead facility protection area within the 10 -year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ). As required, the applicant will apply and obtain either a Drinking Water Permit or exemption prior to construction. Reference the attached Erosion Control Plan, which notes the 10 -year TOTZ and the requirement of a Drinking Water Permit or exemption prior to construction of the on-site building. Refer to the attached e-mail from Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator for Springfield Utility Board (SUB). The Erosion Control Plan is attached as part of the drawing set, which notes the 10 -year TOTZ and the requirement of a Drinking Water Permit or exemption prior to construction of the building. Surrounding Land Uses/Access: The site is located within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary on the west side of 30' Street. To the east of the site, across 30' Street, is a multi -family residential development. There is a railway line located to the west of the site. There are undeveloped industrial properties abutting the northern property boundary. On the south side there are two recently developed light -industrial buildings on two lots. The primary access to the subject site will be via 30' Street. There is one driveway proposed on the north end of Tax Lot 3900 that connects directly to 30' Street and an existing driveway with a shared access easement for use by Tax Lots 3600, 3700, 3800 and 3900. III. BACKGROUND OF THE SITE The subject lot was created as part of the Jeff Parker Subdivision, as recorded September 9, 2002, Reception No. 2002-069738. Tax Lot 3900 is Parcel 4 in the subdivision. Refer to the attached Jeff Parker Subdivision recorded plat. IV. SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA This section is organized by the Site Plan Review approval criteria under SDC 5.17-100. Applicable approval criteria are outlined in bold italics below, followed by proposed findings in normal text. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions: a Type H Site Plan Review application upon determining that approval criteria A. through E., below have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. Decisions approving an application, or approving with conditions shall be based on compliance with the following criteria in Springfield Development Code Section 5.17-125: IM. oa H TEETE.o,e„.—I City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 4 of 11 A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) plan diagram and the Mid- Springfield Refinement Plan diagram designate the subject site as Light-Medium Industrial TL—Ml). This land use designation and the LMI zoning district (per SDC 3.2-405(8)) are intended to provide land for a variety of industries, including those involved in the secondary processing of materials into components, the assembly of components into finished products, transportation, communication and utilities, wholesaling, and warehousing. The external impact from these uses is generally less than Heavy Industrial, and transportation needs are often met by truck. Activities are generally located indoors, with outdoor storage. This designation may also accommodate supporting offices, light industrial uses, and industrial uses allowed in the Campus Industrial. The proposed development and the intended uses — industrial warehousing, secondary business office and outdoor storage — are consistent with this criterion. There is no applicable Conceptual Development Plan for the site. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities, and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. The subject site is within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary and the City limits. They are currently served by the key urban services as prescribed in the Metro Plan. The proposal includes on-site stormwater facilities on Tax Lot 3900 to serve the proposed project prior to discharging into the existing public stormwater system. Refer to the attached Stormwater Report and civil and landscape plans for details. Additionally, there are existing public utility easements on the site for current and future extension of public utility systems. Refer to the attached Topographic Survey for details. There is an existing fire hydrant along 30" Street in the front of site. The proposed building is a Type V-B fully sprinklered tilt-up concrete structures. The farthest point of the proposed building is less than 400'-0" from the existing hydrant. The driveway designs meet the needed radii required for emergency service vehicles. As demonstrated, there is adequate public and private infrastructure capacity to serve the site at the time of development. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. iA—ITEITs.oL-1— City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 5 of 11 C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. The proposed new development complies with applicable standards as further discussed below. Section 3.2-400 LMI Zoning District Development Standards The tenant for the proposed building on Tax Lot 3900 will be an industrial warehouse and secondary business office and outdoor storage uses. All uses will be consistent with the allowed use categories listed under the LMI base zone per SDC 3.2-410 at the time of tenant infill building permit submittal. Specifically, the development complies with the LMI Development Standards (SDC 3.2-400 LMI base zone) as follows: The Development Standards required under SDC 3.2-420 do not apply for three reasons. First, the subject site was created prior to 1982. Second, the minimum lot size and frontage standard of SDC 3.2-420 is a standard imposed for the creation of new lots or parcels. The proposed development does not include partitioning or subdividing the subject property. Third, this standard is not a design or construction standard, and therefore not applicable. The two-story building is compatible with adjacent development and land uses. The proposed building is not within the height limitation zone that is applicable when abutting a residential district. Per SDC 3.2-420, the height limitation applies to the first 50 -feet on-site measured from the property line nearest the residential zone. The proposed building is located more than 50'-0" from the property line to the east. As shown on the attached site plan, the building is about 65'-0" from the 30' Street right-of-way line. Then, it is an additional 60'-0" across the right-of-way to the MDR - zoned properties to the east. Therefore, the maximum building height limitation adjacent to the MDR -zoned properties is not applicable to the proposed building. Refer to the attached plan set for details. Per SDC 3.2-420, the minimum building front yard setback in the LMI zone is 10'-0" and parking and driveway front yard setbacks are 5'-0". The building, parking and driveways either meet or exceed the required front yard setbacks along 30' Street. Refer to the attached Site Plan. Except for the rear setback, all proposed parking and driveways either meet or exceed the required minimum S-0" setback from interior property lines as required per SDC 3.2-420. The applicant owns both Tax Lots 3900 and 3800 and wants the opportunity to connect these parcels at the time of future development of Tax Lot 3800. Per the landscaping standards at SDC 4.4.-100(H), the "[I]andscaped setbacks abutting required screening on the same property may be exempted by the Director from planting requirements if the area is not visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent property." Therefore, as owner of the abutting property and because the landscape setback is located at the back of the site out of view of the public right-of-way, the applicant requests that the Planning Director exempt the 5'-0" landscape setback along the rear yard to accommodate the future development of Tax Lot 3800. IM. oa I TEETE.o,e„uE 1 City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 6 of 11 • As allowed per SDC 3.2-420, note (4)(a), "no building or above grade structure, except a fence, shall be built upon or over that easement," the applicant proposes a metal fence within the PUE along the west and portions of the south and north property lines for security reasons. • On-site pedestrian circulation has been provided throughout the site, which connects to the owner's adjacent Tax Lot 3800 to the west and to the public sidewalk on 30' Street and the industrially zoned properties to the north and south. The site design either meets or exceeds the required ADA minimum 3-0" wide clear pedestrian pathway to accommodate pedestrian circulation throughout the site. • No outdoor merchandise display areas are proposed. • No drive-through facilities are proposed. Section 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District The parcels are located in the Maia Wellhead facility protection area within the 10 -year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ). The applicant understands that the following requirements apply per SDC 3.3-235(C): 1. The storage, handling, treatment, use, production or otherwise keeping on premises of more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater in aggregate quantities not containing DNAPLs [dense non -aqueous phase liquids] is allowed upon compliance with containment and safety standards specified by the most recent Fire Code adopted by the City. 2. All hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater shall be stored in areas with approved secondary containment in place (Springfield Fire Code 2702.1 and 2704.2.2). 3. All new use of DNAPLs are prohibited. 4. Any change in type of use or an increase in the maximum daily inventory quantity of any DNAPL is considered a new use and is prohibited. 5. The following requirements for inspection and record keeping procedures for monthly in-house inspection and maintenance of containment and emergency equipment for all amounts of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater shall be met unless exempted: Schedules and procedures for inspecting safety and monitoring and emergency equipment. The applicant shall develop and follow a written inspection procedure acceptable to the Directorfor inspecting the facility for events or practices which could lead to unauthorized discharges or hazardous materials. An inspection check sheet shall be developed to be used in conjunction with routine inspections. The check sheet shall provide for the date, time, and location of inspection. note problems and dates and times of corrective actions taken. and include the name of the inspector and the countersignature of the designated safety manager for the facility. As noted above, the applicant will apply for and obtain either a Drinking Water Permit or exemption prior to construction of the proposed building. Reference the attached Erosion Control Plan, which notes the 10 -year TOTZ and the requirement of a Drinking Water Permit or exemption prior to construction of the proposed building. Refer to the attached e-mail from Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator for Springfield Utility Board (SUB). IM. oa I TEETE.o,e„FERE City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Section 4.2-105 Public Streets The proposed development does not trigger the need to create or extend any public streets. The proposed project has direct access to 30' Street, a major collector. The sections of 30" Street adjacent to the proposed project meet the standard street right-of-way and paving width dimensions. No additional public right-of-way or street improvements are needed. Section 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways According to Springfield Code Section 4.2-120(A)(1), all developed lots shall have an approved access either directly to a public street, a private street that connects to a public street, or through an irrevocable joint use/access easement. The Code does not limit a development site to one access. The subject site has frontage on 30' Street with direct access proposed to this public street. The proposal will also access the existing irrevocable joint use/access easement that extends westward from 30" Street along the southern property line. The project includes one proposed drivewaywith direct access to Tax Lot 3900 off 30' Street and one existing driveway from 30" Street to the existing irrevocable joint use/access easement serving Tax Lots 3600, 3700, 3800 and 3900. The distance between the driveway to 30' Street and the existing shared driveway is about 141'-0" as measured from the centerlines. Refer to the attached Topographic Survey and Title Report, which will be submitted as part of the Site Plan Review application, for details about the easements. According to Table 4.2-2, the width of a 2 -way driveway shall be a minimum of 24'-0" and a maximum of 35'-0". The proposed driveway connection to 30' Street is about 30'-0" wide and the existing driveway proposed to remain is 35'-0". The proposed and existing driveways to 30' Street have throat depths on the site of about 40'-0" from the start of the driveway and at least 30'-0" from the property line, both of which exceed the minimum 18'-0" standard. The existing southern driveway is existing with a joint use/access easement serving Tax Lots 3800, 3700 and 3600. The northern driveway approach is a dedicated driveway serving the site (Tax Lot 3900). The proposed site driveways meet the City's dimensional requirements for commercial/industrial driveway approaches and is consistent with separation spacing of previously approved driveways along 30' Street, a major collector street. The above findings demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with these standards. The proposed project will be developed and maintained to provide on-site circulation in compliance with City code standards. Section 4.2-140 Street Trees Currently, there are 4 street trees located along the section of 30' Street adjacent to the development site. One existing street tree is proposed to be removed as part of this development because the existing tree is planted in the location of the proposed driveway. The other existing street trees along 30' Street are proposed to remain. There is one new street tree north of the proposed driveway, as shown on the Landscape Plan. V i oa 11-IT11ILIN.—I City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 8 of 11 Section 4.3-140 Public Easements There are adequate existing public utility easements on Tax Lot 3900 for current and future extension of public utility systems. Refer to the Topographic Survey for details. Section 4.4-105 Landscaping The proposed project meets the landscape requirements. The proposed parking area located between the street side of the building (east fagade) and 30' Street includes 8 parking spaces. Therefore, Section 4.4-105(F)(2), parking lot planting areas requiring a minimum of 5 percent of the interior of a parking lot if 24 or more parking spaces are located between the street side of a building and an arterial or collector street does not apply. As illustrated on the attached landscape architecture plans, the proposed landscaping associated with the parking lot and driveway setback areas meet the City landscape requirements. As described above, the applicant requests an exception to the required landscape setback along the rear property line as allowed per the landscaping standards at SDC 4.4.-100(H). As owner of the abutting property and because the landscape setback is located out of view of the public right-of-way, the applicant requests that the Planning Director exempt the requirements in order to accommodate future development on Tax Lot 3800. The proposal is consistent with all other applicable the standards. Section 4.4-110 Screening Where outdoor mechanical devices are proposed on the site, they will be screened with vegetation per SDC 4.4-110(B)(1). The back of the site will be used for outdoor storage. Consistent with this code section, a new metal fence is proposed to screen the back of the site, which will be site -obscuring as applicable. There is also an existing slatted chain-link fence proposed to remain, located along the entire Tax Lot 3900 and 3800 northern property lines. The proposed outdoor trash and recycle area is screened with slatted chain-link fence, as required per SDC 4.4-110(B)(3)(c). Refer to the attached architecture and landscape architecture drawings for details. Therefore, these criteria are met. Section 4.4-115 Fencing As noted above, an 8'-0" high metal fence is proposed to enclose the back of the site for security purposes, which is consistent with the maximum allowed fence height is 8'-0" in Industrial zones. Per SDC 4.4-115 Table 4.4-1, note (1), the proposed fence is behind the front yard setback. Refer to the attached Site Plan. Therefore, these criteria are met. Vi oa I.TEIT,.,,,„E,Ea, City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Section 4.6-110 Vehicle Parking The vehicle and bicycle parking calculations are based on the proposed industrial warehousing and secondary office uses. Per Table 4.6-2, the proposed industrial warehousing and secondary office uses, are required to provide a minimum of 26 off-street vehicle parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 26 parking spaces — two accessible space, 18 standard parking spaces, one parallel space and five compact spaces (which is less than 30 percent of the total proposed parking spaces). The applicant proposes a parking lot design in compliance with SDC 4.6-115. all standard and ADA stall widths are a minimum of 9'-0" wide and 18'-0" in length including a 2'-0" bumper overhang on landscaping beds and walkways where applicable. The parallel space is the minimum of 9'-0" wide and 20'-0" in length. The five compact spaces are a minimum of 8'-0" wide and 16'-0" in length (two spaces are 9'-0" x 16-0", three spaces are 8'-0" x 18'-0"). Refer to the attached Site Plan and Vehicle Parking Calculations table for specific locations and details. The dimensions and proposed striping of the parking spaces and drive aisles meet the parking area standards per SDC 4.6-115 and -120. These findings, together with the architecture and civil engineering drawings, demonstrate that the proposal is consistent with these standards. Section 4.6-130 Loading Areas There are two delivery and loading areas located outside of the required setbacks. Refer to the attached First Floor Plan for details. The total proposed on-site loading area is more than 8,000 square feet for an approximately 12,800 square feet total building area, which exceeds the required 250 square feet of minimum loading area per SDC 4.6-135(C). The applicant will provide a sanitary drain at the threshold or interior of the building in all loading area overhead door locations at the time of building permit submittal. Therefore, these criteria are met. Section 4.6-140 Bicycle Parking The proposed bicycle parking spaces, location and facility design on the development site complies with SDC 4.4-145 through -150. There are three short-term and two long-term bicycle parking spaces required. There are 4 unsheltered short-term bicycle parking spaces located along the on-site pedestrian walkway system with ramps that connect to 30" Street, which exceed the required number of bicycle parking spaces. The proposed short-term spaces are hitching post or staple type racks. All bicycle parking spaces are visible for use by the public. Four long-term bicycle parking spaces will be located inside the warehouse area in a secure location, which will be proposed in compliance with SDC 4.4-145-150 at the time of individual tenant infill building permits. Refer to Sheet A1.1 for Bicycle Parking Calculations and typical details. Therefore, these criteria are met. I i . oa '.. ITIIILI..E 1 City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 10 of 11 D. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. The proposed driveway on 30' Street and the orientation and alignment of the building will serve to maximize efficiency for access, on-site circulation and function while minimizing impact to the adjacent properties. The site plan is organized so that the main access points to the building are located directly off 30" Street and off of the shared access drive. The vehicle parking is located in the front and north side of the site with access via both the existing shared driveway and the proposed driveway. The proposed landscape islands located at the ends of parking aisles provide clear drive aisles to facilitate safe circulation. As noted above, the Site Plan shows on-site circulation for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles as required by the Springfield Development Code. Designated on-site pedestrian circulation is provided for employees and clients of the business from the adjacent, existing 30' Street public sidewalk to the proposed building entrances. On-site pedestrian and bicycle access are provided by a clearly marked, striped, paved walkway across the drive aisles. The existing public sidewalk on 30' Street provides access to adjacent and nearby residential and industrial areas. The closest transit stop to the site is located on Main Street, which is served by Lane Transit District route 11 Thurston. The proposed project abuts other industrially zoned properties. It is not directly adjacent to a residential zoned area, transit stop, neighborhood activity center, or other uses that would benefit with additional connectivity to abutting properties. As stated above, the existing and proposed driveways on 30' Street are in compliance with the Springfield Code Development standards, are sited similarly to the previously approved connections along 30' Street and address the access requirements for industrial uses. Parking areas and ingress - egress points have been designed to safely facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian circulation and avoid congestion as well as provide connectivity within the development site. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. I i . oa '.. IT,.o,e..E 1 City of Springfield Site Plan Review June 9, 2020 Page 11 of 11 E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas,, wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. The proposed site does not contain any Statewide Goal 5 resources. The site is relatively flat. There are no existing trees and shrubs. wetlands. rock outcroppings; orwatercourses on the site that are impacted by the proposed development. There are no known significant archaeological resources. Therefore, the criterion is not applicable. V. Conclusion Based on the information and findings contained in this written statement, associated attachments and drawings, the proposed Site Plan Review application meets the criteria of approval contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the Planning Director approve the proposal as presented. Both the applicant and the applicant's representative are available for questions as necessary. If you have any questions about the above application, please do not hesitate to contact TBG Architects + Planners (541.687.1010). KGT/ZG/nl cc: Jason Paslay, ZAP, LLC Anna Backus, KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc. David Dougherty, Dougherty Landscape Architects Z WROJ MMM Nea Way Detlric MM S Spnngfie1MCorrespV,gencASte Ran ReN UI)2006-SPR Wntten Statement.docx 1■ . na '.TECTA c I1 —1 SPRINGFIELD • U .14 1 il • • ' ej• .� 225 FIFTH STREET DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS ortEGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE. 541.726.3753 FAX541.726.1021 www. smingfield-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ------------------------------------(Area below this linefr/led out by Applicant) --------------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City ofSpringrield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), email: cmceachern@springfi'eld-ocgov Project Name: 306 St. New Way Electric Applicant: Caleb Mau Assessors Parcel #: 1702310003900 Date: 6/8/20 Land Use(s): Industrial Phone #: 815-592-8241 Project Size (Acres): 0.92ac Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: 0.77ac Email Caleb.mau@kpff.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): The site currently is an empty, unpaved lot. Proposed conditions will consist of a warehouse, 2 rain gardens, underground utilities, and a paved parking lot. Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheets) if necessary: Each of the rain gardens will have its own connection point along the storm main in the shared drive lane to the south of the site. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Filtration rain gardens will be used to treat all runoff from impervious areas on site. fArea below this line felled out br the Cin, and Returned to the Applicant) -------------- (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted foram lication to be complete for submittal, although other re uireanuas map be necessmy) Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study —(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: �,/ dWellhead Zone: E] Hillside Development: ( / C.Wetland/Riparian: (% ,NI F�yPlid^ ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: Soil Type: 32 ❑ Other Jurisdictions Downstream Analysis: F% N/A — on)i �I,'s�tihvyl, Guns+ru, t ,? ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Mui} dSc C2c,25 •,T5 cdnnrc-tidn Under 30eh, Return to Clayton MCEachern @ City of Springfield, email; cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS cro�eial usrouv: *Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage, however, this list should not he used in lieu of the Springfeeld Development Code (SDC) or the City'.s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval,' Additional site speck information may he required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Qualitv EDSPM Cha ter 3 Req'd N/A All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered eatchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ® If a stormwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwatec Management Manual. [g E] Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. ® All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall ® ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. rZ ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ® ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. Z n The time of concentration (Te) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. ❑ PS A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03 AC. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ [R Elevations of the HOL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ® F-] Design of Stone Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ® ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan act. M❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 19 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or *This farm shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. * IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAND SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. R ❑ Mannings `h" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three 3 feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Miscellaneous ® ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ® Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more RMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: htto://www.deg.state.or.us/wg/uic/uie.htm for more information. ❑ `rn Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year stone events. *This farm shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. * IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAND SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015