Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 01 19 Memo ODOT Viaduct COMPLETE PC Memo 1_11MEMORANDUM CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DATE OF HEARING: January 11, 2010 TO: Springfield Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL FROM: Mark Metzger, Planner III MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: South Bank Viaduct: Willamette Greenway Development Permit and Site Plan Review ISSUE: The City of Springfield and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) are collaborating on the construction of a bicycle/pedestrian viaduct (South Bank Viaduct) which will allow the existing South Bank Path to continue along the riverfront through Glenwood. At issue is whether the proposed structure complies with Springfield planning policies and site plan design standards. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission conducted a joint hearing with the Lane County Hearings Official on December 7, 2010. A large portion of the viaduct lies outside of the city limits, but within the Springfield UGB, triggering the Hearings Official’s participation. There was an insufficient number of Commissioners present for a quorum. The hearing conducted and was closed. The record left open through December 10 to allow staff to submit revised conditions of approval in response to a request from the Hearings Official and the Commissioners. Attachment 1 contains the proposed amended conditions of approval from staff. The Hearings Official received the staff amended conditions of approval on December 13th and issued his decision on December 15, 2010. He approved of the project with conditions, based on the revised staff conditions found in Attachment 1. His decision is attached as Attachment 2. The Hearing Official’s conditions of approval are found on page 5 of his decision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Willamette Greenway Development Overlay District permit and Site Plan (Tentative) as modified by the conditions of approval issued by the Lane County Hearings Official. While the Commission is not required to follow the decision of the Hearings Official, his decision and conditions of approval are substantively consistent with the recommendations of staff. ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the staff report and attachments submitted with your packet for the December 7th hearing. Members absent from the December 7th hearing should listen to the recording of the hearing provided by the Planning Commission Secretary. The Planning Commission is requested to consider the proposed South Bank Viaduct and approve it, approve it with conditions, or to deny the applications. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Amended Conditions of Approval Prepared by Staff Attachment 2: Lane County Hearings Official Decision Proposed Revisions to the Conditions of Approval for the   South Bank Viaduct Project      Condition of Approval #1:   Lane closures   of Franklin Boulevard should be avoided during the special  events listed in the project’s Traffic Management Plan (TMP), such as the Eugene Marathon, major  University of Oregon sporting events, major holidays, etc.  When lane closure is necessary such  operations shall be performed in consultation with the City of Springfield Traffic Engineer.    Condition of Approval #2:  The currently proposed railing shall be re‐designed to accommodate bicycle  traffic with a suitable rail height and “rub rail” to account for safety concern dealing with bicyclists, and  to conform with the City of Springfield design standards at the time of construction.     Condition of Approval #3: Warning signage or protective devices are needed at these locations to warn  and prevent blunt end collisions by bicyclist using this facility.     Condition of Approval #4: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of  Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed private  vegetative water quality swale shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to  approval of Final Site Inspection; the grassy swale/detention pond shall be fully vegetated with all  vegetation species established prior to City acceptance of the Public Improvement Project.      Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain an interim  erosion control/water quality measure selected from the alternatives found in Section 8A.02.3 through  8A.02.7 of the EDSPM—Temporary and Permanent Seeding , or propose an alternative solution  acceptable to the Public Works Department.      Condition of Approval #5: The details shown for the storm water details do not comply with current City  of Springfield requirements.  The 30 mil black plastic liner under the pipes for the bio‐retention facility  needs to be omitted or replaced by a water‐permeable geotextile liner.  The catchbasin(s) (Mod type  “D” inlets) need to have a 12‐18” sump installed under the outlet pipe as shown on City of Springfield  Standard Specifications 4‐13 and 4‐14.        Attachment 1-1 Attachment 2-1 Attachment 2-2 Attachment 2-3 Attachment 2-4 Attachment 2-5 Attachment 2-6 Attachment 2-7 Attachment 2-8 Attachment 2-9 Attachment 2-10 Attachment 2-11 Attachment 2-12 Attachment 2-13 Attachment 2-14 Attachment 2-15 Attachment 2-16 Attachment 2-17 Attachment 2-18 Attachment 2-19