Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP-Resiliency_Plan_UpdateResiliency Planning Consulting Services Board Update: Seismic Vulnerability Results Workshop March, 2019 1 Agenda Work Progress Level of Service Goals and Performance Objectives Seismic Vulnerability Assessments Discussion, Questions, and Comments 2 Work Progress 3 Work Progress Completed Tasks: LOS Goals Performance Objectives Geotechnical Analysis Tasks In Progress: Finalizing Vulnerability Assessments Assessing Interdependencies Planned Tasks: ID Upgrades Estimate Costs Prepare Report 4 Level of Service Goals 5 LOS Goals – CSZ Seismic Event Conveyance Pump Stations & Pipelines 6 LOS Goals – CSZ Seismic Event Treatment Facilities 7 Performance Objectives 8 Performance Objectives – Seismic 9 Seismic Vulnerability Assessments 10 Assessment Completed by Separating Into: Buried Pipes and Utilities Facilities and Structures Process Capacity and Flow Path Structural Components: Above Grade Below Grade Non-Structural Components Process equipment and pipes Utility equipment, pipes, and conduits Miscellaneous Items 11 Overall Findings: Geotechnical Conditions: No significant areas of: Liquefaction Landslides or slip plane failures Peak ground accelerations and velocities: Considered to be moderate Within design values for recent projects. Three areas along East Bank Interceptor identified for future site-specific analysis 12 Liquefaction Susceptibility 13 Landslide Probabilities 14 Collection System (Liquefaction/Settlement) Canoe Way/ Patterson Slough Siphon Q Street Floodway Siphon Goodpasture Is. Rd. Siphon Delta Hwy. Siphon A Delta Hwy. Siphon B 15 Peak Ground Acceleration 16 Peak Ground Velocity 17 Structural Observations – Pump Stations Irvington PS Anchors Needed to Attach Equip. to Base Buried PS with no major structural deficiencies 18 Structural Observations – Pump Stations Glenwood PS Overall moderate only moderate upgrades identified. Existing cracks should be analyzed to determine cause and then repaired. 19 Structural Observations – Pump Stations Wet Weather PS/Facility Building will likely collapse due “free story” type of failure mechanism; roof is not adequately attached to walls. 20 Structural Observations – Pump Stations Willakenzie PS Overall moderate only moderate upgrades identified. Cracks in older section of PS should be analyzed to determine cause and then repaired. Electrical equipment should be assessed for seismic vulnerability – anchorage and bracing 21 Structural Observations – Owasso Bridge Beam-pier connection may fail causing failure of bridge Force main Power conduits 22 Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Treatment 23 Phase 1 - Immediately after CSZ event (0 – 1 days) 24 Phase 2 – Intermediate-Term (1 to 2 Weeks) High Rate Disinfection IPS and Headworks Primary Clarification 25 Phase 3 – Long-Term (3 to 6 Months) Disinfection IPS and Headworks Primary Clarification 26 Typical Structural Deficiencies for Treatment Facilities 27 Typical Nonstructural Deficiencies for Collection System Adequate lateral bracing Inadequate lateral bracing or anchoring 28 Next Steps 29 Next Steps Identify the upgrades needed to address the vulnerabilities identified Meeting 5: Interdependencies and Flood Assessment Review Last week of April MWMC Review draft TM 4 Provide review comments for Carollo Team to address 30 Discussion, Questions, and Comments 31