HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 03 07 AIS RS DPW 2018-2022 CIP AIS Planning Commission
Agenda
City Hall
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541.726.3610
Online at www.springfield-or.gov
The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48
hours’ notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA Receiver” for the
hearing impaired is available. To arrange for these services, call 541.726.3610. Meetings will end prior to 10:00 p.m. unless extended by a vote of the Planning Commission.
All proceedings before the Planning Commission are recorded. March 7, 2017
_____________________________ 6:00 p.m. Work Session Jesse Maine Room
______________________________________ NO WORK SESSION SCHEDULED
March 7, 2017 _____________________________
6:00 p.m. Regular Session Council Chambers ______________________________________
CONVENE AND CALL TO ORDER THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE SPRINGFIELD PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE: Chair James _____, Vice Chair Koivula _____, Nelson _____, Vohs _____,
Dunn _____, Landen _____, Sherwood _____.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
In response to a request by a member of the Planning Commission, staff or applicant; by consensus
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Testimony is limited to 3 minutes; testimony may not discuss or otherwise address public hearings
appearing on this Regular Session Agenda
Development and Public Works Director
Anette Spickard , 541-726-3697
Current Development Manager:
Greg Mott 541-726-3774
Management Specialist:
Brenda Jones 541.726.3610
City Attorney’s Office
Kristina Schmunk-Krazz
Planning Commissioners:
Greg James, Chair
Michael Koivula, Vice Chair
Nick Nelson
Tim Vohs
Sean Dunn
Andrew Landen
Troy Sherwood
Planning Commission Agenda
March 7, 2017
Page 2
UPDATED 1/15/2015 bj
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING –
1. 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program, A Community Reinvestment Plan
Jeff Paschall, City Engineer 30 Minutes
CONDUCT OF LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair opens the public hearing
Staff report
Testimony in support of the proposal
Testimony opposed to the proposal
Testimony neither in support of nor opposed to the proposal
Questions from the Commission
Summation by staff
Consideration of request for continuation of public hearing, extension of written record, or both
Close or continue public hearing; close or extend written record (continuance or extension by
motion)
Discussion of the proposal including testimony and evidence addressing the applicable approval
criteria or other criteria cited in the record as applicable to the proposal; possible questions to
staff or public
Motion to recommend approval, approval with modification or conditions, or recommendation
not to adopt the proposal based on the information contained in the staff report, oral and
written testimony, and all other evidence submitted into the record
Chair signs recommendation to the City Council
REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION
BUSINESS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Upcoming Planning Commission meetings, committee assignments, appointments or other business
BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION OF THE SPRINGFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission
Agenda
City Hall
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541.726.3610
Online at www.springfield-or.gov
The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48
hours’ notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA Receiver” for the
hearing impaired is available. To arrange for these services, call 541.726.3610. Meetings will end prior to 10:00 p.m. unless extended by a vote of the Planning Commission.
All proceedings before the Planning Commission are recorded. February 7, 2017
_____________________________ 6:00 p.m. Work Session Jesse Maine Room
______________________________________ NO WORK SESSION SCHEDULED
June 7, 2017 _____________________________
6:00 p.m. Regular Session Council Chambers ______________________________________
CONVENE AND CALL TO ORDER THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE SPRINGFIELD PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE: Chair James _____, Vice Chair Koivula _____, Nelson _____, Vohs _____,
Dunn _____, Landen _____, Sherwood _____.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
In response to a request by a member of the Planning Commission, staff or applicant; by consensus
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Testimony is limited to 3 minutes; testimony may not discuss or otherwise address public hearings
appearing on this Regular Session Agenda
Development and Public Works Director
Anette Spickard , 541-726-3697
Current Development Manager:
Greg Mott 541-726-3774
Management Specialist:
Brenda Jones 541.726.3610
City Attorney’s Office
Kristina Schmunk-Krazz
Planning Commissioners:
Greg James, Chair
Michael Koivula, Vice Chair
Nick Nelson
Tim Vohs
Sean Dunn
Andrew Landen
Troy Sherwood
Planning Commission Agenda
March 7, 2017
Page 2
UPDATED 1/15/2015 bj
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING –
1. 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program, A Community Reinvestment Plan
Jeff Paschall, City Engineer 30 Minutes
CONDUCT OF LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Chair opens the public hearing
Staff report
Testimony in support of the proposal
Testimony opposed to the proposal
Testimony neither in support of nor opposed to the proposal
Questions from the Commission
Summation by staff
Consideration of request for continuation of public hearing, extension of written record, or both
Close or continue public hearing; close or extend written record (continuance or extension by
motion)
Discussion of the proposal including testimony and evidence addressing the applicable approval
criteria or other criteria cited in the record as applicable to the proposal; possible questions to
staff or public
Motion to recommend approval, approval with modification or conditions, or recommendation
not to adopt the proposal based on the information contained in the staff report, oral and
written testimony, and all other evidence submitted into the record
Chair signs recommendation to the City Council
REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION
BUSINESS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Upcoming Planning Commission meetings, committee assignments, appointments or other business
BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION OF THE SPRINGFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 3/7/2017
Meeting Type: Regular Meeting
Staff Contact/Dept.: Jeff Paschall/DPW Staff Phone No: 541-726-1674
S P R I N G F I E L D
PLANNING COMMISSION
Estimated Time: 15 Minutes
ITEM TITLE: 2018 - 2022 Capital Improvements Program A Community Reinvestment Plan
ACTION REQUESTED:
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP).
AFTER PUBLIC INPUT, FORWARD RECOMMENDATION OF THE 2018-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ISSUE STATEMENT: The draft of the City of Springfield’s 2018-2022 Capital Improvements Program
(CIP) has been completed by staff and has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission during a work session on February 22, 2017. It is now being brought to the Planning Commission for final comments and a recommendation to forward
the CIP to the City Council. The City Council will review in April, with final adoption scheduled for April 17, 2017.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Memorandum from February 22, 2017 work session. 2. Draft 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Program
3. Memorandum to Planning Commission: Response to Questions
4. CIP Final Order
DISCUSSION:
The Draft City of Springfield 2018 – 2022 CIP was reviewed at the Planning Commission’s February 22, 2017 meeting. Staff will take final comments from the Planning Commission and forward comments and recommendation to the City
Council.
As a reference, the Planning Commission Memorandum from the February 22, 2017 work session is included as Attachment 1.
After hearing public comments, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission support the draft 2018-2022 CIP and recommend it for Council review and ultimate
adoption.
COMMUNICATION MEMORANDUM Meeting Date: 2/22/2017 Meeting Type: Work Session
Staff Contact/Dept.: Jeff Paschall/DPW
Staff Phone No: 541-726-1674 S P R I N G F I E L D
PLANNING COMMISSION
Estimated Time: 30 minutes
ITEM TITLE: 2018-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN
ACTION REQUESTED: Review and provide direction for the recommended five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
ISSUE STATEMENT: The City of Springfield’s 2018-2022 CIP – A Community Reinvestment Plan has been drafted by staff and is now being forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and comment. Staff will bring the CIP back to the Planning Commission March 3, 2015 during the regular session for a recommendation to forward to the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Program – A Community Reinvestment Plan
DISCUSSION: BACKGROUND: The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding and construction of City public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources. The underlying concept is to program, for future expenditure, all reasonably available sources of revenue. Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s infrastructure facilities plans, the CIP is also a vehicle to facilitate reconciliation, in the near term, of the competing priorities for
scarce capital resources.
The CIP is updated on a biennial schedule and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with
long term planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future,
and concludes with the adoption of the annual Capital Budget to appropriate funds for the ultimate construction of those facilities. Operation and maintenance cost is separately included in the City’s budget. The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably be expected to be required in the next five years, refines those concepts, and provides a priority list of projects. Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvements identified in the various master plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council. Traditionally, the principal constraint applied in developing the CIP is the realistic availability of financial resources to fund a project This past year was another busy construction season as several capital projects were completed. Following is a list of some of the significant projects:
Springfield Mill Race Stormwater Facility and Mill race Path Trailhead
The Springfield Flame Foundation and Installation
City Hall Seismic Retrofits, Package 1 and 2
Main Street Pedestrian Crossings (Phase 2)
13th Street Neighborhood Sidewalk Connector
The public input process for the CIP began in November when citizens, organizations, and City staff
were asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP. Staff reviewed and prioritized the projects,
assembling a draft CIP for the Planning Commission review. After the Planning Commission reviews the CIP at work session and the March 7th regular session, the City Council will review it in a work session on April 3, 2017, and will hold a public hearing prior to adoption on April 17, 2017. DISCUSSION: The 2018-2022 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages of planning, design, and construction. In addition, the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding
identified. These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods, providing for economic growth,
improving traffic safety, mobility and access, complying with environmental standards, and maintaining
the existing city infrastructure. The following is a list of the most significant projects in the CIP and
currently budgeted:
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 2
CMOM Planning and Implementation – The City continues to make the repair, rehabilitation, or
replacement of older wastewater pipes throughout the City to reduce leakage of ground water into the
system as a high priority in the Capital Improvement Program. In 2010, The City completed
rehabilitation of the basins identified in the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) adopted in 2001 by the City and the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC). Rather than update the WWFMP, the City, in conjunction with MWMC, is moving to a Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance (CMOM) program to remain in compliance with both State and Federal regulations. This program will be utilized to identify future preservation needs, as may an update to the Local Wastewater Management Plan. Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction –The NEPA process is complete, with the project receiving a Categorical Exclusion (CE). The Franklin concept endorsed by Council in 2008 envisions sections of improved arterial and sections of a multi-way boulevard treatment that includes access lanes and parking
adjacent to the arterial. Project elements include roundabout intersections, median control, relocated
EmX station platforms, space preserved for future dedicated EmX guideways, and provision of high
quality bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The City has received $6 million through the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018 STIP), and will match that with a $3.5 to $5 million
Oregon Transportation Infrastructure Bank loan to complete a Phase 1 improvement from the
Franklin/McVey intersection to a logical termini to the west. Design has been complete and right of way acquisition is significantly complete. The construction contract has been awarded with construction anticipated to be started in late spring and be completed in 2018. Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement – The Over-Under Channel is part of the City’s stormwater system serving mid-Springfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126. The name of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel. A
portion of the piped system, from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street
Channel at Moffitt School, is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) installed in the late 1950’s and early
1960’s. Staff has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of
corrosion and minor failures. In FY 2011, the City Council approved funding to design a replacement
pipe system and identify the amount of additional funds needed for construction. Construction began in
the fall of 2016 and is expected to be complete in late summer 2016. In addition to the above major projects, several other projects are also already budgeted and scheduled, including: the Glenwood Connector Path Extension, the final Main Street Pedestrian Crossings, and the rehabilitation of failing sanitary sewer lines. With stable wastewater and stormwater funding for capital preservation and rehabilitation, one of the most significant issues in the CIP outlook is identifying a stable revenue stream for street preservation.
Capital preservation activities on the City’s street system have been greatly curtailed over the past 8
years, as current revenue streams have been insufficient to support these activities. Significant cuts were
made in both FY 2009 and FY 2010, with no preservation projects occurring on the local street system
except those funded through State or Federal grant programs. The State and Federal programs typically
require awarded funds be used for preserving or enhancing regionally significant collector and arterial
class street segments. This requires the City to identify other revenue sources for a majority of the City’s streets. The outlook for street preservation funding in the 2018-2022 CIP does not provide for adequate maintenance and preservation of the City’s assets to prevent long-term damage to the overall street and transportation system. The prolonged lack of dedicated preservation funding has led to a severe decline of the overall street condition directly correlating to a for higher cost impact by necessitating future reconstruction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The CIP does not carry budget authority. It is, however a valuable planning tool used to guide staff, the Budget Committee, and the City Council in creating the annual budget. Future maintenance impacts of
projects are estimated where possible.
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................1
SECTION I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIP Goals ...........................................................................................................................6
CIP Project Development and Review Process.................................................................6
Types of Capital Needs......................................................................................................7
Project Selection Resources..............................................................................................7
Facilities Plans
Wastewater Master Plan .....................................................................................7
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.......................................................................8
Building and Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work..............................9
Urban Renewal Plans ......................................................................................................10
Land Use Plans
Public Facilities and Services Plan......................................................................10
TransPlan ...........................................................................................................11
Refinement Plans...............................................................................................11
SECTION II FUNDING
Capital Project Funding...................................................................................................15
Systems Development Charges ......................................................................................16
External Revenue Sources...............................................................................................16
Other Revenues ..............................................................................................................17
City Accounting Funds Used for Capital Resources ........................................................17
SECTION III FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
Financial Summaries—All Programs...............................................................................21
SECTION IV PROJECTS
Projects Table of Contents..............................................................................................23
Master Project Map........................................................................................................24
APPENDIX A
Matrices ........................................................................................................................148
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 2 of 152
INTRODUCTION
The City of Springfield’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP)is a fiveyear Community Reinvestment Plan
that describes the nearterm program for funding of construction and improvement of City public
facilities.A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of limited capital resources.
The underlying concept is to program,for future expenditure,all reasonably available sources of
revenue.Since projected revenue is significantly less than the needs identified in the City’s
infrastructure facilities plans,the CIP is used as the vehicle to facilitate reconciliation,in the near term,
of the competing priorities for scarce capital resources.
The CIP is updated on a biennial schedule and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with
long term planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future,
and concludes with the adoption of the annual Capital Budget to appropriate funds for the ultimate
construction of those facilities.Operation and maintenance cost is separately included in the City’s
budget.The CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably be expected to be required in the
next five years,refines those concepts,and provides a priority list of projects.Priority projects are
selected from the long list of needed capital improvements identified in the various master plans and
refinement plans adopted by the City Council.Traditionally,the principal constraint applied in
developing the CIP is the realistic availability of financial resources to fund a project.
Once included in the CIP,the next step is to prepare the City’s annual Capital Budget which draws from
the first year of the CIP,with such modifications as are necessary or prudent to respond to immediate
concerns and the often fluid nature of funding opportunities.In preparation of the capital budget it is
important to consider not only the immediate availability of financial resources,but also the availability
of resources to manage design and construction.This may mean staff resources to conduct those
activities in house,or staff resources to manage consultants who take on responsibility for design and
construction management.A successful capital budget must be mindful of budgeting only those projects
or project phases that the City has the staff resources to deliver.The Development and Public Works
Department maintains two capital project delivery groups,one for the delivery of local projects
presented in this document and the second for delivery of regional projects for the Metropolitan
Wastewater Management Commission capital improvement program.At present the local capital
projects and regional capital projects groups coordinate project management and support resources.
The 2012022 CIP includes those projects that are currently in the Capital Budget and in various stages
of planning,design,and construction.In addition,the CIP includes descriptions of projects that have
been identified through various facilities planning efforts but do not currently have complete funding
identified.These projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods,providing for economic growth,
improving traffic safety,mobility and access,complying with environmental standards,and maintaining
the existing city infrastructure.
Attachment 2, Page 3 of 152
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW
The public input process for the CIP typically begins in October when citizens,organizations,and City
staff are asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP.The Planning Commission and the City
Council then review the draft CIP and a public hearing is held prior to Council adoption.
OCTOBER:CIP PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS STARTS
OCTOBER:CAPITAL PROJECT REQUESTS GO TO PUBLIC AND CITY DEPARTMENTS
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER:PUBLISH INTERNAL DRAFT CIP
NOVEMBER TO JANUARY:BEGIN INTERNAL DRAFT CIP REVIEW
FEBRUARY:PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS DRAFT CIP
MARCH/APRIL:CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION REVIEW AND PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT CIP
APRIL/MAY:CAPITAL BUDGET PRESENTED TO BUDGET COMMITTEE
The City’s final commitment to spend public funds occurs through the annual City budget process.
Although the CIP is the starting point for the annual Capital Budget,the projects actually budgeted each
year can vary somewhat from those proposed in the CIP.
PROJECT CATEGORIZATION
Projects in the CIP are grouped first by the relevant infrastructure system (stormwater,transportation,
wastewater,buildings and facilities,and miscellaneous)and then by the status of project funding.For
historical purposes,the CIP also includes projects that have been completed within the past year.
Project funding includes four categories:In Process,Funding Programmed,Funding Partially
Programmed and Funding Not Programmed.In Process are those projects that are currently in the
Capital Improvement Program,in the Capital Budget,and in planning,design and/or construction.
Funding Programmed is the category of those highest priority projects for which most or all of the
funding has been clearly identified,and the City has taken appropriate steps to make sure the funding
will be available in a timely fashion.Partially funded projects are those higher priority projects where a
portion of the funding has been identified but additional funding is needed before the project can
proceed.Projects that do not have any funding programmed are multiple levels of existing priority
projects with funding sources that are presently unknown.The proposed CIP reflects prioritizations by
staff based on a set of objective criteria designed to maximize the efficiency of using available capital
resources.
The following is a list of the City’s most significant projects in the CIP:
CMOM Planning and Implementation –The City continues to make the repair,rehabilitation,or
replacement of older wastewater pipes throughout the City to reduce leakage of ground water into the
system as a high priority in the Capital Improvement Program.In 2010,The City completed
rehabilitation of the basins identified in the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP)adopted in
2001 by the City and the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC).Rather than
update the WWFMP,the City,in conjunction with MWMC,is moving to a Capacity Management
Operations and Maintenance (CMOM)program to remain in line with both State and Federal
Attachment 2, Page 4 of 152
regulations.This program may,in the future,identify additional preservation needs,as may an update
to the Local Wastewater Management Plan.
Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction –The NEPA process is complete,with the project receiving a
Categorical Exclusion (CE).The Franklin concept endorsed by Council in 2008 envisions sections of
improved arterial and sections of a multiway boulevard treatment that includes access lanes and
parking adjacent to the arterial.Project elements include roundabout intersections,median control,
relocated EmX station platforms,space preserved for future dedicated EmX guideways,and provision of
high quality bicycle and pedestrian facilities.The City has received $6 million through the Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (20152018 STIP),and will match that with a $3.5 to $5 million
Oregon Transportation Infrastructure Bank loan to complete a Phase 1 improvement from the
Franklin/McVey intersectionto a logical termini to the west.Consultant design and right of acquisition
contracts have recently been approved,with construction anticipated in 2016.
OverUnder Channel Pipe Replacement –The OverUnder Channel is part of the City’s stormwater
system serving midSpringfield from 5th to 28th Streets and from Main Street to Highway 126.The name
of the Channel comes from the configuration of the system where stormwater is collected and conveyed
in both an open channel and in a large pipe located under and adjacent to the channel.A portion of the
piped system,from the east side of Silke Field to the outfall of the system into the Q Street Channel at
Moffitt School,is a corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP)installed in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s.Staff
has found that this CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is showing signs of corrosion and
minor failures.In FY 2011,the City Council approved funding to design a replacement pipe system and
identify the amount of additional funds needed for construction.Investigation and hydraulic study work
has been completed,with design and citizen outreach efforts currently underway.
FINANCING
There are limited sources of funding for capital activity.The principal sources include revenues derived
from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes)which function like user fees.By Council direction,
these are preferentially devoted to preservation of existing infrastructure.The second major source is
Systems Development Charges (SDC),which are designed to recover,from development,the cost
impact that development has on infrastructure,both existing and needed to meet the future demands
of development.A large portion of these revenues must,by law,be devoted to capacity increasing
capital activity.Only that portion of SDC revenue,which is derived from a reimbursement fee,may be
expended for preservation of existing infrastructure.A third major source of capital funding is external
contributions,in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans,payments by developers for specific
improvements,and assessments of benefitted property owners,also for specific improvements.Other
sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts,
and revenue from internally generated charges also play a role.
In addition to funding direct project construction,Local Wastewater and Drainage SDC revenues fund
debt service payments for bonds sold to fund prior projects.These projects include both those that
Attachment 2, Page 5 of 152
increased capacity as well as smaller preservation projects as part of continuing preservation programs.
The City sold local wastewater revenue bonds in 2009 and storm drainage revenue bonds in 2010.
Wastewater Bond proceeds were dedicated to completing required rehabilitation projects as well as
expanding sanitary sewer service into unserved areas within the Urban Growth Boundary to promote
future growth.Stormwater revenue bonds have been used to complete several major stormwater
initiatives,and a number of capital projects related to the City’s obligation to address stormwater
quality,permitting and threatened fish impacts.1
Capital preservation activities on the City’s street system have been greatly curtailed over the past eight
years,as current revenue streams have been insufficient to support these activities.Significant cuts
were made in both FY 2009 and FY 2010,with no preservation projects occurring on the local street
system except those funded through State or Federal grant programs.The State and Federal programs
typically require awarded funds be used for preserving or enhancing regionally significant collector and
arterial class street segments.This requires the City to identify other revenue sources for a majority of
the City’s streets.The outlook for street preservation funding in the 20182022 CIP does not provide for
adequate maintenance and preservation of the City’s assets to prevent long term damage to the overall
street and transportation system.The prolonged lack of dedicated preservation funding has led to a
severe decline of the overall street condition directly correlating to a for higher cost impact by
necessitating future reconstruction.
Additionally,SDC reserves remain low forcing many large system expansion projects identified in the
adopted master plans to be projected further out in the CIP than originally planned.Recovery of the SDC
funds has been slow,but picked up pace through the past budget year.By continuing to postpone
projects SDC reserves can be built back up and permit the construction of these system and expansion
projects supporting community growth and development.
External sources,such as intergovernmental grants,or developer or benefitted property owner
contributions,are an important,but highly volatile funding source.Generally they do not form the basis
for concluding a project can be funded,but rather when such funding sources develop,can be a trigger
to increase the priority of a project.Recently,the City has had some success in developing external
funding for isolated projects,such as the Gateway Street Overlay,Franklin Boulevard,Glenwood
Connector Path,and Glenwood Riverfront Path.Future success is highly dependent upon the fiscal and
monetary policies of other levels of government.For example,the current Congressional prohibition on
the practice of “earmarking”funds has reduced the possibility of securing direct appropriations from the
Congress,but may positively affect the ability of the City to secure federal grants.
There are a number of projects added to the CIP for which there are no identified funding sources.
Because of limited revenues,even many of the projects traditionally listed in the CIP cannot be funded
during the next five years.These projects are shown in the CIP to make it possible for the Council and
the public to better understand the scope of the City’s infrastructure need and compare that need to
1 For bonding purposes,the local wastewater and stormwater utilities are combined into a single sewer utility.
Attachment 2, Page 6 of 152
the resources presently available,and provide the basis for developing long term capital financing
strategies.
Following is a chart showing annual project funding needs and resources.
CONCLUSION
The Capital Improvement Program serves as a guide for the City’s needed improvements.It is shaped by
citizen input,the best professional judgment of staff and outside experts,and estimates of the City’s
projected financial resources.The CIP is subject to biennial review and revision.The direction provided
by this document helps the City of Springfield target its resources to capital improvements which best
serve the needs of the citizens of Springfield.The CIP is available on the web for public viewing at
http://www.springfield or.gov/DPW/CIP.htm.
Attachment 2, Page 7 of 152
CIP GOALS
The goals of the CIP include:
1) Providing a balanced program for capital improvements given reasonably anticipated funding
over a fiveyear or greater planning period and identifying the extent to which resources can
meet capital needs;
2) Improving neighborhoods;
3) Providing for economic and community growth;
4) Improving safety,access,and mobility of transportation modes;
5) Complying with environmental standards and improving environmental quality;
6) Maintaining the existing City infrastructure;and
7) Protect public health and safety.
CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW PROCESS
Capital improvements must be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Comprehensive Plan,
including the Public Facilities and Services Plan and TransPlan (the transportation element of the
Comprehensive Plan),and all other Council adopted plans and policies.The relevant plans are listed in a
subsequent section of this report.
In general,all Capital Projects included in the CIP meet one or more of the following criteria:
1) Project addresses State or Federal laws or regulations to eliminate or reduce the potential for
environmental degradation or health hazards or to address issues that affect the safety and
general welfare of the community.
2) Project maintains existing assets,extends the useful life of assets,or improves or expands
infrastructure to facilitate community development and/or improve operations.
3) Project responds to requests from citizens,neighborhood groups,advisory committees,or
government bodies,and provides a public benefit.
4) Project is included in local and/or regional infrastructure plans.
Once the need for a capital improvement has been determined,those improvements are evaluated with
a project prioritization matrix (Appendix A)that has been developed for evaluating and ranking projects
within each system to prioritize programming of scarce capital funding.In the adopted CIP only those
capital improvements which are funded within the current projections for the appropriate revenue
streams are considered adopted.Projects for which the funding is not identified or programmed are
shown strictly for informational purposes.Historically,the CIP has not attempted to consider whether or
not the City has the operating resources (either staff or funding for consultants to manage projects),
necessary to advance a particular project.
Attachment 2, Page 8 of 152
TYPES OF CAPITAL NEED
Rehabilitation &Preservation of Existing Capital Assets
The CIP reflects the broad direction of the City Council as set forth in the Financial Management Policies
to preserve existing capital assets before they fall into disrepair and require expensive rehabilitation or
replacement.Preservation is an important tool used to protect or extend a City asset’s useful life.If
preservation is not completed on a regular and timely basis,the asset will deteriorate prematurely and
its benefit to the community will be lost.In that event reconstruction may be required.Reconstruction
costs are frequently multiple times the cost of preservation and maintenance,particularly for street
surfaces.
Rehabilitation is necessary for some capital assets and the City must demonstrate fiscal responsibility by
planning for this need.Inclusion of these projects in the CIP is a necessary task to plan for that
rehabilitation.
New Capital Facilities and Capacity Enhancements
As the City reaches outward into the Urban Growth Boundary or anticipates infill or increased density of
development in the city limits,the need to plan for expansion of capital assets and provide safe and
efficient capital facilities increases.New streets are necessary to provide for the movement of goods
and people and access to property in developing areas.In addition,wastewater and stormwater systems
are necessary to protect water quality and the environment in order to preserve the health,welfare,
and safety of the community.
PROJECT SELECTION RESOURCES
The following is a list of various plans with descriptive summaries that guide the decisions made about
CIP project choice.The City draws a distinction between facilities plans,which focus on facility needs
and how systems function,and land use plans,which provide more general guidance.General guidance
can inform the development of facilities plans,and can constrain facility development to conform to the
policy set of the land use planning document.(TransPlan is somewhat of an exception to these
distinctions,since it is a land use plan that also serves as a facilities plan and does contain specific
project guidance.)
FACILITIES PLANS
Wastewater Master Plan (2008)
The City of Springfield provides wastewater collection and conveyance services by way of a system of
pipelines and pump stations that it owns and operates.Along with the City of Eugene,Springfield
discharges to a regional collection and treatment system owned by the Metropolitan Wastewater
Management Commission (MWMC).Springfield’s Wastewater Master Plan provides an assessment of
existing and future needs for the City’s collection system.Because the City’s system connects to the
regional system,the Master Plan must consider and reflect results of the MWMC’s Wet Weather Flow
Management Plan (WWFMP),which identifies system maintenance and rehabilitation activities for the
Attachment 2, Page 9 of 152
wastewater collection and treatment facilities in the EugeneSpringfield metropolitan area.Therefore,
Springfield’s plan provides a local solution for existing and future needs within the context of the similar
regional solution.
The Master Plan is intended to identify existing and future capacity constraints,determine capacity
requirements and identify system improvements necessary to meet the City’s projected population and
employment growth through the 2025 planning year.The Department of Environmental Quality has
issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit (#102486)for Springfield,
Eugene and MWMC,which includes conditions under which treated wastewater can be discharged to
the Willamette River.Included in those conditions is a requirement that Springfield,Eugene and MWMC
fully implement a wet weather flow management strategy to comply with the State’s Bacteria Standard,
which prohibits storm related overflows.The standard states that no untreated wastewater can be
discharged to the waters of the State or US,except under the following conditions;for flows greater
than those occurring for the 24hour duration,1 in 5 year winter and 1 in 10year summer storms.These
conditions formed the baseline assumptions for overflow avoidance in this plan and were consistent
with the assumptions of the WWFMP,which included a number of flow reduction projects that were
completed before the December 31,2009 regulatory deadline.
Subsequent to the development and completion of the WWFMP,the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality,in response to an objection from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),is
no longer permitted to include the exceptions for untreated wastewater discharges as provided by the
State’s Bacteria Standard.DEQ is currently placing a prohibition on all overflows from wastewater
conveyance systems and associated pump stations.This regulatory change places additional burden on
the conveyance system operation and maintenance to eliminate all wet weather related overflows.The
NPDES permit for the regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled for renewal in 2017 and will
contain the prohibition of all overflows absent a change of policy from EPA.
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (2008)
In 2008,the City Council adopted a comprehensive Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP).The
purpose of this document is to provide a guide to plan for more comprehensive,efficient,and multi
objective management of the City’s stormwater system.The majority of the City’s stormwater runoff
drains through an integrated network of pipes and open channels,discharging either directly to the
main stem Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or through outfalls to a tributary of either of those rivers.
Prior to the SWFMP,the City typically designed and constructed facilities for treating and conveying
stormwater runoff on an individual development or siteby site basis.In addition,as is typical for nearly
all cities,most of the City’s stormwater collection and conveyance system was historically designed and
built with the sole objective of addressing flooding issues.
Most of the major portions of the City’s stormwater drainage system infrastructure were built during
the 1960s and as development increased,the system was retrofitted with extensions and additions.
Most of the main conveyance system was not upsized to facilitate the increased flows associated with
full City build out.
Attachment 2, Page 10 of 152
The City also has a Counciladopted Stormwater Management Plan which establishes goals,policies and
implementation actions to address water quality and management of the stormwater system,including
open waterways within the City’s jurisdiction.This plan is required and approved by the Department of
Environmental Quality as part of its issuance and management of the City’s stormwater discharge
permit.Additionally,the Willamette River and McKenzie River (a tributary to the Willamette River)are
listed on the State’s 303(d)list indicating that water quality standards for specific pollutants in these
streams are currently not being met.The City must address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
limitations on the level of certain pollutants (temperature,bacteria,and mercury)through
implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan and the TMDL Implementation Plan.These plans
and requirements impact the nature and design of capital projects that are constructed to manage
stormwater.
Building &Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work Plan (2011)
This plan identifies and addresses capital improvement needs at City owned buildings,including:City
Hall,Springfield Justice Center,Springfield Museum,fire stations,Development and Public Works
operations buildings,and the Depot.The Plan,which is in its first year of development,derives from a
report prepared in 2006 by the consulting firm DLR Group.That report provided a snapshot of repairs
and asset preservation improvements that are immediately evident,and which have been deferred for
various reasons,together with ongoing maintenance needs and necessary replacement of building
systems expected to reach the end of their useful life during the next 30 years.
The City continues to face several critical building/facilities operations,maintenance and preservation
issues.The DLR Buildings Condition Report (DLR)identified $600K deferred/backlog facilities repair
needs and $300K ongoing annual maintenance/preservation needs.In FY 2009,the City implemented an
Internal Building Preservation Charge with intent to program $300k annually for ongoing preservation
and $200k to start addressing the backlog projects.Since inception,the Internal Building Preservation
Charge has generated just over $250k per year through FY 2014 dedicated to projects,with just under
$269k anticipated in FY 2015.The first priority of staff charged with this capital program was to develop
the City Buildings/Facilities Work Plan inclusive of all City Fire Stations,City Hall,Springfield Justice
Center,Development and Public Works operations facilities,Springfield Depot,Carter Building.This 5
year work plan is reviewed and updated annually,and used as the basis for project budgeting each fiscal
year.
Additionally,there are other project management responsibilities related to public buildings and
facilities maintenance and preservations that have been identified through previously adopted CIP
documents,such as preservation projects at the Depot and Booth Kelly and demolition of the Carpenter
shed and gun range at Booth Kelly.Any future building needs such as new fire station construction will
be addressed through the CIP process.
Attachment 2, Page 11 of 152
URBAN RENEWAL PLANS
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan (2007)
The primary goal of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is to assist in the revitalization of business and
elimination of blight in the downtown area.The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to
obtain these goals.The plan’s projects include:
Improvements to streets,sidewalks,bike ways and pathways;
Improvements to water,storm and sanitary sewer infrastructure;
Improve the visual appearance of the downtown area;
Improve and expand the existing public parking facilities;
Financial assistance to rehabilitate existing properties and encourage new construction;
Acquisition and disposal of land for public improvements.
Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan (1999,updated 2004)
The primary goal of the Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan is to eliminate blighting influences found in the
Renewal Area.The Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to obtain these goals.The plan’s
projects include:
Promote private development and redevelopment;
Rehabilitate building stock;
Improvements to streets,sidewalks,bike ways,pathways,streetscapes,parks,and open spaces;
Utility improvements;
Parking;
Public facilities;
Housing;
Public signage and community gateway entrance improvements.
LAND USE PLANS
Public Facilities and Services Plan
The Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP)is an element of the Eugene Springfield Metropolitan Area
General Plan (Metro Plan).It is the element which identifies significant facilities in general terms and
confirms that those facilities are consistent with the planning policies set out in the Metro Plan.The
projects identified in the PFSP are generally a subset of the projects contained in the various facilities
plans.The PFSP does not identify transportation projects,which are covered in TransPlan,but does
identify wastewater and stormwater projects,among others.The PFSP does not,nor should it,identify
every project;it includes onlythose projects identified as significant on the basis of definitions set forth
in the PFSP.
Attachment 2, Page 12 of 152
TransPlan (2002)
The EugeneSpringfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan)is the transportation element
of the EugeneSpringfield Metropolitan Area General Plan.While adopted as a refinement to MetroPlan,
and therefore technically a land use plan,TransPlan is also intended as a system facilities plan that
guides local and regional transportation system planning and development in the EugeneSpringfield
metropolitan area.TransPlan also serves as the City’s facilities plan as well as its transportation system
plan,or TSP for identifying projects needed to meet the transportation demand of residents over a 20
year planning horizon while addressing transportation issues and making changes that can contribute to
improvements in the region’s quality of life and economic vitality.In addition to roadway facilities,
TransPlan also calls for significant increases in the amount and convenience of transit service,increases
in the amount of bikeways and sidewalks,and an expansion of the existing program of transportation
demand management (TDM)travel incentives.TransPlan is a jointly adopted document that serves as a
local transportation system plan for both Springfield and Eugene.In 2011,Springfield and Eugene
adopted separate urban growth boundaries.One outcome of that action is that the City has developed
and adopted (2014)a new Springfieldspecific Transportation System Plan (TSP)as part of
implementation of a City stand alone urban growth boundary.The current TransPlan will remain in
force until the new TSP is adopted by Council and acknowledged by the State,which is anticipated to
occur in calendar 2012.The CIP includes a project describing the costs and resources available to
Springfield to complete the TSP Project.The TransPlan theme,‘Improving Our Transportation Choices’,
reflects the plan’s focus to provide citizens with a range of safe,convenient,and efficient transportation
options characterized by smooth connections between modes.TransPlan strives to support the need to
diversify transportation choices,while avoiding reliance on any one transportation mode or method of
managing the transportation system.TransPlan establishes the framework upon which all public
agencies can make consistent and coordinated planning decisions regarding inter and intra
jurisdictional transportation.
Refinement Plans
Downtown Refinement Plan (1986,updated 2005)
The primary goal of the Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan is to provide goals and policies through
which downtown Springfield may become a more vital and attractive place to shop,conduct business,
and recreate.Goals were set forth to guide this revitalization.These goals are:
Create a pedestrian and transit friendly downtown;
Preserve the past;
Reconnect to key natural resource features;
Encourage evening activity in the downtown;
Create new opportunities for office,commercial,residential,civic,and mixed uses;
Ensure adequate parking;
Attachment 2, Page 13 of 152
Create civic gathering places;
Create downtown partnerships;
Identify catalyst projects;
Create a positive identity for downtown.
East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan (1992)
The primary goal of the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens
living within the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood.Goals were set to address these concerns.The goals of
the neighborhood plan are:
Encourage a variety of land uses and housing opportunities;
Provide a safe and effective transportation system;
Provide and maintain public facilities and services;
Improve the character and identity of the neighborhood.
East Main Refinement Plan (1988)
The primary goal of the East Main Refinement Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living within
the East Main Refinement Plan Neighborhood.Goals were set to address these concerns.The goals of
the refinement plan are:
Provide affordable housing for all segments of the population;
Allow flexibility for large vacant areas that are surrounded by mixed uses;
Provide for commercial centers which meet the needs of the community;
Encourage additional industrial development which is compatible with surrounding uses;
Enhance and develop the natural and built environment;
Develop recreational facilities which fill the needs of the area;
Create a safe and efficient street system;
Provide safe,efficient and convenient bicycle facilities.
Gateway Refinement Plan (1992)
The primary goal of the Gateway Refinement Plan is to refine and augment the Eugene Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan to provide specificity for sitespecific land use decisions,and to identify
the near and longterm public facilities needs to support development and livability of the area.This
plan incorporates goals and policies,controls and design standards in areas where protections need to
be stringent.These elements are:
Community and Economic Development;
Residential;
Commercial;
Industrial;
Attachment 2, Page 14 of 152
Natural Assets,Open Space/Scenic Areas,and Recreation;
Historic Resources;
Transportation;and
Public Facilities.
Glenwood Refinement Plan (1999,updated 2012)
The primary goal of the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan Update was to facilitate redevelopment in
Springfield.The plan establishes a preferred outcome for the Glenwood Riverfront based on the
successful implementation of the Plan’s vision,policies,and standards.The plan identifies the density,
mix,type,and location of housing,employment land,and public open space and the required level of
public facilities to support projected demand.The community vision for Glenwood is articulated in the
following goal statements:
o Improve public connections to the Willamette River.
o Establish inviting public spaces,including parks,plazas,and multi use paths.
o Encourage aesthetically pleasing,sustainable buildings and sites that are contextsensitive and
oriented to human activity.
o Provide opportunities for the installation,display,and creation of public art.
o Allow for a mix of uses suitable to the unique development opportunities in Glenwood.
o Provide opportunities for the development of a variety of housing types to meet the needs of a
range of households.
o Facilitate opportunities for businesses to provide goods and services to local,regional,
statewide,national,and international markets.
o Restore,enhance,and protect the ecological function of natural resources,and increase public
awareness of these resources.
o Protect the public from potential natural and manmade hazards.
o Celebrate Glenwood’s contributions to the region’s historic development.
o Enhance the transportation system to improve safety,convenience,and movement for all
modes of travel,including vehicles,trains,public transit,bicycles,and pedestrians.
o Provide a full range of urban public facilities and services for redevelopment and new
development.
o Facilitate redevelopment while addressing the consequences of change to existing residents and
businesses.
MidSpringfield Refinement Plan (1986)
The primary goal of the MidSpringfield Refinement Plan is to assign sitespecific plan designations in
areas designated “Mixed Use”on the Metro Plan Diagram and to recognize the needs of industrial and
commercial land uses and to resolve conflicts with residential neighbors.Goals were set to address
these concerns.The goals of the refinement plan are:
Maximize industrial development potential of industrial designated land;
Encourage functional commercial development on commercially designated land along Main
and 42nd Streets;
Preserve the integrity of residentially designated areas;
Provide a safe and efficient transportation system;
Attachment 2, Page 15 of 152
Provide a means to implement the goals and policies of this refinement plan.
Q Street Refinement Plan (1987)
The primary goal of the Q Street Refinement Plan is to guide land use decisions in the Q Street area.
Land use decisions will be made to follow certain goals.The majority of the goals for the refinement
plan are:
Provide vacant and re developable land to allow for commercial development;
Encourage commercial shopping centers where safe and efficient vehicular access can be
provided;
Participate in efforts to maintain and enhance existing residential neighborhoods and attract
medium and high density residential developments;
Implement mitigating measures for noise,dust,and traffic impacts to residential areas;
Encourage private and public recreational facilities in high density areas;
Buffer multiple family development from single family development and residential land from
commercial land through site plan review;
Work with Willamalane to provide adequate park and recreational facilities to residents;
Discourage through truck traffic in residentially designated areas;
Encourage bicycle path into the design of recreational and new residential facilities.
Attachment 2, Page 16 of 152
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING
There are limited sources of funding for capital activity.The principal sources include 1)revenues
derived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes)which function like user fees;2)Systems
Development Charges (SDCs),which are designed to recover from development the cost impact that
development has on public infrastructure;3)external contributions,in the form of intergovernmental
grants or loans,payments by developers for specific improvements,and assessments of benefitted
property owners,also for specific improvements;and 4)other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax
increment financing in the City’s two urban renewal districts,and revenue from internally generated
charges,which at present play a minor role in capital project funding.
USER FEES
Each of the three public infrastructure systems (streets,sanitary sewers,and storm drainage)is funded
by fees paid by those who use the system.In the case of the local wastewater and storm drainage
systems those fees are directly billed to users.In the case of the transportation system those fees are
collected in the form of taxes on motor fuel at both the state and local level,and by state fees for
licensing and registration of drivers and vehicles,as well as weight mile taxes imposed on the trucking
industry.
City Council policy calls for a portion of those fees,in excess of that required for current operation of the
systems,to be devoted to preservation of the existing systems.However,in the past several years it has
been necessary to devote some portion of those revenues to fund expansion of the system,either
through direct funding of capital activity or by funding debt service on revenue bonds.To date,the City
has issued revenue bonds in 2009 to fund local wastewater capital activity,and in 2010 to fund storm
drainage capital projects.As discussed earlier,the level of capital activity has produced circumstances
which have led to substantial increases in user fees for both systems,and created concerns that user
fees might be bearing a disproportionate share of the burden of capital activity.
Recovery of the SDC funds has been slow,but has steadily picked up as the economy has improved.
However,it is not anticipated that SDC collections will reach historic levels warranting continued
conservatism in future projections.With these conservative projections existing users of the systems will
continue to bear most of the costs associated with expanding and upgrading those systems.
For the 20182022 CIP,a second source of concern is the projection of a continued crisis in street
preservation projects funding.State and local fuel tax revenues continue to remain flat due to cost or
increased fuel efficiency that reduces revenue even in the face of increased miles traveled.The Council
has increased storm drainage and local wastewater fees to maintain and enhance the level of
preservation for those systems to meet local,state and federal requirements.In an effort to address the
growing backlog of street preservation needs and reimple ment an active street preservation program
(estimated at $4M to $5M annual need)City staff have presented options to generate additional
Attachment 2, Page 17 of 152
revenue,and in 2016 Council approved placing an increase to the local gas tax on the ballot.This
request was unsuccessful leaving future revenue projections status quo with the City looking to State
and Federal options for increasing available street preservation funds.
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
The second major source of capital funding is Systems Development Charges (SDCs).These are charges
imposed on development to provide funding to assure that the City can fund the cost of the
infrastructure needed to serve that level of development.There are several types of SDCs that can be
used for capital projects.
These charges are calculated based upon a methodology which must be adopted by the Council and
which must conform to State law.The process involves two separate components.The first is an
improvement fee which is based on a determination of which capital projects are needed to
accommodate growth,the amount of additional capacity that is created by those projects,and a
determination of the unit cost of additional capacity calculated by dividing the sum of project costs by
the sum of the capacity created.The second component,a reimbursement fee,is calculated by
determining the value of the existing system,the amount of capacity available in that system,and the
value of a unit of capacity.If the system has existing capacity,then development can be charged a fee
based upon the units of existing capacity development will require.These charges are increased
annually based on documented increase in the Cost of Construction Index.
EXTERNAL REVENUE SOURCES
These sources include both intergovernmental grants and loans as well as contributions by private
individuals to the cost of infrastructure either through assessments imposed by the City or voluntarily as
part of a proposal to develop property in the City.In many cases these sources of revenue,however
derived,are accompanied by restrictions on their use.
The City regularly receives allocations of transportation funding from Federal programs.The
Metropolitan Policy Organization (MPO)acting through its Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC)
allocates Federal formula funds to its member jurisdictions for planning,preservation and construction
projects on portions of the transportation system that are regionally significant.In addition,the City
regularly seeks Federal funding directly through efforts focused on the Oregon congressional delegation.
The local wastewater system also benefits from a variety of Federal programs,most notably the Clean
Water State Revolving Fund (a program funded by Federal dollars).In recent years,however,Federal aid
for local wastewater activity has declined sharply.
Private contributions toward capital funding also are available,but generally in restricted circumstances.
In order to facilitate provision of services to a new development,a developer can make a significant
contribution to a particular project when it is needed for the development in question when the City
does not have the financial resources to construct the project in circumstances which fit with the
developer’s timetable.Lastly,individual citizens sometimes contribute in the form of assessments for
Attachment 2, Page 18 of 152
specific projects which benefit their properties.This is done through the creation of a local improvement
district (LID),including all of the benefitted properties.The cost of the project is then assessed against
those properties on a proportionate basis.The 2010 Cherokee LID sewer project is the most recent
example of improvement district financing in the City.
OTHER REVENUES
There are two other alternative revenue sources available for capital project funding.The first is tax
increment financing through the two urban renewal districts created by the City –one in Glenwood and
one in Downtown.In an urban renewal district additional taxes resulting from increases in assessed
value are sequestered and made available to the district,which then uses those revenues to support
debt service on urban renewal bonds used to finance projects within the district.At this point the
revenues of either district have not risen to the level deemed adequate to support bond issuance.
Nonetheless,that may occur within the period of the CIP,hence some of those projects are included.
The second alternative revenue source is an internal charge which is assessed against City departments’
operating Budgets to provide funding for preservation and rehabilitation of City buildings and structures.
CITY ACCOUNTING FUNDS USED FOR CAPITAL RESOURCES
USER FEE/TAX FUNDS
Street Capital Fund
Purpose:To account for operation,maintenance,and construction of the City’s streets and
transportation system.This includes the City’s pavement preservation program,signal operations,and
street light replacement and maintenance.Revenues are generated from a threecent local motor
vehicle fuel tax and a State fuel tax.
Restrictions:Use of these funds is restricted to activities within public rights of way by the Oregon
Constitution.
Wastewater Capital Bond
Purpose:To account for the construction of capital facilities which are identified within the Wastewater
Master Plan as requiring rehabilitation of the existing system or expansion to support growth and
development.Bond proceeds provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund.
Restrictions:Funding provided by bond proceeds,including interest earnings,are restricted by the
terms of the bond contract developed at the time of the bond sale.
Attachment 2, Page 19 of 152
Wastewater Capital Fund
Purpose:To account for the operation,construction,and maintenance of the City’s wastewater
collection system.Wastewater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of this
fund.
Restrictions:As allowed under state statute,the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for
planning,constructing,maintaining and operating the wastewater collection system.
Stormwater Capital Fund
Purpose:To account for the operation,construction,and maintenance of the City’s stormwater
collection and treatment system.Stormwater user fee collections provide the financing for the
expenditures of this fund.
Restrictions:As allowed under state statute,the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for
planning,constructing,maintaining,and operating the stormwater collection and treatment system.
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDCS)FUNDS
Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing wastewater collection system that is
attributable to growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions:Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use capital maintenance or
construction on the wastewater collection system.
Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital
projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions:Expenditures of Wastewater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity
enhancing projects for the wastewater system.
Stormwater Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing stormwater system that is attributable to
growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions:Stormwater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or
construction on the stormwater collection system.
Stormwater Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital
projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Attachment 2, Page 20 of 152
Restrictions:Expenditures of Stormwater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity
enhancing projects for the stormwater system.
Transportation Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for available capacity within the existing transportation system that is attributable
to growth.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions:Transportation Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or
construction on the transportation system.
Transportation Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for construction of the growth related portion of capacityenhancing capital
projects.Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions:Expenditures of Transportation Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity
enhancing projects for the transportation systems.
EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTION FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Fund
Purpose:To account for Federal grant revenues received for the primary purpose of advancing capital
projects that primarily benefit low income persons.
Restrictions:CDBG funds,including interest earnings,must meet the Federal government criteria of
benefiting low to moderate income individual’s needs,eliminating slums and blight,and addressing
urgent needs.
Development Projects Fund
Purpose:To account for county,State and Federal grants awarded to the City for the purpose of
preserving or enhancing City facilities.This fund also accounts for funds donated by developers toward
the construction of capital projects directly affected by the particular development.
Restrictions:Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projects
for which they were collected.
Special Assessments Capital Project Fund
Purpose:To account for the interim financing and related costs of construction for public improvements
which primarily benefit adjacent property owners of the subject capital project.Revenues are
generated through special assessments being levied against the benefiting properties.
Restrictions:State law restricts assessments to the specific improvement constructed.
Attachment 2, Page 21 of 152
OTHER FUNDS
Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA)Funds
Purpose:To account for funds collected and set aside within Urban Renewal Districts as defined and
adopted by the City Council.
Restrictions:Funds collected within the specified Urban Renewal District and set aside for capital
projects are restricted for use on capital projects benefiting the Urban Renewal District.
Booth Kelly Fund
Purpose:To account for revenues received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center.These
funds are set aside for Capital Improvement projects that improve the Booth Kelly Center.
Building Preservation Fund
Purpose:To account for funds collected and set aside for maintenance and improvements to City
owned buildings and facilities.
Attachment 2, Page 22 of 152
SCHEDULE II2018 TO 2022SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ($000s)REVENUEFUND BEGINNING 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TOTAL BALANCESOURCE# BALANCE REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND REVENUE EXPEND ASSESSMENTS 00000000000 0 0 0CURRENT REVENUES BUILDING PRES. RESERVE4200300 270300270 300 270 300 270 300 270 1,500 1,350150 SDC (TRANS IMPROV)434 320750 840750715 750 725 750 855 750 335 4,070 3,470600 SDC (TRANS REIMBUR)434 105505575075 2575 1607525455265190 SDC (WASTEWATER IMPROV)611 7293503435067 350 34 30034 250 335 2,329504 1,825 SDC (WASTEWATER REIMBUR)611 9812503330033 3000 30033 30033 2,431132 2,299 SDC (STORM IMPROVEMENT)617 2071752820033 200 62 25033 25033 1,282189 1,093 SDC (STORM REIMBURSEMENT)6170150 12215083 125 133 125 133 125 13367560471 STORM CAPITAL61785 1,500 720 1,200649 1,200 654 1,200 309 1,225 309 6,410 2,641 3,769 WASTEWATER CAPITAL611 224 2,000 1,350 2,025 1,315 2,050 1,950 2,075 1,250 2,100 750 10,474 6,615 3,859 STREET CAPITAL43400000000000000 BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE6180000000000000 SEDA430 0000000000 SEDA42900000000000000Sub-totals:2,651 5,525 3,452 5,350 3,165 5,350 3,853 5,375 3,077 5,375 2,223 29,626 15,770 13,856GRANTS & DONATIONS CDBG**2100000000000000 UNSPECIFIED4200000000000000 LANE COUNTY*4200000000000000 ODOT*4204,704 4,704 1,300 1,30000000 6,004 6,0040 FEDERAL GRANT*420350 3505005000000008508500 MWMC SPONSORSHIP4200000000000000 SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT4200000000000000 WILLAMALANE4200000000000000Sub-totals:0 5,054 5,054 1,800 1,800000000 6,854 6,8540OTHER CAPITAL BOND42800000000000000 WASTEWATER BOND61100000000000000 STORMWATER BOND61700000000000000 UNSPECIFIED WASTEWATER000 1,230 1,230 6,291 6,291 2,145 2,145 3,787 3,787 13,453 13,4530 UNSPECIFIED STORMWATER0500 500 8,921 8,921 10,612 10,612 1,970 1,970 200 200 22,203 22,2030 UNSPECIFIED TRANSPORTATION0 4,706 4,706 8,595 8,595 6,168 6,168 32,263 32,263 15,384 15,384 67,116 67,1160 UNSPECIFIED BUILDING0730 730 5,769 5,769 8,375 8,375 30,260 30,260 9,080 9,080 54,214 54,2140 UNSPECIFIED MISC.0144 144289289 144 144 299 299 144 144 1,020 1,0200 OTHER0688 688000000006886880 DEVELOPER42000000 175 17500001751750Sub-totals:0 6,768 6,768 24,804 24,804 31,765 31,765 66,937 66,937 28,595 28,595 158,869 158,8690Grand Totals:2,651 17,347 15,274 31,954 29,769 37,115 35,618 72,312 70,014 33,970 30,818 195,349 181,493 13,856*These funds may not pass through the City's budget.**Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included.Attachment 2, Page 23 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 24 of 152
SYSTEM PAGE
ALL PROJECTS MAP ............................................................................................................26
UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS ..................................................................................27
STORMWATER
Overview.....................................................................................................................................28
Project Map and Legend .............................................................................................................29
Summary of Projects...................................................................................................................30
Constructed Projects...................................................................................................................31
In Process Projects ......................................................................................................................33
Funding Programmed .................................................................................................................36
Partially Programmed .................................................................................................................46
Funding Not Programmed ..........................................................................................................54
TRANSPORTATION
Overview.....................................................................................................................................59
Project Map and Legend .............................................................................................................60
Summary of Projects ..................................................................................................................61
Constructed Projects...................................................................................................................65
In Process Projects ......................................................................................................................67
Partially Programmed .................................................................................................................73
Funding Not Programmed ..........................................................................................................82
WASTEWATER
Overview.....................................................................................................................................98
Project Map and Legend .............................................................................................................99
Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................100
Constructed Projects.................................................................................................................102
In Process Projects ....................................................................................................................103
Funding Programmed ...............................................................................................................104
Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................110
BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY
Overview...................................................................................................................................119
Project Map and Legend ...........................................................................................................120
Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................121
In Process Projects ....................................................................................................................123
Funding Programmed ...............................................................................................................125
Funding Not Programmed ........................................................................................................130
MISCELLANEOUS
Overview ..................................................................................................................................144
Summary of Projects ................................................................................................................143
Attachment 2, Page 25 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 26 of 152
UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT SHEETS
Once projects are identified and selected for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program,a project
page is created for the project.The project page includes important information about a project such
as:project description,justification,driver,trigger,and status.This information is important for
conveying and tracking details as each project moves from conception to construction.The following is
a list and description of these elements:
Project Description –This is a description or early scope for a project.Many times this description will
be very broad as it may be taken from a master plan or refinement plan and most likely in conceptual
form.The actual scope of a project is generally refined through the various phases of project planning,
design and delivery.
Project Justification –This element explains why the project is an identified capital need,and may be
refined over time as a project moves from project planning to design to bid and construction.
Justification includes meeting regulatory requirements,correcting existing deficiencies,or periodic
preservation to maintain an asset and offset the need for costly repairs or replacement in the future.
Project Driver –The project driver is usually relevant to the specific project.Typical drivers include the
need to accommodate future growth,regulatory requirements,or the need to maintain public health
and safety.This element helps explain why a project is included within the Capital Improvements
Program.
Project Trigger –The project trigger is also relevant to the specific project.Triggers can be completion
of a previous capital improvement,development within a certain region of the City,or necessary
preservation activities as identified through various asset management tools.
Project Status –Status describes the current stage of the Project,e.g.Planning,design,or construction.
Specific Plans/Policies related to this Project –This is a list of the various Council Goals,master plans,
refinement plans,adopted policies,and/or reports that relate to a project.
Improvement SDC Eligibility –Some projects are eligible to receive SDC funding;however most projects
are not eligible for 100%SDC funding.If eligible,this element gives the percent of the total project cost
eligible for improvement SDCs funds.
Expenditure Schedule –Lists various project activities and estimates the timing and cost to accomplish
the project activity.
Operational Impact –Estimates the financial impact by fiscal year to the operating budget upon
completion of the capital improvement.This can be a positive or negative number as some projects
improve existing facilities reducing the operations and maintenance impact while the addition of new
infrastructure will increase operations and maintenance costs due to adding one or more new assets to
the City inventory.
Funding Source –Describes how and when a project will/needs to be funded and the source of that
funding (e.g.bonds,capital funds,SDCs,grants).
Attachment 2, Page 27 of 152
STORMWATER
Overview
Stormwater projects fall into several categories:
Stormwater Studies –These projects typically fund the study of an area to provide for a future water
quality feature or system expansion.Projects may include studies for improving water quality in a
drainage way,work providing data for future Federal funding,or exploring how to improve the existing
system.Current examples of studies in the CIP are the Facility Master Plan update and the Jasper
Slough Plan.
Stormwater Rehab/Improvements –These projects typically provide upgrades to the City’s existing
stormwater system or the removal of inactive or potentially unsafe storm lines.Projects may include the
repair and upsizing of storm lines,or the addition of storm lines to reduce localized flooding.The Over
Under Channel Pipe Replacement and Improvements and the Drainage Repair program projects fall into
this category.
Capacity Enhancement –These projects typically provide additional capacity to the existing stormwater
system.These types of improvements may include an additional detention pond,detention facilities and
offline water quality treatment facilities.Current examples of capacity enhancement in the CIP are the
South 67th Street and “S”and “T”Street Drainage Projects.
Restoration –These projects typically involve restoring streams and waterways.Projects may include
repairing channel deterioration,providing access for fish passage,or improving flow capacity.Examples
of necessary restoration projects include Jasper Slough and Gray Creek/72nd Street.
New Facilities These projects typically add new capacity to the system by constructing new stormwater
facilities as a result of or in anticipation of new development.Projects may include storm lines built as
part of a new subdivision,and extension of storm trunk main lines.
Project Maps
Constructed
SW5 Mill Race Stormwater Facility
SW13 SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update
In Process
SW7 OverUnder Channel Pipe Replacement
&Improvements
SW8 Drainage Repair
Funding Programmed
SW3 5th St./EWEB Path Pipe Upgrade
SW4 Lower Mill Race /Mill Race Outfalls
SW6 Booth Kelly Drainage
SW9 Glenwood Park Blocks
SW14 Mill Race FIRM
SW15 High Banks Road (42nd St.)Levee Study
SW19 Jasper/Natron Drainage
Partial Funding Programmed
SW21 Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction
SW23 Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls
SW24 South 67th Street
SW25 Glenwood
SW26 North Willamette Heights
SW27 Jasper Slough
SW28 Gray Creek/72nd Street
SW29 Corporate Way Pond
Funding Not Programmed
SW22 Woodstave Removal
SW18 ”S”and “T”Streets Drainage
SW32 I5 N.Gateway/Sports Way Channel
SW33 “Q”Street Channel
SW34 Maple Island Slough
Attachment 2, Page 28 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 29 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Mill Race Stormwater Facility 4,233$ - - - - - 4,233
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617) 233$ - - - - 233
Revenue Bonds (617) 4,000$ - - - - - 4,000
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Channel 6 FIRM 265$ - - - - - 265
Capital Fund (617) 20$ - - - - 20
Revenue Bonds (617) 245$ - - - - - 245
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)- - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Over-Under Channel 2,040$ - - - - - 2,040
Capital Fund (617) 912$ - - - - - 912 Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617) 1,128$ - - - - - 1,128
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Drainage Repair 200$ 200 200 200 200 200 1,200
Capital Fund (617) 200$ 161 200 150 150 150 1,011
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ 39 - 50 50 50 189
Channel Improvement 59$ 100 100 100 100 100 559
Capital Fund (617) 37$ 80 80 80 80 80 437
Improvement SDCs (617) 2$ - - - - - 2
Reimbursement SDCs (617) 20$ 20 20 20 20 20 120
5th St./ EWEB Path Pipe Upgrade 88$ - - - - - 88
Capital Fund (617) 88$ - - - - - 88
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Booth Kelly Drainage 360$ - - - - - 360
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617) 310$ - - - - - 310 Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50
Jasper/Natron Drainage 720$ - 2,280 2,000 - - 5,000
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617) 720$ - - - - - 720
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 2,280 2,000 - - 4,280
Glenwood Park Blocks 50$ - - - - - 50
Capital Fund (617) 46$ - - - - - 46
Improvement SDCs (617) 4$ - - - - - 4
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Funding Programmed
Constructed
In Process
Attachment 2, Page 30 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
MS4 Permit Requirements 30$ 30 30 30 30 30 180
Capital Fund (617) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90
Riparian Land Management 28$ 45 45 45 45 45 253
Capital Fund (617) 13$ 30 30 30 30 30 163
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617) 15$ 15 15 15 15 15 90
Other -$ - - - - - -
Lower Mill Race $ 1,110 - - - - - 1,110
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617) 1,085$ - - - - - 1,085
MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25
Mill Race FIRM 20$ 50 - - - - 70
Capital Fund (617) 20$ 50 - - - - 70
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
42nd St. Levee Study 50$ 200 - - - - 250
Capital Fund (617) 50$ 200 - - - - 250
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Facility Master Plan Update 200$ - - - - - 200
Capital Fund (617) 100$ - - - - - 100
Improvement SDCs (617) 100$ - - - - - 100
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Cedar Creek Intake Structure 500$ - 100 - - 200 800
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617) 500$ - - - - - 500
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 100 - - 200 300
Irving Slough Headwaters -$ 150 416 1,966 - - 2,532
Capital Fund (617)-$ 150 290 345 - - 785
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 126 1,621 - - 1,747
South 67th Street -$ - 325 - - - 325
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 325 - - - 325
Glenwood 210$ - 2,000 1,970 1,820 - 6,000
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617) 210$ - - - - - 210
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 2,000 1,970 1,820 - 5,790
Partial Funding Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 31 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Stormwater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
North Willamette Heights -$ - 60 - - - 60
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 60 - - - 60
Jasper Slough -$ - - 60 - - 60
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 60 - - 60
Gray Creek - 72nd Street -$ - 3,000 3,000 - - 6,000
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - 29 - - 29
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 3,000 2,971 - - 5,971
Corporate Way Pond 35$ - 175 - - - 210
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Other (420) 35$ 0 - - - - 35
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 175 - - - 175
Woodstave Removal -$ - - 150 150 - 300
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 150 150 - 300
S & T Drainage -$ - - 600 - - 600
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 600 - - 600
I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel -$ - 105 440 - - 545
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 105 440 - - 545
"Q" Street Channel -$ - 250 250 - - 500
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - 250 250 - - 500
Maple Island Slough -$ - - 550 - - 550
Capital Fund (617)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ - - 550 - - 550
Annual Totals 5,700$ 1,275 9,586 11,361 2,345 575 30,842
Capital Fund (617) 1,481$ 686 615 620 275 275 3,952
Improvement SDCs (617) 316$ - - 29 - - 345
Reimbursement SDCs (617) 50$ 89 50 100 100 100 489
Revenue Bonds (617) 3,743$ - - - - - 3,743
Federal Funds (420)-$ - - - - - -
SEDA Funds (429)-$ - - - - - -
Land Match -$ - - - - - -
Booth Kelly (618) 50$ - - - - - 50
MWMC Sponsorship 25$ - - - - - 25
Other (420) 35$ - - - - - 35
Unspecified Stormwater Funds -$ 500 8,921 10,612 1,970 200 22,203
Funding Not Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 32 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Account #850223
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Mill Race Stormwater Facility 12.7%
Map ID-SW 5
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Mill Race Project
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 150$ 100$ 50$
Engineering 500$ 250$ 250$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction 3,000$ 3,000$
Other 152$ 152$
Total 3,802$ 350$ 3,452$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs 30$ 1$ 1$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
Total 34$ 1$ 1$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Revenue Bonds 425 4,000$ 4,000$
User Fees 425 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp. 440 233$ 233$
Unspecified -$
Total 4,233$ 4,233$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Project is a stormwater treatment facility on land immediately north of the present Mill Pond on land
recently acquired from McKenzie Forest Products. The project will intercept and treat stormwater from the
industrial/commercial sub-basin south of Main Street. The project will include open vegetative treatment for problematic
pollutants to improve water quality in the Springfield Mill Race. It will also provide detention for stormwater and enhance
planned public amenities in this area. The project will require careful phasing to coincide with projected Mill Race/Mill Pond
work to maximize efficiencies.
Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan
Planning and design to continue in 2014
Justification: Stormwater in this sub-basin discharges into the Mill Race, and includes various industrial pollutants from
log yards, industrial sites, and heavy downtown vehicle traffic, resulting in periodic violations of state water quality
standards and presenting hazards to endangered fish species. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
for the Mill Race includes efforts to improve stormwater quality in this waterway. Unique sites and facilities will enhance the
Mill Race renovation project, and provide educational opportunity and a community amenity while improving water quality.
It may provide some contribution to the Mill Pond renovation project by providing fill material at a low cost.
Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for
water entering the Mill Pond. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for
completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 33 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Account #850237
Construction and Preservation
0%
Map ID-SW 13
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
SCS Channel 6 Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 265$ 265$
Engineering -$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction -$
Other -$
Total 265$ 265$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Revenue Bonds 617 245$ 245
SDCs. Reimb. 617 -$
User Fees 617 20$ 20$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 265$ 265$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Programmed
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Past construction along SCS Channel 6
Citizen Request to prepare current flood plain maps
Justification: SCS Channel 6 currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. Since the data
collection was done for the original flood plain mapping in the 1960's and 1970's, numerous changes have been made to SCS
Channel 6, including widening, narrowing, and piping. Each of these changes was considered insignificant and was done
independently, so detailed analysis of the affect of the change on the mapped flood plain was not performed. However, when the changes are taken in aggregate, there may be an affect on some properties. The City has received a request from a
citizen with property along SCS Channel 6 to re-evaluate the current 100-year flood plain boundary and prepare new maps if
needed. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consultant to develop a scope document for the study and mapping
update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work.
Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for SCS Channel 6 from 10th Street to the I-5 Channel to incorporate numerous construction
changes that have occurred along SCS Channel 6 in the past 40 years.
SCS Channel 6 FIRM Update/
SCS Channel 6 Phase 2
Attachment 2, Page 34 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
Construction and Preservation
1.9%
Map ID-SW 7
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 100
Design Consultant Services 800005 500$ 100 400$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 300$ 300$ Construction 800008 2,700$ 1,000$ 1,700$
Total 3,600$ 200$ 1,700$ 1,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Special Assmt.-$ SDCs. Reimb.617 -$
User Fees 617 912$ 912$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Revenue Bond 617 1,128$ 1,128$
Unspecified -$
Total 2,040$ 2,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Planning Analysis and Engineering are underway, Construction anticipated in 2015
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Aged facility at the end of its useful life. Additional capacity needs identified in Stormwater Facilities
Identified structural problems in existing CMP. Delay may increase City's risk.
Over-Under Channel Pipe Replacement & Improvements
Project Description: The Over-Under Channel system includes about 3,900 linear feet of corrugated metal arch pipe (CMP) under the
existing channel. This project is intended to replace the existing CMP with a new pipe, as well as provide a parallel pipe for additional
capacity as recommended in the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan.
Justification: During 2010, staff became aware that some of the existing CMP has reached the end of its useful life and is beginning to
fail. About half of the 3,900 feet of pipe was installed in 1950 and the remainder installed in 1988/89. The Stormwater Facilities Master
Plan also recommends installing 8,720 feet of 36-inch diameter pipe parallel to the existing CMP pipe and other pipes further east to
provide additional capacity to handle existing flows that are conveyed/stored in the channel portion of the system during high flows. This
project will include evaluating alternatives for reducing the size or eliminating the channel by using different pipe sizes and/or
configurations.
Attachment 2, Page 35 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Drainage Repair 0%
Map ID-SW 8
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Springfield Stormwater Management Plan Metro Waterways Project DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,239$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 185$ 129$ 185$ 185$
Total 1,344$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 144$ 200$ 200$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs (13)$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (2)$ (2)$ (3)$ (3)$
Personnel Costs (24)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (3)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$
Total (37)$ (4)$ (4)$ (4)$ (5)$ (6)$ (7)$ (7)$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 1,111$ 200$ 161$ 200$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 100$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
SDCs. Reimb.617 289$ 39$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 100$
Total 1,400$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability, capacity needs, opportunities to reduce
maintenance costs, citizen requests, aged facilities.
Accumulating fund for projects as developed.
Project Description: This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system
and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch
basins and culverts to prevent flooding, and the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Repair West B St. storm
outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6, 72nd St. and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars
causing localized flooding at 1105 S St., 1500 B St., and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations;
Replace catch basin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St.
intersection, A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of
17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Drainage repairs on Quarry Street
and Park Street.
Justification: The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating
costs of the drainage system by reestablishing stormwater efficiency. Reduced costs would be realized in operational costs currently
expensed by responding to localized flooding problems during rain events.
Citizen requests, field surveys, history of identified problem areas.
Attachment 2, Page 36 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Channel Improvement 3.5%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Metro Waterways Project
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 79$ 7$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$
Capital Permitting 800006 316$ 28$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$ 48$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 264$ 24$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$
Total 659$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 10$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Personnel Costs 47$ 5$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 8$
Total 57$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 9$ 10$ 10$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 517$ 37$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$ 80$
SDCs, Imp.617 2$ 2$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ SDCs. Reimb.617 140$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$
Total 659$ 59$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
The need to meet regulatory requirements and address capacity issuesChannel evaluations and project identification
Project Description: This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to
correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality, and fish habitat functions. These
improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. The adoption of
the Springfield Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan identifies an additional temperature benefit from channel restoration and
shading.
Justification: This project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the
Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon Habitat. This project also
enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements. The listing
of the Willamette and McKenzie rivers for temperature identifies the need to provide riparian improvement and shading.
Regulatory and environmental requirements
Attachment 2, Page 37 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
0%
Map ID-SW 13
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
SCS Channel 6 Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 20$ 10 10
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 78$ 78
Total 98$ 10$ 88$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SDCs. Reimb.617 -$
User Fees 617 88$ 88$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 88$ 88$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Programmed
Stormwater Pipe Upgrade
Near the 5th St./EWEB Path intersection Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Approximately 170 feet of an 18-inch diameter stormwater pipe running west along the EWEB path from N. 5th
Street requires upsizing to a 30-inch diameter pipe.
Justification: Currently, a concrete circular 18-inch diameter pipe drains drains stormwater subbasin 59, which is located immediately upstream of a siphon outletto the SCS Channel 6. The current pipe lacks the capacity to sufficiently convey flows from larger storm events, causing localized flooding in neighborhoods to the east of N 5th Street. To reduce and potentially eliminate the extent of flooding that can occur during larger storm events this pipe needs to be upsized to a 30-inch diameter concrete circular pipe.
Reduce localized flooding identified in the Channel 6 Stormwater Master Plan Project #A1-1.
Past construction along SCS Channel 6
Attachment 2, Page 38 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Booth Kelly Drainage 0%
Map ID-SW 6
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Booth Kelly Industrial Complex Stormwater Master Plan
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 15$ 15$
Design Consultant Services 800005 45$ 45$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 300$ 300$
Total 360$ 15$ 345$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 2.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ 0.5$ Personnel Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Total 7.5$ -$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ 1.5$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Revenue Bonds 617 310$ 310$ User Fees 617 -$ SDCs, Imp.617 -$ Booth-Kelly 618 50$ 50$
Unspecified -$
Total 360$ 360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Planning and design to continue in 2014
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site.
Justification: Stormwater runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The site currently does not
have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weather season or provide pretreatment of runoff prior to
discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master plan has been completed to address this issue in order to support ongoing operation of
the Booth-Kelly industrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act storm water requirements and address Endangered Species Act
concerns.
Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan.
The stormwater system in Booth Kelly is aging and under developed. Basic drainage function and water quality are necessary for discharge into the Mill Race. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 39 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Jasper/Natron Drainage 83.4%
Map ID-SW 19
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 220$ 220$
Design Consultant Services 800005 500$ 500$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 780$ 780$ Construction 800008 3,500$ 1,500$ 2,000$
Total 5,000$ -$ 720$ 2,280$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 87$ 29$ 29$ 29$
Personnel Costs 9$ 3$ 3$ 3$
Total 96$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 32$ 32$ 32$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Revenue Bonds 617 720$ 720$
User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 4,280$ 2,280$ 2,000$
Total 5,000$ 720$ -$ 2,280$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: Will expand the storm sewer system to service future growth.
Development within the Jasper/Natron area following completion of the Jasper Trunk Sewer (CIP
Map ID WW-10). Council direction.
Planning is scheduled to begin in late FY 12 or early FY 13, Construction deferred pending
funding.
Project Description: Construction and channel improvements along the existing drainage ways to serve new development in the
Jasper Natron basin. Impacts to the downstream property owners and natural drainage ways located beyond the City's Urban
Growth Boundary will need to be assessed and mitigated in the final design. The first year of the project will include additional
studies to identify the downstream impacts and design the project and its mitigation measures. Construction will occur in the
following years. The impact on the City's operations budget is estimated on the conceptual project but may change on final design.
There is an expected increase in both the annual maintenance and personnel budget.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the existing Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)
to promote future urban development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this
project for completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 40 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Glenwood Park Blocks 8.8%
Stormwater Treatment Design
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Glenwood Refinement Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002 Legal Services 800003 Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 50$ 50$ Design Consultant Services 800005 -$ Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Other -$
Total 50$ -$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 46$ 46$
SDCs, Imp.617 4$ 4$
Unspecified -$
Total 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: It is anticipated that the Glenwood Park Blocks are to be constructed as development occurs within the Glendwood
refinement area. It is intended that the park blocks will become publicly owned infrastructure and incorporate stormwater treament and
Parks and Open Space upon completion. This project is intended to work with Willamalane and a consultant to develop design and
landscape standards for stormwater treatment and open space.
Justification: The park blocks will be publicly owned and maintained.
Project Driver: Development in the Glenwood Refinement area.
Availability of Funds
Attachment 2, Page 41 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
MS4 Permit Requirements 0%
No Map
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008 and the Stormwater Management Plan
City of Springfield Municipal and Development Codes
Regulatory Requirements
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001 -$ Administration 800002 210$ 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 210$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs 56$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$
Total 56$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
SDCs. Reimb.617 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
Total 210$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$
Annual Program
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements.
Justification: In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which authorizes
the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to
implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely
violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements
and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007,
the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit.
Project Driver: Regulatory and environmental requirements
MS4 permit requirements
Attachment 2, Page 42 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Riparian Land Management 12.7%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan
City of Springfield Development Code
Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act
Metro Waterways identified land acquisitions
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 207$ 15 32 32 32 32 32 32
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 92.40$ 14.40$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 299.40$ 29.40$ 45.00$ 45.00$ 45.00$ 45.00$ 45.00$ 45.00$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 13$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 3$ 3$
Personnel Costs 8$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$
Total 21$ 2$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 5$ 5$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SDCs. Reimb.617 105$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
User Fees 617 193$ 13$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Other -$ -$
Total 298$ 28$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Development activity impacts on storm drainage flows and water quality
Accumulating funds for projects as developed
Justification: This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements
and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, some Springfield waterways do not meet federal and state
water quality safety standards for human and aquatic life. In addition to the Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater
quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for at least 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality
standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparian protection has been established in the
Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners, this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners.
Regulatory requirements and community livability
Project Description: This project provides funding to purchase riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet
City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. It also provides funding for consultant
services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them. Property acquisitions will typically result in increased
operational spending to maintain city owned property. Projects developed on property acquired may, however, produce savings through
reduced spending for flood control and water quality improvement activities. Project funding levels have been reduced to conform to
eligibility levels for improvement SDCs. Council adoption and implementation of a reimbursement SDC may permit restoration of prior
funding levels.
Attachment 2, Page 43 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Lower Mill Race / Mill Race Outfalls 12.7%
Map ID-SW 4
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Stormwater Management Plan
Economic Development Downtown Mill Race Ecosystem Plan Booth Kelly Stormwater Master Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 162$ 162$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 848$ 848$
Total 1,110$ 50$ 1,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 14$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 49$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Revenue Bonds 617 1,085$ 1,085$
User Fees 617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$ MWMC sponsorship 25$ 25$
Unspecified -$
Total 1,110$ 1,110$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Planning and design to continue in 2014
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Construct a daylight or diversion pretreatment structure, an offline water quality treatment facility, and a green pipe
open channel improvement. Additional detail for this multi-faceted project are in WQ-12 project of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.
Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project, Completion of Mill Race Stormwater Master Plan.
Justification: These types of projects are needed to meet the City obligations to improve the quality of urban stormwater under the Clean
Water Act, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater discharge permit, and support stormwater management
requirements of new development downtown. The City's agreement with the Corps of Engineers (ACOE) for the Mill Race includes efforts to
improve stormwater quality in this waterway. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2009.
Completion of the Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for water entering the Mill Race.
Attachment 2, Page 44 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Mill Race FIRM Update 0%
Map ID-SW 14
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 70$ 20$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 70$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SDCs. Reimb.617 -$
User Fees 617 70$ 20$ 50$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 70$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Programmed
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Mill Race Restoration Project construction
Required by federal statute 44 CFR 65.3
Project Description: Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate
Map (FIRM) for the Springfield Mill Race from the inlet at Clearwater Park to the outlet at Island Park to incorporate construction changes.
Justification: The Springfield Mill Race currently has a regulatory (100-year) flood plain as depicted on FEMA's FIRMs. With the
construction of the Mill Race Restoration Project, the City is obligated under federal statute to prepare new analyses and maps to show the
affects of the project on the 100-year flood plain. The requested funding will allow the City to hire a consulant to develop a scope document
for the study and mapping update. This scope will then be used to support a future request for funding the update work.
Attachment 2, Page 45 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
High Banks Road (42nd St.) Levee Study 0%
Map ID-SW 15
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
National Levee Safety Program
National Flood Insurance Program
High Banks Road Dike Operation and Maintenance Agreement (1983)
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 25$ 25$
Legal Services 800003 25$ 25$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 200$ 200$ Capital Permitting 800006 -$ Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 350$ 50$ 300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SDCs. Reimb.617 -$
User Fees 617 250$ 50$ 200$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 250$ 50$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Programmed
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Study needed prior to completion of updated McKenzie River flood plain mapping under the Metro Waterways Project.
Federal requirements for maintaining/operating flood control levees
Project Description: Conduct a study of the condition of the High Banks Road (42nd Street) Dike to identify any structural or non-
structural deficiencies and to evaluate the potential for obtaining federal accreditation of this Dike as a flood control facility under the
National Flood Insurance Program and for compliance with the National Levee Safety Program.
Justification: In October 1983, the City entered into an Agreement with the Soil Conservation Service for the operations and
maintenance of the High Banks Road Dike that was constructed by Lane County in the 1950's adjacent to what is now known as 42nd
Street. This dike provides flood control protection for areas of Springfield north of Highway 126 and west of 42nd Street from McKenzie
River flooding. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed an accreditation program for levees that are relied
upon under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and the National Levee Safety Committee has developed recommendations to
Congress for a National Levee Safety Program.
Attachment 2, Page 46 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Stormwater Facility Master Plan Updates 50%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Objective
Stormwater Management Plan/NPDES MS4 Permit
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 25$ 25
Design Consultant Services 800005 175$ 175
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 200$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SDCs. Reimb.617 -$ User Fees 617 100$ 100$ SDCs, Imp.617 100$ 100$ Unspecified -$
Total 200$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending UGB expansion decision
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Regulatory compliance with the City NPDES MS4 permit, future growth, stormwater management and
Council Direction to update SDC's on 5-yr cycle and regulatory requirements
Project Description: Update of the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan. The plan itself identified areas where additional study work is
needed. There is also a need to address the proposed UGB amendments identified in the Commercial, Industrial Buildable Lands study
recently completed. The plan project list will be re-prioritized and costs will be revised to represent current values. New technology for
sustainable development and stormwater management at the source is available to reduce overall system requirements and long term
costs.
Justification: The Council directed staff to maintain and update the Facility Master plan to provide current information for SDC
development, CIP project needs and support for the development community. BMP DS3 of the City's NPDES MS4 permit directs updating
of the SWFMP. The data used for the current Stormwater Facility Master Plan represents the system as it existed in 2005 and doesn't
include new development and repairs of the existing system. The system model needs to be updated to the current GIS standard NAD 83
and completed capital project and system upgrades need to be modeled.
Attachment 2, Page 47 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction 12.7%
Map ID-SW 21
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Metro Waterways Project.
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 250$ 125$ 125$
Design Consultant Services 800005 150$ 75$ 75$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 100$ 100$ Construction 800008 300$ 100$ 200$
Total 800$ -$ 200$ 200$ 100$ 100$ 200$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Revenue Bonds 617 500$ 500$ User Fees 617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 300$ 100$ 200$
Total 800$ 500$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ 200$ -$
Deferred
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The Cedar Creek drainage is the focus of a comprehensive series of stormwater system improvements identified
in the Metro Waterways Study. Metro Waterways represents a regional partnership which includes state, federal, and local partners, including the US Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Land Management and Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, as well as local utilities and
jurisdictions and the McKenzie Watershed Council. Projects identified in the study focus on enhancing riparian areas and stream habitat
for the benefit of endangered species, reducing urban pollutants, and repairing/restoring critical flood control infrastructure on the
McKenzie River and Cedar Creek.
This project, the first of those identified in the multi-year study, is the reconstruction of the intake structure and associated channel
improvements to the inlet of Cedar Creek from the McKenzie River. This work will provide for managing seasonal flows to both reduce
the potential for serious wintertime flooding from the McKenzie River, and ensure adequate summertime flows for fish habitat and
downstream water users, including the Springfield Utility Board. Springfield has participated in the Metro Waterways partnership since
2003.
Justification: Improvements will ensure summertime stream flows in Cedar Creek to provide stormwater management and habitat to
endangered species, and will manage high storm flows, which presently threaten citizens’ homes.
Metro Waterways Study, Cedar Creek Partnership and Salmon Trout Enhancement Program (STEP)
project. The Stormwater Facility Master Plan identified this project as an ongoing need through 2018.
Implementation of the initial project developed out of the Metro Waterways Study and the STEP project.
Attachment 2, Page 48 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls 3.5%
Map ID-SW 23
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 490$ 100$ 100$ 290$
Capital Permitting 800006 185$ 185$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,757$ 1,757$
Total 2,532$ -$ 150$ 150$ 2,232$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs 9$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Total 9$ -$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 785$ 150$ 290$ 345$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$ Unspecified 1,747$ 126$ 1,621$
Total 2,532$ -$ 150$ 416$ 1,966$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for flood control and the construction of a
stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements will be incorporated into the project where applicable to meet regulatory
requirements.
Justification: This project is identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and will help to reduce localized flooding and provide water quality improvements.
Regulatory requirements, minimize risk and liability from flooding incidents
Flood Control and water quality. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for
completion in 2010.
Attachment 2, Page 49 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
South 67th Street 9.5%
Map ID-SW 24
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 10$ 10$
Design Consultant Services 800005 65$ 65$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 250$ 250$
Total 325$ -$ -$ 75$ 250$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 2$ 1$ 1$
Total 2$ 1$ 1$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$ Unspecified 325$ 325$
Total 325$ -$ -$ 325$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: Reduce localized flooding identified in Stormwater Facility Master Plan Project #13FC.
Minimize risk and liability, and an opportunity to reduce maintenance costs
Project Description: Pipe improvements for flood control. Currently, during heavy rainfall the storm system surcharges at 67th and Main
Street flooding private property.
Citizen complaints and localized flooding. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2010.
Attachment 2, Page 50 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Glenwood 8.8%
Map ID-SW 25
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Glenwood Refinement Plan
I-5 Bridge Replacement Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 450$ 200 250
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 600$ 600$
Design Consultant Services 800005 1,450$ 700$ 300$ 450$ Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 1,000$ 500$ 500$ Construction 800008 2,500$ 1,200$ 1,300$
Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 100$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
Personnel Costs 26$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 126$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 30$ 30$ 30$ 30$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 210$ 210$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
Unspecified 5,790$ 2,000$ 1,970$ 1,820$
Total 6,000$ 210$ -$ 2,000$ 1,970$ 1,820$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: To improve the stormwater system including pipe and open channel improvements, for flood control and water
quality improvements at various locations within Glenwood as identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP), and to support implementation of the existing refinement plan for Glenwood. The project will also involve evaluation and
construction/enhancement of stormwater outfall structures to the Willamette River. Specific projects will be implemented as development
occurs, consistent with the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The City's current effort to update the Glenwood Refinement Plan
will likely result in modifications to some of the projects identified in the SWFMP, and will be addressed in future system studies that will
be performed as the Refinement Plan work proceeds.
Justification: Provide infrastructure for new development and to correct existing deficiencies that meet current and future water quality
requirements.
Completion of the Glenwood Refinement Plan Update and development within the Glenwood Area
Stormwater quantity and quality requirements for development within the Glenwood area. The
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2013. This project may
require reprioritization should the City receive federal funding for the Franklin Boulevard project.
Attachment 2, Page 51 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
North Willamette Heights 12.7%
Map ID-SW 26
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Acount Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 60$ 60$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 60$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 60$ 60$
Total 60$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Planning stage deferring pending complete funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Develop a basin plan to guide new development and redevelopment activities with respect to drainage and water
quality.
Justification: This is a largely undeveloped area which creates runoff to the Mill Race and the Booth Kelly site. Provide a drainage
study for future development including water quality elements to protect the Mill Race.
Stormwater management and water quality requirements to guide new development and re-
development.
New development and re-development within the North Willamette Heights drainage basin. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 52 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Jasper Slough 83.4%
Map ID-SW 27
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan Stormwater Management Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 10$ 10
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 50$ 50
Total 60$ -$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs 12$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Total 18$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 60$ 60$
Total 60$ -$ -$ -$ 60$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Culvert and open channel improvements for flood control, riparian enhancement and planting for Total Maximum
Daily Loads (TMDL) concerns.
Justification: Localized filling and degradation of the channel and road crossings cause flooding and erosion. The lack of riparian cover
increases temperature and reduces natural resource value of a natural stream. City stormwater currently discharges into the Jasper
Slough at three locations. The Jasper Slough flows into the Mill Race which has water quality requirements.
TMDL requirements, local flooding and future development
Localized flooding and regulatory requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this
project for completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 53 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Gray Creek/72nd Street 21.1%
Map ID-SW 28
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Metro Waterways
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 300$ 300$
Design Consultant Services 800005 600$ 300$ 300$
Capital Permitting 800006 300$ 150$ 150$
Property Acquisition 800007 500$ 250$ 250$ Construction 800008 4,300$ 2,000$ 2,300$
Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Total 24$ -$ -$ -$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 User Fees 617 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 29$ 29$
Unspecified 5,971$ 3,000$ 2,971$
Total 6,000$ -$ -$ 3,000$ 3,000$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: As outlined in Appendix E of the 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, this project includes constructing a new
open channel to convey discharges from the eastern most portion of Gray Creek to a new outfall to Cedar Creek and regrading the
existing open channel and down stream piped portions of the conveyance system to mitigate anticipated flooding due to future
development.
Justification: Provide flood control for future development combined with localized water quality improvements.
Future development
Development in the east Springfield area. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project
for completion in 2013.
Attachment 2, Page 54 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Corporate Way Pond 12.7%
Map ID-SW 29
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: 2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 60$ 35$ 25$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 150$ 150$
Total 210$ 35$ -$ 175$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Reimb 617 35$ 35$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 175$ 175$
Total 210$ 35$ -$ 175$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Develop a vegetation management plan for the Corporate Pond that discharges to Maple Island Slough. See
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan 43-WQ. Refined construction cost will be developed with the study.
Justification: Flood control and regulatory Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program requirements.
Identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and citizen driven
Stormwater quality requirements
Attachment 2, Page 55 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Woodstave Removal 0%
Map ID-SW 22
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan Pre-2008
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 200$ 100$ 100$ Capital Permitting 800006 50$ Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 300$ -$ -$ 50$ 150$ 150$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 300$ 150$ 150$
Total 300$ -$ -$ -$ 150$ 150$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Project to take the last active portion of the S. A Street woodstave storm line out of service. This line is located
south of S. A Street, between S.10th Street and S. 18th Street. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements. Initial project cost involves scoping
the extent of the removal, permitting and disposal requirements and developing updated costs. Additional funds will then be programmed
as needed to complete the project.
Justification: This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs.
Citizen request and Council priority
Regulatory and environmental requirements. Delay may increase City's risk of regulatory violations.
Attachment 2, Page 56 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: Partial
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
"S" and "T" Streets Drainage 12.7%
Map ID-SW 18
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
SCS Channel 6 Report
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 50$ 50
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 100$ 100$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 450$ 450$
Total 600$ -$ -$ -$ 100$ 500$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 17$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Total 17$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 SDCs. Reimb.617 -$ User Fees 617 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$
Unspecified 600$ 600$
Total 600$ -$ -$ -$ 600$ -$ -$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: This project will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the "S" Street area.
Redevelopment and/or completion of Channel 6 improvements and capacity issues.
Deferred pending funding and completion of the Channel 6 FIRM/Phase 2 plan
Project Description: Construct a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along "S" and "T" Streets between 10th and Debra
Streets. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan expands upon the original Channel 6 report with a necessary downstream Channel 6
project. Increasing the pipe size or pipe length will decrease operational costs slightly.
Citizen complaints regarding localized flooding. Improvement of County standard streets.
Attachment 2, Page 57 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
12.7%
Map ID-SW 32
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 105$ 105$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 440$ 440$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 545$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 6$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 15$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 21$ -$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 617 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
SDCs, Imp.617 -$ Unspecified 545$ 105$ 440$
Total 545$ -$ -$ 105$ 440$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: Improve localized water quality and add capacity to reduce flooding problems.
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan identified and capacity issues
I-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel
Project Description: Construct a combination flood control/water quality facility. Improve the open channel system and construct a 7
acre-foot combination treatment wetland facility on City owned property adjacent to the Gateway Natural Resource area.
Stormwater quality requirements and capacity needs related to development. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for completion in 2014.
Attachment 2, Page 58 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
"Q" Street Channel 12.7%
Map ID-SW 33
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
Metro Waterways
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 125$ 125$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 325$ 325$
Total 500$ -$ -$ 175$ 325$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
Total 16$ 1$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 User Fees 617 -$ SDCs, Imp.617 -$
SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
Unspecified 500$ 250$ 250$
Total 500$ -$ -$ 250$ 250$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Channel repair, riparian enhancement and shading to address temperature issues in the Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) and other water quality concerns. Reduce impact of nuisance species on water quality and bank stability. The Q Street Channel connects to the Alton Baker Canoe Canal near Autzen Stadium. Water quality improvements in the Springfield portion of the
system will also support other efforts to restore fish habitat in the Canoe Canal.
Justification: Improve water quality and temperature on existing drainage way.
Regulatory requirements and environmental opportunities
Stormwater quality requirements. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this project for
completion in 2014.
Attachment 2, Page 59 of 152
Stormwater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, Rehabilitation, and Water Quality
Maple Island Slough 12.7%
Map ID-SW 34
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Stormwater Facilities Master Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 75$ 75
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 475$ 475
Total 550$ -$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 User Fees 617 -$ SDCs, Imp.617 -$ SDCs, Reimb.617 -$
Unspecified 550$ 550
Total 550$ -$ -$ -$ 550$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Conduct an engineering study to evaluate capacity needs for future development. Develop a vegetation
management plan with the intent to improve water quality from the campus industrial portion of the North Gateway area.
Justification: Corporate Way Pond and the Sports Way stormwater channel have overflow outlets that discharge to the Maple Island
Slough. A study is needed to evaluate water quality and capacity needs within existing drainage ways.
Identified in Stormwater Facilities Master Plan and new development
Stormwater quality requirements and flood control. The Stormwater Facilities Master Plan prioritized this
project for completion in 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 60 of 152
TRANSPORTATION
Overview
Transportation projects fall into the categories noted below:
Planning and Project Development –These projects range from larger facility planning,to concept
project planning,to specific project development.Funding for these projects relies heavily on Federal
and State funds,with City funds used to supplement project budgets and in some cases provide required
match funding to external resources.Current examples of this in the CIP are the Springfield
Transportation System Plan and the Franklin Boulevard Environmental Assessment projects.
Maintenance and Operations –These projects are typically programmatic and can provide funding for a
range of activities within each project.Street Light Infill and Pole Replacement,Traffic Control Projects,
and Intelligent Transportation System investments fall in to this category.
Pavement Preservation –These projects are identified by the Maintenance Division through the
Infrastructure Management System.Funding for these projects relies heavily on local and State fuel tax
revenues and are supplemented with Transportation Reimbursements SDCs,and federal dollars
programmed at the discretion of the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning organization (MPO).Examples
of pavement preservation projects identified in the CIP are the Street Seal and Overlay program and the
S.42nd St &Japer Roundabout projects.
System Improvement,Existing –These projects typically either bring existing infrastructure up to the
adopted urban standards,or make capacity and safety improvements to existing facilities.Funding for
these projects rely on all available resources.A current example of these types of projects in the CIP is
the Glenwood Connector Path Extension project.
System Improvement,New Facilities –These projects typically add new infrastructure to the City’s
transportation system and are identified within the various planning documents.The trigger for these
projects is driven mostly by growth and an identified future need to relieve stress on the system.Project
funding relies on all available sources.
Project Maps
Constructed
TS5 Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA
In Process
TS2 Downtown District Lighting
TS32 Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction
Project Phase 1
Funding Programmed
TS3 S.42nd St.&Jasper Roundabout
TS6 Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Boulevard
Partial Funding Programmed
TS18 S.48th Street Connection (Main to
Daisy)
TS21 Gateway/Beltline Intersection
Funding Not Programmed
TS31 Maple Island Improvements
TS33 Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction
Project Phase 2
TS34 Main Street Lighting
TS36 RRFB &PHB Installations
TS38 Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements
TS41 42nd Street Operational,Safety,and
Mobility Improvements
Attachment 2, Page 61 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 62 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total
Transportation System Plan 3,700$ - - - - - 3,700
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Federal Aid (420) 500$ - - - - - 500
State Aid (420) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Franklin Boulevard NEPA 4,160$ - - - - - 4,160
Capital Fund (434) 500$ - - - - - 500
Federal Aid (420) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Improvement SDCs (434)210$ - - - - - 210
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Other (LTD)50$ - - - - - 50
SEDA (429) 200$ - - - - - 200
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Franklin Blvd Reconst. Phase 1 7,600$ 3,800 1,300 - - - 12,700
Capital Fund (434) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Stormwater Capital (617) 2,000$ - - - - - 2,000
Improvement SDCs (434)900$ - - - - - 900
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
State Aid (420)900$ 3,800 1,300 - - - 6,000
Other (Loan) 600$ - - - - - 600
Downtown District Lighting 3,700$ - 400 400 400 400 5,300
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
SEDA (430) 500$ - - - - -
Unspecified 3,200$ - 400 400 400 400 4,800
Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA 30$ 350 3,700 - - - 4,080
Capital Fund (434)30$ - - - - - 30 Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)-$ 350 500 - - 850
Unspecified -$ - 3,200 - - 3,200
Main St Ped Crossing 1,016$ 234 - - - - 1,250
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)500$ - - - - - 500
State Aid (420)516$ 234 - - - - 750
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
S. 42nd St. & Jasper Roundabout 260$ - - - - - 260
Capital Fund (434) 180$ - - - - - 180
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)80$ - - - - - 80
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Boulevard 75$ 805 - - - - 880
Capital Fund (434)20$ - - - - - 20
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ 135 - - - - 135
Reimbursement SDCs (434)25$ - - - - - 25
State Aid (420)30$ 670 - - - - 700
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
ADA Transition Projects 555$ 55 55 55 55 55 830
Capital Fund (434)55$ - - - - - 55
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ 55 - - - - 55
Unspecified 500$ - 55 55 55 55 720
Funding Programmed
Transportation and Street Capital
Projects
Constructed or Complete
Partial Funding Programmed
In Process
Attachment 2, Page 63 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total
Transportation and Street Capital
Projects
Signal System Modernization 110$ 55 55 55 55 55 385
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 110$ 55 55 55 55 55 385
Transportation Demand Mgmt 20$ 20 20 20 20 20 120
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)15$ 5 10 10 10 10 60
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 5$ 15 10 10 10 10 60
Traffic Control Projects 267$ 117 117 117 117 - 735
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)150$ 35 35 35 35 - 290
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 117$ 82 82 82 82 - 445
Gateway Traffic Improvements 4,235$ 416 400 500 500 500 6,551
Capital Fund (434) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Improvement SDCs (434)535$ - 200 250 225 250 1,460 Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 500$ 416 200 250 275 250 1,891
Intelligent Transportation Systems 3,266$ 50 50 50 50 50 3,516
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ 25 25 25 25 25 125
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (xxx) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Unspecified 66$ 25 25 25 25 25 191
South 48th Street (Main to Daisy)3,875$ - - 927 - - 4,802
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)500$ - - - - - 500
Reimbursement SDCs (434) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Unspecified -$ - - 752 - - 752
Other (Developer)175$ - - 175 - - 350
Bridge Preservation 20$ 10 10 10 10 10 70
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - 10 - 10 20
Unspecified 20$ 10 10 - 10 - 50
Gateway - Beltline Intersection 2,817$ 1,418 1,249 725 1,041 1,000 8,250
Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (434)580$ 605 395 355 510 - 2,445
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 2,237$ 813 854 370 531 1,000 5,805
Other -$ - - - - - -
Art/Collectors Street Seal & Overlay 2,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,000
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 2,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 7,000
Street Light Infill & LPS Replacement 3,700$ - 237 237 237 237 4,648
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)500$ - - - - - 500
Unspecified 3,200$ - 237 237 237 237 4,148
Funding Not Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 64 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total
Transportation and Street Capital
Projects
Local Street Seal & Overlay 600$ 600 600 600 600 600 3,600
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Other -$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 600 600 600 600 600 600 3,600
Arterial/Collector Reconstruction 1,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 1,000$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,000
Local/Residential Reconstruction 300$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,800
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 300$ 300 300 300 300 300 1,800
Maple Island Improvements 500$ - 230 550 831 - 2,111
Capital Fund (434) 500$ - - - - - 500
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-
Unspecified -$ - 230 550 831 - 1,611
Intelligent Lighting Control 3,200$ 688 - - - - 3,888
Capital Fund (434) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Other -$ 688 - - - - 688
Main Street Lighting 500$ 250 250 100 100 - 1,200
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)500$ - - - - - 500
Unspecified -$ 250 250 100 100 - 700
RRFB Installations 3,360$ 25 25 25 25 25 3,485
Capital Fund (434) 3,200$ - - - - - 3,200 Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
State Aid (420)160$ - - - - - 160
Unspecified -$ 25 25 25 25 25 125
FYA Left Turns -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ 15 15 15 15 15 75
Traffic Signal Communication 3,700$ - 12 12 12 12 3,748
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Other 500$ - - - - - 500
Unspecified 3,200$ - 12 12 12 12 3,248
Franklin Blvd Reconst. Phase 2 -$ - - - 25,000 10,400 35,400
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - - Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - - Other -$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ - - - 25,000 10,400 35,400
Attachment 2, Page 65 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total
Transportation and Street Capital
Projects
Oakdale Pheasant Bike Imp.-$ - - 330 - - 330
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Other -$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ - - 330 - - 330
42nd Street Operational, Safety, and
Mobility Improvements 500$ - - - 1,700 - 2,200
Capital Fund (434) 500$ - - - - - 500
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
State Aid (420)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ - - - 1,700 - 1,700
Bike Wayfinding & Safety
Improvements -$ 100 - - - - 100
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ 100 - - - - 100
City Hall Public Bike Parking -$ - 35 - - - 35
Capital Fund (434)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - - Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified -$ - 35 - - - 35
Annual Totals 47,566$ 11,308 11,060 7,028 33,068 15,679 125,709
Capital Fund (434) 14,585$ - - - - - 14,585
Improvement SDCs (434) 2,890$ 805 665 675 805 285 6,125
Reimbursement SDCs (434) 4,805$ 55 - 10 - 10 4,880
Stormwater Capital (617) 2,000$ - - - - - 2,000
Unspecified 17,055$ 4,706 8,595 6,168 32,263 15,384 84,171
Other (Developer)175$ - - 175 - - 350
Other (LTD)50$ - - - - - 50
SEDA (429) 200$ - - - - - 200
SEDA (430) 500$ - - - - - 500
Federal Aid (420) 3,200$ 350 500 - - - 4,050
State Aid (420) 1,606$ 4,704 1,300 - - - 7,610
Other 500$ 688 - - - - 1,188
Attachment 2, Page 66 of 152
Transportation and St 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: Yes
Account #830020
Infrastructure Planning & Inventory Study
Springfield Transportation System Plan 50%
No Map
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 214$ 214$
Engineering -$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction -$
Other -$
Total 214$ 214$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street 434 -$
AFG Grant 420 -$
Federal - STP-U* 420 500$ 500$
State Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
Unspecified -$
Total 3,700$ 3,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Plan was adopted in calendar 2014. Updates to the Springfield Development Code have been started.
Statewide Planning Goal 12, Oregon Highway Plan, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Oregon Transportation Plan, Regional
Transportation Plan, Oregon Freight Plan, Metro Plan, TransPlan, Lane County Transportation System Plan, Willamalane
Comprehensive Plan, Local Refinement Plans, Springfield Bicycle Plan, Springfield Development Code, Springfield Engineering
Design Standards Manual.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The Transportation System Plan (TSP) update is intended to serve as a blueprint to guide future multi-
modal transportation system improvements and investment decisions for the City of Springfield. This project includes an
inventory and general assessment of the existing transportation system; a determination of existing and future needs; a road
plan; a public transportation plan; a bicycle/pedestrian plan; a parking plan; a transportation system management and demand
management plan; an air, rail, water, and pipeline plan; and a financing and implementation plan.
Justification: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660 Division 12, requires
jurisdictions throughout Oregon to prepare and adopt regional or local transportation plans that serve as the transportation
element for their comprehensive plans (660 012 0015(2) (4)). Plan updates should respond to transportation, land use,
environmental, population growth, economic and social changes that have occurred in the community since the TSP was last
prepared. Historically, TransPlan has served as the local TSP for both Springfield and Eugene. However, since the passage of
HB 3337, Eugene and Springfield are developing individual TSPs specific to each jurisdiction's separate UGBs.
Project Driver: Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) - OAR 660 Division 12
HB 3337 - Changes in land inventories and UGB boundary
Attachment 2, Page 67 of 152
Transportation and S 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Account #: 870010
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Franklin Boulevard NEPA 50%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Priority
Glenwood Refinement Plan Update
TransPlan
Regional Transportation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 1,260$ 1,260$
Engineering -$ -$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction -$ Other -$
Total 1,260$ 1,260$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 500$ 500$
Federal Aid, STP-420 3,200$ 3,200$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp. 447 210$ 210$
SDCs, Reimb. 446 -$
Other (LTD) 420 50$ 50$
SEDA 429 200$ 200$
Unspecified
Total 4,160$ 4,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
NEPA analysis Complete.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Complete project refinement, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation
for future improvements to Franklin Boulevard, the Franklin/Glenwood, Franklin/Henderson, Franklin/Mississippi and
Franklin/McVay intersections to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians,
and vehicles. Contribute to the required local match for any federal or state funding received.
Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks,
bike lanes, property access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and
anticipates redevelopment in the urban renewal district as directed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency.
Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work.
City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopment
Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront
area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to support planned
Glenwood area redevelopment.
Attachment 2, Page 68 of 152
Transportation and Street Capita 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ng Programmed: Partial
Account #:
Construction and Preservation
Franklin Boulevard Phase 1 Reconstruction 7%
Map ID-TS 32
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Priority TransPlan
Glenwood Refinement Plan Update Regional Transportation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 200$ 200
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 3,085$ 2,030$ 528$ 528$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 4,553$ 4,553$
Construction 800008 6,600$ 3,300$ 3,300$
Total 14,438$ 6,583$ 3,828$ 3,828$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Stormwater Capital 617 2,000$ 2,000$
Street Fund 434 3,200$ 3,200$
Federal Aid, STP-U 420 -$
State Aid, STIP 420 6,000$ 900$ 3,800$ 1,300$
SDCs, Imp.434 900$ 900$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Other (Borrowing)434 600$ 600$
SEDA 429 -$
Unspecified
Total 13,200$ 8,100$ 3,800$ 1,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$
NEPA documentation is complete and authorized by FHWA and ODOT. The balance of Phase 1 right
of way, and cost estimate to construct Phase 1 is approximately $7.65 million. Project funding includes
Federal and State funds (STIP, STP-U, Jurisdicitonal Transfer), and City funds (Stormwater Capital,
Transportation SDCs, SEDA/municipal borrowing).
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Franklin Phase 1 construction is anticipated to include improving the McVay/Franklin intersection with a tie back
to McVay north of the rail trestle and provision for a new north leg to serve the Riverfront area, and facility improvements on Franklin between McVay and Mississippi.
Justification: Franklin Boulevard’s transportation challenges are many. There is limited provision for travel choice alternatives to the
auto. Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is practically nonexistent, and where it has been provided it is substandard and unsafe. Safe
pedestrian crossing opportunities are infrequent and poorly defined. The intersection of Franklin Boulevard and McVay Highway currently operates at a degraded level of service. A modern multi-modal facility leverages Glenwood Riverfront redevelopment, and
Downtown redevelopment.
Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to support planned
Glenwood area redevelopment. .
City priority focus on Glenwood area redevelopment
Attachment 2, Page 69 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ding Programmed: Partial
Account #: 881002
Construction and Preservation
Downtown District Pedestrian Scale Lighting 0%
Map ID-TS 2
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Downtown District Plan and Implementation Strategy
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 1,270$ 50$ 20$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 1,000$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007
Construction 800008 7,260$ 310$ 120$ 350$ 350$ 350$ 350$ 5,430$
Total 8,530$ 360$ 140$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 6,430$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 440$ 440$
State Aid 420 -$
SEDA 430 500$ 500$
Unspecified 10,790$ 3200 400 400$ 400$ 400$ 5,990$
Total 11,730$ 3,700$ -$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 6,430$
This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover only certain blocks or block faces.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The project will evaluate, design, and construct pedestrian level, decorative lighting consistent with the downtown
revitalization district.
Justification: Increased safety, comfort and appearance for pedestrians and vehicles in the district. The project will improve the small town
feel, vitality and livability of the district. Council Direction
Citizen request
Attachment 2, Page 70 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Glenwood Riverfront Path NEPA 8%
Map ID-TS 5
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
TransPlan Glenwood Refinement Plan
Regional Transportation Plan City Transportation Plan
Council Goal WillamalaneComp Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 700$ 300$ 400$
Design Consultant Services 800005 136$ 36$ 100$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 836$ -$ 336$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 30$ 30
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 750$ 350$ 400$
State Aid 420 500$ 500$
SEDA 430 3,200$ 3,200$ Unspecified -$
Total 4,480$ 3,730$ 350$ 400$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Planned
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The project will complete required Federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation and approval for
the new Glenwood Multi-Use Riverfront Path, including locating the path alignment along the Willamette River and completing pathway design. This path is the final remaining unbuilt segment of the riverfront path system within the metro area connecting Eugene, Springfield, and urban
Lane County between the confluence of the Coast For and Middle Fork of the Willamette River to the south and the Beltline Bridge over the
River to the north.
Justification: Developing, and ultimately constructing the Riverfront Path creates a high quality, safe, and efficient dedicated corridor for
walking and cycling along the Willamette River connecting important origins and destinations within the metro area, and leverages Glenwood
Riverfront District redevelopment with world class non-auto connectivity and recreational amenity.
A safe bicycle/pedestrian connection on the north side of Franklin Boulevard between Eugene and
Springfield
Funding Availability
Attachment 2, Page 71 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Main Street Pedestrian Crossings 0%
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goal: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
ODOT Main Street Safety Study TransPlan
Intergovernmental Agreement with ODOT No. 28115
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 110$ 75 35
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 26$ 20$ 6$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$ Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 554$ 376$ 178$
Total 580$ 396$ 184$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 62$ 6$ 6$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs 28$ 3 3$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 90$ 9$ 9$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 500$ 500$
Federal Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
State Aid 420 750$ 516$ 234$
Other -$
Unspecified
Total 4,450$ 4,216$ 234$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
In Process
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The City of Springfield shall design and construct up to six (6) new pedestrian crossings between the intersections of
34th Street and 57th Street. The Project includes installation of crosswalk markings and safety features that may include signing, raised median islands, pedestrian activated beacons, audible warning devices, or other features as determined appropriate for each location through
the approval of the State Traffic Engineer.
Justification: The Springfield Main Street (OR 126) corridor has been a focal point of safety concerns for many years. Because of the
continued occurrence of vehicle collisions with pedestrians between 20th Street and 73rd Street, there is particular public concern for pedestrian safety. State, Agency, and Lane Transit District partnered in conducting a study which resulted in the Springfield Main Street (OR
126) Safety Study, dated February 2011. State and Agency plan to install protected pedestrian crossings along Main Street, as funding allows.
Safety/Hazard condition
Project priority and funding availability
Attachment 2, Page 72 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ding Programmed: Partial
Construction and Preservation
S. 42nd & Jasper Roundabout Overlay 0%
Map ID-TS 3
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Asset Management System
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001 50$ 15$ 35$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 2$ 2$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$ Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 180$ 180$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 232$ 17$ 215$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 180$ 180
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 80$ 80$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 260$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Programmed
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The reconstruction of S. 42nd Street was accomplished in 2005 with funds received from the Oregon Department of
Transportation as part of the jurisditional transfer. Upon Completion of project the remaining funds were set aside in a reserve for future preservation work. This planned preservation project will utilize those reserves to overlay the roundabout at the intersection of 42nd Street and
Jasper Road with concrete, "white topping", and if sufficient funds remain, the remaining ashpalt section will receive a thin lift.
Justification: When S. 42nds St. was originally reconstructed in 2005, the roundabout was constructed with an asphalt pavement section due to
constructability issues at the time. This type of construction is not ideal for roundabouts, but the design team in 2005 chose a pavement section
that would allow for a future overlay with Portland Cement Concrete, rather than face future reconstruction. The Lane Transit District has
explored providing bus service on S. 42nd Street necessitating the need for developing this project.
Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, provide timely preservation, and avoid costly reconstruction
Street condition
Attachment 2, Page 73 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Virginia Avenue/Daisy Street 0%
Bicycle Boulevard
Map ID-TS 6
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
TransPlan 1998 Springfield Bike Plan
Springfield TSP
Regional Transportation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001 60$ 20 40 Administration 800002 15$ 15
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 105$ 75$ 30$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 700$ 700$
Total 880$ 75$ 730$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs 500$ 500$
Total 500$ 3,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Revenue Bonds 420 -$
Street Fund 434 20$ 20$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 700$ 30$ 670$
SDCs, Imp.434 135$ 135$
SDCs, Reimb.434 25$ 25$
Unspecified -$
Total 880$ 75$ 805$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Ongoing need, deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The City of Springfield partnered with the University of Oregon's 2011-2012 Sustainable City Year to plan
Virginia/Daisy corridor bike boulevard improvements. Safety treatments along the entirety of the corridor include: increased signage to slow vehicles and identify the space as a bicycle boulevard, striping of bicycle lanes, sharrows, traffic calming infrastructure (e.g., bulbouts), and intersection treatments (e.g., mini-roundabouts).
Justification: This project supports and enhances Springfield's existing bikeway and pedestrian system. Improvements to Virginia/Daisy
will give bicycles and pedestrians an alternate route to Main Street. This project will improve neighborhood livability and promote healthy
and active lifestyles for the estimated 10,545 residents within 0.25 mile buffered radius of Virginia/Daisy.
Citizen Requests
Customer Service Requests from the low vision pedestrian community T1-1, T2-3, T4-3
Attachment 2, Page 74 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ding Programmed: Partial
Construction and Preservation
ADA Transition Projects 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
ADA
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 350$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
Total 385$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 55$ 55 SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 55$ 55$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Other -$
Unspecified 775$ 500$ -$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
Total 885$ 3,200$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
Current program is unfunded; staff is working on the Transistion Plan
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 requires the City to maintain a "Transition Plan" that details how it will bring
facilities that were not in compliance at the adoption of the act, up to the newly adopted standards. Currently, the City policy is to correct defects as projects occur and to make improvements as requests are received from Citizens who make their need known. This project will set
aside funds to be used for high priority locations that are identified, and will allow the City to respond in a timely manner to those requests.
Justification: Required action as per The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990. In addition, safety and operational benefit of the
transportation network. ADA Compliance
Development of projects with a nexus to ADA law and requests from the public
Attachment 2, Page 75 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ding Programmed: Partial
Construction and Preservation
Signal System Modernization 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
ITS Metro Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001 40$ 10$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 400$ 100$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
Total 440$ 110$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 55$ 55$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Other -$
Unspecified 385$ 110$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
Total 440$ 500$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
This project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover some of the need; currently unfunded
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: As technology advances, the equipment in Signal Controller Cabinets becomes more advanced. These advancements
offer certain advantages operationally but they also have impacts on the availability of replacement parts that are currently in use. Some recent advances that are occurring include the upgrade to 2070 controllers, IP addressable conflict monitors, remote video detection integration, pan-tilt-
zoom cameras, adaptive signal controls and a host of other equipment. Funding is set aside in this program, and as projects are identified that
fit into this category they are given an individual account and another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds.
Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network.
Operational Functionality
Equipment or system failure, equipment obsolescence and unavailability of replacement parts
Attachment 2, Page 76 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Transportation Demand Management Varies
No Map
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
TDM Goals Regional Transportation Plan
TransPlan State Legislation
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 -$
Total 120$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Special Assmt.500$ 500$ Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 60$ 15$ 5$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Unspecified 60$ 5$ 15$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Total 3,820$ 3,720$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or ‘transportation options’ (TO) policies
and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements. At times, TDM activities include locations that are included on the Transportation System Development Charge Project List. For those activities, Transportation Improvement SDC funds can be used to provide project funding up to the percentage that the project location is eligible per the SDC Project List. The TDM project also provides resources to address state-mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction
requirements for the transportation sector.
TransPlan policies, current and pending state regulatory requirements, transportation system
management need.
Funding balance is for accumulating funds for projects as developed and or required.
Project Description: The project includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the
community like the 60th and "E" Street multi-use path, park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations, and other activities that
promote non-single auto travel choices.
Project Driver: TransPlan policies, and state land use, transportation, and GHG reduction laws, statues and rules.
TDM and TO program activities promote alternatives to 1-person/1-car auto trips and is a growing
aspect of system management as system demand outpaces capacity constraints and greenhouse gas
reduction strategies are implemented.
Attachment 2, Page 77 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ng Programmed: Partial
Account #: 850013
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Traffic Control Projects Varies
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
TransPlan
Council Policy
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 65$ 25$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 45$ 17$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
Construction 800008 625$ 225$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$
Total 735$ 267$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 33$ -$ 3$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 33$ 500$ 3$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 9$
3200
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 290$ 150$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$ Unspecified 445$ 117$ 82$ 82$ 82$ 82$
Total 735$ 267$ 117$ 117$ 117$ 117$ -$ -$
Ongoing Project. Funding is programmed as a 'sinking fund' to program resources for future projects as
identified and/or required. A typical intersection upgrade project can range between $50,000 - $500,000.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of
roundabouts at various City intersections. Example intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd St. & Marcola Road, South 42nd
& Daisy St., South 40th & Daisy St., and 28th St. & Centennial Blvd. Signal modifications may include changing phase order, adding
overlaps, and other enhancements to safety or efficiency like improved pedestrian crossings. Various striping and signing improvements
may also be implemented under the Traffic Control Projects. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into
this category they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC
funds.
Justification: As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The
intersections will meet roundabout or signal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing
signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and to enhance traffic flow.
Specific projects are based upon the amount of available funding
Citizen requests, high crash locations, congestion
Attachment 2, Page 78 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ing Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Gateway Area Traffic Improvements Varies
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis
I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment
Council Goals
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 655$ 50$ 100$ 75$ 80$ 250$ 100$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 350$ 350$ Construction 800008 1,846$ 135$ 400$ 341$ 320$ 250$ 400$
Total 2,851$ 535$ 500$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Street Fund 434 3,200$ 3,200$ Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 1,460$ 535$ 200$ 250$ 225$ 250$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Unspecified 1,891$ 500$ 416$ 200$ 250$ 275$ 250$
Other -$
Total 7,051$ 4,735$ 416$ 400$ 500$ 500$ 500$ -$
Ongoing. Funding balance is a 'sinking fund' to program resources for highest priority projects like
Gateway Street operational and safety improvements. Project may also contribute to Gateway/Beltline
funding needs.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion; to improve safety of all modes; and, to
support continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects.
Gateway area development and traffic conditions
Project Description: Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity, relieve congestion,
and improve safety. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an
individual account and at that time another source of funding is identified to match the allowable SDC funds.
Community growth in the Gateway area
Attachment 2, Page 79 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Varies
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Regional ITS Operations & Implementation Plan for Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area TransPlan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
Engineering Staff 800001 37$ 7$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 329$ 59$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$ 45$
Total 366$ 66$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
Special Assmt.500$ 500$
Street Fund 434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 150$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
SDCs, Reimb.434 25$ 25$
Unspecified 191$ 66$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
Total 4,066$ 3,766$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
Ongoing Program. Use as a 'sinking fund' to accumulate resources for highest priority projects.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: ITS projects will typically have a high benefit to reasonable cost ratio. Operational improvements to the street network will
help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, improve safety, and continue to support economic development.
Ongoing. May provide matching funds to Oregon Department of Transportation projects with mutual
benefits.
Project Description: ITS projects in various locations to increase communications, capacity, safety and traveler information. Funding is
set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and at that time
another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds.
Deploying ITS projects enhance the ability to use the transportation system more effectively by
extracting the maximum capacity from the system. This will delay the need for adding new lanes and
links to the system and improve traveler safety and access to traveler information systems.
Attachment 2, Page 80 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
S. 48th Street Connection (Main to Daisy)40%
Map ID-TS 18
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Project #901 in RTP and TransPlan
Agreement between City and Westwind Estates, City Council Resolution 06-35, 7/17/06
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 225$ 225$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 877$ 877$
Total 1,102$ -$ -$ -$ 1,102$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$ State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 500$ 500$
SDCs, Reimb.434 3,200$ 3,200$
Unspecified 752$ 752$
Other (Developer)420 350$ 175$ 175$
Total 4,802$ 3,875$ -$ -$ 927$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding and future development activity
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Construct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street
Intersection. A portion of the cost to construct this project is an obligation of current and future development south of Daisy Street. In 2010, the City received a cash payment of $175,000 to satisfy the obligation of the Westwind Estates development. Remaining funding is
pending future development.
Justification: Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street, to support planned land development,
consistent with TransPlan.
Future development activity and funding availability
Future development and growth will create a need for connection between Daisy Street and Main Street to be constructed to alleviate congestion. Adds needed pedestrian crossing.
Attachment 2, Page 81 of 152
Transportation and Street Ca 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Bridge Preservation and Rehabilitation 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City Council Goals
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 Construction 800008 80$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Total 80$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 7$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs 35$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 42$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Storm Capital 617 -$
Street Capital 434 500$ 500$
Federal Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.)434 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Unspecified 50$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Total 3,780$ 3,720$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Monitoring bridge conditions and working to identify funding for needed repairs and maintenance
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project will address known deficiencies to City owned bridges discovered through City maintenance crew
and/or ODOT Bridge Inspections. ODOT inspects six City bridges every two years and these inspections have identified at least $50k of
needed repairs to preserve function and structural integrity on these six bridges. City crews inspect all 14 City bridges twice per year. Staff
is aware of additional maintenance needs on the remaining eight bridges not inspected by ODOT.
Justification: There are six bridges maintained by the City that are currently inspected by ODOT in correlation to the State wide
transportation system. Repair activities include bank scour beneath the bridge, rebuilding or replacement of a concrete nosing, grouting,
secure embankment erosion, replacing split spacer block, replacing a wing wall and patching concrete spalling. Steps need to be taken to
address the financing of these projects before they reach a critical stage.
Aging facilities and regulatory requirements, pending funding availability
ODOT Bridge Inspection reports provided on a two year cycle - these reports identify repairs and
deficiencies with each bridge. DPW Operations performs semi-annual inspections to identify new issues
and monitor existing ones.
Attachment 2, Page 82 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Gateway/Beltline Intersection 10%
Map ID-TS 21
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
I-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment
Transportation System Plan
Regional Transportation Plan
Gateway Refinement Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 750$ 305$ 445$
Capital Permitting 800006 5,650$ 505$ 5,145$
Property Acquisition 800007 6,626$ 6,626$ Construction 800008 6,745$ 2,817$ 1,368$ 1,199$ 370$ 991$
Total 20,021$ 2,817$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ 1,041$ 1,000$ 11,771$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ Personnel Costs 25$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 35$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 3,200$ 3,200$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 2,445$ 580$ 605$ 395$ 355$ 510$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Unspecified 17,576$ 2,237$ 813$ 854$ 370$ 531$ 1,000$ 11,771$
Other 420 -$
Total 23,721$ 6,517$ 1,418$ 1,249$ 725$ 1,041$ 1,000$ 11,771$
Phase 2 deferred pending funding and traffic operations agreement with ODOT
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a couplet
and purchase of right-of-way. CIP project funding contributes to overall project estimate of $30 million. Phase 1 is complete at a cost of
about $10 million.
Justification: Needed to improve level of service at the intersection and maintain proper function of the intersection in relationship to the
I-5/Beltline Interchange.
Project Phase 1 was completed in 2011. Project Phase 2 trigger is set by traffic operations agreement
with ODOT.
Community growth and agreements with Federal Highways and ODOT to construct intersection
improvements as part of the larger I-5/Beltline interchange upgrade project.
Attachment 2, Page 83 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022ding Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Arterial/Collectors Street 0%
Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance
No Map
18th St. (2,069 ft., $450,000)
28th St. (5.087 ft., $1,100,000)
S. 5th St. (427 ft., $100,000)42nd St. (2,889 ft., $607,000)
Commercial Ave. (496 ft., $108,000)
Marcola Rd. (2,602 ft., $575,000)
G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $425,000)
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Infrastructure Management System
2010 Street Conditions Report
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 960$ 240$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$
Administration 800002 Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 Construction 800008 7,040$ 1,760$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$
Total 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total 500 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 3,200$ 3,200$ Personnel Costs -$
Total 3,200$ 3,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 -$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Unspecified 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Total 8,000$ 2,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council GoalsOngoing Program; Deferred pending funding
W. "D" St. (4,508 ft., $1,000,000) S. 2nd St. (1,765 ft., $402,000)
Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative maintenance
application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly repairs. Overlays are
effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural
base failure.
Aging facilities and programmed preventive maintenance
Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and
improvements to the City's capital infrastructure
Laura St. (2,625 ft., $500,000)
Q St. (1,790 ft., $390,000 )
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
19th St. (531 ft., $120,000)
Project Description: A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement sealing and/or overlay of the Arterial/Collector Street System
performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's arterial and collector system at the current Council target of 85% fair or better level, approximately $750,000 to $1,000,000 in funding is needed annually. Following is a partial list with the highest priority overlays:
Attachment 2, Page 84 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Funding Programmed: No
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goals
TransPlan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 147$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 21$ 42$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,512$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 216$ 432$
Total 1,659$ -$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs (44)$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$
Personnel Costs -$
Total (44)$ -$ (2)$ (4)$ (6)$ (8)$ (10)$ (14)$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$ Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 -$
SDCs, Reimb.434 500$ 500$
Unspecified 4,622$ 3,200$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$
Total 5,122$ 3,700$ -$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 237$ 474$
Ongoing Program need/deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the
CIP process and throughout the year. Replace 2,720 existing low pressure sodium (LPS) lights with LED technology and reduce energy costs.
Implement Council Policy; Citizen Service Requests
Street Light Infill & LPS Light
Replacement/Upgrades
Justification: Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. LPS lights have higher life cycle costs than alternatives.
Replacement will reduce operations cost and improve visibility.
Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed in the City's budget
Attachment 2, Page 85 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022nding Programmed: No
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Local/Residential Street 0%
Scheduled Life Cycle Maintenance
No Map
Total Ft. = 11,577 Total = $319,500
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Council Goals
Infrastructure Management System
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 525$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$ 75$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007
Construction 800008 3,675$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$ 525$
Total 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total 500 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 3,200$ 3,200$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 3,200$ 3,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 -$ -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.434 -$
SDCs, Reimb.434 -$
Unspecified 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$
Total 4,200$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Deferred pending funding
Postal Way, (880 ft., $25,000)
Gateway Lp., (1,870 ft., $50,000)
Shelly St., (2,700 ft., $75,000)
Pheasant, (610 ft., $18,000)
F St., (327 ft., $9,000)
Lindale/Pheasant (2,042 ft., $55,000)
2nd St., (273 ft., $7,500)
N. Cloverleaf, (2,040 ft., $55,000)
Dornoch, (133 ft., $5,000)
Shady Lane Dr., (702 ft., $20,000)
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: This activity repairs and extends the life of the streets, providing the most cost effective long term preventative
maintenance application. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs prolongs the street life and delays more costly
repairs. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing,
and prevent expensive structural base failure.
Specific annual projects are based upon the amount of funding programmed. Aging facilities and
programmed preventive maintenance.
Project Description: A continuing street maintenance preservation effort by slurry and crack sealing of Local/Residential Street
System performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's local street system approximately 5 to 8 miles should be crack sealed
and slurry sealed annually. Following is a partial list indicating the highest priority sealing locations:
Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and
improvements to the City's capital infrastructure.
Attachment 2, Page 86 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: No
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Arterial/Collector Street Reconstruction 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Infrastructure Management System
2010 Street Conditions Report
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 840$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 6,160$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$ 880$
Total 7,000$ Thru 2017 2,018$ 2,019$ 2,020$ 2,021$ 2,022$ Beyond 2022
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total 500 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.3,200$ 3,200$
Street Fund 434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.434 -$ SDCs, Reimb.434 -$ Unspecified 7,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Total 10,200$ 4,200$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 24 miles of streets classified as a collector or
arterial have deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for
preservation activities, this amount has been increasing at approximately 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to
eliminate the current backlog is $10.8 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects:
21st St. (1,586 ft., $1,500,000)Q St. (925 ft., $500,000 )
G St. 21st -28th (1,981 ft., $900,000)B St. (486 ft., $250,000)
Deferred pending funding
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed arterial and collector street segments as identified within the Infrastructure
Management System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance preservation
activities are no longer effective or economical.
Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure.Structural street failures
Attachment 2, Page 87 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: No
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Local/Residential Street Reconstruction 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Infrastructure Management System
2010 Street Conditions Report
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 245$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$
Administration 800002 -$
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007
Construction 800008 1,855$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$ 265$
Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)500
Source Fund # Total 3200 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 -$ -
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.434 -$ SDCs, Reimb.434 -$ Unspecified 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$
Total 2,100$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 68 miles of local/residential streets has
deteriorated to the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option. Due to the reduction of available funding for preservation
activities, this amount has been increasing at approximately 6 miles per year over the last two year. The approximate cost to eliminate the
current backlog is $5.5 million in 2010 dollars. Following is a partial list with the highest priority reconstruction projects:
F St. (306 ft., $35,000)C St. (332 ft., $40,000)
3rd Pl. (583 ft., $60,000)Kelly Blvd. (361 ft., $45,000)
Justification: This activity repairs and reconstructs failed Local and Residential street segments as identified within the Infrastructure
Management System. The identified street segments have reached the limits of their useful life and annual maintenance preservation
activities are no longer effective or economical.
Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and
improvements to the City's capital infrastructure.
Structural street failuresDeferred pending funding
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Attachment 2, Page 88 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Funding Programmed: No
Account #: 850178
System Upgrades, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Preservation
Maple Island Improvements 10%
Map ID-TS 31
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goals-Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, Community Development and Economic Revitalization
TransPlan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 100$ Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 1,365$ 230$ 550$ 585$
Construction 800008 246$ 246$
Other -$
Total 1,711$ -$ -$ 330$ 550$ 831$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Street Fund 434 500$ 500$
Federal Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$ State Aid 420 -$
SDCs, Imp.447 -$
SDCs, Reimb.446 -$
Unspecified 1,611$ 230$ 550$ 831$
Total 5,311$ 3,700$ -$ 230$ 550$ 831$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding and future development activity
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project will upgrade the roundabout at Maple Island Road and International Way. It will also extend the Maple
Island Loop Road to the north along the Maple Island Slough.
Justification: The City of Springfield desires to promote growth and development in the Gateway Area which will increase the need for
more access and connectivity to alleviate traffic congestion. Private developer has constructed a portion of the north extension of Maple
Island Rd., which the City can acquire at cost before 2017.
Sufficient funding to acquire north extension and/or intersection improvements
Council Goals and development within the Gateway Area
Attachment 2, Page 89 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Intelligent Lighting Controls 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project: Council Goal: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 56$ 56$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003 Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 632$ 632$
Total 688$ -$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs*(450)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ (75)$ Personnel Costs (56)$ (3)$ (6)$ (8)$ (11)$ (14)$ (14)$
Total (506)$ -$ (78)$ (81)$ (83)$ (86)$ (89)$ (89)$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total 500 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 3,200$ 3,200$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Other 688$ 688$ Unspecified
Total 3,888$ 3,200$ 688$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
*Maintenance Costs above reflect averaged annual cost to replace stolen wire.
Deferred Pending Funding Availability: this project is scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover areas
of higher energy consumption or areas of high risk of wire theft.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: An Intelligent lighting system will monitor street light performance. The light monitoring system will monitor energy
consumption, fixture output, light outages, generate work orders and, most importantly, alarm per set conditions. The alarm feature would be used as a wire theft prevention with the idea of alerting the Police Department when a series of lights on a circuit suddenly goes dark. This
would be a primary method of protecting the public infrastructure and cost of replacing stolen wire.
Justification: In the past two years the City has lost approximately $150,000 in the repair and replacement of stolen conductors for street
light systems. Also, current loss prevention has resulted in extra expense for our own repair of the systems that do get damaged. Street light
outages are currently reported by citizens and by City personnel conducting physical surveys of the existing system to search for outages and
problems. With the implementation of this system there would be a reduction in labor expense for monitoring the system, wire loss prevention,
and reduced time of light outages, all improving customer service and satisfaction. Finally, the system has a dimming control feature that will
allow for substantial energy savings by allowing the City to DIM light output during non-peak hours. The system will also include a data base of
the lighting assets allowing much better management of the asset.
Opportunity to reduce operational costs and funding availability
Wire theft and street light management
Attachment 2, Page 90 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Main Street Lighting 0%
Map ID-TS 34
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goal: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities ODOT Main Street Safety Study TransPlan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 300$ 150$ 150$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005 Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 400$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$
Total 700$ -$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs 36$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$
Personnel Costs 18$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
Total 54$ -$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 9$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$ SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 500$ 500$
Federal Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
State Aid 420 -$
SEDA 430 -$
Other -$
Unspecified 700$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$
Total 4,400$ 3,700$ 250$ 250$ 100$ 100$ -$ -$
Deferred Pending Funding Availability (This project is scalable and could be completed in phases)
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The project will add lighting to Main Street from 20th to 69th by placing lights on existing poles where available and
installing new poles where necessary. The project could be incremental and done in phases or sections.
Justification: Main Street is a major arterial and has been identified by ODOT as a corridor with significant safety issues. A safety study for
the corridor identified street lighting as a major component toward improving pedestrian safety. ODOT does not light urban highways that are
not freeways. There have been multiple deaths and pedestrian crashes in addition to a high number of vehicle crashes. The improved lighting
offers a significant safety benefit. Improved lighting also has the potential for positive public perception of the corridor.
Safety/Hazard condition
Project priority and funding availability
Attachment 2, Page 91 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
RRFB & PHB Installations 0%
Map ID-TS 36
Project Driver:
Total Project Constructed Cost:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 47$ 17$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 263$ 143$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$ 20$
Total 310$ 160$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 6$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 6$ -$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total 500 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 3,200$ 3,200$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 160$ 160$
Other -$
Unspecified 150$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
Total 3,510$ 3,360$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$ 25$
Council Goals: Enhance Public Safety, Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Deferred Pending Funding Availability
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: The City has and continues to receive numerous requests for improved safety at pedestrian crossings. Statewide, an average of
1 pedestrian/bicylist dies each week and 2 are injured every day. These projects would increase pedestrian safety and respond to public
requests.
Improve safety for pedestrian crossings
Funding availability and project priority
Project Description: Several crossings have been identified that would receive a safety benefit from the installation of a RRFB (Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacon) or a PHB (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon).
Attachment 2, Page 92 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 30$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 60$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Total 90$ -$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 500$ 500$
Other 3,200$ 3,200$
Unspecified 90$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
Total 3,790$ 3,700$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$ 15$
Council Goals: Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Deferred Pending Funding Availability. The project is scalable.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The project will evaluate traffic volumes and determine locations where the implementation of Protective/Permissive turn
movements will benefit safety and operations.
Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Project will result in less delay and therefore fuel consumption.
Improve traffic system operations and reduce vehicle delay
Funding availability and project priority
Flashing Yellow Arrow Prot/Perm Left Turns
Attachment 2, Page 93 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Traffic Signal Communications 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Total Project Constructed Cost:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
ITS Metro Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 15$ 5$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 70$ 20$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Total 85$ -$ 25$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Other 500$ 500$
Unspecified 3,260$ 3200 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$
Total 3,760$ 3,700$ -$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$
This project may be scalable and could be reduced in scope to cover a limited area
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: As traffic signal technology advances, so does the necessary element of communication within the signal network.
Improved communication offers advanced signal control, less maintenance time, and improved error identification capabilities. The City system currently in place is aging and improvements will be necessary in the near future as standards changes. The project will evaluate central
system software, fiber optic lines, wireless radio communication, and existing copper connections.
Justification: Safety and operational benefit of the transportation network. Improved responsiveness to signal issues.
Operational Functionality
Planned installation of high band width requirement equipment that exceeds existing communication
capacity, or failure of legacy system or its components.
Attachment 2, Page 94 of 152
Transportation and Street Ca 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project 7%
Map ID-TS 33
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Priority Franklin Blvd. Study
Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan Glenwood Refinement Plan
TransPlan Regional Transportation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 2,000$ 2,000$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 12,000$ 7,000$ 5,000$ Construction 800008 21,400$ 13,000$ 8,400$
Total 35,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22,000$ 13,400$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 10$ 5$ 5$ Personnel Costs 30$ 15$ 15$
Total 40$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 20$
3200
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)446 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)447 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
Other -$ Unspecified 35,400$ 25,000$ 10,400$
Total 35,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 10,400$ -$
Unfunded
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project will construct modern urban standards improvements on the old Hwy 99
alignment in Glenwood called Franklin Boulevard between the Franklin/Glenwood intersection and the Franklin/McVay intersection to support
Glenwood redevelopment and regional safety and mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos.
Justification: The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, property
access, and intersection control. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and is integrated with the urban renewal plan for
Glenwood. Project is coordinated with Glenwood Refinement Plan Update work.
City priority to redevelop Glenwood riverfront area
Springfield Council goal to facilitate redevelopment in Glenwood, with a specific focus on the riverfront area. Design and function of future improvements to Franklin Boulevard are critical to successful Glenwood area
redevelopment. City, in partnership with the Lane Transit District, ODOT and Eugene continues to seek project funding through various federal initiatives, including a federal transportation bill reauthorization funding request
through the Oregon Congressional Delegation.
Attachment 2, Page 95 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Oakdale/Pheasant Bike Improvements 8%
Map ID-TP 38
Project Driver:
Total Project Constructed Cost:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 30$ 30$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 300$ 300$
Total 330$ -$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 500$ 500$
State Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
Other -$ Unspecified 330$ 330$
Total 4,030$ 3,700$ -$ -$ 330$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Deferred Pending Funding availability
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project will build bicycle facilities and sharrows along the Oakdale and Pheasant routes to improve the connectivity
to regional and local destinations in the Gateway area. The project will offer bicycle commuters a route choice that is less congested with
vehicular traffic. A portion of the project is on County owned jurisdiction and will require County participation.
Justification: There are currently no direct routes from the I-5 pedestrian bridge to the PeaceHealth facility at RiverBend. This route is one
piece of that direct route connection, with the remaining piece of the route currently under county jurisdiction.
Improve alternative mode connectivity to major destinations in the Gateway area.
User demand
Attachment 2, Page 96 of 152
Transportation and Street Capital 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 ng Programmed: Partial
System Upgrades
6%
Map ID-TS 41
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield 2030 Infrastructure Management System
TransPlan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002 55
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 75$ 75$
Design Consultant Services 800005 270$ 170$ 100$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 Construction 800008 1,300$ 1,300$
Total 1,645$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245$ 1,400$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$ Street Fund 434 500$ 500$ Federal Aid, STP-U 420 3,200$ 3,200$ State Aid 420 -$ SDCs, Imp.447 -$
SDCs, Reimb.446 -$
Other (Willamalane)420 -$
SEDA 429 -$
Unspecified 1,700$ 1,700$
Total 5,400$ 3,700$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700$ -$ -$
*City has recently made application to the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018 STIP) for $1.513 million
On Hold Pending Funding
42nd Street Operational, Safety, and Mobility
Improvements Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Upgrade to address safety and operations, in particular for freight accessing the OR 126 Expressway-Freight
Route and OR 126B-Main St. Upgrade the UP rail crossing serving the International Paper, Sierra Pine, and Weyerhaeuser industrial center, upgrade intersection control at the westbound OR 126 ramp terminal, add urban level lighting, add ADA-accessible connections from Olympic St. and Industrial Ave. to the McKenzie Levee Path, add left turn bay on 42nd St. at Industrial Ave and improve traffic signals at the eastbound OR 126 ramp terminal, Olympic Street and the International Paper driveways.
Justification: The 42nd Street project will provide much needed safety and operations improvements along an important freight route in
Springfield. In its current condition, 42nd St. has significant safety and operations issues that are in need of mitigation. The existing rail
crossing on 42nd, leading into a regionally significant industrial employment site is in a constant state of disrepair, with asphalt that
continues to buckle under the heavy weight of freight cars. Signals in the project area are in desperate need of adaptive coordination.
Long vehicular queues exist on 42nd St. due to the existing signal system and cars turning left (west) onto Industrial Ave. These
conditions cause congested traffic, freight delays, and difficulty for trucks entering and exiting the industrial sites.
Congestion and safety issues, in partiuclar freight mobility, that impact local economy.
Operational Functionality and safety/hazard concern
Attachment 2, Page 97 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Bike Wayfinding & Safety Improvements 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Total Project Constructed Cost:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 2$ 2$
Design Consultant Services 800005 16$ 16$
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 82$ 82$
Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$ SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$
Federal Aid 420 500$ 500$
State Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
Other -$
Unspecified 100$ 100$
Total 3,800$ 3,700$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality
Deferred Pending Funding availability
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project will add bicycle wayfinding signage and safety improvements around the City, with priority given to
improvements between the 'D' street path area and downtown Springfield. The project will offer bicycle commuters clear direction on preferred
routes to and from destinations throughout Springfield, with specific emphasis on downtown destinations and the regional 'D' street path.
Safety improvements will include, but are not limited to improved lighting, intersection improvements and striping.
Justification: There is currently no consistent wayfinding signage between the 'D' street path to downtown, or to other areas around
Springfield. A recently completed Springfield Wayfinding Plan will provide guidance to develop this project. Bicycle safety improvements are
also needed around Springfield, but most specifically at the west 'D' street intersection with the 'D' street path. The Springfield Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) made a formal recommendation for this project during their December 17th, 2013 meeting.
Improve bicycle wayfinding and safety, with an emphasis on downtown Springfield
User demand / BPAC recommendation
Attachment 2, Page 98 of 152
Transportation and Streets 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 unding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
City Hall Public Bike Parking 0%
No Mapping
Project Driver:
Total Project Constructed Cost:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 8$ 8$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 27$ 27$
Total 35$ 35$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Street Fund 434 -$
SDCs. Imp. (Str.)434 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (Str.)434 -$ Federal Aid 420 500$ 500$
State Aid 420 3,200$ 3,200$
Other -$ Unspecified 35$ 35$
Total 3,735$ 3,700$ -$ 35$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred Pending Funding availability
City Council Goal - Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project will add secure, long term bicycle parking underneath City Hall. The project will offer bicycle commuters a
secure parking location that includes shelter from the elements.
Justification: There is currently no long term secure bike parking at City Hall for the general public. The Springfield Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) made a formal recommendation for this project during their December 17th, 2013 meeting. A recent Regional
Bicycle Parking Study also recommends additional bike parking at City Hall. The Study will provide guidance on the development details of this
parking.
Improve public bicycle parking at City Hall
User demand / BPAC recommendation
Attachment 2, Page 99 of 152
WASTEWATER
Overview
Wastewater projects fall into several categories:
Preservation and Maintenance –These projects typically involve upgrading the current wastewater
system.Projects may include the rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines,laterals and connections
to reduce infiltration and inflow of groundwater into the system.
New Facilities –These projects typically involve the construction of new wastewater facilities as a result,
or in anticipation of new development.Projects may include sanitary sewer lines built as part of a new
subdivision and extension of sanitary sewer trunk lines.
PROJECT MAPS
Constructed
WW12 Franklin Boulevard System Expansion
In process
WW21 19th Street Sewer Upgrade
Funding Programmed
WW1 Jasper Trunk Line Extension
WW7 Hayden Lo Pump Station
WW8 River Glen Pump Station
Partial Funding/Funding Not Programmed
WW11 Main Street Improvements Unit 1
WW13 Nugget Way Pump Station
WW14 Peacehealth/Riverbend Pump Station
WW15 Main Street Improvements Unit 2
WW16 McKenzie Highway Expansion
WW17 “A”Street Improvements Unit 1
WW18 “A”Street Improvements Unit 2
WW19 “A”Street Improvements Unit 3
WW23 Marcola Rd.Sewer –22nd to 28th
Streets
Attachment 2, Page 100 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 101 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Franklin Boulevard Expansion 2,998$ - - - - - 2,998
Capital Fund (611) 1,681$ - - - - - 1,681
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (611) 1,317$ - - - - - 1,317
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
19th Street Sewer Upgrade 620$ - - - - - 620
Capital Fund (611) 620$ - - - - - 620
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Misc. Wastewater System Repair 450$ 250 250 250 250 250 1,700
Capital Fund (611) 250$ 250 250 250 250 250 1,500
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611) 200$ - - - - - 200
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
CMOM Planning and Implementation 100$ 1,100 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,200
Capital Fund (611) 100$ 1,100 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 4,700
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - 500 500
Hayden Lo Pump Station 1,050$ - - - - - 1,050
Capital Fund (611) 200$ - - - - - 200
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611) 850$ - - - - - 850
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
River Glen Pump Station 250$ - - 700 - - 950
Capital Fund (611) 250$ - - 700 - - 950
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Master Plan Update 135$ - 65 - - - 200
Capital Fund (611) 68$ - 32 - - - 100
Improvement SDCs (611) 67$ - 33 - - - 100
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Jasper Trunk Line Extension 200$ - - - - - 200
Capital Fund (611) 200$ - - - - - 200
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Constructed
In Process
Funding Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 102 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Wastewater Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th -$ - 230 - - - 230
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 230 - - - 230
Main Street Improvements Unit 1 -$ - - 2,102 - - 2,102
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 2,102 - - 2,102
Peacehealth-Riverbend Pump Station -$ - - 3,189 - - 3,189
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - 3,189 - - 3,189
Main Street Improvements 2 -$ - - - 1,145 - 1,145
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - 1,145 - 1,145
McKenzie Highway Improvements -$ - - - - 1,683 1,683
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - 1,683 1,683
"A" Street Improvements 1 -$ - - - - 620 620
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - 216 216
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - 404 404
"A" Street Improvements 2 -$ - - - - 285 285
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - 85 85
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - 200 200
"A" Street Improvements 3 -$ - - - - - -
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - - - - - -
Local Sewer Extensions -$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000
Capital Fund (611)-$ - - - - - -
Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000
Annual Totals 5,803$ 1,350 2,545 8,241 3,395 4,838 20,369
Capital Fund (611) 3,369$ 1,350 1,282 1,950 1,250 750 6,582
Improvement SDCs (611) 67$ - 33 - - 301 334
Reimbursement SDCs (611) 1,050$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (611) 1,317$ - - - - - -
Special Assmt. (419)-$ - - - - - - Unspecified Wastewater Funds -$ - 1,230 6,291 2,145 3,787 13,453
Partial Funding Programmed/Funding Not Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 103 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
Account #
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Franklin Boulevard System Expansion 100%
Map ID-WW 12
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:Construction completion in 2015.
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Direction
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 75$ 75$
Engineering 300$ 300$
Land/Right of Way 250$ 250$
Construction 2,373$ 2,373$
Other -$
Total 2,998$ 2,998 - - - - - -
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 21$ 3$ 4$ 4$ 5$ 5$
Personnel Costs 41$ 7$ 8$ 8$ 9$ 9$
Total 62$ 10$ 12$ 12$ 14$ 14$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
Revenue Bonds 409 1,317$ 1,317$
User Fees 409 1,681$ 1,681$
SDCs, Imp. 443 -$
SDCs, Reimb. 442 -$ Unspecified -$
Total 2,998$ 2,998$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Development activity in the Glenwood area
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This Project expands the Glenwood wastewater system from the existing 30 inch trunk line in
Franklin Boulevard south with approximately 3,900 feet of 15 inch pipe and 2,400 feet of 8 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk
lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by maintenance every five years.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land
use designations in the Glenwood area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2009.
Additionally, should the City receive federal stimulus dollars for the Franklin Boulevard Project, this
will become a priority as some of the new pipe will be under the reconstructed roadway.
Attachment 2, Page 104 of 152
Wastewater Funding Secured: Programmed
Construction and Preservation
19th Street Sewer Upgrade 0%
Map ID-WW 21
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
Compliance with Environmental Protection Agency enforcement order
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 10$ 10
Administration 800002 210$ 210
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 400$ 400
Total 620$ 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Wastewater Capital 611 620$ 620
SDCs. Reimb. (WW)611 -$
SDCs. Imp (WW)611 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 620$ 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Project Description: Project #3 in the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan involves replacing the existing 12-inch wastewater line with an 18-
inch line from MH10034175 (North Springfield Interceptor) to MH10034164 (at Highway 126 westbound off ramp) in 19th Street. This
upgrade will alleviate modeled surcharged flow in the system upstream of the upgrade location.
Justification: The project improves capacity problems in the wastewater collection system during wet weather and peak flow conditions.
This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows.
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the
wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public health and safety. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2014.
Regulatory requirements
Attachment 2, Page 105 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Miscellaneous Wastewater System Repair 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status: Accumulating funds for projects as developed
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Direction
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 260$ 20$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$ 40$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004
Design Consultant Services 800005
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,440$ 180$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$ 210$
Total 1,700$ 200$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 1,750$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 200$ 200$
Unspecified -$
Total 1,950$ 450$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$
Regulatory requirements
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers that require either emergency
rehabilitation as a result of Sanitary Sewer Overflows or the prospect of impending system failures. The DPW Operations Division addresses
an average of four (4) emergency repairs of this nature annually.
Justification: The project will repair and/or replace pipe or other system components that have reached the end of their useful life or are
otherwise causing problems within the collection system. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state
requirements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows (SSO). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as scheduled, thus there is a
minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget.
Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the
wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public
health and safety. This program provides funding for maintenance and engineering to respond to any
system failures or issues quickly and efficiently as they arise or are identified.
Attachment 2, Page 106 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
CMOM Planning & Implementation 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Direction
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan
Regulatory Requirements
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 100$
Design Consultant Services 800005 1,250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 3,750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750$
Total 5,100$ -$ 1,100$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
User Fees 611 5,700$ 100$ 1,100$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 500$ 1,000$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 500$ 500$
Total 6,200$ 100$ 1,100$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Ongoing Program
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: The City of Springfield's obligations in the 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) were completed by
January 2010; however it is necessary for the City to continue to fund wastewater system rehabilitation and Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)
reduction projects. These additional projects will be identified through the Wastewater Master Plan Update project and the Capacity,
Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) program that will likely be included in the next NPDES permit for the wastewater
system.
Justification: This program deals with capacity problems in the wastewater system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective
manner identified by the Wastewater Master Plan and the WWFMP. This is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with fede
and state regulations requiring elimination of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Normal maintenance and inspections will continue as
schedule thus there is a minimal net impact on the operations and maintenance budget.
Regulatory requirements
Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the
wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public
health and safety. This program is a response to the need to both reduce the peak flows to the regional
wastewater plant, as well as address all other requirements.
Attachment 2, Page 107 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Hayden Lo Pump Station 0%
Map ID-WW 7
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 100$ 100$
Administration 800002 50$ 50$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 150$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 600$ 600$
Total 750$ -$ -$ -$ 750$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 5$ 1$ 1$ 1 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs 10$ 2$ 2$ 2 2$ 2$
Total 15$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 200$ 200$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 850$ 850$ Unspecified -$
Total 1,050$ 1,050$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable
the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO.
Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan, Protection of Public health and safety
Programmed
Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer
overflows (SSOs). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a
minimum of 494 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine
actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow
monitoring to occur.
Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This
project is necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to
eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by
2014.
Attachment 2, Page 108 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
River Glen Pump Station 21%
Map ID-WW 8
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 200$ 200$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 700$ 700$
Total 950$ -$ -$ 250$ 700$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 4$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Personnel Costs 8$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Total 12$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 950$ 250$ 700$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$ Unspecified -
Total 950$ 250$ -$ -$ 700$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities. This is necessary to enable
the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to eliminate SSO.
Regulatory Requirements - Facilities Master Plan
Project Description: This project is necessary to maintain system capacity for existing users and avoid the potential for sanitary sewer
overflows (SSO). The 2008 Wastewater Master Plan recommends that the existing pump station be upgraded to provide 2 pumps with a
minimum of 664 gpm capacity each. The Master Plan further recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design to determine
actual capacity requirements and upgrades. Additional funding is needed in the operations budget for maintenance costs to allow for flow
monitoring to occur.
Springfield has an obligation to maintain the wastewater system such that all SSO are eliminated. This is
project necessary to enable the City to maintain compliance with federal and state requirements to
eliminate sanitary sewer overflows. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by
2015.
Attachment 2, Page 109 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Wastewater Master Plan Update 50%
No Map
Project Description:
Justification:
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastewater Master Plan, June 2008
City Council Objective
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 200$ 200
Design Consultant Se 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 200$ -$ -$ -$ 200$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 100$ 68$ 32
SDCs, Imp.611 100$ 67$ 33
SDCs, Reimb. 611 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 200$ 135$ -$ 65$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Update process to begin in 2015
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
To meet 5-yr target set by Council (2013 Adoption)
Council Direction to update Project List and Master Plan on 5-yr cycle
Review June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and update as necessary.
Review and revise the June 2008 Wastewater Master Plan and technical model as necessary to
accommodate changes related to new growth, additional flow monitoring data, implementation of the
Downtown Plan, proposed changes in Glenwood and updating the 1991 North Springfield Sewer Study.
Attachment 2, Page 110 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: Yes
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Jasper Trunk Line Extension Phase 3 81%
Map ID-WW 1
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Direction
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 200$ 200$
Design Consultant Services 800005 1,050$ 1,050$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 750$ 750$
Construction 800008 7,500$ 7,500$
Total 9,500$ 9,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 47$ 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
Personnel Costs 151$ 20$ 20$ 21$ 21$ 23$ 23$ 23$
Total 198$ 26$ 26$ 28$ 28$ 30$ 30$ 30$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 200$ 200$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified -$
Total 200$ 200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Development in the Jasper/Natron Area and the need to decommission 3 pump stations and avoid costly
system upgrades and maintenance activities.
Phase 1 Complete. Phase 2 Complete. Phase 3 easement acquisition underway, construction deferred
pending development activitiy.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Installation of 18,000 feet of 10 to 27 inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from S. 42nd Street to Natron and the
Urban Growth Boundary. The City is planning on borrowing the total of the project cost and collecting the developer share through agreements
and reimbursements upon connection to the system. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video inspected by
Maintenance every five years. The additional impact on the operations and maintenance budget are shown below.
Justification: The Jasper Trunk Line Extension project will provide sewer service to the Jasper/Natron area within the Urban Growth
Boundary that is currently not served. Given completion of the Bob Straub Parkway, it is a priority to extend sewer service to this area to serve
anticipated development. 100% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with an estimated 50% to be reimbursed to the City
by grants, developer contributions, or assessments. The project is currently planned to be constructed in at least 3 phases, with the first 2
phases to be completed in 2012. The remaining phase(s) will be constructed as funding becomes available and development activity resumes.
Completing the first two phases will allow the City to decommission three existing pump stations, thereby significantly reducing the City's
annual operations and maintenance costs.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote future
urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for construction by 2010.
Attachment 2, Page 111 of 152
Wastewater Funding Secured: No
Construction and Preservation
Marcola Rd. Sewer - 22nd to 28th Streets 0%
Map ID-WW 23
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Marcola Meadows Master Plan approval
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 -$
Design Consultant Se 800005 20$ 20$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 210$ 210$
Total 230$ -$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 611 -$
SDCs. Imp (WW) 611 -$
Unspecified 230$ 230$
Total 230$ -$ -$ 230$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Project Description: In 1979, parcels within the Northview Subdivision, on the south side of Marcola Road between 22nd and
28th Streets, were annexed to the City without wastewater service. This project will construct a public 8-inch sewer to provide
service to each parcel. Development of the Marcola Meadows site will include new public wastewater lines within new public
streets, extending south from the North Springfield Interceptor, which will allow service to the Northview Subdivision parcels. The
approved Marcola Meadows Master Plan requires improvements to Marcola Road, including installation of the needed
wastewater line in Marcola Road with the City paying for some or all of the cost to install this line. The City will recoup its costs
through the application of Sewer In-lieu of Assessment fees charged on the Northview Subdivision parcels when they connect to
the new line.
Justification: The project provides wastewater service to unserved, annexed parcels within Springfield concurrent with a
planned project to improve Marcola Road.
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Orderly and efficient provision of key urban services through constructing a needed public wastewater
line in Marcola Road concurrent with a planned street improvement project.
Construction of the Marcola Meadows development
Attachment 2, Page 112 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Main Street Improvements Unit 1 20%
Map ID-WW 11
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:Deferred pending funding and increased development activity
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Direction
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 25$ 25$
Design Consultant Services 800005 721$ 721$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,356$ 1,356$
Total 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 2,102$ 2,102$
Total 2,102$ -$ -$ -$ 2,102$ -$ -$ -$
Regulatory requirements and development activity in the east Springfield area
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This Project begins at 59th Street and replaces approximately 3600 linear feet of 15 and 18 inch wastewater pipe to
the east with a 24 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth. To avoid capacity issues, the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan
identifies a need to upgrade to 21 inch pipe for existing land use; however a 24 inch pipe is recommended to provide for future growth. The
Wastewater Master Plan recommends additional flow monitoring prior to preliminary design.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in
the east Springfield area.
Springfield has an obligation under the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) order to maintain the
wastewater system such that all sanitary sewer overflow (SSOs) are eliminated as well as assuring public
health and safety. Also, Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Bounda
(UGB) to promote future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for
completion by 2011.
Attachment 2, Page 113 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Peacehealth/RiverBend Pump Station 100%
Map ID-WW 14
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
Sanitary Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision (2005)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping 800004 -$
Design Consultan 800005 956$ 956$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisiti 800007 -$
Construction 800008 2,233$ 2,233$
Total 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 44$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 44$ -$ -$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 11$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp. 611 -$
SDCs, Reimb. 611 -$
Unspecified 3,189$ 3,189$
Total 3,189$ -$ -$ -$ 3,189$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Development within the RiverBend Area - capacity issues; and/or construction of the NE link between
RiverBend Drive and International Way.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project is for the engineering and construction of a pump station in the RiverBend area. The
need for the pump station will be driven by development within the RiverBend campus area and as defined in the Sanitary
Sewer Study for RiverBend Subdivision.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land
use designations in the RiverBend area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.
Project construction will occur with development.
Attachment 2, Page 114 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Main Street Improvements Unit 2 25%
Map ID-WW 15
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 406$ 406$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 739$ 739$
Total 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 1,145$ 1,145$
Total 1,145$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,145$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Development activity in the east Springfield area
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This Project begins at 69th Street and replaces approximately 2,300 linear feet of 12 inch wastewater pipe to the east
with a 18 inch wastewater pipe to provide capacity for future growth.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in
the east Springfield area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.
Attachment 2, Page 115 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
McKenzie Highway Expansion 100%
Map ID-WW 16
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 600$ 600$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,083$ 1,083$
Total 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$
Personnel Costs 16$ 4$ 4$ 4$ 4$
Total 32$ -$ -$ -$ 8$ 8$ 8$ 8$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 1,683$ 1,683$
Total 1,683$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,683$ -$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project extends the wastewater system from the existing 21 inch trunk line east along the McKenzie Highway
with approximately 2,000 feet of 10 inch pipe and 2,000 feet of 12 inch pipe. Wastewater trunk lines are typically cleaned annually and video
inspected every five years, and increasing the City's asset inventory will increase the City's maintenance work load and need.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in
the east Springfield area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2012.
Attachment 2, Page 116 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
"A" Street Improvements Unit 1 35%
Map ID-WW 17
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping 800004
Design Consultan 800005 200$ 200$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisiti 800007 -$
Construction 800008 420$ 420$
Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp. 611 216$ 216$
SDCs, Reimb. 611 -$
Unspecified 404$ 404$
Total 620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 620$ -$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project replaces approximately 1,000 feet of an exiting 12 inch wastewater pipe with a 15 inch
pipe from 66th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land
use designations in the east Springfield area.Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.
Attachment 2, Page 117 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
"A" Street Improvements Unit 2 30%
Map ID-WW 18
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 170$ 85 85$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 200$ 200$
Total 370$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 85$ 285$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp.611 85$ 85$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 200$ 200$
Total 285$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 285$ -$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project replaces approximately 529 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch pipe from 69th
Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land use designations in
the east Springfield area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.
Attachment 2, Page 118 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
"A" Street Improvements Unit 3 40%
Map ID-WW 19
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping 800004 -$
Design Consultan 800005 65$ 65$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisiti 800007 -$
Construction 800008 115$ 115$
Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp. 611 72$ 72$
SDCs, Reimb. 611 -$
Unspecified 108$ 108$
Total 180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180$
Deferred pending funding and development activity
Development within the east Springfield Area - capacity issues
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: This project replaces approximately 325 feet of an exiting 10 inch wastewater pipe with a 12 inch
pipe from 70th Street east along "A" Street. Continued flow monitoring is recommended prior to preliminary design.
Justification: This project was identified as a system need to provide capacity for future growth within the existing land
use designations in the east Springfield area.
Springfield desires to provide services to areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to promote
future urban development. The Wastewater Master Plan prioritized this project for completion by 2013.
Attachment 2, Page 119 of 152
Wastewater Funding Programmed: No
System Expansion, Upgrades, and Rehabilitation
Local Sewer Extensions 0%
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goal to provide for development.
2008 Wastewater Master Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 250$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
Design Consultant Services 800005 750$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 4,000$ 800$ 800$ 800$ 800$ 800$
Total 5,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 11$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$
Personnel Costs 12$ 2$ 1$ 2$ 3$ 4$
Total 23$ -$ -$ 3$ 2$ 4$ 6$ 8$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
User Fees 611 -$
SDCs, Imp.611 -$
SDCs, Reimb.611 -$
Unspecified 5,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Total 5,000$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
Deferred pending funding
Council decision - Annexation of developed areas within the UGB and/or petitions for Local Improvement
Districts
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Within the City of Springfield's city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are several areas that are fully
developed, but lack wastewater service. The project would fund extending wastewater pipes to these areas upon request of affected property
owners or annexation, with some or all of the cost possibly reimbursable through assessments. Increased infrastructure will increase the
need for more maintenance personnel which impacts the wastewater operations budget. The estimated increase in the wastewater operat
cost is $1,600 per 1,000 feet of new pipe.
Justification: The City will need to provide wastewater service to all development existing and future within the city and the UGB.
Environmental issues, or failing septic tanks within the City and un-annexed areas within the UGB
Attachment 2, Page 120 of 152
BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY
Overview
The Buildings and Property section covers a variety of projects that include;construction of new
facilities;maintenance,repair or renovation of existing facilities;and the demolition of unnecessary or
unmaintainable facilities.As the City of Springfield grows,so does the need for municipal public
services.These services come with an associated infrastructure that requires continual monitoring,
maintenance,replacement and/or additions.In order to catch up and stay current,Buildings and
Property projects will continue to be a priority.
Numerous other projects are included in the Building Preservation sheet.This project addresses
ongoing maintenance issues as well as maintenance to begin alleviating the backlog of deferred
previously unfunded maintenance projects.There are projects at all Cityowned buildings,including City
Hall,Fire Stations,Museum,Justice Center,Depot,and Development and Public Works Operations
Division Facilities.
Another project is for the removal of the building constructed over the Mill Race west of the spillway
dam.This project is in conjunction with an Army Corp of Engineers Mill Race bank restoration
project.Timing of the removal and related work is related to Army Corp scheduling.
Project Maps
In Process
BP2 Building Preservation
BP3 Firing Range Decommissioning
Funding Programmed
BP4 Book Kelly Internal Structural
Improvements
BP5 Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair
BP6 Booth Kelly Building Removal
BP7 Booth Kelly Water Isolation Analysis
Funding Not Programmed
BP10 Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement
BP13 City Storage Facility
BP15 Renovation of City Hall
BP16 City Hall HVAC System Replacement
BP17 Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements
BP20 Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Trail
BP21 Downtown Mill Plaza
Attachment 2, Page 121 of 152
Attachment 2, Page 122 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Building Preservation 1,582$ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6,582$
Buliding Preservation Fund (420) 1,582$ 270 270 270 270 270 2,932$
Unspecified 730 730 730 730 730 3,650$
Firing Range Decommissioning 125$ - - - - - 125$
Booth Kelly (618)-$ - - - - - -
Revenue Bonds (617)125$ - - - - - 125$
Booth Kelly Building Assessment 30$ - - - - - 30$
Booth Kelly (618)30$ - - - - 30$
Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair 100$ - - - - - 100$
Booth Kelly (618)100$ - - - - - 100$
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Booth Kelly Building Repair 40$ - - - - - 40
Booth Kelly (618)40$ - - - - - 40
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Water Isolation Analysis 30$ - - - - - 30
Booth Kelly (618)30$ - - - - - 30
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Municipal Parking Garage 240$ - 1,190 - - - 1,430$
SEDA 240$ - - - - - 240$
Unspecified -$ 1,190 - - - 1,190$
City Storage Facility -$ - - 275 - - 275
Unspecified -$ - - 275 - - 275
Library 50$ - - 4,800 23,200 - 28,050$
Grant 50$ - - - - - 50$
Unspecified -$ - - 4,800 23,200 - 28,000$
Fire Station 14 420$ - - 750 4,800 - 5,970$
Unspecified 420$ - - 750 4,800 - 5,970$
City Hall Renovation -$ - - 20 330 3,500 3,850$
Unspecified -$ - 20 330 3,500 3,850
Fire Station 4 -$ - - - 1,150 4,800 5,950$
Unspecified -$ - - - 1,150 4,800 5,950$
City Hall HVAC -$ - - 1,650 - - 1,650$
Unspecified -$ - - 1,650 - - 1,650$
FS3 Parking -$ - 29 - - - 29$
Unspecified -$ 29 - - - 29$
Energy Effeciency Projects -$ - 20 100 50 50 220$
Unspecified -$ 20 100 50 50 220$
Pioner Memorial Cemetary Trail -$ - 20 50 - - 70$
Unspecified -$ - 20 50 - - 70$
Downtown Mill Plaza Design & Const.-$ - 3,700 - - - 3,700$
Unspecified -$ - 3,700 - - - 3,700$
Building and Property
Maintenance Capital Projects
In Process
Funding Programmed
Funding Not Programmed
Attachment 2, Page 123 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Building and Property
Maintenance Capital Projects
City Hall Storage -$ - 80 - - - 80$
Unspecified -$ - 80 - - - 80$
Council Chambers Upgrade -$ - - 15 150 - 165$
Unspecified -$ - 15 150 - 165$
Annual Total 2,327$ 1,000 6,039 8,645 30,530 9,350 57,891$ Room Tax (208)-$ - - - - - -$
Booth Kelly (618)200$ - - - - - 200$
Revenue Bonds (617)125$ - - - - - 125$
Springfield Sch. Dist (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Willamalane P&R (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Rainbow Water Dist. (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Other (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Unspecified 420$ 730 5,769 8,375 30,260 9,080 54,634$
Federal Aid (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Unspecified Grant Funds (420)-$ - - - - - -$
Buliding Preservation Fund (420) 1,582$ 270 270 270 270 270 2,932$
Attachment 2, Page 124 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Partial
Building Rehabilitation and Preservation
Building Preservation
Map ID-BP 2
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Acount Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 4,582$ 1,582$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$
Other - Reserve sinking fund 3,000$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$ 500$
Total 7,582$ 1,582$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Capital maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs 904$ 400$ 82$ 83$ 84$ 85$ 85$ 85$
Total 904$ 400$ 82$ 83$ 84$ 85$ 85$ 85$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Building Preservation 420 3,202$ 1,582$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$ 270$
Unspecified 4,380$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$ 730$
Total 7,582$ 1,582$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$
City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities.
Building Condition Report.
Project Description: Perform preservation, capital maintenance and repair projects on City-owned buildings, including but not limited to
City Hall, 5 Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Jail, Depot, Carter Building and Maintenance Facilities. Projects can include the
repair, renovation or replacement of structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Other projects can include systems
preservation such as, painting, roofing, lighting, alarm and elevator projects as well as repair and/or upgrades to aesthetic and
architectural elements.
Justification: These projects are necessary to maintain and preserve City-owned buildings. Project needs, costing, and prioritization
are identified in the Development and Public Works Building Maintenance Work Plan and by City Staff. Deferred capital maintenance
(backlog) and annual ongoing capital maintenance needs are identified. Extending beyond the 5-yr CIP, funding needs will continue and
will likely increase as facilities age and costs increase.
Council decision to increase useful life of City building/facility assets
Aged facilities, regulatory requirements (ADA), implementation of Council 5-year Work plan and 5-year
Building Facility Strategic Plan.
Ongoing capital maintenance program
Attachment 2, Page 125 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Firing Range Decommissioning
Map ID-BP 3
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002 95$ 95$
Legal Services 800003 -$
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 5$ 5$
Design Consultant Se 800005 25$ 25$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$ Other -$
Total 125$ 125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Booth Kelly 618 -$
Revenue Bonds 425 125$ 125$
Unspecified -$
Total 125$ 125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Completion of the Mill Race Restoration Project
Study and Design Phase
Mill Race Restoration Project
Project Description: This project involves the clean-up of the outdoor firing range formerly used by the Police Department.
Cleanup activities include lead mining, removal of miscellaneous materials, and overall environmental assessment of the site.
Justification: The Police department discontinued use of the outdoor firing range and is coordinating firearms training with
other law enforcement agencies. The site is located above the Booth Kelly Mill Pond, which will be rehabilitated for wetlands
and water quality purposes. The outdoor range site must be cleaned up in association with these plans.
Completion of Phase 1 of the Mill Race Restoration Project and stormwater quality requirements for
water entering the Mill Pond. This project was originally prioritized for 2001.
Attachment 2, Page 126 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Booth Kelly Building Assessment and Planning
Map ID-BP 6
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
ProjectElement Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 30$ 30$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 -$
Total 30$ -$ 30$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
ProjectElement Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
PersonnelCosts -$
Total $$$$$$$$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund# Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Booth Kelly 618 30$30$
Total 30$30$$$$$$$
This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan.
Project Description: Assess Booth Kelly buildings for necessary repairs and prepare plan describing needs with potential anticipated costs.
Justification: Production of this plan will be valuable as a planning tool in programming revenue to necessary upgrades and preservation
projects. Currently many repairs and upgreades are conducted on an ad hoc or reactionary basis.
External Structural Improvements
External repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center
Planned
Attachment 2, Page 127 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Booth Kelly Roof Replacement/Repair
Map ID-BP 5
Project Driver: Internal and
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 100$ 100
Total 100$ -$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Booth Kelly 618 100$ 100$ Unspecified
Total 100$ 100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan.
Project Description: Roof replacement or epoxy over coating of the existing roof decking of the "Saw-tooth" building, commonly referred to as
Building G at the Booth-Kelly Center.
Justification: The existing roof material of the "Saw-tooth" building is over 50 years old and no longer provides adequate weather protection
for the building users or interior equipment.
The replacement or over coating of the roof decking will significantly reduce/eliminate the ongoing
maintenance demands of the roof for a period of approximately 20 years.
Programmed
Internal and structural improvements
Attachment 2, Page 128 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: Yes
Construction and Preservation
Booth Kelly Building Repair
Map ID-BP 6
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
ProjectElement Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-d 800004 -$
Design Consultant Servic 800005 5$ 5$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007
Construction 800008 35$ 35$
Total 40$ 40$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
ProjectElement Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
PersonnelCosts -$
Total $$$$$$$$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund# Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Booth Kelly 618 40$40$
Total 40$40$$$$$$$
This project supports the preservation of the Booth Kelly Center and is consistent with the Booth Kelly Development Plan.
Justification: The existing roof cover and structural columns are deteriorating and are over 50 years old and no longer provide
adequate weather protection and could colapse causing damage to surrounding buildings.
External repair/improvements to the Booth Kelly Center
Planned
Project Description: Repair or removal of the building structure referred to as Building D, Suite 188 open cover.
External Structural Improvements
Attachment 2, Page 129 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Secured: Yes
Infrastructure Planning and Inventory Study
Booth Kelly Water Isolation Analysis
Map ID-BP 7
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
ProjectElement Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006 -$
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 30$ 30$
Total 30$ 30$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
ProjectElement Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
PersonnelCosts -$
Total $$$$$$$$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund# Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Booth Kelly 618 30$30
Unspecified $
Total 30$30$$$$$$$
City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental Quality
Project Description: This project will consist of a water isolation analysis to the Booth Kelly Complex grounds in order to locate a slow water
leakage.
Justification: Locating the leakage will enable us to repair and analyze current locations of all water pipes not identified on paper. The
grounds stability will be crucial as to the location of any future building development at Booth Kelly. Possible upgrades or a new direction and reuse of the facility or tear-down and reconstruction of newer buildings would give opportunities for the site, and tying development with updated
plans for the downtown area that are now being considered.
Identify water leakage due to rate increase
Programmed
The future development of Booth Kelly Center
Attachment 2, Page 130 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Municipal Parking Garage (Glenwood)
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 100$ 100$
Design Consultant Services 800005 330$ 140$ 190$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,000$ 1,000$
Total 1,430$ 240$ -$ 1,190$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 12$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 12$ -$ -$ -$ 3$ 3$ 3$ 3$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
SEDA 240$ 240$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW)442 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs. Imp (Storm)440 -$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.)446 -$ Unspecified 1,190$ 1,190$
Total 1,430$ 240$ -$ 1,190$ -$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goals: Community and Economic Development and Revitalization, Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities.
Project Description: This project is for the construction of a municipal parking structure in Glenwood.
Justification: The Glenwood Refinement Phase I planning area is intended to deter surface and exposed parking, requiring
development to either screen small interior block surface lots or construct parking structures. The need for parking is necessitated by
financial institutions funding private development. The development of a municipal parking structure will alleviate parking anxiety for
those developing, living, working and visiting in the Glenwood Riverfront Area. This structure is intended to serve the easterly half of the
phase 1 refinement area and is, at this moment, anticipated to hold between 200-300 spaces. The 'right-size' is determined as part of the
current feasibility and proforma assessment process.
Glenwood redevelopment needs, City landuse and refinement requirements, citizen concerns and
business accessibility
Regional support and signed LOI's between SEDA and surrounding development teams
Structure feasibility study and design in progress.
Attachment 2, Page 131 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
City Storage Facility
Map ID-BP 13
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 25$ 25$
Capital Permitting 800006 Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 250$ 250$
Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs (48)$ (16)$ (16)$ (16)$ Personnel Costs 3$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Total (45)$ -$ -$ -$ (15)$ (15)$ (15)$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Unspecified 275$ 275$
Total 275$ -$ -$ -$ 275$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities.
Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility to provide long term storage for City Departments. The facility
construction is proposed to be a pre-engineered metal building with a concrete floor and include multiple compartments to accommodate
the varying storage needs of Departments. The building would be weather-tight and climate controlled to assure proper storage of
materials and equipment.
Justification: The City owns land at the Development and Public Works-Operation Shops at South 18th street that could be used to
construct this facility. Every Department has growing storage needs which include; long term file retention, historical items, materials,
equipment and supplies. Limited storage space at City facilities have caused several Departments to rent storage in the private sector.
This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces.
Limited space
Capacity Issues
Deferred pending funding
Attachment 2, Page 132 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Account #:
Construction and Preservation
Library Building
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 20222
Planning 50$ 50$
Engineering 2,800$ 2,800
Land/Right of Way 2,000$ 2,000
Construction 18,800$ 18,800$
Other 4,400$ 4,400$
Total 28,050$ 50$ -$ -$ 4,800$ 23,200$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Beyond 2021
Maintenance Costs 32$ 10$ 10$ 12$
Personnel Costs 450$ 150$ 150$ 150$
Total 482$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 160$ 160$ 162$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Beyond 2021
Special Assmt.-$
Grant 420 50$ 50$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$
Unspecified 28,000$ 4,800$ 23,200$
Total 28,050$ 50$ -$ -$ 4,800$ 23,200$ -$ -$
Council Goals #4 - Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities and # 5 - Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and
Environmental Quality. Springfield Public Library Needs Assessment and Programmatic Facility Design -2016
Project Description: Construct an approximately 60k sq. ft. Library facility adequate to serve the needs of Springfield citizens
for the next 20-30 years based on currently adopted population estimates. The projected cost of the new library will include
design and engineering, site preparation, construction, FF&E and landscaping. Estimated facility size and cost were derived from:
Standards for Oregon Public Libraries, 2010; Public Library Space Needs: A Planning Outline, 2009, Wisconsin Dept. of Public
Instruction; and by FFA Architecture + Interiors a consultant recently hired to perform a library needs assesment and conceptual
functional and space diagrams.
Justification: The Library is currently below Oregon Library Standards for both facilities and open hours for communities our
size. It is at "threshold" (minimum) standards for size of collection. In the last decade (2005-15) the library has experienced a
25% increase in circulation and an over 500% increase in program attendance. It cannot expand it's collections in any meaningful
way due to space limitations. The Library cannot keep up with public demand for programming and for community meeting space
and is hampered in effectively deploying new technology due, in part, to the age and infrastructure of the building. Population
estimates project Springfield's population to grow to over 77,000 people in the next 25 years increasing the difficulty in providing
services in a sub-standard facility. In addition, a new Library building can help in the City's efforts at revitalizing the downtown
core by attracting tens of thousands of people to the area through its services and programs and by serving as a community
gathering place.
Ability to provide library service from current facility declines to the point that both quality and quantity of
service are impacted. Citizen feedback and staff reporting support Council action.
Deferred pending funding
Growing demand for Library services; current facility cannot sustain current usage level nor can it
address projected population growth into the future; ability for new Library to act as a positive factor in
revitalizing downtown core.
Attachment 2, Page 133 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Fire Station #14 Relocation/Replacement
Map ID-BP 10
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007 SFLS Strategic Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 750$ 350$ 400
Legal Services 800003 100$ 50 50
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 215$ 15$ 200$
Design Consultant Services 800005 550$ 200$ 350$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 405$ 405$
Construction 800008 3,950$ 3,950$
Total 5,970$ 420$ -$ -$ 800$ 4,750$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 30$ 10$ 10$ 10$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 30$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ 10$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Unspecified 5,970$ 420$ 750$ 4,800$
Total 5,970$ 420$ -$ -$ 750$ 4,800$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Development and Annexation in Jasper Natron requires relocation of fire station to provide urban level
of service
Project Description: The Project will be constructed in east Springfield, and is anticipated to utilize the site at 725 S. 57th Street. The
design of the new facility will need to reflect the character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield.
The City intends for the completed project to meet the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to provide proper Fire and
Life Safety services to the City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Jasper/Natron area. Funding
for this project has not been identified.
Justification: Fire Station #14 located at 4765 Main Street, was originally constructed in 1961 and then remodeled in 1999. In 2007, the
Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc.
The following evaluation of the station was observed; "while minimally functional, this station is not a positive environment for the staff.
Storage and living space are at a critical point. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and
appears to not be in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1961. Since that time the
addition of other fire stations to provide fire and emergency service for the expanding city has caused a significant overlap of coverage. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south to cover the Jasper Natron area will not negatively impact current coverage and will accommodate future annexations and development. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility, the fire department will be unable to deliver this key urban service to these future developments.
Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Jasper/Natron
Attachment 2, Page 134 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Account #
Construction and Preservation
Renovation of City Hall
Map ID-BP 15
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning 20$ 20$
Engineering 330$ 330$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction 3,500$ 3,500$ Other -$
Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$ Unspecified 3,850$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$
Total 3,850$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ 330$ 3,500$ -$
City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental
Quality
Project Description: Once the Library moves out of City Hall into a building of its own, City Hall will be left with about 25,000
square feet of empty space that will need to be reallocated to meet departmental space needs. This project is for the renovation
of City Hall to improve building safety, energy efficiency and space allocation. This project includes additional seismic bracing,
upgraded HVAC system and ductwork, better insulation and interior redesign to better utilize space.
Justification: City Hall holds the majority of City Employees and many essential municipal functions are based out of this aging,
retrofitted building. The building is not designed to current seismic codes and as such is vulnerable to earthquakes. Also while
renovations have improved some energy efficiency from the original construction, additional improvements would increase user
comfort and increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Finally with the space created by the Library moving to
its own building, City Hall can be reconfigured into a more efficient space for staff and users with room for growth as the City
grows.
Providing a safe, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff
Approval of funding for a new Municipal Library
Deferred pending funding
Attachment 2, Page 135 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Fire Station #4 Relocation/Replacement
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007
SFLS Strategic Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 -$
Administration 800002 500$ 350$ 150$
Legal Services 800003 150$ 50$ 100$
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 400$ 200$ 200$
Design Consultant Services 800005 550$ 200$ 350$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 400$ 400$ Construction 800008 3,950$ 3,950$
Total 5,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800$ 4,500$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 20$ 10$ 10$ Personnel Costs -$
Total 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10$ 10$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Unspecified 5,950$ 1,150$ 4,800$
Total 5,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,150$ 4,800$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Development and Annexation in Glenwood requires relocation of Fire Station #4 to provide urban level
of service.
Project Description: The Project will be constructed in downtown Springfield. The design of the new facility will need to reflect the
character of the neighborhood, and be an asset to the area and to the City of Springfield. The City intends the completed project will meet
the needs of the staff, equipment, and materials necessary to implement proper Fire and Life Safety services to the downtown area of the
City of Springfield and specifically to extend Fire and Emergency services to the Glenwood area. Funding for this project has not been identified.
Justification: Fire Station #4, located at 1475 5th Street, was originally constructed in 1973. In 2007, the Department of Fire and Life
Safety Standards of Cover and Deployment Study was conducted by Emergency Services Consulting Inc. The following evaluation of the
station was observed; "Age and construction type has led to increasing maintenance costs. The entire structure shows signs of
excessive usage and wear. The station does not meet today's standards. The building is not fully ADA compliant; and appears to not be
in compliance with fire and life safety codes." The location of the station was established in 1973. Since that time the acceptance of
Glenwood into the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) from the City of Eugene has created a gap in the Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety's ability provide this key urban level of service to portions of Glenwood. Relocation of this station's response apparatus to the south will provide improved coverage to the downtown area and accommodate future annexations and developments in Glenwood with the appropriate response time. Without relocation of this high impact Public Utility Facility the Fire Department will be unable to
deliver urban service levels to future annexations and developments in some areas of Glenwood.
Standards of Cover and Deployment Study; Annexation of Glenwood
Attachment 2, Page 136 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
City Hall HVAC System Replacement
Map ID-BP 16
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 -$
Design Consultant Ser 800005 150$ 150$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 1,500$ 1,500$
Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs (20)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$
Personnel Costs -$
Total (20)$ -$ -$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ (5)$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Unspecified 1,650$ 1,650$
Total 1,650$ -$ -$ -$ 1,650$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental
Quality
Project Description: This project will replace the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system at City Hall. This
project will also include the replacement of 30+ year old fiberboard ductwork with more modern, hygenic material and in a more
effecient design to better serve offices, meeting rooms and cubical areas. Engineering analysis will be done to determine the
most effecient and effective system to be installed, in an effort to maximize energy effeciency and occupant comfort. Design will
try to accomodate maximum flexabiltiy to change easily with building use patterns.
Justification: The existing Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system has several issues that are quickly coming
together to require a complete change out. First, the existing units were installed in the mid 1990's so they are approaching the
end of their useful life. Second, layout of the units has not changed since the original design was done in 1980. However, the
layout of City Hall has changed significantly and as a result the ductwork and zoning is very ineffecient and staff comfort is always
poor. Third, the 65 package unit heat pumps are potentially not the most effecient or effective HVAC for the building and
additional system types should be look into.
Providing a comfortabole, energy efficient and functional space for citizens and staff
End of useful life of the existing HVAC system
Conceptual
Attachment 2, Page 137 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Fire Station #3 Parking Improvements
Map ID-BP 17
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City of Springfield Department of Fire and Life Safety Standards (SFLS) of Cover and Deployment Study - April 2007
SFLS Strategic Plan
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 2$ 2$
Design Consultant Services 800005 2$ 2$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 25$ 25$
Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Unspecified 29$ 29$
Total 29$ -$ -$ 29$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Deferred pending funding
Project Description: This project will expand and improve parking areas at Springfield Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street. The
project involves addition of ten (10) parking spaces for staff and relocation of the existing fence and gate to the south. The City intends for
the completed project to meet the needs of staff, equipment, and materials related to the operation of the fire station. Funding for this
project has not been identified.
Justification: Fire Station #3, located at 1225 28th Street, was originally constructed in 1971. In 2008, the building was remodeled to
provide upgraded kitchen facilities and individual sleeping rooms for 24/7 staff. This one-story addition to the existing 8,579 square foot
facility eliminated approximately ten (10) secured parking spaces for Fire Department staff and equipment. This project will replace the
lost parking areas and relocate the fence that secures the parking area to the South. Current parking availability requires some personal
and staff vehicles to be parked in an unsecure area, susceptible to vandalism.
Capacity Issues and safety concerns
Inadequate facilities
Attachment 2, Page 138 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
Energy Efficiency Projects
No Map
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 20$ 20$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$ Construction 800008 200$ 100$ 50$ 50$
Total 220$ -$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Unspecified 220$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$
Total 220$ -$ -$ 20$ 100$ 50$ 50$ -$
City Council Goals: Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities, and Preserve our Hometown Feel, Livability and Environmental
Quality
Project Description: This project is to install energy efficiency improvements in City facilities. These improvements could include;
photovoltaic (PV) generation panels, passive solar water heating, geothermal HVAC systems, lighting improvements and building weather-
proofing. Work will take place on City facilities including, Regional Fuel Facility, City Hall, five fire stations, City maintenance facilities,
Justice Center, Municipal Jail, and City owned rental facilities. This is a five year plan to make improvements to all locations. The first
year funding is for planning and design, followed by solar hot water at high use facilities, and Geothermal HVAC systems at our fire
stations.
Justification: The City is working with Team Springfield partners to implement an initiative that will engage all of the agencies by
pursuing innovative and sustainable solutions that reduce demand for electricity while at the same time reducing greenhouse gases
(GHG). As a large energy consumer in the area we also generate a significant carbon foot print and contribute to greenhouse gas
emissions. There are currently regional goals that mandate or recommend reductions in municipal carbon footprints and greenhouse gas
emissions; and as such Springfield has determined that we need to look at alternatives to the status quo.
Energy costs and Savings
Deferred pending funding
Attachment 2, Page 139 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Secured: No
Construction and Preservation
Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Trail
Map ID-BP 20
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City Council Goal to Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
City Council Goal to Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001 Administration 800002 Legal Services 800003 Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 5$ 5$
Design Consultant Services 800005 10$ 10$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 5$ 5$
Construction 800008 50$ 50
Total 70$ -$ -$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Unspecified 70$ 20$ 50
Total 70$ -$ -$ 20$ 50$ -$ -$ -$
Pending funding
Citizen requests
Citizen requests and safety related incidents
Project Description: Replace and upgrade the Pioneer Memorial Cemetery Park North Woods trail and steps. The trail and steps were
constructed by Lane Metro Youth Corps in 1991. The existing steps and trail are in disrepair and need replacement. In addition, poor lighting and vegetation have created an area inviting inappropriate uses.
Justification: This project addresses a need to provide a safe access to the Park and the Willamette Heights area. This is a well used
trail that creates a link from the Mill Race/Booth Kelly area to the Park, which is owned by the City. The trail facilitates the Willamette
Height's residents access to the downtown area as there are no sidewalks along S. B Street or S. C Street. The timber steps do not
comply with current ADA standards, do not include handrails, and erosion is occurring along the trail, affecting safe use of the trail and
steps. Enhanced lighting and vegetation replacement will enhance public safety and allow police officers to view into the park while on
patrol.
Attachment 2, Page 140 of 152
Buidings and Property Funding Secured: Partial
Design and Construction
Downtown Mill Plaza Design and Construction
Map ID-BP 21
Project Driver: Downtown Revitalization
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Downtown Urban Design Plan, 2010
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre-design 800004 -$
Design Consultant Services 800005 -$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 1,100$ 1,100$
Construction 800008 2,600$ 2,600$
Total 3,700$ -$ -$ 3,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 8$ 2$ 2$ 2$ 2$
Personnel Costs 20$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 5$
Total 28$ -$ -$ -$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Room Tax 208 -$
Downtown UR/SEDA 430 -$
Unspecified*3,700$ 3,700$
Total 3,700$ -$ -$ 3,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, Springfield Economic Development Agency, 2007
Downtown Plan, 2010
Project Description: This project suports the Downtown Vision Plan recommendation of constructing a Downtown Plaza, referred to as Mill
Plaza. The Plaza is planned to sit on the block between Mill Street and Pioneer Parkway, north of Main Street and South of A Street. The Plaza will require land aquisition, design, and construction. In total, the Plaza supposes approximately .75 acres of public infrastructure and open space
(total plaza including retail and office is 1.3 acres). The design of the plaza includes mostly hardscape elements and is flexible enought to
accomodate large downtown events as well as everyday uses. The cost is estimated by consultants in 2010 for Plaza land aquisition ($1.1M) and
Plaza construction ($2.6M) totals approximately $3.7M (Crandall Arambula, 2011, p. 49).
Justification: Based on the Downtown Vision Plan, the Mill Plaza, park and open space enhancements serve as downtown organizing elements
and amenities, support natural storage of downtown stormwater, and provide community access to ecologically restored public waterways. The
Mill Plaza planned for the west end of Main Street is a focus for creating a downtown retail destination and central gathering space for the
community. The Mill Plaza is identified in the Downtown Vision Plan as a "catalyst and key project."
Completed Property Acquisition and Available Downtown Urban Renewal Funds
Pending Land Acquisition (in process), Funding, and Private Partnership
Attachment 2, Page 141 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
City Hall Storage Facility
Map ID-BP14
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 -$
Design Consultant Serv 800005 5$ 5$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 75$ 75$
Total 80$ -$ -$ 80$ -$ -$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2015 Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Unspecified 80$ -$ -$ 80$
Total 80$ -$ -$ 80$ -$ -$ -$ -$
City Council Goals: Financially Responsible and Stable Governmental Services, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and
Facilities. City Hall Seismic Study
Project Description: This project is to construct a storage facility under City Hall to provide long term file storage for City
Departments. The facility is proposed to be weather-tight, split-face concrete block building with a concrete floor, it will be climate
controlled and fire protected to assure proper storage of materials and files.
Justification: There is unutilized space under City Hall between the fleet vehicle parking and the public sidewalk where this
storage facility can be constructed. Every Department has growing storage needs, particularly for long term file retention and
supplies. Limited storage space in City Hall has caused several Departments to rent storage off-site or crowd files into work
areas. This facility will reduce or eliminate the need for rental spaces and create additional useable space for staff. This may
also be a way to incorporate findings from the FY 2015 City Hall Seismic Study.
Limited space
Capacity Issues
Deferred pending funding
Attachment 2, Page 142 of 152
Buildings and Property Funding Programmed: No
Construction and Preservation
City Hall Council Chambers Upgrade
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Account Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Engineering Staff 800001
Administration 800002
Legal Services 800003
Planning, Scoping, Pre 800004 5$ 5$
Design Consultant Serv 800005 10$ 10$
Capital Permitting 800006
Property Acquisition 800007 -$
Construction 800008 150$ 150$
Total 165$ -$ -$ -$ 15$ 150$ -$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 442 -$
Federal Aid 420 -$
State Aid 420 -$
SDCs. Imp (Storm) 440 -$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 446 -$
Unspecified 165$ -$ -$ 15$ 150$
Total 165$ -$ -$ -$ 15$ 150$ -$ -$
City Council Goals: Provide Financially Responsible and Innovative Governmental Services, Encourage Economic Development
& Revitalization through Community Partnerships, and Maintain & Improve Infrastructure and Facilities. City Hall Seismic
Project Description: This project is to renovate the City Council Chambers in Springfield City Hall. The facility was designed
and constructing in 1980 and has reached the end of its useful life. This project would update the facility's technology
infrastructure and redesign/reconfigure the room to provide better access, higher security, and to be more flexible and functional
allowing a wider range of uses and availability.
Justification: The demand for functional and flexible meeting space has grown significantly. The City of Springfield seeks and
accepts significant public input on the myriad of projects we do on their behalf. As the City grows and our services increase and
diversify the demand for City Hall meeting spaces continues to grow. Other Team Springfield members, public agencies, civic
groups and clubs have also found City Hall to be a convenient, well located facility in which to schedule their meetings and
events. All of this has created a need to update and reconfigure our public spaces to better serve its users.
Growth & increased service levels demand safe, accessible, efficient & comfortable meeting spaces
Capacity Issues, Safety Concerns
Deferred pending funding
Attachment 2, Page 143 of 152
MISCELLANEOUS
Overview
The Miscellaneous section covers debt collection and tracking of public facilities and infrastructure.As
the City of Springfield grows,so does the need for municipal public services.These services come with
an associated infrastructure cost that at times requires the City to acquire debt.
Current debt includes the Springfield Justice Center Facility bond which included the construction of a
jail facility to house misdemeanor offenders.
Miscellaneous projects address ongoing facility and infrastructure upgrades,working to sustain physical
assets found in the field and electronic assets found in databases.Projects include storm,sewer,and
transportation facilities.These projects encompass a variety of areas,like the City’s participation in
public improvements of private developments;for example,the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate
Park.Other projects include citywide base mapping projects,such as the Topographic Remapping
Project,and database projects like the Asset Management System Replacement Project.Because of
budget reductions,the Topographic Remapping Project is not currently funded.
Projects:
Asset Management System Replacement Project –This project addresses failing systems that manage
electronic inventories and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and
mapping functions.Functions serve activities such as planning,designing,constructing,maintaining,
reporting,accounting,forecasting and operating City facilities,i.e.,managing the City’s billion dollars
worth of public facilities.The project is needed to mitigate current and future risk associated with
outdated and failing systems (which failed twice in Fall of 2010),continue to support comprehensive
facilities and asset management needs,and sustain support for a broad range of Development and
Public Works functions.During FY 2012,the City Council approved reappropriating $280,000 each from
Local Wastewater and Stormwater capital project budgets so that this project could proceed.Additional
capital funding for this project is included in future years of the CIP,as well as from the Operating
Budget.
Topographic Remapping Project –This project addresses outof date topographic maps (base maps)for
the entire City.Current base maps are woefully out ofdate and as a result do not reflect significant
development that has occurred over the last 12 years,such as the PeaceHealth RiverBend Medical
Center and MountainGate,and other development activity such as smaller capital improvement
projects,private developments,and natural resource changes that have occurred since the previous
update.Work addresses developmentinduced changes that have occurred across the City and includes
updating full topography (e.g.,elevation,structures,surface facilities,vegetation and surface
waterways)on all City base maps used to supportkey City functions by all Departments including a
broad range of Development and Public Works functions.
Attachment 2, Page 144 of 152
Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Miscellaneous Capital Projects Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
City Participation 300$ 197 250 250 250 250 1,497
Drainage Improvement SDCs (617) 50$ 28 33 33 33 33 210
Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ 33 33 33 33 33 165
Drainage Capital (617) 50$ 34 34 34 34 34 220
Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (611) 33$ 33 33 33 33 33 198
Wastewater Improvement SDCs (611) 34$ 34 34 34 34 34 204
Wastewater Capital (611) 33$ - 33 33 33 33 165
Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (434) 50$ - - - - - 50
Transportation Improvement SDCs (434) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285
Unspecified -$ - - - - - -
Topographic Remapping Project 591$ 15 160 15 170 15 966
Drainage Improvement SDCs (617) 24$ - - - - - 24
Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (617) 40$ - - - - - 40
Drainage Capital (617) 39$ - - - - - 39
Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (611) 39$ - - - - - 39
Wastewater Improvement SDCs (611) 99$ - - - - - 99
Wastewater Capital (409) 39$ - - - - - 39
Street Fund (434) 21$ - - - - - 21
Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Transportation Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 290$ 15 160 15 170 15 665
Asset Management System Replacement 1,087$ 129 129 144 289 144 1,922
Drainage Improvement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (617)-$ - - - - - -
Drainage Capital (617) 321$ - - - - - 321
Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Wastewater Improvement SDCs (611)-$ - - - - - -
Wastewater Capital (611) 321$ - - - - - 321
Street Fund (434) 165$ - - - - - 165
Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (434)-$ - - 15 160 15 170
Transportation Improvement SDCs (434)-$ - - - - - -
Unspecified 280$ 129 129 129 129 129 925
Annual Totals 1,939$ 341 539 376 676 376 4,247
Drainage Improvement SDCs (617) 74$ 28 33 33 33 33 234
Drainage Reimbursement SDCs (617) 40$ 33 33 33 33 33 205
Drainage Capital (617) 410$ 34 34 34 34 34 580
Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs (611) 72$ 33 33 33 33 33 237
Wastewater Improvement SDCs (611) 133$ 34 34 34 34 34 303
Wastewater Capital (611) 354$ - 33 - - - -
Street Fund (434) 186$ - - - - - 186
Transportation Reimbursement SDCs (434) 50$ - - 15 160 15 240
Transportation Improvement SDCs (434) 50$ 35 50 50 50 50 285 Unspecified 570$ 144 289 144 299 144 1,590
Attachment 2, Page 145 of 152
Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes
Debt Service, City Participation, and Others
City Participation Varies
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45.
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Planning -$
Engineering -$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction 1,699$ 300$ 199$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$
Other -$
Total 1,699$ 300$ 199$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 300$ -$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs -$
Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
15 160 15 170 15 170
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Wastewater Capital 611 165$ 33$ -$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$
SDCs. Imp. (WW) 611 204$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 611 198$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$
Storm Capital 617 220$ 50$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$ 34$
SDCs. Imp (Storm) 617 210$ 50$ 28$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$
SDCs. Reimb (Storm) 617 165$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$
SDCs. Imp (Str.) 434 285$ 50$ 35$ 50$ 50$ 50$ 50$
SDCs, Reimb. (Str.) 434 50$ 50$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Street Capital 434
Total 1,497$ 300$ 197$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ -$
On-going sinking fund
Project Description: City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's
Construction Permit process. To respond to known and potential private development projects, it is necessary to budget
$100,000 each fiscal year in each infrastructure program area, i.e. Transportation, Local Wastewater and Stormwater. The
programmed funds for FY13 are only those necessary to meet this estimated need. Currently other programmed funds are not
yet tied to specific projects.
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: In many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyond
a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the
City under Council adopted participation policies.
Private development projects
Development and growth. City requirement of developer to oversize infrastructure.
Attachment 2, Page 146 of 152
Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Partial
Data Improvements
Topographic Remapping Project Varies
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Most other CIP Projects Police Map Books
Mill Race Project Fire and Life Safety Map Books
Glenwood Refinement Plan Water Rescue Maps
FEMA Remapping Project Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans
Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)Transportation System Plan
Standard and Special Purpose Maps Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps)
HB 3337 Implementation and Litigation (2030 Plan, UGB Scenario planning)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022 Planning -$ Engineering -$
Land/Right of Way -$
Construction -$
Other 985$ 440$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ 170$
Total 985$ 440$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ 170$
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beyond 2020
Maintenance Costs -$ Personnel Costs -$
Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 00000Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.-$
WW User Rate 611 39$ 39$
STM Drainage User Rate 617 39$ 39$
Street User Rate 434 21$ 21$
SDCs. Imp (Storm)617 24$ 24$ SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 611 39$ 39$
SDCs. Imp. (WW)611 99$ 99$
SDC Reimb. (Street) 434 -$ -$
SDC Reimb. (Storm) 617 40$ 40$
SDCs, Imp. (Str.)434 -$ -$
Unspecified 835$ 290$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ 170$
Total 1,136$ 591$ 15$ 160$ 15$ 170$ 15$ 170$
Collection of new orthoimagery and LiDAR is complete and planimetric update to the base maps is in
process. Collection of street appurtenance features is planned.Pending funding. (Funding estimates an
approximately 53/47 split where 53% comes from various Public Works user rate and SDC funds and the
remaining 47% comes from other funds managed by other departments.)
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Justification: Current base maps are out-of-dated. Base maps do not reflect significant development that has occurred over the last
12 years such as PeaceHealth and MountainGate, do not reflect other development activity such as smaller capital improvement
projects, private developments, natural resource changes, etc. that have occurred since that last update and do not include
transportation appurtenance features. Many City functions such as facilities planning, design, construction and maintenance, current and long range land use planning, and public safety incident response (fire, police and ambulance) depend on current and complete base maps. In order to serve the broad array of citywide needs for current and complete base map information, this topographic
remapping project is required. The acquisition of new orthoimagery and LiDAR data will assist with remapping efforts. Errors and
omissions on the topographic maps have already begun to impact functions citywide.
Topographic data have reached the end of their useful life and are now obsolete.
City wide needs for current and complete base map information are not being met because topographic
data is 14 years old.
Project Description: Replace out-of-date topographic maps (base maps) for the entire City that were last developed in 2000; replace
orthoimagery and LiDAR data on a 3 year cycle. New maps will address development induced changes that have occurred across the
City and will include updating full topography (e.g., elevation, structures, surface facilities, vegetation, surface waterways and
transportation appurtenances) on all City base maps used to support key City functions by all Departments. New orthoimagery and
LiDAR data will inform and enhance the creation of new base maps. Proposing full remapping in 2013 and then incremental remapping
every 2 years to assure that from 2014 forward, base maps for all areas of the City are current to within 3 years - all areas are
remapped every three years.
Attachment 2, Page 147 of 152
Miscellaneous Funding Programmed: Yes
Account #
System Improvements
Asset Management System Replacement NA
Project Driver:
Project Trigger:
Project Status:
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Most CIP Projects and DPW Operations Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans
Mill Race Project Transportation System Plan
Glenwood Refinement Plan Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Flood Mitigation Facilities Management
Local Wetland Inventory (LWI)Asset management
Standard and Special Purpose Maps Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)
Engineering Map Books (Sewer Maps)
HB 3337 Implementation and Litigation (2030 Plan, UGB Scenario planning)
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Phase 1 Targeted Migration 642$ 642$
Phase 2 Mobile Solutions 165$ 165$
Phase 3 Street Integration 180$ 180$
Capital Reserve 874$ 100$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$
Total 1,861$ 907$ 309$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$
15 160 15 170 15 170
OPERATIONAL IMPACT ($000s)
Project Element Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Maintenance Costs 798$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$
Personnel Costs -$
Total 798$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$ 114$
FUNDING SOURCE ($000s)
Source Fund # Total Thru 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beyond 2022
Special Assmt.
WW User Rate 611 321$ 321$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
STM Drainage User Rate 617 321$ 321$
Street Capital 434 165$ 165$
SDCs. Imp (Storm)617
SDCs. Reimb. (WW) 611
SDCs. Imp. (WW)611
SDC Reimb. (Street) 434
SDC Reimb. (Storm) 617
SDCs, Imp. (Str.)434 Unspecified 1,054$ 280$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$
Total 1,861$ 1,087$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$ 129$
In Process
Improvement SDC Eligibility:
Project Description: Replace failing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Facilities Management (FM) systems that manage
electronic inventories of City infrastructure and provide reliable and well integrated information for asset management and mapping
functions. Functions serve activities such as planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, reporting, accounting, forecasting and
operating City facilities, i.e., managing City facilities valued at approximately one billion dollars. Proposing a phased approach with 1)
targeted replacement of existing system FY12-FY13 for $984,000; 2) integration of Street system information FY14 for $200,000; 3) Transportation appurtenance integration FY15-FY16 for $219,000 ($39,000 from FY15 and $180,000 FY16) and then ongoing system
maintenance and software licensing fees are shown for informational purposes as Operational Impact for $242,000 per year plus
adjustments for inflation beyond - note these costs are not included in the Funding Sources.
Justification: The City faces current challenges and future risk. Servers running the City’s GIS/FM system are old and failing. The FM
Server is over 4 years and the GIS server is over 5 years old. Since November, 2010 the City has had to recover from two system
failures. The first required a half day to repair and the second required 5 days to repair. As a result the system was approximately 90%
restored. Subsequent work included moving systems to another aged server, contracting to audit the system and entering a six month
on-call contract to assure prompt response to anticipated future failures. System software is approximately 10 years old and no longer supported by vendors, except as funded under contract with the City. Recovery from system failure averages between $5,000 and
$10,000 per event. Migration is required to mitigate risk, contain future costs, manage City assets, and sustain facility management
functions described above.
The City must migrate to new systems to continue to support comprehensive facilities and asset
management needs and sustain support for vital Public Works functions.
Systems have exceeded their useful life and are now failing.
Attachment 2, Page 148 of 152
Drivers123WW1Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeededtoaddressdeficiencieswhichmaycontributetodocumentedinstancesofinjury,propertydamage,orfailuretocomplywithregulatoryrequirementswhichmayimpactpublichealthandwelfareNeededtomaintainbasichealth,safetyandenvironmentalqualityconditionsAddressesdevelopingpublichealthorsafety,liabilityconcerns,orconcernsaboutabilitytomeetregulatoryrequirementsorrespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsWW2OperationalFunctionality/MaintainabilityNeededtoaddressaccessibility,workersafety,maintainminimumsystemfunctionality,andmeetsystemoperationalpoliciesImprovesidentifiedsubstandardoperationalconditionsRespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsWW3WastewaterassetpreservationandrehabilitationFailedsystemorstructurePoorconditionrequiringreconstruction,orjustintimepreservationtoavoidimminentfailureandmorecostlyrepair;and/orgrantfundsavailableScheduledlifecycleimprovements/extensionsWW4CommunityDevelopmentandNeighborhoodrevitalizationSystem/capacityexpansionorsystemrestorationtomeetidentifiedCouncilpriorityforcommunitygrowth;highpriorityurbanrenewalprojectIdentifiedinlongrangeplansasneededgenerallytosupportcommunitygrowth;and/orrequestedtosupportspecificdevelopmentareaRespondstopublicrequests,complaints,orcommunityproposalsWW5Operationalcost/EfficiencyRapidpayback(savings)oninvestment,orotherefficiencyimprovementsforwhichexternalsourcesofrevenueareavailableModeratepaybackandSystemImprovementIdentifiedefficienciesandoperationalcostsavingsPrioritiesWastewaterProjectPriorityMatrixAttachment 2, Page 149 of 152
Drivers123T1Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeededtoaddressdeficiencieswhichmaycontributetodocumentedinstancesofinjury,propertydamage,orfailuretocomplywithregulatoryrequirementswhichmayimpactpublichealthandwelfareNeededtomaintainbasichealthandsafetyconditionsAddressesdevelopingsafetyorliabilityconcernorrespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsT2OperationalFunctionalityNeededtoaddressaccessibility,maintainminimumsystemfunctionalityandmeettransportationsystempoliciesImprovesidentifiedsubstandardoperationalconditionsRespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsT3StreetassetpreservationandrehabilitationFailedsystemorstructurePoorconditionrequiringreconstruction,orjustintimepreservationtoavoidimminentfailureandmorecostlyrepair;and/orgrantfundsavailableScheduledlifecycleimprovements/extensionsT4CommunityDevelopmentandNeighborhoodrevitalizationSystem/capacityexpansionorsystemrestorationtomeetidentifiedCouncilpriorityforcommunitygrowth;highpriorityurbanrenewalprojectIdentifiedinlongrangeplansasneededgenerallytosupportcommunitygrowth;and/orrequestedtosupportspecificdevelopmentareaRespondstopublicrequests,complaints,orcommunityproposalsT5Operationalcost/EfficiencyRapidpayback(savings)oninvestment,orotherefficiencyimprovementsforwhichexternalsourcesofrevenueareavailableModeratepaybackandSystemImprovementIdentifiedefficienciesandoperationalcostsavingsPrioritiesTransportationProjectPriorityMatrixAttachment 2, Page 150 of 152
Drivers123SW1Safety/Hazard/Risk/LiabilityNeededtoaddressdeficiencieswhichmaycontributetodocumentedinstancesofinjury,propertydamage,orfailuretocomplywithregulatoryrequirementswhichmayimpactpublichealthandwelfareNeededtomaintainbasichealth,safety,environmentalandpropertyprotectionconditionsAddressesdevelopingpublichealthorsafety,liabilityconcerns,orconcernsaboutabilitytomeetregulatoryrequirementsorrespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsSW2OperationalFunctionalityNeededtoaddressaccessibility,maintainminimumsystemfunctionalityandmeetstormwatersystemmanagementpoliciesImprovesidentifiedsubstandardoperationalconditionsRespondstopublicrequestsorcomplaintsSW3StormwaterassetpreservationandrehabilitationFailedsystemorstructurePoorconditionrequiringreconstruction,orjustintimepreservationtoavoidimminentfailureandmorecostlyrepair;and/orgrantfundsavailableScheduledlifecycleimprovements/extensionsSW4CommunityDevelopment,Neighborhoodrevitalization,andEnvironmentalRestorationSystem/capacityexpansionorsystemrestorationtomeetidentifiedCouncilpriorityforcommunitygrowth;highpriorityurbanrenewalprojectIdentifiedinlongrangeplansasneededgenerallytosupportcommunitygrowthandrestoration/waterqualityimprovementenhancements;and/orrequestedtosupportspecificdevelopmentareaRespondstopublicrequests,complaints,orcommunityproposalsSW5Operationalcost/EfficiencyRapidpayback(savings)oninvestment,orotherefficiencyimprovementsforwhichexternalsourcesofrevenueareavailableModeratepaybackandSystemImprovementIdentifiedefficienciesandoperationalcostsavingsPrioritiesStormwaterProjectPriorityMatrixAttachment 2, Page 151 of 152
Drivers123BP1Safety/HazardConditions CodeComplianceKnownSafetyorHazardConditionDevelopingSafetyConcernBP2BuildingandSystemsIntegrityEminentStructuralorSystemsFailureProtectionofBuildingEnvelopePreventiveMaintenanceand/orPreservationBP3EnergyCost/UsageGeneratesRevenue;RapidPayback;GrantsModeratepaybackandSystemImprovementIdentifiedSavingsPotentialBP4SystemsReliability Justintime/EminentFailureScheduledLifeCycleImprovements/ExtensionModernizationorCorrectionofDecliningConditionsBP5OperationalFunctionalityAccessibility;Min.Functionality;HygieneStandardsImproveConditionsforStaffandPublicAestheticsPrioritiesBuildingsandPropertiesProjectPriorityMatrixAttachment 2, Page 152 of 152
M E M O R A N D U M City of Springfield
To: Springfield Planning Commission
From: Jeff Paschall, City Engineer
Date: March 2, 2017
Subject: Follow-up questions to the February 22, 2017 Capital Improvement Program Presentation
Following the presentation of the 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Program to the Planning Commission,
staff received a few project related questions via email. Following are the questions with staff responses:
1) The wood stave line in South A St. We ran into that a few times when I worked for Spfd. I
recall one time that a worker was almost overcome by fumes emanating from the system, so the
hazard and pollution concerns on this are very real. Regarding the rehab of this system, a couple
of questions. Has the line been TV’d enough to ID the parts that are broken/infiltrated etc, and
can the line be rehabbed as much as possible using in-situ liner? If this could be done, there wouldn’t be as much reason to excavate and then to need to take spoils to Arlington as hazardous
waste. Alternatively, another system could perhaps be installed and the existing line abandoned
in place.
This portion of the woodstave line has yet to be rehabilitated or replaced as it runs under
several buildings and crosses private property that the City does not have easements over. Video review of old woodstave lines is difficult as there are not many access points. When this becomes a priority, staff will look at all viable options that limit exposure and expense
of physically removing the line. This may include some form of liner, or relocation and
abandonment in place.
2) Signal updates. Are we trying to move away from loop detectors as much as practicable? They seem to be pretty fragile systems. And, can this updates be accompanied by installation of
traffic violation cameras? I think these are great ideas, they can reduce policing needs and still
help to create a safer environment.
The Signal System Modernization project listed in the CIP is for modernization of the
controller systems within the cabinets. Replace traffic control and communication systems in conformity with the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Metropolitan Area Plan. The City has received award of STP-U funding for traffic signal performance improvements. The $250k STP-U award will fund the first year of a 5-year program
request to complete a comprehensive traffic control and communication systems upgrade.
The request is for $250k annually for 5-years beginning in FY17. The key actions in this request are:
Replace obsolete traffic signal controllers and cabinets with current standard
controllers and cabinets; ~50 City owned or maintained controllers and cabinets,
ODOT controllers and cabinets are not included.
Upgrade the central control system to current standard and compatibility with controllers.
Repair or replace legacy copper wire signal communication lines and equipment.
Expand digital radio signal communications deployment or establish fiber optic paths to unserved locations or in lieu of legacy copper lines.
As to traffic violation cameras, that is not currently part of the project scope.
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 2
3) In general, I support the rehab of existing roadways over the expansion of the road system. Seals and overlays need to be prioritized. Weight miles are not paying for the damage
that heavy trucks and buses do to street structure. Does LTD pay anything to the street repair
program, even at bus stops where it is clear that the structures are damaged by the buses?
We have an agreement for maintenance for the EmX system within City right of way. For
other routes, City staff will review proposed changes to evaluate whether the streets can support regular bus routes.
4) Fire station replacement projects should be low priority so long as we can maintain
response times. These should only be done after necessary rehabilitation of other City buildings
and infrastructure needs are accomplished. This is a “living within our means” item that would
be impressive to the tax resistant citizens, and could perhaps be done using future bond measures.
Eugene/Springfield Fire and Life Safety manage replacement/relocation of fire stations.
Needs are identified in their strategic plan and then placed in the CIP to seek necessary
funding as need arises.
Attachment 3, Page 2 of 2
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT 2018-2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM + DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT + PROGRAM 2018-2022
+
NATURE OF THE APPLICATION For the last few months the Public Works Department has been going through the process of
updating the Capital Improvements Program document and has produced a draft copy for the five
year period of 2018-2022. The Public Works Department is now bringing the document before the Planning Commission and seeks a recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the draft document.
ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that the draft 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Program document be sent to the City Council with the Planning Commission’s
recommendation for adoption. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning
Commission on March 7th, 2017.
____________________________________
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
AYES: ____ NOES: ____
ABSENT: ____
ABSTAIN: ____
Attachment 4, Page 1 of 1