The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PLANNER 5/12/2008 ,- L1MBIRD Andrew From Sent To Cc Subject ERNST Dennis Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9 54 AM KNAPEL Carole L1MBIRD Andrew FW Rlverbend Plat From Sent To Subject HUNTER Peggy K fm.,ltn Peagv HlINTERrcilCQ L.ne OR USl Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9 S3 AM ERNST Dennis RE R,verbend Plat HI Dennis, I've responded to these two comments below (In green) I'll let you forward them on to Danny as you see fit It looks like they've address most of the other concerns but I haven't gone through each individual comment yet I'll let you know If I have any other queslions or concerns Thanks -Peggy Good Morning Peggy, As you may have guessed the Rlverbend plat IS becoming a higher priOrity over here Peace Health would like to get It filed so they can get the roads open to the public KPFF IS working on getting the plat and what's on the ground to match up As you may have guessed they really wanted me to do their work and Just tell them what to change I would expect we'll see a new paper copy by the end of the week or first of next week There are a couple Issues that they are not sure have been taken care of from your last comments Here are the excerpts from a emall from Carol Knaple, project manager, who IS trying to get this wrapped up before she leaves the City at the end of the month Sheet 6 1 It IS stIli unclear what the easement E13/s Is It for access to the drainage easement? If so, can a note be added as to Its purpose--to dIstingUIsh It from publIc nght of way? [This IS unrelated to Baldy View Lane but IS something with which the City IS qUite familiar, while the county has no knowledge of the details] This Issue has been addressed m a separate document (RIght-of-way use permit) which IS between the City and Peace Health This document clearly explams the purpose of the easement Denms Will convey to the County that tlus has been addressed and no further response IS needed by KPFF The access easement allows for public access to Baldy View until St Joseph Place has been constructed There IS stili some discussions that need to happen as to what that Intersection will look like Even though KPFF did not call this a temporary easement I believe that It was their Intent As this IS a lane through a parking area, It Will never be a typical road way If It would help, KPFF could make this a temporary easement and add some sunset language to make It terminate at such time St Joseph IS complete and accepted . I think refemng to It as a Temporary easement on the plat would be very helpful along a note simIlar to what IS shown on Sheet 14 With a reference to the recording number of the separate document ThIS would alert someone looking at the plat In the future that this easement may no longer eXIst and If they want more specifICS they can look up the document Page 19 1 Date Received- Planner. AL r/11/:WO f' , / " " 1 Should the area for excludmg Baldy VIew nght,of,way also be noted on the plat? Dennis will discuss with Peggy and resolve the Issue He wIll advise her that the City requested that KPFF prepare the documents as they have been prepared It IS the City'S mtentlOn to resolve the matter ofthe final alignment of Baldy View at some pomt m the future and that no further response from KPFF IS needed As far as the City IS concerned, the way KPFF has show the Baldy View right of way IS acceptable to us We would rather have them deal wIth the dedIcatIon Issue when they replat the lands east of Baldy View and we know a lot more about what the development plan looks like We would like to aVOid haVing Peace Health dedIcate some right of way now and know that It Will change before too long and need to vacate or reconvey It We know that Peace Health has bought some of the lands inside the "hole" and may end up with all of It and that Will play Into what the final road location Will be .1 The way Baldy View IS shown IS the city's call I was refernng to notmg the "area" wIth both "Total Area" and "Area excludmg R/W" (Ex Lot 9 Total Area =45216 acres, Area Excludmg RIght of Way=44 ??? acres Agam, thIS IS the CIty's call It was Just a suggestIon Please respond to both of these Issues when you can You may want to send your response to me and Danny Denning and I'll keep Carol In the loop Thanks for your helpl DenniS Date Received .-;~Ju,o f Planner. AL 2 RIVERBEND, PHASE II TIurd Review May 12, 2008 These comments mclude comments trom the May 8th re,submlttal and the field check May 8th Re-Submlttal: 1 Sheet 5, show a set monument at the PT at StatIOn 12+65 62 on Cardmal Way 2 Sheet 8, show a set monument at the PC at StatIOn 22+ 12 46 on RJVerbend Dnve 3 Sheet 14, there IS a dunenslon shown, Just northwest of the mtersectlOn of Baldy View Lane and the Future Street, that IS that IS nght on top of the centerhne Please move so that It'S more readable FIeld Check- The purpose of the field check IS to venlY that what has been found and set m the field matches what IS show on the plat There are a very unusually hIgh number of discrepancIes and specIfic comments WIll not be made unlIl correctlOus have been made Do not request another field check unlIl you are very It IS correct Every pomt set or found need to be freshly marked up m advance of calhng for a field check ResubmIt a new paper copy of the plat With your request for a field check General Comments You have set two types of monuments and have only mdlcated one type on the plat You WIll need to IdenlIlY each one and create a new symbol to dlstmgUlsh the two 2 There are numerous found monuments that are no longer m eXIstence While It IS fine to show what you found, you need to mdICate which monument actually eXist on the ground and which one's have been removed, at the lIme the plat IS filed 3 All hne fences or encroachmg fences must be show If they WIll slIll be m eXistence at the tIme the plat IS filed Date Received Planner. AL :r /121:1001 I /