Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 2/4/2008 , ~ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF OREGON) )ss County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1 I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon 2 I state that In my capacity as, Program Jechnlclal), I prepared and c~used to b", ~ k.~ mailed copies ofSueZOO'l!. =\ -1\.6tu.e ohQ....... . -.... - ~.J-w:t -1 u ~ (See attachment nAn) on ~ L/-- , 2008 addressed to (see Attachment Bn), by causing said letters to be placed In a U S mall box With postage fully prepaid thereon ~~)I!(J.C1~_ ~R~ LaFLEUR'---" )' STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane ~. s- . 2008 Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, Program TechniCian, who acknowledged the foregOing Instrument to be their voluntary act Before me ;= j"'-- - - "'OFFiCiXl sEAl: --:0 - :- 0 ~; : "', REBEKKAH R KEHM I ~ NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON \ ' ; COMMISSION NO 414703 :, ;;;<'. MYCOMMISSIONEIPIRESfEBRUARY27 2011 ~, - ~- ~- ~::::"(3: 2:::: - - - ~., ~flij/L rz - ~ . . My Commission Expires ;:( / ;)- 7 /11 ... " ,City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN Staff Report & Decision PrOject Name Jackson Partition Project Proposal DIvide one lot (47 acre) Into two parcels Case Number SUB2008-00001 Project Location 875 S 43rd Street 18-02-05-21, TL 9100 Zonmg Low DenSity Resldenlial (LDR) Overlay Dlstnct(s) N/A Applicable Refinement Plan N/A Refmement Plan DeSignation N/A Metro Plan DeSignation Low DenSity Resldenlial (LDR) Pre-Submittal Meetmg Date September 14, 2007 Application Submittal Date January 2, 2008 DRC Meeting Date January 29, 2008 DecIsion Issued Date February 4, 2008 Recommendation Approval with Conditions Appeal Deadline Date February 19, 2008 ASSOCiated Applications PRE2007-00060 . '.0 ~i---ifof PLO O"J.,\'" cri1L~ .', " . III \ ~.}f.:' ;-~~~lJemOn~?ad' - _--:?~:~-r W'I 'X::;-' ,:.,.c' ....~~" _ !"'-'II;'i,'Y - :. "-.(i' :ll,n' l'",~,,--,,~t' - l-~ ~t:.jf..1 1 '-f '-,I, '~."'-l( i.liC-~"_~~~;-'-~o=~~~~=~_~ ",- .f r l Jl'MJt:c'--';'.:~\"" 'f) '':cJ:==' -". :~DR L l" ~I_~'FI~ ~ii;jj~.~~~': -'~~~R" . _ . .- _~- ',' . J~&.: :- .. ,.!""~ ~ LD~" -=~=rnl=t....~fj;)._.u....:~-,"._- ...p~""l .~.t;'r_'':Jioli!l:r I{'SIJE :\ t~-~ ~'f-I'r._c.! ".'--.'-.._ __ ~l_ . ],1 'rr;; ~1'P?l-",' ," Illr...~i...-..-"'-'--....~., " "'1J.t-.- "- j......_..;Ji~_.r;; . ", 7) .~ /-,' I" '~l=:;"'-) ,ro~' '-: ~d:o:,\r~C:)J It~..Ai',(;1- ~ 1 ---------'f"" . - . -,.'; l . t ~ 1 ...:.~~. ~\.:!..::...""l. : - . - . - . ~Clty Limits I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C0MMlTiI'EE I POSITION I REVIEW OF I Planner II Land Use Planning I Transportation Planning Engineer I Transportation Public Works CIVil Engineer I Ulilitles, Sanitary & Storm Sewer I Deputy Fire Marshal I Fire and Life Safety I Engineering TechniCian I SUB ElectriC Utilities I CIVil Engineer SUB Water Utilities I APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Owner/Applicant Janice Jackson 875 S 43rd Street Spnngfleld, OR 97478 I I NAME Molly Markarian I Gary McKenney EriC Walter I Gilbert Gordon I Guenter Matyszak Rebecca Temolin PHONE 726-4611 726-4585 736-1034 I 726-2293 1736-3296 726-2396 Applicant's Representative Terry Schiele, PLS 4805 Yellowstone Court, NE Salem, OR 97305 Case No SUB200S-00001 10113 . ,,,, DECISION This staff report and decIsion grants approval with conditIOns to the subject appllcalion, as of the date of this decIsion The standards of the Spnngfleld Development Code (SDC) applicable to each cntenon of approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes (see AppendiX A) unless speCifically noted In this deCISion With findings and conditions necessary for compliance The plat, as well as the Installahon of publiC and pnvate Improvements, must conform to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herein ThiS IS a limited land use deCISion made according to city code and state statutes Unless appealed, the decIsion IS final Please read thiS document In ItS enlirety REVIEW PROCESS ThiS application has been reViewed under the procedures listed In SDC 5 1-130, Type II Applications, and SDC 512-100, Land DIVISions - Partitions and SubdivISions ThiS application was accepted as complete on January 2, 2008, and thiS deCISion IS Issued on the 33rd day of the 120 days permitted per ORS 227 178 COMMENTS RECEIVED Applicalions for Type II limited land use deCISions require notification of property owners and occupants Within 300 feet of the subject property and any applicable neighborhood aSSOCiation, allOWing for a 14- day comment penod on the application per SDC 5 1-130 The property owner, applicant. If different, and parties submitting wntten comments dunng the comment penod have appeal nghts and are mailed a copy of thiS deCISion for conSideration In accordance With SDC 5 1-130, nolice was mailed to the property owners and occupants Within 300 feet of the subject property on January 3, 2008 No wntten comments were received dunng the comment penod SITE INFORMATION The subject property IS a 47 acre (20.662 square feet). rectangular-shaped lot on the east side of S 43rd Street between Mt Vernon Road and Jasper Road and IS located Inside the City limits The property IS relalively flat, and SOils are mapped as Coburg-Urban Land Complex-32 and Malabon-Urban Land Complex-76 Currently, the property contains two residences, as well as a garage/pump house, on the west Side of the property that are all proposed to remain, faCing and taking access from S 43'd Street While property In the VICInity of the site to the north IS zoned Public Land and Open Space, the property IS zoned and deSignated Low DenSity Resldenlial, and land Immediately surrounding the property on all Sides IS zoned Low DenSity ReSidential LAND DIVISIONS - PARTITIONS AND SUBDIVISIONS - TENTATIVE PLAN CRITERIA SDC 512-125 states that an application shall be approved or approved With condllions upon determination that the cntena listed In SDC 512-125 A through J have been satisfied and that If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval cntena, the application shall be denied Cnterlon 1 ISDC 5 12-125 A I, The request conforms to the provIsIons of thiS Code pertammg to lot/parcel sIze and dimenSions Fmdmg' SDC 32-215 states that on standard parcels on north-south streets In all residential zOning dlstncts, the minimum area shall be 5,000 sq ft, and the minimum street frontage shall be 60 ft In addition, It states that on panhandle parcels In all resldenlial zoning dlstncts, the minimum area In the pan portion shall be 4.500 sq ft, and the minimum street frontage shall be 20 ft for a Single panhandle Fmdmg I Parcel ' I 1 I 2 The applicant proposes to create two parcels as follows Parcel Type Area Street Frontage Standard 7,358 sq ft 69 ft Panhandle 12,802 sq ft 31 ft Street Name S 43ra S 43'0 Street T YDe I North-South North-South I Fmdmg, ThiS application meets the requirements of SDC 3 2-215 Case No SUB2008-00001 20113 .. . ConclusIon" This applicatIOn satisfies Criterion 1 (SDC 5 12-125 A) Criterion 2 ISDC 5 12-125 B \ The zonmg IS consistent with the Metro Plan dIagram and/or applicable Refmement Plan diagram, Plan Dlstnct map, and Conceptual Development Plan Fmding" The subject property IS zoned Low Density ReSidential and IS designated Low DenSIty ReSidential by the Metro Plan diagram, and there IS no applicable refinement plan There are no applicable Plan District maps or Conceptual Development Plans for thiS property, and no change to the zOning deslgnalion or boundaries IS proposed ConclUSIon" ThiS applicatIOn sallsfles Criterion 2 (SDC 5 12-125 B) Criterion 3 ISDC 5 12-125 C I, Capacity reqUirements of pUblIC and pnvate faCIlities, mcludmg but not limited to water and electnclty, samtary sewer and storm water management facliltles, and streets and traffiC safety controls shall not be exceeded and the publiC Improvements shall be avaIlable to serve the site at the tIme of development, unless otherwIse proVided for by thiS Code and other applIcable regulatIons The PubliC Works Director or a ufl/dy proVider shall determme capacity Issues Findmg" The Development Review Committee (DRC), including representatives from the City'S Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and Fire and Life Safety Department, as well as the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) reviewed the application, and their comments have been Incorporated Into the findings and conditions below Findmg" Criterion 3 contains two categories of development standards With sub-sections The application as submitted complies With any applicable sub-sections of the development standards unless otherwise noted With speCifiC findings and conditions The development standards relating to Criterion 3 Include but are not limited to the Infrastructure standards discussed In SDC 4 1-100, 42- 100, and 4 3-100 42-100 Infrastructure Standards- Transporlatlon 42-105 Public Streets 4 2-110 Private Streets 4 2-115 Block Length 42-120 Site Access and Driveways 42-125 Intersections 42-130 VIsion Clearance 42-135 Sidewalks 42-140 Street Trees 42-145 Street Lighting 42-150 Bikeways 4 2-155 Pedestrian Trails 42-160 Accessways 43-100 Infrastructure Standards- Utlilt,es 4 3-105 Sanitary Sewers 4 3-110 Stormwater Management 4 3-115 Water Quality Protecllon 43-120 Utility ProVider Coordlnalion 43-125 Underground Placement of UlIlitles 43-130 Water Service and Fire Protection 43-135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines 43-140 Public Easements 43-145 Wireless TelecommUnications Systems FaCilities PublIC Streets Fmdmg: Abutting the subject property to the west IS S 43rd Street, an 18-foot Wide gravel two-lane local street Within a 25-foot right-of-way The street IS not fully Improved to urban standards With curb, gutter, Sidewalk, street trees, or street lighting ThiS secllon of S 43'd Street between Mt Vernon Road and Jasper Road IS approximately 1100 feet long, and average dally traffiC along thiS section of S 43rd Street IS estimated to be fewer than 300 vehicle tripS per day Case No SUB2008-00001 30f 13 . - Finding: SDC 4 2-105 G 1 states that whenever an eXlsling street of Inadequate width IS abutting or Within a development area reqUiring development approval, additional right-of-way IS required SDC 4 2-105 C states that street right-of-way widths are as specified In Table 4 2-1, unless otherwise Indicated In TransPlan, the Conceptual Local Street Plan, or where necessary to achieve right-of-way and street alignment According to Table 42-1, the minimum right-of-way on S 43rd between Mt Vernon Road and Jasper Road shall be 40 feet and the minimum curb-to-curb Width shall be 28 feet since this segment of S 4310 Street IS a local street less than 1200 feet In length With fewer than 1000 vehicle tripS per day Findmg. The applicant has proposed a 25-foot right-of-way dedication along the S 43'd Street frontage of the property to comply With SDC 4 2-105 G 1 CondItIon 1 Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate as right-of-way a strip of land 25 feet Wide by 100 feet long along the S 43rd Street frontage of the property In compliance With SDC 4 2-105 G1 Finding' As condllioned above, thiS applicalion meets the requirements of SDC 4 2-105 G 1 Fmdmg. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Land Use Code 210 (Single Family Detached). full development of Parcel 2 With Single family detached dwellings would generate 10 weekday vehicle tripS and 1 afternoon peak-hour vehicle tripS onto the surrounding street system In addition, assumed development may generate pedestrian and bicycle tripS According to the LCOG household survey from 1994, 126% of household tripS are made by bicycle or walking and 1 8% are made via public transit These tripS may have their origins or destinations at a variety of land uses, Including the subject property Pedestrian and bicycle tripS create the need for Sidewalks, pedestrian crossing signals, crosswalks, bicycle parking, and bicycle lanes Fmdmg, SDC 42-105 G 2 states that whenever a proposed land diVISion or development Will Increase traffiC on the City street system and the development site has unimproved street frontage, that street frontage shall be fully Improved to City specifications In accordance With the criteria listed In SDC 42-105 G 2 a through d SDC 42-105 G 2 Exception I states that In all cases other than a through d of thiS section, an Improvement Agreement shall be reqUired as a condition of development approval, postponing Improvements unlil the time that a City street Improvement project IS Initiated Fmdmg SDC 4 2-105 G 2 Exception I applies to the subject property Since 4 2-105 G 2 a through d do not CondItion 2' Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for for paving, curb, gutter, Sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting Finding. As conditioned above, thiS applicalion meets the reqUirements of SDC 4 2-105 G 2 Street Trees Finding 42-140 B 1 states that eXisting trees may meet the requirement for street trees (I e trees on the City Street Tree List specified In the EDSPM) If excavation or filling for proposed development IS minimized Within the drlpline of the tree Fmding' SIX trees eXist along the proposed west property line of Parcels 1 and 2, all of which are proposed to remain Although the genus and species are not Identified on the application, these trees may be considered street trees CondItIon 3. Excavation or filling In the VICInity of the eXisting street trees, as well as any future removal of these trees, must conform to the standards of the SDC and EDSPM Since these street Case No SUB2008-00001 4 of 13 .. . trees are located on private property, maintenance of the trees shall be performed by the property owner as per SDC 4 2-140 C 2 Finding. As conditioned above, thiS applicalion meets the reqUirements fo SDC 4 2-140 Sanitarv Sewers Finding: SDC 4 3-105 A states that sanitary sewers shall be Installed to serve each new development within the city limits and to connect developments to eXisting mains Finding_ The application indicates that the eXlsling residence on Parcel 1 IS currently served by a lateral from the eight-Inch sanitary sewer main In the right-of-way to the northwest of the property, and the applicant has proposed continUing to serve Parcel 1 via thiS sewer lateral However, the exact location of the sewer lateral has yet to be determined In addllion, the applicant has proposed a private utility easement adjacent to the sewer lateral on Parcel 2 once ItS location IS determined to benefit Parcel 1 The application does not Indicate If the residence on Parcel 2 IS also served by a sewer lateral CondItIon 4' Prior to plat approval, the location of the private sanitary sewer lateral(s) serving Parcels 1 and 2 shall be located ConditIon 5- Prior to plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced With a private sanitary sewer lateral from the eight-inch sanitary sewer main In the right-of-way to the northwest of the property If a lateral to Parcel 2 does not already eXist NOTE Plumbing permits are reqUired to Install thiS private sanitary sewer lateral CondItIon 6' Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a private utility easement adJacent to the sewer lateral on Parcel 2 to benefit Parcel 1 Finding' EXisting faCilities, as well as the above conditions, are adequate to meet the requirements of SDC 4 3-105 A Stormwater Manaaement Finding- SDC 43-110 B states that development approval shall only be granted where the Public Works Director has determined that adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems proVISions, consistent With the EDSPM, have been made Finding- SDC 43-110 D states that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system With suffiCient capacity to accept the discharge Finding SDC 4 3-110 E states that new developments are required to employ drainage management praclices that minimize the amount and rate of surface run-off Into receiving streams and that promote water quality Finding, The application indicates that the eXisting reSidences on the subject property currently pipe roof run-off via a stormwater lateral to an eXisting ditch on the east Side of S 43,d Street or to a wet well near the southwest corner of Parcel 1, and the applicant has proposed continuing to serve Parcels 1 and 2 In thiS fashion Finding' EXisting facllilies are adequate to meet the requirements of SDC 4 3-110 UtllltV PrOVIder CoordinatIon Finding_ SDC 43-120 states that all utility prOViders shall be responsible for coordinating utility installations With the City and the developer through the Development ReView Committee or by Case No SUB200B-OOOOl 50113 . - separate written correspondence and that the developer shall be responsible for the design, installation, and cost of utility lines and facIlities to the salisfactlon of the utility provider Fmdmg: The application indicates that the subject property IS currently served by SUB ElectriC via overhead lines from Pole # 58164 In the northwest corner of the property The applicant has proposed serving Parcel 1 with underground lines along the north Side of the house and serving Parcel 2 with overhead lines from Pole # 58164 Finding' SUB ElectriC adVises that both eXlsling structures are required to underground their electriC utility service SUB also proposes plaCing a Junction box on the property line between Parcels 1 and 2 within the proposed seven-foot frontage PUE to minimize the need for new easements and the distance both homes need to trench to CondItIon 7, Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall extend electriC service from Pole # 58164 In the northwest corner of the property as per SUB ElectriC standards Placement of such facilities shall be In the proposed seven-foot frontage PUE and shall be underground as conditioned In the Underground Placement of Utilities section below Findmg' The applicant has proposed a seven-foot private utility easement In between the two parcels extending approxImately 45 feet east from the west property line to accommodate new utility lines CondItIon 8 Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a seven-foot private ulillty easmentln between the parcels extending east approximately 45 feet from the west property line Findmg' As conditioned above, thiS application meet the requirements of SDC 4 3-120 Underaround Placement of UtIlIties Fmding SDC 4 3-125 states that wherever pOSSible, all utility lines shall be placed underground Findmg' The appllcalion indicates that power and telephone utllllies currently serve the subject property via above-ground lines from an eXisting utility pole on the northwest corner of the property CondItIon 9 Prior to plat approval, all ulillty lines to serve Parcels 1 and 2 shall be placed underground Fmdmg" As conditioned above, thiS application meets the requirements of SDC 4 3-125 Water SerVIce and F"e ProtectIon Findmg' SDC 4 3-130 states that each development area shall be prOVided With a water system haVing suffiCiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply to the development and that fire hydrants and mains shall be Installed by the developer as required by the Fire Marshall and the utility prOVider Fmdmg, The application Indicates that the two residences on the subject property currently receive water service via a private well on the property, and the applicant proposes continuing to serve Parcel 1 via thiS well The applicant has proposed serving Parcel 2 from a new water lateral to the water main In the right-of-way to the west of the property , CondItIon 10 Prior to plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced With a private water lateral from the water main In the right-of-way west of the subject property and a water meter located as per SUB Water standards In addition, Parcel 2 shall be disconnected from the eXisting well, and the disconnection shall be Inspected and verified In compliance With SUB Water standards NOTE Plumbing permits are required to Install thiS private water lateral Case No SUB2008-00001 60113 .. . Finding" Springfield Fire Code (SFC) 508 states that an approved water supply capable of supplYing the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to premises upon which a residence Will be constructed where any portion of that residence IS more than 600 feet from an eXisting fire hydrant Finding SUB water map 14H Indicates that fire hydrant H207 IS located on the southwest corner of S 43'd and Holly Streets, and thiS hydrant IS within 575 feet of the furthest pOint of the eXisting house on Parcel 1 Therefore, no action IS required at this time on the part of the applicant with respect to water supply for fire protection However, the furthest pOint of future construction on Parcel 2 Will likely occur more than 600 feet from an eXisting fire hydrant Thus, the Fire and Life Safety Department adVises that an approved water supply capable of supplYing the required fire flow for fire protection Will likely need to be prOVided at such a time when Parcel 2 IS fully developed Finding' EXisting facilities and the above condition are adequate to meet the reqUirements of SDC 4 3- 110 Public Easements Finding. SDC 43-140 A states that the applicant shall make arrangements With the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area ThiS policy dictates that the mlmmum Width for Public Utility Easements (PUE) adjacent to street nghts-of-way, as well as all other PUEs, shall be seven feet, unless otherwise speCified Finding: The applicant has proposed a seven-foot Wide PUE along the frontage of Parcels 1 and 2 Condition 11 Pnor to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a seven-foot Wide PUE along the frontage of Parcels 1 and 2 Finding As conditioned above, thiS application meet the requirements of SDC 4 3-140 A Conclusion' ThiS application satisfies Criterion 3 (SDC 512-125 C) as conditioned herein Criterion 41SDC 5 12-125 0 \ The proposed land dIVISion shall comply With all applicable publiC and pnvate design and constructIOn standards contamed m thiS Code and other applicable regulations Finding Cnterlon 4 contains four categones of development standards and requirements As such, the application must comply With the development standards of SDC Chapter 4 not addressed by Cnterlon 3, as well as the development standards for the applicable zoning dlstnct not addressed by Criterion 1 In addition, the application must comply With the requirements of any applicable overlay dlstnct andlor refinement plan The application as submitted complies With the applicable development standards and requirements unless otherwise noted With speCifiC findings and conditions The development standards and requirements relating to Cnterlon 4 Include but are not limited to the follOWing Chapter 4 - Development Standards 44-100 Landscaping, Screemng, & Fence Standards 45-100 On-Site Lighting Standards 46-100 Vehicle Parking, Loading, & Bicycle Parking Standards 47-100 SpeCifiC Development Standards for Certain Uses 48-100 Temporary Uses Applicable Overlay Dlstnct Case No SUB2008-00001 3 2-200 ReSidential Zonmg Dlstncts 32-215 Base Zone Development Standards 3 2-220 Additional Panhandle LoUParcel Development Standards 3 2-225 Base Solar Development Standards 3 2-230 Cluster SubdiVISions 3 2-235 ReSidential Manufactured Dwellings 3 2-240 Multl-Umt DeSign Standards Applicable Refmement Plan 70113 . ,. I No overlay districts apply to the subject property I No refinement plans apply to the subject propert~ LandscaDina. Screenina & Fence Standards Fmding' SDC 4 4-105 D states that all required setback areas shall be landscaped SDC 4 4-105 E states that at least 65% of each reqUired planting area shall be covered With living plant material Fmding' The side yard setback on the north side of Parcel 1 adJacent to the reSidence, as well as the adjacent side yard setback on the south side of Parcel 2 are not landscaped I n addition, the side yard setback on the north side of Parcel 2 extending approximately 95 feet from the proposed west property line IS not landscaped ConditIon 12' Prior to plat approval, all setback areas on Parcels 1 and 2 shall be landscaped In accordance With SDC 4 4-105 VehIcle Parkma. Loadma. & Bicvcle Parkma Standards Fmdmg SDC 4 6-125 states that a minimum of two off-street parking spaces are required for slngle- family and duplex dwellings Fmdmg' The application Indicates that the eXisting reSidence on Parcel 2 IS currently served by a one- car attached garage and a gravel driveway and that these faCilities Will conlinue to serve Parcel 2 Fmdmg, SDC Chapter 6 defines a parking space as a permanently maintained paved surface With proper access for one standard size or compact vehicle CondItion 13' Future development of Parcel 2 Will require off-street parking In conformance With SDC 4 6-125 Finding' EXisting faCilities, as well as the above condition, are adequate to meet the requirements of SDC 4 6-125 ConclUSIon' ThiS application satisfies Criterion 4 (SDC 512-125 D) as conditioned herein Criterion 5/SDC 5 12-125 E , PhYSIcal features, mcludmg, but not limited to steep slopes With unstable sailor geologiC conditIons, areas WIth susceptlb1l1ty of floodmg, SIgnificant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and theIr associated npanan areas, wetlands, rock outcroppmgs, open spaces, and areas of hlstonc and/or archaeological Significance, as may be specified m SectIOn 33-900 or ORS 97740- 760, 358 905-955 and 390 235-240, shall be protected as specIfIed m thiS Code or m State or Federal law Fmdmg: The Metro Plan and any applicable refinement plans, Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map, State DeSignated Wetlands Map, HydriC SOils Map, Natural Resources Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, Wlllamalane Park and Recrealion Comprehensive Plan, and the list of HistOriC Landmark sites have been consulted, and there are no features needing to be protected or preserved on the subject property Fmdmg If any histOriC or archaeological artifacts are discovered dUring construction, ORS 97740- 760, 358 905-955, and ORS 390235-240 may apply If any human remains are discovered dUring construction, It IS a Class C felony to proceed under ORS 97 745 ConclUSIOn' ThiS application satisfies Criterion 5 (SDC 5 12-125 E) Case No SUB2008-00001 80113 .. . Criterion 6 ISDC 5 12-125 F_~ Parkmg areas and mgress-egress pomts have been designed to facIlitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestnan safety to avoid congestion, provide connectiVity within the development area and to adjacent reSidential areas, tranSIt stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, Industnal and publiC areas, minimize dnveways on arlenal and collector streets as specified In thiS Code or other applicable regulatIOns and comply with the OOOT access management standards for State highways Finding' The DRC, including representallves from the City's Public Works Department, reViewed the application, and their comments have been Incorporated Into the findings and conditions below Finding Installallon of driveways on a street Increases the number of traffic conflict pOints The greater number of conflict pOints Increases the probability of traffic crashes Therefore, SDC 4 2-120 A 1 states that all developed parcels shall have an approved access to a public street or alley along the frontage of the property, a private street that connects to the public street system, or a public street by an Irrevocable JOint uselaccess easement serving the subject property Finding. SDC 42-120 C states that driveways shall be deSigned to allow safe and effiCient vehicular Ingress and egress as speCified In Tables 4 2-2 through 4 2-5, the City's EDSPM, and the Public Works Standard Construction SpeCifications According to Table 42-2, Single-family and duplex dwellings must conform to a one-way driveway minimum and maximum Width of 12 feet and 16 feet, respectively SDC 3 2-220 5 a states that the paving standards for panhandle driveways are 12 feet Wide for a Single panhandle driveway from the front of the property line to a distance of 18 feet, where there IS an unimproved street Finding' The application Indicates that eXisting access to Parcel 2 IS via a 25-foot Wide gravel driveway onto S 43rd Street, and the applicant has proposed keeping thiS access for Parcel 2 Condition 14, Future development of Parcel 2 Will require paved panhandle driveways Finding EXisting faCilities, as well as the above condition, are sufficient to meet the requirements of SDC 3 2-220 Band SDC 4 2-120 C Finding: SDC 42-130 A states that all parcels shall maintain a clear area at each access to a public street In order to proVide adequate Sight distance for approaching traffic Finding SDC 4 2-130 B states that no screen or other phYSical obstruction IS permitted between two and a half feet and eight feet above the established height of the curb In the triangular area SDC 4 2- 130 C states that the triangular area for driveways IS ten feet along each property line Condition 15. VIsion clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a public street as per SDC 4 2-130 Finding As conditioned above, thiS application meets the requirements of SDC 4 2-130 Conclusion' ThiS applicallon satisfies Criterion 6 (SDC 5 12-125 F) as condllloned herein Criterion 7 IS DC 512-125 G} Development of any remainder of the properly under the same ownership can be accomplished as speCified In thiS Code Finding No property under the same ownership remains Therefore, Criterion 7 IS not applicable ConclUSion. ThiS application satisfies Criterion 7 (SDC 5 12-125 G) Criterion 8 ISDC 5 12-125 H I, Adjacent land can be developed or IS proVided access that Will allow ItS development as speCified In thiS Code Case No SUB2008-00001 9 of 13 . .- Finding Adjacent land IS currently developed with reSidential dwellings and has access to public streets by way of direct frontage ConclusIon' ThiS application satisfies Cntenon 8 (SDC 512-125 H) Criterion 9 ISDC 5 12-1251 \ Where the Partlllon of property that IS outside of the city limits but wllhm the City's urbamzable area and no concurrent annexation application IS submitted, the standards specified m SDC 512-1251 1 and 2 shall also apply Findmg' The subject property IS located Inside the city limits Therefore, Cntenon 9 IS not applicable ConclusIon' ThiS application satisfies Cntenon 9 (SDC 512-1251) CrIterIOn 10 ISDC 5.12-125 J \ Where the SubdivIsion of a manufactured dwellmg park or mobile home park IS proposed, the approval cntena m SDC 5 12-125 J 1 through 7 apply Findmg The application does not propose the subdivIsion of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park Therefore, Cntenon 10 IS not applicable Conclusion, ThiS applicallon satisfies Cntenon 10 (SDC 5 12-125 J ) SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOTE ThiS summary of the condlllons of approval IS provided as a courtesy to the applicant The applicant should, however, carefully read the decIsion m ItS entirety to understand the basIs for each condition In addition, as stated earlier, the applicant must comply With the entire decIsion, and the plat, as well as the mstallatlon of publiC and pnvate Improvements, must conform to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herem 1 Pnor to plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate as nght-of-way a stnp of land 25 feet Wide by 100 feet long along the S 43rd Street frontage of the property In compliance With SDC 4 2-105 G1 2 Pnor to plat approval, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for for paving, curb, gutter, Sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting 3 Excavation or filling In the VICinity of the eXlsllng street trees, as well as any future removal of these trees, must conform to the standards of the SDC and EDSPM Since these street trees are located on pnvate property, maintenance of the trees shall be performed by the property owner as per SDC 4 2-140 C 2 4 Pnor to plat approval, the location of the pnvate sanitary sewer lateral(s) serving Parcels 1 and 2 shall be located 5 Pnor to plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced With a pnvate sanitary sewer lateral from the eight-Inch sanitary sewer main In the nght-of-way to the northwest of the property If a lateral to Parcel 2 does not already eXist NOTE Plumbing permits are required to Install thiS pnvate sanitary sewer lateral 6 Pnor to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a pnvate utility easement adjacent to the sewer lateral on Parcel 2 to benefit Parcel 1 7 Pnor to plat approval, the applicant shall extend electnc service from Pole # 58164 In the northwest corner of the property as per SUB Electnc standards Placement of such faCilities Case No SUB2008-00001 100113 .. . shall be In the proposed seven-foot frontage PUE and shall be underground as condllloned In the Underground Placement of Utilities section below 8 Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a seven-foot private utility easment In between the parcels extending east approximately 45 feet from the west property line 9 Prior to plat approval, all utility lines to serve Parcels 1 and 2 shall be placed underground 10 Prior to plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced With a private water lateral from the water main In the right-of-way west of the subject property and a water meter located as per SUB Water standards In addition, Parcel 2 shall be disconnected from the eXisting well, and the disconnection shall be Inspected and verified In compliance With SUB Water standards NOTE Plumbing permits are required to Install thiS private water lateral 11 Prior to plat approval. the applicant shall record and document a seven-foot Wide PUE along the frontage of Parcels 1 and 2 12 Prior to plat approval, all setback areas on Parcels 1 and 2 shall be landscaped In accordance With SDC 44-105 13 Future development of Parcel 2 Will require off-street parking In conformance With SDC 4 6- 125 14 Future development of Parcel 2 Will require paved panhandle driveways 15 VIsion clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a public street as per SDC 4 2- 130 CONCLUSION The applicallon, as submitted and conditioned herein, complies With the ten criteria listed In SDC 5 12- 125 A through J The tentative plan approved as submitted and conditioned herein may not be substantively changed dUring the platting process Without an approved modification application In accordance With SDC 512-145 WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? SDC 5 12-140 A states that for partlllons, a plat pre-submittal meeting shall be held Within one year of the tentative plan approval Therefore, the applicant has up to one year from the date of thiS deCISion to meet SDC standards and the conditions of approval contained herein and to submit a plat application for pre-submittal SDC 512-140 A also states that the applicant shall submit the mylars and application fee Within 180 days of the pre-submittal meeting If, however, the applicant has not submitted the plat application Within these tlmeframes, the tentative plan approval shall become null and VOId and re-submlttal IS required Please refer to the plat application packet available at the Development Services Department, as well as 512-135 through 512-150, for more detailed Information on the platllng process Please note that the plat, as wel/ as the mstal/atlOn of publiC and pnvate Improvements, must conform to the approved tentatIVe plan or as conditioned herem In addition, please note that no mdlvldual parcels may be transferred and no bUlldmg permits WII/ be Issued until the plat has been recorded at Lane County and the applicant has submitted five (5) recorded, rol/ed paper caples of the plat and three (3) caples of reqUired documents to the Development Services Department Case No SUB2008-00001 11 of 13 . - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The application, all documents, and supporting eVidence are available for free Inspeclion (caples are available for a fee) at the Development Services Department APPEAL This decIsion IS considered a Director's Type II decIsion and as such, may be appealed to the Planning CommiSSion SDC 53-115 states that only the property owner, applicant, If different, and those persons who submitted wntten comments within the 14-day comment penod have standing to appeal this deCISion SDC 5 3-115 also states that an appeal application In accordance with 5 3-100 shall be filed with the Development Services Department within 15 calendar days of the Director's decIsion (the date of thiS decIsion) In accordance with thiS policy and the Oregon Rules of CIVil Procedures, Rule 10(c), the appeal penod for this deCISion expires at 5 OOpm on February 19, 2008 QUESTIONS Please call Molly Markanan In the Development Services Department Planning DIVIsion at 726-4611 or email her at mmarkanan@cl spnngfleld or us If you have any questions PREPARED BY Molly Markanan Planner II Urban Planning Section Case No SUB2008-00001 120113 () '" "' '" z o ~">"-"'-- ~! "T \ ~,~" ) t [''': ..,,,,, 11_!lr<f ~ .as;"',..... en c '" N o o '" 6 o o ~ v.QllrYl,l,l,f' .... LJ'GfND 110 l1X~~"'''''' Ol",omCA1'lN >:I f'OWt.lll'Otl . DfCI!:l.)-:;U5~ ",~...:.fW 'O~!"l1ID """':::::::", "M~ = c'"= = ,......", =- '0000 <>--<>--0 rt>>:r @ ~'...,uUR:'\.j~JlI~:xr lID G"':'5l,lmll. "' """""""~ @ ""'""" @ LtIDfkG~u<I[)s.o.s 10...,. lr:rNOf'GrTY~ct>m"-"l. ~'tol".lJl.Tm:l~ - -I I I .~~ I I '" ~ T;I,X~""I~02 O:!- ZI fAALOI~II00 ~..~,'Yr"'Efj e.n;"Li1'''<l.ilIW~~ 5P'lJtl~rl.WOFt974"':' ~~I 741U"," '" " ~ E ~I g I L,~~"" 5UiW~ ~""""' ..005 "l'fi..0\'6TOlC:;oo1tf !C' ~"'Qlt'7~ 5.011 <'2t-C3:.5 TENTATIVE PARTITION fOR JANICE K. JACl\50N LOCATW IN THE NIV QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOW"SHIF I 8 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST Of THE NILLAM~E 1v1=R1DI~N LANE COUNTY. 5PRI"GFIELD OREGON DECEMBER 2007 \VArr<t5l'lN'a: 1J#<Hlro:c>""f""~lNC~.ubolC.'Yd :;,.p.n4'~W ~...I ~." _6S'orr:IrC~IT_ _P.:.fl'l""'r<:......cn....bllH".......~X_~ t<>~r''Ul ~ //r:h1 < l'M,Cnl1lloO 12A02.3Q~ !~ S~ , Ill"""""':: €l om:'~ ~U~VA.TIONJCONTOUR t\OTE 1(~I'l::CITYOf51'ItJNG....eLD~lJAA.'(T!)LI" WI'101~Arlt"\'lI~ ""~"flt.(IJQSTl"'I..-Gl!i:.t1.x.o.1t.O III nt~ c.>q.0I"5f.;.ew..u. 5OJTt'I 50~O.'JT J:~Qt.I Z;)7~..f':.f'..Zt'O:;T'tU n.eeu"""()o.~ u~nfO ~ ",e",&1 Vi'JqO~" ~'"CT e.:vATlO>.5 v,vot t:tTt..........CCtl T'>.5r.....cn~ll' wt~\'IITl1N05"or:~Horn~f1IUS"O CCflf~,.~~1"Q.\'N~~ Tl1ecl-"V..-rOlI~O'lf116,.~~Al..L 11"T'-l"'O~or<4"'OO hi P o.CI!D.u:M..~~~~...Cllf<..J)T' ~- ~N'!.f.'!Ic.or...-')ro.~lC= lA!OIliNl':loi'Jll:~ ~ '""Q=-N:;JIOtMl;llO!(Jf'OJ'""~~ ~~ J "'l.P".....T'\rt">"'=...."....ON:>tNM'C I ) . ""~1J""\J'!dM!.~_,..1I~~ QNe:~....,."'OCIlT(ir:l"""""'"'~ c-"Il:~'O-..t<<M(><fl;l~._~!>!WC' I'(:II:~""''''''I''''':: ....!A.!l!\eNI.......!IE .....1"'tNIT' ~ $..."""""...u........~o:::N:~to>oO'O:C, tAUWlK""'l U~~M.~NO~l"ll' ~""'..r..,.,.c.-.";IlO.,,....o<Q.Sl_ ~'J....IITT""r--=lTWC G~~...LV'rr''tI\lCl.c:.T...= IOnx:rO'lro.~~_~.....""....!\)lIe D:.J.\"l'llUIll'lTWID'!>O.1l)O.t""'fTJoC~"" ~1<>O"'or~""~ T~oIlUlCl'1.U%"""'[~~'O"'" [_~......rYA:1T~"""'~""U~ " ~wu.."''Y.OHl3"'UM~'-'Q<.~ 'WO::NU.......A.~_"l\l~::::....." _UJ;Nlr>>DcnOl'SI''''''~''--''''' ",",IOC"'-"'Oo ,_,l;.UIf_...:J.o<:C"'~~'''''' ""''''O:lJ''"md,",'l'I;Wf [N~0f'\rC~1O"'PIl'T ","D:I~~""o~"l'IIa'tITrlQOW''' ~.ll"f.l\S-" ""-,~ """"" ""'^'............,lD"OOC;I~_....~t~ ~~c..~.o.lOQ'....lO"""I Z~Mt...oOllaOllWoo;~=-~""'~ ,""OO:.ottooa"fQ"~ 1fJ:!.('...AJ,o...r~JU~!::l~ TERRY J 5CHIElE. FL5 4805 YELLOW5TONE COURT NE 5ALEM. OR 97305 (54 J) 221-0355 J> "'D "'D m Z C X :I> , , City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 .. . MEMORANDUM To: Janice Jackson From: Molly Markarian, Planner II Date: February 4, 2008 Subject: SUB2008-0000l Jackson Partition The City's BUilding DIVISion has Issued a new address for Parcel 2 so that the applicant of SUB2008-0000l can Install required utilities prior to final plat The new address for Parcel 2 IS 871 S 43rd Street If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 726-4611 or emall me at mmarkarlan@C1 springfield or us cc Terry Schiele .~ CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Janlce Jackson 875 S 43rd Street Spr~ngf~eld, OR 97478 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Terry Sch~ele, PLS 4805 Yellowstone Court, NE Salem, OR 97305 ~ f'B" . ...I J