The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Building 1999-02-04CITY OF SPruNGFIEIT', riPRINGFIELD o COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF SPRTNGFIEIJD COMMI'NTTY SERVICES DIVISION BUILDING SAFETY Page 1 ilob Number: 98LL55A 225 North Fifth Street Springfield, OR 91471 Location of Proposed Work: 2728 PHEASAI{T ST Assessors Map #z 17032200 Office: Inspection Line: 726 -37 s9 7 25 -37 69 Tax Lot #: 02503 OwneT: COURTSPORT ATHLETICS Address: 4242 COMMERCE Descriptj-on Of Work: COURTSPORTS Phone #: 687 -2255 Citylstate/Zip: EUGEN, OREGON 974O2 NEW Value 200, 000.00 General: Plumbi-ng: Mechanical: El-ectrical: Contract,or LEE CONSTRUCTIO 0053579 PO BOX 10357 EUGENE OR 974400000 TWTN RIVERS PL 0017695 PO BOX 40397 EUGENE OR 974040000 HARVEY & PRICE OOOOOTT PO BOX 1910 EUGENE OR 974400000 BUILDERS ELE 0004296 195 MADTSON ST EUGENE OR 974025030 Const. Contractor #Expires 0L/L5/ee 03/|L/ee LO/31,/ee 1,2/1_O/ee Phone 583-3507 688 -a444 7 46 -L621 485 - 0922 PLI'MBING No 30 Fee Charge 300.00 300.00 Single Fixture TOTAL PERMIT No 5 MECHANICAL Furnace/burner & vent < 1OOO,0O0 BTUs Vent Fan/Single Duct 3 APPLIANCE VENTS 25 GAS CONNECTIONS Permi-t Issuance ?OTAL PERMIT Fee Charge 135.50 15.00 9.00 1,2 .50 10.00 185 . 00 QUAD AREA: 1CNW -- OFFICE USE LAND USE: 5300 ZONING CODE: CC Item Sq. Ftg Main TOTAL VALUE OF PRO,JECT Square Feet 32400 x $/Square Feet = Value 1, 935 ,529 . OO 1,935 ,628.00 BUILDING Surcharge/admin MECHANICAL Surcharge/admin 3 ,487 .0O 278.96 185.00 14.08 SPFINGFIELD CITY OF a Page 2 PAVING VALUE PLI]MBING Surcharge/admin SIDEWALK CURBCUT CITY SDC FEES SEWER HOOKUP FEE 287, 000 . 00 853.7s 300.00 24 .0O 44.20 18.55 10, 000 . 00 3 , 025 .40 SUBTOTAL PERMTTS 18 ,23A .94 TOTAL PERMTT FEES EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL EIE ?2 /4e he*z:r L8,23L.94/ at?,a.l /42-t{.?9 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS tt is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that all inspections are made at t.he proper time. To request an i-nspection, cal.l 726-3769(recorder), state your City designated job number, job address, type ofinspection reguested and when you will be ready for inspection. Requestsreceived before 7:00 a.m. will be made the same working day, requests made afLer7:00 a.m wil-l- be made the following work day. Special Inspections: fn accordance with Section 305 of the State Special_ty Codea special inspector shal-l be employed by the owner/contractor duringconstruction of any followingrr*" work. A copy of the special testing reportsshafl be furnished to Building Safety. In addition to the inspections specified, the Building Official- may make orrequire other inspections of any construction work to ensure compliance withthe Building, City or Development Code. MASONRY - Steer location, bond beams grouting or verticars in accordance with UBC 24i,5. ROUGH PtITMBING - prior to cover, RoueH cAs - after line is insta]led and capped if not attached to anappliance ROUGH MECHANfCAL - prior to cover. ROUGH ELECTRICAL - Prior To cover. ELEcrRrcA[ sERvrcE - Must be approved to obtain permanent power. FRAMING - Prior to cover- rNsuL-v.B'/suB: To BE cALLED FoR AT SAME TrME As sLiB FRAMTNG rNspECT DRYWALL - prior to taping. MECH/SUB: FOLLOWING ROUGH MECHANICAL APPROVAL, PRIOR TO COVERCETLING GRID RooF SHEATTNG/NATLTNG - Before covering sheathing with fj-nish materialBoLTs rNsrAtLED rN coNcRETE - To be done by state Certifi_ed specialrnspector. Provide inspection/test reports to ci-ty Building rnspectorsrRUcruRA'L coNcRETE in excess of 2500 psi. To be done during constr.by State Cert. fnsp. Results to Cit.y Building fnspectorRoucH GRADTNG - After gravel is in place but pri-or to placing concreteFINAL PLUMBING - When all plumbing work is complete.FINAL GAS - When a1l gas work is complete. GAs sERvrCE - After line is installed and line has been connected to aminimum of one appliance- pressure test done at this point.FINAL MECHANTCAL - when a1r- mechanicar work i-s complete.FrNAL ELECTRTCAL - when aIr electricar- work is complete.FINAL PAVTNG - After paving is complete. FINAL/SUB FrNAL FrRE - when alr Fire DepartmenL reguirements have been met.been met. .fob Number: 981156A SPR!NGFIELD Job Number: 981155A CITY OF SPHNGFIEI-D,a Page 3 FfNAL SITE PLAN - After all requirements have been met for Minimum Development Standards or from the Development Agreement. FINAL BUILDING - When all required inspections have been approved and the building is complete. --- ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DRC 98 _ 06 - 13 O , PLANNER IS .f TM DONOVAN Plans Reviewed By: LORNE PLEGER Bullding Site Revj-ewed By: LISA HOPPER Date: 0a/22/99 By signature, f state and agree, that I have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all informati-on hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed shall be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield, and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any st.ructure wj-thout permission of the Communit.y Services Division, Building Safety. I further certify that only contractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.055 will be used on this project. I further agree to ensure that all reguired inspections are requested at the proper time, that project address is readable from the street, t.hat the permit card is ated at the f of plans wl- Signa re Receipt Number Date Paid n on the si A/, vz t of the property, and the approved set t all times during construcLion. Date VALIDATION --- 2-u^?a Amount Received )- 1/c/. aa Received By etTY CF Sp.q'INGFIELD,,, oREGON D6t6 Autho SPEIIIGETBT.D INSPBCTTON EEQUEST OFEICE: 726-3759 I.EGAL DESCRrITTON /702 7zt 1)oz aaE -t OSNER IIISTAII.ATION The tnstallatlon ls being uade onprop.rry I osn shtlh is not intendedlor sale, Iease or rent. Ocncrs Slgoeturc: DATE; SPEI:JFtELO . A. Ncs Rrsldtntlal-Slnglc ortlultl-Eanlly per dvelllng unlt. Servlce fncluded:Itcns Cost , Sum Address 1'126 Gateway Loop, Suitc 122, D UND Ci tygngti.l,phonc988-3565 I Supervlsor Lleense Nuaber 79'IJLE EXP iratlon !sja 10I0'l/99 Constr Conrr. pr"5"r$353CLE c. Expiration Da(e 10101/99 Slgnature of Supervlslng Electrician D Ovncrs Address Ll tt ?t{t&So-NT:T ct 'ryffis'[susqlps-:40li.ri[d',& .5@ erps -^601 eris to lOOo aaps- over 1000 enps/volts -Rcconncct oniy 1000 sq.ft. or less Each addltlonal 500sq. ft or portlon thereof Erch l{anufrd Boae. or - llodulrr 'Dvelltng Sertlee or Feeder SUETOIAL OF AEOVE 5Z Strtc Sureharge3f Adnlnlstrative Fee ?ctAL ton s 85.00 s 15.00 s 40.00 Pcraits are non-transterablc end expirelf sork lc not et*tcd slthln 180 diysof issuanc€ or lf vork ls suspended for 180 drys. 2. COtlrB,[G[OR INSf,ALIAIION ONDT_ _ l- Scrvlccs or Peeders Erec t r i ce r con t n c, ".'*,,*.', $h0#rc5;,, * n,^',-fiii;Pf i;Urr:X ia t I ons s100 s s s s s oo 00 00 00 oo o0 50 60 FrElt 130.$ s 300 aOs Tenporrry Servlces or FcedcrsInstallatlon, Alteration or RcloceGlon 200 anps"or iess !01 arpq to 199.rps:Over 4O1 to 600 alos 0ver 600 enps or tbOO-?6llTs Branch Clrcuits Suap or irrlgetlon Slgn/Outltne Llghtlns-Llulted Energy/Res TLllltcd Enrrgy/Conn T 40 55 80 .o0 .o0 .00 "8" aEEsce Nev, Alttration or Excension Per Panel One Circuit S 35.OO Each AddttlonalCircuit or uith Serviccor Seeder Permit S 2.0O l{lsccllincous (Scrvlcc/feedcr nor tncluded) -Each lnstallation li. :FU. s 40.00 s 40.00s 20.00s 35.0C NECEIVED 5 .to specific land use numberlor OREGO'I'OF 08/10/Sg TtlE 10:09 FAX 541726: 689 0PFICEI: 726-3759 LT:GAL a ON 0 L Permits are non-transferable and expire NOTICE: rH I S PER M lT sH ALL ExBffitFnlt&yt,Qffirrr Applr cArroN AI.JTHORIZE D UNDERTHIS PERMIT IS NOT COMMENCED OR ISABENbDNESTIPb ltv CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SPRTIIGFIELEl er Nev Residential-Single or MuIti-Family per dwelling unit. Service rncluded:Items Co @ oor ANYlSODEYPENKMXIE TBE SCEEDIII.E BELOI, A s8s .t ' .00 $ 1s.00 $ 40.00 $ 3s. Sum tarted vithin 180 d f r,rork is suspended 1000 sq.ft. or less Each additional 500 sq. ft or portion thereo f Each Hanuf'd Home, or Modular Dvelling Service or Feeder B- Services or Feeders Installation, Alterations or Relocation: C One Circuit Each Additional Circuit or vith Service or Feeder Permit SUBTOTAL OT ABOVE 7% State Surcharge 32 Administrative Fee t if vork is not s 1l ays forof teo iss:uanee or da.ys. ,INSTAII-ATI0N 0NLY l t;racror La* frl$gr:z& ,c Ci ty Phone / tt -/{2-'. *n"cdnseNumber "'lefrui-eor Li ira.tion Date -//-7-aee tr Contr.er 4 a/e / ira.tion Da -o ? ture o Electrician ri3 e Phone 6?7 : 22-5ir ls being made on ih is not intended 200 amps or less $ 50-00 401 amps to 600 amps - $100.00 501 amils to 1000 amps- $130-gg over 1600 amps/volts: $300.00 TemporarY Services or Feeders rnstallaiion, Alteration or Rel-ocation I 200 amps''or iess $ 40-00 over 4b1 to 6oo amps - $ 80.00 or"r eOO arnps or rboOETts see ilBu. a55iE- Branch Circuits : Neu, Alteration or Extension Per Panel cs D s2 ro bo E. Hiscellaneous (Service/feeder rrot included) -Each installation Pump or irrigation -_ Sign/0ut1ine Lighting_ Limited Energy/Res Limited EnergY/Comm t 40.00 40.00 20. o0 36.00 $ s $ $ () O\INER IN installati perty I ovn'r sale, leas rs Slgnat v rs N, ress ty I ?<I,L or rent. -n7 5 $--3a. uo :;-->-'€Y:- {oilow ruies the Oregon UtilitY i'rlotificatrorr Center rules are set fot'ti oAR952-001"JBgAft s5?-001 0090. You maY -001 0 rhrough oDt?irr coples ot the rules by telePhone Q*t c([mtAcr0R trical Con 769 1. LOCATTON QE INSTALI,ATTQry __Zl z8 frt,tzs+t Etyl, I ST YGFIELD ]"",[ifl il,r:;?.,.Jitilifl ,i;:#: "Hflg* INSPECTION REQT]EST : ]264Th6AZEA OFFICE: 726-3759 Slgnature 1. LOCATION OF INSTA.LLATTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION JOB PTION Permits are .non-transferable and expire if vork is not started vithin 1B0 days of issuance or if vork is suspended for 1"80 days. 2. CONTRACTOR INSTALK\TION ONLY Electrical Contractor €t Address\qS MAdl'SOn ciry €Phone 4Kc.'&Zz Supervisor License Number 297)S Expi.r:ation Date to-l'&61 consrr conrr. Number 4zg u Expir:arion Dare l2' lO'? Signature of Sup i.ng Electrician Ovners Name Address The installation:.s being made on property I ovn r-'hich is not intended for sale, lease or rent. Ovners Signature: DATE: RECE ELECTRICAL PERXIT APPLICATION Job Nunbe, ?8,' SCEXDI'LE BELOII Nev Residential-Single or Multi-Family per dvelling unit. Service Included: I tems Cos t Sum 1000 sq.ft. or less Each additional 500 sq. ft or portion t hereo'f Each Manuf'd Home or Modulai Dvelling Service or Feeder s 8s.00 s 1s.00 s 40.00 Zoning225 FIFTB STR-EET sPRTNGFTELD, oREGoN n47?"t" 3 A B. Services or Feeders Installation, Alterations rt [aq]r Relocat ion: 200 amps or less 6 201 amps to 400 amps ,2- 401 amps to 600 amps 601 amps to 1000 amps_ Over 1000 amps/volts ,/ Reconnect oniy + s s0.00 s 60.00 s100.00 s130.00 s300.00s 40.00 ZAD C Temporary Services or Feeders Installation, Alteration or Relocation 200 amps''or less 201 amps to 400 amps -Over 401 to 600 amps Over 600 amps or iOOO-vofTs SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE 52 State Surcharge 32 Admini.strative Fee TOTAL Miscellaneous (Service/feeder -Each installation Pump or irrigation S Sign/outIine Lighting- S Limited Energy/Res $ Limited Energy/Comm S $40 $ss $80 see 00 6ry F4zl@y"P4;82-.:3iE; OIINER INSTATLAfION D. Branch Circuits Nev, Alteration or Extension Per Panel One Circuit S 35.00 Each Additional Circuit or vith Service or Feeder Permit /?? $ 2.00 ZE .00 .00rrgrr "[[!!- not included) 40.00 40.00 20.00 E 5 OREGON RECEIVED B 4r /2-c2<-?2 -ae/ a Z€,O= (qta) oR JoB r,to. 7'8 o f ATTACHMENT A CITY 0F SPRINGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVtr-0PMENT CHARGE TRANSil:01-0000;i WORKSHEET DATE:JAN 25 2i AHT REID:Z $ 98094. CHANE CASHIER: iNAME OR COMPANY: LOCATION DEVELOPMENT TYPE BUILDiNG SIZE OT SIZ 2 FI 1. STORM DRAiNAGE IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT 2. SANITARY SEWER-CITY NO. OF PFU'S (See Reverse Side) abr 7Z fi-/7.r,n1't oeo ? 7{, 73 x $47.14 PER PFU /.7? fr. f/A TOTAL-MWI"IC SDC $ 6 Arca- F.oo-, Jz.2"* ffi4*;#" ,/o, oao /:t X $0.227 PER SQ. FT Pv z Er/st a 3. TRANSPORTATION NO OF UNITS X TRIP RATE X COST PER TRIP x /37 x $475.32 x $475.32 4. SANITARY SEWER-I'4I^IMC A. REIMBURSEMENT COST ara M|,JI'4C CREDIT IF APPLICABLE (SEE REVERSE) |-,l[,JMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS i,2,3 & 4)5. ADMINISTRATiVE FEES: BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) X .05 /F* l4.r**,Date: 4'/ a 6oc 6ordj nator g $ l6)(6c e O(E $X N0 OF FEU'S 3/.€ x k1atR FEU ea $ 4,762- - B. IMPROVEMENT COST: ?o N0. 0F FEU 'S 1? .{ y 'a " PER FtU gs1' 7{ $0001 /o-?6,l/ 1: ( $ ' <r:l/O g 7/$.a, ^-_5/zc ATTACH 'A. WPD Tr, TorAL sDC $, 92a c u1r, / IL[n"-r") * ?t,b?/- ===3===:===========:==;=:=:===:========= CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREEI SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (54 1 )726-3753 :=======:=====:=:=== =: =r= =:====:==::: =:=HHPPY HEUJ YEAR! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ====================::==========_======= REG-RECEIPT:01-0000361 C:JAN 25 2000 CASHIER ID:001 3:26 pm ArJAN 25 2000 = = = -- : = = : = = = = = = = = : : : : : : : = : : : = : = : = I = : = : : : =1071 SDC/SANITAIiY SEI4FRS $8,155.22 J0B*;99-01 166-01 1070 SDC/SI0RM $13,18t;.C6 JtiBf : -q9-0 1 I 66 -it l'lil/l:1ill,l/lii1lt1i' rl r .lr, li'l i..r'r i I r-11 I t07 JOB $5, I il OREGONC;ITY OF 225 FrFTH srRxET l-rete SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 9747r1e0 Stgnalure INSPECTI0N REQUEST: 726-3769 OFFICE: 726-3759 ].. LOCATI OF INSTALLATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Permits are .non-transferable and expire i f vork is no t s tar ted vi thin 1,80 days of issuar:ce or if vork is suspended for 180 days. 2. CONTRACTOR INSTALT.ATION ONLY Electrical Contractor €t eddress\ I 5 Mad 's0n Ci ty Phone 48.'z Supervisor License Number 29 a)-s Expiration Date Consrr Contr. Nr:mber AZq U Expir:ation Date 2- Signature of Supervising Electrician Zoning Ar> r<- -J.c - n ELECTRICAL PERXIT APPLICATION - Ci ty Job Numbe r ?8//66 COHPLETE FEE SCEED{TLE BELOV Nev Residential-Single or MuIti-Family per dvelling unit Service fncluded: I tems 1000 sq.ft. or less Each add i. t i onal 500 sq. ft or portion t he reo'f Each Manuf'd Home. or Modulai Dvelling SerVice or Feeder Cos t s 8s.00 s 1s.00 S VGFIELO B. Services or Feeders Installation, Alterations rC{aQr Relocation: 200 amps or less 201 amps to 400 amps -401 amps to 600 amps _601 amps to L0O0 amps_ Over 1000 amps/vo1ts _ Reconnec t 0nl-Y C rl'r l0llowtng project as submifled has the followinoi,-rrlflp Bhd does not require specific f"nJr"""'-6f,triOVAl 3 A Sum $ 40.00 s s0.00 s 60.00 s100.00 si30.00 s300.00s 40.00 Temporary Services or Feeders Installation, Alteration or Relocation _?&200 amps''or less r 201 amps to 400 amps -Over 401 to 600 amps Over 600 amps or 1O00-7ofTs 40. 80. $ ) $ S 00 00 00 (ee trBrt aEove Ovners Name Ci ty O\TNER INST ON The installation is bei property I ovn ruhich is for sale, lease or rent Ovners Signature: hone Z182-Z2SF made on t intended D. Branch Circui ts Nev, Alteration or Extension Per Panel One Circuit S 35.00 Each Addi tional Circuit or vith Service or Feeder Permit S 2.00 Eng no Miscellaneous ( Service/feeder -Each installation Pump or irrigation S Sign/0utline Lighting_ S Limited Energy/Res $ Limited Energy/Comm S SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE 5Z State Surcharge 3Z Admini.strative Fee TOTAL not included) 40.00 40.00 20. o0 5 DATE: RECEIVED B /2^a7.zze aZaeT -JoB DESCRIPTIoN x. -i'f.f- rzryfrn zm tt\- I ' q I xaress /z ?z G4r/Fi:78 7a,* -'-----=--fu> 3- /, 2a--V=:ze OR JOB NO. ATTACHMENT A CITY OF SPRiNGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELO. ,,iENT CHARGE WORKSHEET NAME OR COMPANY LOCATION DEVELOPMENT TYPE: BUILDING SIZE OT SIZ J2 0. Ft i. STORI'4 DRAINAGE rbr 7Z oao r 78, //E ,e-r/.,h-t t s Aza- Fro-r-, o IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT 2. SANITARY SEI,iER-CiTY NO. OF PFU'S (See Revense Side) TRANSPORTATION /.7? H r/A X $0.227 PER SQ X $47.14 PER PFU TOTAL-t.,lt^llt,lc SDC z 4/fr U qO64e?- sl ,/oJ--E/t/ - $' ?"f/ag 54/a* qrzr?7 '/'@ () a7 ./s, l$.l7,/a aJ 4. SANITARY SEWER-MI^/I.4C A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: 5. ADMINISTRAIIVE FEES: BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) X .05 NO OF UNITS X TRIP RATE X COST PER TRIP x /3? x $415.32 x $475.32 $ 46216. $ 29 No. oF FEU'I 3.2.€ x /oSaER FEU 6a $ 4,762- B. IMPROVEMENT COST: qa N0. 0F FEU',S 1J -t X '.a u PER FEU g 75< $ ).?7f ,-_-$ 10. 00 MI^JMC CREDIT IF APPL]CABLE (SEE REVERSE) Mt^lMC ADMINISTRATIVE FEE SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS 1,2,3 & 4) //e Date:27/'"q ,_^ fu TorAL SDC S. 97/-c u- ATTACH'A. I^JPD rdi nator /L V*r,*, l-'lx I UHE UNIT CALCULATION TABLE: Number of New Fixtures X Unit Equivatent = Fixture ur .s (NOTE: For remodels, calculate onlv the NET additional fixtures) FrxruBE rypE \/ il:,f?ilr?f*rr- EoU,Y'Lr*, :,',X,}:t' Bathtub... Drinking Fountain........ Floor Drain. tnterceptors ro,. c,.u.r")o'iiIrrii.)i,".................' lnterceptors For Sand/Auto WashiEtc..... L a u n d ry r u b /C I oth e s i ""n " r 11 Z bi .ei.K.. . . .. . . . . . . . Clotheswasher - 3 Or More.. Mobile Home Park Trap (1 Per Trailer).... R e ce p to r Fo r R e f ri g e ra to r/Wa t e r s t ati o n leic. . . dA//5"J- Beceptor For Commercial Sink/DishwasheriEtc.. Shower, Single Sta11.......... Shower, Gan9......... Sink: Bar. Commercial, Residential Kitchen.. Urinal, Stall/Wall... Wash Basin lLavatory, Single.. Toilet, Public lnstallation. Toilet, Private....... Miscellaneous:,4.,* TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS 2 1 2 3 6 2 o 6 1 3 2 1/Head 2 2 1 6 4 --v--w-- 3 T -7---_c- B,/5//' ?--77---7r L-? g_v- __/__ /-J 2 / CREDIT CALCULATION TABLE: Based on assessed vaiue calculate credits separates. lf improvements occurred after annexation date in tacle, +,-4 x $ /7' Year Annexed (Rate X Assessed Value)x $_: Rate per $1,000 Assessed Vaiue ?j $ /,;75 7 Credit for Parcel or Land Only lf Applicable lmprovement (if after annexation date) (Rate X Assessed Value) CREDIT TOTAL Year Annexed Rate per $1,000 Assessed Value_/22 1 981 1 982 1 983 1 984 1 985 1 986 1 987 1 988 4.12 200 3.83 3.68 3.48 3.1 8 2.82 2.42 79 or f ore 't ooo 1 990 1 991 1 992 1 004 1 994 1 995 1 004 1 997 $1.98 1.55 1.'15 0.96 0.83 0.67 o.52 o.3B o.21 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE (For Estimating Purposes Only) Residential.....0.4 Commerical lndustrial.... Governmental............ ....0.9 ... o5 ,... 0.5 FIXUNIT.WPD IMPERVIOUS AREA = TOTAL LOT SIZE X RUNOFF COEFFICIENT ___v- - /r' .? 1^-*- -4->(64.27 -'.--Tr{' t7 Build Traffic Votumes a./*,fiE /rr*^' Courbporb TIS - Revised TABLE2 Courtsports Trip Generation zY f,, V4 f,co F#-20 rd-{a Manual counts made as part of the Courtsports Parking Analysis found an average vehicleoccupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle. Applying these rates to the proposed 3g,000 SFGFAdevelopment lelCs an estimated daily traffic voiume ofl (56.5 membervl,OO0 sF) x (38,000 sF) / (r.2 member/vehicre) Trip Distribution and Assignment Estimated new trips.generated by the proposed development were distributed based on the marketresponse anticipated by Courtsports management and assigned to the locations studied as shownin Figures 8 and 9. AII trips to courtsports were assumed to be by private vehicle and no ad.lustment was made for"pass-by'' trips or alternate modes of traver-and "t1 n.* trip, g.n.rrted by the proposeddevelopment were added to the No-build PM peak trou, tiamc volumes. rn..lrurting..Build,,traffic volumes are shown in Figures 9am/pmi"a ro-p* /# -//z- 78// a 6 2:/,b,7 % = Z,/6 TFr/a (3X,le-2a), /"f1-/=i- *.f5 - uz /J2 1,789 vehicles Land Use Health Clubs - #493 Rate per 1,000 SF AM. PM PM Peak EourAM Peak Hour Enter Exit Enter Exit 46%54%6t%39%000 0.3 - 4.3 5 6 ee2 63llt62 McKenney Engineering - 6/2619g 7 ltDUIVr J(Illarr rttLr.Y ALLUUI\ I bulllvlflf"I 1/ lO / >y ACCT : 18 8522 19 98 r -SESSMENT YEAP. COUNTY: LAItrE INll;X: F MAP EQ 17032200u_rj03 ACCT X YRA X ACCT STAT : SADJ, PAYOR, POST PROP DESCR: L7 03 22 00-02503 NAME ADDR: TAJ ENTERPRISES INC LEGAL: PAR 1 PART PLAT 95-P0692 4242 COMMERCE EUGENE OR lZ: J I :54 v /+uz PROP ADDR: YRIA YRLA 95 PROP CLASS 2OO STAT CLASS 3.02 ACRES CYCLE SAV LAND 298,'770 IMPS TIMBER. LAST ACTIVITY 298,770 298 ,77 0 RES NEIGH 81901 COM NEIGH 07-20-98 CONTROL GROUP L9 LEVY CODE 19-OO TAX CERTIFIED: 1900 3,593 . B34 ZONE REAL MARKET (RIvn/) 298,710 1998 YEAR TAX: TAX DUE 1998 YEA.R.: TAX DUE PRIOR YEARS: INTEREST AS OF OI-25-99 TOTAL BALANCE DUE: OLDEST DELINQUENT YEAR 3, 593.83 3,583.02- 3,583.42- GROSS: EXMPTS: NET: L 014 298 ,77 0 298 ,11 0 # 940908007 6aJ9 Wilson / Community Services CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Development Services Department DATE OFLETTER March 19, 1998 APPLICAI\T Mr. Dave Munson General Manager Counsports Athletic Club 4242Commerce Eugene, OR97402 ^4/ ?-q PROPERTY OWNER Tim Hovet Sycan B Corp. 3405 Baldy View Lane Springfield, OR97477 SUBIECT: CITY JOT RNAL NUMBER 98-03-058 - PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE This letter discusses a Pre-Application Conference application for City staffto review a proposed 40,000 square foot athletic club facility in the Gateway arca of Springfield. Please be aware that the large plans submitted showing the existing Courtsports facility in Eugene have no relevance to what is proposed for Springfield. Also, the one reduced plan submifted has no scale and does not respond to all of the issues listedon the application form. Therefore, staff cannot review the application as submitted. The submitted overview stated that parking was a major concern, the Springfield Development Code (SDC) requires over 260 parking spaces and that fewer parkig spaces should be allowed. The parking requirements for the proposed use are found in SDC 18.070(7) which states: 'Recreational facilities - I for each 100 square feet of floor area in the primary assembly area and 1 for each 200 square feet of gross floor area for the remainder of the building." Based on tIe submittal, I cannot caluclate how many parking spaces are required. There is a provision for staffto reduce parking requirements in SDC 31.170(1Xd) which states: "The Director may authorize a rcduction in the number of required parking spaces without a Variance: 1. Based on an approved Traflic Study; and/or 2. When the location of a building on a site makes it impractical to provide the number of required spaces without demolishing all or part of the building, and no alternative parking arrangements are reasonably available; and 3. Based on an aflirmative finding by the Director that the exception will have no negative impacts on neighboring properties; and 4. AII installed parking shall conform to the design standards of this Article.' Subsection 1., stands as a separate alternative. A Traffic Study is required for any proposed staffreviewed reduction ofparking spaces, unless Subsections 2. - 4. apply. Subsections 2. - 4. must be viewed as a connected alternative. Howgver, the intent of this alternative was for the reuse or expansion of developed sites, i.e., sites with existing buildings. The site proposed to be developed is currently vacant. Page2 Therefore, the only alternative to possibly reduce the required number of parking spaces without Planning Commission approval of a variance is by submitting a Trafftc Study. If the variance procedure is chosen requiring Planning Commission approval to possibly reduce the required number of parking spaces, I contend it would be difficult to comply with the variance criteria of approval under SDC I 1.030(2)(aF(e), which are: 'A Variance may be granted only if the proposal is determined by the Approval Authority to meet all of the following criteria: (a) There are unusual conditions, associated with the property or structure which make it impractical to use the development area for its intended purpose under the Springlield Development Code. (b) Granting of the Variance would not be inconsistent with both the Metro Plan and the Springfield Development Code. (c) Granting of the Variance would have no significant adverse affects on the public welfare or neighboring properties, and there are provisions to mitigate those adverse affects which will be a condition of use. (d) The need for a variance has not arisen solely from a previous Code violation and the hardship is not self-imposed. (e) There are no other practical alternatives available that better meet the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and the Metro Plan.' Also, Gateway Refinement Plan Transportation Policy 25.0 states: 'Facilitate the efficient operation of transportation systems serving the commeciall developed areas. ' In order for staffto determine the impact of new development on the Beltline/Gateway intersection, a Traffic Impact Study is required as part of any Site Plan Review or Subdivision Tentative Plan application in the vicinity of this busy intersection. I am enclosing a copy of Public Works' SOPP# T-6.1 which discusses the subject of Traffrc Impact Studies. Please note the following statement at the boffom of Page I of the SOPP: 'The study must be conducted by a professional engineer, registerd in Oregon, with expertise in transportation engineeringor, a recognized transportation planning Iirm having experience in the prepoaration of traffic impact analysis and routine traflic engineering studies.' The "annectdotal" parking comments submitted relate to a 31,500 square foot facility in Eugene (which may have different parking standards than Springfield), not a 40,000 square foot facility which is proposed to be constructed in Springfield. ln order to allow staffto review any submitted proposal in a timely manner, I strongly suggest hiring a professional transportation engineer or planning firm to prepare a Traffic Imapct Study which can include a section on reducing the number of parking spaces required. Since there are existing utilities in the area proposed to be developed, please consider applying directly for Site Plan Review approval. If you choose to forego the Pre-Application Conference based upon this letter, I will allow your Site Plan Review application fee to be credited with the $210.00 you have already paid. If you wish to continue with the Pre-Application Conference application, you must submit revised plans which fully address the submittal requirements on the application form. The Type II Site Plan Review Application fee is $545.00 plus $10.00 per acre and a $50.00 postage fee for the required notice procedure. The application must include a response to all items on the Site plan Review checklist, which is attached to the application form. Please remember that in order for the Site plan Review application to be considered complete for review, a Trafftc Impact Study, based upon SOPP# T-6.1 must be submitted concurrently. Lately, the Site Plan Review process takes 90-l l0 days. Page 3 SUMMARY OF THE REVIEW PROCESS: a. The Site Plan Review application is accepted as complete by City staff. b. Notice is sent to property owners/occupanr within 100 feet of the development area for a l4-day comment period. c. The application is reviewed by City staffand affected agencies. d. City staffmakes the decision. e. Notice of the decision is sent to the applicantand only those who submit written comments to the notice mentioned in b., above. f. The decision may be appealed within ten (10) days of the date of issuance. Appeal applications are available from the Development Services Departnent. If you have any general questions concerning this issue, please call me at 541.726-3777. If you have specific questions concerning the Traffrc Impact Study, please call Masood Miurza at 541.726.4585. PREPARED Planner III Cc: Masood Mirza, Transportation Planning Engineer Enc. h a. s.o.P.P # T-6.1 EFFECTTVE DATE: July l. 1997 (Revision l) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD OPERATING POLICIES & PROCEDI.'RES SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT STTJDTES PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the preparation of traffic impact studies for proposed land developments. GENERAL Traffic operations an$ transportation planning play a mqior role in successful land development ln order to maximize the benefits of land developmen! it is essentid that the land be served by an adequate traffic system. Besides b.i"g able to provide good access to and from the new developmeng it is equally important to assess and mitigate impacts to the surrounding communities and to the existing traffrc and street network To determine the traffic impacts and - to properly plan for new land development it is necessary that traffic studies be prepare,{" To assure proper and adequate land use and transportation'itanqjng, a development proposal withpotentdforsignificanttrafficimpactsshallincludeatrafficimpactassessmentstudy. This trdffic study shall bc prepared by the developer. The intent of this policy is to minimize traffic related impacts onthe existing land use in the' immediate vicinity of the proposcd developmen! the proposed dwelopment itself and on traffic conditions and control devices ttrat are outside of the immediate vicinity ofthe proposed deielopment but are ocpected to be affected by increased traffic volumes. fne neea for and the detall of the traffic impgct shrdy will be determined by the Directorof Public Works or designee and guided by current Development Code requiiements The requirements for preparing the traffrc study and the information to be included in the study are as follows: Minor TraIIic Study (250 - 500 vehicle trips per day) I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The study must be conducted by a professional errtin"er, registered in Oregon, with expertise in transportation engineering or, a recogilzpAtransportation planning firm having experience in the preparation of traffic impact analysis and routine traffic ( L t. engineering studies. 2. PROJECT DESCRTPTTON This section should include (but not limited to) project name, locationisize of project (including building sizes by land uses, total building are4 total site), number of parking stalls ( standard, compact and handicap), type and number of access points and any other transporlation related special features. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS I. Street Network Include a.detailed description of the adjacent street network This description should include (but not limited to) number and width of travel lanes, median t,?esr t)?e and width of sidewalks, number and operation of existing driveways, bicycle lanes, road signs, on street parking restrictions, bus stops, geometry and traffic controls at , the pertinent intersections ' : II. Traffic Accidents Analysis Summarize recent ttree-year traffic accident data The taffic accident data can be obtained from City or State.. The analysis should include (but not limiJed tQ total number of accidents by type (PDO, injury and fatal, rear end, head-on, sidesnipe etc.), total number of fatalities,' high accident locations, accident patterns, road ' deficiencies and mitigation measur6s. : : m. 'Transit Facilities This section should discuss bus stop lbcations, bus routes and schedules, special routes (during AM and PM peak hours), any proposed routes (ifany), car and van pools. IV. Non-MotorizedFacilities The section should include a discussion of existing sidewalks, bike [ane, pedestrian signils and push buttons at intersections, pedesfuian crossings atintersotions and mid blocks. Identiff deficiencies and propose mitigation measures. tL 4. PROJECT TRAFFIC I. Trip Generation Trip generatio.n for the proposed project should be developed in accordance with ttre most current edition of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. If the projectis to bp devetoped in stages,'the trip.generation section shoutd address this and the tip generation table should reflect the staged developmenl If the tip geoeration rates arc not given in the ITE Trip Geneiation lvlanual mentioned above or project proponent wishes to use some other tip generation. ratcs, then these propo.sed trip generation rates'must be pre-app_roved by tlre Crty. The proposedtip generationrates shbuld be zupportin 6y actual tip generirtion' daa from co-mparable existing sitcs and or published reports in transportation and traffi c engineering jodrnals. The trip generation should atso include " ai*"Ion 1if necessaryl ojtip tpes and any tip rate cr€dits. The gip,rate credit disctrssion should be zupported by actual' ilata and/or published reportsintransportation and traffic engineering joumals. II. Trip Distribution and Assignment The vehicular tips generated by th6 prcposed development should be distibuted to the existing rtr."t nitt ork in accordance with the oxistingtraffic flow pallerns,'land irse patrcrru computer modeldeveloped by the City oran Origin and Destination survey. The tip distribution and assignments should be elapndedto areasonable distance from the site, covering major intersections anq if require{ to the nearest fr,eeway interchange. Maior Traftre Impact Analysis ( 500 or more vehicles trips per day) I. GFNBRAL REOUREMENIS The study must be conducted by aprofessional engineer, registered in Oregon, with e:<pertis3 in transportation engineering or, a recognized transportatioii planning firm baving experience in the preparation of traffic impact analysis and routine traffic engineering studies. , ir.' .l .t 2. This'section should include (but not limited to) project name, location, size of projecl '(i"-"J"ai"g building sizes by iand uses, total #ldff** Lra site), number of parking shlls ( stildar4 cogpact and handicap), type and number of access points and any other transportation related special features. 3 I. StreetNetnork ' II. - TrafficConditions Level of Service (LOS) analysis should be perfonned at the pertincnt intersections and./or as identified by the city. The Los analysis should be qonducted in accodance withthe Highnray Capacrty ldanual (Special Report 209)'third edition (1994) method using-Highway capacity software (HCS). Additionat anatysis (signal Coordination, Queue Length, delay, noise etc.) may be required uy ttre city on a case by case bases. m. Traffic Accidents Analysis tr. !llRr.:z _ S t nmarize recent three.year traffic accident data The traffic accident data cad be obtained from city or state. The analysis shoutd include (but not timilsd to) lstal number of accidents by type (PDo, injury and fatal, *:ar end, head-on, sideswipe etc.), total number of fatalities, .high "q"id"ot locations, accident patterns, ,oj deficiencies and mitigation measures. IV. Transit Facitities This section should discuss bus stop locations, bus routes and schedules, special routes (during AM and PM peak hours), any,proposed routes (if any), car and van pools. .Include a detailed description ofthe adjacent steet network. This description shouldh"lrd:gutnot limited to) numbbr and width of travel lanes, median typ"r, t1,p" _and wiCthof sideuAlks, number.andoperation hf existrng.diivenays, bicycle tanes, . -: ,..ii. rcad sigps, on stneet parking ro.ni"tio*, bus stops,;;;oy and tr-affic cohtols at Provide AM and PM peak houtunring movements counts at the pertinent intersections. These counts.should not be more than oo" y*roia.^So-" ,,*i"g moveme. nts counts are available from the City. In addition to thc peak hour turiing motement'counts, the City may require r"".ot tube counts on'certain steets. EXISTING CONDITIONS i.rti !r''i V. Non-MotbrizedFacilities The section shoirld include a discussion of existing sidewalls, bike [ane, pedestian signals and push buttons at intersoctions; podestrian crossings at intersections and mid blocks. Identiff deficiencies and propose mitigation measures. 4. PROJECT TRAFFIC L . Trip Generation Trip generatiort for the proposed project,should be developed in accordance:with the mostcurrent edition of tnstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Tiip .Generation ' . lvfanudl.. -.i I tt'' 5 , If the project is to be developed in stages, the tip geniration section should address Air u"a ,U" oip generation table should reflect tne stagea developmenr If,thetip generation rates arb noJ gveuinthe ITETrip Generationlv{anual mentioned above or project proponent wishes td use some other trip generation rates, then thesb proposed tip generation rates must be pre-approved by the City. The proposed tip generation rates shoutd be strpported by achral trip generation data fromcpmparable existing sites and or published reports in tragsportation and trafEc engineering journals. :, . The tip generation should alsp includi: a discussion (ifnecessary) of rip tlpes and any trip ratc credits..The trip rarc creiit discussioin should be supported by actual data and/orpublished reports in transportation and traffic engineering journals. II. Trip Distributionand'Assignrnent .ir-;,:.1i:. r. : '.-:., The vehicular trips generated by the proposed development should be distributed to the existing street network in accordance with the existing faffic flowpatterns,land use pattern, computer model developed by the City or an Origin and Destination survey. The tip disnibution and assignments should be extended to a reasonable distance fromthe site, covering major intersections an( ifrequire{ to the nearist freeway interchange. FUTURE TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT I. Traffic Volumes and LOS Analysis ,' ,:.,, The TIA should clearly identiff the total built-out year. Existing trffic should be projected for the built-out year based on the pre-approved (by the City) growth ' rta ( rates. The project proponent or their representative should obtain a list of impending development projects from the City. The traffic generated by these projects stiould be added to above mentioned traffic volumes to reflect the total assumed traffic volumes without the project 'Level of Serviceanalysis (LOS) should be performed at pertinent intersections and./or as identified by the City. Additional analysis may be required by the Cityon a case by case basis. II. Proposed Transportation Improvements projects This section of the report should Hgnti$ ahy relevant Transportation lmprove,ment. Projects in city's caprtal Improvement plaq Transplan, cotrnty,s Road ' lmFrovement Plans and-st4tewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIp). 6. The TLA should clearly identify funre traffic volumes (including traffic generated by the proposed development).The following analysis should be conducted to iJentiff the ' impacts of the-proposed development I. LOS analysis should be performed at the pertinent intersections and./or as identified by the Cityand at all site access points. All intersections at LOS E or worse should be'identified. Additional analysis may be required by the City on a case by c.ase basis. Recommendations should be made for improvements that would be required to maintain LOS D at affected intersections when the development is complete. Specific'!:uign recorlmendations should be made. I A determination of the need for traffic signals based on taffic signal warrants in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Contnot pivice (MIITCD) m.Recommendations should be made for improvements that woutd be required to maintain an adequate level of safety on uff""t"d stoeets when the development is completed such as turn widening, sight distance tiangle and signing. Specific design recommendations should be made. IV. Indicate any significant increase in noise ?nd air pollution and proposed methods to mitigate the impacts. i,.,,. .a. !_r(\-!'! V Discuss proposed improvements to enhance bicycle and pedestrian usage and facilities, and the availability of mass transit to serve the proposed development. VI. Determine on-site parking requirements in accordance with the Springfield Development Code, and analyze the internal traffic circulation.to the extent that it can be determined whether the points of access witl operate properly. VII. Internal roads, whether public or private, should be analyzsd for safe and efficient intemal traffic circulation. 7. CONCLUSTONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS This section should include a summary of all proposed traffic mitigation measures and conclusions. 8. APPENDIX All the calculation sheets and supporting data sheets should be included in this section ... . .. .r +\W CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Development Services Department DATE OF LETTER July 10, 1998 y* APPLICANT Mr. Dave Munson GeneralManager Courtsports Athletic Club 4242 Commerce Eugene, OR 97402 SUBJECT: CITY JOURNAL NUMBER 98-03-058 - PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE This letter discusses a Pre-Application Conference application for City staff to review parkinq requirements only for a proposed athletic club facility on Pheasant Street between Harlow Road and Oakdale Road. Based on the review of the "Parking Needs Analysis" dated May 18, 1998 the Transportation Section has the following recommendations: 1. The proposed development must have at least 175 parking stalls, including standard, compact and handicap stalls.2. The internalcirculation as proposed is acceptable.3. The applicant must include bike racks. Since the Site Plan application for the proposed facility has already been submitted, staff will not consider specifics at this time. The City's Development Review Committee will consider the Site Plan application at their August 8 meeting. Jim Donovan, Planner l, has been assigned to the Site Plan application. lf you have any questions concerning this letter or the Site Plan Review process itself, please call Jim at 726.3660. P M. Karp 7*'1 Planner lll Gc: Masood Mirza, Transportation Planning Engineer Jim Donovan, Planner I CITY OF OREGO'V SPRIr- TFIELO DEVELOPM ENT S ERW C ES DE PARTMENT &'/ LZ ?nu-.*'-t- Notice of Decision - Limited Land Use - Site Plan Review 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541 ) 726-3753 FAX(541) 726-3689 Date of Letter: October 2, 1998 Journal Number: 1998-06-0130 Owner/Applicants:Desiqn Gonsultants: Courtsports Athletic Club 9242 Commerce Eugene, 0R 97402 Roberts Sherwood Architects 132E. Broadway, Ste. 540 Eugene, OR 97401 Nature of Application: The applicant has submitted a Type ll Site Plan Review Application to the City of Springfield for approval to construct an athletic club that combines secondary food, beverage and retail sales with on-site day care facilities in addition to athletic recreation activities. The proposed club is located on Pheasant Boulevard, north Harlow Road, in Springfield. Decision: Tentative Site Plan Aporoval , with conditions, as of the date of this letter. Ihis is a limited land use decision made according to city code and state statute. Unless appealed, the decision is final. Please read this document carefully. Final Sife Plans must conform to the tentative site plan approval. Other Uses That Mav Be Authorized Bv The Decision: None. The proposed primary use is permitted in accordance with SDC18. 020(6Xm). Uses permitted in the zone but not listed on the application require additional review and permits. Future development will be in accordance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code, Gateway Refinement Plan and allapplicable permit procedures. Site lnformation: The 3 acre site is classified as Community Commercialon the Gateway Refinement Plan diagram. The site is currently vacant, fenced and graveled. Developed property classified Community Commercia! abuts the subject site to the north (mini-storage) and south (mote!, tire center). A residentialcondominium development abuts the site along west property line. The subject site has approximately 227 teel of frontage on Pheasant Boulevard along east property line. Pheasant Boulevard is a fully improved local street adjacent to the development site. Written Comments: Applications for Limited Land Use Decisions require the notification of property owners/occupants within 100 feet of the subject property allowing lor a 14 day comment period on the application. No letters were received. 2 Courtsports, PJ No.fEtr8-06-0130 (2t Criteria of Site Plan Approval: Section 31.060, Site Plan Review Standards, of the Springfield Development Gode states: 'The Director shall approve, or approve with conditions, a Type ll Site Plan Application upon determining that criteria (1) through (4) of this section have been satisfied. !f conditions cannot reasonably be attached to satisfy the criteria, the Director shall deny the application." (1) COMPLTANCE WITH THE SUBMTTTAL REQUTREMENTS OF SECTTONS 3.050 AND 31.050 0F THIS CODE. The site plan application was accepted as complete on August 4, 1998 and contained all information required to initiaie Type ll Site Plan Review procedures in accordance with SDC Articles 3 and 31. This decision is issued within the required 120 calendar day review period. Finding of Fact 1: Criteria t has been met because the applicant has complied with all submittal requirements and the decision was issued within the required 120 days. PROPOSED ON€ITE AND OFF€ITE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUFFIGIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SPECIFIED IN ARTICLES 31, 32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND/OR OVERLAY DISTRIGT ARTICLE AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Subcriteria a. Conformance with Article 32 (Public and Private Improvements) Water and Electric Service. SDC Section 32.120 states: "Each development shall be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish adequate supply to the development. " The Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides water and electrical service to the development area. Water service is available from Pheasant Boulevard street side PUEs. The proposed building will require water development fees for connections and metering. Backflow prevention devices are required. Bart McKee of SUB Water Department, (726-2396) is the contact person. Water services wil! be extended from existing facilities upon the collection of development charges. Work within the public right of way will require permits from the City of Springfietd Public Works Department. The utility vault that houses fire and domestic water meters, check valves and backflow devices is located above ground, in the parking lot adjacent to Pheasant Boulevard public right of way (pg. P1). SDC 31.160 (1Xb) requires that equipment vaults be screened with earthen, planted or structural screening. Staff recommends expanding perimeter landscaping to surround the vault. 3 Courtsports, PJ No.1998-06-0130 Finding: The utilities vault located in the parking lot along west propefty line lacks the screening required by SDC 31.160. The following Condition of Approval is applied for full compliance with standards of this code: 1) The Final Site Plan shall be revised to provide screening of mechanical equipment in accordance with the standards of SDC 3r.160(1). SDC 32.120(2) states, "Wherever possible, utility lines shall be placed underground." There is SUB overhead electrical service available to serve the site from south property line. Underground service can be constructed as proposed on the submitted site plan. Services will be installed upon the collection of deveiopinent charges. Ed Head of SUB Electric (726-2395) is the contact person. Fire and Life Safety. The existing fire lines on Pheasant Boulevard have sufficient volume to serve the fire protection system proposed on the submitted plans. Please contact Al Gerard, Fire and Life Safety at726-2298 if you have further questions. Sanitary Sewer. SDC 32.100 (1) states, "...sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect the developments to new mains. lnstallation of sanitary sewers shall comply with the provisions of this code, the Standard Construction Specifications, Ghapter 2 of the City Gode, and the Department of Environmental Quality regulations..." Connection of a 4 inch line to the existing sanitary facilities as proposed on Sheet P.1 of the tentative site plans is acceptable. AII new sewer taps will require permits from the Public Works Department prior to connection. Ken Vogeney of the Public Works Division (726-3688) is the contact person. Finding: The proposed development plan is in conformance with SDC 32.100 because the City Engineer has determined that existing public sanitary facilities have sufficient capacity available fo serve the site and proposed connections meet the applicable construction standards. Storm Sewer. SDG Section 32.110 states, "The ApprovalAuthority shall grant development approval only where adequate provisions for storm and floodwater run-off to the City storm water drainage system have been made as determined by the Gity Engineer." SDC 32.110(4) states, " A development shall be required to employ drainage management practices approved by the Gity Engineer.... in order to relieve demand on the Gity's piped drainage system and to alleviate future costs of treating the piped discharge; to promote water quality, to preserve groundwater and the vegetation and riverr it supports, and to reduce peak storm flows..." Storm water drainage systems: The submitted site plan proposes to connect private drain systems to an existing stub and a 21 inch public storm drain along west property line. Adequate capacity exists within the public system to serve 4 Courtsports, PJ No.1w8-06-0130 the proposed system. However, prior to final site plan approval, the applicant must provide design calculations prepared by a registered engineer to verify the effects of the private system on the City's piped drainage system. Finding: The existing 21 inch public storm line has capacity available to serve the private sysfem proposed. ln order to verify remaining capacity in the public sysfem the following condition of approval is applied in accordance with SDC 32.110ft): 2) Pior to final site plan approval, the applicant must provide design calculations prepared by a registered engineer to determine the affects of the private storm sysfem on the CiU's piped drainage sysfem. Pretreatment and Reduction Measures: The private drainage system proposes to drain 5000 square feet of parking lot area through oilArater separator catch basins and combine it with roof run off prior to discharging to the public system. The City Engineer has determined that the proposed design does not meet the standards of SDC Section 32.110(4): SDC Section 32.110(4) implements Metro and Gateway Refinement Plan policies for water quality pre-treatment and storm water reduction by authorizing the City Engineer to require drainage management practices that "relieve demand on the Gity's piped drainage system and... alleviate future costs of treating the piped discharge'. Section 32.110(4) lists 8 methods of pretreatment and reduction that range from minimizing impervious surfaces to constructing wetlands. The Gateway Refi nement Plan Natu ral Assets Element specifi cally requires applicants to minimize the negative impacts of development on water quality and quantity through the use of filtering and retention techniques to reduce the amount of contaminants passing through ground water to drinking water wellsites, or being canied to Maple Island Slough and the McKenzie River. (Policy 3.0, lmplementation Actions 3.1&2, pgs. 34-35) Staff recommends integrating planted swales into landscape designs. FINDING: The submitted plans for storm water drainage do not meet the prvtrcatment standads of the SDC and the Gateway Refinement Plan because 2 cell catch basins are the proposed storm watertrcatment technique wherc the code and refinement plan emphasize natural filtration and detention of storm water on site. The following condition of approval is applied forfullcode compliance: 3) FinalSde P/ans shall be revised to incorporate methods of natural fiftration and detention listed,n SDC Secfrbn 32.110(4) into storm drainage plans. Storm drainage plans shall be approved by the City Engineer piorto Final Site Plan Approval. 5 Courtsports, PJ No.199846-0130 FINDING: Discharging relatively clean roof drainage directly to the public sysfem dres not reduce quantrty or relieve demand on the public sysfem as required by SDC 32.110(4). The following Condition of Approval is applied for full compliance with the code: 4) FinalSde P/ans shall be revised to direct roof run off to one or more dry wells. The dry wells must be located in vegetated areas and must have an ovefflow connection to the storm sysfem. The dry wells shall be shown on revised storm drainage plans. Street lmprovements: SDC 32.040(f) states, "Sidewalks and accessways shall be constructed, replaced or repaired in accordance with the Standard Construction Specifications." Concurrent with building construction, sidewalks must be repaired and/or installed along the full frontage of the site abutting Pheasant Boulevard. Sidewalks may be transitioned to setback at the driveway as proposed on the submitted plans. The existing curb return style driveway must be reconstructed to city standards for curb return driveways, (ref: SDC 32.080). Street trees proposed on the landscape plans meet the standards of SDC 32.050 and may be installed as shown. Harlow Rd/Pheasant Boulevard & Harlow Rd/Pioneer Parhrvay intersections may require improvement in the future based on trip generation from the subject site and surrounding development. ln accordance with SDC 32.020, the City Transportation Planning Engineer requires that an lmprovement Agreement guaranteeing the applicant's participation in the costs of future intersection improvements be signed because the development area is served by the City street system and adjacent intersections. The lmprovement Agreement is required for the Harlow Road/ Pheasant Boulevard intersection based on review of the submitted Tentative Site Plan and Traffic lmpact Analysis in accordance with SDC 32.020(10)(4Xa) & 32.020(12). The agreement form is attached. Finding: An lmprovement Agreement for the adjacent intersection rs necessary because the development site rs seryed by the City street system and development increases traffic at the adjacent intersection. The following Condition of Approval is applied for conformance with this Code: 5) A signed lmprovement Agreement for the Hadow Road/Pheasant Boulevard intersection must be submitted with the Final Site Plan in accordance with SDC 31.070, 32.020(1 )(c.3), s2.020(10)(4)(a) & 32.020(1 2). Subcriteria b) Conformance with standards of SDC Article 31- Site Plan Review and Article l8- CommercialZonino Districts. Setbacks: The submifted site plan complies with the setback provisions of SDC 18.050 because the proposed structure is setback 140 feet from west property line (rear yard), 20 feet from north and 60 feet from south property lines (side yards) and 210 feet from east (front) property line; proposed parking is setback 5 feet from all adjacent property lines. 6 Courtsports, PJ No.1w8-06-0130 Buildinq Heioht: SDC Section 18.060(2) states: " When a...CG District abuts an LDR District to the... west...the building height limitation shall be no greater than that permitted in the ...LDR ..District(s) for a distance of 50 feet." The proposed structure is setback 140 feet from the residentialzoning district located along west property line, therefor no height restrictions apply. Landscapinq. Liohtino and Screeninq. The lighting plan submitted meets the provisions of SDG 31.{60. Existing screening along west property line meets the provisions of SDC 31.160. The landscape plan submitted meets the planting standards of SDC 31 .140(1). However, required revisions to the submitted drainage plans may affect landscape planS becaUse planted swales or ponds are required for filtration of storm water. Final landscape plans must reflect the location and plantings of required storm water facilities. Parkino. Parking design standards of SDC Sections 3{.170-190 are designed and adopted to implement Metro Plan and Oregon Transportation Planning Rule 12 (OAR 660) policies for the provision of safe and efficient auto circulation and alternative methods of transportation. The tentative site plan provides 191 vehicle parking spaces, a pedestrian sidewalk connection from the building to the public sidewalk and 15 bicycle parking spaces. SDC 31.{90(10) requires that bicycle parking be "secured'. Staff interpretsnsecure'to mean safe and protected in addition to anchored. \Mrere regular or high levels of use are expected, the facilities must be protected, or made usable, in all weather conditions. The parking area must be covered to protect and safeguard against rain and the elements. A structural cover must be provided for the required bicycle parking. Additionally, Staff recommends that a second additional bicycle parking area, covered or uncovered, be provided opposite the proposed area. As submitted, the current design provides a pedestrian connection along south property line to the public sidewalk to provide safe and efficient movement of foot traffic, as required by Oregon's Transportation Planning Rule 12, (OAR 660-12- 0045). To provide a safe and reasonably direct connection for foot traffic originating from high and medium density residential areas to the north, staff recommends a second sidewalk from the north end of the building entrance to the public sidewalk. A Parking Needs Analysis submitted for the subject site (Pre-Application Jo. No. 1998-03-0058) indicated that the development would require from 149 to 175 spaces (164 avg.) to meet peak demands based on industry standard data (lTE Manual, Land Use #495). A "similar use' study of the existing Courtsports Club in Eugene indicated that the Springfield club would require 130 spaces to meet peak demand. The analysis concludes that'a maximum of 175 on-site parking spaces would be adequate to accommodate expected peak demand for the proposed development.' The Director and the City Transportation Engineer concur with the conclusion of the analysis. ln accordance with SDG 31.170(1Xd), the Director wil! allow the number of required spaces to be 7 Courtsports, PJ No.1998-06-0130 reduced to 175, as requested. Furthermore, the number may be reduced in accordance with the submitted analysis to a minimum of 150 spaces in order to accommodate the provision of storm water treatment features, additional bicycle parking or pedestrian connections. Finding: The parking lot design cannot be approved as proposed because fhe Director finds that drainage, pedestrian connections and bicycle parking facilities have not been adequately addressed The following Conditions of Approval are applied for full compliance with this Code and applicable secfions of Oregon Administrative Rules: 6) The Finat Site Plan shall be revised to provide covered bifycle parking adjacent to the building entrance in accordance with SDC 31.190. 7) The Final Site Plan shall be revised to provide a second pedestrian sidewalk connection along nofth property line to the public sidewalk in accordance with oAR 660-12-0045. 8) The number of parking spaces on the Final Site Plan shall not be /ess fhan 150 spaces. Subcriteria c) Proposed on-site and off-site public and private improvements are sufficient to accommodate the proposed development as specified in anv applicable refinement plan. Gonformance with Applicable Gateway Refinement Plan Gommercial and Public Facilities Policies: The site is defined as Tax Lot 2603 on Lane County Assessor's Maps 17-03-22. The property is designated Community Commercial on the Gateway Refinement Plan, as adopted by the City of Springfield, October 19, 1992, Lane County, September 1, 1992, and the City of Eugene, November 9, 1992. COMMERCIAL ELEMENT (pos. 21-22): Policv 1.0: " Provide for appropriate buffering between commercialand residential uses.' lmplementation Action 1.1: ' Give particular attention during the site plan review process to minimizing lighting, noise, and visual impacts from commercialdevelopments on adjacent residential areas.' Staff finds the intent of GRP Commercial Element lmplementation Action 1.1 has been met because conflicts between the proposed use and the abutting Medium Density Residential Distict have been minimized by the applicant wherever possrb/e: 1) the submifted site plan design provides substantial setback, 2) the building design directs door openings away from residentialdevelopment, 3) the landscape plan supplements existing screening with additional plantings, 4) the lighting plan will not reflect on residential structures and provides tncreased security to the area. NATURAL ASSETS ELEMENT (pqs. 34-35): Policv 3.0: *Ensure adequate storm drainage management planning, emphasizing the minimization of negative impacts on water quality and quantity resulting 8 Courtsports, PJ No.ftg8-06-0130 from development in the Refinement Plan area.' lmplementation Actions 3.1 and 3.2 require applicants to minimize the negative impacts of development on water quality and quantity through the use of natural filtration and retention techniques. Sfafffnds thatthe submitted srfep/ans must be conditioned to provide natural filtration and detention facilities to meet the policies of the Natural Assets Element. When required reyisions to drainage plans are approved by the City Engineer, on site private improvements will be sufficient to accommodate the proposed development as specified in NaturalAssets Policy 3.0. Ultimate Finding of Fact 2: This criterion is met because Subcriteria a), b)' and c), a{cOnditioned, fully conform to the requirements of this Code pertaining to sufficient public and private improvemenfs fo accommodate the proposed development in accordance with SDC Articles 78, 31, 32 and the Gateway Refinement Plan, (3) TNVENTORTED NATURAL (|NCLUD|NG REGULATED WETLANDS) AND HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE SITE HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY CONSIDERED IN THE PROJECT DESIGN. The site is defined as Tax Lot 2603 on Lane county Assessor's Maps 17-03-22, The Gateway Refinement Plan, the Draft Natural Resources special study, the Springfield Wetland lnventory Map, and the list of Historic Landmark Sites have been consulted. No wetland, natural or other cultural resources have been identified on the site. There are no inventoried historic features or archeological sites located on the development site. lf any artifacts are encountered during construction, there are state laws that could apply, ORS 97.740, ORS 3S8.90S, ORS 390.235. tf human remains are discovered during construction it is a class 'c'ferony to proceed under ORS 97.740. Finding of Fact 3: This criterion is met because the aforementioned resources were consulted and no natural or historic resources have been identified. (4)PARKING AREAS AND INGRESS-EGRESS POTNTS HAVE BEEN DESTGNED SO AS TO FACILITATE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, TO AVOID CONGESTION AND TO MINIMIZE CURB CUTS ON ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR STREETS AS SPECIFIED IN ARTICLES 31, 32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND/OR ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ARTICLE AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Parkinq Areas. The submitted parking lot design has been conditioned to provide parking in accordance with sDc 31.170, covered bicycle parking and additional pedestrian connections. The design submitted provides ADA accessible spaces. 9 Courtsports, PJ No.1998-06-0130 lnsress and Eqress Points. One 30' driveway access to Pheasant Boulevard is proposed. The existing curb return driveway will be repaired to meet SDC and Standard Construction Specifications. A sidewalk transition from curb side to setback will be constructed at the driveway location. The repairs and design, as conditioned, meet the provisions of SDC Section 32.080. NOTE: A driveway connecting the subject site to the Les Schwab property along south property line would improve internal circulation and provide secondary access to Harlow Road. The connection is not required at this time but should be considered by the applicant. Finding of Fact 4: Staff finds sife access andliarRing,es cdnditioned, facilitates traffic safety and reduces congestion because off street parking, pedestrian connections and all weather bicycle parking are provided in accordance with the provisions of SDC Articles 78,37, 32 and the Gateway Refinement Plan. Driveway access and street improvements will be made to City and ADA specifications. What Needs To Be Done Bv The Aoplicant To Obtain Final Site Plan Aoproval? Three copies of a Final Site Plan and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be submitted to the Planning Division within 90 days of the date of this letter showing compliance with SDC Article 31 Criteria of Approval 1-4, as conditioned: 1) The Final Site Plan shall be revised to provide screening of mechanical equipment in accordance with the standards of SDC 3r.160(1). 2) Prior to final site plan approval, the applicant must provide design calculations prepared by a registered engineer to determine the affects of the private storm sysfem on the City's piped drainage sysfem. 3) Finalsife P/ans shall be revised to incoryorate methods of naturalfiltration and detention listed,n SDC Secfrbn 32.110(4) into storm drainage plans. Sform drainage ptans shall be approved by the City Engineer piorto Final Site Plan Apprcval. 4) Finalsrfe P/ans shall be revised to direct roof run off to one or more dry wells. The dry wells must be located in vegetated areas and must have an overflow connection to the storm sysfem. The dry wells shall be shown on revised storm drainage plans. 5) A signed lmprovement Agreement for the Harlow Road/Pheasant Boulevard intersection must be submitted with the Final Site Plan in accordance with SDC 31.070, 32.020(1 )(c.3), 32.020(1 0)(4)(a) & 32.020(1 2). 6) The Final Site Plan shall be revised to provide covered bicycle parking adjacent to the building entrance in accordance with SDC 31.190- 10 Courtsports, PJ No.1UV8-06-0130 7) The Final Site Plan shall be revised to provide a second pedestrian sidewalk connection along north property line to the public sidewalk in accordance with oAR 664-12-0045. 8) The number of parking spaces on the Final Site Plan shall not be /ess fhan 1 50. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: ln order to complete the review process, a Development Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of Final site plan review are binding upon both the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff and upon approval of the Final Site Plan and mu3f6E-Signeif6yme property owner prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING P1ANS TO OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PI.AN APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDC 31.080 AT THEIR OWN RISK. ALL CONCURRENT SUBMITTALS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIS]ON FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL SITE PLAN. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDC 31.090 WLL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE BEEN REVISED. CONFLICT!NG PLANS CAUSE DEI.AYS. Additional lnformation: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available at a cost of $0.75 for the first page and $0.25 for each additional page at the Development Services Department,225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. SIGNS: Signs are regulated by the Springfield City Code Article g, Chapter 7. The number and placement of signs must be coordinated with the Community Services Division. The locations of signs on a site plan do not constitute approval from the Community Services Division. A separate sign permit is required. Lisa Hopper (726- 3790) is the contact person. Appeal: lf you wish to appeal this Type !l Limited Land Use Site Plan Review Approval decision, you must do so within 10 davs of the date of this letter. Your appeal must be in accordance with SDC, Article 15, Appeals. Appeals must be submitted on a City form with a fee of $250.00. The fee wil! be returned to the applicant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. Questions: Please call Jim Donovan in the Planning Division of the Development Services Department at (541) 726-3660 if you have any questions regarding this process. SPRINGFIELE, 225 North Fifth street Springfield, OR 97477 Locatsion of Proposed Work: 2728 PHEASANT ST Assessors Map #: 1-7032200 a COMMERCTAL/INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPI,ICATION CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ilob Number: COMMI'NITY SERVICES DIVISTON BUILDING SAFETY Office: Inspection Line: Page 1 9 8L15 5 726 - 37 59 725 -37 69 Tax Lot #: 02603 SPruNGFIELD, Owner : COURTSPORT ATHLETICS AddrESS: 4242 COMMERCE Description Of Work: COURTSPORTS FACILITY Phone #: 687-2255 city/state/zip: EUGEN, oREGON 9'7402 NEW Value:0.00 Architect: Name ROBERTSON SHERW Address Phone Contractor ConsE. Contractor #Expires oL/L5/ee oo / 6L/ es LO/3l./ee 1-2/LO/e8 Phone 683-3607 928 -2292 7 45 -L62L 485 - O922 General: Plumbing: Mechanical El-ectrical LEE CONSTRUCTIO 0063579 PO BOX 10367 EUGENE OR 974400000 TWIN RIVERS 0045848 257L SE ERMINE ALBANY OR 97321OOOO HARVEY & PRICE OOOOOTT PO BOX 1910 EUGENE OR 974400000 BU]LDERS ELECTR 0004296 195 MADISON ST EUGENE OR 974025030 --- PLIIMBING --. No 50 Fee Charge s00.00 40.00 55.00 265 . OO 55.00 20.00 93s.00 Single Fixture Sanitary Sewer Water Service Storm Sewer 2A8' FIRE LINE 2 BACKFLOW DEVICES TOTAL PERMIT 110 21,8 1583 ft fr fr HANDICAP ACCESS: Y # OF BLDGS: 1 -- OFFICE USE .- QUAD AREA: 1CNW ZONING CODE: CC L-AND USE : 53 00 Item 10% FOUNDATION ONLY TOTAI, VALUE OF PROiIECT Square Feet 24000 x $/Square Feet Value 200, 000.00 200,000.00 Plan Check Fee: 2,L98.95 Rec #: 3L739 SPRI]{GFIELE' .fob Number: 981-1-66 SPilNGFIELT', Page 2 Date: 1,0/13/98 Rec By: AL WARD BUILDING surcharge/admin MECHANICAL Surcharge/admin PLUMBING surcharge/admin SUBTOTAL PERMITS TOTAL PERMIT FEES EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL 558.00 52 .64 0.00 0.00 935.00 74.8O L ,'t20 .44 L ,7 20 .44 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that a1l- inspections are made at the proper time. To request an inspection, call 725-3769 (recorder), sLate your City designated job number, job address, type of j-nspection requesLed and when you will be ready for inspection. Requests received before 7:00 a.m. will be made the same working day, requests made after 7:00 a.m will be made the following work day. Special Inspections: In accordance with Section 306 of the State Specialty Code a special inspector shal-f be employed by the Owner/Contractor during construction of any following "*" work. A copy of the special testing reports sha1l be furnished to Building Safety. In addition Lo the inspections specified, the Building Official may make or require other inspections of any construcLion work to ensure compliance with the Building, City or DevelopmenL Code. GRADING/EXCAVATING/FILLING - To be done during constr by Special State Certified Inspector. Provide reports/tesLs to City Building Inspector ITNDERGROITND PLITMBING - Prior to fill-ing trench. WATER LINE - Prj-or to filling trench. SATiIITARY SEWER IJINE - Prior to filling trench. STORM SEWER LINE - Prior to filling trench. I,NDERGROI,ND ELECTRICAI, - PTiOT IO COVET. FOOTING - After trenches are excavated. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE in excees of 2500 psi. To be done during constr. by State Cert. Insp. Results to City Buildi-ng Inspector FOTNDATION - After forms are erected but prior to concrete placement. BoLTS INSTALL,ED IN CoNCRETE - To be done by State Certified Special Inspector. Provi-de inspection,/test reports to Ci-ty Building Inspector SLAB - To be made after all inslab building service equipment, conduit piping, and other equipment items are in place buE prior to concrete --- ADDITIONAI.. COMMEMTS --- DRC 98-03_058, PLANNER IS GARY KARP DRC JOURNAL #98-05-130, \TIM DONOVAN, PLANNER THIS REVIEW AND APPROVAL IS FOR SITEWORK AND FOUNDATTON ONLY Plans Reviewed By: LORNE PLEGER Building Site Reviewed By: LISA HOPPER Date: 1,1 /02/98 SPRI]r.GF'ELE, Job Number: 981166 Page 3 By signature, I state and agree, that f have carefully examined the completed application and do hereby certify that all information hereon is true and correct, and I further certi-fy that any and all work performed shal1 be done in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Springfield, and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaj-ning to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY will be made of any strucLure without permission of the Community Services Division, Building Safety. I further certify that only contracEors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.055 will be used on thj-s project. I further agree to ensure that all required i-nspections are requested at the proper time, permit card i of plans will that project address is from the street, that the s Ioc at the front of property, and the approwed set on the site at lu. Signature Receipt Number: Date Paid: Amount Received: Received By: v2e92 //,/? -% /^^ 'ly' -z7,zz:- - oN --- times during construction. I 225 FIFTE STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97471 INSPECTION REQIIEST: 726- 0FFICE: 726-3759 1. LOCA ON F INSTALLATION.4-* LEGAI DESCRTPTT ONI 7.-2) -O ua3 Ta X /c-l AZbo3 icq0 rvr'cg 9 \GFIELD CAL PERYIT APPLICATION City Job Number COHPI-ETE FEE SCMDULE BELOS Nev Residential-Single orMulti-Family per dvelling unit Service Included: Items Cos t s 8s.00 s 1s.00 $ 40.00 1000 sq.ft. or less Each additional 500 200 amps or l-ess 201 amps to 4OO amps 401 amps to 600 amps 1000 am ps Miscellaneous ( Service,/feeder -Each ins talLation Pump or irrigation SSign/0ut1ine Lighting- S Limi ted Energy/Res - SLimited Energy/Comm S SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE 5Z State Surcharge 3Z Admini.s trat ive Fee TOTAL s$FtDO 3 A Sum Perr,ri ts are .non-transf erabLe andif vork is not started vithin LBOof issuance or if vork is suspend 180 days. 2. CONTRACTOR INSTALI,,ATION ONLY Electrical Contractor Address 195 clr,SOn Ci ty ti Phone =-cgzz Ai IEIV 1[0,!Supervisor License Number -S followru ioy Expirati.on Date 0-in OAR Constr Contr. ruurbur 42 9ou calling Expir:ation Date number Ce Signature of Supervising Electrician . sq. ft or portion "X5i6f;orre E; e ilf;'fi3i"r,d Home or--- "d f TilIS PEHMIT94AUgEXBIEEiTIdE WORK ;;;il;;Ds EfrtLff Tf; ts FEnds' t s Nor CO M i#E IJC E BS'H 6 ABAN W\FJE FQR E l€c,tur\' c',nuttf$,lBi t il; . AI t e ra t i ons s s0.00 s 60.00 s100.00 $ 130. 00 s300.00 s 40.00 0wners Name v-f ft+1, Add ress one U- OIINER INSTALLATION The installation is being made onproperty I ovn r,rhich is not intendedfor saIe, lease or rent. 0vners Signature: DATE: regon Utiliry__ ru are set ders'or Relocat 10n $ 40.00 $ ss.00 Over 401 to ps - $ Bo.oo Over 600 amps or 1000-voTTs see rrB, a6oTE- D. Branch Circui ts Nev, Alteration or Extension Per Panel One Circui.t S 35.00 Each Addi tionalCircuit or with Serviceor Feeder Permit g 2.00 ry ciry F unlnt 7(br?-2L55 E 5 not includeC) 40.00 40.00 20.00 36.00 RECETVED B JOB (