HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Fence 1991-07-26CITY OF OREGO'V
SPRII{GFIELD
FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION
225 F'ifth St,reet
Springf ield, Oregon 97 477 I
Off i ce:
ION LINE:
726-3759
726-3769
Job Locati on: ?a t S lT .f ,) oP ?2v23
Assessors Map #: l?t9 32 Y)Tax Lot #: a ?za o
0wner , ,/" A o. n 7- /, -f,7*-.tr( DA 1L
Addressi ?n, S'q?Phone #: 7y/^??
City:I State z s,P Zi z? 2 *zlp
# ],f,o -d1)Value of Fence:
Contractor/Installer: o tt t.y p-?.
Fence Permjt is $5.00
Address:
City:State:
Construction Contractors Registrat'ion #:
FOR OFFICE USE
ree to cal I for an inspection once myI also state that all information on
hat I was provided w'ith the Springfie'ld
standards.
Phone #:
Li p:
Ex pires:
By sign'ing this permit/applicat'ion, I ag
fence has been constructed (726-3769).
thi s app'li cation/perm'it is correct and t
Development Code requirements for fence
v>?/- Pr
DaE
Date of Appf icat'ion:
Rece'ipt #:
Job #:
Issued By:ft ,n ^ ^ o *-
Total Amount Collected:
Checked for Del inquencies:
45b
Checked for Historical Status:
fu^v.Mz
5'ignature
4n883{
CITY OF SPRTNGFIELD
DEVELOPMENT SERVICBS DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STRBET
SPRTNGFTBLD, oREGoN 97477
PHONE: (503) 726-3759
HODIFICATION OT PROVISIONS APPLICATION
W^a t)
aiF' 1U1b
e
lIDEE3
SPRINGFIELE'
LOCATION OF PROPERTY 4o Lf t/7
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY ,(e s i/e a,'r'aL
C.r rt Qot{oZE,CHFzroz
Hr.(f
4I
DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION BEING SOUGHT 7z ,32a. aa I .t/Z a ,ll.pt
\O
-fl--fi
c
pF
(n
U'trl(A(no
Ta
=ru
P
f,
o
P
tllt\Is
It\
zTr
Err- A b,t7 il" /,t lt
=tJUFIHFI,dtrltrIo
tsc,C)cFC]t'
zFdHHHtE Fj(,tr (fAPPLICANT NAME
ADDRESS
/?, ^b,"nr.f 7a rk) A2z
/F-l
X
r.oFl
I
-Joc)\
rq-
T
I
t
E
C)FoFrl
Fl
rforac
/ttt.rr( PHONE: 7 'ttt-fJ12
OIJNBR NAME fa-* t- tsf, ) d,t u p,
ADDRESS
PHONE:
THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOI.ILEDGES THAT THE
CORRECT AND ACCURATE.
INFORHATION IN THI S APPLICATION IS
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
IF THE APPLTCANT IS OTHER THAN THE OUNER, THE OITNBR HEREBY GRANTS PERMISSION
FOR THE APPLICANT TO ACT IN THEIR BEHALF.
OIIINER SIGNATURE
PLBASE ATTACH THE NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBBR AND SIGNATURE OF ANY ADDITIONAL
PROPERTY OLINER.
\
s_s
{
N
\l-
c) tqtC)cltrl trl|oH
trl trl(,u
t! t!
F
tE,
C)tnHEFl
ry
P
t$
0fr
>lu1
OVBR
to / €t/ c e,u/ 8a* 6art /, a, o4 a xa e
fo bor. ,e "r/ 2a-r / e xe 1/l/ ,'/ 7y'd ,Y 6
37? I Y? s/a/
42) 5 qZ fPt2
7"v- tr?zI
qq/- 2lr z
t2
\
NOTICE OF DECISION
irrcnrroru oF PRovlsloNSMOD
F
DATE OF DECISION
JulY ??, 1991
JOURNAL NUMBER
91 -07-1 04
APPLICANT
Robert Stocl<dall
401 South 47th Street
Springfield, OR 974i8
PROPEBTY OWNER
Bobert Stocl<dall
401 South 47th Street
SPringfietd, OR 97 478
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
401 South 47th Street
Tax Assesro,'' rvruJ fi-02-32-43; Lot 7000
The aPP lication is f or m odification of the Pr ovision establishing a maximum height of six
feet for fences in reside ntial districts IRef ' S ection 16'090 (1)(a)1 of the SPringfield
T
E
DevelcPm ent Codel. Th e applicant seeks aPP roval to construc t a fence aPProximate
inches (6' 6") in helght o n the south and east boundaries of the propertY. The ProPos ed
height excee ds the SPringtie ld DeveloPment C ode standard bY six i nches, or aPproxlm ately
8 percent' Th e purPose of t he proPosed fence is to screen unwant ed views associated
with the horse barnyard and gr azing on the adia cent properties, and to ensure that the
horse s will not be able to enter the aPPlicant's PropertY ln addition , the aPPlicant feels
that the existing "barbed-wire e lectrif ied" fence Present s a potential hazard to his
grandchildren' R easons for the requested modification are as f ollows
ly 78
1)
2\
the additional six inches will help screen the unwanted views;
Seasonalstanding*u.u,.necessitat.'ut.n."designthatelevatestheil;;; of the .f ence six inches.above srade;
in order to use th";;;;; mentioned tJnl"-i.tign, and standard six-f oot
fencing material, tht it;; will need t;be appr-oximatelv 78 inches in
Art At \ ltt- tu rLL !)vL Lh
3)
height
NOTICE OF DECTSTON JO. NO. 91-O7-1A4
Page 2
DECISION
The requested t\4odification of Provisions is found to be consistent rryith t-re criteria cf
Section 11.030('l) of the Springfield Developrrent Code and is hereby aporoi,ed w,ith
conditions (see belovy under "Conditions of Approval").
OTHER USES THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED BY THE DECISIOI{
None
SITE INFORI\4ATICN
The property is located at the intersection of Souti'r 47th Street anc Bluebell \',,/ay (401
South 47th Street - Tax Assessor's Map 17-02-32-43; Lot 7000). The prop.":y is located
within the boundaries of the East I'lain Refinernent PIan. The Zoning, ltletro :ran
designation, and Refinement Plan designation are Low Density Residential. lhe property is
developed with a single-family residence. The terrain is flat, and soils are poorly drained
with seasonal standing water. The property is bordered on the south and north by single-
family residences, on the east by vacant land owned by Weyerhaeuser, and on the west
by 47th Street. Surrounding properties are all zoned and designated Low Density
Residential. The back portion of the adjacent property to the south, as vyell as the
Weyerhaeuser property to the east, are used for horse pastures and barnyard.
CRITERIA OF APPROVAL (Ref . Section 1 1.030 of the Springfield Development Code).
(1)MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS. THE DIRECTOR MAY ADJUST ANY
OUANTITATIVE STANDARD OF THIS CODE INVOLVING UP TO A 20 PERCENT
REDUCTION OR INCREASE PROVIDED THAT:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
LOCATIONAL OR DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED; AND
THE PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT IS THE MINIMUM/MAXIMUM NECESSARY
TO ALLEVIATE THE IDENTIFIED DIMENS]ONAL OR LOCATIONAL PROBLEM;
AND
THERE ARE NO ADVERSE AFFECTS ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
PUBLIC SAFETY WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED.
This decision is base on findings in response to these criteria as follows:
(a) LOCATIONAL OR DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED;
The purpose of the proposed fence is to screen unwanted views associated with the horse
barnyard and grazing on the adjacent properties, and to ensure that the horses will not be
able to enter the applicant's property. ln addition, the applicant feels that the existing
"barbed-wire electrified" fence presents a potential hazard to his grandchildren. The
presence of seasonal standing water necessitates a fence design that elevates the bottom
of the fence above grade.
NOTICE OF DECISION JO. NO. 91'07-144
Page 3
(b) THE PROPOSED ADJUSTMENT IS THE MINIMUM/MAXIMUM NECESSARY TO
ALLEVIATE THE IDENTIFIED DIMENSIONAL OR LOCATIONAL PROBLEM;
Six inches is a reasonable minimum distance to elevate the bottom of the fence in order to
prevent rotting due to the presence of seasonal standing water. ln order to use such a
design, and standard six-foot fencing material, the fence will need to be approximately 78
inches in height. The applicant proposes to build the fence only on the south and east
boundaries, r,vhere the un"vanted viertls occur.
(c) THERE ARE NO ADVEBSE AFFECTS ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES
The back portion of the adjacent property to the south is currently used as a horse pasture
ancj barnyard. The acjclitional six inches of fence height rruill not adversely affect this use.
The front portion is landscaped front yard, r.vith several tall shrubs and trees along the
property line. The additional six inches vvould not exceed the height of this vegetation;
nevertheless, this approval includes the condition that the portion of the fence abutting
this front yard be limited to the standard six feet. The adjacent property to the east is
vacant, and is separated from the proposed fence by an open drainage ditch lined with
riparian vegetation; the proposed fence, including the additional six inches will be screened
by the existing vegetation. No fence is proposed f or the other property lines.
(d) PUBLIC SAFETY WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED.
The proposed fence is not in any vision clearance area, and presents no public safety
hazard.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The portion of fence on the south boundary, from a point flush with the front (or
west) wall of the existing "shop" building to a point 10 feet east of the front (or
west) property line (see revised site plan), will be a maximum of six feet in height.
Within the front yard setback (ten feet from the front property line) the maximum
fence height will be three feet if a sight obscuring fence is used, or four feet if an
unslatted cyclone fence is used (Ref. Section 16.090(1)(a)2 of the Springfield
Development Code).
Applicant will obtain a fence construction permit consistent with Section
16.090(2)(a) of the Springf ield Development Code.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and the applicable
criteria are available for a free inspection, and copies will be available at a cost of $0.75
f or the f irst page and $0.25 f or each additional page, at the Development Services
Departmenl, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon.
2
J
NOTTCE OF DECtSTON JO, NO.91-07-104
Page 4
APPEAL
lf you wish to appeal this Type Il Site Pi:n Review decision, you must do so wi'.'rin 1O
davs of the date of this letter. Your appeal must be in accordance w,ith Springf eld
Development Code, Article 15, APPEALS.
OUESTIONS
Please call the Development Services Department at726-3759 if you have any ques:icns
regardirrg this process.
PREPARED BY
Greg Hyde
Assistant Planner
Copy to: Applicant
Property OvvnersiResidents within 300 feet of the subject property
I
-J
VIE IN ITY MAP
MODIFICATION OT PROVISIONS
RoBtRT STOCKDAI-L GJO. NO. 9'1 -A7-1C4 *o-E*
Fa
IFq:l
oz
Fa
IF
z
TAST MAIN ST
SU BJ tCT P ROPTRTY
TBELL
ou
Jf,
I
u.
af,
I
U
IJ
BF
-.ts
l'.{
IA
F
Ul CAMELLIA ST
Y
DAISY
UNI AVE
.-.1--++
:-: -:-J
..'.-_t_:-i--
-:t-:-r
It
-L-f
I
lt !titlt
III
I I
I i
I
I ittitNil
li'-T-1-
I I ll
IIt|lI
I
I
i I I r i 1.1 i
I
I
titirLiIIril !lll!
I r l,llll i
I rll llill III
I
I
-t I I I I
I l _l{lili
I I I
I trtttlltII
I I I I I II
I rlllllll
-+D--A-ri
ar/
I !l
ry
1T'.
I
--1
l
I I I
I I IIlI
I
I I
tltittl
I lilllll!
I I I I I
I
I
I Iil
I-t-j-.1-
1":i+-i-r-.t--il-i-t-i- -I
A .4 pl :,+A:,t//,o
I
i-;llr-i-1-iT-
i I I
I I
I' /(:
I
!ilI
HT
.0Iz{
FIo
2
Fo
{:
-r
I'-1-"r-