The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Meeting CMO 5/20/2008 J < \.J AG . A.' ': . . ." . OF :Ef.IESPRINGFIELID PLANNING COMMISSION . . ~. >;! . . . SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL * CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS * 225 FIFTH STREET * 541 726-3753 Tuesday May 20, 2008 7 00 pm 1 ,PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- 2 APPROVAL OF MINUfES- REGULAR SESSION I move to accept the Mmutes of the Spnngfield Plannmg CommIssion Dated JUNE 20, 2006 work and regular, November 20, 2007 Regular SessIOn and December 11, 2007 Regular SessIOn as submItted 3 BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCF.;- 4. OUASI-.nJDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING- a. APPLICATION: APPLICANT(s) NAME: CASE NUMBER PROJECT SITE PROJECT PROPOSAL: PLANNER. Zone Map Amendment for approximately 0 27 acres Larry Burr ZON2008-000 13 859 West M Street, 1392 & 1395 Rambow Dnve, 17-03-27-43 TL 3001 The purpose of the requested actIOn IS to correct an mconslstency between the zomng and Metro Plan deSIgnatIOn of a partIcular property Smce the eXlstmg LDR zonmg IS not consIstent WIth the MDR plan deSignation as a result of the Metro Plan adoption, the DIrector has determmed that thIS applIcation qualIfies to be processed as a Clty- Sponsored zomng map amendment, as establIshed by department polIcy m 2006 Molly Markanan CONDUCT OF QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Staff WIll explam procedural reqUIrements mandated by State Law Commencement of the heanng Declaration of conflict of mterest or "ex-parte" contact Staff report Testimony from the applIcant Testimony of those m support TestImony of those III opposltlon\QuestlOns from the CommiSSIOn Summation by the Staff Rebuttal from the applIcant Close of the publIc hearmg I or extend the wntten record Planmng CommissIOn diSCUSSIOn (pOSSIble questIOns to staff or publIc) Motion to recommend approval or approval With condItIOns or demal of the request based on staff report and/or oraVwntten testimony Recommendation SIgned by ChaIr mcorporatmg findmgs and reasomng to support deCISIOn . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.J\e Received' Planner. MEM 6jJ-o!cIb The mee/rng [ocallOn lS wheelchair-accessIble For the hearmg-Impazred, an mterpreter can be prowded wuh 48 hours notice prior to the meetmg For meetmgs m the Counczl Mee/mg Room, a "Personal P A RecefVer" for the hearmg-ImpaIred IS avaIlable To arrange for these services, phone 726-2700 PC Agenda - Brenda Jones Page 1 5/20/2008 6. BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR 7. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION 8. ~USINESS FROM THE COMMISSION 9. AD,IOIJRN REGULAR " . . . ,-~ . - ,.. . ~ ~J. j}>o. h~~\ " " PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Frank Cross, ChaIT Johnny Krrschenmarm, Vice ChaIr Lee Beyer Tern Leezer Enc SmIth Shen Moore Steve Moe The meetmg locatton 1.S wheelchalr-accesslble For the hearmg-lmpalred, an mterpreter can be provided wllh 48 hours notlee pYlor to the meetmg For meetmgs m the Councz/ Meetmg Room, a Personal P A Receiver" for the hearmg-lmpalred lS available To arrange for these servlces, phone 726-2700 PC Agenda - Brenda Jones Page 2 5/20/2008 MEMORANDUM CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DATE OF HEARING May 20, 2008 TO Spnngfield Planning commlsslo~n PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL ~ MEMORANDUM FROM Molly Markanan, Planner II J C/ SUBJECT Case No ZON2008-00013, Request for City-Sponsored ZOning Map Amendment ISSUE The Planning Commission IS asked to conduct a public heanng and decide whether or not to approve a request to amend the zoning map for a 27 -acre property located at the corner of West M Street and Rainbow Dnve from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) to conform to the Metro Plan designation of MDR DISCUSSION The purpose of the requested action IS to correct an Inconsistency between the zOning and Metro Plan designation of a particular property Since the eXisting LOR zOning IS not consistent with the MDR plan designation as a result of the Metro Plan adoption, the Director has determined that thiS application qualifies to be processed as a City-sponsored zOning map amendment. as established by department policy In 2006 Approval of zOning map amendments requires a demonstration of compliance with three cntena of approval outlined In the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) section 5 22-115 The Planning Commission IS asked to consider the applicant's request and the findings of fact contained In the attached staff report to confirm that the application meets these cntena of approval and that the zoning map amendment IS appropnate In thiS case RECOMMENDATION' Upon review of the applicant's request, City staff finds that the proposed zOning map amendment meets the cntena of approval listed In the SDC Code and therefore recommends approval of thiS application ACTION REQUESTED Approval of the ZON2008-00013 zOning map amendment request ATTACHMENTS. Attachment 1 Staff Report Attachment 2 Maps & Photos Attachment 3 Legal Descnptlon Attachment 4 Final Order Date Received ~)~ Planner MEM I City of Sprmgfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Staff Report Case Number ZON2008-00013 Project Location, 859 West M Street, 1391 & 1395 Rambow Dnve Map 17-03-27-43, Tax Lot 3001 Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR) Overlay Dlstrict(s)' N/A Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Metro Plan Designation Medium Density Residential (MDR) Application Submittal Date February 26, 2008 Application Accepted As Complete Date: March G, 2008 Public Hearing Date May 20, 2008 Associated Applications ZON2005-00046 - Development Issues Meeting (DIM), ZON2005-00054 - DIM l:ciTY;o~SBRlNGF,iEC[f,b'EVEi:c:fP.MENTIREViEWrCOMMltlEE~~~~~~~/b.~A~~~~~1 I POSITION I Planner II I Transportation PlannlnQ EnQmeer I Public -Works EnQmeer In TrammQ I Deputy Fire Marshal REVIEW OF Land Use Planning Transportation Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safety NAME Molly Markanan Gary McKenney Jesse Jones Gilbert Gordon PHONE 726-4611 726-4585 736-1036 726-2293 l"'AF!P.IJCANT.'S;DEVELOP.MENTJTEAM:i!t~,fJ;~;':,~~if.'.l'o~~~~~~~\','F~~~ Owner/Applicant Applicant's Representative larry Burr JRH - land Use DIvISion 3310 Talon Street 4765 Village Plaza loop, SUite 201 Eugene, OR 97408 Eugene, OR 97401 Case No ZON2008-00013 Attacllment 1-1 1014 REQUEST The applicant has requested a City-sponsored zOning map amendment to change the zoning for the subject property from low Density Residential (lDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) to conform to the Metro Plan designation for the property of MDR Approval of the applicant's request would not only bring the zOning on the property Into conformance with the Metro Plan, but It would also enable the applicant to proceed with other land use applications that are contingent upon zOning and plan deslgnallon conformity Thus, In the future, development may occur on the property In accordance With SDC 3 2-200 for MDR properties Such development would permit a minimum of two and a maximum of five dwelling Units on the 27 -acre property subject to a Type II land use approval (Site Plan ReView and/or land DIvIsion) DISCUSSION According to State law, the local zoning deslgnallon of properties must conform to the land use deSignation of the Metro Plan, the region's official long-range comprehensive planning document However, when the Metro Plan was Originally adopted In 1982, zOning deSignations already eXisted In the City of Springfield, and many properties were already developed In accordance with such deSignations Therefore, In some Instances, rather than Immediately changing the zoning of developed land (which would create eXlsllng non-conforming uses), owners were allowed to maintain the zoning on their properties with the understanding that as such properties were redeveloped over time, plan/zone conflicts would be resolved before such development proceeded RecogniZing that a property owner should not have to pay to resolve such plan/zone conflicts resulting from the City's approach to early Implementation of the Metro Plan, the City Initiated a City-sponsored zoning map amendment process In 2006 for properties where the zOning and Metro Plan deslgnallon are clearly In conflict ThiS process allows for City-sponsored zone changes three times annually In January, May, and September Due to the scale and non-property specific nature of the adopted Metro Plan Diagram, the City IS best able to Identify clear plan/zone conflicts for properties within Refinement Plan boundanes However, there can be Instances where, due to prominent Identifiable geographic features on the Metro Plan Diagram, little doubt eXists that a property falls within a certain designation, as well In such Instances, It IS the discretion of the Director or hiS representallve to determine If there IS a clear plan/zone conflict, thus qualifying the appllcallon for a City-sponsored zone change Dunng Initial meellngs In 2005 with City Planning staff regarding a proposed land diVIsion Involving the subject property, the applicant was adVised that the zoning on the property IS lDR while the Metro Plan deSignation IS MDR, and thiS plan/zone conflict needed to be resolved before the applicant could proceed with the land diVISion City staff at that time determined that prominent Identifiable geographic I features, Including the curvature of Centennial Boulevard and the relatIOnship of the MDR area of the I Metro Plan diagram to the Community Commercial area of the diagram In thiS part of the City, suggest that the western boundary of the MDR deSignation IS Rainbow Dnve Therefore, the subject property, which IS located east of Rainbow Dnve, would fall within the MDR deSignation and thus qualify for a City-sponsored zone change (see Attachments 2-1 through 24 , REVIEW PROCESS ThiS City-sponsored zOning map amendment Involves the appllcallon of eXisting policy to one speCific property and does not Include a Metro Plan diagram amendment As such, thiS IS a Type III application requlnng a quasI-Judicial decIsion and IS therefore reviewed under the procedures listed In Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 51-135, Type III Appllcallons, 52-100, Public Heanng Process, and SDC 5 22-100, ZOning Map Amendment Applications for Type III quasI-Judicial land use decIsions require newspaper nOtice, as well as mailed notification of the applicant and owner of record, property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property, any applicable neighborhood aSSOCiation, and any person who submits a written request to receive notice at least 20 days pnor to the date of the heanng per SDC 5 2-115 ThiS Case No ZON200lHl0013 2014 Attachment 1-2 I application was accepted as complete on March 6, 2008 Per the public notice reqUirements of SDC, notice of the public heanng was mailed on Apnl 24, 2008, and was published In the RegIster Guard on Apnl 29, 2008 No wntten comments were received at the lime of Issuing this Staff Report In addllion, per State law, notice of the application was mailed to Department of Land ConselVatlon and Development on March 20, 2008 For quasI-Judicial decIsions, the Planning COmmission's decIsion IS the City'S final deCISiOn, unless appealed Only those persons who participated either orally or In wntlng have standing to appeal the decIsion of the Planning Commission, and grounds for appeal are limited to those Issues raise either orally or In writing before the close of the public record SITE INFORMATION The subject property IS a 27 acre (11,761 square feet), L-shaped lot at the southeast comer of Rainbow Dnve and West M Street and IS located Inside the City limits The property IS relalively flat and currently contains a detached single family dwelling that faces and takes access from West M Street, as well as a duplex that faces and takes access from Rainbow Dnve Property In the VICInity of the site IS zoned a combination of Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, and Public Land and Open Space However, the subject property IS zoned Low Density Residential, and land Immediately surrounding the property to the north, south, and east IS zoned Low Density Residential while property to the west IS zoned both Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential The MDR zOning designation requires the development of resldenlial uses at a density of 11 to 20 dwelling Units per acre The subject property, which IS approximately 27 acres and has three dwelling Units, already has eleven dwelling units per acre A maximum of five dwelling Units could be developed on the property In the future ZONING MAP AMENDMENT - CRITERIA SDC 5 22-115 states that the Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a quasI-Judicial Zoning Map Amendment based upon the approval cntena listed In SDC 522-115 C 1 through C 3 CrIterion 1 /SDC 5 22-115 C 1.\ ConsIstency wIth applIcable Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan diagram Findmg. Metro Plan policy A 2 states that resldenlially designated land within the Urban Growth Boundary should be zoned consistent with the Metro Plan and applicable plans and policies Fmdmg' The subject property IS zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) Finding The current version of the Metro Plan diagram depicts an area designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) In the VICInity of the subject property This MDR area extends northeast of a pOint on Centennial Boulevard that does not have any Identifiable geographic features However, the western boundary of this area IS a hard north-south line In the middle of the diagonal section of Centennial Boulevard There IS only one street, Rainbow Drive, that extends north-south along this seclion of Centennial Boulevard Therefore, City Planning staff has always Interpreted this to mean that the western boundary of the MDR area IS Rainbow Drive The subject property, which IS located east of Rainbow Dnve and north of Centennial Boulevard therefore falls within the MDR designation on the Metro Plan Fmdmg. The subject property must be rezoned from LDR to MDR In order for the zOning to be consistent with the applicable Metro Plan policies and Metro Plan diagram Therefore, the application to resolve this plan/zone conflict IS consistent with the Metro Plan policies and diagram Case No ZON200B-00013 3014 A ttachlTfent 1-3 Conclusion' This application satisfies Cntenon 1 (SDC 5 22-115 C 1 ) Criterion 21SDC 5.22-115 C 2.\ Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Dlstnct maps, Conceptual Development Plans, and functional plans Findmg' There are no applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Dlstnct maps, Conceptual Development Plans, or functional plans for this property Therefore, Cntenon 2 IS not applicable Conclusion' This application satisfies Cntenon 2 (SDC 5 22-115 C 2) Critenon 3 ISDC 5 22-115 C 3 \ The property IS presently provided with adequate publIC facilities, services, and transportation networks to support the use, or these factlttles, services, and transportation networks are planned to be provided concurrently with the development of the property . Findmg: The Development Review Committee (DRC), Including representatives from the City'S Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and Fire and Life Safety Department reviewed the application, and their comments have been Incorporated Into the findings and conditions below Finding: Given the location and size of the property, the proposed zone change would have no significant Impact on the transportation system Impact to the transportation system Will be reviewed again via the land diVISion or site plan review process In the event that future development occurs on the property Finding. The proposed zone change on thiS property Will have no affect on fire department services based on eXlsling site conditions However, any changes to the eXisting structures or Increased denSity on the property Will require an Increase In the available fire flow to meet current fire code requirements, which Will be enforced via the land diVISion or site plan review process Finding' The Public Works Englneenng DIVISion has reViewed the proposed zone change and does not find any Issues With the eXisting conditions With respect to the sanitary sewer or stormwater management systems Public Improvement requirements Will be reViewed again via the land diVISion or site plan review process In the event that future development occurs on the site Finding. The property IS currently serviced With adequate public faCilities and transportalion networks In the event that the property IS further developed after the proposed zone, change, the adequacy of public faCilities for any future development Will be reViewed via the land diVISion or site plan review process Conclusion' ThiS application salisfies Cntenon 3 (SDC 5 22-115 C 3) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SDC 522-120 authonzes the Approval Authonty to attach conditions as may be reasonably necessary to a zone change approval to ensure that the application meets the approval cntena City staff finds that the application as submitted complies With all applicable approval cntena and therefore does not recommend any conditions of approval CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION After reviewing thiS application, City staff finds that It complies With the three cntena listed In SDC 5 22- 115 C 1 through C 3 Therefore, City staff recommends that the Planning CommiSSion approve thiS application Case No ZON2008-00013 40/4 Attachment 1-4 EXISTING ZONING ZON2008-00013 859 West M Street - 17-03-27-43, TL 3001 I ~ I , -.J BCD 8B~ ~- ~ B ~-S"" I I '"'I s! &1' 7- ~'- -W-M-S:r- ,.~.. , l .. ~.....~ t l d _ n ' _ I L ZONING LEGEND I ~ Low Density Residential (LOR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Community Commercial (CC) Attachment 2-1 PROPOSED ZONING ZON2008-00013 859 West M Street - 17-03-27-43, TL 3001 --1ll~ - I , ..J BCD 88- J! B ~~" '1 ~ d co 2!: ;[. -\ V-M-8=F , ~~'~"1 'UJ 'li ... ~........t l , L K ZONING LEGEND I Low Density Residential (LDR) r .. ........1 Medium Density Residential (MDR) High Density Residential (HDR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Community Commercial (CC) Attachment 2-2 EXISTING & UNCHANGED PLAN DEgdi'GNATION ZON2008-00013 859 West M Street - 17-03-27-43, TL 3001 SITE~ ,,\...\\p..L BLVD C ENTE\''6\.... . -. . - N "k- G-SPR HWY ~ ~ 'J) :c I - - ~ , -1.0 1::" " '(' ~ 1.4 ". j ,~. EST Enlargement of Plan Diagram PLAN DESIGNATION LEGEND ,4-.., Urbotn Growth Bolndary 0 ~w De~y RelLldentlal 0 L1Jht Medium Indultrtal [j AgtIctJ1UffI ,,"',...,,' MclroPf.Jn ~; I 0 Me4.m Denlhv Ae4denllal [SSJ C.-npullndustrW !:l F ,Ill /".../ R.Aoad. D '-gh Don"'. ........n1... 0 UrJ.te:nhv Relurch D Pual Reild~IJaI " /V f1var. and Panch D 0 ~ Commercial GoIIBmtr'11 , I: I. ,'.,llon Ru<oI " <I" " , ' ~ '-1!XIld u.. Ar..' ~ Mllial" Aetall Center. . P"ka and Open Spue ~ Pual ~du.trbl ~ Nodal Dew I A... 0 Hea"V htu,ttlal 0 NJllural Re&OUfC'e ~ Atpor1 Re,el'V'8 o YJllamelle, ~ Speclotl l-M.vy h1ullrlaI 0 SaNf and Gr.-..el Attachment 2-3 SITE PHOTOS ZON2008-00013 859 West M Street - 17-03-27-43, TL 3001 " - '- I,. Wll~ .. '"1 --- ~---+- ---.....;... . West M Street. ~' ",-....."" ....- ---.......~. - ~ . " ',I' ' : en =/'. :3.._ i ..::,;; I -: _I...,. 'boo - ..... , ._-.. ' nt : -. I :..... ;.. . ' : - :....., .............. . "~ .-. , i. .2 ~.,\ ..;'~ lOP 0 .... I ~.. ... - I :;;: o .;lw, , .0 'H' C r(ij 0:: "'<.,' ......~"jo... ~l'c, ":" -~",-'r ~. , - . '~~If~:~ ,I . ,~ . . , ll."; '. I ~ I ..~.- f , ii :1:.._ J V ". r', , ~ to:.y -. ~ '.~~ ,t" . ~. n:,~ _ ... '. , ,! -~ 1/. . . ......~ .... Ii ...- ..., ..-0.... (;(J"I Existing dwelling fronting West M Street .},." '1L:1 :: I' . :- .~i . '" " ~ ~ :'11- , . .. ..,..,. ; f I ~ =J' '.. .' I ; L.. ,WestN Street "- ,i .... .LJ - "';':~ , r . . r r~1 ...... ., I , ,'i ~ ','. " .1 l. . I .. . I~ .. a'~' ~"7:: ~ . ,.... . \..4' \~:-(" . I . it. , ",;. .' .oo "" ,i V .~ ~~~~Vd'N .' . .. . '~-'~~~..;:'~. ' . I t.j<....;.. . "'"'"... . . " - ".. .. ~... . ,--.. .... lJO~~ '- '. ,-.-. ~~ .~"'''"-: , -." . .- .:~... . - ~~'---'-..~ ,.' ,'. ,.."..... '.~. ,~f1 . '.;a. .,~.". I f';;t. . .;.: ~~...::;r".:;~.'~r..~~-. . ~.ti~7J''''.... -, . .' ~ ",. - ,,'.. , "\ .- , I , '~~.."III~~~ml~1I1i~l\~lIn. ~ ,- - -""=--,; --~~~..:::- Existing dwelling fronting Rainbow Drive Attachment 2-4 REC6RD1NG ~UESTED By FIDEUTY NA nOHAL TITlE COMPANY Of OREGON r Divisian at Chie' ~ ~ :lerk Lan. Colmt.y o..a and Recarda GRANTOR'S NAME Douglas S Gannon and Shiels Lynn Gannon UIIIIIIIIIIII"" IIml~ I mlllllllllllllllll' M7281602el50B&5321'L L.L L-. 08/22/2005 03,17:44 P" RPR-IlEED Cnt=1 Stn=4 CASHIER 02 110 00 III 00 110 00 , ~27\ $3100 GRANTEE'S NAME Larry Burr SEND TAX STA1l:MENTS To Mr Larry Burr 859 West "M" Street 0 i; Springfield. OR 97477 ~"'''-:..;fJ ~oq'I,,~ AFnR RECORDING RETURN TO ~ ~;.:~~o~~ Mr Larry 8urr ~~ ~G ofT 859 We.. "M" Street O'?-~~ Ooq'l ",'" ' ~ Sprlngfleld. OR 97477 ~~~{),,:....1<':~ 'b~W> _~;"~...'l;;;~<-..o'?- "rr.,V ~{) c,- ~\'" (3.f()' ...rloll..,; jo\g....v,; In.;;. ......,; I"vn 1"I,;l..vnlJ,;ri .. u..c #' ~oS STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Douglas 5 Gannon and Shiela Lynn Gannon as tenants by the entirety, Grantor, conveys and warrants to tJj Larry Burr, A Married Man, Grantee, the follOWing descnbed real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, srtuated In the County of Lane, State of Oregon, SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Subjec1 to and excepting Convenants, Conditions, Restrictions, and Easements at Record THIS INSTRUMENTWIU NOT AUOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACaUIRING FEE TIRE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULO CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING OEPARTMENTTO VERIFY APPROVEO USES ANO TO OETERMINEANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEfiNED IN ORS 30930 THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $200.00000 ISee ORS 930301 DATED August 17. 2005 #~ ~ ,,~ ./J\ ..,(~ Douglas S Gannorf t/ I .I itA' 14... ~1k.J't/I61'V /Shlela Lynn GanKon [~~! L..?~.A.~IALJ~N = = ~J-'. NOTARY PUBUC QREGOO ' . ~MSSlCIN NO. 3B2253 IdYC~ElCl'GlES~_":2IlO8 Date ReceIved. FEB 2 6 2008 STATE OF ORijGON COUNTY OF ~ Onginal submittal ThIs instrument was acknowledged before me on () .. -0..-.... It, ')""" ~- . s,J.:~ t..,,,,.. G",,,-,,,,,,- ,,,,-0(,,,,,,,,... .Ia- by ........'" =:0 ~""--'b~-b'" ~ ~ tdif.....-v NOTARY - ~FOR OREGON MYCOMM~~'EXPlRES (, I::'dl ~.....I'J r1'o.-p"ft- 1,03 )"1....1 0?-"01 aw!#loS.,9'1.) FORD-313 lRev 2/961 STATUTORY W"RRANTY DEED ~'* ;>ot.1 '-IOCJ]ro AttachmeFlt 3-1 . . E.~ No ~38o-DJA-46 nu. cirdlr No oc1400380 EXHIBIT ONE Beginning at a pOint on the South fine of -M- Street If the same was produced In Spnngfield. Lane County, Oregon, North 890 24' 30. West 113665 feet from the pomt on Intersectron of said South hne of -M- Street With the East fine of the Robert E Campbell Donation Land Claim No 59, Township 17 South. Range 3 West. Wlllamette Mendlan. South 0059' Wes1 1300 feet. thence South 890 24' 30. East 44 17 feet. thence South 00 59' West 150 feet; thence North 890 24' 30. West 1200 feet. thence North 00 59' East 1450 feet to the South Ime of -M- Street. thence along said South line. South 890 24' 30. East 75 83 feetto the Pomt of Beglnmng, In Lane County, Oregon Date Received FEB 2 6 2008 Original Submittal Attachment 3-2 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON FINAL ORDER FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CASE NO ZONE2008-00013 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER NATURE OF THE APPLICATION ZOning Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) to conform to the Metro Plan designation for Assessor's Map 17-03-27-43, Tax Lot 3001 1 On March 6, 2008, the following application for a ZOning Map Amendment was accepted as complete change the zOning on approximately 27 acre of land located at 859 West M Street and 1391& 1395 Rainbow Drive from LOR to MDR, Case No ZON2008-00013 2 The application was submitted In accordance With Spnngfield Development Code (SDC) 5 4-105 Timely and sufficient notice of the public heanng has been provided. pursuant to SDC 5 2-115 3 On May 20, 2008, a public heanng for the ZOning Map Amendment request was held before the Spnngfield Planning Commission The Development Services Department staff notes, including cnterla of approval, findings, and recommendations, together With oral and written testimony submitted have been considered and are part of the record of thiS proceeding CONCLUSION On the basIs of thiS record, the requested ZOning Map Amendment application IS consistent With the crltena of SDC 5 22-115 ThiS general finding IS supported by the specific findings of fact and conclusions In the attached staff report and attached hereto FINAL ORDER It IS ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that Case No ZON2008-00013. Zoning Map Amendment request, be approved ThiS ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning CommisSion on May 20, 2008 Planning CommisSion Chairperson ATTEST AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Attachment 4-1