HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 5/8/2008
U S Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th A venue, SUite 2500
Portland, OR 97204 (503) 227-3251 FAX (503) 274-4681
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Page 1 of 1
Co ~sultlng E ngln6e(5
ATTN
TO
Carole Knapel
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Avenue
Springfield, OR 97477
DATE
JOB#'
RE
May 8, 2008
30114078
Peace Health
RlverBend Final Plat
WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA
D Messenger D 3 Hour
DShop Drawings
DCopy of Letter
DEma11
D 2 Hour
DPrlnts
DChange Order
D Fax D U SMail
D 1 Hour D 30 MIn
DSamples
DPlans
D Overnight Courier
[g] Hand Delivery
DSpeclficatlons
[8JAppllcatlon
I Copies
I 1
I 1
I 1
I
Date
05/08/08
08/08/08
05/08/08
No Description
Plat Drawings
Closure Sheets
Applicant Response to Comments from 2nd review (submitted 04/14/08)
I
These are transmitted as checked below
DFor your use DApproved as submitted
DFor your approval DApproved as noted
DAs requested DApproved as Noted
DFor review & comment D
REMARKS
I Copy to I file
DResubmlt _ copies for approval
DSubmlt _ copies for distribution
DReturn _ corrected prints
DFor BIDS DUE _
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
I Slgnedw~~fJ;<
~~~hel Griffith, roJect Administrator
Date ~eeelved
Planner. AL
,,~h"Of
/
~
INo I Sheet
I
10
13
14
.
1 General
2 General
3 General
4 General
5 General
6
7
8
9
11
12
15
16
17
R,verBend Phase II Plat
Appllca, dsponse to City and County Comments from 2na.
ew
I Comment I Response
RlverSend Phase II Plat Comments from the City of Springfield, 2nd ReVIew, Dated 05/01/08
Plat has been revised
Please place the follOWing note on each sheet where a public utility
easement IS shown No bUildings, structures, trees, shrubbery or
other obstructions shall be placed on or In a Public Utility Easement
Record both the Peace Health rrght of way dedication deed for MLK
and the City deed of the excesS rrght of way back to Peace Health
before recording this plat
Applicant IS awaiting the completion of this task This IS the
responsibility of the City and IS In progress
Plat has been reVised
Add a note alluding to the fact that the area of the rrver front lots has
been calculated to the Ordinary High Water marks shown, but not
dimensioned on thiS plat ThiS should be place on any sheet that
shows the area of a watertront lot as It IS Impossible to calculate the
areas from the Information on the plat
The post monumentatlon depOSit IS $2800 + $120/ Inonument
Attached are the forms for your use The depOSit Will need to be paid
at tile time you brrng the mylars, all final documents and an updated
tllle report In
We are currently working on the field check and Will be returTllng
comments to you shortly Once both City and County comments
have been addressed, please submit a paper copy to both the City
and the County
2
Post Man depOSit Will be paid at time of mylar submittal
Another paper copy Will be submitted after field check comments
are received and addressed
Plat has been reVised
Add the found monument symbol to the legend for found monument
lust west of the POint "A' monument along Game Farm Road
2 In the Found Monument Table No 25, the bearrng needs to Indicate Plat has been reVised
fhat thiS IS from monument 24 to 25
2 In the Deta]1 tor the VICITllty of monument 84, the set monument IS not Plat has been reVised
shown In the detail
2 The distance 347 61 that IS show along fhe southerly Side of tax lot Plat has been reVised, dimenSion has been removed
600 does not add up Is thiS dlmensLon really needed?
3 It looks like monuments 54 and 55 were held Please Indicate that Plat has been reVised, ,ndlcated In table
somewhere I
3 You could remove the black square symbol from the legend as I Plat has been reVised
don't see one on thiS page I
3 You show you Will set a monument In MLK at the centerline northerly Plat has been revlse~, symbol removed
of the west line of Lot 1 As thiS IS no longer a outer boundary
mtersectlon pomt you are not required to set one
3 Plat has been revised
Show the set monument symbol for centerline monuments being set
on St Joseph Place (Boundary Intersecllon, PC and PT) Show all
the outer boundary monuments at directions changes as set
monuments
3 On the west, northerly line of Lot 11 the distance 347 61 doesn't add Plat has been reVised, dimenSion has been removed
up You may want to remove thiS distance as]t IS not a boundary
dimenSion or add crows feet to show were It goes
4 Indicate which found monuments are being held somewhere (In the Plat has been reVised, indicated In table
table or by the monument) j
4 Plat has been reVised
Show the monuments being set along the outer boundary along MLK
4 in the Northwest corner, show the easement line of easement E32 Plat has been reVised
Intersecting the boundary If It does (see sheet 3 where It IS shown
correctly)
n~ RFlr.llIIJer!'
~ , <
Planner. ~
s:,/1/p,or-
Page 1 of 5
05/08/08
I No Sheet
118
119
I 20
I 21
I 22
I 237,8, & 9
I 24
I 25
I 26
I 27
I 28
I 29
I 30
/
I
I 33
I
31
32
34
35
36
37
38
39
Appl
RlverBend Phase II Plat
Response to City and County Comments from 2, .evlew
.
JComment
5 Show the monuments on the outer boundary being set and the
centerlme monuments you are setting as well
5 Add the symbol to the legend for the monuments set by Lane County Plat has been revised
on the Cardinal centerhne
6 Monument 59 IS shown as being held but It IS not on any boundary
What's It holding?
6 Show the centerline monuments you are setting as found
monuments
6 Please revise the tax lot note to read This hne divides Tax Lot 100 Plat has been revised
The un-surveyed remainder of the lot IS north of thLS hne
Show centerhne monuments you are setting as set monument and Plat has been revLsed
amend your legend
10 Show the symbol for the monuments set by Lane County In the MLK Plat has been revised
centerhne
10 Show centerhne monuments you are setting as set monument and Plat has been revised
amend your legend
10 Show the easterly nght of way half width near Station 405+00 on
MLK where the taper beginS
111 Set a pin at the Southeast corner of Lot 8 or use a reference
monument If you cannot set the actual corner
11 Show a tie distances for the intersections of the Conservation
easement and the Corp nght of way with the southerly boundary
12 Show the monuments on the outer boundary being set and the
centerline monuments you are settmg as well
121Add the symbol to the legend for the monuments set by Lane County Plat has been revised
Jon the MLK centerhne
13/Specdy the datum for your benchmark elevation Plat has been revised
141ShOW and monument the center hne of Baldy View Lane and Future Plat has been revised
Street
141Set the Southerly corner common to Lots 8 and 9 Show set
monument symbol In legend
14 Under the Future Street label place (Not Named)
15
Need to set the Baldy View Lane PC Is the monument to be set on
the outer boundary Southwest of monument 62 the centerhne PRC?
If It IS show the station If It'S the centerline intersection pOint with the
boundary check and see If the PRC fall Inside your property
boundary
15 Monument 60 beanng and distance indicates It'S some dLstance from Plat has been revLsed, indicated station and offset
KPFF I'm not sure I know what that means Please find some other
way to reference It'S location
16
Show a distance tie from the most easterly monument on the
Rlpanan Boundary on the easterly property hne to the Southeast
corner of Lot 9 There should also be a tie distance for the
Intersection of the Corp nght of way and Conservations easement
with the eastedy boundary too
221The narrative needs to mention the dedications along MLK as It
amends the boundary survey you cite (CS 39772)
22 Near the end of the third paragraph after Together WLth ,the
descnptlon states a compound curve and It should be a reverse
curve
'~.~
Page 2 of 5
Response
Plat has been revised
Monument IS not held, plat has been reVIsed
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revIsed
PC falls outside of boundary, not set StatIOn and offset
Lndlcated for intersection with boundary
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
05/08/08
RrverBend Phase II Plat
Applrcal ....sponse to Crty and County Comments from 2nd ew
No I Sheet I Comment I Response
RlverBend Phase II Plat Comments ffom Lane County, 2nd Review, Dated 04/28/08
1 General Plat has been revised
All of Deadmond Ferry should be excluded From the InllIal POint
northeasterly, the r/w IS 20' from centerline for the first :1:180' and 30'
from centelllne for the remain Lng :t85' Boundary should
monumented where It changes from 20' to 30' Change Descnptlon
to reftect change
2 General MLK, Jr Parkway and Cardinal Way should be monumented pnor to Completed
recording since they are part of the extenor of the plat
3 General Plat has been revised
Make cerlaln there LS room for recording sticker on each sheet (1 5"
x 4") There may need to be some shifting of text on Pgs 3 and 6
4 General Recommend changing DLC line to a long dashed line to distinguish It Plat has been reVised
from boundary
5 General Plat has been reVised
In the Legend, please remove the blank from Post-mon symbol It
will be wntten In on Sheet 22 Recommend "Denotes 5/8" x 30" Iron
rod w/YPC marked "KPFF INC" to be post-monumented See Sheet
22 for Post Monumentatlon Certificate'
6 General
Plat has been reVised
Some places surveys are referred to as "CSF" and some places
"SN" We would prefer them to be "CSF", but you could add to the
legend on Sheet 1 that SN denotes Survey Number, same as CSF"
To clanly the response to our anginal comment concerning the 25'
nght of way of Baldy View Lane (Pg 2, Item "lc" of Applicant
Response) The response stated "The County confirmed m wnllng
(Michael Jackson, 4/1/08) that they have no record of any
dedications for Baldy View Lane "I think you are refemng to the
emall dated Apnll MLke does not say that the county has no record
of dedications HIs letter stated "Baldy View IS a public road (local
access road, LAR), from our records II has never been a County
Road, by saymg that Lane County would not have any authonty for
a Vacation Any nght of way acqUired by Lane County for public
road purposes that IS now wlthm the CIty lImits would lie the cItIes
responsIbI/liy for vacations"
Applicant acknowledges explanation that Baldy View Lane IS City
(not County) Junsdlctlon No nght-ot-way vacation applications
have been made by Applicant Applicant Interprets these as
granted easements, not dedicated nght-of-way Applicant
continues to depict Baldy View Lane as dllected by, and In
agreement With, the CLty of Spnngfleld
7a
General
7b General
The ongmal dedIcatIons for Baldy VIew were dedicated to, and
accepted by, Lane County for publIC road purposes (but not as a
County Road) Lane County had junsdICtlOn unlIl II was annexed
One of Ihe differences between a "Public Road" and a "County
Road" IS the transfer of jUnSdIctlOn after they have been annexed
PublIC Roads are automatIcally transferred to City jUnSdIctlOn when
they are annexed (as m the case of Baldy VIew Lane), but County
Roads must go through a fonnal surrender process to transfer the
jUnSdIct,on Smce Baldy VIew IS now under lunsdIctlon of the CIfy of
Spnngfield, any vacatIOns of the road would be processed through
them
Page 3 of 5
Date Received' S-le/Hot'
PI~nner. AL
05/08/08
R,verBend Phase II Plat
App. Response to City and County Comments from ~ <eVI€W
I No Sheet
I 8
I 9
10
Comment
2 Please Include RfW width of Oeadmond Ferry Road adjacent to Lot
10
2 Include distance between Monument 23 and 24
2 SE comer of map Since the easement that "L7" IS dimenSIoning IS
not shown on this Sheet, It would be better to remove the "L 7" or
leave It and add the easement line
11 3 Plat has been revised
in Legend Include the symbol for Found monument per CSF 40328
12 5 Corrected, plat has been revised
Check Chord BeaTing of C24 OescTlplion calls It S69"29'18"E
13 6 It IS stili unclear what the easement E13 IS Is It for access to the Public Access Easement E13 provides public access across
drainage easement? If so, can a note be added as to ItS purpose--to pf/vate property (Lot 8) between RlverBend Of/ve and Baldy
dlslingulsh It frompubllc Tight of way? View Lane unlil St Joseph Place IS extended to Baldy View
....., _ f"....
14 6 Add beaTing to the dimension of "25 02" (north line of TL 1802) Plat has been revised
Monument 18 IS said to be 24 82' from CL, but appears to be about
to 30' from CL monument
Response
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
157,8, & 9
Plat has been revised
FlTst Item Ln Legend could be removed since there IS no monument
table on thiS Sheet
Include symbol for 1 "x33" Pipe on Sheet 8
Change CL statLonlng at MLK & RLverbend Or 410+6237
167,8,&9
1710 & 12
1810 & 12
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
Plat has been revised
In Legend Include the symbol for Found monument per CSF 40328
13 Should the 25' dimenSion (that overlaps first line In Legend) be
somewhere else?
19
Removed, plat has been revised
20
14 The south end of Baldy View should be monumented unless Lt will be Applicant LS awalling deCISion form City on thiS Issue
vacated before the recording of the plat
19 Adjust boundary along Oeadmond Ferry Rd per comment 1, General Plat has been revised
Comments
19 Should the area for excluding Baldy View Tlght-of-way also be noted
on the plat?
19 Is the Ref for the McBroom property necessary?
19 Reception # at end of most northerly dedication on Baldy View
should be 8544718
22 Adjust boundary descnptlon along Oeadmond Ferry as noted Ln
comment 1, General Comments
22 Plat has been revLsed
Since Baldy View Condominiums no longer extends to the slough, It
may be better to leave out the reference to the Northeast Corner of
Baldy View Condominiums In the 13Lh and 14th course of the
descTlptlon
22 Plat has been reVised
I understand that the Oeed to Spnngfield for MLK Will be recorded
pTlor to the plat recording, and the recording numbers Will Inserted
before pTlntlng on Mylar It would be preferable to refer to the
recording number as Instrument or Reception number rather than
Fee number
22 In the 3" course of 8Lh paragraph of 2" column check Chord BeaTing VeTlfied correct, beaTing on Sheet 5 corrected
(See comment Page 5)
22
21
22
Applicant believes area IS not reqUITed to be noted on plat
Baldy View Lane IS depicted on plat per City direction
No, thiS has been removed from plat
Plat has been reVised
23
24
25
Plat has been reVised
26
27
28
Plat has been reVised
Include Post-Monumentatlon Completion Statement wLth blanks to fill
In for Oate they were set and recording information of AffidaVit
29
Page 4 of 5
05/08/08
No Sheet
30
RlverBend Phase II Plat
Apphcat ~sponse to CIty and County Comments from 2nd ~w
Comment
23
The Declaration refers to Emergency access and Pedestnan Access
Easements as shown, but I don't see any labeled as such Is It
referring to the Trail Easements or Access Easement E-13?
Recommend the Declaration correspond with labels used on map
Include a statement Ln the Declaration that they are creating Pnvate
Storm Drainage Easement by separate document (Are there any
other Pnvate Easements being created?)
Page 5 of 5
Response
"Emergency access" deleted and the "Pedestnan Access
Easements" changed to "Public Trail Easements"
Answer 01 Refers to Public Trail Easements
Answer 02 Yes, detailed as follows
Et8 ((Shts 6,15,18) - Pnvate Storm DraLn Easement
E19 (Shts 2, 3) - Pnvate Storm Drain Easement
E20 (Sht 7) Pnvate Sanitary Sewer Easement
Date Received
Planner AL
I
dilMO,r
, J
05/08/08