Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 02 07 AIS CIP Planning Commission Agenda City Hall 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541.726.3610 Online at www.springfield-or.gov Planning Manager: Greg Mott Management Specialist: Brenda Jones 541.726.3610   Planning Commissioners: Johnny Kirschenmann, Chair Greg James, Vice Chair Steve Moe Stacy Salladay Denise Bean Bob Brew Tim Vohs The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA Receiver” for the hearing impaired is available. To arrange for these services, call 541.726.3710. Meetings will end prior to 10:00 p.m. unless extended by a vote of the Planning Commission. All proceedings before the Planning Commission are recorded. February 7, 2012 _____________________________ 6:00 p.m. Work Session Jesse Maine Room ______________________________________ CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE: Chair Kirschenmann ___, Vice Chair James ___, Moe___, Salladay___, Bean ___, Brew___ , and Vohs____,. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION WORK SESSION ITEM(S) 1. 2013-2017 Capital Improvements Program- A Community Reinvestment Plan The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding and construction of City public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The draft of the City of Springfield’s 2013-2017 CIP has been completed by staff and is now being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. Staff will bring the CIP back to the Commission in a Regular Session on February 22, 2012 for final comments and a recommendation to forward the CIP to the City Council. Staff: Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer Ken Vogeney, City Engineer ADJOURNMENT M E M O R A N D U M CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DATE: January 27, 2012 TO: Springfield Planning Commission PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Jeff Paschall, P.E., Supervising Civil Engineer TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program A Community Reinvestment Plan ISSUE The draft of the City of Springfield’s 2013-2017 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been completed by staff and is now being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. Staff will bring the CIP back to the Commission in a regular session on February 22, 2012 for final comments and a recommendation to forward the CIP to the City Council. The City Council will review in March, with final adoption scheduled for March 19, 2012. BACKGROUND The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding and construction of City public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The underlying concept is to program, for future expenditure, all reasonably available sources of revenue. Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities plans, the CIP is also a vehicle to facilitate reconciliation, in the near term, of the competing priorities for scarce capital resources. Last year $1.2 million in federal Surface Transportation Program funding was secured to fund overlaying “A” Street and Thurston Road this coming summer. Also, the Jasper Trunk Sewer extension was divided into several discreet construction phases which allowed the award of a construction contract for phase 1 this past August. In addition, work continues on several rehabilitation and upgrade projects, as well as the stormwater quality projects. The public input process for the CIP began in November when citizens, organizations, and City staff were asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP. Staff reviewed and prioritized the projects, assembling a draft CIP for the Planning Commission review. After the Planning Commission reviews the CIP at work session and the February 22nd regular session, the City Council will review it in a work session on March 5, 2012, and the will hold a public hearing prior to adoption on March 19, 2012. 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Page 1 of 3 2011 - 2015 Capital Improvements Program Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION The 2013-2017 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages of planning, design, and construction. In addition, the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding identified. These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods, providing for economic growth, improving traffic safety, mobility and access, complying with environmental standards, and maintaining the existing city infrastructure. The following is a list of the most significant projects in the CIP and currently budgeted: Jasper Trunk Sewer Extension – The Jasper Trunk Sewer Extension will provide sewer service to the Jasper/Natron urban growth area that is currently not serviced. The City Council has made this a priority project to promote development and community growth. In FY 2012 the project was divided into four separate construction contracts and construction on the first phase began. Construction of the first phase allowed for the decommissioning of the Lucerne Meadows Pump Station, which was due for major upgrades. Construction of the second phase is anticipated in FY 2013 and will allow for the decommissioning of two additional pump stations. Funding for the project was secured through the issuance of revenue bonds in 2009. Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement – This program is an on-going series of construction projects to address capacity problems in the wastewater system. Resolving these capacity problems is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with Federal and State requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). By the end of FY 2010 the most urgent construction projects identified in WWFMP in Springfield had been completed. These projects had been identified as essential to complying with an order of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to insure that no overflows of the wastewater system (“sanitary sewer overflows” or “SSOs”) occur on or after December 31, 2009. Additional capacity concerns and associated construction projects were identified by the City in the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan, such as rehabilitation of sewers in Basin 22; a new parallel trunk sewer under Highway 126; and a flow control manhole and relief sewer in 58th Street. These projects are currently funded and it is anticipated that construction of these projects will be completed in FY 2013. In addition, Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) reduction efforts will continue in the local collection system to maintain compliance with the SSO prohibition. To assist this effort in the local collections system, an update to the Wastewater Master Plan is programmed in the CIP and is expected to generate a new list of projects for the city to complete over the next decade. Until the update to the Wastewater Master Plan is completed, Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement funding has deferred so that other high priority projects could proceed. Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction – The project will construct modern urban standards improvements on Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood to support Glenwood redevelopment and provide safe and convenient facilities for transit, bicycles, pedestrians and autos. Glenwood redevelopment is a Council priority goal and upgrading and modernizing Franklin Boulevard is seen as a critical step to achieving this goal. The next activity in moving Franklin 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Page 3 of 3 reconstruction forward will be to complete the required National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation, likely an Environmental Assessment (EA). The cost to complete an EA is approximately 80% funded with City Transportation Systems Development Charges (SDC) funds, Central Lane Metropolitan Planning Organization (CLMPO) discretionary federal funds, and Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA) funds. Springfield continues to work on identifying gap funding to complete the EA process and is now working with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to begin the EA. Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement – The Over-Under Channel is part of the City’s stormwater system serving mid-Springfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126. The name of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel. A portion of the piped system, from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel at Moffitt School, is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. Staff has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion and minor failures. In FY 2011, the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system and identify the amount of additional funds needed to commence construction in FY 2013. In addition to the above major projects, several other projects are also already budgeted and scheduled, including: the Mill Race Stormwater Facility, Booth Kelly Drainage, and the restoration of the Lower Mill Race and Mill Race Outfalls. For the 2013-2017 five-year outlook, due to the initiation of a right of way use fee for the storm and sanitary utilities a small transfer of funding for street capital projects has been made possible through 2016; however a continued shortfall in funding for transportation and street projects is projected. Revenues generated from the local motor fuel tax are not projected to provide sufficient funding to adequately fund the City’s current street preservation program. FINANCIAL IMPACT The CIP does not carry budget authority. It is, however a valuable planning tool used to guide staff, the Budget Committee, and the City Council in creating the annual budget. Future maintenance impacts of projects are estimated where possible. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission support the draft 2013-2017 CIP and recommend it for Council adoption. COMMISSION ACTION REQUESTED The Commission is requested to review staff’s proposal and forward it to the City Council with comments and a recommendation for adoption. Attachment 1: Draft CIP The City of Springfield, Oregon Capital Improvement Program A Community Reinvestment Plan 2013-2017 DRAFT 3        TABLE OF CONTENTS      EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1      SECTION I   CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM  CIP Goals ........................................................................................................................... 7  CIP Project Development and Review Process ................................................................. 7  Types of Capital Needs ...................................................................................................... 8  Project Selection Resources .............................................................................................. 8  Facilities Plans  Wastewater Master Plan ..................................................................................... 8  Stormwater Facilities Master Plan ....................................................................... 9  DLR Building Condition Report .......................................................................... 10  Urban Renewal Plans ......................................................................................... 11  Land Use Plans  Public Facilities and Services Plan ...................................................................... 11  TransPlan ........................................................................................................... 12  Refinement Plans ............................................................................................... 12       SECTION II  FUNDING  Capital Project Funding ................................................................................................... 16  Systems Development Charges ...................................................................................... 17  External Revenue Sources ............................................................................................... 18  Other Revenues .............................................................................................................. 19  City Accounting Funds Used for Capital Resources ........................................................ 19      SECTION III  FINANCIAL SUMMARIES  Financial Summaries—All Programs ............................................................................... 23      SECTION IV   PROJECTS  Projects Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 24  Master Project Map ........................................................................................................ 26             EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  INTRODUCTION  The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five‐year Community Reinvestment Plan  that describes the near‐term program for funding and construction of City public facilities.  A  fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The  underlying concept is to program, for future expenditure, all reasonably available sources of revenue.  Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities  plans, the CIP is used as the vehicle to facilitate reconciliation, in the near term, of the competing  priorities for scarce capital resources.  The CIP is updated annually and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with long term  planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future, and  concludes with the adoption of a budget appropriating funds for the ultimate construction and  operation of those facilities.  The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably be expected  to be required in the next five years, refines those concepts, and provides a priority list of projects.   Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvements identified in the various  master plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council.  Traditionally, the principal constraint  applied in developing the CIP is the realistic availability of financial resources to fund a project.   Once included in the CIP, the next step is to prepare the City’s annual Capital Budget which draws from  the first year of the CIP, with such modifications as are necessary or prudent to respond to immediate  concerns and the often fluid nature of funding opportunities.  In preparation of the capital budget it is  important to consider not only the immediate availability of financial resources, but also the availability  of resources to manage design and construction. This may mean staff resources to conduct those  activities in house, or staff resources to manage consultants who take on responsibility for design and  construction management. A successful capital budget must be mindful of budgeting only those projects  or project phases that the City has the staff resources to deliver.  At present, because the recession has  put operating budgets under great stress, the City is in the position of having significant capital  resources due to bond sales, but without the staff to deliver the breadth of anticipated projects.  This  adds another dimension to the complex task of prioritizing the capital program and can result in projects  with identified funding being delayed.  The 2013‐2017 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages  of planning, design, and construction.  In addition, the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have  been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding  identified.  These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods, providing for economic growth,  improving traffic safety, mobility and access, complying with environmental standards, and maintaining  the existing city infrastructure.    2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW  The public input process for the CIP typically begins in October when citizens, organizations, and City  staff are asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP.  The Planning Commission and the City  Council then review the draft CIP and a public hearing is held prior to Council adoption.   € OCTOBER: CIP PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS STARTS  € OCTOBER: CAPITAL PROJECT REQUESTS GO TO PUBLIC AND CITY DEPARTMENTS  € NOVEMBER/DECEMBER: PUBLISH INTERNAL DRAFT CIP  € NOVEMBER/DECEMBER: BEGIN INTERNAL DRAFT CIP REVIEW  € JANUARY: PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS DRAFT CIP  € FEBRUARY: CITY  COUNCIL WORK SESSION REVIEWS DRAFT  CIP  € MARCH: PUBLIC HEARING AT CITY COUNCIL ON DRAFT CIP  € APRIL:  CAPITAL  BUDGET PRESENTED TO BUDGET COMMITTEE   The City’s final commitment to spend public funds occurs through the annual City budget process.  Although the CIP is the starting point for the annual Capital Budget, the projects actually budgeted each  year can vary somewhat from those proposed in the CIP.    PROJECT CATEGORIZATION  Projects in the CIP are grouped first by the relevant infrastructure system (stormwater, transportation,  wastewater, buildings and facilities, and miscellaneous) and by the status of project funding. For  historical purposes, the CIP also includes projects that have been completed within the past year.   Project funding includes four categories: In Process, Funding Programmed, Funding Partially  Programmed and Funding Not Programmed.  In Process are those projects that are currently in the  Capital Improvement Program, in the Capital Budget, and in design and/or construction.  Funding  Programmed is the category of those highest priority projects for which most or all of the funding has  been clearly identified, and the City has taken appropriate steps to make sure the funding will be  available in a timely fashion.   Partially funded projects are those higher priority projects where a portion  of the funding has been identified but additional funding is needed before the project can proceed.   Projects that do not have any funding programmed are multiple levels of priority projects with funding  sources that are presently unknown.  The proposed CIP reflects prioritizations by staff based on a set of  objective criteria designed to maximize the efficiency of using available capital resources. The criteria  shown in Appendix A provide clarity on how prioritization decisions are made.  The following is a list of the most significant projects:  Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement – This program is an on‐going series of construction projects to  address capacity problems in the wastewater system.  Resolving these capacity problems is necessary to  enable the City to maintain compliance with Federal and State requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer  overflows (SSOs). By the end of FY 2010 the most urgent construction projects identified in WWFMP in  Springfield had been completed. These projects had been identified as essential to complying with an  order of the U.S. Environmental Protection Administration to insure that no overflows of the  Page 2 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       wastewater system (“sanitary sewer overflows” or “SSOs”) occur on or after December 31, 2009.,  Additional capacity concerns and associated construction projects were identified by the City in the  2008 Wastewater Master Plan, such as rehabilitation of sewers in Basin 22; a new parallel trunk sewer  under Highway 126; and a flow control manhole and relief sewer in 58th Street.  These projects are  currently funded and it is anticipated that construction of these projects will be completed in FY 2013.    In addition, Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) reduction efforts will continue in the local collection system to  maintain compliance with the SSO prohibition.  To assist this effort in the local collections system, an  update to the Wastewater Master Plan is programmed in the CIP and is expected to generate a new list  of projects for the city to complete over the next decade.  Until the update to the Wastewater Master  Plan is completed, Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement funding has deferred so that other high priority  projects could proceed.     Jasper Trunk Sewer Extension – The Jasper Trunk Sewer Extension will provide sewer service to the  Jasper/Natron urban growth area that is currently not serviced.  The City Council has made this a priority  project to promote development and community growth.  In FY 2012 the project was divided into four  separate construction contracts and construction on the first phase began.  Construction of the first  phase allowed for the decommissioning of the Lucerne Meadows Pump Station, which was due for  major upgrades.  Construction of the second phase is anticipated in FY 2013 and will allow for the  decommissioning of two additional pump stations.  Funding for the project was secured through the  issuance of revenue bonds in 2009.    Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction – The project will construct modern urban standards improvements  on Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood to support Glenwood redevelopment and provide safe and  convenient facilities for transit, bicycles, pedestrians and autos.  Glenwood redevelopment is a Council  priority goal and upgrading and modernizing Franklin Boulevard is seen as a critical step to achieving this  goal.  The next activity in moving Franklin reconstruction forward will be to complete the required  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation, likely an Environmental Assessment (EA).  The  cost to complete an EA is approximately 80% funded with City Transportation Systems Development  Charges (SDC) funds, Central Lane Metropolitan Planning Organization (CLMPO) discretionary federal  funds, and Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA) funds.  Springfield continues to work on  identifying gap funding to complete the EA process and is now working with the Oregon Department of  Transportation (ODOT) to begin the EA.  Over‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement – The Over‐Under Channel is part of the City’s stormwater  system serving mid‐Springfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126.  The name  of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed  in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel.  A portion of the  piped system, from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel at  Moffitt School, is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.  Staff  has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion and  minor failures.  In FY 2011, the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system and  identify the amount of additional funds needed to commence construction in FY 2013.  2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 3 FINANCING  There are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include revenues derived  from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes) which function like user fees. By Council policy, these  are preferentially devoted to preservation of existing infrastructure. The second major source is Systems  Development Charges (SDC), which are designed to recover, from development, the cost impact that  development has on infrastructure, both existing and needed to meet the future demands of  development. A large portion of these revenues must, by law, be devoted to capacity increasing capital  activity. Only that portion of SDC revenue which is derived from a reimbursement fee may be expended  for preservation of existing infrastructure. A third major source of capital funding is external  contributions, in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans, payments by developers for specific  improvements, and assessments of benefitted property owners, also for specific improvements. Other  sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts,  and revenue from internally generated charges, also play a role, at present minor.   In part, Local Wastewater and Drainage SDC revenues fund debt service for prior capacity increasing  projects and continuing programs, which fund small repair projects and permits.  The City sold local  wastewater revenue bonds in March, 2009 to fund required sanitary sewer rehabilitation work and the  design of the Jasper Trunk Line Extension.  The City also sold storm drainage revenue bonds in October,  2010 to fund several major stormwater initiatives, and a number of capital projects related to the City’s  obligation to address stormwater quality, permitting and threatened fish impacts.1  The Jasper Trunk  Line Extension and other high priority wastewater and stormwater capital projects have been divided  into multiple phases to postpone the need for future revenue bond sales until at least 2014.  For the 2013‐1017 CIP, a five‐year outlook, one of the most significant aspects is the projection of a  continued uncertainty in funding for street preservation projects.  The outlook for street infrastructure  funding has not yet recovered from the loss of County funding, which occurred in 2007. In addition, the  continued weakness in revenues from State and local fuel taxes (a product of both increased fuel  efficiency and decreased use because of the recession) has left revenues stagnant. Finally, the lack of  development activity as a result of the recession has caused SDC revenues to deteriorate sharply.   A second significant aspect of the funding scenario is the continuing imbalance between user fees and  SDCs as sources of capital funding. City staff has documented that in many cases user fees are funding a  disproportionate share of capital projects.  With the full implementation of the revised SDCs effective  January 1, 2011, new users will, once development activity resumes following the recession, be paying  proportional larger share of the costs associated with expanding and upgrading the public  transportation, wastewater, and stormwater systems.  The revised SDC’s resulted, in part, from the  recent development and adoption of updated facilities plans for the local sewer and storm drainage  infrastructure.  These plans identify significant new capital project and financing needs, and the SDC  methodologies and charges needed to be updated to reflect new projects and costs.  Even though the  increases in SDC rates tend to restore a proper balance between user fees and SDCs as a revenue source                                                               1 For bonding purposes, the local wastewater and stormwater utilities are combined into a single sewer utility.  Page 4 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       for infrastructure financing, SDCs are designed to build up reserves of funding to permit construction of  larger projects, not provide immediate resources. Consequently, even with the increased rates, it will  take some time after the beginning of a new development cycle to generate the level of funding needed  to have a major impact on the level of funding available.  External sources, such as intergovernmental grants or developer or benefitted property owner  contributions, are an important, but highly volatile funding source. Generally they do not form the basis  for concluding a project can be funded, but rather when such funding sources develop, can be a trigger  to increase the priority of a project. Recently, the City has had some success in developing external  funding for isolated projects, such as the Mill Race Restoration, ‘A’ Street Overlay, Thurston Road  Overlay, and the Glenwood Connector Path. Future success is highly dependent upon the fiscal and  monetary policies of other levels of government. For example, the current Congressional prohibition on  the practice of “earmarking” funds will not be followed, has reduced the possibility of securing direct  appropriations from the Congress, but may positively affect the ability of the City to secure federal  grants.  There are a number of projects added to the CIP for which there are no identified funding sources.  Because of limited revenues, even many of the projects traditionally listed in the CIP cannot be funded  during the next five years.  These projects are shown in the CIP to make it possible for the Council and  the public to better understand the scope of the City’s infrastructure need and compare that need to  the resources presently available, and provide the basis for developing long‐term capital financing  strategies.  Following is a chart showing annual project funding needs and resources.  2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 5   CONCLUSION  The Capital Improvement Program serves as a guide for the City’s needed improvements.  It is shaped by  citizen input, the best professional judgment of staff and outside experts, and estimates of the City’s  projected financial resources. The CIP is subject to annual review and revision. The direction provided by  this document helps the City of Springfield target its resources to capital improvements which best serve  the needs of the citizens of Springfield.  The CIP is available on the web for public viewing at  http://www.springfield‐or.gov/Pubworks/CIP_Program.htm.      Page 6 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       SECTION I  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM  CIP GOALS  The goals of the CIP include:  1) Providing a balanced program for capital improvements given reasonably anticipated funding  over a five‐year or greater planning period and identifying the extent to which resources can  meet capital needs;  2) Improving neighborhoods;   3) Providing for economic and community growth;   4) Improving safety, access, and mobility of transportation modes;   5) Complying with environmental standards and improving environmental quality;   6) Maintaining the existing City infrastructure; and    7) Protect public health and safety.  CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW PROCESS  Capital improvements must be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Comprehensive Plan,  including the Public Facilities and Services Plan and TransPlan (the transportation element of the  Comprehensive Plan), and all other Council adopted plans and policies. The relevant plans are listed in a  subsequent section of this report.    In general, all Capital Projects included in the CIP meet one or more of the following criteria:  1) Project addresses State or Federal laws or regulations to eliminate or reduce the potential for  environmental degradation or health hazards or to address issues that affect the safety and  general welfare of the community.  2) Project maintains existing assets, extends the useful life of assets, or improves or expands  infrastructure to facilitate community development and/or improve operations.  3) Project responds to requests from citizens, neighborhood groups, advisory committees, or  government bodies, and provides a public benefit.  4) Project is included in local and/or regional infrastructure plans.  Once the need for a capital improvement has been determined, those improvements are evaluated with  a project prioritization matrix (Appendix A) that has been developed for evaluating and ranking projects  within each system to prioritize programming of scarce capital funding.  In the adopted CIP only those  capital improvements which are funded within the current projections for the appropriate revenue  streams are considered adopted.  Projects for which the funding is not identified or programmed are  shown strictly for informational purposes only. Historically, the CIP has not attempted to consider  whether or not the City has the operating resources (either staff or funding for consultants to manage  projects), necessary to prosecute a particular project.  2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 7 TYPES OF CAPITAL NEED   Rehabilitation & Preservation of Existing Capital Assets   The CIP reflects the broad direction of the City Council as set forth in the Financial Management Policies  to preserve existing capital assets before they fall into disrepair and require expensive rehabilitation or  replacement. Preservation is an important tool used to protect or extend a City asset’s useful life.  If  preservation doesn’t happen on a regular basis, the asset will deteriorate prematurely and its benefit to  the community will be lost. In that event reconstruction may be required. Reconstruction costs are  frequently multiple times the cost of preservation and maintenance, particularly for street surfaces.   Rehabilitation is necessary for some capital assets and the City must demonstrate fiscal responsibility by  planning for this need.  Inclusion of these projects in the CIP is a necessary task to plan for that  rehabilitation.  New Capital Facilities and Capacity Enhancements  As the City reaches outward into the Urban Growth Boundary or anticipates infill or increased density of  development in the city limits, the need to plan for expansion of capital assets and provide safe and  efficient capital facilities increases. New streets are necessary to provide for the movement of goods  and people and access to property in developing areas. In addition, wastewater and stormwater systems  are necessary to protect water quality and the environment in order to preserve the health, welfare,  and safety of the community.  PROJECT SELECTION RESOURCES  The following is a list of various plans with descriptive summaries that guide the decisions made about  CIP project choice. The City draws a distinction between facilities plans, which focus on facility needs  and how systems function, and land use plans, which provide more general guidance.  General guidance  can inform the development of facilities plans, and can constrain facility development to conform to the  policy set of the land use planning document. (TransPlan is somewhat of an exception to these  distinctions, since it is a land use plan that also serves as a facilities plan and does contain specific  project guidance.)  FACILITIES PLANS  Wastewater Master Plan (2008)  The City of Springfield provides wastewater collection and conveyance services by way of a system of  pipelines and pump stations that it owns and operates.  Along with the City of Eugene, Springfield  discharges to a regional collection and treatment system owned by the Metropolitan Wastewater  Management Commission (MWMC).  Springfield’s Wastewater Master Plan provides an assessment of  existing and future needs for the City’s collection system.  Because the City’s system connects to the  regional system, the Master Plan must consider and reflect results of the MWMC’s Wet Weather Flow  Management Plan (WWFMP), which identifies system maintenance and rehabilitation activities for the  wastewater collection and treatment facilities in the Eugene‐Springfield metropolitan area.  Therefore,  Page 8 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       Springfield’s plan provides a local solution for existing and future needs within the context of the similar  regional solution.  The Master Plan is intended to identify existing and future capacity constraints, determine capacity  requirements and identify system improvements necessary to meet the City’s projected population and  employment growth through the 2025 planning year.  The Department of Environmental Quality has  issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (#102486) for Springfield,  Eugene and MWMC, which includes conditions under which treated wastewater can be discharged to  the Willamette River. Included in those conditions is a requirement that Springfield, Eugene and MWMC  fully implement a wet weather flow management strategy to comply with the State’s Bacteria Standard,  which prohibits storm related overflows. The standard states that no untreated wastewater can be  discharged to the waters of the State or US, except under the following conditions; for flows greater  than those occurring for the 24‐hour duration, 1 in 5‐year winter and 1 in 10‐year summer storms. These  conditions formed the baseline assumptions for overflow avoidance in this plan and were consistent  with the assumptions of the WWFMP, which included a number flow reduction projects that were  completed before the December 31, 2009 regulatory deadline.  Subsequent to the development and completion of the WWFMP, the Oregon Department of  Environmental Quality, in response to an objection from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is  no longer permitted to include the exceptions for untreated wastewater discharges as provided by the  State’s Bacteria Standard. DEQ is currently placing a prohibition on all overflows from wastewater  conveyance systems and associated pump stations. All NPDES permits issued beginning in August 2009  must contain the prohibition. This regulatory change places additional burden on the conveyance  system operation and maintenance to eliminate all wet weather related overflows.  The NPDES permit  for the regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled for renewal in 2012 and will contain the  prohibition of all overflows absent a change of policy from EPA.   Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (2008)  In 2008, the City Council adopted a comprehensive Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP).  The  purpose of this document is to provide a guide to plan for more comprehensive, efficient, and multi‐ objective management of the City’s stormwater system.  The majority of the City’s stormwater runoff  drains through an integrated network of pipes and open channels, discharging either directly to the  main stem Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or through outfalls to a tributary of either of those rivers.   Prior to the SWFMP, the City typically designed and constructed facilities for treating and conveying  stormwater runoff on an individual development or site‐by‐site basis.  In addition, as is typical for nearly  all cities, most of the City’s stormwater collection and conveyance system was historically designed and  built with the sole objective of addressing flooding issues.    Most of the major portions of the City’s stormwater drainage system infrastructure were built during  the 1960s and as development increased, the system was retrofitted with extensions and additions.  Most of the main conveyance system was not upsized to facilitate the increased flows associated with  full City build out.    2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 9 The City also has a Council‐adopted Stormwater Management Plan which establishes goals, policies and  implementation actions to address water quality and management of the stormwater system, including  open waterways within the City’s jurisdiction.  This plan is required and approved by the Department of  Environmental Quality as part of its issuance and management of the City’s stormwater discharge  permit. Additionally, the Willamette River and McKenzie River (a tributary to the Willamette River) are  listed on the State’s 303(d) list indicating that water quality standards for specific pollutants in these  streams are currently not being met.  The City must address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)  limitations on the level of certain pollutants (temperature, bacteria, and mercury) through  implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan and the TMDL Implementation Plan.  These plans  and requirements impact the nature and design of capital projects that are constructed to manage  stormwater.  Building & Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work Plan (2011)  This plan identifies and addresses capital improvement needs at City owned buildings, including: City  Hall, Springfield Justice Center, Springfield Museum, fire stations, Public Works maintenance buildings,  and the Depot.  The Plan, which is in its first year of development, derives from a report prepared in  2006 by the consulting firm DLR Group. That report provided a snapshot of repairs and asset  preservation improvements that are immediately evident, and which have been deferred for various  reasons, together with ongoing maintenance needs and necessary replacement of building systems  expected to reach the end of their useful life during the next 30 years.  The City continues to face several critical building/facilities operations, maintenance and preservation  issues.  The DLR Buildings Condition Report (DLR) identified $600K deferred/backlog facilities repair  needs and $300K ongoing annual maintenance/preservation needs. In FY 2009, the City implemented an  Internal Building Preservation Charge and programmed $300k for ongoing preservation and $200k to  start addressing the backlog projects, and $300k is anticipated for the FY 2013 budget.  The first priority  of staff charged with this capital program was to develop the City Buildings/Facilities Work Plan inclusive  of all City Fire Stations, City Hall, Springfield Justice Center, Public Works maintenance facilities,  Springfield Depot, and the newly acquired Carter Building. This 5‐year work plan is reviewed and  updated annually, and used as the basis for project budgeting each fiscal year.    Additionally, there are other project management responsibilities related to public buildings and  facilities maintenance and preservations that have been identified through previously adopted CIP  documents, such as preservation projects at the Depot and Booth Kelly and demolition of the Carpenter  shed and gun range at Booth Kelly.  Any future building needs such as new fire station construction will  be addressed through the CIP process.     Page 10 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       URBAN RENEWAL PLANS  Downtown Urban Renewal Plan (2007)  The primary goal of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is to assist in the revitalization of business and  elimination of blight in the downtown area.  The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to  obtain these goals.  The plan’s projects include:  € Improvements to streets, sidewalks, bike ways and pathways;  € Improvements to water, storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure;  € Improve the visual appearance of the downtown area;  € Improve and expand the existing public parking facilities;  € Financial assistance to rehabilitate existing properties and encourage new construction;  € Acquisition and disposal of land for public improvements.  Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan (1999, updated 2004)  The primary goal of the Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan is to eliminate blighting influences found in the  Renewal Area.  The Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to obtain these goals.  The plan’s  projects include:  € Promote private development and redevelopment;  € Rehabilitate building stock;  € Improvements to streets, sidewalks, bike ways, pathways, streetscapes, parks, and open spaces;  € Utility improvements;  € Parking;  € Public facilities;  € Housing;  € Public signage and community gateway entrance improvements.  LAND USE PLANS  Public Facilities and Services Plan  The Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP) is an element of the Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan Area  General Plan (Metro Plan). It is the element which identifies significant facilities in general terms and  confirms that those facilities are consistent with the planning policies set out in the Metro Plan. The  projects identified in the PFSP are generally a subset of the projects contained in the various facilities  plans. The PFSP does not identify transportation projects, which are covered in TransPlan, but does  identify wastewater and stormwater projects, among others. The PFSP does not, nor should it, identify  every project; it includes only those projects identified as significant on the basis of definitions set forth  in the PFSP.      2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 11 TransPlan (2002)  The Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) is the transportation element  of the Eugene‐Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. While adopted as a refinement to MetroPlan,  and therefore technically a land use plan, TransPlan is also intended as a system facilities plan that  guides local and regional transportation system planning and development in the Eugene‐Springfield  metropolitan area. TransPlan also serves as the City’s facilities plan as well as its transportation system  plan, or TSP for identifying projects needed to meet the transportation demand of residents over a 20‐ year planning horizon while addressing transportation issues and making changes that can contribute to  improvements in the region’s quality of life and economic vitality.  In addition to roadway facilities,  TransPlan also calls for significant increases in the amount and convenience of transit service, increases  in the amount of bikeways and sidewalks, and an expansion of the existing program of transportation  demand management (TDM) travel incentives. TransPlan is a jointly adopted document that serves as a  local transportation system plan for both Springfield and Eugene.    In 2011, Springfield and Eugene  adopted separate urban growth boundaries.   One outcome of that action is that the City is now  developing a new Springfield‐specific Transportation System Plan (TSP) as part of implementation of a  City stand alone urban growth boundary.  The current TransPlan will remain in force until the new TSP is  adopted by Council and acknowledged by the State, which is anticipated to occur in calendar 2012.   The  CIP includes a project describing the costs and resources available to Springfield to complete the TSP  Project. The TransPlan theme, ‘Improving Our Transportation Choices’, reflects the plan’s focus to  provide citizens with a range of safe, convenient, and efficient transportation options characterized by  smooth connections between modes.  TransPlan strives to support the need to diversify transportation  choices, while avoiding reliance on any one transportation mode or method of managing the  transportation system.  TransPlan establishes the framework upon which all public agencies can make  consistent and coordinated planning decisions regarding inter‐ and intra‐jurisdictional transportation.    Refinement Plans  Downtown Refinement Plan (1986, updated 2005)  The primary goal of the Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan is to provide goals and policies through  which downtown Springfield may become a more vital and attractive place to shop, conduct business,  and recreate.  Goals were set forth to guide this revitalization.  These goals are:  € Create a pedestrian and transit friendly downtown;  € Preserve the past;  € Reconnect to key natural resource features;  € Encourage evening activity in the downtown;  € Create new opportunities for office, commercial, residential, civic, and mixed uses;  € Ensure adequate parking;  Page 12 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       € Create civic gathering places;  € Create downtown partnerships;  € Identify catalyst projects;  € Create a positive identity for downtown.  East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan (1992)  The primary goal of the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens  living within the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood.  Goals were set to address these concerns.  The goals of  the neighborhood plan are:  € Encourage a variety of land uses and housing opportunities;  € Provide a safe and effective transportation system;  € Provide and maintain public facilities and services;  € Improve the character and identity of the neighborhood.   East Main Refinement Plan (1988)  The primary goal of the East Main Refinement Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living within  the East Main Refinement Plan Neighborhood.  Goals were set to address these concerns.  The goals of  the refinement plan are:  € Provide affordable housing for all segments of the population;  € Allow flexibility for large vacant areas that are surrounded by mixed uses;  € Provide for commercial centers which meet the needs of the community;  € Encourage additional industrial development which is compatible with surrounding uses;  € Enhance and develop the natural and built environment;  € Develop recreational facilities which fill the needs of the area;  € Create a safe and efficient street system;  € Provide safe, efficient and convenient bicycle facilities.  Gateway Refinement Plan (1992)  The primary goal of the Gateway Refinement Plan is to refine and augment the Eugene‐Springfield  Metropolitan Area General Plan to provide specificity for site‐specific land use decisions, and to identify  the near and long‐term public facilities needs to support development and livability of the area.  This  plan incorporates goals and policies, controls and design standards in areas where protections need to  be stringent.  These elements are:  € Community and Economic Development;  € Residential;  € Commercial;  € Industrial;     2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 13 € Natural Assets, Open Space/Scenic Areas, and Recreation;  € Historic Resources;  € Transportation; and  € Public Facilities.  Glenwood Refinement Plan (1999)  The intent of the Glenwood Refinement Plan is to provide background information and policy direction  for public and private decisions affecting the growth and development of the Glenwood area.  The plan  will guide the provision of public service, such as sanitary sewers and street improvements.  It will serve  as a basis for evaluating private development proposals, such as zone change requests.  It will also  provide a common framework for those engaged in the conservation, development, and redevelopment  of the area.  The Glenwood Refinement Plan is currently being updated, and a revision of the plan with  respect to the riverfront areas is expect to be presented to the Council for consideration during Spring,  2012.   The community direction goals in the existing plan are:  € Maintain and improve Glenwood’s sense of identity and community as it transitions into the  City;  € Maintain the viability of the residential area within Glenwood by conserving and upgrading the  quality of existing housing wherever possible while retaining its affordable character;  € Promote Glenwood as an attractive industrial area because of its easy access to I‐5 and rail  service, convenient location between Eugene and Springfield, and the availability of a variety of  sizes of vacant industrial parcels.  € Reduce conflicts between industrial and residential development through use of site review  procedures.  € Foster Franklin Boulevard and the McVey Highway as a desirable commercial location while  improving its visual quality;  € Encourage a variety of commercial, industrial, and residential uses as an integral part of the  Glenwood community;  € Promote use of rail service as a viable method of transport of industrial materials and goods;  € Improve bicycle and pedestrian access into, out of, and within Glenwood and along the river;  € Provide urban services in a timely way, including providing sanitary sewers to those who need  them, improving street drainage, ensuring timely public safety response, and maintaining the  viability of James Park or other park facilities;  € Be sensitive to annexation concerns and provide for voluntary annexation wherever feasible;   € Provide access to the river and promote development opportunities along the river, which take  advantage of the river’s natural assets and are sensitive to the river environment;  € Improve the community’s quality of life by addressing such issues as litter and noise pollution.  Mid‐Springfield Refinement Plan (1986)  The primary goal of the Mid‐Springfield Refinement Plan is to assign site‐specific plan designations in  areas designated “Mixed‐Use” on the Metro Plan Diagram and to recognize the needs of industrial and  Page 14 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program       commercial land uses and to resolve conflicts with residential neighbors.  Goals were set to address  these concerns.  The goals of the refinement plan are:  € Maximize industrial development potential of industrial designated land;  € Encourage functional commercial development on commercially designated land along Main  and 42nd Streets;  € Preserve the integrity of residentially designated areas;  € Provide a safe and efficient transportation system;  € Provide a means to implement the goals and policies of this refinement plan.  Q Street Refinement Plan (1987)  The primary goal of the Q Street Refinement Plan is to guide land use decisions in the Q Street area.   Land use decisions will be made to follow certain goals.  The majority of the goals for the refinement  plan are:  € Provide vacant and re‐developable land to allow for commercial development;  € Encourage commercial shopping centers where safe and efficient vehicular access can be  provided;  € Participate in efforts to maintain and enhance existing residential neighborhoods and attract  medium and high density residential developments;  € Implement mitigating measures for noise, dust, and traffic impacts to residential areas;  € Encourage private and public recreational facilities in high density areas;  € Buffer multiple family development from single family development and residential land from  commercial land through site plan review;  € Work with Willamalane to provide adequate park and recreational facilities to residents;  € Discourage through truck traffic in residentially designated areas;  € Encourage bicycle path into the design of recreational and new residential facilities.    2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 15         SECTION II  FUNDING  CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING  There are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include 1) revenues  derived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes) which function like user fees; 2) Systems  Development Charges (SDCs), which are designed to recover from development the cost impact that  development has on public infrastructure; 3) external contributions, in the form of intergovernmental  grants or loans, payments by developers for specific improvements, and assessments of benefitted  property owners, also for specific improvements; and 4) other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax  increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts, and revenue from internally generated  charges, which at present play a minor role in capital project funding. The City of Springfield’s accounts  for these four revenue sources are in special revenue or enterprise funds, such as the Street Capital  Fund, Systems Development Charges funds, and the Wastewater and Drainage Capital funds. The funds  used by the City to record and account for capital funding are listed following this discussion, along with  the limitations imposed by local, state, or federal laws associated with the funding source.    USER FEES  Each of the three public infrastructure systems (streets, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage) is funded  by fees paid by those who use the system. In the case of the local wastewater and storm drainage  systems those fees are directly billed to users. In the case of the transportation system those fees are  collected in the form of taxes on motor fuel at both the state and local level, and by state fees for  licensing and registration of drivers and vehicles, as well as weight mile taxes imposed on the trucking  industry.  City Council policy calls for a portion of those fees, in excess of that required for current operation of the  systems, to be devoted to preservation of the existing systems.  However, in the past several years it has  been necessary to devote some portion of those revenues to fund expansion of the system, either  through direct funding of capital activity or by funding debt service on revenue bonds. To date, the City  has issued revenue bonds in 2009 to fund local wastewater capital activity, and in 2010 to fund storm  drainage capital projects. As discussed earlier, the level of capital activity has produced circumstances  which have led to substantial increases in user fees for both systems, and created concerns that user  fees might be bearing a disproportionate share of the burden of capital activity.   The economic downturn experienced in recent years led Council to defer significant portions of SDC  increases that have been proposed based on updated facilities plans. Although the recommended SDC  increases were fully implemented effective January 1, 2011, the sluggish economic recovery continues  to be reflected in a substantially reduced number of building permits and resultant SDC revenues.  Until  economic conditions and development activity improves, existing users of the systems will continue to  bear most of the costs associated with expanding and upgrading those systems.  It is also important to  note that the Council has discussed a further debt issue in FY 2014 to fund local wastewater needs.  Page 16 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program      For the 2013‐2017 CIP, a second source of concern is the projection of a continual decrease in funding  for street preservation projects.  State and local fuel tax revenues continue to decline because of the  current recession and increased fuel efficiency that reduces revenue even in the face of increased miles  traveled.  While the Council has increased storm drainage and local wastewater fees to maintain and  enhance the level of preservation for those systems, the City no longer has the authority to increase its  local fuel tax. While the State Legislature approved an increase in the State fuel tax that became  effective on January 1, 2011, the City does not expect that the increased revenue it will receive from the  State will be sufficient to reverse the trend of declining revenues to support the City’s transportation  system.   In 2011, the City Council approved a new revenue source for capital activities in the transportation  system; a Right‐of‐Way Use Fee for the Local Wastewater and Stormwater Utilities. This right of way use  fee of three percent of gross revenues will fund ongoing operations and maintenance of the  transportation system and may provide some limited funding for preservation activity.  SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES   The second major source of capital funding is Systems Development Charges (SDCs). These are charges  imposed on development to provide funding to assure that the City can fund the cost of the  infrastructure needed to serve that level of development. There are several types of SDCs that can be  used for capital projects. One of the SDC funds is the “Old” SDCs, which were funds collected under SDC  laws in effect prior to 1991, and have different restrictions on use than the current SDC funds.    These charges are calculated based upon a methodology which must be adopted by the Council and  which must conform to State law. The process involves two separate components. The first is an  improvement fee which is based on a determination of which capital projects are needed to  accommodate growth, the amount of additional capacity that is created by those projects, and a  determination of the unit cost of additional capacity calculated by dividing the sum of project costs by  the sum of the capacity created. The second component, a reimbursement fee, is calculated by  determining the value of the existing system, the amount of capacity available in that system, and the  value of a unit of capacity. If the system has existing capacity, then development can be charged a fee  based upon the units of existing capacity development will require. These charges are increased  annually based on documented increase in the Cost of Construction Index.   Unfortunately, the facilities plans which are used to derive the projects to be constructed and the  capacity created by those projects (which dated from the 1970s), had been significantly out of date for  both local wastewater and storm drainage.  As a result, fees collected were far below the amount,  permissible under the statutes, which were needed to construct improvement projects.  In 2008, the  City did update those two facilities plans and moved in 2009 to update the SDCs. While that process  resulted in substantial increases in fees, the decline in development activity has resulted in minimal  increases in SDC revenue.  In addition, because of the economic downturn, the Council deferred the  increases as they applied to one and two family residential construction until the fall of 2010, when  2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 17         Council implemented a series of incremental increases with the full fees becoming effective January 1,  2011.   While the Transportation project list was much more current, having last been updated in 2000, it did  not reflect significant price escalation during the current decade.  At the same time that Council updated  the project lists for the other infrastructure systems, it also updated the costs on the transportation list,  leading to a substantial increase in SDCs.  As with the local wastewater and storm drainage systems, the  recession, and Council deferral of residential increases, has reduced the revenue impact of those  increases. The Council has discussed the potential need to review the Transportation project list  following completion of the current effort to develop a Springfield‐specific TSP. It is also likely that the  Transportation SDC methodology may be reviewed and updated at that time, since it was not updated in  2009.  In July 2009, the City Council approved a new revenue source for capital activities in the stormwater  system; a Stormwater Reimbursement SDC fee.  This fee is new for Springfield and provides a payment  from new users to the City to pay for a portion of the excess capacity in the stormwater system that was  provided when the existing system was constructed.  Reimbursement SDC’s are less constrained than  Improvement SDC’s because they can be used for maintenance of the existing system as well as for  funding new expansion projects.    EXTERNAL REVENUE SOURCES  These sources include both intergovernmental grants and loans as well as contributions by private  individuals to the cost of infrastructure either through assessments imposed by the City or voluntarily as  part of a proposal to develop property in the City. In many cases these sources of revenue, however  derived, are accompanied by restrictions on their use.   The City regularly receives allocations of transportation funding from Federal programs. The  Metropolitan Policy Organization (MPO) acting through its Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC)  allocates Federal formula funds to its member jurisdictions for planning, preservation and construction  projects on portions of the transportation system that are regionally significant. In addition, the City  regularly seeks Federal funding directly through efforts focused on the Oregon congressional delegation.   The City was instrumental in securing over $20 million in Federal funding to modernize the interchange  at I‐5 and Beltline Road. Most recently, the City received almost $1.2 million in Federal funding through  the Surface Transportation Program, which is funding two overlay projects in FY 2013.  In addition to  Federal transportation grants the City has received significant transportation funding from Lane County  in past years, although the County’s fiscal condition makes receipt of future grants unlikely.  The local wastewater system also benefits from a variety of Federal programs, most notably the Clean  Water State Revolving Fund (a program funded by Federal dollars). In recent years, however, Federal aid  for local wastewater activity has declined sharply.  Private contributions toward capital funding also are available, but generally in restricted circumstances.  In order to facilitate provision of services to a new development, a developer can make a significant  Page 18 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program      contribution to a particular project when it is needed for the development in question when the City  does not have the financial resources to construct the project in circumstances which fit with the  developer’s timetable. Lastly, individual citizens sometimes contribute in the form of assessments for  specific projects which benefit their properties. This is done through the creation of a local improvement  district (LID), including all of the benefitted properties. The cost of the project is then assessed against  those properties on a proportionate basis.  The 2010 Cherokee LID sewer project is the most recent  example of improvement district financing in the City.  OTHER REVENUES  There are two other alternative revenue sources available for capital project funding. The first is tax  increment financing through the two urban renewal districts created by the City – one in Glenwood and  one in Downtown. In an urban renewal district additional taxes resulting from increases in assessed  value are sequestered and made available to the district, which then uses those revenues to support  debt service on urban renewal bonds used to finance projects within the district.  At this point the  revenues of either district have not risen to the level deemed adequate to support bond issuance.  Nonetheless, that may occur within the period of the CIP, hence some of those projects are included.  The second alternative revenue source is an internal charge which is assessed against City departments’  operating Budgets to provide funding for preservation and rehabilitation of City buildings and structures.    CITY ACCOUNTING FUNDS USED FOR CAPITAL RESOURCES  USER FEE/TAX FUNDS  Street Capital Fund  Purpose:  To account for operation, maintenance, and construction of the City’s streets and  transportation system.  This includes the City’s pavement preservation program, signal operations, and  street light replacement and maintenance.  Revenues are generated from a three‐cent local motor  vehicle fuel tax and a State fuel tax.   Restrictions: Use of these funds is restricted to activities within public rights of way by the Oregon  Constitution.  Wastewater Capital Bond  Purpose:  To account for the construction of capital facilities which are identified within the Wastewater  Master Plan as requiring rehabilitation of the existing system or expansion to support growth and  development.  Bond proceeds provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund.  Restrictions:  Funding provided by bond proceeds, including interest earnings, are restricted by the  terms of the bond contract developed at the time of the bond sale.  2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 19         Wastewater Capital Fund  Purpose:  To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City’s wastewater  collection system.  Wastewater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of this  fund.  Restrictions:  As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for  planning, constructing, maintaining and operating the wastewater collection system.  Stormwater Capital Fund  Purpose:  To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City’s stormwater  collection and treatment system.  Stormwater user fee collections provide the financing for the  expenditures of this fund.  Restrictions:  As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for  planning, constructing, maintaining, and operating the stormwater collection and treatment system.  SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDCS) FUNDS  Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for available capacity within the existing wastewater collection system that is  attributable to growth.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Restrictions:  Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use capital maintenance or  construction on the wastewater collection system.  Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Improvement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capital  projects.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Restrictions: Expenditures of Wastewater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity‐ enhancing projects for the wastewater system.  Stormwater Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for available capacity within the existing stormwater system that is attributable to  growth.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Restrictions:  Stormwater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or  construction on the stormwater collection system.  Stormwater Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capital  projects.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Page 20 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program      Restrictions: Expenditures of Stormwater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity‐ enhancing projects for the stormwater system.  Transportation Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for available capacity within the existing transportation system that is attributable  to growth.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Restrictions: Transportation Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or  construction on the transportation system.  Transportation Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacity‐enhancing capital  projects.  Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.    Restrictions: Expenditures of Transportation Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity‐ enhancing projects for the transportation systems.  EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTION FUNDS  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund  Purpose:  To account for Federal grant revenues received for the primary purpose of advancing capital  projects that primarily benefit low income persons.  Restrictions:  CDBG funds, including interest earnings, must meet the Federal government criteria of  benefiting low to moderate income individual’s needs, eliminating slums and blight, and addressing  urgent needs.  Development Projects Fund  Purpose:  To account for county, State and Federal grants awarded to the City for the purpose of  preserving or enhancing City facilities.  This fund also accounts for funds donated by developers toward  the construction of capital projects directly affected by the particular development.  Restrictions:  Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projects  for which they were collected.  Special Assessments Capital Project Fund  Purpose:  To account for the interim financing and related costs of construction for public improvements  which primarily benefit adjacent property owners of the subject capital project.  Revenues are  generated through special assessments being levied against the benefiting properties.  Restrictions:  State law restricts assessments to the specific improvement constructed.    2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 21         OTHER FUNDS  Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA) Funds  Purpose:  To account for funds collected and set aside within Urban Renewal Districts as defined and  adopted by the City Council.   Restrictions:  Funds collected within the specified Urban Renewal District and set aside for capital  projects are restricted for use on capital projects benefiting the Urban Renewal District.  Booth Kelly Fund  Purpose:  To account for revenues received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center.  These  funds are set aside for Capital Improvement projects that improve the Booth Kelly Center.  Building Preservation Fund  Purpose:  To account for funds collected and set aside for maintenance and improvements to City  owned buildings and facilities.    Page 22 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program  SECTION III  FINANCIAL SUMMARIES    2013-2017 Capital Improvement ProgramPage 23     SECTION IV   PROJECTS  SYSTEM PAGE  UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS .................................................................................. 25  ALL PROJECTS MAP ............................................................................................................ 26  STORMWATER  Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 27  Project Map and Legend ............................................................................................................. 28  Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................... 29  In Process Projects ...................................................................................................................... 34  Funding Programmed ................................................................................................................. 41  Partially Programmed ................................................................................................................. 51  Funding Not Programmed .......................................................................................................... 63    TRANSPORTATION  Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 68  Project Map and Legend ............................................................................................................. 70  Summary of Projects  .................................................................................................................. 71  Constructed Projects ................................................................................................................... 76  In Process Projects ...................................................................................................................... 78  Funding Programmed ................................................................................................................. 83  Partially Programmed ................................................................................................................. 88  Funding Not Programmed .......................................................................................................... 98    WASTEWATER  Overview ................................................................................................................................... 116  Project Map and Legend ........................................................................................................... 117  Summary of Projects  ................................................................................................................ 118  In Process Projects .................................................................................................................... 121  Funding Programmed ............................................................................................................... 125  Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................ 130  BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY  Overview ................................................................................................................................... 144  Project Map and Legend ........................................................................................................... 145  Summary of Projects  ................................................................................................................ 146  Constructed Projects ................................................................................................................. 148  In Process Projects .................................................................................................................... 149  Funding Programmed ............................................................................................................... 151  Partially Programmed ............................................................................................................... 155  Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................ 156  MISCELLANEOUS  Overview  .................................................................................................................................. 168  Summary of Projects  ................................................................................................................ 169          UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS  Once projects are identified and selected for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program, a project  page is created for the project.  The project page includes important information about a project such  as:  project description, justification, driver, trigger, and status.  This information is important for  conveying and tracking details as each project moves from conception to construction.  The following is  a list and description of these elements:  Project Description – This is a description or early scope for a project.  Many times this description will  be very broad as it may be taken from a master plan or refinement plan and most likely in conceptual  form.  The actual scope of a project is generally refined through the various phases of project planning,  design and delivery.  Project Justification – This element explains why the project is an identified capital need, and may be  refined over time as a project moves from project planning to design to bid and construction.   Justification includes meeting regulatory requirements, correcting existing deficiencies, or periodic  preservation to maintain an asset and offset the need for costly repairs or replacement in the future.  Project Driver – The project driver is usually relevant to the specific project.  Typical drivers include the  need to accommodate future growth, regulatory requirements, or the need to maintain public health  and safety.  This element helps explain why a project is included within the Capital Improvements  Program.  Project Trigger – The project trigger is also relevant to the specific project.  Triggers can be completion  of a previous capital improvement, development within a certain region of the City, or necessary  preservation activities as identified through various asset management tools.  Project Status – Status describes the current stage of the Project, e.g. Planning, design, or construction.  Specific Plans/Policies related to this Project – This is a list of the various Council Goals, master plans,  refinement plans, adopted policies, and/or reports that relate to a project.  Improvement SDC Eligibility – Some projects are eligible to receive SDC funding; however most projects  are not eligible for 100% SDC funding.  If eligible, this element gives the percent of the total project cost  eligible for improvement SDCs funds.  Expenditure Schedule – Lists various project activities and estimates the timing and cost to accomplish  the project activity.  Operational Impact – Estimates the financial impact by fiscal year to the operating budget upon  completion of the capital improvement.  This can be a positive or negative number as some projects  improve existing facilities reducing the operations and maintenance impact while the addition of new  infrastructure will increase operations and maintenance costs due to adding one or more new assets to  the City inventory.  Funding Source – Describes how and when a project will/needs to be funded and the source of that  funding (e.g. bonds, capital funds, SDCs, grants).   2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 25 Page 262013-2017 Capital Improvement Program     STORMWATER   Overview   Stormwater projects fall into several categories:  Stormwater Studies – These projects typically fund the study of an area to provide for a future water  quality feature or system expansion.  Projects may include studies for improving water quality in a  drainage way, work providing data for future Federal funding, or exploring how to improve the existing  system.  Current examples of studies in the CIP are the Facility Master Plan update and the UGB  Expansion Area Facility Planning.  Stormwater Rehab/Improvements – These projects typically provide upgrades to the City’s existing  stormwater system or the removal of inactive or potentially unsafe storm lines.  Projects may include  the repair and upsizing of storm lines, or the addition of storm lines to reduce localized flooding.  The  Over‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement and Improvements and the 59th, Aster, and Daisy Street projects  fall into this category.  Capacity Enhancement – These projects typically provide additional capacity to the existing stormwater  system.  These types of improvements may include an additional detention pond, detention facilities  and offline water quality treatment facilities.  Current examples of capacity enhancement in the CIP are  the South 67th Street and “S” and “T” Street Drainage Projects.  Restoration – These projects typically involve restoring streams and waterways.  Projects may include  repairing channel deterioration, providing access for fish passage, or improving flow capacity.  Examples  of necessary restoration projects include Island Park, Jasper Slough, and Gray Creek/72nd Street.  New Facilities ‐ These projects typically add new capacity to the system by constructing new stormwater  facilities as a result of or in anticipation of new development.  Projects may include storm lines built as  part of a new subdivision, and extension of storm trunk main lines. Project Maps    SW1 Mill Race Restoration  SW2 59th, Aster, and Daisy Street  SW3 Island Park  SW4 Lower Mill Race / Mill Race Outfalls  SW5 Mill Race Stormwater Facility   SW6 Booth Kelly Drainage  SW7 Over‐Under Channel Pipe Replacement  & Improvements  SW8 Drainage Repair  SW9 Metro Waterways Study  SW10 Channel Improvements  SW11 MS4 Permit Requirements  SW12 Riparian Land Management  SW13 SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update  SW14 Mill Race FIRM  SW15 High Banks Road (42nd St.) Dike Study  SW16 Facility Master Plan Updates  SW17 Glenwood Bridget Drainage  SW18 ”S” and “T” Streets Drainage  SW19 Jasper/Natron Drainage  SW20  Channel 6  SW21 Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction  SW22 Woodstave Removal  SW23 Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls   SW24 South 67th Street  SW25 Glenwood   SW26 North Willamette Heights   SW27 Jasper Slough  SW28 Gray Creek/72nd Street   SW29 Corporate Way Pond  SW30 McKenzie Oxbow   SW31 UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans  SW32 I‐5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel  SW33 “Q” Street Channel  SW34 Maple Island Slough   2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 27 Page 282013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Mill Race Restoration 3,500$ - - - - - 3,500 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 350$ - - - - - 350 Land Match -$ - - - - - - Federal Funds (420) 3,150$ - - - - - 3,150 59th, Aster, & Daisy Street 298$ 52 1,950 - - - 2,300 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 298$ - - - - - 298 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 52 1,950 - - - 2,002 Other -$ - - - - - - Island Park 2,000$ - - - - - 2,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 257$ - - - - - 257 Revenue Bonds (425) 1,743$ - - - - - 1,743 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Lower Mill Race 1,145$ - - - - - 1,145 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 1,120$ - - - - - 1,120 Federal Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25 Mill Race Stormwater Facility 1,767$ 83 152 - - - 2,002 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 83 152 - - - 235 Revenue Bonds (425) 1,767$ - - - - - 1,767 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly Drainage 360$ - - - - - 360 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 310$ - - - - - 310 Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50 Over-Under Channel 1,128$ - 2,472 - - - 3,600 Capital Fund (425)-$ - 348 - - - 348 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 1,128$ - - - - - 1,128 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 2,124 - - - 2,124 Drainage Repair 150$ 200 200 200 200 144 1,094 Capital Fund (425) 150$ 129 100 161 109 11 660 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ 71 100 39 91 133 434 Funding Programmed In Process 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 29 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Metro Waterways Study 50$ 50 50 50 - - 200 Capital Fund (425) 25$ 25 25 25 - - 100 Improvement SDCs (440) 25$ 25 25 25 - - 100 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Channel Improvement 57$ 59 100 100 100 100 516 Capital Fund (425) 55$ 37 78 78 78 78 404 Improvement SDCs (440) 2$ 2 2 2 2 2 12 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ 20 20 20 20 20 100 MS4 Permit Requirements 25$ 30 30 30 30 30 175 Capital Fund (425) 25$ 15 15 15 15 15 100 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Riparian Land Management 38$ 26 30 47 47 47 234 Capital Fund (425) 10$ 10 13 30 30 30 123 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Reimbursement SDCs (441) 1$ 1 2 2 2 2 9 Other 27$ - - - - - 27 Channel 6 FIRM 20$ - - - - - 20 Capital Fund (425) 20$ - - - - 20 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)- - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Mill Race FIRM 20$ - - - - - 20 Capital Fund (425) 20$ - - - - - 20 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - 42nd St. Dike Study 50$ - - - - - 50 Capital Fund (425) 50$ - - - - - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Facility Master Plan Update 30$ 170 - - - - 200 Capital Fund (425) 15$ 85 - - - - 100 Improvement SDCs (440) 15$ 85 - - - - 100 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Glenwood Blvd Bridge Drainage Imp -$ 50 - - - - 50 Capital Fund (425)-$ 50 - - - - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Page 30 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total S & T Drainage -$ - 150 450 - - 600 Capital Fund (425)-$ - 76 250 - - 326 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - 74 - - - 74 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 200 - - 200 Jasper-Natron 720$ 2,280 2,000 - - - 5,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 720$ - - - - - 720 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 2,280 2,000 - - - 4,280 Channel 6 500$ - 1,000 - - - 1,500 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 18$ - - - - - 18 Revenue Bonds (425) 482$ - - - - - 482 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 1,000 - - - 1,000 Cedar Creek 500$ - - - 100 - 600 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 500$ - - - - - 500 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - 100 - 100 Woodstave Removal -$ - - - 50 150 200 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - 50 - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - 150 150 Irving Slough Headwaters -$ - - 416 1,966 - 2,382 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - 290 345 - 635 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 126 1,621 - 1,747 South 67th Street -$ 325 - - - - 325 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 31 - - - - 31 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 294 - - - - 294 Glenwood -$ 2,000 2,000 2,000 - - 6,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 30 35 175 - - 240 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - SEDA Funds (429)-$ 1,970 1,965 1,825 - - 5,760 Partial Funding Programmed 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 31 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total North Willamette Heights -$ 60 - - - - 60 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 8 - - - - 8 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 52 - - - - 52 Jasper Slough -$ 60 - - - - 60 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ 50 - - - - 50 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 10 - - - - 10 Gray Creek - 72nd Street -$ - 3,000 3,000 - - 6,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - 29 - - 29 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 3,000 2,971 - - 5,971 Corporate Way Pond -$ 210 - - - - 210 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Other (420)35 - - - - 35 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 175 - - - - 175 McKenzie Oxbow -$ 500 500 - - - 1,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 500 500 - - - 1,000 UGB Expansion Area Facility -$ - 100 - - - 100 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 100 - - - 100 I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel -$ - - 105 440 - 545 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 105 440 - 545 "Q" Street Channel -$ 100 100 100 100 100 500 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 100 100 100 100 100 500 Funding Not Programmed Page 32 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Maple Island Slough -$ - 550 - - - 550 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 550 - - - 550 Annual Totals 12,331$ 6,255 14,384 6,498 3,033 571 43,071 Capital Fund (425) 370$ 351 655 849 627 134 2,986 Improvement SDCs (440) 615$ 329 229 246 17 17 1,453 Reimbursement SDCs (441) 1$ 107.40 211 76 128 170 692 Revenue Bonds (425) 8,120$ - - - - - 8,120 Federal Funds (420) 3,150$ - - - - - 3,150 SEDA Funds (429)-$ 1,970 1,965 1,825 - - 5,760 Land Match -$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50 MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25 Other (420)-$ 35 - - - - 35 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 3,463 11,324 3,502 2,261 250 20,800 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 33 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830001 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Mill Race Restoration 12.7% Map ID-SW 1 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,500$ 3,450$ 50 Other -$ Total 3,500$ 3,450$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5 Personnel Costs 350$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50 Total 385$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 350$ 350$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 3,150$ 3,150$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Land Match -$ Unspecified -$ Total 3,500$ 3,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Phase II under construction with scheduled completion in Fall 2012 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Phase I: Move inlet upstream to improve flow; rehabilitate former river channel to carry flow and connect to existing Mill Race near current inlet; rehabilitate downstream channel. Phase II: lower elevation of inlet to Gorrie Creek. Reconfigure Mill Pond to create a meandering channel with a 12-foot wide low flow channel and 15-foot wide high flow benches, similar to the upper Mill Race. The channel between the F Street Bridge and the Mill Pond inlet will be narrowed. The channel in the pond will have a higher riparian terrace alongside each bank, and seasonal wetland ponds will be created. The proposed three seasonal wetland ponds have a total surface area of three acres and connections at the upstream and downstream ends. At each point, the inlet is designed to be at the channel invert elevation with the outlet. A rock weir is proposed at each pond outlet to prevent head cuts into the ponds. Justification: Improve water quality on existing drainage way; provide habitat restoration; provide aesthetic environmental amenities in downtown; support redevelopment of downtown. In construction Increase water quality along the Mill Race Page 34 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850191 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality 59th, Aster, and Daisy Street 9.5% Map ID-SW 2 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 250$ 50$ 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,800$ 100$ 1,700$ Other 250$ 15$ 85$ 150$ Total 2,300$ 65$ 285$ 1,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs (4)$ 1$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ Total (4)$ 1$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 298$ 298$ Unspecified 2,002$ -$ 52$ 1,950$ Total 2,300$ 298$ 52$ 1,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Phase 1 of this project is to install 350 feet of 42 inch storm sewer in the area of South 59th Street and Aster Street. Phase 2 will be to install additional parallel stormwater pipe in Daisy Street to provide additional capacity. Capacity issue, minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs. Additional capacity will minimize liability and risk from flooding. Phase I in progress with construction planned for Summer 2012. Phase II deferred pending funding. Justification: This project will complete a piped storm system for the Mountain Gate area drainage. The current system now consists of a piped system in the unimproved Aster Street Right-of-Way that outfalls into a open ditch in a wetland area. The wetland then drains back into a piped system. The open ditch does not have the capacity to convey stormwater from large rain events creating a flooding situation over South 59 Street and adjoining properties. Phase II Daisy St. parallel pipe will be needed to provide capacity through the system to the 48th St. channel Citizen complaints, localized flooding and development impacts. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 35 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850221 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Island Park 12.7% Map ID-SW 3 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Project #16WQ Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Mill Race Ecosystem Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 500$ 35$ 465$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,500$ -$ 200$ 1,300$ Other -$ Total 2,000$ 35$ 665$ 1,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 7$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ Personnel Costs 8$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ Total 15$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 4$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 1,743$ 1,743$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 257$ 257$ Unspecified -$ Total 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning and designing in 2011. Scheduled for construction in Summer 2012 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: These projects are intended to improve stormwater quality from urban runoff in two heavily trafficked downtown drainage basins. Stormwater from these basins drain to the Springfield Mill Race and the Island Park Slough, both of which have significantly impaired water quality. Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urban stormwater under the Clean Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater discharge permit, and support stormwater management requirements of new development downtown. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009. Community Mill Race restoration Stormwater quality requirements Page 36 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850222 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Lower Mill Race / Mill Race Outfalls 12.7% Map ID-SW 4 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management Plan Economic Development Downtown Mill Race Ecosystem Plan Booth Kelly Stormwater Master Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 247$ 247$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 898$ 898$ Other -$ Total 1,145$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 12$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 42$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 1,120$ 1,120$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ OWEB grant -$ MWMC sponsorship 25$ 25$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,145$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning and design to continue in 2012 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct a daylight or diversion pretreatment structure, an offline water quality treatment facility, and a green pipe open channel improvement. Additional detail for this multi-faceted project are in WQ-12 project of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urban stormwater under the Clean Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater discharge permit, and support stormwater management requirements of new development downtown. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009. Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Race. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 37 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850223 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Mill Race Stormwater Facility 12.7% Map ID-SW 5 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Mill Race Project EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 300$ 300$ Engineering 50$ 50$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,500$ 1,500$ Other 152$ 152$ Total 2,002$ 50$ 452$ 1,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 30$ 1$ 1$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ Total 34$ 1$ 1$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 1,767$ 1,767$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 235$ 83$ 152$ Unspecified -$ Total 2,002$ 1,767$ 83$ 152$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond on land recently acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from the industrial/commercial sub-basin south of Main Street from the Booth Kelly site (the new Woodstave line). The project will include open vegetative treatment for problematic pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race. It will also provide detention for stormwater and enhance planned public amenities in this area. The project will require careful phasing to coincide with projected Mill Race/Mill Pond work to maximize efficiencies. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project Planning and design to continue in 2012 Justification: Stormwater in this sub-basin discharges into the Mill Race, and includes various industrial pollutants from log yards, industrial sites, and heavy downtown vehicle traffic, resulting in periodic violations of state water quality standards and presenting hazards to endangered fish species. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. Unique sites and facilities will enhance the Mill Race renovation project, and provide educational opportunity and a community amenity while improving water quality. It may provide some contribution to the Mill Pond renovation project by providing fill material at a low cost. Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Pond. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Page 38 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #810032 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Booth Kelly Drainage 0% Map ID-SW 6 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Booth Kelly Industrial Complex Stormwater Master Plan Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 60$ 60$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 360$ -$ 360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 2.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ Personnel Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total 7.5$ -$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 310$ 310$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Booth-Kelly 618 50$ 50$ Unspecified -$ Total 360$ 360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning and design to continue in 2012 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site. Justification: Stormwater runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The site currently does not have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weather season or provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master plan has been completed to address this issue in order to support ongoing operation of the Booth-Kelly industrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act storm water requirements and address Endangered Species Act concerns. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project The stormwater system in Booth Kelly is aging and under developed. Basic drainage function and water quality are necessary for discharge into the Mill Race. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 39 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850234 Construction and Preservation 1.9% Map ID-SW 7 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering 500$ 400$ 100$ Land/Right of Way 300$ 300$ Construction 2,700$ 2,700$ Other -$ Total 3,600$ -$ 800$ 2,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 348$ 348$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Revenue Bond 425 1,128$ 1,128$ Unspecified 2,124$ 2,124$ Total 3,600$ 1,128$ -$ 2,472$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Consultant selection for alternatives analysis and design Improvement SDC Eligibility: Aged facility at the end of its useful life. Additional capacity needs identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan - Project #15FC. Identified structural problems in existing CMP. Delay may increase City's risk. The Over-Under Channel system includes about 3,900 linear feet of corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) under the existing channel. This project is intended to replace the existing CMP with a new pipe, as well as provide a parallel pipe for additional capacity as recommended in the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. During 2010, staff became aware that some of the existing CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is beginning to fail. About half of the 3,900 feet of pipe was installed in 1950 and the remainder installed in 1988/89. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan also recommends installing 8,720 feet of 36-inch diameter pipe parallel to the existing CMP pipe and other pipes further east to provide additional capacity to handle existing flows that are conveyed/stored in the channel portion of the system during high flows. This project will include evaluating alternatives for reducing the size or eliminating the channel by using different pipe sizes and/or configurations. Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement & Improvements Page 40 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850014 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Drainage Repair 0% Map ID-SW 8 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 100$ 10$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,250$ 140$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 185$ Other -$ Total 1,350$ 150$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (13)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (2)$ (2)$ (3)$ (3)$ Personnel Costs (24)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ Total (37)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ (5)$ (6)$ (7)$ (7)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 760$ 150$ 129$ 100$ 161$ 109$ 11$ 100$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 534$ 71$ 100$ 39$ 91$ 133$ 100$ Total 1,294$ 150$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 144$ 200$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability, capacity needs, opportunities to reduce maintenance costs, citizen requests, aged facilities. Accumulating fund for projects as developed Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, and the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Repair West B St. storm outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6, 72nd St. and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars causing localized flooding at 1105 S St., 1500 B St., and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catch basin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St. intersection, A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Drainage repairs on Quarry Street and Park Street. Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating costs of the drainage system by reestablishing stormwater efficiency. Reduced costs would be realized in operational costs currently expensed by responding to localized flooding problems during rain events. Citizen requests, field surveys, history of identified problem areas. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 41 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # 830017 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Metro Waterways Study 12.7% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 200$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 200$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Other -$ Total 200$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ Accumulating fund for projects as developed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Springfield is participating along with Eugene and Lane County in an ongoing Army Corps of Engineers General Investigation Study authorized under the Water Resources Development Act. Springfield’s share (25%) of this approximately $3,500,000 project is $875,000. The current project is a feasibility study necessary to identify future water quality projects within the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan watershed. CIP projects, such as Channel Improvements, Floodplain Mapping (currently underway) and McKenzie Oxbow will qualify as in-kind match and satisfy the balance of the local obligation. The Cedar Creek Drainage Basin has been identified as Springfield’s highest priority study area. The Cedar Creek Intake reconstruction is identified as the initial project in the Metro Waterways Study. The Intake Reconstruction is identified in a separate project sheet. Justification: This planning study will assist the City in future years to gain access to federal funding (similar to the Mill Race funding) for capital improvement projects that address drainage capacity, water quality, and flood control. Future growth, stormwater management and water quality Currently stormwater from the Thurston area outfalls into Cedar Creek. Future developments will increase stormwater and impact Cedar Creek. Page 42 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850089 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Channel Improvement 3.5% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 74$ 7$ 7$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 244$ 20$ 24$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Other 298$ 30$ 28$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ Total 616$ 57$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 8$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 39$ 5$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ Total 47$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 9$ 10$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 482$ 55$ 37$ 78$ 78$ 78$ 78$ 78$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 14$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Total 616$ 57$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: The need to meet regulatory requirements and address capacity issues Accumulating fund for projects as developed Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality, and fish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. The adoption of the Springfield Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan identifies an additional temperature benefit from channel restoration and shading. Justification: This project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements. The listing of the Willamette and McKenzie rivers for temperature identifies the need to provide riparian improvement and shading. Regulatory and environmental requirements 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 43 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850117 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality MS4 Permit Requirements 0% No Map Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 and the Stormwater Management Plan City of Springfield Municipal and Development Codes Regulatory Requirements Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 205$ 25$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Total 205$ 25$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 48$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ Total 48$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 115$ 25$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 90$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Total 205$ 25$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Accumulating funds for projects as developed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements. Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which authorizes the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007, the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit. Project Driver: Regulatory and environmental requirements The work under the MS4 Plan in on going to address permit requirements Page 44 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850093 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Riparian Land Management 12.7% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan City of Springfield Development Code Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act Metro Waterways identified land acquisitions Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 102.55$ 14.65$ 14.65$ 14.65$ 14.65$ 14.65$ 14.65$ 14.65$ Construction -$ Other 179$ 24$ 12$ 15$ 32$ 32$ 32$ 32$ Total 281.05$ 38.40$ 26.40$ 29.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 13$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$ Personnel Costs 8$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ Total 21$ 2$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 5$ 5$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 90$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ User Fees 425 153$ 10$ 10$ 13$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 11.05$ 1.40$ 1.40$ 1.65$ 1.65$ 1.65$ 1.65$ 1.65$ Other 27$ 27$ Total 281.05$ 38.40$ 26.40$ 29.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ 46.65$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Development activity impacts on storm drainage flows and water quality Accumulating funds for projects as developed Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, some Springfield waterways do not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to the Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparian protection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners. Regulatory requirements and community livability Project Description: This project provides funding to purchase riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. It also provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them. Property acquisitions will typically result in increased operational spending to maintain city owned property. Projects developed on property acquired may, however, produce savings through reduced spending for flood control and water quality improvement activities. Project funding levels have been reduced to conform to eligibility levels for improvement SDCs. Council adoption and implementation of a reimbursement SDC may permit restoration of prior funding levels. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 45 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850237 Construction and Preservation SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update 0% Map ID-SW 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 20$ 20$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Past construction along SCS Channel 6 Citizen Request to prepare current flood plain maps Justification: SCS Channel 6 currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. Since the data collection was done for the original flood plain mapping in the 1960's and 1970's, numerous changes have been made to SCS Channel 6, including widening, narrowing, and piping. Each of these changes was considered insignificant and was done independently, so detailed analysis of the affect of the change on the mapped flood plain was not performed. However, when the changes are taken in aggregate, there may be an affect on some properties. The City has received a request from a citizen with property along SCS Channel 6 to re-evaluate the current 100-year flood plain boundary and prepare new maps if needed. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consultant to develop a scope document for the study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work. Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for SCS Channel 6 from 10th Street to the I-5 Channel to incorporate numerous construction changes that have occurred along SCS Channel 6 in the past 40 years. Page 46 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850238 Construction and Preservation Mill Race FIRM Update 0% Map ID-SW 14 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 20$ 20$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Study will commence following funding approval Improvement SDC Eligibility: Mill Race Restoration Project construction Required by federal statute 44 CFR 65.3 Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Springfield Mill Race from the inlet at Clearwater Park to the outlet at Island Park to incorporate construction changes. The Springfield Mill Race currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain as depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. With the construction of the Mill Race Restoration Project, the City is obligated under federal statute to prepare new analyses and maps to show the affects of the project on the 100-year flood plain. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consulant to develop a scope document for the study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 47 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850239 Construction and Preservation High Banks Road (42nd St.) Dike Study 0% Map ID-SW 15 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: National Levee Safety Program National Flood Insurance Program High Banks Road Dike Operation and Maintenance Agreement (1983) Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Study will commence following funding approval Improvement SDC Eligibility: Study needed prior to completion of updated McKenzie River flood plain mapping under the Metro Waterways Project. Federal requirements for maintaining/operating flood control levees Conduct a study of the condition of the High Banks Road (42nd Street) Dike to identify any structural or non-structural deficiencies and to evaluate the potential for obtaining federal accreditation of this Dike as a flood control facility under the National Flood Insurance Program and for compliance with the National Levee Safety Program. In October 1983, the City entered into an Agreement with the Soil Conservation Service for the operations and maintenance of the High Banks Road Dike that was constructed by Lane County in the 1950's adjacent to what is now known as 42nd Street. This dike provides flood control protection for areas of Springfield north of Highway 126 west of 42nd Street from McKenzie River flooding. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed an accreditation program for levees that are relied upon under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the National Levee Safety Committee has developed recommendations to Congress for a National Levee Safety Program. Page 48 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830018 Construction and Preservation Stormwater Facility Master Plan Updates 50% No Map Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Objective Stormwater Management Plan/NPDES MS4 Permit EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 25$ 25$ Engineering 175$ 175$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 200$ 25$ 175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 100$ 15$ 85$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 100$ 15$ 85$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 200$ 30$ 170$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Master Plan update will commence following funding approval Improvement SDC Eligibility: Regulatory compliance with the City NPDES MS4 permit, future growth, stormwater management and Council Direction to update SDC's on 5-yr cycle and regulatory requirements Update of the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. The plan itself identified areas where additional study work is needed. There is also a need to address the proposed UGB amendments identified in the Commercial, Industrial Buildable Lands study recently completed. The plan project list will be re- prioritized and costs will be revised to represent current values. New technology for sustainable development and stormwater management at the source is available to reduce overall system requirements and long term costs. The Council directed staff to maintain and update the Facility Master plan to provide current information for SDC development, CIP project needs and support for the development community. BMP DS3 of the City's NPDES MS4 permit directs updating of the SWFMP. The data used for the current Stormwater Facility Master Plan represents the system as it existed in 2005 and doesn't include new development and repairs of the existing system. The system model needs to be updated to the current GIS standard NAD 83 and completed capital project and system upgrades need to be modeled. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 49 Stormwater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation Glenwood Blvd Bridge Drainage Improvements 0% Map ID-SW 17 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council goals to maintain infrastructure and provide financially responsible services EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 40$ 40$ Other -$ Total 50$ -$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Revenue Bonds 425 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 50$ -$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending funding. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. Lane County has a project to rehabilitate Glenwood Boulevard pavement in 2014. Correcting the drainage issues prior to that project will ensure that their work will not be compromised by the City's work. The City owns the Glenwood Boulevard Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Staff has determined that the existing measures for collecting stormwater runoff from Glenwood Boulevard and the Bridge are insufficient to protect the bridge and supporting embankments from water and erosion damage. This project involves installing new drainage infrastructure on the southerly approach to the Bridge to intercept the water and convey it safely downslope. The project also involves repairing the eroded embankments under the south and north ends of the Bridge. The project may use consultant services in FY13 to provide recommendations for appropriate measures to repair the embankment erosion. Glenwood Boulevard is a major transportation connection to and from I-5. Continued erosion of the embankments supporting the bridge could result in the bridge becoming unable to carry traffic without load limitations. Several years ago, City staff repaired the embankment erosion at the bridge's south end. However, without addressing the drainage problems at that time, more erosion is occurring at the south end and erosion is also now occurring at the north end. Page 50 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality "S" and "T" Streets Drainage 12.7% Map ID-SW 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: SCS Channel 6 Report Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Facilities Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 475$ 25$ 450$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 600$ -$ -$ -$ 150$ 450$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 15$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 15$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 74$ 74$ -$ User Fees 425 326$ 76$ 250$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 200$ 200$ Total 600$ -$ -$ 150$ 450$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: This project will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the "S" Street area. Redevelopment and/or completion of Channel 6 improvements and capacity issues. Deferred pending funding Project Description: Construct a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along "T" and "S" Streets between 10th and Debra Streets. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan expands upon the original Channel 6 report with a necessary downstream Channel 6 project. Increasing the pipe size or pipe length will increase operational costs slightly. Citizen complaints regarding localized flooding. Improvement of County standard streets. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 51 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850233 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Jasper/Natron Drainage 83.4% Map ID-SW 19 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 250$ 250$ Engineering 500$ 500$ Land/Right of Way 500$ 500$ Construction 3,500$ 1,500$ 2,000$ Other 250$ 250$ Total 5,000$ 1,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 145$ 29$ 29$ 29$ 29$ 29$ Personnel Costs 15$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 160$ -$ -$ 32$ 32$ 32$ 32$ 32$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 720$ 720$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 4,280$ 2,280$ 2,000$ Total 5,000$ 720$ 2,280$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Will expand the storm sewer system to service future growth Development within the Jasper/Natron area following completion of the Jasper Trunk Sewer (CIP Map ID WW-10). Council direction. Deferred pending funding Project Description: Construction on channel improvement along the existing drainage ways to serve new development in the Jasper Natron basin. Impacts to the downstream property owners and natural drainage ways located beyond the City's Urban Growth Boundary will need to be assessed and mitigated in the final design. The first year of the project will include additional studies to identify the downstream impacts and design the project and its mitigation measures. Construction will occur in the following years. The impact on the City's operations budget is estimated on the conceptual project but may change on final design. There is an expected increase in both the annual maintenance and personnel budget. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the existing Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Page 52 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850220 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Channel 6 3.5% Map ID-SW 20 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 210$ 60$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,240$ 440$ 800$ Other -$ Total 1,500$ 500$ -$ -$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 14$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$ Total 44$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 482$ 482$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 18$ 18$ Unspecified 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 1,500$ 500$ -$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Improvements to the existing storm drainage pipes and channel, a proposed by-pass pipe, and construct a new regional detention facility. This project needs additional study and design to better meet regulatory goals. It is possible to pursue in phased increments. Justification: This project will increase capacity and help to reduce and eliminate localized flooding along the channel, which will lower annual operations costs. Identified capacity and water quality needs identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Project #4 FC and #4 WQ Flooding in area around channel 6, between I-105 and Hayden Bridge Road. Total Maximum Daily Load goals for shading and channel improvement. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 53 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850235 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction 12.7% Map ID-SW 21 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Waterways Project. 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 125$ 100$ 25$ Engineering 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way 100$ 100$ Construction 300$ 100$ 200$ Other -$ Total 600$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 200$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 500$ 500$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 100$ 100$ Total 600$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Cedar Creek drainage is the focus of a comprehensive series of stormwater system improvements identified in the Metro Waterways Study. Metro Waterways represents a regional partnership which includes state, federal, and local partners, including the US Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, as well as local utilities and jurisdictions and the McKenzie Watershed Council. Projects identified in the study focus on enhancing riparian areas and stream habitat for the benefit of endangered species, reducing urban pollutants, and repairing/restoring critical flood control infrastructure on the McKenzie River and Cedar Creek. This project, the first of those identified in the multi-year study, is the reconstruction of the intake structure and associated channel improvements to the inlet of Cedar Creek from the McKenzie River. This work will provide for managing seasonal flows to both reduce the potential for serious wintertime flooding from the McKenzie River, and ensure adequate summertime flows for fish habitat and downstream water users, including the Springfield Utility Board. Springfield has participated in the Metro Waterways partnership since 2003. Justification: Improvements will ensure summertime stream flows in Cedar Creek to provide stormwater management and habitat to endangered species, and will manage high storm flows, which presently threaten citizens’ homes. Metro Waterways Study, Cedar Creek Partnership and Salmon Trout Enhancement Program (STEP) project. The Stormwater Facility Master Plan identified this project as an ongoing need through 2018. Implementation of the initial project developed out of the Metro Waterways Study and the STEP project. Page 54 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850177 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Woodstave Removal 0% Map ID-SW 22 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 200$ 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50$ 150$ 150$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 300$ 150$ 150$ Total 350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50$ 150$ 150$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the S. A Street woodstave storm line out of service. This line is located south of S. A Street, between S.10th Street and S. 18th Street. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements. Initial project cost involves scoping the extent of the removal, permitting and disposal requirements and developing updated costs. Additional funds will then be programmed as needed to complete the project. Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs. Citizen request and Council priority Regulatory and environmental requirements. Delay may increase City's risk of regulatory violations. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 55 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls 3.5% Map ID-SW 23 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 440$ 440$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,757$ 1,757$ Other 185$ 185$ Total 2,382$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,382$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 9$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 9$ -$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 635$ 290$ 345$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 1,747$ 126$ 1,621$ Total 2,382$ -$ -$ -$ 416$ 1,966$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for flood control and the construction of a stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements will be incorporated into the project where applicable to meet regulatory requirements. Justification: This project is identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and will help to reduce localized flooding and provide water quality improvements. Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability from flooding incidents Flood Control and water quality. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. Page 56 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality South 67th Street 9.5% Map ID-SW 24 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 10$ 10$ Engineering 65$ 65$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 325$ -$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Total 2$ 1$ 1$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 31$ 31$ -$ Unspecified 294$ 294$ Total 325$ -$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Reduce localized flooding identified in Stormwater Facility Master Plan Project #13FC. Minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs Project Description: Pipe improvements for flood control. Currently, during heavy rainfall the storm system surcharges at 67th and Main Street flooding private property. Citizen complaints and localized flooding. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 57 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Glenwood 8.8% Map ID-SW 25 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan I-5 Bridge Replacement Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 300$ 300$ Engineering 1,450$ 700$ 300$ 450$ Land/Right of Way 1,000$ 500$ 500$ Construction 2,500$ 1,200$ 1,300$ Other 750$ 500$ 250$ Total 6,000$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25 Personnel Costs 26$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5 Total 126$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 240$ 30$ 35$ 175$ -$ SEDA 429 5,760$ 1,970$ 1,965$ 1,825$ Total 6,000$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: To improve the stormwater system including pipe and open channel improvements, for flood control and water quality improvements at various locations within Glenwood as identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP), and to support implementation of the existing refinement plan for Glenwood. The project will also involve evaluation and construction/enhancement of stormwater outfall structures to the Willamette River. Specific projects will be implemented as development occurs, consistent with the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The City's current effort to update the Glenwood Refinement Plan will likely result in modifications to some of the projects identified in the SWFMP, and will be addressed in future system studies that will be performed as the Refinement Plan work proceeds. Justification: Provide infrastructure for new development and to correct existing deficiencies that meet current and future water quality requirements. Completion of the Glenwood Refinement Plan Update and development within the Glenwood Area Stormwater quantity and quality requirements for development within the Glenwood area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. This project may require reprioritization should the City receive federal funding for the Franklin Boulevard project. Page 58 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality North Willamette Heights 12.7% Map ID-SW 26 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 60$ 60$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 60$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 8$ 8$ Unspecified 52$ 52$ Total 60$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning stage deferring pending complete funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop a basin plan to guide new development and redevelopment activities with respect to drainage and water quality. Justification: This is a largely undeveloped area which creates runoff to the Mill Race and the Booth Kelly site. Provide a drainage study for future development including water quality elements to protect the Mill Race Stormwater management and water quality requirements to guide new development and re- development. New development and re-development within the North Willamette Heights drainage basin. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 59 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Jasper Slough 83.4% Map ID-SW 27 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 60$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 15$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Asset.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 50$ 50$ Unspecified 10$ 10$ Total 60$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Culvert and open channel improvements for flood control, riparian enhancement and planting for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) concerns. Justification: Localized filling and degradation of the channel and road crossings cause flooding and erosion. The lack of riparian cover increases temperature and reduces natural resource value of a natural stream. City stormwater currently discharges into the Jasper Slough at three locations. The Jasper Slough flows into the Mill Race which has water quality requirements. TMDL requirements, local flooding and future development Localized flooding and regulatory requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Page 60 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850148 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Gray Creek/72nd Street 21.1% Map ID-SW 28 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Waterways 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 300$ 300$ Engineering 600$ 300$ 300$ Land/Right of Way 500$ 250$ 250$ Construction 4,300$ 2,000$ 2,300$ Other 300$ 150$ 150$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total 24$ -$ -$ -$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 29$ 29$ Unspecified 5,971$ 3,000$ 2,971$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As outlined in Appendix E of the 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, this project includes constructing a new open channel to convey discharges from the eastern most portion of Gray Creek to a new outfall to Cedar Creek and regrading the existing open channel and down stream piped portions of the conveyance system to mitigate anticipated flooding due to future development. Justification: Provide anticipated flood control for future development combined with localized water quality improvements. Future development Development in the east Springfield area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 61 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #930086 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Corporate Way Pond 12.7% Map ID-SW 29 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 60$ 60$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 150$ 150$ Other -$ Total 210$ -$ 210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ Developer 420 35$ 35$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 175$ 175$ Total 210$ -$ 210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop a vegetation management plan for the Corporate Pond that discharges to Maple Island Slough. See Stormwater Facilities Master Plan 43-WQ. Refined construction cost will be developed with the study. Justification: Flood control and regulatory Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program requirements. Identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and citizen driven Stormwater quality requirements Page 62 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #830012 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality McKenzie Oxbow 12.7% Map ID-SW 30 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master plan McKenzie River Oxbow Natural Area Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Metro Waterways Study Project #8WQ EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 250$ 250$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 500$ 500$ Other 250$ 250$ Total 1,000$ -$ 500$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 1,000$ 500$ 500$ Total 1,000$ -$ 500$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The McKenzie Oxbow area was donated to the City and has been maintained by the City for some time. In 2001, there were plans to turn the area over to Willamalane. However, before that can happen, it is important to find out what effects the stormwater has that is draining to the river, and if any changes need to be made prior to the transfer of the land over to Willamalane. McKenzie Oxbow Management Plan Project Description: Study of the McKenzie Oxbow area to determine the impact of existing stormwater flows on the McKenzie River. The study will include options on what needs to be done before the area can be turned over to Willamalane Park. Phase 2 of this project includes construction of facilities and improvements identified in the study. Stormwater quality requirements, Willamalane Park District needs and Council direction 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 63 Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Stormwater 50% No Map Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Plan 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 100 Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 100$ -$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified 100$ 100 Total 100$ -$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and funding identification. Improvement SDC Eligibility: 2030 Refinement Plan acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Council approval of UGB Expansion Area(s) Develop a Stormwater Facility Master Plan for each of the areas selected by the City Council for expansion of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas for potential UGB Expansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory (CIBL). Urban facility planning will need to occur once the Council determines which area(s) are appropriate for UGB expansion. Page 64 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality 12.7% Map ID-SW 32 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 105$ 105$ Land/Right of Way 440$ 440$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 545$ -$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 4$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 10$ 5$ 5$ Total 14$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 545$ 105$ 440$ Total 545$ -$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Improve localized water quality and add capacity to reduce flooding problems Stormwater Facilities Master Plan identified and capacity issues I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel Project Description: Construct a combination flood control/water quality facility. Improve the open channel system and construct a 7 acre-foot combination treatment wetland facility on City owned property adjacent to the Gateway Natural Resource area. Stormwater quality requirements and capacity needs related to development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 65 Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality "Q" Street Channel 12.7% Map ID-SW 33 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Metro Waterways EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Other -$ Total 500$ -$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 500$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Total 500$ -$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Channel repair, riparian enhancement and shading to address temperature issues in the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and other water quality concerns. Reduce impact of nuisance species on water quality and bank stability. The Q Street Channel connects to the Alton Baker Canoe Canal near Autzen Stadium. Water quality improvements in the Springfield portion of the system will also support other efforts to restore fish habitat in the Canoe Canal. Justification: Improve water quality and temperature on existing drainage way Regulatory requirements and environmental opportunities Stormwater quality requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014. Page 66 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Maple Island Slough 12.7% Map ID-SW 34 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 75$ 75$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 475$ 475$ Other -$ Total 550$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 550$ 550$ Total 550$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Conduct an engineering study to evaluate capacity needs for future development. Develop a vegetation management plan with the intent to improve water quality from the campus industrial portion of the North Gateway area. Justification: Corporate Way Pond and the Sports Way stormwater channel have overflow outlets that discharge to the Maple Island Slough. A study is needed to evaluate water quality and capacity needs within existing drainage ways. Identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and new development Stormwater quality requirements and flood control. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 67     TRANSPORTATION   Overview  Transportation projects fall into the categories noted below:    Planning and Project Development – These projects range from larger facility planning, to concept  project planning, to specific project development.  Funding for these projects relies heavily on Federal  and State funds, with City funds used to supplement project budgets and in some cases provide required  match funding to external resources.  Current examples of this in the CIP are the Springfield  Transportation System Plan and the Franklin Boulevard Environmental Assessment projects.  Maintenance and Operations – These projects are typically programmatic and can provide funding for a  range of activities within each project.  Street Light Infill and Pole Replacement, Traffic Control Projects,  and Intelligent Transportation System investments fall in to this category.  Pavement Preservation – These projects are identified by the Maintenance Division through the  Infrastructure Management System.  Funding for these projects relies heavily on local and State fuel tax  revenues and are supplemented with Transportation Reimbursements SDCs, and federal dollars  programmed at the discretion of the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning organization (MPO).  Examples  of pavement preservation projects identified in the CIP are the Street Seal and Overlay program and the  “A” Street and Thurston Rd.  Overlay projects.  System Improvement, Existing – These projects typically either bring existing infrastructure up to the  adopted urban standards, or make capacity and safety improvements to existing facilities.  Funding for  these projects rely on all available resources.  A current example of these types of projects in the CIP is  the Glenwood Connector Path project.  System Improvement, New Facilities – These projects typically add new infrastructure to the City’s  transportation system and are identified within the various planning documents.  The trigger for these  projects is driven mostly by growth and an identified future need to relieve stress on the system.   Project funding relies on all available sources.   Project Maps    TP1  Pedestrian Signal  TP2 Street Lighting Upgrades  TP3 Glenwood Connector Path   TP4 Glenwood Connector Path Ext.  TP5 Springfield Transportation System Plan  TP6 “A” Street Overlay   TP7 Thurston Road Overlay  TP8 Downtown Lighting  TP9 ADA Transition Project  TP10 Signal System Modernization  TP11 E. 17th Avenue Pavement Preservation  TP12 Glenwood Blvd. Bridge Repairs  TP13 Transportation Demand Management  TP14 Arterial/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay  TP15 Traffic Control Projects  TP16 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements  TP17 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)  TP18 S. 48th Street Connection (Main to  Daisy)  TP19 Franklin Boulevard NEPA  TP20 Bridge Preservation and Rehabilitation  TP21 Gateway/Beltline Intersection  TP22 Uniform Traffic Control Devices  Compliance  TP23 Street Light Infill & LPS Light  Replacement  TP24 Local/Residential Street Slurry Seal  Page 68 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program        TP25 Street Light Pole Test, Treat &  Replacement  TP26 Street Lights ‐ NESC Compliance  TP27 Arterial/Collector Street Reconstruction  TP28 Arterial/Collector Street Scheduled Life  Cycle Maintenance  TP29 Local/Residential Street Reconstruction  TP30 Local/Residential Street Scheduled Life  Cycle Maintenance   TP 31 Wayfinding For Low Vision Users and  Pedestrian Safety  TP32 Maple Island Improvements  TP33 Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction  Project  TP34 Intelligent Lighting Controls  TP35 Main Street Lighting  TP36 Wire Theft Remediation  TP37 RRFB & PHB Installations  TP38 Flashing Yellow Arrow Prot/Perm Left  Turns  TP39 Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements  TP40 UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans ‐  Transportation  TP41 Cherokee Dr. Overlay  TP42 Traffic Signal Communications       2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 69 Page 702013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total EECBG Pedestrian Lighting -$ - - - - - - Capital Fund (434)- Improvement SDCs (447)- Reimbursement SDCs (446)- EECBG Signal Lighting 2$ - - - - - 2 Capital Fund (434)- Improvement SDCs (447)- Reimbursement SDCs (446)- Federal Aid (420)2$ - - - - - 2 Glenwood Connector Path 2,100$ - - - - - 2,100 Federal Aid 1,200$ - - - - - 1,200 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - - - - State Aid 900$ - - - - - 900 Glenwood Connector Path Ext.30$ 295 - - - - 325 Capital Fund (434)30$ 60 - - - - 90 Federal Aid -$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ 5 - - - - 5 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)-$ 230 - - - - 230 Transportation System Plan 190$ 24 - - - - 214 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)23$ 10 - - - - 33 State Aid (420)167$ 14 - - - - 181 "A" Street Overlay 958 - - - - - 958 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420) 750$ - - - - - 750 Reimbursement SDCs (446)208$ - - - - - 208 Thurston Road 553 - - - - - 553 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420) 400$ - - - - - 400 Reimbursement SDCs (446)153$ - - - - - 153 Downtown District Lighting -$ 1,100 - - - - 1,100 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 1,100 - - - - 1,100 ADA Transistion Projects -$ 55 55 55 55 55 275 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - 55 53 - 108 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 55 55 - 2 55 167 Signal System Modernization -$ 110 55 55 55 55 330 Capital Fund (434)-$ - 33 40 52 - 125 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 110 22 15 3 55 205 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Constructed In Process Funding Programmed 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 71 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects E. 17th Ave. Pavement Preservation -$ - 120 - - - 120 Capital Fund (434)-$ - 60 - - - 60 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - 60 - - - 60 Glenwood Blvd. Bridge Repairs -$ 5 15 - - - 20 Capital Fund (434)-$ 5 - - - - 5 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - 15 - - - 15 Transportation Demand Mgmt 20$ 20 20 20 20 - 100 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)15$ 5 10 10 10 - 50 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 5$ 15 10 10 10 - 50 Art/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay 1,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - 194 81 - - 275 Unspecified 1,000$ 1,000 806 919 1,000 1,000 5,725 Traffic Control Projects 150$ 117 117 117 117 - 618 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)150$ 35 35 35 35 - 290 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 82 82 82 82 - 328 Gateway Traffic Improvements 537$ 500 416 400 500 500 2,853 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)537$ - - 200 250 250 1,237 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 500 416 200 250 250 1,616 Intelligent Transportation Systems 21$ 50 50 50 50 50 271 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)21$ 25 25 25 25 25 146 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ 25 25 25 25 - 100 Revenue Bonds (xxx)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - - 25 25 South 48th Street (Main to Daisy)175$ - 927 - - - 1,102 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 752 - - - 752 Other (Developer)175$ - 175 - - - 350 Franklin Boulevard NEPA 1,000$ 700 - - - - 1,700 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420) 400$ 400 - - - - 800 Improvement SDCs (447)160$ 50 - - - - 210 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other (LTD)-$ 50 - - - - 50 SEDA (429)-$ 200 - - - - 200 Unspecified 440$ - - - - - 440 Bridge Preservation 10$ 10 10 10 10 10 60 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - 10 10 10 10 40 Unspecified 10$ 10 - - - - 20 Partial Funding Programmed Page 72 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects Gateway - Beltline Intersection 1,287$ 1,530 1,418 1,249 725 1,041 7,250 Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)225$ 355 605 395 355 510 2,445 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 1,062$ 1,175 813 854 370 531 4,805 Other -$ - - - - - - MUTCD Compliance 85$ 85 85 85 85 85 510 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ 40 40 40 - - 120 Unspecified 85$ 45 45 45 85 85 390 Street Light Infill & LPS Replmnt -$ 268 268 268 268 268 1,340 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 268 268 268 268 268 1,340 Local Street Seal & Overlay 300$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,800 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified 300 300 300 300 300 300 1,800 Street Light Pole Test -$ 80 8 8 8 8 112 Capital Fund (434)-$ 25 - - - - 25 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 55 8 8 8 8 87 Arterial/Collector Reconstruction -$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 Arterial/Collector Scheduled Maintenance -$ 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 Local/Residential Reconstruction -$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,500 Capital Fund (434) -$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,500 Local/Residential Scheduled Maintenance -$ 600 600 600 600 600 3,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 600 600 600 600 600 3,000 Funding Not Programmed 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 73 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects Maple Island Improvements 230$ 550 100 831 - - 1,711 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)- Unspecified 230$ 550 100 831 - - 1,711 Franklin Blvd Reconstruction -$ - 25,000 13,000 7,000 - 45,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other - Unspecified -$ - 25,000 13,000 7,000 - 45,000 Intelligent Lighting Control -$ 688 - - - - 688 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ 688 - - - - 688 Main Street Lighting -$ 150 250 100 100 100 700 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 150 250 100 100 100 700 Wire Theft Remediation -$ 230 60 60 60 60 470 Capital Fund (434)-$ - 7 - - - 7 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ 15 - - - 31 46 Unspecified -$ 215 53 60 60 29 417 RRFB Installations 59$ 200 25 25 25 25 359 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)-$ 160 - - - - 160 Other -$ 40 - - - - 40 Unspecified 59$ - 25 25 25 25 159 FYA Left Turns -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Oakdale Pheasant Bike Imp.-$ - 330 - - - 330 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 330 - - - 330 UGB Expansion Area Facility -$ 75 - - - - 75 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 75 - - - - 75 Page 74 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects Cherokee Dr. Overlay -$ - 200 - - - 200 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 200 - - - 200 Traffic Signal Communication -$ 25 12 12 12 12 73 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 25 12 12 12 12 73 Annual Totals 6,607$ 10,582 33,256 20,060 12,805 5,984 89,294 Capital Fund (434)30$ 90 100 95 105 - 420 Improvement SDCs (447) 1,108$ 475 675 665 675 785 4,383 Reimbursement SDCs (446)361$ 80 344 156 35 41 1,017 Unspecified 3,191$ 8,145 31,962 19,144 11,990 5,158 79,590 Other (Developer)175$ - 175 - - - 350 Other (LTD)-$ 50 - - - - 50 SEDA (429)-$ 200 - - - - 200 SEDA (430)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420) 1,575$ 410 - - - - 1,985 State Aid (420)167$ 404 - - - - 571 Other -$ 728 - - - - 728 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 75 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Yes System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Pedestrian Signal Upgrades 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Energy Conservation strategies EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (12)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (12)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Funding has been received and projects are completed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The City of Springfield applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Projects under the American Recovery and Revitilization Act (Federal stimulus). The City received $539,400 from the Stimulus package and with direction from City Council divided the grant between City projects and projects at Willamalane Park and Recreation District and Springfield Public Schools. Justification: This is Federal stimulus money used to provide funding for projects that will create new jobs and reduce energy consumption. There was no matching funding required for this grant and the grant dollars will be leveraged by energy rebates from the Springfield Utility Board. Between the grant and rebates, Team Springfield will be able to make a significant difference in several locations by increasing lighting quality and conserving energy and reducing future energy costs. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant awarded Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requirements and energy conservation Page 76 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Yes System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Street Lighting Upgrades 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Energy Conservation strategies EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (12)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (12)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ (2)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 2$ 2$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 2$ 2$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Funding has been received and projects are completed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The City of Springfield applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Projects under the American Recovery and Revitilization Act (Federal stimulus). The City received $539,400 from the Stimulus package and with direction from City Council, divided the grant between City projects and projects at Willamalane Park and Recreation District and Springfield Public Schools. Justification: This is Federal stimulus money used to provide funding for projects that will create new jobs and reduce energy consumption. There was no matching funding required for this grant and the grant dollars will be leveraged by energy rebates from the Springfield Utility Board. Between the grant and rebates Team Springfield will be able to make a significant difference in several locations by increasing lighting quality and conserving energy and reducing future energy costs. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant awarded Upgrading poor lighting fixtures to improved light sources that consume less energy 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 77 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Yes Account #870008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Glenwood Connector Path 0% Map ID-TP 3 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Regional Transportation Plan Willamalane River Path Plan Council Goal EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,100$ 2,100$ Other -$ Total 2,100$ 2,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 12$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total 18$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid*1,200$ 1,200$ State Aid*900$ 900$ Other 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 2,100$ 2,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ * This funding has been dedicated as part of ODOT's project to replace the Willamette Bridge and will not flow through the City's budget. The project is in the final design phase, with right of way negotiations to follow. Construction to begin once the NB I-5 Willamette River Bridge is completed. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Glenwood Connector Path (GCP) is a multi-use path bridge located along the south bank of the Willamette River between the I-5 Bridge and the Oldham property on the north side of Franklin Boulevard. The GCP will connect the existing bike path from the south side of the Knickerbocker pedestrian/bike bridge in Eugene along the river bank to the western edge of the Oldham property in Glenwood. In the future, the GCP will also be able to connect to the planned Glenwood Riverfront Path. This ODOT project is related to the City's Glenwood Connector Path Extension project, which is east of this project. Upon completion of the project by ODOT, the path will be owned and maintained by the City. Justification: The GCP is a crucial link between Eugene and Springfield for bicycles and pedestrians. The GCP provides the necessary link between the existing multi-use path in Eugene and the planned Riverfront Bike Path in Glenwood. The Glenwood Riverfront Path is a planned bike route in TransPlan and the Regional Transportation Plan. Currently, the bicycle lane on the north side of Franklin Boulevard does not connect safely to the multi‐use path, forcing cyclists to cross Franklin Boulevard without a safe crossing treatment to access the path. The GCP provides for the safe and continuous connection. A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene and Springfield. ODOT agreement to build the GCP in conjunction with the I-5 Willamette River Bridge replacement project. Page 78 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850241 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Glenwood Connector Path Extension 50% Map ID-TP 4 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Regional Transportation Plan Willamalane River Path Plan Council Goal EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 65$ 15$ 50$ Land/Right of Way 30$ 15$ 15$ Construction 230$ 230$ Other -$ Total 325$ 30$ 65$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 8$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 12$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 90$ 30$ 60$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 5$ 5$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 230$ 230$ Other 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 325$ 30$ 295$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Obligating Federal funds and beginning the design Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Glenwood Connector Path Extension (GCPE) is located along the south bank of the Willamette River between the Oldham property on the north side of Franklin Boulevard and the Glenwood Blvd. intersection. The Glenwood Connector Path Extension temporarily connects the Glenwood Connector Path to Franklin Blvd., until the planned Glenwood Riverfront Path is constructed. Justification: The Glenwood Connector Path Extension is a crucial mid-term temporary link between Eugene and Springfield for bicycles and pedestrians until the Glenwood Riverfront Path is constructed. The Glenwood Riverfront Path is a planned bike route in TransPlan and the Regional Transportation Plan. The Glenwood Connector Path Extension provides for the safe and continuous connection between the Glenwood Connector Path (viaduct) and Glenwood Blvd. A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene and Springfield. City agreement to build the GCPE in conjunction with the Glenwood Connector Path, and the I-5 Willamette River Bridge replacement project. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 79 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830020 Infrastructure Planning & Inventory Study Springfield Transportation System Plan 50% Map ID-TP 5 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 214$ 190$ 24$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 214$ 190$ 24$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street 434 -$ AFG Grant 420 -$ Federal - STP-U* 420 33$ 23$ 10$ State Aid 420 181$ 167$ 14$ Unspecified -$ Total 214$ 190$ 24$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ * ODOT has set aside $25,000 for consultant services, with the remaining $80,000 set aside City incurred costs. In Process - Transportation inventory, existing conditions, draft policies and evaluation criteria have been completed by City Staff. Transportation modeling work is currently being completed by LCOG staff. Project team will be working with the Stakeholder Committee and Technical Advisory Committee on the Future Alternatives Analysis in winter-spring 2012. Statewide Planning Goal 12, Oregon Highway Plan, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Oregon Transportation Plan, Regional Transportation Plan, Oregon Freight Plan, Metro Plan, TransPlan, Lane County Transportaton System Plan, Willamalane Comprehensive Plan, Local Refinement Plans, Springfield Bicycle Plan, Springfield Development Code, Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Transportation System Plan (TSP) update is intended to serve as a blueprint to guide future multi- modal transportation system improvements and investment decisions for the City of Springfield. This project includes an inventory and general assessment of the existing transportation system; a determination of existing and future needs; a road plan; a public transportation plan; a bicycle/pedestrian plan; a parking plan; a transportation system management and demand management plan; an air, rail, water, and pipeline plan; and a financing and implementation plan. Justification: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660 Division 12, requires jurisdictions throughout Oregon to prepare and adopt regional or local transportation plans that serve as the transportation element for their comprehensive plans (660 012 0015(2) (4)). Plan updates should respond to transportation, land use, environmental, population growth, economic and social changes that have occurred in the community since the TSP was last prepared. Historically, TransPlan has served as the local TSP for both Springfield and Eugene. However, since the passage of HB 3337, Eugene and Springfield are developing individual TSPs specific to each jurisdiction's seperate UGBs. Project Driver: Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) - OAR 660 Division 12 HB 3337 - Changes in land inventories and UGB boundary Page 80 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Yes Account #: 850194 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation "A" Street Overlay 0% Map ID-TP 6 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Asset Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 25$ 25$ Engineering 283$ 283$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 650$ 650$ Other -$ Total 958$ 958$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 750$ 750$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 208$ 208$ Unspecified -$ Total 958$ 958$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Overlay "A" Street from 5th Street to Mill Street, and 4th Street from Main Street to "C" Street. Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to deteriorated condition Street condition, Justice Center construction completion Starting design Justification: As part of the construction of the Springfield Justice Center, one block of "B" Street was closed and Lane Transit District (LTD) bus routes were redirected onto "A" Street. "A" Street is due for an overlay which will also bolster the structure to withstand the additional stress of the added bus traffic. This project is scheduled for construction in 2012. Provide adequate structure to support heavier bus traffic, and to avoid costly reconstruction 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 81 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Yes Account #: 850194 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Thurston Road Overlay 0% Map ID-TP 7 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Asset Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 553$ 553$ Other -$ Total 553$ 553$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 400$ 400$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 153$ 153$ Unspecified -$ Total 553$ 553$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Starting design Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Overlay Thurston Road from 69th Street east to the City limits. Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to deteriorated condition. Justification: This section of Thurston Road is classifies as a minor arterial in the the City of Springfield's street system. It is identified in the pavement management system as a high prioirty for an overlay to avoid more serious deterioration leading to the need for more extensive reconstruction expenses. Provide scheduled overlay to avoid more extensive repair and reconstruction. Pavement condition report Page 82 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Downtown District Pedestrian Scale Lighting 0% No Map Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:Downtown District Plan and Implementation Strategy EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,000$ 1,000$ Other -$ Total 1,100$ -$ 1,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SEDA 430 -$ Unspecified 1,100$ Total -$ -$ 1,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only certain approaches Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will evaluate, design, and construct pedestrian level, decorative lighting consistent with the downtown revitalization district. Justification: Increased safety, comfort and appearance for pedestrians and vehicles in the district. The project will improve the small town feel, vitality and livability of the district. Operational Functionality 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 83 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation ADA Transition Projects 0% No Map Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 330$ -$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 163$ 55$ 53$ 55$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 167$ 55$ 55$ 2$ 55$ Total 330$ -$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only ceratin approaches Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990 requires the City to maintain a "Transition Plan" that details how it will bring facilities that were not in compliance at the adoption of the act, up to the newly adopted standards. Currently, the City policy is to correct defects as projects occur and to make improvements as requests are received from Citizens who make their need known. This project will set aside funds to be used as locations that need upgrade are identified and will allow the City to respond in a timely maner to those requests. Justification: Required action as per The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990. In adddition, safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Operational Functionality Page 84 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Signal System Modernization 0% No Map Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 35$ 10$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 350$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 385$ -$ 110$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 180$ 33$ 40$ 52$ 55$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 205$ 110$ 22$ 15$ 3$ 55$ Total 385$ -$ 110$ 55$ 40$ 55$ 55$ 55$ Project is funded. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As technology advances, the equipment that is used within our Signal Controller Cabinets become more advanced. These advancements offer certain advantages operationally but they also have impacts on the availability of replacement parts that are currently in use. Some recent advances that are occuring include the upgrade to 2070 controllers, IP addressable conflict monitors, remote video detection interigation, pan-tilt-zoom cameras, adaptive signal controls and a host of other equipment. This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only ceratin approaches. Justification: Required action as per The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990. In adddition, safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Operational Functionality 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 85 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation E. 17th Avenue Pavement Preservation 0% Map ID-TP 11 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 120$ 120$ Other -$ Total 120$ -$ -$ 120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 60$ 60$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 60$ 60$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 120$ -$ -$ 120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: E. 17th Avenue between Glenwood Boulevard and Henderson Avenue (in Glenwood) is a city street. The 2010 Street Conditions Report identified this street segment as a high priority collector street for an overlay. Under a 2011 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County, the City has the option to request that the County rehabilitate, at City's expense, the pavement on E. 17th Avenue in 2014 concurrent with the County's project to rehabilitate the pavement on Glenwood Boulevard. E. 17th Avenue is a collector street in Glenwood. The condition of the pavement is such that full reconstruction will be needed if rehabilitation does not occur soon. Combining this work with Lane County's project on Glenwood Boulevard should allow the City to realize significant cost savings by avoiding the full reconstruction and through the economies of scale by adding this work to the County's larger project. IGA with Lane County regarding Glenwood Blvd overlay and jurisdiction transfer Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 2014Page 86 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation Glenwood Blvd Bridge Repairs 0% Map ID-TP 12 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 15$ 15$ Other -$ Total 20$ -$ 5$ 15$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 5$ 5$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 15$ 15$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 20$ -$ 5$ 15$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: The City owns the Glenwood Boulevard Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Staff has determined that the joints between the bridge deck and the adjoining pavement are insufficient to protect the bridge deck and pavement from damage due to thermal expansion and contraction. Under a 2011 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County, the County will rehabilitate the street pavement and resurface the bridge deck in 2014. As part of this IGA, the City is responsible to pay for new bridge joints and any other repairs that may be needed to the bridge deck prior to resurfacing. The project plan is to use consultant services in FY13 to provide recommendations for appropriate bridge joints and any other apparent repairs, then authorize and pay Lane County to implement the selected recommendations as part of their project in 2014. Installing appropriate bridge deck joints protects both the bride structure and the adjoining street pavement from damage caused by thermal expansion and contraction, thereby extending the service life of both the bridge and the pavement. Replacing bridge joints during the planned bridge resurfacing and pavement rehabilitation project in 2014 provides the most efficient construction process and least disruption to the travelling public from construction activities. IGA with Lane County regarding Glenwood Blvd overlay and jurisdiction transfer Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 20142013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 87 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870003 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Transportation Demand Management Varies No Map Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TDM Goals Regional Transportation Plan TransPlan State Legislation EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 100$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Total 100$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 50$ 15$ 5$ 10$ 10$ 10$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 50$ 5$ 15$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Total 100$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or ‘transportation options’ (TO) policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements. At times, TDM activities include locations that are included on the Transportation System Development Charge Project List. For those activities, Transportation Improvement SDC funds can be used to provide project funding up to the percentage that the project location is eligible per the SDC Project List. The TDM project also provides resources to address state-mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction requirements for the transportation sector. Project Driver: TransPlan policies, and state land use, transportation, and GHG reduction laws, statues and rules. TDM and TO program activities promote alternatives to 1-person/1-car auto trips and is a growing aspect of system management as system demand outpaces capacity constraints and greenhouse gas reduction strategies are implemented. TransPlan policies, current and pending state regulatory requirements, transportation system management need. Funding balance is for accumulating funds for projects as developed and or required Project Description: The project includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the community like the 60th and "E" Street multi-use path, park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations, and other activities that promote non-single auto travel choices. Page 88 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Arterial/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay 0% Map ID-TP 14 Commercial Ave. (496 ft., $108,000) Marcola Rd. (2,602 ft., $547,000) G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $416,000) S. 5th St. (427 ft., $93,000) Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 840$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 6,160$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ Other -$ Total 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 275$ 194$ 81$ Unspecified 6,725$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 806$ 919$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Gateway St. (6,820 ft., $1,432,000) Harlow Rd. (756 ft., $155,000) 19 th St. (531 ft., $112,000) Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement sealing and/or overlay of the Arterial/Collector Street System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's arterial and collector system at the current Council target of 85% fair or better level, approximately $750,000 to $1,000,000 in funding is needed annually. Following is a partial list with the highest priority overlays: Laura St. (2,625 ft., $449,000)18th St. (2,069 ft., $435,000) E. 17th St. (945 ft., $198,000) 28 th St. (5.087 ft., $1,071,000) Q St. (1,790 ft., $376,000 ) 42 nd St. (2,889 ft., $607,000) Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals Ongoing Program W. "D" St. (4,508 ft., $947,000) S. 2nd St. (1,765 ft., $402,000) Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenance Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 89 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850013 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Traffic Control Projects Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Council Policy EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 55$ 15$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way 38$ 10$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ Construction 525$ 125$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Other -$ Total 618$ 150$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 33$ -$ 3$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 33$ -$ 3$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 290$ 150$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 328$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$ Total 618$ 150$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$ Ongoing Project. Funding is programmed as a 'sinking fund' to program resources for future projects as identified and/or required. A typical intersection upgrade project can range between $50,000 - $500,000. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at various City intersections. Example intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd St. & Marcola Road, South 42nd & Daisy St., South 40th & Daisy St., and 28th St. & Centennial Blvd. Signal modifications may include changing phase order, adding overlaps, and other enhancements to safety or efficiency like improved pedestrian crossings. Various striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the Traffic Control Projects. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow. Specific projects are based upon the amount of available funding Citizen requests, high crash locations, congestion Page 90 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850069 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Gateway Area Traffic Improvements Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment Council Goals EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 655$ 50$ 100$ 75$ 80$ 250$ 100$ Land/Right of Way 350$ 350$ Construction 1,848$ 137$ 400$ 341$ 320$ 250$ 400$ Other -$ Total 2,853$ 537$ 500$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 1,237$ 537$ 200$ 250$ 250$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,616$ 500$ 416$ 200$ 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 2,853$ 537$ 500$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ -$ Ongoing. Funding balance is a 'sinking fund' to program resources for highest priority projects like Gateway Street operational and safety improvements. Project may also contribute to Gateway/Beltline funding needs. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion; to improve safety of all modes; and, to support continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects. Gateway area development and traffic conditions Project Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity, relieve congestion, and improve safety. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding is identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Community growth in the Gateway area. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 91 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870001 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Regional ITS Operations & Implementation Plan for Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 241$ 16$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ Other -$ Total 271$ 21$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 146$ 21$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Unspecified 25$ 25$ Total 271$ 21$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ Ongoing Program. Use as a 'sinking fund' to accumulate resources for highest priority projects. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: ITS projects will typically have a high benefit to reasonable cost ratio. Operational improvements to the street network will help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, improve safety, and continue to support economic development. Ongoing. May provide matching funds to Oregon Department of Transportation projects with mutual benefits. Project Description: ITS projects in various locations to increase communications, capacity, safety and traveler information. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Deploying ITS projects enhance the ability to use the transportation system more effectively by extracting the maximum capacity from the system. This will delay the need for adding new lanes and links to the system and improve traveler safety and access to traveler information systems. Page 92 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850162 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation S. 48th Street Connection (Main to Daisy) 40% Map ID-TP 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Project #901 in RTP and TransPlan Agreement between City and Westwind Estates, City Council Resolution 06-35, 7/17/06 EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 225$ 225$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 877$ 877$ Other -$ Total 1,102$ -$ -$ 1,102$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 752$ 752$ Other (Developer 420 350$ 175$ 175$ Total 1,102$ 175$ -$ 927$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and future development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street Intersection. A portion of the cost to construct this project is an obligation of current and future development south of Daisy Street. In 2010, the City received a cash payment of $175,000 to satisfy the obligation of the Westwind Estates development. Remaining funding is pending. Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street, to support planned land development, consistent with TransPlan. Future development activity and funding availability Future development and growth will create a need for connection between Daisy Street and Main Street to be constructed to alleviate congestion. Adds needed pedestrian crossing. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 93 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870010 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Franklin Boulevard NEPA 50% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Priority Glenwood Refinement Plan Update TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 1,040$ 500$ 500$ 40$ Engineering 660$ 200$ 400$ 60$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 1,700$ 700$ 900$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid, STP-420 800$ 400$ 400$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 210$ 160$ 50$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other (LTD) 420 50$ 50$ SEDA 429 200$ 200$ Unspecified 440$ 440$ Total 1,700$ 1,000$ 700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Concept phase complete, NEPA documentation and preliminary design funding gap identified to complete NEPA analysis. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Complete project refinement, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation for future improvements to Franklin Boulevard, the Franklin/Glenwood and Franklin/McVay intersections to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos. Contribute to the required local match for any federal funding received. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and anticipates redevelopment in the urban renewal district as directed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work. City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopment Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to support planned Glenwood area redevelopment. Page 94 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850224 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Bridge Preservation and Rehabilitation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goals EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 60$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 60$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 36$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 40$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Unspecified 20$ 10$ 10$ Total 60$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ -$ Monitoring bridge conditions and working to identify funding for needed repairs and maintenance Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will address known deficiencies to City owned bridges discovered through City maintenance crew and/or ODOT Bridge Inspections. ODOT inspects six City bridges every two years and these inspections have identified at least $50k of needed repairs to preserve function and structural integrity on these six bridges. City crews inspect all 14 City bridges twice per year. Staff is aware of additional maintenance needs on the remaining eight bridges not inspected by ODOT. Justification: There are six bridges maintained by the City that are currently inspected by ODOT in correlation to the State wide transportation system. Repair activities include bank scour beneath the bridge, rebuilding or replacement of a concrete nosing, grouting, secure embankment erosion, replacing split spacer block, replacing a wing wall and patching concrete spalling. Steps need to be taken to address the financing of these projects before they reach a critical stage. Aging facilities and regulatory requirements, pending funding availability ODOT Bridge Inspection reports provided on a two year cycle - these reports identify repairs and deficiencies with each bridge. PW Maintenance performs semi-annual inspections to identify new issues and monitor existing ones. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 95 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850151 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Gateway/Beltline Intersection 49% Map ID-TP 21 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan Gateway Refinement Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 200$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 750$ 305$ 445$ Land/Right of Way 5,650$ 5,650$ Construction 6,626$ 6,626$ Other 5,754$ 1,287$ 1,530$ 1,368$ 1,199$ 370$ Total 18,980$ 1,287$ 1,530$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ -$ 12,771$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 25$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 35$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 2,445$ 225$ 355$ 605$ 395$ 355$ 510$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 17,576$ 1,062$ 1,175$ 813$ 854$ 370$ 531$ 12,771$ Other 420 -$ Total 20,021$ 1,287$ 1,530$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ 1,041$ 12,771$ Phase 2 deferred pending funding and traffic operations agreement with ODOT Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a couplet and purchase of right-of-way. CIP project funding contributes to overall project estimate of $30 million. Phase 1 is complete at a cost of about $10 million. Justification: Needed to improve level of service at the intersection and maintaining proper function of the intersection in relationship to the I-5/Beltline Interchange. Project Phase 1 was completed in 2011. Project Phase 2 trigger is set by traffic operations agreement with ODOT. Community growth and agreements with Federal Highways and ODOT to construct intersection improvements as part of the larger I-5/Beltline interchange upgrade project. Page 96 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850006 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Uniform Traffic Control Devices Compliance 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 70$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 525$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ Other -$ Total 595$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 120$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Unspecified 475$ 85$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 85$ 85$ 85$ Total 595$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ 85$ OTC Manual update adoption expected in 2012 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Replace and revise signs, markings, traffic signals, beacons and other work to conform to the pending update of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as suplemented by Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR). Justification: Federal Highway Administration and Oregon Department of Transportation periodically update the Manual. The City is required to conform to the revisions in the new Manual over specified time frames. Failure to comply violates state law and jeopardizes federal highway funds. MUTCD Update OAR adoption by the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) Regulatory mandate and traffic safety 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 97 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850066 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 91$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 26$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,785$ 255$ 255$ 255$ 255$ 255$ 510$ Other -$ Total 1,876$ -$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 536$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (44)$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (44)$ -$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,876$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 536$ Total 1,876$ -$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 268$ 536$ Ongoing Program Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace 2,720 existing low pressure sodium (LPS) lights with metal hallide or LED technology. Implement Council Policy; Citizen Service Requests Street Light Infill & LPS Light Replacement Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. LPS lights have higher life cycle costs than alternatives. Replacement will reduce operations cost and improve visibility. Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget Page 98 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Local/Residential Street Slurry Seal 0% No Map Total Ft. = 11,577 Total = $269,400 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Council Goals Infrastructure Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 280$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,820$ 260$ 260$ 260$ 260$ 260$ 260$ 260$ Other -$ Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed. Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenance. Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort by slurry and crack sealing of Local/Residential Street System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's local street system approximately 5 to 8 miles should be crack sealed and slurry sealed annually. Following is a partial list indicating the highest priority sealing locations: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Deferred pending funding Postal Way, (880 ft., $20,200) Gateway Lp., (1,870 ft., $43,000) Shelly St., (2,700 ft., $62,100) Pheasant, (610 ft., $14,000) F St., (327 ft., $7.500) Lindale/Pheasant (2,042 ft., $50,000) 2nd St., (273 ft., $6,300) N. Cloverleaf, (2,040 ft., $47,000) Dornoch, (133 ft., $3,100) Shady Lane Dr., (702 ft., $16,200) 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 99 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastrcuture and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 22$ 7$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 98$ 73$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Other -$ Total 120$ -$ 80$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 25$ 25$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 95$ 55$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ Total 120$ -$ 80$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ Ongoing Program Street Light Pole Test, Treat & Replacement Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Test and treat light poles at 10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits in the City owned street light system. Justification: Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. Treating poles reduces rate of deterioration. The proposed project replaces poles identified as at the end of useful life. The City's light poles were last tested in 1999. Testing and treating is recommended at 10 year intervals Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget Page 100 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Arterial/Collector Street Reconstruction 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 720$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 5,280$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ Other -$ Total 6,000$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 6,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 6,000$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed arterial and collector street segments as identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance perservation activities are no longer effective or economical. Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Structural street failures Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 24 miles of streets classified as a collector or arterial have deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approxiamtely 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $10.8 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects: 21st St. (1,586 ft., $1,475,000) Q St. (925 ft., $500,000 ) G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $900,000) B St. (486 ft., $250,000) 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 101 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Arterial/Collector Street 0% Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 600$ 100$ 100$ 100 100$ 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ Other -$ Total 3,000$ -$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 3,000$ 500$ 500$ 500 500$ 500$ 500$ Total 3,000$ -$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort to complete necessary annual life cycle projects on the arterial and collector system. This includes routine overlay and street seal projects. Street section has failed Deferred pending funding Justification: This funding is set aside to complete required life cycle maintenace and repairs on the arterial and collector street system throughout the City. Projects are identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. This activity is critical to limiting the number of street segments that require major reconstruction or overlays. Street structure has failed and current maintenance procedures no longer provide satisfactory results Page 102 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Local/Residential Street Reconstruction 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 210$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,590$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ Other -$ Total 1,800$ -$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ - Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,800$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Total 1,800$ -$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed Local and Residential street segments as identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance perservation activities are no longer effective or economical. Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Structural street failures Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 68 miles of local/ residential streets has deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approxiamtely 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $5.5 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects: F St. (306 ft., $23,000) C St. (332 ft., $28,500) 3rd Pl. (583 ft., $43,500) Kelly Blvd. (361 ft., $25,500) 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 103 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Local/Residential Street 0% Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 450$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,150$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ Other -$ Total 3,600$ -$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 3,600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ Total 3,600$ -$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort to complete necessary annual life cycle projects on the local and residential system. This includes routine overlay and street seal projects. Justification: This funding is set aside to complete required life cycle maintenace and repairs on the arterial and collector street system throughout the City. Projects are identified within the Infrastrucure Managment System. This activity is critical to limiting the number of street segments that require major reconstruction or overlays. Street structure has failed and current maintenance procedures no longer provide satisfactory results Street section has failed Page 104 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850178 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Maple Island Improvements 80% Map ID-TP 31 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals-Maintain and Improve Infrastrcuture and Facilities,Community Development and Economic Revitalization TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 415$ 415$ Construction 246$ 246$ Other 950$ 230$ 550$ 170$ Total 1,711$ 230$ 550$ 100$ 831$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,711$ 230$ 550$ 100$ 831$ Total 1,711$ 230$ 550$ 100$ 831$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and future development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will upgrade the roundabout at Maple Island Road and International Way. It will also extend the Maple Island Loop Road to the north along the Maple Island Slough. Justification: The City of Springfield desires to promote growth and development in the Gateway Area which will increase the need for more access and connectivity to alleviate traffic congestion. Private developer has constructed a portion of the north extension of Maple Island Rd., which the City can acquire at cost before 2017. Sufficient funding to acquire north extension and/or intersection improvements Council Goals and development within the Gateway Area 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 105 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project 20% Map ID-TP 32 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Priority Franklin Blvd. Study Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 2,000$ 2,000$ Land/Right of Way 15,000$ 10,000$ 5,000$ Construction 28,000$ 13,000$ 8,000$ 7,000$ Other -$ Total 45,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 13,000$ 7,000$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 10$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 30$ 15$ 15$ Total 40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 20$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund #Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 45,000$ 25,000$ 13,000$ 7,000$ Total 45,000$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 13,000$ 7,000$ -$ -$ Pending potential funding inclusion in the reauthorization of the Federal Transportation Bill and/or the 2012 Federal annual appropriations bill. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation phase currently partially funded - see Franklin Boulevard NEPA project (#870010). Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project will construct modern urban standards improvements on the old Hwy 99 alignment in Glenwood called Franklin Boulevard between the Franklin/Glenwood intersection and the Franklin/McVay intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional safety and mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and is integrated with the urban renewal plan for Glenwood. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work. City priority to redevelop Glenwood riverfront area Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to successful Glenwood area redevelopment. City, in partnership with the Lane Transit District, ODOT and Eugene continues to seek project funding through various federal initiatives, including a federal transportation bill reauthorization funding request through the Oregon Congressional Delegation. Page 106 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Intelligent Lighting Controls 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilites EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 56$ 56$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 632$ 632$ Other -$ Total 688$ -$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs*(450)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ Personnel Costs (56)$ (3)$ (6)$ (8)$ (11)$ (14)$ (14)$ Total (506)$ -$ (78)$ (81)$ (83)$ (86)$ (89)$ (89)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other 688$ 688$ Unspecified Total 688$ -$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Maintenance Costs above reflect averaged annual cost to replace stolen wire. Deferred Pending Funding Availability: this project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only areas of high risk of wire theft Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: An Intelligent lighting system will monitor street light performance. The light monitoring system will monitor energy consumption, fixture output, light outages, generate work orders and, most importantly, alarm per set conditions. The alarm feature would be used as a wire theft prevention with the idea of alerting the Police Department when a series of lights on a circuit suddenly goes dark. This would be a primary method of protecting the public infrastructure and cost of replacing stolen wire. Justification: In the past two years the City has lost approximately $150,000 in the repair and replacement of stolen conductors for street light systems. Also, current loss prevention has resulted in extra expense for our own repair of the systems that do get damaged. Street light outages are currently reported by citizens and by City personnel conducting physical surveys of the existing system to search for outages and problems. With the implementation of this system there would be a reduction in labor expense for monitoring the system, wire loss prevention, and reduced time of light outages, all improving customer service and satisfaction. Finally, the system has a dimming control feature that will allow for substantial energy savings by allowing the City to DIM light output during non-peak hours. The system will also include a data base of the lighting assets allowing much better management of the asset. Opportunity to reduce operational costs and funding availabiltiy Wire theft and street light management 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 107 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Main Street Lighting 0% Map ID-TP 34 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastrcutre and Facilities ODOT Main Street Safety Study TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 300$ 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Other -$ Total 700$ -$ 150$ 250$ 100$ 100$ 100$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 36$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ Personnel Costs 18$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 54$ -$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 700$ 150$ 250$ 100$ 100$ 100$ -$ Total 700$ -$ 150$ 250$ 100$ 100$ 100$ -$ Deferred Pending Funding Availability (This project is scalable and could be completed in phases) Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will add lighting to Main Street from 20th to 69th by placing lights on existing poles where available and installing new poles where necessary. The project could be incremental and done in phases or sections. Justification: Main Street is a major arterial and has been identified by ODOT as a corridor with significant safety issues. A safety study for the corridor identified street lighting as a major component toward improving pedestrian safety. ODOT does not light urban highways that are not freeways. There have been mutilple deaths and pedestrian crashes in addition to a high number of vehicle crashes. The improved lighting offers a significant safety benefit. Improved lighting also has the potential for positive public perception of the corridor. Safety/Hazard condition Project priority and funding availability Page 108 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Wire Theft Remediation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 45$ 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 485$ 210$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ Other -$ Total 530$ -$ 230$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 7$ 7$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 46$ 15$ 31$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 477$ 215$ 53$ 60$ 60$ 29$ 60$ Total 530$ -$ 230$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ Deferred Pending Funding Availabilty and project priority. This project is scalable. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: In the past several years, the City has suffered theft of wire and damage to it's street lighting systems on a large scale. As the losses suffered have increased, it has become an unmanageable burden for normal maintenance budgets to repair/replace the infrastructure. This project would identify areas of theft or vandalism, develop plans to replace/repair the lighting system and have the work completed. Justification: Replacement and repair of City lighting systems that were rendered inoperable due to theft, vandalism, accident or crash. Safety and Citizen Requests Response to inoperable lighting systems 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 109 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation RRFB & PHB Installations 0% Map ID-TP 36 Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 92$ 17$ 50$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 292$ 42$ 150$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Other -$ Total 384$ 59$ 200$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 6$ -$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 160$ 160$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other 40$ 40$ Unspecified 184$ 59$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Total 384$ 59$ 200$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Council Goals: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding Availability. Project is scalable. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The City has and continues to receive numerous requests for improved safety at these crossings. These projects would increase pedestrian safety and respond to public requests. Improve safety for pedestrian crossings Funding availability and project priority Project Description: Several crossings have been identified that would receive a safety benefit from the installation of a RRFB (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) or a PHB (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon). Those locations are: *S. 32nd St.@Oregon (adjacent to Willamalane Sports Complex) *S. 42nd St.@Daisy *Bob Straub Parkway@Mt. Vernon *N. 58th St.@Thurston High School Page 110 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 25$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 50$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 75$ -$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 75$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Total 75$ -$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ -$ Council Goals: Maintain and Improve Infrastrcuture and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding Availability. The project is scalable. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will evaluate traffic volumes and determine locations where the implementation of Protective/Permissive turn movements will benefit safety and operations. Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Project will result in less delay and therefore fuel consumption. Improve traffic system operations and reduce vehilce delay Funding availabilty and project priority Flashing Yellow Arrow Prot/Perm Left Turns 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 111 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements 0% Map ID-TP 38 Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 30$ 30$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 330$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 330$ 330$ Total 330$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding availability Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will build bicycle facilities and sharrows along the Oakdale and Pheasant routes to improve the connectivity to regional and local destinations in the Gateway area. The project will offer bicycle commuters a route choice that is less congested with vehicular traffic. A portion of the project is on County owned jurisdiction and will require County participation. Justification: There are currently no direct routes from the I-5 pedestrian bridge to the PeaceHealth facility at Riverbend. This route is one piece of that direct route connection, with the remaining piece of the route currently under county jurisdiction. Improve alternative mode connectivity to major destinations in the Gateway area. Page 112 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Transportation 50% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Plan TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 75$ 75$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 75$ -$ 75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 75$ 75$ Total 75$ -$ 75$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Council Goals: Community and Economic Development and Revitalization Maintian and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Pending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and funding availability Improvement SDC Eligibility: Growth areas adopted into the 2030 Refinement Plan and acknowleded by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Council approval of UGB Expansion Area(s) Project Description: Amend the Transportation System Plan to include areas selected by the City Council for expansion of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Justification: As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas for potential UGB Expansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial Buildable Lands Inventory (CIBL). Urban facility planning will need to occur once the Council determines which area(s) are appropriate for UGB expansion. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 113 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Cherokee Dr. Overlay 0% Map ID-TP 40 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 40$ 40$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 160$ 160$ Other -$ Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 200$ 200$ Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending funding availability and project priority Improvement SDC Eligibility: Pavement failures Citizen inquiries, following LID construction which likely accelerated pavement failure. Rehabilitate the street pavement on Cherokee Drive, from S. 34th Place to S. 38th Street, to restore the street pavement following the Cherokee Drive Sewer Local Improvement District (LID). The Cherokee Drive Sewer LID is complete. During construction, staff found that the existing pavement structure was about 2 inches of asphalt over about 6 inches of base. This structure is significantly less than current standards for a local street, and the street is exhibiting significant cracking following the LID project. Page 114 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Traffic Signal Communications 0% No Map Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:ITS Metro Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 15$ 5$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 70$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 85$ -$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 85$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ Total 85$ -$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ This project may be scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover a limited area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As traffic signal technology advances, so does the necessary element of communication within the signal network. Improved communication offers advanced signal control, less maintenance time, and improved error identification capabilities. The City system currently in place is aging and improvments will be necessary in the near future as standards changes. The project will evaluate central system software, fiber optic lines, wireless radio communication, and existing copper connections. Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Improved responsiveness to signal issues. Operational Functionality 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 115     WASTEWATER   Overview  Wastewater projects fall into several categories:  Preservation and Maintenance – These projects typically involve upgrading the current wastewater  system.  Projects may include the rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines, laterals and connections  to reduce infiltration and inflow of groundwater into the system.  New Facilities – These projects typically involve the construction of new wastewater facilities as a result,  or in anticipation of new development.  Projects may include sanitary sewer lines built as part of a new  subdivision and extension of sanitary sewer trunk lines.  PROJECT MAPS  WW1 Jasper Trunk Line Extension  WW2 Sanitary Basin #22 Rehabilitation  WW3 10th and “N” Street Upgrade  WW4 58th Street Flow Control Facility  WW5 Hayden Lo Pump Station  WW6 River Glen Pump Station  WW7 Wastewater Master Plan Update  WW8 Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement  WW9 Miscellaneous Wastewater System  Repair  WW10 UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans  WW11 Franklin Boulevard System Expansion  WW12 ”A” Street Improvements Unit 1  WW13 “A” Street Improvements Unit 2  WW14 ”A” Street Improvements Unit 3  WW15 Main Street Improvements Unit 1  WW16 Nugget Way Pump Station  WW17 Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump Station  WW18 Main Street Improvements Unit 2   WW19 McKenzie Highway Expansion  WW20 Local Sewer Extensions    Page 116 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program 2013-2017 Capital Improvement ProgramPage 117 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Jasper Trunk Line Extension 5,700$ 1,700 4,850 - - - 12,250 Capital Fund (409) 200$ - - - - - 200 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 5,500$ 1,700 - - - - 7,200 Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 4,850 - - - 4,850 Sanitary Basin 22 Rehabilitation 5,550$ - - - - - 5,550 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 5,550$ - - - - - 5,550 10th and "N" Sewer Upgrade 2,000$ 2,000 - - - - 4,000 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 2,000$ 2,000 - - - - 4,000 58th Street Flow Control Facility 275$ 2,000 - - - - 2,275 Capital Fund (409)-$ 2,000 - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 275$ - - - - - - Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement -$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Capital Fund (409)-$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Misc. Wastewater System Repair 200$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 955 5,155 Capital Fund (409)-$ - 212 425 587 304 1,528 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442) 200$ 200 200 475 413 50 1,538 Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ 800 588 100 - 601 2,089 Hayden Lo Pump Station -$ 200 - 850 - - 1,050 Capital Fund (409)-$ 200 - - - - 200 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - 850 - - 850 Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - River Glen Pump Station -$ 250 - - 975 - 1,225 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - 400 - 400 Revenue Bonds (409)-$ 250 - - 575 - 825 Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Master Plan Update 85$ - - - - - 85 Capital Fund (409) 43$ - - - - - 43 Improvement SDCs (443)42$ - - - - - 42 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - In Process Page 118 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total UGB Expansion Area Facility -$ 100 - - - - 100 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ 100 - - - - 100 Main Street Improvements Unit 1 -$ - 2,102 - - - 2,102 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 2,102 - - - 2,102 Franklin Boulevard Expansion -$ 625 2,373 - - - 2,998 Capital Fund (409)-$ 625 - - - - 625 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - 614 - - - 614 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,759 - - - 1,759 Nugget Way Pump Station -$ - 1,443 - - - 1,443 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,443 - - - 1,443 Peacehealth-Riverbend Pump Station -$ - 3,189 - - - 3,189 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 3,189 - - - 3,189 Main Street Improvements 2 -$ - 1,145 - - - 1,145 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,145 - - - 1,145 McKenzie Highway Improvements -$ - 1,683 - - - 1,683 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,683 - - - 1,683 "A" Street Improvements 1 -$ - - 620 - - 620 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - 216 - - 216 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 404 - - 404 "A" Street Improvements 2 -$ - - 285 - - 285 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - 85 - - 85 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 200 - - 200 Funding Not Programmed 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 119 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total "A" Street Improvements 3 -$ - - 180 - - 180 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - 72 - - 72 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 108 - - 108 Local Sewer Extensions -$ - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 19th Street Sewer Upgrade -$ - - - 620 - 620 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - 620 - 620 E. 17th Avenue Sewer -$ 105 - - - - 105 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ 105 - - - - 105 Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th -$ 230 - - - - 230 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ 230 - - - - 230 Annual Totals 14,160$ 8,210 18,785 4,935 4,595 2,955 39,480 Capital Fund (409) 293$ 2,825 1,212 1,425 1,587 1,304 8,353 Improvement SDCs (443)42$ - 614 373 - - 987 Reimbursement SDCs (442) 200$ 200 200 1,325 813 50 2,588 Revenue Bonds (409) 13,325$ 3,950 - - 575 - 4,525 Special Assmt. (419) 300$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ 1,235 16,759 1,812 1,620 1,601 23,027 Page 120 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850105 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Jasper Trunk Line Extension 81% Map ID-WW 1 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 200$ 200$ Engineering 1,050$ 350$ 350$ 350$ Land/Right of Way 500$ 500$ Construction 10,500$ 1,000$ 5,000$ 4,500$ Other Total 12,250$ 2,050$ 5,350$ 4,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 47$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7 7$ Personnel Costs 151$ 20$ 20$ 21$ 21$ 23$ 23$ 23$ Total 198$ 26$ 26$ 28$ 28$ 30$ 30$ 30$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 7,200$ 5,500$ 1,700$ User Fees 409 200$ 200$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 4,850$ 4,850$ Total 12,250$ 5,700$ 1,700$ 4,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Development in the Jasper/Natron Area and the need to decommission 3 pump stations and avoid costly system upgrades and maintenance activities. Construction is underway on Phase 1. Design is underway for Phase 2 with construction planned for 2012. Construction of future phases is deferred pending funding. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 10 to 27 inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from S. 42nd Street to Natron and the Urban Growth Boundary. The City is planning on borrowing the total of the project cost and collecting the developer share through agreements and reimbursements upon connection to the system. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by Maintenance every five years. The additional impact on the operations and maintenance budget are shown below. Justification: The Jasper Trunk Line Extension project will provide sewer service to the Jasper/Natron area within the Urban Growth Boundary that is currently not served. Given completion of the Bob Straub Parkway, it is a priority to extend sewer service to this area to serve anticipated development. 100% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with an estimated 50% to be reimbursed to the City by grants, developer contributions, or assessments. The project is currently planned to be constructed in at least 3 phases, with the first 2 phases to be completed in 2012. The remaining phase(s) will be constructed as funding becomes available and development activity resumes. Completing the first two phases will allow the City to decommission three existing pump stations, thereby significanly reducing the City's annual operations and maintenance costs. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for construction by 2010. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 121 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850216 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Sanitary Basin #22 Rehabilitation 0% Map ID-WW 2 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:Phase I - Complete Phase II - Under Construction Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 400$ 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 4,750$ 1,200$ 3,550$ Other 350$ 350$ Total 5,550$ 1,450$ 4,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 5,550$ 5,550$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 5,550$ 5,550$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Regulatory requirements and aged facilities. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan identified Sanitary Basin #22 as a primary source of Infiltration and Inflow (I/I), and thus a priority for rehabilitation and this basin has been identified as a high risk for sanitary sewer overflows. This project requires approximately 20,000 linear feet of pipe to be rehabilitated. Nearly a third of the total was completed in FY 2011 with the remainder to be completed in FY 2012. In order to simplify construction, several of the collection lines in Basin 22 will be constructed as part of the 10th & N Street Upgrade project. Justification: The project improves the capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as schedule, thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to the regional wastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2010, it was deferred as the EPA order put an emphasis on other wastewater service basins. Page 122 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850225 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation 10th and "N" Sewer Upgrade 0% Map ID-WW 3 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 1,396$ 250$ 1,000$ 146$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,539$ 2,000$ 539$ Other 65$ 65$ Total 4,000$ 250$ 3,000$ 750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 34$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ Personnel Costs 34$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ Total 68$ 12$ 12$ 14$ 14$ 16$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 4,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Other -$ Total 4,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Design is underway with construction scheduled to begin in 2012 and be completed in 2013 Regulatory requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct approximately 6,500 linear feet of 24 inch wastewater pipe parallel to the existing 24 inch wastewater pipe. This project will require the line to be bored under Highway 126. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need. In order to simplify construction, several of the collection lines in Basin 22 will be constructed as part of the 10th & N Street Upgrade project. Justification: The project improves the capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2010. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 123 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850226 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation 58th Street Flow Control Facility 12% Map ID-WW 4 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Compliance with Environmental Protection Agency enforcement order EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 375$ 225$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,600$ 1,600$ Other 300$ 50$ 250$ Total 2,275$ 275$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 12$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$ Personnel Costs 40$ 6$ 8$ 8$ 9$ 9$ Total 52$ 8$ 10$ 10$ 12$ 12$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 275$ 275$ User Fees 409 2,000$ 2,000$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Other -$ Total 2,275$ 275$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Design underway with construction planned for FY 2013 Regulatory requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct approximately 4,900 linear feet of 15 inch wastewater pipe as a wet weather flow control facility. This project will cross the Bob Straub Parkway near Main Street and then turn north at 58th Street eventually tying into the Thurston Road wastewater trunk line. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need. Justification: The project improves the capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilities during wet weather and peak flow conditions. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2011. Page 124 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #830010 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Sewer Wet Weather Flow Abatement 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan Regulatory Requirements EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 1,000$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,000$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ Other -$ Total 4,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 4,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 4,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ -$ Funding deferred for FY 2012 and 2013 to allow other projects to move ahead. Funding will resume once additional projects are identified. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The City of Springfield's obligations in the 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) were completed by January 2010; however it is necessary for this program to continue to fund additional wastewater system rehabilitation and Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) reduction projects. These additional projects will be identified through the Wastewater Master Plan Update project and the upcoming Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) program that will likely be included in the next NPDES permit for the wastewater system. Justification: This program deals with capacity problems in the wastewater system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective manner identified by the Wastewater Master Plan and the WWFMP. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state regulations requiring elimination of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) . Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as schedule thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget. Regulatory requirements Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to the regional wastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 125 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850007 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Miscellaneous Wastewater System Repair 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Accumulating funds for projects as developed Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 770$ 20$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 4,430$ 180$ 850$ 850$ 850$ 850$ 850$ Other -$ Total 5,200$ 200$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 2,028$ 212$ 425$ 587$ 304$ 500$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 2,038$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 475$ 413$ 50$ 500$ Unspecified 2,089$ 800$ 588$ 100$ 601$ Total 6,155$ 200$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 955$ 1,000$ Regulatory requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers that require either emergency rehabilitation as a result of Sanitary Sewer Overflows or the prospect of impending system failures. The PW Maintenance Division addresses an average of four (4) emergency repairs of this nature annually. Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe or other system components that havereached the end of their useful life or are otherwise causing problems within the collection system. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as scheduled, thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. This program provides funding for maintenance and engineering to respond to any system failures or issues quickly and efficiently as they arise or are identified. Page 126 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Hayden Lo Pump Station 0% Map ID-WW 7 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 600$ 600$ Other 250$ 250$ Total 1,050$ -$ 200$ -$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 4$ 2$ 2$ Total 6$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 200$ 200$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 850$ 850$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,050$ -$ 200$ -$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO. Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan, Protection of Public health and safety Programmed Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 494 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This project is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2014. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 127 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation River Glen Pump Station 21% Map ID-WW 8 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 700$ 700$ Other 275$ 275$ Total 1,225$ -$ 250$ -$ -$ 975$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 4$ 2$ 2$ Total 6$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 825$ 250$ 575$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 400$ 400$ Unspecified - Total 1,225$ -$ 250$ -$ -$ 975$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO. Project Driver: Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This is project necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2015. Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 664 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Page 128 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830005 Construction and Preservation Wastewater Master Plan Update 50% No Map Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Wastewater Master Plan, June 2008 City Council Objective EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 85$ 85$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 85$ 85$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 43$ 43$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.443 42$ 42$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 85$ 85$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending available staff resources to manage study Improvement SDC Eligibility: To meet 5-yr target set by Council (2013 Adoption) Council Direction to update Project List and Master Plan on 5-yr cycle Review June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and update as necessary. Review and revise the June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and technical model as necessary to accommodate changes related to new growth, additional flow monitoring data, implementation of the Downtown Plan, proposed changes in Glenwood and updating the 1991 North Springfield Sewer Study. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 129 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation UGB Expansion Area Facility Plans - Wastewater 50% No Map Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Plan 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 100$ 100$ Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Pending City Council approval of UGB Expansion Areas and 2030 Refinement Plan and funding Develop a Wastewater Facility Master Plan for each of the areas selected by the City Council for expansion of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). As part of the proposed 2030 Refinement Plan Project, the City is evaluating several areas for potential UGB Expansion to address identified deficiencies in the Commercial and Industrial Buildable Council approval of UGB Expansion Area(s) 2030 Refinement Plan acknowledgement by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Page 130 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Main Street Improvements Unit 1 20% Map ID-WW 11 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 25$ 25$ Engineering 721$ 721$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,356$ 1,356$ Other -$ Total 2,102$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 2,102$ 2,102$ Total 2,102$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Regulatory requirements and development activity in the east Springfield area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project begins at 59th Street and replaces approximately 3600 linear feet of 15 and 18 inch wastewater pipe to the east with a 24 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. To avoid capacity issues, the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan identifies a need to upgrade to 21 inch pipe for existing land use; however a 24 inch pipe is recommended to provide for future growth. The Wastewater Master Plan recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. Also, Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2011. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 131 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Franklin Boulevard System Expansion 100% Map ID-WW 12 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 75$ 75$ Engineering 300$ 300$ Land/Right of Way 250$ 250$ Construction 2,373$ 2,373$ Other -$ Total 2,998$ - 625 2,373 - - - - OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 21$ 3$ 4$ 4$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 41$ 7$ 8$ 8$ 9$ 9$ Total 62$ 10$ 12$ 12$ 14$ 14$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 625$ 625$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 614$ 614$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,759$ 1,759$ Total 2,998$ -$ 625$ 2,373$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Development activity in the Glenwood area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project expands the Glenwood wastewater system from the existing 30 inch trunk line in Franklin Boulevard south with approximately 3,900 feet of 15 inch pipe and 2,400 feet of 8 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by maintenance every five years. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the Glenwood area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009. Additionally, should the City receive federal stimulus dollars for the Franklin Boulevard Project, this will become a priority as some of the new pipe will be under the reconstructed roadway. Page 132 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Nugget Way Pump Station 0% Map ID-WW 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 300$ 300$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,043$ 1,043$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 1,443$ -$ -$ 1,443$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 18$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 18$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,443$ 1,443$ Total 1,443$ -$ -$ 1,443$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Regulatory Requirements and Facilities Master Plan Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 911 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Also, completion of the Franklin Expansion will most likely allow for decommissioning of this pump station as well as reducing the future maintenance burden. Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009. Currently the pump station is not experiencing problems, and flow monitoring will be done to determine if and when future upgrades will be needed. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 133 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump Station 100% Map ID-WW 14 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Sanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision (2005) EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 956$ 956$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,233$ 2,233$ Other -$ Total 3,189$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 66$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 66$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 3,189$ 3,189$ Total 3,189$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development within the RiverBend Area - capacity issues; and/or construction of the NE link between RiverBend Drive and International Way. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project is for the engineering and construction of a pump station in the RiverBend area. The need for the pump station will be driven by development within the RiverBend campus area and as defined in the Sanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the RiverBend area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. Project construction will occur with development. Page 134 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Main Street Improvements Unit 2 25% Map ID-WW 15 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 406$ 406$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 739$ 739$ Other -$ -$ Total 1,145$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,145$ 1,145$ Total 1,145$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development activity in the east Springfield area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project begins at 69th Street and replaces approximately 2,300 linear feet of 12 inch wastewater pipe to the east with a 18 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 135 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation McKenzie Highway Expansion 100% Map ID-WW 16 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 600$ 600$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,083$ 1,083$ Other -$ Total 1,683$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$ Personnel Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$ Total 32$ -$ -$ -$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,683$ 1,683$ Total 1,683$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project extends the wastewater system from the existing 21 inch trunk line east along the McKenzie Highway with approximately 2,000 feet of 10 inch pipe and 2,000 feet of 12 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. Page 136 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 1 35% Map ID-WW 17 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 420$ 420$ Other -$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 216$ 216$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 404$ 404$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 1,000 feet of an exiting 12 inch wastewater pipe with a 15 inch pipe from 66th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 137 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 2 30% Map ID-WW 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 90$ 90$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 195$ 195$ Other -$ Total 285$ -$ -$ -$ 285$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 85$ 85$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 200$ 200$ Total 285$ -$ -$ -$ 285$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 529 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch pipe from 69th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. Page 138 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 3 40% Map ID-WW 19 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 65$ 65$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 115$ 115$ Other -$ Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ 180$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 72$ 72$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 108$ 108$ Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ 180$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 325 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch pipe from 70th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 139 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Local Sewer Extensions 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal to provide for development. 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 200$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 600$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,200$ 800$ 800$ 800$ 800$ Other -$ Total 4,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 10$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$ Personnel Costs 10$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$ Total 20$ -$ -$ -$ 2$ 4$ 6$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 4,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 4,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Deferred pending funding Council decision - Annexation of developed areas within the UGB and/or petitions for Local Improvement Districts Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City of Springfield's city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are several areas that are fully developed, but lack wastewater service. The project would fund extending wastewater pipes to these areas upon request of affected property owners or annexation, with some or all of the cost possibly reimbursable through assessments. Increased infrastructure will increase the need for more maintenance personnel which impacts the wastewater operations budget. The estimated increase in the wastewater operations cost is $1,600 per 1,000 feet of new pipe. Justification: The City will need to provide wastewater service to all development existing and future within the city and the UGB. Environmental issues, or failing septic tanks within the City and un-annexed areas within the UGB Page 140 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation 19th Street Sewer Upgrade 0% Map ID-WW 21 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Compliance with Environmental Protection Agency enforcement order. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 10$ 10$ Engineering 210$ 210$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 400$ Other -$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 User Fees 409 -$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified 620$ 620$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project #3 in the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan involves replacing the existing 12-inch wastewater line with an 18-inch line from MH10034175 (North Springfield Interceptor) to MH10034164 (at Highway 126 westbound off ramp) in 19th Street. This upgrade will alleviate modelled surcharged flow in the system upstream of the upgrade location. The project improves capacity problems in the wastewater collection system during wet weather and peak flow conditions. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2014. Regulatory requirements. City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 20142013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 141 Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation E. 17th Avenue Sewer 0% Map ID-WW 22 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 15$ 15$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 90$ 90$ Other -$ Total 105$ -$ 105$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 User Fees 409 -$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified 105$ 105$ Total 105$ -$ 105$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Properties along the south side of E. 17th Avenue in Glenwood, between Glenwood Boulevard and Henderson Avenue, do not have public wastewater service available. The City and Lane County have entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) in 2011 for pavement rehabilitation and jurisdiction transfer of Glenwood Boulevard. This IGA includes the option for the City to pay the County for pavement rehabilitiation on this segment of E. 17th Avenue if the City has funds available. City desires to install the needed public wastewater line prior to the pavement rehabilitation in 2014. The project provides wastewater service to unserved, unannexed parcels within Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary in Glenwood prior to a planned project to rehabilitate the street pavement. Orderly and efficient provision of key urban services through constructing a needed public wastewater line in E. 17th Avenue prior to rehabilitating the street pavement. E. 17th Avenue paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 2014Page 142 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th Streets 0% Map ID-WW 23 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Marcola Meadows Master Plan approval EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 20$ 20$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 210$ 210$ Other -$ Total 230$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 User Fees 409 -$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified 230$ 230$ Total 230$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity. Improvement SDC Eligibility: In 1979, parcels within the Northview Subdivision, on the south side of Marcola Road between 22nd and 28th Streets, were annexed to the City without wastewater service. This project will construct a public 8-inch sewer to provide service to each parcel. Development of the Marcola Meadows site will include new public wastewater lines within new public streets, extending south from the North Springfield Interceptor, which will allow service to the Northview Subdivision parcels. The approved Marcola Meadows Master Plan requires improvements to Marcola Road, including installation of the needed wastewater line in Marcola Road with the City paying for some or all of the cost to install this line. The City will recoup its costs through the application of Sewer In-lieu of Assessment fees charged on the Northview Subdivision parcels when they connect to the new line. The project provides wastewater service to unserved, annexed parcels within Springfield concurrent with a planned project to improve Marcola Road. Orderly and efficient provision of key urban services through constructing a needed public wastewater line in Marcola Road concurrent with a planned street improvement project. Construction of the Marcola Meadows development. City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 20142013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 143     BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY  Overview  The Buildings and Property section covers a variety of projects that include; construction of new  facilities; maintenance, repair or renovation of existing facilities; and the demolition of unnecessary or  un‐maintainable facilities.  As the City of Springfield grows, so does the need for municipal public  services.  These services come with an associated infrastructure that requires continual monitoring,  maintenance, replacement and/or additions.  In order to catch up and stay current, Buildings and  Property projects will continue to be a priority.  Numerous other projects are included in the Building Preservation sheet.  This project addresses  ongoing maintenance issues as well as maintenance to begin alleviating the backlog of deferred  previously unfunded maintenance projects.  There are projects at all City‐owned buildings, including City  Hall, Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Depot, and Public Works Maintenance Division Facilities.    Another project is for the removal of the building constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillway  dam.  This project is in conjunction with an Army Corp of Engineers Millrace bank restoration project.   Timing of the removal and related work is related to Army Corp scheduling.  Project Maps    BP1 Fuel Facility  BP2 Building Preservation  BP3 Firing Range Decommissioning  BP4 Book Kelly Improvements  BP5 Roof Repair   BP6 Building Removal  BP7 Water Isolation Analysis  BP9 Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement   BP10 Fire Station #4 Relocation/Replacement  BP11 Municipal Parking Lot  BP12 City Storage Facility  BP13 Library Building  BP14 Renovation of City Hall  BP15 Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements  BP16 Electric Vehicle Projects   BP17 Solar Improvements  BP8 City Building Maintenance   Page 144 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program 2013-2017 Capital Improvement ProgramPage 145 Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Fuel Facility 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Old SDCs (420) 30.0$ - - - - - 30.0$ Springfield Sch. Dist (420) 24.0$ - - - - - 24.0$ Willamalane P&R (420)4.8$ - - - - - 4.8$ Rainbow Water Dist. (420)1.2$ - - - - - 1.2$ Buliding Preservation Fund (420)-$ - - - - - - Building Preservation 915$ 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,415$ Revenue Bonds (xxx)-$ - - - - - - Buliding Preservation Fund (420)915$ 267 300 300 300 300 2,382$ Unspecified -$ 233 700 700 700 700 3,033$ Firing Range Decommissioning 25$ 100 - - - - 125$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)25$ 100 - - - - 125$ Booth Kelly Internal Structural Imp.50$ 50 50 - - 100 250$ Booth Kelly (618)50$ 50 50 - - 100 250$ Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair 359$ 20 21 - - - 400$ Booth Kelly (618)359$ 20 21 - - - 400$ Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly Building Removal 40$ 30 20 10 - - 100 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly (618)40$ 30 20 10 - - 100 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Water Isolation Analysis -$ 10 10 10 - - 30 Booth Kelly (618)-$ 10 10 10 - - 30 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - City Building Maintenance 40$ 40 40 40 40 40 240$ Old SDCs (420)40$ 17 57$ Unspecified -$ 23 40 40 40 40 183$ Fire Storage Building -$ - - 250 - - 250$ Revenue Bonds (420)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - 250 - - 250$ Fire Station 14 420$ - 4,400 850 - - 5,670$ Unspecified 420$ - 4,400 850 - - 5,670$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - Fire Station 4 -$ - 1,150 4,800 - - 5,950$ Unspecified -$ - 1,150 4,800 - - 5,950$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - Municipal Parking Lot -$ - 665 - - - 665$ Revenue Bonds (420)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 665 - - - 665$ City Storage Facility -$ - - - 275 - 275$ Revenue Bonds (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Unspecified -$ - - - 275 - 275$ Library -$ - - - 25,300 - 25,300$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - 25,300 - 25,300$ City Hall Renovation -$ - - - - 3,850 3,850$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - 3,850 3,850$ Building and Property Maintenance Capital Projects Constructed In Process Funding Programmed Funding Not Programmed Page 146 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Building and Property Maintenance Capital Projects City Hall HVAC -$ - - 1,650 - - 1,650$ Unspecified -$ - 1,650 - - 1,650$ FS3 Parking -$ - 29 - - - 29$ Unspecified -$ - 29 - - - 29$ Electric Vehicle Projects -$ - 850 850 - - 1,700$ Unspecified -$ - 850 850 - - 1,700$ Energy Effeciency Projects -$ 20 100 50 50 50 270$ Unspecified -$ 20 100 50 50 50 270$ Pioner Memorial Cemetary Trail -$ 20 50 - - - 70$ Unspecified -$ 20 50 - - - 70$ Annual Total 1,839$ 773 8,385 9,510 26,665 5,040 52,212$ Booth Kelly (618)449$ 110 101 20 - 100 780$ Revenue Bonds (425)25$ 100 - - - - 125$ Springfield Sch. Dist (420)24$ - - - - - 24$ Willamalane P&R (420)5$ - - - - - 5$ Rainbow Water Dist. (420)1$ - - - - - 1$ Other (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Unspecified 420$ 296 7,984 9,190 26,365 4,640 48,895$ Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Buliding Preservation Fund (420)915$ 267 300 300 300 300 2,382$ 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 147 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account #870009 Construction and Preservation Fuel Facility Map ID-BP 1 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 60$ 60$ Other -$ Total 60$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs (old)420 30$ 30$ Springfield Sch. Dist 420 24$ 24$ Willamalane P&R 420 4.8$ 4.8$ Rainbow Water Dist 420 1.2$ 1.2$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 447 -$ Building Preservation -$ Total 60.0$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project costs will be shared by all partners based on historic annual average usage. Phase 1 completed in FY11. Phase 2 to be completed in FY12. Project Description: The Regional Fuel Facility was commissioned in 1990 in partnership with the Springfield School District, Willamalane Park and Recreation, Rainbow Water District and the City of Springfield. Approximately three (3) million gallons of fuel are dispensed annually from the facility. Minimal on-going maintenance has been performed over the years and is now time critical to be proactive to remain in compliance with Federal, State and Local regulatory mandates and codes. Now more major system upgrades are necessary to remain in compliance. The project is being proposed in two phases: Phase 1 will include installing leak containment under each pump, replacement of aged dispenser equipment, replacement of the current sump and leak containment chamber, and install spill containment at the tank fill location. Phase 2 includes replacement of the fuel card readers, tank monitoring and leak detection systems. Justification: To meet all applicable Federal, State and Local regulatory mandates, to replace aged equipment and systems, to address operating efficiency and facilities for all fuel facility partners. Aged facilities and environmental requirements The need for routine improvements and upgrades of inadequate aging facilities Page 148 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Partial Account #810050 Building Rehabilitation and Preservation Building Preservation Map ID-BP 2 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 6,415$ 915$ 500$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 6,415$ 915$ 500$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Capital maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 240$ 160$ 80$ Total 240$ 160$ 80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Building Preservation 420 2,682$ 915$ 267$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Unspecified 3,733$ 233$ 700$ 700$ 700$ 700$ 700$ Total 6,415$ 915$ 500$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Building Condition Report. Project Description: Perform preservation, capital maintenance and repair projects on City-owned buildings, including City Hall, 5 Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Jail, Depot, Carter Building and Maintenance Facilities. Projects can include the repair, renovation or replacement of structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Other projects can include systems preservation such as, painting, roofing, lighting, alarm and elevator projects as well as repair and/or upgrades to aesthetic and architectural elements. Justification: These projects are necessary to maintain and preserve City-owned buildings. Project needs, costing, and prioritization are identified in the Public Works Building Maintenance Work Plan and by City Staff. Deferred capital maintenance (backlog) and annual ongoing capital maintenance needs are identified. Extending beyond the 5-yr CIP, funding needs will continue and will likely increase as facilities age and costs increase. Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assets Aged facilities, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation of Council 5-year Work plan and 5-year Building Facility Strategic Plan Ongoing capital maintenance program 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 149 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account 810022 Construction and Preservation Firing Range Decommissioning Map ID-BP 3 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 5$ 5$ Engineering 25$ 20$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 95$ 95$ Other -$ Total 125$ 25$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Booth Kelly 618 -$ Revenue Bonds 425 125$ 25$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 125$ 25$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project Planned Mill Race Restoration Project Project Description: This project involves the clean-up of the outdoor firing range formerly used by the Police Department, including lead mining, removal of miscellaeous materials, and overall environmental assessment of the site. Justification: The Police department has stopped using the the outdoor firing range and is coordinating firearms training with other law enforcement agencies. The site is located above the Booth Kelly Mill Pond, which will be rehabilitated for wetlands and water quality purposes. The outdoor range site must be cleaned up in association with these plans. Project Driver: Completion of Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Pond. This project was originally prioritized for 2001. Page 150 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account 810041 Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Internal Structural Improvements Map ID-BP 4 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 50$ 50 50$ 100$ Other -$ Total 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ -$ 100$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Booth Kelly 618 250$ 50$ 50 50$ 100$ Total 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ -$ 100$ -$ Booth Kelly Development Plan Project Description: Structural repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center. Justification: This project will complete the internal structural rehabilitation of certain areas of the facility that were considered nonessential when the initial repairs were completed in the early 1990s. Certain structural and/or lease space modifications are also anticipated due to tenant vacancies. This project also includes new roof covering for the southeast portion of the facility and waterline replacement in the east-west alleyway. Structural repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center Programmed Project Driver: Internal and structural improvements. This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 151 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account # Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair Map ID-BP 5 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 200$ 200$ Other -$ Total 400$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Booth Kelly 618 400$ 359$ 20$ 21$ Unspecified -$ Total 400$ 359$ 20$ 21$ -$ -$ -$ -$ This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan. Project Description: Complete roof replacement or epoxy over coating of the existing metal roof decking of the "Saw-tooth" building, commonly referred to as Building G at the Booth-Kelly Center. Justification: The existing roof material of the "Saw-tooth" building is over 50 years old and no longer provides adequate weather protection for the building users or interior equipment. The replacement or over coating of the roof decking will significantly reduce/eliminate the ongoing maintenance demands of the roof for a period of approximately 20 years. Programmed Internal and structural improvements Page 152 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account #810043 Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Building Removal Map ID-BP 6 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Planning -$   Engineering 20$ 10$ 10$   Land/Right of Way -$   Construction 80$ 30$ 20$ 20$ 10$   Other -$ Total 100$ 40$ 30$ 20$ 10$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Maintenance Costs -$   Personnel Costs -$ Total ‐$                ‐$             ‐$           ‐$           ‐$           ‐$            ‐$           ‐$                   FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Special Assmt.‐$                  AFG Grant 420 ‐$                  SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 ‐$                  Federal Aid 420 ‐$                  State Aid 420 ‐$                  SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 ‐$                  SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 ‐$                  Booth Kelly 618 100$          40$         30 20$       10$        Total 100$          40$         30$       20$       10$       ‐$            ‐$           ‐$                   This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan. Project Description: Removal of the building structual referred to as Building D, Suite 188 open cover.   Justification: The existing roof cover is deteriorating and is over 50 years old and no longer provides weather protection for the building causing flooding in the immediate area. The removal of the structual and fill of the loading ramp with the relocation of sump pump will eliminate flooding and improve drainage. Project Driver: External Structual Improvements. External repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center Planned 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 153 Buildings and Property Funding Secured: No Infrastructure Planning and Inventory Study Booth Kelly Water Isolation Analysis Map ID-BP 7 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Planning -$   Engineering -$   Land/Right of Way -$   Construction -$   Other 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Total 30$ -$ 10$ 10$ 10$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Maintenance Costs -$   Personnel Costs -$ Total ‐$            ‐$              ‐$           ‐$           ‐$           ‐$            ‐$           ‐$                    FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017   Special Assmt.‐$              AFG Grant 420 ‐$              SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 ‐$              Federal Aid 420 ‐$              State Aid 420 ‐$              SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 ‐$              SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 ‐$              Booth Kelly 618 30$        10$       10$       10$          Unspecified ‐$            Total 30$        ‐$             10$       10$       10$       ‐$            ‐$           ‐$                    City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and  Environmental Quality Project Description: This project will consist of a water isolation analysis to the Booth Kelly Complex grounds in order to locate a slow water leakage. Justification: The City has been chosen as part of the Sustainable Cities Year Project.The location of the leakage will enable us to repair and analyze current locations of all water pipes not identified on paper. The grounds stability will be crucial as to the location of any future building developement at Booth Kelly. Possible upgrades or a new direction and re-use of the facility or tear-down and reconstruction of newer buildings would give opportunities for the site, and tying development with updated plans for the downtown area that are now being considered. Project Driver: The future development of Booth Kelly Center Identify water leakage due to rate increase. Deferred pending funding Page 154 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Partial Account #810002 Building Rehabilitation and Preservation City Building Maintenance No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 240$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Total 240$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Capital maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Old SDCs 420 57$ 40$ 17$ Unspecified 183$ 23$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Total 240$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ -$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Building Condition Report. Project Description: Perform major maintenance and contracted activities to address unanticipated emergency facility equipment and systems replacement. Justification: Each year we budget for preservation maintenance and ongoing repair and preventive maintenance of equipment and systems. However, unanticipated breakdowns occur. This project covers unanticipated repairs or replacements of equipment and or systems. Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assets Aged facility equipment and systems failures, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation of Council 5-year Workplan and 5-year Building Facility Strategic Plan Ongoing capital maintenance program 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 155 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Storage Building Map ID-BP 9 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 250$ -$ -$ -$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (16)$ (16)$ Personnel Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Total (14)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (15)$ 1$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 250$ 250$ Total 250$ -$ -$ -$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Project Description: This project is to construct a 3,000 square foot storage facility to provide long term storage for the Department of Fire & LIfe Safety. The facility construction is proposed to be a pre-engineered metal building with a concrete floor and include multiple compartments to accommodate the varying storage needs of the Department. The building would be weather-tight and climate controlled to assure proper storage of materials and equipment. Justification: The City owns land at fire station #5 that could be used to construct this facility. The Department has growing storage needs which include; reserve apparatus, equipment and supplies. Limited storage space at exisitng fire stations has caused the Department to rent storage in the private sector. This facility will eliminate the need for rental spaces. Limited space Capacity Issues Page 156 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement Map ID-BP 10 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan. Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 15$ 15$ Engineering 550$ 200$ 350$ Land/Right of Way 405$ 405$ Construction 3,950$ 3,950$ Other 750$ 250$ 500$ Total 5,670$ 420$ -$ 4,400$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 30$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ 10$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 5,670$ 420$ 4,400$ 850$ Total 5,670$ 420$ -$ 4,400$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development and Annexation in Jasper Natron requires relocation of fire station to provide urban level of service Project Description: The Project will be constructed in east Springfield, utilizing the site at 725 S. 57th Street. The design of the new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to provide proper Fire and Life Safety services to the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Jasper/Natron area. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #14 located at 4765 Main Street, was originally constructed in 1961 and then remodeled in 1999. In 2007, the Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the station was observed; "while minimally functional, this station is not a positive environment for the staff. Storage and living space are at a critical point. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1961. Since that time the addition of other fire stations to provide fire and emergency service for the expanding city has caused a significant overlap of coverage. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south to cover the Jasper Natron area will not negatively impact current coverage and will accommodate future annexations and development. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility, the fire department will be unable to deliver this key urban service to these future developments. Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Jasper/Natron 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 157 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #4 Relocation/Replacement No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 200$ 200$ Engineering 550$ 200$ 350$ Land/Right of Way 400$ 400$ Construction 3,950$ 3,950$ Other 850$ 350$ 500$ Total 5,950$ -$ -$ 1,150$ 4,800$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 20$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 5,950$ 1,150$ 4,800$ Total 5,950$ -$ -$ 1,150$ 4,800$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development and Annexation in Glenwood requires relocation of Fire Station #4 to provide urban level of service Project Description: The Project will be constructed in downtown Springfield. The design of the new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends the completed project will meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to implement proper Fire and Life Safety services to the downtown area of the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Glenwood area. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #4, located at 1475 5th Street, was originally constructed in 1973. In 2007, the Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the station was observed; "Age and construction type has led to increasing maintenance costs. The entire structure shows signs of excessive usage and wear. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1973. Since that time the acceptance of Glenwood into the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) from the City of Eugene has created a gap in the Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety's ability provide this key urban level of service to portions of Glenwood. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south will provide improved coverage to the downtown area and accommodate future annexations and developments in Glenwood with the appropriate response time. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility the Fire Department will be unable to deliver urban service levels to future annexations and developments in some areas of Glenwood. Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Glenwood Page 158 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Municipal Parking Lot No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 475$ 475$ Construction 190$ 190$ Other -$ Total 665$ -$ -$ 665$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 21$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 21$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 665$ 665$ Total 665$ -$ -$ 665$ -$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Community and Economic Development and Revitalization, Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Project Description: This project is for the purchase of land and construction of a 150 car asphalt parking lot with concrete curbs and gutters for City of Springfield employees and fleet vehicles. This will replace the former lot at 4th and B Streets that was incorporated into the Springfield Justice Center as well as provide adequate parking for City Hall fleet vehicles. Justification: Construction of the Justice Center required removal of 84 spaces previously reserved for City staff parking. This loss has caused staff to park curbside in the adjacent business district, residential neighborhood, and/or in dedicated public parking around City Hall. Staff have received complaints from businesses and property owners and from the patrons visiting City facilities. By relocating staff and fleet vehicles away from City Hall, additional parking will be made available for customers patronizing downtown businesses and Municipal facilities. Downtown redevelopment, citizen concerns and business accessibility Capacity Issues, citizen concerns and business accessibility Deferred pending funding 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 159 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation City Storage Facility Map ID-BP 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 25$ 25$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (32)$ (16)$ (16)$ Personnel Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Total (30)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (15)$ (15)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 275$ 275$ Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility to provide long term storage for City Departments. The facility construction is proposed to be a pre-engineered metal building with a concrete floor and include multiple compartments to accommodate the varying storage needs of Departments. The building would be weather-tight and climate controlled to assure proper storage of materials and equipment. Justification: The City owns land at the Public Works-Maintenance Shops at South 18th street that could be used to construct this facility. Every Department has growing storage needs which include; long term file retention, historical items, materials, equipment and supplies. Limited storage space at City facilities have caused several Departments to rent storage in the private sector. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces. Limited space Capacity Issues Deferred pending funding Page 160 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account #: Construction and Preservation Library Building No Map Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 2,500$ 2,500$ Land/Right of Way 2,000$ 2,000$ Construction 16,800$ 16,800$ Other 4,000$ 4,000$ Total 25,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,300$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs 240$ 80$ 80$ 80$ Total 270$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90$ 90$ 90$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 25,300$ 25,300$ Total 25,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,300$ -$ -$ Council Goals #4 - Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities and # 5 - Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality. Project Description: Construct an approximately 60k sq. ft. Library facility adequate to serve the needs of Springfield citizens for the next 20-30 years based on currently adopted population estimates. The projected cost of the new library will be $25,300,000 including design, site preparation, construction, FF&E and landscaping. Estimated facility size and cost were derived from: Standards for Oregon Public Libraries, 2008 by the Public Library Division of the Oregon Library Association; Public Library Space Needs: A Planning Outline, 2009, Anders C. Dahlgren, President of Library Planning Associates, Inc., Wisconsin Dept. of Public Instruction; Robertson/Sherwood Architects, Eugene, Oregon, Randy Nishimura - Architect. Justification: The Library is currently below Oregon Library Standards for both facilities and open hours for communities our size. It is at "threshold" (minimum) standards for size of collection. Recently, the Library has experienced double digit increases in both circulation (13%) and program attendance (20%). It cannot expand it's collections in any meaningful way due to space limitations. The Library cannot keep up with public demand for programming and for community meeting space and is hampered in effectively deploying new technology due, in part, to the age and infrastructure of the building. Population estimates project Springfield's population to grow to over 80,000 people in the next 20 years increasing the difficulty in providing services in a sub- standard facility. In addition, a new Library building can help in the City's efforts at revitalizing the downtown core by attracting tens of thousands of people to the area through its services and programs and by serving as a community gathering place. Project Driver: Growing demand for Library services; current facility cannot sustain current usage level nor can it address projected population growth into the future; ability for new Library to act as a positive factor in revitalizing downtown core. Ability to provide library service from current facility declines to the point that both quality and quantity of service are impacted. Citizen feedback and staff reporting support Council action. Deferred pending funding 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 161 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Renovation of City Hall Map ID-BP 15 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 350$ 350$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,500$ 3,500$ Other -$ Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,850$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 3,850$ 3,850$ Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,850$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: Once the Library moves out of City Hall into a building of its own, City Hall will be left with about 25,000 square feet of empty space that will need to be reallocated to meet departmental space needs. This project is for the renovation of City Hall to improve building safety, energy efficiency and space allocation. This project includes additional seismic bracing, upgraded HVAC system and ductwork, better insulation and interior redesign to better utilize space. Justification: City Hall holds the majority of City Employees and many essential municipal functions are based out of this aging, retrofitted building. The building is not designed to current seismic codes and as such is vulnerable to earthquakes. Also while renovations have improved some energy efficiency from the original construction, additional improvements would increase user comfort and increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Finally with the space created by the Library moving to its own building, City Hall can be reconfigured into a more efficient space for staff and users with room for growth as the City grows. Providing a safe, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff Approval of funding for a new Municipal Library Deferred pending funding Page 162 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation City Hall HVAC System Replacement Map ID-BP 16 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,500$ 1,500$ Other -$ Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs (15)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (15)$ -$ -$ -$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 1,650$ 1,650$ Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: This project will replace the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system at City Hall. This project will also include the replacement of 30+ year old fiberboard ductwork with more modern, hygenic material and in a more effecient design to better serve offices, meeting rooms and cubical areas. Engeering analysis will be done to determine the most effecient and effective system to be installed, in an effort to maximize energy effeciency and occupant comfort. Design will try to accomodate maximum flexabiltiy to change easily with building use patterns. Justification: The existing Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system has several issues that are quickly coming together to require a complete change out. First, the existing units were installed in the mid 1990's so they are approaching the end of their useful life. Second, layout of the units has not changed since the original design was done in 1980. However, the layout of City Hall has changed significantly and as a result the ductwork and zoning is very ineffecient and staff comfort is always poor. Third, the 65 package unit heat pumps are potentially not the most effecient or effective HVAC for the building and additional system types should be look into. Providing a comfortabole, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff End of useful life of the existing HVAC system Conceptual 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 163 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements Map ID-BP 17 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 2$ 2$ Engineering 2$ 2$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 25$ 25$ Other -$ Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 29$ 29$ Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Project Description: This project will expand and improve parking areas at Springfield Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street. The project involves addition of ten (10) parking spaces for staff and relocation of the existing fence and gate to the south. The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of staff, equipment, and materials related to the operation of the fire station. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street, was originally constructed in 1971. In 2008, the building was remodeled to provide upgraded kitchen facilities and individual sleeping rooms for 24/7 staff. This one-story addition to the existing 8,579 square foot facility eliminated approximately ten (10) secured parking spaces for Fire Department staff and equipment. This project will replace the lost parking areas and relocate the fence that secures the parking area to the South. Current parking availability requires some personal and staff vehicles to be parked in an unsecure area, susceptible to vandalism. Project Driver: Inadequate facilities Capacity Issues and safety concerns Page 164 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Electric Vehicle Projects No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 150$ 75$ 75 Engineering 150$ 75$ 75 Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 200$ 100$ 100 Other 1,200$ 600$ 600 Total 1,700$ -$ -$ 850$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 1,700$ 850$ 850 Total 1,700$ -$ -$ 850$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality. Energizing Oregon, a PEV Market and Community Plan, Clean Cities Community Readiness and Planning for Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Charging Infrastructure. In 2007 the Legislative Assembly set ambitious targets for the reduction of greenhouse gases (“GHG”) from activity in Oregon. House Bill 3543 calls for a target reduction of 10 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 and 75 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Grant funding opportunities and agency fleet replacement funds support project implementation Project dependent on Federal/State Aid or Grant Assistance Funding Justification: All TEAM Springfield agencies have interests to reduce GHG emissions and a responsibility to work toward more energy independence and environmental sustainability. By changing some of our fleet vehicles and rolling stock to equipment that can operate on electricity or alternative fuels we can help to meet these independence and sustainability goals. The City and TEAM Springfield agencies have concluded that it is vital to reduce the use of fossil based fuels by replacing vehicles with those that are fueled by electricity, and to begin the process of providing solar based electricity for those vehicles, so that ultimately there will be no GHG impact from the fleet. The partners are now seeking supplemental grant funding to support existing vehicle replacement reserves and replace 30 administrative vehicles over the next three years. Project Description: The City of Springfield and our TEAM Springfield partners desire to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and begin to transition agency fleets from fossil fuel based vehicles to electric or hybrid fueled vehicles. The project objective is to seek clean energy opportunities through moving our fleet to alternative fuels that promote the use of renewable and clean energy sources. Priority first phase projects initiatives include development and installation of approximately 10 electric vehicle (EV) charging stations at the Regional Fuel Facility and other strategic locations within Springfield. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 165 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Energy Efficiency Projects No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 270$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 270$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Total 270$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: This project is to install energy effeciency improvements in City facilities. These improvements could include; photovoltaic (PV) generation panels, passive solor water heating, geothermal HVAC systems, lighting improvements and building weather-proofing. Work will take place on City facilities including, Regional Fuel Facility, City Hall, five fire stations, City maintenance facilities, Justice Center, Municipal Jail, and City owned rental facilities. This is a five year plan to make improvements to all locations. The first year funding is for planning and design, followed by solor hot water at high use facilities, and Geothermal HVAC systems at our fire stations. Justification: The City is working with Team Springfield partners to implement an initiative that will engage all of the agencies by pursuing innovative and sustainable solutions that reduce demand for electricity while at the same time reducing greenhouse gases (GHG). As a large energy consumer in the area we also generate a significant carbon foot print and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. There are currently regional goals that mandate or recommend reductions in municipal carbon footprints and greenhouse gas emissions; and as such Springfield has determined that we need to look at alternatives to the status quo. Energy costs and Savings Deferred pending funding Page 166 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Buildings and Property Funding Secured: No Construction and Preservation Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Trail Map ID-BP 20 Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities City Council Goal to Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning 5$ 5$ Engineering 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way 5$ 5$ Construction 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 70$ -$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Unspecified 70$ 20$ 50$ Total 70$ -$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending funding Replace and upgrade the Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Park North Woods trail and steps. The trail and steps were constructed by Lane Metro Youth Corps in 1991. The existing steps and trail are in disrepair and need replacement. In addition, poor lighting and vegetation have created an area inviting inappropriate uses. This project addresses a need to provide a safe access to the Park and the Willamette Heights area. This is a well used trail that creates a link from the Mill Race/Booth Kelly area to the Park, which is owned by the City. The trail facilitates the Willamette Height's residents access to the downtown area as there are no sidewalks along S. B Street or S. C Street. The timber steps do not comply with current ADA standards, do not include handrails, and erosion is occurring along the trail, affecting safe use of the trail and steps. Enhanced lighting and vegetation replacement will enhance public safety and allow police officers to view into the park while on patrol. Citizen requests Citizen requests and safety related incidents City of Springfield Capital Improvement Program 2010 ‐ 20142013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 167     MISCELLANEOUS  Overview  The Miscellaneous section covers debt collection and tracking of public facilities and infrastructure.  As  the City of Springfield grows, so does the need for municipal public services.  These services come with  an associated infrastructure cost that at times requires the City to acquire debt.    Current debt includes the Springfield Justice Center Facility bond which included the construction of a  jail facility to house misdemeanor offenders.  Miscellaneous projects address ongoing facility and infrastructure upgrades, working to sustain physical  assets found in the field and electronic assets found in databases.  Projects include storm, sewer, and  transportation facilities.  These projects encompass a variety of areas, like the City’s participation in  public improvements of private developments; for example, the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park.   Other projects include citywide base mapping projects, such as the Topographic Remapping Project, and  database projects like the Asset Management System Replacement Project.  Because of budget  reductions, the Topographic Remapping Project is not currently funded.    Projects:    Asset Management System Replacement Project – This project addresses failing systems that manage  electronic inventories and provide reliable and well‐integrated information for asset management and  mapping functions.  Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining,  reporting, accounting, forecasting and operating City facilities, i.e., managing the City’s billion dollars  worth of public facilities.  The project is needed to mitigate current and future risk associated with  outdated and failing systems (which failed twice in Fall of 2010), continue to support comprehensive  facilities and asset management needs, and sustain support for a broad range of Public Works functions.   During FY 2012, the City Council approved reappropriating $280,000 each from Local Wastewater and  Stormwater capital project budgets so that this project could proceed.  Additional capital funding for  this project is included in future years of the CIP, as well as from the Operating Budget.  Topographic Remapping Project – This project addresses out‐of‐date topographic maps (base maps) for  the entire City.  Current base maps are woefully out‐of‐date and as a result do not reflect significant  development that has occurred over the last 12 years, such as the PeaceHealth RiverBend Medical  Center and MountainGate, and other development activity such as smaller capital improvement  projects, private developments, and natural resource changes that have occurred since the previous  update.  Work addresses development‐induced changes that have occurred across the City and includes  updating full topography (e.g., elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation and surface  waterways) on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments including a  broad range of Public Works functions.  Page 168 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Micellaneous Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Debt - SLI 82$ 82 82 82 - - 328 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 30$ 30 30 30 - - 121 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 39$ 39 39 39 - - 157 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) 12$ 12 12 12 - - 49 Debt - Interceptor 457$ 312 315 244 - - 1,328 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 20$ - - - - - 20 Wastewater Capital (409) 437$ 312 315 244 - - 1,308 City Participation 300$ 237 300 300 300 300 1,737 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 50$ 33 33 33 33 33 215 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ 33 33 33 33 33 Drainage Capital (425) 50$ 34 34 34 34 34 220 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 33$ 33 33 33 33 33 198 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 34$ 34 34 34 34 34 204 Wastewater Capital (409) 33$ - 33 33 33 33 165 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Topographic Remapping Project 425$ 15 135 15 160 15 765 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 13$ - - - - - 13 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) 21$ - - - - - 21 Drainage Capital (425) 21$ - - - - - 21 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 21$ - - - - - 21 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 51$ - - - - - 51 Wastewater Capital (409) 21$ - - - - - 21 Street Fund (434) 21$ - - - - - 21 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Transportation Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 256$ 15 135 15 160 15 596 Asset Management System Replacement 560$ 247 280 129 129 129 1,474 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Drainage Capital (425) 280$ 41 - - - - 321 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Capital (409) 280$ 41 - - - - 321 Street Fund (434)-$ 165 - - - - 165 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Transportation Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 280 129 129 129 667 Annual Totals 1,824$ 893 1,112 770 589 444 5,632 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 93$ 63 63 63 33 33 349 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) 21$ 33 33 33 33 33 186 Drainage Capital (425) 351$ 75 34 34 34 34 562 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 93$ 72 72 72 33 33 376 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 105$ 34 34 34 34 34 275 Wastewater Capital (409) 771$ 353 348 277 33 33 1,815 Street Fund (434) 21$ 165 - - - - 186 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) 62$ 47 62 62 50 50 334 Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Unspecified 256$ 15 415 144 289 144 1,263 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 169 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account # Debt Service, City Participation, and Others Debt - SLI 37% Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Wastewater Master Plan Council Direction EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 328$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$ Total 328$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 157$ 39$ 39$ 39$ 39$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 121$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 49$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ Unspecified Total 328$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The loan and repayment of the loan was approved by Council in 1994 Loan secured Projects completed. This represents the debt service payments Project Description: Oregon Special Public Works payment on a loan for a portion of the public improvements in the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park. The total loan amount is $952,309 and is to be paid over a 20 year period. The last payment will be in FY 2015. Development and growth Page 170 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account #NA Wastewater System Expansion and Upgrades Sanitary Sewer Interceptor - Debt Service 8.3% Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:In repayment Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 1980 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other (Debt Pymt)1,934$ 606$ 457$ 312$ 315$ 244$ Total 1,934$ 606$ 457$ 312$ 315$ 244$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 409 1,308$ 437$ 312$ 315$ 244$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 20$ 20$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 Unspecified Total 1,328$ 457$ 312$ 315$ 244$ -$ -$ -$ Bond Sale Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Annual payment of 20 year revenue bonds and State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan to fund the South Springfield Interceptor. Justification: A portion of the South Springfield Interceptor sewer was funded with loans and bonds amortized over a 20 year period. The SRF loan of $1,075,000 for Phase 1 resulted in an annual payment of $75,000. In Phase II, the $3.3 million revenue bond sold in 1995 resulted in an annual payment of $285,000. The payment on the $2,900,000 DEQ Revolving Loan for Phase III in FY 1998 equals $300,000 per year. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 171 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account # Debt Service, City Participation, and Others City Participation Varies Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,737$ 300$ 237$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 1,737$ 300$ 237$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Wastewater Capital 409 165$ 33$ -$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Imp. (WW) 443 204$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 198$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ Storm Capital 425 220$ 50$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 215$ 50$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Reimb (Storm) 441 165$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Imp (Str.) 447 285$ 50$ 35$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 285$ 50$ 35$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Street Capital 434 Total 1,737$ 300$ 237$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ -$ 860002, 870004, 880001 On-going sinking fund Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's Construction Permit process. To respond to known and potential private development projects, it is necessary to budget $100,000 each fiscal year in each infrastructure program area, i.e. Transportation, Local Wastewater and Stormwater. The programmed funds for FY13 are only those necessary to meet this estimated need. Currently other programmed funds are not yet tied to specific projects. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyond a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the City under Council adopted participation policies. Private development projects Development and growth. City requirement of developer to oversize infrastructure. Page 172 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Partial Account # Data Improvements Topographic Remapping Project Varies Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Most other CIP Projects Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps) Mill Race Project Police Map Books HB 3337 Planning (UGB, Comp Plan, BLI Inventories)Fire and Life Safety Map Books Glenwood Refinement Plan Water Rescue Maps 2010 FEMA Remapping Project Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)TransPlan Standard and Special Purpose Maps Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 935$ 425$ 15$ 135$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ Total 935$ 425$ 15$ 135$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt.-$ WW User Rate 409 21$ 21$ STM Drainage User Rate 425 21$ 21$ Street User Rate 434 21$ 21$ SDCs. Imp (Storm)440 13$ 13$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 21$ 21$ SDCs. Imp. (WW)443 51$ 51$ SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 -$ -$ SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 21$ 21$ SDCs, Imp. (Str.)447 -$ -$ Unspecified 766$ 256$ 15$ 135$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ Total 935$ 425$ 15$ 135$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ Pending funding. (Funding estimates an approximately 53/47 split where 53% comes from various Public Works user rate and SDC funds and the remaining 47% comes from other funds managed by other departments.) Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Current base maps are woefully out-of-date. Base maps do not reflect significant development that has occurred over the last 12 years such as PeaceHealth and MountainGate and do not reflect other development activity such as smaller capital improvement projects, private developments, natural resource changes, etc. that have occurred since that last update. Many City functions such as facilities planning, design, construction and maintenance, current and long range land use planning, and public safety incident response (fire, police and ambulance) depend on current and complete base maps. In order to serve the broad array of citywide needs for current and complete base map information, this topographic remapping project is required. The acquisition of new orthoimagery and LiDAR data will assist with remapping efforts. Errors and omissions on the topographic maps have already begun to impact functions citywide. Topographic data have reached the end of their useful life and are now obsolete City wide needs for current and complete base map information are not being met because topographic data is 12 years old Project Description: Replace out-of-date topographic maps (base maps) for the entire City that were last developed in 2000; replace orthoimagery and LiDAR data on a 3 year cycle. New maps will address development induced changes that have occurred across the City and will include updating full topography (e.g., elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation and surface waterways) on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments. New orthoimagery and LiDAR data will inform and enhance the creation of new base maps. Proposing full remapping in 2012 and then incremental remapping every 2 years to assure that from 2013 forward, base maps for all areas of the City are current to within 3 years - all areas are remapped every three years. 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program Page 173 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Improvements Asset Management System Replacement NA Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Most CIP Projects and PW Operations Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps) Mill Race Project Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans HB 3337 Planning (UGB, Comp Plan, BLI Inventories)TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Flood Mitigation Facilities Management Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)Asset management Standard and Special Purpose Maps Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Phase 1 Targeted Migration 642$ 560$ 82$ Phase 2 Mobile Solutions 165$ 165$ Phase 3 Street Integration 180$ 180$ Captial Reserve 616$ 100$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ Total 1,603$ 560$ 247$ 280$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Maintenance Costs 746$ 74$ 102$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 746$ 74$ 102$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Beyond 2017 Special Assmt. WW User Rate 409 321$ 280$ 41$ STM Drainage User Rate 425 321$ 280$ 41$ Street Capital 434 165$ 165$ SDCs. Imp (Storm)440 SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 SDCs. Imp. (WW)443 SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 SDCs, Imp. (Str.)447 Unspecified 796$ 280$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ Total 1,603$ 560$ 247$ 280$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ In Process Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Replace failing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Facilities Management (FM) systems that manage electronic inventories of City infrastructure and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and mapping functions. Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, reporting, accounting, forecasting and operating City facilities, i.e., managing City facilities valued at approximately one billion dollars. Proposing a phased approach with 1) targeted replacment of existing system FY12-FY13 for $984,000; 2) integration of Street system information FY14 for $200,000; and then ongoing system maintenance and software licensing fees are shown for informational purposes as Operational Impact for $242,000 per year plus adjustments for inflation beyond - note these costs are not included in the Funding Sources. Justification: The City faces current challenges and future risk. Servers running the City’s GIS/FM system are old and failing. The FM Server is over 4 years and the GIS server is over 5 years old. Since November, 2010 the City has had to recover from two system failures. The first required a half day to repair and the second required 5 days to repair. As a result the system was approximately 90% restored. Subsequent work included moving systems to another aged server, contracting to audit the system and entering a six month on-call contract to assure prompt response to anticipated future failures. System software is approximately 10 years old and no longer supported by vendors, except as funded under contract with the City. Recovery from system failure averages between $5,000 and $10,000 per event. Migration is required to mitigate risk, contain future costs, manage City assets, and sustain facility management functions described above. The City must migrate to new systems to continue to support comprehensive facilities and asset management needs and sustain support for vital Public Works functions. Systems have exceeded their useful life and are now failing. Page 174 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program