The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, City Council CMO 2/4/2008 crry OF SPRINGFIELD - DEVH~"MENT REVIEW COMMITTEE , DISTRIBUTION DATE: February 4, 2008 TO: ~ --:?" """"7' 7" ,./ /" "7 ~ 7' v 7 -:7 7' =f ~ 7' ~ ~/ ~ =? =v . Date Received: Current Planning Staff: G. Karp, J. Donovan, Liz Mill r Kitti Gale, L. Pauly, Tara Jones, Andy Umbird, Dave Reeso Steve Hopkins Molly Markarian "Matt Stouder, Engineering - Public Works [k~. " . ,; "Les Benoy, Engineer Group, EngineeringlPublic Works "Chuck Gottfried, Environmental Services Brian Bamett, Traffic EngineerlPE, Public Works Department (agenda only 2102) "Gary McKenney, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Department "Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department Melissa Fechtel, Fire Agenda only "Pat French, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District "Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) "Bart McKee, Springfield Ulility Board (Water) Jack Foster, Springfield Utility Board (Energy Conservation) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (Drinking Water) Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 (Subdivisions, Street name changes) Dave WMe, U.S.P.S. (Growth Mgmt. Coordinator) Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas (needs full packets for PartitionslSubdivisions) "Celia Barry, Lane County Transportation Thornas Jeffreys, Emerald People's Utility District (EPUD) Jim Mann, Lane County Land Management [Urban Transijion Zone] George Ehlers, Lane County Sanitarian [Urban Transition Zone] (if applicable) Tim Hanely, Rainba.v Water District{" only if in the North Spfld area) (If applicable) Ralph Johnston, Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (If applicable) Dale Ledyard, Operations Chief, McKenzie Fire District (If applicable) Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable (if applicable) Debbie Crampton, EWEB (electric) (" If in Glenwood) Dick HelgesonlMel Damewood, EWEB (water) ("If in Glenwood) Steve Moe, Glenwood Water District ("If in Glenwood) Bill Grile - Development Services Director (agenda) John Tamulonis, Economic & Community Development Manager Cindie Mott, Code Enforcemenllnspeclor (agenda) "Dave Puent, Building Official (agenda) Usa Hopper, Building Services Representative (agenda) " Greg Ferschweiler, Keith Miyata, Brian Conlon, Gene Butterfield, PW Dept. "Craig Fitzgerald, Maintenance PW Dept George Walker, Environmental Works Dept., (agenda only) Deanna Buckem, Engineering Assistant, Public Works Dept. (agenda) Police Chief, Jerry Smith, Police Department (agenda) *Will Mueller, L ro Nonn Palmer, Quest Corporation (agenda Mike Wilbur, ODOT, State Highway Division (agenda) Steve Barrett, Asst. Superin. of Operations, Springfield School District (agenda) William Lewis, Financial Services, Springfield School District ( agenda) Jack Moran, Reporter, Eugene Register-Guard (agenda) INCLUDE WEEKLY LAND USE INFO Springfield Beacon (agenda) Joe Leahy, City Attorney Dennis Emst, City Surveyor Carole Knapel, PEACEHEAL THlJUSTICE CENTER/FIRE STATION ITEMS FEB - 4 2008 Original Submittal (agenda) (agenda) A request for land use action, as described on the attached agenda, has been received by the Development Services Office. Specific concems of your division/department/agency should be addressed. If you have comments or requirements of this proposal, please send them in writing to the assigned planner @ Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 974n. If your written comments are not received by Friday, February 15, 2008 specific concems of your division/department/agency will not be addressed unless you attend the meeting on February 19, 2008. The Development Review Committee holds staff review meetings on Tuesday @ 8:00 -10:00 a.m. You should also plan to attend the staff meeting on Tuesday if you have specific concems so that the Planning representative can discuss them prior to meeting with the applicant. If the Planner feels ij is necessary for you to participate in the public meetings he/she will let you know on Tuesday. " will receive a full packet Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Original Submittal DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET Conference Room 615 Staff Review: February 19, 2008 @ 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. 1. PARTITION TENTATIVE #SUB200B-00005 BERRY 8 - 9 a.m. Assessor's Map: 17-03-15-40 TL 1500 Address: 255 Deadmond Ferry Road Existing Use: Residential Applicant submitted plans to partition one lot into two duplex lots Planner: Steve Hopkins 2. SITE PLAN TENTATIVE #DRC200B-0000B IRISH GLEN/HAMMERlARAMARK 9-10 a.m. Assessor's Map: 17-02-30-44 TL 100, 200 Address: 1230 40th Street & Vacant lot Existing Use: Vacant Applicant submitted plans to construct a 25,000 square foot office/industrial building as the Aramark Distribution Center. Planner: Steve Hopkins 1 Wednesday, November 28,200712:57 PM p,02 Cily of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Flfth Street Springfield, OR 97477 O. , ng/nal Submittal Site Plan Application, Type II r I Date Received: JAN 2 9 2008 Application Type ", ' (Applicant: chacl, one) .. ' ' ,':", '~' ':,:'; Site Plan Review:, . t'8l.. Major Site Plan Major Modificat,ion 0 Applicant Name: IIf /SH ::) Le....J LLf..., Phone: S41-1t'/3 - / /(P(p, Company: 8 A Yh e:., Fax: G<I't - ("J'3 - ~ffl Address: Po 6 ox. .;1..~& '" we; ~Nc.. q ..,40:;- APp"~ant's R~~,: _ ::r; H jJ "11.4 ~ fYI~.e...., lI1ettt"~ 'Phone: 'fJ4t - (P!'.3 - II~?> Company: .I ~/5J.1 6u;J LL.,C- " Fax: 6<P1-~J'3-,;;.m_ Address: P a 80x ~~(,,(P DA5e<Je... q'1.40~ Property Owner: , If<ISH .bl.f~LLL Phone: f)4'-l4n-//~(,. Company: -~}'}mc:. PClX: 6~-(P.t3-~#9 Address: f {; 60x a~t.> &~,ME:..,_ Q140:>-. ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: /1-o~-30 ,- 44 _TAX LOT NO(s): OOIOOovCJO:J.CJCJ Property Address: J:L/O, q /L3Q.jfCJ/!:l.-~ . - \ ,_ Size of Property: j 14,.5(p;)..-~ ~Acre5 0 square "eet [H'/ Proposed Name of Project: ..A.f?A VlAAB I~ OI.5T "I lSl,O' I DM c;~~:rc R ~~:;~~::~n of .;)s, 600 J;2f OFAC-C//tJ"DU~/~L /:;ulL-b1iJ6 # of Lots/Parcels: cl.....Avg', Lot/Parcel Size: l.l:t,.ft.. z.. sf Density: ~ du/ac:re New ImpervIous Surface coverage::l 04e. sf Bldg. Gross Floor Area~OO sf Zoning: Applicable Refinement Plan: Location: CIty Limits 0 Associated Applications: Pre-Submittal Case No.: (/\--( Z4.i1.- ~tP~ Date: Case NO':~C.2-wP..-~_D..te: I/~r/QfQ Application Fee: $~4 ~.ro Technica.l Fee: $ 1L./'72./':) , TOTAL ..ee's ,$ ?:JI) n-:m. t.5 _ Overlav District: Plan Designation: , Urban Growth Boundary 0 Reviewed by: ReviewQd by: ~ Postl!ge Fee: ~ / <. '\ s:- Dc!lte RCl..I;ived:- l/pdotcd 1218/2006 nrond. Jone.. QJrJ~1-~I~ FEB - 4 2008 Original Submittal Tuesday, January 08,200812:13 PM Date Received: p.02 :\uraW\l1ammer,\"uno St U6\ARAM, .9.dwq, 1217/20079:24:12 AM . . :q 11 mr JAN 2 9 2018 (>) . ~ ~r _'.... -,:,.itiael~!llleittal- ~-=- -/' f!], . ~ ~~;"~71~~.1 - " ~ , _.. It I ~ .., ,. . 1, , , ! .:.. ... .~ : I (Ill . .j ~~t~ftl t 1 HI '1'!\+'" I . ~I it 1t,' I . =. I I' 1111!1111!.1 il!!rii!i I ,:i Iti; ~-+-: r'. = : Ii U d Q I:R 1~:'1 11 'II i fffitH 'i /-1 <l"):- I l'lli ill ,'Ii t ,i 9;;~ ~lr 'I' I I I' . I' - I -I: \: ; '. I' H'" ~ I I I 1.1: [I' ~ I ~ 'I II 1!1 " '. -l ~ ! :~ I; I,I : I I r~ ' ,'L :'r~uL--"~!_lJ. I ! r ~ ~'I.~~ ......~.....- I I ~. --=-===' --- "// ! JL _ ,:' .L, .., -+--""l~ ! \~~ ._ti: ~..I I'~I !-W. 1f f- I I fl, \ l\..,r~~' .8' -- . I (\ .....,.\ \.../,;; -==- = -)" : -'. . - - . <J. , ~=(_ . /-:::':::~=/'! ~... .... .' . I j I I' I ~------(__'- "'6-\ i' .".' -' . - +. .-. I I \ \~~2~:-'- ..., - ---------- 4-, L. f I '\" .~,/ ,/ iom S1'twrr II " .---------------------- .. ,- I I / ......... I / ,........ )' ~. . ///./ ~-- .- - - - ... - - - - - - ... ,. /' ~..-....'-_.- ,.' Date Recei'ed: ,~ : = '. .~ 'tI .~ . '. ~ FEB-4208 (>) 'If'~ J. i ~ 'n , ~ .~ ~ . I. Original Submittal AIlAMARK ~ -:-- --- : ~ IfW ~u l4~11 i I ha~~~ -~ h ~ i'~; ) ~~I 10'-0" ., ., __....____ ..__ __. __ _ _ 1_.. J 'f m~~HRT UM-A~ .~.1f'~I" ~ cco... . ( II I 1 t t 1 ~ r I ~ _ IIIl ,";:"::'''';''=:''' - _ ''it. ltt\\~ -~ SITIl PLAN Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 Original Submiltal CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP DRC2008-00008 1210 & 1230 40th Street , .f Date Received: F.~ " JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal r= C/) ,; J: . ~~~. 9 .-,,~l ,', :Q ~I....:t,\ VE - - .( ~STBLJ A . . -IT ~ --., SITE Map 17-02-30-44 Tax Lot 100, 200 North + LUlD USE rwrNING AIID CDMSlJI1IIIG sanm 370 Q snm SPRINGFIElD, OREGON 97477 1541' 302-9830 fAX 115411610-1805 Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 Date Received: JAN 2 9 2008 Original submittal Original Submittal SITE PLAN REVIEW APPUCATION FOR IRISH GLEN, LLC (NEW ARAMARK BUILDING) Property Owner/Applicant: Project Coordinator/ Applicant's Representative! Architect: SurveyinglEngineering: Planning: Landscape Design: Assessar's Map: Tax Lots: Platted Lots: . Zoning: Plan Designatian: Area: Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review Irish Glen, LLC PO Bax 2266 Eugene, OR 97402 Tel (541) 683-1166 Rabert L. Shaw 656 Chamelton Street Eugene, OR 97401 Tel (541) 485-4963 Fax (541) 342-2909 Olson & Marris c/o. Scott Morris, PEl Lany Olson, PLS 380 Q Street, Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9790 Metro Planning, Inc. c/o. Rabert Stevens, AICP 370 Q Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 Susan Crabtree Landscape Design 89618 Amirante Eugene, OR 97408 17-02-30-44 100 & 200 Lats 5/6; JP Hammer Industrial Park HI (Heavy Industrial) Heavy Industrial 114,357 Square Feet (2.63 Acres) December 14,2007 Page I Date Received: >, ! Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal Backl!round Original Submittal. This application is for Site Plan Review approval for one new industrial building and associated parking lot for Aramark. Aramark is a commercial laundry cleaning company that will be relocalin" it. existin" facilitv and 45 emnlovees from Eu"ene to Snrin"field. This Aramark facility will only be for the cleaning of mats. All other cleaning activities (including dry cleaning) occur,in Portland. Primarily, the facility will serve as a regional distribution center; which is the reason for the cross dock building design. The doors on one side of the building will be for dropping off dirty mats and the other side will be for distributing clean mats. The facility will distribute mats throughout Oregon; including Albany, Medford, Klamath Falls, and Bend. The subject site for this proposed development is zoned HI (Heavy Industrial) and platted in the J.P. Hammer Industrial Park as Lots 5 and 6. The J.P. Hammer Industrial Park was platted and recorded on April 17 ,2002. This industrial subdivision created three public streets (Kathryn Street, 40th Street, Industrial Avenue). The proposed Aramark building will have frontage and access on 40th Street. Adjacent to the Aramark facility will be the existing Mount Hood Beverage Company building. When the J.P. Hammer Industrial Park was created, all of the necessary public utilities necessary to serve the proposed development were constructed and are available in the public right-of-way. There are codes, covenants, and restrictions (CC&R) that apply to said subdivision. The Arantark facility will be in compliance with the CC&Rs. The ..._.._oed building in this Site Plan Review application will be located across the existing platted line s....~..;:ng Lots 5 and 6. To allow this development, a deed restriction is proposed to require that Lots 5 and 6 remain in common ownership. This written statement addresses the Site Plan Review approval criteria found in Springfield DevelopmentCode (SDC) 5.17-125. In this written statemenl.w:w.w_ces are made to some of the sheets in the attached plan set. The following is the order of the sheets in the plan set. Sheet No. Sheet Name S1 Cover Sheet S2 Sije Plan A 1 Floor Plan A:l Elevpftons C 1 1I:;~sfinQ Cpm..\!iorpi C2 I site Gradln!ilPsVlnQ Plan C3 I Utility Plan .- C4 I Storm ManaQen:tClllt Plan I EC1 I Land DralnaQe Alteration Plan ILA1 I ' I LA2 tlanting Plan I SL 1 I L1ahtina Plan Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review December 14,2007 Page 2 Date Received: Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal SDC 5.17-125 Site Plan Review Aonroval Criteria Original Submittal A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The Metro Plan Land Use Diagram designates the property as app.up.;ate for Heavy Industrial. The Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan Diagram also designates the property for Heavy Industrial uses. These plan designations are consistent with the current zoning of HI (Heavy Industrial). Per SDC 3.2-410, in the HI zone cleaning plants and 'regional distribution' are permitted uses. The Aramark facility will be a commercial laundry facility for the cleaning of mats and distributing those mats throughout the state/region. Given that the Aramark facility will be engaged in HI zone permitted uses; this site plan review application will be consistent with the Metro Plan and Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan heavy industrial plan designation. The t',ut'u~d development also meets the development standards for the HI zone per SDC 3.2-420. Both of the existing lots are each over I acre in size; thus meeting the minimum lot size of 1 0,000 square feet. The existing Lot 6 has about 174 feet of frontage and Lot 5 has about 131 feet of frontage; thus exceeding the minimum lot frontage of75 feet. In the HI zone there are no interior yard setbacks for buildings, but there is a minimum 10 foot front yard setback. The proposed building will be setback over 130 feet from 40th Street; thus exceeding the minimum front yard setback of 10 feet. Per the same section referenced above, there is a requirement for landscaped setbacks of 5 feet around the parking lot/driveway. There will be proposed landscaped planters around all of the driveways and parking spaces and the minimum width of the planters is 5 feet. There will also be ample landscaping along the west t',ut''',;j boundary for screening between this industrial site and the adjacent residential area. Please refer to Sheets LA I and LA2 for details about the Planting Plan. The existing chain link fence along the west boundary will also remain to help with screening this industrial development from the residential neighborhood. Based on the above facts, the development standards of SDC 3.2-420 are met and the new Aramark facility will be consistent with the HI zoning designation. Further, since the proposed building will be located across the common lot line between Lots 5 and 6 of the J.P. Hammer Industrial Park a deed restriction is proposed that will require both lots remain in common ownership while the building exists on-site. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls sball not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. The existing public improvements including the 8" wastewater line, 24"/30" storm drainage system, and 40th Street were constructed during the platting of J.P. Hammer Industrial Park. Other utilities (i.e. electric, water, phone, and gas) are also already constructed and stubbed Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review December 14,2007 Page 3 Date Received: Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal Original Submittal to the two existing lots of the industrial park. These utilities are located within the existing 10 foot PUB (public utility easement) located along the entire frontage of 40th Street adjacent to the proposed development. There are no traffic lights or other safety devices adjacent to the proposed subdivision. There are existing street trees and street lights already installed in the public right-of-way. All of the existing public improvements are delineated on the attached drawings. These public improvements were sized and constructed to accommodate the type ood intensity of development proposed with this site ploo review application. In the table below are calculations showing the maximum, future ooticipated water usage that will be flowing into the existing, public wastewater system. The maximUlll number of washers that will be used at the facility is two (2) and the numbers below are the maximum discharge from two commercial washing machines. . /AntiClpated Water Usage (Discharge to Wastewater SyStem'. IMaxiinum Water Fill Capacitv: 516 Gallons /Maximum Gallons Used P9r Load: 1.306 Gallons Maximum Gallons per 8 Hour Shift 26.120 Gallons Maximum Instantaneous 1,032 Gallons . Dlscharoe Flow < 1 Minute: per Minute IAVerage Flow for 8 Hour 54 Gallons per Shrift: Minute . Calculations based on 2.5 washer loads per hour per machine. Calculations based on two (2) Jensen 800 OP washers. With the numbers above in mind, the project engineer at Olson & Morris has carefully sized the private utilities to hoodle the anticipated water discharge volumes. The pertinent calculations to demonstrate that the proposed private utilities and existing public improvements have the capacity to hoodle the discharge are included on Sheet C3 (Utility Plan). All proposed utility lines and connections are delineated on the attached utility plan. C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. The public improvements necessary to serve the proposed development were constructed as part of the original J.P. Hwnmer Industrial Park. The applicant is proposing to construct private improvements that connect to the existing public improvements. A utility ood grading/paving plan are included with this site plan review application. The private improvements include the proposed private utilities/parking lot necessary to accommodate the new Aramark facility. All of the private design and construction standards of this code Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review December 14, 2007 Page 4 . Date Received: Date Received: FEB - 4 2008 JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal Original Submittal are complied with in regards to the private improvements. Please refer to the attached utility and grading and paving plans for applicable details. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffie, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. The existing public street network., 40th Street and Industrial A venue, provide sufficient and safe vehicular access to adjacent streets Kathryn and Olympic Streets and 4200 Avenue. l1Us street connectivity also provides for connections belween the proposed development and the neighboring residential area. 401h Street provides existing sidewa1ks for safe pedestrian access to the proposed development site. In addition, there are already IwO existing 36 foot driveways that will provide safe vehicular and pedestrian access from the public right-of-way to the Aramark building that will be .constructed on the development site. No new ingress- egress points are proposed; thus controlling access onto the adjacent street network and minimizing the number of curb cuts onto the public street The proposed parking area on the subject property has been designed and constructed to blend in nicely with the existing shared driveways to ensure vehicular and pedestrian circulation ....m.inq safe and convenient The parking lot design conforms to the dimensional requirements ofSDC 4.6-115. The parking space dimensions are shown on the attached plans. The parking lot will be paved, as required, and the stormwater nm-off from the parking lot will flow through one of three bio-swales. The bio-swales will be located within the landscaped setbacks along the north and east property lines and in the southeast comer of the site. These bio-swales will pre-treat the stormwater runoff prior to discharging into the existing public storm system in 401h Street. Where necessary, due to landscaped planter widths wheel bumpers are being provided. The parking lot will also be clearly striped to indicate pedestrian crossings and parking spaces. Regarding !he minimum number of parking spaces, a cleaning plant/distribution plant use most closely falls under !he primary industrial (manufacture/assembly) category that reqUires I space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area The proposed building will be approximately 24,800 square feet There would be a requirement for 50 parking spaces. There are more than 50 parking spaces being provided with this application. In addition to !he required vehicle parking spaces, there are nine (9) bicycle parking spaces being provided on-site to meet !he minimum requirements. As required, seventy-five percent (7 spaces) of the nine bicycle spaces will be located outside for short-term use. Two long-term spaces for bicycle parking will be located inside the building. The parking lot and ingress-egress points meet !he applicable requirements of the SDC and thus this criterion is satisfied. Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review December 14,2007 Page 5 Date Received: FEB - ~ 2008 Date Received: JAN 2 9 2008 Original Submittal Original Submittal E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soll or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant c1usten of trees and shrubs; waL.. _..Jnes shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. There are no physical features on the subject ".u"".;j; this includes trees, shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or historic features. Given the absence of any physical features on the site; this criterion is not applicable. This proposed Aramark facility in the J.P. Hammer Industrial Park on 40th Street clearlv meets ~l annroval criteria of the Snrim/field Develonment Code. The applicant respectfully requests that the. Planning Director '"t'".- Ie this site plan review application. Ifthere are any questions about this written ~~~.ent, please do not hesitate to contact me at Metro Planning via email (robertla2metroolanninl!.com) or phone (541-302-9830). For questions relating to the project in general, please contact the project coordinator/architect R....."uu:.lily. AtJ~ Robert Stevens. AICP Metro Planning, Inc Irish Glen, LLC Site Plan Review December 14, 2007 Page 6