HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018 12 18 AIS for Rosen Sunvisor Site Plan ReviewAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 12/18/2018 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting
Staff Contact/Dept.: Andy Limbird, DPW
Staff Phone No: 541-726-3784 Estimated Time: 20 Minutes
S P R I N G F I E L D PLANNING COMMISSION Council Goals: Encourage Economic Development and Revitalization through Community Partnerships ITEM TITLE: REQUEST FOR TYPE III SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A PROPOSED 12,735 FT2 EXPANSION
TO AN EXISTING LIGHT MANUFACTURING BUILDING LOCATED AT 4884 FRANKLIN
BOULEVARD, CASE 811-18-000208-TYP2
ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct a public hearing and deliberations on a proposal to use alternative design standards for an industrial building expansion in the Employment Mixed Use district of the Glenwood Phase 1
Refinement Plan area.
ISSUE STATEMENT: The applicant has submitted a Site Plan Review application for a proposed 12,735 ft2 expansion to the existing Rosen Sunvisor manufacturing facility. In accordance with provisions of the Glenwood Employment Mixed Use District, alternative design standards proposed for the building
façade and public street interface can be processed as a Type III review.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report for Site Plan Review 2. Site Map 3. Application and Exhibits
4. CC&Rs for Wildish Industrial Park 5. PC Final Order – Site Plan Review Application 811-18-000208-TYP2
DISCUSSION:
The subject site is addressed as 4884 Franklin Boulevard (Map 18-03-03-14, Tax Lots 2000 &
2001), and it is located at the intersection of Franklin Boulevard and Nugget Way. The 1.8-acre
site currently contains a 24,274 ft2 industrial building with parking lots, loading docks, truck maneuvering areas, outdoor storage compound, and landscaping. The project site is zoned
Employment Mixed Use and is located within Sub-Area D of the Glenwood Refinement Plan area. The property has public street frontage on Nugget Way along the south and southwest edges. A City-owned linear parcel is located between the eastern boundary of the property and the edge of
the Franklin Boulevard (McVay Highway) right-of-way.
In accordance with provisions of the Windows and Doors subsection of the Employment Mixed Use District (SDC 3.4-275.F.1.d.i): “Light manufacturing windows and doors shall comprise a
minimum of 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of a building’s first floor
façades to allow views into lobbies and work areas and allow persons inside to look out.” The applicant has determined that they cannot meet this standard for two reasons:
1. There is a restrictive covenant on the property placed by the original developer of the industrial
subdivision that limits the types of exterior walls allowed. In accordance with a restrictive covenant, the applicant has elected to use concrete tilt up panel construction. The applicant advises that this method of construction is not conducive to having extensive window and door
penetrations of the wall panel; and
2. The applicant’s facility utilizes proprietary manufacturing processes for products with commercial and military applications. The applicant has expressed concerns about increased
exposure and views into potentially sensitive work areas as required by SDC 3.4-275.F.1.d.i.
To satisfy the Code requirements, the applicant is proposing to use alternative design standards to create visual interest and an improved public street interface along the Nugget Way frontage of the
site. The proposed measures include variations in masonry materials and accents, repeating
window patterns and trim, variation in rooflines, decorative stone outlines, feature strips, and awnings.
The Planning Commission is requested to hold a public hearing and conduct deliberations on the
proposal to use alternative design standards for the south and west building façades in accordance with provisions of the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use District.
Type III TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT & Recommended conditions
Project Name: Rosen Sunvisor Site Plan Review
Project Proposal: Construct a new 12,735 ft2 expansion of an existing industrial manufacturing facility Case Number: 811-18-000208-TYP2
Project Location: 4884 Franklin Blvd
(Map 18-03-03-14, TL 2000 & 2001)
Zoning: Employment Mixed Use (GEMU)
Comprehensive Plan Designation: GEMU (Glenwood Refinement Plan)
Overlay Districts:
None Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: 10/16/2018
Application Submitted Date: 10/26/2018 Public Hearing Date: 12/18/2018
Associated Applications: 811-18-000108-PRE (Development Issues Meeting); 811-18-000191-PRE (Pre-
Submittal for Site Plan Review)
APPLICANT’S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicant: Niles Hanson
Rosen Sunvisor Systems 4884 Franklin Boulevard
Eugene OR 97403
Applicant’s Representative: Becky Wiltse
SSW Engineers Inc. 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene OR 97401
Project Engineer: Michael Cox, PE
SSW Engineers Inc. 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene OR 97401
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD’S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE
Project Manager Planning Andy Limbird 541-726-3784
Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation Michael Liebler 541-736-1034
Public Works Engineer Utilities Clayton McEachern 541-736-1035
Public Works Engineer Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton McEachern 541-736-1035
Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Eric Phillips-Meadow 541-726-2293
Building Official Building David Bowlsby 541-736-1029
SITE
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 18
Page 2 of 18
Site Information: The subject site is located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard and it consists of two adjoining tax lots comprising approximately 1.77 acres. The property contains an existing 24,274 ft2 light manufacturing facility with
parking lot and driving aisles, outdoor storage compound, truck loading docks and site landscaping. The proposed
development site has public street frontage on Nugget Way along the southern and western boundaries, and it abuts a City-owned road widening parcel along the eastern boundary. For the purpose of this review, the site effectively
abuts Franklin Boulevard along the eastern boundary.
The subject site is within the Glenwood Riverfront area of the adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan diagram. The
property is zoned and designated Employment Mixed Use (GEMU). The developer is proposing to build the
project on the western half (approximately) of the property and leave the eastern half more or less intact with the exception of reconstructing some existing stormwater planters in the parking lot. Other properties in the vicinity of
the subject site are zoned GEMU and Light Medium Industrial (LMI).
The applicant is proposing to construct a 12,735 ft2 expansion to the existing industrial building; reconfigure the
truck loading dock, vehicle maneuvering, and parking lot areas on the west side of the building; install a covered trash enclosure and additional bicycle parking; and install site landscaping and vegetated stormwater management facilities to serve the project site. The southern and western edges of the proposed building façade are proximate to
the public street frontage on Nugget Way. To address the design standards of the Glenwood Riverfront District, the applicant is proposing alternative standards for window and door treatment along the south and west building
façade. In accordance with SDC 3.4-235.B, the proposed alternative design standards trigger a Type III review
before the Springfield Planning Commission. See Page 17 for a summary of the recommended conditions of approval.
REVIEW PROCESS: The application has been elevated to Type III quasi-judicial review by the Springfield
Planning Commission in accordance with the applicant’s request for alternative design standards to meet the
requirements of the Glenwood Riverfront District (SDC 3.4-230.B.4 & 3.4-235.B). The subject application was submitted and considered complete on October 26, 2018.
Procedural Finding: Applications for Type III Quasi-Judicial Decisions require the notification of property owners/occupants within 300 feet of the subject property allowing for a 20-day comment period on the application
leading up to and including the public hearing meeting (SDC Sections 5.1-130 and 5.2-115). Procedural Finding: On December 7, 2018, the City’s Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed
plans (11 Sheets – SSW Engineers Sheets G0.0, V1.0, C1.0, C3.0-5.0, C7.0-8.0 and A1.0-2.0; and Rexius Forest Products Sheet L1.0) and other supporting information. City staff’s review comments have been reduced to proposed findings and conditions only as necessary for compliance with the Site Plan Review criteria of SDC 5.17-
125 and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Modification criteria of SDC 3.4-230.E.
Procedural Finding: In accordance with SDC 5.17-125 to 5.17-135, and SDC 3.4-230.E, the Final Site Plan shall
comply with the requirements of the SDC and the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission in this decision. The Final Site Plan otherwise shall be in substantial conformity with the tentative plan reviewed. Portions of the
proposal approved as submitted during tentative review cannot be substantively changed during Final Site Plan
approval. Approved Final Site Plans (including Landscape Plans) shall not be substantively changed during Building Permit Review without an approved Site Plan Modification Decision.
WRITTEN COMMENTS: Procedural Finding: In accordance with SDC 5.1-135 and 5.2-115, notice was sent to adjacent property
owners/occupants within 300 feet of the subject site on November 27, 2018. No telephone calls or written comments were received.
CRITERIA OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SDC 5.17-125, Site Plan Review Standards, Criteria of Site Plan Approval states, “the Director shall approve, or approve with conditions, a Type II Site Plan Review Application upon determining that criteria A through E of this
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 18
Page 3 of 18
Section have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the criteria, the Director shall deny the application.” This application has been elevated to Type III review as a Major Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use
Plan District Modification under SDC 3.4-230.B.4; accordingly, the Planning Commission replaces the Director as
the approval authority for this application. In addition to the Site Plan Review criteria, the proposed modification must meet the criteria listed in SDC 3.4-230.E.1-3. See Subsection C.2 below.
A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Finding 1: The site is zoned and designated Employment Mixed Use in accordance with the Springfield Zoning Map and the adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan Phase 1 diagram. There are no proposed changes to
the zoning for the site.
Finding 2: In accordance with SDC 3.4-250, light manufacturing facilities that include fabrication, assembly,
testing and processing are an allowable use in the Glenwood Employment Mixed Use District, subject to Site Plan Review.
Conclusion: This proposal satisfies Criterion A.
B. Capacity requirements of public improvements, including but not limited to, water and electricity;
sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Development & Public
Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Finding 3: Approval of this proposal would allow for construction of a 12,735 ft2 expansion of an existing
24,274 ft2 industrial building. The proposed development would also reconfigure the truck loading dock and maneuvering area on the west side of the property; install a covered trash enclosure on the west edge of the
building; and install vegetative stormwater management facilities and site landscaping.
Finding 4: For all public improvements, the applicant shall retain a private professional civil engineer to design
the site improvements in conformance with City codes, this decision, and the current Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). The private civil engineer also shall be required to provide construction inspection services.
Finding 5: The Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed site plans on December 7, 2018. City staff’s review comments have been incorporated in findings and conditions contained herein.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Water and Electricity Improvements Finding 6: SDC 4.3-130 requires each development area to be provided with a water system having sufficiently
sized mains and lesser lines to furnish adequate supply to the development and sufficient access for maintenance. Springfield Utility Board (SUB) coordinates the design of the water system within Springfield
city limits.
Finding 7: In accordance with SDC 4.3-125, wherever possible all utility lines shall be placed underground.
Additionally, vaults and transformers for utility connections should be screened from view or placed out of sight at the side or rear of the building.
Finding 8: The applicant is proposing to use the existing water system connections on Nugget Way.
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 18
Page 4 of 18
Finding 9: SUB Water advises that all non-residential domestic and irrigation services require a reduced pressure backflow assembly. All fire services require a minimum of a double check detector assembly with a
detector meter on a bypass. The assemblies are required to be installed above ground and adjacent to the water
service. The applicant is advised to contact SUB Water Division’s Backflow Prevention Specialist at (541) 726-2396 to discuss the backflow prevention and fire protection service requirements.
Finding 10: The applicant is proposing to leave the existing SUB electrical transformers along the southern edge of the site intact and unaffected by the project.
Finding 11: Based on the applicant’s submittal, the existing water, electrical and telecommunication facilities are adequate for the proposed development.
Conclusion: The existing SUB Water and Electric facilities are adequate to serve the site. Therefore, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Management Facilities
Sanitary Sewer
Finding 12: Section 4.3-105.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new
development and to connect developments to existing mains. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities.
Finding 13: The applicant is proposing to use the existing private sanitary sewer lateral that will run beneath the building expansion area, and to install a Y-connection with cleanout to serve the truck loading dock and
trash enclosure. The private sanitary lateral connects with the public sewer line in Nugget Way which has
adequate capacity for the proposed development.
Finding 14: In accordance with Chapter 3.02.4.A of the City’s EDSPM and Section 3.4 of the City of Eugene
Stormwater Management Manual, material transfer and solid waste storage areas shall be covered and hydraulically isolated from potential stormwater runoff, and directed to the sanitary sewer system. To meet this
requirement, the applicant is proposing to construct a truck loading dock and a trash enclosure along the western edge of the building. The loading dock and trash enclosure are both proposed to be covered, hydraulically isolated and equipped with a floor drain that is plumbed to the sanitary sewer system.
Finding 15: The applicant’s proposed sanitary sewer connections meet the City’s requirements.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Stormwater Management (Quantity)
Finding 16: SDC 4.3-110.B requires that the Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where
adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by
the Development & Public Works Director, consistent with the EDSPM.
Finding 17: SDC 4.3-110.D requires that runoff from a development shall be directed to an approved
stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge.
Finding 18: SDC 4.3-110.E requires new developments to employ drainage management practices that
minimize the amount and rate of surface water runoff into receiving streams, and that promote water quality.
Finding 19: To comply with Sections 4.3-110.D & E, stormwater runoff from the site will be directed into a series of filtration rain gardens prior to discharge into the public stormwater system located on Nugget Way.
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 18
Page 5 of 18
Finding 20: The applicant proposes to use Gibson Steel catch basins to be installed in the Nugget Way right-of-way as ‘bubblers’ to accommodate runoff from the site. The City’s standards do not permit the use of steel
catch basins in the right-of-way or grates in the public sidewalk. Because there is no piped stormwater system
along the property frontage, the applicant could use standard concrete catch basins in the public right-of-way and curbside weep holes or another mechanism acceptable to the City.
Recommended Condition of Approval: 1. The Final Site Plan shall provide for City of Springfield standard concrete catch basins (Detail 4-11)
or Lane County equivalent for the bubblers. City staff will accept drainage through the curbside weep holes as there is no piped stormwater system along the property frontage.
Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Stormwater Management (Quality) Finding 21: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City of Springfield has obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision of this permit requires the City to demonstrate
efforts to reduce the pollution in urban stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP).
Finding 22: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) rules require the City’s MS4 plan to address six “Minimum Control Measures”. Minimum Control Measure 5, “Post-Construction
Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment”, applies to the proposed development.
Finding 23: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement and enforce a
program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff to the MEP. The City also must develop and implement strategies that include a combination of structural or non-structural Best Management Practices
(BMPs) appropriate for the community.
Finding 24: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to use an ordinance or other
regulatory mechanism to address post-construction runoff from new and re-development projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regulatory mechanisms used by the City include the SDC, the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP).
Finding 25: Section 3.02 of the City’s EDSPM states the Development & Public Works Department will
accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities designed pursuant to the
policies and procedures of the City’s EDSPM and the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
Finding 26: Sections 3.02.5 and 3.02.6 of the City’s EDSPM states all public and private development and
redevelopment projects shall employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs that in combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total suspended solids in the runoff generated by the
development. Section 3.03.4.E of the manual requires a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop
impervious area on a site shall be treated for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods and 100% of the area shall be pre-treated.
Finding 27: To meet the requirements of the City’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the City’s EDSPM, the applicant has proposed using filtration rain gardens.
Finding 28: The vegetation proposed for use in the filtration rain gardens will serve as the primary pollutant removal mechanism for the Stormwater runoff. Satisfactory pollutant removal will occur only when the
vegetation has been fully established.
Attachment 1, Page 5 of 18
Page 6 of 18
Finding 29: The applicant’s civil drawings and landscaping plan do not provide a description of the planting medium for the filtration rain gardens. A suitable soil mix will be required to ensure the filtration rain gardens
can be properly vegetated and will remain viable and functional into the future.
Finding 30: The applicant is proposing to use a monoculture of spreading rush (Juncus patens) for the filtration
rain gardens, which is an acceptable plant species. However, staff advises that one or more additional species
could be added for diversity.
Finding 31: The applicant’s site landscaping plan proposes to remove four existing trees along the eastern edge
of the site and reconstruct the planter islands as filtration rain gardens. However, trees and shrubs are not prescribed for the new filtration rain gardens. The existing trees are considered street trees and also function as
parking lot landscaping trees, both of which are required elements of site development. To compensate for the
tree removal, staff advises that at least four replacement trees will be required along the eastern edge of the site to address the parking lot landscaping, street tree, and vegetated stormwater facility requirements. If necessary,
the linear stormwater filtration rain gardens can be reconfigured to accommodate the trees. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
2. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City of Springfield, whereby the applicant will provide routine maintenance for functionality of
the filtration rain gardens serving the development site. 3. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance
plan satisfactory to the City to ensure viable long-term maintenance and operation of the stormwater filtration rain gardens. The operations and maintenance plan shall designate the responsible party for operating and maintaining the system and shall be distributed to all property owners and tenants
of the site. A record of this plan shall be filed against the property deed with Lane County Deeds and Records.
4. To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the filtration rain gardens shall be fully
vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to issuance of final occupancy and commencement of operations. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the
Development & Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the filtration rain garden vegetation becomes fully established. The interim erosion control measures shall be in addition to the required plantings for the site.
5. The Final Site Plan shall provide a description of a suitable growing medium for the filtration rain gardens.
6. The Final Site Plan shall provide for at least four replacement street trees along the eastern boundary of the site. If necessary, the configuration of the filtration rain gardens along the eastern
boundary of the site can be adjusted to accommodate the trees. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Streets and Traffic Safety Controls
Finding 32: SDC 4.2-105.G.2 requires that whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on the City street system and that development has unimproved street frontage abutting a fully improved
street, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications.
Attachment 1, Page 6 of 18
Page 7 of 18
Finding 33: The subject property abuts a City-owned road widening parcel for Franklin Boulevard along the eastern boundary. Along the subject property frontage, Franklin Boulevard is an approximately 45-foot wide
minor arterial street within a 60-foot wide right-of-way. The street is improved with paving, line striping and
street lighting.
Finding 34: Along the southern site frontage, Nugget Way is a 37-foot wide Lane County local access road
within a variable-width right-of-way. Nugget Way is improved with sidewalk, curb and gutter but lacks street lighting and a continuous row of street trees. The applicant is proposing to install sidewalk connections, ADA
crossings, and street trees along the Nugget Way frontage of the site in accordance with City standards.
Finding 35: The proposed development will likely generate additional pedestrian and bicycle trips. According
to the “Household” survey done by Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) in 1994, 12.6% of household trips
are made by bicycle or walking and 1.8% are by transit bus. These trips may have their origins or destinations at a variety of land uses, including this site. Pedestrian and bicycle trips create the need for sidewalks,
pedestrian crossing signals, crosswalks, bicycle parking and bicycle lanes. Finding 36: The proposed transportation facilities would be adequate to accommodate the anticipated vehicular
and pedestrian traffic patterns generated by the development in a safe and efficient manner.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations.
Finding 37: Criterion C contains three different elements with sub-elements and applicable code standards.
The site plan application as submitted complies with the code standards listed under each sub-element unless
otherwise noted with specific findings and conclusions. The elements, sub-elements and code standards of Criterion C include but are not limited to:
1. Infrastructure Standards in accordance with SDC 4.1-100, 4.2-100 & 4.3-100
• Water Service and Fire Protection (4.3-130)
• Public and Private Easements (4.3-120 – 4.3-140)
2. Conformance with standards of SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, and SDC 3.4-200 Employment Mixed Use Zoning District, and SDC 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards
• Establishment of Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District (3.4-205)
• Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Modifications (3.4-230)
• Design Standards Alternatives/Exemptions from Design Standards (3.4-235)
• Schedule of Uses for Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District (3.4-250)
• Base Zone Development Standards (3.4-265)
• Public and Private Development Standards (3.4-270)
• Building Design Standards (3.4-275)
3. Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements
• Glenwood Refinement Plan
Attachment 1, Page 7 of 18
Page 8 of 18
C.1 Public and Private Improvements in accordance with SDC 4.1-100, 4.2-100 & 4.3-100
Water Service and Fire Protection (4.3-130)
Access
Finding 38: All fire apparatus access routes are to be paved all-weather surfaces able to support an 80,000 lb. imposed load in accordance with the 2014 Springfield Fire Code (SFC) 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1.
Access to the project area is afforded from Nugget Way.
Finding 39: The existing access to the subject site is acceptable, and will be maintained with the proposed
development on the property.
Finding 40: In accordance with SFC 912.3, immediate access to fire department connections shall be
maintained at all times and without obstruction by fences, trees, shrubs, walls or any other objects. Finding 41: The applicant’s site plan indicates that the perimeter of the site is to be fenced and equipped with
controlled access gates for the parking lot and truck loading dock areas. The applicant has not indicated if the gates are proposed to be manually or electronically operated. To ensure that 24/7 emergency access can be
maintained for the site, a Knox box keyed system (for an electronic gate) or a Public Works lock (for a
manually operated gate) will need to be provided. The selected gate operation system will need to be depicted on the final site plan. A Public Works lock can be obtained from Heyman’s Lock, Safe and Security at 131 14th Street in Springfield (ph. 541-747-6713).
Water Supply
Finding 42: The applicant has depicted the location of an existing fire hydrant outside the northeast corner of the site at the edge of the Franklin Boulevard right-of-way. The fire hydrant provides sufficient coverage for
the proposed development.
Recommended Condition of Approval:
7. The Final Site Plan shall provide for a Knox Box keyed system or Public Works lock for the emergency access gates serving the site.
Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Public and Private Easements (4.3-120 – 4.3-140)
Finding 43: SDC 4.3-130.A requires each development area to be provided with a water system having
sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish adequate supply to the development and provide sufficient access for maintenance. SUB coordinates the design of the water system within Springfield city limits.
Finding 44: SDC 4.3-140.A requires applicants proposing developments to make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or
land beyond the development area. The minimum width for public utility easements (PUEs) adjacent to street
rights-of-way and internal to private properties shall be 7 feet, unless the Development & Public Works Director requires a larger easement to allow for adequate maintenance access. There is an existing 5-foot wide
PUE along the property frontage on Nugget Way that will suffice for the project. Finding 45: There is an existing 10-foot wide slope easement along the southeast edge of the site, and two 35-
foot wide right of access easements along the eastern boundary of the property where it abuts the City-owned road widening parcel. The City-owned parcel is not intended to be used as road widening in the near future so
Attachment 1, Page 8 of 18
Page 9 of 18
the applicant can retain the perimeter fence for the time being and use the enclosed area for occasional parking, if desired.
Finding 46: The applicant is proposing to dedicate a private cross-access easement between Tax Lots 2000 and 2001 to allow for truck maneuvering and loading dock access across the two properties. The private cross-
access easement will need to be executed and recorded prior to commencement of operations for the new
loading dock.
Recommended Condition of Approval:
8. Prior to issuance of Final Occupancy and commencement of operations, the applicant shall execute and record a private cross-access easement between Tax Lots 2000 and 2001 as generally depicted on
the approved Final Site Plan, and provide evidence thereof to the City.
Conclusion: Safe and efficient provision of public access and utilities requires the provision of corresponding access and utility easements. As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
C.2 Conformance with Standards of SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, and SDC 3.4-200, Employment Mixed Use District
Establishment of Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District (3.4-205) Finding 47: In accordance with SDC 3.4-205.B the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District is intended
to provide customized development standards for sites within the Glenwood Riverfront area. Among other things, the District encourages aesthetically pleasing, sustainable buildings and sites that are context sensitive
and oriented to human activity; allows for a mix of uses suitable to unique development sites; facilitates
opportunities for businesses to provide goods and services for local, national and international markets; and facilitates redevelopment while addressing the consequences of change to existing businesses.
Finding 48: The applicant’s submittal proposes to expand an existing business that provides goods for local, national and international markets. To address the provisions of the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan
District, the applicant is proposing alternative design standards as described in the subsection below. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Modifications (3.4-230)
Finding 49: In accordance with SDC 3.4-230.B.4, an alternative to a building design standard as specified in SDC 3.4-275 is classified as a Major Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Modification and it is
processed as a Type III review. The applicant is proposing an alternative building design standard pursuant to
SDC 3.4-275.F.d, which triggers this review. Further discussion of the proposed alternative design standard is found in Section 3.4-275 below.
Finding 50: In accordance with SDC 3.4-230.E, there are three criteria for Major Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan Area Modifications: 1) Maintaining the integrity of the north-south and east-west street grid; 2) Not
significantly affecting the landscaping, stormwater management, design, circulation and access policies of the
Glenwood Refinement Plan, SDC 3.4-270.A.3, or the EDSPM; and 3) Resulting in a development design that meets or exceeds the applicable purposes of SDC 3.4-205.
Finding 51: The applicant is not proposing any changes or modifications that affect the existing or planned street network in the Glenwood Riverfront. Therefore, criterion 3.4-230.E.1 is not applicable.
Finding 52: The applicant is not proposing any changes or modifications that affect the landscaping,
stormwater management, circulation and access policies of the Glenwood Refinement Plan, SDC 3.4-270.A.3
Attachment 1, Page 9 of 18
Page 10 of 18
or the EDSPM. However, the applicant is proposing alternative design standards in accordance with SDC 3.4-235 below. Provided the alternative design standards proposed herein are determined to be satisfactory, this
criterion has been met.
Finding 53: The applicant is proposing a development design that meets the applicable purposes of SDC 3.4-
205.B.3 (encourages aesthetically pleasing, sustainable buildings and sites); 3.4-205.B.7 (facilitates
opportunities for businesses to provide goods and services to local, national and international markets); and 3.4-205.B.13 (facilitates redevelopment while addressing the consequences of change to existing businesses).
Provided the alternative design standards proposed herein are determined to be satisfactory, this criterion has
been met. Design Standards Alternatives / Exemptions from Design Standards (3.4-235)
Finding 54: In accordance with SDC 3.4-235.A, the development and design standards of the Glenwood
Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District require the developer to comply with the standards, request an exemption from a certain standard, or propose alternative design standards that meet or exceed the subject standard. For the subject application, the applicant is proposing to incorporate alternative design standards.
Finding 55: In accordance with SDC 3.4-235.B, a developer can request that the Site Plan Review process is
elevated to a Type III review as specified in SDC 5.1-130 and 5.13-115.A.1. The applicant has requested a
Type III review before the Planning Commission for the proposed alternative design standards (see Building Design Standards, Section 3.4-275.F below).
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Schedule of Uses for Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District (3.4-250)
Finding 56: In accordance with SDC 3.4-250, light manufacturing facilities engaged in the manufacture of
finished products, including processing, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, are allowable in the
Glenwood Employment Mixed Use District. The existing and proposed development is consistent with these allowable elements of light manufacturing use.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Base Zone Development Standards (3.4-265) Finding 57: In accordance with SDC 3.4-265, buildings in the Employment Mixed Use District are regulated
by the build-to lines and building setback provisions of SDC 4.-275.H; the landscape provisions of SDC 3.4-270.F; and the building height provisions of SDC 3.4-275.D.
Finding 58: The existing building was constructed in 1978 so it pre-dates the provisions of the Glenwood Refinement Plan as originally adopted in 1999 and updated in 2012. Staff advises that the current site
configuration does not fully meet the requirements of the adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan for building
placement, landscaping, or parking. However, a key aspect of the proposed building expansion project is that it will increase the degree of conformity for the building and site through improving the public street frontages,
managing vehicle and bicycle parking on the site, providing window glazing and doors on the street-side
facades of the building, and improving the landscaping and stormwater management facilities on the site.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Attachment 1, Page 10 of 18
Page 11 of 18
Public and Private Development Standards (3.4-270)
Finding 59: The subject site has direct frontage on Nugget Way, which is a Lane County local access road.
The Nugget Way public street frontage has been improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving but lacks street lighting and continuous street trees. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the public sidewalk along
the Nugget Way frontage to meet ADA accessibility guidelines and also to route the sidewalk around an
existing transformer at the southwest corner of the site. The applicant is not required to construct other public street improvements for the project for two reasons: first, the street frontage is already improved to acceptable
urban industrial standards and second, the street is not under City jurisdiction and Lane County Transportation
has not requested any street improvements to serve this project. Therefore, SDC 3.4-270.A is not applicable.
Finding 60: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.B, street trees and curbside planter strips are required for public
street frontages. The applicants’ site landscaping plan (Sheet L1.0) depicts curbside planters and street trees along the Nugget Way frontage of the site, which meets this requirement.
Finding 61: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.C, private on-site lighting shall meet the standards of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) and be shielded and downcast to prevent glare
and light trespass onto adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. The applicant has provided lighting fixture cut sheets for the wall-mounted LED lights that are to be installed on the building exterior. The proposed light
fixtures are shielded and downcast, and meet IESNA standards for full cutoff compliance. Therefore, the
proposal meets this requirement.
Finding 62: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.D, bicycle facilities are to be provided for commercial and
industrial uses within the Glenwood Riverfront Area. The applicant has depicted the location of outdoor, covered bicycle parking facilities on the site plan. Additional covered, indoor bicycle parking spaces are to be
provided for the benefit of the employees working at the facility. At build-out, the facility will be
approximately 37,009 ft2 and Table 3.4-2 requires a bicycle parking provision of 1 space per 10,000 ft2 of manufacturing space. Fractional spaces are rounded up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the total
bicycle parking requirement for the site at build-out is four spaces, of which at least three (75%) are to be
covered, long-term spaces.
Finding 63: The applicant is proposing to install a single bicycle parking hoop along the eastern edge of the building (capacity two bicycles) and provide a single long-term space inside the building. The outdoor spaces at the edge of the building are beneath a proposed canopy, so they can be considered long-term spaces. To
comply with the requirements of SDC Table 3.4-2, an additional space either inside or outside the building is required. The location of the four bicycle parking spaces need to be depicted on the final site plan.
Finding 64: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.E, a multi-use path is to be constructed along the Glenwood Riverfront. The subject site does not interface with the river’s edge; therefore, this requirement is not
applicable.
Finding 65: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.F, private landscaping is required within building setbacks and
for the management of stormwater, where feasible. Landscaping can consist of trees, shrubs, groundcover
plants and turf grass, or a combination thereof. The applicant is proposing to install new street trees and groundcover plants along the public street frontage on Nugget Way, which meets this requirement.
Additionally, the applicant is proposing to construct stormwater filtration rain gardens along the eastern edge of
the site where it abuts the City-owned road widening parcel, and at the southeast and southwest corners of the site. The vegetated filtration rain gardens perform a dual role of managing runoff from the site and serving as
required landscaping within the building setback and parking lot areas. Finding 66: The applicant is proposing to retain existing trees and vegetation along the northern boundary of
the site, which is outside the project impact area.
Attachment 1, Page 11 of 18
Page 12 of 18
Finding 67: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.F.3.i, landscaping areas are to be provided with a permanent irrigation system or a mechanism to ensure establishment and long-term viability. The applicant is proposing
to install a permanent underground irrigation system for all landscaping areas, which meets this requirement.
Finding 68: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.G.1, vehicle and bicycle parking areas shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with provisions of the Glenwood Refinement Plan and Sub-Area D of the Glenwood
Riverfront area.
Finding 69: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.G.5.b, sites within Sub-Area D of the Glenwood Riverfront area
and located south of the Union Pacific railroad bridge can have parking facilities that face the Franklin Boulevard (McVay Highway) corridor, provided they are screened and limited to two rows of parking with a
bi-directional driving aisle. The subject site is located in Sub-Area D, south of the Union Pacific railroad
bridge, and it has a parking lot with two rows of parking spaces (one facing the building, the other facing Franklin Boulevard) with a bi-directional driving aisle. Therefore, the existing parking configuration meets the
requirements of SDC 3.4-270.G.5.b with the exception of providing vegetative screening along the eastern boundary of the site.
Finding 70: The applicant is proposing to install filtration rain gardens along the eastern edge of the site where it abuts the road-widening parcel owned by the City. The existing trees are proposed to be removed and will
need to be replaced in accordance with Recommended Condition 6. To address the parking lot screening
requirements of SDC 3.4-270.F.4.b and 3.4-275.G.5.b, staff recommends that screening vegetation (e.g. shrubs) is also added to the proposed filtration rain gardens at the eastern edge of the site. Appropriate shrub species
can be found on the City’s approved plant list for stormwater management facilities (ref. Appendix 6B of the
EDSPM).
Finding 71: In accordance with SDC Table 3.4-1, the maximum parking provision for light manufacturing
facilities is one space for every 550 ft2 of gross floor area. At build-out, the proposed building will be 37,009 ft2 which generates a maximum parking provision of 68 spaces. The proposed parking space provision is about
24 spaces, which meets this requirement.
Finding 72: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.G.15, loading areas are to be located at the rear or side of a
development area with access taken from a public service street. The applicant is proposing to construct a new truck loading dock area at the western edge of the building expansion area, with access derived from the adjacent industrial street (Nugget Way). A vehicle maneuvering area with cross-access easement is proposed
across the western edge of the site to facilitate use of the new truck loading dock. Finding 73: The applicant is not proposing any new or modified public sanitary sewer facilities. Therefore,
SDC 3.4-270.H is not applicable.
Finding 74: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.I.2, private stormwater facilities shall be designed and
constructed as specified in the City’s EDSPM to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) approach. The proposed development manages stormwater runoff from the site by directing it into a series of filtration rain
gardens prior to discharge onto Nugget Way. There is no piped stormwater system available for the property,
so the applicant has abided by the recommendations of City staff for management, treatment and conveyance of runoff from the site.
Finding 75: The applicant is not proposing any public parks and open space. Therefore, SDC 3.4-270.J is not applicable.
Finding 76: The applicant is not proposing to install or modify any transit stops along Franklin Boulevard. Therefore, SDC 3.4-270.K is not applicable.
Attachment 1, Page 12 of 18
Page 13 of 18
Finding 77: The applicant is not proposing any new or modified signs on the property. If signage is proposed, it will need to comply with the City’s Sign Regulations found in Chapter 8 of the Springfield Municipal Code
and provisions of SDC 3.4-270.L.
Finding 78: In accordance with SDC 3.4-270.M, light manufacturing facilities shall be enclosed within a
building and shall adhere to performance standards listed in SDC 3.4-270.M.7-13, including prevention of air
pollution, glare, noise, odors, radiation and vibrations. The existing and proposed use on the site complies with the standards listed in SDC 3.4-270.M for light manufacturing activities and operations.
Finding 79: There are no inventoried historic resources on the site, therefore SDC 3.4-270.N is not applicable.
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
9. The Final Site Plan shall provide for at least four (4) bicycle parking spaces of which at least three
are to be covered, long-term spaces located under a canopy or inside the building. 10. The Final Site Plan shall provide for vegetative screening of the parking lot along the eastern edge of the site. The screening vegetation can be standalone or incorporated into the filtration rain gardens depicted on the site landscaping plan.
Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
Building Design Standards (3.4-275)
Finding 80: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.A, building design standards for the Glenwood Riverfront area
apply to new development and site redevelopment. The objective of the design standards is to establish a sense
of place, promote aesthetically pleasing building and sites that are oriented to the human scale, and provide an improved streetscape.
Finding 81: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.B, a project design team is required for proposed developments requiring Site Plan Review. The applicant’s project design team complies with the requirements of SDC 3.4-
275.B because it includes a civil engineer, landscape designer, and project architect. The architectural submittal will be detailed in the Building Permit drawings that are prepared and submitted for the project.
Finding 82: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.C, building facades are to include architectural detailing including awnings and canopies, variation in building materials, ground floor windows and doors, and other
features.
Finding 83: The south side of the existing building is a blank, featureless wall that faces Nugget Way. The
applicant is proposing to modify the southern and western building elevations by incorporating limited window
glazing, roll-up and man doors, awnings, feature strips, and variations in textures and materials. The proposed building also has variations in the roofline and colored accents to increase the visual interest along the public
street frontage. The proposed architectural detailing meets the requirements of SDC 3.4-275.C with the
exception of window glazing and doors as described below in SDC 3.4-275.F.
Finding 84: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.D.1, the minimum building height for single-story buildings in
Sub-Area D is 20 feet. The proposed building is between 20 and 25.5 feet high, which meets this requirement.
Finding 85: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.E, building massing and articulation is to be employed where building facades are visible from the public realm. For the subject development site, the requirements for building massing and articulation is limited to the portion that is being modified (i.e. the Nugget Way frontage).
Finding 86: The subject property has a restrictive covenant on title requiring the use of concrete tilt-up panel
construction for the exterior building walls (see Attachment 4). While the restrictive covenant does not
Attachment 1, Page 13 of 18
Page 14 of 18
supersede the City’s adopted Development Code requirements, it has led the applicant to propose a design solution that satisfies both requirements. The concrete tilt-up panel method of construction is not particularly
conducive to detailed building articulation and extensive wall penetrations to accommodate window glazing
and door openings. To address the building massing requirements, the applicant is proposing to use repeating window and trim patterns along the southern and western facades; design elements including awnings, colored
accents, and variations in rooflines; and decorative concrete and masonry block materials. The proposed
building elevations are provided in the application packet and staff will provide color renderings at the public hearing meeting.
Finding 87: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.F.d, light manufacturing buildings are to contain windows and doors along at least 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of the façade to allow for views into
lobbies and work areas, and to allow persons inside to look out.
Finding 88: The applicant has expressed concern about the requirements of SDC 3.4-275.F.d for two reasons.
First, the method of construction (concrete tilt-up panel), which the applicant is obligated to use for the project, is not particularly conducive to extensive window and door penetrations. Second, the applicant notes that the facility uses proprietary manufacturing methods to create products with private, commercial and military
applications. Therefore, the requirement to provide “views into work areas” conflicts with the applicant’s desire to limit the exposure of their testing, manufacturing and production practices to direct public view.
Finding 89: The applicant is proposing some window glazing and door penetrations of the project area, including the south building façade which is currently a blank, featureless wall. However, in lieu of providing
doors and windows along 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the area, the applicant is proposing
windows (and feature strips that mimic windows) along with awnings, vertical features of decorative stone, and color variations as depicted on the building elevations on Sheet A2.0. The applicant is requesting that the
Planning Commission grant approval of the alternative design standards to be used on the south and west
building façades where the applicant does not meet the minimum window and door requirements.
Finding 90: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.G, building entrances are to be oriented such that they are
identifiable, can be accessed from the public sidewalk, and have architectural elements such as awnings, canopies and overhangs. The existing entrance is located near the southeast corner of the building and it is not
proposed to be modified. However, the existing entrance provides an architectural projection and additional window glazing, and is directly accessible from the adjacent public street. Additionally, the entrance to the light manufacturing building portrays an office-like appearance in accordance with SDC 3.4-275.G.3.
Finding 91: In accordance with SDC 3.4-275.H, new construction is to comply with build-to lines that bring
building edges closer to the public street. Section 3.4-275.H.2.a&b allows for buildings to be set back up to 10
feet behind the build-to line. To meet this requirement, the proposed building expansion brings the south façade to within less than 7.5 feet of the property line along Nugget Way. In accordance with SDC 3.4-
275.H.2.b.i, the west façade is set back farther from the property line to allow for truck maneuvering and access
to the loading dock and trash enclosure. The applicant has provided truck turning and maneuvering information on Sheet C1.0 demonstrating that an increased setback is warranted for the west façade.
Finding 92: Staff observes that the building cannot be feasibly located closer than 7 feet from the southern property line due to an existing 5-foot wide public easement that contains a SUB Electric transformer, which
itself has a minimum building setback requirement of at least 3 feet. The existing building face is set back approximately 23 feet from the southern boundary or build-to line. The proposed building expansion includes a new southern building façade that is within 7.5 feet of the build-to line, and which increases the degree of
conformity for the building. Therefore, the proposed build-to lines meet the requirements of SDC 3.4-275.H for bringing the building façade closer to the public street.
Finding 93: The subject site has a paved curbside surface along the edge of Nugget Way, which effectively serves as a public sidewalk. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure and improve the sidewalk connection
along Nugget Way to meet ADA accessibility guidelines and also to bypass an existing electrical transformer at
Attachment 1, Page 14 of 18
Page 15 of 18
the southwest corner of the site. Sidewalks are not continuous along Nugget Way west of the subject property. Despite the discontinuous nature of the public sidewalk system west of the subject property, pedestrian
amenities as described in SDC 3.4-275.I are applicable and required for the project. The City’s design
standards are applicable to Nugget Way, as a county local road inside Springfield’s UGB. Lane Code 15.704(1)(d). The property has 440 feet of frontage along Nugget Way. Due to the industrial use of the
property and discontinuous sidewalk along Nugget Way, the following pedestrian amenities listed under
subsection I.2.c are not consistent with the character and scale of surrounding development: sitting space for outdoor restaurant areas, transit shelters, information kiosks, sidewalk displays, wayfinding signage consisting
of a distinctive logo and directional guidance to neighborhood destinations; stands selling flowers, food or
drink; and entry steps, porches or gardens for residential mixed-use. Any other combination of pedestrian amenities listed under subsection I.2.c would meet the intent to provide comfortable and inviting pedestrian
spaces that are consistent with the character and scale of the surrounding development. The Final Site Plan will
need to depict the location and type(s) of pedestrian amenities found in SDC 3.4-275.I.2 as required under the Condition of Approval listed below.
Finding 94: The applicant has not provided information on possible rooftop mechanical equipment to serve the building expansion area. If rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed, it will require screening in accordance
with SDC 3.4-275.J.
Finding 95: The applicant is not proposing a parking structure, therefore SDC 3.4-275.K is not applicable.
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
11. The applicant’s alternative design standards for the south and west building façades, as described in the application narrative and generally depicted on Sheet A2.0, are hereby approved and satisfy the requirements of SDC 3.4-235 and 3.4-275.F.
12. The Final Site Plan shall provide for pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Way frontage of the site to satisfy the requirements of SDC 3.4-275.I.2. Specifically, the Final Site Plan must show at least 6
benches, 6 trash receptacles, 9 pedestrian-scale wall mounted lights meeting the standards in SDC 3.4-270C.2, between the curb of Nugget Way and the build-to-line, and at least 11 additional amenities that may be any combination of the following in any location between the building and the
curb along Nugget Way: benches; garden walls or ledges; building canopies, awnings, or pergolas (minimum projection of 4 feet over a sidewalk or other pedestrian space); drinking fountains;
planting beds, hanging flower baskets, large semi-permanent potted plants, and/or ornamental planters; decorative clocks; public art sculpture, statutes, murals, or fountains; or bicycle racks.
13. The Final Site Plan shall provide for appropriate screening of any rooftop mechanical units installed or modified with the building expansion project.
Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
C .3 Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements
Finding 96: The subject site is not located within the mapped Time of Travel Zones (TOTZs) for Springfield’s
drinking water wells. However, as a “Best Practices” recommendation for this site, care must be taken during
site construction and operation to prevent contamination from chemicals that may spill or leak onto the ground surface, including fuel and automotive fluids (such as lubricants and antifreeze, etc.). Fluid-containing
equipment, including vehicles parked on the site, shall be monitored for leaks and spills. Any chemical spills
or leaks must be cleaned up immediately and cleanup materials disposed off-site in accordance with Lane County and State DEQ requirements.
Attachment 1, Page 15 of 18
Page 16 of 18
Finding 97: The subject site is within the adopted Glenwood Refinement Plan area. As stated previously, the current Employment Mixed Use zoning is consistent with the zoning designation for the property, and therefore
satisfies the Refinement Plan policies applicable to this site.
Finding 98: The site is outside the delineated Willamette Greenway Overlay District and therefore the
provisions of SDC 3.4-280 are not applicable to the subject development.
Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion.
D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public
areas; minimize curb cuts on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways.
Finding 99: Installation of driveways on a street increases the number of traffic conflict points. The greater number of conflict points increases the probability of traffic crashes. Effective ways to reduce the probability
of traffic crashes include: reducing the number of driveways; increasing distances between intersections and driveways; and establishing adequate vision clearance areas where driveways intersect streets. Each of these
techniques permits a longer, less cluttered sight distance for the motorist, reduces the number and difficulty of
decisions that drivers must make, and contributes to increased traffic safety.
Finding 100: In accordance with SDC 4.2-120.C, site driveways shall be designed to allow for safe and
efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5, the City’s EDSPM, and the City’s Standard Construction Specifications. Ingress-egress points must be planned to facilitate traffic and
pedestrian safety, avoid congestion, and minimize curb cuts on public streets.
Finding 101: The applicant is proposing to close an existing driveway on Nugget Way and relocate it
approximately 45 feet to the northwest along the public street. The relocated driveway increases the separation
distance from the intersection with Newman Street and the “elbow” of Nugget Way where it deflects eastward to the intersection with Franklin Boulevard. The proposed relocated driveway improves sight distance and
accommodates truck access and maneuvering for the loading dock on the west side of the building. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this criterion.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the
Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this
Code or in State or Federal law.
Finding 102: The Natural Resources Study, the National Wetlands Inventory, the Springfield Wetland
Inventory Map, Wellhead Protection Overlay and the list of Historic Landmark Sites have been consulted and there are no natural features or resources on the property that warrant protection.
Finding 103: Stormwater runoff from the subject site eventually flows to the Willamette River system. This river is listed with the State of Oregon as a “water quality limited” stream for numerous chemical and physical
constituents, including temperature. Provisions have been made in this decision for protection of stormwater quality. The proposed on-site stormwater treatment system consists of filtration rain gardens and catch basin ‘bubblers’ that outfall to the public street.
Attachment 1, Page 16 of 18
Page 17 of 18
Finding 104: As previously noted herein, groundwater protection must be observed during construction on the site. The applicant shall maintain the private stormwater facilities on the site to ensure the continued protection
of surface water and groundwater resources.
Conclusion: The proposed development provides storm and ground water quality protection in accordance with
SDC 3.3-200 and receiving streams have been protected in accordance with SDC 4.3-110 and 4.3-115.
CONCLUSION: The Tentative Site Plan, as submitted and conditioned herein, complies with Criteria A-E of SDC 5.17-125 and Criteria 1-3 of SDC 3.4-230.E.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The Final Site Plan shall provide for City of Springfield standard concrete catch basins (Detail 4-11) or Lane County equivalent for the bubblers. City staff will accept drainage through the curbside weep
holes as there is no piped stormwater system along the property frontage. 2. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the
City of Springfield, whereby the applicant will provide routine maintenance for functionality of the filtration rain gardens serving the development site.
3. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance plan satisfactory to the City to ensure viable long-term maintenance and operation of the stormwater filtration rain gardens. The operations and maintenance plan shall designate the responsible party for
operating and maintaining the system and shall be distributed to all property owners and tenants of the site. A record of this plan shall be filed against the property deed with Lane County Deeds and Records.
4. To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the filtration rain gardens shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to issuance of final occupancy and commencement of operations.
Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Development & Public Works Department that
will suffice until such time as the filtration rain garden vegetation becomes fully established. The interim erosion control measures shall be in addition to the required plantings for the site.
5. The Final Site Plan shall provide a description of a suitable growing medium for the filtration rain gardens.
6. The Final Site Plan shall provide for at least four replacement street trees along the eastern boundary of the site. If necessary, the configuration of the filtration rain gardens along the eastern boundary of the site can be adjusted to accommodate the trees.
7. The Final Site Plan shall provide for a Knox Box keyed system or Public Works lock for the emergency access gates serving the site.
8. Prior to issuance of Final Occupancy and commencement of operations, the applicant shall execute and record a private cross-access easement between Tax Lots 2000 and 2001 as generally depicted on the
approved Final Site Plan, and provide evidence thereof to the City.
9. The Final Site Plan shall provide for at least four (4) bicycle parking spaces of which at least three are to be covered, long-term spaces located under a canopy or inside the building.
10. The Final Site Plan shall provide for vegetative screening of the parking lot along the eastern edge of the site. The screening vegetation can be standalone or incorporated into the filtration rain gardens depicted on the site landscaping plan.
Attachment 1, Page 17 of 18
Page 18 of 18
11. The applicant’s alternative design standards for the south and west building façades, as described in the application narrative and generally depicted on Sheet A2.0, are hereby approved and satisfy the requirements of SDC 3.4-235 and 3.4-275.F.
12. The Final Site Plan shall provide for pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Way frontage of the site to satisfy the requirements of SDC 3.4-275.I.2. Specifically, the Final Site Plan must show at least 6
benches, 6 trash receptacles, 9 pedestrian-scale wall mounted lights meeting the standards in SDC 3.4-270C.2, between the curb of Nugget Way and the build-to-line, and at least 11 additional amenities that may be any combination of the following in any location between the building and the curb along Nugget
Way: benches; garden walls or ledges; building canopies, awnings, or pergolas (minimum projection of 4 feet over a sidewalk or other pedestrian space); drinking fountains; planting beds, hanging flower baskets, large semi-permanent potted plants, and/or ornamental planters; decorative clocks; public art
sculpture, statutes, murals, or fountains; or bicycle racks.
13. The Final Site Plan shall provide for appropriate screening of any rooftop mechanical units installed or modified with the building expansion project. QUESTIONS: Please call Andy Limbird in the Current Development Division of the Development & Public Works Department at (541) 726-3784 or email alimbird@springfield-or.gov if you have any questions regarding
this process.
PREPARED BY
Andy Limbird
Andy Limbird
Senior Planner
Attachment 1, Page 18 of 18
811-18-000208-TYP2 – SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION AT ROSEN SUNVISOR SYSTEMS
4884 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD (MAP 18-03-03-14, TAX LOTS 2000 & 2001)
SITE CONTEXT MAP
SITE
Eugene Mobile Village
RV Park Attachment 2, Page 1 of 1
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 2 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 3 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 4 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 5 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 6 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 7 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 8 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 9 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 10 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 11 of 23
Attachment 3, Page 12 of 23
A3VAwliko-
HANSON PROPERTIES 11 LLC;
86365 COLLEGE VIEW RD.
EUGENE, OR 97405
541-747-4269
CONTACT: NILES HANSOM
EMAIL: niles@nwstamping.com
TENANT
ROSEN SUNVISOR SYSTEMS
86365 COLLEGE VIEW ROAD
EUGENE, OR 97405
541-747-0034
CONTACT: NILES HANSOM
EMAIL: niles@nwstamping.com
SSW ENGINEERS, INC
2350 OAKMONT WAY, SUITE 105
EUGENE, OR 97401
541-485-8383
ENGINEER OF RECORD: MICHAEL COX, P.E.
CONTACT: BECKY WILTSE
EMAIL* beckyw@ssweningeers.com
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
ORDELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC ri
29771 EAST ENID ROAD 'GO.
EUGENE, OR 97402
541-747-8734
CONTACT: STEVE PORTER
EMAIL: Sporter@ordeliconstruction.com
Mr.1
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TAX MAP: 18-03-03-14
TAX LOT: 2000 & 2001
ADDRESS: 4884 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD
ZONING: EMPLOYMENT MIXED-USE (GLENWOOD)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EXISTING CONDITIONS: TWO STRUCTURES
PROPOSED CONDITIONS: A CONCRETE TILT UP ADDITION OFF OF THE EXISTING
STRUCTURES
SITE
USES OF ADJACENT LAND
NORTH, SOUTH, & EAST: EMPLOYMENT MIXED-USE (GLENWOOD)
WEST: LIGHT MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
DRAW I N (43 1 NU"
08"
EX ms
GO.0 TITLE SHEET
V1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C1.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
C3.0 SITE UTILITIES PLAN
C4.0 SITE STORMWATER PLAN
C5.0 SITE GRADING PLAN
C7.0 CIVIL DETAILS
C8.0 STORMWATER DETAILS
A1.0 FLOOR PLAN
A2.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
S P2_
iZZSW
n \ bf
Date Received
OCT 26 2018
Original Submittal-_
PROPF
I N
A? 77009
0
1 ,
N
6L A0'
IRENEWS: 12f31119
ANmRM
SSW
I N EERS Nc
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING a LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
641) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
LLJ
0 < U) U. z
W
d ZWCY
Z),I- <
0 IZ.- :CM
UJ U in W U)
Cif U) z 0 _ w
J
LU - - LL
17- > z
W 0U) z z (9
D < 0
W LU Z
W LL 0
z "l.
0
W 00
00F_ U)
0
LL
REVISIONS
date by
TITLE SHEET,
PROJECT INFO.
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
flied
SHEET
aoo(o
1 Of 10 Exhibit 3A 1 of 11Attachment 3, Page 13 of 23
LOT
S 88*51'25" E
LOT I
5' P.U.E.
FGAS1— GAS
TAX LOT 2000
EXISTING BUILDING
IND U T IF - I A L
USED WAS 61T-Y- 8'-E-N-CH`M-A'RK-- NO, -6_
0505,
A"'
BRASS CAP IN THE CURB NEAR THE SW
CORNER OF NUGGET WAY AND MCVAY HIGHWAY wwww ww -7- ww ww wwALSOKNOWNASFRANKLINBOULEVARD) ON TTHESOUTHSIDEOFNUGGETWAY, 21 FEET D
WEST OF THE END OF CURB AND 3.5 FEET POSSIBLE LOCATION OF
EXISTING WASTEWATER .7L77 NORTH OF A POWER POLE. 6 LINE BASED ON OLD
PLANS AND CITY
ELEVATION = 449.374 (NAVD '88 DATUM) INFORMATION. VERIFY.
8=19Aa NEE,
N
THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A
BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS SUBJECT TO
ANY INACCURACIES THAT A SUBSEQUENT CURVE C2
BOUNDARY SURVEY MAY DISCLOSE. R = 70.00' A S P H A L T
A = 43'14'05"
L = 52.82'
EMEMEbli WIE1 CH = 51.58'
N 30 52 02 " W 2.5 -OV
EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS PER CHICAGO TITLE WASTEWATER MANHOLE
INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 73106-52225: RIM = 437.56
FL 10" NW = 428.28 Q0.
FL 10" S 428,28 XA. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER THE
NORTHERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 5.00 FEET o -v
C. 16,61, -77ASSET FORTH BY THE PLAT. (THE LOCATION OF CURVE C1 Ilk
THESE EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AND NOTED R = 25.00'
HEREON). A = 80*1,8'00"
L = 35.04'
B. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS AND SLOPE EASEMENT SEE EASEMENT.. OTE CCH = 32.24'
coGRANTEDTO STATE OF OREGON BY INSTRUMENT N 49*24'00" W emwRECORDEDMARCH9, 1966, RECEPTION NO.
39389, AND BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED MARCH
27, 1968, RECEPTION NOS. 18222 AND 18824,
AND AS MODIFIED BY THAT INDENTURE OF ACCESS
RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 2000, RECEPTION NO.
r
a
SEE EAST 14ENT NOTE C
2000-053332, LANE COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS.
5- THE LOCATION OF THE 10.00 FOOT WIDE SLOPE Er
ve
0z 1
338.57'
X-1
w
p
EXISTING BUILDING
GAIE71-7771
G
U) 01
Mo
KE
M
a i
A S P H A L TA0
U) J, p
4t
n
C)
YTI itIT
rri
L4 p
IUI(p,
iiA
M
n
T —T —T 1
T —T —T
T<R.
40
ti 0 It
rn
03 V)
R
rri
f It
ASPHALT
It
1000 FOOTSLOPE
4T. FASEMEt SEE
tIia
EASEMENT NOTE B o)
00
CA
QTAXLOT2002
AS P HALT (0. D. O.T.)
777777-- I q
B
ELEC FED t It
AA2t:.AZ)tMLNI AND THE LOCATION OF APPROVED E.
189*
33067 WACCESSRIGHTSARESHOWNANDNOTEDHEREON). 5 ' P.U.E. WL& FVAUL 1w
T T, T W —w
E —'E T T r ------- E- T- C. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED TO L T
E ETHECITYOFEUGENEBYINSTRUMENTRECORDED441 11—
AUGUST 6, 1969, RECEPTIw w
ON NO. 76323, LANE
COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS. (THIS EASEMENT IS C5 q 9FORTHATPORTIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES THAT
FALL OUTSIDE OF THE 5.00 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY ww ww ww WN,— ww ww ww Q 0t-1'4- ww 8" ww ww ww T - EASEMENT). ,-Z
ww WW— ww ww ww-:__ ww ww 8" ww Ww — ww ww WW— WW— WW— ww ww — ww
D. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN CL CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
DECLARATION RECORDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996, 7> 0BENCHMARK4600avM -- N G G E W A- Y -- RECEPTION NO. 9613731, LANE COUNTY OFFICIAL
0 wRECORDS.
GASGASGGASGASWGAS — GAS I GAS IGASGASGASGASGAS GM— GAS — GAS4s — GAS GASIGAS — GAS — GAS
OHW— 014W— OHW— OHW— OHW— OHW— OHW— 04 OHW— OHW— OHVI— OHW— OHW PP OHW— OHW— OHW— 0 nww_ Aww— ^u- UBM NQIE; OHW H OHW — OHW— OHW--I- OH
UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE
pp 0
BASED ON A COMBINATION OF FIELD WASTEWATER MANHOLE WASTEWATER MANHOLE
vmw
RIM = 437.94 RIM = 442.22SURVEYOFOBSERVABLEEVIDENCE, FL 10" N = 428.46 FL 8" W = 429.13UTILITYCOMPANYLOCATIONMAPSANDFL8" E = 428.46 FL 8" S = 429-34PAINT, AND OLD CONSTRUCTION PLANS FL 8" S = 428.52 FL 8" E = 429.14
FL 8" W = 428.54ANDARESUBJECTTOVERIFICATION. 81LEGENDpp.
ow EXISTING WATER VALVE IM EXISTING ELECTRIC METER ------ 0 a EXISTING HANDRAIL OR CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE
Elwm EXISTING WATER METER OPP EXISTING POWER POLE — ST EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE (SIZE AS NOTED)
M EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 17D EV EXISTING ELECTRIC VAULT — ww— EXISTING WASTEWATER PIPE (SIZE AS NOTED) DENOTES EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
CJ's' EXISTING WATER VAULT El ET EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER — GAS — EXISTING NATURAL GAS LINE
EXISTING STORMWATER MANHOLE E— EXISTING POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR —w — EXISTING WATER LINE (SIZE AS NOTED)
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE AS NOTED)
EM EXISTING CATCH BASIN 0B EXISTING BOLLARD —E — EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEIEXISTINGCONIFEROUS TREEEE (SIZE AS NOTED)
EXISTING CURB INLET EXISTING SIGN A9 NOTED OHW— 170 EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRE( S)
EXISTING WASTEWATER MANHOLE F21 EXISTING GAS METER T EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE
P.I.I
0 .
E. DENOTES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
ocQ EXISTING CLEANOUT, EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATIONS RISERonTEXISTING DATA BOX
R.O.W. DENOTES RIGHT-OF-WAY
OG O.D.O.T. DENOTES OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATIONEXISTINGGASVALVEomwEXISTING MONITORING WELL
Date Received
0 CT 2 6 2C131
Odginal Submittal IL -
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
JULY 11, 2000
MICHAEL R. DAHRENS
60052 1
RENEWS: 12-31-2019
in MUL
SSW
mN61& momsRStNEM
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING* LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541)485-8383
FAX (541) 4858384
Vp".sswengineers.com
I REVISIONS 11
I date by 11
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
I PLAV
Exhibit 3A 2 of 11Attachment 3, Page 14 of 23
LEGEND
1 NEW CURB & GUTTER, SEE DETAIL
5/C7.0
D NEW ASPHALT
REMOVE BOLLARDS
SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL 6/C7.0 I s
JI --
1
LOT 2 L.03 7
w
I k
sL PROPOSED CROSS -ACCESS
EASEMENT
Q
rn
We a
e 0oma• \
4'
Q1
O
h° QP
yJ'L'Va
S 88'51'25" E
338.57'
1
ter '•..
1
r
TRUCK TURN ANALYSIS
FOR ACCESS TO
PROPOSED TRUCK
DOCK MITF
i
1
I
7s;
A`1913%
EXISTING DRIVEWAY ---'' &
o -
2
TO REMAIN
i •. .
PROPOSED LOCATION OF
NEW `24" DRIVEWAY & .
GATE, SEE DETAIL 9/C7.0 x # TRUCK DOCK
COVERED TRASH ENCLOSURE
x X
CURVE Cit % X 1
R = 70.00' xXs t. BUILDING EXPANSION
A = 43° 14'05"
x
x
L = 52.82' EXISTING DRIVEWAYS
NN30°52 028 w TO BE CLOSED 25 00' x x
w, x # FBLTRATION RAIN GARDEN,
x X SEE SHEETS C4.0 & C8.0xxXxz x
x - x
CURVE C1 NEW FENCE o xx x x K x M x x,
z._ x x x z x u x
R = 25.00' x x X.IX xx
i[+azxx xXXxXx NX <, A= 80* 18'00" x x xxX%
C
XX
L = 35.04' %
Kx Xxx xX%
M X x X X x X X SEE EASEMENT NOTE CCH32.24' 0 MXUXX xxx
N 49°24'00" W l -' x. x. x x x%
a XXxx xx aMw 32, x{
7
jpxC
X x x
NEW RIGHT OF WAY SIDEWALK
a.+
SEE EASEMENT NOTE C
j ,
4
Er
y : ti • ..R•.. e 0 tf .:4 .•
7'-4"t
T
REPAIR SIDEWALK AS
NEEDED TO MANTIAN
2% CROSS SLOPE
PP
TAX LOT 2000
EXISTING BUILDING
0 10' 20' 40' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
Q0 OM2'
TAX
GATE
ftibTI
EXISTING BUILDING
T 2001
CD
Z
LU N U G G E T W A Y
Ox
PP
I GATE ate=
x
I
I
I NEW CANOPY
NEWBICYCLE HOOP
j} ADDITIONAL LONG
IJ TERM SPACE INSIDE
FH
W
LTD BUS STOP APPROXIMATELY
600'± TO THE NORTHx
1
2
4 #
K FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN,
X $ R SEE SHEETS C4. 0 & C8. 0
C7.0
EXISTING BUILDING
T 2001
CD
Z
LU N U G G E T W A Y
Ox
PP
10.00 FOOT SLOPE I `I,
EASEMENT. SEE ,
EASEMENT NOTE B 0') _
a5
TAX LOT 2002 '' r
I r---- O.D.O.TNEWCANOPY
5' P.U.E.
H
223.36'
FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN, F
x x X X SEE SHEETS C4.0 & C8.0 E' h
X Y x X x
XXHY xXx
x X% x VX x Y. x
xyX}xp a x
X x ELL PED X X
x x. x x x x x x x e
x x x x X X X X%
X x x X x x% x X x x
X x x z x z x X x x
W°
EXISTING 6'-0" CHAINLINK FENCE
4 a
t 1
W LTD BUS STOP APPROXIMATELY
11 90'± TO THE SOUTH
f
i
t
V-PP
pp
ii
a
z iz i
s% Ra,a 12evieanj
Vose.n SM0sD*f S s}em5
90 3 Q L1 I
Date Received
OCT 26 238
Original Submittal M
PRop,,
G I N EFR ,0
cr 770
a
GON
y9FL M -N
RENEWS: 121311/9
asw
E an Lano
Ne
INC
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL.- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING a LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
LL >.
UJ
Z
W
V Z
d' <
J U ®®W W
Z0J
JLz
W
0
W
L)
0
VJ
REVISIONS
date _.__. by
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
Checked MAC
filed
SHEET
0 (B
Of 1
iq F
i
FH
W
LTD BUS STOP APPROXIMATELY
600'± TO THE NORTHx
2
4 #
K FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN,
X $ R SEE SHEETS C4. 0 & C8. 0
kk
v
X V.
W
Ln 2
i
XX
E
o0
2'-0" WIDE RAISED ASPHALT 3
PATCH, SEE SHEET C5.0
U) FOR ELEVATIONS
RE-ESTABLISHED ADA PARKING
rri
x X STALLS WITH SIGN AND MARKINGS
Xix I
W 01 Y§ rn
s FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN, } tn
x
rn
Z SEE SHEETS C4.0 & C8.0 F>
x r O
W C
bl
2'-0" WIDE RAISED ASPHALT ;`E1
PATCH, SEE SHEET C5.0
FOR ELEVATIONS iii"
10.00 FOOT SLOPE I `I,
EASEMENT. SEE ,
EASEMENT NOTE B 0') _
a5
TAX LOT 2002 '' r
I r---- O.D.O.TNEWCANOPY
5' P.U.E.
H
223.36'
FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN, F
x x X X SEE SHEETS C4.0 & C8.0 E' h
X Y x X x
XXHY xXx
x X% x VX x Y. x
xyX}xp a x
X x ELL PED X X
x x. x x x x x x x e
x x x x X X X X%
X x x X x x% x X x x
X x x z x z x X x x
W°
EXISTING 6'-0" CHAINLINK FENCE
4 a
t 1
W LTD BUS STOP APPROXIMATELY
11 90'± TO THE SOUTH
f
i
t
V-PP
pp
ii
a
z iz i
s% Ra,a 12evieanj
Vose.n SM0sD*f S s}em5
90 3 Q L1 I
Date Received
OCT 26 238
Original Submittal M
PRop,,
G I N EFR ,0
cr 770
a
GON
y9FL M -N
RENEWS: 121311/9
asw
E an Lano
Ne
INC
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL.- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING a LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
LL >.
UJ
Z
W
V Z
d' <
J U ®®W W
Z0J
JLz
W
0
W
L)
0
VJ
REVISIONS
date _.__. by
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
Checked MAC
filed
SHEET
0 (B
Of 1 Exhibit 3A 3 of 11Attachment 3, Page 15 of 23
NOTES:
1. EXTEND SANITARY SEWER, WATER,
GAS AND ELECTRICAL FROM
EXISTING BUILDING.
2. SEE SHEET C4.0 FOR STORMWATER
INFORMATION.
LOT 2
05
CURVE C2
R 70.00'
A 43' 14'05"
L 52.82'
CH 51.58'
N 3952'02" W
CURVE C1
R 25.00'
A 80* 18'00"
L 35,04'
CH 32.24'
N 49*24'00" W
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM = 437.56
FL 10" NW = 428.28
FL 10" S = 428.28
0 ___
VM ____
0
25.
001
pa
GAS — GAS — GAS — GAf
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM 437.94
FL 10" N 428.46
FL 8" E 428.46
FL 8* S 428.52
FL 8" W 428.54
O
M 0
W, WW WW WN__
L
GAS GAS GAS GAS I GAS
SITE UTILITIES PLAN
10' 20' 40' ea
SCALE: 1 20'-0"
I?]
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM = 442. 22
FL 8" W = 429.13
FL 8" S = 429.34
FL 8" E = 429-14
FH q
W
ST^' ' p
81
la_
Z
T —T —T
Znl
i
0
c
ASPHALT
TAX LOT 2002
O.D.O.T.) ,' '€
1't
0
W
ft
s
V
T T
W
E
W E
a 0
o
WW_ WW_ WW WW WW WW
0
33 0
GAS GAS GAS GAS
OHW OHW- OHW— OHW OH
pp
PP
rite, copy
0=_ 110Z
sk, MyA eM*eAAJ
Fz ot, Suw \4 scy 5 +cm
Date Received
OCT 26 2C13
Original SubmiftaI_ha81__,A_
PRop
I N 4P
CC 77009
OR ON
yqL A
RENEWS: 12/31/19
dMlb, AMb,
MLV& qMIftImVMIm
40sw
rra Aft
mEE NcEN111It
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING o LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineem.com
90
V
0 <
LL > z
W
P^
V J Ce) U)
0 z
0 0')
0 U) CO Cr Jff% Z 0
ULJ > Ld Z
z
Z W
z c) U) <
atom < p
P^ WzVJW
U. 0
z C)
00U)
JtWJ%hL
U
r%.00
LJL
REVISIONS
date by
SITE
UTILITIES
PLAN
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25f18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
0.(B
4 of 10
9
WW -8" WWI— WW_ WW_ WW_ WW_ WW_ L_ WW_ VW_ WW_ WW_ ww— WW—8" WW— WW— WW— WW2
N U G GE T W A Y
GAS GAS — GAS — GAS GAS GAS W GAS GAS W— GAS— GAS— GAS— GAS— M— GAS
I?]
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM = 442. 22
FL 8" W = 429.13
FL 8" S = 429.34
FL 8" E = 429-14
FH q
W
ST^' ' p
81
la_
Z
T —T —T
Znl
i
0
c
ASPHALT
TAX LOT 2002
O.D.O.T.) ,' '€
1't
0
W
ft
s
V
T T
W
E
W E
a 0
o
WW_ WW_ WW WW WW WW
0
33 0
GAS GAS GAS GAS
OHW OHW- OHW— OHW OH
pp
PP
rite, copy
0=_ 110Z
sk, MyA eM*eAAJ
Fz ot, Suw \4 scy 5 +cm
Date Received
OCT 26 2C13
Original SubmiftaI_ha81__,A_
PRop
I N 4P
CC 77009
OR ON
yqL A
RENEWS: 12/31/19
dMlb, AMb,
MLV& qMIftImVMIm
40sw
rra Aft
mEE NcEN111It
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING o LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineem.com
90
V
0 <
LL > z
W
P^
V J Ce) U)
0 z
0 0')
0 U) CO Cr Jff% Z 0
ULJ > Ld Z
z
Z W
z c) U) <
atom < p
P^ WzVJW
U. 0
z C)
00U)
JtWJ%hL
U
r%.00
LJL
REVISIONS
date by
SITE
UTILITIES
PLAN
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25f18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
0.(B
4 of 10 Exhibit 3A 4 of 11Attachment 3, Page 16 of 23
I
TIE (E) DOWNSPOUTS TO NEW PIPE
b."i = 44U.79 _6!ST = 440.54 6"ST = 440.
ST 4- ST - ST - s1r - ST 5T ST - ST - ST - ST
771111111111111111111,1--177
caCATCH BASIN
till GRATE = 437.9043
1 --= -= =
F7
s_rSTSTS'r
7Z
INSTALL FLOGARD
FILTER
All TAX LOT 2000ASPHALTO
0)
WO EXISTING BUILDING
o
7- 7
LOT 1
LOT
1A/
7-
E) DOWNSPOUTS TO BE PIPED
ALONG WALL THROUGH 6" PIPEINDUS)F-i -F\ J ';_ 11
CURVE C2. xx
x 9
R = 70.00' ASPHALT
A = 43* 14'05"
L = 52.82
CH = 51.58'01
N 30°52'02''W WASTEWATER MANHOLE ?,.0.* -
RIM = 437.56 Z ...
FL 10" NW = 428.28
N) LANDSCAPE STRIPFL10" S = 428-28 6" PERF 435,70WITH6" CURB AND k
GUTTER ASPHALT SIDE O x R x x x s x 12"1 FILTRATION RAIN
CURVE Cl GARDEN, SEE DETAILS I & 2111
R = 25.00' 36.L3 BOTTOM OF GARDEN4
A = 80118,00" N) GIBSON STEEL CATCH
L = 35.04' BASIN. -BASIN WITH PUMP
N) GIBSON STEEL 18"x18"i 6" PERF ;= 435.68CH = 32.24' COMPACT CATCH BASIN MODIFIED R x u x « x x RIM = 437M
N 49°24 00 W AS A BUBBLER. SEE DETAIL 51C8.0 t 2" OULETTO BUBBLER omw
V. . (N) 4" PERFORATED FOUNDATION
RIM = 438:13 x x - DRAIN ALONG INTERIOR OF NEW
SPILLWAY INTO GUTTER = 437.71 CONTINUOUS PERIMETER FOOTINGS.
2" ST FROM PUMP = 436.88
ET
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM = 437.94
FL 10" N = 428.46
FL 8" E = 428.46
FL 8" S = 428.52
FL 8" W = 428.54
Vky, A011 : 4N W WW"I
0 10 20 401 60,
SCALE'
if
338.
ST - ST - ST - ST - ST
EXISTING BUILDING
2001
E) DOWNSPOUTS TO
BE PIPED ALONG
WALLI THROUGH 6"
PIPE
6" ST = 459.82 WALL HUNG)
6" ST = 441.49
18'iix18'x24' GIBSON COMPACT
BASIN WITH BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY
GRATE ACTING AS A BUBBLERTO STREET
Ft 6"ST = 439.30
C.B. RIM =440.80
6 ST 440 04 6"P -RF =439.58
ST ST - ST
ADD 12" CURB CUTS AT * 8-i
O.0 TO (E) CURBS 41ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS W1'J".'__
12" CURB CUTS AT V 0"O.C. 5'=6"x43'N.E. FILTRATION GARDEN: REMOVE
EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND REPLACE WITH
RAIN FILTRATION GARDEN. SEE DETAIL 3/C8.0
61, PERF =439.58
6" ST = 439.58
OVERFLOW
RIDGE = 442.40
A"
rnA
6" PERF =439AI
0
ADD 12P CURB CU
O.0 TO (E) CURBS
ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS WI
12" CURB C KUTSATV-0"O.C.
ADD 12 CURB CUTS AT 8'-U'
441. 16 BOTTOM OF RAIN GARDE
O.0 TO (E) CURBS
ALT* REPLACE (E) CURBS W
12" CURB CUTS AT 81 O.C. 7
6-61"1 FILTRATION GARDEN: REMOVE
EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND REPLACE WITH
RAIN FILTRATION GARDEN. SEE DETAIL VC8.0
1
q0
6" PERF =439.41
6's
r
OVERFLOW
Z
A S P H A L T
RAISED ASPHALT PATCH;
ALTERNATIVE,. ADD CURB
bDr
GIBSON STEEL STORMWATER i
CATCH BASIN WITH A PUMP
TAX LOT 2002
61ST (EAST) =438.84 (0. D. Q. T.)
C.B.RIM=441.95
2" ST DISCHARGE -440 78
14'x10' MIN. S.E. FILTRATION GARDEN:
REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND
6" ST = 438.88 REPLACE WITH RAIN FILTRATION
GARDEN. SEE DETAIL 41C8.0ADD12" CURB (Ci 8'-0"'
0 C TO (E) CURBS
Ad- REPLACE (E) CURBS W/
B 12 CURB CUTS AT 8-0' O C x tx # 6" PERF =440.03
B 441.78 BOTTOM
OF RAIN GARDEN
ELF
5' P.U.E. t,i
GATE WO
441.33
qa 3:: \\ (N) GIBSON STEEL 18"18"1
C50 COMPACT CATCH BASIN MODIFIED
AS A BUBBLER. SEE DETAIL 5/C8.0
2" WEEP HOLE IN CURB
8" ST = 438.42
z C.B. BUBBLER RIM = 440.09 @
SPILLWAY TO GUTTER= 439.63
C G E T W A Y
C5 af
pp
xr,
pp t
WASTEWATER MANHOLE
RIM = 442.22
FL 8" W = 429.13FI
FL 8" S = 429.34
FL 8" E = 429.14
ppo
1E
We CON
swosv S95W
dpp
Date Received
OCT 2 6 2018
dginal Submiftal_W___
RENEWS; WS: 12J31/19
A911L 01111111111LMW -W
SSW
WMIL 0
t N 6 1
No
E. E i
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING,,, LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
40
5 of 10
40 ^
W
NEW'M
r%ki
LL_
0
00
LL.
0 U) LL Z
W W
OZWqt <
1)
W U
0 :C0
im W U)
A0L.L ff% W
z 0 _J
LU zJUJ
ez
LU c)
D
Von
W z
W U. 0
C -
If ^
VJ
00
qqJ-
A00"i
U
100
LL.
REVISIONS
date by
SITE
TVI MW
PLAN
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
40
5 of 10 Exhibit 3A 5 of 11Attachment 3, Page 17 of 23
NOTES
CUT = 299 CUBIC YARDS
FILL = 865 CUBIC YARDS
S 88*51'25" E
437.20
d 439.00 438.60
22 437.70 TC 437.78 438.20 438.33 -.438.49t..-`•:438.52
TAX LOT 2000
EXISTING BUILDING
9bJn 438.16 440,81 /440.
10 439. ' 76) U Is J/_\ S439.
Lo10 7 . . . . . .
439 02
438. 438.43
442.70 FFL-2-_
IN, 437 An 438.67
37 442.80 FFVIC.'-t . 43 - 35
437.22439.37 ssTz " . . :t 43 2 438.29A07 442.80 FFTCd,I . _ ,
43 . 63U,
437.72 '438... 438
437.24r. Q7.84 43 8.57437.73 8.34TC10
1
437.25 l,-,438 04
4z437.74 .438 0
0437.26 437.87 4
437,854 8
438.3
42
437.79437.29 437 .77'
37.89 438.29TC z 4;
437M!-
337.31 7.74
CURVE C2 438. 24TC I J438j39_..
43177• 438 . 37R = 70.00'
437.89 TG
438.03
A = 43'14'05" 437.93 TC 437.69
xK 438.1 .437.59
L = 52' 82 x x
437.64 4:3 7 72.: r'438.09TC 43
CH = 51.58' 438j4T
N 30' 52' 02" W= x 438.10
438.01 TC x x 437,50
43811
e., 438.0XXXxx 43
438.01TC
CURVE C1
R 25. 00'
A 80' 18'00"
L 35.04'
CH 32.24'
N 49*24' 00" w
3
CATCH BASIN
x
438.03TC X. . . . . . I
ATE = 437.90
x x
XXX
437.59
441.33 BOTTOM OF RAIN GARDEN
8. 0 TC
I -x
438.15
1.7
TAX LOT 2002
41
438.13 TC
O.D. O.T.)
438,
14
23.
RIDGE = 442A0
438.26
38. 36
42.81
L
8. 7
43 .5-7
RIDGE = 442.40
43772
438:2 _C 438.41
t, 38. 46
438.54
V M
X .6 . H. . .
YYYiii
FF ELM 'PEON85
n
A S P H A L T
we 438
442.77 FF
442........
co
5' P.U. E.
442.80 FF
J
442.77 FF
F
0
GATE WO
4,
442.19 P H A L TRIDGE
437.20
d 439.00 438.60
22 437.70 TC 437.78 438.20 438.33 -.438.49t..-`•:438.52
TAX LOT 2000
EXISTING BUILDING
9bJn 438.16 440,81 /440.
10 439. ' 76) U Is J/_\ S439.
Lo10 7 . . . . . .
439 02
438. 438.43
442.70 FFL-2-_
IN, 437 An 438.67
37 442.80 FFVIC.'-t . 43 - 35
437.22439.37 ssTz " . . :t 43 2 438.29A07 442.80 FFTCd,I . _ ,
43 . 63U,
437.72 '438... 438
437.24r. Q7.84 43 8.57437.73 8.34TC10
1
437.25 l,-,438 04
4z437.74 .438 0
0437.26 437.87 4
437,854 8
438.3
42
437.79437.29 437 .77'
37.89 438.29TC z 4;
437M!-
337.31 7.74
CURVE C2 438. 24TC I J438j39_..
43177• 438 . 37R = 70.00'
437.89 TG
438.03
A = 43'14'05" 437.93 TC 437.69
xK 438.1 .437.59
L = 52' 82 x x
437.64 4:3 7 72.: r'438.09TC 43
CH = 51.58' 438j4T
N 30' 52' 02" W= x 438.10
438.01 TC x x 437,50
43811
e., 438.0XXXxx 43
438.01TC
CURVE C1
R 25. 00'
A 80' 18'00"
L 35.04'
CH 32.24'
N 49*24' 00" w
ftoftl Mel MA111k 91101 low i
0 11Y 20 40' 60,
Wnwonvi
20'-0"
A S P H A L T
QMW
T 442.76 442.78
442.66 4444 :6
7 4-
438.33
50
440.'
439J
N
338.57'
438.16
FH
Wq
438.11 3Rx . . . x
438.03TC X. . . . . . Ito . 9 x .
438.13 x . x t . . . .
x x
XXX
437.59
441.33 BOTTOM OF RAIN GARDEN
8. 0 TC
I -x
438.15
1.7
TAX LOT 2002
41
438.13 TC
O.D. O.T.)
438,
14
23.
RIDGE = 442A0
438.26
38. 36
42.81
8. 7
43 .5-7
RIDGE = 442.40
43772
438:2 _C 438.41
t, 38. 46
438.54
V M
X .6 . H. . .
FF ELM 'PEON85
n
x. . . .
442.81
V:
442.77 FF
442........
5' P.U. E.
442.80 FF
J
442.77 FF
W
ftoftl Mel MA111k 91101 low i
0 11Y 20 40' 60,
Wnwonvi
20'-0"
A S P H A L T
QMW
T 442.76 442.78
442.66 4444 :6
7 4-
438.33
50
440.'
439J
N
338.57'
FH
Wq
7777777777777777//
IQ
CO
T
A
441.33 BOTTOMOF RAIN GARDEN
I -x
1.7
TAX LOT 2002
41
O.D. O.T.)
14 RIDGE = 442A0
7, J_
42.81 xXXXxx
RIDGE = 442.40
z' C>
0
0
V M
X .6 . H. . .
FF ELM 'PEON85
n
x. . . .
442.81
V:
442.77 FF
442........
5' P.U. E.
442.80 FF
442.77 FF
W
0
GATE WO
442.19 P H A L TRIDGE
V EXISTING BUILDING
TAX OT 2001
440.14
AAL62TC
440.49
440.01
C G E T W A Y
IN
Ppo
Gw
e nk)
I m %
0
C
M
Q%
M
ate Received
OCT 26 2C43
ofiqinal SubVW1ta1__yn__1_
PROFFss
77
1, %
N
yq L AI.N
RENEWS:
12131119IIIL
1
SSW,
a a M AE
RNMA"
I
ann
E E WRI S
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING,- LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineersl.com
U.
0
LLJ>
z
Uw)
0 zW <
sonumm (Y. 0
LLJ U U)
A10 e ^ W
L.L V j Z 0 _j
W LLJ Z
Z F- W
D
WWz
W LL 0
z 1.
LLJ 00
F- rn 100
W 04 Vt
AONWA
U
d
L1.
REVISIONS
date by
SITE
GPRADING
LAN
Jab 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
6 of 10
IQ
CO
A
1.7
TAX LOT 2002
51 O.D. O.T.)
14 RIDGE = 442A0
42.81 xXXXxx
X .6 . H. . .
FF ELM 'PEON85x. . . .
442.81
442........
5' P.U. E.
W
0
GATE WO
PP
IN
Ppo
Gw
e nk)
I m %
0
C
M
Q%
M
ate Received
OCT 26 2C43
ofiqinal SubVW1ta1__yn__1_
PROFFss
77
1, %
N
yq L AI.N
RENEWS:
12131119IIIL
1
SSW,
a a M AE
RNMA"
I
ann
E E WRI S
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING,- LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineersl.com
U.
0
LLJ>
z
Uw)
0 zW <
sonumm (Y. 0
LLJ U U)
A10 e ^ W
L.L V j Z 0 _j
W LLJ Z
Z F- W
D
WWz
W LL 0
z 1.
LLJ 00
F- rn 100
W 04 Vt
AONWA
U
d
L1.
REVISIONS
date by
SITE
GPRADING
LAN
Jab 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
6 of 10 Exhibit 3A 6 of 11Attachment 3, Page 18 of 23
WMAI11swel: 10% o 9- yasN
A
3/8" RADIUS
ELEVATION
VARIES SEE C5.0
FOR GRADES
5
C7.0
a
EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS
NEW ADA SYMBOL
0
Z
C) C:) I:
bo
Z
0
zo
Z
NEW ADA VAN SYMBOL
NEW ADA POLE & SIGN, TYP.
SEE DETAILS 2 &3/C7.0
MOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER
SLOPE VARIES, SEE
SHEET C5.0 FOR
GRADES
I
a
H
I 1 -Off
HANDICAP PARKING
SIGN (TYPES R7-8,
R7 -8P, OR7-8c) TO BE
INSTALLED PER
CODE BY
CONTRACTOR
AT VAN -ACCESSIBLE
SPACES ONLY
PARKING SURFACE
PARKING SIGN
A
SEE SITE DEVELOPMENT AND
BATTER 6:1 GRADING PLANS FOR ASPHALT
AND/OR LANDSCAPING ELEVATION
Driveway paw limit Zone to match extq. driveway
NOTES:
it monolithic, Inciudeacijacent curb) 'engthvades
See general note 7 (see general note 6)
20' landi.9 area
L
t Jse max. width feasiblel
Driveway (
see general note 5)
lip exposure 2% maxPoTbmugSl2m, % nntm. 12% max. change
si.'eCys. ....... m x in sto eP IVmax.) Intervals (SAG) Slope 1.5% max.
Fh an (Max, 2. 0% finished surface slope)
r (Normal st jewalk crosS slope) % maxgrade. it
w
e vanes
1. TOOLED JOINTS PER PLANS.
VAnormal)
U)
2. CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 20' W
INTRVALS WITH ASPHALTE
Fy
IMPREGNATED JOINT FILLER.
VARIES, SEE ARCH.
4
1) 44 CONTINUOUS
91
CONCRETE APRON/SIDEWALK DETAIL
It 0 611 it 21 31
101 ,Oki kTJ : VITITYA
I 1011111111111111t . I
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
Effective Date: June 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Kul"
3
C7.0
GALV. CAP ---
POST-1POST -1 1/2" O.D.
GALV. PIPE
ASPHALT PER -
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
V-0" DIA.
ADA PARKING SIGN POLE
0 611 if 2'
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
z
W
Z UJ NOTE:
R ALL RADII TO BE 3/4'
ASPHALT PER
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
0 6" 11 21
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
011
ME
I a 1*1 &1 &01 S J9
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
21-511
id GREASE TRAP
W/ HINGED LID
TO SEWER
21-011
4
NOTES:
1. BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA MATERIAL.
2, BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE - SUPPORTS AASHTO
H25 LOADING.
3. GIBSON MODEL NO. GCB10-38HB-6 PER DIMENSIONS SHOWN.
4. SERVICE CATCH BASIN TWO TIMES PER YEAR MINIMUM - ONCE
BEFORE AND ONCE AFTER SEASONAL RAINS- TYP.
5. PROVIDE PRIMER & TRAP.
STANDARD CATCH BASIN
0 611 it 21
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
Date Received
OCT 2 6 20"43
Original Submittal--V(-V
PRaFfissGINSc
tr 7700,
otzE ON
A
ITR-ENEFS- -1273171-;-
7
UL
1 SW
Ea 0 Ark AS&
ago In
no ow
IGNEERY.
CIVILo STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING o LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
641)485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
0
LLJ LU
CJ) gyp? d ZW
000 00
W Cr (1)
W
U) Z 0 -J
Ld ZJzeLU
U) Z (.9
5 F-
U) WWZ
LLJ U. 0
0
U)
A1111011"11111,
U
REVISIONS
date by
DETAILS
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
Mate 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
7 of 10
Driveway paw limit Zone to match extq. driveway
Sidewalkwidth-Worgreater
Seegeneral not
Usemax. width feasible
See general note S)
it monolithic, Inciudeacijacent curb) 'engthvades
See general note 7 (see general note 6)
20' landi.9 area
L
t Jse max. width feasiblel
Driveway (
see general note 5)
lip exposure 2% maxPoTbmugSl2m, % nntm. 12% max. change
si.'eCys. ....... m x in sto eP IVmax.) Intervals (SAG) Slope 1.5% max.
Fh an (Max, 2. 0% finished surface slope)
r (Normal st jewalk crosS slope) % maxgrade. it
w
e vanesVAnormal)
d 8% rnax.changeY.' preformed.filter in sl10'
i.rervads (CREST),
Seegeneral note 7 .
4 -1E
P.C. concretec'er. driveway,
n, thIm. 35 shown,
Curbtype van. oras dlr.
Seegeneral note4)
SECTION A -A
GENERAL NOTES FOR ALL DETAILS:
4. Details arebasedan United States Access Board Standards.
OPTION D 2. Only use details allowed bijurisdiction.
DRIVEWAY IN WIDE WOR GREATER} SIDEWALK 3. The following dimensions are as shown on plans, oras directed: driveway width, cirvewayslope, sidewalk width, curb exposure, drivewaylip exposure, landing area length and width. See project plans fordetails not shown.
4. Curb, gulter, and sidewalk types varies, seeplans.
SeeStd:D.9s. RD700 & R0701 for curb details.
Sea Sid, Dw9. 6720 forsidewalk details.
S. 4' unobstructed dear passage with slope I .S% mu. (Max. 2.0% finished surface slope) Is required behinddriveway apron,
6. Whereexistingdriveway Is Ingood condition,. and meets sloperequirements, construct only as much as required forsatisfactory
connection With new Work.
Use reversing curves
foral=m transition!
7. Checkthe gutterflow depth atdriveway locations to assum that the design flood does notovertop thebackofsidewalk at driveway.
Ifovertopping occurs placean inlet at upstream side of driveway or perform other approved design mitigation.
Sidewalkwidth (As directed)
e general note 5)
I'-- I - - - - - - 8. Tooled Joints am required atall drivewaysiopebreak lines.
9, 1S' min: of thedriveway behind thesidewalk should besurfaced to preventtracking ofgravel ontothe sidewalk.
rr
tr- y7
Use max.dth feasiblewia)ible
See general 5not,
ry
Seegeneral note 7 L,
10, Monolithiccurb & sidewalkshall retainthickened edgethrough loweredprofile, toaaomodate drivewayuse.
SeeSid. Dwg. RD720 fordetails.
11. Onoralong state highways, curband gutterIsrequiredat curb ramps.
oSidewalk
Driveway paylimit
ifmonolithic, Include adjacent curb)
See pr*ct plans for details not shown)
Slope 1.5%=x
Max. 2.0% finished surface slope)
Normalsufmalkcross slope)
CALC WOXM - - - - - BASELINE UMRTDATE
Theselection andi1seDONS
StandardDrawing, whileoe -
sionedinaccordance with
geftErdIlyffCICOPted engfneer-
ingprincialesandpractices,
Is thesole responsibilityof
NOTE; ABOt -emDreg. S -dudsPWft.d01
OREGON STANDARD DRAWINGS
CURB LINE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAYS
OR ALLEYS (OPTIONS D & E)
ODOT HIGHWAYS
W Widthofdriveway the userandshould notbe 2038
OPTION E E Curbexposure use outCOJ?S a
Re ra
SIDEWALK WRAPPED AROUND DRIVEWAY P 7.01in commerdaj land use types
3.5' In residential land use types
gineer.
101 ,Oki kTJ : VITITYA
I 1011111111111111t . I
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
Effective Date: June 1, 2018 - November 30, 2018 Kul"
3
C7.0
GALV. CAP ---
POST-1POST -1 1/2" O.D.
GALV. PIPE
ASPHALT PER -
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
V-0" DIA.
ADA PARKING SIGN POLE
0 611 if 2'
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
z
W
Z UJ NOTE:
R ALL RADII TO BE 3/4'
ASPHALT PER
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
0 6" 11 21
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
011
ME
I a 1*1 &1 &01 S J9
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
21-511
id GREASE TRAP
W/ HINGED LID
TO SEWER
21-011
4
NOTES:
1. BOX FABRICATED FROM 10 GA MATERIAL.
2, BIKE PROOF, HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE - SUPPORTS AASHTO
H25 LOADING.
3. GIBSON MODEL NO. GCB10-38HB-6 PER DIMENSIONS SHOWN.
4. SERVICE CATCH BASIN TWO TIMES PER YEAR MINIMUM - ONCE
BEFORE AND ONCE AFTER SEASONAL RAINS- TYP.
5. PROVIDE PRIMER & TRAP.
STANDARD CATCH BASIN
0 611 it 21
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
Date Received
OCT 2 6 20"43
Original Submittal--V(-V
PRaFfissGINSc
tr 7700,
otzE ON
A
ITR-ENEFS- -1273171-;-
7
UL
1 SW
Ea 0 Ark AS&
ago In
no ow
IGNEERY.
CIVILo STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING o LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
641)485-8383
FAX (541) 485-8384
www.sswengineers.com
0
LLJ LU
CJ) gyp? d ZW
000 00
W Cr (1)
W
U) Z 0 -J
Ld ZJzeLU
U) Z (.9
5 F-
U) WWZ
LLJ U. 0
0
U)
A1111011"11111,
U
REVISIONS
date by
DETAILS
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
Mate 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
7 of 10 Exhibit 3A 7 of 11Attachment 3, Page 19 of 23
NOTE: PLANTING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS.
STANDARD OVERFLOW
CATCH BASIN W/ PUMP
GROWING MEDIUM
DRAIN ROCK ---, J
SLOPE TO MATCH
EXISTING GRADING
3 MAX
F
11-6" L 91-011 V-6"
121-01k
12" MINIMUM
GROWING MEDIUM
EXISTING CURB.—
AND PAVING
m
Im
WEST RAIN GARDEN SECTIO1
It 0 11 3 1 51
SCALE: 112" V-0"
VARIES. SEE STORMWATER PLAN
BUBBLER CATCH BASIN,
SEE DETAIL 5 & 61C8.0
NEW SIDEWALK -----
2" OVERFLOW
PIPE TO CURB
EXISTING CURB
AND PAVING
o
6" PERF. PIPE (SEE
x/ STORMWATER PLAN
FOR ELEVATIONS)
12" MINIMUM DRAIN ROCK
12" MINIMUM
GROWING MEDIUM
EXISTING CURB
AND PAVING
all 01:40MV000111
it 0 it 31 51
1 m iiiiiii A
SCALE: 1/2" = T-0"
1 i1 Al a is 1, §.-% R At_r' s 1 fit n
10'4% SEE STORMWATER PLAN
5'- 0" MIN.
6" OVERLFLOW
3 MAX
F_
EXISTING
LANDSCAPING
7-
X x
X/
lv
30 MIL PLASTIC
A xz
1_5 FILM BARRIER
Xr 5 4' X_Tz -K, )f- M., yJ/ M 4
W A, I :X1
rJ
y.
6" PERF. PIPE (SEE
ST RMWATER PLAN0
FOR ELEVATIONS)
TYPICAL EAST RAIN GARDEN SECTIO 4 SOUTH-EAST RAIN GARDEN SECTION
0 611 .{A 21 3' 0 611 11 21 31
1111111IN11111
11111
SCALE: V = T -O" SCALE: 1 1'-0"
BUBBLER CATCH BASIN PLAN
0 6" if 21 3t
SCALE: 1 1'-0"
BIKE PROOF, HEAVY
DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE
MODIFIED 18"x18"x24"
COMPACT CATCH BASIN
3'X18" CURB SPILLWAY
Kuut-, 1-itAvy DU I
IC GRATE
CURB SPILLWAY
SECTION A -A
AV - 11=n 18"v18" v74"
COMPACT CATCH BASIN
JIL
0 611 is 21 31
SCALE: lit 1 1-011
F t6 spy
t i - - 0 0020? -TYP2_
sk PU Kem'ew
Kosen SUAA0 so( S"s
0
D
C\?
CD
C_)
CU co
Q
D PROP,
I N
g
EGON
1, %
Cam
6 L ALN
RENEWS: 12/31/19 1
idillb, .mmm
mw,mmw
IL
MLIft
Umuff- an m -mmMmIlsMESI&INEEIRS.
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING* LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485- 8383
FAX (541) 485- 8384
www.sswengineers.com
REVISIONS
date by
STORMWATER
I r% D ETAI LO
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
oa
8 of 10
rr
m
Im
WEST RAIN GARDEN SECTIO1
It 0 11 31 51
SCALE: 112" V-0"
VARIES. SEE STORMWATER PLAN
BUBBLER CATCH BASIN,
SEE DETAIL 5 & 61C8.0
NEW SIDEWALK -----
2" OVERFLOW
PIPE TO CURB
EXISTING CURB
AND PAVING
o
6" PERF. PIPE (SEE
x/ STORMWATER PLAN
FOR ELEVATIONS)
12" MINIMUM DRAIN ROCK
12" MINIMUM
GROWING MEDIUM
EXISTING CURB
AND PAVING
all 01:40MV000111
it 0 it 31 51
1 m iiiiiii A
SCALE: 1/2" = T-0"
1 i1 Al a is 1, §.-% R At_r' s 1 fit n
10'4% SEE STORMWATER PLAN
5'- 0" MIN.
6" OVERLFLOW
3 MAX
F_
EXISTING
LANDSCAPING
7-
X x
X/
lv
30 MIL PLASTIC
A xz
1_5 FILM BARRIER
Xr 5 4' X_Tz -K, )f- M., yJ/ M 4
W A, I :X1
rJ
y.
6" PERF. PIPE (SEE
ST RMWATER PLAN0
FOR ELEVATIONS)
TYPICAL EAST RAIN GARDEN SECTIO 4 SOUTH-EAST RAIN GARDEN SECTION
0 611 .{A 21 3' 0 611 11 21 31
1111111IN11111
11111
SCALE: V = T -O" SCALE: 1 1'-0"
BUBBLER CATCH BASIN PLAN
0 6" if 21 3t
SCALE: 1 1'-0"
BIKE PROOF, HEAVY
DUTY TRAFFIC GRATE
MODIFIED 18"x18"x24"
COMPACT CATCH BASIN
3'X18" CURB SPILLWAY
Kuut-, 1-itAvy DU I
IC GRATE
CURB SPILLWAY
SECTION A -A
AV - 11=n 18"v18" v74"
COMPACT CATCH BASIN
JIL
0 611 is 21 31
SCALE: lit 1 1-011
F t6 spy
t i - - 0 0020? -TYP2_
sk PU Kem'ew
Kosen SUAA0 so( S"s
0
D
C\?
CD
C_)
CU co
Q
D PROP,
I N
g
EGON
1, %
Cam
6 L ALN
RENEWS: 12/31/19 1
idillb, .mmm
mw,mmw
IL
MLIft
Umuff- an m -mmMmIlsMESI&INEEIRS.
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING* LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485- 8383
FAX (541) 485- 8384
www.sswengineers.com
REVISIONS
date by
STORMWATER
I r% D ETAI LO
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
oa
8 of 10 Exhibit 3A 8 of 11Attachment 3, Page 20 of 23
SYMBOLS
GRID LINE G F E D C B A
ROOM NUMBER 90s-21'
DOOR NUMBER 20'-10"
A 22'-6" FIELD VERIFY 46-1011
XX WINDOW NUMBER ALL PURPOSE
ROOM
GENERAL NOTES
1. EXISTING RESTROOMS ARE
TO BE UTILIZED FOR THIS
ADDITION.
5
6 )
a-
0
AWNING
F.11 "'iIZII LN [C9
L11
sk Plan Reviem-1
co cR,Q<,,M V\AcDU >Y"
i) PRop,
G I N 67
77
OREGON
y UyF 1,
A
RENEWS: 12131119-1
IL
100k
11L
IN& Im
O SW.
KvA% BLENMOORAgft
R-
mob
NIL ILnoL11IEL SIR
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING,, LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485- 8384
www.sswengineers.com
df Of
0 U) < z
If ^
W W
VJ J Cf) U)
d ZWD < W 00
W U
0 W
U) z
W ujz
LzLJ
5
U) W z
W U. 0
z 4.
0
W 00
00U) it
U
111,00
LAM
REVISIONS
date by
OVERALL
FLOOR PLAN
job 18-75551drawnRRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
1 0(
9 of 10
CU
0
i) PRop,
G I N 67
77
OREGON
y UyF 1,
A
RENEWS: 12131119-1
IL
100k
11L
IN& Im
O SW.
KvA% BLENMOORAgft
R-
mob
NIL ILnoL11IEL SIR
CIVIL -STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING,, LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541) 485-8383
FAX (541) 485- 8384
www.sswengineers.com
df Of
0 U) < z
If ^
W W
VJ J Cf) U)
d ZWD < W 00
W U
0 W
U) z
W ujz
LzLJ
5
U) W z
W U. 0
z 4.
0
W 00
00U) it
U
111,00
LAM
REVISIONS
date by
OVERALL
FLOOR PLAN
job 18-75551drawnRRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
1 0(
9 of 10 Exhibit 3A 9 of 11Attachment 3, Page 21 of 23
SYMBOLS
GRID LINE
DOOR NUMBER
8> WINDOW NUMBER
4 4
WINDOW, TYP.
WINDOW, TYP.
a
FEATURE STRIP WINDOW
OUTLINES, TYP.
FEATURE STRIP WINDOW
OUTLINES, TYP.
FEATURE FORMLINER
1545 AESTHETIC STONE
OUTLINE, PAINT
LIGHT/MEDIUM GRAY, TYP.
r__D PRop,,
IN EFS 0
E60
ti 3c
I ,
A
fRENEWS: 1213-1715 I
SOUTH ELEVATION
L_JNL_JpL --- now
SCALE: 3/ 16" = 1'-0"
26-7 1/211
T.O. WALL BEEaNMINEER'S.
o-, R,
FEATURE STRIP WINDOW
ggi- RE
r_AINT BLUE, SIMILAR
OUTLINES, TYP.
w," 21,
CIVIL- STRUCTURAL- BUILDING DESIGN
TO ROSEN SIGNAGE
SURVEYING LAND USE PLANNING
7,
20'-O"± T.O. 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
U LINE u ene Oregon 97401
178 '- T.O. 541)485-8383
AWNING ABOVE WINDOW/OUTLINE FAX (541) 485-8384
DOORS, TYP. 15'-8"±T.0, www.sswengineers.com
SOUTH ELEVATION
L_JNL_JpL --- now
SCALE: 3/ 16" = 1'-0"
I 1 ff % I Vs %a I v1 %Ivv4 ss V4..g %
1545 AESTHETIC STONE
OUTLINE, PAINT
LIGHT/MEDIUM GRAY, TYP.
2 - WEST ELEVATION
s(k PwA ftA2.02' 0 2' 4' 6' 10' 12' 14! qfVJ
SCALE: 3/ 16" 1'-0"
FINISH FLOOR
21'-0"
P T.O. WALL
PAINT BLUE, SIMILAR
TO ROSEN SIGNAGE
1 +11'- 11"±
V T.O. MEZZANINE
PAINT OFF WHITE,
MATCH EXISTING
BUILDING COLOR
01-011
FINISH FLOOR
M T*l I ril ky, I on a U.3 o I zo
Date Received
OCT 2 6 2018
Original Submittala_
FREVISIONS
date by
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
L%200
10 of 10
o-, R,
9
ggi- RE
r_AINT BLUE, SIMILAR
w," 21, TO ROSEN SIGNAGE
I 1 ff % I Vs %a I v1 %Ivv4 ss V4..g %
1545 AESTHETIC STONE
OUTLINE, PAINT
LIGHT/MEDIUM GRAY, TYP.
2 - WEST ELEVATION
s(k PwA ftA2.02' 0 2' 4' 6' 10' 12' 14! qfVJ
SCALE: 3/ 16" 1'-0"
FINISH FLOOR
21'-0"
P T.O. WALL
PAINT BLUE, SIMILAR
TO ROSEN SIGNAGE
1 +11'- 11"±
V T.O. MEZZANINE
PAINT OFF WHITE,
MATCH EXISTING
BUILDING COLOR
01-011
FINISH FLOOR
M T*l I ril ky, I on a U.3 o I zo
Date Received
OCT 2 6 2018
Original Submittala_
FREVISIONS
date by
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
job 18-7555
drawn RRW
date 10/25/18
checked MAC
filed
SHEET
L%200
10 of 10 Exhibit 3A 10 of 11Attachment 3, Page 22 of 23
18''X18"X24 GIBSON COMPACT CATCH BASIN
WITH BIDE PROOF, HEAVYDUTY GRATE
ACTING AS A BUBBLER TO STREET
u 1 PATCH; A PRAISEDSHAL CH , I i
rALTERNATIVE: ADD CURB 3fi5ir. S} azx
1 I
w
i 3=' 2 §z
tFl as
f
3I 8xHADD123CURBCUTSAT V-0"
o. lY,.. O.0 TO (E)CURBS
ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS W1
I / I ,12" CURB CUTS AT 8'- 0" O.C.It it
E) DOWNSPOUTS TOit9£PIPED ALONG WALL tt
k"
fi D U THROUGH 6" PIPE A L I
c
FTW
3 F
5'-6"X70' E. FILTRATION GARDEN B: REMOVE EXISTING
J
WASTEWATER CATCH BAST N
LANDSCAPI
Yf
GARDEN. SEE
G
DETAILETAIL PeLAX(X
YU IfiH RA IN F ILT RAT ION
3
t gsS s egalNOSTrRMWTRCATCH BA SIV
x s?
PROPOSED LOCATION OF z
NEW 24'DRIVEWAY ,.
t IM
4
it 11
t .
AQP -IALT
it 1 i
RAISED ASPHALT PATCH.; '
w a .,._.. ALTERNATIVE: ADD CURB
NOTES: t
A s t
1. Irrigation - All new landscape areas to receive permanent underground' EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO
BE CLOSEDirrigation. The irrigation system will be an automatic electrically controlled - - T R A C Tsystem.ItN) LANDSCAPE STRIP s: } GIBBON STEEL TORMWATERNITH6" CURB AN _ _._ a
GUT -ER ASPHALT SID - CATCH BASIN WITH A PUMP it itlA.S_PHALT 312'X40'FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN. D
f A,
g.4 # f /t 14'X10' MIN. S.E. FILTRATION GARDEN C: REMOVE1hEXISTINGLANDSCAPINANDREPLACEWITH RAIN
i {N) GIBSON ST L CATCH BASIN FILTRATION GARDEN, SEE DETAIL X1GX.X
BASINC
WITH BASINExistingTree :; ADD 12" CURB CUTS AT 8'- 0" {
O.0 TO (E) CURBS F
o mw g < ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS W/
M
f 12" CURB ctJTs AT s' -a" O.C.
Existing Tree aN) 4" PERFORATED FOUNDATI g
DRAIN ALONG INTERIOR {3F NE E) DOWNSPOUTS e
CONTINUOUS PERIMETER FOO ING . BE PIPED ALONG WALL a
i
PIPEN) GI N STEEL 18'X18"X24" iitTHROUGHS
C PACTATCH BASIN MODIFI ' • ` ' ` C
ABU Le) R. SEE DETNL >Q X • rniSDSDSDSDSDSDSD ------ ET L SD
J•jk Z \. M ala '^I`_. .;?
f'
i . is' n 1. ":k4£\..l
tiff :• 3
Z. xv:..... aC%
GATE '
3GATEp <. si
I
N) GIBSON STEEL 2" WEEP HOLE IN CURB
18"X18"x24' COMPACT
CATCH BASIN MODIFIED
AS A BUBBLER. SEE I
DETAIL XICX.X
1
REPLACE DISTURBED EXISTING
G G ET WAY
LANDSCAPING
pp l
a- OPP
PPItIt
E 111
SITE QEVELOPMENTi
i E ! 4/ li
rr rlr rr'
V=2) 0'- 0"
f
I &
Dpt 1(y)
16_00D S--nrz,
SLt-e pLaa Rewew
R,O SUr sar S k s
a l aF tl
Date Received
OCT 2 6 N, }
odglnal Submlttal
w
t)igfta!%signed by Mark
DN c-U S "
E marks nirius.com,
t5 "Rexioio&est
Mark Anderson $y- Produ4s" tiU-Director of
Commerdat onstrucGon,
CN Mark A1iderson
D$te zi :o. 22
REMUS
FOREST BYPRODUCTS
a
W :2
O
LLV
Z>-lali,r.l W
V
jMC13
0=
0
0)
mcg
y) W
Lid—I w zz
1— `e UJ 0
W W Z
U. z
W 00
W V 00
lt
z 0
REVISIONS
fob 18-7555
drawn SC/GC
state 9/28/18
checked SC/ MA
file
GI IEET
L 1.a
i, f
date by
S /
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
TTt?e l X X X MEcS /rs 3i z z*4 sd d s 3 r
r xtt
4 01"W"(1's-, a . a., it/S R>' ?' xd'H,.Motv'.RS,fx.s' if ,. .,rk», r
3 Existing to Remain
t
7 2" Cal. Acer rubrurn'Red Sunset' Red Maple
C 4 } .v9"
max„...'`v`.. #.,
5 Y' Y ? 3. 'SEr311111 - r . v' ,;"T s :t
12 1 Cornus Kelse ii Dwarf Refit ig Dogwood
t 22 3 Prunus lusitanCea'Portuguese Laurel" Portugal Laurel
w k 8 1 Prunus Otto Luyken Laurel Dwarf English Laurel
4 3 P€ lystiChum mar;iturn ° ord Fern' western SwDrd Fern
u F C4 k 5T4i4
a• C 3ry .f :: L 2iY »' c vF26Ye3 z f
sr } t r
775 4F pct Rufusjaiycinoides Creeping Rasbernj
V//j 1,255 a pot Junous Patens Spreading Rush
u 1 PATCH; A PRAISED SHAL CH , I i
rALTERNATIVE: ADD CURB 3fi5ir. S} azx
1 I
w
i 3=' 2 §z
tFl as
f
3I 8xHADD123CURBCUTSAT V-0"
o. lY,.. O.0 TO (E)CURBS
ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS W1
I / I ,12" CURB CUTS AT 8'- 0" O.C.It it
E) DOWNSPOUTS TOit9£PIPED ALONG WALL tt
k"
fi D U THROUGH 6" PIPE A L I
c
FTW
3 F
5'-6"X70' E. FILTRATION GARDEN B: REMOVE EXISTING
J
WASTEWATER CATCH BAST N
LANDSCAPI
Yf
GARDEN. SEE
G
DETAILETAIL PeLAX(X
YU I fiH RAI N F ILT RAT I ON
3
t gsS s egalNOSTrRMWTRCATCH BA SIV
x s?
PROPOSED LOCATION OF z
NEW 24'DRIVEWAY ,.
t IM
4
it 11
t .
AQP -IALT
it 1 i
RAISED ASPHALT PATCH.; '
w a .,._.. ALTERNATIVE: ADD CURB
NOTES: t
A s t
1. Irrigation - All new landscape areas to receive permanent underground' EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO
BE CLOSEDirrigation. The irrigation system will be an automatic electrically controlled - - T R A C Tsystem.ItN) LANDSCAPE STRIP s: } GIBBON STEEL TORMWATERNITH6" CURB AN _ _._ a
GUT -ER ASPHALT SID - CATCH BASIN WITH A PUMP it itlA.S_PHALT 312'X40'FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN. D
f A,
g.4 # f /t 14'X10' MIN. S.E. FILTRATION GARDEN C: REMOVE1hEXISTINGLANDSCAPINANDREPLACEWITHRAIN
i {N) GIBSON ST L CATCH BASIN FILTRATION GARDEN, SEE DETAIL X1GX.X
BASINC
WITH BASINExistingTree :; ADD 12" CURB CUTS AT 8'- 0" {
O.0 TO (E) CURBS F
o mw g < ALT: REPLACE (E) CURBS W/
M
f 12" CURB ctJTs AT s' -a" O.C.
Existing Tree aN) 4" PERFORATED FOUNDATI g
DRAIN ALONG INTERIOR {3F NE E) DOWNSPOUTS e
CONTINUOUS PERIMETER FOO ING . BE PIPED ALONG WALL a
i
PIPEN) GI N STEEL 18'X18"X24" iitTHROUGH S
C PACTATCH BASIN MODIFI ' • ` ' ` C
ABU Le) R. SEE DETNL >Q X • r niSDSDSDSDSDSDSD ------ ET L SD
J•jk Z \. M ala '^I`_. .;?
f'
i . is' n 1. ":k4£\..l
tiff :• 3
Z. xv:..... aC%
GATE '
3GATEp <. si
I
N) GIBSON STEEL 2" WEEP HOLE IN CURB
18"X18"x24' COMPACT
CATCH BASIN MODIFIED
AS A BUBBLER. SEE I
DETAIL XICX.X
1
REPLACE DISTURBED EXISTING
G G ET WAY
LANDSCAPING
pp l
a- OPP
PPItIt
E 111
SITE QEVELOPMENTi
i E ! 4/ li
rr rlr rr'
V=2) 0'- 0"
f
I &
Dpt 1(y)
16_00D S--nrz,
SLt-e pLaa Rewew
R,O SUr sar S k s
a l aF tl
Date Received
OCT 2 6 N, }
odglnal Submlttal
w
t)igfta!%signed by Mark
DN c-U S "
E marks nirius.com,
t5 "Rexioio&est
Mark Anderson $y- Produ4s" tiU-Director of
Commerdat onstrucGon,
CN Mark A1iderson
D$te zi :o. 22
REMUS
FOREST BYPRODUCTS
a
W :2
O
LLV
Z>-lali,r.l W
V
jMC13
0=
0
0)
mcg
y) W
Lid—I w zz
1— `e UJ 0
W W Z
U. z
W 00
W V 00
lt
z 0
REVISIONS
fob 18-7555
drawn SC/GC
state 9/28/18
checked SC/ MA
file
GI IEET
L 1.a
i, f
date by
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
Exhibit 3A 11 of 11Attachment 3, Page 23 of 23
Attachment 4, Page 1 of 5
Attachment 4, Page 2 of 5
Attachment 4, Page 3 of 5
Attachment 4, Page 4 of 5
Attachment 4, Page 5 of 5
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW + CASE NO. 811-18-000208-TYP2 + FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
+ AND ORDER NATURE OF THE APPLICATION
The applicant submitted a Site Plan Review application for construction of a 12,735 ft2 building
expansion of an existing light manufacturing facility located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard (Assessor’s Map 18-03-03-14, Tax Lots 2000 & 2001). The site is within the Employment Mixed
Use District and Sub-Area D of the Glenwood Riverfront Area. In accordance with Springfield
Development Code (SDC) Section 3.4-235.A, the applicant can request alternative design standards for required elements listed in the District. The Site Plan Review application is being
elevated to a Type III request requiring action by the Planning Commission before the subject
development can be approved for the site.
1. On October 26, 2018 the following application for Site Plan Review was accepted:
Allow for a construction of a 12,735 ft2 building expansion along with modified truck loading docks and maneuvering areas, stormwater management facilities and site
landscaping on an existing industrial site within the Employment Mixed Use District, Case Number 811-18-000208-TYP2, Becky Wiltse, SSW Engineers, applicant.
2. The application was submitted in accordance with Section 5.4-105 of the Springfield Development Code. Public notification and request for comments, pursuant to Section
5.1-130.B of the Springfield Development Code, has been provided.
3. On December 18, 2018 a public hearing on the Type III Site Plan Review request was
held. The Development & Public Works Department staff report including criteria of
approval, findings and recommendations, together with the testimony and submittals of the persons testifying at the hearing have been considered and are part of the record of
this proceeding.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of this record, the requested Site Plan Review application is consistent with the criteria of Sections 5.17-125 and 3.4-230.E of the Springfield Development Code. This general
finding is supported by the specific findings of fact, conclusions, and conditions of approval in the attached staff report (Exhibit A) attached hereto.
ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that Case Number 811-18-000208-
TYP2, Site Plan Review application, be approved with conditions. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on December 18, 2018.
EXPIRATION OF APPROVAL
This approval expires two (2) calendar years after the date of approval by the Planning
Commission unless extended in accordance with the provisions of SDC Section 5.17-140.
Attachment 5, Page 1 of 2
APPEAL
Pursuant to SDC Sections 5.1-135 and 5.2-155, this Type III decision is final unless appealed to the Springfield City Council in accordance with SDC Section 5.3-120. Only those persons who
participated either orally or in writing have standing to appeal the Planning Commission’s decision. An appeal application shall be filed with the Director within 15 calendar days of the Planning Commission’s decision (i.e. by 5:00 pm on January 2, 2019) to be considered valid.
The appeal application shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed by the City Council ($250.00). The filing fee will be refunded to the appellant if one or more of the appeal
allegations are upheld by the City Council, or if the decision is amended, remanded or reversed.
_______________________________ Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Attachment 5, Page 2 of 2