HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/29/2020City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
SPRINGFIELD
w 0#/
PApplication Type (Applicant: check
artition Tentative Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: r®
Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Monkey Hero LLC Phone: 541 896 0408
Company: Monkey Hero LLC
Fax:
Address: 42941 Leaburg Drive Leaburg OR 97489
Applicant's Rep.: Kath Thomas
Phone: 541 8960408
Company:
Fax:
Address: 42941 Leaburg Drive Leabura OR 97489
Property Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
Phone: 541 896 0408
Company:
Fax:
Address: 42941 Leabura Drive Leabura OR 97489
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17023323
TAX LOT NOS
Property Address:
Size of Property: Acres ® Square Feet
Proposed Name of Subdivision: Monkey Hero 2020
Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: 4 lot subdivision with 3 to face 51 st and1 to face D Street
Existing Use: Sin le Family Home Site to Remain
Total acreage of parcels/ _ q Ilan proposed ar 4 are possible after the
# of Lots/Parcels: 4 allowable dens' .54/ �r a�t�B g Dwell unto, division
Si natures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.
Associated Applications:
box on the next pace.
complete this section)
Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre -Submittal
Owner:
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
7�2er �r e„LLG6�Kat�� &Maw Date: 05/09/2020
Signature
Monkey Hero LLC by Kathy Thomas
Submittal
Owner:
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.176 pertaining to a
complete application.
Signature
Print
Date:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10
Land Division Tentative Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal
• The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
• A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
• Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre -
submittal meeting.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
• A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal
Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10
Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
• ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
J Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre -submittal and submittal stages.
U Land Division Tentative Application Form
[y] Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density
and the density proposed.
® Copy of the Deed
[� Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
® Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of
the required neighboring property notification packet.
®'A Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
J Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.
®A Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
® Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR
Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets:
J All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved
and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
�GJ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10
R Vicinity Map
® The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings,
curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and
what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use
and required setbacks from proposed property lines.
WAThe name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
QAThe 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision —Property is outside of the 500 year floodplain - see map
f The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
[ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
® Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Land Division Tentative Plan
® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor
"City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division
FC] Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the
proposed land division
J Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Q Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and
area of illumination
J Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and
relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map.
�Gf Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
J Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways
�XJ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
[f] Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
[X] Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip
Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10
R] Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
"The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated
f�.Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified
in SDC 5.12-120 E.
c. Stormwater Management Plan
r , Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
NU Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
NU Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
N9 Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
NU The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
Jj , Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
GAmount of proposed cut and fill
x1 Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
®o, Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement
®o, Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal
as specified in SDC 3.2-230
WF Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
�q Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
�q If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
®o, A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
QA Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
Already Permitted
Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10
pl Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
QF An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate
time of installation and method of financing
Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX. 541.736.1021
www.spnngfield-orgov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton
McEachem.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield-
or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov
Phone: (541) 736 —1036
Fax: (541) 736-1021
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD
225 FIFTH STREET
OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.726.1021
www.spdrygfialdor.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
----------- — (Area below this b'seJUIed outbyApplica n) __—
(Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprb4gi2eld Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov
Project Name: Monkey Hero 5550 Applicant: Monkey Hern I I G
Assessors Parcel #: 1702332306300 Date:
Land Use(s): I w n n ra c1 n Phone #: Sd1 aoa nano
0 P Sity P dP tial
Project Size (Acres): .54 Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area: N/A Email: leaburg6bgmail.eom
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): 17023323 06300
No Stormwater Management System is anticipated as only vacant lots are being created, and no
development is anticipated.
Drainage Proposal (Public connedion(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
The attached materials demonstrate that the soil can accept a soakage trench. However, sizing is not
possible until future development provides sizing of impervious areas. Weep holes exist at the streets
which would allow the stormwater to be treated on site and then released.
Proposed Storrewater Best Management Practices: For the purpose of demonstrating the property
can be used for future development, infiltration tests are attached, and a future potential soakage
trench may be used, which will be determined through the building permitting process.
(Area below this line rdkd ord by the City andRehvned k the Aaabeand
(At a nunimmte5 all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlds sheet shall be subnutted
or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone:
❑ Wedand/Riparian:
❑ Soil Type:
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Other Jurisdictions
Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on
application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield
Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site
appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been
signed in the spare provickel below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual.
❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1).
❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual.
❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscethmeous
❑
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
❑
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
drains.
❑
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event
Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0
❑
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
❑
❑
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscethmeous
❑
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑
Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to
another.
❑
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation.
❑
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady.
* IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN'
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
Narrative
This document addresses the requirements listed in the checklist adding commentary to each of the
requirements where appropriate.
Application Fee to be paid upon request.
Land Division Tentative Application Form has been attached above this Narrative
Narrative, explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and
any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken, is undertaken
herein.
Density -list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. The
property is.54 acres (23,522 squarefeet). The lot is zoned low density residential. Each of the proposed
lots is within the expected size of low density lots within the City of Springfield. No panhandle lots are
proposed.
Copy of the Deed See Attached
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all
encumbrances. This document is attached with this submission.
Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 8%"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required
neighboring property notification packet. This document cannot be printed at this time and submitted
as the City of Springfield offices are closed.
Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon
Department of Transportation(ODOT) facility. This is not required as no work is proposed within the
Right -of -Way.
Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping
Sheet Attached — Infiltration reports are submitted as a part of this Tentative Plan. However no
stormwater scoping is possible at this time as no new dwellings or structures are proposed.
Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.
2-105A.4. Not required with this plan.
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or
Engineer
o Vicinity Map Is attached.
Parcel Number: 1702332306300
Address: 490 51" Street, Springfield OR 97478
Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
o The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is
being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required
setbacks from proposed property lines. This document is attached.
o The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and
required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on
file in the Development & Public Works Department N/A
o The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or
Letter of Map Revision N/A This property is above the 500 yearflood plain.
o The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department See
Attached. Related Maps
o Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 Y. feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas,
wetlands and rock outcroppings Attached. However, some of the trees shown on document
are a collection of suckers, with no trunk.
o Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane
County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if
the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high
water table See attached reportfrom Branch Engineering.
b. Land Division Tentative Plan
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor. See Attached.
o City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or
railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division. No boundaries abut or
crass the proposed land division.
o Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed
landdivision Any/alleasements are documented in the title report. Proposed easements
are shown on the Tentative Map.
o Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale .
No other property is owned by the property owner in the vicinity of this proposed land
division.
o Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets,
Parcel Number: 1702332306300
Address: 490 51" Street, Springfield OR 97478
Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and
relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual
Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. No additional street lighting, streets,
alleys, dedications, or other right -of --ways within or adjacent to this division are proposed.
However, an existing incandescent street light on D Street may be replaced with a new LED
head.
o Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities. This is shown on the
attached Existing Conditions Map.
o Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways. No additional driveways are
proposed.
o Location of existing and proposed transit facilities. Transit facilities are currently located at
Bob Straub and Main Street. No new transit facilities are proposed.
o Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails. Existing conditions are shown on the Existing Condition Map.
No new facilities are proposed.
o Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter. No new street
trees are proposed, as there is no planter strip on either D Street, nor 51" Street.
o Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Existing facilities and
utilities are shown on the Existing Conditions Map. No new facilities or utilities are
proposed, other than the new waste water lines on a Private Utility Easement as shown on
the tentative plan.
o The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated None are proposed.
o Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in
SDC 5.12-120 E. None are proposed.
c. Stormwater Management Plan
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer. No new stromwater facilities are proposed.
o Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system No new plantings are proposed.
Parcel Number: 1702332306300
Address: 490 51" Street, Springfield OR 97478
Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
o Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations No new roofs arimperviaus areas are
proposed.
o Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns No new roofs or impervious areas are
proposed.
o The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not
limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality
measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained. No newroofs orimpervious areas are
proposed.
o Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land
with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of
proposed cut and fill N/A
Additional Materials N/A
Additional Notes:
With regard to the Complete PreSubmittal Checklist sent by Melissa Carina after the PreSubmittal
meeting regarding the tentative plan, each area is addressed below:
Planning Notes:
1. The a current title report is attached.
2. There is an existing 7' PUE for SUB along the property's D Street side.
3. This lot is level and as such does not slope. No buildings are proposed, however, the
plan not shows the areas of the map upon which buildings may be erected.
4. Location for future "no parking' signs are now shown on the Tentative Plan.
S. No new sidewalks are proposed. However, the width of the existing sidewalks is
noted on the Plan.
6. No new street trees are proposed as no planter strip exists on either D Street or 51�
Street.
7. Communication with SUB occurred before purchase of the property and has been
confirmed before this submission. The overhead line providing power to f 490 51"
will be placed underground as a condition of approval of the final plat. SUB did
provide a document to be completed and recorded with the final plat which will
provide for a 7' PUE along the property's 51" side. No new easements are required
to provide water service. The new easement will be used to provide power.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application.
1. No residential buildings are planned at this time. When building permit requests
are submitted for these lots, after recording of the final plat, residential buildings
will be determined. However, the required density is addressed in the Tentative
Subdivision Application.
2. The issue of driveways being too close to the school or intersections was addressed
in the pre -submittal meeting. Subsequent to that potential parking plans were
Parcel Number: 1702332306300
Address: 490 51" Street, Springfield OR 97478
Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
submitted to Mike Liebler. He also visited the site and determined the site would be
able to accommodate the necessary parking. During the meeting, Mike Liebler
discussed the reasons the site, when built out, would not be in conflict with the
adjacent school.
All utilities servicing the proposed lots will be placed underground.
The existing street light will be upgraded to LED as discussed in the pre -submittal
meeting and as a condition of the final plat being accepted.
An infiltration report is attached with this Application. The driveway is not being
altered, with the exception of a cut, 10' x 3, which will serve as a stormwater
facility.
Building permits applications will not be submitted until all aspects of the tentative
plan have been approved.
During the pre -submittal meeting, it was determined that Note B, regarding a
private utility easement for sewer lines should be designated as a variable width
easement, rather than a 7' easement, because, as the Tentative Plan shows, the
width must vary in order to navigate and existing power pole.
Additional Comments from the Pre -Submittal Meeting:
1. A demolition permit will be needed to remove the existing garage and this is to be
complete prior to the recordation of the final plat.
2. An LDAP will be needed to install the sewer lines. This too will be done before the
final plan.
3. The hazard trees have been removed.
4. Mike Liebler has reviewed a potential parking plan for the site and agrees that the
configuration would satisfy parking demands. Although, this potential plan is not
intended to be the only possible design.
5. Clayton MCEachern has reviewed a potential residential structure plan, with sized
soakage trenches, and agrees that the configuration would satisfy his concerns.
Although, this potential plan is not intended to be the only possible design.
Parcel Number: 1702332306300
Address: 490 51" Street, Springfield OR 97478
Owner: Monkey Hero LLC
TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION,
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name: Monkey Hero 4 -lot Subdivision
Project Proposal: 4 -lot Residential Subdivision
Case Number: 811 -20 -00077 -PRE
Project Address: 490 51'' Street
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): Map 17-02-33-23, Tax Lot 6300
Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR)
EPRINOFIE�
0#
Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (10-99 year TOTZ)
Applicable Refinement Plan: East Main Refinement Plan Refinement Plan Designation: LDR
Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: May 8, 2020
Application Submittal Deadline: November 9, 2020
Associated Applications: N/A
PRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT RE
POSITION REVIEWOF
NAME
PHONE
Project Planner
Land Use Planning
Melissa Carino
541.744.4068
Transportation Planning Engineer
Transportation
Michael Liebler
541.736.1034
Public Works Civil Engineer
Utilities
Clayton McEachern
541.736.1036
Public Works Civil Engineer
Sanitary/Storm Sewer
Clayton McEachern
541.736.1036
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire and Life Safety
Eric Phillips -Meadow
541.682.5741
Building Official
Building
Robert Castile
541.726.3666
Applicant
Kathy Thomas
Monkey Hero, LLC
42941 Leaburg Dr
Leaburg, OR 97489
541.896.0408
Revised 10/22/18
Applicant's Representative
Kathy Thomas
Monkey Hero, LLC
42941 Leaburg Dr
Leaburg, OR 97489
541.896.0408
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees
- Subdivision (LDR) Tentative Plan= ($6,726 + ($289/lot x 4lots) app fee) + (5% tech fee) + ($190
postage fee) = $8,466.10
- Subdivision (LDR) Pre -Submittal Plat = $421.00
- Subdivision (LDR) Plat=$930+($580/lotx4lots)+(5%techfee)=$3,412.50
o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8%"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑ 8 %" x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission
from the property owner is required.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑ 1
o Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑
❑
® 2
❑
® 3
❑ ® 4
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
All existing and proposed easements
Dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the too and toe of cut and fill slopes to
scale
Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right
of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed land
division
Location of existing and required traffic control
devices fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public
facilities
2
❑
® 5
Location and width of all existing and proposed
sidewalks sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and bike trails
❑
® 6
Location, size and type of plantings and street trees
in any required planter strip
❑
® 7
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities
on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points.
o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include the boundaries
and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must progress in a sequence promoting
street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
❑ ❑ N/A Phased Development Plan
Planning Notes.
1. At submittal, be sure to include a title report dated within 30 days of application submittal.
2. Do not see proposed PUEs for the new lots in the tentative plan. Mark public utility
easements (PUE) that is at least 7' wide along street frontages (51" Street).
3. Dimensions are provided for each lot both on the plans and in the narrative and all proposed
lots meet minimum lot size requirements. However, the approximate dimensions of each
building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale are not shown.
4. Please show the location of existing and required traffic control devices (e.g. no parking signs
for shared driveway) and similar public facilities.
5. While sidewalk location is shown on the plans, the width is not provided. Show location and
width of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
6. Since no new street trees are proposed, show existing location, size and type of plantings and
street trees in any required planter strip along street frontages on the tentative plan.
7. All proposed utility connections and one stormwater facility are shown. Other stormwater
facilities? Has applicant been in touch with SUB Water & Electric already? All overhead lines
will need to be undergrounded as per SDC standards.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
• What type of residential buildings are planned for Lots 1, 2, & 3? LDR Density = 6-14 dwelling
units/net acre.
• Transportation: are proposed driveways too close to intersections? Safe Routes to Schools?
• All utilities provided to serve the subdivision will need to be placed underground.
• Existing street light needs to be upgraded.
• Drainage report? Stormwater mitigation (existing and new)? Driveway fortreatment like last
Monkey Hero partition?
• Subdivision approval — "substantially complete"— is required before applying for building
permits.
• Note B? 7' easement for a private sewer (Clayton)?
FIRE
Fire access and water supply are fine for the proposed 4 -lot partition. Ladd at SUB Water confirmed
that they have adequate fire flow from both hydrants, which are within 600 feet of potential houses
on these lots.
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 20 -77 -PRE
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
® ❑ Vicinity Map
® ❑ The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use and
required setbacks from proposed property lines
❑ ❑
n/a The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
❑ ❑
n/a The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
❑ ❑
n/a The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
® ❑
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/1 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
® ❑
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
Revised 10/25/07
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
®
❑
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor in
accordance with ORS 92
®
❑
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements on and abutting the property
®
❑
Boundaries of the entire area owned by the property
owner, of which the proposed land division is a part,
as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the
approximate dimensions of each building site
indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to
scale
®
❑
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
®
❑
1
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
o Stormwater Management Plan
Complete
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
❑
®
2
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
❑
®
2
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
❑
®
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
❑
®
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
❑
®
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
❑ ® Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
❑ ❑ n/a Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
Revised 10/25/07
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
❑ n/a Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
PW Notes:
1. all electrical services to ALL lots and structures in the subdivions must be placed
undergroudn inlcuding the existing home.
2. The provided infiltration /soils report shows that onsite treatment is possible and
reasonable for this subdivision. A drainage report with appropiate sizing of the
disposal facility for the planned homes in the subdivision is required. When the
home size is not known the code guidance is to use 2640 sf as the default size for
roof and driveway area. The subdivsion plan will need to show a building
footprint and stormwater disposal faiclity footprint can be located on each lot that
meet required setback or other arrangments made with the building deparment
for infiltration close to buildings. It appears that lots 2,3 and 4 will use a shared
driveway and lot 1 will have a separate driveway. The shared driveway currently
exists but will require some treatement as it is in excess of 500sf. Staff would
recommend a middle grassy swale for the driveway if possible with the house
configurations. The new driveway may fall under the 500sf that requires
treatment but this will need to be shown.
3. the existing sodium streetlight on the pole at the northwest corner will need to be
replaced with current LED standard.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
• The only stormwater item that will be required to be constructed prior to plat is the
shared driveway treatment area.
• The sewer connections to the future lots must be established to the lot lines prior to
granting final plat. This will regiure an encroachment permit, the encroachment
permit should be noted on the plans.
Revised 10/25/07
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Transportation Engineer/ Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#: 20-000077
Applicant: Monkey Hero
TRANSPORTATION
Right -of -Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application
o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ NA Traffic Impact Study
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination
® ❑ Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
❑
® (1)
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
®
❑
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
®
❑
Location, widths, conditions, and names of
all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications, access easements or other
right-of-ways within or adjacent to the
proposed land division. Proposed streets
should also include approximate radius of
curves and grades and relationship to any
Revised 10/25/07
projected streets as shown on the Metro
Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development
Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map
® ❑ Location of existing and required traffic
control devices
Transportation Notes:
1. Please show on plan sheet that Lots 2, 3 and 4 obtain access via the shared
easement.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Date: May 1, 2020
File Number: 20 -000077 -PRE / 20-000060-PRO3
Address: 490 51' St.
Proposal: 4 -lot Subdivision
Planner: Melissa Carino
Deputy Fire Marshal: Eric Phillips -Meadow
FIRE COMMENTS
o Tentative Land Division Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
® ❑ 1 Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division
® ❑ 2 Location of existing and required fire hydrants
Fire Notes:
1. Fire apparatus access to the proposed lots from the City streets is adequate.
2. There are 2 fire hydrants within 600 feet of the most remote portions of each lot. Fire flow
required for new houses is 1,000 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi.
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS
APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE -APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Applicable
®
❑
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association
Agreement
❑
®
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision
proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230
❑
®
Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of
the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or
within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
❑
®
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted
concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
®
❑
Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable,
address the additional standards of the overlay district
®
❑
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as
specified in SDC 5.19-100
❑
®
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must
be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
❑
®
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or
evidence the permit application has been submitted for review
®
❑
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development,
a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to
development
❑
®
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC
5.9-100 and 5.21-100
THIS APPLICATION IS:
❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
❑ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
May 8, 2020
City Planner Date
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4-105 and Oregon
Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days
afterthe application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period forthis application begins when
all the missing information is submitted orwhen you request that the City proceed without the
information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City
within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing
information. If you indicate herein or in yourwritten response that the missing information will be
submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review
to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then
upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete
for purposes of starting the 120 -day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may
be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of
the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day
period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is
submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is
required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is
required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -
day timeline.
Signature
ranch
ENGINEERING -
April 10, 2020
Kathy Thomas
Monkey Hero LLC
42941 Leaburg Drive
Leaburg, OR 97489
RE: SnE INFR.ntwnoN Tlsr REszmT
490 N. 51^ S T FET
SPRENGFEEM, ORECAN
REt PREUECTNo.20-186
Branch Engineering Inc. (BEI) has performed infiltration testing in two hand -auger test holes
located at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. The purpose of our testing
was to provide site specific infiltration rates for the design of on-site infiltration facilities for the
disposal of stormwater generated from new impervious surface areas.
Field Work and Site Description
Three approximately 6 -inch diameter hand auger holes were advanced to a maximum depth of
40.5 -inches below ground surface (BGS) and pre -saturated with water. On April 9, 2020 Falling
Head Infiltration Tests were performed in accordance with the 2014 City of Eugene Stormwater
Manual. Infiltration testing commenced for three successive trials with water added between
each trial, field data is attached.
At the time of testing the site is occupied by a single-family residence and garage on the
northern half of the site, the rest of the site is landscaped grass with Douglas fir and fruit trees.
Similar soil conditions were encountered in each of the three infiltration test holes and it is our
conclusion that the soil conditions throughout the lot are similar.
Soils
The soil in the test hole was visually classified using the American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Method D-2488. Soil conditions from approximately 0- to 12 -inches BGS
consisted of soft, damp, dark brown silty clay before transitioning to medium stiff, moist, brown
clayey silt with trace fine grain sand (ML). The NRCS Web Soil Survey of the Lane County Area
maps the site soil as Salem -Urban land complex which is described as well drained stream
terrace deposits of gravelly silt loam derived from gravelly mixed alluvium.
Groundwater
Ground water was not encountered in the site borings, well logs in the site vicinity indicate static
groundwater levels at 12- to 19 -feet below the surface, see attached well logs. A five-foot buffer
must exist between the bottom of the soakage trench and recorded static groundwater levels.
Based on site testing and recorded well logs in the site vicinity, this buffer should exist.
Summary of Field Infiltration Test Results
The results of our April 9, 2020 field testing are summarized below in Table 1. The hydraulic
conductivity is based on the infiltration rates measured in the field and summarized on the
attached Infiltration Testing Field Data. The rates shown below have no factors of safety applied
and represent the slowest infiltration rate measured of the three trials.
EUGENE SPRINGFIELD SALEM-KEIZER
310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.]46.063] 1 w .branchengineenng.wrn
490 N. 51 m Sheet
Infiltration Testing
Apnl 10, 2020
Measured Rate of
Depth of Hydraulic Conductivity,
Location Test (in) k (in/hr)
Infiltration Test IT -1 40.5 11.6
Infiltration Test IT -2 39 14.5
Recommended Infiltration Design Rates
Using the recommended factor of approximately safety of 2, a design infiltration rate of 6 in/hr
is suggested. Safety factors may be applied at the discretion of the designer and the 2014 City
of Eugene Stormwater Manual.
Conclusions
Based on our field findings and infiltration testing results, disposal of stormwater via infiltration
facilities on the site is feasible.
If you have any questions regarding the test method, data analysis or design please contact the
undersigned
Sincerely,
Branch Engineering Inc,
EXPIRES: 12/31/2021
Ronald Derrick PR GR
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Attached:
Figure 1 Site Map
Infiltration Testing Field Data
NRCS Site Sell Mapping
Nearby Well Logs
Branch Engineering, Inc.
Digitally signed by Ronald J.
ck Derrick
Date: 2020.04.1413:05:12 -07'00'
lTF �L:i
T
Y,
4
* � a
4 •l
N _
LEGEND anch
O
IT-] INDICATES APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF GN E E RING=
SCALE: 1:30(8.5'x11„' INFILTRATION TESTING &.,I;;
SITE EXPLORATION MAP -490 N. 51st STREET FIGURE -1
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 04-10-2020
PROJECTNO. J186
anch
I(GI N E E RI N G-
mimeuov Ten Rea .
W
lYm (mlv)
sufam (W
P
IW
N,I 49] N 11x151-11
PnNB
A anm ofFW xl PnM'1
SUM eOU�ta
Tnlfug l%Ie: 04/10/1020
o.wa¢IWa
0
350
Numhea': 201%
Aug Pa¢oPFJI T1(�
SU eGUGtita (Io)
fi
.Projec'1
Tnl Type: F ,ad lNHlnlim
11 .1 140 Q14 8.2
1
4 H2H
Tbne-0al atlAlim NH2O
,aha
1.n tmHm TM 1911a11
P
W
lYm (mlv)
sufam (W
P
IW
I�MfiU
PnNB
A anm ofFW xl PnM'1
SUM eOU�ta
fi
o.wa¢IWa
0
350
15.5
Aug Pa¢oPFJI T1(�
SU eGUGtita (Io)
fi
SUM eH NACS Qn) 10
11 .1 140 Q14 8.2
1
Tee1R BGS Qn) 40.5
20 3i.5 130 all fi.]
V Im Wala ) 2
30 .1 120 Q10 6.0
10
tlockO-al Suet 1208
40 395 11.0 010 6.0
fi.]
ASTM6o11T Qa)
TeeIR B Qn)
20
4]0
IMIWIIm TM1
P
lYmelmly) o.w210 I3 I�nhnml I�nNl1
Aug Pa¢oPFJI T2I�n/Lr1
d
V Im Wna )
1.5
1 1
0
2].0
11.0
009
O� 1250
.1
10 3Q0 2Q5 030 180
41
988
20 320 185 020 120
008
43 4.5
3fi 340 1.1 013 7.1
ASFMSo11T
98 358 148 011 8.8
11.6
I_e,aTM1
P
llmelMn) SLIfem(WamI�nhnml I�nNl1
Aug Pa¢oPFJI T3(�n/L11
V Im Wala )0
e dLKII
320
P
tlockO�
10 350030 1803]0020
120385
1 MflmTM27I 2
015 9.040
s am ata
J,
398 013 ].5
llfi
c
Vd-e I WalaA d al)
eMe of WMer Level Fall IlNminl
0
380
21.0
,.__ ___ . ; �¢ I�3
1251
10
410
180
030
180
P
IMIWIIm TM2TL11
lYmelmly)
o.wa¢IWa
IW
ftMb•)
anNO
Aug Pa¢oPFJI T1(�
SU eGUGtita (Io)
fi
0
410
1
SUM eH NACS
20
10
450
14010
020
120
TeeIR B Qn)
20
4]0
120
020
120
Im t
V Wna )
1 1
31
980
11.0
009
ll�a-
1210
41
988
103
008
43 4.5
8.5
ASFMSo11T
P
P
P a
1 MflmTM27I 2
lZ(m
s am ata
J,
(mry�F
PnN
Avs.&Fag F3(n/Im)
Vd-e I WalaA d al)
13
0
380
21.0
O�
1251
10
410
180
030
180
20
435
11.1
025
11.0
39
.1
125
021
129
39
47.5
11.1
020
120
145
P
IvfllWtlm TM 2llla13
lYmelmly)
Slnf9¢I�n)
IW
I�nhnml
I�nNl1
AVGPa¢rI FJIi2I�a/hl1
V Ime WMa )
1
0
420
1].0
1333
10
45.0
140
030
180
A
4].0
120
020
120
30
988
103
018
40
498
9.3
010
fi.0
..0
15.0
Ma
al Wafer Fall fiamin)
`ems
c
M 111 N
3 Sod Map—lane County Area, Oregon =
(400 N 51st Street)
ti ti
3 3
Ap Sraa l:618Rpnial m Apntr n(SYx IV)disa.
p Nhtma
A
0 5 T 20 w b
® m
Nw p�l,trn:wm hHUv Cmrrmontltala: NG584 55ena:IIIM Zme1W YJG539
p5W Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4lUM20
�i Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 a 3
Shc Map—Lane County Area, Oregon
(490 N 519 Street)
_SD, Natural Resources web Sol Survey 41D21)21)
all Conservation Service National Cooperative Shc Survey Page 2 of 3
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area at Were. tA09
Spot Area
The sal surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI)
1:20,090.
Q
Stany Spat
Soils
Very Sony Spa
Waming: Shc Map may not be vapid al Mrs scale.
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
9
VJrf Spot
p
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
,.,.
Soil Map Unic Lines
misunderslantling of the tletail of mapping and accuracy of soil
4
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Soil Map Unit Points
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Special Line Feelcontrasting
Special
Point Features
scale.
Lg
Blowout
water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
®
Boraw Pit
measurements.
Trenspartatian
Clay Spot
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
0
Closed Depression
Web Soil SurveyLIRL:
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: web Mercator(EPSG:355])
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Gravely Spa
Malor Roads
projection, which preserves and shape but
ion that schdistorts
and area, projection that preserves area, such as the
®
Landfill
Local Roads
Abersdistance
o
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Lara Flaw
accurate calculations of distance or area are req uired,
Background
aga
Marsh or swamp
.
Aerial Photography
This productis generated from the USDA4JRCS certified data as
of Ne version dates) listed below
*
Mine or Query
Sus Survey Area: Lane County
®
Miscellaneous Ydscer
10, 2019
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2019
Sep
®
Perennial VMmer
Shc map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
y,
Rock Outcrop
1:50,099 or larger.
A
Saline Spot
Dates) aerial images were photographed: Jun 12, 20191
19, 2019
Sandy Spot
The odhophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Severely Eroded Spot
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
Sinkhole
shifting ofmap and boundaries may be evident.
�p
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
_SD, Natural Resources web Sol Survey 41D21)21)
all Conservation Service National Cooperative Shc Survey Page 2 of 3
Sal Map�ane Connly Area, Oregon
Map Unit Legend
4011 N 519 Street
LSIA Nature Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2020
iMi Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of3
Map Unit Symbd
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
119
Seem -Urban land complex
2.0
100.0%
Totes for Area of Interest
20
100.0%
LSIA Nature Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2020
iMi Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of3
Map Unit Description: Salon -Urban lend ccrnplex--Lane County Area, Oregon
Lane County Area, Oregon
119—Salem-Urban land complex
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2341
Elevation. 300 to 800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees F
Frost -free period. 165 to 210 days
Farmland classification. Farm land of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Salem and similar soils. 45 percent
Urban land. 45 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of
the mapunit.
Description of Salem
Setting
Landfomt: Stream terraces
Landfomt position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Gravelly mixed alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly silt loam
H2-7to26inches. gravelly clay loam
H3 - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):
Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Fraquencyofflooding: None
Frequencyofponding. None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Lard capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Lard capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Well drained < 15% Slopes
(G002XY0020R)
Hydric soil rating. No
490 N 519 Sbeel[
LSM Nature! Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2020
irk Conservation Serves National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 ort
Map Unit Description: Satan -Urban land cornplex--Lane County Area, Oregon
Description of Urban Land
Interpretive groups
Lard capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Lard capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric sal rating. No
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2019
490 N 519 Street
LSM Nature! Resources Web Soil Survey 4/10/2020
irk Conserv9ion Service National Cooperatirve Soil Survey Page 2 ort
STATEOFOREGON RECEIVCRE
APR 111998
(1) OWNER: TE
Name LnM
UY.
��
Andrew;
sucte��Zip
(2)��LLYY
ORK
® New Well ❑ Deepen ❑ Recondition ❑ Abandon
(3) DRILL METHOD
U'11 aotemy Air ❑ artery Mud- - ❑ cable
❑ Other
(4) PROPOSED USE:
R Domestic ❑ Community ❑ Induetrul ❑ Irrigation
❑-'he"wo LJ Other
Omai
BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION:
Special Constructioneppeovel Yes No Depth of Completed Well
Yes No ❑ ❑
O
3F ft.
Explosivesused ❑ R Type Amount
SEAL
Amount
laWHOLE
star From To Material From To
sacknurp... dr,
A0
a ll
How was seal placed, Method ❑ A ❑ B 19 C ❑ D
❑ E
❑ aher, _
B-Afillphrecofmm 1_ ttto t R. Material e'+s�
Doi placed fmm ft. w_R Siseorgravel
(6) CASING/LINER:
Diameter From To Gauge
Steel Plastic -
Welded Tbrandr
l
Cosine: O
N ❑
❑ ❑
®
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑
❑- ❑
❑
❑ -
Line,
❑ El-
❑
❑
Li El
11
Li�looetion
o[ehoele)
(7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS:
14 Perforetiorm Method
❑ Scream Type Material
Slot Telumble
'P*Om
To also NumberDiameter aise
Casing
Liner
fa o
19
❑
❑
❑
❑ '❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
(8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is
1 hour
❑ PemP ❑ Bailar ® Ah
❑ FAn 5m
Yieldga4min Drawdown Drill stem at
Time
I
1'empemtureofwater MrG Depth Arte.E.Flow Fountl
Wase wateranalyeu done? ❑Yes Bywhmn
Didany stmt, mutein water act suitable for inrendeduse? ❑ Toolittle
❑ Sucre ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor, ❑ culored ❑ Other
Depthofstuma:
S
(9) LOCATTpION OF WELL by legal description:
county -ate-9 Latitude ' 'La.gimde
Township 47 NmS,R-, 2 /Y Ear W,WM.
Section 33 SA /tee—w
Tax Lot Lot BlockSubdivision-
Street Addressof Welllornee tad oa)�Sga AL A
r9�ef�—
(10) STAT WATER LEVEL:
12- ft. below land surface. Date
Artesian pressure If. per square inert. Data
(11) WATER BEARING ZONES:
Depth.t which wmerwns fret found 2 %L _
From To Estimated Flow Rete SWL
P
(12) WELL LOG: r....,,.,a a..,a.....
Dateetarlad $ 7. i - XX Coompleted 3-96- 8V
(unbonded) Water Well Coastedctor Certification:
I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or
abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon well construction
standards Materials used and information reported above are true to my best
knowledge and belief.
W WC Number
Signed Data
(bonded) Water Well Constructor Certification:
I meant map ... ibility far the comtr.cttom alteration, or abandonment
work performed on thin well during the construction dates reported above. all
work performed during this time is in compliance with Oration well
construction standards. This report is true to the beat of raY knowledge and
belief.�- ry W{VC Number d 40
Signed s ��-� 2l/�iri.4. Data 7 ^ 14- Q 4'
"START CARD"
l -t W'JRI
[AAA s 1 1C18
NOTICE OF BEGINNING OF WELL CONSTRUCTION
(as required by ORS 537.762) WAT VR RESOURCES DEPT.
,4 _M, OREGON
This form must be completed, signed by both the owner (or authorized agent) and constructor, and the original
delivered to the Water Resources Department prior to commencement of construction, alteration or abandon-
ment of each well.
Owner's Name and
Mailing Address
d
Proposed Commencement Date ,3 - ;L "3— 669
Proposed Well Depth y0,40 Diameter / f
and Use:
Domestic ❑ Community ❑ Industrial
❑Thermal El Injection El Other
Proposed Well Location: County
❑ Irrigation
Township I7 s IN or S) Range 2 ' (E or W) Section -33
1. it 1 /4 of A/ W 1/4 of above section
2. street address of 56- 6e, AL A.
At least 2 well location
of theses
must be
provided 3. tax lot number of well location
4. attach approved map with location identified.
(see reverse of this form for approved maps)
We hereby certify that we have read the back of this form, and that to the best of our knowledge the information
provided herein is accurate and the well is being properly located from septic tanks and septic drain fields.
Bonded Water Well constructor
License No. 6 3O
Company
Note: This is not a Water Right application. The owner is responsible for obtaining a Water Right through the
Water Resources Department if required.
Form 537.7621987
Y STATE OF OREGON AUG - J 1941
MONITORING WELL REPORT
Ow required by ORS 577.765 & OAR 690.210.095) ky"..7Eii
(1) OWNERIPROJECT: WELLNO.M w_5
n- 4"1 -) n a—$f,
(2) TYPE OF WORK:
WNew cors.iun
❑ Conversion
Rotuy Air
Hollow Stens Auger
❑ Repair ❑ Remrditim
❑ Deelseeft ❑Abandonment
❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Cable
Yee No � ^
pial 9mmmds .® ❑ Delab of mmpletm wen e� ft.
Seal
ifft.
TO
3fL
Filter
rack
-1ft.
TO -
s�ft.
(5) WELL TEST:
❑Pomp ❑Bailer
dC�-
By legal description
Well
2.
t ATTACH MAP WITH LOCATION'.
(7) WATER LEVEL:
MFc below Imd mdace.
Anaian Ptessumn lb/eq. lo.
(S) WATER BEARING ZONES:
Depth at which wits was first found_
From
To
Ea. Flow Rate
SWL
( 3'/a
a o
f
13'
Muerial
Welded naeedm
Flood
❑
.PA
Cl
Line
:.:ins
'T
4
(9) WELL LOG:
dimtetar
n
.n.l
�ye-
Muerial
Welded naeedm
Flood
❑
.PA
Cl
Line
dlaruamr
in.
mYe al
Welded Thsaded
Glum
❑
❑
❑
Benwnite pluuga lust 2 ft. thick
mrerul_y L�
intervd(s): -LTD
f �
FrOm�Tov
From To
Slot aim Q n
❑ Air ❑ Flowing Armrim
Comueti.ity PH
Tmperemre of waur-S'-1°FIC Depth maim flow found &
Wuwatermetysiadane7 ❑Yen❑No
By whom? t
Deghofnmatobemalymmi. From Run fu
Rauarkr:
None of snpuvirirsg CseobgiWErigirs.
(unbowed) Munitor Well Comwaor Certfscatioo:
I certify then the work I performm on ilc construction, alteration, or
ahadaurmt of rkie well is m cwnplimce wiw Oregon well construction
eandade. Mstuiala usd am informaico reported above are nucro une best
luawledge am belief.
MWC Nombrr
(booded) Mmiwr Well Comwuor Certification:
I accept responsibility for the conrtmction, aliastion, or abvsdamient
work perfomad on this well during Oc cnnOmcrinn doer reported above All
work?--f
o ed during this time u a
in .nplimce with Oregon well oiruhuction
aThin n' t wt batof mylmmvhdge and belief.
.✓iY a� U MWC �Nm)L
Signed L
WATER WELL REPORT REI EI yI (93
"'}5}a ® �)
STATE OF OREGON - JUJUL619
WATER RESOURCES DEPT:
SALEM, ORE:_::d
(1) O ' R: (10) LOCATION OF WELL:
ti
Name / Cowt �j
Addrras Ir "ZTR�IS RRZ
u useet'
ci state Taxfut9 s4 - - -
(2) TAF WOR { (check):. Aaaxeaa at well meas et.:r/fP
New We Deepening ❑ - ,eecaditioc log ❑- Abandon ❑ _
vabana¢w�ent describe materiel ane ororeamei Ile Iz (11) WATER LEVEL: Com$$leted well.
(3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): DePthat wmehw� ,rybpawd 0 it
Sta[iclevel k be 1 nd smi Da L't+h'"U
Ibtvy Air [L"Ihirca ❑ Comfen� 2i iadumiel ❑ MwiapW o
Ifem'Mein Dull ❑ 'rmtwen o saber ❑ Axteelaaesaura - lbs. r 7hoeh.Date
Cft o cored ❑ rl,u,,,ai: w:uwaw ❑ Raiwertma o (12) WELL LOQ Dianaternf wart bemwraai,:.. `
( CASING INSTALLED: steel � Plastie ❑ Depthdrined yi -- k Depth ofeconpletooml well f
Threaded ❑ W d P/ Eoaemxr'b
hen: Oee color. oa aace, grain eke and saactere of materials; an d aMw
....:'Dunn. frmn.... ..... . EG [o... thickness wd imtme of each stratum evd aTuife, alstrated, with at lean one entry
--- -- --- - for each chaaea of formation. Repmt each change in Position of Static water Level
............ Diem. fmm........... _ft W.. ._k. Ganes _. and imlicate principal walc,- ring ateata. _-
*LINER INSTALLED: -- - MATERIAL _ IsmIn swL
----------.,"Dian.from............... ft- ce.......—., fG Ga.,
(6) PERFORATIONS: Perrmetaa? o Yee ;? o
Type of cerfmfltas user]
Siuofcerfur.ucas inbyL _
...................... . ...................... Parfalatic—from............ _.ft W.._._......_£t. �
................................. ..... _.,,_.-„f.w............ ... fG
_
...........................
(T) SCREENS: well aereen ”"=mlleax ❑Yea QIf'o --.
Manufacturers Na ona .....
TYPe ....._. .Model No. ..•�-
Diem. ..... ... 91st S' ..._self...... ...,._.Stasft
....
Diem._ Sbt Siu..... .9etfron fGW [t � -
................ ....
(S) WELL TESTS: Drawdown ie-amount water level is lowered
�b/bJ`' static level -
��at madev ❑ Y �N If ho ��
�' fh Gdr wdo ager hra --
_Airiest N hn _- drill J (t � hrn
Bailer teat Del/ "th I dr e< hn
nflow m
ratore fwater - Depth U Sexed k
Work started 19 Com Ie[ed — 19
(0) CONSTRUCT I$ speda smile Y ❑ Daae weuar,m machmenovaiefrof 1 -_ s t' I
Won eeni Materiel usN D Mlli r re_ -
"' --- rM" Operator'. Certefi tion:
Well sealed£rom land sur[am to .......... ft Tlu@Well was. d detect aup¢rneion. Materials sed
Ommetex of well bore [o bottom r 1 -. - sell] mfnrme ton p e to ncY beet knowle ,�arr¢�d'hely
.... 4)2'x'/�YY
Diameter of wall bore ealaw seal . in (9 gned] .. Dgte —bR, 19
�} —b
xnmberofaaeka xr<.ment urea ^ n,'j/ �' f-�)) m•Po.. F� -
Howwascementgmutplaced2 Q,fj�,j1 M• Th'yll ng Machine Qp¢ t�.Lice�e No ,. „_„_ .~
W
. ........... .. ..... .. .=>s..._LL.,_...>....__.._. c Water Wen Contractor'. Certification:
--: _.._ Thhewe way U¢d aaaer ary pa,aamtroa and u,;B mWd' €Zo
was Pane,�tallea . th best 1 _
1}ye ffP Depth fG ed6e a beU¢r. f� �'
Wesadriveeh ed ❑N Plug gz locati n rt Name (,. .. i oryu / ... /
Type of {VetchAddle �'
d p[h of strafe
Method of —0ing strata off _ [Signed)
Wasweilc,calseekedv ❑YeaN sell welltA
5 f I -CsntracWr'e Lica N.
G,ave] l.cedfrom.. _. ft to .,,tt ../. .Date (f B --19
NOTICE TO WATER WE LL CONTRACTOR WATER RESOURCES DEPA3=v W, �.yaaag.ago
'heanglnalvN! mpy of ttie repart fl4 KOREGON 97310
erewmmaadmthe wid,m ao save rmm ma dammwefi ®eieeinn.
LANE
STATE OF OREGON
d GEOTECHNICAL HOLE REPORT
(m reyuii by OAR M 240-035)
(1) OWNER/PROJECT: HoleNumber P-2
Name_ Stal,cup Trucking_.__._
Address 811 N. 53rd Ave.
CIO, Springfield stale OR zip 97477
(2) TYPE OF WORK
ONew ❑Deepening ❑Altera[ion(repalrha,md... mODAbandoamem
(3) CONSTRUCTION:
L]RotmyAir E]HanJAugcr ❑Hollow Smm Auger
❑Rouri ❑CableTwl bPuehProbe ❑Other
(4) TYPE OF HOLE:
qUseased Temporary ❑Cased Permanent
❑ Unenved Permanent ❑ Shopo Stability E] Other
(5) USE OF HOLE:
Test halo __ groundwater sampling
(6) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION:
Speeial Construction a pproval❑YesE�No Depthof Completed Hole 1R' It
HOLE
Diameter Farm
To
SEAL
Matvid From
To
Seeks or pounds
1 .5"1 Or
18'
Bentonitiss
n,
11R,
1A jhq
By whom? Pacific NW Laboratory
Depth of strata analyzed. From 14'
h. m 18' fit
Remarks: Stpnhpn lawn – RRRA
BackfillplacW from I.m _ ft. Material
FIlmr P.1,plaeedfrom ft, ft. Slzeofpack
Frnm 'Io Gang,
Seel Platin waided Theandal
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ El El
❑ ❑ ❑
El❑ ElLl❑ ❑
❑ Pump ]Bailer [] Air
❑ Flowing Arw,On
Permeability Yield
GPM
Conductivity PH
T peratureort wam�P/C Depthanesiantlowfound ft.
WwwrR,.alysiadone? ®Yes []No
SIR xis,
(S) WELLTEST.
❑ Pump ]Bailer [] Air
❑ Flowing Arw,On
Permeability Yield
GPM
Conductivity PH
T peratureort wam�P/C Depthanesiantlowfound ft.
WwwrR,.alysiadone? ®Yes []No
By whom? Pacific NW Laboratory
Depth of strata analyzed. From 14'
h. m 18' fit
Remarks: Stpnhpn lawn – RRRA
RECEIVE®
58718
STCOILV2.00E
(9) LOCATION OF HOLE by legal description:
County _ I anp Larmde _ useghude
T,,—,hiP 17 S N .r S Range 2 W E or W. wit_
Seed. 33 NE 1/4 NW I/4
T. Lot Lot Bleck Subdivision
Shoat Address of well(., affirm add res s) Stalnln Trucking
811 N. 53rd Ave. Springfield, OR 97477
Map with location identified must be attached
(10) STATIC WATER LEVEL:
14' ft, below land surface, Date 8/14/00
Artesian pressure Ib. per square inch. Date
(11) SUBSURFACE. LOG:
Gmuoil Elevmioa 495.'_
DartStvmA 8/14/00 Dam Completed R/14/HO ,.
(12) ABANDONMENT LOG:
Dat—himed 8/14/00 Date Completed R/14/00
Professional Certification
(m be signed by a licensed water supply or monitoring well consvucmr, or Oregon
registered geologol orcivil engineer).
for the construction, alteration or abandonment work
o isnlreti.o damcp
s ro,md ab,ve All work performed
omliance with Oregon's geotechnical bole construction
ye,true to the hest of my knowledge and belief
Number 10289
—81 -144011 -
THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMIT7rGi{jQ,Tj1E 7f6R RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK
ORIGINAL—WATFJ[�Itkle7�t il1{i('�S/d(,pkC[PARTUMP.NT FIRST COPY –CONSTRf1CTOR SPLOND COPV –CUSTOMER
Y_YXICUf1ECMJ,U0U7fCESN EPT.
18
i Trucking
�azueeeasway way
Mag law
Tue Apr 1116:x92000
Scale 1:15,626 (y ceriler)
tacy R°
Majv Caaiecla
1000 Fast
�
Pn-w Slate Rage
500 Mesas
GIMerslye/Lim Access
—y
❑ Etl
Rwi
Wy
-- Kizer Slough
S
C-1.
C
RECEIVED
Ole SEP 2 7 2000
4,
.0 c
a
=a6Sg1