HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 07 05 RS
The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA Receiver” for the hearing-impaired is available. To arrange for these services, phone 726-3700.
PC Agenda – July 5, 2000 1
SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL * CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS * 225 FIFTH STREET * 541 726-3753 Wednesday July 5, 2000 7:00 pm
REGULAR SESSION
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE –
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – June 6, 2000 Work and Regular Sessions
3. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION –
4. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE –
5. QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING –
A. Modification of a Cascade Drive-In property Development Area Plan (DAP Condition 1998-04-
0082 and Site Plan Review 1999-12-0294– Continuation of the public hearing for Jenna Estates LLC for: 1) a modification of Development Area Plan (DAP) condition 4.1. and 2) Site Plan Review approval. Rather than deny the Site Plan application for not meeting the DAP condition for an approved Wetland Mitigation Plan and not having an approved access to the property, staff asked for a
continuance of the public hearing from March 21, 2000 until April 18, 2000 and from April 18, 2000 until June 6, 2000 and from June 6, 2000 until July 5, 2000. The Planning Commission granted those continuances. The DAP condition and the South 48th Street right-of-way issues are still unresolved. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing from July 5, 2000 until September 19, 2000. The applicant has signed a new waiver of the 120-day requirement until October 1, 2000. (Karp)
B. Appeal of the Director’s Decision Jo. No. 99-05-126 – On July 28th, 1999, the Appellants, Robert and Sharon McClure, filed a Notice of Intent to Appeal the Planning Commission’s July 7, 1999, decision with the State Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). The case was heard before LUBA on February 3, 2000. LUBA issued a decision on the case March 10, 2000 that found that the findings submitted by the City were insufficient to support the dedications
required by Conditions. The case has been remanded back to the Planning Commission for additional findings. In response to LUBA’s request for greater specificity, Development Services and Public Works staff
have prepared a package of specific findings, including quantified calculations, which provide evidence showing the conditions required by the Director are at least roughly proportional to the
impacts resulting from the creation of two new dwellings. (Stephens)
The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA Receiver” for the hearing-impaired is available. To arrange for these services, phone 726-3700.
PC Agenda – July 5, 2000 2
CONDUCT OF QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff will explain procedural requirements mandated by State Law
Commencement of the hearing
Declaration of conflict of interest or “ex-parte” contact
Staff report
Testimony from the applicant
Testimony of those in support
Testimony of those in opposition
Questions from the Commission
Summation by the Staff
Rebuttal from the applicant
Close of the public hearing
Planning Commission discussion (possible questions to staff or public)
Motion to approve or deny request based on staff report and/or oral/written testimony
Final order signed by Chair incorporating findings and reasoning to support decision
6. BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
7. BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION
8. ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING