The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Building 2019-12-31OREGON Web Address: www.springfield-or.9ov Building Permit Residentia ! Structu ra ! Permit Number: 811-19-OO2461-STR IVR Number: 81,1087304992 City of Springfield Development and Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-726-3753 Email Add ress: permitcenter@springfield-or. gov SPRINGIIELD tr TYPE OF WORK Category of Construction: Detached Accessory Struct Calculated Job Value: $6,262,84 Description of Work: Garage addition and entire re-roof of garage Type of Work: Addition JOB SITE INFORMATION Worksite Address 922 B ST Springfield, OR 97477 Parcel 170335 13 13500 Owner: Address: HERNRIED FAMILY TRUST 922 B ST SPRINGFIELD, AR 97477 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION Business Name DAVID ZARZYCKI GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC - Primary License ccB License Number 105626 Phone 541-688-0243 PENDING INSPECTIONS Inspection Final Land Use 1999 Final Building 1260 Framing 1110 Footing 1120 Foundation 1530 Exterior Shearwall 7020 Zoning/Setbacks Inspectaon Group Planning Struct Res Struct Res Struct Res Struct Res Struct Res Struct Res Inspection Status Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending SCHEDULING INSPECTIONS Various inspections are minimally required on each project and often dependent on the scope of work. Contact the issuing jurisdiction indicated on the permit to determine required inspections for this project. Schedule or track inspections at www.buildingpermits,oregon.gov Call or text the word "schedule" to 1-888-299-2821 use IVR number: 811087304992 Schedule using the Oregon ePermitting Inspection App, search "epermitting" in the app store Permits expire if work is not started within 180 Days of issuance or if work is suspended for 180 Days or longer dependine on the issuing agency's policy, r Permit Issued: December 31, 2019 All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this typ€ of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. cranting ofa permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions ofany other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction, ATTENTIOIT: Oregon law requires you to follow rules adopted by the Oregon Utility Notification Center. Those rules are set forth in OAR 952-001-0010 through OAR 952-OO1-OO9O. You may obtain copies of the rules by calling the center at (5o3) 232-L947. All persons or entities performing work under this permit are required to be licensed unless exempted by ORS 7O1.O1O (StructurauMechanical), ORS 479.540 (Electrical), and ORS 693,010-O2O (Plumbing). Printed on: f2/3llt9 page 1 of 2 C:\myReports/reports//production/01 STANDARD Permit Number: 81 1-19-OO246I-STR Page 2 of 2 Fee Description Technology Fee Plan Review - Minor, City SDC: Improvement Cost - Storm Drainage SDC: Total Storm Administration Fee SDC: Reimbursement Cost - Storm Drainage Fire SDC - New Res Construction Sq Ft fee - enter sq ftg Structural building permit fee Structural plan review fee State of Oregon Surcharge - Bldg (L2o/o of applicable fees) Quantity 1 47.2 3.99 32.5t 108 Total Fees: Fee Amount $20.87 $ 141.00 $47.20 $3.99 $32.51 $6.48 $167.50 $ 108.88 $20.10 $s48. s3 Construction Type VB Printed on: 743ll79 Occupancy Type U Utility, misc. Unit Amount 108.00 Unit Sq Ft Unit Cost $48.73 Job Value $5,262.84 $5,262.84 C :\myReports/reports//prcduction/0 1 STAN DARDPage 2 of 2 PERMIT FEES VALUATION INFORMATION SPRINGFIELD {6 OREGON www.springfield-or. gov Woksite address: 922 B ST, Springfield, OR97477 Parcel:1703351313500 Transaction Receipt 811-19-002461-STR IVR Number: 8'l I 087304992 Receipt Number: 473419 Receipt Date:12131119 City of Springfield Development and Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 54L-726-3753 permitcenter@springfi eld-or. gov Transaction Units date 12131119 1.00 Ea Description Structural building permit fee State of Oregon Surcharge - Bldg (12o/o ot applicable fees) SDC: Reimbursement Cost - Storm Drainage Fire SDC - New Res Construction Sq Ft fee - enter sq ftg 224-00000 -425602- 1 030 I 00-00000-424005-1 091 't2131t19 1.00 Ea 821 -00000-21 5004-0000 12t31t19 32.51 Amount 61 7-00000-448029-8800 121311'19 47.20 Amount SDC: lmprovement Cost - Storm Drainage 61 7-00000-448028-8800 't2t31t19 3.99 Amount SDC: Total Storm Administration Fee 719-00000-426604-8800 12t31119 1.00 Ea Plan Review - Minor, City 1 00-00000-425002-1 039 12t31119 '1 .00 Automatic Technology Fee 204 -00000 -425605-0000 12t31119 108.00 SqFt Fees Paid Account code Fee amount $167.50 $20.1 0 $32.51 $47.20 $3.99 $141.00 $20.87 $6.48 Paid amount $167.50 $20.1 0 $32.51 $47.20 $3.99 $141.00 $20.87 $6.48 Payment Method:Credit card authorization: 02276p Payer: david zarzyck Payment Amount:$439.65 Cashier: Katrina Anderson Receipt Total:$439.65 Printed: 12131/19 l1:08 am Page 1 of 1 Fl N_Tra nsactionReceipt_pr tr Structural Permit Application 225 Fifth Street 0 Springfield, OR 97477 o PH(541 )726-3753. FAX(541 )726-3689 This permit is issued under OAR 918-460-0030. Permits expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance or if work is suspended for 180 days. -q ffi Hnr.rr:a5 (C Atz"r\z,rp e\Fc,,,,l.) br"^r:- 4-d a/< (L>c - oL? "A.Ae,*,(- [,l> Permit*, 11 - OC^..tt, I Date: tO >t 9 LOCAL ( This project has final land-use approval Signature:Date: This project has DEQ approval Signature:Date: Zoningapproval verifled: E Yes n No Property is within flood plain: ! Yes E No EBesidential E CommercialE Government Jobsiteaddress: qLL $,, ST S t \State: Q(zrP:qlgl Subdivision:Lot no.: Reference:11 - &3- EB - \ B Taxlot: \BBoO Name: {1__fi-1-1 {]ffiRY ttge61elgll Address: q)Z B €-1 . city: SPerF{6Ft EtD State: Ct(z|,: Phone: 541 * -lq O- q I t8 Fa>i E-mail Building Owner or Owner's agent authorizing this application: Sign here: kly\,Vfu,k ! This installation is b{ig} -u\$n residential or larm property owned by me or a member of my immediate family, and is exempt from licensing requirements under ORS 701.010. &\r$,f Business name Address: City: ts)60.^A-t-State: frf(-ZtP: {]4 Phone:5q{- \- t qX-O}4-4 Fax:,'ll -ttbl - ot"l I E-mail: d fnrrfUZVClt* tiS ,rrv,>, t . iSrm CCB license no Print name: Signature CCB Licensc #PhoneName Electrical Plumbing \lechanical Construction type: UeOP fu*<rt\ ? (a) Job description: \rnOccupancyCTr Y3e Square feet: Cost per square foot: Other information Type ofHeat: Energy Path: *orE new Ealteration E addition (b) Foundation-only permit? ! Yes E No .$1,00 (BTotal valuation:l .,*Wt\ $(a) Permit fee (use valuation table): (b) Investigative fee (equal to [2a])$ (c) Reinspection ($ per hour): (number ofhours x fee per hour)$ (d) Enter 12%o surcharge (.12 x [2a+2b+2cl\:$ (e) Subtotal offees above (2a through 2d)S 3. PIan review fees (a) Plan review (557o x permit fee [2a]):$ hg.fig (b) Fire and life safety (65% x permit fee [2a]):$ (c) Subtotal offees above (3a and 3b):s 4. Miscellaneous fees (a) Seismic fee, l%o (.01 x permit fee [2a])$ (b) Tech fee,5o/o (.05 x permit fee[2a]+PR fee [3c])$ I'OTAL fees and surcharges (2e+3c+4a+b):s Last edited 5-5-2019 IlJones GJ. f^la- t\ "t rA DEPARTMENT.USE ONLY CATEGORY OF CONSTRUCTION JOB SITE INFORMATION AND LOCATION PROPERTY OWNER CONTRACTOR INSTALLATION SUB.CONI*AMOR I N FORMATION FEE SCHEDULE i'Stv).h, a fees SPRINGFIELD OREGON www. springfi eld-or. gov Worksite address: 922 B ST, Springfield, OR97477 Parcel: 1 70335'1 31 3500 Transaction Receipt 81 1 -1 9-002461 -STR Receipt Number: 472859 Receipt Date: 10/31/19 ,lb City of Springfield Development and Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 54t-726-3753 permitcenter@spri n gfield-or. gov Fees Paid Transaction date 10t31t19 Units 1.00 Ea Description Structural plan review fee Account code 224-00000-425602-1 030 Fee amount $108.88 Paid amount $108.88 Payment Method:Credit card authorization: 03097p Payer: DAVID ZARZYCKIGENERAL CON Payment Amount:$108.88 Cashier: Katrina Anderson Receipt Total:$108.88 Printed: 10/31/19 3:35 pm Page 1 of 1 Fl N_Tra nsaction Receipt_pr It^ SPFII{OFIII.D TYPE I HISTORIC REYIEW, STAFF REPORT & DECISION Project Proposal: Install skylights and construct an addition off the east wall of an accessory structure. Case Number: 81 1-19-000060-TYP1 Project Location: 922 B Street Assessor's Map: 17-03-35-13 ll 13400 & 13500 Zoning: Low Density Residential Historic Commission Notice: NiA Application Submitted Date: March 11,2019 Decision Issued Date: April 19,2019 Appeal Deadline Date: In accordance with SDC 5.1-125.C, the Director's decision is the final decision of the City. Associated Applications: None CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVTEW TEAM BACKGROUND The Washburne Historic District was entered in the National Register of Historic Places on February 10, 1987. The home located al922 B Street is considered to be Primary Significant (contributing) within the Washbume Historic district according to a 1984 Survey Sheet. In addition, the original survey documents show the two car garage with sliding doors and recommends repairs including finding matching doors and compatible hardware (Attachment A). PROPOSAL The applicant proposes changes to the existing accessory structure which include removal of the existing roof and replace with engineered trusses; install four aluminum skylights (Attachment B); remove and replace sliding garage doors on south wall with single hung exterior doors and energ;r efficient windows (Attachment C); and construct a new addition extending into the garden area to the east. All new siding and trim materials is proposed to match existing trim and color. APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Applicant/Owners: Alan G Hemried 922 B Street Springfield, OR97477 Representative: N/A POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE Planner Planning/Histori c Regulations Drew Larson s4t 736-1003 81 l-19-000060-TYPl Type I Historical Review Poge I ofl /-:l ,N J&i" +J6ll 6U)M+*@ t I IEF. fir I i REVIEW PROCESS This proposal is a Type I Historic Overlay District application. The application was reviewed in accordance with SDC 3.3-915 C and review criteria 3-3.945. The elements of the submitted proposal that would have exceeded the Type I process and/or significantly impacted the external historic character ofthe structures are precluded herein or were voluntarily withdrawn by the applicants. DECISION Type I Historical Review approval as of the date of this letter, subject to the conditions and recommendations described herein. CRITERIA FORAPPROVAL (SDC Section 3.3-945 Major and Minor Alteration Standards) 1. Any proposed use shall minimize exterior alteration of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environmentl uses that require substantial exterior alteration shall not be permitted. Finding: The proposed alterations and addition is to change the historic garage to a hobby wood shop. The applicant proposes significant exterior alteration to the south fagade including removal ofthe original style sliding garage doors. Finding: The original survey documents show the two car garage with sliding doors and recommends repairs including finding matching doors and compatible hardware (Attachment A) Finding: The proposed hobby wood shop is a change of use from the existing garage and substantial exterior alterations are not permitted. However, internal construction to wall off the south entrance is permitted. Condition of Anproval 1. The applicant shall maintain the sliding garage doors in order to maintain the structure as close to its original construction as possible. Conclusion: As conditioned, this proposal satisfies Criterion I 2, The distinguishing original qualities of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment shall not be substantially altered. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features is prohibited unless an immediate hazard to public safety exists. Finding: It is not clear when the accessory structure was constructed on site. Its droplap siding and color match the primary residence. The accessory structure has a gable roof and two sliding garage doors on the south face. Finding: The proposed work includes removal of the sliding doors; an addition and expansion on the east side ofthe structure; new truss roof; and the installation ofskylights. Finding: The proposed alterations and addition is intended to match the existing accessory structure with droplap siding with new wood doors and windows. Finding: The removal of the sliding garage doors and installation of street facing windows on the south fagade is a substantial alteration of the distinctive features and is not permitted. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, this proposal satisfies Criterion 2 3. All Historic Landmark Sites or Structures are recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance are prohibited. 81 t-19-000060-TYPt Type I Historical Review Page 2 ofl Finding: The proposed alterations and addition does not seek to create an earlier or modern appearance. The applicant proposes to use similar materials that are consistent with the features of the existing garage. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 3. 4. Changes that have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a Historic Landmark Site or structure and its environment. Where changes have acquired significance in their own right, this significance shall be recognized. Finding: The structure's sliding garage doors have historical significance and cannot be removed. Conclusion: As condition above, this proposal satisfies Criterion 4. 5. Distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship which characterize a Historic Landmark Site or Structure shall be retained. Finding: The proposed addition and minimum alterations are consistent with the distinctive features, materials and craftsmanship of the period. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 5 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced. In the event replacement cannot be avoided, the new material shall match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features is based on accurate duplicate features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural design, or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. Finding: No existing distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship that characterizes the structure will be altered, as conditioned herein, as a result of the alterations and addition. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 6. 7. New design for undeveloped Historic Landmark Sites in the Washburne Historic Landmark District and for alterations and additions to existing Historic Landmark Sites and Structures are permitted when they complement significant historic, architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. Finding: As proposed, the applicant's alterations and addition is compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 7. 8. New additions or alterations to Historic Landmark Structures shall not impair the essential form and integrity of the structure. Finding: The existing structures' essential form is not affected by the proposed alterations or addition. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 8. DECISION Type I Historical Review approval as of the date of this letter. Maintaining the sliding garage doors and matching the historic materials shall be the top priority during the project. 81 1-19-000060-TvPl Type I Historical Review Page j of4 : WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall call the Planner on Duty for an appointment to have the repair work photo-documented for City archives. Ifyou have any questions please contact Drew Larson,54l-736-1003 Attachments: A. Original Survey Information B. Skylight Info Sheet C. Door and Window Info Sheet 81 1-19-000060-TvPl Type I Historicol Review Page 4 of4 JOURNAL OR JOB NUMBER: NAME ORCOMPANY: IOCATION: TAX I,OTNUMBER: DEVEI,OPMENT TYPE: NEW DWELLING I,,NITS IMPERVIOUS AREA I. STORM DRAINAGE DIRECT RT]NOFT TO CITY STORM SYSTEM CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET l9-002461-STR AI A}IANDTERRYMRNRIED 922 B ST 1703351313s00 Residence A. REIMBURSEMENTCOSTlffiERvroffi I loR 00 B. IMPROVEMENT COSTI_Filffiffi I lo8.oo ITEM I TOTAL. STORM DRAINAGE SDC 2. SANITARY SEWER - CITY A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: NUMBEROFDFU'S 0 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBEROFDFU'S 0 COST PER S.F. $0.301 COST PER S.F. $0.437 COST PER Dzu $ I 70.50 COST PER DFU $83.99 NUMBEROFUMTS 0 NUMBEROFUNITS 0 COST PER FEU s135.93 COST PERFEU $ 1,620.85 COST PER FEU $22.82 ADM. FEE RATE 5o/o AREA DRAINING TO DRYWELL 0 $79.70 $0.00 COST PER TRIP 19.86 COST PER TRIP $377.40 $0.00 $0.00 $79.70 CHARGE $3.99 CHARGE $32.51 CHARGE $47.20 NEW TRIP FACTOR 1.00 NEW TRIP FACTOR 1.00 x x ITEM 2 TOTAL. CITY SANITARY SEWER SDC A. REIMBT,IRSEMENT COST: ADT TRIP RATE 9.57 x x x x x x xx xx B. IMPROVEMENT COST: ADT TRIP RATE 9.57 ITEM 3 TOTAL - TRANSPORTATION SDC 4. SANITARY SEWER - MWMC A. REIMBURSEMENTCOST: NUMBEROFFEU's 0 B. IMPROVEMENT COST: NUMBER OF FEU'S 0 C. COMPLIANCE COST: NUMBER OF FEU's 0 x x MWMC CREDIT IFAPPUCABLE (SEE REVERSE) MWMC ADMINISTRATI\'E FEE ITEM 4 TOTAL - IVTWMC SANITARY SEWER SDC SUBTOTAL (ADD rrEMS 1,2,3, & 4') 5. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: SUBTOTAL $79.70 TOTAL STORM ADMIMSTRATION FEE TOTAL SEWER ADMINISTRATION FEE : TOTAI TRANSPORTATION ADMIMSTRATION FEE: TOTAL MWMC ADMINISTRATION FEE . I,OCAL 0 LOT SIZEI $32.s1 y7.20 s0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $83.69 l09l 1092 1093 1094 1054 1055 1054 1056 1079 I 078 r! U IJ.]Fa tr.l& PREPARED BY Steven Petersen DATE 1t/13t20t9 TOTAL SDC CHARGES DRATNAGE FIXTURB UNIT CALCULATION TABLE NUMBER OF NEW FXTURTS x UNIT EQUIVALENT = DRAINACE FXTURE UNITS FOR CAI.CUI.A.TE ONLY T}IE NET ADDITIONAL NO. OF FIXTURES TINIT FIXTURE TYPE NEW OLD MISCELLANEOUS DFU TYPE NUMBEROF EDU'S TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS rsa toa unit set at 167 MWMC CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: BASED ON COUNTY ASSESSED VALUE DRAINAGE FIXTURE I.-INITS 0 0 0 1979 *EDU $5.29 $5.19 $5.12 $4.98 $4.80 $4.63 $4.40 $4.07 $3.67 $3.22 $2.73 $2.25 $1.80 IS LAND ELGIBLE FORANNEXATION CREDIT? (Enter I for Yes, 2 for No) IS IMPROVEMENT ELGIBLE FOR ANNEX. CREDIT? (Enter I for Yes, 2 for No) BASE YEAR CREDIT FOR LAND (IF APPLICABLE) VALUE / IOOO $0.00 CREDITRATE $s.29x CREDIT FOR IMPROVEMENT (IF AFTERANNEXATION) VALUE / IOOO CREDIT RATE $0.00 x $5.29 TOTAL MWMC CREDIT$1.59 $1.45 $1.25 $1.09 $0.92 $0.72 $0.48 $0.28 $o.oe $0.0s 0 0 3 0BATHTUB 0001DRINKING FOUNTAIN 0 3 0FLOORDRAIN0 0 0 3 0INTERCEPTORS FOR GREASE / OIL / SOLIDS / ETC. 0INTERCEPTORS FOR SAND / AUTO WASH / ETC.0 0 6 0 2 0LALTNDRY TUB 0 0 0 3 0CLOTHESWASHER / MOP SINK CLOTHESWASHER. 3 OR MORE (EA)0 0 6 0 0 12 0MOBILE HOME PARK TRAP (I PER TRAILER)0 RECEPTORFOR REFRIG / WATER STATION / ETC.0 0 1 0 3 0RECEPTOR FOR COM. SINK / DISHWASHER / ETC.0 0 SHOWER, SINGLE STALL 0 0 2 0 2 0SHOWER, GANG (NUMBER OF HEADS)0 0 0 0 3 0SINK: COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL KITCHEN SINK: COMMERCIAL BAR 0 0 2 0 0SINK: WASH BASIN/DOUBLE LAVATORY 0 0 2 0 0 1 0SINK: SINGLE LAVATORY/RESIDENTIAL BAR URINAL. STALL i WALL 0 0 5 0 TOILET, PUBLIC INSTALLATION 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0TOILET, PRIVATE INSTALLATION YEAR ANNEXED CREDIT RATEi$1,OOO ASSESSED VALUE BEFORE I979 1979 1980 l98l 1982 1983 1984 1985 00 l 986 1987 I 988 1989 1990 l99t 1992 00 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 20 Plon Review Checkli MAP a TAXLoT :l-l -O3- 3R- 13 - l35oe> PERMIT +: I e) * (+)tD2, ...........-f^ I -<{-r2 Enter data into project log Check address on plans is correct ChecktoSeeifLDAPhasbeenissued.LDAPPermit# Readallcommentsfromotherworkgroupstoseeif anythingneedstobeconsideredduringstructural review. !.lo car+rrci.<s Check Setbacks on Site Plan |\la rlAlrEs pg;r- pr.lrr61pc, - R^-Da-i- LA,E=A) t Bt<^rrSC. rl- E N a'ce'E^n;A' check RLrD to make suretaxrot matches whlti,ln"*" "*,'"r',il",6t84r'f,9r!ftF"tHF$&06;!6{ttlE"lf"fflrrI'}iffi"'-#r^';tri check to seiif bt is sloped or@f tf sloped, will back deck meet setback ri ,= +-i uef's1 lf a new hom;-is being buih amuntaingate or River Heights, check the subdivision books to see if a Geo-Tech report is req, 'f.-rr-r. GAISID a\'' Check soils to-determine whether or not a Geotechnical evaluation should be required N- FrYF.ura ti.6(L'$ i rrg a^rf If property is 6n septig check for proper setbacks from building to tank, distribution bo& and leach field Make sure thatpropertyis notin Flood Hazard A affected property accordinE to Mapspring (ifit iswe need 3 engineers surveys) r.lo e\.aet, z.raG 16B.IGS Check that everythinB required to be engineered has entineering and that the stamp is current Check the truss package and make sure it matches the plans (qty oftrusses, type, attachements)- lfthe numberinB doesn't *match butthe uplift and reactions look correct it is OK. Falls under field verii/ *Make sure that ifthere is HVAC equipment in the attic, the trusses were desitned to support it Ch€ck overhang to make.ertain they don't project farthririhan alloweil for fire sdpirjitio; I t j;-in"hes (a.c-ac-'a.r.. 1a s^-lcg ) lf rafterframing, check spans lf trusses or rafters are between 2/12 and 4/12 pitch, make not that duel layers of underlayment required. Less than 2/12 needs to be a membrane roof. check to see if anything over +odol'bs'is bea'iing'down bn strip footings. lf so this needs to be enlar8ed. Check H o ld Downs, high light h old downs for the inspector Er..,rrlcc.\Eo r-s?.ry\-.r- Oa6le&rF Check Foundation Venting -!^B Check for propane tanks; look for setbacks, siesmic attachments, and protection of the tank. Make notes on plans with stepped foundations howfar back they need to be from the edge ofthe cut and the uphillcut. check header sizes Check footing sizes Make sure that if rebar is used that it has minimum cover depths. Check energy code requirements. Additionalenergy measure selections: Envelope Enhancement_Conservation Measure- *Make sure that insulation called out meets the energy code and if not make note ofthe required R value. \!..H-.r3b a tr aa E E E lz a Z E E tr ilI E a)IIlola w A E E V ADDRESS '4?9'- tj< €'z \ ffi tngl fl,s VaJL V * Vn til EI V V, Et w,x EI xOn additions/remodels where existing conditions come into play, see code section N1101.3 & table N1101.2 Check tempered glazing (hazardous locations, windows in stairwell, within 24" of door, where a door would open into ifi; al*r,i=til' Check bedrooms for egress (window sizes, make sure that garage door to house doesn't go into bedrooms) Check to see if there is a living area above the garage, if so, make note of 5/8" type X gyp board fire separation requirement. Check for mechanical equipment protection (bollards) in the garage lf DETACH ED ga rage is being built less tha n 3ft to existing structure it needs to have t/2 CVp boa rd on the interior walls lf Garage is elevated, make sure columns supporting underfloor of garage are continous to footing (make note on plans) Check fire/sound separation assembly on 2 family dwellings Check for smoke alarms/Caibon"'tiionoxide alarms (look on gf3c!.rcial ,1,h,9"1r if there qren't any-shown on floor plan)*Check wall bracing Ef-rarsrgl=ts=F Check minimum room size Na HABr?ABI-E sg.rd-€ Make sure that minimum bathroom fixture distances are met Check to make sure stairs meet code Check roofing material (composition shingles, Spanish tile, metal, etc.) Check for attic access and underfloor access on plans e-le * 6a.r€€6r\-- Tn-rrSStES Check beam sizes Read over all the general notes to make certain that nothing was missed and there are no conflicts lF new SFD or ADU, make sure that Willamalane form is attached. Transfer all notes made by other work groups until there are two identical sets of plans (jobsite and city set) lnclude standard attachments : Exterior Wa ll Envelope Self-Certification Form Moisture Content Acknowledgement Form I I' ! ' High-Efficiency Lighting Systems Oregon Residential Specialty Code (ORSC) Noise Ordinance Notice SmOkeAlarm r*...".."-rr...-;.._-,. VentilationRequirementsT<jrf(itchensandB"athfbomi;",- Green Approved Plans Cover Sheet (Found under "Cover" in file cabinet) on all new square footage, that a Fire SDC is charged. X^ -'. ;', * .",.. . !.'r"r I i J., ;li.r.I :. j ,"- ".. ." i;t-"' I.t.r!, 1; '; ',. i.:* i- -. i *-",,:. l !.-'r'':'.i r ,i ;r I.. .i' .-'"'.. ..:.-: I 'i."; .- i .l', .. ";-' t ' '-. " 'r'.' fl. ' I-r - Make sure tr Add all inspections and fees into Accela (including Willamalane fee and addressing fee) Stamp planswith the "Reviewed forCode Compliance" stamp, sign the approved by line and perforate Approve Building Review line in Accela & call or email application with fees due and attach placard to jobsite set * Enter energy path data from Additonal Energy Measures Table N110t.t(21into Accela Signed electrical application received .{r E H Print out the Fee Schedule and put it with the Put any inspection notes into Accela that need to be there before the plan is issued. Check off Project Log and enter today's date. Plan check items/notes