HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06 Transportation System Plan Implementation Project AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 3/18/2019
Meeting Type: Work Session
Staff Contact/Dept.: Emma Newman/DPW Staff Phone No: 541.726.4585
Estimated Time: 40 Minutes
S P R I N G F I E L D C I T Y C O U N C I L Council Goals: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and
Facilities ITEM TITLE: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
ACTION REQUESTED: Decide whether or not to develop a Council Alternative for motor vehicle parking and street standards sections of the recommended Springfield Development Code
amendments. If a Council Alternative is desired, direct staff on developing the Alternative.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
This item and documentation is being brought back from the March 11, 2019 Work
Session. The City of Springfield adopted the 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) in 2014. The Transportation System Plan Implementation Project is
following direction from the adopted TSP to update the Springfield Development
Code, adopt a Conceptual Street Map as a new TSP Figure, and make some changes to the TSP Project List and existing Figures to further implement already
adopted policies.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Communication Briefing Memo
Please bring your paper copies of the TSP Implementation Project Planning Commission Recommendation that were provided to Council via mailboxes on December 3, 2018 and the Transportation System Plan that was provided following
the January work session. The Planning Commission Recommendation can be found in electronic form on the project website.
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Council is preparing for a joint public hearing with Lane County. During the
1/14/19 work session, Council gave direction to staff to develop Council Alternatives for specific pieces of the Planning Commission Recommendation in
order to seek public comment on those Alternatives in addition to the Planning Commission Recommendation.
In prior work sessions, Council has asked for more information on motor vehicle
parking and street standards as recommended by the Planning Commission. To answer these questions and determine whether or not Council would like to develop Council Alternatives for these sections of the Code, staff will share the draft
Springfield Development Code amendments that were proposed, the comments that the Planning Commission received, and how the Planning Commission chose to
respond to the comments and address the topics raised. Staff will provide options to
the Council and seek input on how to proceed in preparation for the public hearing. Attachment 1 provides information on both the motor vehicle parking and street
standards topics.
Copies of the Springfield 2035 TSP were provided to each Councilor in their City Manager’s Office mailboxes. Chapter 2 of the TSP provides adopted goals,
policies, and actions that this project is working to further implement. Chapter 7
provides direction for the TSP Implementation project.
The May 6 work session is reserved for continued discussion on the TSP
Implementation Project.
M E M O R A N D U M City of Springfield
Date: 3/18/2019
To: Gino Grimaldi COUNCIL
From: Tom Boyatt, Interim DPW Director
Sandy Belson, Interim CMD Manager
Emma Newman, Senior Transportation Planner
BRIEFING
Subject: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT MEMORANDUM
ISSUE:
The City of Springfield adopted the 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) in 2014. The
Transportation System Plan Implementation Project is following direction from the adopted TSP
to update the Springfield Development Code, adopt a Conceptual Street Map as a new TSP
Figure, and make some changes to the TSP Project List and existing Figures to further
implement already adopted policies.
COUNCIL GOALS/
MANDATE:
Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
BACKGROUND:
In preparation for a joint public hearing with Lane County on the full package of TSP
Implementation project materials, staff has provided information below regarding the motor
vehicle parking and street standards sections of the Springfield Development Code (SDC)
amendments (Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Recommendation). Options for action are
provided at the bottom of each section. Where recommendation or “recommended” is
mentioned, it refers to the Planning Commission Recommendation for this project.
Per Council’s process direction from the January 14, 2018 work session, Council may decide to
develop a Council Alternative for specific topics to put out for public comment alongside the
Planning Commission Recommendation.
1. Motor Vehicle Parking
Location in Code: The motor vehicle parking standards are located in Springfield Development
Code sections 4.6-110, 4.6-115, 4.6-120, and 4.6-125. The recommended amendments to these
standards and supporting commentary, which provide explanation of the recommended changes
and relevant TSP policies from TSP Chapter 2, are shown on pages 47 – 59 of Exhibit A of the
Planning Commission Recommendation. Council received paper copies of Exhibit A in the TSP
Implementation project packets that were provided for the January 14, 2019 work session.
Overview
The recommended amendments:
1) Reduce the number of on-site motor vehicle parking spaces developers must provide for
single-family dwellings, duplexes, and manufactured dwellings when on-street parking is
provided;
2) Reduce the multi-family dwelling requirement from 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit to 1;
3) Set a maximum number of parking spaces allowed (125% of the minimum) for non-
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 2
residential uses; and
4) Provide a broader range of options (SDC 4.6-110G-M) for reducing motor vehicle parking
space requirements through a streamlined process that does not require a Variance
application and approval.
These changes are intended to implement TSP Policy 2.7 Action 1 by allowing more land to be
utilized for development. Based on input from Councilor Wylie, serving as the Council Liaison
on the project’s Stakeholder Sounding Board, SDC 4.6-110C was added to ensure parking
reductions will not reduce the number of required ADA parking spaces.
The recommended amendments also align with broader transportation trends to reduce motor
vehicle parking spaces across the state and nation, given the recent evolution in mobility options
(i.e. rideshare, increased transit, etc.) and the acknowledgement that many jurisdictions have
required developments to provide more parking spaces than are actually utilized. The
amendments are a moderate, incremental step in the direction of reducing motor vehicle parking
space requirements and providing more flexibility in how the number of required off-street
parking spaces is determined.
Question 1A - Does Council want to propose any changes to the recommended number of
motor vehicle parking spaces required (Table 4.6-2)?
Table 4.6-2 Recommended Motor Vehicle Parking Space Amendments
The following code amendments section is copied and pasted from the Planning Commission
Recommendation Exhibit A document (SDC 4.6-125, Table 4.6-2, showing the changes to
existing code highlighted in yellow.
4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking – Parking Space Requirements
Table 4.6-2
Use Minimum Parking Requirements (1)
Dwellings-single-family, duplexes and
manufactured
2 for each dwelling
1 for each dwelling when on-street parking is planned
and provided; or 2 for each dwelling when no on-street
parking is provided, or when provided on-street parking
is planned to be eliminated or repurposed
Dwellings-cluster subdivisions See applicable dwelling unit
Dwellings-multiple family other than
quads or quints
1.5 for each dwelling unit
1 for each dwelling unit
Dwellings-quads or quints 0.75 for each bedroom
Use Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements (1) (2)
Child Care Centers 1 drop-off space for each 700 square feet of gross floor
area, plus 1 long-term space for each 350 square feet of
gross floor area
Education Facilities Public/Private 2 for each classroom, plus 1
elementary/middle school for each 100 square feet of 6
or more student’s the largest public assembly area.
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 3
Group Care Facilities 0.25 for each bedroom or dwelling unit plus 1 per full
time employee on the busiest shift.
Public Utility Facilities None, unless utility vehicles will be parked overnight.
Transient Accommodations
Bed and breakfast facilities, boarding
and rooming houses and hotels
1 plus 1 for each guest bedroom
Emergency shelter homes None
Youth hostels 0.3 for each guest bedroom
Eating and drinking establishments 1 for each 100 square feet of gross floor area.
Recreational facilities and religious, social
and public institutions
1 for each 100 square feet of floor area in the primary
assembly area and 1 for each 200 square feet of gross
floor area for the remainder of the building.
Retail sales, personal service, including
small scale repair and maintenance and
offices
1 for each 300 square feet of gross floor area.
Shopping centers and malls 1 for each 250 square feet of gross floor area, exclusive
of covered pedestrian walkways. Once a shopping
center or mall has been approved, no additional parking
shall be required, unless there is new construction
Transportation facilities 1 for each 300 square feet of gross floor area not
including vehicle storage areas.
Warehouse commercial sales 1 for each 600 square feet of gross floor area.
Manufacture and assembly, and other
primary industrial uses
1 for each 500 square feet industrial of gross floor area
(manufacture and assembly) for each 1000 square feet
of gross floor area (warehousing)
Secondary industrial uses See applicable use in this table
(1) Table 4.6-2 establishes minimum off-street parking required for various uses except as may be
reduced in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.6-110.
(2) Table 4.6-2 establishes maximum off-street parking requirements for all uses except residential
dwelling units. Maximum off-street parking is 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking
required above in Table 4.6-2, except as may be increased by the Director based upon an approved
Parking Generation Study prepared by a professional Transportation Engineer licensed by the State
of Oregon and an approved Transportation Demand Management Plan.
Public Input
Bree Nicolello, in her public comment submitted to the Springfield Planning Commission on
February 13, 2018, stated “I am in support of streamlining parking requirements to support
livable development that prioritizes housing units over vehicular parking. In my work as a land
use planner, I have had to eliminate dwelling units to accommodate the required amount of
parking spaces. As our area is facing a housing crisis and there is a shortage of units throughout
Lane County, it is difficult to sacrifice a place for an individual or family to live in favor of a
parking space.”
Planning Commission Deliberation
The Planning Commission agreed with the testimony and did not make any changes to the initial
proposal.
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 4
Council Options for Question 1A:
Proceed with a public hearing on the Planning Commission recommended
amendments to Table 4.6-2 in SDC 4.6-125 for motor vehicle parking space
requirements.
Develop a Council Alternative for Table 4.6-2, direct staff on development of the
Alternative
Question 1B - What additional options does Council want to provide to allow for a
reduction in the number of required parking spaces (implementing TSP Policies 2.7 and
3.8)?
Existing Code Compared to Recommended Code Amendments
Existing SDC 4.6-120.I allows a developer to substitute additional bicycle parking for up to 25%
of required vehicle parking. The recommended code language (see SDC 4.6-110.G-M) provides
more options to reduce required motor vehicle parking spaces. The following table shows a
comparison of the existing code to the recommended code for parking space reduction options
and processes.
Parking Space Reduction Options
Existing Code Planning Commission Recommendation
On-street parking may substitute for
some parking spaces (SDC 4.6-110F)
On-street parking may substitute for some parking
spaces – clarifies that on-street parking must be
planned and provided (i.e. cannot count planned
bike lane space as “on-street parking” for
reduction purposes) (SDC 4.6-110G)
Additional bike parking may substitute
for up to 25% of required vehicle
parking (SDC 4.6-120I)
Parking reduction of up to 20% total for a
combination of:
Additional bike parking (≤20%)
Abutting frequent transit corridor (≤15%)
Nearby frequent transit corridor (≤10%)
ADA improvements near frequent transit
corridor (≤10%)
(SDC 4.6-110 H-L)
Reduction does not apply to ADA spaces (SDC
4.6-110C)
Variance process requiring professional
engineering analysis
Exception allows for additional reduction based on
substantial evidence (SDC 4.6-110M)
Recommended Parking Space Reduction Options Amendments
The following code amendments section is copied and pasted from the Planning Commission
Recommendation Exhibit A document (SDC 4.6-110C and SDC 4.6.-110G-M).
C. Parking reductions under Sections 4.6-110.H-L and Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2 shall not
reduce the number of ADA parking spaces required in accordance with the minimum parking in
Table 4.6-2 or under Section 4.6-110.M.
GF. Parking When on-street parking is planned and provided, parking spaces in a public right-of-way
directly abutting the development area may be counted as fulfilling a part of the parking
requirements for a development as follows: For each 18 feet of available on-street parking,
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 5
there will be 1/2 space credit toward the required amount of off-street parking spaces. The
developer is responsible for marking any on-street spaces.
H. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Additional Bicycle Parking. Bicycle Additional
bicycle parking beyond the minimum amount required in Table 4.6-3 that complies with the
bike parking standards in Sections 4.6-145 and 4.6-150 may substitute for up to 2025 percent of
required vehicular parking off-street motor vehicle parking otherwise required in Table 4.6-2.
For every 5two (2) non-required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short or long term bicycle
parking standards specified in Table 4.6-3, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by
one (1) space. When existing parking converted to bicycle parking under this subsection results
in surplus motor vehicle parking spaces, the surplus parking may be converted to another use in
conformance with the requirements of this Code. Existing parking may be converted to take
advantage of this provision.
I. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors – Abutting Sites.
Development sites abutting an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a
reduction of up to 15 percent from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table
4.6-2.
J. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors – Nearby Sites.
Development sites not abutting but within 1/4-mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit
Corridor may request a reduction of up to 10 percent from minimum off-street motor vehicle
parking required in Table 4.6-2.
K. Reduction Credit for ADA Improvements for Frequent Transit Corridors. Development sites
abutting or within ¼-mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may receive a
reduction of up to 10 percent from the minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in
Table 4.6-2 in exchange for contribution to the City for ADA improvements in the public right-of-
way. The required contribution will be equal to the Base Curb Ramp Fee multiplied by each set
of four parking spaces to be reduced, rounded up to the next whole number (e.g. one Base Curb
Ramp Fee for 1-4 parking spaces reduced, double the Base Curb Ramp Fee for 5-8 parking
spaces reduced, etc.). The Base Curb Ramp Fee must be set by Council resolution and must be
approximately the cost of constructing one ADA-compliant curb ramp. Nothing in this
subsection waives or alters any requirement for a developer to construct or provide on-site or
off-site ADA improvements.
L. Outside of the Downtown Exception Area and Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District, a
cumulative maximum reduction of 20 percent of the minimum off-street parking required in
Table 4.6-2 may be applied using the credits, allowances, and exceptions to minimum parking
requirements established in this Code.
M. EXCEPTION: The Director may authorize reductions to the minimum number of parking spaces
required in Table 4.6-2, including reductions in excess of the cumulative maximum reduction
specified in Section 4.6-110.K. above, based on substantial evidence that less than the minimum
required parking spaces would be utilized. Substantial evidence includes, but is not limited to,
the parking requirements based upon the current version of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Parking Manual, an approved Parking Generation Study prepared by a licensed
engineer, evidence regarding specific use characteristics, or evidence regarding site proximity to
multi-modal improvements that are likely to reduce on-site parking demand.
Public Input
The Stakeholder Sounding Board (SSB) supported providing flexibility in vehicular parking
requirements to allow the developer to more efficiently use a development site in locations that
would be more likely to see walking, biking, and transit trips. In most situations, the sites where
the on-site parking reduction would be applied would be at sites where additional bike parking is
provided, at sites that are located along or nearby a frequent transit corridor, and/or for
developments that have contributed to better walking access to or from the bus to the site by
contributing to ADA ramp improvements. Reducing required parking allows developers to more
easily use their sites for economic development, such as allowing for larger building area. Using
more site area for economic uses has the effect over time of decreasing the distances between
destinations and making walking, biking, and taking transit in Springfield along these specific
Attachment 1, Page 5 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 6
corridors more attractive. This aligns with the direction for the TSP Implementation project from
TSP Chapter 7, which states, “Recommended implementation measures address the following…
ways of supporting and promoting walking, biking, and taking transit.”
Planning Commission Deliberations
Commissioner Koivula raised concerns regarding the initial draft proposal to allow cumulative
parking space maximum reduction of 25% of the minimum off-street parking required using a
combination of space reduction options. He was not comfortable granting a total reduction of
that magnitude without requiring a parking generation study (see SDC 4.6-110G-M.) to ensure
that there would be no detrimental impact to the neighbors.
Planning Commission Revisions
After deliberating, the Planning Commission changed the originally proposed 25% to
20% as the cumulative maximum reduction to minimum off-street parking space
requirements that would be allowed without an Exception (see SDC 4.6-110.L).
Council Options for Question 1B:
Support Planning Commission language for reduction options for motor vehicle
parking spaces (SDC 4.6-110)
Develop a Council Alternative for motor vehicle parking standards, direct staff on
development of the Alternative
2. Street Standards
Location in Code: Public Streets and Private Streets standards are located in Springfield
Development Code sections 4.2-105 and 4.2-110 respectively. Table 4.2-1, within SDC 4.2-105,
sets the minimum street standards for right-of-way and curb-to-curb widths. The recommended
amendments to these standards and supporting commentary, which provide explanation of the
recommended changes and relevant TSP policies from TSP Chapter 2, are shown on pages 9 –
34 of Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Recommendation. Table 4.2-1 is on pages 13 - 14.
Council received paper copies of Exhibit A in the TSP Implementation project packets that were
provided for the January 14, 2019 work session.
Overview
The recommended amendments to the Public Streets section of the Springfield Development
Code add certain street and intersection typologies (i.e. multi-way boulevard and roundabout,
respectively), which have unique right-of-way and design needs. The amendments also clearly
articulate the relationship between various planning documents in relation to Table 4.2-1 (see
SDC 4.2-105.C).
The recommended amendments to Table 4.2-1 clarify the various minimum measurements of the
components of a given street classification. Street widths for different classification streets are
broken down into specific measurements for travel lanes, turn lanes, bicycle lanes, planting
strips/curbs, and sidewalks. The recommended revised Table 4.2-1 provides flexibility to allow
narrower street cross-sections by not including parking on one or both sides of the street. The
new, recommended table also provides different standards for Major Collectors and Minor
Collectors. All of the street standards except for the steep (>15 percent grade) local streets
include planter strips on both sides of the street to help implement TSP policy direction to
enhance the walking environment by providing a buffer between pedestrians and travel lanes.
Per feedback from the Stakeholder Sounding Board, illustrative cross-section graphics were
added into SDC 4.2-105 and referenced in the Figure Number column of Table 4.2-1 to help
Attachment 1, Page 6 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 7
people visually picture what a potential street configuration that meets the standards could look
like in an effort to make the Code easier to use. See pages 25 – 33 of 104 of Exhibit A of the
Planning Commission Recommendation for illustrative figures of what each street classification
cross-section could look like.
Table 4.2-1 Recommended Amendments
The following code amendments section is copied and pasted from the Planning Commission
Recommendation Exhibit A document (SDC 4.2-105). The current Table 4.2-1 is struck and
replaced by a new table, as shown below.
Attachment 1, Page 7 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 8
Question 2A - What standards does Council want to set for street widths (Table 4.2-1)?
Public Input
The existing Development Code does not require on-street parking in all cases. One public
comment opposed removing the requirement for on-street parking on some streets (see Ron and
Michelle Barth written testimony). The Planning Commission also considered feedback from the
Stakeholder Sounding Board (SSB). The SSB supported the draft code due to the flexibility it
provided by indicating the right-of-way and curb-to-curb widths for the various different street
layouts (parking both sides, parking one side, no on-street parking), the options for more context
sensitive design flexibility, and more land that could be dedicated to additional housing and
economically productive uses.
Planning Commission Deliberations
The Planning Commission spent time over the course of several meetings talking about traffic
calming as a priority in response to concerns from community members about traffic speeds on
local, neighborhood streets. The recommended revisions allow more flexibility for street design
and could result in traffic calming benefits. If on-street parking lanes are provided on a street and
Attachment 1, Page 8 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 9
not utilized, the wider street width conditions encourage speeding and less safe traffic
conditions. Narrower streets reduce crossing distances for pedestrians and increase safety.
Planning Commission Revisions
The Planning Commission chose to keep the street standards that allow for on-street
parking on both, one, or no sides of the street
Council Options for Question 2A:
Support Planning Commission recommended Table 4.2-1
Develop a Council Alternative for street widths Table 4.2-1, direct staff on
development of the Alternative
Question 2B - Are Planning Commission’s recommended changes sufficient to provide
assurance that the standards in Table 4.2-1 will not trigger additional right-of-way
dedication for Main Street?
Public Input
A few property and business owners from the Main Street corridor provided comments
expressing their concerns with Table 4.2-1 Arterial Street Classification Standards (see above)
since they were concerned about potential right-of-way impacts along Main Street.
Planning Commission Deliberations
The Planning Commission considered the need to have clear and objective dimensional
standards for streets per state Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requirements. The Planning
Commission also discussed how the amendments to SDC 4.2-105.C explain the applicability of
the Springfield TSP and other planning documents in determining street and right-of-way widths
for specific streets throughout Springfield where there are planned projects.
Planning Commission Revisions
The Planning Commission added footnote 5 to Table 4.2-1 that reads “Arterial streets
that are Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facilities are not subject to the
standards in Table 4.2-1, but must meet ODOT design standards.”
The Planning Commission also verbally responded to the concerns raised by sharing
about the Main Street Safety Project planning process that is currently underway, which
will result in a Main Street Facility Plan that will be adopted into the TSP. The
Commission clarified that the Main Street Safety Project is separate from the TSP
Implementation project.
Council Options for Question 2B:
Support Planning Commission recommended SDC 4.2-105C, including Table 4.2-1
with footnote 5
Develop a Council Alternative, direct staff on development of the Alternative
Question 2C - Should there be different standards for private streets? If so, what should
they consist of?
Overview
Council asked about whether or not it would be possible to have a different standard for private
streets inside developments. There is a Private Streets section of the code (SDC 4.2-110) for
Attachment 1, Page 9 of 10
MEMORANDUM 3/11/19 Page 10
Manufactured/Mobile Home Parks and singularly owned developments (such as apartment
complexes), but staff has not been applying the Private Street standards in those instances since
the Driveway standards apply to singularly owned properties. Upon closer look, staff
recommends deleting SDC 4.2-110.A since the driveway standards are the appropriate standard
in these cases.
Staff is seeking input from Council on whether or not to have a Private Streets standard and if
so, what it should consist of. Should there be a Private Street option for partitions and
subdivisions? Does Council want to create an option that limits public access to neighborhoods
(such as gated communities)? If there is a Private Street standard, staff recommends keeping
SDC 4.2-110.B to ensure that there are legal assurances for continued maintenance of private
streets.
Recommended Private Streets Section Amendments
The following code amendments section is copied and pasted from the Planning Commission
Recommendation Exhibit A document (SDC 4.2-110). Planning Commission did not recommend
making any changes to this section.
4.2-110 Private Streets
A. Private streets are permitted within Mobile Home/Manufactured Dwelling Parks and singularly
owned developments of sufficient size to permit interior circulation. Construction specifications
for private streets shall be the same as for public streets.
EXCEPTION: During the Site Plan Review, Partition or Subdivision processes involving private
streets, the Director may allow alternative construction materials and methods to be used.
B. The Approval Authority shall require a Homeowner's Agreement or other legal assurances
acceptable to the City Attorney for the continued maintenance of private streets.
Council Options for Question 2C:
Develop a Council Alternative that removes the Private Streets section and
standards from the Code (SDC 4.2-110)
Develop a Council Alternative for Private Streets Standards, direct staff on
development of the Alternative
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Decide whether or not to develop a Council Alternative for
motor vehicle parking and street standards sections of the Springfield Development Code
amendments. If a Council Alternative is desired, direct staff on developing the Alternative.
Attachment 1, Page 10 of 10
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 1
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
RECOMMENDED SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC) AMENDMENTS
8/15/2018
*** This version incorporates staff’s recommended revisions explained in the 8/15/2018 Planning
Commission meeting packet. It also incorporates the recommended revisions from both the Springfield
and Lane County Planning Commissions at their 8/15/2018 joint meeting. This version is being
recommended for approval from both Commissions to the City Council and Lane County Board of
Commissioners. Existing language in relevant sections of the SDC is presented below with proposed new
text underlined. Text that has been moved is shown in double underlines, both in the strikethrough
deletion location as well as where it has been added. Recommended deleted text is shown
in strikethrough format. All text changes are highlighted in yellow. ***
Introduction
The 2035 Springfield Transportation System Plan (TSP) reflects a community vision for Springfield’s future
transportation system by establishing goals, policies, and action items, as well as specific project lists for a
20-year planning horizon. The TSP was adopted by the City Council in 2014 as a functional plan refining the
Eugene-Springfield Area Metropolitan Plan (Metro Plan), and fulfilling the City’s requirements under
statewide planning Goal 12 (Transportation). TSP policies “provide high-level direction for the City’s policy
and decision-makers and for City staff.” Action items “offer direction to the City about steps needed to
implement recommended policies.”
Appendix I of the TSP provided an outline of sections of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) that may
need to be amended to implement the TSP. The following offers for review draft language to amend
portions of the SDC furthering TSP implementation. Relevant TSP policies and implementation actions
applicable to proposed Code changes are cited at the beginning of each Code section, along with
explanatory Staff commentary.
1. Proposed Changes to Use Tables (SDC Chapter 3)
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions:
Policy 1.4: Strive to increase the percentage of bicycle and pedestrian system users by planning, designing, and
managing systems to support the needs of diverse populations and types of users, including meeting
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) needs.
Action 1: Create a network of bicycle and pedestrian routes and way-finding signage that
guides users to destination points.
Policy 2.4: Maintain and preserve a safe and efficient bike and pedestrian system in Springfield.
Action 1: Coordinate with Willamalane Park and Recreation District to maintain and preserve
the off-street path system.
Exhibit A, Page 1 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 2
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Policy 3.2: Expand and enhance Springfield’s bikeway system and provide bicycle system support facilities for
both new development and redevelopment/expansion.
Action 4: Require bike lanes and paths to connect new development with nearby neighborhood
activity centers and major destinations. Connectivity should include connecting bike
facilities to each other as well as to major destinations.
Action 7: Design bike transportation routes that separate bicycle traffic from large volumes of
fast-moving automobile traffic.
Policy 3.8: Coordinate the design of Springfield’s transportation system with relevant local, regional, and state
agencies.
Action 5: Coordinate with Willamalane Park and Recreation District to address bicycle and
pedestrian system deficiencies and address new transportation system goals and
policies in the Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan,
including providing improved connectivity to parks and open space areas.
Staff Commentary: The following revisions add “Linear Parks” to the list of Primary Uses allowed in various
zoning districts. Although all three terms are defined in Code, currently “multi-use path” is allowed only
in the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District as a permitted use, and “bike paths” are permitted in
the Campus Industrial District only as a secondary use. Staff interpretations of “low impact facilities”
have authorized the Middle Fork and Millrace multi-use pathways in several zoning districts, absent
clearly having the use enumerated in Code. The additions proposed would legitimize the use, eliminate
the need for interpretation, and further the objectives behind the above policies and implementation
actions. A definition for “Linear Park” is proposed to be added to Section 6.1-110.
Chapter 3 – Land Use Districts
3.2-200 Residential Zoning Districts
3.2-210 Schedule of Use Categories
Residential Districts
Use Categories/Uses LDR SLR MDR HDR
Public and Institutional Uses
Churches (Section 4.7-130) D* D* D* D*
Educational facilities: public/private elementary/middle schools
(Section 4.7-195)
1 to 5 students in a private home (in a 24-hour period) P* P* P* P*
6 or more students (Section 4.7-195) D* D* D* D*
Parks: neighborhood and private (Section 4.7-200) P/D* P/D* D* D*
Linear Park P P P P
**********
3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts
Exhibit A, Page 2 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 3
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
3.2-310 Schedule of Use Categories
Commercial Districts
Use Categories/Uses NC CC MRC GO
Transportation Facilities (Section 4.7-240):
Bus terminals N S S N
Dock, boat ramps and marinas N D N N
Heliports N S S N
Helistops N S S N
Linear Park P P P P
**********
3.2-400 Industrial Zoning Districts
3.2-410 Schedule of Light-Medium, Heavy and Special Heavy Industrial Use Categories
Industrial Districts
Use Categories/Uses LMI HI SHI
Other Uses
Agricultural cultivation of undeveloped land P P P
Business, labor, scientific and professional organizations and headquarters P P S
Public utility facilities:
High impact facilities (Section 4.7-160)
Low impact facilities
S
P
S
P
S
S
Private/public Elementary and Middle Schools (Section 4.7-195) D* N N
Certain Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities See
Section
4.3-145
See
Section
4.3-145
See
Section
4.3-145
Linear Park P P P
3.2-415 Schedule of Campus Industrial Use Categories
Use Categories/Uses CI District
Primary Uses(3)
Advertising, marketing, and public relations P
Agricultural cultivation is permitted as an interim use on undeveloped land,
provided that spraying, dust, odors, and other side effects of the use do not
interfere with the operation of permitted uses in the CI District (7)
P
Blueprinting and photocopying P
Business Parks (2) P
Call centers that process predominantly inbound telephone calls P
Computer systems design services P
Corporate headquarters, regional headquarters, and administrative offices (4) P
Data processing and related services P
E (electronic)-commerce including mail order houses P
Educational facilities in business parks including, but not limited to,
professional, vocational and business schools; and job training and vocational
rehabilitation services
P
Exhibit A, Page 3 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 4
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Graphic art services P
High Impact Public Facilities (10) P
Internet and web site and web search portal (includes services and technical
support center)
P
Laboratories, including medical, dental and x-ray P
Large- and medium-scale research and development complexes (6) P
Light industrial manufacturing involving the secondary processing of
previously prepared materials into components or the assembly of
components into finished products (1)
P
Mail distribution facilities (5) P
Management, consulting, and public relations offices P
Media productions, including, but not limited to: TV and radio broadcasting
studios as well as cable and other program distribution and motion picture
production
P
Linear Park P
Non-profit organization office P
Printing and publishing P
Professional membership and union offices P
Satellite telecommunications P
Software development (includes services and technical support center) and
publishing
P
Wired or wireless telecommunications carrier offices P
**********
3.2-600 Mixed-Use Zoning Districts
3.2-610 Schedule of Use Categories
Mixed-Use Districts
Use Categories/Uses MUC MUE MUR
Transportation Facilities
Heliports N P N
Helistops N P N
Public transit station, without park and ride lot P P P
Linear Park P P P
**********
3.2-700 Public Land and Open Space Zoning District
3.2-710 Schedule of Use Categories
Use Categories/Uses PLO District
Primary Uses (Section 4.7-203)
Parks and Open Spaces
Public and private parks and recreational facilities:
Exhibit A, Page 4 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 5
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Linear Park P
Neighborhood Parks P
Community Parks S
Regional Parks S
Private areas of greater than 1 acre reserved for open space as part of a
cluster or hillside development
P
Publicly and privately owned golf courses and cemeteries D
R.V. parks and campgrounds within a regional park S
R.V. parks and campgrounds outside of a regional park and without sanitary
sewer service as a temporary use subject to termination when within 1,000
feet of sanitary sewer
D
**********
3.2-800 Quarry and Mining Operations Zoning District
3.2-810 Schedule of Use Categories
Uses/Use Categories/Uses QMO District
Extracting and storing of rocks and minerals, including equipment and
materials necessary to carry out these functions
P
Plants for the processing of minerals from quarry and mining extraction
operations
P
Sale of products generated form the quarrying and mining operation P
Activities permitted as part of the reclamation process P
Structures and buildings used in conjunction with the extracting and storing of
mineral
P
Parking facilities for employees and customers P
Tree felling necessary to prepare a site for mining or as a quarry activity as
specified in Section 5.19-100
P
Low impact public facilities P
High impact public facilities P
Certain Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities (Section 4.3-145) P
Night watchperson’s quarters P
Linear Park P
*********
3.3-800 Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District
3.3-815 Schedule of Use Categories when there is an Underlying Residential, Commercial, or Industrial
District
Underlying Zoning District
Use Categoryies/Uses Residential Commercial Industrial
Agricultural uses and structures P P P
Child care facility (Section 4.7-125) S N N
Detached single-family dwellings and manufactured homes (Section
3.3-825)
P N N
Exhibit A, Page 5 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 6
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Home Occupations (Section 4.7-165) S S S
Neighborhood parks that do not require urban services (Section 4.7-
200)
S* N N
Partitions (Section 3.3-825E.) P N N
Property Line Adjustments P N N
High Impact Facilities (Section 4.7-160) S* S* S*
Low Impact Facilities P P P
Temporary sales/display of produce, the majority of which is grown
on the premises (Section 4.8-125)
P P P
Tree felling (Section 5.19-100) P P P
R.V. parks and campgrounds (Section 4.7-220D.) S* N N
RV parks and campgrounds that do not require urban services
(Section 4.7-220D.)
N D* D*
Expansion of non-conforming uses existing on the effective date of
Lane County’s application (on either the /ICU or I/U District to the
property (Section 3.3-825F.)
N D* D*
Expansion or replacement of lawful uses permitted in the underlying
commercial or industrial district (Section 3.3-825F.)
N P* P*
Expansion or replacement of lawful Discretionary Uses in the
underlying zoning district (Section 3.3-825F.)
N D* D*
New Permitted and Specific Development Standards in the
underlying zoning district within existing structures (Section 3.3-
825F.)
N P* P*
Manufactured home (night watch person) or manufactured unit
(office) in an industrial district (Sections 4.7-185 and 4.7-170)
N N S*
Certain Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities See Section
4.3-145
See Section
4.3-145
See Section
4.3-145
Linear Park P P P
**********
3.4-300 Booth-Kelly Mixed-Use Plan District
3.4-320 Schedule of Use Categories
Use Categories/Uses BKMU District
Transportation Facilities (Section 4.7-240):
Bus terminals D
Docks and marinas D
Heliports S
Helistops S
Linear Park P
Train Stations S
**********
Exhibit A, Page 6 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 7
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
2. Proposed Changes to Development Standards (SDC Chapter 4)
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions:
Policy 1.2: Consider environmental impacts of the overall transportation system and strive to mitigate negative
effects and enhance positive features.
Policy 1.4: Strive to increase the percentage of bicycle and pedestrian system users by planning, designing, and
managing systems to support the needs of diverse populations and types of users, including meeting
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) needs.
Policy 2.1: Manage the roadway system to preserve safety, longevity, and operational efficiency.
Action 1: Evaluate, update, and implement access management regulations for new or
modified access to the roadway system.
Policy 3.2: Expand and enhance Springfield’s bikeway system and provide bicycle system support facilities for both
new development and redevelopment/expansion.
Action 1: Require bike lanes and/or adjacent paths along new and reconstructed arterial and
major collector streets.
Action 4: Require bike lanes and paths to connect new development with nearby neighborhood
activity centers and major destinations. Connectivity should include connecting bike
facilities to each other as well as to major destinations.
Action 7: Design bike transportation routes that separate bicycle traffic from large volumes of
fast-moving automobile traffic.
Policy 3.3: Street design standards should be flexible and allow appropriate-sized local, collector, and arterial streets
based upon traffic flow, geography, efficient land use, social, economic and environmental impacts.
Action 1: Conduct a comprehensive review and update of Springfield street standards, and
develop code to address transportation system deficiencies, adopted goals, and
policies.
Action 2: Consider effects of stormwater runoff in street design and reduce runoff through
environmentally sensitive street designs for new and reconstructed streets.
Action 3: Incorporate traffic calming measures into street designs and standards where
appropriate, considering the needs of emergency services vehicles. Traffic calming
measures should reduce vehicular speeds and bypass traffic while encouraging safe
bicycle and pedestrian travel.
Action 4: Integrate pedestrian amenities into street designs that create pedestrian refuges and
allow safe and continuous pedestrian travel.
Exhibit A, Page 7 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 8
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Policy 3.4: Provide for a continuous transportation network with reasonably direct travel routes to destination points
for all modes of travel.
Action 1: Design new streets to provide a connected grid network, including alleyways, when
technically feasible.
Action 2: Construct sidewalks or other suitable pedestrian facilities along local streets and
along urban area arterial and collector roadways, except freeways. …
Policy 3.5: Address the mobility and safety needs of motorists, transit users, bicyclists, pedestrians, freight, and the
needs of emergency vehicles when planning and constructing roadway system improvements.
Action 1: Ensure that current design standards address mobility needs and meet ADA
standards.
Policy 3.7: Provide for a pedestrian environment that supports adjacent land uses and is designed to enhance the
safety, comfort, and convenience of walking by providing direct routes and removing barriers when
possible.
Staff Commentary: The following two sections include clarifying language, updates to plans referenced, and the
addition of multi-use paths and bikeways to be consistent with adopted TSP policies and the Willamalane
Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan.
Chapter 4 – Development Standards
4.1-105 Purpose
These regulations provide standards for the location, alignment, design and construction of the following public and
private infrastructure: transportation and facilities, including streets, sidewalks, multi-use paths, and bikeways
(Section 4.2-100); and utilities, including sanitary sewer, stormwater management, electricity, water service and
wireless telecommunications systems facilities (Section 4.3-100).
4.1-110 Applicable Documents
A. Planning references for public and private improvements. This Section ensures that public and
private improvements within the city limits and the City’s urbanizable area are installed and serve
all lots/parcels to implement plan policies by providing logical and efficient connected systems
serving all lots, parcels, buildings or structures as specified in applicable Metro Plan comprehensive
plan policies, including the Transportation System Plan and Auxiliary Map #1, TransPlan,other
functional plans,; the Conceptual Local Street Map,; the Local Street Network Map when
applicable; applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, City-adopted Master Plans,; the
Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan,; and Conceptual Development Plans; this
Code,; and any other applicable regulations.
B. Construction and design references for public improvements under City jurisdiction. Specifications
for the design, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, alleys, sidewalks, multi-use paths,
Exhibit A, Page 8 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 9
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
bikeways, bus turnouts, accessways, curbs, gutters, street lights, traffic signals, street signs,
sanitary sewers, stormwater management systems, street trees and planter strips within the public
right-of-way, medians, round-abouts and other public improvements within the city limits and the
City’s urbanizable area are as specified in this Code, the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997, the
Stormwater Management Plan, the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual,
and the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. The Public Works Director retains the
right to modify the cited references on a case-by-case basis without the need of a Variance when
existing conditions make their strict application impractical.
C. Construction and design references for other public agency improvements. Each public agency,
including but not limited to, the provider of water, electricity, parks and public transit service that
have specific construction standards shall submit correspondence during the Development Review
process that addresses their construction requirements.
D. Construction design references for private improvements.
1. Specifications for private street improvements within the city limits and the City’s
urbanizable area shall be approved by the Public Works Director as specified in Section 4.2-
110 and the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and any other
applicable regulations.
2. Other private improvements within the city limits and the City’s urbanizable area are as
specified in this Code and/or approved by the Building Official.
E. Americans with Disabilities Act. All applicable public and private improvements shall meet current
applicable standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
**********
Staff Commentary: As part of updating street design standards per TSP Policy 3.3, Action 1, revisions are
proposed to SDC 4.2-105C., Table 4.2-1. Existing Code makes no reference to certain street or intersection
typologies (i.e., multi-way boulevard and roundabout, respectively), which have unique right-of-way and
design needs. The proposed Code language allows for engineering standards for roundabouts and multi-way
boulevards to be applied in a site-specific manner, rather than “one size fits all” specific numerical standards
for minimum right-of-way and street widths in Table 4.2-1. The revision to minimum curb-to-curb width for
local streets allows for possible modification of certain standards (i.e., right-of-way width for on-street parking,
setback sidewalks, park strip width, etc.) to allow for more efficient use of land, provide more land for housing
needs, and greater ability to meet the City’s standards for density, frontage and lot requirements. There are
several examples in the City currently that have a 28’-wide curb-to-curb width (i.e. E St east of 58th St). Some
streets, such as N St north of Centennial between 13th and Mohawk and Ethan Ct are even narrower at 25 ft
wide. The proposed change legitimizes this as a minimum standard, while still accommodating pedestrian
movement as called for in the above TSP policies. Some housekeeping text amendments are also included
among the changes proposed below.
Exhibit A, Page 9 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 10
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
To implement TSP Policy 3.4 and Policy 3.5, the proposed code replaces the existing connectivity standards in
SDC 4.2-105A.1.a with new street network standards in SDC 4.2-105D and E. First, SDC 4.2-105D includes
proposed General Criteria for street networks that apply to all categories of development, except needed
housing, unless a housing developer elects to use the general criteria. These standards implement TSP policies
that favor connectivity, mobility, and safety while providing flexibility for developers and the City. Second, SDC
4.2-105E contains street network standards for “Needed Housing.” These standards apply to all housing
development within the Springfield UGB that is identified as needed in the Springfield 2030 Refinement Plan
Residential Land Use and Housing Element. The “Needed Housing” section includes clear and objective
standards regulating the layout and number of local streets within a development, connections from the
development area to the public street system, secondary emergency access, and pedestrian accessways.
These regulations implement TSP Policy 3.4 and 3.5, and meet the requirement in the TPR to provide standards
for the layout of local streets.
The block length and block perimeter standards in SDC 4.2-115 have been incorporated into the street network
standards in this section for better organization of the code. Revisions to block length standards in SDC 4.2-
115 proposed below help implement Policy 3.4, Action 1 and Policy 3.5, Action 1. The changes further
development of an interconnected street grid with safe, efficient movement for all travel modes, including
emergency access, and provide more clarity regarding requirements and exceptions to standards.
The proposed revision to SDC 4.2-105G. establishes that bonding or other financial surety is a specific
requirement prior to issuance of occupancy permits or final plat approval when improvements are required by
a development agreement but may not be constructed prior to final plat approval or occupancy. This
requirement ensures that required public improvements are completed while providing some developer
flexibility for timing/phasing of improvements. The Fairfield Inn & Suites currently under construction in
Glenwood is an example of how SDC 4.2-105G may be applied. The hotel is the second of three proposed
buildings on the development site. As part of this second phase, the developer proposed to construct parking
that would eventually serve the third hotel. A bond was required to allow this parking lot development to
occur at this early stage of development, to ensure that necessary improvements to screen the parking lot can
be constructed if the third hotel is not eventually constructed on site.
Since roundabouts may be applied as a traffic control device in certain instances – rather than a stop sign or
traffic signal – changes to SDC 4.2-105J are proposed below to update street standards. Language below in a
new subsection SDC 4.2-105M allows the Director to require traffic calming measures, consistent to implement
TSP Policy 3.3, Action 3. Other changes included below are housekeeping measures, or revisions to align with
language used in the TSP (e.g., “Conceptual Street Map” will be used in all references to that document, or
“Local Street Network Map” for references to that document).
SDC 4.2-105M proposes a “Special Street Setback” for future street connectivity. This section is intended to
ensure that development based only on a building permit (i.e. not site plan review, subdivisions, or partitions)
Exhibit A, Page 10 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 11
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
is located in a way that preserves options for future street connectivity, should the subject property or
neighboring properties redevelop in the future. The special street setback would require that buildings not be
constructed on an area intended as a future right-of-way, either because there is existing right-of-way
immediately next to the property that is of inadequate width or that is intended to continue through the
property in the future. The setback does not require dedication of right-of-way until development occurs and
does not set the right-of-way line. The setback would ensure that buildings are not constructed in locations
that make future streets impossible or highly impractical to construct, thereby implementing Policy 3.4 to
“[p]rovide for a continuous transportation network with reasonably direct travel routes to destination points
for all modes of travel,” and Policy 3.4 Action 1, “Design new streets to provide a connected grid network[.]”
Section F Medians has been added. It was located in the Engineering Design Specifications and Procedures
Manual, but should also be located in the Development Code and adopted by ordinance.
4.2-100 Infrastructure Standards – Transportation
4.2-105 Public Streets
A. General Provisions.
1. The location, width and grade of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned
streets, to topographical conditions, and to the planned use of land to be served by the streets. The
street system shall assure efficient traffic circulation that is convenient and safe. Grades, tangents,
curves and intersection angles shall be appropriate for the traffic to be carried, considering the
terrain. Street location and design shall consider solar access to building sites as may be required to
comply with the need for utility locations, and the preservation of natural and historic inventoried
resources. Streets shall ordinarily conform to alignments depicted in TransPlan, the Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, Conceptual
Development Plans, or the Conceptual Local Street Map. The arrangement of public streets shall
provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding area,
unless topographical or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing street
alignments impractical.
a. The following street connection standards shall be used in evaluating street alignment
proposals not shown in or different from an adopted plan or that are different from the
Conceptual Local Street Map:
i. Streets shall be designed to efficiently and safely accommodate all modes of travel
including emergency fire and medical service vehicles.
ii. The layout of streets shall not create excessive travel lengths, particularly for
pedestrians and cyclists.
iii. Streets shall be interconnected to provide for the efficient provision of public
facilities and for more even dispersal of traffic.
iv. New streets shall be designed to accommodate pedestrians and bicycles safely.
Exhibit A, Page 11 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 12
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
v. The street circulation pattern shall provide connections to and from activity
centers for example, schools, commercial areas, parks, employment centers, and
other major attractors.
vi. Street design shall minimize impacts to waterways and wetlands, and shall follow
slope contours where possible.
vii. Street design shall enhance the efficiency of the regional collector and arterial
street system by providing relatively uniform volumes of traffic to provide for
optimum dispersal.
viii. Streets identified, as future transit routes shall be designed to safely, efficiently
and physically accommodate transit vehicles.
ix. Streets shall meet all design standards in this Code, the City’s Engineering Design
Standards and Procedures Manual, the Public Works Standard Construction
Specifications, and the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997.
x. Streets shall provide logical and efficient extensions of the public street system to
adjoining properties.
b. The Director, in consultation with the Public Works Director, may modify the Conceptual
Local Street Map when a proposed alignment is consistent with the street connection
standards in Subsection 1.a., above or when existing conditions make application of the
Conceptual Local Street Map impractical or inconsistent with accepted transportation
planning principles.
2. All public streets and alleys shall be dedicated and must be improved as specified in this Code. and
must Streets shall be dedicated through the approval of a subdivision plat, or by acceptance of a
deed when approved by the City for general traffic circulation, as specified in the Metro Plan and
the TransPlan.
2. Functional Classification of Streets. The City’s street system consists of streets that are classified as
Major and Minor Arterial streets,; Minor Arterial; Major and Minor Collector streets,; and
Local streets and Alleys, consistent with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (Figure 2)
and the Federally Designated Roadway Functional Classification map, contained in the Regional
Transportation Plan. Local Streets include all streets not classified as Arterial or Collector streets.
3. New connections to arterials and state highways must be consistent with any designated access
management category. Development Approval shall not be granted where a proposed application
would create unsafe traffic conditions.
B.4. An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from
proposed development and needed mitigation measures. A TIS is required if any of the following criteria are
met:
1a. Peak Hour Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 100 or
more trips during any peak hour as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition
of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS shall be performed by a
registered professional engineer.
Exhibit A, Page 12 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 13
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
2b. Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates
1,000 or more trips per day as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of
the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS shall be performed by a
registered professional engineer.
3c. Variance and Known Issues Threshold. The Public Works Director may determine that a TIS is
necessary to support a request for a Variance from the transportation provisions of this code or
where traffic safety, street capacity, future planned facility, or multimodal concerns may be
associated with the proposed development.
4d. The nature and extent of the TIS scope shall be determined by the Public Works Director based
upon a trip distribution and assignment prepared by the Applicant. At a minimum, locations
impacted by more than 20 trips during the identified peak hour shall be included in the trip
distribution and assignment.
5e. The Director, with the approval of the Public Works Director, may modify TIS requirements
consistent with applicable local and regional transportation system plans and the intent of this Code
when existing conditions make their strict application impractical or inconsistent with accepted site
planning or transportation planning principles.
B. Streets shall be dedicated through the approval of a subdivision plat, or by acceptance of a deed when
approved by the City for general traffic circulation, as specified in the Metro Plan and the TransPlan.
C. Street Minimum street curb-to-curb widths and minimum street right-of-way widths are as specified in Table
4.2-1, unless otherwise indicated in TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan, an applicable
Refinement Plan, Plan District, Master Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, the
Conceptual Local Street Plan Map, or the adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan;, or where necessary to
achieve right-of-way and street alignment; or as needed to meet site-specific engineering standards,
including but not limited to requirements for multi-way boulevard and/or modern roundabout designs.
Example street layouts meeting minimum street standards are provided in Figures 4.2-B through 4.2-P for
illustrative purposes only. These Figures are intended to demonstrate potential street configurations that
meet the requirements.
Table 4.2-1
Minimum Street Right-of-Way and Curb-to-Curb Width Specifications Standards
Type of Street Minimum Right-of-Way Minimum Curb-to-Curb
Major Arterial 100’ 76’
Minor Arterial 70’ 48’
Collector 60’ 36’ (3)
Local Street
<15 percent slope (1) 50’ 57’ 36’
>15 percent slope (1) 40’ 28’ (2)
<1,200’ length and <1,000 vehicle trips/day 40’ 28’
Cul-de-Sac Bulb 83’ 70’
Alley 20’ 20’ (4)
Exhibit A, Page 13 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 14
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
(1) i.e. the average slope of the development area.
(2) 20’ streets are allowed with approved parking bays of 8’ x 24’ per vehicle
(3) Additional right-of-way may be required to accommodate a center turn lane where significant
volumes of left-turn traffic occur
(4) Alleys do not have curbs, 20’ is entire paving width
Fig.
No.
Street
Classification
Right-of-
Way (1)
Curb-to-Curb
Width (1)
Travel
Lanes
Travel
Lanes
Width
Turn Lane
Width (2)
Bicycle
Lanes
(3)
Planting
Strip and
Curb (4)
Sidewalk
4.2
B-D
Major Arterial
(5)
100’/92’/
84’
76’/69’/60’ 4 12’ 14’ where
required
6’ both
sides
5’ 7’ both
sides
4.2
E-G
Minor Arterial
(5)
76’/68’/60’ 52’/44’/36’ 2 12’ 14’ where
required
6’ both
sides
5’ 7’ both
sides
4.2
H-J
Major Collector 72’/64’/56’ 52’/44’/36’ 2 12’ 14’ where
required
6’ both
sides
5’ 5’ both
sides
4.2
K-M
Minor Collector 70’/62’/54’ 50’/42’/34’ 2 11’ 13’ where
required
6’ both
sides
5’ 5’ both
sides
4.2
N-P
Local Street <15
percent slope (6)
57’/49’/41’ 36’/28’/20’ 2 10’ N/A Not
required
5’ 5’ both
sides
4.2
Q-S
L
percent slope (6)
48’/40’/32’ 36’/28’/20’ 2 10’ N/A Not
required
6” curbs
only
5’ both
sides
Cul-de-sac Bulb 83’
diameter
70’ diameter N/A N/A N/A N/A 5’ around
bulb
5’ around
bulb
Alley 20’ No curbs, 18’
paving width
N/A N/A N/A Not
required
Not
required
(1) Minimum right-of-way widths and curb-to-curb widths are listed in this order: Streets with parking on both
sides of street/Streets with parking on one side of street/Streets with no on-street parking. Where indicated,
parking width is 8’ per side of street. Minimum right-of-way widths and curb-to-curb widths listed above do
not include additional right-of-way width and curb-to-curb width required to accommodate a center turn
lane or center median.
(2) When a center turn lane or center median is required to address a significant volume of left-turn traffic or
other safety or site-specific engineering concerns, additional right-of-way width and curb-to-curb width is
required to accommodate the turn lane and/or center median. Width of the turn lane will be not less than
the standard provided in Table 4.2-1 above.
(3) Bike lanes on one-way streets must be on the right side of the street, except in the case where a left-side
bike lane would cause fewer conflicts, and people riding bicycles can return to the right safely.
(4) The planting strip and curb includes 4.5’ planting strip and 6” curb on both sides of the street, unless
otherwise indicated in Table 4.2-1.
(5) Arterial streets that are Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facilities are not subject to the
standards in Table 4.2-1, but must meet ODOT design standards.
(6) Slope is the average slope of the development area per the calculation in SDC 3.3-520.A. Minimum curb-to-
curb width for local streets includes 6” behind the sidewalk for property pins.
Exhibit A, Page 14 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 15
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
D. Functional Classification of Streets. The City’s street system consists of streets that are classified as Major
Arterial; Minor Arterial; Collector and Local, consistent with the Federally Designated Roadway Functional
Classification map, contained in the Regional Transportation Plan. Local Streets include all streets not
classified as Arterial or Collector streets.
D. Street Network Standards – General Criteria.
1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the location of
collectors streets and arterials streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including
the and Conceptual Street Map.
2. Local Streets. The local street network, which includes pedestrian accessways and multiuse paths,
must meet the following standards:
a. Local streets with connection points in the general location shown on the Local Street
Network Map are allowed. Alternatives that meet and comply with the other standards in this
subsection are also allowed.
b. Streets shall be designed toThe local street network must efficiently and safely
accommodate all modes of travel including emergency fire and medical service vehicles.
c. The layout of streets shall The local street network must not create excessive travel
lengths, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists.
d. Streets shallmust be interconnected to provide for the efficient provision of public and
private utilities facilities and for more even dispersal of traffic.
e. New streets shall be designed toThe local street network must safely accommodate
pedestrians and cyclistsbicycles safely.
f. The street circulation pattern shall Streets must provide connections to and
from Neighborhood Activity Centers activity centers for example, schools, commercial areas, parks,
employment centers, and other major attractors and other areas that attract high levels of
pedestrian and bicycle traffic, or alternative bicycle or pedestrian facilities must provide conections
where street connections are not practical.
g. Street design shall minimize The alignment of local streets must mitigate impacts to
waterways and wetlands, and shall must follow slope contours where possible.
h. Street design shall The alignment of local streets must enhance the efficiency of the
regional collector and arterial street system by providing relatively uniform volumes of traffic to
provide for balancing traffic volumes on local streets to promote optimum dispersal.
Exhibit A, Page 15 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 16
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
i. Streets shallThe local street network must provide logical and efficient extensions of the
public street system to adjoining properties.
3. Dead-End Streets.
a. Dead-end streets shall must terminate in a cul-de-sac bulb, “hammerhead,” or other design
that provides an adequate vehicular turn-around areas, Public Works access, and pedestrian and
bicycle connections as may be approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshal. When
development generates additional vehicular trips on an existing dead-end street without a
turnaround area, the development must include a turnaround area on the dead-end street that
meets the requirements of this subsection.
b. A dead-end street, excluding the bulb or other approved vehicular turn-around
area, shall must have a minimum length of 65 feet and shall must have a maximum length of 400
feet as measured from the nearest curb line of the intersecting street. The right-of-way and paving
requirements for cul-de-sacs, including the bulbs and or other approved vehicular turn-around
areas, are as specified in Table 4.2-1 of this Code, the Oregon Fire Code, the Development & Public
Works Standard Construction Specifications and the City’s Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
EXCEPTION: Where streets that are planned to be through streets are partially constructed during
phased development, temporary dead-end streets with temporary vehicular turn-around areas will
be permitted as specified in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual that
meet the requirements for a dead-end fire apparatus access road will be permitted with a maximum
length of 600 feet as measured from the nearest curb line of the intersecting street. In this case,
the 400-foot maximum length standard shall not apply.
4. Block Length and Block Perimeter
a. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following maximums:
i. 1,400 feet in Mixed-Use Districts consistent with standards in Section 3.2-625E;
ii. 2,600 feet in industrial zoning districts;
iii. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts.
b. Block length for local streets not in industrial zones or that do not serve industrial non-
conforming uses must not exceed 600 feet or the maximum block length established in an
applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District, whichever is less.
c. Block length for individual local streets in industrial zones or that serve industrial non-
conforming uses must not exceed 1,000 feet or the maximum block length established in
an applicable adopted Refinement Plan or Plan District, whichever is less.
d. EXCEPTION: The Director may authorize a block length or block perimeter that exceeds the
applicable maximum specified in this Section. In authorizing a block length or block
perimeter that exceeds the above maximum lengths, the Director may establish
requirements for interim street connectivity and/or pedestrian accessways consistent with
Exhibit A, Page 16 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 17
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
standards in Section 4.2-160. Where the extension of a public street would create a block
length or block perimeter that exceeds the applicable maximum, the block length and block
perimeter must be as close as possible to the applicable maximum.The Director will
authorize an exception only if the applicant/developer demonstrates that the existence of
any of the following conditions justifies the exception:
i. Physical conditions that cannot be mitigated necessitate a block length or block
perimeter that is longer than the applicable maximum preclude a block length of
600 feet or less. These conditions may include topography or the existence of
physical features, including, but not limited to: wetlands, ponds, streams,
channels, rivers, lakes, or steep grades, or a resource under protection by State or
Federal law; or
ii. Buildings or other existing development on adjacent lands, including previously
subdivided but vacant lots/ or parcels that physically necessitate a block length or
block perimeter that is longer than the applicable maximumpreclude a block
length 600 feet or less, considering the potential for redevelopment; or
iii. Industrial development areas greater than 25 acres pursuant to an adopted
Master Plan.
E. Street Network Standards – Needed Housing. The development of needed housing, as defined in ORS
197.303, must meet the following street network standards, unless the applicant elects review under the
general criteria in Section 4.2-105D.
1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this Code, the location of collector and
arterial streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street
Map.
2. Local Streets. The local street network must meet the following standards:
a. New local streets, pedestrian accessways, and multiuse paths within a development area
must connect to all existing or planned local streets, accessways, and multiuse paths,
respectively, including truncated or “stub” streets, accessways, or multiuse paths that abut
the development area. For the purposes of this Section, a planned street, accessway, or
multiuse path means unimproved dedicated right-of-way; a street or multiuse path
adopted in the Transportation System Plan; or a street, accessway, or multiuse path shown
in an approved Master Plan, Site Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Subdivision Plan.
b. Where there is an existing or planned local street or multiuse path within ¼ mile of the
outer boundary of the development area, a new local street or multiuse path must extend
to the outer boundary lines of the development area in alignment with the centerline of
existing or planned street or multiuse path. The new street or multiuse path and existing
or planned street or multiuse path are in alignment if the angle between the projection of
the centerlines of both streets is not less than 170 degrees or more than 190 degrees.
Exhibit A, Page 17 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 18
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
c. Local streets spaced no greater than 600 feet apart from centerline to centerline must
extend to all undeveloped or underdeveloped land that is adjacent to the development
area, zoned or designated for residential or mixed use, and 5 contiguous gross acres or
larger. For the purposes of this Section, “underdeveloped” means lots and parcels that are
developed at less than half the minimum residential density required in the underlying
zoning district.
d. The number of new local street intersections with major collector or arterial streets that
provide ingress or egress to the development area must be the smallest number necessary
to ensure that not more than 100 dwelling units are attributed to any one intersection with
a major collector or arterial street, including via existing local streets that intersect major
collector or arterial streets outside the development area. A dwelling unit is attributed to
the intersection of a local street and major collector or arterial street that has the smallest
travel distance from the centerline of the street at the midpoint of the dwelling unit’s
frontage to the centerline of the street at the boundary line of the development area.
e. EXCEPTION: Street, accessway, and multiuse path connections to adjacent property under
Sections 4.2-105E.2.a through 4.2-105E.2.d above are not required where the following
barriers physically prevent their construction: railroad right-of-way, limited access highway
or freeway right-of-way, existing development, streets that would be unable to meet the
slope standards specified in Section 3.3-525, natural resource protection areas listed in
Section 4.3-117B, or Historic Landmark Sites or Structures established on the Historic
Landmark Inventory according to Section 3.3-920 of this Code.
f. Developments must provide fire apparatus access roads as required by and in compliance
with the Oregon Fire Code.
3. Cul-de-sacs and Dead-End Streets. New and existing dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs must meet
the standards for dead-end fire apparatus access roads in the Oregon Fire Code and the following
standards:
a. Cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets that are not planned to be through streets are permitted
only when physical barriers prevent the construction of through streets or stubbed streets
that meet the local street network standards in Section 4.2-105E.2, or the block length and
block perimeter standards in Section 4.2-105E.6. Physical barriers are railroad right-of-
way, limited access highway or freeway rights-of-way, existing development, streets that
would be unable to meet the slope standards specified in Section 3.3-525, natural resource
protection areas listed in Section 4.3-117B, or Historic Landmark Sites or Structures
established on the Historic Landmark Inventory according to Section 3.3-920 of this Code.
b. All cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets, including stubbed streets required under Sections 4.2-
105E.2.a through 4.2-105E.2.c above, must meet the length standards in Section 4.2-
105D.3.b.
Exhibit A, Page 18 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 19
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
c. A cul-de-sac or dead-end street that is not a stubbed street must include one or more
pedestrian accessways or multiuse path connections from the cul-de-sac or dead-end
street to an existing or planned street, accessway, or multiuse path when the cul-de-sac or
dead end street is within ¼ mile of a Neighborhood Activity Center, as measured in a
straight line from the nearest outer boundary of the Neighborhood Activity Center to the
centerline of the dead-end street at its terminus or the center point of the cul-de-sac. The
accessway or multiuse path must be located in a manner that would shorten the walking
and biking distance from the cul-de-sac or dead-end street to the Neighborhood Activity
Center as compared to the shortest walking or biking distance without the connection.
EXCEPTIONS: An accessway or multiuse path is not required where physical barriers listed
under Section 4.2-105E.3.a above prevent construction of any accessway or multiuse path
under this section, or when no accessway or multiuse path would decrease the walking or
biking distance from the cul-de-sac or dead-end street to the Neighborhood Actity Center.
4. Block Length and Block Perimeter.
a. Block perimeter for local and minor collector streets must not exceed 1,400 feet in Mixed-
Use Districts, consistent with standards in Section 3.2-625E, and 1,600 feet in other zoning
districts.
b. Block length for local streets must not exceed 600 feet or the maximum block length
established in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District.
5. Maximum Street Grades. Street grades must not exceed 8% on major and minor arterial streets,
10% on major and minor collector streets, and 12% on local streets.
6. Intersections of Streets and Alleys.
a. Angles. Streets and alleys must intersect one another at an angle as close to a right angle
(i.e. 90 degrees) as possible. Street intersections must have a minimum intersection angle
of 80 degrees. All legs of an intersection must meet the above standard for at least 100
feet from the point of intersection of the street centerlines. No more than two streets may
intersect at any location (i.e. not creating more than a four-legged intersection) unless at a
roundabout.
b. Intersection Offsets. Intersections must be offset at least 100 feet on a local street, 200
feet on a minor collector street, and 400 feet on a major collector or arterial street, or the
safe stopping sight distance as determined by the AASHTO publication “A Policy on
Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,” whichever is greater. Offset distance must be
measured from the curb or edge of pavement or, where there is no curb, to the closest
curb or edge of pavement of the next offset street.
F. Medians
Exhibit A, Page 19 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 20
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
1. General. A raised median physically deters vehicles from crossing or entering a median area by way
of a raised curb or concrete barrier. Raised medians help avoid crashes caused by crossover traffic,
reduce headlight glare distraction, prevent traffic turning left from through lanes, provide refuge for
pedestrians crossing the street, and remove turning traffic from through lanes, thereby maintaining
efficient and safe traffic flow. Median design and installation must follow the standards in the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and AASHTO’s “A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets.”
2. Raised Median Width and Size.
a. In addition to the minimum street curb-to-curb and right-of-way standards specified in
Section 4.2-105.C, extra right-of-way width for medians may be required to address known
safety issues or fulfill safety and operational needs as specified in this Code or identified in
an engineering study.
b. Elongated Median.
i. An elongated median intended to deter turning movements must be a minimum
of four (4) feet wide and no less than 150 square feet in area. Where a raised
median is required on a facility with an existing median area between opposing
travel lanes, the new raised median must be the same width as the existing
median area minus the distance from the edge line striping required in the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In special circumstances where the
necessary right-of-way cannot be provided or obtained, medians intended to
deter turning movements may be as narrow as two (2) feet wide as approved by
the Director.
ii. An elongated median intended as a pedestrian refuge must be a minimum of eight
(8) feet wide, and no less than 150 square feet in area. In special circumstances
where the necessary right-of-way cannot be provided or obtained, pedestrian
refuge medians may be as narrow as six (6) feet wide as approved by the Director.
3. Length of a Raised Median.
a. Where medians are required to prohibit turns into a specific access, the median must fully
cover the access location plus an additional twenty (20) feet on either end. Modifications
to median length given site specific needs may be approved by the Director.
b. The length of raised medians not intended for pedestrian refuge is determined based on
the storage length requirements of a turn lane as determined in a Traffic Impact Study
(TIS), or based on safety and operational needs of the street first and access second.
E. Dead-End Streets.
1. Dead-end streets shall terminate in cul-de-sac bulb, “hammerhead” or other design that provides an
adequate vehicular turn-around area as may be approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire
Marshal.
2. A dead-end street, excluding the bulb or other approved vehicular turn-around area, shall have a
minimum length of 65 feet and shall have a maximum length of 400 feet as measured from the
Exhibit A, Page 20 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 21
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
nearest curb line of the intersecting street. The right-of-way and paving requirements for cul-de-
sacs, including the bulb or other approved vehicular turn-around area, are as specified in the Public
Works Standard Construction Specifications and the City’s Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
EXCEPTION: Where streets that are planned to be through streets are partially constructed during
phased development, temporary dead-end streets with temporary vehicular turn-around areas will
be permitted as specified in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. In this
case, the 400-foot maximum length standard shall not apply.
3. Where there is an existing dead-end street without a turn-around at the time of development that
generates additional vehicular trips, the property owner shall provide for a turn-around area to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshall. Permitted vehicular turn-around
areas may include, but are not limited to hammerheads, partial cul-de-sac bulbs and private
driveways.
F. Where necessary to ensure that adequate access will be feasible for the orderly development and/or division
of adjacent land or to provide for the transportation and access needs of the City as determined by the
Public Works Director, streets shall be extended to the appropriate boundary of the property proposed to be
developed, partitioned or subdivided. A City standard barricade and/or signs and markings as may be
necessary to adequately warn traffic approaching the end of the street shall be constructed at the
developer's expense.
G. Additional Right-of-Way and Street Improvements
1. Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring
Development Approval, dedication of additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street
dedication results in right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed
restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Recording OfficerDeeds and Records stating that
the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street is constructed to serve the
property, and connect with the City street system.
2. Whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on the City street system
and the development site has unimproved street frontage, that street frontage shall be fully
improved to City specifications in accordance with the following criteria:
a. When fully improved street right-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property,
street improvements shall be constructed across the entire property frontage.
b. When there is a fully improved partial-width street opposite the frontage of the subject
property, street improvements shall be constructed across the entire property frontage to
provide a full-width street.
c. Where property has frontage on unpaved street right-of-way, or where unpaved street
right-of-way extends to a side property boundary, the minimum level of street
improvements necessary to provide for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles and
pedestrians from/to the proposed development shall be constructed.
Exhibit A, Page 21 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 22
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
d. Where there is multifamily residential, commercial or industrial development at the
intersection of a fully improved street and an unimproved street, if access is taken from the
unimproved street, the unimproved street frontage shall be improved.
EXCEPTIONS:
i. In all other cases of unimproved streets, an Improvement Agreement shall be
required as a condition of Development Approval, postponing improvements until
the time that a City street improvement project is initiated.
ii. In the case of siting accessory structures and other structures not occupied by
humans, and changes of use which do not increase parking requirements shall not
be considered development which increases traffic on the City street system; full
street improvement or an Improvement Agreement shall not be required.
3. In subdivisions, anAn approved performance bond or suitable substitute in a sufficient amount to
ensure the completion of all required improvements, including the installation of sidewalks and
accessways is required prior to occupancy or Final Plat approval when necessary to ensure
compliance with a development agreementmay be required.
4. Partial-width streets shall be permitted only if both of the following approval criteria are met:
a. There is inadequate right-of-way to install a full-width street improvement without
changing street alignments; and
b. The partial-width street is adequate to carry anticipated traffic loads until adjacent
properties are developed and the street is fully improved.
5. If the developer bears the full cost of dedicating the necessary right-of-way for and/or constructing
partial-width street improvements, the developer may retain a reserve strip subject to the following
terms and conditions:
a. The retention of this strip does not constitute either an express or implied agreement by
the City:
i. To require an abutting property owner to take access to the street across the
reserve strip;
ii. To withhold approval of development and building on abutting property unless
the abutting property owner takes access to the street across the reserve strip;
iii. That it will not or cannot prohibit access from abutting properties to the street
across the reserve strip.
b. Abutting property owners may purchase access rights across the reserve strip by paying to
the developer a prorated share of the developer's costs of the fully improved street. The
developer shall submit actual development costs to the City within 6 months following
street construction. The cost of purchasing access rights across the reserve strip shall
include the actual construction cost per lineal foot, plus inflation, at a rate not to exceed 5
percent per year. It shall not be the City's responsibility to record legal documents.
Exhibit A, Page 22 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 23
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
H. Where a development would result in the need to improve a railroad crossing, or an approach to a railroad
crossing, the developer shallmust bear the cost for the permitting and improvements. When other property
owners are benefited, other equitable means of cost distribution may be approved by the City.
I. Signs and SignalsTraffic Control Devices.
1. All traffic control signs, traffic signals pavement markings, and street name signs, and other traffic
control devices must be shall be in conformance with the U.S. Department of Transportation's Manual
of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (including Oregon supplements), the City’s
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, and the Development & Public Works Standard
Construction Specifications and this Code.
2. Unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director:
a. The developer is responsible for providing and installing all traffic control devices and
street name signs as necessary to support the proposed development.
b. Where a proposed street intersection will result in an immediate need for a
traffic signal control device, the developer shall bear the cost for the improvements. When
other property owners are benefited, other equitable means of cost distribution may be
approved by the City.
J. Bus turn out lanes shallmust be consistent with current standards in the City’s Engineering Design Standards
and Procedures Manualadopted Lane Transit District construction and design standards and location policies.
K. Street names are assigned as specified in the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997.
L. The Director may require a developer to install traffic calming measures, including, but not limited to, speed
tables and mini-roundabouts, to address public safety considerations on roadways.
M. Special Street Setbacks.
1. A special street setback is established in the following circumstances:
a. A special street setback is established as provided in Table 4.2-1A wherever there is (i)
partially-improved or unimproved street or alley right-of-way of inadequate width abutting
a property, (ii) right-of-way that terminates at a property line, or (iii) right-of-way that
terminates at a T-intersection with a local street abutting the property line.
b. A special street setback is established wherever future right-of-way is shown in the
Springfield Transportation System Plan, a refinement plan, or on an adopted Master Plan,
Site Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, Subdivision or Partition for the width of the street
shown on said plan, or as provided in Table 4.2-1A if no width is specified.
2. Buildings are not permitted within the special street setback specified in this section. Any portion of
a building lawfully established within a special street setback prior to adoption of this ordinance is
considered a non-conforming building subject to Section 5.8-100 of this Code.
Exhibit A, Page 23 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 24
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
3. The special street setbacks provided in Table 4.2-1A are based on the functional classification of the
street as shown in the Springfield Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map.
Where a street is not shown in the Springfield TSP, including the Conceptual Street Map, the special
setback for local streets applies.
4. The special setback provided in Table 4.2-1A is measured from the centerline of the existing or
future street right-of-way as follows:
a. Where partially-improved or unimproved right-of-way of inadequate width abuts a
property line, the setback is measured from the location where the centerline would be if
the street was fully improved.
b. Where right-of-way terminates at the property line or at a T-intersection on only one side
of a property, the centerline is the straight line continuation of the centerline of the
abutting right-of-way until it reaches the property line on the opposing side.
c. Where right-of-way terminates at the property boundary on two sides, the centerline is the
straight line between the points where the right-of-way centerlines intersect the property
lines on each side.
d. Where right-of-way terminates at the property line on one side at at a T-intersection on
the other side, the centerline is the straight line from the right-of-way centerline
intersection with the property line to the intersection of the existing street centerlines at
the T-intersection.
e. Where right-of-way terminates at T-intersections on two sides of a property, the centerline
is the straight line beween the intersections of the existing street centerlines at each T-
intersection.
5. Other yard or building setbacks are in addition to the special setbacks required by this section.
Those setback distances must be measured at right angles to the street centerline specified above.
Table 4.2-1A
Special Street Setbacks
Street Classification Setback Distance from
the Centerline (1)
Major Arterial 50’
Minor Arterial 38’
Major Collector 36’
Minor Collector 35’
Local Street, <15 percent slope 28.5’
28’
Alley 10’
(1) Where fully improved right-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property, the setback
distance is one-half of the width of the existing, fully improved right-of-way.
Exhibit A, Page 24 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 25
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-B
Figure 4.2-C
MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES Ref. Section 4.2-105.C. ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 25 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 26
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-D
Figure 4.2-E
MAJOR ARTERIAL WITH NO ON-STREET PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MINOR ARTERIAL WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 26 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 27
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-F
Figure 4.2-G
MINOR ARTERIAL WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MINOR ARTERIAL WITH NO
ON-STREET PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 27 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 28
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-H
Figure 4.2-I
MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES Ref. Section 4.2-105.C. ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 28 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 29
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-J
Figure 4.2-K
MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH NO ON-STREET
PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MINOR COLLECTOR WITH PARKING ON BOTH
SIDES
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C. ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 29 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 30
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-L
Figure 4.2-M
MINOR COLLECTOR WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
MINOR COLLECTOR WITH NO PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 30 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 31
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-N
Figure 4.2-O
LOCAL STREET <15 PERCENT SLOPE
WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
LOCAL STREET <15 PERCENT SLOPE WITH
PARKING ON BOTH SIDES
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 31 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 32
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-P
Figure 4.2-Q
LOCAL STREET <15
PERCENT SLOPE WITH NO
ON-STREET PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
LOCAL STREET 15 PERCENT SLOPE
WITH PARKING ON BOTH SIDES Ref. Section 4.2-105.C. ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 32 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 33
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.2-R
Figure 4.2-S
4.2-110 Private Streets
A. Private streets are permitted within Mobile Home/Manufactured Dwelling Parks and singularly
owned developments of sufficient size to permit interior circulation. Construction specifications for
private streets shall be the same as for public streets.
5 PERCENT SLOPE WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
WITH NO ON-STREET PARKING
Ref. Section 4.2-105.C.
ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
Exhibit A, Page 33 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 34
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
EXCEPTION: During the Site Plan Review, Partition or Subdivision processes involving private
streets, the Director may allow alternative construction materials and methods to be used.
B. The Approval Authority shall require a Homeowner's Agreement or other legal assurances
acceptable to the City Attorney for the continued maintenance of private streets.
**********
Staff Commentary: The proposal below repeals SDC 4.2-115 as a separate section of the development code, and
moves the block length and block perimeter requirements (with proposed amendments) to the Local
Street Network Standards General Criteria in SDC 4.2-105D.4. In addition, simplified clear and objective
block length and perimeter standards for needed housing have been incorporated into SDC 4.2-105E.4
above. This reorganization places all the standards regarding street network design in the same section
of the Development Code.
4.2-115 Block Length
Block length for local streets shall not exceed 600 feet, unless the developer demonstrates that a block length shall be
greater than 600 feet because of the existence of one or more of the following conditions:
A. Physical conditions preclude a block length of 600 feet or less. These conditions may include topography or
the existence of physical features, including, but not limited to: wetlands, ponds, streams, channels, rivers,
lakes or steep grades, or a resource under protection by State or Federal law;
B. Buildings or other existing development on adjacent lands, including previously subdivided but vacant
lots/parcels that physically preclude a block length 600 feet or less, considering the potential for
redevelopment; or
C. Where the extension of a public street into the proposed development would create a block length
exceeding 600 feet, the total block length shall be as close to 600 feet as possible.
**********
Staff Commentary: Revisions proposed below to site access, driveway, and vision clearance standards in SDC 4.2-
120 and 4.2-130, respectively, implement TSP Policy 2.1 and Action 1, TSP Policy 2.4, and TSP Policy 3.5
by ensuring access while managing the roadway capacity and enhancing safety. These changes are
intended to encourage connecting parking lots between sites so that people can move from one to
another without needing to enter and exit the main roadway. Some housekeeping revisions are included
within proposed Code language below.
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions:
Policy 2.1: Manage the roadway system to preserve safety, longevity, and operational efficiency.
Exhibit A, Page 34 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 35
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Action 1: Evaluate, update, and implement access management regulations for new and
modified access to the roadway system.
Policy 2.4: Maintain and preserve a safe and efficient bike and pedestrian system in Springfield.
Policy 3.5: Address the mobility and safety needs of motorists, transit users, bicyclists, pedestrians, freight, and the
needs of emergency vehicles when planning and constructing roadway system improvements.
Action 1: Ensure that current design standards address mobility needs and meet ADA
standards.
4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways
A. Site Access and Driveways – General.
1. All developed lots/parcels shall have an are entitled to one approved driveway access provided by
either direct access to a:
a. Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or
b. Private street that connects to the public street system. The private street shall be constructed
as specified in Section 4.2-110 (private streets shall not be permitted in lieu of public streets
shown on the City’s adopted Conceptual Local Street Plan Map or TransPlan the Springfield
Transportation System Plan); or
c. Public street by an irrevocable joint use/access easement serving the subject property that has
been approved by the City Attorney, where:
i. A private driveway is required in lieu of a panhandle driveway, as specified in Section
3.2-220B.; or
ii. Combined access for 2 or more lots/parcels is required to reduce the number of
driveways along a street, as determined by the Public Works Director.
2. Driveway access to designated State Highways is subject to the provisions of this Section in addition
to requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Highway Division. Where City
and ODOT regulations conflict, the more restrictive regulations shall apply.
3. As determined by the Director, sites with abutting parking areas within the same zoning district may
be required to provide driveway connections or pedestrian connections internal to the sites and
joint access agreements to provide efficient connectivity and preserve public street functions and
capacity.
B. Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development sites abut more than one
street and streets are of differing classification as identified in the Springfield Transportation System
Plan access to local streets is generally encouraged in preference to access to streets of higher classification.
EXCEPTION: Driveway access to or from a higher classification arterial and collector streets may be permitted
if no reasonable alternative street access exists or where heavy use of local streets is in-appropriate due to
traffic impacts in residential areas.
Exhibit A, Page 35 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 36
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
1. Where a proposed development abuts an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the
development design and off-street improvements shall minimize the traffic conflicts.
2. Additional improvements or design modifications necessary to resolve identified transportation
conflicts may be required on a case by case basis.
C. Driveways shall be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-
2 through 4.2-5 and the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Development &
Public Works Standard Construction Specifications.
Table 4.2-2
Driveway Design Specifications
1-Way
Driveway
Width
2-Way
Driveway
Width
Transition
Width
Driveway
Throat
Depth
Land Use Min./Max. Min./Max. Min./Max.
Single-family and Duplexes (3)(4) 12’/16’ 12’/24’(1) 3’/3’ N.A.
Multifamily Residential 24’/35’(1) 5’/8’ 18’(2)
Commercial/Public Land (4)(5) 12’/18’ 24’/35’(1) 8’/N.A. 18’(2)
Industrial (6) 12’/18’ 24’/35’(1) 8’/N.A. 18’(2)
(1) Driveway widths and throat depths may be varied if no other reasonable alternative exists to
accommodate on-site development needs and traffic safety is not impaired.
(2) Measured from the face of curb to the first stall.
(3) Single driveways A driveway serving a single-family or and duplex dwellings shall must be paved for the
first 18 feet from the edge of existing street pavement to the property line and for a distance of at least 18
feet from the property line into the property when abutting a curb and gutterpaved street; these
driveways may be graveled surfaced for the remainder of their length. Driveways A residential driveway
abutting an unimproved gravel streets shall be may have a graveled surface until the abutting street is
paved. Permeable pavement is allowed on a residential driveway consistent with standards in the City’s
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual.
(4) Off-street vehicle parking is restricted to approved driveways and parking lots, and is not otherwise
allowed between the street and primary building, consistent with Springfield Municipal Code 5.002(11).
(5) Driveways for commercial uses must be paved for their entire length.
(6) Driveways for industrial uses must be paved at least up to any employee or customer parking areas.
Table 4.2-3
Curb Return Driveway Design Specifications
Driveway
Throat Depth
Minimum(3)
Driveway Width(1) Radius of Curb(2)
Land Use Min. Max. Min. Max.
Exhibit A, Page 36 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 37
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Single-family and Duplexes N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Multifamily Residential 24 feet 30 feet 10 feet 20 feet 60 feet
Commercial/ Public Land 24 feet 35 feet 15 feet 35 feet 60 feet
Industrial 24 feet 35 feet 15 feet 35 feet 60 feet
(1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or to improve traffic safety.
(2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are anticipated.
(3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle.
Table 4.2-4
Minimum Separations Between a Driveway and the Nearest
Intersection Curb Return on the Same Side of the Street.(1)
Street Type
Land Use Arterial Collector Local
Single-family Residential and
Duplexes
200 feet 50 feet 30 feet
Multifamily Residential 200 feet 100 feet 75 feet
Commercial/ Public Land 200 feet 100 feet 75 feet
Industrial 200 feet 200 feet 150 feet
(1) Each category of street is considered separately. Distances may be reduced in the following circumstances:
(a) Access is from a one-way street.
(b) The driveway is marked for "right-in-right-out only."
(c) The driveway is marked "exit only" and is designed to prevent left turns.
(d) In cases where an existing lot/parcel and/or use make compliance with these specifications unreasonable, a
new driveway or an existing driveway required to be relocated by this Code shall be placed at the furthest
point from the intersection curb return, considering both safety and internal circulation requirements of the
development.
**********
4.2-130 Vision Clearance Area
A. All corner lots/or parcels shall must maintain a Vision Clearance Area clear area at each access to a public
street and on each corner of property at the intersection of 2 streets or a street and an alley in order to
provide adequate sight distance for approaching traffic. Vision clearance areas must be shown on Site Plans
for applicable land use applications.
B. No screens, plantings, or other physical obstructions are is permitted between 2 ½ and 8 feet above the
established height of the curb in the Vision Clearance Areatriangular area (see Figure 4.2-A).
EXCEPTION: Items associated with utilities or publicly-owned structures – for example, poles, and signs, and
existing street trees – may be permitted.
C. The clear area shall Vision Clearance Area must be in the shape of a triangle. Two sides of the
triangle shall must be property lines for a distance specified in this Subsection. Where the property lines
Exhibit A, Page 37 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 38
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
have rounded corners, they are measured by extending them in a straight line to a point of intersection. The
third side of the triangle is a line across the corner of the lot or /parcel joining the non-intersecting ends of
the other 2 sides. The following measurements shall establish the Vision Clearance Area clear vision areas:
Table 4.2-5
Type of Intersection Measurement Along Each
Property Line
Any Street 2520 feet(1)
Any Alley 15 feet(1)
Any Driveway 10 feet(1)
(1) Note: These standards may be increased if warranted for safety reasons by the Public Works
Director.
EXCEPTION: The Director may require that the Vision Clearance Area be increased to be consistent with the
sight distance standards and requirements in the AASHTO Green Book when safety concerns warrant the
increase.
Figure 4.2-A
**********
Exhibit A, Page 38 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 39
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Staff Commentary: Changes to sidewalk standards in SDC 4.2-135 implement TSP Policies 1.2, 1.4 and 3.7; Policy
3.3, Actions 1, 2, and 4; and Policy 3.4, Action 2 by establishing setback sidewalks as the default standard,
thereby promoting enhanced pedestrian access and improving street design.
Additional language that is proposed to be added to this section is being brought from the Engineering
Design Specifications and Procedures Manual into the Code in order to be adopted by ordinance.
4.2-135 Sidewalks
A. Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets shall be located wholly within the public street right-of-
way, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director.
B. Sidewalks shall be designed, constructed, replaced or repaired as specified in the City’s Engineering Design
Standards and Procedures Manual, the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications
and the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997. New sidewalk design shall be consistent with existing sidewalk
design in the same block in relation to width and type.
C. Concrete sidewalks must be provided according to Section 4.2-105.C, Table 4.2-1, and the following criteria:
1. Sidewalks must conform to the existing or planned street grades.
2. Sidewalks must conform to current ADA standards.
3. Sidewalks must be separated from the curb by the planting strip, except when necessary for
connectivity, safety, or to comply with street design requirements, and subject to approval by the
Director.
4. New sidewalk width and type must be consistent with existing sidewalk design in the same block,
but must physically transition to comply with current sidewalk standards as determined by the
Director. When replacing damaged sidewalk, new sidewalk must be located in the same position as
the existing sidewalk.
5. Facilities including, but not limited to, mail boxes, water meters, valves, junction boxes, manholes,
utility poles, trees, benches, fire hydrants, signs, and bus stops must not be located within the
sidewalk, and must be removed or relocated prior to the construction or reconstruction of the
sidewalk, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If facilities remain, there must be at least
5 feet of unobstructed width on arterial class streets and 4 feet on all other streets.
D. Planter strips are may be required as part of sidewalk construction. Planter strips shall must be at least 4.5
feet wide (as measured from the back of curb to the edge of the sidewalk) and long enough to allow the
street tree to survive. Planter strips must have approved landscaping consisting of street trees and ground
cover allowed per the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Tree wells set in concrete
or sidewalk areas must be a minimum of four (4) feet by four (4) feet. Concrete, asphalt or other
Exhibit A, Page 39 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 40
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
impermeable pavement are not allowed to substitute for landscaping within planter strips. Maximum planter
strip width is dependent upon the type of tree selected as specified in the City’s Engineering Design
Standards and Procedures Manual.
EXCEPTION: Planter strips less than 4.5 feet wide may be permitted when necessary for connectivity, safety,
or to comply with street design requirements, subject to approval by the Director.
DE. Maintenance of sidewalks is the continuing obligation of the abutting property owner.
**********
Staff Commentary: Implementing updated street design standards per Policy 3.3, Action 1, changes to SDC 4.2-140
clarify that street trees on private property cannot be removed without prior approval, that street trees
cannot be removed to accommodate proposed driveways, and that street tree removal requires prior City
authorization. Other housekeeping-related text changes are included below.
4.2-140 Street Trees
Street trees are those trees required within the public right-of-way. The primary purpose of street trees is to create a
streetscape that benefits from the aesthetic and environmental qualities of an extensive tree canopy along the public
street system. Street trees are attractive amenities that improve the appearance of the community, providing provide
shade and visual interest, and enhance the pedestrian environment. Street trees also improve air quality, reduce
stormwater runoff, and moderate the micro-climate impacts of heat absorbed by paved surfaces. Street trees may be
located within a planter strips, in or within individual tree wells within a sidewalk, round-abouts, or medians.
EXCEPTION: In order to meet street tree requirements where there is no planter strip and street trees cannot be
planted within the public right-of-way, trees shall be planted in the required front yard or street side yard setback of
private property as specified in the applicable zoning district.
A. New Street Trees. New street trees shall be at least 2 inches in caliper. New street trees shall be selected
from the City Street Tree List and installed as specified in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual. The Public Works Director shall determine which species are permitted or prohibited
street trees.
B. Existing Street Trees.
1. Street Tree Retention Standards. Existing trees may meet the requirement for street trees ( i.e.,
trees on the City Street Tree List specified in the City’s Engineering and Design Standards and
Procedures Manual with a minimum caliper caliber of 2 inches) if excavation or filling for proposed
development is minimized within the dripline of the tree. Sidewalks of variable width, elevation, and
direction may be used to save existing trees, subject to approval by the Director and Public Works
Director.
Exhibit A, Page 40 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 41
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Existing street trees shall be retained as specified in the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual, unless approved for removal as a condition of Development Approval or in
conjunction with a street construction project.
2. Street Tree Removal Standards.
a. Any City removal of existing street trees within the public right-of-way is proposed to be
removed by the City exempt from the tree felling regulations specified in Section 5.19-100.
b. Any existing Existing street trees on private property cannot be removed without prior
authorization by the Director proposed to be removed shall require notification of the
Public Works Director prior to removal. Removal of 5 or more street trees on private
property shall be is subject to the tree felling standards specified in Section 5.19-100.
c. Existing street trees on private property must not be removed to accommodate additional
or expanded driveways.
3. Street Tree Replacement Standards. Where possible, any street tree proposed to be removed shall
be replaced with a tree at least 2 inches in caliper.
a. It is the responsibility of the City to plant any replacement tree within the public right-of-
way.
a. It is the responsibility of the property owner to plant any replacement street tree on
private property, either as a condition of a Tree Felling Permit or when the property owner
removes a street tree on private property without the City’s authorization. Any
replacement street tree shall meet the standards specified in Subsection A, above.
b. Whenever the property owner removes a street tree within the public right-of-way without
the City’s authorization, that person is responsible for reimbursing the City for the full
value of the removed tree, to include replanting and watering during the 2-year tree
establishment period.
C. Street Tree Maintenance Responsibility.
1. Maintenance of street trees in the public right-of-way shall be performed by the City.
2. Maintenance of street trees on private property shall be performed by the property owner.
3. Removal of street trees on private or public property does not constitute maintenance. Any removal
of street trees on private property is subject to prior approval by the City as specified in Section 4.2-
140B.2.b. above.
**********
Exhibit A, Page 41 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 42
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Staff Commentary: As part of implementing updated street design standards per Policy 3.3, Action 1, changes to
SDC 4.2-145 clarify that installation of decorative street lighting may be requested, but requires prior City
authorization. Other housekeeping-related text changes are included below.
Additional language that is proposed to be added to this section is being brought from the
Engineering Design Specifications and Procedures Manual into the Code in order to be adopted by
ordinance.
4.2-145 Street Lighting Standards
Public street lighting Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and accessways must conform to the following
design standards and is specified in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the
Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and is approved by the Public Works Director.:
A. Street lighting shall Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment. Existing street
lights shall lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new developments or redevelopment as
determined by the Public Works Director. The developer is responsible for street lighting material and
installation costs.
B. A Upon approval by the Director, a developer may install decorative streetlights, as may be permitted in this
sectionin the City’s Engineering and Design Standards and Procedures Manual and in the Development &
Public Works Standard Construction Specifications.
C. Design Standards.
1. Lighting must comply with Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice
for Roadway Lighting – RP-8-14 and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National
Electrical Code (NEC) standards.
2. Intersections must be illuminated to a level equal to the sum of the average required illuminance of
the two intersecting streets.
3. Mid-block crosswalks that are approved by the City Traffic Engineer must have two times the
illumination required for the street.
4. Decorative poles with City-approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used on all streets
within the Nodal Development Overlay District and where any refinement plan or plan district
requires decorative lighting. Decorative poles may be used on streets, paths, and accessways in any
other zone at the option of the developer as approved by the Director.
5. City-approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used when lighting is required along multi-
use paths and accessways.
Exhibit A, Page 42 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 43
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
6. Roadway style poles and “cobra head” fixtures with City-approved LED fixtures and lighting controls
must be used along streets in all other locations.
7. When roadway style poles are used on arterial and collector streets in any zone other than
residential, they must be steel or aluminum. When roadway style poles are used on local and
collector streets in residential zones, they must be fiberglass, steel, or aluminum.
8. Where lot frontages are 80 feet or less, poles must be located at property lines unless approved by
the Director.
9. The weak point illumination must not be less than 0.1 foot candles.
10. Roadway style poles set behind sidewalks must have eight (8) foot arm length. Roadway style poles
set between curb and sidewalk or where no sidewalk exists must have six (6) foot arm length.
11. Pole handholes must be used instead of junction boxes where feasible. Junction boxes for street
lighting must only be utilized for street crossings or where necessary to comply with electrical code
standards cited above.
12. Pole Height.
a. Lights on arterial and collector streets outside of a residential zone must have a 35-foot
fixture mounting height.
b. Lights on local streets with a curb-to-curb width of 28 feet or greater and collectors within
residential zones must have a 30-foot fixture mounting height.
c. Lights on local streets with a curb-to-curb width of less than 28 feet must have a 20-foot
fixture mounting height.
d. Decorative poles must be 12 feet tall, except that 16-foot tall decorative poles may be
approved by the Director when the required illumination levels cannot be achieved with
12-foot tall decorative poles.
e. Lighting on local streets must be installed on the same side of the street and on the side of
the street first constructed, except where necessary to be consistent with the existing
lighting design and placement.
f. Light poles must not be placed on the outside of curves with less than a 1000-foot radius.
**********
Staff Commentary: The following text revisions clarify that paved bikeways and multi-use paths are subject to the
City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual standards, and are referenced in the TSP or
City bike/ped plan (which has yet to be developed). In making this change, it distinguishes unpaved bike
Exhibit A, Page 43 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 44
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
facilities, such as single-track mountain bike trails for recreational use, which are not considered part of
the City’s transportation network. These changes support TSP Policy 1.4; Policy 3.2, Actions 1, 4 and 7;
Policy 3.4, Action 2; and Policy 3.7.
Additional language that is proposed to be added to this section is being brought from the Engineering
Design Specifications and Procedures Manual into the Code in order to be adopted by ordinance.
4.2-150 BikewaysMulti-Use Paths
A. Bikeways. Development abutting an existing or proposed bikeways multi-use path identified in TransPlan or
Springfield Bicycle Plan shall the Springfield Transportation System Plan, City-adopted bicycle and pedestrian
plan, adopted Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan, or shown on the Conceptual
Street Map must include provisions for the extension of these facilities the multiust-use path through the
development area by the dedication of public easements or rights-of-way. The developer shall bears the cost
of bikeway multi-use path improvements unless additional property owners are benefitted. In this case,
other equitable means of cost distribution may be approved by the City.
B. Bikeways shall be designed and constructed as specified in Multi-use paths that are dedicated as right-of-way
or in a public easement must conform to the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, the Oregon Bike and
Pedestrian Design Guidelines, AASHTO guidelines, this Code, and the City’s Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
C. The right-of-way or easement area for a multi-use path must include a minimum paved area of 10 feet, a
minimum clear zone of 2 feet on both sides of the path, and any additional width necessary to accommodate
lighting required under this section.
D. Where a multi-use path runs parallel and adjacent to a public street, the multi-use path must be separated
from the edge of the street by a width of at least 5 feet or by a physical barrier that meets the standards in
the Oregon Bike and Pedestrian Design Guidelines, AASHTO guidelines, or the National Association of City
Transportation Officials Urban Bikeway Design Guide.
E. Lighting for multi-use paths must be installed according to the standards in Section 4.2-145. Lighting must
not obstruct the paved surface or 2-foot clear area on either side. All lighting must be installed within the
right-of-way or public easement area.
**********
Staff Commentary: The following section proposes to remove Pedestrian Trails from the Springfield
Development Code since there are no planned unpaved “pedestrian trails” in the Springfield 2035
Transportation System Plan and the current 25 feet wide public right of way exceeds what is
proposed for a multi-use path facility. If this change is implemented, the Code will still be consistent
with the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District’s Comprehensive Plan since the plan distinguishes
Exhibit A, Page 44 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 45
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
between “multi-use paths” and “pedestrian trail” and does not provide standards for these facilities.
The planned pedestrian trails in the Willamalane Comprehensive Plan are primarily within
Willamalane owned property, such as Thurston Hills and Dorris Ranch.
4.2-155 Pedestrian Trails
A. Developments abutting existing or proposed pedestrian trails identified on the adopted Willamalane Park
and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan shall provide for the future extension of the pedestrian trails
through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. The developer is responsible for trail surfacing, as
approved by the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District and/or the City. Trails shall be constructed to
allow for adequate drainage and erosion control.
B. In dedicating an easement or right-of-way for public trails, the owner shall demonstrate compliance with the
following criteria:
1. Trail easements or right-of-way shall:
a. Be 25 feet wide as and paved as specified in the ODOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and/or
with the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The width standard
may be reduced if the Director finds this standard to be impractical due to physical
constraints.
b. Be located within a site:
i. To allow the trail to be buffered from existing and proposed dwellings on the site
and on adjacent properties;
ii. To maintain the maximum feasible privacy for residents; and
ii. Ensure that future trail construction will avoid parking and driveway areas and
other activity areas which might conflict with pedestrian movements.
c. Allow for future construction of trails.
2. Site area included within a trail easement or right-of-way shall be counted as a portion of the
landscaped and open space area required for the proposed development.
**********
Staff Commentary: The following revision provides more flexibility for establishing accessways and directs people
to the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual for pedestrian scale lighting
requirements, in order to provide more options for context sensitive lighting based on current
technology and each project’s needs.
Exhibit A, Page 45 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 46
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
4.2-160 Accessways
A. Accessways allow pedestrians and bicyclists convenient linkages to adjacent streets, residential areas,
neighborhood activity centers, industrial or commercial centers, transit facilities, parks, schools, open space,
or trails and paths where no public street access exists. Accessways may also be used as a secondary
emergency access. Accessways shall must be dedicated as public right-of-way during the development
review process.
EXCEPTIONS: When site constraints preclude the ability to dedicate right-of-way without impacting setback
requirements or other development standards, the Director may authorize dedication of a public easement
or may otherwise modify the stnadards in this section.
1. There is an existing building or conditions on an abutting property that makes the accessway
impractical; or
2. There are slopes in excess of 30 percent.
B. Accessways shall must comply with the following design standards:
1. Where an accessway is proposed for only bicycle and/or pedestrian travel, the right-of-way shall
must be paved a minimum of 12 feet wide, with a 10-foot wide paved surface of either asphalt
concrete or Portland Cement concrete. Any necessary light Light standards shallmay be installed
within outside of the 12-foot travelway path, as long as a minimum 8-foot wide clear path is
maintainedbut within the public right-of-way.
2. Where an accessway is proposed as a secondary access for emergency vehicles or in combination
with bicycle and/or pedestrian travel, the right-of-way shall must be a minimum of 2420 feet wide;
consisting of a 1012-foot wide area paved with either asphalt concrete or Portland Cement concrete
and two2 additional 45-foot wide areas on both sides that may be are turf block, grass-crete, or
other similar permeable material approved by the Public Works Director on a base of gravel capable
of supporting fire equipment weighing 80,000 pounds. Any necessary light Light standards shall
must be installed outside the 20-foot travelway path, but within the public right-of-way.
3. Illumination for accessways must be installed in accordance with Section 4.2-145. In addition to the
locational standards accessway lighting specified in Subsections 1. and 2., above any street light
installed in an accessway shall be a City-approved decorative streetlight.
C. The Director may require improvements to existing unimproved accessways on properties abutting and
adjacent to the property proposed to be developed. Where possible, the improvements to unimproved
accessways shall continue to the closest public -street or developed accessway. The developer shall bear the
cost of accessway improvements, unless other property owners are benefited. In this case, other equitable
means of cost distribution may be approved by the City. Where possible, accessways may also be employed
to accommodate public utilities.
Exhibit A, Page 46 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 47
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
3. Proposed Changes to Parking Standards (SDC Chapter 4)
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions:
Policy 2.7: Manage the off-street parking system to assure major activity centers meet their parking demand
through a combination of shared, leased, and new off-street parking facilities and TDM programs.
Action 1: Modify parking requirements to assure that they are appropriate for land uses. The
purpose of this action is to reduce parking requirements to utilize land for economic
development.
Policy 3.8: Coordinate the design of Springfield’s transportation system with relevant local, regional, and state
agencies.
Action 3: Partner with LTD to provide frequent transit network connections along major
corridors. The frequent transit network should connect to local neighborhood bus
service and major activity centers to provide viable alternatives to vehicle trips.
Staff Commentary: The proposed changes to the parking standards in SDC 4.6-110 implement the
above TSP policies and action items by providing more options to reduce parking requirements. The
standards reduce minimum parking required for development sites on, or proximate to, high
frequency transit corridors, allowing developers to take advantage high frequency transit and to put
more area of a site into an economically productive use. Reducing parking requirements provides
more flexibility in site design and can serve as a cost-saving incentive for needed development of
housing and employment uses.
The proposed standards cap the total parking reduction a developer can obtain for all sites outside
the Downtown Exception Area (where there is no minimum parking requirement) to maintain a
minimum level of off-street vehicle parking. The bike parking credit was moved from Section 4.6-120I
to 4.6-110H and was reduced from 5 bike spaces for every vehicle space to 2 bike spaces per vehicle
space to incentivize developers to take advantage of the bike parking reduction credit. Staff believe
that the existing 5-bike-space standard was adopted to conform to the number of spaces provided
by a single wave rack (the previously accepted bike parking standard). Because the new, proposed
bike parking standard requires a high quality rack (i.e. “staple rack”) that has space for 2 bikes per
rack, it makes sense to adjust the requirement. A standard vehicle parking space can fit 4-5 staple
racks (or up to 10 bike parking spaces). Under the proposed bike parking reduction credit, a
developer could convert an existing vehicle parking space to up to 10 bike parking spaces, resulting in
a maximum net reduction of 4 vehicle parking spaces for every existing vehicle parking space that is
converted to bike parking. The new language also clarifies that bike parking may substitute for a
percentage of vehicle parking only when additional bike parking provided is above minimum quantity
of bike parking otherwise required.
Exhibit A, Page 47 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 48
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
4.6-100 Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards
4.6-110 Motor Vehicle Parking—General
A. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided, consistent with requirements in Section 4.6-125, Table 4.6-2,
unless excepted as allowed herein, for:
1. All new construction and expansion of multiple family residential, commercial, industrial and public
and semi-public uses. If an existing development is expanded, new parking spaces shall be provided
in proportion to the increase only.
2. Changes in use or the use category of an existing building or structure.
3. The Director may authorize a reduction in the number of required parking spaces without a
Variance:
a. Based on an approved Parking Study, prepared by a Transportation Engineer; and/or
b. When the location of a building on a site makes it impractical to provide the number of
required spaces without demolishing all or part of the building, and no alternative parking
arrangements are reasonably available; and
c. Based on an affirmative finding by the Director that the exception will have no negative
impacts on neighboring properties; and
d. All installed parking shall confirm to the design standards of this Section and Section 4.6-
115 and 4.6-120.
B. If parking has been provided to serve an existing use, the number of parking spaces shall cannot be reduced
if the result would be fewer spaces than required by this Section, except as parking reductions are allowed
below and under Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2.
C. Parking reductions under Sections 4.6-110.H-L and Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2 shall not reduce the
number of ADA parking spaces required in accordance with the minimum parking in Table 4.6-2 or under
Section 4.6-110.M.
DC. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of passenger automobiles vehicles of residents,
customers, patrons, visitors, and employees only, and shall not be used for outdoor displays, storage of
vehicles, equipment, or materials. Parking for company motor vehicles that remain on the premises
overnight, or enclosures designed for the temporary collection of shopping carts, must shall be provided in
addition to the number of parking spaces required by this Section.
ED. Unless joint use of parking facilities is requested as may be permitted in Subsection E. below, the total
requirement for off-street parking spaces is the sum of the requirements for all uses. If the total number of
required parking spaces results in a fraction, the fraction shall be rounded up to the next whole number. Off-
street parking facilities for 1 one use shall not be considered as providing parking facilities for any other use,
unless as may be permitted in Subsection F., below.
Exhibit A, Page 48 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 49
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
FE. The Director, upon application by all involved property owners, may authorize joint use of parking facilities,
provided that:
1. The applicant shall demonstrate that there is no substantial conflict in the principal operating hours
of the buildings or uses for which the joint use of parking facilities is proposed; and
2. The parties concerned in the joint use of off-street parking facilities shall provide evidence of
agreement for the joint use by a legal instrument approved by the City Attorney. An agreement for
joint use of parking facilities shall provide for continuing maintenance of jointly used parking
facilities;
3. The agreement shall be recorded at Lane County Deeds and Records at the applicant’s expense.
GF. Parking When on-street parking is planned and provided, parking spaces in a public right-of-way directly
abutting the development area may be counted as fulfilling a part of the parking requirements for a
development as follows: For each 18 feet of available on-street parking, there will be 1/2 space credit toward
the required amount of off-street parking spaces. The developer is responsible for marking any on-street
spaces.
H. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Additional Bicycle Parking. Bicycle Additional bicycle
parking beyond the minimum amount required in Table 4.6-3 that complies with the bike parking standards
in Sections 4.6-145 and 4.6-150 may substitute for up to 2025 percent of required vehicular parking off-
street motor vehicle parking otherwise required in Table 4.6-2. For every 5two (2) non-required bicycle
parking spaces that meet the short or long term bicycle parking standards specified in Table 4.6-3, the motor
vehicle parking requirement is reduced by one (1) space. When existing parking converted to bicycle parking
under this subsection results in surplus motor vehicle parking spaces, the surplus parking may be converted
to another use in conformance with the requirements of this Code. Existing parking may be converted to
take advantage of this provision.
I. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors – Abutting Sites. Development
sites abutting an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 15 percent
from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2.
J. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors – Nearby Sites. Development
sites not abutting but within 1/4-mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a
reduction of up to 10 percent from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2.
K. Reduction Credit for ADA Improvements for Frequent Transit Corridors. Development sites abutting or
within ¼-mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may receive a reduction of up to 10
percent from the minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2 in exchange for
contribution to the City for ADA improvements in the public right-of-way. The required contribution will be
equal to the Base Curb Ramp Fee multiplied by each set of four parking spaces to be reduced, rounded up to
the next whole number (e.g. one Base Curb Ramp Fee for 1-4 parking spaces reduced, double the Base Curb
Ramp Fee for 5-8 parking spaces reduced, etc.). The Base Curb Ramp Fee must be set by Council resolution
and must be approximately the cost of constructing one ADA-compliant curb ramp. Nothing in this
Exhibit A, Page 49 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 50
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
subsection waives or alters any requirement for a developer to construct or provide on-site or off-site ADA
improvements.
L. Outside of the Downtown Exception Area and Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District, a cumulative
maximum reduction of 20 percent of the minimum off-street parking required in Table 4.6-2 may be applied
using the credits, allowances, and exceptions to minimum parking requirements established in this Code.
M. EXCEPTION: The Director may authorize reductions to the minimum number of parking spaces required in
Table 4.6-2, including reductions in excess of the cumulative maximum reduction specified in Section 4.6-
110.K. above, based on substantial evidence that less than the minimum required parking spaces would be
utilized. Substantial evidence includes, but is not limited to, the parking requirements based upon the
current version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Manual, an approved Parking
Generation Study prepared by a licensed engineer, evidence regarding specific use characteristics, or
evidence regarding site proximity to multi-modal improvements that are likely to reduce on-site parking
demand.
4.6-115 Motor Vehicle Parking—Parking Lot Design
All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards:
Table 4.6-1
Dimensional Feature (all dimensions in feet) Diagram
Parking Angle
0 45 60 90
Stall width, standard A 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Stall width, compact A 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Stall length, standard B 24.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Stall length, compact B 22.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
Aisle width between stall lines C 12.0 12.0 16.0 24.0
Bumper overhang (typical) D 0.0 1.5 1.8 2.0
Cross-aisle, 1-way E 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0
Cross-aisle, 2-way F 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0
Exhibit A, Page 50 of 104
Exhibit A: Springfield Development Code Amendments
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 51
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.6A
Parking Lot Design
x xWALL
BAC
E/F
CURB
D= STALL NOT ACCESSIBLE IN CERTAIN LAYOUTSx
Exhibit A, Page 51 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 52
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Figure 4.6A 1
Parking Lot Design 2
3
4
5
********** 6
7
8
Staff Commentary: Changes in SDC 4.6-120 relocate the parking reduction currently allowed under Subsection I to group it with 9
other parking reduction options in SDC 4.6-110. Revision to SDC 4.6-120.A. to allow for permeable pavement is proposed 10
following review of City standards called for in Policy 3.3, Action 1. The added language permits the Director to authorize 11
permeable paving in parking areas and driveways, providing stormwater and environmental benefits from an alternative 12
to standard paving. 13
Exhibit A, Page 52 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 53
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
14
Section F shown as strikethrough has been moved to Section 4.2-120.A.3. and amended. 15
16
4.6-120 Motor Vehicle Parking – Parking Lot Improvements 17
18
All parking areas shall conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting and screening provisions of this Code and shall be completed 19
prior to occupancy. Required parking spaces shall be improved as follows: 20
21
A. All parking areas shall lots, bays, and spaces must have a durable, dust free surfacing of Asphaltic concrete, Portland cement 22
concrete or other materials as specified in the Building Safety Codes and approved by the Building Official City Engineer. 23
Permeable pavement meeting standards in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual may be allowed 24
by the City Engineer for parking areas and driveways. Parking lot surfacing shall not encroach upon the public right-of-way. 25
26
B. Adequate drainage improvements shall be provided to dispose of manage all on-site run-off. Provisions shall be made for the 27
on-site collection of drainage waters to eliminate sheet flow onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private 28
property. All drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer Building Official and shall be constructed in 29
conformance with the Building Safety Codes. 30
31
C. All parking stalls spaces fronting a sidewalk, alley, street, landscaped area or structure shall be provided with a secured wheel 32
bumper or linear curb not less than 6 inches in height to be set back from the front of the stall a minimum of 2 feet to allow 33
for vehicle encroachment. Wheel bumpers shall be a minimum of 6 feet in length. Curbs shall be constructed in conformance 34
with the Standard Construction Specifications. 35
36
EXCEPTION: As an option, the sidewalk or landscaped area may be widened 2 feet beyond the minimum dimension required 37
to allow for vehicle encroachment. A curb not less than 6 inches in height shall protect the widened sidewalks and planter 38
areas. 39
40
D. Backing into the public right-of-way, other than alleys is prohibited. 41
42
EXCEPTION: Parking areas of less than 4 spaces on a residentially zoned lot/parcel may back into the public right-of-way. 43
44
E. All spaces shall be permanently and clearly marked unless the Director determines that the spaces should not be marked for 45
safety considerations. Old striping shall not be visible after being replaced by new striping. 46
47
F. Parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on abutting sites within the same zoning district to eliminate the 48
use of the street for cross movements. 49
Exhibit A, Page 53 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 54
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
50
FG. Not more than 30 percent of the total parking spaces in a parking lot may be designated for compact cars, unless a greater 51
percentage is authorized by the Director based on substantial evidence that greater than 30 percent of the total parking 52
spaces is appropriate for the use. These spaces shall be signed and/or the space painted with the words “Compact Car Only.” 53
54
GH. Parking Spaces For Disabled Persons for People with Disabilities. 55
56
1. Parking spaces for disabled persons people with disabilities and accessible passenger loading zones that serve a 57
particular building shall be located as close as possible to a building entrance. 58
2. The number and dimensions of parking spaces for disabled personspeople with disabilities shall be as specified in 59
Section 1104 1106 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. 60
61
I. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit. Bicycle parking may substitute for up to 25 percent of required vehicle parking. 62
For every 5 non-required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short or long term bicycle parking standards specified in Table 63
4.6-3, the motor vehicle requirement is reduced by 1 space. Existing parking may be converted to take advantage of this 64
provision. 65
66
67
********** 68
69
70
Staff Commentary: Text proposed below in SDC 4.6-125 furthers TSP Policy 2.7, Action 1 to foster economic development by 71
establishing maximum quantities of off-street parking, based on 125% of the minimum parking required. Establishing a 72
parking maximum, with allowances for exceeding that percentage, supports better site utilization for productive, 73
revenue-generating use and has precedent in other communities. For example, Eugene limits parking for non-residential 74
uses to 125% of the minimum required. Corvallis limits parking for any site to 130% of the minimum required, and Bend 75
limits surface parking to 150% of the minimum required. Under the existing Springfield Development Code, a maximum 76
parking limitation is provided only for non-residential uses in Mixed Use Districts (i.e., 120% of the minimum required in 77
SDC 4.6-125G.1.b.) and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District area. 78
The proposed language allows the Director to approve an alternative parking quantity for a particular use based upon 79
evaluation of parking demands in the ITE Parking Manual or a parking study without applying for a variance. Proposed 80
new text also permits the Director to allow an exceedance of the parking maximum based on a parking study and 81
approved TDM plan. 82
Language changes to parking requirements Table 4.6-2 for schools are provided for clarity. 83
Exhibit A, Page 54 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 55
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
It is common for development applications to have difficulties reaching the parking minimum requirements as the current 84
Springfield Development Code applies. Very rarely do our development applications greatly exceed the minimums 85
required. Staff does not foresee the proposed parking maximum (125% of the minimum parking required) to be a 86
detriment to development in Springfield. The proposed parking maximum helps implement Policy 2.7, Action 1, “Modify 87
parking requirements to assure that they are appropriate for land uses. The purpose of this action is to reduce parking 88
requirements to utilize land for economic development.” 89
Under Special Provisions in SDC 4.6-125G.1.a., the existing 20% limitation on parking reduction for nonresidential uses in 90
Mixed Use Districts is proposed to be deleted, given the proposed text in SDC 4.6-110 allows for a higher percentage 91
parking reduction. Text in SDC 4.6-125G.2. is modified to reflect that residential mixed uses – like non-residential mixed 92
uses – are required to comply with the minimum parking requirements only for off-street surface parking. This helps 93
distinguish, and provide support, for provision of structured parking to help meet parking demands, particularly within 94
Mixed Use zoning districts. The exception language in SDC 4.6-125G.3. is proposed to be deleted since the proposed new 95
Code text allows parking reductions for development sites on, and proximate to, frequent transit corridors irrespective of 96
the use. 97
98
The deletion in SDC 4.7-195.1.8. is for consistency with the proposed amendments in Table 4.6-2. 99
100
4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking – Parking Space Requirements 101
102
Table 4.6-2 103
Use Minimum Parking Requirements (1)
Dwellings-single-family, duplexes and
manufactured
2 for each dwelling
1 for each dwelling when on-street parking is planned and provided;
or 2 for each dwelling when no on-street parking is provided, or
when provided on-street parking is planned to be eliminated or
repurposed
Dwellings-cluster subdivisions See applicable dwelling unit
Dwellings-multiple family other than quads or
quints
1.5 for each dwelling unit
1 for each dwelling unit
Dwellings-quads or quints 0.75 for each bedroom
104
Use Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements (1) (2)
Child Care Centers 1 drop-off space for each 700 square feet of gross floor area, plus 1
Exhibit A, Page 55 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 56
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Use Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements (1) (2)
long-term space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area
Education Facilities Public/Private 2 for each classroom, plus 1 elementary/middle school
for each 100 square feet of 6 or more student’s the largest public
assembly area.
Group Care Facilities 0.25 for each bedroom or dwelling unit plus 1 per full time employee
on the busiest shift.
Public Utility Facilities None, unless utility vehicles will be parked overnight.
Transient Accommodations
Bed and breakfast facilities, boarding and
rooming houses and hotels
1 plus 1 for each guest bedroom
Emergency shelter homes None
Youth hostels 0.3 for each guest bedroom
Eating and drinking establishments 1 for each 100 square feet of gross floor area.
Recreational facilities and religious, social and
public institutions
1 for each 100 square feet of floor area in the primary assembly area
and 1 for each 200 square feet of gross floor area for the remainder
of the building.
Retail sales, personal service, including small scale
repair and maintenance and offices
1 for each 300 square feet of gross floor area.
Shopping centers and malls 1 for each 250 square feet of gross floor area, exclusive of covered
pedestrian walkways. Once a shopping center or mall has been
approved, no additional parking shall be required, unless there is
new construction
Transportation facilities 1 for each 300 square feet of gross floor area not including vehicle
storage areas.
Warehouse commercial sales 1 for each 600 square feet of gross floor area.
Manufacture and assembly, and other primary
industrial uses
1 for each 500 square feet industrial of gross floor area (manufacture
and assembly) for each 1000 square feet of gross floor area
(warehousing)
Secondary industrial uses See applicable use in this table
(1) Table 4.6-2 establishes minimum off-street parking required for various uses except as may be reduced in accordance with the 105
provisions of Section 4.6-110. 106
(2) Table 4.6-2 establishes maximum off-street parking requirements for all uses except residential dwelling units. Maximum off-107
street parking is 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking required above in Table 4.6-2, except as may be increased by the 108
Director based upon an approved Parking Generation Study prepared by a professional Transportation Engineer licensed by the 109
State of Oregon and an approved Transportation Demand Management Plan. 110
Exhibit A, Page 56 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 57
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Special Provisions: 111
A. Downtown Exception Area. Within the Downtown Exception Area, all lots/parcels and uses areshall be exempt from the 112
minimum off-street parking space requirements of this Section. However, if the Director determines there is a need for off-113
street parking, the Director may require an Institute of Transportation Engineering (ITE) Parking Generation Report to 114
determine the off-street parking requirements. In any case, any voluntarily installed parking shall conform to the design 115
standards of this Section. 116
117
B. Commercial Districts. 118
119
1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commerical (NC) District shall be designed so that every seventh space is developed 120
as a landscaped separator between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces shall locate 121
half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed buildings. 122
123
2. Parking lots shall be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles. 124
EXCEPTION: Parking spaces in excess of the number required by this Code may be used for temporary sales or display 125
of merchandise where the activity does not create a hazard for automobile or pedestrian traffic or where otherwise 126
allowed under this Code or the Springfield Municipal Code. 127
3. A minimum of 4 off-street parking spaces shall be required for all sites in commercial zoning districtsuses that require 128
parking, unless reduced under Section 4.6-110M. 129
130
C. Light-Medium Industrial (LMI), Heavy Industrial (HI), and Special Heavy Industrial (SHI) Districts. In addition to reductions 131
permitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.6-110, pParking spaces may be reduced in LMI, HI, or SHI zoning 132
districts on a 1-for-1 basis when the number of spaces required is more than the number of employees working on the busiest 133
shift, provided that a landscaped area equal to the total number of spaces reduced shall be held in reserve for future use. 134
135
D. Campus Industrial (CI) District. 136
1. To the greatest extent practicable, parking shall be located behind buildings, internal to development or to the side 137
of a building. 138
139
EXCEPTIONS: 140
a. The number of required parking spaces for uses not shown in Table 4.6-2 shall be determined based upon 141
standards for similar uses. 142
Exhibit A, Page 57 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 58
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
b. Parking spaces may be reduced on a 1-for-1 basis when the number of spaces required is more than the shift 143
with the largest number of employees, provided that a landscaped area equal to the total number of spaces 144
reduced is held in reserve for future use. 145
146
2. An additional 5 percent of impermeable surface may be allowed in cases where all parking on a lot/parcel is screened 147
by earthen berms with an average height of 3 feet (measured from the finished grade of the edge of the parking lot), 148
sunken below grade an average depth of 3 feet (measured from the finished grade of the edge of the parking lot to 149
the finished grade of the adjacent berm or landscaped area), or both. 150
151
3. Truck parking for vehicles necessary for the operation of the facility may be located either: 152
153
a. Within an enclosed building; or 154
b. Outside of a building if the following standards are met and shall: 155
156
i. Be prohibited in all front and street-side yards; 157
158
ii. Meet the building setback standards specified in Section 3.2-420; and 159
160
161
iii. Be screened as specified in Section 3.2-445. 162
163
E. Medical Services District. Motor vehicle parking standards shall be determined based upon standards for similar uses in Table 164
4.6-2 and upon the required Traffic Study. 165
F. Public Land and Open Space District. Motor vehicle parking standards shall be determined based upon standards for similar 166
uses in Table 4.6-2. Uses not listed shall require a Parking Study. 167
168
G. Mixed Use Districts. 169
1. Nonresidential Requirements. 170
a. Off-street surface parking shallmust meet the minimum parking requirement for the various commercial and 171
industrial uses in Table 4.6-2 unless reduced under applicable provisions in this Code. The Director may 172
reduce the minimum number of parking spaces required, based on a parking generation study, without the 173
need for a Variance. The study shall demonstrate how a proposal to reduce parking is justified by estimated 174
peak use, easy pedestrian access, availability of transit service, and adjacent on-street parking. This 175
reduction shall be limited to 20 percent of the established standard. 176
Exhibit A, Page 58 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 59
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
177
b. The maximum number of parking spaces allowed shall not exceed 120 percent of the minimum parking requirement for 178
commercial and industrial uses in Table 4.6-2. The Director may increase the allowed number of parking spaces based 179
on a parking generation study, using statistical analysis from the Institute of Transportation Engineering (ITE) Parking 180
Generation Report without the need for a Variance. The study shall demonstrate how a proposal to increase parking is 181
justified by estimated peak use, and how parking demand management techniques to reduce the needed number of 182
parking spaces would be ineffective for the development. 183
184
2. Residential Requirements. Minimum off-street parking standards for residential uses shall must comply with the 185
standards specified in Table 4.6-2 unless reduced under applicable provisions in this Code. 186
187
3. EXCEPTION: The Director may reduce the minimum residential parking standard when it is demonstrated that 188
proposed housing is along a frequent service transit line, or is otherwise provided for by this Code. 189
190
********** 191
4. Proposed Changes to Bicycle Parking Standards (SDC Chapters 3 & 4) 192
193
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions: 194
Policy 2.7: Manage the off-street parking system to assure major activity centers meet their parking demand through a combination 195
of shared, leased, and new off-street parking facilities and TDM programs. 196
Action 2: Consider bike parking recommendations from the 2013 Regional Bike Parking Study when updating 197
Springfield’s bike parking standards. 198
Policy 3.2: Expand and enhance Springfield’s bikeway system and provide bicycle system support facilities for both new development 199
and redevelopment/expansion. 200
Action 6: Create city-wide bike parking stations in strategic locations such as along major transit routes and in 201
Springfield’s central business district. 202
Policy 3.8: Coordinate the design of Springfield’s transportation system with relevant local, regional, and state agencies. 203
Action 1: Work with ODOT, Lane County, and LTD to improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities along state 204
highways and major transit routes where appropriate. 205
Action 2: Coordinate with Springfield Public Schools to provide key bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities 206
near schools to ensure safe, convenient, and well-connected routes to schools. 207
208
Staff Commentary: The following revisions recommend increasing the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required from 3 209
spaces to 4 spaces because high-quality “staple” or “inverted-U” style bike racks typically hold two bicycles each. Changes 210
are intended to update the bicycle parking standards to modern recommended rack type and installation standards to 211
Exhibit A, Page 59 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 60
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
provide better quality facilities than the previous version of the Code. Figure 4.6-B is also updated to align with current 212
best practices for bike parking installation. 213
214
Section D that is shown as strikethrough has been relocated to Section 4.6-150.A.7. 215
216
.6-135 217
4.6-140 Bicycle Parking—Purpose and Applicability 218
219
A. Safe and convenient bicycle parking is required in most zoning districts and land use categories to encourage the use of 220
bicycles as a mode of transportation. The required number of spaces is lower for uses that do not tend to attract bicycle riders 221
and higher for those that do. Additionally, some bicycle parking is required on the basis of specifically encouraging employee, 222
student or customer related bicycle use. The following standards ensure that bicycle parking is convenient to the cyclist in its 223
location and provides sufficient security from theft and damage. Long-term bicycle parking space requirements accommodate 224
employees, commuters, students, residents and other persons who expect to leave their bicycles for more than 2 hours. 225
Short-term bicycle parking spaces accommodate visitors, customers, messengers, and other persons expected to depart 226
within approximately 2 hours. 227
228
B. Unless exempted elsewhere in this Code, all development shall comply with the bicycle parking provisions of this Section. 229
230
4.6-145 Bicycle Parking—Facility Design 231
232
A. The required minimum number of bicycle parking spaces for each principal use is 3 spaces. Specific requirements per use are 233
given in Section 4.6-155. Additional bicycle parking spaces may be required at common use areas. Fractional numbers of 234
spaces shall be rounded up to the next whole space. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be a powder coated 235
staple or inverted-U rack as shown in Figure 4.6-B. Alternatively, the required bicycle parking spaces must fulfill the criteria for 236
quality bicycle parking, which are as follows: 237
238
1. Supports the bicycle frame in a stable position without damage to wheels, frames, or components and provides two 239
points of contact; 240
2. Allows locking of the frame and one or both wheels with a U-lock; 241
3. Is securely anchored to the ground or to a structure; 242
4. Resists cutting, rusting, bending, or deformation, both from natural causes and from human abuse; 243
5. Powder coated or durable, non-scratching surface; and 244
6. Works well for a variety of bicycle frame types (e.g. should work for step-through frame as well as diamond frame, 245
children’s bicycles as well as adult bicycles, recumbent as well as other styles of adaptive bicycles). 246
247
Exhibit A, Page 60 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 61
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
B. Each bicycle parking space shall be at least 2 by 6 feet with an overhead clearance of 7 feet, and with a 5-foot access aisle 248
beside or between each row of bicycle parking, and between parked bicycles and a wall or structure (the dimensions for 249
commonly used bicycle racks are shown in Figure 4.6-B.). Bicycles may be tipped vertically for storage but not hung above the 250
floor. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be constructed and installed in accordance with Section 4.6-150 and 251
Figures 4.6-B and 4.6-C. Bicycle parking shall must be provided at ground level unless an elevator with clear bicycle wayfinding 252
signage is easily accessible and directs users to an approved bicycle storage area. Each required bicycle parking space shall 253
must be accessible without removing another bicycle. 254
255
C. All required long-term bicycle parking spaces shall must be sheltered from precipitation and include lighting. Short-term 256
bicycle parking is not required to be sheltered. 257
258
D. Short-term bicycle parking must be sheltered as follows: 259
260
1. If 10 or fewer short-term bicycle parking spaces are required, no shelter is required for short-term bicycle parking. 261
262
2. If more than 10 short-term bicycle parking spaces are required, at least 50 percent of the short-term bicycle parking 263
spaces in excess of 10 must be sheltered. 264
265
3. Shelters must have a minimum 7-foot overhead clearance and must completely cover the bicycle parking rack and 266
any bicycles that are parked in the way the rack was designed to be used. 267
268
E. Bicycle parking that accommodates oversized bicycles and alternative bicycle types must be provided as follows: 269
270
1. Each oversized bicycle parking space must provide minimum clear area of 4 feet by 8 feet as shown in Figure 4.6-C. 271
272
2. At least 10% of the long-term bicycle parking spaces for commercial uses and residential uses must be oversized 273
bicycle parking spaces. 274
275
3. At least 10% of the short-term bicycle parking spaces for schools (elementary through high school) must be oversized 276
bicycle parking spaces. 277
278
D. Direct access from bicycle parking spaces to the public right-of-way shall be provided with access ramps, if necessary, and 279
pedestrian access from the bicycle parking area to the building entrance. 280
281
Figure 4.6-B 282
Exhibit A, Page 61 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 62
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
283
284
285
286
Exhibit A, Page 62 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 63
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
287
Exhibit A, Page 63 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 64
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
288
289
Figure 4.6-C 290
Exhibit A, Page 64 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 65
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
291
Exhibit A, Page 65 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 66
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
292
293
********** 294
295
Staff Commentary: The following section proposes establishing requirements for rack type that align with current high quality 296
standards for bicycle racks. 297
298
4.6-150 Bicycle Parking—Facility Improvements 299
300
A. Bicycle Parking Location and Security. 301
302
1. Bicycle parking shall consist of a securely fixed structure that supports the bicycle frame in a stable position without 303
damage to wheels, frames or components and that allow the frame and both wheels to be locked to the rack by the 304
bicyclist's own locking device; and be provided within a convenient distance of, and clearly visible from, the main 305
entrance to the building or point of entry to the use as determined by the City. Bicycle parking racks, shelters, or 306
lockers shall must be securely anchored to the ground or to a structure. 307
308
2. Exterior long-term bicycle parking must be located within 200 feet from the main building entrance, primary point of 309
entry to the use, or employee entrance. 310
311
3. Exterior short-term bicycle parking must: 312
313
a. Be located no further than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the 314
use, as determined by the City, but not further away than the closest on-site automobile parking space 315
excluding designated accessible parking spaces, whichever distance is less; and 316
b. Be clearly visible from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the use. 317
318
42. Bicycle parking shall be separated from motor vehicle parking by a barrier, curb, or sufficient distance to prevent 319
damage to parked bicycles. 320
321
53. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way, signs shall be 322
provided to direct bicyclists to the parking. Directions to sheltered facilities inside a structure may be signed or 323
supplied by the employer, as appropriate. Short-term parking shall be made available to the general public. 324
325
64. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor, which has an outdoor entrance open for use, and which 326
does not require stairs to access the space.; 327
Exhibit A, Page 66 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 67
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
328
EXCEPTION: The Director may allow bicycle parking on upper stories within multi-story residential buildings. 329
330
75. Bicycle parking and bicycle racks shall must be located to avoid conflict with pedestrian movement and access. Direct 331
access from bicycle parking spaces to the public right-of-way must be provided by at-grade or ramp access. Pedestrian access 332
must be provided from the bicycle parking area to the building entrance. Bicycle parking may be located in the public sidewalk 333
or right-of-way where there is a minimum 5 feet between the parked bicycle and the storefront and does not conflict with 334
pedestrian accessibility. 335
86. For multifamily dwellings with required bike parking, requirements may be met through the provision of individual 336
garages or storage units. For housing relying on a common garage and without storage units, bicycle racks shall be provided in 337
the garage. 338
339
B. Businesses Employers with changing rooms and shower facilities or other additional amenities that encourage bicycling or 340
other alternative modes of transportation by employees or patrons may be eligible for a 10 percent reduction of 341
Transportation System Development Charges if the Director determines that those facilities encourage bicycling or 342
other alternative active modes of transportation by employees or patrons if the City Engineer determined a decrease in 343
vehicle trips will result. 344
345
Figure 4.6-B 346
Exhibit A, Page 67 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 68
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
347
348
********** 349
Exhibit A, Page 68 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 69
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
350
Staff Commentary: The following table is intended to entirely replace existing Table 4.6-3 in order to make it more concise. 351
The existing table 4.6-3 is shown in strikethrough, highlighted formatting. Below the existing strikethrough table, the 352
proposed table started with the recommendations from the Regional Bike Parking Study and then was further revised 353
through input from the Stakeholder Sounding Board and Planning Commissions. 354
355
4.6-155 Bicycle Parking—Number of Spaces Required 356
357
A. The required minimum number of bicycle parking spaces for each principal use is four (4) spaces, unless otherwise specified in 358
Table 4.6-3. Additional bicycle parking spaces may be required at common use areas. When the number of required spaces 359
results in a fractional number, the total number of required spaces will be rounded up to the next whole number. When 360
application of the long and short term bicycle parking percentages results in a fractional number of long and short term 361
spaces, the number of long term spaces required will be rounded up to the next whole number; the remaining number of 362
required spaces will be designated as short term bicycle parking. 363
364
B. The following parking standards have been established according to land use and apply to that use in any zoning district. 365
366
Table 4.6-3 367
368
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
Residential Uses
Tri-plexes, 4-plexes, and multifamily (3 or
more dwellings on same lot/parcel)
1 per dwelling unit 100% long term
Manufactured dwelling park 1 per 400 square feet for common use
buildings
N.A.
Day care centers where 13 people or more are
served
1 per 10 employees 100% long term
Group care facilities with 6 or more people
living at the facility
1 per 10 employees N.A.
Exhibit A, Page 69 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 70
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
Transient accommodations
Bed and breakfast facilities 1 per 10 guest bedrooms. 100% long term
Bedroom, boarding and rooming houses 1 per guest room. 100% long term
Emergency shelter homes/homeless shelters 1 per 10 beds. 75% long term
25% short term
Campus living organizations, including
fraternities and sororities
1 for each 2 occupants for which sleeping
facilities are provided.
100% long term
University and college dormitories 1 for each 2 occupants for which sleeping
facilities are provided.
100% long term
Commercial Uses
Agricultural and animal sales and service 1 per each 4000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Amusement centers (including, but not
limited to: arcades, pool tables, bowling
alleys)
1 per each 1000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Arenas (indoor and outdoor) 1 per 20 seats. 25% long term
75% short term
Artists galleries/studios 1 per each 500 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Athletic facilities and sports clubs
Viewing areas 1 per each 280 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
Exhibit A, Page 70 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 71
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
75% short term
Locker rooms, saunas whirlpools, weight
rooms, or gymnasiums
1 per each 750 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Lounge or snack bar areas 1 per each 600 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Pro shops or sales areas 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Playing courts 10% of auto spaces (minimum of 4). 25% long term
75% short term
Swimming pools 1 per each 2000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Automotive, marine, appliance, service and
repair
1 per each 6000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Automotive parts stores 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Ballet, dance, and gymnastic
schools/academies/studios
1 per each 400 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Banks, savings and loan offices, credit unions 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Business and professional offices and 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
Exhibit A, Page 71 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 72
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
services, personal services (except as noted
below)
75% short term
Barber, beauty, nail, tanning shops, and self-
service laundromats
1 per each 2000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Convenience stores, liquor stores, general
merchandise stores, including supermarkets,
department stores, and specialty stores
(computer, gift, or video, for example)
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Eating and drinking establishments 1 per each 600 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Equipment, heavy and light,
rental/sales/service. Includes truck and tractor
sales
1 per each 4000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Furniture and home furnishing stores,
hardware/home improvement stores,
including building material and supplies
1 per each 6000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Garden supply/nurseries, including fee and
seed stores
1 per each 6000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Hotels, motels, youth hostels, and similar
businesses providing overnight
accommodations
1 per 10 guest bedrooms. 25% long term
75% short term
Manufactured dwelling Sales/service/repair 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Motor vehicle and tire sales, service stations, 1 per each 6000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Exhibit A, Page 72 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 73
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
including quick servicing
Mortuaries and cemeteries 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Office or medical equipment and supplies 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Photographer’s studios, picture framing and
glazing
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Public utility facilities not containing
employees in commercial districts
Recreational vehicles and heavy truck sales,
service, and repair
1 per each 4000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Shopping centers and malls 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Theaters, live entertainment and motion
picture
1 per 40 seats. 25% long term
75% short term
Transportation facilities 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 75% long term
25% short term
Warehouse commercial sales, regional
distribution center
1 per each 6000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Industrial Uses
Agricultural, resource production and 1 per each 600 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Exhibit A, Page 73 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 74
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
extraction
Manufacture and assembly 1 per 3000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Retail trade when secondary, directly related,
and limited to products manufactured,
repaired, or assembled on the development
site
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Education
Universities or colleges, schools, business or
specialized educational training
1 per 5 full-time students 25% long term
75% short term
Schools, driving (including use of motor
vehicles)
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Schools, public or private (elementary through
high school)
1 per 8 students. 25% long term
75% short term
Universities or colleges 1 per 5 full-time students. 25% long term
75% short term
Government
Libraries 1 per each 1500 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Museum 1 per each 500 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Exhibit A, Page 74 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 75
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
Government services, not specifically listed in
this or any other uses and permits table
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Correctional facilities, excluding residential
treatment centers
1 per 20 beds. 25% long term
75% short term
Medical and Health Services
Blood banks 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Hospitals, clinics, or other medical health
treatment facilities (including mental health)
in excess of 10,000 square feet of floor area
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Laboratories--medical, dental, x-ray. 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Nursing homes, plasma center, residential
treatment centers.
1 per 15 beds 75% long term
25% short term
Veterinary and wildlife care centers 1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area 100% short term
Other uses
Civic, social, fraternal organizations, including
clubs and lodges of national organization
1 per each 3000 square feet of floor area. 100% short term
Community and neighborhood centers 1 per each 1000 square feet of floor area. 25% long term
75% short term
Park, community or regional Minimum of 4 plus additional spaces if the 100% short term
park is developed with the following
Exhibit A, Page 75 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 76
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Land Use Minimum Parking Requirements (Minimum 3
spaces required)
Type and % of Bike Parking
improvements:
Playing court: 2 spaces
Picnic Shelter: 2 spaces
Playground: 2 spaces
Athletic/Playing Field: 4 spaces
Skateboard Park: 2 spaces
Restroom: 2 spaces
Parking garages 10% of auto spaces. 100% long term
Race tracks, including drag strips and go-cart
tracks
1 per 40 seats. 25% long term
75% short term
Religious, social and public institutions 1 per 40 fixed seats or 60 feet of bench length
or every 200 square feet where no permanent
seats or benches are maintained in main
auditorium (sanctuary or place of worship).
100% short term
Transit park and ride, transit station Minimum 10 spaces, 10% of auto spaces,
whichever is greater.
25% long term
75% short term
369
Table 4.6-3 Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces 370
371
Use Category Specific Uses Number of Required Spaces
Long and Short Term
Bicycle Parking
Percentages
Residential Single-family and duplexes 0 N/A
Triplex, four-plex, and multi-
family
1 per dwelling unit 75% long term
25% short term
Exhibit A, Page 76 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 77
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Dormitories 1 space per every 3 occupants 50% long term
50% short term
Assisted care and day cares 1 per 5 employees 75% long term
25% short term
Other Residential Uses 1 per dwelling unit 50% long term
50% short term
Commercial General Retail 1 per 3000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Eating and Drinking
Establishments
1 per 600 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Service Establishments 1 per 2000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Art Institution/Gallery 1 per 1500 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Drive-through Only
Establishments
2 for employee parking (minimum of 4 does
not apply)
100% long term
Lodging 1 per 10 rentable rooms 75% long term
25% short term
Office, including Medical Offices
and Clinics
0.75 per 5000 square feet of floor area 75% long term
25% short term
Industrial and Wholesale 0.25 per employee OR 1 per 4000 square feet
of floor area, whichever is less
75% long term
25% short term
Institutional Government related uses 1 per 3000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Schools (elementary through
high school)
1 per 10 students based on planned capacity 25% long term
75% short term
Parks and playgrounds 8 per park or playground 100% short term
Recreation, Amusement, and
Entertainment Facilities
1 per 1000 square feet of floor area 25% long term
75% short term
Universities/Colleges 1 per 5 full time students 25% long term
75% short term
Hospitals and Medical Centers 1 per 3000 square feet of floor area 75% long term
25% short term
Religious Institutions and Places
of Worship
1 per 20 seats or 40 feet of bench length (fixed
seating) or 1 per 500 square feet of floor area
(no fixed seating)
100% short term
Transportation-
Related
Structured Parking 10% of the number of vehicle parking spaces
provided
75% long term
25% short term
Exhibit A, Page 77 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 78
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Transit Station 10% of the number of vehicle parking spaces
provided (if no vehicle parking is provided, the
minimum of 4 applies)
50% long term
50% short term
Transit Park & Ride 10% of the number of vehicle parking spaces
provided
50% long term
50% short term
372
Exhibit A, Page 78 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 79
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
373
********** 374
Exhibit A, Page 79 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 80
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Staff Commentary: Changes to Section 3.4-270 are intended to align the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District 375
Bike Parking standards with the proposed changes to the general bike parking Section 4.6-150. 376
377
Section 3.4-200 GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MIXED-USE PLAN DISTRICT 378
379
3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards 380
381
********** 382
G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards. 383
384
13. Bicycle Parking. Safe and convenient bicycle parking shall be provided for residents, visitors, employees and patrons. 385
In mixed-use developments, the required bicycle parking for each use shall be provided. Required off-street bicycle 386
parking spaces shall be as specified in Table 3.4-2. The requirements in Table 3.4-2 supersede any conflicting 387
requirements in Section 4.6-155. The required minimum number of parking spaces for each listed use is 4 spaces. 388
389
Bicycle Parking Standards Table 3.4-2 390
Use Category Use Sub-Category Number of Required Spaces Long and Short Term Bicycle Parking
Percentages
Commercial Eating and Drinking
Establishments 1 per 600 sq. ft. of floor area 25% long term 75% short term
Hospitality 1 per 20 rentable rooms 75% long term 25% short term
Personal Services 1 per 2000 sq. ft. of floor area 25% long term 75% short term
Professional, Scientific and
Technical Services 1 per 3000 sq. ft. of floor area 75% long term 25% short term
Retail Sales and Services 1 per 3000 sq. ft. of floor area 25% long term 75% short term
Employment Office Employment 1 per 3000 sq. ft. of floor area 75% long term 25% short term
Light Manufacturing 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area 75% long term 25% short term
Light Manufacturing Storage 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area 75% long term 25% short term
Warehousing 1 per 40,000 sq. ft. of floor area 75% long term 25% short term
Exhibit A, Page 80 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 81
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Recreation
Park Blocks or Riverfront
Linear Park Recreational
Facilities
8 per each park block and 4 per each
mile of riverfront linear park 100% short term
Residential Senior and Congregate Care 1 per 4 rooms 75% long term 25% short term
Dormitories 1 per every 3 beds 75% long term 25% short term
High-Density Residential
Housing 1 per 2 dwelling units 75% long term 25% short term
Vehicle Related Uses Structured Parking Public or
Private
5% of the number of vehicle spaces
provided or 105% of the demand 75% long term 25% short term
391
14. Bicycle Parking Design, Location and Security. 392
393
a. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be constructed and installed in accordance with Sections 394
4.6-145 and 4.6-150. Long term bicycle parking required in association with a commercial or employment 395
use shall be provided in a well-lighted, secure location within a convenient distance of a main entrance and 396
any secondary entrance. A secure location is defined as one in which the bicycle parking is a bicycle locker, a 397
lockable bicycle enclosure, or provided within a lockable room. 398
399
b. Long term bicycle parking provided in outdoor locations shall not be farther away than the closest on-site 400
automobile parking space, excluding designated accessible parking spaces. 401
402
c. Long term bicycle parking required in association with high-density residential use shall be provided in a 403
well-lighted, secure ground-level or underground location within a convenient distance of an entrance to the 404
residential unit. A secure location is defined as one in which the bicycle parking is provided outside the 405
residential unit within a protected garage, a lockable room, a lockable bicycle enclosure, or a bicycle locker. 406
407
d. Short term bicycle parking shall consist of a securely fixed structure that supports the bicycle frame in a 408
stable position without damage to wheels, frame, or components and that allows the frame and both 409
wheels to be attached to the rack by the bicyclist’s own locking device. Innovative bicycle racks that 410
incorporate street art shall be encouraged. Short term bicycle parking shall be provided within a convenient 411
distance of and clearly visible from, the main entrance and/or any secondary entrance to the building, but it 412
shall not be farther away than the closest on-site automobile parking space, excluding designated accessible 413
parking spaces. 414
415
********** 416
Exhibit A, Page 81 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 82
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Staff Commentary: The Springfield and Lane County Planning Commissions recommended approval of adding language 417
to SDC 4.7-195A.8. to increase convenience and safety of people walking and biking within school sites. The Planning 418
Commission and Stakeholder Sounding Board felt that it was appropriate to require the additional design requirements 419
where students will be frequent users. The section below was moved from the “Housekeeping changes” section of the 420
document to this new location due to the nature of the proposed amendments. 421
422
Section 4.7-100 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 423
424
425
4.7-195 Public/Private Elementary/Middle Schools 426
427
A. Schools are identified in the Metro Plan or Springfield Comprehensive Plan as key urban services, which shall be provided in 428
an efficient and logical manner to keep pace with demand. Schools may be located in any zone that permits schools. A unique 429
relationship exists between schools and the community, which requires special consideration when applying screening 430
standards. Maintaining clear sight lines for the security and safety of children is desirable and may be achieved through the 431
use of non-opaque fencing and/or landscaping. The standards in Section 5.17-100 are applied only when required to screen 432
playground structures, spectator seating facilities, parking, storage yards and trash receptacles or where significant conflicts 433
are determined by the Director. 434
435
1. All new facilities and additions over 10,000 square feet or those additions exceeding 50 percent of the size of the 436
existing building shall be approved in accordance with a Type Ill review procedure (a Type II Site Plan application 437
raised to a Type Ill review as specified in Section 5.1-130). The Site Plan application shall also address the standards 438
specified in Subsections 2. through 11., below. 439
440
EXCEPTION: Public/Private Elementary/ Middle Schools in the PLO District are reviewed under Type II Review. 441
442
2. A maximum of 65 percent of the site may be covered in impervious surface. The remainder of the site shall comply 443
with the planting standards in Section 4.4-100. 444
445
3. Schools shall have a landscaped front yard of 20 feet and landscaped side and rear yards of 30 feet. Athletic spectator 446
seating structures adjoining residential uses shall be set back at least 75 feet, unless the Director determines that 447
adequate buffering can be provided with a reduced setback. However, in no instance shall this setback (from 448
spectator facilities) be less than 30 feet. Parking areas shall maintain a landscaped buffer of 15 feet when adjoining a 449
residential use. 450
451
4. Light shall be directed away from adjoining less intensive uses. 452
453
Exhibit A, Page 82 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 83
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
5. Other uses permitted within school facilities include day care facilities, social service offices or other after school 454
program activities approved by the School District and which otherwise do not require discretionary approval. 455
456
6. All plants used for “landscaped buffering” shall be a minimum of 5-gallon in size and shall reach a height of at least 36 457
inches within 1 year of planting. 458
459
7. Paved playground areas may be used as overflow parking for special events. 460
461
8. Parking is limited to 2 spaces for each teaching station in the school plus 1 parking space for each 100 square feet of 462
public indoor assembly area. All parking lots and driveways shall be designated to separate bus and passenger 463
vehicle traffic. All parking lots shall have sidewalks raised a minimum of 6 inches above grade where pedestrians have 464
to cross parking lots to enter or leave the school grounds. All parking lots must be designed so that a person walking 465
between the bicycle parking facilities and the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the school is not 466
required to cross a driveway, loading space, or other area intended for motor vehicle circulation. The Director may 467
require wider sidewalks at major approaches to schools as deemed necessary for pedestrian safety and capacity. 468
469
9. Any jointly shared recreational facilities, playgrounds or athletic field shall require a joint use agreement that will 470
provide for public use and continued maintenance. 471
472
10. Elementary schools shall have a maximum building height of 35 feet, middle schools shall have a maximum building 473
height of 45 feet. 474
475
11. A Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study, prepared by a Transportation Engineer, shall be approved by the City 476
Engineer. 477
478
B. In the PLO District, public/private elementary/ middle schools shall be adjacent to residentially-zoned property. 479
480
********** 481
482
Staff Commentary: Definitions for “block,” “block length,” and “block perimeter” are added based on the proposed 483
amendments to SDC 4.2-115, establishing new maximum block perimeters. Although a maximum block length is already 484
included in the 4.2-115, the term “block length” is not currently defined in the development code. The definition for a 485
“block” is proposed to be amended to provide better clarity. The new definition for Frequent Transit Corridor relates to 486
TSP Policy 3.8, Action 3, and to changes in parking requirements and allowed reductions proposed for SDC 4.6-110 and 487
4.6-125. The revised definition for “vision clearance area” reflects that a vision clearance area may not always be a 488
triangular area, and adds that vision clearance areas are also required for driveway/street intersections. If the proposed 489
Exhibit A, Page 83 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 84
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
changes are impmlemented, the term “bikeway” no longer will appear in the Springfield Development Code, and 490
therefore the definition should be removed. 491
492
Section 6.1-100 Definitions 493
494
6.1-110 Meaning of Specific Words and Terms 495
496
AASHTO. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 497
498
Bikeway. Any street, path or way which in some manner is specifically designated for bicycle travel, regardless of whether the facilities 499
are designated for the exclusive use of bicycles or are to be shared with other transportation modes. 500
Block. An area of land containing one or more lots/parcels surrounded by public or private streets, railroad and/or un-subdivided 501
acreage. 502
Block Length. The distance along a public or private street between the centerline of two intersecting streets, including “T” 503
intersections but excluding cul-de-sacs. 504
505
Block Perimeter. The sum of all block lengths for a given block, also measured as the distance to travel once completely around the 506
block, ending at the starting point as measured from the centerline of the street. 507
Development Services and Public Works Department. The department responsible for the administration of this Code and the 508
implementation of the Metro Plan within Springfield’s Urban Growth Boundary. 509
510
Director. The Development Services and Public Work Director or the duly authorized representative who is responsible for the 511
administration and interpretation of this Code. 512
513
Frequent Transit Corridor. Arterial and collector roadways forming a Frequent Transit Network, as identified in the adopted 514
Springfield Transportation System Plan, representing the highest order of transit service along major thoroughfares within the city. 515
Characteristics of Frequent Transit Network corridors include, but are not limited to: 10-15 minute transit frequency during peak travel 516
times, a well-connected street and transit network providing circulation integrated with pedestrian and bicycle connections, support 517
and compatibility with urban design goals for development along the corridors, geographically equitable coverage serving populations 518
protected by Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and high-quality transit station amenities. 519
Future Development Plan. A line drawing (required for some land division proposals, or building permits in the City’s urbanizable area) 520
that includes the following information: the location of future right-of-way dedications based on TransPlan the Springfield 521
Transportation System Plan, the Conceptual Local Street Plan Map; or block length and lot/parcel size standards of the SDC; a re-522
division plan at a minimum urban density established in this Code based on the existing Metro Plan designation of the property for any 523
Exhibit A, Page 84 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 85
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
lot/parcel that is large enough to further divide; and the location of hillsides, riparian areas, drainage ways, jurisdictional wetlands and 524
wooded areas showing how future development will address preservation, protection or removal. 525
526
Neighborhood Acitivity Center. Any public park or recreation facility, public or private school, government service, commercially 527
zoned property, or mixed-use zoned property. 528
529
Public Works Director. The Director of Public Works or a duly authorized representative. The City Engineer, the Environmental Services 530
Manager and the Transportation Manager routinely serve as representatives of the Public Works Director. 531
532
Linear Park. A public or private park that provides public access to trail-oriented activities, which may include walking, running, biking, 533
or skating, and preserves open space. A linear park consists of a multi-use path, pedestrian trail, or bikeway, and related facilities. 534
535
Vision Clearance Area. A triangular shaped portion of land established at street, alley, or driveway intersections or driveways in which 536
nothing over 2 1/2 feet is erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow to may obstruct the sight distance of motorists entering or 537
leaving the intersection, unless specifically exempted by this Code. 538
********** 539
540
541
Exhibit A, Page 85 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 86
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
5. Proposed Changes to Various Standards for Code Administration (SDC Chapters 3, 4, and 5) 542
543
Relevant TSP Policies/Actions: 544
Policy 3.3: Street design standards should be flexible and allow appropriate-sized local, collector, and arterial streets based upon 545
traffic flow, geography, efficient land use, social, economic and environmental impacts. 546
Action 1: Conduct a comprehensive review and update of Springfield street standards, and develop code to 547
address transportation system deficiencies, adopted goals, and policies. 548
Action 2: Consider effects of stormwater runoff in street design and reduce runoff through environmentally 549
sensitive street designs for new and reconstructed streets. 550
Policy 3.4: Provide for a continuous transportation network with reasonably direct travel routes to destination points for all modes 551
of travel. 552
553
Staff Commentary: The following Code revisions are proposed to address ambiguity in the existing Code, to help clarify application 554
of Code standards, and/or to reconcile site-related development standards with street design standard modifications 555
called for in TSP Policy 3.3 and in Policy 3.3 Actions 1 and 2, and Policy 3.4. 556
The new text proposed in SDC 3.2-220A.6. provides a maximum length for a panhandle driveway where none exists 557
currently in Code. Absent having any standard, panhandle driveway lengths can meet or exceed the minimum block 558
length for public streets and maximum length for dead end streets. Establishing a maximum driveway length for new 559
panhandle lots ensures suitable fire access, and encourages connectivity and enhances pedestrian access. 560
561
3.2-220 Additional Panhandle Lot/Parcel Development Standards 562
563
A. Special provisions for lots/parcels with panhandle driveways: 564
565
1. Panhandle driveways are permitted where dedication of public right-of-way is impractical or to comply with the 566
density standards in the applicable zoning district. Panhandle driveways shall not be permitted in lieu of a public 567
street, as determined by the Director. 568
569
2. Panhandle driveways shall not encroach upon or cross a watercourse, other body of water or other topographic 570
feature unless approved by the Director and the City Engineer. 571
572
3. The area of the pan portion does not include the area in the “panhandle” driveway. 573
574
Exhibit A, Page 86 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 87
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
4. No more than 4 lots/parcels or 8 dwelling units shall take primary access from 1 multiple panhandle driveway. 575
576
5. The paving standards for panhandle driveways are: 577
578
a. Twelve feet wide for a single panhandle driveway from the front property line to a distance of 18 feet, 579
where there is an unimproved street; and from the front property line to the pan of the rear lot/parcel, 580
where there is an improved street; and 581
b. Eighteen feet wide for a multiple panhandle driveway from the front property line to the pan of the last 582
lot/parcel. This latter standard takes precedence over the driveway width standard for multiple-family 583
driveways specified in Table 4.2-2. 584
585
6. New panhandle driveways must not exceed 250 feet in length as measured from the front property line to the pan of the 586
rear lot/parcel. 587
588
589
B. The Director may waive the requirement that buildable lots/parcels have frontage on a public street when access 590
has been guaranteed via a private street, or driveway with an irrevocable joint use/access easement as specified in 591
Section 4.2-120A. In the residential districts, when a proposed land division includes single or multiple panhandle 592
lots/parcels and the front lot/parcel contains an existing primary or secondary structure, the Director may allow an 593
irrevocable joint use/access easement in lieu of the panhandles when there is not enough area to meet both the 594
applicable panhandle street frontage standard and the required 5-foot wide side yard setback standard for the 595
existing structure. In this case, the irrevocable access easement width standard shall be: 596
597
1. Fourteen feet wide for a single panhandle lot/parcel in the LDR District. 598
599
2. Twenty feet wide for a single panhandle in the MDR and HDR District, or where multiple panhandles are 600
proposed in any residential district. 601
602
603
********** 604
605
Staff Commentary: Changes to SDC 4.7-140 and SDC 5.12-120 relate to the review of City standards called for in Policy 3.3, 606
Action 1. These changes more clearly link new residential driveway siting and lot layout with safety-based roadway 607
standards for minimum driveway separation and location. Other housekeeping text amendments are also included below. 608
609
4.7-140 Siting Duplexes in All Residential Districts 610
611
Exhibit A, Page 87 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 88
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
A. New Duplexes in the LDR and SLR Districts. A single duplex may be located on corner lots/parcels as specified in Section 3.2-612
215. The design standards specified in Section 4.7-142 shall only apply to duplexes in the SLR District. Corner lots/parcels 613
proposed for new duplexes must demonstrate that lot/parcel configuration, lot/parcel size, driveway locations, and driveway 614
distances from street intersections are adequate to ensure traffic and pedestrian safety. 615
616
B. Pre-existing Duplexes in the LDR District. Prior to the adoption of this Code: 617
618
1. Duplexes on interior lots/parcels approved as part of a Planned Unit Development shall not be considered to be 619
nonconforming uses. 620
621
2. Duplexes on interior lots/parcels approved on property previously zoned RG Residential Garden (RG) Apartments 622
shall not be considered to be a nonconforming use. 623
624
3. Duplexes on interior lots/parcels that meet the density requirements of this zoning district shall not be considered a 625
nonconforming use. 626
627
C. New Duplexes in the MDR and HDR Districts. 628
629
1. A single duplex shall be permitted on corner lots/parcels as specified in Section 3.2-210. The design standards of 630
Section 4.7-142 shall apply to this category of duplexes. 631
632
2. Where more than 1 duplex is proposed on lots/parcels that are less than 1/2 acre in size and the minimum MDR or 633
HDR density standard for the entire development area can be met, the design standards specified in Section 4.7-142 634
shall apply to this category of duplexes. 635
636
3. Where more than 1 duplex is proposed on lots/parcels that are 1/2 acre or more and the minimum MDR or HDR 637
density standard for the entire development area can be met, the multifamily design standards specified in Section 638
3.2-240 shall apply to this category of duplexes. 639
640
D. Partitioning Corner Duplex Lots. A proposed or existing duplex on a corner lot/parcel in any residential district may be 641
partitioned for the purpose of allowing independent ownership of each dwelling unit, providing the 2 platted parcels meet the 642
minimum area standards for corner duplex parcels specified in Section 3.2-215 and the minimum separation of driveways 643
from the nearest street intersection as specified in Section 4.2-120, Table 4.2-4. In this case, the partition shall meet the land 644
division standards specified in Section 5.12-100 and the following: 645
646
1. Utility service to each unit shall be separate. 647
648
2. All walls connecting abutting units shall be fire resistive walls as specified in the Oregon Residential Specialty Code. 649
Exhibit A, Page 88 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 89
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
650
3. The property line separating the 2 units shall have not more than 2 angle points. The angle points shall not occur 651
within the wall between abutting units. 652
653
********** 654
655
5.12-100 Land Divisions – Partitions and Subdivisions 656
657
5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements 658
659
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are being fulfilled. 660
661
EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Pre-662
Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of a future development application. 663
664
A. General Requirements. 665
666
1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed 667
Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18” x 24”. The services of an Oregon Licensed Professional Engineer 668
may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design 669
and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. 670
671
2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally 672
673
674
3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. 675
676
4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the 677
Partition Tentative Plan. 678
679
5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or subdivider of which the proposed land 680
division is a part. 681
682
6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-683
way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. 684
685
Exhibit A, Page 89 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 90
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 686
feet of the boundary of the subject property. 687
688
8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions 689
of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. 690
691
9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and 692
their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. 693
694
10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to 695
the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, 696
gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. 697
698
11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division; 699
the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. 700
701
12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the 702
reservations clearly indicated. 703
704
B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape 705
Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at 1-foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps 706
and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director 707
may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact 708
on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties 709
may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. 710
711
1. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water 712
Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQWWQLW) Map on file in the Development Services and Public Works 713
Department; 714
715
2. The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood 716
Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; 717
718
3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on 719
file in the Development Services and Public Works Department; 720
721
Exhibit A, Page 90 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 91
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on 722
the (WLQWWQLW) Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; 723
724
5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane Count; and 725
726
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117. 727
728
C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1-foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely 729
maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or more, contours 730
may be shown at 5-foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. 731
Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon lLicensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. 732
Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also 733
be required. The plan shall include the following components: 734
735
1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; 736
737
2. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; 738
739
3. The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, 740
catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be 741
retained; 742
743
4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours; and 744
745
5. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in Section 4.3-746
110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and documentation shall be 747
consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the 748
proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes. 749
750
D. A Response response to Transportation transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code. 751
1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and names of 752
all existing streets, alleys, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed land division; 753
754
2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of 755
curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan or 756
Exhibit A, Page 91 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 92
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
Springfield Comprehensive Plan, including the TransPlan Springfield Transportation System Plan, any approved 757
Conceptual Development Plan and the latest version of the Conceptual Local Street Map; 758
759
3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails multi-use paths, and accessways, 760
including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip; 761
762
4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood 763
mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable; 764
765
5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways demonstrating conformance with lot or parcel 766
dimensions and frontage requirements for single-family and duplex lots/parcels established in Section 3.2-215, and 767
driveway width and separation specifications established in Section 4.2-120, where applicable; 768
769
6. The location of existing and proposed street trees, associated utilities along street frontage(s), and street lighting: 770
including the type, height and area of illumination; 771
772
7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities; 773
774
8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of 775
Transportation (ODOT) facility; and 776
777
9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in Section 4.2-778
105A.4. 779
780
E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are 781
proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: 782
783
1. Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel dimensions and sequencing of each proposed 784
redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan showing building footprints for compliance with the 785
minimum residential densities specified in Section 3.2-205. 786
787
2. Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based upon compliance 788
with TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan, the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable 789
Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, Conceptual Development Plans, or the Conceptual Local Street Map 790
and this Code; 791
792
Exhibit A, Page 92 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 93
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
3. Accommodates other required public improvements, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater 793
management, water and electricity; 794
795
4. Addresses physical features, including, but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses 796
shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock 797
outcroppings and historic features; and 798
799
5. Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing. 800
801
802
F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the 803
following items, where applicable: 804
805
1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property; 806
807
2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; 808
809
3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and other 810
transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or 811
Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division; 812
4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district; 813
814
5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable; 815
816
6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100; 817
818
7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required 819
Site Assessment in Section 5.12-120B. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water 820
table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; 821
822
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7-100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits 823
but within City’s urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer; 824
825
9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a 826
wetland on the property; 827
828
Exhibit A, Page 93 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 94
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently; 829
830
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of 831
financing; 832
833
12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner’s Association Agreement, where appropriate; 834
835
13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2-230; 836
837
14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive 838
certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the 839
applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-125. 840
********** 841
842
843
Exhibit A, Page 94 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 95
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
7. Other Proposed Code Housekeeping Changes 844
845
Staff Commentary: The following amendments to the Code are principally for housekeeping purposes, and proposed in addition to 846
certain housekeeping changes proposed above with more substantive Code amendments implementing TSP policies. The 847
proposed changes help standardize terminology (e.g., current Code has numerous variations in referring to the 848
Conceptual Street Map), address out-of-date references (e.g., department and Director citations below reflect the current 849
Development and Public Works Department naming conventions), correct certain scriveners errors, and update internal 850
cross-references to amended Code provisions. 851
852
3.2-200 Residential Zoning Districts 853
854
3.2-215 Base Zone Development Standards 855
856
(8) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 857
858
********** 859
3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts 860
861
3.2-315 Base Zone Development Standards 862
863
(4) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 864
865
********** 866
3.2-400 Industrial Zoning Districts 867
868
3.2-420 Base Zone Development Standards 869
870
(4) Setback Exceptions: 871
(b) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 872
********** 873
874
875
876
877
878
879
Exhibit A, Page 95 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 96
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
3.2-500 Medical Services Zoning District 880
881
3.2-515 Base Zone Development Standards 882
883
(3) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 884
********** 885
3.2-600 Mixed-Use Zoning Districts 886
887
3.2-615 Base Zone Development Standards 888
889
(4) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 890
********** 891
3.2-700 Public Land and Open Space Zoning District 892
893
3.2-715 Base Zone Development Standards 894
895
(2) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 896
897
3.2-635 Phased Development 898
899
(A) If development is planned to occur in phases, a phased development plan shall be submitted concurrently with the Site Plan 900
application specified in Section 5.17-100. In addition to the phasing requirements specified in Section 5.17-115, the phasing 901
plan shall include the following information: 902
1. Existing buildings and dimensions with distances from property lines and other buildings. 903
2. The location of future right-of-way dedications based on TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan, the adopted 904
City’s Conceptual Local Street Network Plan Map and the block length and size standards specified in Section 3.2-625E. 905
906
********* 907
Section 3.2-900 Agriculture – Urban Holding Area (AG) Zoning District 908
909
3.2-925 Standards for Interim Development 910
911
These regulations apply to the development of interim uses as specified in Subsections 3.2-915 and 3.2.920 in the AG District. 912
913
A. Receive certification from the Lane County Sanitarian that any proposed wastewater disposal system meets Oregon 914
Department of Environmental Quality (D.E.Q.) standards prior to Development Approval. 915
Exhibit A, Page 96 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 97
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
916
B. Interim uses may not be placed on a site in a manner that would impede future development of land designated Urban 917
Holding Area-Employment with urban employment uses. 918
919
C. Interim uses may not be placed on a site in manner that would impede extension of infrastructure to serve land 920
designated Urban Holding Area-Employment from developing with urban employment uses. 921
922
D. To demonstrate compliance with this provision, and in addition to the special provisions listed in Table A, the Applicant 923
shall submit a Future Development Plan that: 924
925
1. Includes a brief narrative explaining the existing and proposed use of the property; 926
927
2. Indicates the proposed development footprint on a scaled plot plan of the property; 928
929
3. Limits the proposed new development footprint to 1/2 acre or less of the site; 930
931
4. Addresses future street connectivity as shown in the Springfield Transportation System Plan, Regional 932
Transportation System Plan, Local Street Network PlanConceptual Street Map, Springfield Comprehensive Plan, 933
applicable Refinement Plans and this Code; 934
935
5. Addresses the number and type of vehicle trips to be generated by the proposed use; 936
937
6. Addresses the applicable Natural Resources protection, Water Quality Limited Watercourses protection, 938
Floodplain Overlay Development Standards, and Drinking Water Protection Overlay Development Standards of this 939
Code. 940
941
E. Development shall utilize the following base zone development standards: 942
943
Minimum Lot/Parcel Sizes A 50-acre minimum lot/parcel size is applied to lots/parcels 50 acres or larger. A 20-
acre minimum lot/parcel size is applied to lots/parcels less than 50 acres in size.
Lots/parcels less than 20 acres in size may not be further divided. (1)
Main Building Height 35 feet
Accessory Building Height 35 feet (2)
Building/Structure Setbacks: UHA-E
designated parcels 20 acres and larger
20 feet from State, County, City roads, streets and local access roads.
Exhibit A, Page 97 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 98
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
At least 100 feet from the adjoining lines of property zoned EFU; and in a location that
does not impede future development of urban employment use or extension of urban
infrastructure as shown in transportation plans, public facilities plans or master plans.
Building/Structure Setbacks: UHA-E
designated parcels smaller than 20 acres
20 feet from State, County, City roads, streets and local access roads.
10 feet from other property lines.
Minimum Lot/Parcel Frontage None
Minimum Lot/Parcel Depth None
944
(1) Exemption: Land divisions that create lots/parcels for the purpose of establishing a Natural Resource or Public/Semi-Public Parks 945
and Open Space designation within the floodway, wetland or riparian resource portions of the site may create lots/parcels less than 946
20 acres within the Natural Resource or Public/Semi-Public Parks and Open Space designation portion of the parent lot/parcel. 947
(2) Water tanks, silos, granaries, barns and similar accessory structures or necessary mechanical appurtenances may exceed the 948
minimum height standard. 949
950
********* 951
952
Section 3.3-1000 Nodal Development Overlay District 953
954
3.3-1005 Purpose, Applicability and Review 955
956
A. Purpose. The Nodal Development (ND) Overlay District is established to work in conjunction with underlying zoning districts to 957
implement transportation-related land use policies found in TransPlan Springfield Transportation System Plan and in the 958
Metro Plan. The ND Overlay District also supports “pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use development” as outlined in the State 959
Transportation Planning Rule. 960
961
962
3.3-1015 Location Standards 963
964
When establishing the location and boundaries of a ND Overlay District, the following criteria shall be considered: 965
966
A. The ND Overlay District shall be applied to the mixed-use centers or “nodes” identified by the City in response to its 967
responsibility under TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan. 968
969
********** 970
971
3.4-200 Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District 972
973
3.4-265 Base Zone Development Standards 974
Exhibit A, Page 98 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 99
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
975
(5) Required setbacks are measured from the special street setback in Section 4.2-105N, where applicable. 976
977
3.4-270 Public and Private Development Standards 978
979
A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks 980
981
1. Public streets, alleys and sidewalks in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement 982
Plan Transportation Chapter and designed and constructed as specified in the Springfield Engineering Design 983
Standards and Procedures Manual. 984
985
2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Plan Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as 986
specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. The following is an overview of the Glenwood Riverfront street network: 987
988
********** 989
B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Plan Policies and 990
Implementation Strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. 991
992
********** 993
C. Lighting 994
995
1. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Plan Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as 996
specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. 997
********** 998
999
D. Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities shall be required: off-street as part of the multi-use path specified in Subsection 3.4-270E.; 1000
on-street; or as part of a mid-block connector. 1001
1002
1. Bicycle facilities in the Glenwood Riverfront shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation 1003
and Open Space Chapters. 1004
1005
2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Plan Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as 1006
specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. 1007
1008
E. Multi-Use Path. The multi-use path shall be part of the riverfront linear park along the entire length of the Willamette River in 1009
the Glenwood Riverfront. The multi-use path shall provide opportunities for active and passive recreation activities, including 1010
Exhibit A, Page 99 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 100
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
but not limited to, walking, jogging, running, cycling, inline skating, and nature watching. The multi-use path shall be located 1011
at the outermost edge of the 75-foot-wide Greenway Setback Line/Riparian Setback to the maximum extent practicable. 1012
1013
1. The multi-use path shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and Open Space Chapters. 1014
1015
2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation Plan and Open Space Chapter policies and implementation 1016
strategies shall be as specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. 1017
1018
********** 1019
G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards. 1020
1021
1. Vehicle/bicycle parking standards shall be as described in the Glenwood Refinement Plan Transportation and the 1022
Housing and Economic Development Chapters. 1023
1024
2. Applicable Glenwood Refinement Plan Vehicle/Bicycle Parking Policies and Implementation Strategies shall be as 1025
specified in Appendix 3 of this Code. 1026
1027
3. Vehicle/bicycle parking and loading standards shall be designed and constructed as specified in this Subsection. 1028
1029
4. Vehicle Parking – General. Adequate vehicle parking shall be provided to support new development and 1030
redevelopment in the Glenwood Riverfront, while minimizing adverse visual, environmental, and financial impacts on 1031
the public. In line with the land use vision for compact development and a walkable, pedestrian-friendly 1032
environment, on-street parking, aboveground and underground off-street parking structures, and parking located 1033
within or under buildings shall be encouraged. Locating and designing all required vehicle parking to minimize the 1034
visibility of parked cars to pedestrians from street frontages and light and noise impacts of parking lots strengthens 1035
the character of the Glenwood Riverfront, reinforces the emphasis on pedestrian, bike, and transit for travel, and 1036
minimizes the potential for vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. The Director may require a parking study to determine 1037
adequacy of parking to support a given use or proposed development, but parking must not exceed the maximum 1038
number of spaces established in Table 3.4-1 except as provided in Section 3.4-270G.8. 1039
1040
********* 1041
4.2-100 Infrastructure Standards – Transportation 1042
1043
4.2-110 Private Streets 1044
1045
A. Private streets are permitted 1046
********** 1047
Exhibit A, Page 100 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 101
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
EXCEPTION: During the Site Plan Review, Partition or Subdivision processes involving private streets, the Public Works 1048
Director may allow 1049
********** 1050
Section 4.7-100 Specific Special Development Standards 1051
1052
4.7-120 Bed and Breakfast Facilities 1053
1054
A. Bed and Breakfast facilities shall may be located on local, collector, or arterial streets. All Bed and Breakfast facilities proposed 1055
to be located on local streets are subject to Discretionary Use approval as specified in Section 5.9-100. 1056
EXCEPTIONS: 1057
1. In the Washburne Historic District, Bed and Breakfast facilities may be located on any classification of street. 1058
1059
2. Outside of the Washburne Historic District, Bed and Breakfast Facilities may be located on local streets. 1060
1061
3. All Bed and Breakfast facilities proposed to be placed on local streets shall require Discretionary Use approval as specified in 1062
Section 5.9-100. 1063
1064
B. The facility shall be owner-occupied. 1065
1066
C. There shall be no more than 4 guest bedrooms. 1067
1068
D. No guest parking is permitted within the front yard setback. Required guest parking shall be screened from public view 1069
1070
E. For structures on the Springfield Historic Inventory, any external modification shall be fully compatible with the original 1071
design. 1072
1073
F. A minimum of 25 percent of the lot/parcel shall be landscaped. 1074
1075
1076
********** 1077
1078
4.7-240 Transportation Facilities-Bus TerminalsTransit Stations, Heliports, and Helistops 1079
1080
Exhibit A, Page 101 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 102
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
New transit stations, hHeliports and helistops shall not be located within 200 feet of any residential district. Noise attenuating barriers 1081
shall be constructed where necessary to mitigate land use conflicts. 1082
New transit stations abutting residential districts may be required to provide noise attenuating barriers. 1083
EXCEPTION: In the BKMU district, transit stations are exempt from the setback requirement. 1084
1085
********** 1086
Section 5.12-100 Land Divisions – Partitions and Subdivisions 1087
1088
5.12-130 Tentative Plan Conditions 1089
1090
A. Dedication of right-of-way and/or utility easements. 1091
1. Right-of-way, when shown in: TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan; transportation elements of 1092
refinement plans; or on the most recent Conceptual Local Street Plan Map; and as specified in Table 4.2-1. 1093
********** 1094
5.17-100 Site Plan Review 1095
1096
5.17-130 Conditions 1097
1098
A. Dedication of right-of-way and/or utility easements. 1099
1. Right-of-way, when shown in: TransPlan the Springfield Transportation System Plan, transportation elements of 1100
refinement plans; or on the most recently adopted Conceptual Local Street Plan Map; and as specified in Table 4.2-1. 1101
********** 1102
1103
5.20-100 Vacations of Rights-of-Way and Easements 1104
1105
5.20-130 Criteria 1106
1107
A. For the Vacation of public utility easements, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. The 1108
application will be approved if the Vacation is found to be consistent with the following criteria: 1109
Exhibit A, Page 102 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 103
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
1110
1. There are no present or future services, facilities, or utilities deemed to be necessary by a utility provider and the 1111
easement is not necessary; or 1112
1113
2. If the utility provider deems the easement to be necessary, public services, facilities, or utilities can be extended in an 1114
orderly and efficient manner in an alternate location. 1115
1116
B. Where the proposed Vacation of public rights-of-way, other city property, or Partition or Subdivision Plats is reviewed under 1117
Type IV procedure, the City Council shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Vacation application. The application 1118
will be approved if the Vacation is found to be consistent with the following approval criteria. 1119
1. The Vacation shall be in conformance with the Metro Plan, TransPlan Springfield Transportation System Plan, the 1120
Conceptual Local Street Map and adopted Functional Plans, and applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District 1121
map, or Conceptual Development Plan. 1122
3. The Vacation shall not conflict with the provisions of Springfield Municipal Code, 1997; and this Code, including but 1123
not limited to, street connectivity standards and block lengths; and 1124
1125
3. There shall be no negative effects on access, traffic circulation, emergency service protection or any other benefit 1126
derived from the public right-of-way, publicly owned land or Partition or Subdivision Plat. 1127
1128
C. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection B., above where the land affected by the proposed Vacation of public right-of-1129
way, other public land as specified in ORS 271.080, or public easement will remain in public ownership and will continue to be 1130
used for a public purpose, the request shall be reviewed under the Type IV procedure. The City Council may approve the 1131
Vacation application if it is found to be consistent with the following criteria: 1132
1133
1. The Vacation was initiated by the City Council pursuant to ORS 271.130(1); 1134
1135
2. Notice has been given pursuant to ORS 271.110(1); 1136
1137
3. Approval of the vacation would be consistent with provision of safe, convenient and reasonably direct routes for 1138
cyclists, pedestrians and vehicles as provided in OAR 660-012-00045(3); 1139
1140
4. Whether a greater public benefit would be obtained from the vacation than from retaining the right of way in its 1141
present status; and 1142
1143
5. Whether provisions have been made to ensure that the vacated property will remain in public ownership. 1144
1145
Exhibit A, Page 103 of 104
8/15/2018 Planning Commission Recommended Code Changes – TSP Code Implementation Project Page 104
Visit project website for more information: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/TSP.htm
********** 1146
Exhibit A, Page 104 of 104