HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Correspondence 1987-05-21SPRINGFIELD
CITY OF SPRINGFIETD
Office of Community & Economic Development
l4ay 21, 1987
Mr. Gary Henry
1432 Buck Street
Eugene, 0regon 9740?
SuDject: Pre-Application Conference re arding a proposed residential/professionaloffi ce .1 810 North 15th
As you ane aware, a pre-applicatton conference was held today. This'letter willsunrnarize the results of the meet'ing.
1. A s'ite plan shall be submttted incorporating all submittal reguiremenrs toconstitute a comp'lete appl'icat'ion. As a reminder, landscaping is subject tothe irrigation standards.
2. The clriveway on North 15th Street snall be widened to 24'or a minor var.ianceshall be requested.
5
6
3.
4
8
A letter from netghbortng property owners regand'ing on-stneet park'ing sha11 besubmitted a.long with the site plan review app'lication.
A 90 watt Low Pressure Sodium (LPS) public street light shall oe installed ona 16 foot mast arm. The light shall be installed on the exist'ing power poleto the north of the pnoposed driveway on North 15th Str^eet. Coorotnate thisinstal lation with vi rgr'l Lang)ey of the springfield uti l ity Board.
The dr] veway located on "Q" street shal I be removed and nep'laced v{ith standardcurb and gutter.
The Deve'lopment Agreement requined as part of site plan r.eview will includethe types of uses permitted in the nesidential/pnofessional offices. The
Code states uses not l'isteO are not permitted
An Encroachment Permit shall be obta'ined from the Eng'ineening D'ivision for anywork i n the puD'l 'ic ri ght -of -way.
Relocation of the guy wire shall
Board.
be pursued through the Springfielcl Utility
S'ite Plan Review fee is $210.00; Minor Variance fee is $75.00. If you submitthe applications concurrently (assuming you apply for the vartance) your totalfee w'ill be reduced by 20%. If only site plan review is applleo for, thenewill be no discount on fees as the code states the 20% neduction.is only given
i f concurrent appl i cat'ions are made.
225 North Sth Street r Springfield, Oregon97477 . 503/726-3753
7
9.
(,
reet
CorOially,
hia L.
Devel opment
Ha rmon
Permit CoorOi nator
Your pre-app'licat'ion applicat'ion only inc'lucled one draw'ing. The applicationform requires 11 copies. In order to avo'id neturn'ing youi application as'incomplete, copies were prepared anct distribured. you w.ill be b.i lleo $3.00for the cop'ies we prepared for^ you.
When youn site plan is submitted, the ent'r re 11 cop'ies of the plan shal I beincluded with youn app'licatron or.it will be returned as incomplete.
11. When your app.l:cation'is submitted the $250.00 you have on account with theCity for a previous van'iance nequest w'ill be used to cover costs, the balanceof your money w'il I be ref unded.
Please call tne Planning & Development Department if you have questions regar^dingthe information above.
(r
SPRINGFIELD PI.ANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FINAL DECISI0N: Variance
JOURNAL NUMBER: 87-05-71
APPLICANT NAME:
REQUEST
LOCATTON
LEGAL
Gary Henr^y
Varrance to Minimum Drrveway [,lidth
1810 North 15th Street
17-03-25-23, Tax Lot 02401
The Development Code Administnator grants appnoval of Journal Number
87-05-71, Mi nor Vari ance, based on af f i rmati ve f 'r ndr ngs that the r'equest
as submitteci satisfies each of the crrteria of Section 11.030, Article 11,
Sprrngfreld Deve.lopment Code (SDC ).
STANDARDS FOR THE DECISION
Sect,ron 11.030 Criten'ia, of Article 11 of the Springfield Development
Code, provides as follows:
(1) Except as specifred in Subsection (2) of thrs Sectron, a Minor or
Major Variance shall be granted if the proposal is deter^m'ined by the
Approva.l Authority to meet each of the fol'lowing criteria:
(a) There are unusual cjrcumstances, associated with the property orstructure wh'icn make it impnact'ical to use the deve1opment areafor its'intencled punpose under the Springfield Development Code.
(0) Gr^antrng of the Variance would not be inconsistent v','rth both the
l4etro Plan ano the Springfield Development Code.
(c) Gnanti ng of the Var'i ance would have no si gni fi cant adverse
affects on the public welfare on neighboring properties, and
there are provisions to mit'igate those adverse affects whi ch
snall be a cond'rtion of use.
(d)The need for
Cooe violation;
a Vanr ance has noti.e. the hardsh'ip is
arise so'lely from a pnevious
not sel f-imposed
(e) There are no other pnact'ical alternatives avai laole that better
meet the provisions of the Springfteld Development Code and the
Metro Plan.
F INDINGS
(a) There are unusual conditions associated wlth the propenty orstructure wh'ich make it tmpnactical to use the development area forits intended purpose unden the springfield Development corle.
The appf icant has subm'itted general f ind'ings which address this cniter.ionand to wh'ich staff agrees (see attachment). A single family or- duplexnesidence would be requ'ined to locate a driveway no closer than 30 feetfrom 'Q' Street. At th'is distance a st,andand restdent'ral w'idth dn.tvewaycould be instal led without relocat'ing power poles or removing exist'inglandscaptng. Retalning this landscaping'is consistent with the speciaTuse standards for professional office use in nesiclential districts.
(b) Granttng of the Variance woulo not be tncons'istent with both theMetno Plan and tne Sprrngfield Development Code.
The applicant has submrtted genenal findings which address this criterionand to which staff agnees. Dr^iveway location and size is a function ofthe use of the property and the street to be accessed. Nortn 15tn.is alocal stneet with low traffic demand. Pnofess'ronal office use, thoughconsldened "commencia]" fon drtveway design purposes, also has .low tr"afficdemand. The ltmtted anea avat'lab'le for on-site panktng has resulted in athree space parking lot wh'ich, through this lrmitation, cannot generate
enough tn'tps per day t,o create access conf'licts.
(c) Granting_ of a Variance would have no signrficantthe publ r c wel f a re or nei ghbon.i ng proferti es,provistons to mit'igate those adverse affectscondition of use.
adverse affects onand there are no
wh'ich shall be a
The applicant has suDmitted general findings which address this crtterionand to which staff agrees. The funct'ion of a thnee space parktng 16t canbe adequately senved by a reduced width driveway. The anglecl approach andretention of the street tnee provide a visual design more in keeprng withthe intent of the Residentral Professional specral use standards thanwou'ld a 24' wide straight ahead drtveway. the appf icant has receiveds'lgned petitlons from netghbortng propenty owners'indrcating no objectionto proposed on-street parking.
(d) The need for a Vartance has not anise so1e1y from a previous Codeviolation; 'i .e. the hardship rs not self-imposeo.
The applrcant hds submitted genenal find'lngs wh'ich addnesses thiscritenion and to whi ch staff agnees. The need for the Variance iitwo-fold: (1) The policies of the 'Q' str-eet Refinement plan do notallow access to'Q'street (2) Tne only anea of the property avarlable forpark'l ng wh'lch meets the spectal use standards for^ Resideniral professionuses and which does not nequire demo'lrtion of part of the structure iswhere the applicant has proposed. [^lrth the nanrower, angled dr.ivewaypanki ng i n the f nont yard setback i s e.limi nated. The rraiosnr p .is noisel f-imposed.
(e) There are no other pract'ica1 altennatives ava'ilaole that better meetthe provistons of the Spni ngf ie.ld Deve'lopment Cocle and the Metro P'lan.
The appl i cant has submitted gener"al f i nd'ings whi ch address thi s critert on
and to which staff agnees. Tne altennative, i.e. compl'iance with tne 24'
wicle driveway standards, will reduce the amount of landscaping, increasethe anea of pavement, a'l1ow parki ng 'in the f ront yand setback and
general ly nun counten to the 'intended purpose of several speci a'l use
standands for Residential Professiona'l development.
CONCLUS ION
0n the basis of thrs record, the requested Variance confonms with the
necessany approva.l cr"iteria of Section 11.030, Article 11 of the
Springfielo Development Code. Approval of this Variance is granted.
#1390
S I GNATURE
DATE
Springfield City Ha1l
Planning and Developnent Department
225 N. 5th Street
springfield, Or. 97477 May 2L,L987
Re: Variance R,equest
GarYl Henry ProPert,
1810 N, 15th Street
Map and Tax Lot 17-O3-25-23-O24OL
VARI.qI{CE REQUEST
we are asking for a variance to a Driveway width Standard. we reguest
a reduction irom 24 feet to 19 feet. The driveway placement is on the
15th Street side of the ProPertY.
VARIANCE E}GLANATION
We are asking for this variance to comply with staff requirement of a
75 feet setback for access on 15th Street- ltris can be dorie, however,
it is a very tight fit with the existing tree and power Pole guide
line. rr> ""iri"r6 tt" setback, w€ must make the driveway 19 feet' We
feel that thisl,adeqgate with the type of parking we are now proposing.
Staff has indicated tfr"t they prefEi this wi,dth so we can- provide- more
screening at that end of the-plrking- arear dod reducing the possibil-
ity of plrking in the Front Yard Setback'
Sincerely,
65n*{ X
Gary Henry 344-9OLO
L432 Buck Street
Eugene, OE. 97402
ce. Johnson and Kloos
-1-
a
Paqe 2
Ilenry Application
May 2L,L9g7
V,CRfA}TCE CRITSR.IA
I) As stated in previous variance reqr:ests, this property is not suitedfor quality residential occupancy. Staff has agreed to reduce the
number of parking spaces, and has tentatively approved ou:i currentproposed site pIan. However, to meet the 75 feet required access set-backr w€ must reduce the driveway width from 24 feet to 19 feet. Thisis due to the close proximity of a flowering plum tree,. drd a powerpole gruide line. S€.aff has indicated that they prefer this reduetion,and agree that it wiJ.l provide more screeningr and be better appearing-They also do not foresee any traffic problems as a result of this re-duction.
2) Gianting this variance is not inconsistant with the Metro plan or theSpringfield Deveopment Code. The overall proposal supports both plansby eliminating "problern'laceess on "Q"Slreet, providing outside invest-ment to the area, improving the guality and appearance rcf the site, -.anC providing euality office spaee to new or exj.sting business.
3) By granting this variance we find no adverse effects on neighboringproperties or the general public. The proposed parking area createssome overflow to on street parking, however, the adjoining property
owners have sigrned a statement of thei.r approval anyway. The reduct-ion of the driveway width actually improves the appearance withoutcausingr any adverse effects.
4) our request for this variance tras not come from any previous codeviolations. Current use is allor.redr and proposed use i-s allowed.
5) 97e feel that there are no reasonable alternatives to this variancerequest. Staff has reguired us to meet all of the setback standardsfor Residential,/profeJsibnal use. They have also regui-red us to meetthe Commercial setback for access and driveway width- In order tomeet these standards, we rnust request this variance for driveway width.
fn conc-l-usionr w€ show that we have nej-ghborhood support and staffhas requested that we submit the current site plan as a better solutionto the parking problen- I,Ie feel that there are no alternatives to ourrequested variance, due to the presence of the above mentioned obsta-c1es, We ask that our request be approved-
_=:Q- 3T. ':.. -
E-OEYELO ?M EN.T-' PLAN F_O FI A PF|OFESSIONAL C,FFTCE BUIT
t o__lYoEr_1 s JH-_s_I:._s pR I Nc F_! EL El
r,N E E!_GAI Y 4N, g_AN E'E E_w__t! E !v FIY
r!
li
trl
J,i3(r
ti3-ori
h
,'
/
l-'
t;
$
tl
Ip
d-
z'o
l!{
t+I
4
l2cnaui' altatrp< t
ti
!
fI i:"....I
t
I
i.., :,
..4.
tt
t,lls
li
li
Hili
fl;ilr
ll Ir! ll -lle llo
uo
f,r(r
4',
-t--
I
I
I
t-
I
I
I
I
D
F
\
toF
/
t,{,
(
o-l
N\I
i
^)r
li
I.i
'fl
p
a
0
t!
1
;il$
iiP,| ,ihlln
,tr1
GENEFIAL PLAN
R I nlr rior.la'i'iri..o tr IPlr ;i!<
o
OREOONEpAFIEO BY3 EVALEI NIELSEN LANI]SCAPE AtrCH]TECT .... 'ow,o.
{
I
,.
T
I
I
mrI
I
I
'ls
t\
il
a
TO springfield office of community and Economic Development
I support the proposed conversion of the bui15th Street to aattached landscacalls for threethat are normallwill cause someNevertheless, Iproposed will re
My address islocation of my
prof
ping essional building in acand site plan.I realparking spaces on the lot ray reguired. I also realizeoverflow of parking onto thebelieve that the conversionsult in a net rovement to
lding at 1810 Northcordance with theize that the proposalther than the ni-nethat the reductionstreet.
and landscaping asny neighborhood.
:
- have rnarked the
i1op
-J5t,
erty on e atta plan
lsc
nt)
)
Name (pI
t
ia
Da
.--: Q- 1T.',
GENETTAL PLAN
IE DE\.IELE'PMENT. PLAN FOFI A PFIOFESSTONAL OFFICE BUIT
FTELEt
INER! GATTY ANEt ANE)FIEl^,.: HENFIY
I l,llc
l1llti
:l
I,
o
o
I
i
fth
I
I
r'-l
NI!
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i,
:l
lrl
i
T.{
il:r
i
I
I
I
I
,t,
ntIt
d)
I
4
z'o
t!I
L+
1
(
t;"t.
I
tl
i
I
i-
';'-.
.. i'.
\
rlII\I\ll\ln
ilr
llu
lt\IA
llh
llxtri
th
t;
II Ihllq
l
I
lo
lE
lr
t,li
o
o
In
D!
\
\
-r
toea
/
!
q
$
iu ,
0t,tt ,
,1l! rll8ll,l
I
'rit
,0'!
0l
ll
tnlir ri
of..t.dIiE
f ir
EPAFTEO EtYT EVALD NTELSEN LANEISCAPE AFICHITEC T ......wdoi oirEooN
o NOtrT .tsTH siT. SPFIING
.t
I
F
i',').
v\
1,$
a
!lr
I
ii
mrI
I
I
I
-IINh
/
tt
To: springfield office of community and Economic Development
I support the proposed conversion of the building at 1810 North15th Street to a professional building in accordance with theattached randscaping and site plan. r realize that the proposalcalls for three parking spaces on the Iot rather than the ninethat are normally required. I also realize that the reductionwill cause some overflow of parking onto the st,reet.Nevertheless, r believe that the conversion and land.scaping asproposed will result in a net improvement to my neighboihood.
My address is ',\li-t) ,{'9 'l,trt' -,.'i b 1tL. I have marked theIocation of my property on the attached p1an.
,,/:,-, ;-I i,1/,-',.--.n-
^-Name (ease pr
S 9na ure
Date
nt)
,4i cr ,1c'f)LL Lt-.t LI,.L-
'
,l
t_
5--zt-t
IHIS
DAY
SPR I
OF
NGFI
SIIE PLAI{ REYIE[,/ DEVELOPflENI AGREII,IENI
Slre puru
'w" ihi.'';q':l{{fr ,f{,iT,',
# bfr,.tr}-i,#,..dj tr
REC IIALS
n"" Sxf lYTsl* -+
ilJ., 3I*-,H8-'' **'srd *lE%. ri1.,ffiITo,* rHE S r re p r-nruIHe cHr
*'**ii+#,*p,*r::*l
'#i..;5fp$$fu
+##*n^.:.*::Ti
At-so see Jounrua. Nut'uen 87-05-71- vnRlRr,rce ro Secrlorv 32.0g0 resle 32-c.
***,*t****ji*f,l,iffmtf,,l,'tr+,,-';$l.;ffT..H
1. Remrvnl
:'il*oloifr .,Ik-'Li3JJ#'*3*JJ,TJ.,T,#.,o-nm,;if;
F.iJ^r?rlii.di[f .X
sHowN oN
2. IHe ExIS
" *e''=''S'Xff' #J5[.,,?i;0;^,iJ35il,ff%H,fi[,3[-#..Jffi,1,
rHE GARAGE .HALL3. THe pRop(e!'ss-*****tq*g5g*p,-'.l**;ffioF 35 i,THO STREE
RE,VIAINiNG
4'
IIs,,m+,
$1! - *ry#i,ifiii, .f,,n jjri+f*,ltt*tiiJi*it*ilry,{t *fLONTACT 7}THIS I,IATTER.
5. fse Frrvru Stre puru sHALL rNcLuDE cHAr,lGEs LrsrED ABovE.
3 )..t o0 r:
r)Deverr_oemavr
A enE glerur
r i:r3'.:i;
iL
- I,IHEREAS, IN coNSiDERATIoN FoR srrE puru nppnovAl, THE rssuANCE oF AButt-olrue Penmtt, AM THE ISSUANCE -or_ mr _OCcu'pnNci"-PiRil;;, AS spEcrFrED rN THESpntruerlrm DrvelopmeNr Cone Srcrtoru 31.090;--Ai,i,Liinr'n-iCners ro col,lply wrrH rHEFOLLOWING SPECIFIC CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY NS PART OF Mr SIrr P1-NIr_NPPNOVAL:
1' THe usEs PERMITTED wITHIN THIs AppRovED RESIDENTrnUpRorrsstoNAL oFFrcE ARELIT4ITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ACCOUNTANTS, ARCHITECTS, ATTORNEYS, ENGINEERS, I1EDICALAND DENTAL PRACTITIONERS, PLANNERS, REALTORS, AND STUDIOS FOR ARTISTS, INTERIORDECORAT0RS AND PHOTOGRAPHERS. At-t- UsEs NoT spEcIFICALLy LISTED ARE NoTPERMITTED.
2. Att neourRED BUTLDTNc pERMITS sHALL BE oBTATNED.
...^- IIOTI.-]HEBEEPBE .IT--qOi{!IDEBA]IQ|t. QF.IL|E FqREEQINC BEEITALS hlHICH ARE EXPRESSLY|'IADE A PART 0F THIS AGREEI{ENT;-clTY-AND APpLIcnivT"n0nEr"nS'ro[[o'wsir'r^vr,r'|rL
L'\I r\
AGREEI'1El'li
.^^^ THE AppLIcANT AGREES To suBMIT R FtruRl SrrE punlr tru.UUU OF THT SPRII'IGFIELD DEVEIOPMETT COPC COruCUNNEruTLY I{ITH
2. STANDARDS.^ TNT APPLICANT AGREES TO FULFILL ALL APPLiCABLE STANDARDSSPECIFIED iN THE SpntruerlEu DEveLoPMENT Conr nruo rHE spEcrFrc sTANDARDS LIsTED INRECITALS PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, UNLESS CERTAIN STANDARDS IIAVE BEEN DEFERRED To A LATERDATE IN ACCoRDANCE wIrH Secrtoru 11.110 oF rHE SpRttqerler-o lrvEiopmEr'rr-i6E. -
3' c0NDITI0NS' THe Appt-tcmr AEBEEI.TQ FULFTLL ALL spEciFrc coNDrrroNS 0FAPPROVAL REQUIRED BY THE Ctrv UISTED rru RECiTALS pnion-io occupnr.rcv, uNLESS cERTAINCoNDITIoNS HAVE BEEN DEFERRED T0 A LATER DATE IN AccoRDnr.rce-wrri-sicirolt-jt:iiO"#rHe SpRiNGFTELD DEvelopmeru-r Cooe.
^ 4' ['10DIFICATI0NS' Tne APPLICANT AGREEs Nor ro roDrFy rHE AppRovm Frrunr- SrrrPr-nru wtrHour FIRSI NoTIFYING rHe ciry. -NbI'iFicArroNS
ro rHE Frrunr- Sire puru 5HALL BEREVIEWED ll'l ACCoRDANCE wITH Secrtoru 11.100 oF THE SpnluerrEr_o DevEr_opmEr,rrlo'oi.
5' I1AINTAINING THE USE. THe Rppt-rcANr AGREES ro rHE FoLLowrNG:
(e)
-THr^ zuILDING AND srrE SHALL BE T,TAINTAINED rN ACCoRDANCE wITH THEPROVISIONS 0F THE SpRtlterleuo Devrlopmerur-CooE tru oRDER To coNTTNUE THE usE.
(a) Ir sHALL BE THE coNTINUING -pBLIGATToN oF THE pRopERTy ol{NER ToMAINTAIN rHE PLANTING REQUIRED By Secrroru 31.11+0 or rHe SpnrruoriErn'DEvelopr,rei,ii-CooEIN AI! ATTRACTIVE |'IANNER FREE oF wEEDS AM oTHER TNVADING vEerrnrroN: -iN nnolrtou,PLANTINGS IN THE VISI0N CLEARANCE ARErA SHALL BE TRII'IV1ED To t4EET-T'ue'i I/2-foft HEIGHTSTANDARD IN ACCoRDANCE wITH SEcrioru 32.070 oF THE Spnluerrer-o-leva-oFmElri Cooe.
(c) Pnnrirue Lors sHALL BE T4AiNTAINED By rHE pRopERTy owNER oR TENANT IN A. CONDITION FREE OF LITTER OR DUST, AND DETERIORATED PNVCMEruT CONDITIONS SHALL BE.
IMPROVED TO |,IAINTAIN CONFORI'TANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS.
Devetopmrrur
2
1. FINAL SITE PLAN
ACCoRDANCE wrrH SEcrtoru 31
rHts AcReEMENT.
Srre Puru Aenermerr
(o) Uruoeveuopro LAND T.TITHIN THE DEVELopMENT AREA sHALL BE T4ATNTATNED FREEOF TRASH A}ID STORED MATERIALS IN A I'OI{ED AT.ID ATTRAcTIVE MANNER. UTrTvTLOPED LAND
SHALL NOT BE USED FOR PARKING.
6. It't ADDITIoN To ALL orHER REMEDIES wHICH r'1Ay BE pRovtDED By LAtr oR Eoutry(trucr-uolrue BUT NoT LIMTTED To pENALTIES pRovrDED By AppLTcABLE srATE LAw oR ctry
ONOIruMCTS) APPI-TCRIW AGREES mnr CITY MAY ENFoRcE Appllcanr,S REsPoNSIBILITIES BY
wTTHHoLDING oR TERI'4INATIue Appr_tcANT's Occupnrucy Penmtr.
7. Attv Ftruru Stre Puru AppRovED BEcot'rES NULL AND voiD IF coNSTRUCTION mES NoT
COVII'1ENCE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE DATE OF THIS AENTE}4ENT.
IN hIITNESS tillERE0F, THE Appt-tcANr AND me Crry HAVE ExEcurm rHls AeneEMENT As oF rHE
DATE FIRST HEREINABOVE y{RITTEN.
APPLICANT
lz ?1 7]_ /
TE
STATT OF ORE6ON,&qrL,
ERSONALLY APPEARED THE ABOVE NAJ'IED
WHO ACKNOI,/LEDGED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT TO
BE TH R ACT.ME:
UBLIC FOR EGON
l'1y Cot+rtssroN ExprRES /d-1C--:
BYr
BY:
:ik6-n-?7 D*hlEgd&rffi
DnrE
E 0F 0REGON, Counrr or
BE R VOLUNTARY ACT.
ffiED THE ABoVE Na.aED
, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT TO
E ME:
ARY UBLI
l,ly ColtqrssroN ExPrR
Stre Pt-nlr DEvelopmerur AenermEnt3.,
SPRINGFIELEI
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
Office of Community & Economic Development
April 24, 1987
Mr. Gary Henry
1432 Buck Street
Eugene, 0regon 97402
Subject: Res'irlenti al /Prof ess'iona'l proposal for. 1810 North 15th Street.
Dear Mr. Henry:
At your request, a requisition requesting the refund of your $250. app'lication
submittal fee is be'ing processed. You wi l'l receive your refund short'ly.
We encourage you to pursue your proposal incorporating Special Use Standardsfor Residential/Pnofessiona'l uses and the intent of the Springfield
Development Code for such uses on r^esidential property.
t,Je look forward to wor^king with you in accomplishing youc aoa'ls when you
complete a des'ign that meets both the intent of the springfield Develbpment
Code fon safety and the appearance of the "Q" Street nesidential area; and the
Special Use Standards for professiona'l uses in a res'idential zoning district.
Please contact Administrative Secretany Ann Pansoy if you do not receive your
refund in a timely manner.
Cord'ia11y,
il.t*r4-gxj
cc:
thia L. Harmon
Development Permit Coordinator
Ron LeBlanc, City Manager
Gneg l.linterowd, Planning & Development D'irectoi
Greg Mott, Development Code Admin'istrator
Lorne Pleger, Plans Examiner
Allen J. Johnson, Attorney at Law
Jack Gischel, Spn'ingfield Planning Conmission Chair
225 North 5th Street o Springfield, Oregon97477 o 503/726-3753
M/zta
SPRINGFIELE'
CITY F SPRINGFIELD
Office of Community & Economic Development
/F/0 /u'/-fr //
Mr. Allen L. Johnson
Attorney at Law
767 Willamette Street, Suite 203
Eugene, 0regon 97401
Subject: Gary Henry, Journal Number 87-04-34
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Your letter regard'ing Gary Henry's proposal was received today and I have
discussed the issues with Gneg Wintenowd. Based on your Ietten we cons'ider
the variance nequest off icial ly withclrawn. l'lr. Henry may re-apply for any
necessary variance(s) in the future. l,le will be happy to apply tne $250.00 to
the Type II site p'lan rev'iew necessany for approval of th]s reguest and refund
the remaining $40.00 upon acceptance of a complete application.
I have discussed the 6 requrnements with Greg and we w'ill proceed on this
understanding. We do have on minor correction however. To the oest of my
knowledge Portland does not extend this far south. [,Ie wrll assume you meant
to 15th Street.
[,le have already been in touch with Eva Neilson who has indicated a w'i'lf ingness
to participate in our pre-application process. We look forward to the
successfu'l resolution of problems associated with the proper planning of this
site.
We appreciate your cooperation'in this matter and if we can be of further
assistance please let me know.
Cordr a1 1y,
/
'nth i a L. Harmon
Development Permit Coorclinator
Greg l,li nterowd, Pl anni ng & Devel opment Di rector
Gregory S. Mott, Development Code Adm'inistraton
503/726-3753
{)
225 North 5th Sheet o Springfield, Oregon 97477 o
May 11, 1987,
Aart
CNY OF SPRINGFIELD
SPRINGFIELD
Office of Community and Economic Development
April 15, 1987
Garv R. Henrv
1432 Bucr Stieet
Eugene, 0R gl4oz
SUBJECT:Occupancy inspection at
0regon
1810 N. 15th Street, Springfield,
Dear Mr. Henry:
At your request, t!" Springfielct Bu'ilding Safety Divis.ion recentlyconducted an 'inspection of the building locatea at the above address.The purpose of the inspection was to determine the su.itability of thebu'ilding for the proposed use indicated below.
Based on the proposed occupancy, the ex'isting conditions which arement'ioned below do not meet tne minimum Euilcting Safety Coderequirements. corrective measutes must be taken, prior to occupancy,to install, repa'ir, replace or modify the fol'lowing items in orderfor the building to conform to the applicable safety codes:
Proposed Use: Business 0ffices
Occupancy Group: 82
Theoretical Occupant Loact: Less than 10
Structural
I Each tenant
measuri ng at,
hei ght.
s p
I
ace
east
must be3 feet
provided with an entry doonw'ide and 6 feet - 8 inches in
II.Landi ngs are requ'ired on each si cle of a'l I doors, i ncl udi ngexterior exits. such 'landings shal I not be more than I 'inch
below the thresho'ld of the door, and shall have a length (inthe direction of travel) of not less than 44 inches for thefull width of the door.
225 North Sth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 503/726-3753
iri
III.
IV.
El ectri cal
VI.
Pl umbi ng
VII.space shal I
Al I toi lets
Ex.it doors which need a key or any special knowledge to be
opened from the i ns'i de i n a Group B 0ccupancy shal I be
provided with a readily visible, durable sign 'in or adjacent
to the door stat'ing THIS D00R T0 REMAIN UNL0CKED DURING
BUSINESS HOURS with letters not less than 1 inch high on a
contrasti ng background.
You have indicated that you
garage to offi ce space.
department whi ch show the
obtaini ng permits.
propose to convert the existing
Please submit dnawings to this
proposed modifications prior to
V F'ire extinguishers are required for each tenant space.Install a type 2A-108C extinguisher in locations approved by
the City F'ire Marshal .
Each tenant space must have direct access to the electricalservice which supplies power to that space. Electrical powen
serving each tenant space shall be capable of being totally
disconnected by no more than six sw'itches.
Each tenantfacilities.
seats.
ha ve
shal'l
access to on-site toi let
be provided with open front
VIII.All plumbing fixt,ure connections shall be properly capped or
pluggecl where fixture is removed.
The above 'items are requ'irements for the exist'ing construction on1y.0ther items such as parking, paviog, Site improvements, sidewalki,etc., have not been addressed as part of this inspection, and may be
necessary as part of the required srte plan review and zone changeapproval. Please contact the City Planning office fon additional
information.
Perm'its wi I I be requi red for most of the above items, or anyaddttional modiftcat'ions you may desire which involve changes oradditions to the structural , electrical , mechanical , or pl umbing
systems. Required permits may be obtained from th'is office.
If we can be of assistance in clarifying the above nequirements orthe oprions ur1]]abre.to bring_!!e ouiioiig into compriance for yourproposed use, please call us at 126_3159
cc
Si ncerely,
Don Moore, Bui'lding Inspector
David J. Puent, Building Officia'lMike Hudman, Fire Marshal
Greg Mott, Development CoorOinat.ion Administnator
Andrew A. HenryP.0. Box 657
Thousand Palms, CA 92276
#1276