The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015 03 03 AIS RS DPW 2016-2020 CIP AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 3/3/2015 Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Staff Contact/Dept.: Jeff Paschall/DPW Staff Phone No: 541-726-1674 S P R I N G F I E L D PLANNING COMMISSION Estimated Time: 15 Minutes ITEM TITLE: 2016 - 2020 Capital Improvements Program A Community Reinvestment Plan ACTION REQUESTED: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). AFTER PUBLIC INPUT, FORWARD RECOMMENDATION OF THE 2016-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ISSUE STATEMENT: The draft of the City of Springfield’s 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has been completed by staff and has been reviewed by the Planning Commission during a work session on February 18, 2015. It is now being brought to the Planning Commission for final comments and a recommendation to forward the CIP to the City Council. The City Council will review in March, with final adoption scheduled for April 6, 2015. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Memorandum from February 18, 2015 work session. 2. Draft 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program 3. CIP Final Order DISCUSSION: The Draft City of Springfield 2016 – 2020 CIP was reviewed at the Planning Commission’s February 18, 2015 meeting. Staff will take final comments from the Planning Commission and forward comments and recommendation to the City Council. As a reference, the Planning Commission Memorandum from the February 18, 2015 work session is included as Attachment 1. After hearing public comments, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission support the draft 2016-2020 CIP and recommend it for Council adoption. COMMUNICATION MEMORANDUM Meeting Date: 2/18/2015 Meeting Type: Work Session Staff Contact/Dept.: Jeff Paschall/DPW Staff Phone No: 541-726-1674 S P R I N G F I E L D PLANNING COMMISSION Estimated Time: 30 minutes ITEM TITLE: 2016-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN ACTION REQUESTED: Review and provide direction for the recommended five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). ISSUE STATEMENT: The City of Springfield’s 2016-2020 CIP – A Community Reinvestment Plan has been drafted by staff and is now being forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Staff will bring the CIP back to the Planning Commission March 3, 2015 during the regular session for a recommendation to forward to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program – A Community Reinvestment Plan DISCUSSION: BACKGROUND: The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding and construction of City public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The underlying concept is to program, for future expenditure, all reasonably available sources of revenue. Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities plans, the CIP is also a vehicle to facilitate reconciliation, in the near term, of the competing priorities for scarce capital resources. The CIP is updated on a biennial schedule and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with long term planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future, and concludes with the adoption of the annual Capital Budget to appropriate funds for the ultimate construction of those facilities. Operation and maintenance costis separately included in the City’s budget. The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably be expected to be required in the next five years, refines those concepts, and provides a priority list of projects. Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvements identified in the various master plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council. Traditionally, the principal constraint applied in developing the CIP is the realistic availability of financial resources to fund a project This past year was another busy construction season as several capital projects were completed. Following is a list of some of the significant projects: Phase One of the McVay Highway Trunk Line Extension Attachment 1-1 South 2nd Street Sewer Replacement Phase Two of the 10th and “N” Street Sewer Upgrade Kellogg Storm Drainage 17th Street Storm Drainage Neighborhood Street Slurry Seal The public input process for the CIP began in November when citizens, organizations, and City staff were asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP. Staff reviewed and prioritized the projects, assembling a draft CIP for the Planning Commission review. After the Planning Commission reviews the CIP at work session and the March 3rd regular session, the City Council will review it in a work session on March 16, 2015, and will hold a public hearing prior to adoption on April 6, 2015. DISCUSSION: The 2016-2020 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages of planning, design, and construction. In addition, the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding identified. These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods, providing for economic growth, improving traffic safety, mobility and access, complying with environmental standards, and maintaining the existing city infrastructure. The following is a list of the most significant projects in the CIP and currently budgeted: CMOM Planning and Implementation – The City continues to make the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of older wastewater pipes throughout the City to reduce leakage of ground water into the system as a high priority in the Capital Improvement Program. In 2010, The City completed rehabilitation of the basins identified in the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) adopted in 2001 by the City and the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC). Rather than update the WWFMP, the City, in conjunction with MWMC, is moving to a Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance (CMOM) program to remain in compliance with both State and Federal regulations. This program will be utilized to identify future preservation needs, as may an update to the Local Wastewater Management Plan. Gateway Street Overlay – The City has received approximately $1.5 million in Surface Transportation Program funding for pavement preservation work on Gateway Street. Gateway Street is an extremely busy minor arterial providing critical commercial access and serving over 22,000 vehicles a day. The current Surface Condition Index (SCI) is 38.6, which equates to a rating of poor. The receipt of this federal funding is timely and critical to preserving Gateway Street, as further deterioration of the pavement structure would most likely result in a full depth reconstruction that would be extremely costly, and have major impact to the commercial and retail community. The anticipated project includes 0.97 miles of pavement preservation as well as ADA and signal upgrades. Franklin Boulevard Sanitary Sewer System Expansion – The expansion of the Franklin Boulevard Trunk Sewer extends the Glenwood wastewater system Attachment 1-2 from the end of the existing trunk line in Franklin Boulevard south to the Urban Growth Boundary. The City Council has made the redevelopment of Glenwood and the reconstruction of Franklin Boulevard a priority to promote development and community growth. The City has recently applied for funding to begin construction of the roadway project, elevating the priority for the sewer extension project. Funding to begin the planning and design phase was programmed and budgeted in FY 2013. Construction began in FY 2014 and will continue into FY 2015 ensuring the sewer extension project is completed ahead of any street construction work. Funding for the project is secured through wastewater user fee collections. Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction –The NEPA process is complete, with the project receiving a Categorical Exclusion (CE). The Franklin concept endorsed by Council in 2008 envisions sections of improved arterial and sections of a multi-way boulevard treatment that includes access lanes and parking adjacent to the arterial. Project elements include roundabout intersections, median control, relocated EmX station platforms, space preserved for future dedicated EmX guideways, and provision of high quality bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The City has received $6 million through the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018 STIP), and will match that with a $3.5 to $5 million Oregon Transportation Infrastructure Bank loan to complete a Phase 1 improvement from the Franklin/McVey intersection to a logical termini to the west. Consultant design and right of acquisition contracts have recently been approved, with construction anticipated in 2016. Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement – The Over-Under Channel is part of the City’s stormwater system serving mid-Springfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126. The name of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel. A portion of the piped system, from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel at Moffitt School, is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. Staff has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion and minor failures. In FY 2011, the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system and identify the amount of additional funds needed for construction. Investigation and hydraulic study work has been completed, with design and citizen outreach efforts currently underway. Mill Race Stormwater Facility – The Mill Race Stormwater Facility Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from the industrial/commercial sub-basin south of Main Street. The project will include open vegetative treatment for problematic pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race. It will also provide detention for stormwater and enhance planned public amenities in this area. This project will address water quality of stormwater flow entering the Mill Race. In addition, the City of Springfield is working with Willamalane to incorporate park and trail features as part of the design. In addition to the above major projects, several other projects are also already Attachment 1-3 budgeted and scheduled, including: the Glenwood Connector Path Extension, Main Street Pedestrian Crossings, and the 19th Street Sewer Upgrade. With stable wastewater and stormwater funding for capital preservation and rehabilitation, one of the most significant issues in the CIP outlook is identifying a stable revenue stream for street preservation. Capital preservation activities on the City’s street system have been greatly curtailed over the past 6 years, as current revenue streams have been insufficient to support these activities. Significant cuts were made in both FY 2009 and FY 2010, with no preservation projects occurring on the local street system except those funded through State or Federal grant programs. The State and Federal programs typically require awarded funds be used for preserving or enhancing regionally significant collector and arterial class street segments. This requires the City to identify other revenue sources for a majority of the City’s streets. During FY 2015, the City Council directed staff to identify funds for a slurry seal project on local streets. A project was completed for just over $128,000 effectively slurry sealing approximately 3.4 lane miles of local class streets, or 1.5% of the system inventory. The outlook for street preservation projects in the 2016-2020 CIP is still inadequate, and the prolonged lack of dedicated preservation funding has led to a severe decline overall street condition directly correlating to the need for higher cost reconstruction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The CIP does not carry budget authority. It is, however a valuable planning tool used to guide staff, the Budget Committee, and the City Council in creating the annual budget. Future maintenance impacts of projects are estimated where possible. Attachment 1-4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................1 SECTION I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CIP Goals ...........................................................................................................................7 CIP Project Development and Review Process.................................................................7 Types of Capital Needs......................................................................................................8 Project Selection Resources..............................................................................................8 Facilities Plans Wastewater Master Plan .....................................................................................8 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.......................................................................9 Building and Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work............................10 Urban Renewal Plans ......................................................................................................11 Land Use Plans Public Facilities and Services Plan......................................................................11 TransPlan ...........................................................................................................12 Refinement Plans...............................................................................................12 SECTION II FUNDING Capital Project Funding...................................................................................................16 Systems Development Charges ......................................................................................17 External Revenue Sources...............................................................................................18 Other Revenues ..............................................................................................................19 City Accounting Funds Used for Capital Resources ........................................................19 SECTION III FINANCIAL SUMMARIES Financial Summaries—All Programs...............................................................................23 SECTION IV PROJECTS Projects Table of Contents..............................................................................................25 Master Project Map........................................................................................................27 APPENDIX A Matrices ........................................................................................................................172 Attachment 2-1 Attachment 2-2 INTRODUCTION The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP)is a fiveyear Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the nearterm program for funding and construction of City public facilities.A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources.The underlying concept is to program,for future expenditure,all reasonably available sources of revenue. Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities plans,the CIP is used as the vehicle to facilitate reconciliation,in the near term,of the competing priorities for scarce capital resources. The CIP is updated on a biennial schedule and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with long term planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future, and concludes with the adoption of the annual Capital Budget to appropriate funds for the ultimate construction of those facilities.Operation and maintenance costis separately included in the City’s budget.The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably be expected to be required in the next five years,refines those concepts,and provides a priority list of projects.Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvements identified in the various master plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council.Traditionally,the principal constraint applied in developing the CIP is the realistic availability of financial resources to fund a project. Once included in the CIP,the next step is to prepare the City’s annual Capital Budget which draws from the first year of the CIP,with such modifications as are necessary or prudent to respond to immediate concerns and the often fluid nature of funding opportunities.In preparation of the capital budget it is important to consider not only the immediate availability of financial resources,but also the availability of resources to manage design and construction.This may mean staff resources to conduct those activities in house,or staff resources to manage consultants who take on responsibility for design and construction management.A successful capital budget must be mindful of budgeting only those projects or project phases that the City has the staff resources to deliver.The Development and Public Works Department maintains two capital project delivery groups,one for the delivery of local projects presented in this document and the second for delivery of regional projects for the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission capital improvement program.At present the local capital projects and regional capital projects groups coordinate project management and support resources. The 20162020 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages of planning,design,and construction.In addition,the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding identified.These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods,providing for economic growth, improving traffic safety,mobility and access,complying with environmental standards,and maintaining the existing city infrastructure. Attachment 2-3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW The public input process for the CIP typically begins in October when citizens,organizations,and City staff are asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP.The Planning Commission and the City Council then review the draft CIP and a public hearing is held prior to Council adoption. OCTOBER:CIP PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS STARTS OCTOBER:CAPITAL PROJECT REQUESTS GO TO PUBLIC AND CITY DEPARTMENTS NOVEMBER/DECEMBER:PUBLISH INTERNAL DRAFT CIP NOVEMBER TO JANUARY:BEGIN INTERNAL DRAFT CIP REVIEW FEBRUARY:PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS DRAFT CIP MARCH/APRIL:CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION REVIEW AND PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT CIP APRIL/MAY:CAPITAL BUDGET PRESENTED TO BUDGET COMMITTEE The City’s final commitment to spend public funds occurs through the annual City budget process. Although the CIP is the starting point for the annual Capital Budget,the projects actually budgeted each year can vary somewhat from those proposed in the CIP. PROJECT CATEGORIZATION Projects in the CIP are grouped first by the relevant infrastructure system (stormwater,transportation, wastewater,buildings and facilities,and miscellaneous)and then by the status of project funding.For historical purposes,the CIP also includes projects that have been completed within the past year. Project funding includes four categories:In Process,Funding Programmed,Funding Partially Programmed and Funding Not Programmed.In Process are those projects that are currently in the Capital Improvement Program,in the Capital Budget,and in planning,design and/or construction. Funding Programmed is the category of those highest priority projects for which most or all of the funding has been clearly identified,and the City has taken appropriate steps to make sure the funding will be available in a timely fashion.Partially funded projects are those higher priority projects where a portion of the funding has been identified but additional funding is needed before the project can proceed.Projects that do not have any funding programmed are multiple levels of existing priority projects with funding sources that are presently unknown.The proposed CIP reflects prioritizations by staff based on a set of objective criteria designed to maximize the efficiency of using available capital resources. The following is a list of the City’s most significant projects in the CIP: CMOM Planning and Implementation –The City continues to make the repair,rehabilitation,or replacement of older wastewater pipes throughout the City to reduce leakage of ground water into the system as a high priority in the Capital Improvement Program.In 2010,The City completed rehabilitation of the basins identified in the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP)adopted in 2001 by the City and the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC).Rather than update the WWFMP,the City,in conjunction with MWMC,is moving to a Capacity Management Operations and Maintenance (CMOM)program to remain in line with both State and Federal Attachment 2-4 regulations.This program may,in the future,identify additional preservation needs,as may an update to the Local Wastewater Management Plan. Gateway Street Overlay –The City has received approximately $1.5 million in Surface Transportation Program funding for pavement preservation work on Gateway Street.Gateway Street is an extremely busy minor arterial providing critical commercial access and serving over 22,000 vehicles a day.The current Surface Condition Index (SCI)is 38.6,which equates to a rating of poor.The receipt of this federal funding is timely and critical to preserving Gateway Street,as further deterioration of the pavement structure would most likely result in a full depth reconstruction that would be extremely costly,and have major impact to the commercial and retail community.The anticipated project includes 0.97 miles of pavement preservation as well as ADA and signal upgrades. Franklin Boulevard Sanitary Sewer System Expansion –The expansion of the Franklin Boulevard Trunk Sewer extends the Glenwood wastewater system from the end of the existing trunk line in Franklin Boulevard south to the Urban Growth Boundary.The City Council has made the redevelopment of Glenwood and the reconstruction of Franklin Boulevard a priority to promote development and community growth.The City has recently applied for funding to begin construction of the roadway project,elevating the priority for the sewer extension project.Funding to begin the planning and design phase was programmed and budgeted in FY 2013.Construction began in FY 2014 and will continue into FY 2015 ensuring the sewer extension project is completed ahead of any street construction work. Funding for the project is secured through wastewater user fee collections. Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction –The NEPA process is complete,with the project receiving a Categorical Exclusion (CE).The Franklin concept endorsed by Council in 2008 envisions sections of improved arterial and sections of a multiway boulevard treatment that includes access lanes and parking adjacent to the arterial.Project elements include roundabout intersections,median control, relocated EmX station platforms,space preserved for future dedicated EmX guideways,and provision of high quality bicycle and pedestrian facilities.The City has received $6 million through the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (20152018 STIP),and will match that with a $3.5 to $5 million Oregon Transportation Infrastructure Bank loan to complete a Phase 1 improvement from the Franklin/McVey intersectionto a logical termini to the west.Consultant design and right of acquisition contracts have recently been approved,with construction anticipated in 2016. OverUnder Channel Pipe Replacement –The OverUnder Channel is part of the City’s stormwater system serving midSpringfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126.The name of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel.A portion of the piped system,from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel at Moffitt School,is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP)installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.Staff has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion and minor failures.In FY 2011,the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system and Attachment 2-5 identify the amount of additional funds needed for construction.Investigation and hydraulic study work has been completed,with design and citizen outreach efforts currently underway. Mill Race Stormwater Facility –The Mill Race Stormwater Facility Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from the industrial/commercial subbasin south of Main Street.The project will include open vegetative treatment for problematic pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race.It will also provide detention for stormwater and enhance planned public amenities in this area.This project will address water quality of stormwater flow entering the Mill Race.In addition,the City of Springfield is working with Willamalane to incorporate park and trail features as part of the design. FINANCING There are limited sources of funding for capital activity.The principal sources include revenues derived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes)which function like user fees.By Council direction, these are preferentially devoted to preservation of existing infrastructure.The second major source is Systems Development Charges (SDC),which are designed to recover,from development,the cost impact that development has on infrastructure,both existing and needed to meet the future demands of development.A large portion of these revenues must,by law,be devoted to capacity increasing capital activity.Only that portion of SDC revenue,which is derived from a reimbursement fee,may be expended for preservation of existing infrastructure.A third major source of capital funding is external contributions,in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans,payments by developers for specific improvements,and assessments of benefitted property owners,also for specific improvements.Other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts, and revenue from internally generated charges also play a role (at present a minor one). In addition to funding direct project construction,Local Wastewater and Drainage SDC revenues fund debt service payments for bonds sold to fund prior projects.These projects include both those that increased capacity as well as smaller preservation projects as part of continuing preservation programs. The City sold local wastewater revenue bonds in 2009 and storm drainage revenue bonds in 2010. Wastewater Bond proceeds were dedicated to completing required rehabilitation projects as well as expanding sanitary sewer service into unserved areas within the Urban Growth Boundary to promote future growth.Stormwater revenue bonds are dedicated to complete several major stormwater initiatives,and a number of capital projects related to the City’s obligation to address stormwater quality,permitting and threatened fish impacts.1 Capital preservation activities on the City’s street system have been greatly curtailed over the past 6 years,as current revenue streams have been insufficient to support these activities.Significant cuts were made in both FY 2009 and FY 2010,with no preservation projects occurring on the local street system except those funded through State or Federal grant programs.The State and Federal programs typically require awarded funds be used for preserving or enhancing regionally significant collector and 1 For bonding purposes,the local wastewater and stormwater utilities are combined into a single sewer utility. Attachment 2-6 arterial class street segments.This requires the City to identify other revenue sources for a majority of the City’s streets.During FY 2015,the City Council directed staff to identify funds for a slurry seal project on local streets.A project was completed for just over $128,000 effectively slurry sealing approximately 3.4 lane miles of local class streets,or 1.5%of the system inventory.The outlook for street preservation projects in the 20162020 CIP is still inadequate,and the prolonged lack of dedicated preservation funding has led to a severe decline overall street condition directly correlating to the need for higher cost reconstruction. Additionally,SDC reserves remain very low forcing many large system expansion projects identified in the adopted master plans to be projected further out in the CIP than originally planned.Recovery of the SDC funds has been slow,but the positive trend that started in FY 2014 has continued into FY 2015.By continuing to postpone projects SDC reserves can be built back up and permit the construction of these system and expansion projects supporting community growth and development. External sources,such as intergovernmental grants,or developer or benefitted property owner contributions,are an important,but highly volatile funding source.Generally they do not form the basis for concluding a project can be funded,but rather when such funding sources develop,can be a trigger to increase the priority of a project.Recently,the City has had some success in developing external funding for isolated projects,such as the Gateway Street Overlay,Franklin Boulevard,Glenwood Connector Path,and Glenwood Riverfront Path.Future success is highly dependent upon the fiscal and monetary policies of other levels of government.For example,the current Congressional prohibition on the practice of “earmarking”funds has reduced the possibility of securing direct appropriations from the Congress,but may positively affect the ability of the City to secure federal grants. There are a number of projects added to the CIP for which there are no identified funding sources. Because of limited revenues,even many of the projects traditionally listed in the CIP cannot be funded during the next five years.These projects are shown in the CIP to make it possible for the Council and the public to better understand the scope of the City’s infrastructure need and compare that need to the resources presently available,and provide the basis for developing longterm capital financing strategies. Following is a chart showing annual project funding needs and resources. Attachment 2-7 CONCLUSION The Capital Improvement Program serves as a guide for the City’s needed improvements.It is shaped by citizen input,the best professional judgment of staff and outside experts,and estimates of the City’s projected financial resources.The CIP is subject to biennial review and revision.The direction provided by this document helps the City of Springfield target its resources to capital improvements which best serve the needs of the citizens of Springfield.The CIP is available on the web for public viewing at http://www.springfieldor.gov/DPW/CIP.htm. 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 RevenueExpendituresRevenueExpendituresRevenueExpendituresRevenueExpendituresRevenueExpenditures2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Capital Improvement Program Revenue and Expenditures 2016 2020 Stormwater Wastewater Transportation Buildings/Property Developer $shown is 000 Attachment 2-8 CIP GOALS The goals of the CIP include: 1) Providing a balanced program for capital improvements given reasonably anticipated funding over a fiveyear or greater planning period and identifying the extent to which resources can meet capital needs; 2) Improving neighborhoods; 3) Providing for economic and community growth; 4) Improving safety,access,and mobility of transportation modes; 5) Complying with environmental standards and improving environmental quality; 6) Maintaining the existing City infrastructure;and 7) Protect public health and safety. CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW PROCESS Capital improvements must be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Comprehensive Plan, including the Public Facilities and Services Plan and TransPlan (the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan),and all other Council adopted plans and policies.The relevant plans are listed in a subsequent section of this report. In general,all Capital Projects included in the CIP meet one or more of the following criteria: 1) Project addresses State or Federal laws or regulations to eliminate or reduce the potential for environmental degradation or health hazards or to address issues that affect the safety and general welfare of the community. 2) Project maintains existing assets,extends the useful life of assets,or improves or expands infrastructure to facilitate community development and/or improve operations. 3) Project responds to requests from citizens,neighborhood groups,advisory committees,or government bodies,and provides a public benefit. 4) Project is included in local and/or regional infrastructure plans. Once the need for a capital improvement has been determined,those improvements are evaluated with a project prioritization matrix (Appendix A)that has been developed for evaluating and ranking projects within each system to prioritize programming of scarce capital funding.In the adopted CIP only those capital improvements which are funded within the current projections for the appropriate revenue streams are considered adopted.Projects for which the funding is not identified or programmed are shown strictly for informational purposes.Historically,the CIP has not attempted to consider whether or not the City has the operating resources (either staff or funding for consultants to manage projects), necessary to advance a particular project. Attachment 2-9 TYPES OF CAPITAL NEED Rehabilitation &Preservation of Existing Capital Assets The CIP reflects the broad direction of the City Council as set forth in the Financial Management Policies to preserve existing capital assets before they fall into disrepair and require expensive rehabilitation or replacement.Preservation is an important tool used to protect or extend a City asset’s useful life.If preservation is not completed on a regular and timely basis,the asset will deteriorate prematurely and its benefit to the community will be lost.In that event reconstruction may be required.Reconstruction costs are frequently multiple times the cost of preservation and maintenance,particularly for street surfaces. Rehabilitation is necessary for some capital assets and the City must demonstrate fiscal responsibility by planning for this need.Inclusion of these projects in the CIP is a necessary task to plan for that rehabilitation. New Capital Facilities and Capacity Enhancements As the City reaches outward into the Urban Growth Boundary or anticipates infill or increased density of development in the city limits,the need to plan for expansion of capital assets and provide safe and efficient capital facilities increases.New streets are necessary to provide for the movement of goods and people and access to property in developing areas.In addition,wastewater and stormwater systems are necessary to protect water quality and the environment in order to preserve the health,welfare, and safety of the community. PROJECT SELECTION RESOURCES The following is a list of various plans with descriptive summaries that guide the decisions made about CIP project choice.The City draws a distinction between facilities plans,which focus on facility needs and how systems function,and land use plans,which provide more general guidance.General guidance can inform the development of facilities plans,and can constrain facility development to conform to the policy set of the land use planning document.(TransPlan is somewhat of an exception to these distinctions,since it is a land use plan that also serves as a facilities plan and does contain specific project guidance.) FACILITIES PLANS Wastewater Master Plan (2008) The City of Springfield provides wastewater collection and conveyance services by way of a system of pipelines and pump stations that it owns and operates.Along with the City of Eugene,Springfield discharges to a regional collection and treatment system owned by the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC).Springfield’s Wastewater Master Plan provides an assessment of existing and future needs for the City’s collection system.Because the City’s system connects to the regional system,the Master Plan must consider and reflect results of the MWMC’s Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP),which identifies system maintenance and rehabilitation activities for the Attachment 2-10 wastewater collection and treatment facilities in the EugeneSpringfield metropolitan area.Therefore, Springfield’s plan provides a local solution for existing and future needs within the context of the similar regional solution. The Master Plan is intended to identify existing and future capacity constraints,determine capacity requirements and identify system improvements necessary to meet the City’s projected population and employment growth through the 2025 planning year.The Department of Environmental Quality has issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit (#102486)for Springfield, Eugene and MWMC,which includes conditions under which treated wastewater can be discharged to the Willamette River.Included in those conditions is a requirement that Springfield,Eugene and MWMC fully implement a wet weather flow management strategy to comply with the State’s Bacteria Standard, which prohibits storm related overflows.The standard states that no untreated wastewater can be discharged to the waters of the State or US,except under the following conditions;for flows greater than those occurring for the 24hour duration,1 in 5 year winter and 1 in 10year summer storms.These conditions formed the baseline assumptions for overflow avoidance in this plan and were consistent with the assumptions of the WWFMP,which included a number of flow reduction projects that were completed before the December 31,2009 regulatory deadline. Subsequent to the development and completion of the WWFMP,the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,in response to an objection from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),is no longer permitted to include the exceptions for untreated wastewater discharges as provided by the State’s Bacteria Standard.DEQ is currently placing a prohibition on all overflows from wastewater conveyance systems and associated pump stations.This regulatory change places additional burden on the conveyance system operation and maintenance to eliminate all wet weather related overflows.The NPDES permit for the regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled for renewal in 2017 and will contain the prohibition of all overflows absent a change of policy from EPA. Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (2008) In 2008,the City Council adopted a comprehensive Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP).The purpose of this document is to provide a guide to plan for more comprehensive,efficient,and multi objective management of the City’s stormwater system.The majority of the City’s stormwater runoff drains through an integrated network of pipes and open channels,discharging either directly to the main stem Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or through outfalls to a tributary of either of those rivers. Prior to the SWFMP,the City typically designed and constructed facilities for treating and conveying stormwater runoff on an individual development or siteby site basis.In addition,as is typical for nearly all cities,most of the City’s stormwater collection and conveyance system was historically designed and built with the sole objective of addressing flooding issues. Most of the major portions of the City’s stormwater drainage system infrastructure were built during the 1960s and as development increased,the system was retrofitted with extensions and additions. Most of the main conveyance system was not upsized to facilitate the increased flows associated with full City build out. Attachment 2-11 The City also has a Counciladopted Stormwater Management Plan which establishes goals,policies and implementation actions to address water quality and management of the stormwater system,including open waterways within the City’s jurisdiction.This plan is required and approved by the Department of Environmental Quality as part of its issuance and management of the City’s stormwater discharge permit.Additionally,the Willamette River and McKenzie River (a tributary to the Willamette River)are listed on the State’s 303(d)list indicating that water quality standards for specific pollutants in these streams are currently not being met.The City must address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) limitations on the level of certain pollutants (temperature,bacteria,and mercury)through implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan and the TMDL Implementation Plan.These plans and requirements impact the nature and design of capital projects that are constructed to manage stormwater. Building &Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work Plan (2011) This plan identifies and addresses capital improvement needs at City owned buildings,including:City Hall,Springfield Justice Center,Springfield Museum,fire stations,Development and Public Works operations buildings,and the Depot.The Plan,which is in its first year of development,derives from a report prepared in 2006 by the consulting firm DLR Group.That report provided a snapshot of repairs and asset preservation improvements that are immediately evident,and which have been deferred for various reasons,together with ongoing maintenance needs and necessary replacement of building systems expected to reach the end of their useful life during the next 30 years. The City continues to face several critical building/facilities operations,maintenance and preservation issues.The DLR Buildings Condition Report (DLR)identified $600K deferred/backlog facilities repair needs and $300K ongoing annual maintenance/preservation needs.In FY 2009,the City implemented an Internal Building Preservation Charge with intent to program $300k annually for ongoing preservation and $200k to start addressing the backlog projects.Since inception,the Internal Building Preservation Charge has generated just over $250k per year through FY 2014 dedicated to projects,with just under $269k anticipated in FY 2015.The first priority of staff charged with this capital program was to develop the City Buildings/Facilities Work Plan inclusive of all City Fire Stations,City Hall,Springfield Justice Center,Development and Public Works operations facilities,Springfield Depot,Carter Building.This 5 year work plan is reviewed and updated annually,and used as the basis for project budgeting each fiscal year. Additionally,there are other project management responsibilities related to public buildings and facilities maintenance and preservations that have been identified through previously adopted CIP documents,such as preservation projects at the Depot and Booth Kelly and demolition of the Carpenter shed and gun range at Booth Kelly.Any future building needs such as new fire station construction will be addressed through the CIP process. Attachment 2-12 URBAN RENEWAL PLANS Downtown Urban Renewal Plan (2007) The primary goal of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is to assist in the revitalization of business and elimination of blight in the downtown area.The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to obtain these goals.The plan’s projects include: Improvements to streets,sidewalks,bike ways and pathways; Improvements to water,storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure; Improve the visual appearance of the downtown area; Improve and expand the existing public parking facilities; Financial assistance to rehabilitate existing properties and encourage new construction; Acquisition and disposal of land for public improvements. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan (1999,updated 2004) The primary goal of the Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan is to eliminate blighting influences found in the Renewal Area.The Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to obtain these goals.The plan’s projects include: Promote private development and redevelopment; Rehabilitate building stock; Improvements to streets,sidewalks,bike ways,pathways,streetscapes,parks,and open spaces; Utility improvements; Parking; Public facilities; Housing; Public signage and community gateway entrance improvements. LAND USE PLANS Public Facilities and Services Plan The Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP)is an element of the Eugene Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).It is the element which identifies significant facilities in general terms and confirms that those facilities are consistent with the planning policies set out in the Metro Plan.The projects identified in the PFSP are generally a subset of the projects contained in the various facilities plans.The PFSP does not identify transportation projects,which are covered in TransPlan,but does identify wastewater and stormwater projects,among others.The PFSP does not,nor should it,identify every project;it includes onlythose projects identified as significant on the basis of definitions set forth in the PFSP. Attachment 2-13 TransPlan (2002) The EugeneSpringfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan)is the transportation element of the EugeneSpringfield Metropolitan Area General Plan.While adopted as a refinement to MetroPlan, and therefore technically a land use plan,TransPlan is also intended as a system facilities plan that guides local and regional transportation system planning and development in the Eugene Springfield metropolitan area.TransPlan also serves as the City’s facilities plan as well as its transportation system plan,or TSP for identifying projects needed to meet the transportation demand of residents over a 20 year planning horizon while addressing transportation issues and making changes that can contribute to improvements in the region’s quality of life and economic vitality.In addition to roadway facilities, TransPlan also calls for significant increases in the amount and convenience of transit service,increases in the amount of bikeways and sidewalks,and an expansion of the existing program of transportation demand management (TDM)travel incentives.TransPlan is a jointly adopted document that serves as a local transportation system plan for both Springfield and Eugene.In 2011,Springfield and Eugene adopted separate urban growth boundaries.One outcome of that action is that the City has developed and adopted (2014)a new Springfieldspecific Transportation System Plan (TSP)as part of implementation of a City stand alone urban growth boundary.The current TransPlan will remain in force until the new TSP is adopted by Council and acknowledged by the State,which is anticipated to occur in calendar 2012.The CIP includes a project describing the costs and resources available to Springfield to complete the TSP Project.The TransPlan theme,‘Improving Our Transportation Choices’, reflects the plan’s focus to provide citizens with a range of safe,convenient,and efficient transportation options characterized by smooth connections between modes.TransPlan strives to support the need to diversify transportation choices,while avoiding reliance on any one transportation mode or method of managing the transportation system.TransPlan establishes the framework upon which all public agencies can make consistent and coordinated planning decisions regarding inter and intra jurisdictional transportation. Refinement Plans Downtown Refinement Plan (1986,updated 2005) The primary goal of the Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan is to provide goals and policies through which downtown Springfield may become a more vital and attractive place to shop,conduct business, and recreate.Goals were set forth to guide this revitalization.These goals are: Create a pedestrian and transit friendly downtown; Preserve the past; Reconnect to key natural resource features; Encourage evening activity in the downtown; Create new opportunities for office,commercial,residential,civic,and mixed uses; Ensure adequate parking; Attachment 2-14 Create civic gathering places; Create downtown partnerships; Identify catalyst projects; Create a positive identity for downtown. East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan (1992) The primary goal of the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living within the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood.Goals were set to address these concerns.The goals of the neighborhood plan are: Encourage a variety of land uses and housing opportunities; Provide a safe and effective transportation system; Provide and maintain public facilities and services; Improve the character and identity of the neighborhood. East Main Refinement Plan (1988) The primary goal of the East Main Refinement Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living within the East Main Refinement Plan Neighborhood.Goals were set to address these concerns.The goals of the refinement plan are: Provide affordable housing for all segments of the population; Allow flexibility for large vacant areas that are surrounded by mixed uses; Provide for commercial centers which meet the needs of the community; Encourage additional industrial development which is compatible with surrounding uses; Enhance and develop the natural and built environment; Develop recreational facilities which fill the needs of the area; Create a safe and efficient street system; Provide safe,efficient and convenient bicycle facilities. Gateway Refinement Plan (1992) The primary goal of the Gateway Refinement Plan is to refine and augment the Eugene Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan to provide specificity for sitespecific land use decisions,and to identify the near and longterm public facilities needs to support development and livability of the area.This plan incorporates goals and policies,controls and design standards in areas where protections need to be stringent.These elements are: Community and Economic Development; Residential; Commercial; Industrial; Attachment 2-15 Natural Assets,Open Space/Scenic Areas,and Recreation; Historic Resources; Transportation;and Public Facilities. Glenwood Refinement Plan (1999,updated 2012) The primary goal of the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan Update was to facilitate redevelopment in Springfield.The plan establishes a preferred outcome for the Glenwood Riverfront based on the successful implementation of the Plan’s vision,policies,and standards.The plan identifies the density, mix,type,and location of housing,employment land,and public open space and the required level of public facilities to support projected demand.The community vision for Glenwood is articulated in the following goal statements: o Improve public connections to the Willamette River. o Establish inviting public spaces,including parks,plazas,and multi use paths. o Encourage aesthetically pleasing,sustainable buildings and sites that are contextsensitive and oriented to human activity. o Provide opportunities for the installation,display,and creation of public art. o Allow for a mix of uses suitable to the unique development opportunities in Glenwood. o Provide opportunities for the development of a variety of housing types to meet the needs of a range of households. o Facilitate opportunities for businesses to provide goods and services to local,regional, statewide,national,and international markets. o Restore,enhance,and protect the ecological function of natural resources,and increase public awareness of these resources. o Protect the public from potential natural and manmade hazards. o Celebrate Glenwood’s contributions to the region’s historic development. o Enhance the transportation system to improve safety,convenience,and movement for all modes of travel,including vehicles,trains,public transit,bicycles,and pedestrians. o Provide a full range of urban public facilities and services for redevelopment and new development. o Facilitate redevelopment while addressing the consequences of change to existing residents and businesses. MidSpringfield Refinement Plan (1986) The primary goal of the MidSpringfield Refinement Plan is to assign sitespecific plan designations in areas designated “Mixed Use”on the Metro Plan Diagram and to recognize the needs of industrial and commercial land uses and to resolve conflicts with residential neighbors.Goals were set to address these concerns.The goals of the refinement plan are: Maximize industrial development potential of industrial designated land; Encourage functional commercial development on commercially designated land along Main and 42nd Streets; Preserve the integrity of residentially designated areas; Provide a safe and efficient transportation system; Attachment 2-16 Provide a means to implement the goals and policies of this refinement plan. Q Street Refinement Plan (1987) The primary goal of the Q Street Refinement Plan is to guide land use decisions in the Q Street area. Land use decisions will be made to follow certain goals.The majority of the goals for the refinement plan are: Provide vacant and re developable land to allow for commercial development; Encourage commercial shopping centers where safe and efficient vehicular access can be provided; Participate in efforts to maintain and enhance existing residential neighborhoods and attract medium and high density residential developments; Implement mitigating measures for noise,dust,and traffic impacts to residential areas; Encourage private and public recreational facilities in high density areas; Buffer multiple family development from single family development and residential land from commercial land through site plan review; Work with Willamalane to provide adequate park and recreational facilities to residents; Discourage through truck traffic in residentially designated areas; Encourage bicycle path into the design of recreational and new residential facilities. Attachment 2-17 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING There are limited sources of funding for capital activity.The principal sources include 1)revenues derived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes)which function like user fees;2)Systems Development Charges (SDCs),which are designed to recover from development the cost impact that development has on public infrastructure;3)external contributions,in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans,payments by developers for specific improvements,and assessments of benefitted property owners,also for specific improvements;and 4)other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts,and revenue from internally generated charges,which at present play a minor role in capital project funding.The City of Springfield’s accounts for these four revenue sources are in special revenue or enterprise funds,such as the Street Capital Fund,Systems Development Charges funds,and the Wastewater and Drainage Capital funds.The funds used by the City to record and account for capital funding are listed following this discussion,along with the limitations imposed by local,state,or federal laws associated with the funding source. USER FEES Each of the three public infrastructure systems (streets,sanitary sewers,and storm drainage)is funded by fees paid by those who use the system.In the case of the local wastewater and storm drainage systems those fees are directly billed to users.In the case of the transportation system those fees are collected in the form of taxes on motor fuel at both the state and local level,and by state fees for licensing and registration of drivers and vehicles,as well as weight mile taxes imposed on the trucking industry. City Council policy calls for a portion of those fees,in excess of that required for current operation of the systems,to be devoted to preservation of the existing systems.However,in the past several years it has been necessary to devote some portion of those revenues to fund expansion of the system,either through direct funding of capital activity or by funding debt service on revenue bonds.To date,the City has issued revenue bonds in 2009 to fund local wastewater capital activity,and in 2010 to fund storm drainage capital projects.As discussed earlier,the level of capital activity has produced circumstances which have led to substantial increases in user fees for both systems,and created concerns that user fees might be bearing a disproportionate share of the burden of capital activity. Recovery of the SDC funds has been slow,but the positive trend that started in FY 2014 has continued into FY 2015.However,it is not anticipated that SDC collections will reach historic levels warranting continued conservatism in future projections.With these conservative projections existing users of the systems will continue to bear most of the costs associated with expanding and upgrading those systems. For the 20162020 CIP,a second source of concern is the projection of a continued crisis in street preservation projects funding.State and local fuel tax revenues continue to remain flat or a slow decline due to high fuel costs and increased fuel efficiency that reduces revenue even in the face of increased Attachment 2-18 miles traveled.The Council has increased storm drainage and local wastewater fees to maintain and enhance the level of preservation for those systems to meet local,state and federal requirements.In an effort to address the growing backlog of street preservation needs and reimplement an active street preservation program (estimated at $4.5M annual need)City staff have presented options to generate additional revenue.In addition,the Lane County Board of Commissioners is considering a countywide vehicle registration fee that will directly benefit the City of Springfield in addressing part of the annual need. In 2011,the City Council approved a new revenue source for capital activities in the transportation system;a Rightof Way Use Fee for the Local Wastewater and Stormwater Utilities.This right of way use fee of three percent of gross revenues will fund ongoing operations and maintenance of the transportation system and provides limited funding for preservation activity. SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES The second major source of capital funding is Systems Development Charges (SDCs).These are charges imposed on development to provide funding to assure that the City can fund the cost of the infrastructure needed to serve that level of development.There are several types of SDCs that can be used for capital projects.One of the SDC funds is the “Old”SDCs,which were funds collected under SDC laws in effect prior to 1991,and have different restrictions on use than the current SDC funds. These charges are calculated based upon a methodology which must be adopted by the Council and which must conform to State law.The process involves two separate components.The first is an improvement fee which is based on a determination of which capital projects are needed to accommodate growth,the amount of additional capacity that is created by those projects,and a determination of the unit cost of additional capacity calculated by dividing the sum of project costs by the sum of the capacity created.The second component,a reimbursement fee,is calculated by determining the value of the existing system,the amount of capacity available in that system,and the value of a unit of capacity.If the system has existing capacity,then development can be charged a fee based upon the units of existing capacity development will require.These charges are increased annually based on documented increase in the Cost of Construction Index. Unfortunately,the facilities plans which are used to derive the projects to be constructed and the capacity created by those projects (which dated from the 1970s),had been significantly out of date for both local wastewater and storm drainage.As a result,fees collected were far below the amount, permissible under the statutes,which were needed to construct improvement projects.In 2008,the City did update those two facilities plans and moved in 2009 to update the SDCs.While that process resulted in substantial increases in fees,the decline in development activity has resulted in minimal increases in SDC revenue.In addition,because of the economic downturn,the Council deferred the increases as they applied to one and two family residential construction until the fall of 2010,when Council implemented a series of incremental increases with the full fees becoming effective January 1,2011. While the Transportation project list was much more current,having last been updated in 2000,it did not reflect significant price escalation during the current decade.At the same time that Council updated Attachment 2-19 the project lists for the other infrastructure systems,it also updated the costs on the transportation list, leading to a substantial increase in SDCs.As with the local wastewater and storm drainage systems,the recession,and Council deferral of residential increases,has reduced the revenue impact of those increases.The Council recently adopted the Springfield TSP,and earlier this year this year adopted an updated Transportation SDC methodology and fee structure. In July 2009,the City Council approved a new revenue source for capital activities in the stormwater system;a Stormwater Reimbursement SDC fee.This fee is new for Springfield and provides a payment from new users to the City to pay for a portion of the excess capacity in the stormwater system that was provided when the existing system was constructed.Reimbursement SDC’s are less constrained than Improvement SDC’s because they can be used for maintenance of the existing system as well as for funding new expansion projects. EXTERNAL REVENUE SOURCES These sources include both intergovernmental grants and loans as well as contributions by private individuals to the cost of infrastructure either through assessments imposed by the City or voluntarily as part of a proposal to develop property in the City.In many cases these sources of revenue,however derived,are accompanied by restrictions on their use. The City regularly receives allocations of transportation funding from Federal programs.The Metropolitan Policy Organization (MPO)acting through its Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) allocates Federal formula funds to its member jurisdictions for planning,preservation and construction projects on portions of the transportation system that are regionally significant.In addition,the City regularly seeks Federal funding directly through efforts focused on the Oregon congressional delegation. The City was instrumental in securing over $20 million in Federal funding to modernize the interchange at I5 and Beltline Road.Most recently,the City received almost $1.7 million in Federal funding through the Surface Transportation Program,which is funding the overlay of Gateway Street and initiating the federal process for the Glenwood Riverfront Path in FY 2015. The local wastewater system also benefits from a variety of Federal programs,most notably the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (a program funded by Federal dollars).In recent years,however,Federal aid for local wastewater activity has declined sharply. Private contributions toward capital funding also are available,but generally in restricted circumstances. In order to facilitate provision of services to a new development,a developer can make a significant contribution to a particular project when it is needed for the development in question when the City does not have the financial resources to construct the project in circumstances which fit with the developer’s timetable.Lastly,individual citizens sometimes contribute in the form of assessments for specific projects which benefit their properties.This is done through the creation of a local improvement district (LID),including all of the benefitted properties.The cost of the project is then assessed against those properties on a proportionate basis.The 2010 Cherokee LID sewer project is the most recent example of improvement district financing in the City. Attachment 2-20 OTHER REVENUES There are two other alternative revenue sources available for capital project funding.The first is tax increment financing through the two urban renewal districts created by the City –one in Glenwood and one in Downtown.In an urban renewal district additional taxes resulting from increases in assessed value are sequestered and made available to the district,which then uses those revenues to support debt service on urban renewal bonds used to finance projects within the district.At this point the revenues of either district have not risen to the level deemed adequate to support bond issuance. Nonetheless,that may occur within the period of the CIP,hence some of those projects are included. The second alternative revenue source is an internal charge which is assessed against City departments’ operating Budgets to provide funding for preservation and rehabilitation of City buildings and structures. CITY ACCOUNTING FUNDS USED FOR CAPITAL RESOURCES USER FEE/TAX FUNDS Street Capital Fund Purpose:To account for operation,maintenance,and construction of the City’s streets and transportation system.This includes the City’s pavement preservation program,signal operations,and street light replacement and maintenance.Revenues are generated from a threecent local motor vehicle fuel tax and a State fuel tax. Restrictions:Use of these funds is restricted to activities within public rights of way by the Oregon Constitution. Wastewater Capital Bond Purpose:To account for the construction of capital facilities which are identified within the Wastewater Master Plan as requiring rehabilitation of the existing system or expansion to support growth and development.Bond proceeds provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund. Restrictions:Funding provided by bond proceeds,including interest earnings,are restricted by the terms of the bond contract developed at the time of the bond sale. Wastewater Capital Fund Purpose:To account for the operation,construction,and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection system.Wastewater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund. Restrictions:As allowed under state statute,the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for planning,constructing,maintaining and operating the wastewater collection system. Stormwater Capital Fund Attachment 2-21 Purpose:To account for the operation,construction,and maintenance of the City’s stormwater collection and treatment system.Stormwater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund. Restrictions:As allowed under state statute,the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for planning,constructing,maintaining,and operating the stormwater collection and treatment system. SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDCS)FUNDS Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing wastewater collection system that is attributable to growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use capital maintenance or construction on the wastewater collection system. Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Improvement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Expenditures of Wastewater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity enhancing projects for the wastewater system. Stormwater Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing stormwater system that is attributable to growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Stormwater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or construction on the stormwater collection system. Stormwater Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Expenditures of Stormwater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity enhancing projects for the stormwater system. Transportation Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing transportation system that is attributable to growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Transportation Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or construction on the transportation system. Attachment 2-22 Transportation Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties. Restrictions:Expenditures of Transportation Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity enhancing projects for the transportation systems. EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTION FUNDS Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Fund Purpose:To account for Federal grant revenues received for the primary purpose of advancing capital projects that primarily benefit low income persons. Restrictions:CDBG funds,including interest earnings,must meet the Federal government criteria of benefiting low to moderate income individual’s needs,eliminating slums and blight,and addressing urgent needs. Development Projects Fund Purpose:To account for county,State and Federal grants awarded to the City for the purpose of preserving or enhancing City facilities.This fund also accounts for funds donated by developers toward the construction of capital projects directly affected by the particular development. Restrictions:Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projects for which they were collected. Special Assessments Capital Project Fund Purpose:To account for the interim financing and related costs of construction for public improvements which primarily benefit adjacent property owners of the subject capital project.Revenues are generated through special assessments being levied against the benefiting properties. Restrictions:State law restricts assessments to the specific improvement constructed. OTHER FUNDS Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA)Funds Purpose:To account for funds collected and set aside within Urban Renewal Districts as defined and adopted by the City Council. Restrictions:Funds collected within the specified Urban Renewal District and set aside for capital projects are restricted for use on capital projects benefiting the Urban Renewal District. Booth Kelly Fund Attachment 2-23 Purpose:To account for revenues received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center.These funds are set aside for Capital Improvement projects that improve the Booth Kelly Center. Building Preservation Fund Purpose:To account for funds collected and set aside for maintenance and improvements to City owned buildings and facilities. Attachment 2-24 SCHEDULE II2015 TO 2019SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ($000s)REVENUEFUND BEGINNING 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 TOTAL BALANCESOURCE# BALANCE REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND ASSESSMENTS 00000000000 0 0 0CURRENT REVENUES BUILDING PRES. RESERVE420 0 300 270 300 270 300 270 300 270 300 270 1,500 1,350 150 SDC (TRANS IMPROV)447 90 750 705 750 715 750 725 750 855 750 335 3,840 3,335 505 SDC (TRANS REIMBUR)446 45 75 35 75 50 75 60 75 50 75 60 420 255 165 SDC (WASTEWATER IMPROV)443 195 100 82 100 34 100 191 100 250 100 34 695 591 104 SDC (WASTEWATER REIMBUR)442 0 250 151 300 83 300 0 300 33 300 33 1,450 300 1,150 SDC (STORM IMPROVEMENT)440 127 100 189 100 96 50 92 250 213 250 33 877 623 255 SDC (STORM REIMBURSEMENT)441 0 156 108 127 146 127 133 127 133 127 133 664 653 12 STORM CAPITAL425 795 900 1,461 550 699 600 654 550 309 500 309 3,895 3,432 463 WASTEWATER CAPITAL409 0 2,000 1,968 2,000 1,808 2,000 1,283 2,000 1,283 2,000 783 10,000 7,125 2,875 STREET CAPITAL434 176 150 326 100 9 0 52 0 0 0 0 426 387 39 BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE618 200 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 195 5 SEDA430 140 140 140 140 0 0 0 280 280 0 SEDA429 0 0 0 2,000 0 1,965 0 1,825 0 0 0 5,790 0 5,790Sub-totals:1,628 4,921 5,630 6,542 4,049 6,267 3,460 6,277 3,396 4,402 1,990 30,037 18,525 11,512GRANTS & DONATIONS CDBG**210 000 0000000 0 0 0 UNSPECIFIED420 0 0 0 0 275 275 0 0 0 0 275 275 0 LANE COUNTY*420 000 0000000 0 0 0 ODOT*420 4,500 4,500 1,300 1,300 0 0 0 0 0 5,800 5,800 0 FEDERAL GRANT*420 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 250 0 MWMC SPONSORSHIP420 000 0000000 0 0 0 SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT420000 0000000 0 0 0 WILLAMALANE420000 0000000 0 0 0Sub-totals:0 4,750 4,750 1,300 1,300 275 2750000 6,325 6,3250OTHER CAPITAL BOND42800000000000000 WASTEWATER BOND40900000000000000 STORMWATER BOND425 3,1620 3,01200000000 3,162 3,012150 UNSPECIFIED WASTEWATER000 3,332 3,332 7,017 7,017 1,712 1,712 1,500 1,500 13,561 13,5610 UNSPECIFIED STORMWATER0 2,060 2,060 8,921 8,921 12,462 12,462 1,970 1,970 200 200 25,613 25,6130 UNSPECIFIED TRANSPORTATION0 5,315 5,315 5,291 5,291 6,176 6,176 32,323 32,323 15,444 15,444 64,549 64,5490 UNSPECIFIED BUILDING0 1,480 1,480 5,509 5,509 8,080 8,080 29,930 29,930 5,580 5,580 50,579 50,5790 UNSPECIFIED MISC.0147 147144144 289 289 144 144 299 299 1,023 1,0230 OTHER0688 688000000006886880 DEVELOPER42000000 175 17500001751750Sub-totals:3,162 9,690 12,702 23,197 23,197 34,199 34,199 66,079 66,079 23,023 23,023 159,350 159,200150Grand Totals:4,790 19,361 23,082 31,039 28,546 40,741 37,934 72,356 69,475 27,425 25,013 195,712 184,050 5,872*These funds may not pass through the City's budget.**Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included.Attachment 2-25 Attachment 2-26 SYSTEM PAGE ALL PROJECTS MAP ............................................................................................................27 UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS ..................................................................................29 STORMWATER Overview.....................................................................................................................................30 Project Map and Legend .............................................................................................................31 Summary of Projects...................................................................................................................33 Constructed Projects...................................................................................................................37 In Process Projects ......................................................................................................................39 Funding Programmed .................................................................................................................43 Partially Programmed .................................................................................................................57 Funding Not Programmed ..........................................................................................................65 TRANSPORTATION Overview.....................................................................................................................................69 Project Map and Legend .............................................................................................................71 Summary of Projects ..................................................................................................................73 Constructed Projects...................................................................................................................77 In Process Projects ......................................................................................................................81 Partially Programmed .................................................................................................................89 Funding Not Programmed ..........................................................................................................99 WASTEWATER Overview...................................................................................................................................117 Project Map and Legend ...........................................................................................................119 Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................121 Constructed Projects.................................................................................................................124 In Process Projects ....................................................................................................................127 Funding Programmed ...............................................................................................................129 Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................135 BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY Overview...................................................................................................................................144 Project Map and Legend ...........................................................................................................146 Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................148 In Process Projects ....................................................................................................................150 Funding Programmed ...............................................................................................................152 Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................157 MISCELLANEOUS Overview ..................................................................................................................................168 Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................169 Attachment 2-27 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-28 Future Map Attachment 2-29 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-30 UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS Once projects are identified and selected for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program,a project page is created for the project.The project page includes important information about a project such as:project description,justification,driver,trigger,and status.This information is important for conveying and tracking details as each project moves from conception to construction.The following is a list and description of these elements: Project Description –This is a description or early scope for a project.Many times this description will be very broad as it may be taken from a master plan or refinement plan and most likely in conceptual form.The actual scope of a project is generally refined through the various phases of project planning, design and delivery. Project Justification –This element explains why the project is an identified capital need,and may be refined over time as a project moves from project planning to design to bid and construction. Justification includes meeting regulatory requirements,correcting existing deficiencies,or periodic preservation to maintain an asset and offset the need for costly repairs or replacement in the future. Project Driver –The project driver is usually relevant to the specific project.Typical drivers include the need to accommodate future growth,regulatory requirements,or the need to maintain public health and safety.This element helps explain why a project is included within the Capital Improvements Program. Project Trigger –The project trigger is also relevant to the specific project.Triggers can be completion of a previous capital improvement,development within a certain region of the City,or necessary preservation activities as identified through various asset management tools. Project Status –Status describes the current stage of the Project,e.g.Planning,design,or construction. Specific Plans/Policies related to this Project –This is a list of the various Council Goals,master plans, refinement plans,adopted policies,and/or reports that relate to a project. Improvement SDC Eligibility –Some projects are eligible to receive SDC funding;however most projects are not eligible for 100%SDC funding.If eligible,this element gives the percent of the total project cost eligible for improvement SDCs funds. Expenditure Schedule –Lists various project activities and estimates the timing and cost to accomplish the project activity. Operational Impact –Estimates the financial impact by fiscal year to the operating budget upon completion of the capital improvement.This can be a positive or negative number as some projects improve existing facilities reducing the operations and maintenance impact while the addition of new infrastructure will increase operations and maintenance costs due to adding one or more new assets to the City inventory. Funding Source –Describes how and when a project will/needs to be funded and the source of that funding (e.g.bonds,capital funds,SDCs,grants). Attachment 2-31 STORMWATER Overview Stormwater projects fall into several categories: Stormwater Studies –These projects typically fund the study of an area to provide for a future water quality feature or system expansion.Projects may include studies for improving water quality in a drainage way,work providing data for future Federal funding,or exploring how to improve the existing system.Current examples of studies in the CIP are the Facility Master Plan update and the UGB Expansion Area Facility Planning. Stormwater Rehab/Improvements –These projects typically provide upgrades to the City’s existing stormwater system or the removal of inactive or potentially unsafe storm lines.Projects may include the repair and upsizing of storm lines,or the addition of storm lines to reduce localized flooding.The Over Under Channel Pipe Replacement and Improvements and the 59th,Aster,and Daisy Street projects fall into this category. Capacity Enhancement –These projects typically provide additional capacity to the existing stormwater system.These types of improvements may include an additional detention pond,detention facilities and offline water quality treatment facilities.Current examples of capacity enhancement in the CIP are the South 67th Street and “S”and “T”Street Drainage Projects. Restoration –These projects typically involve restoring streams and waterways.Projects may include repairing channel deterioration,providing access for fish passage,or improving flow capacity.Examples of necessary restoration projects include Jasper Slough and Gray Creek/72nd Street. New Facilities These projects typically add new capacity to the system by constructing new stormwater facilities as a result of or in anticipation of new development.Projects may include storm lines built as part of a new subdivision,and extension of storm trunk main lines. Project Maps Constructed SW17 Glenwood Blvd Bridge Drainage Improvements SW20 Channel 6 Master Plan In Process SW5 Mill Race Stormwater Facility SW7 OverUnder Channel Pipe Replacement &Improvements SW8 Drainage Repair Funding Programmed SW13 SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update SWXX 5th St./EWEB Path Pipe Upgrade SW6 Booth Kelly Drainage SW19 Jasper/Natron Drainage SW9 Glenwood Park Blocks SWXX 5th Street Water Quality Facility SW4 Lower Mill Race /Mill Race Outfalls SW14 Mill Race FIRM SW15 High Banks Road (42nd St.)Dike Study Partial Funding Programmed SW2 59th,Aster,and Daisy Street SW21 Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction SW22 Woodstave Removal SW23 Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls SW24 South 67th Street SW25 Glenwood SW26 North Willamette Heights SW27 Jasper Slough SW28 Gray Creek/72nd Street SW29 Corporate Way Pond Funding Not Programmed SW18 ”S”and “T”Streets Drainage SW32 I5 N.Gateway/Sports Way Channel SW33 “Q”Street Channel SW34 Maple Island Slough Attachment 2-32 Future Map Attachment 2-33 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-34 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Glenwood Blvd Bridge Drainage Imp 50$ - - - - - 50 Capital Fund (425) 50$ - - - - - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Channel 6 Master Plan 500$ - - - - - 500 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 18$ - - - - - 18 Revenue Bonds (425) 482$ - - - - - 482 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Mill Race Stormwater Facility 1,850$ 1,952 - - - - 3,802 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 83$ 150 - - - - 233 Revenue Bonds (425) 1,767$ 1,802 - - - - 3,569 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Over-Under Channel 1,900$ 1,700 - - - - 3,600 Capital Fund (425) 772$ 140 - - - - 912 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 1,128$ - - - - - 1,128 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 1,560 - - - - 1,560 Drainage Repair 200$ 200 200 200 200 200 1,200 Capital Fund (425) 200$ 161 200 150 150 150 1,011 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ 39 - 50 50 50 189 Channel Improvement 59$ 100 100 100 100 100 559 Capital Fund (425) 37$ 80 80 80 80 80 437 Improvement SDCs (440)2$ - - - - - 2 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441) 20$ 20 20 20 20 20 120 Channel 6 FIRM 20$ - - - - - 20 Capital Fund (425) 20$ - - - - 20 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)- - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - 5th St./ EWEB Path Pipe Upgrade -$ - 125 - - - 125 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - 63 - - - 63 Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - 63 - - - 63 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Funding Programmed Constructed In Process Attachment 2-35 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Booth Kelly Drainage 360$ - - - - - 360 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 310$ - - - - - 310 Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50 Jasper/Natron Drainage 720$ - 2,280 2,000 - - 5,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 720$ - - - - - 720 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 2,280 2,000 - - 4,280 Glenwood Park Blocks 50$ - - - - - 50 Capital Fund (425) 46$ - - - - - 46 Improvement SDCs (440)4$ - - - - - 4 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - 5th Street Water Quality Facility -$ 2,210 - - - - 2,210 Capital Fund (425)-$ 1,000 - - - - 1,000 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ 1,210 - - - - 1,210 Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - MS4 Permit Requirements 30$ 30 30 30 30 30 180 Capital Fund (425) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90 Riparian Land Management 26$ 28 45 45 45 45 234 Capital Fund (425) 10$ 13 30 30 30 30 143 Improvement SDCs (440)1$ - - - - - 1 Reimbursement SDCs (441) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90 Other -$ - - - - - - Lower Mill Race $ 1,110 - - - - - 1,110 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 1,085$ - - - - - 1,085 MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25 Mill Race FIRM 20$ - - - - - 20 Capital Fund (425) 20$ - - - - - 20 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - 42nd St. Levee Study 50$ - - - - - 50 Capital Fund (425) 50$ - - - - - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Facility Master Plan Update 200$ - - - - - 200 Capital Fund (425) 100$ - - - - - 100 Improvement SDCs (440) 100$ - - - - - 100 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - - Attachment 2-36 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total 59th, Aster & Daisy St. Drainage 450$ - - 1,850 - - 2,300 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440) 298$ - - - - - 298 Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds 152$ - - 1,850 - - 2,002 Cedar Creek Intake Structure 500$ - 100 - - 200 800 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 500$ - - - - - 500 Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 100 - - 200 300 Woodstave Removal -$ - 50 150 150 - 350 Capital Fund (425)-$ - 50 - - - 50 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 150 150 - 300 Irving Slough Headwaters -$ - 416 1,966 - - 2,382 Capital Fund (425)-$ - 290 345 - - 635 Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 126 1,621 - - 1,747 South 67th Street -$ - 325 - - - 325 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 325 - - - 325 Glenwood -$ - 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 6,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - 30 180 - 210 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 2,000 1,970 1,820 - 5,790 North Willamette Heights -$ - 60 - - - 60 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 60 - - - 60 Partial Funding Programmed Attachment 2-37 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Jasper Slough -$ - - 60 - - 60 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 60 - - 60 Gray Creek - 72nd Street -$ - 3,000 3,000 - - 6,000 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - 29 - - 29 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 3,000 2,971 - - 5,971 Corporate Way Pond 35$ - 175 - - - 210 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Other (420) 35$ 0 - - - - 35 Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 175 - - - 175 S & T Drainage -$ - - 600 - - 600 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 600 - - 600 I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel -$ - 105 440 - - 545 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 105 440 - - 545 "Q" Street Channel -$ - 250 250 - - 500 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 250 250 - - 500 Maple Island Slough -$ - - 550 - - 550 Capital Fund (425)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 550 - - 550 Annual Totals 7,580$ 6,720 9,761 13,241 2,525 575 40,402 Capital Fund (425) 1,270$ 1,409 665 620 275 275 4,514 Improvement SDCs (440) 488$ 150 63 59 180 - 940 Reimbursement SDCs (441) 50$ 89 113 100 100 100 552 Revenue Bonds (425) 5,510$ 3,012 - - - - 8,522 Federal Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - SEDA Funds (429)-$ - - - - - - Land Match -$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50 MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25 Other (420) 35$ - - - - - 35 Unspecified Stormwater Funds 152$ 2,060 8,921 12,462 1,970 200 25,765 Funding Not Programmed Attachment 2-38 Stormwater Funding Secured: Yes Account 850245 Construction and Preservation Glenwood Blvd Bridge Drainage Improvements 0% Map ID-SW 17 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council goals to maintain infrastructure and provide financially responsible services. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 40$ 40$ Other -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Revenue Bonds 425 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Justification: Glenwood Boulevard is a major transportation connection to and from I-5. Continued erosion of the embankments supporting the bridge could result in the bridge becoming unable to carry traffic without load limitations. Several years ago, City staff repaired the embankment erosion at the bridge's south end. However, without addressing the drainage problems at that time, more erosion is occurring at the south end and erosion is also now occurring at the north end. Project Description: The City owns the Glenwood Boulevard Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Staff has determined that the existing measures for collecting stormwater runoff from Glenwood Boulevard and the Bridge are insufficient to protect the bridge and supporting embankments from water and erosion damage. This project involves installing new drainage infrastructure on the southerly approach to the Bridge to intercept the water and convey it safely down slope. The project also involves repairing the eroded embankments under the south and north ends of the Bridge. The project may use consultant services in FY13 to provide recommendations for appropriate measures to repair the embankment erosion. Project in Design Improvement SDC Eligibility: Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. Lane County has a project to rehabilitate Glenwood Boulevard pavement in 2014. Correcting the drainage issues prior to that project will ensure that their work will not be compromised by the City's work. Attachment 2-39 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850220 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Channel 6 Master Plan 3.5% Map ID-SW 20 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 210$ 60$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,240$ 440$ 800$ Other -$ Total 1,500$ 500$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 17$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 52$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 482$ 482$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 18$ 18$ Unspecified -$ Total 500$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Modeling phase nearly complete Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will provide a study and master plan of the Channel 6 Drainage, defining improvements to the existing storm drainage pipes and channel, a proposed by-pass pipe, and construct a new regional detention facility. Once project details are better defined, design and construction can proceed in a phased approach. Justification: This project will increase capacity and help to reduce and eliminate localized flooding along the channel, which will lower annual operations costs. Identified capacity and water quality needs identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Project #4 FC and #4 WQ Flooding in area around channel 6, between I-105 and Hayden Bridge Road. Total Maximum Daily Load goals for shading and channel improvement. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009. Attachment 2-40 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850223 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Mill Race Stormwater Facility 12.7% Map ID-SW 5 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Mill Race Project EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 150$ 100$ 50$ Engineering 500$ 250$ 250$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,000$ 3,000$ Other 152$ 152$ Total 3,802$ 350$ 3,452$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 30$ 1$ 1$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ Total 34$ 1$ 1$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 3,569$ 1,767$ 1,802$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 233$ 83$ 150$ Unspecified -$ Total 3,802$ 1,850$ 1,952$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond on land recently acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from the industrial/commercial sub-basin south of Main Street. The project will include open vegetative treatment for problematic pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race. It will also provide detention for stormwater and enhance planned public amenities in this area. The project will require careful phasing to coincide with projected Mill Race/Mill Pond work to maximize efficiencies. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan Planning and design to continue in 2014 Justification: Stormwater in this sub-basin discharges into the Mill Race, and includes various industrial pollutants from log yards, industrial sites, and heavy downtown vehicle traffic, resulting in periodic violations of state water quality standards and presenting hazards to endangered fish species. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. Unique sites and facilities will enhance the Mill Race renovation project, and provide educational opportunity and a community amenity while improving water quality. It may provide some contribution to the Mill Pond renovation project by providing fill material at a low cost. Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Pond. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-41 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850234 Construction and Preservation 1.9% Map ID-SW 7 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 100$ 100 Engineering 500$ 100 400$ Land/Right of Way 300$ 300$ Construction 2,700$ 1,000$ 1,700$ Other -$ Total 3,600$ 200$ 1,700$ 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 912$ 772$ 140$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Revenue Bond 425 1,128$ 1,128$ Unspecified 1,560$ 1,560$ Total 3,600$ 1,900$ 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning Analysis and Engineering are underway, Construction anticipated in 2015 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Aged facility at the end of its useful life. Additional capacity needs identified in Stormwater Facilities Identified structural problems in existing CMP. Delay may increase City's risk. Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement & Improvements Project Description: The Over-Under Channel system includes about 3,900 linear feet of corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) under the existing channel. This project is intended to replace the existing CMP with a new pipe, as well as provide a parallel pipe for additional capacity as recommended in the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. Justification: During 2010, staff became aware that some of the existing CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is beginning to fail. About half of the 3,900 feet of pipe was installed in 1950 and the remainder installed in 1988/89. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan also recommends installing 8,720 feet of 36-inch diameter pipe parallel to the existing CMP pipe and other pipes further east to provide additional capacity to handle existing flows that are conveyed/stored in the channel portion of the system during high flows. This project will include evaluating alternatives for reducing the size or eliminating the channel by using different pipe sizes and/or configurations. Attachment 2-42 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850014 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Drainage Repair 0% Map ID-SW 8 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,239$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 129$ 185$ 185$ Other -$ Total 1,344$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 144$ 200$ 200$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs (13)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (2)$ (2)$ (3)$ (3)$ Personnel Costs (24)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ Total (37)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ (5)$ (6)$ (7)$ (7)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 1,111$ 200$ 161$ 200$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 100$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 289$ 39$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 100$ Total 1,400$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability, capacity needs, opportunities to reduce maintenance costs, citizen requests, aged facilities. Accumulating fund for projects as developed. Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, and the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Repair West B St. storm outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6, 72nd St. and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars causing localized flooding at 1105 S St., 1500 B St., and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catch basin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St. intersection, A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Drainage repairs on Quarry Street and Park Street. Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating costs of the drainage system by reestablishing stormwater efficiency. Reduced costs would be realized in operational costs currently expensed by responding to localized flooding problems during rain events. Citizen requests, field surveys, history of identified problem areas. Attachment 2-43 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850089 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Channel Improvement 3.5% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 79$ 7$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 264$ 24$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Other 316$ 28$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ Total 659$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 10$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 47$ 5$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8$ Total 57$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 9$ 10$ 10$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 517$ 37$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 2$ 2$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 140$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Total 659$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: The need to meet regulatory requirements and address capacity issues Channel evaluations and project identification Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality, and fish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. The adoption of the Springfield Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan identifies an additional temperature benefit from channel restoration and shading. Justification: This project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements. The listing of the Willamette and McKenzie rivers for temperature identifies the need to provide riparian improvement and shading.Regulatory and environmental requirements Attachment 2-44 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850237 Construction and Preservation 0% Map ID-SW 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan SCS Channel 6 Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Revenue Bonds 245$ 245 SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 20$ 20$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 265$ 20$ 245$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Past construction along SCS Channel 6 Citizen Request to prepare current flood plain maps Justification: SCS Channel 6 currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. Since the data collection was done for the original flood plain mapping in the 1960's and 1970's, numerous changes have been made to SCS Channel 6, including widening, narrowing, and piping. Each of these changes was considered insignificant and was done independently, so detailed analysis of the affect of the change on the mapped flood plain was not performed. However, when the changes are taken in aggregate, there may be an affect on some properties. The City has received a request from a citizen with property along SCS Channel 6 to re-evaluate the current 100-year flood plain boundary and prepare new maps if needed. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consultant to develop a scope document for the study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work. Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for SCS Channel 6 from 10th Street to the I-5 Channel to incorporate numerous construction changes that have occurred along SCS Channel 6 in the past 40 years. SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update/ SCS Channel 6 Phase 2 Attachment 2-45 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # Construction and Preservation 0% Map ID-SW 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan SCS Channel 6 Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 20$ 10 10 Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 78$ 78 Other -$ Total 98$ -$ 10$ 88$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Revenue Bonds -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 88$ 88$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 88$ -$ 88$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Stormwater Pipe Upgrade Near the 5th St./EWEB Path intersection Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Approximately 170 feet of an 18-inch diameter stormwater pipe running west along the EWEB path from N. 5th Street requires upsizing to a 30-inch diameter pipe. Justification: Currently, a concrete circular 18-inch diameter pipe drains drains stormwater subbasin 59, which is located immediately upstream of a siphon outletto the SCS Channel 6. The current pipe lacks the capacity to sufficiently convey flows from larger storm events, causing localized flooding in neighborhoods to the east of N 5th Street. To reduce and potentially eliminate the extent of flooding that can occur during larger storm events this pipe needs to be upsized to a 30-inch diameter concrete circular pipe. Reduce localized flooding identified in the Channel 6 Stormwater Master Plan Project #A1-1. Past construction along SCS Channel 6 Attachment 2-46 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #810032 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Booth Kelly Drainage 0% Map ID-SW 6 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Booth Kelly Industrial Complex Stormwater Master Plan Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 15$ 15$ Engineering 45$ 45$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 360$ 15$ 345$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 2.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ Personnel Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total 7.5$ -$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 310$ 310$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Booth-Kelly 618 50$ 50$ Unspecified -$ Total 360$ 360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning and design to continue in 2014 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site. Justification: Stormwater runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The site currently does not have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weather season or provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master plan has been completed to address this issue in order to support ongoing operation of the Booth-Kelly industrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act storm water requirements and address Endangered Species Act concerns. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan. The stormwater system in Booth Kelly is aging and under developed. Basic drainage function and water quality are necessary for discharge into the Mill Race. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-47 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850233 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Jasper/Natron Drainage 83.4% Map ID-SW 19 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 220$ 220$ Engineering 500$ 500$ Land/Right of Way 780$ 780$ Construction 3,500$ 1,500$ 2,000$ Other -$ Total 5,000$ -$ 720$ 2,280$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 87$ 29$ 29$ 29$ Personnel Costs 9$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 96$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 32$ 32$ 32$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 720$ 720$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 4,280$ 2,280$ 2,000$ Total 5,000$ 720$ -$ 2,280$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Will expand the storm sewer system to service future growth. Development within the Jasper/Natron area following completion of the Jasper Trunk Sewer (CIP Map ID WW-10). Council direction. Planning is scheduled to begin in late FY 12 or early FY 13, Construction deferred pending funding. Project Description: Construction and channel improvements along the existing drainage ways to serve new development in the Jasper Natron basin. Impacts to the downstream property owners and natural drainage ways located beyond the City's Urban Growth Boundary will need to be assessed and mitigated in the final design. The first year of the project will include additional studies to identify the downstream impacts and design the project and its mitigation measures. Construction will occur in the following years. The impact on the City's operations budget is estimated on the conceptual project but may change on final design. There is an expected increase in both the annual maintenance and personnel budget. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the existing Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-48 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Glenwood Park Blocks 8.8% Stormwater Treatment Design Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Glenwood Refinement Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 50$ -$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 46$ 46$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 4$ 4$ -$ Unspecified -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: It is anticipated that the Glenwood Park Blocks are to be constructed as development occurs within the Glendwood refinement area. It is intended that the park blocks will become publicly owned infrastructure and incorporate stormwater treament and Parks and Open Space upon completion. This project is intended to work with Willamalane and a consultant to develop design and landscape standards for stormwater treatment and open space. Justification: The park blocks will be publicly owned and maintained. Project Driver: Development in the Glenwood Refinement area. Availability of Funds Attachment 2-49 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850014 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality 5th Street Water Quality Facility 0% Map ID-SW 8 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 10$ 10$ Engineering 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,000$ 400$ 1,600$ Other -$ Total 2,210$ -$ 610$ 1,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs (10)$ (2)$ (2)$ (3)$ (3)$ Personnel Costs (15)$ (3)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ Total (25)$ -$ -$ -$ (5)$ (6)$ (7)$ (7)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 1,210$ 1,210$ User Fees 425 1,000$ 1,000$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ Total 2,210$ -$ 2,210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning phase. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct a water quality facility at the outfall of the over-under channel near N. 5th Street and M Street. An open ditch system currently serves as the outfall of the over-under channel in addition to an existing underpipe. This open ditch system currently runs north between the former Moffit Elementary school to the west and residential properties to east and outfalls into the Q Street Channel. This storwater quality facility has the potential to treat stormwater from approximately 450 acres. Justification: The Springfield School District has sol bonds to build a new middle school near where Moffit Elementary school was sited. This provides the opportunity to partner a with the School disrict to acquire sufficient acreage for a significant water quality facility. Water quality within the Q Street Channel. Regulatory requirements Attachment 2-50 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850117 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality MS4 Permit Requirements 0% No Map Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 and the Stormwater Management Plan City of Springfield Municipal and Development Codes Regulatory Requirements Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 205$ 25$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Total 205$ 25$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 56$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ Total 56$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Total 210$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Annual Program Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which authorizes the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007, the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit. Project Driver: Regulatory and environmental requirements MS4 permit requirements Attachment 2-51 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850093 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Riparian Land Management 12.7% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan City of Springfield Development Code Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act Metro Waterways identified land acquisitions Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 92.40$ 14.40$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ Construction -$ Other 187$ 12$ 15$ 32$ 32$ 32$ 32$ 32$ Total 279.40$ 26.40$ 28$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 13$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$ Personnel Costs 8$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ Total 21$ 2$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 5$ 5$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ User Fees 425 173$ 10$ 13$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 1.40$ 1.40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Other -$ -$ Total 279.40$ 26.40$ 28$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Development activity impacts on storm drainage flows and water quality Accumulating funds for projects as developed Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, some Springfield waterways do not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to the Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparian protection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners. Regulatory requirements and community livability Project Description: This project provides funding to purchase riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. It also provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them. Property acquisitions will typically result in increased operational spending to maintain city owned property. Projects developed on property acquired may, however, produce savings through reduced spending for flood control and water quality improvement activities. Project funding levels have been reduced to conform to eligibility levels for improvement SDCs. Council adoption and implementation of a reimbursement SDC may permit restoration of prior funding levels. Attachment 2-52 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850222 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Lower Mill Race / Mill Race Outfalls 12.7% Map ID-SW 4 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management Plan Economic Development Downtown Mill Race Ecosystem Plan Booth Kelly Stormwater Master Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 100$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 162$ 162$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 848$ 848$ Other -$ Total 1,110$ 50$ 1,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 14$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 49$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 1,085$ 1,085$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ OWEB grant -$ MWMC sponsorship 25$ 25$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,110$ 1,110$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning and design to continue in 2014 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct a daylight or diversion pretreatment structure, an offline water quality treatment facility, and a green pipe open channel improvement. Additional detail for this multi-faceted project are in WQ-12 project of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan. Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, Completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan. Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urban stormwater under the Clean Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater discharge permit, and support stormwater management requirements of new development downtown. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009. Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Race. Attachment 2-53 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850238 Construction and Preservation Mill Race FIRM Update 0% Map ID-SW 14 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 20$ 20$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Mill Race Restoration Project construction Required by federal statute 44 CFR 65.3 Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Springfield Mill Race from the inlet at Clearwater Park to the outlet at Island Park to incorporate construction changes. Justification: The Springfield Mill Race currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain as depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. With the construction of the Mill Race Restoration Project, the City is obligated under federal statute to prepare new analyses and maps to show the affects of the project on the 100-year flood plain. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consulant to develop a scope document for the study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work. Attachment 2-54 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850239 Construction and Preservation High Banks Road (42nd St.) Levee Study 0% Map ID-SW 15 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: National Levee Safety Program National Flood Insurance Program High Banks Road Dike Operation and Maintenance Agreement (1983) Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Study needed prior to completion of updated McKenzie River flood plain mapping under the Metro Waterways Project. Federal requirements for maintaining/operating flood control levees Project Description: Conduct a study of the condition of the High Banks Road (42nd Street) Dike to identify any structural or non-structural deficiencies and to evaluate the potential for obtaining federal accreditation of this Dike as a flood control facility under the National Flood Insurance Program and for compliance with the National Levee Safety Program. Justification: In October 1983, the City entered into an Agreement with the Soil Conservation Service for the operations and maintenance of the High Banks Road Dike that was constructed by Lane County in the 1950's adjacent to what is now known as 42nd Street. This dike provides flood control protection for areas of Springfield north of Highway 126 and west of 42nd Street from McKenzie River flooding. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed an accreditation program for levees that are relied upon under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the National Levee Safety Committee has developed recommendations to Congress for a National Levee Safety Program. Attachment 2-55 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830018 Construction and Preservation Stormwater Facility Master Plan Updates 50% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Objective Stormwater Management Plan/NPDES MS4 Permit EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 25$ 25 Engineering 175$ 175 Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 100$ 100$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.440 100$ 100$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 200$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending UGB expansion decision Improvement SDC Eligibility: Regulatory compliance with the City NPDES MS4 permit, future growth, stormwater management and Council Direction to update SDC's on 5-yr cycle and regulatory requirements Project Description: Update of the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. The plan itself identified areas where additional study work is needed. There is also a need to address the proposed UGB amendments identified in the Commercial, Industrial Buildable Lands study recently completed. The plan project list will be re-prioritized and costs will be revised to represent current values. New technology for sustainable development and stormwater management at the source is available to reduce overall system requirements and long term costs. Justification: The Council directed staff to maintain and update the Facility Master plan to provide current information for SDC development, CIP project needs and support for the development community. BMP DS3 of the City's NPDES MS4 permit directs updating of the SWFMP. The data used for the current Stormwater Facility Master Plan represents the system as it existed in 2005 and doesn't include new development and repairs of the existing system. The system model needs to be updated to the current GIS standard NAD 83 and completed capital project and system upgrades need to be modeled. Attachment 2-56 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850191 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality 59th, Aster, and Daisy Street 9.5% Map ID-SW 2 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 250$ 150$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,800$ 200$ 1,600$ Other 250$ 100$ 150$ Total 2,300$ 450$ -$ -$ 1,850$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs (5)$ 1$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ Total (5)$ 1$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 298$ 298$ Unspecified 2,002$ 152$ 1,850$ Total 2,300$ 450$ -$ -$ 1,850$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Phase 1 of this project is to install 350 feet of 42 inch storm sewer in the area of South 59th Street and Aster Street. Upon observation of system functionality phase 2 will be to install additional parallel stormwater pipe in Daisy Street to provide additional capacity. Capacity issue, minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs. Additional capacity will minimize liability and risk from flooding. Phase I construction is complete and pending as-built review Phase II deferred pending funding. Justification: This project will complete a piped storm system for the Mountain Gate area drainage. The current system now consists of a piped system in the unimproved Aster Street Right-of-Way that outfalls into a open ditch in a wetland area. The wetland then drains back into a piped system. The open ditch does not have the capacity to convey stormwater from large rain events creating a flooding situation over South 59 Street and adjoining properties. Phase II Daisy St. parallel pipe will be needed to provide capacity through the system to the 48th St. channel Citizen complaints, localized flooding and development impacts. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. Attachment 2-57 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850235 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction 12.7% Map ID-SW 21 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Waterways Project. 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 250$ 125$ 125$ Engineering 150$ 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way 100$ 100$ Construction 300$ 100$ 200$ Other -$ Total 800$ -$ 200$ 200$ 100$ 100$ 200$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 500$ 500$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 300$ 100$ 200$ Total 800$ 500$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ Deferred Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Cedar Creek drainage is the focus of a comprehensive series of stormwater system improvements identified in the Metro Waterways Study. Metro Waterways represents a regional partnership which includes state, federal, and local partners, including the US Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, as well as local utilities and jurisdictions and the McKenzie Watershed Council. Projects identified in the study focus on enhancing riparian areas and stream habitat for the benefit of endangered species, reducing urban pollutants, and repairing/restoring critical flood control infrastructure on the McKenzie River and Cedar Creek. This project, the first of those identified in the multi-year study, is the reconstruction of the intake structure and associated channel improvements to the inlet of Cedar Creek from the McKenzie River. This work will provide for managing seasonal flows to both reduce the potential for serious wintertime flooding from the McKenzie River, and ensure adequate summertime flows for fish habitat and downstream water users, including the Springfield Utility Board. Springfield has participated in the Metro Waterways partnership since 2003. Justification: Improvements will ensure summertime stream flows in Cedar Creek to provide stormwater management and habitat to endangered species, and will manage high storm flows, which presently threaten citizens’ homes. Metro Waterways Study, Cedar Creek Partnership and Salmon Trout Enhancement Program (STEP) project. The Stormwater Facility Master Plan identified this project as an ongoing need through 2018. Implementation of the initial project developed out of the Metro Waterways Study and the STEP project. Attachment 2-58 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850177 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Woodstave Removal 0% Map ID-SW 22 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 100$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 200$ 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 350$ -$ -$ 50$ 150$ 150$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ User Fees 425 50$ 50$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 300$ 150$ 150$ Total 350$ -$ -$ 50$ 150$ 150$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the S. A Street woodstave storm line out of service. This line is located south of S. A Street, between S.10th Street and S. 18th Street. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements. Initial project cost involves scoping the extent of the removal, permitting and disposal requirements and developing updated costs. Additional funds will then be programmed as needed to complete the project. Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs. Citizen request and Council priorityRegulatory and environmental requirements. Delay may increase City's risk of regulatory violations. Attachment 2-59 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls 3.5% Map ID-SW 23 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 100$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 490$ 100$ 100$ 290$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,757$ 1,757$ Other 185$ 185$ Total 2,532$ -$ 150$ 150$ 2,232$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 9$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 9$ -$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 635$ 290$ 345$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 1,747$ 126$ 1,621$ Total 2,382$ -$ -$ 416$ 1,966$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for flood control and the construction of a stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements will be incorporated into the project where applicable to meet regulatory requirements. Justification: This project is identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and will help to reduce localized flooding and provide water quality improvements. Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability from flooding incidents Flood Control and water quality. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. Attachment 2-60 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality South 67th Street 9.5% Map ID-SW 24 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 10$ 10$ Engineering 65$ 65$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 325$ -$ -$ 75$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 2$ 1$ 1$ Total 2$ 1$ 1$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 325$ 325$ Total 325$ -$ -$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Reduce localized flooding identified in Stormwater Facility Master Plan Project #13FC. Minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs Project Description: Pipe improvements for flood control. Currently, during heavy rainfall the storm system surcharges at 67th and Main Street flooding private property. Citizen complaints and localized flooding. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010. Attachment 2-61 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Glenwood 8.8% Map ID-SW 25 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan I-5 Bridge Replacement Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 300$ 300$ Engineering 1,450$ 700$ 300$ 450$ Land/Right of Way 1,000$ 500$ 500$ Construction 2,500$ 1,200$ 1,300$ Other 750$ 500$ 250$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Personnel Costs 26$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 126$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 210$ 30$ 180$ -$ Unspecified 5,790$ 2,000$ 1,970$ 1,820$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: To improve the stormwater system including pipe and open channel improvements, for flood control and water quality improvements at various locations within Glenwood as identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP), and to support implementation of the existing refinement plan for Glenwood. The project will also involve evaluation and construction/enhancement of stormwater outfall structures to the Willamette River. Specific projects will be implemented as development occurs, consistent with the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The City's current effort to update the Glenwood Refinement Plan will likely result in modifications to some of the projects identified in the SWFMP, and will be addressed in future system studies that will be performed as the Refinement Plan work proceeds. Justification: Provide infrastructure for new development and to correct existing deficiencies that meet current and future water quality requirements. Completion of the Glenwood Refinement Plan Update and development within the Glenwood Area Stormwater quantity and quality requirements for development within the Glenwood area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. This project may require reprioritization should the City receive federal funding for the Franklin Boulevard project. Attachment 2-62 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality North Willamette Heights 12.7% Map ID-SW 26 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 60$ 60$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 60$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 60$ 60$ Total 60$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planning stage deferring pending complete funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop a basin plan to guide new development and redevelopment activities with respect to drainage and water quality. Justification: This is a largely undeveloped area which creates runoff to the Mill Race and the Booth Kelly site. Provide a drainage study for future development including water quality elements to protect the Mill Race Stormwater management and water quality requirements to guide new development and re- development. New development and re-development within the North Willamette Heights drainage basin. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-63 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Jasper Slough 83.4% Map ID-SW 27 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 10$ 10 Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 50$ 50 Other -$ Total 60$ -$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 12$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 18$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Asset.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 60$ 60$ Total 60$ -$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Culvert and open channel improvements for flood control, riparian enhancement and planting for Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) concerns. Justification: Localized filling and degradation of the channel and road crossings cause flooding and erosion. The lack of riparian cover increases temperature and reduces natural resource value of a natural stream. City stormwater currently discharges into the Jasper Slough at three locations. The Jasper Slough flows into the Mill Race which has water quality requirements. TMDL requirements, local flooding and future development Localized flooding and regulatory requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-64 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850148 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Gray Creek/72nd Street 21.1% Map ID-SW 28 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Metro Waterways 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 300$ 300$ Engineering 600$ 300$ 300$ Land/Right of Way 500$ 250$ 250$ Construction 4,300$ 2,000$ 2,300$ Other 300$ 150$ 150$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total 24$ -$ -$ -$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 29$ 29$ Unspecified 5,971$ 3,000$ 2,971$ Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As outlined in Appendix E of the 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, this project includes constructing a new open channel to convey discharges from the eastern most portion of Gray Creek to a new outfall to Cedar Creek and regrading the existing open channel and down stream piped portions of the conveyance system to mitigate anticipated flooding due to future development. Justification: Provide flood control for future development combined with localized water quality improvements. Future development Development in the east Springfield area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. Attachment 2-65 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account #930086 System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Corporate Way Pond 12.7% Map ID-SW 29 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 60$ 35$ 25$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 150$ 150$ Other -$ Total 210$ 35$ -$ 175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ Developer 420 35$ 35$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 175$ 175$ Total 210$ 35$ -$ 175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Develop a vegetation management plan for the Corporate Pond that discharges to Maple Island Slough. See Stormwater Facilities Master Plan 43-WQ. Refined construction cost will be developed with the study Justification: Flood control and regulatory Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program requirements. Identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and citizen driven Stormwater quality requirements Attachment 2-66 Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality "S" and "T" Streets Drainage 12.7% Map ID-SW 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: SCS Channel 6 Report Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Facilities Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 100$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 450$ 450$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 600$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ 500$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 17$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 17$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. 441 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 600$ 600$ Total 600$ -$ -$ -$ 600$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: This project will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the "S" Street area. Redevelopment and/or completion of Channel 6 improvements and capacity issues. Deferred pending funding and completion of the Channel 6 FIRM/Phase 2 plan Project Description: Construct a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along "S" and "T" Streets between 10th and Debra Streets. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan expands upon the original Channel 6 report with a necessary downstream Channel 6 project. Increasing the pipe size or pipe length will decrease operational costs slightly. Citizen complaints regarding localized flooding. Improvement of County standard streets. Attachment 2-67 Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality 12.7% Map ID-SW 32 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Stormwater Management Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 105$ 105$ Land/Right of Way 440$ 440$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 545$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 6$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 15$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 21$ -$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ Unspecified 545$ 105$ 440$ Total 545$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Improve localized water quality and add capacity to reduce flooding problems. Stormwater Facilities Master Plan identified and capacity issues I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel Project Description: Construct a combination flood control/water quality facility. Improve the open channel system and construct a 7 acre-foot combination treatment wetland facility on City owned property adjacent to the Gateway Natural Resource area. Stormwater quality requirements and capacity needs related to development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014. Attachment 2-68 Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality "Q" Street Channel 12.7% Map ID-SW 33 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Metro Waterways EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 125$ 125$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 325$ 325$ Other -$ Total 500$ -$ -$ 175$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 500$ 250$ 250$ Total 500$ -$ -$ 250$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Channel repair, riparian enhancement and shading to address temperature issues in the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and other water quality concerns. Reduce impact of nuisance species on water quality and bank stability. The Q Street Channel connects to the Alton Baker Canoe Canal near Autzen Stadium. Water quality improvements in the Springfield portion of the system will also support other efforts to restore fish habitat in the Canoe Canal. Justification: Improve water quality and temperature on existing drainage way. Regulatory requirements and environmental opportunities Stormwater quality requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014. Attachment 2-69 Stormwater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality Maple Island Slough 12.7% Map ID-SW 34 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 75$ 75 Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 475$ 475 Other -$ Total 550$ -$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 425 -$ User Fees 425 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 440 -$ -$ Unspecified 550$ 550 Total 550$ -$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Conduct an engineering study to evaluate capacity needs for future development. Develop a vegetation management plan with the intent to improve water quality from the campus industrial portion of the North Gateway area. Justification: Corporate Way Pond and the Sports Way stormwater channel have overflow outlets that discharge to the Maple Island Slough. A study is needed to evaluate water quality and capacity needs within existing drainage ways. Identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and new development Stormwater quality requirements and flood control. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011. Attachment 2-70 TRANSPORTATION Overview Transportation projects fall into the categories noted below: Planning and Project Development –These projects range from larger facility planning,to concept project planning,to specific project development.Funding for these projects relies heavily on Federal and State funds,with City funds used to supplement project budgets and in some cases provide required match funding to external resources.Current examples of this in the CIP are the Springfield Transportation System Plan and the Franklin Boulevard Environmental Assessment projects. Maintenance and Operations –These projects are typically programmatic and can provide funding for a range of activities within each project.Street Light Infill and Pole Replacement,Traffic Control Projects, and Intelligent Transportation System investments fall in to this category. Pavement Preservation –These projects are identified by the Maintenance Division through the Infrastructure Management System.Funding for these projects relies heavily on local and State fuel tax revenues and are supplemented with Transportation Reimbursements SDCs,and federal dollars programmed at the discretion of the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning organization (MPO).Examples of pavement preservation projects identified in the CIP are the Street Seal and Overlay program and the S.42nd St &Japer Roundabout projects. System Improvement,Existing –These projects typically either bring existing infrastructure up to the adopted urban standards,or make capacity and safety improvements to existing facilities.Funding for these projects rely on all available resources.A current example of these types of projects in the CIP is the Glenwood Connector Path Extension project. System Improvement,New Facilities –These projects typically add new infrastructure to the City’s transportation system and are identified within the various planning documents.The trigger for these projects is driven mostly by growth and an identified future need to relieve stress on the system.Project funding relies on all available sources. Project Maps Constructed TS11 E.17th Avenue Pavement Preservation TS12 Glenwood Blvd Bridge Repairs In Process TS1 Gateway Street Overlay TS2 Downtown District Lighting TS4 Glenwood Connector Path Ext. TS5 Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA TS32 Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project Phase 1 Funding Programmed TSXX S.42nd St.&Jasper Roundabout TS42 Weyerhaeuser Haul Road Acquisition TSXX Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Boulevard Partial Funding Programmed TS18 S.48th Street Connection (Main to Daisy) TS21 Gateway/Beltline Intersection Funding Not Programmed TS31 Maple Island Improvements TS33 Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project Phase 2 TS34 Main Street Lighting TS36 RRFB &PHB Installations TS38 Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements TS40 Cherokee Dr.Overlay TS41 42nd Street Operational,Safety,and Mobility Improvements Attachment 2-71 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-72 Future Map Attachment 2-73 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-74 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation System Plan 214$ - - - - - 214 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)33$ - - - - - 33 State Aid (420)181$ - - - - - 181 E. 17th Ave. Pavement Preservation 120$ - - - - - 120 Capital Fund (434)60$ - - - - - 60 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)60$ - - - - - 60 Glenwood Blvd. Bridge Repairs 20$ - - - - - 20 Capital Fund (434)5$ - - - - - 5 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)15$ - - - - - 15 Franklin Boulevard NEPA 1,260$ - - - - - 1,260 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)800$ - - - - - 800 Improvement SDCs (447)210$ - - - - - 210 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other (LTD)50$ - - - - - 50 SEDA (429)200$ - - - - - 200 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Glenwood Connector Path Ext.325$ - - - - - 325 Capital Fund (434)90$ - - - - - 90 Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)5$ - - - - - 5 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)230$ - - - - - 230 Franklin Blvd Reconst. Phase 1 3,500$ 3,800 2,300 - - - 9,600 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)900$ 3,800 1,300 - - - 6,000 Other (Loan) 2,600$ - 1,000 - - - 3,600 Gateway Street Overlay 1,700$ - - - - - 1,700 Capital Fund (434)175$ - - - - - 175 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420) 1,525$ - - - - - 1,525 Downtown District Lighting 220$ 140 140 400 400 400 1,700 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - SEDA (430)220$ 140 140 - - - Unspecified -$ - - 400 400 400 1,200 Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA 30$ 250 - - - - 280 Capital Fund (434)30$ - - - - - 30 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)-$ 250 - - - - 250 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - S. 42nd St. & Jasper Roundabout -$ 180 - - - - 180 Capital Fund (434)-$ 180 - - - - 180 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Funding Programmed Transportation and Street Capital Projects Constructed or Complete In Process Attachment 2-75 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects Weyerhaeuser Haul Road Acquisition -$ - - - - - - Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)-$ - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Boulevard -$ 790 - - - - 790 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)-$ 700 - - - - 700 Unspecified -$ 90 - - - - 90 ADA Transition Projects 55$ 55 55 55 55 55 330 Capital Fund (434)55$ 53 - - - - 108 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 2 55 55 55 55 222 Signal System Modernization 110$ 55 55 55 55 55 385 Capital Fund (434)-$ - 9 52 - - 61 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 110$ 55 46 3 55 55 324 Transportation Demand Mgmt 20$ 20 20 20 20 20 120 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)15$ 5 10 10 10 10 60 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 5$ 15 10 10 10 10 60 Art/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay 2,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 2,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,000 Traffic Control Projects 267$ 117 117 117 117 - 735 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)150$ 35 35 35 35 - 290 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 117$ 82 82 82 82 - 445 Gateway Traffic Improvements 1,035$ 416 400 500 500 500 3,351 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)535$ - 200 250 225 250 1,460 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 500$ 416 200 250 275 250 1,891 Intelligent Transportation Systems 66$ 50 50 50 50 50 316 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ 25 25 25 25 25 125 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (xxx)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 66$ 25 25 25 25 25 191 South 48th Street (Main to Daisy)175$ - - 927 - - 1,102 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - 752 - - 752 Other (Developer) 175$ - - 175 - - 350 Bridge Preservation 20$ 10 10 10 10 10 70 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - 10 - 10 20 Unspecified 20$ 10 10 - 10 - 50 Partial Funding Programmed Attachment 2-76 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects Gateway - Beltline Intersection 2,817$ 1,418 1,249 725 1,041 1,000 8,250 Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)580$ 605 395 355 510 - 2,445 Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 2,237$ 813 854 370 531 1,000 5,805 Other -$ - - - - - - Street Light Infill & LPS Replacement -$ 237 237 237 237 237 1,185 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 237 237 237 237 237 1,185 Local Street Seal & Overlay 600$ 600 600 600 600 600 3,600 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified 600 600 600 600 600 600 3,600 Street Light Pole Test 53$ 28 - - - - 81 Capital Fund (434)53$ 28 - - - - 81 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Arterial/Collector Reconstruction 1,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 1,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000 Local/Residential Reconstruction 300$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,800 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 300$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,800 Wayfinding -$ 90 90 - - - 180 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 90 90 - - - 180 Maple Island Improvements -$ - 230 550 831 - 1,611 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)- Unspecified -$ - 230 550 831 - 1,611 Intelligent Lighting Control -$ 688 - - - - 688 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ 688 - - - - 688 Wire Theft Remediation 40$ 230 60 60 60 60 510 Capital Fund (434)40$ - - - - - 40 Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 230 60 60 60 60 470 Main Street Lighting -$ 250 250 100 100 - 700 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 250 250 100 100 - 700 RRFB Installations 160$ 25 25 25 25 25 285 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)160$ - - - - - 160 Unspecified -$ 25 25 25 25 25 125 Funding Not Programmed Attachment 2-77 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Transportation and Street Capital Projects FYA Left Turns -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75 Traffic Signal Communication -$ 25 12 12 12 12 73 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 25 12 12 12 12 73 Cherokee Dr. Overlay -$ - 200 - - - 200 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 200 - - - 200 Franklin Blvd Reconst. Phase 2 -$ - - - 25,000 10,400 35,400 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - 25,000 10,400 35,400 Oakdale Pheasant Bike Imp.-$ - - 330 - - 330 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - 330 - - 330 42nd Street Operational, Safety, and Mobility Improvements -$ - - - 1,700 - 1,700 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - State Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - - 1,700 - 1,700 Bike Wayfinding & Safety Improvements -$ 100 - - - - 100 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 100 - - - - 100 City Hall Public Bike Parking -$ - 35 - - - 35 Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - 35 - - - 35 Annual Totals 13,293$ 11,889 7,450 7,088 33,128 15,739 88,587 Capital Fund (434)508$ 261 9 52 - - 830 Improvement SDCs (447) 1,495$ 670 665 675 805 285 4,595 Reimbursement SDCs (446)75$ - - 10 - 10 95 Unspecified 6,955$ 5,380 5,336 6,176 32,323 15,444 71,614 Other (Developer) 175$ - - 175 - - 350 Other (LTD)50$ - - - - - 50 SEDA (429)200$ - - - - - 200 SEDA (430)220$ 140 140 - - - 500 Federal Aid (420) 2,325$ 250 - - - - 2,575 State Aid (420) 1,290$ 4,500 1,300 - - - 7,090 Other -$ 688 - - - - 688 Attachment 2-78 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830020 Infrastructure Planning & Inventory Study Springfield Transportation System Plan 50% Map ID-TS 5 Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 214$ 214$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 214$ 214$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street 434 -$ AFG Grant 420 -$ Federal - STP-U* 420 33$ 33$ State Aid 420 181$ 181$ Unspecified -$ Total 214$ 214$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Plan expected was adopted in calendar 2014. Updates to the Springfield Development Code have been started. Statewide Planning Goal 12, Oregon Highway Plan, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Oregon Transportation Plan, Regional Transportation Plan, Oregon Freight Plan, Metro Plan, TransPlan, Lane County Transportation System Plan, Willamalane Comprehensive Plan, Local Refinement Plans, Springfield Bicycle Plan, Springfield Development Code, Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Transportation System Plan (TSP) update is intended to serve as a blueprint to guide future multi- modal transportation system improvements and investment decisions for the City of Springfield. This project includes an inventory and general assessment of the existing transportation system; a determination of existing and future needs; a road plan; a public transportation plan; a bicycle/pedestrian plan; a parking plan; a transportation system management and demand management plan; an air, rail, water, and pipeline plan; and a financing and implementation plan. Justification: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660 Division 12, requires jurisdictions throughout Oregon to prepare and adopt regional or local transportation plans that serve as the transportation element for their comprehensive plans (660 012 0015(2) (4)). Plan updates should respond to transportation, land use, environmental, population growth, economic and social changes that have occurred in the community since the TSP was last prepared. Historically, TransPlan has served as the local TSP for both Springfield and Eugene. However, since the passage of HB 3337, Eugene and Springfield are developing individual TSPs specific to each jurisdiction's separate UGBs. Project Driver: Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) - OAR 660 Division 12 HB 3337 - Changes in land inventories and UGB boundary Attachment 2-79 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Secured: Yes Account Construction and Preservation E. 17th Avenue Pavement Preservation 0% Map ID-TS 11 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 120$ 120$ Other -$ Total 120$ 120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 60$ 60$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 60$ 60$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 120$ 120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: E. 17th Avenue between Glenwood Boulevard and Henderson Avenue (in Glenwood) is a city street. The 2010 Street Conditions Report identified this street segment as a high priority collector street for an overlay. Under a 2011 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County, the City has the option to request that the County rehabilitate, at City's expense, the pavement on E. 17th Avenue in 2014 concurrent with the County's project to rehabilitate the pavement on Glenwood Boulevard. Justification: E. 17th Avenue is a collector street in Glenwood. The condition of the pavement is such that full reconstruction will be needed if rehabilitation does not occur soon. Combining this work with Lane County's project on Glenwood Boulevard should allow the City to realize significant cost savings by avoiding the full reconstruction and through the economies of scale by adding this work to the County's larger project. Constructed Improvement SDC Eligibility: IGA with Lane County regarding Glenwood Blvd overlay and jurisdiction transfer Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014 Attachment 2-80 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Secured: Yes Account 850246 Construction and Preservation Glenwood Blvd Bridge Repairs 0% Map ID-TS 12 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 15$ 15$ Other -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 5$ 5$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 15$ 15$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 20$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: The City owns the Glenwood Boulevard Bridge over the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Staff has determined that the joints between the bridge deck and the adjoining pavement are insufficient to protect the bridge deck and pavement from damage due to thermal expansion and contraction. Under a 2011 Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County, the County will rehabilitate the street pavement and resurface the bridge deck in 2014. As part of this IGA, the City is responsible to pay for new bridge joints and any other repairs that may be needed to the bridge deck prior to resurfacing. The project plan is to use consultant services in FY13 to provide recommendations for appropriate bridge joints and any other apparent repairs, then authorize and pay Lane County to implement the selected recommendations as part of their project in 2014. Justification: Installing appropriate bridge deck joints protects both the bride structure and the adjoining street pavement from damage caused by thermal expansion and contraction, thereby extending the service life of both the bridge and the pavement. Replacing bridge joints during the planned bridge resurfacing and pavement rehabilitation project in 2014 provides the most efficient construction process and least disruption to the travelling public from construction activities. Constructed Improvement SDC Eligibility: IGA with Lane County regarding Glenwood Blvd overlay and jurisdiction transfer Glenwood Blvd. paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014 Attachment 2-81 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870010 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Franklin Boulevard NEPA 50% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Priority Glenwood Refinement Plan Update TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 1,260$ 800$ 460$ Engineering -$ -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 1,260$ 800$ 460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid, STP-420 800$ 800$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 210$ 210$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other (LTD) 420 50$ 50$ SEDA 429 200$ 200$ Unspecified Total 1,260$ 1,260$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NEPA analysis Complete. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Complete project refinement, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation for future improvements to Franklin Boulevard, the Franklin/Glenwood, Franklin/Henderson, Franklin/Mississippi and Franklin/McVay intersections to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and vehicles. Contribute to the required local match for any federal or state funding received. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and anticipates redevelopment in the urban renewal district as directed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work. City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopment Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to support planned Glenwood area redevelopment. Attachment 2-82 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850241 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Glenwood Connector Path Extension 8% Map ID-TS 4 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Regional Transportation Plan Willamalane Comp Plan Council Goal EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 65$ 65$ Land/Right of Way 30$ 30$ Construction 230$ 230$ Other -$ Total 325$ 95$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 15$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 90$ 90$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 5$ 5$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 230$ 230$ Other 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 325$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Federal funds obligated, design complete, construction 2015 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Glenwood Connector Path Extension (GCPE) is located along the south bank of the Willamette River between the Oldham property on the north side of Franklin Boulevard and the Glenwood Blvd. intersection. The GCPE temporarily connects the Glenwood Connector Path to Franklin Blvd., until the planned Glenwood Riverfront Path is constructed. Justification: The GCPE is a crucial mid-term temporary link between Eugene and Springfield for bicycles and pedestrians until the Glenwood Riverfront Path is constructed. The Glenwood Riverfront Path is a planned bike route in TransPlan and the Regional Transportation Plan. The GCPE provides for the safe and continuous connection between the Glenwood Connector Path (viaduct) and Glenwood Blvd. A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene and Springfield City agreement to build the GCPE in conjunction with the Glenwood Connector Path, and the I-5 Willamette River Bridge replacement project Attachment 2-83 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: Construction and Preservation Franklin Boulevard Phase 1 Reconstruction 7% Map ID-TS 32 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Priority TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Update Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 500$ 500$ Land/Right of Way 3,000$ 3,000$ Construction 5,500$ 3,500$ 2,000$ Other 600$ 300$ 300$ Total 9,600$ 3,500$ 3,800$ 2,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid, STP-U 420 -$ State Aid, STIP 420 6,000$ 900$ 3,800$ 1,300$ SDCs, Imp.447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other (Borrowing) 434 3,600$ 2,600$ 1,000$ SEDA 429 -$ Unspecified Total 9,600$ 3,500$ 3,800$ 2,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NEPA documentation is funded and underway. $600,000 of Phase 1 funding is contained in the 2014- 2017 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and $5,400,000 is proposed in the Draft 2015-2018 STIP. City has committed to providing the $3,600,000 balance of funds for Phase 1. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Franklin Phase 1 construction is anticipated to include improving the McVay/Franklin intersection with a tie back to McVay north of the rail trestle and provision of a new north leg to serve the Riverfront area, facility improvements on Franklin between McVay and Mississippi, and improvments to the Mississippi/Franklin intersection. Justification: Franklin Boulevard’s transportation challenges are many. There is limited provision for travel choice alternatives to the auto. Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is practically non existent, and where it has been provided it is substandard and unsafe. Safe pedestrian crossing opportunities are infrequent and poorly defined. The intersection of Franklin Boulevard and McVay Highway currently operates at a degraded level of service. A modern multi-modal facility leverages Glenwood Riverfront redevelopment, and Downtown redevelopment. Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to support planned Glenwood area redevelopment. . City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopment Attachment 2-84 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Yes Account #: 850258 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Gateway Street Overlay 0% Map ID-TS Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Asset Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 425$ 425$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,275$ 1,275$ Other -$ Total 1,700$ 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 175$ 175$ Federal Aid 420 -$ Federal Aid 420 1,525$ 1,525$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,700$ 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Design phase has started. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project includes 0.97 miles of pavement preservation. The pavement preservation includes a 2 inch mill and 4 inch overlay. Existing ramps and driveways will be upgraded to new ADA standards. New signal controller cabinets will be installed and flash-yellow arrows add to traffic signals within the project area. Justification: Gateway St. is classified as a minor arterial and has an ADT of over 22,000 vehicles. The Surface Condition Index (SCI) of Gateway St. is currently at 38.6, a rating of "poor". Provide timely preservation, and avoid costly reconstruction Street condition Attachment 2-85 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Partial Construction and Preservation Downtown District Pedestrian Scale Lighting 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Downtown District Plan and Implementation Strategy EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 1,220$ 30$ 20$ 20$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 1,000$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 6,910$ 190$ 120$ 120$ 350$ 350$ 350$ 5,430$ Other -$ Total 8,130$ 220$ 140$ 140$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 6,430$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 440$ 440$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SEDA 430 500$ 220$ 140$ 140$ Unspecified 7,190$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 5,990$ Total 8,130$ 220$ 140$ 140$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 6,430$ This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only certain blocks or block faces. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will evaluate, design, and construct pedestrian level, decorative lighting consistent with the downtown revitalization district. Justification: Increased safety, comfort and appearance for pedestrians and vehicles in the district. The project will improve the small town feel, vitality and livability of the district. Council Direction Citizen request Attachment 2-86 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Partial Construction and Preservation Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA 8% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan Regional Transportation Plan WillamalaneComp Plan Council Goal EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 280$ 280$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 280$ -$ 280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 30$ 30 SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 250$ 250$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SEDA 430 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 280$ 30$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Planned Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will complete required Federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation and approval for the new Glenwood Multi-Use Riverfront Path, including locating the path alignment along the Willamette River and completing pathway design. This path is the final remaining segment of the riverfront path system within the metro area connecting Eugene, Springfield, and urban Lane Caounty between the confluence of the Coast For and Middle Fork of the Willamette River to the south and the Beltline Bridge over the River to the north. Justification: There are currently very limited and sporadic bicycle and pedestrian facilities serving east west alternative mode travel in Glenwood, forcing non-auto trips onto Franklin Blvd. and McVay Highway, and creating competition for lane usage on these non-modern high speed urban arterial state highway segments. While safety is challenged, the deeper issue is that most walkers and cyclists are deterred from even attempting to use those travel modes by the utter lack of dedicated facilities and the associated perception that attempting to walk or bike along these highway segments is dangerous. Developing, and ultimately constructing the Riverfront Path provides a high quality, safe, and efficient dedicated corridor for walking and cycling along the Willamette River connecting important origins and destinations within the metro area. A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene and Springfield Funding Availability Attachment 2-87 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Partial Construction and Preservation S. 42nd & Jasper Roundabout Overlay 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Asset Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 2$ 2$ Engineering 28$ 28$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 150$ 150$ Other -$ Total 180$ -$ 180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 180$ 180$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SEDA 430 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 180$ -$ 180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Programmed Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The reconstruction of S. 42nd Street was accomplished in 2005 with funds received from the Oregon Department of Transportation as part of the jurisditional transfer. Upon Completion of project the remaining funds were set aside in a reserve for future preservation work. This planned preservation project will utilize those reserves to overlay the roundabout at the intersection of 42nd Street and Jasper Road with concrete, "white topping", and if sufficient funds remain, the remaining ashpalt section will receive a thin lift. Justification: When S. 42nds St. was originally reconstructed in 2005, the roundabout was constructed with an asphalt pavement section due to constructability issues at the time. This type of construction is not ideal for roundabouts, but the design team in 2005 chose a pavement section that would allow for a future overlay with Portland Cement Concrete, rather than face future reconstruction. The Lane Transit District has explored providing bus service on S. 42nd Street necessitating the need for developing this project. Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, provide timely preservation, and avoid costly reconstruction Street condition Attachment 2-88 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: System Expansion Weyerhaeuser Haul Road Acquisition 9% Map ID-TS 42 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Willamalane Comprehensive Plan TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 750$ 750$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 750$ -$ 750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid, STP-U 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other (Willamalane) 420 -$ SEDA 429 -$ Unspecified -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *City has recently made application to the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018 STIP) for $577,000 On Hold Pending Funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Acquire the Weyerhaeuser Haul Road between OR126B-Main Street and Wallace Creek Road for conversion to an off street pathway facility, a portion of which is anticipated to also include roadway, in order to create a multi- modal system connection between the Jasper Natron area (east of the Bob Straub Parkway) and Main Street (OR126B), as well as to the planned Virginia/Daisy bike boulevard. Justification: East Springfield currently has very limited access and mobility for bikes and pedestrians, including both east- west and north-south. The Jasper-Natron area of Springfield (south of Main Street, east and west of the Bob Straub Parkway) is the last remaining large undeveloped area in the Springfield UGB. As this area continues to develop, it will be essential to have safe and efficient travel options for bikes and pedestrians. In its current condition, many local residents use the Weyerhaeuser Haul Road as a de facto multi-use path. However, the Haul Road is in a decayed condition and is still in private ownership. Acquisition of the Haul Road is the first step needed to eventually turn this road into a public multi-use path and partial new road with green street design elements. Opportunity to acquire the Haul Rd. in partnership with Willamalane. Identified east-west multi-modal mobility issues. Identified need and opportunity to acquire Attachment 2-89 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 860013 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Virginia Avenue/Daisy Street 0% Bicycle Boulevard No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan 1998 Springfield Bike Plan Springfield TSP Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 700$ 700$ Other 15$ 15$ Total 790$ -$ 790$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 700$ 700$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 90$ 90$ Total 790$ -$ 790$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Ongoing need, deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The City of Springfield partnered with the University of Oregon's 2011-2012 Sustainable City Year to plan Virginia/Daisy corridor bike boulevard improvements. Safety treatments along the entirety of the corridor include: increased signage to slow vehicles and identify the space as a bicycle boulevard, striping of bicycle lanes, sharrows, traffic calming infrastructure (e.g., bulbouts), and intersection treatments (e.g., mini-roundabouts). Justification: This project supports and enhances Springfield'd existing bikeway and pedestrian system. Improvements to Virginia/Daisy will give bicycles and pedestrians an alternate route to Main Street. This project will improve neighborhood livability and promote healthy and active lifestyles for the estimated 10,545 residents within 0.25 mile buffered radius of Virginia/Daisy. Citizen Requests Customer Service Requests from the low vision pedestrian community T1-1, T2-3, T4-3 Attachment 2-90 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Partial Construction and Preservation ADA Transition Projects 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: ADA EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 350$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 385$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 108$ 55 53$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 277$ 2$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ Total 385$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ Current program is unfunded; staff is working on the Transistion Plan Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 requires the City to maintain a "Transition Plan" that details how it will bring facilities that were not in compliance at the adoption of the act, up to the newly adopted standards. Currently, the City policy is to correct defects as projects occur and to make improvements as requests are received from Citizens who make their need known. This project will set aside funds to be used for high priority locations that are identified, and will allow the City to respond in a timely manner to those requests. Justification: Required action as per The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990. In addition, safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. ADA Compliance Development of projects with a nexus to ADA law and requests from the public Attachment 2-91 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: Partial Construction and Preservation Signal System Modernization 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: ITS Metro Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 40$ 10$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 440$ 110$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 116$ 9$ 52$ 55$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 324$ 110$ 55$ 46$ 3$ 55$ 55$ Total 440$ 110$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover some of the need; currently unfunded Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As technology advances, the equipment in Signal Controller Cabinets becomes more advanced. These advancements offer certain advantages operationally but they also have impacts on the availability of replacement parts that are currently in use. Some recent advances that are occurring include the upgrade to 2070 controllers, IP addressable conflict monitors, remote video detection integration, pan-tilt-zoom cameras, adaptive signal controls and a host of other equipment. Funding is set aside in this program, and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Operational Functionality Equipment or system failure, equipment obsolescence and unavailability of replacement parts Attachment 2-92 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870003 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Transportation Demand Management Varies No Map Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TDM Goals Regional Transportation Plan TransPlan State Legislation EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Total 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 60$ 15$ 5$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 60$ 5$ 15$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Total 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or ‘transportation options’ (TO) policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements. At times, TDM activities include locations that are included on the Transportation System Development Charge Project List. For those activities, Transportation Improvement SDC funds can be used to provide project funding up to the percentage that the project location is eligible per the SDC Project List. The TDM project also provides resources to address state-mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction requirements for the transportation sector. TransPlan policies, current and pending state regulatory requirements, transportation system management need. Funding balance is for accumulating funds for projects as developed and or required. Project Description: The project includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the community like the 60th and "E" Street multi-use path, park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations, and other activities that promote non-single auto travel choices. Project Driver: TransPlan policies, and state land use, transportation, and GHG reduction laws, statues and rules. TDM and TO program activities promote alternatives to 1-person/1-car auto trips and is a growing aspect of system management as system demand outpaces capacity constraints and greenhouse gas reduction strategies are implemented. Attachment 2-93 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Arterial/Collectors Street 0% Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance Map ID-TS14 18th St. (2,069 ft., $450,000) 28th St. (5.087 ft., $1,100,000) S. 5th St. (427 ft., $100,000)42nd St. (2,889 ft., $607,000) Commercial Ave. (496 ft., $108,000) Marcola Rd. (2,602 ft., $575,000) G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $425,000) Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 960$ 240$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 7,040$ 1,760$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ Other -$ Total 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals Ongoing Program; Deferred pending funding W. "D" St. (4,508 ft., $1,000,000) S. 2nd St. (1,765 ft., $402,000) Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenance Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure Laura St. (2,625 ft., $500,000) Q St. (1,790 ft., $390,000 ) Improvement SDC Eligibility: 19th St. (531 ft., $120,000) Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement sealing and/or overlay of the Arterial/Collector Street System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's arterial and collector system at the current Council target of 85% fair or better level, approximately $750,000 to $1,000,000 in funding is needed annually. Following is a partial list with the highest priority overlays: Attachment 2-94 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850013 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Traffic Control Projects Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: TransPlan Council Policy EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 65$ 25$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way 45$ 17$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ Construction 625$ 225$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Other -$ Total 735$ 267$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 33$ -$ 3$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 33$ -$ 3$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 290$ 150$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 445$ 117$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$ Total 735$ 267$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$ Ongoing Project. Funding is programmed as a 'sinking fund' to program resources for future projects as identified and/or required. A typical intersection upgrade project can range between $50,000 - $500,000. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at various City intersections. Example intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd St. & Marcola Road, South 42nd & Daisy St., South 40th & Daisy St., and 28th St. & Centennial Blvd. Signal modifications may include changing phase order, adding overlaps, and other enhancements to safety or efficiency like improved pedestrian crossings. Various striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the Traffic Control Projects. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow. Specific projects are based upon the amount of available funding Citizen requests, high crash locations, congestion Attachment 2-95 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850069 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Reserve #: 930169 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment Council Goals EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 655$ 50$ 100$ 75$ 80$ 250$ 100$ Land/Right of Way 350$ 350$ Construction 1,846$ 135$ 400$ 341$ 320$ 250$ 400$ Other -$ Total 2,851$ 535$ 500$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 1,460$ 535$ 200$ 250$ 225$ 250$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,891$ 500$ 416$ 200$ 250$ 275$ 250$ Other -$ Total 3,351$ 1,035$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ 500$ -$ Ongoing. Funding balance is a 'sinking fund' to program resources for highest priority projects like Gateway Street operational and safety improvements. Project may also contribute to Gateway/Beltline funding needs. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion; to improve safety of all modes; and, to support continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects. Gateway area development and traffic conditions Project Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity, relieve congestion, and improve safety. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding is identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Community growth in the Gateway area Attachment 2-96 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 870001 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Varies No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Regional ITS Operations & Implementation Plan for Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 37$ 7$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 329$ 59$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ Other -$ Total 366$ 66$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 150$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 25$ 25$ Unspecified 191$ 66$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Total 366$ 66$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Ongoing Program. Use as a 'sinking fund' to accumulate resources for highest priority projects. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: ITS projects will typically have a high benefit to reasonable cost ratio. Operational improvements to the street network will help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, improve safety, and continue to support economic development. Ongoing. May provide matching funds to Oregon Department of Transportation projects with mutual benefits. Project Description: ITS projects in various locations to increase communications, capacity, safety and traveler information. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds. Deploying ITS projects enhance the ability to use the transportation system more effectively by extracting the maximum capacity from the system. This will delay the need for adding new lanes and links to the system and improve traveler safety and access to traveler information systems. Attachment 2-97 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850162 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation S. 48th Street Connection (Main to Daisy) 40% Map ID-TS 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Project #901 in RTP and TransPlan Agreement between City and Westwind Estates, City Council Resolution 06-35, 7/17/06 EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 225$ 225$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 877$ 877$ Other -$ Total 1,102$ -$ -$ -$ 1,102$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 752$ 752$ Other (Developer 420 350$ 175$ 175$ Total 1,102$ 175$ -$ -$ 927$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and future development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street Intersection. A portion of the cost to construct this project is an obligation of current and future development south of Daisy Street. In 2010, the City received a cash payment of $175,000 to satisfy the obligation of the Westwind Estates development. Remaining funding is pending future development. Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street, to support planned land development, consistent with TransPlan. Future development activity and funding availability Future development and growth will create a need for connection between Daisy Street and Main Street to be constructed to alleviate congestion. Adds needed pedestrian crossing. Attachment 2-98 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #850224 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Bridge Preservation and Rehabilitation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goals EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 80$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 80$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 7$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 42$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Storm Capital 425 -$ Street Capital 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Unspecified 50$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Total 80$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Monitoring bridge conditions and working to identify funding for needed repairs and maintenance Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will address known deficiencies to City owned bridges discovered through City maintenance crew and/or ODOT Bridge Inspections. ODOT inspects six City bridges every two years and these inspections have identified at least $50k of needed repairs to preserve function and structural integrity on these six bridges. City crews inspect all 14 City bridges twice per year. Staff is aware of additional maintenance needs on the remaining eight bridges not inspected by ODOT. Justification: There are six bridges maintained by the City that are currently inspected by ODOT in correlation to the State wide transportation system. Repair activities include bank scour beneath the bridge, rebuilding or replacement of a concrete nosing, grouting, secure embankment erosion, replacing split spacer block, replacing a wing wall and patching concrete spalling. Steps need to be taken to address the financing of these projects before they reach a critical stage. Aging facilities and regulatory requirements, pending funding availability ODOT Bridge Inspection reports provided on a two year cycle - these reports identify repairs and deficiencies with each bridge. DPW Operations performs semi-annual inspections to identify new issues and monitor existing ones. Attachment 2-99 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: 850151 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Reserve #: 930151 Gateway/Beltline Intersection 10% Map ID-TS 21 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment Transportation System Plan Regional Transportation Plan Gateway Refinement Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 750$ 305$ 445$ Land/Right of Way 5,650$ 505$ 5,145$ Construction 6,626$ 6,626$ Other 6,745$ 2,817$ 1,368$ 1,199$ 370$ 991$ Total 20,021$ 2,817$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ 1,041$ 1,000$ 11,771$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 25$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Total 35$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 2,445$ 580$ 605$ 395$ 355$ 510$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 17,576$ 2,237$ 813$ 854$ 370$ 531$ 1,000$ 11,771$ Other 420 -$ Total 20,021$ 2,817$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ 1,041$ 1,000$ 11,771$ Phase 2 deferred pending funding and traffic operations agreement with ODOT Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a couplet and purchase of right-of-way. CIP project funding contributes to overall project estimate of $30 million. Phase 1 is complete at a cost of about $10 million. Justification: Needed to improve level of service at the intersection and maintain proper function of the intersection in relationship to the I-5/Beltline Interchange. Project Phase 1 was completed in 2011. Project Phase 2 trigger is set by traffic operations agreement with ODOT. Community growth and agreements with Federal Highways and ODOT to construct intersection improvements as part of the larger I-5/Beltline interchange upgrade project. Attachment 2-100 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850066 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 147$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 42$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,512$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 432$ Other -$ Total 1,659$ -$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs (44)$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (44)$ -$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,659$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$ Total 1,659$ -$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$ Ongoing Program need/deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace 2,720 existing low pressure sodium (LPS) lights with LED technology and reduce energy costs. Implement Council Policy; Citizen Service Requests Street Light Infill & LPS Light Replacement/Upgrades Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. LPS lights have higher life cycle costs than alternatives. Replacement will reduce operations cost and improve visibility. Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget Attachment 2-101 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850008 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Local/Residential Street 0% Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance No Map Total Ft. = 11,577 Total = $319,500 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Council Goals Infrastructure Management System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 525$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,675$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ Other -$ Total 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ Total 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Deferred pending funding Postal Way, (880 ft., $25,000) Gateway Lp., (1,870 ft., $50,000) Shelly St., (2,700 ft., $75,000) Pheasant, (610 ft., $18,000) F St., (327 ft., $9,000) Lindale/Pheasant (2,042 ft., $55,000) 2nd St., (273 ft., $7,500) N. Cloverleaf, (2,040 ft., $55,000) Dornoch, (133 ft., $5,000) Shady Lane Dr., (702 ft., $20,000) Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed. Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenance. Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort by slurry and crack sealing of Local/Residential Street System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's local street system approximately 5 to 8 miles should be crack sealed and slurry sealed annually. Following is a partial list indicating the highest priority sealing locations: Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Attachment 2-102 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850247 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 9$ 6$ 3$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 72$ 47$ 25$ Other -$ Total 81$ 53$ 28$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 81$ 53$ 28$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other -$ Unspecified -$ Total 81$ 53$ 28$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Ongoing Program Street Light Pole Test, Treat & Replacement Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Test and treat light poles at 10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits in the City owned street light system. Justification: Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. Treating poles reduces rate of deterioration. The proposed project replaces poles identified as at the end of useful life. The last system wide test of City light poles was in 1999. About 30% of poles were tested in 2013. Testing and treating is recommended at 10 year intervals Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget Attachment 2-103 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Arterial/Collector Street Reconstruction 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 840$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 6,160$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ Other -$ Total 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 24 miles of streets classified as a collector or arterial have deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approximately 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $10.8 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects: 21st St. (1,586 ft., $1,500,000) Q St. (925 ft., $500,000 ) G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $900,000) B St. (486 ft., $250,000) Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed arterial and collector street segments as identified within the Infrastructure Management System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance preservation activities are no longer effective or economical. Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Structural street failures Attachment 2-104 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Local/Residential Street Reconstruction 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Infrastructure Management System 2010 Street Conditions Report EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 245$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,855$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ Other -$ Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ - Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 68 miles of local/residential streets has deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approximately 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the current backlog is $5.5 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects: F St. (306 ft., $35,000)C St. (332 ft., $40,000) 3rd Pl. (583 ft., $60,000)Kelly Blvd. (361 ft., $45,000) Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed Local and Residential street segments as identified within the Infrastructure Management System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance preservation activities are no longer effective or economical. Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure. Structural street failures Deferred pending funding Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Attachment 2-105 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Account #: 850178 System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation Maple Island Improvements 10% Map ID-TS 31 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals-Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, Community Development and Economic Revitalization TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way 415$ 415$ Construction 246$ 246$ Other 950$ 230$ 550$ 170$ Total 1,711$ -$ -$ 330$ 550$ 831$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Unspecified 1,611$ 230$ 550$ 831$ Total 1,611$ -$ -$ 230$ 550$ 831$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and future development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will upgrade the roundabout at Maple Island Road and International Way. It will also extend the Maple Island Loop Road to the north along the Maple Island Slough. Justification: The City of Springfield desires to promote growth and development in the Gateway Area which will increase the need for more access and connectivity to alleviate traffic congestion. Private developer has constructed a portion of the north extension of Maple Island Rd., which the City can acquire at cost before 2017. Sufficient funding to acquire north extension and/or intersection improvements Council Goals and development within the Gateway Area Attachment 2-106 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Intelligent Lighting Controls 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 56$ 56$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 632$ 632$ Other -$ Total 688$ -$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs*(450)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ Personnel Costs (56)$ (3)$ (6)$ (8)$ (11)$ (14)$ (14)$ Total (506)$ -$ (78)$ (81)$ (83)$ (86)$ (89)$ (89)$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other 688$ 688$ Unspecified Total 688$ -$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Maintenance Costs above reflect averaged annual cost to replace stolen wire. Deferred Pending Funding Availability: this project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover areas of higher energy consumption or areas of high risk of wire theft. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: An Intelligent lighting system will monitor street light performance. The light monitoring system will monitor energy consumption, fixture output, light outages, generate work orders and, most importantly, alarm per set conditions. The alarm feature would be used as a wire theft prevention with the idea of alerting the Police Department when a series of lights on a circuit suddenly goes dark. This would be a primary method of protecting the public infrastructure and cost of replacing stolen wire. Justification: In the past two years the City has lost approximately $150,000 in the repair and replacement of stolen conductors for street light systems. Also, current loss prevention has resulted in extra expense for our own repair of the systems that do get damaged. Street light outages are currently reported by citizens and by City personnel conducting physical surveys of the existing system to search for outages and problems. With the implementation of this system there would be a reduction in labor expense for monitoring the system, wire loss prevention, and reduced time of light outages, all improving customer service and satisfaction. Finally, the system has a dimming control feature that will allow for substantial energy savings by allowing the City to DIM light output during non-peak hours. The system will also include a data base of the lighting assets allowing much better management of the asset. Opportunity to reduce operational costs and funding availability Wire theft and street light management Attachment 2-107 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Wire Theft Remediation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goals: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 50$ 5$ 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 520$ 35$ 210$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ Other -$ Total 570$ 40$ 230$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 40$ 40$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 530$ 230$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ Total 570$ 40$ 230$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ 60$ Deferred Pending Funding Availability and project priority. This project is scalable. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: In the past several years, the City has suffered theft of wire and damage to it's street lighting systems on a large scale. As the losses suffered have increased, it has become an unmanageable burden for normal maintenance budgets to repair/replace the infrastructure. This project would identify areas of theft or vandalism, develop plans to replace/repair the lighting system and have the work completed. Justification: Replacement and repair of City lighting systems that were rendered inoperable due to theft, vandalism, accident or crash. Safety and Citizen Requests Response to inoperable lighting systems Attachment 2-108 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Main Street Lighting 0% Map ID-TS 34 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities ODOT Main Street Safety Study TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 300$ 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ Other -$ Total 700$ -$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 36$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ Personnel Costs 18$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Total 54$ -$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SEDA 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 700$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$ Total 700$ -$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$ -$ -$ Deferred Pending Funding Availability (This project is scalable and could be completed in phases) Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will add lighting to Main Street from 20th to 69th by placing lights on existing poles where available and installing new poles where necessary. The project could be incremental and done in phases or sections. Justification: Main Street is a major arterial and has been identified by ODOT as a corridor with significant safety issues. A safety study for the corridor identified street lighting as a major component toward improving pedestrian safety. ODOT does not light urban highways that are not freeways. There have been multiple deaths and pedestrian crashes in addition to a high number of vehicle crashes. The improved lighting offers a significant safety benefit. Improved lighting also has the potential for positive public perception of the corridor. Safety/Hazard condition Project priority and funding availability Attachment 2-109 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation RRFB & PHB Installations 0% Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 47$ 17$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 263$ 143$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ Other -$ Total 310$ 160$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 6$ -$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 160$ 160$ Other -$ Unspecified 150$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Total 310$ 160$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ Council Goals: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding Availability Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The City has and continues to receive numerous requests for improved safety at pedestrian crossings. Statewide, an average of 1 pedestrian/bicylist dies each week and 2 are injured every day. These projects would increase pedestrian safety and respond to public requests. Improve safety for pedestrian crossings Funding availability and project priority Project Description: Several crossings have been identified that would receive a safety benefit from the installation of a RRFB (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) or a PHB (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon). Attachment 2-110 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 60$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 90$ -$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 90$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Total 90$ -$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ Council Goals: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding Availability. The project is scalable. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The project will evaluate traffic volumes and determine locations where the implementation of Protective/Permissive turn movements will benefit safety and operations. Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Project will result in less delay and therefore fuel consumption. Improve traffic system operations and reduce vehicle delay Funding availability and project priority Flashing Yellow Arrow Prot/Perm Left Turns Attachment 2-111 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Traffic Signal Communications 0% No Map Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: ITS Metro Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 15$ 5$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 70$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Other -$ Total 85$ -$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 85$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ Total 85$ -$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ This project may be scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover a limited area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: As traffic signal technology advances, so does the necessary element of communication within the signal network. Improved communication offers advanced signal control, less maintenance time, and improved error identification capabilities. The City system currently in place is aging and improvements will be necessary in the near future as standards changes. The project will evaluate central system software, fiber optic lines, wireless radio communication, and existing copper connections. Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Improved responsiveness to signal issues. Operational Functionality Planned installation of high band width requirement equipment that exceeds existing communication capacity, or failure of legacy system or its components. Attachment 2-112 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Cherokee Dr. Overlay 0% Map ID-TS 40 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 40$ 40$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 160$ 160$ Other -$ Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 200$ 200$ Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: Rehabilitate the street pavement on Cherokee Drive, from S. 34th Place to S. 38th Street, to restore the street pavement following the Cherokee Drive Sewer Local Improvement District (LID). Justification: The Cherokee Drive Sewer LID is complete. During construction, staff found that the existing pavement structure was about 2 inches of asphalt over about 6 inches of base. This structure is significantly less than current standards for a local street, and the street is exhibiting significant cracking following the LID project. Pending funding availability and project priority Improvement SDC Eligibility: Pavement failures Citizen inquiries, following LID construction which likely accelerated pavement failure. Attachment 2-113 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project 7% Map ID-TS 33 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Priority Franklin Blvd. Study Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 2,000$ 2,000$ Land/Right of Way 12,000$ 7,000$ 5,000$ Construction 21,400$ 13,000$ 8,400$ Other -$ Total 35,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22,000$ 13,400$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 10$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 30$ 15$ 15$ Total 40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 20$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund #Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 35,400$ 25,000$ 10,400$ Total 35,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 10,400$ -$ Unfunded Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project will construct modern urban standards improvements on the old Hwy 99 alignment in Glenwood called Franklin Boulevard between the Franklin/Glenwood intersection and the Franklin/McVay intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional safety and mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos. Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and is integrated with the urban renewal plan for Glenwood. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work. City priority to redevelop Glenwood riverfront area Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to successful Glenwood area redevelopment. City, in partnership with the Lane Transit District, ODOT and Eugene continues to seek project funding through various federal initiatives, including a federal transportation bill reauthorization funding request through the Oregon Congressional Delegation. Attachment 2-114 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements 8% Map ID-TP 38 Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 30$ 30$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 330$ -$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 330$ 330$ Total 330$ -$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Deferred Pending Funding availability Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will build bicycle facilities and sharrows along the Oakdale and Pheasant routes to improve the connectivity to regional and local destinations in the Gateway area. The project will offer bicycle commuters a route choice that is less congested with vehicular traffic. A portion of the project is on County owned jurisdiction and will require County participation. Justification: There are currently no direct routes from the I-5 pedestrian bridge to the PeaceHealth facility at RiverBend. This route is one piece of that direct route connection, with the remaining piece of the route currently under county jurisdiction. Improve alternative mode connectivity to major destinations in the Gateway area. User demand Attachment 2-115 Transportation and Street Capital Projects Funding Programmed: Partial Account #: System Upgrades 6% Map ID-TS 41 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield 2030 Infrastructure Management System TransPlan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 75$ 75$ Engineering 270$ 170$ 100$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,300$ 1,300$ Other 55$ 55$ Total 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300$ 1,400$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid, STP-U 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 447 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$ Other (Willamalane) 420 -$ SEDA 429 -$ Unspecified 1,700$ 1,700$ Total 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700$ -$ -$ *City has recently made application to the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018 STIP) for $1.513 million On Hold Pending Funding 42nd Street Operational, Safety, and Mobility Improvements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Upgrade to address safety and operations, in particular for freight accessing the OR 126 Expressway- Freight Route and OR 126B-Main St. Upgrade the UP rail crossing serving the International Paper, Sierra Pine, and Weyerhaeuser industrial center, upgrade intersection control at the westbound OR 126 ramp terminal, add urban level lighting, add ADA-accessible connections from Olympic St. and Industrial Ave. to the McKenzie Levee Path, add left turn bay on 42nd St. at Industrial Ave and improve traffic signals at the eastbound OR 126 ramp terminal, Olympic Street and the International Paper driveways. Justification: The 42nd Street project will provide much needed safety and operations improvements along an important freight route in Springfield. In its current condition, 42nd St. has significant safety and operations issues that are in need of mitigation. The existing rail crossing on 42nd, leading into a regionally significant industrial employment site is in a constant state of disrepair, with asphalt that continues to buckle under the heavy weight of freight cars. Signals in the project area are in desperate need of adaptive coordination. Long vehicular queues exist on 42nd St. due to the existing signal system and cars turning left (west) onto Industrial Ave. These conditions cause congested traffic, freight delays, and difficulty for trucks entering and exiting the industrial sites. Congestion and safety issues, in partiuclar freight mobility, that impact local economy. Operational Functionality and safety/hazard concern Attachment 2-116 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Bike Wayfinding & Safety Improvements 0% Map ID-TP 38 Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 2$ 2$ Engineering 16$ 16$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 82$ 82$ Other -$ Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 100$ 100$ Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality Deferred Pending Funding availability Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will add bicycle wayfinding signage and safety improvements around the City, with priority given to improvements between the 'D' street path area and downtown Springfield. The project will offer bicycle commuters clear direction on preferred routes to and from destinations throughout Springfield, with specific emphasis on downtown destinations and the regional 'D' street path. Safety improvements will include, but are not limited to improved lighting, intersection improvements and striping. Justification: There is currently no consistent wayfinding signage between the 'D' street path to downtown, or to other areas around Springfield. A recently completed Springfield Wayfinding Plan will provide guidance to develop this project. Bicycle safety improvements are also needed around Springfield, but most specifically at the west 'D' street intersection with the 'D' street path. The Springfield Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) made a formal recommendation for this project during their December 17th, 2013 meeting. Improve bicycle wayfinding and safety, with an emphasis on downtown Springfield User demand / BPAC recommendation Attachment 2-117 Transportation and Streets Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation City Hall Public Bike Parking 0% Map ID-TP 38 Project Driver: Total Project Constructed Cost: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 8$ 8$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 27$ 27$ Other -$ Total 35$ 35$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.) 447 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Other -$ Unspecified 35$ 35$ Total 35$ -$ -$ 35$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred Pending Funding availability City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project will add secure, long term bicycle parking underneath City Hall. The project will offer bicycle commuters a secure parking location that includes shelter from the elements. Justification: There is currently no long term secure bike parking at City Hall for the general public. The Springfield Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) made a formal recommendation for this project during their December 17th, 2013 meeting. A recent Regional Bicycle Parking Study also recommends additional bike parking at City Hall. The Study will provide guidance on the development details of this parking. Improve public bicycle parking at City Hall User demand / BPAC recommendation Attachment 2-118 WASTEWATER Overview Wastewater projects fall into several categories: Preservation and Maintenance –These projects typically involve upgrading the current wastewater system.Projects may include the rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines,laterals and connections to reduce infiltration and inflow of groundwater into the system. New Facilities –These projects typically involve the construction of new wastewater facilities as a result, or in anticipation of new development.Projects may include sanitary sewer lines built as part of a new subdivision and extension of sanitary sewer trunk lines. PROJECT MAPS Constructed WW3 10th and “N”Street Upgrade WW5 S.2nd Street Sewer Replacement WW22 E.17th Avenue Sewer In process WW12 Franklin Boulevard System Expansion WW21 19th Street Sewer Upgrade Funding Programmed WW7 Hayden Lo Pump Station WW8 River Glen Pump Station WW1 Jasper Trunk Line Extension Partial Funding/Funding Not Programmed WW11 Main Street Improvements Unit 1 WW13 Nugget Way Pump Station WW14 Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump Station WW15 Main Street Improvements Unit 2 WW16 McKenzie Highway Expansion WW17 “A”Street Improvements Unit 1 WW18 “A”Street Improvements Unit 2 WW19 “A”Street Improvements Unit 3 WW23 Marcola Rd.Sewer –22nd to 28th Streets Attachment 2-119 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-120 Future Map Attachment 2-121 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-122 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total 10th and "N" Sewer Upgrade 4,000$ - - - - - 4,000 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 4,000$ - - - - - 4,000 S. 2nd Street Sewer Replacement 1,030$ - - - - - 1,030 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 1,030$ - - - - - 1,030 E. 17th Avenue Sewer 135$ - - - - - 135 Capital Fund (409) 135$ - - - - - 135 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Franklin Boulevard Expansion 2,998$ - - - - - 2,998 Capital Fund (409) 1,681$ - - - - - 1,681 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 1,317$ - - - - - 1,317 Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - 19th Street Sewer Upgrade 20$ 600 - - - - 620 Capital Fund (409) 20$ 600 - - - - 620 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Misc. Wastewater System Repair 200$ 250 250 250 250 250 1,450 Capital Fund (409)-$ 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442) 200$ - - - - - 200 Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - CMOM Planning and Implementation 100$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,100 Capital Fund (409) 100$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 4,600 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - 500 500 Hayden Lo Pump Station 1,050$ - - - - - 1,050 Capital Fund (409) 200$ - - - - - 200 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442) 850$ - - - - - 850 Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Constructed In Process Funding Programmed Attachment 2-123 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total River Glen Pump Station 250$ 200 575 - - - 1,025 Capital Fund (409)-$ 100 525 - - - 625 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ 100 50 - - - 150 Revenue Bonds (409) 250$ - - - - - 250 Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Master Plan Update 135$ - - - - - 135 Capital Fund (409) 68$ - - - - - 68 Improvement SDCs (443) 67$ - - - - - 67 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Jasper Trunk Line Extension 9,500$ - - - - - 9,500 Capital Fund (409) 200$ - - - - - 200 Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409) 9,300$ - - - - - 9,300 Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - - Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th -$ - 230 - - - 230 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 230 - - - 230 Main Street Improvements Unit 1 -$ - 2,102 - - - 2,102 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 2,102 - - - 2,102 Peacehealth-Riverbend Pump Station -$ - - 3,189 - - 3,189 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 3,189 - - 3,189 Main Street Improvements 2 -$ - - 1,145 - - 1,145 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 1,145 - - 1,145 McKenzie Highway Improvements -$ - - 1,683 - - 1,683 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 1,683 - - 1,683 Partial Funding Programmed/Funding Not Programmed Attachment 2-124 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total "A" Street Improvements 1 -$ - - - 620 - 620 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - 216 - 216 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - 404 - 404 "A" Street Improvements 2 -$ - - 85 200 - 285 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - 85 - - 85 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - 200 - 200 "A" Street Improvements 3 -$ - - 72 108 - 180 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - 72 - - 72 Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - 108 - 108 Local Sewer Extensions -$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Capital Fund (409)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (409)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 Annual Totals 19,418$ 2,050 5,157 8,424 3,178 2,250 21,059 Capital Fund (409) 2,404$ 1,950 1,775 1,250 1,250 750 6,975 Improvement SDCs (443) 67$ - - 157 216 - 373 Reimbursement SDCs (442) 1,050$ 100 50 - - - 150 Revenue Bonds (409) 15,897$ - - - - - - Special Assmt. (419)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 3,332 7,017 1,712 1,500 13,561 Attachment 2-125 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850225 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation 10th and "N" Sewer Upgrade 0% Map ID-WW 3 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 545$ 545$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,390$ 3,390$ Other 65$ 65$ Total 4,000$ 4,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 50$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8 8$ Personnel Costs 50$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8$ 8$ Total 100$ 12$ 12$ 14$ 14$ 16$ 16$ 16$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 4,000$ 4,000$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Other -$ Total 4,000$ 4,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Phase 1 Construction complete, Phase 2 construction complete, Council Acceptance early 2015. Regulatory requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Construct approximately 6,500 linear feet of 24 inch wastewater pipe parallel to the existing 24 inch wastewater pipe. This project will require the line to be bored under Highway 126. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need. In order to simplify construction, several of the collection lines in Basin 22 will be constructed as part of the 10th & N Street Upgrade project. Justification: The project improves the capacity problems in the wastewater collection system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2010. Attachment 2-126 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850249 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation S. 2nd Street Sewer Replacement 0% Map ID-WW 5 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 225$ 150$ 75$ Land/Right of Way 15$ 15$ Construction 1,700$ 850$ 850$ Other 15$ 15$ Total 1,955$ 1,030$ 925$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 1,030$ 1,030$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Other -$ Total 1,030$ 1,030$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Construction completed. Council acceptance early 2015 Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Replace the sanitary sewer line in S. 2nd Street, upgrading a portion of the line from 8 inch to 12 inch to better accommodate the permitted industrial discharges, as well as the future Harbor Drive Pump Station. The project will also correct identified grade issues as well as inflow/infiltration concerns Justification: During the summer of 2012, the S. 2nd Street sanitary sewer mainline experienced a sanitary sewer overflow (SSO). It was determined that cause of the overflow was a build-up of resin from an industrial customer connected to line as well as the age (40 to 60 yrs) of the line. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. Regulatory requirements, recent sanitary sewer overflow Attachment 2-127 Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation E. 17th Avenue Sewer 0% Map ID-WW 22 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2011 IGA with Lane County EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 15$ 15$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 120$ 120$ Other -$ Total 135$ 135$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 User Fees 409 135$ 135$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 135$ 135$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: Properties along the south side of E. 17th Avenue in Glenwood, between Glenwood Boulevard and Henderson Avenue, do not have public wastewater service available. The City and Lane County have entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) in 2011 for pavement rehabilitation and jurisdiction transfer of Glenwood Boulevard. This IG includes the option for the City to pay the County for pavement rehabilitation on this segment of E. 17th Avenue if the City has funds available. City desires to install the needed public wastewater line prior to the pavement rehabilitation in 2014. Justification: The project provides wastewater service to unserved, unannexed parcels within Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary in Glenwood prior to a planned project to rehabilitate the street pavement Construction completed 2014, Council acceptance 2015. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Orderly and efficient provision of key urban services through constructing a needed public wastewater line in E. 17th Avenue prior to rehabilitating the street pavement. E. 17th Avenue paving rehabilitation per IGA with Lane County (Council Motion on 10/17/11) in 2014. Attachment 2-128 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Franklin Boulevard System Expansion 100% Map ID-WW 12 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:Construction completion in 2015. Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 75$ 75$ Engineering 300$ 300$ Land/Right of Way 250$ 250$ Construction 2,373$ 2,373$ Other -$ Total 2,998$ 2,998 - - - - - - OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Maintenance Costs 21$ 3$ 4$ 4$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 41$ 7$ 8$ 8$ 9$ 9$ Total 62$ 10$ 12$ 12$ 14$ 14$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 1,317$ 1,317$ User Fees 409 1,681$ 1,681$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 2,998$ 2,998$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Development activity in the Glenwood area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project expands the Glenwood wastewater system from the existing 30 inch trunk line in Franklin Boulevard south with approximately 3,900 feet of 15 inch pipe and 2,400 feet of 8 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by maintenance every five years. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the Glenwood area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009. Additionally, should the City receive federal stimulus dollars for the Franklin Boulevard Project, this will become a priority as some of the new pipe will be under the reconstructed roadway. Attachment 2-129 Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation 19th Street Sewer Upgrade 0% Map ID-WW 21 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Compliance with Environmental Protection Agency enforcement order EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 10$ 10 Engineering 210$ 10 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 400$ 400 Other -$ Total 620$ 20$ 600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 User Fees 409 620$ 20 600$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 620$ 20$ 600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: Project #3 in the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan involves replacing the existing 12-inch wastewater line with an 18-inch line from MH10034175 (North Springfield Interceptor) to MH10034164 (at Highway 126 westbound off ramp) in 19th Street. This upgrade will alleviate modeled surcharged flow in the system upstream of the upgrade location. Justification: The project improves capacity problems in the wastewater collection system during wet weather and peak flow conditions. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2014. Regulatory requirements Attachment 2-130 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #850007 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Miscellaneous Wastewater System Repair 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Accumulating funds for projects as developed Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Planning -$ Engineering 260$ 20$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,440$ 180$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$ Other -$ Total 1,700$ 200$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 1,500$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 200$ 200$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,700$ 200$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ Regulatory requirements Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers that require either emergency rehabilitation as a result of Sanitary Sewer Overflows or the prospect of impending system failures. The DPW Operations Division addresses an average of four (4) emergency repairs of this nature annually. Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe or other system components that have reached the end of their useful life or are otherwise causing problems within the collection system. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as scheduled, thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. This program provides funding for maintenance and engineering to respond to any system failures or issues quickly and efficiently as they arise or are identified. Attachment 2-131 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account #830010 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation CMOM Planning & Implementation 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan Regulatory Requirements EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 1,250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ Other -$ Total 5,000$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 5,600$ 100$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 500$ 1,000$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 500$ 500$ Total 6,100$ 100$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Ongoing Program Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: The City of Springfield's obligations in the 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) were completed by January 2010; however it is necessary for the City to continue to fund wastewater system rehabilitation and Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) reduction projects. These additional projects will be identified through the Wastewater Master Plan Update project and the Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) program that will likely be included in the next NPDES permit for the wastewater system. Justification: This program deals with capacity problems in the wastewater system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective manner identified by the Wastewater Master Plan and the WWFMP. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state regulations requiring elimination of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as schedule thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget. Regulatory requirements Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to the regional wastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements. Attachment 2-132 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Hayden Lo Pump Station 0% Map ID-WW 7 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 600$ 600$ Other 250$ 250$ Total 1,050$ 200$ 850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2 2$ 2$ Total 15$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 200$ 200$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 850$ 850$ Unspecified -$ Total 1,050$ 1,050$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO. Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan, Protection of Public health and safety Programmed Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 494 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This project is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2014. Attachment 2-133 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation River Glen Pump Station 21% Map ID-WW 8 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 50$ 50$ Engineering 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 700$ 700$ Other 275$ 275$ Total 1,225$ 250$ 275$ 700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs 8$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Total 12$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 250$ 250$ -$ User Fees 409 625$ 100$ 525$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 150$ 100$ 50$ Unspecified - Total 1,025$ 250$ 200$ 575$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO. Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a minimum of 664 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow monitoring to occur. Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This is project necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2015. Attachment 2-134 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # 830005 Construction and Preservation Wastewater Master Plan Update 50% No Map Project Description: Justification: Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Wastewater Master Plan, June 2008 City Council Objective EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 135$ 15$ 120 Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 135$ 15$ 120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 68$ 68$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.443 67$ 67$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 135$ 135$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Update process to begin in 2015 Improvement SDC Eligibility: To meet 5-yr target set by Council (2013 Adoption) Council Direction to update Project List and Master Plan on 5-yr cycle Review June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and update as necessary. Review and revise the June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and technical model as necessary to accommodate changes related to new growth, additional flow monitoring data, implementation of the Downtown Plan, proposed changes in Glenwood and updating the 1991 North Springfield Sewer Study . Attachment 2-135 Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes Account # 850105 System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Jasper Trunk Line Extension 81% Map ID-WW 1 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 200$ 200$ Engineering 1,050$ 1,050$ Land/Right of Way 750$ 750$ Construction 7,500$ 7,500$ Other Total 9,500$ 9,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 47$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ Personnel Costs 151$ 20$ 20$ 21$ 21$ 23$ 23$ 23$ Total 198$ 26$ 26$ 28$ 28$ 30$ 30$ 30$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 9,300$ 9,300$ User Fees 409 200$ 200$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$ Total 9,500$ 9,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Development in the Jasper/Natron Area and the need to decommission 3 pump stations and avoid costly system upgrades and maintenance activities. Phase 1 Complete. Phase 2 Complete. Phase 3 easement acquisition underway, construction deferred pending development activitiy. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 10 to 27 inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from S. 42nd Street to Natron and the Urban Growth Boundary. The City is planning on borrowing the total of the project cost and collecting the developer share through agreements and reimbursements upon connection to the system. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by Maintenance every five years. The additional impact on the operations and maintenance budget are shown below. Justification: The Jasper Trunk Line Extension project will provide sewer service to the Jasper/Natron area within the Urban Growth Boundary that is currently not served. Given completion of the Bob Straub Parkway, it is a priority to extend sewer service to this area to serve anticipated development. 100% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with an estimated 50% to be reimbursed to the City by grants, developer contributions, or assessments. The project is currently planned to be constructed in at least 3 phases, with the first 2 phases to be completed in 2012. The remaining phase(s) will be constructed as funding becomes available and development activity resumes. Completing the first two phases will allow the City to decommission three existing pump stations, thereby significantly reducing the City's annual operations and maintenance costs. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for construction by 2010. Attachment 2-136 Wastewater Funding Secured: No Account Construction and Preservation Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th Streets 0% Map ID-WW 23 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Marcola Meadows Master Plan approval EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 20$ 20$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 210$ 210$ Other -$ Total 230$ -$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 User Fees 409 -$ Revenue Bond 409 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ SDCs. Imp (WW) 443 -$ Unspecified 230$ 230$ Total 230$ -$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Description: In 1979, parcels within the Northview Subdivision, on the south side of Marcola Road between 22nd and 28th Streets, were annexed to the City without wastewater service. This project will construct a public 8-inch sewer to provide service to each parcel. Development of the Marcola Meadows site will include new public wastewater lines within new public streets, extending south from the North Springfield Interceptor, which will allow service to the Northview Subdivision parcels. The approved Marcola Meadows Master Plan requires improvements to Marcola Road, including installation of the needed wastewater line in Marcola Road with the City paying for some or all of the cost to install this line. The City will recoup its costs through the application of Sewer In-lieu of Assessment fees charged on the Northview Subdivision parcels when they connect to the new line. Justification: The project provides wastewater service to unserved, annexed parcels within Springfield concurrent with a planned project to improve Marcola Road. Deferred pending funding and development activity Improvement SDC Eligibility: Orderly and efficient provision of key urban services through constructing a needed public wastewater line in Marcola Road concurrent with a planned street improvement project. Construction of the Marcola Meadows development Attachment 2-137 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Main Street Improvements Unit 1 20% Map ID-WW 11 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status:Deferred pending funding and increased development activity Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Direction 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 25$ 25$ Engineering 721$ 721$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,356$ 1,356$ Other -$ Total 2,102$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 2,102$ 2,102$ Total 2,102$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Regulatory requirements and development activity in the east Springfield area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project begins at 59th Street and replaces approximately 3600 linear feet of 15 and 18 inch wastewater pipe to the east with a 24 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. To avoid capacity issues, the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan identifies a need to upgrade to 21 inch pipe for existing land use; however a 24 inch pipe is recommended to provide for future growth. The Wastewater Master Plan recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. Also, Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2011. Attachment 2-138 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Peacehealth/RiverBend Pump Station 100% Map ID-WW 14 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Sanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision (2005) EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 956$ 956$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 2,233$ 2,233$ Other -$ Total 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 44$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 44$ -$ -$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 3,189$ 3,189$ Total 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development within the RiverBend Area - capacity issues; and/or construction of the NE link between RiverBend Drive and International Way. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project is for the engineering and construction of a pump station in the RiverBend area. The need for the pump station will be driven by development within the RiverBend campus area and as defined in the Sanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the RiverBend area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. Project construction will occur with development. Attachment 2-139 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Main Street Improvements Unit 2 25% Map ID-WW 15 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 406$ 406$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 739$ 739$ Other -$ Total 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,145$ 1,145$ Total 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development activity in the east Springfield area Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This Project begins at 69th Street and replaces approximately 2,300 linear feet of 12 inch wastewater pipe to the east with a 18 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. Attachment 2-140 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation McKenzie Highway Expansion 100% Map ID-WW 16 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 600$ 600$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,083$ 1,083$ Other -$ Total 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$ Personnel Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$ Total 32$ -$ -$ -$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 1,683$ 1,683$ Total 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project extends the wastewater system from the existing 21 inch trunk line east along the McKenzie Highway with approximately 2,000 feet of 10 inch pipe and 2,000 feet of 12 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012. Attachment 2-141 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 1 35% Map ID-WW 17 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 200$ 200$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 420$ 420$ Other -$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 216$ 216$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 404$ 404$ Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 1,000 feet of an exiting 12 inch wastewater pipe with a 15 inch pipe from 66th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area.Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. Attachment 2-142 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 2 30% Map ID-WW 18 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 85$ 85$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 200$ 200$ Other -$ Total 285$ -$ -$ -$ 85$ 200$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 85$ 85$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 200$ 200$ Total 285$ -$ -$ -$ 85$ 200$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 529 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch pipe from 69th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. Attachment 2-143 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation "A" Street Improvements Unit 3 40% Map ID-WW 19 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 65$ 65$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 115$ 115$ Other -$ Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ 65$ 115$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 72$ 72$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 108$ 108$ Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ 72$ 108$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding and development activity Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: This project replaces approximately 325 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch pipe from 70th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design. Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in the east Springfield area. Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013. Attachment 2-144 Wastewater Funding Programmed: No Account # System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation Local Sewer Extensions 0% No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal to provide for development. 2008 Wastewater Master Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Engineering 750$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 4,000$ 800$ 800$ 800$ 800$ 800$ Other -$ Total 5,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 11$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$ Personnel Costs 12$ 2$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$ Total 23$ -$ -$ 3$ 2$ 4$ 6$ 8$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 409 -$ User Fees 409 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp. 443 -$ SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified 5,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Total 5,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Deferred pending funding Council decision - Annexation of developed areas within the UGB and/or petitions for Local Improvement Districts Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Within the City of Springfield's city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are several areas that are fully developed, but lack wastewater service. The project would fund extending wastewater pipes to these areas upon request of affected property owners or annexation, with some or all of the cost possibly reimbursable through assessments. Increased infrastructure will increase the need for more maintenance personnel which impacts the wastewater operations budget. The estimated increase in the wastewater operations cost is $1,600 per 1,000 feet of new pipe. Justification: The City will need to provide wastewater service to all development existing and future within the city and the UGB. Environmental issues, or failing septic tanks within the City and un-annexed areas within the UGB Attachment 2-145 BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY Overview The Buildings and Property section covers a variety of projects that include;construction of new facilities;maintenance,repair or renovation of existing facilities;and the demolition of unnecessary or unmaintainable facilities.As the City of Springfield grows,so does the need for municipal public services.These services come with an associated infrastructure that requires continual monitoring, maintenance,replacement and/or additions.In order to catch up and stay current,Buildings and Property projects will continue to be a priority. Numerous other projects are included in the Building Preservation sheet.This project addresses ongoing maintenance issues as well as maintenance to begin alleviating the backlog of deferred previously unfunded maintenance projects.There are projects at all Cityowned buildings,including City Hall,Fire Stations,Museum,Justice Center,Depot,and Development and Public Works Operations Division Facilities. Another project is for the removal of the building constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillway dam.This project is in conjunction with an Army Corp of Engineers Mill Race bank restoration project.Timing of the removal and related work is related to Army Corp scheduling. Project Maps In Process BP2 Building Preservation BP3 Firing Range Decommissioning Funding Programmed BP4 Book Kelly Internal Structural Improvements BP5 Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair BP6 Booth Kelly Building Removal BP7 Booth Kelly Water Isolation Analysis Funding Not Programmed BP10 Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement BP13 City Storage Facility BP15 Renovation of City Hall BP16 City Hall HVAC System Replacement BP17 Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements BP20 Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Trail BP21 Downtown Mill Plaza Attachment 2-146 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-147 Future Map Attachment 2-148 Intentionally Left Blank Attachment 2-149 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Building Preservation 1,582$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,582$ Revenue Bonds (xxx)-$ - - - - - - Buliding Preservation Fund (420) 1,582$ 270 270 270 270 270 2,932$ Unspecified 730 730 730 730 730 3,650$ Firing Range Decommissioning 125$ - - - - - 125$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Revenue Bonds (425) 125$ - - - - - 125$ Booth Kelly Building Assessment 429$ 30 - - - - 459$ Booth Kelly (618) 429$ 30 - - - 459$ Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair -$ 100 - - - - 100$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ 100 - - - - 100$ Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly Building Removal -$ 40 - - - - 40 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Booth Kelly (618)-$ 40 - - - - 40 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Water Isolation Analysis 5$ 25 - - - - 30 Booth Kelly (618)5$ 25 - - - - 30 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Gateway Art 28$ 250 - - - - 278$ Room Tax (208)13$ - - - - - 13$ Other (420)15$ Unspecified -$ 250 - - - - 250$ City Storage Facility -$ - - 275 - - 275 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - 275 - - 275 Fire Station 14 420$ - - 750 4,800 - 5,970$ Unspecified 420$ - - 750 4,800 - 5,970$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - Library -$ - - 4,800 23,200 - 28,000$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ - - 4,800 23,200 - 28,000$ City Hall Renovation -$ 1,000 1,860 - 2,300 9,600 14,760$ Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - - Fire Station 4 -$ - - - 1,150 4,800 5,950$ Unspecified -$ - - - 1,150 4,800 5,950$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - - Municipal Parking Garage -$ 500 930 - - - 1,430$ Revenue Bonds (420)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified -$ 500 930 - - - 1,430$ City Hall HVAC -$ - - 1,650 - - 1,650$ Unspecified -$ - - 1,650 - - 1,650$ FS3 Parking -$ - 29 - - - 29$ Unspecified -$ 29 - - - 29$ Energy Effeciency Projects -$ - 20 100 50 50 220$ Unspecified -$ 20 100 50 50 220$ Building and Property Maintenance Capital Projects In Process Funding Programmed Funding Not Programmed Attachment 2-150 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Building and Property Maintenance Capital Projects Pioner Memorial Cemetary Trail -$ - 20 50 - - 70$ Unspecified -$ - 20 50 - - 70$ Downtown Mill Plaza Design & Const.-$ - 3,700 - - - 3,700$ Unspecified -$ - 3,700 - - - 3,700$ City Hall Storage -$ - 80 - - - 80$ Unspecified -$ - 80 - - - 80$ Annual Total 2,576$ 1,945 5,779 8,625 30,200 5,850 54,975$ Room Tax (208)13$ - - - - - 13$ Booth Kelly (618) 434$ 195 - - - - 629$ Revenue Bonds (425) 125$ - - - - - 125$ Springfield Sch. Dist (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Willamalane P&R (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Rainbow Water Dist. (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Other (420)15$ - - - - - 15$ Unspecified 420$ 1,480 5,509 8,080 29,930 5,580 50,999$ Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - -$ Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - 275 - - 275$ Buliding Preservation Fund (420) 1,582$ 270 270 270 270 270 2,932$ Attachment 2-151 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Partial Account #810050 Building Rehabilitation and Preservation Building Preservation Map ID-BP 2 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 4,582$ 1,582$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ Other - Reserve sinking fund 3,000$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ Total 7,582$ 1,582$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Capital maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 904$ 400$ 82$ 83$ 84$ 85$ 85$ 85$ Total 904$ 400$ 82$ 83$ 84$ 85$ 85$ 85$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Revenue Bonds 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Building Preservation 420 3,202$ 1,582$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$ Unspecified 4,380$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$ Total 7,582$ 1,582$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Building Condition Report. Project Description: Perform preservation, capital maintenance and repair projects on City-owned buildings, including but not limited to City Hall, 5 Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Jail, Depot, Carter Building and Maintenance Facilities. Projects can include the repair, renovation or replacement of structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Other projects can include systems preservation such as, painting, roofing, lighting, alarm and elevator projects as well as repair and/or upgrades to aesthetic and architectural elements. Justification: These projects are necessary to maintain and preserve City-owned buildings. Project needs, costing, and prioritization are identified in the Development and Public Works Building Maintenance Work Plan and by City Staff. Deferred capital maintenance (backlog) and annual ongoing capital maintenance needs are identified. Extending beyond the 5-yr CIP, funding needs will continue and will likely increase as facilities age and costs increase. Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assets Aged facilities, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation of Council 5-year Work plan and 5-year Building Facility Strategic Plan. Ongoing capital maintenance program Attachment 2-152 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account 810022 Construction and Preservation Firing Range Decommissioning Map ID-BP 3 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 5$ 5$ Engineering 25$ 25$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 95$ 95$ Total 125$ 125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Booth Kelly 618 -$ Revenue Bonds 425 125$ 125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 125$ 125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project Study and Design Phase Mill Race Restoration Project Project Description: This project involves the clean-up of the outdoor firing range formerly used by the Police Department. Cleanup activities include lead mining, removal of miscellaneous materials, and overall environmental assessment of the site. Justification: The Police department discontinued use of the outdoor firing range and is coordinating firearms training with other law enforcement agencies. The site is located above the Booth Kelly Mill Pond, which will be rehabilitated for wetlands and water quality purposes. The outdoor range site must be cleaned up in association with these plans. Completion of Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Pond. This project was originally prioritized for 2001. Attachment 2-153 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account #810053 Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Building Assessment and Planning Map ID-BP 6 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 30$ 30$ Engineering -$ Land/Right ofWay -$ Construction -$ Other -$ Total 30$ -$ 30$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ PersonnelCosts -$ Total $$$$$$$$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund# Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.$ AFGGrant 420 $ SDCs.Reimb.(WW) 442 $ FederalAid 420 $ StateAid 420 $ SDCs.Imp(Storm) 440 $ SDCs,Reimb.(Str.) 446 $ Booth Kelly 618 30$30$ Total 30$$30$$$$$$ This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan. Project Description: Assess Booth Kelly buildings for necessary repairs and prepare plan describing needs with potential anticipated costs. Justification: External Structural Improvements External repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center Planned Attachment 2-154 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account # 810052 Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair Map ID-BP 5 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 100$ 100 Other -$ Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Booth Kelly 618 100$ 100$ Unspecified Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan. Project Description: Roof replacement or epoxy over coating of the existing roof decking of the "Saw-tooth" building, commonly referred to as Building G at the Booth-Kelly Center. Justification: The existing roof material of the "Saw-tooth" building is over 50 years old and no longer provides adequate weather protection for the building users or interior equipment. The replacement or over coating of the roof decking will significantly reduce/eliminate the ongoing maintenance demands of the roof for a period of approximately 20 years. Programmed Internal and structural improvements Attachment 2-155 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes Account #810043 Construction and Preservation Booth Kelly Building Repair Map ID-BP 6 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 5$ 5$ Land/Right ofWay -$ Construction 35$ 35$ Other -$ Total 40$ -$ 40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ PersonnelCosts -$ Total $$$$$$$$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund# Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.$ AFGGrant 420 $ SDCs.Reimb.(WW) 442 $ FederalAid 420 $ StateAid 420 $ SDCs.Imp(Storm) 440 $ SDCs,Reimb.(Str.) 446 $ Booth Kelly 618 40$40$ Total 40$$40$$$$$$ This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan. Justification: The existing roof cover and structural columns are deteriorating and are over 50 years old and no longer provide adequate weather protection and could colapse causing damage to surrounding buildings. External repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center Planned Project Description: Repair or removal of the building structure referred to as Building D, Suite 188 open cover. External Structural Improvements Attachment 2-156 Buildings and Property Funding Secured: Yes Account # 810029 Infrastructure Planning and Inventory Study Booth Kelly Water Isolation Analysis Map ID-BP 7 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right ofWay -$ Construction -$ Other 30$ 5$ 25$ Total 30$ 5$ 25$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) ProjectElement Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ PersonnelCosts -$ Total $$$$$$$$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund# Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.$ AFGGrant 420 $ SDCs.Reimb.(WW) 442 $ FederalAid 420 $ StateAid 420 $ SDCs.Imp(Storm) 440 $ SDCs,Reimb.(Str.) 446 $ Booth Kelly 618 30$5 25$ Unspecified $ Total 30$5$25$$$$$$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: This project will consist of a water isolation analysis to the Booth Kelly Complex grounds in order to locate a slow water leakage. Justification: Locating the leakage will enable us to repair and analyze current locations of all water pipes not identified on paper. The grounds stability will be crucial as to the location of any future building development at Booth Kelly. Possible upgrades or a new direction and re-use of the facility or tear-down and reconstruction of newer buildings would give opportunities for the site, and tying development with updated plans for the downtown area that are now being considered. Identify water leakage due to rate increase Programmed The future development of Booth Kelly Center Attachment 2-157 Buildings and Property Funding Secured: Partial Account #860014 Construction Gateway Art - Entry Beautification Project Map ID-BP 8 Project Driver: Gateway Area Development and Tourism Readiness Project Trigger: Project Status: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 4$ 4$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 24$ 24$ Other 250$ 250$ Total 278$ 4$ 274$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 5$ -$ -$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ Room Tax 208 13$ 13$ Downtown UR/SEDA 430 -$ Other (Developer) 420 15$ 15$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ Booth Kelly 618 -$ Unspecified*250$ 250$ Total 278$ 28$ 250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pending design and financial resources to build an suitable entry sign/monument with appropriate landscaping/viewing area. Original 'Flags' design was too expensive for the $15,000 provided by Symantec plus $12,500 set aside then in Room Tax Funds. Permits are in hand from ODOT, the property owner. Project Description: At the completion of the I-5/Gateway intersection upgrade, land located on the south west corner was identified for a entry beautification project. The project is likely to include art, flags, lighting, minimal concrete work, landscaping, and irrigation. Funding for this project is likely to be from multiple sources including area Room Tax Funds. Justification: The Gateway area is a major entry way to the City of Springfield. Every day, citizens from Springfield, and Eugene and traveling along I-5 visit the Springfield Gateway area for dining, shopping, staying in hotels, medical visits, and working, among many other things. The installation of an entry beautification project to signify reaching their desired destination is an important part of this experience. Suitable design & funding that would come with Chamber spearheading the design & capital campaign. Attachment 2-158 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation City Storage Facility Map ID-BP 13 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 25$ 25$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 250$ 250$ Other -$ Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs (48)$ (16)$ (16)$ (16)$ Personnel Costs 3$ 1$ 1$ 1$ Total (45)$ -$ -$ -$ (15)$ (15)$ (15)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 275$ 275$ Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility to provide long term storage for City Departments. The facility construction is proposed to be a pre-engineered metal building with a concrete floor and include multiple compartments to accommodate the varying storage needs of Departments. The building would be weather-tight and climate controlled to assure proper storage of materials and equipment. Justification: The City owns land at the Development and Public Works-Operation Shops at South 18th street that could be used to construct this facility. Every Department has growing storage needs which include; long term file retention, historical items, materials, equipment and supplies. Limited storage space at City facilities have caused several Departments to rent storage in the private sector. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces. Limited space Capacity Issues Deferred pending funding Attachment 2-159 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement Map ID-BP 10 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 15$ 15$ Engineering 550$ 200$ 350$ Land/Right of Way 405$ 405$ Construction 3,950$ 3,950$ Other 750$ 250$ 500$ Total 5,670$ 420$ -$ -$ 4,400$ 850$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 30$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ 10$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 5,670$ 420$ 4,400$ 850$ Total 5,670$ 420$ -$ -$ 4,400$ 850$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development and Annexation in Jasper Natron requires relocation of fire station to provide urban level of service Project Description: The Project will be constructed in east Springfield, and is anticipated to utilize the site at 725 S. 57th Street. The design of the new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to provide proper Fire and Life Safety services to the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Jasper/Natron area. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #14 located at 4765 Main Street, was originally constructed in 1961 and then remodeled in 1999. In 2007, the Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the station was observed; "while minimally functional, this station is not a positive environment for the staff. Storage and living space are at a critical point. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1961. Since that time the addition of other fire stations to provide fire and emergency service for the expanding city has caused a significant overlap of coverage. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south to cover the Jasper Natron area will not negatively impact current coverage and will accommodate future annexations and development. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility, the fire department will be unable to deliver this key urban service to these future developments. Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Jasper/Natron Attachment 2-160 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account #: Construction and Preservation Library Building No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 2,800$ 2,800 Land/Right of Way 2,000$ 2,000 Construction 18,800$ 18,800$ Other 4,400$ 4,400$ Total 28,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800$ 23,200$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 40$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs 320$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ Total 360$ -$ -$ -$ 90$ 90$ 90$ 90$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 28,000$ 4,800$ 23,200$ Total 28,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800$ 23,200$ -$ -$ Council Goals #4 - Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities and # 5 - Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality. Project Description: Construct an approximately 60k sq. ft. Library facility adequate to serve the needs of Springfield citizens for the next 20-30 years based on currently adopted population estimates. The projected cost of the new library will be $28,000,000 including design, site preparation, construction, FF&E and landscaping. Estimated facility size and cost were derived from: Standards for Oregon Public Libraries, 2008 by the Public Library Division of the Oregon Library Association; Public Library Space Needs: A Planning Outline, 2009, Anders C. Dahlgren, President of Library Planning Associates, Inc., Wisconsin Dept. of Public Instruction; Robertson/Sherwood Architects, Eugene, Oregon, Randy Nishimura - Architect. Justification: The Library is currently below Oregon Library Standards for both facilities and open hours for communities our size. It is at "threshold" (minimum) standards for size of collection. Recently, the Library has experienced double digit increases in both circulation (13%) and program attendance (20%). It cannot expand it's collections in any meaningful way due to space limitations. The Library cannot keep up with public demand for programming and for community meeting space and is hampered in effectively deploying new technology due, in part, to the age and infrastructure of the building. Population estimates project Springfield's population to grow to over 80,000 people in the next 20 years increasing the difficulty in providing services in a sub- standard facility. In addition, a new Library building can help in the City's efforts at revitalizing the downtown core by attracting tens of thousands of people to the area through its services and programs and by serving as a community gathering place. Ability to provide library service from current facility declines to the point that both quality and quantity of service are impacted. Citizen feedback and staff reporting support Council action. Deferred pending funding Growing demand for Library services; current facility cannot sustain current usage level nor can it address projected population growth into the future; ability for new Library to act as a positive factor in revitalizing downtown core. Attachment 2-161 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Renovation of City Hall Map ID-BP 15 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering 330$ 330$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 3,500$ 3,500$ Other -$ Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 3,850$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$ Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: Once the Library moves out of City Hall into a building of its own, City Hall will be left with about 25,000 square feet of empty space that will need to be reallocated to meet departmental space needs. This project is for the renovation of City Hall to improve building safety, energy efficiency and space allocation. This project includes additional seismic bracing, upgraded HVAC system and ductwork, better insulation and interior redesign to better utilize space. Justification: City Hall holds the majority of City Employees and many essential municipal functions are based out of this aging, retrofitted building. The building is not designed to current seismic codes and as such is vulnerable to earthquakes. Also while renovations have improved some energy efficiency from the original construction, additional improvements would increase user comfort and increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Finally with the space created by the Library moving to its own building, City Hall can be reconfigured into a more efficient space for staff and users with room for growth as the City grows. Providing a safe, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff Approval of funding for a new Municipal Library Deferred pending funding Attachment 2-162 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #4 Relocation/Replacement No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 200$ 200$ Engineering 550$ 200$ 350$ Land/Right of Way 400$ 400$ Construction 3,950$ 3,950$ Other 850$ 350$ 500$ Total 5,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,150$ 4,800$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 20$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 5,950$ 1,150$ 4,800$ Total 5,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,150$ 4,800$ -$ Deferred pending funding Development and Annexation in Glenwood requires relocation of Fire Station #4 to provide urban level of service. Project Description: The Project will be constructed in downtown Springfield. The design of the new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends the completed project will meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to implement proper Fire and Life Safety services to the downtown area of the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Glenwood area. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #4, located at 1475 5th Street, was originally constructed in 1973. In 2007, the Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the station was observed; "Age and construction type has led to increasing maintenance costs. The entire structure shows signs of excessive usage and wear. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1973. Since that time the acceptance of Glenwood into the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) from the City of Eugene has created a gap in the Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety's ability provide this key urban level of service to portions of Glenwood. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south will provide improved coverage to the downtown area and accommodate future annexations and developments in Glenwood with the appropriate response time. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility the Fire Department will be unable to deliver urban service levels to future annexations and developments in some areas of Glenwood. Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Glenwood Attachment 2-163 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Municipal Parking Garage (Glenwood) No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Planning 100$ 100$ Engineering 280$ 140$ 140$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,000$ 1,000$ Other 50$ 50$ Total 1,430$ -$ -$ 240$ 1,190$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Maintenance Costs 12$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 12$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Beyond 2019 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 1,430$ 500$ 930$ Total 1,430$ -$ -$ 500$ 930$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Community and Economic Development and Revitalization, Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. Project Description: This project is for the construction of a municipal parking structure in Glenwood. Justification: Construction of the Justice Center required removal of 84 spaces previously reserved for City staff parking. This loss has caused staff to park curbside in the adjacent business district, residential neighborhood, and/or in dedicated public parking around City Hall. Staff have received complaints from businesses and property owners and from the patrons visiting City facilities. By relocating staff and fleet vehicles away from City Hall, additional parking will be made available for customers patronizing downtown businesses and Municipal facilities. Glenwood redevelopment, citizen concerns and business accessibility Deferred pending funding Attachment 2-164 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation City Hall HVAC System Replacement Map ID-BP 16 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 150$ 150$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,500$ 1,500$ Other -$ Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs (20)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ Personnel Costs -$ Total (20)$ -$ -$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 1,650$ 1,650$ Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: This project will replace the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system at City Hall. This project will also include the replacement of 30+ year old fiberboard ductwork with more modern, hygenic material and in a more effecient design to better serve offices, meeting rooms and cubical areas. Engineering analysis will be done to determine the most effecient and effective system to be installed, in an effort to maximize energy effeciency and occupant comfort. Design will try to accomodate maximum flexabiltiy to change easily with building use patterns. Justification: The existing Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system has several issues that are quickly coming together to require a complete change out. First, the existing units were installed in the mid 1990's so they are approaching the end of their useful life. Second, layout of the units has not changed since the original design was done in 1980. However, the layout of City Hall has changed significantly and as a result the ductwork and zoning is very ineffecient and staff comfort is always poor. Third, the 65 package unit heat pumps are potentially not the most effecient or effective HVAC for the building and additional system types should be look into. Providing a comfortabole, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff End of useful life of the existing HVAC system Conceptual Attachment 2-165 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements Map ID-BP 17 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 2$ 2$ Engineering 2$ 2$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 25$ 25$ Other -$ Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 29$ 29$ Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Deferred pending funding Project Description: This project will expand and improve parking areas at Springfield Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street. The project involves addition of ten (10) parking spaces for staff and relocation of the existing fence and gate to the south. The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of staff, equipment, and materials related to the operation of the fire station. Funding for this project has not been identified. Justification: Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street, was originally constructed in 1971. In 2008, the building was remodeled to provide upgraded kitchen facilities and individual sleeping rooms for 24/7 staff. This one-story addition to the existing 8,579 square foot facility eliminated approximately ten (10) secured parking spaces for Fire Department staff and equipment. This project will replace the lost parking areas and relocate the fence that secures the parking area to the South. Current parking availability requires some personal and staff vehicles to be parked in an unsecure area, susceptible to vandalism. Capacity Issues and safety concerns Inadequate facilities Attachment 2-166 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Construction and Preservation Energy Efficiency Projects No Map Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 20$ 20$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 200$ 100$ 50$ 50$ Other -$ Total 220$ -$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ AFG Grant 420 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 220$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ Total 220$ -$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ -$ City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality Project Description: This project is to install energy efficiency improvements in City facilities. These improvements could include; photovoltaic (PV) generation panels, passive solar water heating, geothermal HVAC systems, lighting improvements and building weather-proofing. Work will take place on City facilities including, Regional Fuel Facility, City Hall, five fire stations, City maintenance facilities, Justice Center, Municipal Jail, and City owned rental facilities. This is a five year plan to make improvements to all locations. The first year funding is for planning and design, followed by solar hot water at high use facilities, and Geothermal HVAC systems at our fire stations. Justification: The City is working with Team Springfield partners to implement an initiative that will engage all of the agencies by pursuing innovative and sustainable solutions that reduce demand for electricity while at the same time reducing greenhouse gases (GHG). As a large energy consumer in the area we also generate a significant carbon foot print and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. There are currently regional goals that mandate or recommend reductions in municipal carbon footprints and greenhouse gas emissions; and as such Springfield has determined that we need to look at alternatives to the status quo. Energy costs and Savings Deferred pending funding Attachment 2-167 Buildings and Property Funding Secured: No Construction and Preservation Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Trail Map ID-BP 20 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and FacilitiesCity Council Goal to Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning 10$ 5$ 5$ Engineering 20$ 10$ 10$ Land/Right of Way 10$ 5$ 5$ Construction 50$ 50 Other -$ Total 90$ -$ 20$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Unspecified 70$ 20$ 50 Total 70$ -$ -$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ Pending funding Citizen requests Citizen requests and safety related incidents Project Description: Replace and upgrade the Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Park North Woods trail and steps. The trail and steps were constructed by Lane Metro Youth Corps in 1991. The existing steps and trail are in disrepair and need replacement. In addition, poor lighting and vegetation have created an area inviting inappropriate uses. Justification: This project addresses a need to provide a safe access to the Park and the Willamette Heights area. This is a well used trail that creates a link from the Mill Race/Booth Kelly area to the Park, which is owned by the City. The trail facilitates the Willamette Height's residents access to the downtown area as there are no sidewalks along S. B Street or S. C Street. The timber steps do not comply with current ADA standards, do not include handrails, and erosion is occurring along the trail, affecting safe use of the trail and steps. Enhanced lighting and vegetation replacement will enhance public safety and allow police officers to view into the park while on patrol. Attachment 2-168 Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No Account # Construction and Preservation City Hall Storage Facility Map ID-BP14 Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering 5$ 5$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 75$ 75$ Other -$ Total 80$ -$ -$ 80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 80$ -$ -$ 80$ Total 80$ -$ -$ 80$ -$ -$ -$ -$ City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. City Hall Seismic Study Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility under City Hall to provide long term file storage for City Departments. The facility is proposed to be weather-tight, split-face concrete block building with a concrete floor, it will be climate controlled and fire protected to assure proper storage of materials and files. Justification: There is unutilized space under City Hall between the fleet vehicle parking and the public sidewalk where this storage facility can be constructed. Every Department has growing storage needs, particularly for long term file retention and supplies. Limited storage space in City Hall has caused several Departments to rent storage off-site or crowd files into work areas. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces and create additional useable space for staff. This may also be a way to incorporate findings from the FY 2015 City Hall Seismic Study. Limited space Capacity Issues Deferred pending funding Attachment 2-169 MISCELLANEOUS Overview The Miscellaneous section covers debt collection and tracking of public facilities and infrastructure.As the City of Springfield grows,so does the need for municipal public services.These services come with an associated infrastructure cost that at times requires the City to acquire debt. Current debt includes the Springfield Justice Center Facility bond which included the construction of a jail facility to house misdemeanor offenders. Miscellaneous projects address ongoing facility and infrastructure upgrades,working to sustain physical assets found in the field and electronic assets found in databases.Projects include storm,sewer,and transportation facilities.These projects encompass a variety of areas,like the City’s participation in public improvements of private developments;for example,the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park.Other projects include citywide base mapping projects,such as the Topographic Remapping Project,and database projects like the Asset Management System Replacement Project.Because of budget reductions,the Topographic Remapping Project is not currently funded. Projects: Asset Management System Replacement Project –This project addresses failing systems that manage electronic inventories and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and mapping functions.Functions serve activities such as planning,designing,constructing,maintaining, reporting,accounting,forecasting and operating City facilities,i.e.,managing the City’s billion dollars worth of public facilities.The project is needed to mitigate current and future risk associated with outdated and failing systems (which failed twice in Fall of 2010),continue to support comprehensive facilities and asset management needs,and sustain support for a broad range of Development and Public Works functions.During FY 2012,the City Council approved reappropriating $280,000 each from Local Wastewater and Stormwater capital project budgets so that this project could proceed.Additional capital funding for this project is included in future years of the CIP,as well as from the Operating Budget. Topographic Remapping Project –This project addresses outof date topographic maps (base maps)for the entire City.Current base maps are woefully out ofdate and as a result do not reflect significant development that has occurred over the last 12 years,such as the PeaceHealth RiverBend Medical Center and MountainGate,and other development activity such as smaller capital improvement projects,private developments,and natural resource changes that have occurred since the previous update.Work addresses developmentinduced changes that have occurred across the City and includes updating full topography (e.g.,elevation,structures,surface facilities,vegetation and surface waterways)on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments including a broad range of Development and Public Works functions. Attachment 2-170 Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Miscellaneous Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total City Participation 300$ 199 300 300 300 300 1,699 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 50$ 28 33 33 33 33 210 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - 33 33 33 33 132 Drainage Capital (425) 50$ 34 34 34 34 34 220 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 33$ 33 33 33 33 33 198 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 34$ 34 34 34 34 34 204 Wastewater Capital (409) 33$ - 33 33 33 33 165 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Unspecified -$ - - - - - - Topographic Remapping Project 440$ 173 15 160 15 170 973 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 13$ 11 - - - - 24 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) 21$ 19 - - - - 40 Drainage Capital (425) 21$ 18 - - - - 39 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 21$ 18 - - - - 39 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 51$ 18 - - - - 69 Wastewater Capital (409) 21$ 18 - - - - 39 Street Fund (434) 21$ - - - - - 21 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Transportation Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 271$ 71 15 160 15 170 702 Asset Management System Replacement 1,087$ 129 129 129 129 129 1,732 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440)-$ - - - - - - Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441)-$ - - - - - - Drainage Capital (425) 321$ - - - - - 321 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443)-$ - - - - - - Wastewater Capital (409) 321$ - - - - - 321 Street Fund (434) 165$ - - - - - 165 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446)-$ - - - - - - Transportation Improvement SDCs (447)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified 280$ 129 129 129 129 129 925 Annual Totals 1,827$ 501 444 589 444 599 4,404 Drainage Improvement SDCs (440) 63$ 39 33 33 33 33 234 Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (441) 21$ 19 33 33 33 33 172 Drainage Capital (425) 392$ 52 34 34 34 34 580 Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (442) 54$ 51 33 33 33 33 237 Wastewater Improvement SDCs (443) 85$ 52 34 34 34 34 273 Wastewater Capital (409) 375$ 18 33 33 33 33 525 Street Fund (434) 186$ - - - - - 186 Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (446) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Transportation Improvement SDCs (447) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Unspecified 551$ 200 144 289 144 299 1,627 Attachment 2-171 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account # Debt Service, City Participation, and Others City Participation Varies Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction 1,699$ 300$ 199$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ Other -$ Total 1,699$ 300$ 199$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ -$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Wastewater Capital 409 165$ 33$ -$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Imp. (WW) 443 204$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 198$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ Storm Capital 425 220$ 50$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 210$ 50$ 28$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Reimb (Storm) 441 132$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ SDCs. Imp (Str.) 447 285$ 50$ 35$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 285$ 50$ 35$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ Street Capital 434 Total 1,699$ 300$ 199$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ -$ 860002, 870004, 880001 On-going sinking fund Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's Construction Permit process. To respond to known and potential private development projects, it is necessary to budget $100,000 each fiscal year in each infrastructure program area, i.e. Transportation, Local Wastewater and Stormwater. The programmed funds for FY13 are only those necessary to meet this estimated need. Currently other programmed funds are not yet tied to specific projects. Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyond a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the City under Council adopted participation policies. Private development projects Development and growth. City requirement of developer to oversize infrastructure. Attachment 2-172 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Partial Account #860016 Data Improvements Topographic Remapping Project Varies Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Most other CIP Projects Police Map Books Mill Race Project Fire and Life Safety Map Books Glenwood Refinement Plan Water Rescue Maps FEMA Remapping Project Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)Transportation System Plan Standard and Special Purpose Maps Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps) HB 3337 Implementation and Litigation (2030 Plan, UGB Scenario planning) EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Planning -$ Engineering -$ Land/Right of Way -$ Construction -$ Other 965$ 440$ 150$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ Total 965$ 440$ 150$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt.-$ WW User Rate 409 39$ 21$ 18$ STM Drainage User Rate 425 39$ 21$ 18$ Street User Rate 434 21$ 21$ SDCs. Imp (Storm)440 24$ 13$ 11$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 39$ 21$ 18$ SDCs. Imp. (WW)443 69$ 51$ 18$ SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 -$ -$ -$ SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 40$ 21$ 19$ SDCs, Imp. (Str.)447 -$ -$ Unspecified 717$ 271$ 71$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ Total 988$ 440$ 173$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ Collection of new orthoimagery and LiDAR is complete and planimetric update to the base maps is in process. Collection of street appurtenance features is planned.Pending funding. (Funding estimates an approximately 53/47 split where 53% comes from various Public Works user rate and SDC funds and the remaining 47% comes from other funds managed by other departments.) Improvement SDC Eligibility: Justification: Current base maps are out-of-dated. Base maps do not reflect significant development that has occurred over the last 12 years such as PeaceHealth and MountainGate, do not reflect other development activity such as smaller capital improvement projects, private developments, natural resource changes, etc. that have occurred since that last update and do not include transportation appurtenance features. Many City functions such as facilities planning, design, construction and maintenance, current and long range land use planning, and public safety incident response (fire, police and ambulance) depend on current and complete base maps. In order to serve the broad array of citywide needs for current and complete base map information, this topographic remapping project is required. The acquisition of new orthoimagery and LiDAR data will assist with remapping efforts. Errors and omissions on the topographic maps have already begun to impact functions citywide. Topographic data have reached the end of their useful life and are now obsolete. City wide needs for current and complete base map information are not being met because topographic data is 14 years old. Project Description: Replace out-of-date topographic maps (base maps) for the entire City that were last developed in 2000; replace orthoimagery and LiDAR data on a 3 year cycle. New maps will address development induced changes that have occurred across the City and will include updating full topography (e.g., elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation, surface waterways and transportation appurtenances) on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments. New orthoimagery and LiDAR data will inform and enhance the creation of new base maps. Proposing full remapping in 2013 and then incremental remapping every 2 years to assure that from 2014 forward, base maps for all areas of the City are current to within 3 years - all areas are remapped every three years. Attachment 2-173 Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes Account # System Improvements Asset Management System Replacement NA Project Driver: Project Trigger: Project Status: Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Most CIP Projects and DPW Operations Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans Mill Race Project Transportation System Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Flood Mitigation Facilities Management Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)Asset management Standard and Special Purpose Maps Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps) HB 3337 Implementation and Litigation (2030 Plan, UGB Scenario planning) EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Phase 1 Targeted Migration 642$ 642$ Phase 2 Mobile Solutions 165$ 165$ Phase 3 Street Integration 180$ 180$ Capital Reserve 874$ 100$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ Total 1,861$ 907$ 309$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s) Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Maintenance Costs 798$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ Personnel Costs -$ Total 798$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ FUNDING SOURCE ($000s) Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020 Special Assmt. WW User Rate 409 321$ 321$ STM Drainage User Rate 425 321$ 321$ Street Capital 434 165$ 165$ SDCs. Imp (Storm)440 SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 SDCs. Imp. (WW)443 SDC Reimb. (Street) 446 SDC Reimb. (Storm) 441 SDCs, Imp. (Str.)447 Unspecified 1,054$ 280$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ Total 1,861$ 1,087$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ In Process Improvement SDC Eligibility: Project Description: Replace failing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Facilities Management (FM) systems that manage electronic inventories of City infrastructure and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and mapping functions. Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, reporting, accounting, forecasting and operating City facilities, i.e., managing City facilities valued at approximately one billion dollars. Proposing a phased approach with 1) targeted replacement of existing system FY12-FY13 for $984,000; 2) integration of Street system information FY14 for $200,000; 3) Transportation appurtenance integration FY15-FY16 for $219,000 ($39,000 from FY15 and $180,000 FY16) and then ongoing system maintenance and software licensing fees are shown for informational purposes as Operational Impact for $242,000 per year plus adjustments for inflation beyond - note these costs are not included in the Funding Sources. Justification: The City faces current challenges and future risk. Servers running the City’s GIS/FM system are old and failing. The FM Server is over 4 years and the GIS server is over 5 years old. Since November, 2010 the City has had to recover from two system failures. The first required a half day to repair and the second required 5 days to repair. As a result the system was approximately 90% restored. Subsequent work included moving systems to another aged server, contracting to audit the system and entering a six month on-call contract to assure prompt response to anticipated future failures. System software is approximately 10 years old and no longer supported by vendors, except as funded under contract with the City. Recovery from system failure averages between $5,000 and $10,000 per event. Migration is required to mitigate risk, contain future costs, manage City assets, and sustain facility management functions described above. The City must migrate to new systems to continue to support comprehensive facilities and asset management needs and sustain support for vital Public Works functions. Systems have exceeded their useful life and are now failing. Attachment 2-174 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT 2016-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM + DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT + PROGRAM 2016-2020 + NATURE OF THE APPLICATION For the last few months the Public Works Department has been going through the process of updating the Capital Improvements Program document and has produced a draft copy for the five year period of 2016-2020. The Public Works Department is now bringing the document before the Planning Commission and seeks a recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the draft document. ORDER It is ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that the draft 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program document be sent to the City Council with the Planning Commission’s recommendation for adoption. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on March 3rd, 2015. ____________________________________ Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: AYES: ____ NOES: ____ ABSENT: ____ ABSTAIN: ____ Attachment 3-1