Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCMOM Presentation 11-8-19Capacity Management Operations and Maintenance State of the Systems Agency Representatives: City of Eugene Sub-Surface Operations Manager | Rob Hallett Civil Engineer | Patrick Cox Associate Engineering Technician | Jennah Maier Principal Civil Engineer | Doug Singer City of Springfield DPW Operations Director | Brian Conlon Operations Supervisor | Keith Miyata Engineering Division Manager | Jeff Paschall 1 What is CMOM? An adaptive plan to achieve effective collection system operations Over-arching goal of CMOM is sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) prevention CMOM has two approaches: Capacity Management and Operations Maintenance 2 Cities, 1 Goal CMOM framework is useful for capital improvement as well as Operations strategies 2 Hydro-jet cleaning Flow monitoring   CCTV inspection  Pipe repairs  Smoke/dye testing  Root and foreign debris removal  O & M Activities 3 Root Removal Hydro-Jet Cleaning O & M Activities 4 CCTV Pipe Repairs Smoke Testing O & M Activities 5 Master Planning and GIS Flow-Monitoring and I & I Detection Prioritize Wastewater Rehab Projects Construct Wastewater Rehab Projects Quantifying I & I Reduction Capacity Management Activities 6 Master Planning & GIS Eugene’s next step in modeling the system is to add definition or granularity to the model, adding “mirco-basins” to further identify where the worst problems are within a basin to even better target expenditures. 7 Flow Monitoring + I & I Detection 8 Prioritize Rehab Projects Applying Decision Criteria 9 Construct Rehab Projects 10 Quantifying I & I Reduction 11 Eugene manages 682 miles of wastewater mains Wastewater model calibrated to three seasons of data About 200 miles of wastewater mains are concrete and over 50 years old Eugene rehabilitates about 2 miles of mains per year Ownership of laterals in right-of-way (since 2017) 2019(?) Wastewater Master Plan City of Eugene Status Public Works Engineering manages the I&I Identification and Rehabilitation through flow monitoring and capital rehabilitation projects. (692 miles, 27 local pump stations, 20,000 manholes) Why is “over 50 years old” important? Prior to the mid-1970’s, wastewater pipe was primarily constructed with concrete, clay or transite. While these materials are generally good for this use, they are subject to corrosion and deterioration of the jointing materials allowing ground water to infiltrate. Investigations and modeling of the older parts of the system indicate that a majority of I/I is coming from these older pipes. Today’s materials of PVC, HDPE and ductile iron are chemically resistant and have superior jointing materials. By 2029, we expect that quantity of older pipe needing to be rehabilitated will level out at about 1.5 million feet of mainline pipe. Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining Lateral Lining Chemical Grouting of Laterals Manhole Sealing Pipe Bursting Reconstruction 12 Budget Constraints PWE - system is aging faster than we can rehab it PWM - now maintaining ROW laterals as well as mainline pipe Structural Rehab vs I & I Reduction Risk Base Project Selection Eugene Next Steps 13 Springfield manages 245 miles of wastewater mains – 16 pump stations – 4900 maintenance access points Replaced more than 3,500 linear feet of sanitary sewer pipe and replaced 10 maintenance access points in FY19 Utilized output from updated model to identify section of 27” trunk line for rehabilitation in 2020 Redeployed 15 flow monitors in anticipation of upcoming micro-modeling efforts Updating the collection system hydraulic model with completion in October 2019 Anticipate Master Plan update kick off in early 2020 City of Springfield Status Speak to experience with SSOs; re-evaluating decision criteria for strategic system rehabilitation 14 Continue robust preventive maintenance activities Complete collection system hydraulic model analysis Begin Wastewater Master Planning and Development Continue micro-basin modeling that will help interpret pre and post capital projects aimed at I & I reduction Begin conversations with policy makers regarding potential I & I impacts from private laterals Springfield Next Steps 15 Questions 16