The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Building 1998-10-01CITY OF SPruNGFIELT', SPFTIIGFTELD 225 North Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Locat,ion of Proposed Work z 295 S 18TH ST Assessors Map #: 17033500 Page 1 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF SPRINGFIELD rTob Nurnber: 980355 COMMI'NITY SERVICES DIVISION BUILDING SAFETY Office: 725-3759 Inspection Line : 726-3759 Tax Lot #: 00504 OwneT: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AddrCSS: 2OI SOUTH 18TH STREET Description Of Work: FLEET MAINT SHOP Phone #: 725-376L Citylstate/zip: SpRTNGFTELD, OREGON 97477 NEW Val-ue 0.00 Architect: Name ROBERTSON/SHERW Address Phone General-: Plumbing: Mechanical El-ectrical Contractor DORMAN OO58BO1 32986 ROBERTS CT COBIIRG OR 974OBOOO GRIDLTNE 0086252 36748 ENTERPRISE ROAD CRESWELL OR 9 FM SHEETMETAL OO5O995 544 Conger Street Eugene OR 974O2OO ABSOLUTE 0108946 3843 W 11TH AV #22 EUGENE OR 974020 Const. Contractor #Expires oB /3!/ eB oe/2s/e8 o7/3t/94 oe /26 / e8 Phone 984 - 001_2 726 - 977 I 344- 5002 344 - L082 No t2 No --- PLIIMBING --- fr fr fr t4 TOTAL PERMIT Furnace/burner & vent < 1OOO,OOOVent Fan/Single Duct OUTDOOR AC IINIT 5 GAS OUTLETS 9 ATR OUTLETS Permit fssuance TOTAL PERMTT Fee Charge 120.00 55.00 55.00 115.00 55.00 20.00 420.00 Charge 36.00 18.00 5.00 2 .50 4 .50 10.00 77.00 Single Fixture Sani-tary Sewer WaLer Service Storm Sewer 181' FIRE LINE 2 BACKFLOW DEVTCES 226 201 564 5 6y 4/g 4,s 4ll,n lo- urly OFFTCE USE SPRINGFIELD Job Number: 980355 OTT OF SPilNGFIETI', Page 2 HAND]CAP ACCESS: Y QUAD AREA: 2CSW LAND USE: 5800 Item Sq. Ftg Main MEZZANTNE TOTAL VALUE OF PRO.JECT Square Feet 5400 1500 $/Square Feet = Value 350, 458 . 00 0.00 350, 458 . 00 Plan Check Fee 66L.70 Rec #: 29322 Date: 04/03/98 Rec By: LISA HOppER ,BUILDTNG Surcharge/admin / MECHANTCAL Surcharge/admin ,PAVfNG VALUE r' PLUMBING Surcharge/admin CITY SDC FEES / ELECTR]CAL PERMIT SEWER HOOKUP FEE SUBTOTAL PERMITS TOTAL PERMIT FEES EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL 40 ,722 .0O 997.75 79.82 77.00 5.36 242 .50 420 . OO 33.60 7 ,224.03 4L4.72 2,380.00 Ll,,874.78 LL,87 4 .7 8 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS rt is the responslbility of the permit ho1der to see that all inspections are made at the proper time. To request an inspection, call 726-3769(recorder), staLe your cit.y designated job number, job address, type ofi-nspection requested and when you will be ready for inspection. Requestsreceived before 7:00 a.m. will- be made the same working day, requests made after7:00 a.m will be made the foll-owing work day. special- rnspections: In accordance with section 305 of the state specialty Codea special inspector shall- be employed by the Owner,/Contractor duringconstruction of any following r'*rrwork. A copy of the special testing reportsshall be furnished to Building Safet.y. rn addition to the inspections specified, the Building officiar may make orrequire other inspections of any const.ruction work to ensure compliance withthe Buj-Iding, City or Development Code. GRADTNG/EXCAVATTNG/FrILrNG - To be done during constr by special stateCertified rnspector. Provj-de reports/tests to city Building rnspectorUNDERGROITND PLIII4BING - prior to fj_Il_ing trench. I,NDERGROI,ND EIJECTRTCAL _ Prior To Cover. FOOTING - After t.renches are excavated. BoLTs TNSTALLED rN coNcRETE - To be done by state certified specialrnspect'or. Provide inspection/test reports to city euilding rnspectorSLAB - To be made after all- insl_ab building service eguipment, conduitpiping, and other equipment items are in place but prior to concreteHrcH srRENcrH BOLTTNG - To be done during constr by st.ate certifiedspecial rnspector- Resurts provided to city Building Division. SPRINGF!ELD Job Number: 980355 CITY OF SPruNGFIEI^D, Page 3 STRUCTURAT WELDS - To be done during constr by State Cert Special Inspector. ResulLs of inspection/test to City Building Inspector ROUGH PTIIMBING - Prior To cover. ROUGH cAS - after line is installed and capped if not attached to an appliance ROUGH MECHA.DIICAL - Prior to cover. ROUGH ELECTRICAL - PriOT IO COVET. ELECTRICAL SERVICE - Must be approved to obtain permanent power. INSULATION - F1oor,' prior Lo decking Wa11/Ceiling; Prior to cover VAPOR BARRIER/INSULATIoN - To be made after insulation and required vapor barriers are in p1ace, buL prior to any wa11 cowering- INSUL-V.B./SUB: TO BE CALLED FOR AT SAME TIME AS SUB FRAMTNG INSPECT DRYWALL - Prior to taping. ROUGH GR.ADING - After gravel is in place but prior to placing concrete FINAL Pf,ITMBING - When all plumbing work is complete. FINAL GAS - When all gas work is complete. cAS SERVICE - After line is instafled and line has been connected to a minimum of one appliance. Pressure test done at this point. FINAL MECIIANICAL - When all mechanical- work is complete. FINAL ELECTRICAL - When afl electrical work is complete. FINAL/SUB FINAL PAVING - After paving is complete. FINAL FrRE - When all- Fire Department requirements have been met. been met. FINAL SITE PLA.I{ - After all requirements have been met for Mini-mum Development Standards or from the Development Agreement. FINAL BUILDING - When all required inspections have been approved and the building is complete. --- ADDITIONAL COMMENTS --- DRC #98-01-005, PLANNER rS,JrM DONOVAN SITE PLAN REVIEW JOURNAL #98-01-005, JIM DONOVAN, PLANNER Plans Revi-ewed By: LORNE PLEGER Building Site Reviewed By: LISA HOPPER Date: 04/22/98 By signature, I state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that a1I information hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shal-I be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield, and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCy will be made of any structure without permission of the Community Services Division, Building Safety. I furLher certify that only contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.055 will be used on this project. I further agree Lo ensure that all required inspections are requested at the proper time, that project address is readable from the street, that the permit card is tocated at the front of the property, and the approved set of plans will remain on the site at alf times durlng construcLion. 4: fuL3/r"!^ ture Date --- VALIDATION Receipt er Date Paid Amount Received \\oDb 3D q8 Received By: m.03 A to/t/qr JoB No. ?g&tr ATTACHMENT A CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WORKSHEET NAI'4E OR COMPANY C'/-/ oJ *r,nr,E,e.',/J LOCATION: DEVELOPM/fr T---.--' I TNT TYPE t-fue ztan''!^*i t- SiZ x$0 X $46. 86 PER PFU $ TOTAL.t4l/.lMc SDC t BUILDING SIZE 1 IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT 2. SANITARY SEWER-CITY /5As7 0. Ft sroRM DRAINAGE E t; -f ne,-" 1'*,V = - r*ta f ,?c't-l6t : lq tat F A /- //c-nt .226 PER sQ. FT. $=f.glaa 3. TRANSPORTATI0N - /do 67^"r^e Pr o-ff.JnA r"z,#,{/ / ,, NO. OF PFU'S (See Reverse Side) NO OF UNITS X TRIP RATE X COST PER TRIP x $472.49 x _ x $472.49 x $472.49 4. SANITARY SEI^IER-MI^IMC Mt^Jl4C CREDiT IF APPLiCABLE (SEE REVERSE) SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS 1,2,3 & 4) ADMINISI,RATIVE FEES BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) X .05 k _1,/*.,ro,, 71 %$ /rt) VO tu$uX $X 4v ^ -?LN0. 0F FEU'.S -rf? X 6?"pep. FEU + $10 MI,IMC/ADM FEE $ .173 $ 3ezl .g 5 oa) $3??- o?ffito,Date 1/Ja/es - TOTAL SDC $'u-?/ - ?,i ss t oj $ 6/ ttc FIXTURE UNIT CALCULATION TABLE: Number ot New Fixtures X unit Equivalent -(NOTE: For remodels, calculate only -e NET additional fixtures) n v.tr Lqurv'trenr - Fixture Units' FIXTURE TYPE Bathtub..... Drinking Fountain...... Floor Drain............... lnterceptors For Grease/Oil/Solids/Etc................. lnterceptors For Sand/Auto Wash/Etc.................. LaundrrT Tub/Clotheswasher... Clotheswasher - 3 Or More.... Mobile Home Park Trap (1 per Trarler)...... Receptor For Refrigerator/Water Station/Etc........ Receptor For Commercial Sink/Dishwasher/Etc.. Shower, Singte Stail...... Shower, Gang........ Sink: Bar, Commercial, Residential Kitchen.... Urinal, StalUlvall... Wash Basin/Lavatory, Single.. Toilet, Public lnstallation. Toilet, Private...... Miscellaneous NUMBER OF NEW FIXTURES UNIT EOUIVALENT FIXTURE UNITS TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS -T - ,/o { ---- - - -- I - - T- ,4 /,1l4 2 1 2 3 6 2 ,6 6 1 3 2 1/Head 2 2 1 6 4 CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE Based on assessed value. lf i mprovements occurred after annexation date in table,calculate credits se a rates Credit for Parcel or Land Only lf Applicable lmprovement (if after annexation date) Year Annexed 3 .?f X$ (Rate X Assessed Value)X$ (Rate X Assessed Value) Rate per $1,00O Assessed Value 1,46 s L6/*CREDIT TOTAL Rate per $1,000 Assessed Value Year Anne 'l 979 or before 1 980 1 981 1 982 1 983 1 984 1 985 1 986 3.83 3.70 3.55 3.39 3.20 2.91 '$ 3. 89 1 987 1 988 1 989 1 990 1 991 1992 1 993 1 994 1 995 1 996 $2.56 2.17 1.73 1.31 o.92 o.v4 0.61 o.45 o.31 o.17 RUNOFF COEFFICTENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE (For Estimating Purposes Only) Residential Commerical............ lndustrial... Governmental......... o.4 0.9 05 0.5 IMPERVIOUS AREA : TOTAL LOT SIZE X RUNOFF COEFFTCTENT / The following project as submitted has the following zonlng, and does not require specific land use sP iFIELE, ss 0/ 0 e C. Tempo Ins talLat i 200 amps''or Ie 201- amps to 40 Over 401- to 60 Over 600 amps E 225 FIFTB STREET SPRINGFTELD, oREGoN 97 INSPECTION REQIIEST: 7 OFFICE: 726-3759 approval. Zoning Date 417NW# signature 1 F I JOB DESCRIPTION Permits are non-transferable and expire if vork is not started vithin 1-80 days of issuance or if vork is suspended for 1,80 days. 2. CONTRACTOR INSTALT.ATION ONLY Electrical Contractor Address Ci ty Phone Supervisor License Number Expiration Date tOlrloo consrr contr. Number LPUPnq Expir:ation Date 1lt Si ture o Supervising Electrician Name Address cir Phone ALLATION The installation is being made on property I ovn which is not intended for sale, ]ease or rent. 0vners Signature: ELECTRICAL PERHIT APPLICATION ty Job Number 3. COMPLETE FEE SCEEDIJLE BELOI{ Nev Residential-Single or Multi-Family per dvelling unit. Service fncluded: ryff*r#&: rtems cost L00g..;sfl-ft. or less S 85.00 Each a&d iit i&raatr, 5o.o ,;fl;;35;o' ?ahtfff"EltlE vork oo Eagh Manu f ' d :iHome',g'f' .tlflr.?-r,T /S funIModular Dve1lingtt|J'}Ct trn .,^-''-I Service or feeder .._",*ug 40.00 Services or Feeders InstalIation, Alterations or ReI tion: A Sum B 100C{ 2 2 4 6 0 R 50 60 00 $ s $r .00 .00 .00 .00 I 0 amps 0 amps or LOO0-vofTs tion 0.00 $ ss.00 $ 80.00 see rtBt' aEove IR Branch Circui ts Nev, Alteration or Extension Per Pane1 OneCircuit t $35.00 Each Addi tional Circuit or vith Service or Feeder Permit $ 2.0O 5p0 Miscelfaneous ( Service/feeder -Each instal-lation Pump or irrigation S signzoutline Lighting-- S Limited Energy/Res $ not ineluded) 40.00 40.00 20.00 5 SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE 52 State Surcharge 3Z Admini.s trative Fee TOTALRECEIVED B DATE: MIiMOIIANI)TJM City ot Springficld To: From: Date: Subject: Mike I(islcy. Maintcnance Supervisor Dave Gadornski, Dlectrical lnspector bh January 12,1999 295 South lStr' Street tN ,l'lris nrenror.nclunr is in rcsponsc t() your rcrlucst lbr an clcctrical changc ordcr lbr the Maintenance Fleet Shop project, 295 South l8'r' Street, City Job Nulnber 980355' The National Electrical Code cloes not require an equipment ground conductor be installed in a service lateral as shown on the plans. The conduit fill capacity for 3" PVC Schedule 40 in Chapter 9, Tables l, 4, and 5 is as follows: a Table I requircs where over two wires are installed, conduit fill capacity is 40 percent. 't'able 4 lists 3" PVC at 7.268 square inclres x 4oyo:2.9072 sqttare inches Table 5 lists type Tl IWN #500 wire as 0.7073 stluare inches x 4 wires :2-8292 a a In accordarrcc with lhc abovc tables,3-inch conduit will nleet thc National Electrical Code requirements. lf I rnay be offurther assistance, please pltone nre at 3663 {-gy CITY OF OREGO'V SPRI. .FIELO D EVE LOP M ENT S ERW C ES DE PARTM E NT Notice of Decision - Limited Land Use - Site Plan Review Date of Letter: Joumal Number: March 31, 1998 98-01-05 rd*Owner/Applicant: City of Springfield Attn: Public Works Maintenance Division 291 S. 18th Street Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 726-3616 Consultinq Architects: Robertson / Sherwood /Architects 132 E. Broadway, Ste.540 Eugene, OR 97401 (541) U2-8O77 qq5 C. Nature of Application: Site Plan Review Application requesting approval for construction of an automotive and heavy equipment repair and maintenance facility at S. 18th Street, in Springfield. Decision: Tentative Site Plan Approval, with conditions, as of the date of this letter. Other Uses That Mav Be Authorized Bv The Decision: None. The proposed use is permitted in accordance with SDC 20.020(3Xa). Future development, occupancy modifications or uses not approved must be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and all applicable permit procedures. Site lnformation: The 4.47 acre development area is an unpaved site with 2 existing structures. The development area surface is compacted gravel. Shallow ditches drain surface water toward an open storm drainage system and the Southem Pacific Rail Road (SPRR) main line easement abufting the property along south property line. The property is zoned Heavy lndustrial on the City of Springfield Zoning Map, consistent with the Metro Plan Diagram. Properg north of the subject site is owned by the City of Springfield, zoned Public Land and Open Space. All other abutting properties are zoned Heavy lndustrial on the City of Springfield Zoning Map. A gated, unimproved driveway provides access to the site from S. 18th Street. The 18th Street public right of way ends at property line, adjacent an SPRR rail road spur easement. The applicant proposes to vacate the full length of 18th Street, south of McKenzie Highway, by separate application to the City of Springfield. Written Comments: Applications for Limited Land Use Decisions require the notification of properg owners/occupants within 100 feet of the subject property allowing for a 14 day comment period on the application. No letters were received. Criteria of Site Plan Aporoval: Section 31.060, Site Plan Review Standards, of the Springfield Development Code states: 'The Director shall approve, or approve with conditions, a Type ll Site Plan Application upon determining that criteria (1) through (4) of this section have been satisfied. lf conditions cannot reasonably be attached to satisff the criteria, the Director shall deny the application.' (T) COMPLIANCE wlTH THE SUBMITTAL REQUTREMET.ITS OF SECTIONS 3.050 AND 3I.O5O OF THIS CODE. The site plan application was accepted as complete on January 13, 1998 and contained all information rcquircd to initiate Type ll Site Plan Review prccedures in accordance with SDC Afticles 3 and 31. This decision rs issued within the rcquircd 120 catendar day rcview peiod. Finding of Fact 1: Criteria t has been met because the applicant has complied with all submittal requlremenb and the decislon was issued wlthin the required 12o days. 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541 ) 726-3753 FAX(s41) 726-368e 2 City of Springfield Site Pn'n Review, Journal #98-01-005 (2t PROPOSED ON€ITE AND OFF€ITE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SPECIFIED IN ARTICLES 31,32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND'OR OVERLAY DISTRICT ARTICLE AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Subcriteria 2a. Conformance with Article 32 (Public and Private lmprovements) Water and Electric. The development site is receiving water service from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB). Existing services can be expanded to serve the proposed development. ln accordance with SDC 32.120, the applicant must coordinate the installation of additional water lines and other utilities with SUB during construction. SUB recommends relocation of the existing water valve and meter out of the paved parking and circulation area. (See attached comments.) Water service facilities will be installed upon the collection of development charges, which are paid directly to SUB. Contact Chuck Davis (726-2396) if there are any questions. There are existing SUB Electric power poles and overhead lines bisecting the site in an east west direction. The proposed extension of lateral service from the east-west over head lines to the building cannot be constructed as proposed according to the service provider. Lateral underground service must be extended from a pole located at the north east corner of the site and must be placed within a new 7'wide public utility easement (pue). (See attached SUB correspondence.) Secondary service must be constructed underground in accordance with SDC 32.120(21. All easements must be shown on the Final Site Plan. (l'he existing 26' overhead utility easement location must be shown.) Ed Head of SUB Electric (726-2395) is the contact person. Services will be installed upon the collection of development charges. Finding: The prcposed plans for installation of water and electical seruice do not comply with the standads in SDC Article 32 forthe prcvision of key uftan servrbes because electrical seruice cannot be extended as prcposed. The following conditions of approval arc applied for full compliance with the prcvisions of this code: o The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to indicate undergrcund electical services extended to the prcposed building frcm the point identified by the seruice prcvider in accordance with SDC 32.120.o A 7' wide PUE must be prcvided for the extension of underground electrical seruices in accordance with SDC 32.120.o The location of the existing 26' wide overhead utility easement must be shown on the plan in accordance with SDC 31.050. Fire and Llfe Safetv. The proposed H4 building occupancy allows the storage chemicals and combustible materials upon approval of a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP). The HMMP must include a hazardous material inventory statement (HMIS) for review by the Fire and Life Safety Division in accordance with the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. Please contact Al Gerard, Fire and Life Safety a1726-2294 for more information on how to prepare an HMMP. Finding: An H4 building occupancy requircs a plan to demonstmte safety prccautions and emetgency response measulas. The following condition of approval is applied: o A hazardous material inventory and handling plan (HMMP) must be submitted for rcview and apprcval by the City of Spingfield Firc and Life Safety Depaftment pior to Final Site Plan Apprcval. Sanitary Sewer. A 4-inch sewer lateral is shown to serve the proposed building, connecting to the new South Springfield lnterceptor Sewer. Connection to the lnterceptor will not be permitted until completion of the public project in the summer of 1998. The proposed truck wash down bay and strip drains must be connected to the sanitary sewer system, not to the storm system as shown on the plan. The wash down and ground gutters must also be covered or moved inside to prevent storm water ftom entering the sanitary system. An existing wash slab and water line at the east side of the property must be connected to the sanitary system or capped and removed during construction. 3 City of Springfield Site Plan Review, Joumal #98-01-005 A copy of a sanitary sewer easement or other documentation will be required prior to crossing the adjacent SPRR property and connecting the proposed lateral to the lnterceptor. All new sewer taps will require permits from the Public Works Department prior to connection. ln Lieu of Assessment charges must be paid prior to connection and are estimated by the City Engineer at $1960. For more engineering information contact Ken Vogeney in the Engineering Division (726- 3688). Finding: The submitted site plan meets the prcvisions of SDC 32.100 because the City Engineer has detennined that the prcposed development can be connected to the public sanitary sewer system after completion of the lnterceptor Sewer prcject. Forfull compliance with the provisions of SDC 32.100 the following Conditions of Apprcval are applied: o The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to show the proposed truck wash and stip gutters covercd and connected to the sanitary sewersystem prcposed. o An easement or other apprcval documentation to extend sewer servrbe across SPRR prcperty to the lnterceptor must be prcvided pior to connection.tr The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to indicate the rcmoval of the existing truck wash unless it is connected to the sanitary sysfem. Storm Sewer. Storm drainage service is available ftom an existing 24-inch storm pipe that bisecls the site. The proposed site drainage system is inadequate to serve the development because additional paving is required to control run off and protect groundwater in accordance with SDC 32.110141. Site paving must be provided so that 20'wide a@ess drives are provided to each building on site. Additionally, all required parking spaces for each building and all heavy equipment storage areas must be paved and drained to an approved storm water system. All paving, with parking and storage areas delineated, must be shown on the Final Site Plan. The on site drainage system must also catch and clean storm water prior to discharging to the public system in accordance with SDC 32.110(4). An oil-water separator (Stormceptor, or approved equal) may be used as a water quality facility for the site by directing all of the storm water into a piped system and then directing the piping into the separator. Altematively, multi- chamber catch basins, with an oil filtering media in all of the catch basins, or bio-filtration swales could be included in the design. The drainage system must incorporate adequate pipe sizes and number of catch basins to efficiently drain the site. No easements are required for the on-site storm system. However, the 16 foot wide easement shown on the plan for the existing 24 inch storm pipe runs under an existing sheet metal building; the pipe it was created for is constructed outside the easement. Prior to Final Site Plan Approval, the portion of the easement that is under the existing building must be vacated and a new easement reserved for that portion of the storm drain pipe that is outside the easement. For more information regarding final storm drainage plans please contact Ken Vogeney of the Engineering Division (726-3688) Finding: The City Engineer has determined that adequate provisions have not been made for rcduction and prc-trcatment of storm water run+ff in accordance with SDC 32.110 because additional site paving is requircd and the proposed system has not been designed with adequate capacity or pre-trcatment capabilities. Ihe following Conditions of Apprcval are applied for full compliance with this code: tr All vehicle circulation arcas, padcing and stonge arcas must be paved and must be delineated on the Final Site Plan.o A site dninage and gruding plan apprcved by the City Engineer must be submifted with the FinalSite Plan.o The existing 16' storm easement must be vacated and rededicated to cover the existing pipe, 4 City of Springfield Site Mr Review, Journal #98-01-005 Street lmprovements: The development site is located at the dead end terminus of 18th Sfeet and abuts other property owned by the City of Springfield. The applicant is aclively pursuing a vacation of 18th Street, south of A Street (OR Highway 126). S. A Street is fully improved along the frontage of propefi under the same ownership as the subject site. S. 18th Street is expected to become an intemal acoess to this development site and abufting properties, therefor no street improvements are required. Safe and reasonable access to the site will be maintained during review procedures in accordance with SDC Article 9 - Vacations. Subcriteria 2b) Conformance with standards of SDC Article 3l- Site Plan Review and Article 20- lndustrial Zoninq Districts. Setbacks: The development area will not have street frontage on a public right of way and does not abut a residential district. ln accordance with 20.050(1&2), no required setback areas apply. However, there is an existing BPA easement that crosses the site which is not shown on the site plan. ln accordance with SDC 20.050(3), the easement must be removed or the building must be relocated. Finding: Therc is an existing BPA easement crossing the site wherc the prcposed building is located. The following condition of apprcval is applied for complete compliance with the provlsions of this code:o The existing BPA easement must be vacated or documentation of other apprcvals must be submitted priorto final site plan apprcval. Landscapins. SDC 31.140(1) Site Plan Review - Planting Standards states, "... the areas of a lot which shall be planted include: (a) All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as specified in the appropriate zoning district. No required setback areas apply. Therefore, there are no required plantings in accordance with SDC 31.140(1)(a). Parkinq. The site plan submitted provides 10 vehicle parking spaces for 5400 square feet of new floor area dedicated to the proposed use and 1600 square feet of accessory storage. A parking rate of one space per 300 square feet is required for the proposed transportation use, and one per 1000 square feet of storage area in accordance with SDC 20.070(4). The new structure requires 19 parking spaces. The existing sheet metal structure on the eastern portion of the site requires one space per 1000 square feet of existing warehouse space, or 7 spaces. The existing office building requires one space per 300 square feet of space, or 2 spaces. A total of 28 parking spaces are required. Exception: Parking spaces may reduced on a one for one basis when the number of spaces required is more than the number of employees working on the busiest shift, provided that an area equal to the total number of spaces reduced is held in reserve for future use (sDc 20.070(7). ln accordance with SDC 32.190 two handicapped accessible parking space must be provided when 25 -50 spaces are required. One ADA space must be provided adjacent the new building and one must be provided adjacent the existing structures. Unobstructed and direct pedestrian and wheelchair access to structures must be provided. One ADA space must be van accessible and provide an 8'wide landing pad in accordance with federal ADA and UBC standards. All paved parking, circulation and storage areas must be delineated on the Final Site Plan in accordance with SDC 31.190. Finding: The site ptan submifted does not fully meet the prcvisions of SDC for pa*ing lot design because an insufficient number of pa*ing spaces and intemal circulation arcas have been identified in accordance with SDC 31.190. The following condition of apprcval is applied for full compliance with this code: tr The Finat Site Plan must be rcvised to provide or teseve 28 patuing spaces (2 ADA) in accordance with 31 . 1 90. All paved pa*ing, intemal circulation and storage areas musf be delineated on the Final Site Plan. (3) 5 City of Springfield Site Plan Review, Journal #98-01-005 Ultimate Finding of Fact 2: This criterion ls met because Subcnteia a), b) and c), as conditioned, tully conform to the requiremenb of this Code pertainlng to sufficient public and pdvate improvemenb to accommodate the proposed development ln accordance with SDC Artrcles 20, 31, 32 and the Metro Plan. TNVENTORTED NATURAL (TNCLUDTNG REGULATED WETLANDS) AND HTSTORIC FEATURES OF THE SITE HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED IN THE PROJECT DESIGN. The subject site is defined as Tax Lot 504 on Lane County Assessor's Maps 17-03-36 The Metro Plan, the Draft Natural Resources Special Study, the NationalWetlands lnventory, the draft Springfield Wetland lnventory Map, the well head protection zone inventory map and the list of Historic Landmark Sites have been consulted. No wetland, natural or other cultural resources have been identified on the site. lf any artifacts are encountered during construction, there are state laws that could apply, ORS 97.740, ORS 358.905, ORS 390.235. lf human remains are discovered during construction it is a Class 'C' felony to proceed under ORS 97.740. Findtng of Fact 3: This crlterion is met because the Dlrector and the Ctty Englneer have determlned that the site plan, as conditioned in accordance with SDC 32.110, has adeguately considered the significance of the Booth-Kelly ltlll Race in lE design and function. (4) PARKTNG AREAS AND TNGRESS-EGRESS POTNTS HAVE BEEN DESTGNED SO AS TO FACILITATE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFEW, TO AVOID CONGESTION AND TO MINIMIZE CURB CUTS ON ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREETS AS SPECIFIED IN ARTICLES 31,32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND'OR ZONING OVERI.AY DISTRICT ARTICLE AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Parkinq Areas. The submitted parking lot design has been reviewed by the Director and Transportation Engineer and conditioned to provide adequate traffic circulation area, regular and handicapped parking in accordance with the Americans \Mth Disabilities Act and the applicable provisions of SDC 18.070. lnEress and Egress Points. ln accordance with SDC 32.070, ten foot vision clearance areas must be maintained at the gated entry way to the development area and at the intersection of private driveways and the public right of way. No storage area shall obscure the entry way on the Final Site Plan and vision clearance triangles shall be maintained during future vacation and development procedures. Finding of Fact 1: Staff finds the site plan, as conditioned, has designed parking and access points to facllitate traffic and pedestrian safety in accordance with the provislons of SDC Artrcles 20, 31, 32 and the Americans tllith Disabilities AcL The Final Site Plan must be revised to indicate undergrcund electical seruices extended to the prcposed building frcm the point identified by the seruice prcvider in accordance with SDC 32.120. The location of the existing 26' wide overhead utility easement must be shown on the plan in accordance with SDC 31.0fi. The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to show the prcposed truck wash and strip gutters covered and connected to the sanitary sewersystern prcposed. Ytlha! Needs To Be Done Bv The Aoplicant To Obtain Final Site Plan Approval?_Three copies of a Final Site Plan and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be submifted to the Planning Division withln g0 days of the date of this tetter showing conformity with the Tentative ptan and compliance with SDC Article 31 Criteria of Approval 14, as conditioned: 1 2. 3. 6 City of Springfield Site Frlrrt Review, Joumal#98-01-005 4. The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to indicate the rcmoval of the existing truck wash unless ft is connected to the sanitary systern.5. All vehicle circulation arcas, parl<ing and stonge areas must be paved and must be delineated on the Final Site Plan. 6. A site drainage and grading plan apprcved by the City Engineer must be submifted with the Final Site Plan.7. The Final Site Plan must be rcvised to provide or teserve 28 pa*ing spaces (2 ADA) in accordance with 31 .190. All paved pa*ing, intemal circulation and storage arcas must be delineated on the Final Site Plan. Required Easements and Documents: Easements with property descriptions must be submitted for review by the City Surveyor with a fee to cover the cost of filing with the Lane County Deeds and Records Office:D A 7' wide PUE must be prcvided for the extension of underyround electrical seruices in accordance with SDC 32.120.tr A hazardous mateial inventory and handling plan (HMMP) must be submifted for rcview and approval by the City of Spingfield Firc and Life Safety Depaftment prior to Final Site Plan Apprcval.o An easement or other apprcval documentation to extend sewer seruice across SPRR property to the lnterceptor must be prcvided pior to connection. tr The existing 16' storm easement must be vacated and rcdedicated to coverthe existing pipe pior to final site plan apprcval.o The existing BPA easement must be vacated or documentation of other apprcvals must be submifted priorto final site plan apprcval. FINAL SITE PLANS NOT IN SUBSTANTTAL CONFORMITY WTH THE APPROVED TENTATIVE SITE PI.AN, AS CONDITIONED, REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC NOTICE PROCEDURES WHICH DELAY FINAL APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMITS. SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATIONS REQUIRE A NEW 120 DAY PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WTH SDC 31.100. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING PLANS TO OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDC 31.080 AT THEIR OWN RISK. ALL CONCURRENT SUBMITTALS ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL SITE PLAN. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDC 31.090 WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL PI.ANS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE BEEN REVISED. CONFLICTING PLANS CAUSE DELAYS. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: ln order to complete the review process, a Development Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of Final site plan review are binding upon both the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff and upon aporoval of the Final Site Plan and must be signed by the property owner prior to the issuance of a buildinq oermit. SIGNS: Signs are regulated by the Springfield City Code Article 9, Chapter 7. The number and placement of signs muit be coordinated with the Community Services Division. The locations of signs on a site plan do not constitute approval from the Community Services Division. A separate sign permit is required. Lisa Hopper (726-3790) is the contact person. Additional lnformation: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available at a cost of $0.75 for the first page and $0.25 for each additional page at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Systems Development and Sanitary ln Lieu of Assessment Charges not a part of this limited land use decision. Estimated fees are included for informational purposes only and are set by separate city ordinances. Please contact the Public Works Department (726-3753) for more information. 7 7 City of Springfield Site Pran Review, Journal #98-01-005 Appeal: lf you wish to appeal this Type ll Limited Land Use Site Plan Review Approval decision, you must do so within 10 davs of the date of this letter. Your appeal must be in accordance with SDC, Article 15, Appeals. Appeals must be submitted on a City form with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the applicant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. Questions: Please call Jim Donovan in the Planning Division of the Development Services Department at(il1) 726-3660 if you have any questions regardinglhis process. SPF|ING .LO {)fi, aafnlet roc1tl,EFato r& 1000 sq.ft. or less uach additional 500 sq. ft or Portion thereof Each Manuf'd Home' or ular'Dvellinge or Feeder or Feeders oor Alterations /F 401 t 60L amps to 1 0ver 1000 amPs/vo Reconnect 0n1Y C 'or to to Ci or F, ilJi,i-r"rilY Per dvelling unlt' service rncruded, ,,u*" cost JOB 2. COMRACTOR ONLY Electrical Contractor Address Ci ty =u/^ ^. Supe ?as€5 Expiration Date /e €7 consrr conrr. Nunbe: /2% Expiration Date ?'ze'?B of Su rvising Electrician i4 n^ fnllawlhg prcld, r. , snd does not lo-l-?( ''''''*lon*-C9- BLE.TRT.AL pERHrr ArpLrcATr,N 225 FIFTE STREET $fuite-r'fiLD' oREGoN e7477 --iiffi;aioH neouEst z 726-37 orrrCst 726-3759 ,(3,no.,r"o ,) Date ON BELOg 1 ,, AOF INST u> Sum Permits are non-transferable and expire if vork is not started vithin 180 days ;; i;;;.;"" o, ii vork is susPended for 180 daYs. $ 8s.00 $ 1s.00 $ 40.00 1,/'t/s s0.00 s 60.00 $100.00 s130.00 $300.00 $ 40.00 1 ru TemDorary Services or Feeders in"i"fi"iion, Alteration or Relocation amps'Iess / $40.00 -92400 amps --- E t?.99 600 amps $ 80'00 s or Lb00-6Es see 'rB" aboveSignature t5; I ( 0vners Name Address e Ci ty Phone ??4 -7%I OVNER INST The installation is being made on property I ol.,n vhibh is not intended for saIe, lease or rent. Ovners Signature: DATE: ion Per Panel of $ 3s.00 . $ 2.00 /4 E. Misce]laneous (Service/feeder not included ) -Each installation Pump or irrigation - Sign/Out1ine Lighting- Limi ted EnergY/Res --Limi ted EnergY/Comm SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE 57. State Surcharge 3Z Administrative Fee TOTAL . ,,. . t,e s 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 20.00 $ 36.00 RECETVED B 5 ara LEGAL DBSCRIPTION*": ii-ae aF f city Job Nwber ?fuV€f Tnformation Buil"dOn. Golrculfng.lbsilfrtgl MIKE RISLEY CITY OF SPRINGFTELD 2O1 SOUTH I8T STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 DECEMBER 28. 1S98 1994 UBC SECT|oN 2227.4 ASTM A325 PROTO MODEI.6020A 288(} Testing Laboratory DivisionPiftsburgh REPORT OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLT TESTING TESTED FOR: CRITERIA: BOLT TYPE(S}; TOROUE WRENCH: PSI LAB NO.: CC: PROJECT: FLEET REPORT NO.: 722-BA23}-ZZ 29s soUTH 1a{'STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON JOB #t-985, PERMTT #980355 AS REOUIBED BY THE ClTiIll-gIATED ABOVE, (3)lryHCAr BOLT ASSEMBT]!! oF EACH DTAMETER, LENGTH ANDGRADE *EBE suBMlrrED To Psl BY ooitaaniHepneseureirvi rnriiig tqr rEsrrrrc. psr usro .ALTBRATEDSKTDM.RE M.DEI #Ms' sEBlAt #I2055 wiiEx conapues wntt iiic Iicrror 2227.zron rrniior 'AUBRAT'BS. THE TOBOUE WRENCH {SI IDEI{TIFIED IN THIS REPORT SHOULOTHE TABIE ABovE FoR coRnEsponrorarc s6LiAssEuBuEs. BE SET TO THE TOROUE VALUE'IDENTIFIED IN REMABKS:SAMPLES DO NOT MEET THE FEOUIRED LENGTH (3X DIAMETER} AS PER ASTM A37O SEC. 1.1 TECHNICIAN: MIKE OEWEY RESPECTFUTLY SUEMITTED, PROFESSIONAI SERUTCE//NDUSTRIES, TNC. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD - BOB RADOSTTTZ ROBERTSOIII/SHERWooo/ARCHITECTS - oAvE GUADAGNIANG ETIIGINEERING GROUP - JOK ANG DORMAN CONSTBUCTTON _ TtM McMAHON JAlt I pgg DORIIAN COI.ISIR$ I ION INC. ESIE urI BOLT DESCRIPTION REOUIRED TENSION. SEE UBC TABLE 22.IV.D (K|PS} 2a RESUL TS (FT-LBSI TRIAL #T #2 TRIAL #3 VALUE (AVERAGE 3 TRIALS X 270 240 270 27? DATE; a m r.leR 11 '99 1?:49 FR SHEET FAX TO ?263589 P.@t/2@ Inforurution Pittsbu rgh Testing Labo ratory DivisionBuild On Englneedng . Consultittg' Testlngt trllCOYER Hard Copy to Follow: _ Yes X No To:fuB Company:Ota nr SQ)IEFIEJD Fax#7U--g-gq Subjcct: Datc:'fime @,1-/)-aq 5:ry>a.nl. Pages: Zrc), , irrcluding this cover sleet, COMMENTS: CONFtDENTIAI.IT\/ NOTICE - Thc docunrenrs accompanying tlris tclccopy trarrsrnis$ion contain inlbrma(ion wlriclr is lcgally privilcged. Thc inlbrrrration i.s intcndcd only lor thc usc of rhc rceipicnt narned ahove. ll'you havc ieceived ttlts tulccoDy in crror. plcasc notifl,us irrrrncdtarcly by tclcphorre t(r;rrnllgc (hc rcturn ol'thc (clocopicd docttt)lctr( to us. You ilrc hcrby notificd lhat an), unnuthorizcd disclosurc, cop1.ing, distriburion or rcliancc on llrc From the desk of. BRIAN CURRIER Geotechnical & Cottstruction Services Staff Engineer contca(s ol' tltis telecof)icd l5 stricth, nrrrhibitcd Professronat Sorvice lndustries, lnc, . 27t0 Wasl slh Avenue . Eugene, OFI 97402 . Phone 3411444-9?12 . Fax Sat1344-2735 P1 TESTED FOR DATE: l,lRR 11 ',99 1,?, @9 FR MIKE RTSI,EY CITY OF SPRINGFIE],D 201 SOU,I.H 18TH STREET SPRTNGFTELD, OR 97477 October 08, 1998 TO ?263689 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P.@2/?@ F],EET BUIIJDING PROJECT 295 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRTNGFTELD, OREGON JOB #r- - 98 5 , PERMTT llgB 03 s5 REVISION #1 ouR REPORT NO.; 72e-80239-7 PAGE 1 OF { TESTDATA; (5) SPRINGFIELD 3/4'-O (PS] I,AB #2805) OPT- MQIST.8-5t MAXIMUl\/I LAg DRY * OENslry 14?.0 CQMMENTS' EST DEPTH Ei,EVATIAN WFI DEN9ITY DRY DENSTTV l_31.5 ]32.7 Spec 95t Min l 4il 4f rr 4,t TEST LOCATION: 1-B 1-B 1-B 1-A ]_EI l_-A TES-T NO 1 60tL tD _Nu!\|F.Et. s WATER CONTENT 3 9 89.s \.!MTA9I IUII 5 3.4 135.6 t37 .22 3 5FIJBF FLBF FITEF 90.3 t26 .2 85.I 5 3.+ 4_5FI,BF FLBF L47 .O L47 -Q 147.0 1{7,0 L47.0 4.L 130.5 145.9 L42.5 140 .6 f5.b :? L52.!103.5 93 .1r35 159.6PI,BF 5 E Aq PIT #]-2 (CENTDR) Z 3 PIT #11 (CENTER) PIT #10 (CENTER) PIT #14 (CENTER) PIT #9 (CENTER) MIDDIJE OF PAD 5 5 NOTES:TEI DE PER & ASTM D3017-8S(93)'ooMMENTSI + (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: ?ROX],ER REMARKS: PSI did not moniEor r-he materiaL placehent ',ltsCHNI(-'IAN: MIKE DEWEY cc "ITY oF SPRINGFTELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) THESE TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO TIIE $PECIFIC LOL}I IONS NOTEO AND I,AY NOT REPRESEI\IT ANY O'HER LOCATIONS OR ELEVATbNE REPORTs AAY NM BE REPRODUCED. O(CEPI II'I FI'LL Wt}{OuT U/NTTTEN PEF'II'ASIoN BY FROFES$IoNAL 5ERVICE INOUSTRIEA. INC, 1. FILL MATERIAL A, TEST RESULTS GOIvIPLY WITH SPEclFlcATlO^ls 2. BACKFILL E. PERCENT CON/IPACTION DOES NOT COMPLY 3. BASE COURSE vVlTH SPECIFICATIONS 4. SUBBASE C. RETESTOFPREVIOUS TEST 5. SOIL CEMENT D. MOISTURE IN E(CESS OF SPECIFICATI9NS 6. OTHER E. MOISTURE BELOW SPECIFICATIONS dry on STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENTDATA M: D: D. Respecffully submitted, Ptofos s I o nal Seryiee I nd u slrl es, I n c. PSt A'lOO.3 i3)F ) 6 .tn AI 1 TESTED FOR: DATE: f'1RR 11 '99 17:49 FR MIKE RTSI,EY CITY OF SPRINGFIEI,D 201 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIE],D, OR 97477 Oclober 08, 1998 TO ?2636e9 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: p.@Jt2@ FLEET BUII,DING PRO.]ECT 29S SOUTH IETH STREET SFRINGFIE],D, OREGON .lOB #1-985, PERMfT #980355 REVISION #1 ouR REPORT NO.: 722-AO239-7 PAGE 2 OF 4 TEgT NEPTH sorL lD N(iNlgeR MAXIIIUM LAB DFiY * DENSTTY WATER ;ONTENT WET DENSry PERCHNT COMPACTIAN 4il7 5 145-5 DFYoEN!rr..'_ 99.0 B L47.0 l_47.0 96.3 9 E 5 135.3 r41.5 92.o 10 14?.0 L47 "0 qtr d5 5 3.8 4.0 4.1 ?1 4.2 152.0 147.3 138 - 7 r_46.1, L40.7 146.9 140.3 134.5 91.5 t2 1 4I 4r, {n FI,BF FI,BF FLBF'4" 5 141 .O 147.0 96.2 COMMENTS'TEST TEST LOCATION: NO ELEVATION ET Nl;. FI,BF FIJBF 4-5 1-A 1-A-C 1.8-C 1-A-C 1-B- L41, _ 4 r--A-c 5 I NORTHWEST OF NORTHWEST CORNER OF P]T #10 (IN OVEREXCAV.ETION) - NEW FAT) RETBST OF PIT #11 (AI,IPP) 10 11 9 RETESI' OF PIT #12 (AMPP) RETEST OF PIT #12 (AMPI7) RE,IEST OF PIT #1-O (AMPP) l2 RETEST OF PIT #10 (A}4PP) NOTES PER ASTM 02522-91 & ASTM D3017-88(93) TCOMMENTS: Lbs. on * (5) 'I'180 TEST INSTRUMENT: TROX]-ER REMARKS: P.SI did not moniE.or the mat.erial placement. TECHNICIAN: MIKE DEWEY CC. {--ITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) THEsETESTRE.9!LT9APPLYONLY ToI.IILSPECIFICLOCAT,ONSN TEOANOMAYNOTNEFRESENTANYoTHER LGATI6tIToRELEvA'Tot{S. NEPOFTS M Y NOT BE REFRODUCEb, ExtrEP]- IN FULL, wTHoUT wRITTEN FERMIS9IeN EY PRoFEESIoNAL sERyIcE INDI,.i,?iIEs, INc. 1. FILL MATERIAL A. TEST RESIJLTS COMPLY W|TH SFECIFICATION52.EACKFILL B, PERCENTCOMPACTIONDOESNOTCOMPLY 3. BASE COURSE WTH SPECIFICATIONS4.SUtsBASE C. RETESTOFPREVIOUSTEST 5, SOIL CEMEI'IT D. MOISTURE IN E(CESS OF SPECIFICATIONS6. OTIiER E. MOISTURE EELOWSPECIFICATIONS dty STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENTDATA M;D: Respectfully subrnitted, Profess io nal Seryice I n du stri as, I nc, F91 A"lilrl (l)1. TEST DATA: (5) SPRINGFIELD 3/4'I -g (PSI ],AB #2805) OPt. MQIST. = 8.5K 7 B TESTED FOR NtrR 11 ',99 t7.@9 FR MIKE RISLEY CITY OF SPRINGFTELD 201 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIE],D , OR 97 477 TO ?253589 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT; P.@4/?g FIEET BUII.IDING PRO.TECT 295 SOUTH 18TH S?REET SPRINGF]EI,D, OREGON JoB #1-985. PERMTT #980355 REVISION #1 722-A0239-7 PAGE 3 OF 4DATE:October 0B 1998 OUR REPORT NO TESTDATA: (5) .SPRINGFIELD 3/4"-O (PSI LAB #2805) OPT. MOTST. = 8.57 COMMENTs- TEST LOCATION ORY DENgIYYNO WATER CONTENT 4.0 1-A-C TEST DEPTH ELEVATION MAXIMUM I,Ats DRY * DENSITY VVET DENSTTV PEFCENT COMPACTION 13 4."FLBF 145.5 139_9L4',t.O sotL to NUMtsEN 5 95.2 RETEST OF PIT #9 (AMPP) NOTES: TESTS PERFORMED PER & ASTM D3017-EE(93)'COMMENTS dry * (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: TROXTER REMARKS: PSI did not monit.or the material placemenE. TECI"INTCIAN: MTKE DEWEY cc 'IITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) THETE TEsi REgULTTi AFPLY oNLY I,o YI1E sPEcIFIC LoCATIONS NOTED ^ND [4AY NOT REFREEENT ANY OTHEf( LOCATIONS OR ET6/ATloNA. REPoRT5 M'/ iloT BE AEF.NoOiICEO, EXGEPI IN PULL VT]THoUT Y!fi'|TTEN PERMISSION BY PRffi9SION.AI. SERVICE If{DIJSTFIES. IIIC. A. B. d. D. E.on ;, 2.) 3. I4,, 5, 5, o I/UTH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLY STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENT DATA M: D; D; Respectfully submitted, Professional Service lndustries, lnc. PgtA-!@-l (3)F I3 TESTED FOR: DATE; tlFR 11 '99 1?:18 FR MIKE RISIEY CTTY OF SPRINGFTELD 201 SOU:TH ]-BTH STREET SPRINGF]ELD, OR 97477 Ocllober 0ts, l-998 T0 ?263589 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P.A5/29 FI,EET BUTLDING PROJECT 295 SOTITH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIEI,D, OREGON JoB #1-985, PERMTT #9803s5 REVISION *1 OUR REPORT NQ,: 722 - 80239 -7 PAGE 4 OF 4 TESTDATA: (5) SPRINGFIELD 3/4"-o (PSI LAB #2805) OPT. MOIST. = 8.5i- f DRY DENSITY PERCENT COMPACTION l.-A r_-B r_a-rl 1-L-r, 1-A-C ELEVAT'ON FGBS FGBF L47.0 TEST LOCATION J PAD/MIDD],E OF WASH BAY PI'I #13 (CENTER) RETEST OF PIT #13 4 F.ETEST OF PIT #13 RETEST OF PIT #] TEST NO SOIL ID NUMBER WATER CONTENT t TE.CT UEPTH 5 145.6 2 3 {il 99 90.2 c) o, oT.'GBF FGBF 5 5 L32.6 136-s 141.I4"95.s 5 95 ,3FGBF 147. 0 L47 .O t47 _o q? 7.5 7.2 142.5 146.3 151-4 1.41 . O 4.8 6.8 r53 .0 140.l_ 4 r\4rt 1 1 NoTEs: TESTS * (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUIVIENT; TRQXLER REMARKS: PSf did r-rL)t monit,or che material- placemenE FGBS a FINAI, GRI'DE BELOW SLAB FGBh' = FINJ\L GRADE BEITOW FOOTINGS TECI.INTCIAN: MIKE DEWEY CC :ITY OF SPRINGFTELD (BC)B RADOSTITZ) I F€$E I E:i I FtstILTS APPLY oNLY To THE SPEoIFIC LocATIaI{g NQTED ANU TYIAY NOT REFBEAENT ANY OT}IER LACA?IONS OR ELEVATIONE, IIEPO({Tg MAY NOT BE REPROOUCED. SCEFT IN FULL. WITHOTIT WKIfTET PERIT{SSION BY PROFEgs'IONAL SEhVICE INOUSTRIEE. INC. ASTM D2S22-91 &ASTM O3017-88(e3) TCOMMENTS: dry .I. FILL MATERIAL 2. BACXFILL 3. tsASE COURSE 4. SUBBASE 5. SOIL CEMENT 6. OTHER A. B. c, D. E, WITH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLY on STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENTDATA M: D D Respectfully submitted, Profeseio na I Senti ce I ndq s tri es, I nc. Fsta-i@-r (llF COMMENTS' L52.6 5 l'1AR 11 '99 1?:10 FR Informati.on ToBuildOn Englrtgledttg. @nsiltiry e TEs',ng P ittsbu rgh Testi ng Laborato ry Division 1 1,1- - gO 23q"1 ,ofoflo T0 ?253589 P.@5/29 j t4 I0 q i ,l ,l -'t - \.gNs\l .t ,r)l ..1 I .t i \ -l--; :-" I .l.l F Professional Servic€ lndustries. lnc, ' 271o W€st Sth Avenue . Eugene, OR 97402 . Phone 541l4gl-9212 - Fax VllU+2735 I I i I T ,I I i!. i. 3 @ I I I , I I I i I I TESTED FOR DATE: tlRR 11 '99 1?:18 FR MIKE R]SIJEY CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 2O]- SOI]TH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97471 October 07 1998 REPORT OF INSPEETIOII SERVICES PROJECT: ouR REPORT NO.: 722-80239 - 6 TO ?263589 P.@7/24 FIEET EUIIJDING PROJECT 295 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON JOB #1-eS5, PERMTT #980355 REMARKS:AS REQUESTED, PSI REPRESENTATIVE MIKE DEWEY WAS PRESENT ON SITE QN THE .ABOVE DATE I-OR THE PI]RPOSE OE INSPECTTNG/TESTING EARTHWORK AS FOLI,OWS AFTER ARRIVING ON SITE, PSI REPRESENTA,TIVE I^JAS INFORMED BY TIM (DORIVTAN CONSTRUCTION) AND BOB (CITY OF SPRINGFIELD) T}IAT SPECI.AI, INSPECTION WAS TO BE DONE, PSI REPRESENTATIVE WAS INF'ORIIED BY MTKE (CENTERI,INE EXCAVATION) THAT THE FILL THAT HAD ALRE^ADY BEEN PLACED IN PITS 10, 11, & 13 WAS AS FOLLOWS: 28r'OF 5'OPEN ROCK, THEN GEOTEX FABRre, '[HEN 3 LIFTS (28'' E.A,CI{ ],IFT) OI':".0 ROCK, NOTE TI{AT PIT T3 NOW EXISTED AS AN OVER- EXCAVATION (-12'x 20') AS DID pITS 10 & l-1 (ALSO -12'X 20') - THESS OVER- EXCAVATIONS WERE PERFORMED ON MQNDAY IN ORDER TO REMOVE TRASH DISCOVERED IN THEM. PSr REPRESENTATIVE OBSERVED IJI-FTS 4'8 OIr 3"-0 ROCK IN BOTH OVER.EXCAVAT]ONS. I,IFT 4 & 5 WERE HOB-PACKED AI{D ROI,],ED. SUBSEQUENT LIFTS WBRE ONLY ROLLED. PROOFROI,LS OVER THESE ].IFTS (5-E) ALL PASSED. AT TI{E POINT WHEN 3/4"-0 ROCK hlAS TO BE PLACED, PSI REPRESENTATIVE WAS INFORMED BY TIM (DORMAN CONSTRUCTION) THAT CENTERLTNE CONSTRUCTTON WOULD NOT HAVE Tr{E -i /4"-o LrtrTS IN THE REMAINING PITS (9, 10, 11, L2, 13, & L4) UNTrL -9: OO PM, TI{EREFORE HB ASKED PSI REPRESENTATIVE TO LEAVE THE SITE AND SCFIEDUITE POR 8:00 AM THE FOLLOVIING MORNING FOR COMPACTION TESTING OIf TI{E 314"-0 [,rFT (FrNA], GRADE BELOW FOOTINGS) . PI,EASE SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PIT AND OVEREXCAVi.\TION IDENTIFICATION. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, PROFESSIONAI SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC cc: CITY oF SPRINGFfEI",D (BOB EADOSTITZ) It.LFonTs IIAY NoT BE REPRoDUoED, Ex6EPT IN FUII., WTHOUY WTdTTCN PERMIs5ION BY FFOFESAIONAL g€RVICE INOU5IRIES' INC' Pst A-300-1il F tlRR 11 ' 99 1?: 1@ FR TO ?263689 P.@B/2@ Information BuildOn EngtneerirtE. Cottsuldng o lEilne Pittsbu rgh Testi ng Laborato ry Division 1zz- eo)3 1-L lol-tf rc o,rtS +Z l0 I 1 4 3 :i Professional Service lnduBtriep, lnc, . 2710 West Sth Avqnue . Eugene, OR 97402 - Phone 541/484-{t1Z . Fax il1l344.ZT3F ]_} t1 @ ',:. TESTED FOR: DATE f,1FR 11 '99 1?:14 FR MIKE RISLEY CITY OF SPRINGFTELD 2OI SOUTH 1B'I'H STREET SE'RINGFIELD, OR 97471 Occober' 05, 1998 TO ?253589 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: p.SJIZ@ FI,EET BUI],DING PROJECT 295 S. 18TH ST; JOB #1-985 ouR REPoRT NO.: 722-80239 -s PAGE 1 OF 5 TESTDATA: (5) SPRINGFIELD 3/4"-0 (PSI I"AB #2805) oPT. MOIST. = 8.58 TEgT NO TEST DEPTI.I ,TION MAXIMUM IAB DRY * DENSITY COMMENTS- Spec.95t Min t-B 'a Atla 85.4 1-B :1.-B 1-B 1-B 1-B --.1 I E 5 +r' TEST LOCATIONT 3.3 3.5FI,BF PlT #]. (CENTER) PIT #2 (CENTER) PIT #3 (CENTER) sotL tD NUMBEN WE1 OEN6IIY 5 tzl _9 80_1_I FIJBF )tr WATER ___99|{lEl.'I_ 117.8 5 3.s 1r3.s2 129 .8rJ !' rrE Il FI,BF 0 5.t 117.5 134.6 t27.O r-23 - 3FI,BF 5,L 125.7 77 .2 88_l 83.9 85.5FI,BF t4?.0 L47 .Q L47.0 147.0 1,47 . O 125.5147.0 130.0 5 5 I 3 5 6 l+PIT #4 (CENTER) NOTEg: P]T #5 (CE\TTER) RBTEST OF #5 PER of 1. FILL MATERIAL 2. BACKFILL 3, EASE COURSE 4, SUBBASE 5. SOIL CEMENT 6. OTHER WITH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLY& ASTM D3017-88(93) 'COMMENTS: dry A. E. c. D. E.* (s) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: TROXI,ER, 3430 REMARKS: PSI did noE monitor the material- placement. FLBF = FINJ\I LIFT BBI,OW PQQTINGS TECI-TNICIAN: MIKE DEWEY CC . ^ITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) THEEE TEST REgULTs APPLY ONLV IO YHE EFECIFIC LODAT'ONg NOYED AND I\IAY NOT REPREAEIT AI{Y ETNER LOqTIONS OR ELEVA'! IONS. aEPoRTg MAY I.IOT hE xLPRoDUcEo. E)(cEPT IN FULL, WTHOUT wl(ITI.EN PERMSSION BY PROFEAAONAL SIFVICE INDUSTRIE€' INC. STANDARD COUNT M: 6'7 9 ADJUSTMENT DATA M: 2947 Res pectfu lly su bmitted, Profes ei o n eI Senzce I n d u stri ss, I nc. D D P3r a-1ao,t {3)F DRY DENSITY PERCENT COMPACTION 1,29 .8 l,lRR 11 ',99 t?t 11 FR T0 ?253589 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P .1a,/2@ I'I.EE? BUI],DING PROJECT 295 S. 18TH ST; JoB #1-985 P.A,GE 2 OF 6 TESTED FOR M]KE RISLEY CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 201 SOUTH ISTH STREET SPRINGFIEl,D, OR 97 477 DATE OcE,ober 06, L998 ouR REPORT NO.: 122-80239-5 TEST DATA: (s) SPRINGFTEI,D 3/4'r -0 (PSI LAB #2805) OPT. MOIST 8.58 MAXIMUM OOMMENTST TEST vr,Er OENSITY *Spec 95* Mir-r L22.s l_-B 1-B 1-A .t_-B 1-n 1-B C I]4 C Ct2 TEST LOCATION: q '77.O PERCENT COMFA6TION sotL lo NUMBER ]-47.0 12? .95 729 -3 83.5 g4.s5147_0 4.1 4.t-'7 8 4tt 159. +103.95l+1.0 4.4 124.2 L32.7 120.2 ELEVATION r.LEF FLBF FLBF FLBF +,, 4il 9 1L) 5_5 125.0 L4't .9 81.8 otr dFLBF 5 5 LL8.7 L40 .2 LL3.25 L47.O ]-41 .O :-47.0FLBF : o PIT #6 (CENTER) CF:NTER OF PIT #7 MIDDIE Otr PAD 10 RETEST PIT #5 (AF'TER I{OE PACKING) RETEST OF PIT #2 (AFTER I.IOE PACKING) LZ RETEST OF PIT #1 (AFTER WATERING) dry 1. FILL MATERIAL 2. BACKFILL 3. tsASE COURSE 4- SUBBASE 5. SOIL CEMENT 6. OTHER A. E. c. D. E. WITH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLYNOTES:AS 1 & ASTI4 D3017-88(e3) rC6['[VIENT$: * (5) T 180 TESTINSTRUMENT: TROXLER, 3430 REMARKS: PSI did not rflonitor the materiaf placement. CC CITY OF SPRINGFIEI,D (BOB RADOSTITZ) l HEEE TEs'r REEU LTs ApFLv oNLy To TH€ gFEctFlc LOcAnoNa NoIED AHD l'rrAY aloT REPREaEI{T AtrY o?}lEt LocATloNs oR ELEvATloug. fiCpoRrs My Nfi sE REpRooUcED. ETCEFr lN FULL, WTHOUT Wf{llYeil PERMISSIoI{ E PROFEaAIoNAL sEfiVltrg ltlDtETRlEEl, INc. STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENT DATA M; D, D: Respectfully submitted, Ptofess i o n aI Service I nd u stri es, I n c. PSr A-10O': {3tF WATER -q9NTEry,I- DRYpENSrrY 4.0 TESTED FOR tlFR 11 '99 1?:11 FR MIKE RISLEY CI,TY OF SPRINGFIELD 201 SOUTH ].8TI.I STREET S PRINGFTELD , OR 9'7 477 TO ?253689 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P.tvza PAGE 3 OF 6DATEOctober 06 1998 ouR REPoRT NO.: 722-8023s-5 TEST DATA: (5) SPRTNGFTEID 3,/4"-0 (pSI LAB #2805) opt- MOIST. = B.s& ELEVATION 4'! 4n 4r FI,BF FLBF TEST LOCATION 13 RETT]SI. OF PIT #3 (AFTER HOE PACKING) WATER CONTENT COtiilMENTS' t--B-c 1-B-C 1-B-C l--B-c 1-B-C 1^A.C59s.9 1+I{ETEST OF PIT #3 (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING) TEST NO, MAXIMUM I-qB DRY DENSITY wEr DENSITY bRY DEAISTY PEFCENT COMPACTION 1l Fl,BF E solL to NUMBER 6 -4 130.9 89.0 FI,BF 6.6 139.3 146-9 93 .7 147.0 L47.0 a4'7 .0 6-4 L41 .2 94.1 1+ 15 I5 b.LBF FLEF 5 I47.0 5.8 13?-8 138.3 139.0 9{1 .6 EJ L47 _0 5.s t47.L L47 .7 138.7 94 .4 4" 4h r-8 L7 4'l L47.0 5.7 t-49 _ 0 141.0 RETEST OE PIT #3 (AI'TER MORE HOE PACKING) 16 RETEST OF PIT *3 (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING) t1 RETEST OF PIT #3 (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING) RETEST OF PIT #4 (AFTER MORE I'IOE PACKTNG) ASTM e ASTM D3017-66(93) rqoM[4gN1s WITH SPECIFICATIONS DOE.s NOT COMPLYNOTES Uri rgtlrplE dry + (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: REMARKS: PSI did not monitor Erre mat.erial placement cc: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADoSTTTZ) THESE ,..)I NESULT€ APPLY ONI.\'TO THE SECIFIC LOCATION$ NOT€D ^NO !,lAY NOT REPREAEMT ANY OTTIER LOCATIoN5 OE ELEVATIONA. REPoRTg A,AY NoT BE REPRooUcED, FxoEFT IN FVLL, WTHoUI WIIYTEn PERMISSION BY PROFESEIOilAL .$ERVICE INOUSTRIES. INC. 1. FILL MATERIAL A. 2. BACKFILL B, 3. BASE COURSE 4. SUBEASE Cs.5o-[cEtENT D: G. OTHER E. STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENTDATA M: D Res pectfu lly submitted, Professl on al S eryi ce I nd u stri es, I nc. PSr A-rocl (l)F F],EET BUIIJDTNG PRO.]ECT 295 S. 18TH ST; ITQE #1-98s TEsI gFilFl 15 18 TESTED FOR: DATE t1trR 11 ',99 L?t 11 FR I\,1IKE RTSI,EY CITY OF SPRINGFTEI,D 201 SOUTH 18TI{ STREET SPR]NGFIEI,D , OR 97 477 October 06 1998 TO ?253589 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P - 72/24 FI,EET BUILDING PROJECT 295 s. 18TH ST; .ToB il1-985 ouR REPORT NO.: 722-80239-5 PAGE 4 OF 6 TESTDATA: (s) SPRTNGFTELD 3/4"-0 (PSI LAB +i2805) oPT- MOIST 8 - 5k TEST NO,i)EPIH soil. lD NUMSER irMuM IDfiY * I WATEFrsrTY I CoNTENI PERCENT COMPACTION 4rt 5 4.9 135.8 92.1 20 4r,5 4-8 95 .2 2L 5 84.9 5 4rt 4tr FLBF r39.9 124 .8 L22.8 4tl E 4 3 6.s 4.8 5.0 t47.O 130.2 146.1 130.8 1,41 . O l4'7 . O 139.4FT,Btr FLBF 5 83. s 94,8 o, ': 22 1 AOMMENTS'*VVET OENSITY 742.5 r_46.6 142.8 t_36.0 ELEVATION FIJBF FI,BF I9 TEST LOCATION: L47.0 ]-47 _Q 1_47.0 1-B-C 1-E-C 1-rr-c L-B-c 1-B-C 1-B RETEST OF PIT #1 (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING)1.9 20 2L )) RETEST OF PFT #]. (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING) RETEST OF PIT #5 (AFTER MORE HOE PACKING) RETEST OF PIT #6 (AFTBR MORE HOE PACKING) 23 RETEST OF PIT #6 (AFTER MORE I{OE PACKING) 24 PIT #8 NOTES:PERFoRMED PER ASTM o2B2?-91 & ASTr\, D3017-88(s3) 'COMMENTS' dry on I, FILL MATERIAL 2, EACKFILL 3. &qSE COURSE d, SUBMSE 5, SOIL CEIYIENT 6. OTHER A. B. a, D. WTTH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLY TloNs * (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: REMARKST I,Sr did noE monitor the material placemeflt. cc :ITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) IHE9E TESI RESU t7S APPLY ONLY IO THE 6PECIFIC LOCATI6Ng NOTED AND I\iAY NOT REPRESEIT AI{Y OTTIE( LAGATIONS OR EIEVATIoNE. iEPORT9 MAY NTT (iE I{EPRODUCEO, EICEPT Iil FULL, WITHOUT WRITTEIl PERMISSION BY PROFEB9lONAI $€ftVICE IilOUSTRIEE. It{C, STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENTDATA M: D; D; Respectfu lly su bmitted, Professl o n aI Seryrce I ndu strl es, I nc. PSrLloE: (3)F trT.pEr TESTED FOR DATE. t1trR 11 ',99 L7112 FR MIKE RIS],EY CIT'Y OF SPRINGFIELD 201 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIEI,D, OR 9'T4'77 ocEober 06, 1998 TO ?263689 PROJECT: P . t3/24 FLEET BUILDING PROJECT 295 S- 18TH ST; JoB #1-985 ouR REPORT NO.: 722-80239-s PAGE 5 OF 6 TEST DATA: (s) spRrNGFrEI,D 3/4', 0 (t,SI LAB #2805) OpT. MOIST- = I.5* COMMENT$. ELEVATIOI.] *qotL tD NI,,MBER ?ct 4', 30 4t'FLBF TEST LOCATION: RETEST OF PlT #5 (AFTER MORE HOE PT,CKING) RETEST OF PI'I' #B (AI'TER P],ATE POUNDING) 21 RETEST OF PIT #5 (AFTER MORE I{OE PACKING) )a RETEST OF PIT #8 (AFTER MORE PLATE POUNDING) RETEST OF P]T #7 (AFTER MORE I'IOE PACKING) RETEST Otr PIT #5 (AFTER MORE PT,ATE POUNDING) 1 & ASTM 03017-66(93) rcoMMENTs: DRY 1 144.8 6.2 154,1 98.7 1-B-C 1-B_C 1-B-C 1-A-C 1-B-C 1-A-C NOTES: on lfiltpl€ * (5) T r80 TEST INSTRUMENT: REMARKS: PSI did not monj.Eor the maEerial placement cc -ITY OF SPRIITGFIEID (BOB RADOSTITZ) ] HESE TES RESULTS APFLY OilLY TO THE SPECIFIC LOCATION,g NOT€D AND IIAV NOI REFRE6E'II AXY ATHEN LOC.AIIONS OA EIVATIONS. REPORTS MY NOT BE REPROOUCED. EXCEPT Ii FULL. vvfTIIOUT WRITTEH FERMSSON BY PROFES9IOML TEI{VICE IXDUSTNIEA. INC. 1. FILL MATERIAL 2, tsACKFILL 3. BASE COURSE 4. SUBBASE 5. 6OIL CEMENT 6, OTHER A. B. c,D. W|TH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLY STANDARD COUNT M: ADJU5TMENTDATA M: D: D: Respectfully submitted, Profe.ss i o n aI Service I n d u strl es, I n c. P5r A-10C! (3tF WATER CONTENT tlWETIDRYIPERCENT DENSITY I DENSTTY ICOMFACTTON 25 TEST DEPTH l.47 _O MAXIMUM LAB DRY oENSIY 4" FI,BF FLBF 5.0 4.826 27 5 R 5 14?.0 147.0 131.5 94.4 l_38 - 2 150-2 144 .6 B9^s 93 .4 138.0 145. I 137 .3 143.5 138 _ 7 97 .6 93.9 28 4" FLBF FLBF 147 _O FLBF 5 E 6.2 4.7 4.4 tr L47.O t4'7 . O REPORT OF FIELD COIVIPACTION TESTS TEST NO 145.8 -)q 26 29 30 TESTED FOR DATE NeR 11 '99 1?:12 FR MTKE RISI,EY CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ?01 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIE],D, OR 9'7 4'1'7 october 06, 1998 TO ?253689 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: ? . L4/29 FI,EET BUIIJDING PROJECT 295 S^ 18TH ST; JOB #1-98s ouR REPORT NO.: 722-8023s-5 PAGE 6 OF 5 TEST DATAI (5) SPRINGFIEI,D 3/4'I-O (PS] I,AB #2805) OPT. MOIST. = 8 ^58 COMMENTS' TEST PEPTH 31 TEST LOCATION: ELEVATION sotL rD NUI\4gER FI,BF DRY DENSTY IEST N1l PERCENT COMPACTION 98 .4 92 .4 r--A-C r--B-C 1_-B-C 1-A-C R]TI'EST OF PIT #6 RETEST OF PIT #7 MAXIMUM LAB DRY * DENSITY t47.4 1,47 - O 135.9 144.6 5 tr 14?.0 1 WATER CONTENI \A'ET DEN.sITY zo 4.9 5,1 d5 148 ,2 143 l_51.7 L42.6 r_47 _ 0 95, 9 92.5L36.4 r40.9 4" 4t,FLBIi FIJBF FLBF 5 RETEST OF PfT #7 31 32 ?l ? .d.RETES'I, OF PIT #7 NOTES; dry + (5) T 180 TEST INSTRUMENT: REMARKS: PSI did noE monitor che macerial placelnent C( .]ITY OF SPRINGFIE],D (BOB RADOSTITZ) I HEsts I EEt HEsuLrs AFpLy oNly To THE lpEclFlc LocATloNs l.loTED AND M^V tloi fiEFRFSENT At{Y OTI IER LocATloNs oR ELEVAIIoN$. REpoRTs MAy NoT BE REpRoDUcED FIeEft tN rULL. vvlTltouT vmrTTEN FERMlaaloN EY PRoFE+sloN^L gERVlcE INDUSTRIE5, lNC, ASTM D2922-91 & ASTM D3017-88(93) 'COMMENTS:1. FILL MATERIAL 2. EACKFILL 3, BASE @URSE 4. SUBEASE 5. SOIL CEMENT 6. OIHEFI A. B. c. D. E. WITH SPECIFICATION5 DOES NOT COMPLY TIONs STANDARD COUNT hi: ADJUSTMENT DATA M: Respectfully submitted, Professi o nal Sentl cs I nd us ties. I nc. P5t A-10O.: (siF 4il D: D: NFR 11 '99 1?:12 FR TO ?253689 P.L5/24 1e- 80>71-, p le f ao ^I 'i lil i N iil.' ll l ii ,j .gl. Yr\ 't'i/ :: Yl- -l --D-l I I @ .+ I l'1RR 11 ',99 L?i 12 FR MIKE RTSLEY CI,IY OF SPRINGFIELD 201 SOUTH ]-8TH STRBE? SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 October 06, 1998 REPORT OF INSPECTTON SERVICES PROJECT; ouR REPORT NO,; 722-80239-4 FLEET BUILDING PRO.JECT 295 SOUTH ]-BTH STREET SPRINGFIE],D, OREGON JOB #r--985, PERMTT #98035s TO ?253589 P - 76/24 TESTED FOR: DATE REN/ARKS AS REQUESTED, PST REPRESENTATIVE MIKE DEWEY WAS PRESENT ON SITE ON THE ABOVE DATE FOR TI.IE PURPOSE OF TESTING EARTTIWORK AS FO],I,O9[S: ARRIVED ON SITE AT 8:00am AS SCHEDULED TO TEST THE FfNAl, LIFT OF THE FOOT- INGS FIIJI, . SPR'INGF]ELD 3/4U'O (8' IJIFT) , PITS 1-8 WERE FII,LED TO FINA.L GRADE BELOvi FQOTING AI.ID WERE READY I'O TEST. PITS 9-14 WERE NOT FIIJLED AIID NO READY TO TEST. PTTS 1-8 WERE TESTED. AII 8 FAILED WTTI{ E.COMPACTION VAIUES RANGING FROM -77-888. PLEASE SEE MAP ATTACHED TO REPORT OF FIEL! DENSITY TESI:ING FORM FOR IDENTIPICATION OF PITS. WHEN REPEATED TREATMENTS OF HOE-PACKTNG YIELDED EITTIER NEUTRAI, (NO TMPROVEMEN'I' IN T COMPACTION) OR NEGATIVE (]]OWER ? COIVIPACTION) RESTIL,TS, THE GEOTECHNICAI, ENGINEER (DAVE IIEICH) WAS CONSUI,TED. AFTER A I,TTTI,E TRIAI, A}TD ERROR, HE RECOMMENDED HOE- PACKING TO BE FOI,IOWED BY PLATE POUNDING I'NTTL COMPACTION REQUIREMENT WAS ACHTEVED. WITH *30 MTNUTES OF PI,ATE POUNDING PER PTT, THE REQUIRED COMPACTTON (953 PR.OCTOR) WAS ACHIEVED POR PITS ].-8. PSI REPRESENTATIVE WAS TOI,D BY BOB (CITY OF SPRINGFIELD) THAT HE WAS SCHEDULED FOR THE FOI.LOW- ]NG DAY- RESPECTFULLLY SUBMITTED, PROFESSIONAIJ SERVICE INDUSTRIES, TNC. cc: CITY Oll SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) I{EPORT6 M^Y NOT BE REFRODUCED. EXCE''T Iil TULL, WTTHOUT V{RITrEN PERMISSIAN 6Y FfrOFES]sIOI{^L sERVIC€ INDUSTKIEE, INC. NtrR 11 ',99 t?i 12 FR TO ?253689 P . L7/24 .1zz- e,0'-31,-S +4 p I tf ta T N ,n I ili t. I :\r.,'../ E \"-.. --h Y[ --o E @ I -J o. f'1FR 11 '99 1?:13 FR MIKE RIS],EY CTTY OF SPRTNGFIET,D 201 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRTNGFIELD, OIT, 9747'7 OcEober Q5, 1998 REPORT OF INSPECTTO}I SERVICES PROJECT: ouR REPORT NO.: 722-8023e-3 F'I,EET BUI],DING PROJECT 295 SOUTH 18TFI STREET SPRINGFIEID, OREGON JOB #r.-985. PERMTT #98035s TO 7263689 P.7P/29 TESTED FOR. DATE; REMARKS AS REQUES'TED, PSI REPRESENTAT]VE MIKE DEWEY WAS PRESENT ON SITE ON THE ABOVE DA,.l.E FOR TI,IE PURFOSE OF TNSPECTING/TESTING EARTI]WoRK AS FoILoWS: ARRIVED ON SITE AS SCHEDULED AT 8: OOATTT A}ID I/iAS TNFORMED THAT TI{E CENTERIJINE EXCAVATION CIIEW HAD BEEN CALLED TO ANOTHER.]OB AND WOUI,DN'T BE BACK UNTIL 9:3OAM^ PSI REPRESENTAT]VE IdAS TOLD BY C],IENT, BOB OF CITY oF 5PRINGFIE],D, TO RETURN To TI{E SITE AT 10:0Qam TO PERFoRM FILL INSPECTfON. WITEN pSI REPRESENTATTVE ARRIVED ON SITE AT lO:OOaTn, BOB INFORMED THAT HE WouI.D PER- F,ORM FI],L P],ACEMENT INSPECT]QN AIID THAT PSI REPRESENTATIVE SHOULD SCHEDUI,E HIMSELF FOR NUC],EAR DENSITY COMPACTION TESTING OF THE F'INAL LIFT OF FTLL (8 '' O!, SPRINGFIELD 3 /4U -O) FOR THE FOIJIJOWTNG MDRNING - RESPECTFU],LY SUBMI'ITTJD, PROFESSIONAJ, SERVTCE TNDUSTRIES, TNC. cc: CITY OF -SPRINGFTEIJD (BOB RADOSTITZ) REPORTS MAV NOT 6E IEPROOUCED, D(CEIT IN FULL, WTTIOUT WFITTEN PENM|S.gION bY PROFEASIOUAL SEI(VIEE INDUSThIE9, INC. PSI L300-1N F TESTED FOR; DATE: NAR 11 '99 1?:13 FR MIKE RISIEY CITY OF SPRINGFIEI,D 201 SOUTH 1BTH STREET SPRINGFTEI,D, OR 9'7 477 Oc[ober 02, 1998 REPORT OF TNSPECTION SERVICES PROJECT; ouR REPORT NO,; 722-8023e-2 TO ?263589 FLEET BUTLDING PRO.fECT 295 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRINGFIE],D, OREGON JOB #1-985. PERMTT #SAO:SS REIVIARKS AS REqUESTED, PSI REFRESENTATTVE MIKE DEWEY WAS PRESENT ON SITE ON THE A-BOVE DATE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTTNG/TESTTNG EARTHWORK AS FOLITOWS: OBSERVED EXCAVATION OF FOOTINGS PITS TO TI{E 4.5 I BELOW SURFACE GRADE ELE. VATION AS PER CONSTRUCTION PLANS. IT WAS POINTED OUT TO PSI REPRESENTATIVE BY TIM MCIVIAHQN (DOR.}IA}I CONSTRUCTION) THAT THE TWO MOST SOUTHERN PTTS J\],ONG THE WEST WA]JL HAD EXPOSED LIJ},IBER (PROCESSED WOOD) IN THETR SIDE WA]J]JS. ALSO. UPON EXCAVATING THE E.ASTERN P]T OF THE CAR WASI{ PAD (TO THE SOUTH OF THE BUII,IDNG PAD) A TRUCK TIRE VIAS EXPOSED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PIT. AFTER CQNSUI,TING MIKE RISI,EY (CITY OF SPRINGFTEIJD) , IT WAS REVEAIED THAT A GEO. TECHNICAI, REPORT FOR THE SITE EXISTED. PSI REPRESENTATTVE REQUESTED TO REVIEW TI{E REPORT IN ORDER TO ASCERTAIN WHAT SUBSURFACE INFORM.A,TION WAS AVAILABLE FOR THE SITE. NO MENTION OF TRASH DEPOSITS WERE MENTTONED IN THE REPORT. IN ORDER TO ESTAB],ISH WHAT IF AATY NEW EXCAVAT]ON/CONSTRUCTION PARAMETERS M]GHT NEED TO BE EMPLOYED ]N i.,IGHT OF T]IE DISCOVERY OF BURIED TRASI{, THE GEOTECHNICA], REPORT'S AUTHOR DAVID REICH (OREGON GEOTECHNIC]SL SERVICES) WAS CA.I,I,ED AND A MEETING BETWEEN PSI REPRESENTATIVB AND HE, AIONG ViITH THE ARCHITECT (DAVE GUADAGNI), TIM MCMAHON A}ID THE CLIENT REPRESEN- ,l,J.\*IIVE MIKE RISLEY (CITY OF SPRINGFIELD) , AT THE MEETING, DAVE REICI.I RECOMMENDED THAT OVER-EXCAVATION TO REMOVE AI,L TRASH A],ONG FOOTING WAJ,],S AND BEIJOW THE BUII,DING PAD. A REVISED FILT PROFILE WA'S ESTABIISHED WHICH CHANGED THE BELOW FOOTINGS FILL DEPTH TO 25" BETJoW FOOTINGS INSTEAD oF THE ]-8I' A.S ORTGINALLY SPECIFIED. BOB (CITY OF SPR]NCFIELD) INFORMBD PSI REPRESENTATIVE THAT MIKE (CENTERLINE EXCAVATION) SHOULD BE CONSULTED TI(T DETERMINE WHEN FABRIC A}TD FIIJI' WOU]'D BE PLACED ON MONDAY 1Ol5. HE ESTIMAT- ED 8: OOAM, ACCQRDINGLY PSI REPRESENTATTVE SCHEDUIJED TO ARRIVE ON SITE AT 8:OOANI ON MONDAY TO OBSERVE/INSPECT F.ABRIC AND FILL PLACEMENT. RESPECTFUL],Y SUBMITTED, PRO}'ESSION.I\L SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC cc: CITY OF SI'RINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) &EPOI(1S MY NOT SE REFRODUCED. EXCEFI II.I FULL, WTTHOUT U/f,TTTEN PERMI5SIOH BY I'KOFESSIOi{^L SENYCE INDI'IiThIES, INC. FSt A-300"1N F P . I9/?A TESTED FOR DATE r.1FR 11 '99 1?:13 FR MIKE RISLEY(JITY OF SFRINGFIET,D 201 SOUTI{ 18TH STREET SPRTNGFIEI,D, OR 97 +17 OeEober 02, 1998 TO ?263689 REPORT OF FIELD COMPACTION TESTS PROJECT: P.2A/24 E.LEET BUTLDING PRO.fECT 295 SOUTH 18TH STREET SPRTNGFIE],D, OREGON JOB #1--9S5. PERMIT #980355 OUR REPORT NO.: 7zz-BOZ39-L TE5 I NO. 1 TESTDATA: (1) SPRINGFIELD 3/4,-O SUPPLTED BY CLIENT OPT. MOIST. = 8.57 ELEVATION SOIL ID NUMBER WATER CONTENT 1st IJBC tL'l . o 5.8 151.1 +n 1S l; IJBC l-47 -O 3.9 ]-4.6 -7 TEST LOCATION CAMMENTS' Spec 95? Mrrt 1-A 1-h i_CENTER OF BT]ILDING 15' SOUTH OF NORTH EDGE, 15 I WEST OF EAST EDGE IN NORTHEAST CORNER ASTM I &A$TM b3017-88(e3) 'coMMENTslNOTES: TESTS 1. FILLMATERIAL A 2. bA:'c-KFttt ""- 'Ei: 3.8ASE COURSE 4, SUEEASE C. S. SOIL QEMENT D, G. OTHER E. \MTH SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT COMPLYof on r /t \\r/ TEST INSTRUIilENT: TROXITER REMARKS: PSI did not monitor the material placement. I,BC = LIFT BASE COURSE TECi{}dICIAN: MIKE DEWBY cc: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (BOB RADOSTITZ) THEAE IEJULT-I APFL)' ONLYTO THE s''ECIFIC LOCATIONE NOTEO ANU MAY NOT REPRESENT AilY THEF LQCATIONE OR ELEVATIONS. REPORII ,dY NAT OE REPRODUCEO. EXCEPT IN FULL, WTHOTIT WRIIIEN PERMIESIOi{ NY PKOFES5IONAL SENVICE INOUATRIE9, IXC. STANDARD COUNT M: ADJUSTMENT DATA M: D: D: Respectfully submitted, Professional Setvice I ndustries, I nc. MAXIMUM LAB DRY * DENSITY I DEY DENSITY L42 -8 97 .L PTiHLEN I QOMPACII,OX 1 96 .1141.2 2 P9l A-11)0-Z (f,)F ,I(x TOTFL PRGE.Z@ XX dry CITY OF SPRINGFIELD03/11/99 THU 17:08 FAX 5417 89 RECEPTION OK TXIRX NO CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID ST, TIME I.ISAGE T PGS. RESI.ILT ********************* *a* RX REPORT *** ********************* 5323 @ oo1 541 344 2735 03/Ll l7:02 05'08 20 OK