HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Electrical 1997-05-21€
SPR iFIELO
h,The {ollowing prolect as eubmilted ha9 thg
,,.,, ;,-r g,-;;J iSei' not require spacif ic land
'. .,..,.t'!t"/ v' "'r' | /
_9
5225 FIT-IE STREET
SPRINGFIELD, oREGON 97471
INSPECTION REQTEST: 726-3769
OFFICE: 726-3759
1. LOCATI ON OF INSTAILATION
ELESTRICAL PERHIT A?PLICATION
Lft _ .r., *o QtoTq tr
COMPIJTE FEE SCMDULE BELOI.T
New Residential-Single or
Multi-Family per dvelling unit.
Service Included:Items Cost
1000 sq.ft. or less
Eaeh additional 500
sq. ft or portion
thereof
Each Manuf'd Home- or
Modular Dvelling
Service or Feeder
$ 8s.00
$ r.s.00
Services or Feeders
Installation, Alterations
or Relocation:
200 amps or less
201 amps to 400 amPs
-
40L amps to 600 amPs
-
601 amps to 1000 amPs-
0ver 1000 amPs/volts
-
Reconnect OnlY
C
D.
3 ttlo b,L^v D
3
A
t70IfGAL
lqs
constr Contr. Number ? I b1 t
Expiration Date * ls I ts
Si ture of S Electrician
0 Name
Address lZ8€ONZ
Ci ty E dfu,/E phone ,l <s ' t {o 6
OVNER INSTALI,ATION
The installation is being made on
property I ovn vhich is not intended
for sale, lease or rent.
Ovners Signature:
Temporary Services or Feeders
Installaiion, Alteration or Relocation
200 amps''or less $ 40'00
over 4bL to 600 amps
-
$ 8o.oo
o""i ooo .*p" o.-iboo ,oIT" see rrB* a6ovE-
Nev, Alteration or Extension Per Panel
t $ 3s.oo 35,"o
Servicet{ $ 2.00
One Circuit
Each Additional
Circuit or vith
or Feeder Permit
SUBTOTAL OF ABOVE
5Z State Surcharge
3Z Administrative Fee
TOTAL
Sum6
t^l
JOB DESCRTPTIONi+W,AiiD Lrkttr frxivw
Permits are non-transferable and expire
if vork is not started vithin 180 days
of issuance or if vork is suspended for
180 days.
Z. CONTRACTOR INSTALLATION ONLY
Electrical Contractor S{*,aroJ 6''zqt<?
Address La5 o buAL 9r
Ci ty AJa€rJ E Phone g*-t>&,
Supervisor Li cense Number 7-q LS 9
Expiration Date ,rf l,
v)
$ 40.00
B
s s0.00
s 60.00
$100.00
s130.00
s300.00s 40.00
^)
?c
E Miscel-Ianeous (Service/feeder not included)
-Each instaLlation
Pump or irrigation
-
Sign/Out1ine Lighting-
Limited EnergY/Res
-
Limited EnergY/Comm
s 40.00
s 40.00
$ 20.00
$ 36.00
5 -r.-e oe'- -4 ,1dt''l\ J1.?F-70.2p
DATE:
RBCEIVED
SPRINGFlELO
D EV ELO P M EN T S ERV IC€S D EPART M EN T afr,225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
(50s) 726.s753
.F,Y (50s) 726.368e
BOARD OT APPEAIS
NOTICE OF DECISION
APPLICANT: Chevron USA productE DAIE: April 25, 1995
ADDRESS: 1111 Mohawk Blvd., springfierd, oregon cAsE Nos 9s-04-1oo
VARIANCE REQUESI: RequeEts a variance from Sectl-on 9-7-14 (1) to al1ow- additional exterior waII eignage, and, Secilon g-7-3 (4)' relatlve to.the propoeed locatlon of a freeetandlng eign.
At the Board of Appeala Meetlng held on April 25, 1995 The Board of Appealerendered the followJ-ng declslon regarding the above referenced varlanlL requeet:
XX* APPRO1IED xx*r DENIED
FTNDINGS OF FACT:
WaII signage and pifnt of sale signs were appror"ai
1) Although the number of wall eigne exceedg the total number allowed bythe sign Code, the total Equare footage of the proposed algnage Ie firbelow the allowable area, and l-e leee Bquare footale than the-exlstlngaignage.
2t The two signe (decale) which are to be placed on the windowe would beexempt if they were to be praced l-ngide of the wLndows, but due to thetype of graee, the decars mugt be placed on the exterior of thewlndowe.
3) The two PoLnt of sale Signe are emall and diecrete, and are vigl-bleonly to cuatomerg already on the property.
Freestandlng SLgn Location wae dehied**
1) The freestandLng sign ia within the five foot requLred getback from thefront property line.
2l rf the exieting pole ia to be ueed) the eign structure can be placed onthe east elde of the po1e. By placing the gt=ucture on the eaat eideof the pole, the elgn would not be located within the requJ-red getback... area.
, Chalrperson
CITY OF ONEGON
,J Board of Appeala
:l
e"
CITY OF SPRTNGFTELD
BUILDING BOARD OF APPEAIS
MINUTES
1 RoII CaIIs Present were gutlh Baird, Chairperaon; JJ.m Ingram,' Krans, and orville Tharp.
Tom Miller rraa abeent.
Staff: Dave Puent, LLsa Hopper, Secretary to the Board
New Business:
Ainglie
2
e
Chairperson Baird aeked the Board to declare any conflLctg of Lnterestsprior to the hearing. No conflicte were noted.
a. Chevron Il.S.A. Producte Companv, #95-04-100
The property in gueetlon Le located at 1111 Mohawk Brvd., springfield,Oregon. /
The applicant requeBtB a variance from Sectlon 9-7-14 (1) of the SpringfLeldSign Code relatl-ve to allowable wall eLgnage, and SectLon 9-?-3 (4) relativeto the proposed location of a freestanding sign.
Lisa Hopper preEented the ataff report to the Board sayJ.ng that staff
eupports the applicante request of additional waIl eLgnage. She explainedalthough the number of signs exceedg the total number arrowed Ln a
commercial district, three wall signs, the combined aguare footage is far
below the allowable area.
MB. HoPPer aleo explained that Staff ie algo recommending approval for the
proposed eignage to be placed on the exterLor of the wlndows of thebueiness. she gaid that lf the aLgns were placed on the interl-or of thewindows, the signs would not be regulated by the SLgn Code. Mg. Hopper
added that the applicants LnLtl-al wiehee were to place these aJ-gne on thel-nterior of the windowe, but due to a reflectLon film placed on the wlndowa,it would be nearly impossible to attach the signs.
ME. Hopper gaLd that Staff Le recommending denlal of the applJ.catlon for thefreestanding sign. She said that the original plans and site plan that were
eubmitted with the variance app}ication were incorrect and presented the
Board with a profeesional Eurvey of the property showJ-ng different
dimenelone and a different location of the freestanding elgn than orlglnallysubmitted. She saLd that the new plot plan ehows the pole of the slgn at 5feet from the property line, but no longer withLn the 10 foot eetback areawhich J-s regul-red from a driveway. She added that the sign le not located,in the vieLon clearance area. MB. Hopper explalned that the reaeon for theflve foot eetback from the property lLne ia for vLElon/safety reaBonB.
C
Springfield City HaIt Thursday
33lil3EIi3'"i3II'Eii l"Eil'-i"' ^ni'1,?ie llil
Board of APPeaIs
l.ll-nutes
April 25, 1995
Page 2.
ME. Hopper said that Staff Lg algo recommending denlal on the propoeed Pol-ntof Sale (POs) eJ.gna to be located on the pump Lalands. She sal-d that the
Pos Eigns are categorized ae a freestanding eign and by approval of theEe
two POS eigns, that would be'allowing three freeetanding signa on thlg
commercially zoned property. She added that no.algn dLstrLct in the City
allowE three.freeetandl-ng signe, and that the only area whLch allowg two
freestandLng aigna ie the I-5 Commercial SJ-gn Dl-Etrl-ct.
ChrLs Hopkins and .7Lm Truhan, employed by Robert H. Lee .and AeeocJ.ates, .tepresenting chevron U.S.A. Product-, weie present to addregs the Board'for
the applicant.
Mr. Hopkins explal.ned to the Board that the PoS aigna are gmall anddigcrete. He preaented photographe to the Board showJ.ng PoS algna currentlylocated on the property. He said that the aLgna are prJ-marily ueed for
cuEtomer information, i.e., obtal-n a charge account, open 24 hours, etc.
l.tr. Hopkins then directed hia presentation to the freestanding sign. He
explained that Chevron would like to uee the exlsting pole and place a new
sLgn atructure on tle wegt sl-de of the pole. He gal-d that Lf the pole wereto be relocated, it would be a hardshlp on the ohrner becauEe of the ltmttedparking on the lot. With the relocation of this pole, it would take one to
two exLatlng parkLng EPaceE. Mr. Hopklne added that Chevron haE strLct
standardg for the locatlon and poaLtJ-oning of their eigna.
Chairperson Baird questLoned the placement of the aign structure on the westgLde of the po1e. Be aeked }{r. ltopkina why the aign could not be placed on
the east side of the pole. Mr. Hopkina reEponded that it wag agal.nat
Chevrong policy.
Mr. Krane asked l{r. Hopkine tf Eomeone waE making them relocate the elgn.
Mr. Hopkins said no, that it was ChevronE wishes to uprdate the exiatlng
eJ-gnage on the property.
Mr. HopkLne preeented to the Board photographe of the exigtLng freeetandJ-ng
eign and specLfic standarde for freeetandlng sLgns from the Chevron Standard
Hanual. ChairperEon Bal-rd noticed that the Standards ghowed options for the
freeetandlng eigns and gueatloned Mr. Hopkins about dl-fferent optLona sLnce
Mr. HopkLng had etated that Chevron standardg had no optlona and were very
strLct on placement and deaign of each sLgn. Mr. Truhan explaLned that eome
cltleg only a1low monument signe, and that lE the reaaon for the options
ghown.
C
Mr. Tharp expreeeed concern with the clearance
the eign. lle felt that a pedeetrian or bicycli
propoaed Location belng eo close to the street.
they would be happy to conetruct a planter box
prevent personal contact wlth the slgn.
from grade to the bottom of
et may hLt the aLgn wlth the
Mr. Hopklns etated that
lrouwhlchsignthearound
s
&
Board of Appeale
!tlnuteg
eprLl 25, 1995
Page 3.
:
t'
Mr. Hopklns said that the PoS algne were Lntended for the customer locatedon the bueLnege property. ,The aLgne are emall and cannot eaally be eeen bypasaing vehicular or pedestrglan traffic.
Chairperson Baird agked staff if they would like to present additlonalLnformatLon prlor to closing the heaitng. uE. Hopper atated trrat wiitr ttreerze of the proposed atgn as tndlcated on the drawLngs, the argn wourdextend approxLmately 7 inches into the right of way. She gaLd that eLgneprojectlng into the right of way are allowed l-n the Downtown Sign olatitctonly and reguire eubetantLal bonde and ineurance.
ChaLrperson Baird eaid that hls opinion ig that the freestanding sLgngtructure can be placed on the east eide of the pole, and can find no reaeorito approve a varlance for this requeet. He added that he concurg wLthstaffe recommendatlon on the Pos BLgns becauee of the current number ofslgns already located on the property.
Mr. Tharp eaid that he also agreea with the staff report recommendlng denlalof the freeetanding eign location, but would be in support of the proposed
POS signs. /
e,
ur. rngram gaLd that Ln hLs opJ.nLon, the pos algne add to the property.
Krans agreed wlth Mr. Tharp and Mr. Ingram.
Mr. Tharp moved to deny the pracement of a nel, algn atructure on thefreeetandlng slgn and to approve the pracement of the pos signs. ur.
seconded the motion.
Mr
Ingram
Chairperson Baird aEked Mr. Tharp if he would.consider eeparating the twoiteme for the vote. Mr. Tharp gaid he wourd not have a probrem wLtheeparating the two isguee for the vote.
Mr. Tharp moved to deny the placement of a new slgn structure on thefreestanding eign. Mr. rngram seconded the motion. The motion paseed
unanJ-mouely.
Mr. Tharp moved to approve the two Pos signs to be praced on the pumpLslande. !lr. fngram eeconded the motion. the motlon paaeed 3 to 1 wlthChalrperson Baird voting agalnet the motLon.
Mr. Tharp moved to approve the additLonal wall eLgnage ag degcrLbed Ln thestaff report. ChaLrperson Baird eeconded the motLon. The motLon paseed
unanLmously.
b. Twln Rl-vere Baptist Church, #95-04-101
the property in queetion ie located at 1660 Mohawk Brvd., sprrngfield,
Oregon.
U
@
c,TY OF SPFTTVGF7ELD, OREGON
SPRINGFIELE,
D EV ELOP M ENT S ERWCES DE PARTME NT
June 23, 1998
Brian Burke
BURKE'S CHEVRON
llll Mohau'kBlvd.
Springfield, OR 97478
Minimum Devcloprncnt Standards (MDS) rcquirements
Burkc'sChcvronatllllMohan,kBlvd.-Jo.No.98-03-059. TheserequirenrcntsaretiedtoCity
Council issues relaling to beautifving the Cily, improving Ciry sfteets and lhe transportation system, and
supporting econ om i c det,e I opnte n l.
Dear Mr. Burke:
We have received your application and plot plan to renrodel the interior and exterior of an existing
Chevron gas station rvith no increase in square footage of the building itself. The rninimal improvements
will include addition of one parking space and a food mart to be located in the existing gas station. There
is also no proposed change in the utility senice.
As shorvn on your plan. paved parking areas shall be striped lvith wheel stops or linear curbs
installed for parking spaces. Spaces for companl,r,ehicles that rernain on the premised over
night shall be providcd in addition to the nuurbcr ofspaccs shorvn. The designated
"handicapped" parking space is a 9-ft. space rvith an abutting access aisle at least 8 feet wide, as
part ofan acccssible route lo the building entrance. A secured bicycle rack, designed to hold a
ttrinitrrutrr of j bic.vcles of an approvecl desigrt should be provided a.r part of ltour parking lot.
Parking lots shall bc maintained in a condition free of litter, dust, and deteriorated pavement
conditions shall bc inrproved to rnaintain conformance rvith standards.
Trash rcccptacles and anl,outdoor storage areas shall be screened by a structure or enclosure
pennanently afllxed lo the ground. Partial screening along rights-of-way and non-residential
zoning districts may be peruritted rvhen necessary for security reasons and upon determination of
the police departrnent. Thc surrounding properties are zoned cornrnunity commercial (CC).
Landscaping shall be thc continuing obligation of the property owner to maintain in an attractive
manner and free of weeds and otlter invading vegetation. All planted tnaterials must hqve a
permanent irrigoliott svslem unless drought resistant plants are used.
The above condilions are parl the inforrnation you received u,ith your application (Springfield
Developrnerlt Code (SDC) 31.010) If 1,ou have further questions please contact me at :-26-3610
Ztu*
'ulie Scott
Planning Techniciarr
2fr,225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
(541 ) 726-3753
FAX(541) 726-3689
CC:Building Division
IA fgvd AIH) 3xUnA BTEZg'ITEBg AE:AI L66T/9Z,INB
--<
11. .itl
,i}l
tt,.t I I
lA't!,-tt)
i(L tiffi
@a
J' r{l
{et
t7,"F
.. .lt
!flt
'r 'li
irt
isl-t
-,:
l$
'rl''d
;
;,'''13
ffifl
.l
ffiil
ill
,tl
N
1{ fl
;",t
t;r;}$
;*.r$
,1,.fl
{,$'.fr
'r $
ttr.D
ffiil
occupANcr rIspECrIoN AppLIG[TroN
CITT OP SPBIIIGPIEU}
--!t==---EEE===ErE===::ErEt--r---E== =gg!E-===--EaEq!r=
DATI]:A.3 q2(
.r.l
ll,.'iil
BUIIDITIG
ADDITESS OF INS
OI.IN$,R:
O d,t^s
hc
JOB
PHONE
r)
g'/7
OUNDR, S ADDRESS:loc,.Rus(I
APPLICANT:
APPLICAT.IT' S ADDRESS :
FOR ACCESS TO PROPERTY - TEIJPHONE NUHSER:
---D-r------a=_--_!E___= =EIa===_IrE= =-GE-at9E+=rte-------!---
PROPOSP.D USE:
A S35.OO INSPECTION TEE IS REQUIRED AT THE TIHE OF APPLI
THIS APPLI
INSPECTED.
CATION FORH ST BE SIGNED BY THE OSNER OF THE PROPTNTY
POR OTFICE USE ONLY
DATE PAID:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
DATE OF CERTIFICATE OF COHPLTANCE:
CO|{HENTS I
Rf,CEIPT NUHBER:
D4?E OF REPORT:
}ROPOSED FTOOB PLAII NEQUTBED AT TI'TE OF
t^VO
, sY(-
A/z q
AFDLT
(()-