The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Building 2005-07-21Building/Combination Permit Status Issued 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676Fax 541-726-37 69 Inspection Line PERMIT NO: COM2005-00599ISSUED: 0712112005APPLIEDz 0512012005EXPIRES: 0112112006VALUE: $ 228,656.00 SITE ADDRESS: 751 S 48th St Springfield TYPE OF WORK: Single Family Residence ASSESSOR'SPARCELNO.: 1802051101800 TYPE OF USE: New Residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Single Family Residence, Lot 15 Rocky Road Subdivision Owner: Address: PARKER HOMES 24717 WOLF CREEK RD VENETA OR 97487 PhoneNumber: 541-935-4099 Contractor Tvpe General Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Contractor PARI(ER HOMES INC BATEMAN ELECTRIC INC HOME COMFORT HEATING & AIR HOME COMFORT HEATING & AIR INC License 162168 151911 84164 84164 Expiration Date tut8t2006 06t2u2008 06t2st2007 06t25t2007 Phone 541-935-7984 s4t-99s4757 541-345-2838 541-34s-2838 CONTRACTOR INFOR]VIATION # of Units: Primary Occupancy Group: Secondary Occupancy Group: Primary Construction Type Secondary Construction Type: # of Bedrooms: Frontyard Setback: Side I Setback: Side 2 Setback: Rearyard Setback: Solar Setbacks: S ubdivision Not Accepted Street Improvements: Storm Sewer Available: Special Instruction: # of Stories: Height of Structure Type of Heat: Water Type: Range Type: Energy Paved o/o of Lot Size: 2 Yes 27.40 Sidewalk Type: Downspouts/Drains: lst Floor: Floor: Load: REQUIRED PARKING Total: 2 Ilandicapped: Compact: 6,534 1,401 762 431 93 Curbside 5' Curb and Gutter I R-3 U VN 3 18.00 7.00 5.00 42.00 30.00 #.d'€l C)v Fully Improved Yes Notes: No hook-up to City Infrastructure until Public Improvements accepted by the City; storm drainage piped to curb face 512312005 CAS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Page 1 of4 I T t:LI l, U llull\ U Il\ rr (Jt(YrA,!!V1l l 10 {$o o 19$e$e {so .--; Building/Combination Permit Status Issued 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676Fax 541 -7 26-37 69 Inspection Line PERMIT NO: COM2005-00599ISSUED: 0712112005APPLIEDz 0512012005 EXPIRESz 0112112006VALUE: $ 228,656.00 Valuation Descrinfion Description A.C. - Residen Deck/Balconv Dwellings Garage Tvpe of Construction AC - Residential Deck V Wood Frame Garage $ Per Sq Ft or multiplier s4.00 $17.00 $96.00 $25.00 $619.06 $10.00 $169.69 $r18.78 $306.00 $31.00 $27.00 $984.90 $80.00 $6.00 $9.00 $12.00 $15.00 $4.00 $1.00 $12.00 $103.00 $21.13 $-30.00 $r06.00 $76.00 $511.84 $673.12 $10.00 $865.31 $82.03 s132.92 s62.73 $772.49 $175.13 $80.00 $823.05 $70.00 Square Footage or Bid Amount 2,163.00 93.00 2,163.00 431.00 Value $8,652.00 $1,581.00 $207,648.00 $10,775.00 $228,656.00 Date Calculated 0712U2005 07t2u2005 0st20t2005 07121,t200s Fee Description Plan Review Residential -Mechanical Issuance Fee- + l0o/o Administrative Fee + 1oh State Surcharge 3 Baths One & Two Family Addressing Assignment Appliance Not Listed Building Permit Curbcut Permit Dryer Vent Exhaust Hoods Furnace - up to 100,000 btu Gas Fireplace Gas Outlets 1-4 Gas Outlets 4+ Heat Pump PIan Review Major - Planning Plan Review Residential PW Disc - 2nd Permit (Street) Residence Wiring 1000 Sq Ft Residence Wiring Ea Addtl500 Sanitary Sewer - Improvement Sanitary Sewer - Reimbursement SDC MWMC Administration SDC MWMC Improvement SDC NIWMC Reimbursement SDC Sanitary/Storm Admin SDC Transpo Admin SDC Transpo Improvement SDC Transpo Reimbursement Sidewalk Permit Storm Drainage Impervious Area Storm Sewer Each Addtl 100' Amount Paid Total Value of Project Date Paid 5t20t05 712y05 7t2u05 7t2u05 7t2u05 7t2u0s 712il05 7t2il05 7t2u05 7t2u0s 7t2u0s 7t2u0s 7t2u05 7t2u05 7t2y05 7t2U05 7t2u05 712|05 7t2u05 7t2u05 712u05 7t2u0s 7t2u0s 7l2uo5 7t2u05 7t2u05 7t2u05 712u05 7t2u05 712u05 7t2u0s 7t2u0s 7t2u05 Receipt Number 2200500000000000619 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200s00000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 220050000000000096s 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200s00000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200s0000000000096s 220050000000000096s 2200s0000000000096s 2200500000000000965 220050000000000096s 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200500000000000965 2200s0000000000096s 2200500000000000965 220050000000000096s 220050000000000096s Pase2 of 4 -u ees raro I Building/Combination Permit Status Issued 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676Fax 541-7 26-37 69 Inspection Line PERMIT NO: COM2005-00599ISSUED: 0712112005APPLIEDz 0512012005 EXPIRESz 0112112006YALUE: $ 228,656.00 Temp Power 200 amps or less Vent Fan Willamalane Single Family Total Amount Paid $s0.00 $18.00 $1,000.00 $8,008.18 7t2U05 7l2u0s 7t2il05 2200500000000000965 220050000000000096s 220050000000000096s Plan Reviews Initial Review Planning Review Public Works Review Structural Review Structural Review Structural Review 0st23t200s 0st23t200s 05t23t2005 06n3t200s APP APP SKG TAJ 05t23t2005 05t23t200s APP CAS 05123t2005 0st2st2005 Io LLH 05t2st200s 07n512005 07n9t200s APP JB Choose street trees from the list on Exhibit B for trees outside the Hillside District attached to the Street Tree handout. No hook-up to City Infrastructure until Public Improvements accepted by the City; Storm drainage piped tc curb face 5/2312005 CAS Plans forwarded to Jason Bush for review Plans approved as noted on plans To Request an inspection call the24 hour recording at 726-3769. All inspection requested before 7:00 a.m. wiII be made the same working day, inspections requested after 7:00 a.m. will be made the following work day. Erosion/Grading Inspection: Prior to ground disturbance and after erosion measures are installed. Sidewalk - Curbside: After forms are erected but prior to placement of concrete. Curbcut - Standard: After forms are erected but prior to placement of concrete. Ufer Electrical Ground: Install ground rod at footing and call for inspection in conjunction with footing and/or foundation inspection. Footing: After trenches are excavated. Foundation: After forms are erected but prior to concrete placement. Post and Beam: Prior to floor insulation or decking. Floor Insulation: Prior to decking. Shear Wall Nailing: Before covering sheathing with finish materials. Framing Inspection: Prior to cover and after all rough in inspections have been approved. WalI Insulation: Prior to cover. Ceiling Insulation: Prior to cover. Drywall: Prior to taping. Paee 3 of4 Building/Combination Permit Status Issued 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676Fax 541-7 26-37 69 Inspection Line PERMIT NO: COM2005-00599ISSUED: 0712112005APPLIED: 05/2012005 EXPIRESz 0112112006VALUE: $ 228,656.00 Final Building: After all required inspections have been requested and approved and the building is complete. Perimeter Foundation Drains: After gravel and filter cloth is installed but prior to backlill. Underfloor Plumbing: Prior to insulation or decking. Rough Plumbing: Prior to cover and including required testing. Water Line: Prior to filling trench and including required testing. Sanitary Sewer Line: Prior to filling trench and including required testing. Storm Sewer Line: Prior to filling trench. Final Plumbing: When all plumbing work is complete. Underfloor Mechanical. Prior to insulation or decking and including required testing. Underfloor Gas: After line is installed and required testing and capped if not attached to an appliance. Rough Gas: After line is installed and required testing and capped if not attached to an appliance. Gas Service: After line is installed and line has been connected to a minimum of one appliance including required testing. Presure test done at this point. Rough Mechanical: Prior to Cover Final Gas: When all gas work is complete. Final Mechanical: When all mechanical work is complete. Temporary Electric: Approval required prior to Utility Company energizing pole. Rough Electric: Prior to Cover Electric Service: Approval required prior to utility company energizing service. Final Electric: When all electrical work is complete. By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all information hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any structure without permission of the Community Services Division, Building Safety. I further certify that only contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.005 will be used on this project. I further agree to ensure that all required inspections are requested at the proper time, that each address is readable from the street, that the permit card is located at the front of the property, and the approved set of plans will remain on the site at all times during construction. Owner or Contractors Signature Page 4 of4 Date t LOCATIONv{t q,4 6 nsf LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6 ozo9 tl ot cE) JOBDESCRIPTION 9t^L Permits cre and exPire if work is not started within 18lt daYs of issurnce or if workb Suspended for 180 deYs A- 'Frerl Ruiii"ntiut-.sit gte oi,1t1gg-{amilv per .rl. :1,1., . drvelling unit. , Each additional 5@ sq' ft' or + $ 19.00 '?0, Oc) Each Mulrfact'd Home or ModulrDrellingService or $50'00 B., q.t"L ii;i'***T-lnstellitiolilrglh:*:l tulo*69l' -,' i - $ 63'00, i i(:ooAmpsorless 4Ol Ampsto600AmPs C. Tgmpg.rgy Serwices or Feeders - : Phone Supervisor License Number Expiration Date tb -t ()Installetion, 200 AnPs or I6:ri 201 AmPs to1Gl Expiration Date *4 -0 Signature of Supervising Electrician OwnetsName Address City Phone OWNER INSTALLATION The installation is being rnade qt prope(y I wm which is not interded for sale, lease or rent. Owners Signature: Service Induded 1000 sq. ft- or less 401 AnPs to Over D. I stoo-oo $ 43.00 $ 3.00 $ 50.00 s 50.00 $ 25.00 $ 45.00 t()12 o., 2. E./.]ui 1 Hecrical Contactor 1*11 li Address $ 5o.oo 96*r: $ 69.00 'with Lirnircd EnergY/Residential Limied Energa/Corrmercial Minimum Ehctric Permlt Inspecdon Fce is 3{5'fit * Surchargcs SwgTGVAL 23 1Yo Stata Surcharge l0% Administrative Fee TOTAL lb, Inspectlon Requese 72G37 69 4. '---Et-i--l p-*it Annlinatim l43.doc SPRIbIGFIELD'OREGONOFCITY PH:(54lP2G37sl o-1 _al 3. Xnntnq \ $t-^ \tc 3i- Constr. Contr. Number Lighting f 2.+r . CITY OF Sh{NGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMEN ,,ORKSHEET JOURNAL OR JOB NUMBER: COM2005-00599 NAME ORCOMPANY Parker Homes LOCATION:751 S 48th St TAX LOTNUMBER:1802051 101800 DEVELOPMENT TYPE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE NEW DWELLING TINITS I BUILDINC SIZE 2163 LOT SrZE (SF):6720 I. STORM DRAINAGE RT]NOFF TO CITY STORM SYSTEM 265s.01 RTINOFF ROUTED TO IMPERVIOUS S.F 0.00 ITEM 1 TOTAL. STOR]U DRAINAGE SDC 2. SANITARY SEWER- CIry A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: IMPERVIOUS S.F NUMBER OF DFU's 28 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF DFU's 28 ADTTRIP RATE 9.57 SUBTOTAL s3.912.9'7 COST PER S.F $0.31 0 COST PER S.F $0.3 r 0 COST PER DFU s24.04 $r 8.28 NUMBER OF LINITS I NI.IMBEROF I.]NITS I ADM. FEE RATE 5Yo CHARGE $823.05 DISCOI.]NT RATE 50Yo $823.05 DRYWELL DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO CITY STANDARDS x x x x x x x x x DISCOLNT $0.00 ITEM 2 TOTAL - CITY SANITARY SEWER SDC 3. TRANSPORTATION A. REIMBURSEMENTCOST: $1,184.96 COST PER TRIP $ 18.30 COST PER TRIP $80.72 s947.62 xx NEW TRIP FACTOR 1.00 NEW TRIP FACTOR 1.00 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: ADT TRIP RATE 9.57 ITEM 3 TOTAL - TRANSPORTATION SDC 4. SANITARY SEWER - MWMC A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's I x xx B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU's I MWMC CREDIT IF APPLICABLE (SEE REVERSE) MWMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ITEM 4 TOTAL - MWMC SANITARY SEWER SDC SUBToTAL (ADD ITEMS l, 2, 3, & 4) 5. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: $957.34 CHARGE $ r 95.65 TOTAL SANITARY ADMINISTRATION FEE: TOTAL TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION FEE: CherylSlaymaker sl23l200s COST PER FEU $82.03 $673.12 $82.03 $865.31 sr0.00 132.92 $4,108.62 1 070 l09l 1092 1 093 1094 I 055 1056 078 a iJ.1 t--l O HFa rr.l COST PER FEU $865.3 r 912-97 PREPARED BY DATE TOTAL SDC CTIARGES DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNIT CALCULATION TABLE NUMBER OF NEW FXTURES x UNIT EQUIVALENT = DRAINAGE FXTURE UMTS FOR CALCULATE ONLY T}IE NET ADDITIONAL NO. OF FIXTURES UNIT FIXTURE ryPE NEW OLD MISCELLANEOUS DFU TYPE NUMBER OF EDU'S TOTAL DRAINAGE FD(TURE UNITS lsa toa unit set at I 67 MWMC CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: BASED ON COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE *EDU DRAINAGE FTXTURE LINITS 0 2 1979 BEFORE 1979 1979 I 980 l98l 1982 t983 1984 1986 1987 1988 1989 I 990 I 991 1992 1993 1994 t99s 1996 1997 1998 1999 $5.29 $5.29 $5.19 $5.12 $4.98 $4.80 $4.63 $4.40 $4.07 $3.67 $3.22 $2.73 $2.25 $1.80 VALUE / IOOO $0.00 CREDIT RATE $5.29 IS LAND ELGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION CREDIP (Enter I for Yes, 2 for No) IS IMPROVEMENT ELGIBLE FORANNEX. CREDIT? (Enter I for Yes, 2 for No) BASE YEAR CREDIT FOR LAND (IF APPLICABLE) 2 x1985 CREDIT FOR IMPROVEMENT (IF AFTER ANNEXATION) VALUE / IOOO CREDIT RATE $0.00 x $5.29 TOTAL MWMC CREDIT$1.s9 $1.45 $1.25 $1.09 $0.92 $0.72 $0.48 $0.28 $0.09 $0.05 BATHTUB 2 0 3 6 DRINKING FOLTNTAIN 0 0 1 0 FLOORDRAIN 0 0 3 0 INTERCEPTORS FOR GREASE / OIL / SOLIDS /ETC.0 0 3 0 INTERCEPTORS FOR SAND / AUTO WASH / ETC.0 0 6 0 LALINDRY TT]B 0 0 2 0 CLOTTMSWASHER / MOP SINK 1 0 3 3 CLOTT{ESWASHER.3 OR MORE (EA)0 0 6 0 MOBILE HOME PARK TRAP (I PER TRAILER)0 0 12 0 RECEPTOR FOR REFRIG / WATER STATION / ETC.0 0 1 0 RECEPTOR FOR COM. SINK / DISHWASHER / ETC.0 0 3 0 SHOWER" SINGLE STALL 1 0 2 2 SHOWER, GANG OTUMBER OF HEADS)0 0 2 0 SINK: COMMERCIAL/RESI DENTIAL KITCFIEN 1 0 3 3 SINK: COMMERCIAL BAR 0 0 2 0 SINK: WASH BASIN/DOUBI,E LAVATORY 2 0 2 4 SINK: SINGLE LAVATORY/RESIDENTTAL BAR 1 0 1 I URINAL, STALL / WALL 0 0 5 0 PUBLIC INSTALLATION 0 0 6 0 TOILET, PRIVATE INSTALLATION 3 0 3 I 28 YEAR ANNEXED CREDIT RATE/$I,OOO ASSESSED VALTIE 0 2000 2001 20 I Servioes Division -Codes PRINGFI' \ (54i ) 726-3753 FAX (541) 726-3676 Notice to Permit Applicant Soils stabilizrtion required for subdivision sites Name of Owner Permit: Address of Project: rl Tax Map ,\gyLUL\\ raxLot:b\SO Subdivision The building site at the above address is located on property that has soils prone to shrink-swell or other potential movement. Excavations, placement of fill materials and drainage for this site must be done under the direct supervision of a properly licensed Professional Engineer or Architect to verify the stability of the resulting building pad and the site. The owner, or the owner's qualified agent, is responsible to obtain the services of the appropriate professional engineer or architect (design professional). The design professional shall provide direction for the stabilization methods to be used for the building pad (and surrounding site, when site stabilization is also necessary). The geotechnical report, which was prepared for this subdivision, may be utilized to provide appropriate guidance for the methods of stabilization and required compaction for the specific site. The engineer or architect shall prepare a report to be submitted to the City stating how the soil stabilization is being accomplished, including requirements not yet completed (if any). A signed ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The undersigned acknowledges the forgoing requirements for soil stabilization, including excavation, fill, soil compaction and drainage, as provided in the geotechnical report for The stabilization will be accomplished under the or architect as noted above.direction of a Name Afliliation to owner Date ROCKY ROAD SdBD. 3.27 , Lot3 1, 2,3,4,7,18 & 19 Storm patgr D.rainage. At the time 9f the bsd,,g p*it applicatioa fi, id above lots, plars shill dso be submitted to constrtrst perimeter interceptor drains. 3.27,1 LoB lB & lg. Orlmers of Lots 18 and 19 shall provide a perimeter interceptor arain prpe along the south side of their lots intercepting o$site drainage from the south. Ortfalls shall be directed to the crub weep hoies in S. 486 SrcA' g27A Loa 3 & /. Owners of Lots 3 and 4 shall provide a perimeter interceptor drain pipe along O" ro"tU side of their lots intercepting o$site drainage from the south' The C;*u; pipe sfuu,il;A..trd to rhe prirate storm sewer pipe tbat runs thnoqh Lot 3 north fromRockyRoad. 1273 LoE lr 2r'& 7. Owners of Lots 1,2 and 7 shalt provide a perimeter iuterceptor drri" pip";ong'the perimeter of their tots intercepting oFsite drainage' Olthlls shall be directed to tb" ;rtr;.q ioles ia S. 47t Street and Rocky Road" 32g Tree Consenation Zones on Lots 1 through E and 12 & 13. Th€re are Tree Conservation Zones located ou Lots 1 tbrough 8 and L2 & L3 of Rocky Road Subdivision The Oumers of these lots are restisted from reur6ving any trees larger thao s:-DB.H without written arthorization of the Architectural Coutrol Committee and the Cfty 9f Springfield- Ary qe" removal will require a tee-felling permit from the city. Existinq *ittttoy ve.Setatioli.the conservation zones consists of tieiollowing natine plants: Nootka Rose' Snowberry' 'Western sword Fern, other i**-*aoregou crrad*d witi ue preserrred- Removal of the preseryeq .ndcstory ,.g"t"tioi r* *t be JmpHra *ituoot the written authorization ofthe Architectural control committee-J the city or spriogfi.ld. There is -also so-mrc nuisance understory .-o*iJi"g orutu.ru"rry *a pomo oak. ThiJnuisance vegetation can be removed by the ovEler. 3.29 Building Envelope and Tree Removal All residential cgytruction- shal]hllnfu.3 within the building elnvetopeishowu on Lots 3, 5;6,7 arld 8' The building envelope iolluat: { irp*io* .ro" -i*loding the residence, acces:oly structures Pd.ryl:g areas' See Exhrtit D for Building Borrropi:roiations. Tree remorat fr9m Y*1* the building euvelo-pe1 shall F coryleted oofy u6ri ;irhg unitten a,thorization tom the City of Springfield and tbe Architect,ral control committee. The crty requires a tree'felling permit to be obtained by the lot owner prior to any tree.removal and/or building permits' 330FireSprinklersLots3,S,6,TandS.aresubj-ect-pF:-ry:Ferinstallationif the residences are notlocated and constmcted in accordance with SDC 26'090(1X2)(3)' 331 Class A & B Roofing. All structrres on Lots that abut a Tree conservationTnte shall have Class A or B roofi.g in accordance with the Oregon State Stuctural Specialty Code. Note: This statement also appears in 5.7.1. 9ROCKY ROAD - Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions g32 ' Geotechpical Assessment. Lot onmers are required to -oQqPy with'the Geotechnical Assessmed dated August 6,zoo3 irnd.tue follow-up repol-dated:February 19, 2004 unless ro r$.pt utr alternativJis approved by the crty. The Geotechnical Asses$neril and follow-up re,port re inehrded inExhibit C. ARTICLE 4. ARCEITECTURAT CONTROL COMIVIITTEE 4,! Menbership.-The Architectr:ral Coffiol Commiuee members sball initially be appointed by tbe Declarant. SubsUhrtions and replacemgnts shatl be PPgr+ed by tbe Declarant udit all Lots have G, *fA or Declarad Uas turaeA over control of the committee to the homeowners. whcn all the Lots in the Derrclopment harrc becn sold' the Declaraot shall turn over contor of the c"rdtd to the Hompowners. After the Declaraut has tunrcd over the control of the committee to the Homeowners, substitutions and replacenogntl-sball be voted on b,"h" H;;" "rr-*Uttitrtions and rqrlacements shall be voted on by the Homeowners' with one vote for eachLot 42 Duties The Architectuml Cortrol Committee (herein" Comraittee') shall be cstablished to review and approve or deny plaos, qpecifications, design' constnrctio!' and arterations of an lrp;";;d; buih within tui rroperty, pursuant to design qpecifications set o$ in tne Covenaits, Cooaitio* and Restristions. The Committee shall consist of three members. It is recommended that at least one of the Committee members be an architect' engineer, or coutrastor or shall have such other similal qualifications. The Committee shall consider tu" roor-"naations, if ann of the Declarant and Homeowners for design corfrol and site approval for proposed lryrovemeuts, but it shall exercise its own judgment regarding the proposed Lp.or.r.iir. fo "iproving or denyiug proryyd lryrweoen!, the. Committee shall consider whether the Iryrovement coqliis with this Declaration' the desrgn guidelines contained hereiq -d tb6fi,;all;sthetic ,i*t ry and feeling of continuity ofthe Dwelopmeut. 4s Approval No improvemeut shall be uadertakenuntil the constnrctionplans have been approveit by tnt atchittctural Control Committee Architect,ral plans will be reviewed by the fuchitecttral Control Committee for a fee of $200 which ir p.y.Ui. Uy tni inaiviaual property -o*3 to the Committee at time of submittal rru"y prans suiuia;rq#. more than tno uo*r'orreview, an hourly rate of $100 per hour shall be charged Lantscape plans wiu be reviewed by the Architectrual Control Committee for a fee of $100 which ir p.Vi'Ut Uy the individr:al qonerty3wner to the Committee at time of submittal ii-y pf*r rniuiJrrqoir more than ooi U6* of review, an hor:rly rate of $100 per hour sball be charged 4.4 Application for Approval Each Owner desiring to make site or structural improvemeuts on his or her Lot Gtt" ptiot to-reque.strng a building-pamit.from the City of Splrgn.fd, subnit to the fuchitectural-iontol Comrnittee for approval, the following: a<R-*x *lp1 ROCKY ROAD - Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions 10 GEOTECHNICAL AS SESSMENT ROCKY ROAD SUBDIVISION S. 47'h Sfteet, Springfield August 6,2003 Prepared for: David Nichols, PE Pacific West Engineering 3610 Goodpasture Loop Eugene OR 97401 P.O. Box 2238, Euqene, OR 97402 (541) 607-5700 FAX: 607'5701 ccB # 127073 o I I I I EXECUTIVE SUMT{ARY . .. . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Published Literature) FIELD I}WESTIGATION 11 1 I Methods Results DISCUSSiON I I 2 z 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDAT]ONS Design Area I Design Area? Design Area 3 LIMITATIONS Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: LIST OF FIGT]RES Follows Page Site Map and Test Pit Locations Location Map Design Areas I 2 4 LIST OF APPENDICES Pacific West Engineering Test Pit Photos Test Pit and Hand Auger Logs Site Photos Soil UnitsRockUnits ......:.. ! The area proposed for constn:ction of the Rocky Road subdivision can be divided into three design areas: Design Area DA-l includes all of Lot 1 and portions of Lots 2 and 3, in the northwest portion of the site. This area is underlain by expansive soil and Rock Unit RU-302, which consists of over- consolidated high-liquid-limit clay. As a result, the foundation of the structre to be built on Lot 1 should be designed for highly expansive material. On Lots 2 atd3, stnrcfiues can be placed within Design Area 3. D1-Zincludes the lower-sloping northem and eastenr portions of the site, and is underlain by RU- 101, a fine-grained dark gray igneous rock ("basalt"), which is decomposed to depths varying between 5 and 10 feet. DA-3 includes the western and central portions ofthe site and is underlain by RU- 1 0 1 . In this design area, partly decomposed to nearly fresh state fractured in-place rock is located at shallow depth, pote111ia1i requiring larger equipment or hydraulic hammers for deeper excavations. No evidence of slope movement was noted on the site, and there is no indication that the proposed development will rlsult in slope stability issues, as long as grading recommendations in this report are followed. iiRocky Road Subdivision, Springfield GcotcchnicaVsoils Assessmcn! GeoSciencs, Inc. 8'5'03 This report presents the results of a geotechnical assessment to determine soil and rock conditions at a proposed subdivision located northeast and east of the current north end of S 47th Street off Jasper Road (Figue 1). The assessment was conducted for Mr. David Nichols; PE, of Pacific West Engineering. A total of five test pits had been excavated in August of 2002 u:rder direction of Mr. Nichols, and copies of color photos of these test pets were available for review. The site was re- visited with l\dr. Nichols on June 18, 2003,and the older test pit sites were re-examined for evidence of the materials encountered at that time. Based on these observations, the site appeared to be underlain by two rock units with significantly different characteristics. The distribution of the two units appeared to be well-defined by the site topography, with the higher and steeper portions underlain by competent fine-grained igneous rock ("basalt") and the low-lying portion in the northwest comer underlain by completely decomposed state pyroclastic or contact metamorphic rock. However, additional exploration was required to delineate the boundary between the two rock units in the west-northwest part of the site. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The geologic map included taGround Water in the Eugene-Sprtngfield Area, Southern Wtllamette Vally, Oregon (IJSGS Water Supply Paper 20t8,1973) indicates that the entire site is underlain by the Tertiary Little Butte Volcanics, which are also known as the Post-Eugene Volcanics in this area- According to the Water Resources Paper, the Little Butte Volcanics consist of a sequence of predominantly dacitic and andesitic flows and tuffls and olivine basalt flows with some scoriaceaous materiai. The Soi/ Suruey of Lane County Area, Oregon (JSDA Soil Conservation Service, 1987) indicates that the northern portions of the site are underlain by Hazelair silty clay loam,whereas the southern two thirds of the area are underlain by Nekia silty clay loam. T1te Hazelair soil is classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System as a CL soil (upper 15 inches) over a CH soil to 3 feet, with weathered rock below 36 inches. T\e J,leHa soil is classified as an ML soil in the upper 10 inches over a CL or GC soil, with weathered rock reported at a depth of 35 inches. F EI,D II{YFI,STIG A TION Methods The site was originally visited with Mr. Nichols on June 18, 2003. At that time, the material backJiiled into the previous testpit locations was observed. The site was re-visited on July 31,2003 and two test pits were excavated using a rubber-tired 4-wheel drive Case 580 backhoe with a2-foot toothed bucket. Soils encountered in the test pits (and backfilled test pits) were classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System using ASTM Method D-2488 (Visual-Manual Procedure). Distances from kaown landmarla to the test pits were determined using a Wheel-a-Tape device. Roclcy Road Subdivisiory Springf cld Gcotechnicaysoils Asscssmcnt, GeoScience, Inc. 8-6-03 1 . : lul deyl uogecol :1 e.rn8g:uogdeS ,rA ,8'99 g9.ZZI N ,,e'10 ,20 o?*Q :uoBEco'I FEt096Z qenbe pu; t rapcs e00a!8:Eleo (n3lJeNHds :arrEN .:. al! g tt, . ' :.'r. .,| I I I t,' .1 .t t: )--;r/ - ,' ':L- i i.0 ,- -t.-.,,.1 1 .t. "t t f' i:' I ..1 t t: I t--- -,'.=.; . .. .lt ,t q ,t'i-- 'j- 10. c, t c9 .J.a I L I VYr u{snJ F'l { .lr a.',i" : i rp F ;j Il' i' :j:.. :; I I .t :a ,rt t9E JI epf.,l \:' r'a +" L !"ttt 8V . . c'og -.- ---l I tlrs {!!lIuotunq.L c ,a !i pl t'. :.1:=*:- ,'J "LI ,,j ', '9 -.: ..: I : i a I I .t -_ .:---:t-. 2002 Test Pitg, 2003 Hand Auger Borings The test pits excavated on August 21, 2002, under supervision of Mr. Nichols were designed primarily to determine excavation conditions at the site. Copies of photos of the test pits are included in Appendix A. Assessment of the soiVrock materials in these pits was conducted by GeoScience primarily based on the materials still exposed in the backfilled test pits and also based on color photos provided by Mr. Nichols. In addition, on August 4,2003 hand auger holes were advanced in the area immediately surrounding TH-1, between TH-1 and T:H-z, and at Ti{-2. Hand auger logs are included in Appendix B. 2003 Test Pits On July 31, 2003, nvo additional test pits were excavated along the existing driveway. The main focus of this exploration was to more closely define the location of the contact between the two major rock units at this site. Test pit logs are included in Appendix B and photos in Appendix C. Results Three soil units were identified at the site, which were designated SU-B, SU-C, and SU-D for purposes ofthis report. SU-B is present approximately in the area outlined as Nekia soil on the Soil Survey and SU-C is present in the area outlined as Hazelair soil. SU-D is present beneath SU-B/C in the northwest portion of the site. SU-B consists of dark brown to brown clayey or silty sand with angular stained-state (STS) to Visually Fresh State (VFS) igpeous rock fragments (see RU-i01, below). Rock fragment content varies from 70 to 80% by volume, the fragments are angular, and range in size from a few inches to four feet in diameter. The finer-grained matix is estimated to consist of 75 % fine- to medium- grained sand and 25 % fnes. The matrix has low dry strength, medium toughness, and slow dilatancy. As a result, the matrix is classified u a silty SAND (SM) according to the USCS and the fi,nes are probably either MH or CL. The soil appears to be partly matrix-supported and partly clast- supported and ranged in thickness from 2 to 4 feet. At the time of test pit excavation, SU-A was dry and below the plastic limit @PL). The unit is interpreted as a top-soiVcolluvial deposit derived from weathering of RU-101 on steeper slopes. SU-C consists of dark brown silty sand (70 S, 30 F) with igneous rock fragments. The rock fragment content is lower than in SU-B, ranging from 5 to 20 yo. In addition, rock fragments are smaller, ranging in size from 2 to 8 inches. SU-C has low dry strength, low toughness, and rapid dilatancy. As a result, SU-C is classified as a silty SAND (Slrf) according to the USCS. SU-C was approximately 1 .5 to 2.25 feet thick in the hand auger holes, and was dry and BPL at the time of the site visit. The unit is interpreted as a top-soiVcolluvial deposit derived from weathering of RU- 1 0 1 on lower slopes. Rocky Road Subdivision, SpringJield GcotcchnicaVsoils Asscssment, GcoSciencc, Inc. 8-5'03 ) I Soil Unir ROCKY ROAD SUBDTVISION 'i:;lq Ge,r0{:ir:isr ll c(: -[-etrt P it iiii ,ALtc'11-tst, ?003 (j,,: ar{;ir:ir: I IG*': F{;r il r.{ l\x trr 1 1,1s' l:loritr il r\111'r1gnt, ?fl{;}3 Pacific West Engr. Test Pit Aug l' = IAO' \ -I I I Road 47th treet, S rln, and Test Pit/Hand2z Site Map Locations Scale as Shown SU-D consists of gray to light gray sandy clay. Thg estimated gradation is 30 %o medium-grained sand and 70 % fines. The unit has very high dry stiength, high toughness and rro dilatancy. As a result it is classified as a sandyfat CLAY (CIf). SU-D was 0.5 feet thick in I{AH-lD, and was not encountered in HAH-3. The unit is interpreted as a colluvial deposit derived from weathering of RU-302. Rock Units Two rock units were identified. Rock unit RU-101 is present beneath the eastern, central, and southwestern portion of the site. RU-302 is present beneath the low-sloping area in the northwest corner of the site. In visually fresh state (VFS), RU-i01 consists of a dark gray very fine-grained igneous rock ("basalt"). It was not determined if the unit is intrusive or extrusive. RU-l01 is the source of the igneous rock fragments in SU-B and -C. The depth of weathering of the unit is dependent on location. At most locations, the unit is either completely decomposed or partly decomposed to depths of five feet or more. Completely decomposed state (CD S) RU- I 0 1 is light brown to tan and remolds with finger pressue to a sandy silt, which is APL when moist. The resulting "soil" has low to medium dry stength, low toughness, and rapid dilatancy. Partly decomposed state (PDS) RU- 101 is tan to light gray with rust-brown spots and contains more than 50 %o mateial which cannot be remolded with finger pressure. The depth to partly decomposed RU- 1 0 1 appears to be variable from approximately 2 to 5 feet. The minimum depths to PDS RU-101 appear to be present along the steeper slope in the southwestern portion of the site. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of CDS RU-101 was measured in TP-2, using a pocket penetrometer. The UCS of the material exceeded the range of the instrument (9,000 psf). Rock Unit RU-302 underlies the northwestem part ofthe site. The unit is present only in completely decomposed state (CDS). lr "unweathered" state, the unit consists of a maroon to brick-red to whitish-tan over-consolidated clay, which decrepitates rapidly upon exposure to moisture. In the presence of moisture, the unit can be completely remolded to fines which have very high dry strength, high toughness and no dilatancy. Where re-weathered, the unit is rust brown, but retains its other characteristics. The unit is interpreted as either a contact-metamorphic zone atthe base of the RU-l01, or a plro-clastic rock unit which was deeply weathered shortly after deposition, and then consolidated by burial under several thousand feet of rock which has subsequently been removed by erosion. Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfi eld Gcotcchnical/Soils Assessment, GeoScicnce, Inc. 8-5-03 3 Based onthe observations and subsurface exploration, the site canbe divided inio three design areas, which are based on soiVrock unit distribution and slope. These areas are shown on Figpre 3. Design area DA-1 is located in the norrhwest portion of the site, including Lot I and parts of Lots 2 aad3. This area is characterized by the presence of SU-B/C over SU-D and RU-3 02. Of these units, SU-D and RU-3 02 are probably highly expansive. Based on experience with similar or identical rock units in the Eugene/Springfield metro area, only the near-swface portions of RU-302 are subject to seasonal moisture .h*g.r because swelled portions isolate the deeper portions from water infiltration. The unit is hard when dry and in-place but decrepitates rapidly upon exposure to moisture and loses signifrcant strength. The swell pressures developed drxing this hydrationprocess exceed typical residential bearing pressures, and result in distress to structures due to differential up- lift. Thi issue has been successfully mitigated by deep foundation designs consisting of drilled piers and above-grade concrete beams. It may also be possible to mitigate the conditiol br !o-o$ing_of $e building p"a to expand the foundation material and constuction of posttensioned slabs. In the Rocky R.oad Subdivision, only the northwestem corner of the site is affected and only one lot (Lot l) is iituated such that the residence will need to be constucted within DA-1. Seasonal shallow perched groundwater is expected in DA-l within SU-B/C. Therefore, it is recommended to install up-slope and side-slope iut-off drains into SU-D around the residence on Lot 1. For road construction in this aria, itis recommended to place geo-fabric on the native subgrade to prevent mixing of the overlying road base with softened SU-D or RU-l01 during the wet season. DA-2is located in the eastern and northeastern portion of the site, and includes all gr ry{ ofp! 9 through Zg. DA-2 is characterized by the presence of SU-C over RU-101 which is in CDS to PDS to deptf,s up to l0 feet. This material does not have characteristics with expansive soil (very high ary siengttr, high toughness, and no dilatancy). CDS RU-l01 may lose strength if subjected to rooirto., Uut this rur-U. mitigated by placement of a few inches of rock to provide confining pressure. Foundations should be placed on in-place PDS RU-l01 where possible. If foundations are to be placed on CDS RU-101, it is recommended to veriff bearing capacity after excavation of the pad, and prior to placement of rock or forms. Roads construction does not require special measures in DA-2, altiough exposed CDS/PDS RU-l01 should not be subjected to traffic during wet weather. Shallow groundwater may be present seasonaily, perched on PDS RU-101. Therefore, it is .""o**"nded to install foundation drains on the up- and side-slope sides of residence in DA-2. Such drains should extend into native material at least 6 inches below the base of the adjacent footing, should be lined with filter fabric and backfilled with open drain rock after placement of a perforated rigid pipe with glued joints. DA-3 includes all or parh of Lots 2 through 8. DA-3 is characterized by the presence of SU-B over RU- i 0 1 . Deep excavations for foundations and/or underground utilities in this area may require use of a large trackhoe, and, in some cases, a hydraulic hammer. Excavations are likely to produce large fragments of VFS RU-101 (&om both SU-B and in-place PDS-VFS RU-i01). RoclT Road Subdivision, Springfield GcotcchnicaVsoils Assessmcnt" GcoScicncc, lnc. 8-6-03 4 ROCKY ROAD SUBDTVISION rffi Design Area 1 Design Area 2 Design Area 3 l' = loo' t '-:r: : ,it I ) i I I i I i i I ".!c I Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, S 47th Street, Springfield Figure 3: Design Areas Scale as Shown :: : ., l ) ,i ''"...j . . I -'l 'l None of the design'areas show evidence of previous slope movement. The steeper portions ofthe subdivision are underlain by competent in-place RU-l01. Slopes in the area undeilain at shallow depths by RU-302.are suffrciently gentle to preclude deep-seated slope moveinent. Due to the content of expansive clay minerals it is not recommended to use excavated SU-D or RU- 302 as structura|fill. SU-B, -C, and CDS RU-i01 can be used as stnrctural fill after removal of oversize material, which may not be cost-effective. permanent cut banks in SU-B and SU-C should be sloped at no steeper than 2H : lV. In CDS to pDS RU-l01 zuch cut banl$ can be sloped at 1.7 5 : 1. Stained-state (STS) to VFS RU'10i can be sloped near-vertical, although rock falls due to freeze-thaw may be expected after the bank has been in place for several years. CONCL Surficial observations and subsurface exploration of the proposed Rocky Road subdivision in Springfield indicates that the site is underlain by two rock units with widely differing characteristics. tir. nortfr*est portion of the site is underlain in the shallow subsurface by RU-3 02, which originated either as a contact metamorphic at the lower margin of RU-101, or is the product of weathering and subsequent over-consolidation of a pyroclastic deposit. RU-302 is maroon to brick-red to whitish tan and consists entirely of high-liquid-limit clay which, in-place, is over-consolidated. When weathered, the color is rust-brown. In-place material decrepitates rapidly in the presence of water, softening to a material which can be remolded to APL with finger pressure. Once completely hydrated and remolded, the material has very high dry strength, high toughness, and no dilatancy. As a result, it is iikely that RU-302 is expansive. RU-l01 consists (in fresh state) of a dark gray very fine-grained igneous rock. In CDS, the unit is tan and can be completely remolded (when moist) to a sandy (very fine-grained) silt with low dry strength, low toughness, and rapid dilatancy. These characteristics are not consistent with expansive soil. Three soil units were identified at the site. The steeper slopes in the westent portion are underlain by SU-B, which consists of angular fragments of RU-101 up to 4 feet or more in diameter, in a dark brown to brown matrix of silty sand (SM), with low dry strength, low toughness and slow dilatancy. Rock fragments constitute from 70 to 80 % (by volume) of SU-B. Rock fragment fiequency decreases with distance from the steeper slope, and much fewer rock fragments are present in the lower-sloping northeastern and eastern portion of the site. The soil in that vicinity contains between l0 to 20 i/o rickfragments in a dark brown silty sand matix equivalent to that of SU-B. This soil was designated SU--C. In the northwest portion of the site, SU-D is found under SU-B/C, overlying RU-302. SU-D consists of a gray to light gray fatclay (CFI), which appea$ to have been derived from weathering of RU-302. No evidence of previous slope movement was noted at the site. Roc\7 Road Subdivision, Springiield GcotechnicaVSoils Assessment, GeoSciencc, Inc. 8-6-03 5 DA.1 Foundations It is recommended to design foundations for structures in DA-i to mitigate the effects of the presence of highly expansive RU-302 and SU-D. This can be achieved by construction of deep foundations (e.& drilled piers) and above-grade concrete beams. Piers should be installed to at least five feet below the top of in-place RU-302, and, in that case, may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 9,000 psf. If slabs are to be constructed for garages, it is recommended to either construct a slab-on-joist system or to avoid tying slabs to the perimeter foundation. Alternatively, foundation may be constructed by inundation of the building pad and placement of a post-tensioned slab foundation. ln the latter case, it is possible that the slabs may be somewhat out of level after diftbrential shrinking or swelling. For road construction it is recommended to place Geo-fabric (woven, e.g. Amoco 2002) on the native subgrade to prevent mixing of softened SU-D or RU-302 with the road base material. Wet weather construction in DA-l may present significant challenges due to loss of strengh of the native subgrade when exposed to moisture. Excavation and Grading All materials within DA-l can be excavated by conventional means. Permanent cut slopes in SU-D through RU-302 should be retained. Filt slopes in this area should not exceed four feet in depth without further engineering design and should be sloped at no more than 3H : 1V. Slope Stability No slope stability issues are anticipated if recommendations regarding grading are followed. Use of Materials It is not recommended to use any materials excavated from DA-l as str:ctural fill. Whereas SU-B/C may be suited for use as structural fill, the thickness of these units and close association with underlying expansive SU-D and RU-302 makes it difficult to completely separate the units. Drainage Areas around structures should be sloped to drain away from the buildings. It is recommended to install a shallow cut-offdrain around the up-slope and side-slope perimeter of structures in this area in order to intercept groundwater which is probably seasonally perched on SU-D and/or RU-302. Rocky Road Subdivision, Springfi eld GeotechnicaVSoils Asscssmcnt, 6coScicnce, Inc. 8-643 6 RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed subdivision can be divided into three design areas based on geOtechnical considerations. The perti:rent recommendations for each design area are summarized below: DA.2 Foundations Foundations in DA-2 can be constructed as conventional spread-footings on CDS to PDS or less weathered RU-101. If foundations are to be constructed on CDS RU-101, the bearing capacity should be verified by a qualified professional prior to placement of rock or concrete forms. Excavation and Grading Excavation is anticipated to be possible with conventional methods to depths up to 5 feet or deeper. Cut banks in CDSpbS RU-101 willbetemporarily stable atnear-vertical angles unless construction is conducted during wet weather. Permanent cut banks in CDS/PDS RU-l01 should be sloped at no steeper than 2 : 1 and the tops should be rounded to preclude sloughing of SU-B/C. Fill slopes should be constructed no steeper than 2 : i. Slope Stability There is no evidence of slope stability issues in this area. Use of Materials SU-C and CDS-pDS RU-101 may be utilized as structural fill provided over-size material is removed prior to compaction. Verification of compaction may be difficult unless prootrolling is used, or iisufficient Proctor testing is conducted to provide for mixing-curves ofthe materials. Drainage Because shallow groundwater is expected to be perched on PDS RU-101 seasonally, it is recommendedto install foundation drainage at structures within DA'2. These drains should consist of a trench excavated into native CDSIPDS RU-101 on the up- and side-slope sides of stnrctures to a depth of at least 6 inches below adjacent base of footing grade. The tenches should be sloped to &ain, Iined with filter fabric, and backfrlled with drain rock after placement of a perforated rigid pipe with glued joints. Drain rock should be extended to within 12 inches of the surface, and covered with filter fabric prior to placement of other material (top soil, crushed rock, etc.). Rocky Road Subdivisioq Springficld GcotcchnicaVsoils Asscssmcn! GcoSciencc, lnc. 8-543 7 Foundations Foundations inDA-3 canbeplaced on CDS to VFS RU-101 and can consist of conventional spread footings. Due to potential differential settlement, foundations should not be placed partly on SU-B andpartlyonin-placeRU-10i. ForfoundationsplacedonCDSRU-lOlbearingcapacityshouldbe verified by a qualified professional prior to placement of a leveling course or concrete forms. Excavation and Grading Excavation within DA-3 may require use of a large excavator or a hydraulic hammer. However, with the information presently available it is not possible to identify areas or depths where such measures may become necessary Permanent cut banks in CDS/PDS RU-101 should be sloped at no steeper than 1.75H : lV. Cut banks in VFS RU- 1 0 1 may be sloped near-vertical but, in that case, may be subj ect to rock falls due to freeze-thaw after several years. Fill slopes in this area should not exceed 2 : 1. Slope Stability There is no evidence of previous slope movement in this area. The area is underlain at shallow depth by competent RU-l01 and no deep-seated failures are anticipated. Drainage Seeps may occur from fractures in PDS to VFS RU-101 during the wet season. Therefore, it is recorlmended to install foundation drainage at structures with daylight basements in DA-3. Rocla Road Subdivision, Springfi eld GeotcchnicaVsoils fuscssment, GeoSciencc, Inc. 8-6-03 8 DA-3 This report was prepared for the use of Pacific West Engineering, and their authorized agents for planning and design purposes. Otu professional services were performed, and ou recommendations provided in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist and assunxe that the limited number of points investigated are generaily representative of subswface conditions. The report is not a waranty of subsurface conditions. ii in the future, conditions are found which difter significantly from those presented here, GeoScience must be advised at once so that these conditions and our recommendations can be reviewed and revised, ifnecessary. Should a substantial lapse oftime occurbetweenthis investigation and funue site activity, or if conditions have changed due to nearby construction or natural causes, the data contaiaed in this report should be reviewed to determine its continued applicability. This report is not intended to provide a seismic risk evaluation of the subject property. The report should be made available to potential contractors who will perforrr the construction work. GeoScience cannot be responsible for any deviation from the recommended construction methods or means discussed in this report, likewise, our firm cannot be responsible for construction activity on other sites which neighbor or abut the subject properfy referenced in this report. If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at (541) 607-5700. Respectfully submitted, GeoScience, trnc. ,a, /Arrfi Gunnar Sctrlieder, Ph.D., CEG Roclcy Road Subdivision, Springfi cld GcotcchnicaVsoits Assessmcn! GcoSciancc, Inc. 8-5{3 9 oREOOll SUNNAR E11A9 ,e l : I I i II I ! { $ fl- T lii.d i", . 'l ..:ir3,' , .1.. rll | ', - 1 I 3.i I l,), Ij t t : .->!! ::l+t.' I L! .i 2. t ;,.\j .t: l+.. .l rix :ii I u u. uat <!I} rr su all 9u str t ,- .'1 ::! i:.':1: I I 2# n -a j I t I 't t e 'i 68 69 ?O 7l 72 ?3 ,,1 I i,:' { :t::.. t-'i't '.:1r.,: i" I Ia 'sh 'l g?)ti i L-., a'r- tlt+k: I I. 1 i . '1 . d -{il g ,E ii{ - i I I 1 i : I I l'J Elevatlon: 514' AMSL Depth 11 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Depth to Water: NA \Logger: GS Depth: 1.5 ft Depth to Rock: NAaHAH-1a Date: A4l20O3 \ileather: Sunny - 80sOperator: GSLoc: See Map Equlpmenfi ?-ll4't OD Auger UUS psfMolstPlast. UCS psfUSCS Est. Grad.cls [wc Cons.DescriptlonSymboIUnit Dy FLSC7030Flard SU€ 0 - 1.s', Brown dayby SAND with 20 €0 % (y volume) igneous rock fragments. Low dry strength, low toughness,slow dihtancy. USGS clasa. appllee to matrlx only. Hand auger reftrsal on lgltotts rock fngmont at 1.5'. Road Subdivision'Proposed HAH-1a GS Dete 12 .'. i.: . ' Springfield ( HAH.lb Elcvatlon: 514r AMSL Depth I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 t0 11 t2 Date:81412003 GS 1.5 fL to Rock: NA to Water: NA GS lVeather: Sunny - 80s Cons.Moist PlasLbolUnitUSCSG SU.c BPLSC7030F{std DrV O - 1r Brown clayey SAND with 20 -30% (y volume) lgneous rock lragments. Low dry strength, low toughness,slow dihtancy. USCS clase. appllee to matrlx only. Hand auger refi.sal on lgneous rock fmgment at 1'. Proposed Rocky Road Subdivision, Drawn GS Dato&6$ ) Loc: See Map Equipment: 2-ll4t' ODAuger UCS nsf UUS psfDescription HAH.Tb HAH-1c Depth I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1t 12 to \ilater: NAto Rock: NA: 1.5 ft.Date: 8l4l2ffi3 :GS \ileather: Sunny - 80sGS2-u4" ODLoc: See PIast.MolstsUnit ry EPL7030Fladsc- 1.5' Brown dayey SAND with 20 -30 % votume) ignoous rock lragmonts. Low dry strength, Iow toughness,slow dilatancy. USCS class. appllea to matrlx only. SUC Hand atrger rofusal on lgneous tock tagment at 1.5'. Rocky Road Subdivision, HAH-Lc Drawn Dato 8€{3 UUS osf UCS psfConsDescriptlonSymbol I :: r,. ',, " HAH-1d 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 Depth lt 10 Date:81412003 Logger: GS Depth: 4.15 ft.Depth to Rock: 2.25 Depth to VYater: NA \ Loc: See Equipment: 2-ll4n OD Auger Operator: GS Weather: Sunny - 80s Symbol Unit Description USCS EsL Grad.cls hwc Cons.Moist PIast. UCS psf UUS psf strc o- 1.75Brown dayey SAND with 20 -30% (y volume) igneous rock lraginents. Low dry strength, Iow toughness,slow dilatancy. USCS claes. appllea to matrlx only. SC 70 30 Had ry EPL sLlf)1.7s - Ught gray Cl3Y. Very hlghdry strength, 225' high toughness, no dllatancy.CH n 80 l-lad SL npH EPL RU-302 Rusl-brown CDS Pyro-clastic rock unit. Decomposod to clay, over-consolidated. Decrepitates ln presence ol water and remolds to APL, with very high dry strength hlgh toughnoss, and no dilatancy Maroon tobrlck red pyroclastic rock CDS. zz5- 4-251 4.Xi- 4,7s'. Hole termlnated at 4.75'. No raeter errcountered- Rocky Road Subdlvision, HAH.ld Drawn GS 8{q} ) ) 12 Dlevatlon: 514'AMSL It HAII.2 Depth I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Date:8l4l2OO3 GS : lfL to Rock: NA Loc: See Map Equipment: 2-ll4't OD GS to Water: NA Weather: Sunny - EOs MoistSymboIUnitUSCSG Plast. SU€70 30 l'lad ry EPLsc- 1' Brown dayoy SAND with 20 -30 % (y volume) lgneous rock fragments. Low dry strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy, USCS class. appllee to matrlx only. Hand auger rofuse! on lgrrous rock fragmont at 1'. Proposed Road Subdivislon, Drawn t2 Elevatlon: 524r AMSL alf s Cons UCS psf UUS psfDescrlption HAH.2 i Dat6 86-03;r i HAH-3 Elevation: 531' AMSL Depth 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I I t0 Date: A4l2O03 Logger: GS Depth: 2.5fL Depth to Rock: 2.25 Depth to Water: NA \ Loc: See Equipment: 2-114" OD Auger Operator: GS Weather: Sunny - EOs Symbol Unlt Description USCS s Cons.Moist PlasL UCS psf UUS psf strc o - 225'Brown ctayey SAND with 5 - t0 % (by volume) lgneous rock lragments. Low dry strength, low toughness,slow dilatancy. SC 10 65 z5 Flad Dy BPL \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\.-f-r-a-a-a-a-, a_t L , t a , a Holo tormlnated at 2.5'. No raator encounterod. Road Subdivlslon, HAH.3 Drawn Date 86{3 ) ) t2 E G IP.1 Depth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. L2 to Ylaters N/Ato Rock: 2 ft.GS 45 fa.I)ate:712912003 Weather: Sulury - 80sf.anrceC-ase 580Loc: DVIEntr. Moist Plast.sUnitSymbol BH.g)Fbrl70sc SU.B Dafi brovrn dapySAt'lD wTOto 80 % (by volume) VFS lgneous tock fragments to 24'. Low dry shength, lowtougtuness, slow dllatancy. USGS aPPllcs to matrlx only. o-z RU-302 - 4'5' uaroon to brlckred to rnfrlsstrtan oveconsolldated day. Probably eltered pyrcdasdc rock tnlt l-lard ulren dry or sllgtrtmolst Docrepltates rapldly ln presonoe of molsfrrre. Remdde to APL ulth vey tilgh dry strength, ttlgh tougtmoss and no dllatency. Road Subdlvlsior4Roclcy TT.1 Date 8.640Drautrt Elevation: 5(}6' AMSL UUS psfUCS psfConsI)escription Dy > 9,OOO of plt at 4.5 feet. No ueter encountered. -n-l{:'... t.,; TP-2 trlevation: 506r AMSL Depth 1 2 ) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t2 ) GS to Ylater: N/AI)ate:712912003 6ft.to Rock: 4 ft. LanceLoc: DW Entr.Case 580 Moist Plast.Unit Dafi bmvn dayoySAtlD riu/70 to 80 % (by Volumo) VFS lgneous rock fragments to 48'. Lowdry strength, lowtor.ryhnoss, slow dllatancy. USCS classlflcatton applleo to matrlx only. o-4 SC 70 s Flarl .Molst > I,000 \\\\\\\\\,rlarrru\\\\\\\\\,rt?rraa,\\\\\\\\\,aarrrrr,\\\\\\a\\attrraan\\\\\\\\\tttrrrtta'\\\\\\\\\trttttrt,\\\\\\\\\taatrtrt,,\\\\\\\\\lflfarln \\\\\\ RU-l01 - 5'5' CDS: Tan vpathered tgneous rodc Remolds to sandy sllt u/lowdry sbength, lowtoughness and rapld dllatancy. 5.S - 6' PDS: loss tsn 50 96 remoldable. Roclry Road Subdivision, Drautrt GS DateS{43 \ Yleather: Sunny - 80s Symbol I)escription EsL Grad.els luvc Cons UCS rrsf UUS rrsf SU.B Dry BPI- Bottom of plt at 6feet. No tnater encountered. TP-2 -/ I ; i f SpringficldSubdivisioL GeoScicncc,fusessment, --l I :. l, .) -'t I- t.t,. ':.-:.: : I .'.: Photo l: Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4: PHOTO LOG Backhoe backfilling TP-1. View SSW. TP-1 was located just up-slope tom ttrabeginning of the existing driveway. TP- 1. View ESE. The test pit wu located in the cut bank for the existing &iveway. Total height ofcut 4.5 feet. Bottom portion of TP-l. The maroon material with lighter-colored spots is RU'302. TP-2, Iocated 116 feet along driveway from TP-l. View E. Note size of rock fragments excavated withSU-B. MostofSU-BconsistsofrockfragmentsofRU-l01. PhotosTthroughl0areadditional pictures of TP-2. (Upside-down). Upper portion of T?-1, with SU-B. Note size and angularity of rock fragments in this unit (Upside-down - tape measure case is at bottom of photo). Lower portion of TP-I. The contact between SU-B and underlying RU-302 is located at approximately the 3-foot mark on the tape measure. TP-2. View SE. Most of the back wall of the test pit consists of SU-B Closer view of SU-B in TP-2. View E. Note visually fresh-state rock fragments where the fragments have been broken by the backhoe. TP-2. Contact between SU-B (upper half of back wall in this picture) and light-colored CDS/PDS RU-l0l in lower half. T?-2. CDSi?DS RU-I01 in lower portion of the test pit. Most of this material can be remolded with finger pressr:re. However, at bottom of pit, material could not be remolded. Photo 5: Photo 6 Photo 7: Photo 8: Photo 9: Photo 10: Photo 5: Roclcy Road Subdivision, Springf cld GeotcchnicaVSoils Assessmeng GcoScicncc, lnc. 8-643 ! l I tr5 grc{ att{O tl -Et o oooa Ia)o f) do t9 U2 g ah o r',ll 0e-(! 5 : I( I i I :.i i. ..l w I t }r .l ' .t',.i.B : ,.1:: ' I I,nI i- d 'I t.i ":E.--:. it-i.'.' =:: '' 1 .. t. ?...-:-: tt5 g\ { au{ oo(D Fo f?F FoE ctl b g .D o-- (h E rt - 0eID Gg ErtoE I i i I i i I I I I i I , 'l : I Photo 5 Photo 6 d : ; t; i\i i -rf ! di i- # Ur5 g\ { a tJt-t rg rl r5oo(! -r of) 7o !e v) I ta ) U) rt 0a ito -iI t' ,! ,!t. 1 .,;^s+'t.l I ;- n a,_ C r ".lh _.'i - i.t I t ?|r -/ I 7t .i I I \i s+1 _t e \ ,i'!rr':;.i t .t ,! I ,_ t :t1 {l! 9 ;, B I a 1, l '.t r ') ? , I I ! -- t. t . 1 t: t ,rl - _,. .,.4'." t. e\. +Ii i l F February 19,2004 lrrlr. David Nichols, PE Pacific West Engineering 3610 Goodpastue Loop Eugene OR 97401 R.E: GEOTECHMCAI N,IEETING ITEMS RELATING TO ROCKY ROAD SUBDryISION Dear Mr. Nichols: I am uriting this lerter per rhe discussion on February 17 ,2004 at the meeting regarding the proposed Roclcy Road subdivision. Comrnents had been received from City of Springfield staffregarding the subdivision application documents, and the meeting had been called to clarifr these comments and determine the responses required to satisff the requirements. Specifically, City staffnoted that the original GeoScience geotechnical report (dated August 6, 2003) did not contain recommendations regarding constnrction of public improvements (e.9. streets and public utilities) for Desi-en Areas 2 and3. These areas are underlain by RU-l0l (as described in the original report) at depths var)'ing from a few inches to 2 feer RU-101 is present in completely decomposed state (CDS) to partty decomposed state (PDS) to depths of l0 feet or greater. The rock unit is tverlain by SU-C a bro*n clayiy sand (SC) u'irh low dry strengtla low toughness and slow dilatancy. Neither SU-C, nor CDS RU-l0l have characteristics consistent with the presence of expansive clay. Therefore, no special mea^sures are required for road construction in this area. The uppermost, organic-rich portion of SU-C should be removed priorto placement of fill. During wet weather construction, SU-C and the upper portions of CDS RU-101 should be protected from softening under traffic loads by placement of at least six inches of inches of base rock. Excavation for underground utilities will not present a problem in Design Area2,because all units can be excavated to the required depths using conventional means- In Design Area 3, road base rock can be placed on CDS to visually fresh state (VFS) RU-101. Grading in SU-B may rezult in ripping up of larger rock fragments, and the resulting holes will need to be filled. However, no orher special measures are required for road construction in this area. Public utility trenches (e.g. sanitary and storm sewers) in DA-3 may encoluster areas u'here a large trackloe or hydraulic hammer is required for excavation. Limiting trench depths to the minimum required will minimize this possibility. tA Er-- ,t,la6 E..---- fiEt fr?rntl ttrAi.rAn7-tr?nn traY. 6(l7-57n1 eeB * 127rl73 e Mr. Davidlidichols Febnrary 79,2W4 PageZ The other issue discussed at the meeting related to the position of the building envelope relative to the design areas. Specifically, the three lots at the northwest comer oftbe zubdivision ([,ots 7, 1 , and Z) arebisected by tile bounaary between DA-l and DA-3. Of these, the corner lot (Lot 1) is located mostly within DA-1, and will require aformdation designed tomitiqate forthe presence ofexpansivs soil and RU-302. On Lots 2 and7, it is possible to place the building envelope within either DA-l or'DA-3,or over the boundary. It is recommended to leave the determination of where to place the horse up to the future owner or builder. If the residence is proposed to be placed entirely or partly within pa-t it is recommeoded to require a forurdatioa which mitigates the expansive material in the subsr:rface (e.g. dritled pier formdation with above-grade beams). If the residence is proposed- to be constnrcted elrtirely within DA-3, it is recommended to require inspection ofthe foundation excavation by a qualified geotechnical professional prior to placement of a leveling cou$e or foundation forms. In this maluner, it is possible to verifr the prese,nce of RU-l01 as the foundation zubgrade. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not besitate to contact me at 607-5700. Sincerely, GeoScience,Inc. icdrtu? Gunnar Schlieder, Ph.D., CEG Lr.\r -t\l Gttt$tAR SCHLIE0Ea OREGON 225 Fifth Street Springtield, Oregon 97 47 7 541-726-3759 Phone rity of Springlield Official Receipt _ evelopment Services Department'' Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 2200500000000000965 Date: 0712112005 3:21:25PM Job/Journal Number coM200s-00s99 coM2005-00s99 coM200s-00s99 1 COM2005-00599 !.. cotvtzoos-00599 coM200s-00s99 coM200s-00s99 c:0M200s-00599 coM200s-00599 coM200s-00599 coM2005-00599 coM2005-00s99 coM200s-00599 coM2005-00599 coM2005-00599 coM2005-00599 coM200s-00599 ioNazoos-oosqq coM2005-00s99 coM2005-00s99 * covrzoos-00599 V-'coM2005-00599 coM2005-00599 iovrzoos-oosqq cbMzoos-oosqs ioNazoos-oosqs coM200s-00599 coM2005-00s99 coM2005-00599 coM2005-00s99 coM2005-00s99 coM2005-00s99 Description Willamalane Single Family Addressing Assignment Residence Wiring 1000 Sq Ft Residence Wiring Ea Addtl 500 Temp Power 200 amps or less Sidewalk Permit Curbcut Permit PW Disc - 2nd Permit (Street) SDC MWMC Administration Plan Review Major - Planning SDC MWMC Improvement SDC Sanitary/Storm Admin SDC MWMC Reimbursement Sanitary Sewer - Improvement Sanitary Sewer - Reimbursement Storm Drainage Impervious Area SDC Transpo Admin SDC Transpo Improvement SDC Transpo Reimbursement Plan Review Residential Building Permit 3 Baths One & Two Family Storm Sewer Each Addtl 100' Furnace - up to 100,000 btu Vent Fan Exhaust Hoods Dryer Vent Gas Outlets l-4 Gas Outlets 4+ Gas Fireplace Heat Pump Appliance Not Listed -Mechanical Issuance Fee- + 7o/o State Surcharge + l0o/o Administrative Fee coM200s-00s99 coM2005-00599 coM2005-00599 Amount Due 1,000.00 31.00 106.00 76.00 50.00 80.00 80.00 (30.00) 10.00 103.00 865.31 132.92 82.03 5l 1.84 673.t2 823.05 62.73 772.49 175.13 21.t3 984.90 306.00 70.00 12.00 18.00 9.00 6.00 4.00 L00 15.00 12.00 27.00 10.00 I18.78 169.69 Item Total:$7,389.12 {Payments: Type of Payment Paid By CheckNumber Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Paid Qheck PARKERHOMES INC.jmp 6591 In Person $7,389.12 Payment totat: -5ffi1.-I7 7/2U2005 Page I of I ll